§63.11501. What are the notification, recordkeeping, and reporting requirements?
40 C.F.R. § 63.11501
(1) Date each defect was detected and the instrument reading (in ppmv) during the performance test.
(2) Date of the next performance test that shows the instrument reading is less than 500 ppmv and the instrument reading (in ppmv) during the performance test.
(3) Start and end dates of each period after the date in paragraph (c)(4)(ix)(B)(1) of this section when the pressure vessel was completely empty.
(4) Estimated emissions from each defect.
(1) You may develop a written procedure that identifies the conditions that justify a delay of repair. In such cases, reasons for delay of repair may be documented by citing the relevant sections of the written procedure.
(2) If delay of repair was caused by depletion of stocked parts, there must be documentation that the spare parts were sufficiently stocked on-site before depletion and the reason for depletion.
(1) The start and end time and date of each pressure release to the atmosphere.
(2) Records of any data, assumptions, and calculations used to estimate of the mass quantity of each organic HAP released during the event.
(3) Records of the root cause analysis and corrective action analysis conducted as required in § 63.165(e)(3)(iii), including an identification of the affected facility, a statement noting whether the event resulted from the same root cause(s) identified in a previous analysis and either a description of the recommended corrective action(s) or an explanation of why corrective action is not necessary under § 63.165(e)(7)(i).
(4) For any corrective action analysis for which implementation of corrective actions are required in § 63.165(e)(7), a description of the corrective action(s) completed within the first 45 days following the discharge and, for action(s) not already completed, a schedule for implementation, including proposed commencement and completion dates.
(1) The date of each pressure test and the date of each leak repair attempt.
(2) Repair methods applied in each attempt to repair the leak.
(3) The reason for the delay of repair.
(4) The expected date for delivery of the replacement equipment and the actual date of delivery of the replacement equipment.
(5) The date of successful repair.
(1) Detailed schematics, design specifications of the control device, and piping and instrumentation diagrams.
(2) The dates and descriptions of any changes in the design specifications.
(3) The flare design (i.e., steam-assisted, air-assisted, or non-assisted) and the results of the compliance demonstration required by subpart SS of this part.
(4) A description of the parameter or parameters monitored, as required in § 63.172(e), to ensure that control devices are operated and maintained in conformance with their design and an explanation of why that parameter (or parameters) was selected for the monitoring.
(1) Dates and durations when the closed vent systems and control devices required in § 63.11495(a)(6) are not operated as designed as indicated by the monitored parameters, including periods when a flare pilot light system does not have a flame.
(2) Dates and durations during which the monitoring system or monitoring device is inoperative.
(3) Dates and durations of startups and shutdowns of control devices required in § 63.11495(a)(6).
(1) For each inspection conducted in accordance with the provisions of § 63.172(f)(1) or (2) during which leaks were detected, the information specified in paragraph (c)(9)(iii) of this section must be recorded.
(2) For each flow event from a bypass line subject to the requirements in § 63.172(j), you must maintain records sufficient to determine whether or not the detected flow included flow requiring control. For each flow event from a bypass line requiring control that is released either directly to the atmosphere or to a control device not meeting the requirements in § 63.11495(a)(6), you must include an estimate of the volume of gas, the concentration of organic HAP in the gas, and the resulting emissions of organic HAP that bypassed the control device using process knowledge and engineering estimates.
Notes, amendments, and revision history
Amendments
[74 FR 56041, Oct. 29, 2009, as amended at 77 FR 75758, Dec. 21, 2012; 91 FR 16528, Apr. 1, 2026]
Source
Source: 74 FR 56041, Oct. 29, 2009, unless otherwise noted.
Authority
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Source
Source: 57 FR 61992, Dec. 29, 1992, unless otherwise noted.
Amendments
[74 FR 56041, Oct. 29, 2009, as amended at 77 FR 75758, Dec. 21, 2012; 91 FR 16528, Apr. 1, 2026]