US Codex
C.F.R.
Browse by date
Notes

§171.34. Standards of review.

17 C.F.R. § 171.34

(a)
Disciplinary actions. In reviewing a final decision of the National Futures Association in a disciplinary action, the Commission shall affirm the order of the National Futures Association, unless the Commission finds that:
(1)
The proceedings were not conducted in a manner consistent with fundamental fairness;
(2)
The proceedings were not conducted in a manner consistent with the rules of the National Futures Association;
(3)
The weight of the evidence does not support the findings of the National Futures Association concerning the relevant acts or practices engaged in or omitted;
(4)
The determination that the acts or practices engaged in or omitted violated rules of the National Futures Association does not rest on a reasonable interpretation of the rules at issue;
(5)
The National Futures Association's application of its rules is not consistent with the purposes of the Act;
(6)
The National Futures Association's choice of sanction is excessive or oppressive in light of the violations found having due regard for the public interest.
(b)
Membership denial actions. In reviewing a final decision of the National Futures Association in a membership denial action, the Commission shall affirm the order of the National Futures Association, unless the Commission finds that:
(1)
The proceedings were not conducted in a manner consistent with fundamental fairness;
(2)
The proceedings were not conducted in a manner consistent with the rules of the National Futures Association;
(3)
The weight of the evidence does not support the findings made or adopted in the final decision;
(4)
The conclusion of the National Futures Association is not consistent with the purposes of the Act.
(c)
Registration actions. In reviewing a decision of the National Futures Association in a registration action, the Commission shall affirm the order of the National Futures Association unless the Commission finds that:
(1)
The proceedings were not conducted in a manner consistent with fundamental fairness;
(2)
The proceedings were not conducted in a manner consistent with the rules of the National Futures Association;
(3)
The weight of the evidence does not support the findings made or adopted in the final decision;
(4)
The conclusion of the National Futures Association is not consistent with the purposes of the Act.
Notes, amendments, and revision history

Authority

Authority: 7 U.S.C. 4a, 12a and 21, unless otherwise noted.

Source

Source: 55 FR 41068, Oct. 9, 1990, unless otherwise noted.