US Codex
Bill
Notes

H.R. 3684 — what changed

Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act

From Introduced in House to Reported in House. 96 sections amended and 18 added between Introduced in House and Reported in House.

Sec. 104 Federal Transit Administration

(a)
All stations accessibility program—
(1)
In general— The Secretary may make grants under this subsection to assist eligible entities in financing capital projects to upgrade accessibility for persons with disabilities by increasing the number of covered stations that meet (including exceeding) the new construction standards of title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 12131 et seq.).
(2)
Eligible costs— A grant awarded under this section shall be used on a covered system for the purpose described in paragraph (1) only—
(A)
for a project to repair, improve, or relocate station infrastructure at a covered station;
(B)
to develop or modify a plan for pursuing public transportation accessibility projects; or
(C)
to carry out other projects at covered stations that meet (including exceeding) the new construction standards of title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 12131 et seq.).
(3)
Eligible facilities— The Secretary—
(A)
may not provide a grant awarded under this subsection to upgrade a station that is accessible to and usable by individuals with disabilities, including individuals who use wheelchairs, consistent with current new construction standards under title II the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 1231 et seq.); and
(B)
may provide a grant to upgrade a station that is not accessible and usable as described in paragraph (1), even if related services, programs, or activities, when viewed in entirety, are readily accessible and usable as so described.
(4)
Application— To apply for a grant under this subsection, an applicant shall provide to the Secretary such information as the Secretary may require, including, at a minimum, information on—
(A)
the extent to which the proposed project will increase the accessibility of a covered system;
(B)
projected improvements in access to jobs, community activities, and essential destinations provided by such project;
(C)
the applicant’s plans to—
(i)
enhance the customer experience and maximize accessibility of rolling stock and stations for individuals with disabilities;
(ii)
improve the operations of, provide efficiencies of service to, and enhance the public transportation system for individuals with disabilities; and
(iii)
address equity of service to all riders regardless of ability, including for riders of differing abilities that are low-income, seniors, or riders from communities of color; and
(D)
coordination between the applicant and disability advocacy entities.
(5)
Federal share— The Federal share of the net project cost of a grant provided under this subsection shall be 90 percent. The recipient may provide additional local matching amounts.
(6)
Grant requirements— Except as otherwise provided under this subsection, a grant provided under this subsection shall be subject to the requirements of section 5307 of title 49, United States Code.
(7)
Grant solicitation— The Secretary may provide funds authorized under this subsection through 1 or more notices of funding opportunity.
(8)
Authorization of appropriations— There is authorized to be appropriated from the Mass Transit Account $1,000,000,000 for fiscal year 2022 to provide grants under this subsection.
(9)
changed Availability of amounts— Amounts made available under this subsection shall be available for a period of 4 fiscal years after the fiscal year in which the amount is made available.subsection—
(A)
added shall remain available for 4 fiscal years after the fiscal year for which the amount is made available; and
(B)
added that remain unobligated at the end of the period described in subparagraph (A) shall be made available to other eligible projects.
(10)
Definitions— In this section:
(A)
Covered station— The term covered station means a rail fixed guideway public transportation station for passenger use constructed prior to the date of enactment of this Act.
(B)
Covered system— The term covered system means a rail fixed guideway public transportation system that was in operation before July 26, 1990.
(C)
Disability— The term disability has the meaning given such term in section 3 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 12102).
(D)
Eligible entity— The term eligible entity means a State or local governmental authority that operates a rail fixed guideway public transportation system that was in operation before July 26, 1990.
(b)
Reducing transit deserts—
(1)
In general— The Secretary may make grants under this subsection to eligible recipients for eligible projects to establish new bus service or increase the frequency of bus service.
(2)
Eligible projects— Eligible projects under this subsection are projects in eligible areas—
(A)
changed to establish or enhance bus service with headways equal to or shorter than 20 minutes for at least 18 hours per day in neighborhoods lacking such service; orservice;
(B)
changed to establish or increase express lane transit service that connects communities to jobs and essential destinations, as long as such service will improve mobility or expand affordable transportation options in underserved communities.communities; or
(C)
added to establish or enhance high-quality bus service to community colleges and Minority Serving Institutions, including Historically Black Colleges and Universities.
(3)
Eligible costs— Eligible costs under this section include—
(A)
acquisition of vehicles;
(B)
acquisition, installation, and construction of bus stops, stations, and related infrastructure;
(C)
construction or expansion of maintenance facilities to support the new or enhanced service;
(D)
maintenance activities to support the expanded service; and
(E)
operating expenses for up to 2 years beginning on the first day of revenue service.
(4)
Application— To apply for a grant under this subsection, an applicant shall provide to the Secretary such information as the Secretary may require, including information on the extent to which the project will—
(A)
changed provide reliable and frequent connections to jobs jobs, education and workforce training, and essential destinations;
(B)
reduce air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions; and
(C)
support unserved and underserved populations and communities.
(5)
Federal share—
(A)
In general— The Federal share of the net project cost of a capital project carried out using a grant under this subsection shall be 80 percent. The recipient may provide additional local matching amounts.
(B)
Operating costs— The Federal share of net operating costs for a project carried out using a grant under this subsection shall be not more than 50 percent.
(6)
Grant requirements—
(A)
In general— A grant under this subsection shall be subject to the requirements of section 5307 of title 49, United States Code, for eligible recipients, except operating expenses shall be eligible for funding under this subsection for 2 years beginning on the first day of revenue service in urbanized areas with populations greater than 200,000.
(B)
New or enhanced service— The new or enhanced service funded under this subsection shall be operated for a period of at least 5 years.
(7)
Grant solicitation— The Secretary may provide funds authorized under this subsection through 1 or more notices of funding opportunity.
(8)
Justice40 Initiative— In making competitive grants under this subsection, the Secretary shall, to the extent practicable, have a goal that 40 percent of the overall benefits of the Federal investment flow to disadvantaged communities, consistent with sections 219 and 223 of Executive Order 14008 and related regulations, Executive Orders, and administrative guidance.
(9)
Availability of amounts— Any amounts made available under this subsection—
(A)
shall remain available for 2 fiscal years after the fiscal year for which the amount is made available; and
(B)
that remain unobligated at the end of the period described in subparagraph (A) shall be made available to other eligible projects.
(10)
Authorization of appropriations— There is authorized to be appropriated out of the Mass Transit Account $1,000,000,000 for fiscal year 2022 to provide grants under this subsection.
(11)
Definitions— In this subsection:
(A)
Eligible area— The term eligible area means a neighborhood or service area, as defined by the Secretary, within an urbanized area that has a population of more than 100,000 where fewer than 45,000 annual fixed route bus vehicle revenue miles per square mile are operated.
(B)
Eligible recipient— The term eligible recipient means—
(i)
designated recipients that allocate funds to fixed route bus operators or express lane transit operators; or
(ii)
State or local governmental entities that operate or propose to operate fixed route bus service or express lane transit.
(C)
Express lane transit— The term express lane transit means an integrated combination of bus rapid transit and tolled managed lanes that allows for limited access entry of toll paying vehicles to restricted lanes, while prioritizing transit’s need and use of available capacity in order to improve transit performance.
(c)
Federal share adjustments—
(1)
In general— In addition to amounts made available under section 5338(b) of title 49, United States Code, and section 102(a)(2)(B)(iii) of this division, there are authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2022 such sums as may be necessary to increase the Federal share, at the request of the project sponsor, of a new fixed guideway, a core capacity improvement, or a small starts project that is not open to revenue service and that has received an allocation of funding in fiscal years 2019, 2020, or 2021.
(2)
changed Considerations—Criteria— In making allocations under subparagraph (1), the Secretary shall take into consideration the extent to which the project sponsor demonstrates a need for a higher Federal share, including the extent to which—
(A)
changed a project sponsor made a local financial commitment that exceeded the required non-Federal share of the cost of the project;project; and
(B)
changed a project sponsor has experienced, as a result of the coronavirus public health emergency, a loss of non-Federal revenues that were intended to support the project.emergency.
(3)
changed Adjustment— Notwithstanding any other provision of law, if a project meets 1 or both of the criteria in paragraph (2), the Secretary may shall increase the Federal share of a project under this section by up to 30 percent, up to a maximum of an 80 percent Federal share.
(4)
Amount— Amounts distributed under this subsection shall be provided notwithstanding the limitation of any calculation of the maximum amount of Federal financial assistance for the project for a new fixed guideway, a core capacity improvement, or a small start project.

Sec. 107 Member designated project authorizations

(a)
Member designated projects— The amount listed for each member designated project in the table in subsection (c) shall be available (from amounts made available by paragraphs (1), (3), and (4) of section 103(c)) for fiscal year 2022 to carry out each such project.
(b)
Savings clause—
(1)
Additional information— In administering member designated projects, the Secretary shall consider the additional information provided in the Committee Report, or any subsequent report superceding such Committee Report, accompanying this Act.
(2)
Subsequent phases—
(A)
In general— Subject to subparagraph (B), nothing in the table in subsection (c), or in the Committee Report, or any subsequent report superceding such Committee Report, accompanying this Act, shall prevent the Secretary, at the discretion of the Secretary, from allowing a subsequent phase of a member designated project to be carried out with funds reserved for such project under subsection (c).
(B)
changed Project sponsor concurrence— The Secretary shall only allow under this paragraph a subsequent phase of a member designated project to be carried out with funds reserved for such project under subsection (c) with the concurrence of the project sponsor for such project listed in the Committee Report Report, or any subsequent report superseding such Committee Report, accompanying this Act,Act.
(3)
Repurposing— Nothing in the table in subsection (c), or the Committee Report, or any subsequent report superceding such Committee Report, accompanying this Act, shall prevent funds reserved for a member designated project from being repurposed as described in section 103(i)(2), provided that all requirements in such section are satisfied.
(c)
changed Project designations— To be supplied.The table in this subsection is as follows:

Sec. 1101 Authorization of appropriations

(a)
In general— The following amounts are authorized to be appropriated out of the Highway Trust Fund (other than the Mass Transit Account):
(1)
Federal-aid highway program— For the national highway performance program under section 119 of title 23, United States Code, the pre-disaster mitigation program under section 124 of such title, the railway crossings program under section 130 of such title, the surface transportation program under section 133 of such title, the highway safety improvement program under section 148 of such title, the congestion mitigation and air quality improvement program under section 149 of such title, the clean corridors program under section 151 of such title, the national highway freight program under section 167 of such title, the carbon pollution reduction program under section 171 of such title, and metropolitan planning under section 134 of such title—
(A)
$56,522,048,429 for fiscal year 2023;
(B)
$57,480,646,776 for fiscal year 2024;
(C)
$58,595,359,712 for fiscal year 2025; and
(D)
$59,618,666,186 for fiscal year 2026.
(2)
Transportation infrastructure finance and innovation program— For credit assistance under the transportation infrastructure finance and innovation program under chapter 6 of title 23, United States Code, $250,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2023 through 2026.
(3)
Construction of ferry boats and ferry terminal facilities— For construction of ferry boats and ferry terminal facilities under section 147 of title 23, United States Code, $120,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2023 through 2026.
(4)
Federal lands and tribal transportation programs—
(A)
Tribal transportation program— For the tribal transportation program under section 202 of title 23, United States Code, $800,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2023 through 2026.
(B)
Federal lands transportation program—
(i)
In general— For the Federal lands transportation program under section 203 of title 23, United States Code, $555,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2023 through 2026.
(ii)
Allocation— Of the amount made available for a fiscal year under clause (i)—
(I)
the amount for the National Park Service is $400,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2023 through 2026;
(II)
the amount for the United States Fish and Wildlife Service is $50,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2023 through 2026;
(III)
the amount for the United States Forest Service is $50,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2023 through 2026;
(IV)
the amount for the Corps of Engineers is $16,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2023 through 2026;
(V)
the amount for the Bureau of Land Management is $16,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2023 through 2026;
(VI)
the amount for the Bureau of Reclamation is $16,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2023 through 2026; and
(VII)
the amount for independent Federal agencies with natural resource and land management responsibilities is $7,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2023 through 2026.
(C)
Federal lands access program— For the Federal lands access program under section 204 of title 23, United States Code, $345,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2023 through 2026.
(D)
Federal lands and tribal major projects grants— To carry out section 208 of title 23, United States Code, $400,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2023 through 2026.
(5)
Territorial and Puerto Rico highway program— For the territorial and Puerto Rico highway program under section 165 of title 23, United States Code, the amounts specified in paragraphs (1) and (2) of section 165(a) for each of fiscal years 2023 through 2026.
(6)
Projects of national and regional significance— For projects of national and regional significance under section 117 of title 23, United States Code, $3,000,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2023 through 2026.
(7)
Community transportation investment grants— To carry out section 173 of title 23, United States Code, $600,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2023 through 2026.
(8)
Community climate innovation grants— To carry out section 172 of title 23, United States Code, $250,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2023 through 2026.
(9)
National scenic byways program— To carry out section 162 of title 23, United States Code, $16,000,000 for each of fiscal year 2023 through 2026.
(10)
Rebuild rural bridges program— To carry out section 1307 of this Act, $250,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2023 through 2026.
(11)
Parking for commercial motor vehicles— To carry out section 1308 of this Act, $250,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2023 through 2026.
(12)
Active connected transportation grant program— To carry out section 1309 of this Act, $250,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2023 through 2026.
(13)
Wildlife crossings program— To carry out section 1310 of this Act, $100,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2023 through 2026.
(14)
Reconnecting neighborhoods program— To carry out section 1311 of this Act, $750,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2023 through 2026.
(15)
Metro performance program— To carry out section 1305 of this Act, $250,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2023 through 2026.
(16)
Gridlock reduction grant program— To carry out section 1306 of this Act, $500,000,000 for fiscal year 2023.
(b)
Treatment of funds— Amounts made available under paragraphs (10) through (14) of subsection (a) shall be administered as if apportioned under chapter 1 of title 23, United States Code.
(c)
Disadvantaged business enterprises—
(1)
Findings— Congress finds that—
(A)
despite the real improvements caused by the disadvantaged business enterprise program, minority- and women-owned businesses across the country continue to confront serious and significant obstacles to success caused by race and gender discrimination in the federally assisted surface transportation market and related markets across the United States;
(B)
the continuing race and gender discrimination described in subparagraph (A) merits the continuation of the disadvantaged business enterprise program;
(C)
recently, the disparities cause by discrimination against African American, Hispanic American, Asian American, Native American, and women business owners have been further exacerbated by the coronavirus pandemic and its disproportionate effects on minority- and women-owned businesses across the nation;
(D)
Congress has received and reviewed testimony and documentation of race and gender discrimination from numerous sources, including congressional hearings and other investigative activities, scientific reports, reports issued by public and private agencies at every level of government, news reports, academic publications, reports of discrimination by organizations and individuals, and discrimination lawsuits, which continue to demonstrate that race- and gender-neutral efforts alone are insufficient to address the problem;
(E)
the testimony and documentation described in subparagraph (D) demonstrate that discrimination across the United States poses an injurious and enduring barrier to full and fair participation in surface transportation-related businesses of women business owners and minority business owners and has negatively affected firm formation, development and success in many aspects of surface transportation-related business in the public and private markets; and
(F)
the testimony and documentation described in subparagraph (D) provide a clear picture of the inequality caused by discrimination that continues to plague our nation and a strong basis that there is a compelling need for the continuation of the disadvantaged business enterprise program to address race and gender discrimination in surface transportation-related business.
(2)
Definitions— In this subsection, the following definitions apply:
(A)
Small business concern— The term small business concern means a small business concern (as the term is used in section 3 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632)).
(B)
Socially and economically disadvantaged individuals— The term socially and economically disadvantaged individuals has the meaning given the term in section 8(d) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 637(d)) and relevant subcontracting regulations issued pursuant to that Act, except that women shall be presumed to be socially and economically disadvantaged individuals for purposes of this subsection.
(3)
Amounts for small business concerns— Except to the extent that the Secretary of Transportation determines otherwise, not less than 10 percent of the amounts made available for any program under titles I, II, V, and VII of this division and section 403 of title 23, United States Code, shall be expended through small business concerns owned and controlled by socially and economically disadvantaged individuals.
(4)
Annual listing of disadvantaged business enterprises— Each State shall annually—
(A)
survey and compile a list of the small business concerns referred to in paragraph (3) in the State, including the location of the small business concerns in the State; and
(B)
notify the Secretary, in writing, of the percentage of the small business concerns that are controlled by—
(i)
women;
(ii)
socially and economically disadvantaged individuals (other than women); and
(iii)
individuals who are women and are otherwise socially and economically disadvantaged individuals.
(5)
Uniform certification—
(A)
In general— The Secretary of Transportation shall establish minimum uniform criteria for use by State governments in certifying whether a concern qualifies as a small business concern for the purpose of this subsection.
(B)
Inclusions— The minimum uniform criteria established under subparagraph (A) shall include, with respect to a potential small business concern—
(i)
on-site visits;
(ii)
personal interviews with personnel;
(iii)
issuance or inspection of licenses;
(iv)
analyses of stock ownership;
(v)
listings of equipment;
(vi)
analyses of bonding capacity;
(vii)
listings of work completed;
(viii)
examination of the resumes of principal owners;
(ix)
analyses of financial capacity; and
(x)
analyses of the type of work preferred.
(6)
Reporting— The Secretary of Transportation shall establish minimum requirements for use by State governments in reporting to the Secretary—
(A)
information concerning disadvantaged business enterprise awards, commitments, and achievements; and
(B)
such other information as the Secretary determines to be appropriate for the proper monitoring of the disadvantaged business enterprise program.
(7)
Compliance with court orders— Nothing in this subsection limits the eligibility of an individual or entity to receive funds made available under titles I, II, V, and VII of this division and section 403 of title 23, United States Code, if the entity or person is prevented, in whole or in part, from complying with paragraph (3) because a Federal court issues a final order in which the court finds that a requirement or the implementation of paragraph (3) is unconstitutional.
(8)
Sense of Congress on prompt payment of DBE subcontractors— It is the sense of Congress that—
(A)
the Secretary of Transportation should take additional steps to ensure that recipients comply with section 26.29 of title 49, Code of Federal Regulations (the disadvantaged business enterprises prompt payment rule), or any corresponding regulation, in awarding federally funded transportation contracts under laws and regulations administered by the Secretary; and
(B)
such additional steps should include increasing the Department of Transportation’s ability to track and keep records of complaints and to make that information publicly available.
(9)
added Sense of Congress on fulfilling certain contracts— It is the sense of Congress that contractors participating in a federally funded transportation contract with a small business concern owned and controlled by socially and economically disadvantaged individuals should ensure that the percentage of a contract promised to such small business concern is fulfilled, unless prior approval is obtained consistent with the regulations under part 26 of title 49, Code of Federal Regulations.
(d)
Limitation on financial assistance for state-Owned enterprises—
(1)
In general— Funds provided under this section may not be used in awarding or exercising an option on a previously awarded contract, a contract, subcontract, grant, or loan to an entity that is owned or controlled by, is a subsidiary of, or is otherwise related legally or financially to a corporation based in a country that—
(A)
is identified as a nonmarket economy country (as defined in section 771(18) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1677(18))) as of the date of enactment of this Act;
(B)
was identified by the United States Trade Representative in the most recent report required by section 182 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2242) as a priority foreign country under subsection (a)(2) of that section; and
(C)
is subject to monitoring by the Trade Representative under section 306 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2416).
(2)
Exception— For purposes of paragraph (1), the term otherwise related legally or financially does not include a minority relationship or investment.
(3)
International agreements— This subsection shall be applied in a manner consistent with the obligations of the United States under international agreements.

Sec. 1102 Obligation limitation

(a)
General limitation— Subject to subsection (e), and notwithstanding any other provision of law, the obligations for Federal-aid highway and highway safety construction programs shall not exceed—
(1)
changed To be supplied. $66,097,092,526 for fiscal year 2023;
(2)
changed To be supplied. $66,570,608,070 for fiscal year 2024;
(3)
changed To be supplied. $67,701,550,431 for fiscal year 2025; and
(4)
changed To be supplied. $68,741,903,518 for fiscal year 2026.
(b)
Exceptions— The limitations under subsection (a) shall not apply to obligations under or for—
(1)
section 125 of title 23, United States Code;
(2)
section 147 of the Surface Transportation Assistance Act of 1978 (23 U.S.C. 144 note; 92 Stat. 2714);
(3)
section 9 of the Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1981 (95 Stat. 1701);
(4)
subsections (b) and (j) of section 131 of the Surface Transportation Assistance Act of 1982 (96 Stat. 2119);
(5)
subsections (b) and (c) of section 149 of the Surface Transportation and Uniform Relocation Assistance Act of 1987 (101 Stat. 198);
(6)
sections 1103 through 1108 of the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (Public Law 102–240);
(7)
section 157 of title 23, United States Code (as in effect on June 8, 1998);
(8)
section 105 of title 23, United States Code (as in effect for fiscal years 1998 through 2004, but only in an amount equal to $639,000,000 for each of those fiscal years);
(9)
Federal-aid highway programs for which obligation authority was made available under the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (112 Stat. 107) or subsequent Acts for multiple years or to remain available until expended, but only to the extent that the obligation authority has not lapsed or been used;
(10)
section 105 of title 23, United States Code (as in effect for fiscal years 2005 through 2012, but only in an amount equal to $639,000,000 for each of those fiscal years);
(11)
section 1603 of SAFETEA–LU (23 U.S.C. 118 note; 119 Stat. 1248), to the extent that funds obligated in accordance with that section were not subject to a limitation on obligations at the time at which the funds were initially made available for obligation;
(12)
section 119 of title 23, United States Code (as in effect for fiscal years 2013 through 2015, but only in an amount equal to $639,000,000 for each of those fiscal years);
(13)
section 119 of title 23, United States Code (but, for fiscal years 2016 through 2022, only in an amount equal to $639,000,000 for each of those fiscal years);
(14)
section 203 of title 23, United States Code (but, for fiscal years 2023 through 2026, only in an amount equal to $550,000,000 for each of those fiscal years); and
(15)
section 133(d)(1)(B) of title 23, United States Code (but, for fiscal years 2023 through 2026, only in an amount equal to $89,000,000 for each of those fiscal years).
(c)
Distribution of obligation authority— Subject to paragraph (1)(B), for each of fiscal years 2023 through 2026, the Secretary of Transportation—
(1)
(A)
shall not distribute obligation authority provided by subsection (a) for the fiscal year for—
(i)
amounts authorized for administrative expenses and programs by section 104(a) of title 23, United States Code;
(ii)
amounts authorized for the Bureau of Transportation Statistics;
(iii)
amounts authorized for the tribal transportation program under section 202 of title 23, United States Code; and
(iv)
amounts authorized for the territorial and Puerto Rico highway program under section 165(a) of title 23, United States Code; and
(B)
for each of fiscal years 2023 through 2026, in addition to the amounts described in subparagraph (A), shall not distribute obligation authority provided by subsection (a) for the fiscal year for amounts authorized for the metro performance program under section 1305 of this Act;
(2)
shall not distribute an amount of obligation authority provided by subsection (a) that is equal to the unobligated balance of amounts—
(A)
made available from the Highway Trust Fund (other than the Mass Transit Account) for Federal-aid highway and highway safety construction programs for previous fiscal years, the funds for which are allocated by the Secretary (or apportioned by the Secretary under section 202 or 204 of title 23, United States Code); and
(B)
for which obligation authority was provided in a previous fiscal year;
(3)
shall determine the proportion that—
(A)
the obligation authority provided by subsection (a) for the fiscal year, less the aggregate of amounts not distributed under paragraphs (1) and (2) of this subsection; bears to
(B)
the total of—
(i)
the sums authorized to be appropriated for the Federal-aid highway and highway safety construction programs, other than sums authorized to be appropriated for—
(I)
provisions of law described in paragraphs (1) through (13) of subsection (b);
(II)
section 203 of title 23, United States Code, equal to the amount referred to in subsection (b)(14) for the fiscal year; and
(III)
section 133(d)(1)(B) of title 23, United States Code, equal to the amount referred to in subsection (b)(15) for the fiscal year; less
(ii)
the aggregate of the amounts not distributed under paragraphs (1) and (2) of this subsection;
(4)
shall distribute the obligation authority provided by subsection (a), less the aggregate amounts not distributed under paragraphs (1) and (2), for each of the programs (other than programs to which paragraph (1) applies) that are allocated by the Secretary under this Act and title 23, United States Code, or apportioned by the Secretary under section 202 or 204 of such title, by multiplying—
(A)
the proportion determined under paragraph (3); by
(B)
the amounts authorized to be appropriated for each such program for the fiscal year; and
(5)
shall distribute the obligation authority provided by subsection (a), less the aggregate amounts not distributed under paragraphs (1) and (2) and the amounts distributed under paragraph (4), for Federal-aid highway and highway safety construction programs that are apportioned by the Secretary under title 23, United States Code (other than the amounts apportioned for the surface transportation program in section 133(d)(1)(B) of title 23, United States Code, that are exempt from the limitation under subsection (b)(15) and the amounts apportioned under sections 202 and 204 of such title) in the proportion that—
(A)
amounts authorized to be appropriated for the programs that are apportioned under title 23, United States Code, to each State for the fiscal year; bears to
(B)
the total of the amounts authorized to be appropriated for the programs that are apportioned under title 23, United States Code, to all States for the fiscal year.
(d)
Redistribution of unused obligation authority— Notwithstanding subsection (c), the Secretary of Transportation shall, after August 1 of each of fiscal years 2023 through 2026—
(1)
revise a distribution of the obligation authority made available under subsection (c) if an amount distributed cannot be obligated during that fiscal year; and
(2)
redistribute sufficient amounts to those States able to obligate amounts in addition to those previously distributed during that fiscal year, giving priority to those States having large unobligated balances of funds apportioned under section 104 of title 23, United States Code.
(e)
Special limitation—
(1)
In general— Except as provided in paragraph (2), obligation limitations imposed by subsection (a) shall apply to contract authority for—
(A)
transportation research programs carried out under chapter 5 of title 23, United States Code, and title V of this Act; and
(B)
the metro performance program under section 1305 of this Act.
(2)
Exception— Obligation authority made available under paragraph (1) shall—
(A)
remain available for a period of 4 fiscal years; and
(B)
be in addition to the amount of any limitation imposed on obligations for Federal-aid highway and highway safety construction programs for future fiscal years.
(f)
Lop-Off—
(1)
In general— Not later than 30 days after the date of distribution of obligation authority under subsection (c) for each of fiscal years 2023 through 2026, the Secretary of Transportation shall distribute to the States any funds that—
(A)
are authorized to be appropriated for the fiscal year for Federal-aid highway programs; and
(B)
the Secretary determines will not be allocated to the States (or will not be apportioned to the States under section 204 of title 23, United States Code), and will not be available for obligation, for the fiscal year because of the imposition of any obligation limitation for the fiscal year.
(2)
Ratio— Funds shall be distributed under paragraph (1) in the same proportion as the distribution of obligation authority under subsection (c)(5).
(3)
Availability— Funds distributed to each State under paragraph (1) shall be available for any purpose described in section 133(b) of title 23, United States Code.

Sec. 1112 Buy America

(a)
In general— Section 313 of title 23, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
in subsection (a)—
(A)
by striking “Notwithstanding” and inserting “In general.—Notwithstanding”;
(B)
by striking “Secretary of Transportation” and inserting “Secretary”;
(C)
by striking “the Surface Transportation Assistance Act of 1982 (96 Stat. 2097) or”; and
(D)
by striking “and manufactured products” and inserting “manufactured products, and construction materials”;
(2)
in subsection (b) by inserting “Determination.—” before “The provisions”;
(3)
in subsection (c) by striking “For purposes” and inserting “Calculation.—For purposes”;
(4)
in subsection (d)—
(A)
by striking “The Secretary of Transportation” and inserting “Requirements.—The Secretary”; and
(B)
changed by striking “the Surface Transportation Assistance Act of 1982 (96 Stat. 2097) or”; andor”;
(5)
added in subsection (g) by inserting “or within the scope of the applicable finding, determination, or environmental review decision made pursuant to authority granted by the Secretary under section 330, if applicable,” before “regardless of the”; and
(6)
renumbered was (2)(7) by adding at the end the following:

“(h) Waiver procedure

“(1) In general—Not later than 120 days after the submission of a request for a waiver, the Secretary shall make a determination under paragraph (1) or (2) of subsection (b) as to whether subsection (a) shall apply.

“(2) Public notification and comment

“(A) In general—Not later than 30 days before making a determination regarding a waiver described in paragraph (1), the Secretary shall provide notification and an opportunity for public comment on the request for such waiver.

“(B) Notification requirements—The notification required under subparagraph (A) shall—

“(i) describe whether the application is being made for a determination described in subsection (b)(1); and

“(ii) be provided to the public by electronic means, including on the public website of the Department of Transportation.

“(3) Determination—Before a determination described in paragraph (1) takes effect, the Secretary shall publish a detailed justification for such determination that addresses all public comments received under paragraph (2)—

“(A) on the public website of the Department of Transportation; and

“(B) if the Secretary issues a waiver with respect to such determination, in the Federal Register.

“(i) Review of nationwide waivers

“(1) In general—Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this subsection, and at least every 5 years thereafter, the Secretary shall review any standing nationwide waiver issued by the Secretary under this section to ensure such waiver remains justified.

“(2) Public notification and opportunity for comment

“(A) In general—Not later than 30 days before the completion of a review under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall provide notification and an opportunity for public comment on such review.

“(B) Means of notification—Notification provided under this subparagraph shall be provided by electronic means, including on the public website of the Department of Transportation.

“(3) Detailed justification in Federal Register—After the completion of a review under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall publish in the Federal Register a detailed justification for the determination made under paragraph (1) that addresses all public comments received under paragraph (2).

“(4) Consideration—In conducting the review under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall consider the research on supply chains carried out under section 1112(c) of the INVEST in America Act.

“(j) Report—Not later than 120 days after the last day of each fiscal year, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives, the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives, the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate, and the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate a report on the waivers provided under subsection (h) during the previous fiscal year and the justifications for such waivers.

added “(k) Construction materials defined—In this section, the term construction materials means primary materials, except for iron and steel, that are commonly used in highway construction, as determined by the Secretary.”

removed “(k) Construction materials defined—In this section, the term construction materials means primary materials that are commonly used in highway construction, as determined by the Secretary.”

(b)
Construction materials—
(1)
Establishment of requirements— The Secretary shall issue such regulations as are necessary to implement the amendment made subsection (a)(1)(D). Such regulations shall ensure the continued availability of construction materials to carry out projects under title 23, United States Code.
(2)
Considerations— The requirements of this section, and the amendments made by this section—
(A)
shall seek to maximize jobs located in the United States;
(B)
may establish domestic content requirements that increase over time, based on the current and expected future domestic availability of construction materials; and
(C)
shall take into consideration the research conducted under subsection (c).
(3)
Applicability— The amendment made by subsection (a)(1)(D) shall take effect beginning on the date that the Secretary establishes the requirements described under paragraph (1).
(c)
Research on supply chains—
(1)
In general— The Secretary shall conduct research on covered items that are commonly used or acquired under title 23, United States Code, including—
(A)
construction materials;
(B)
manufactured products;
(C)
vehicles; and
(D)
alternative fuel infrastructure and electric vehicle supply equipment.
(2)
Considerations— The research under paragraph (1) shall consider—
(A)
changed the current domestic availability of covered items;
(B)
changed the current supply chain for covered items.items; and
(C)
changed the estimated market share of demand, in relation to total United States demand from all sources, for covered items from—
(i)
procurement under the Federal-aid highway program;
(ii)
procurement under other programs administered by the Secretary of Transportation; and
(iii)
changed other Federal procurement; andprocurement.
(D)
removed the cost differential, if any, of domestically produced covered items as compared to non-domestically produced covered items.
(3)
Domestic suppliers— As part of the review under this paragraph, the Secretary may establish and maintain a list of known domestic suppliers of covered items.
(4)
changed Definition of covered item— For the purposes of this section, the term covered item means any material or product (except for iron and steel) subject to the requirements of section 313(a) of title 23, United States Code, that is commonly used in highway construction or procured under the Federal-aid highway program.
(d)
added Iron and steel— This section, and the amendments made by this section, shall not affect the requirements under section 634.410(b)(1)(ii) of title 23, Code of Federal Regulations, with respect to iron and steel.
(e)
renumbered was (5) SAFETEA–LU Technical Corrections Act of 2008— Section 117 of the SAFETEA–LU Technical Corrections Act of 2008 (23 U.S.C. 313 note) is repealed.

Sec. 1113 Federal-aid highway project requirements

(a)
In general— Section 113 of title 23, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
by striking subsections (a) and (b) and inserting the following:

changed “(a) In general—The Secretary shall take such action as may be necessary to ensure that all laborers and mechanics employed by contractors and or subcontractors on construction work performed on projects financed or otherwise assisted in whole or in part by a loan, loan guarantee, grant, credit enhancement, or any other form of Federal assistance administered by the Secretary or the Department, including programs to capitalize revolving loan funds and subsequent financing cycles under such funds, shall be paid wages at rates not less than those prevailing on projects of a character similar in the locality, as determined by the Secretary of Labor in accordance with subchapter IV of chapter 31 of title 40. With respect to the labor standards specified in this section, the Secretary of Labor shall have the authority and functions set forth in Reorganization Plan Numbered 14 of 1950 (64 Stat. 1267) and section 3145 of title 40.”

(2)
by redesignating subsection (c) as subsection (b); and
(3)
in subsection (b), as so redesignated, by inserting “Apprenticeship and skill training programs.—” before “The provisions”.
(b)
Conforming amendments—
(1)
Section 133 of title 23, United States Code, is amended by striking subsection (i).
(2)
Section 167 of title 23, United States Code, is amended by striking subsection (l).
(3)
Section 1401 of the MAP–21 (23 U.S.C. 137 note) is amended by striking subsection (e).

Sec. 1205 Surface transportation program

(a)
In general— Section 133 of title 23, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
in the heading by striking “block grant”;
(2)
in subsection (a) by striking “block grant”;
(3)
in subsection (b)—
(A)
by striking “block grant”;
(B)
added in paragraph (1)(B) by inserting “, except that for the purposes of this section hovercraft and terminal facilities for hovercraft engaging in water transit for passengers or vehicles shall be considered ferry boats and ferry terminal facilities eligible under section 129(c)” after “section 129(c)”;
(C)
renumbered was (2)(5)(3) in paragraph (4) by striking “railway-highway grade crossings” and inserting “projects eligible under section 130 and installation of safety barriers and nets on bridges”;
(D)
renumbered was (2)(5)(4) in paragraph (6)—
(i)
renumbered was (2)(5)(4)(2) by striking “Recreational” and inserting “Transportation alternatives projects eligible under subsection (h), recreational”; and
(ii)
renumbered was (2)(5)(4)(3) by striking “1404 of SAFETEA–LU (23 U.S.C. 402 note)” and inserting “211”;
(E)
renumbered was (2)(5)(5) in paragraph (12) by striking “travel” and inserting “transportation”; and
(F)
renumbered was (2)(5)(6) by adding at the end the following:

“(16) Protective features (including natural infrastructure and vegetation control and clearance) to enhance the resilience of a transportation facility otherwise eligible for assistance under this section.

“(17) Projects to reduce greenhouse gas emissions eligible under section 171, including the installation of electric vehicle charging infrastructure.

“(18) Projects and strategies to reduce vehicle-caused wildlife mortality related to, or to restore and maintain connectivity among terrestrial or aquatic habitats affected by, a transportation facility otherwise eligible for assistance under this section.

“(19) A surface transportation project carried out in accordance with the national travel and tourism infrastructure strategic plan under section 1431(e) of the FAST Act (49 U.S.C. 301 note).

“(20) roads in rural areas that primarily serve to transport agricultural products from a farm or ranch to a marketplace.

“(21) The removal, retrofit, repurposing, remediation, or replacement of a highway or other transportation facility that creates a barrier to community connectivity to improve access for multiple modes of transportation.”

(4)
in subsection (c)—
(A)
by striking “block grant” and inserting “program”;
(B)
by striking paragraph (3) and inserting the following:

“(3) for a project described in—

“(A) subsection (h); or

“(B) section 101(a)(29), as in effect on the day before the date of enactment of the FAST Act;”

(C)
by redesignating paragraph (4) as paragraph (5); and
(D)
by inserting after paragraph (3) the following:

“(4) for a project described in section 5308 of title 49; and”

(5)
in subsection (d)—
(A)
in paragraph (1)—
(i)
by inserting “each fiscal year” after “apportioned to a State”;
(ii)
by striking “the reservation of” and inserting “setting aside”; and
(iii)
in subparagraph (A)—
(I)
by striking “the percentage specified in paragraph (6) for a fiscal year” and inserting “57 percent for fiscal year 2023, 58 percent for fiscal year 2024, 59 percent for fiscal year 2025, and 60 percent for fiscal year 2026”;
(II)
in clause (i) by striking “of over” and inserting “greater than”; and
(III)
by striking clauses (ii) and (iii) and inserting the following:

“(ii) in urbanized areas of the State with an urbanized area population greater than 49,999 and less than 200,001;

“(iii) in urban areas of the State with a population greater than 4,999 and less than 50,000; and

“(iv) in other areas of the State with a population less than 5,000; and”

(B)
by striking paragraph (3) and inserting the following:

“(3) Local coordination and consultation

“(A) Coordination with metropolitan planning organizations—For purposes of paragraph (1)(A)(ii), a State shall—

“(i) establish a process to coordinate with all metropolitan planning organizations in the State that represent an urbanized area described in such paragraph; and

“(ii) describe how funds described under paragraph (1)(A)(ii) will be allocated equitably among such urbanized areas during the period of fiscal years 2023 through 2026.

“(B) Joint responsibility—Each State and the Secretary shall jointly ensure compliance with subparagraph (A).

“(C) Consultation with regional transportation planning organizations—For purposes of clauses (iii) and (iv) of paragraph (1)(A), before obligating funding attributed to an area with a population less than 50,000, a State shall consult with the regional transportation planning organizations that represent the area, if any.”

(C)
in the heading for paragraph (4) by striking “over 200,000” and inserting “greater than 200,000”;
(D)
by striking paragraph (6) and inserting the following:

“(6) Technical assistance

“(A) In general—The State and all metropolitan planning organizations in the State that represent an urbanized area with a population of greater than 200,000 may jointly establish a program to improve the ability of applicants to deliver projects under this subsection in an efficient and expeditious manner and reduce the period of time between the selection of the project and the obligation of funds for the project by providing—

“(i) technical assistance and training to applicants for projects under this subsection; and

“(ii) funding for one or more full-time State, regional, or local government employee positions to administer this subsection.

“(B) Eligible funds—To carry out this paragraph, a State or metropolitan planning organization may use funds made available under paragraphs (2) or (6) of section 104(b)

“(C) Use of funds—Amounts used under this paragraph may be expended—

“(i) directly by the State or metropolitan planning organization; or

“(ii) through contracts with State agencies, private entities, or nonprofit organizations.”

(6)
in subsection (e)—
(A)
in paragraph (1)—
(i)
by striking “over 200,000” and inserting “greater than 200,000”; and
(ii)
by striking “2016 through 2020” and inserting “2023 through 2026”; and
(B)
by adding at the end the following:

“(3) Annual amounts—To the extent practicable, each State shall annually notify each affected metropolitan planning organization as to the amount of obligation authority that will be made available under paragraph (1) to each affected metropolitan planning organization for the fiscal year.”

(7)
by striking subsection (f) and inserting the following:

“(f) Bridges not on Federal-Aid highways

“(1) Definition of off-system bridge—In this subsection, the term off-system bridge means a bridge located on a public road, other than a bridge on a Federal-aid highway.

“(2) Special rule

“(A) Set aside—Of the amounts apportioned to a State for each fiscal year under this section other than the amounts described in subparagraph (C), the State shall obligate for activities described in subsection (b)(2) (as in effect on the day before the date of enactment of the FAST Act) for off-system bridges an amount that is not less than 20 percent of the amounts available to such State under this section in fiscal year 2020, not including the amounts described in subparagraph (C).

“(B) Reduction of expenditures—The Secretary, after consultation with State and local officials, may reduce the requirement for expenditures for off-system bridges under subparagraph (A) with respect to the State if the Secretary determines that the State has inadequate needs to justify the expenditure.

“(C) Limitations—The following amounts shall not be used for the purposes of meeting the requirements of subparagraph (A):

“(i) Amounts described in section 133(d)(1)(A).

“(ii) Amounts set aside under section 133(h).

“(iii) Amounts described in section 505(a).

“(3) Credit for bridges not on Federal-aid highways—Notwithstanding any other provision of law, with respect to any project not on a Federal-aid highway for the replacement of a bridge or rehabilitation of a bridge that is wholly funded from State and local sources, is eligible for Federal funds under this section, is certified by the State to have been carried out in accordance with all standards applicable to such projects under this section, and is determined by the Secretary upon completion to be no longer a deficient bridge—

“(A) any amount expended after the date of enactment of this subsection from State and local sources for the project in excess of 20 percent of the cost of construction of the project may be credited to the non-Federal share of the cost of other bridge projects in the State that are eligible for Federal funds under this section; and

“(B) that crediting shall be conducted in accordance with procedures established by the Secretary.”

(8)
in subsection (g)—
(A)
in the heading by striking “5,000” and inserting “50,000”; and
(B)
in paragraph (1) by striking “subsection (d)(1)(A)(ii)” and all that follows through the period at the end and inserting “clauses (iii) and (iv) of subsection (d)(1)(A) for each fiscal year may be obligated on roads functionally classified as rural minor collectors or local roads or on critical rural freight corridors designated under section 167(e).”.
(b)
Clerical amendment— The analysis for chapter 1 of title 23, United States Code, is amended by striking the item relating to section 133 and inserting the following:
(c)
Conforming amendments—
(1)
Advance acquisition of real property— Section 108(c) of title 23, United States Code, is amended—
(A)
in paragraph (2)(A) by striking “block grant”; and
(B)
in paragraph (3) by striking “block grant”.
(2)
Public transportation— Section 142(e)(2) of title 23, United States Code, is amended by striking “block grant”.
(3)
Highway use tax evasion projects— Section 143(b)(8) of title 23, United States Code, is amended in the heading by striking “block grant”.
(4)
Congestion mitigation and air quality improvement program— Section 149(d) of title 23, United States Code, is amended—
(A)
in paragraph (1)(B) by striking “block grant”; and
(B)
in paragraph (2)(A) by striking “block grant”.
(5)
Territorial and Puerto Rico highway program— Section 165 of title 23, United States Code, is amended—
(A)
in subsection (b)(2)(A)(ii) by striking “block grant” each time such term appears; and
(B)
in subsection (c)(6)(A)(i) by striking “block grant”.
(6)
Magnetic levitation transportation technology deployment program— Section 322(h)(3) of title 23, United States Code, is amended by striking “block grant”.
(7)
Training and education— Section 504(a)(4) of title 23, United States Code, is amended by striking “block grant”.

Sec. 1211 Electric vehicle charging stations

(a)
Electric vehicle charging stations— Chapter 1 of title 23, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 154 the following new section:

“155. Electric vehicle charging stations

“(a) In general—Any electric vehicle charging infrastructure funded under this title shall be subject to the requirements of this section.

“(b) Interoperability—An electric vehicle charging station funded under this title shall—

“(1) provide a charging connector type or means to transmit electricity to vehicles that meets applicable industry accepted practices and safety standards; and

“(2) have the ability to serve vehicles produced by more than one vehicle manufacturer.

“(c) Open access to payment—Electric vehicle charging stations shall provide payment methods available to all members of the public to ensure secure, convenient, and equal access and shall not be limited by membership to a particular payment provider.

“(d) Network capability—An electric vehicle charging station funded under this title shall be capable of being remotely monitored.

changed “(e) Standards and guidance—Not Guidance—Not less than 180 days after enactment of the INVEST in America Act, the Secretary of Transportation, in coordination with the Secretary of Energy, shall, as appropriate, develop standards and publish guidance for public comment applicable to any electric vehicle charging station funded in whole or in part under this title related to—

“(1) the installation, operation, or maintenance by qualified technicians of electric vehicle charging infrastructure;

changed “(2) the physical, software, physical and payment interoperability of electric vehicle charging infrastructure;

“(3) any traffic control device or on-premises sign acquired, installed, or operated related to an electric vehicle charging station funded under this title; and

changed “(4) network connectivity of electric vehicle charging, including measures to protect personal privacy and ensure cybersecurity.”cybersecurity.

added “(f) Wage requirements—Section 113 shall apply to any project for electric vehicle charging infrastructure funded under this title.”

(b)
Clerical amendment— The analysis for chapter 1 of title 23, United States Code, is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 154 the following new item:
(c)
Electric vehicle charging signage— The Secretary of Transportation shall update the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices to—
(1)
ensure uniformity in providing road users direction to electric charging stations that are open to the public; and
(2)
allow the use of a comprehensive system of signs for electric vehicle charging providers to help drivers identify the type of charging and connector types available at the location.
(d)
Agreements relating to the use and access of rights-of-Way of the interstate system— Section 111 of title 23, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:

“(f) Interstate system rights-of-Way

“(1) In general—Notwithstanding subsection (a) or (b), the Secretary shall permit, consistent with section 155, the charging of electric vehicles on rights-of-way of the Interstate System, including in—

“(A) a rest area; or

“(B) a fringe or corridor parking facility, including a park and ride facility.

“(2) Savings clause—Nothing in this subsection shall permit commercial activities on rights-of-way of the Interstate System, except as necessary for the charging of electric vehicles in accordance with this subsection.”

Sec. 1214 Recreational trails

Section 206 of title 23, United States Code, is amended—

(1)
in subsection (a)—
(A)
in paragraph (1) by striking “except for” and all that follows and inserting the following:

“(A) a motorized wheelchair; and

“(B) in any case in which applicable laws and regulations permit use, an electric bicycle, as defined in section 217(j).”

(B)
in paragraph (2)—
(i)
in subparagraph (F) by striking “and” at the end;
(ii)
in subparagraph (G) by striking the period and inserting “; and”; and
(iii)
by adding at the end the following:

“(F) electric bicycling.”

(2)
by adding at the end the following:

changed “(j) Special rule—Section 113 shall not apply to projects under this section.”section.

added “(k) Use of other apportioned funds—Funds apportioned to a State under section 104(b) that are obligated for recreational trails and related projects shall be administered as if such funds were made available for purposes described under this section.”

Sec. 1217 Noise barriers

(a)
Permitting use of highway trust fund for construction of certain noise barriers— Section 339(b)(1) of the National Highway System Designation Act of 1995 (23 U.S.C. 109 note) is amended to read as follows:

“(1) General rule—No funds made available out of the Highway Trust Fund may be used to construct a Type II noise barrier (as defined by section 772.5(I) of title 23, Code of Federal Regulations) pursuant to subsections (h) and (I) of section 109 of title 23, United States Code, unless—

“(A) such a barrier is part of a project approved by the Secretary before November 28, 1995; or

“(B) such a barrier separates a highway or other noise corridor from a group of structures of which the majority of those closest to the highway or noise corridor—

“(i) are residential in nature; and

“(ii) either—

“(I) were constructed before the construction or most recent widening of the highway or noise corridor; or

“(II) are at least 10 years old.”

(b)
changed Eligibility for surface transportation block grant program funds— Section 133 of title 23, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
in subsection (b) by adding at the end the following:

changed “(20) “(22) Planning, design, or construction of a Type II noise barrier (as described in section 772.5 of title 23, Code of Federal Regulations).”

(2)
changed in subsection (c)(2) by inserting “and paragraph (20)” (22)” after “(11)”.

Sec. 1219 Youth service and conservation corps

(a)
In general— Chapter 2 of title 23, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 211 (as added by this Act) the following:

“212. Use of youth service and conservation corps

“(a) In general—The Secretary may allow and shall encourage project sponsors to enter into contracts and cooperative agreements with qualified youth service or conservation corps, as described in sections 122(a)(2) of the National and Community Service Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 12572(a)(2)) and 106(c)(3) of the National and Community Service Trust Act of 1993 (42 U.S.C. 12656(c)(3)) to perform appropriate projects eligible under sections 133(h), 162, 206, and 211.

“(b) Requirements—Under any contract or cooperative agreement entered into with a qualified youth service or conservation corps under this section, the Secretary shall—

“(1) set the amount of a living allowance or rate of pay for each participant in such corps at—

“(A) such amount or rate as required under State law in a State with such requirements; or

“(B) for corps in States not described in subparagraph (A), at such amount or rate as determined by the Secretary, not to exceed the maximum living allowance authorized by section 140 of the National and Community Service Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 12594); and

changed “(2) not subject such corps to the requirements of section 112 or 113.”112.”

(b)
Clerical amendment— The analysis for chapter 2 of title 23, United States Code, is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 211 (as added by this Act) the following:

Sec. 1301 Projects of national and regional significance

(a)
In general— Section 117 of title 23, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:

“117. Projects of national and regional significance

“(a) Establishment—The Secretary shall establish a projects of national and regional significance program under which the Secretary may make grants to, and establish multiyear grant agreements with, eligible entities in accordance with this section.

“(b) Applications—To be eligible for a grant under this section, an eligible entity shall submit to the Secretary an application in such form, in such manner, and containing such information as the Secretary may require.

“(c) Grant amounts and project costs

“(1) In general—Each grant made under this section—

“(A) shall be in an amount that is at least $25,000,000; and

“(B) shall be for a project that has eligible project costs that are reasonably anticipated to equal or exceed the lesser of—

“(i) $100,000,000; or

“(ii) in the case of a project—

“(I) located in 1 State or territory, 30 percent of the amount apportioned under this chapter to the State or territory in the most recently completed fiscal year; or

“(II) located in more than 1 State or territory, 50 percent of the amount apportioned under this chapter to the participating State or territory with the largest apportionment under this chapter in the most recently completed fiscal year.

“(2) Large projects—For a project that has eligible project costs that are reasonably anticipated to equal or exceed $500,000,000, a grant made under this section—

“(A) shall be in an amount sufficient to fully fund the project, or in the case of a public transportation project, a minimum operable segment, in combination with other funding sources, including non-Federal financial commitment, identified in the application; and

“(B) may be awarded pursuant to the process under subsection (d), as necessary based on the amount of the grant.

“(d) Multiyear grant agreements for large projects

“(1) In general—A large project that receives a grant under this section may be carried out through a multiyear grant agreement in accordance with this subsection.

“(2) Requirements—A multiyear grant agreement for a large project shall—

“(A) establish the terms of participation by the Federal Government in the project;

“(B) establish the amount of Federal financial assistance for the project;

“(C) establish a schedule of anticipated Federal obligations for the project that provides for obligation of the full grant amount by not later than 4 fiscal years after the fiscal year in which the initial amount is provided; and

“(D) determine the period of time for completing the project, even if such period extends beyond the period of an authorization.

“(3) Special rules

“(A) In general—A multiyear grant agreement under this subsection—

“(i) shall obligate an amount of available budget authority specified in law; and

“(ii) may include a commitment, contingent on amounts to be specified in law in advance for commitments under this paragraph, to obligate an additional amount from future available budget authority specified in law.

“(B) Contingent commitment—A contingent commitment under this subsection is not an obligation of the Federal Government under section 1501 of title 31.

“(C) Interest and other financing costs

“(i) In general—Interest and other financing costs of carrying out a part of the project within a reasonable time shall be considered a cost of carrying out the project under a multiyear grant agreement, except that eligible costs may not be more than the cost of the most favorable financing terms reasonably available for the project at the time of borrowing.

“(ii) Certification—The applicant shall certify to the Secretary that the applicant has shown reasonable diligence in seeking the most favorable financing terms.

“(4) Advance payment—An eligible entity carrying out a large project under a multiyear grant agreement—

“(A) may use funds made available to the eligible entity under this title or title 49 for eligible project costs of the large project; and

“(B) shall be reimbursed, at the option of the eligible entity, for such expenditures from the amount made available under the multiyear grant agreement for the project in that fiscal year or a subsequent fiscal year.

“(e) Eligible projects

“(1) In general—The Secretary may make a grant under this section only for a project that is a project eligible for assistance under this title or chapter 53 of title 49 and is—

“(A) a bridge project carried out on the National Highway System, or that is eligible to be carried out under section 165;

“(B) a project to improve person throughput that is—

“(i) a highway project carried out on the National Highway System, or that is eligible to be carried out under section 165;

“(ii) a public transportation project; or

“(iii) a capital project, as such term is defined in section 22906 of title 49, to improve intercity rail passenger transportation; or

“(C) a project to improve freight throughput that is—

“(i) a highway freight project carried out on the National Highway Freight Network established under section 167 or on the National Highway System;

“(ii) a freight intermodal, freight rail, or railway-highway grade crossing or grade separation project; or

“(iii) within the boundaries of a public or private freight rail, water (including ports), or intermodal facility and that is a surface transportation infrastructure project necessary to facilitate direct intermodal interchange, transfer, or access into or out of the facility.

“(2) Limitation

“(A) Certain freight projects—Projects described in clauses (ii) and (iii) of paragraph (1)(C) may receive a grant under this section only if—

“(i) the project will make a significant improvement to the movement of freight on the National Highway System; and

“(ii) the Federal share of the project funds only elements of the project that provide public benefits.

“(B) Certain projects for person throughput—Projects described in clauses (ii) and (iii) of paragraph (1)(B) may receive a grant under this section only if the project will make a significant improvement in mobility on public roads.

“(f) Eligible project costs—An eligible entity receiving a grant under this section may use such grant for—

“(1) development phase activities, including planning, feasibility analysis, revenue forecasting, environmental review, preliminary engineering and design work, and other preconstruction activities; and

“(2) construction, reconstruction, rehabilitation, acquisition of real property (including land related to the project and improvements to the land), environmental mitigation, construction contingencies, acquisition of equipment, and operational improvements directly related to improving system performance.

“(g) Project requirements—The Secretary may select a project described under this section for funding under this section only if the Secretary determines that the project—

“(1) generates significant regional or national economic, mobility, safety, resilience, or environmental benefits;

“(2) is cost effective;

“(3) is based on the results of preliminary engineering;

“(4) has secured or will secure acceptable levels of non-Federal financial commitments, including—

“(A) one or more stable and dependable sources of funding and financing to construct, maintain, and operate the project; and

“(B) contingency amounts to cover unanticipated cost increases;

“(5) cannot be easily and efficiently completed without additional Federal funding or financial assistance available to the project sponsor, beyond existing Federal apportionments; and

“(6) is reasonably expected to begin construction not later than 18 months after the date of obligation of funds for the project.

“(h) Merit criteria and considerations

“(1) Merit criteria—In awarding a grant under this section, the Secretary shall evaluate the following merit criteria:

“(A) The extent to which the project supports achieving a state of good repair.

“(B) The level of benefits the project is expected to generate, including—

“(i) the costs avoided by the prevention of closure or reduced use of the asset to be improved by the project;

“(ii) reductions in maintenance costs over the life of the asset;

“(iii) safety benefits, including the reduction of accidents and related costs;

“(iv) improved person or freight throughput, including congestion reduction and reliability improvements;

“(v) national and regional economic benefits;

“(vi) resilience benefits, including the ability to withstand disruptions from a seismic event;

“(vii) environmental benefits, including reduction in greenhouse gas emissions and air quality benefits; and

“(viii) benefits to all users of the project, including pedestrian, bicycle, nonvehicular, railroad, and public transportation users.

“(C) How the benefits compare to the costs of the project.

“(D) The average number of people or volume of freight, as applicable, supported by the project, including visitors based on travel and tourism.

“(2) Additional considerations—In awarding a grant under this section, the Secretary shall consider the following:

“(A) Whether the project spans at least 1 border between 2 States.

“(B) Whether the project serves low-income residents of low-income communities, including areas of persistent poverty, while not displacing such residents.

“(C) Whether the project uses innovative technologies, innovative design and construction techniques, or pavement materials that demonstrate reductions in greenhouse gas emissions through sequestration or innovative manufacturing processes and, if so, the degree to which such technologies, techniques, or materials are used.

“(D) Whether the project improves connectivity between modes of transportation moving people or goods in the Nation or region.

“(E) Whether the project provides new or improved connections between at least two metropolitan areas with a population of at least 500,000.

changed “(F) Whether the project would replace, reconstruct, or rehabilitate a commuter corridor (including a high-commuter corridor (as such term is defined in section 203(a)(6)) 203(a)(6))) that is in poor condition.

added “(G) Whether the project would improve the shared transportation corridor of a multistate corridor.

“(i) Project selection

“(1) Evaluation—To evaluate applications for funding under this section, the Secretary shall—

“(A) determine whether a project is eligible for a grant under this section;

“(B) evaluate, through a methodology that is discernible and transparent to the public, how each application addresses the merit criteria pursuant to subsection (h);

“(C) assign a quality rating for each merit criteria for each application based on the evaluation in subparagraph (B);

“(D) ensure that applications receive final consideration by the Secretary to receive an award under this section only on the basis of such quality ratings and that the Secretary gives final consideration only to applications that meet the minimally acceptable level for each of the merit criteria; and

“(E) award grants only to projects rated highly under the evaluation and rating process.

“(2) Considerations for large projects—In awarding a grant for a large project, the Secretary shall—

“(A) consider the amount of funds available in future fiscal years for the program under this section; and

“(B) assume the availability of funds in future fiscal years for the program that extend beyond the period of authorization based on the amount made available for the program in the last fiscal year of the period of authorization.

“(3) Geographic distribution—In awarding grants under this section, the Secretary shall ensure geographic diversity and a balance between rural and urban communities among grant recipients over fiscal years 2023 through 2026.

“(4) Publication of methodology

“(A) In general—Prior to the issuance of any notice of funding opportunity for grants under this section, the Secretary shall publish and make publicly available on the Department’s website—

“(i) a detailed explanation of the merit criteria developed under subsection (h);

“(ii) a description of the evaluation process under this subsection; and

“(iii) how the Secretary shall determine whether a project satisfies each of the requirements under subsection (g).

“(B) Updates—The Secretary shall update and make publicly available on the website of the Department of Transportation such information at any time a revision to the information described in subparagraph (A) is made.

“(C) Information required—The Secretary shall include in the published notice of funding opportunity for a grant under this section detailed information on the rating methodology and merit criteria to be used to evaluate applications, or a reference to the information on the website of the Department of Transportation, as required by subparagraph (A).

“(j) Federal share

“(1) In general—The Federal share of the cost of a project carried out with a grant under this section may not exceed 60 percent.

“(2) Maximum Federal involvement—Federal assistance other than a grant under this section may be used to satisfy the non-Federal share of the cost of a project for which such a grant is made, except that the total Federal assistance provided for a project receiving a grant under this section may not exceed 80 percent of the total project cost.

“(k) Bridge investments—Of the amounts made available to carry out this section, the Secretary shall reserve not less than $1,000,000,000 in each fiscal year to make grants for projects described in subsection (e)(1)(A).

“(l) Treatment of projects

“(1) Federal requirements—The Secretary shall, with respect to a project funded by a grant under this section, apply—

“(A) the requirements of this title to a highway project;

“(B) the requirements of chapter 53 of title 49 to a public transportation project; and

“(C) the requirements of section 22905 of title 49 to a passenger rail or freight rail project.

“(2) Multimodal projects

“(A) In general—Except as otherwise provided in this paragraph, if an eligible project is a multimodal project, the Secretary shall—

“(i) determine the predominant modal component of the project; and

“(ii) apply the applicable requirements of such predominant modal component to the project.

“(B) Exceptions

“(i) Passenger or freight rail component—For any passenger or freight rail component of a project, the requirements of section 22907(j)(2) of title 49 shall apply.

“(ii) Public transportation component—For any public transportation component of a project, the requirements of section 5333 of title 49 shall apply.

“(C) Buy America—In applying the Buy America requirements under section 313 of this title and sections 5320, 22905(a), and 24305(f) of title 49 to a multimodal project under this paragraph, the Secretary shall—

“(i) consider the various modal components of the project; and

“(ii) seek to maximize domestic jobs.

“(m) TIFIA program—At the request of an eligible entity under this section, the Secretary may use amounts awarded to the entity to pay subsidy and administrative costs necessary to provide the entity Federal credit assistance under chapter 6 with respect to the project for which the grant was awarded.

added “(n) Administration—Of the amounts made available to carry out this section, the Secretary may use up to $5,000,000 in each fiscal year for the costs of administering the program under this section.

removed “(n) Administration—Of the amounts made available to carry out this section, the Secretary may use up to $5,000,000 for the costs of administering the program under this section.

“(o) Technical assistance—Of the amounts made available to carry out this section, the Secretary may reserve up to $5,000,000 to provide technical assistance to eligible entities.

“(p) Congressional Review

“(1) Notification—Not less than 60 days before making an award under this section, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public Works, the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate—

“(A) a list of all applications determined to be eligible for a grant by the Secretary;

“(B) the quality ratings assigned to each application pursuant to subsection (i);

“(C) a list of applications that received final consideration by the Secretary to receive an award under this section;

“(D) each application proposed to be selected for a grant award;

“(E) proposed grant amounts, including for each new multiyear grant agreement, the proposed payout schedule for the project; and

“(F) an analysis of the impacts of any large projects proposed to be selected on existing commitments and anticipated funding levels for the next 4 fiscal years, based on information available to the Secretary at the time of the report.

“(2) Committee review—Before the last day of the 60-day period described in paragraph (1), each Committee described in paragraph (1) shall review the Secretary’s list of proposed projects.

“(3) Congressional disapproval—The Secretary may not make a grant or any other obligation or commitment to fund a project under this section if a joint resolution is enacted disapproving funding for the project before the last day of the 60-day period described in paragraph (1).

“(q) Transparency

“(1) In general—Not later than 30 days after awarding a grant for a project under this section, the Secretary shall send to all applicants, and publish on the website of the Department of Transportation—

“(A) a summary of each application made to the program for the grant application period; and

“(B) the evaluation and justification for the project selection, including ratings assigned to all applications and a list of applications that received final consideration by the Secretary to receive an award under this section, for the grant application period.

“(2) Briefing—The Secretary shall provide, at the request of a grant applicant under this section, the opportunity to receive a briefing to explain any reasons the grant applicant was not awarded a grant.

“(r) Definition of eligible entity—In this section, the term eligible entity means—

“(1) a State or a group of States;

“(2) a unit of local government, including a metropolitan planning organization, or a group of local governments;

“(3) a political subdivision of a State or local government;

“(4) a special purpose district or public authority with a transportation function, including a port authority;

“(5) an Indian Tribe or Tribal organization;

“(6) a Federal agency eligible to receive funds under section 201, 203, or 204, including the Army Corps of Engineers, Bureau of Reclamation, and the Bureau of Land Management, that applies jointly with a State or group of States;

“(7) a territory; and

“(8) a multistate or multijurisdictional group of entities described in this paragraph.”

(b)
Clerical amendment— The analysis for chapter 1 of title 23, United States Code, is amended by striking the item relating to section 117 and inserting the following:

Sec. 1302 Community transportation investment grant program

(a)
In general— Chapter 1 of title 23, United States Code, as amended by this title, is further amended by adding at the end the following:

“173. Community transportation investment grant program

“(a) Establishment—The Secretary shall establish a community transportation investment grant program to improve surface transportation safety, state of good repair, accessibility, and environmental quality through infrastructure investments.

“(b) Grant authority

“(1) In general—In carrying out the program established under subsection (a), the Secretary shall make grants, on a competitive basis, to eligible entities in accordance with this section.

“(2) Grant amount—The maximum amount of a grant under this section shall be $25,000,000.

“(c) Applications—To be eligible for a grant under this section, an eligible entity shall submit to the Secretary an application in such form, at such time, and containing such information as the Secretary may require.

“(d) Eligible project costs—Grant amounts for an eligible project carried out under this section may be used for—

“(1) development phase activities, including planning, feasibility analysis, revenue forecasting, environmental review, preliminary engineering and design work, and other preconstruction activities; and

“(2) construction, reconstruction, rehabilitation, acquisition of real property (including land related to the project and improvements to such land), environmental mitigation, construction contingencies, acquisition of equipment, and operational improvements.

“(e) Rural and community setasides

“(1) In general—The Secretary shall reserve—

“(A) not less than 25 percent of the amounts made available to carry out this section for projects located in rural areas; and

changed “(B) not less than 25 percent of the amounts made available to carry out this section for projects located in urbanized areas with a population greater than 49,999 74,999 individuals and fewer than 200,001 individuals.

changed “(2) Definition of rural area—In this subsection, the term rural area means all areas of a State or territory not included in that are outside of an urbanized areas.area with a population greater than 74,999 individuals, as determined by the Bureau of the Census.

“(3) Excess funding—If the Secretary determines that there are insufficient qualified applicants to use the funds set aside under this subsection, the Secretary may use such funds for grants for any projects eligible under this section.

“(f) Evaluation—To evaluate applications under this section, the Secretary shall—

“(1) develop a process to objectively evaluate applications on the benefits of the project proposed in such application—

“(A) to transportation safety, including reductions in traffic fatalities and serious injuries;

“(B) to state of good repair, including improved condition of bridges and pavements;

“(C) to transportation system access, including improved access to jobs and services; and

“(D) in reducing greenhouse gas emissions;

“(2) develop a rating system to assign a numeric value to each application, based on each of the criteria described in paragraph (1);

“(3) for each application submitted, compare the total benefits of the proposed project, as determined by the rating system developed under paragraph (2), with the costs of such project, and rank each application based on the results of the comparison; and

“(4) ensure that only such applications that are ranked highly based on the results of the comparison conducted under paragraph (3) are considered to receive a grant under this section.

“(g) Weighting—In establishing the evaluation process under subsection (f), the Secretary may assign different weights to the criteria described in subsection (f)(1) based on project type, population served by a project, and other context-sensitive considerations, provided that—

“(1) each application is rated on all criteria described in subsection (f)(1); and

“(2) each application has the same possible minimum and maximum rating, regardless of any differences in the weighting of criteria.

“(h) Transparency

“(1) Publicly available information—Prior to the issuance of any notice of funding opportunity under this section, the Secretary shall make publicly available on the website of the Department of Transportation a detailed explanation of the evaluation and rating process developed under subsection (f), including any differences in the weighting of criteria pursuant to subsection (g), if applicable, and update such website for each revision of the evaluation and rating process.

“(2) Notifications to Congress—The Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives, the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate, the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate, and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate the following written notifications:

“(A) A notification when the Secretary publishes or updates the information required under paragraph (1).

“(B) Not later than 30 days prior to the date on which the Secretary awards a grant under this section, a notification that includes—

“(i) the ratings of each application submitted pursuant to subsection (f)(2);

“(ii) the ranking of each application submitted pursuant to subsection (f)(3); and

“(iii) a list of all applications that receive final consideration by the Secretary to receive an award under this section pursuant to subsection (f)(4).

“(C) Not later than 3 business days prior to the date on which the Secretary announces the award of a grant under this section, a notification describing each grant to be awarded, including the amount and the recipient.

changed “(i) Technical assistance—Of the amounts made available to carry out this section, the Secretary may reserve up to $3,000,000 in each fiscal year to provide technical assistance to eligible entities.

“(j) Administration—Of the amounts made available to carry out this section, the Secretary may reserve up to $5,000,000 for the administrative costs of carrying out the program under this section.

“(k) Treatment of projects

“(1) Federal requirements—The Secretary shall, with respect to a project funded by a grant under this section, apply—

“(A) the requirements of this title to a highway project;

“(B) the requirements of chapter 53 of title 49 to a public transportation project; and

“(C) the requirements of section 22905 of title 49 to a passenger rail or freight rail project.

“(2) Multimodal projects

“(A) In general—Except as otherwise provided in this paragraph, if an eligible project is a multimodal project, the Secretary shall—

“(i) determine the predominant modal component of the project; and

“(ii) apply the applicable requirements of such predominant modal component to the project.

“(B) Exceptions

“(i) Passenger or freight rail component—For any passenger or freight rail component of a project, the requirements of section 22907(j)(2) of title 49 shall apply.

“(ii) Public transportation component—For any public transportation component of a project, the requirements of section 5333 of title 49 shall apply.

“(C) Buy America—In applying the Buy America requirements under section 313 of this title and sections 5320, 22905(a), and 24305(f) of title 49 to a multimodal project under this paragraph, the Secretary shall—

“(i) consider the various modal components of the project; and

“(ii) seek to maximize domestic jobs.

“(l) Transparency

“(1) In general—Not later than 30 days after awarding a grant for a project under this section, the Secretary shall send to all applicants, and publish on the website of the Department of Transportation—

“(A) a summary of each application made to the program for the grant application period; and

“(B) the evaluation and justification for the project selection, including ratings and rankings assigned to all applications and a list of applications that received final consideration by the Secretary to receive an award under this section, for the grant application period.

“(2) Briefing—The Secretary shall provide, at the request of a grant applicant under this section, the opportunity to receive a briefing to explain any reasons the grant applicant was not awarded a grant.

“(m) Definitions—In this section:

“(1) Eligible entity—The term eligible entity means—

“(A) a metropolitan planning organization;

“(B) a unit of local government;

“(C) a transit agency;

“(D) an Indian Tribe or Tribal organization;

“(E) a multijurisdictional group of entities described in this paragraph;

“(F) a special purpose district with a transportation function or a port authority;

“(G) a territory; or

“(H) a State that applies for a grant under this section jointly with an entity described in subparagraphs (A) through (G).

“(2) Eligible project—The term eligible project means any project eligible under this title or chapter 53 of title 49.”

(b)
Clerical amendment— The analysis for chapter 1 of title 23, United States Code, is further amended by adding at the end the following new item:

Sec. 1303 Clean corridors program

(a)
Purpose— The purpose of this section is to establish a formula program to strategically deploy electric vehicle charging infrastructure along designated alternative fuel corridors that will be accessible to all drivers of electric vehicles.
(b)
National electric vehicle charging and hydrogen, propane, and natural gas fueling corridors— Section 151 of title 23, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
in subsection (a) by striking “Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of the FAST Act, the Secretary shall” and inserting “The Secretary shall periodically”;
(2)
in subsection (b)(2) by inserting “previously designated by the Federal Highway Administration or” after “fueling corridors”;
(3)
in subsection (d)—
(A)
changed by striking “5 years after the date of establishment of the corridors under subsection (a), and every 5 years thereafter” “Not later than” and inserting “180 days after the date of enactment of the INVEST in America Act”; andfollowing:

added “(1) In general—Not later than”

(B)
changed by striking “5 years after the date of establishment of the corridors under subsection (a), and every 5 years thereafter” and inserting “establish a recurring process to regularly” “180 days after “the Secretary shall”;the date of enactment of the INVEST in America Act”;
(C)
added by inserting “establish a recurring process to regularly” after “the Secretary shall”; and
(D)
added by adding at the end the following:

added “(2) Freight corridors—Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of the INVEST in America Act, the Secretary shall designate national electric vehicle charging and hydrogen fueling freight corridors that identify the near- and long-term need for, and the location of, electric vehicle charging and hydrogen fueling infrastructure to support freight and goods movement at strategic locations along major national highways, the National Highway Freight Network, and goods movement locations including ports, intermodal centers, and warehousing locations.”

(4)
in subsection (e)—
(A)
in paragraph (1) by striking “; and” and inserting a semicolon;
(B)
in paragraph (2)—
(i)
by striking “establishes an aspirational goal of achieving” and inserting “describes efforts to achieve”; and
(ii)
changed by striking “by the end of fiscal year 2020.” and inserting “, including progress on the implementation of subsection (f); and”; andand”;
(C)
by adding at the end the following:

“(3) summarizes best practices and provides guidance, developed through consultation with the Secretary of Energy, for project development of electric vehicle charging infrastructure to allow for the predictable deployment of such infrastructure.”

(5)
by adding at the end the following:

“(f) Clean corridors program

“(1) Establishment—There is established a clean corridors program (referred to in this subsection as the “Program”) to provide funding to States to strategically deploy electric vehicle charging and hydrogen fueling infrastructure along alternative fuel corridors and to establish an interconnected network to facilitate data collection, access, and reliability.

“(2) Purpose—The purpose of the Program is to provide funding for—

“(A) the acquisition and installation of electric vehicle charging infrastructure and hydrogen fueling infrastructure to serve as a catalyst for the deployment of such infrastructure and to connect it to a network to facilitate data collection, access, and reliability;

“(B) proper operation and maintenance of electric vehicle charging infrastructure; and

“(C) data sharing about charging and fueling infrastructure to ensure the long-term success of investments made through the Program.

“(3) Alternative distribution of funds

“(A) Plan—The Secretary shall establish a deadline by which a State shall provide a plan to the Secretary, in such form and such manner that the Secretary requires, describing how such State intends to use its allocation under this section.

“(B) Efficient obligation of funds—If a State fails to submit the plan required by subparagraph (A) to the Secretary in a timely manner, or if the Secretary determines a State has not taken sufficient action to carry out its plan, the Secretary may—

“(i) withdraw from the State the funds that were apportioned to the State for a fiscal year under section 104(b)(10);

“(ii) award such funds on a competitive basis to local units of government within the State for use on projects that meet the eligibility requirements described in paragraph (4); and

“(iii) ensure timely obligation of such funds.

“(C) Redistribution among States—If the Secretary determines that any funds withdrawn from a State under subparagraph (B)(i) cannot be fully awarded to local units of government within the State under subparagraph (B)(ii) in a manner consistent with the purpose of this subsection, any such funds remaining under subparagraph (B)(i) shall be—

“(i) apportioned among other States (except States for which funds for that fiscal year have been withdrawn under subparagraph (B)(i)) in the same ratio as funds apportioned for that fiscal year under section 104(b)(10)(C) for the Program; and

“(ii) only available to carry out this section.

“(4) Eligible projects

“(A) In general—Funding made available under this subsection shall be for projects—

“(i) directly related to the electric charging or hydrogen fueling of a vehicle; and

“(ii) only for infrastructure that is open to the general public or to authorized commercial motor vehicle operators from more than 1 company.

“(B) Location of infrastructure

“(i) In general—Any charging or fueling infrastructure acquired or installed with funding under this subsection shall be located along an alternative fuel corridor.

“(ii) Guidance—Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of the INVEST in America Act, the Secretary of Transportation, in coordination with the Secretary of Energy, shall develop guidance for States and localities to strategically deploy charging and fueling infrastructure along alternative fuel corridors, consistent with this section.

“(iii) Additional considerations—In developing the guidance required under clause (ii), the Secretary of Transportation, in coordination with the Secretary of Energy, shall consider—

“(I) the distance between publicly available charging and fueling infrastructure eligible under this section;

“(II) connections to the electric grid or fuel distribution system, including electric distribution upgrades, vehicle-to-grid integration, including smart charge management or other protocols that can minimize impacts to the electric grid, and alignment with electric distribution interconnection processes;

“(III) plans to protect the electric grid from added load of charging distribution systems from adverse impacts of changing load patterns, including through on site storage;

“(IV) plans for the use of renewable energy sources to power charging, energy storage, and hydrogen fuel production;

“(V) the proximity of existing off-highway travel centers, fuel retailers, and small businesses to electric vehicle charging infrastructure acquired or funded under this subsection;

“(VI) the need for publicly available electric vehicle charging infrastructure in rural corridors;

“(VII) the long-term operation and maintenance of publicly available electric vehicle charging infrastructure to avoid stranded assets and protect the investment of public funds in that infrastructure;

“(VIII) existing private, national, State, local, Tribal, and territorial government electric vehicle charging infrastructure programs and incentives;

“(IX) fostering enhanced, coordinated, public-private or private investment in charging and fueling infrastructure;

changed “(X) ensuring consumer protection and pricing transparency; andtransparency;

changed “(XI) any other factors, as determined by the Secretary.availability of onsite amenities for vehicle operators, including restrooms or food facilities; and

added “(XII) any other factors, as determined by the Secretary.

“(5) Eligible project costs—Subject to paragraph (6), funds made available under this subsection may be used for—

“(A) the acquisition or installation of electric vehicle charging or hydrogen fueling infrastructure;

“(B) operating assistance for costs allocable to operating and maintaining infrastructure acquired or installed under this subsection, for a period not to exceed five years;

“(C) the acquisition or installation of traffic control devices located in the right-of-way to provide directional information to infrastructure acquired, installed, or operated under this subsection; or

“(D) on-premises signs to provide information about infrastructure acquired, installed, or operated under this subsection.

added “(6) Guidance—Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of the INVEST in America Act, the Secretary of Transportation, in coordination with the Secretary of Energy, shall, as appropriate, publish guidance for public comment related to—

removed “(6) Project requirements—Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of the INVEST in America Act, the Secretary of Transportation, in coordination with the Secretary of Energy, shall, as appropriate, develop standards and requirements related to—

“(A) the installation, operation, or maintenance by qualified technicians of electric vehicle charging infrastructure under this subsection;

added “(B) the physical and payment interoperability of electric vehicle charging infrastructure under this subsection;

removed “(B) the physical, software, and payment interoperability of electric vehicle charging infrastructure under this subsection;

“(C) any traffic control device or on-premises sign acquired, installed, or operated under this subsection;

“(D) any data requested by the Secretary related to a project funded under this subsection, including the format and schedule for the submission of such data; and

“(E) network connectivity of electric vehicle charging that includes measures to protect personal privacy and ensure cybersecurity.

“(7) Federal share—The Federal share payable for the cost of a project funded under this subsection shall be 80 percent.

“(8) Period of availability—Notwithstanding section 118(b), funds made available for the Program shall be available until expended.

“(9) Additional assistance grants—For each of fiscal years 2023 through 2026, before making an apportionment under section 104(b)(10), the Secretary shall set aside, from amounts made available to carry out the clean corridors program under this subsection, $100,000,000 for grants to States or localities that require additional assistance to strategically deploy infrastructure eligible under this subsection along alternative fuel corridors to fill gaps in the national charging network, including in rural areas.

“(10) Definition of alternative fuel corridors—In this subsection, the term alternative fuel corridors means a fuel corridor—

“(A) designated under subsection (a); or

“(B) equivalent to a fuel corridor described under such subsection that is designated, after consultation with any affected Indian Tribes or Tribal organizations, by a State or group of States.”

Sec. 1304 Community climate innovation grants

(a)
In general— Chapter 1 of title 23, United States Code, as amended by this title, is further amended by inserting after section 171 the following:

“172. Community climate innovation grants

“(a) Establishment—The Secretary shall establish a community climate innovation grant program (in this section referred to as the “Program”) to make grants, on a competitive basis, for locally selected projects that reduce greenhouse gas emissions while improving the mobility, accessibility, and connectivity of the surface transportation system.

“(b) Purpose—The purpose of the Program shall be to support communities in reducing greenhouse gas emissions from the surface transportation system.

“(c) Eligible applicants—The Secretary may make grants under the Program to the following entities:

“(1) A metropolitan planning organization.

“(2) A unit of local government or a group of local governments, or a county or multi-county special district.

“(3) A subdivision of a local government.

“(4) A transit agency.

“(5) A special purpose district with a transportation function or a port authority.

“(6) An Indian Tribe or Tribal organization.

“(7) A territory.

“(8) A multijurisdictional group of entities described in paragraphs (1) through (7).

“(d) Applications—To be eligible for a grant under the Program, an entity specified in subsection (c) shall submit to the Secretary an application in such form, at such time, and containing such information as the Secretary determines appropriate.

“(e) Eligible projects—The Secretary may only provide a grant under the Program for a project that is expected to yield a significant reduction in greenhouse gas emissions from the surface transportation system and—

“(1) is a project eligible for assistance under this title or under chapter 53 of title 49, or is a capital project for vehicles and facilities, whether publicly or privately owned, that are used to provide intercity passenger service by bus; or

“(2) is a capital project as defined in section 22906 of title 49 to improve intercity passenger rail that will yield a significant reduction in single occupant vehicle trips and improve mobility on public roads.

“(f) Eligible uses—Grant amounts received for a project under the Program may be used for—

“(1) development phase activities, including planning, feasibility analysis, revenue forecasting, environmental review, preliminary engineering and design work, and other preconstruction activities; and

“(2) construction, reconstruction, rehabilitation, acquisition of real property (including land related to the project and improvements to the land), environmental mitigation, construction contingencies, acquisition of equipment, and operational improvements.

“(g) Project prioritization—In making grants for projects under the Program, the Secretary shall give priority to projects that are expected to yield the most significant reductions in greenhouse gas emissions from the surface transportation system.

“(h) Additional considerations—In making grants for projects under the Program, the Secretary shall consider the extent to which—

“(1) a project maximizes greenhouse gas reductions in a cost-effective manner;

“(2) a project reduces dependence on single-occupant vehicle trips or provides additional transportation options;

“(3) a project improves the connectivity and accessibility of the surface transportation system, particularly to low- and zero-emission forms of transportation, including public transportation, walking, and bicycling;

“(4) an applicant has adequately considered or will adequately consider, including through the opportunity for public comment, the environmental justice and equity impacts of the project;

“(5) a project contributes to geographic diversity among grant recipients, including to achieve a balance between urban, suburban, and rural communities;

“(6) a project serves low-income residents of low-income communities, including areas of persistent poverty, while not displacing such residents;

“(7) a project uses pavement materials that demonstrate reductions in greenhouse gas emissions through sequestration or innovative manufacturing processes;

“(8) a project repurposes neglected or underused infrastructure, including abandoned highways, bridges, railways, trail ways, and adjacent underused spaces, into new hybrid forms of public space that support multiple modes of transportation; and

“(9) a project includes regional multimodal transportation system management and operations elements that will improve the effectiveness of such project and encourage reduction of single occupancy trips by providing the ability of users to plan, use, and pay for multimodal transportation alternatives.

“(i) Funding

“(1) Maximum amount—The maximum amount of a grant under the Program shall be $25,000,000.

“(2) Technical assistance—Of the amounts made available to carry out the Program, the Secretary may use up to 1 percent to provide technical assistance to applicants and potential applicants.

“(j) Treatment of projects

“(1) Federal requirements—The Secretary shall, with respect to a project funded by a grant under this section, apply—

“(A) the requirements of this title to a highway project;

“(B) the requirements of chapter 53 of title 49 to a public transportation project; and

“(C) the requirements of section 22905 of title 49 to a passenger rail or freight rail project.

“(2) Multimodal projects

“(A) In general—Except as otherwise provided in this paragraph, if an eligible project is a multimodal project, the Secretary shall—

“(i) determine the predominant modal component of the project; and

“(ii) apply the applicable requirements of such predominant modal component to the project.

“(B) Exceptions

“(i) Passenger or freight rail component—For any passenger or freight rail component of a project, the requirements of section 22907(j)(2) of title 49 shall apply.

“(ii) Public transportation component—For any public transportation component of a project, the requirements of section 5333 of title 49 shall apply.

“(C) Buy America—In applying the Buy America requirements under section 313 of this title and sections 5320, 22905(a), and 24305(f) of title 49 to a multimodal project under this paragraph, the Secretary shall—

“(i) consider the various modal components of the project; and

“(ii) seek to maximize domestic jobs.

“(k) Single-Occupancy vehicle highway facilities—None of the funds provided under this section may be used for a project that will result in the construction of new capacity available to single occupant vehicles unless the project consists of a high-occupancy vehicle facility and is consistent with section 166.

“(l) Public comment—Prior to issuing the notice of funding opportunity for funding under this section for fiscal year 2023, the Secretary, in consultation with the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, shall solicit public comment on the method of determining the significant reduction in greenhouse gas emissions required under subsection (e).

changed “(m) Consultation—Prior to making an award under this section in a given fiscal year, the Secretary shall consult with the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to determine which projects are expected to yield a significant reduction in greenhouse gas emissions as required under subsection (e).”(e).

added “(n) Rural set-aside

added “(1) In general—The Secretary shall set aside not less than 10 percent of the amounts made available to carry out this section for projects located in rural areas.

added “(2) Definition of rural area—In this subsection, the term “rural area” means all areas of a State or territory that are outside of an urbanized area with a population greater than 74,999 individuals, as determined by the Bureau of the Census.”

(b)
Clerical amendment— The analysis for chapter 1 of title 23, United States Code, is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 171 the following:

Sec. 1305 Metro performance program

(a)
Establishment— The Secretary of Transportation shall establish a metro performance program in accordance with this section to enhance local decision making and provide enhanced local control in transportation project delivery.
(b)
Direct recipient designation—
(1)
In general— The Secretary shall designate high-performing metropolitan planning organizations based on the criteria in paragraph (3) to be direct recipients of funds under this section.
(2)
Authority— Nothing in this section shall be construed to prohibit a direct recipient from taking any action otherwise authorized to secure and expend Federal funds authorized under chapter 1 of title 23, United States Code.
(3)
Criteria— In designating an applicant under this subsection, the Secretary shall consider—
(A)
the legal, financial, and technical capacity of the applicant;
(B)
the level of coordination between the applicant and—
(i)
the State department of transportation of the State or States in which the metropolitan planning area represented by the applicant is located;
(ii)
local governments and providers of public transportation within the metropolitan planning area represented by the applicant; and
(iii)
if more than one metropolitan planning organization is designated within an urbanized area represented by the applicant, any other such metropolitan planning organization;
(C)
in the case of an applicant that represents an urbanized area population of greater than 200,000, the effectiveness of project delivery and timely obligation of funds made available under section 133(d)(1)(A)(i) of title 23, United States Code;
(D)
if the applicant or a local government within the metropolitan planning area that the applicant represents has been the recipient of a discretionary grant from the Secretary within the preceding 5 years, the administration of such grant;
(E)
the extent to which the planning and decision making process of the applicant, including the long-range transportation plan and the approved transportation improvement program under section 134 of such title, support—
(i)
the performance goals established under section 150(b) of such title; and
(ii)
the achievement of metropolitan or statewide performance targets established under section 150(d) of such title;
(F)
whether the applicant is a designated recipient of funds as described under subparagraphs (A) and (B) of section 5302(4) of title 49, United States Code, or a direct recipient of funds under section 5307 of such title from the Federal Transit Administration; and
(G)
any other criteria established by the Secretary.
(4)
Requirements—
(A)
Call for nomination— Not later than February 1, 2022, the Secretary shall publish in the Federal Register a notice soliciting applications for designation under this subsection.
(B)
Guidance— The notification under paragraph (1) shall include guidance on the requirements and responsibilities of a direct recipient under this section, including implementing regulations.
(C)
Determination— The Secretary shall make all designations under this section for fiscal year 2023 not later than June 1, 2022.
(5)
Term— Except as provided in paragraph (6), a designation under this subsection shall—
(A)
be for a period of not less than 5 years; and
(B)
be renewable.
(6)
Termination—
(A)
In general— The Secretary shall establish procedures for the termination of a designation under this subsection.
(B)
Considerations— In establishing procedures under subparagraph (A), the Secretary shall consider—
(i)
with respect to projects carried out under this section, compliance with the requirements of title 23, United States Code, or chapter 53 of title 49, United States Code; and
(ii)
the obligation rate of any funds—
(I)
made available under this section; and
(II)
in the case of a metropolitan planning organization that represents a metropolitan planning area with an urbanized area population of greater than 200,000, made available under section 133(d)(1)(A)(i) of title 23, United States Code.
(c)
Use of funds—
(1)
Eligible projects— Funds made available under this section may be obligated for the purposes described in section 133(b) of title 23, United States Code.
(2)
changed Administrative expenses and technical assistance— Of the amounts made available under this section, the Secretary may set aside not more than $5,000,000 in each of fiscal years 2023 through 2026 for program management, oversight, and technical assistance to direct recipients.
(d)
Responsibilities of direct recipients—
(1)
Direct availability of funds— Notwithstanding title 23, United States Code, the amounts made available under this section shall be allocated to each direct recipient for obligation.
(2)
Distribution of amounts among direct recipients—
(A)
In general— Subject to subparagraph (B), on the first day of the fiscal year for which funds are made available under this section, the Secretary shall allocate such funds to each direct recipient as the proportion of the population (as determined by data collected by the Bureau of the Census) of the urbanized area represented by any 1 direct recipient bears to the total population of all of urbanized areas represented by all direct recipients.
(B)
Minimum and maximum amounts— Of funds allocated to direct recipients under subparagraph (A), each direct recipient shall receive not less than $10,000,000 and not more than $50,000,000 each fiscal year.
(C)
Minimum guaranteed amount— In making a determination whether to designate a metropolitan planning organization as a direct recipient under subsection (b), the Secretary shall ensure that each direct recipient receives the minimum required allocation under subparagraph (B).
(D)
Additional amounts— If any amounts remain undistributed after the distribution described in this subsection, such remaining amounts and an associated amount of obligation limitation shall be made available as if suballocated under clauses (i) and (ii) of section 133(d)(1)(A) of title 23, United States Code, and distributed among the States in the proportion that the relative shares of the population (as determined by data collected by the Bureau of the Census) of the urbanized areas of each State bears to the total populations of all urbanized areas across all States.
(3)
Project delivery—
(A)
In general— For 1 or more projects carried out with funds provided under this section, the direct recipient may, consistent with the agreement entered into with the Secretary under this paragraph, assume the Federal-aid highway project approval and oversight responsibilities vested in the State department of transportation under section 106 of title 23, United States Code.
(B)
Partnership— The direct recipient may partner with a State, unit of local government, regional entity, or transit agency to carry out a project under this section.
(C)
Procedural, legal, and substantive requirements— A direct recipient entering into an agreement with the Secretary under this section shall assume responsibility for compliance with all procedural and substantive requirements as would apply if that responsibility were carried out by a State, unless the direct recipient or the Secretary determines that such assumption of responsibility for 1 or more of the procedural and substantive requirements is not appropriate.
(D)
Written agreement— The Secretary and the direct recipient shall enter into an agreement in writing relating to the extent to which the direct recipient assumes the responsibilities of the Secretary under this paragraph. Such agreement shall be developed in consultation with the State.
(E)
Use of funds— The direct recipient may use amounts made available under this section for costs incurred in implementing this paragraph and to compensate a State, unit of local government, or transit agency for costs incurred in providing assistance under this paragraph.
(F)
Limitations— The direct recipient may not assume responsibilities described in subparagraph (A) for any project that the Secretary determines to be in a high-risk category, including projects on the National Highway System.
(e)
Expenditure of funds—
(1)
Consistency with metropolitan planning— Except as otherwise provided in this section, programming and expenditure of funds for projects under this section shall be consistent with the requirements of section 134 of title 23, United States Code, and section 5303 of title 49, United States Code.
(2)
Selection of projects—
(A)
In general— Notwithstanding subsections (j)(5) and (k)(4) of section 134 of title 23, United States Code, or subsections (j)(5) and (k)(4) of section 5303 of title 49, United States Code, a direct recipient shall select, from the approved transportation improvement program under such sections, all projects to be funded under this section, including projects on the National Highway System.
(B)
Eligible projects— The project selection process described in this subsection shall apply to all federally funded projects within the boundaries of a metropolitan planning area served by a direct recipient that are carried out under this section.
(C)
Consultation required— In selecting a project under this subsection, the metropolitan planning organization shall consult with—
(i)
in the case of a highway project, the State and locality in which such project is located; and
(ii)
in the case of a transit project, any affected public transportation operator.
(3)
Rule of construction— Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit the ability of a direct recipient to partner with a State department of transportation or other recipient of Federal funds under title 23, United States Code, or chapter 53 of title 49, United States Code, to carry out a project.
(f)
Treatment of funds—
(1)
In general— Except as provided in this section, funds made available to carry out this section shall be administered as if apportioned under chapter 1 of title 23, United States Code.
(2)
Federal share— The Federal share of the cost of a project carried out under this section shall be determined in accordance with section 120 of title 23, United States Code.
(g)
Report—
(1)
Direct recipient report— Not later than 60 days after the end of each fiscal year, each direct recipient shall submit to the Secretary a report that includes—
(A)
a list of projects funded with amounts provided under this section;
(B)
a description of any obstacles to complete projects or timely obligation of funds; and
(C)
recommendations to improve the effectiveness of the program under this section.
(2)
Report to Congress— Not later than October 1, 2024, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives a report that—
(A)
summarizes the findings of each direct recipient provided under paragraph (1);
(B)
describes the efforts undertaken by both direct recipients and the Secretary to ensure compliance with the requirements of title 23 and chapter 53 of title 49, United States Code;
(C)
analyzes the capacity of direct recipients to receive direct allocations of funds under chapter 1 of title 23, United States Code; and
(D)
provides recommendations from the Secretary to—
(i)
improve the administration, oversight, and performance of the program established under this section;
(ii)
improve the effectiveness of direct recipients to complete projects and obligate funds in a timely manner; and
(iii)
evaluate options to expand the authority provided under this section, including to allow for the direct allocation to metropolitan planning organizations of funds made available to carry out clause (i) or (ii) of section 133(d)(1)(A) of title 23, United States Code.
(3)
Update— Not less frequently than every 2 years, the Secretary shall update the report described in paragraph (2).
(h)
Definitions—
(1)
Direct recipient— In this section, the term direct recipient means a metropolitan planning organization designated by the Secretary as high-performing under subsection (b) and that was directly allocated funds as described in subsection (d).
(2)
Metropolitan planning area— The term metropolitan planning area has the meaning given such term in section 134 of title 23, United States Code.
(3)
Metropolitan planning organization— The term metropolitan planning organization has the meaning given such term in section 134 of title 23, United States Code.
(4)
National Highway System— The term National Highway System has the meaning given such term in section 101 of title 23, United States Code.
(5)
State— The term State has the meaning given such term in section 101 of title 23, United States Code.
(6)
Urbanized area— The term urbanized area has the meaning given such term in section 134 of title 23, United States Code.

Sec. 1306 Gridlock reduction grant program

(a)
Establishment— The Secretary of Transportation shall establish a gridlock reduction program to make grants, on a competitive basis, for projects to reduce, and mitigate the adverse impacts of, traffic congestion.
(b)
Applications— To be eligible for a grant under this section, an applicant shall submit to the Secretary an application in such form, at such time, and containing such information as the Secretary determines appropriate.
(c)
added Eligibility—
(1)
added Eligible applicants— The Secretary may make grants under this section to an applicant that serves an eligible area and that is—
(c)
removed Eligible Applicants— The Secretary may make grants under this section to an applicant that is serving a combined statistical area, as defined by the Office of Management and Budget, with a population of not less than 1,300,000 and that is—
(A)
renumbered was (4)(3) a metropolitan planning organization;
(B)
renumbered was (4)(4) a unit of local government or a group of local governments;
(C)
added a multijurisdictional group of entities described in subparagraphs (A) and (B);
(3)
removed a multijurisdictional group of entities described in paragraphs (1) and (2);
(D)
renumbered was (4)(6) a special purpose district or public authority with a transportation function, including a port authority; or
(E)
added a State that is in partnership with an entity or group of entities described in subparagraph (A), (B), or (C).
(2)
added Eligible area— An eligible area for an eligible entity under paragraph (1) shall be—
(A)
added a combined statistical area, as defined by the Office of Management and Budget, with a population of not less than 1,300,000; or
(B)
added a metropolitan statistical area that is not part of a combined statistical area, as defined by the Office of Management and Budget, that has a population of not less than 750,000.
(5)
removed a State that is in partnership with an entity or group of entities described in paragraph (1), (2), or (3).
(d)
changed Eligible Projects—projects— The Secretary may award grants under this section to applicants that submit a comprehensive program of surface transportation-related projects to reduce traffic congestion and related adverse impacts, including a project for one or more of the following:
(1)
changed Transportation systems management and operations.operations, including strategies to improve the operations of high-occupancy vehicle lanes.
(2)
changed Intelligent transportation systems.systems to improve connectivity and innovation.
(3)
Real-time traveler information.
(4)
Traffic incident management.
(5)
Active traffic management.
(6)
Traffic signal timing.
(7)
Multimodal travel payment systems.
(8)
Transportation demand management, including employer-based commuting programs such as carpool, vanpool, transit benefit, parking cashout, shuttle, or telework programs.
(9)
A project to provide transportation options to reduce traffic congestion, including—
(A)
changed a project under chapter 53 of title 49, United States Code;Code, including value capture and transit-oriented development projects;
(B)
a bicycle or pedestrian project, including a project to provide safe and connected active transportation networks; and
(C)
a surface transportation project carried out in accordance with the national travel and tourism infrastructure strategic plan under section 1431(e) of the FAST Act (49 U.S.C. 301 note).
(10)
changed Any other project, as determined appropriate by the Secretary.Secretary utilizing eligible projects.
(e)
Award Prioritization—
(1)
In general— In selecting grants under this section, the Secretary shall prioritize applicants serving urbanized areas, as described in subsection (c), that are experiencing a high degree of recurrent transportation congestion, as determined by the Secretary.
(2)
Additional considerations— In selecting grants under this section, the Secretary shall also consider the extent to which the project would—
(A)
reduce traffic congestion and improve the reliability of the surface transportation system;
(B)
mitigate the adverse impacts of traffic congestion on the surface transportation system, including safety and environmental impacts;
(C)
maximize the use of existing capacity; and
(D)
employ innovative, integrated, and multimodal solutions to the items described in subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C).
(f)
Federal share—
(1)
In general— The Federal share of the cost of a project carried out under this section may not exceed 60 percent.
(2)
Maximum Federal share— Federal assistance other than a grant for a project under this section may be used to satisfy the non-Federal share of the cost of such project, except that the total Federal assistance provided for a project receiving a grant under this section may not exceed 80 percent of the total project cost.
(g)
Use of funds— Funds made available for a project under this section may be used for—
(1)
development phase activities, including planning, feasibility analysis, revenue forecasting, environmental review, preliminary engineering and design work, and other preconstruction activities; and
(2)
construction, reconstruction, rehabilitation, acquisition of real property (including land related to the project and improvements to the land), environmental mitigation, construction contingencies, acquisition of equipment, and operational improvements.
(h)
Funding—
(1)
Grant amount— A grant under this section shall be in an amount not less than $10,000,000 and not more than $50,000,000.
(2)
Availability— Funds made available under this program shall be available until expended.
(i)
Freight project set-Aside—
(1)
In general— The Secretary shall set aside not less than 50 percent of the funds made available to carry out this section for grants for freight projects under this subsection.
(2)
Eligible uses— The Secretary shall provide funds set aside under this subsection to applicants that submit a comprehensive program of surface transportation-related projects to reduce freight-related traffic congestion and related adverse impacts, including—
(A)
freight intelligent transportation systems;
(B)
real-time freight parking information;
(C)
real-time freight routing information;
(D)
freight transportation and delivery safety projects;
(E)
first-mile and last-mile delivery solutions;
(F)
shifting freight delivery to off-peak travel times;
(G)
reducing greenhouse gas emissions and air pollution from freight transportation and delivery, including through the use of innovative vehicles that produce fewer greenhouse gas emissions;
(H)
use of centralized delivery locations;
(I)
designated freight vehicle parking and staging areas;
(J)
curb space management; and
(K)
other projects, as determined appropriate by the Secretary.
(3)
Award prioritization—
(A)
In general— In providing funds set aside under this section, the Secretary shall prioritize applicants serving urbanized areas, as described in subsection (c), that are experiencing a high degree of recurrent congestion due to freight transportation, as determined by the Secretary.
(B)
Additional Considerations— In providing funds set aside under this subsection, the Secretary shall consider the extent to which the proposed project—
(i)
reduces freight-related traffic congestion and improves the reliability of the freight transportation system;
(ii)
mitigates the adverse impacts of freight-related traffic congestion on the surface transportation system, including safety and environmental impacts;
(iii)
maximizes the use of existing capacity;
(iv)
employs innovative, integrated, and multimodal solutions to the items described in clauses (i) through (iii);
(v)
leverages Federal funds with non-Federal contributions; and
(vi)
integrates regional multimodal transportation management and operational projects that address both passenger and freight congestion.
(4)
Flexibility— If the Secretary determines that there are insufficient qualified applicants to use the funds set aside under this subsection, the Secretary may use such funds for grants for any projects eligible under this section.
(j)
Report—
(1)
Recipient report— The Secretary shall ensure that not later than 2 years after the Secretary awards grants under this section, the recipient of each such grant submits to the Secretary a report that contains—
(A)
information on each activity or project that received funding under this section;
(B)
a summary of any non-Federal resources leveraged by a grant under this section;
(C)
any statistics, measurements, or quantitative assessments that demonstrate the congestion reduction, reliability, safety, and environmental benefits achieved through activities or projects that received funding under this section; and
(D)
any additional information required by the Secretary.
(2)
Report to Congress— Not later than 9 months after the date specified in paragraph (1), the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public Works, the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, and the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate, and make publicly available on a website, a report detailing—
(A)
a summary of any information provided under paragraph (1); and
(B)
recommendations and best practices to—
(i)
reduce traffic congestion, including freight-related traffic congestion, and improve the reliability of the surface transportation system;
(ii)
mitigate the adverse impacts of traffic congestion, including freight-related traffic congestion, on the surface transportation system, including safety and environmental impacts; and
(iii)
employ innovative, integrated, and multimodal solutions to the items described in clauses (i) and (ii).
(k)
Notification— Not later than 3 business days before awarding a grant under this section, the Secretary shall notify the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public Works, the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, and the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate of the intention to award such a grant.
(l)
Treatment of projects—
(1)
Federal requirements— The Secretary shall, with respect to a project funded by a grant under this section, apply—
(A)
the requirements of title 23, United States Code, to a highway project;
(B)
the requirements of chapter 53 of title 49, United States Code, to a public transportation project; and
(C)
the requirements of section 22905 of title 49, United States Code, to a passenger rail or freight rail project.
(2)
Multimodal projects—
(A)
In general— Except as otherwise provided in this paragraph, if an eligible project is a multimodal project, the Secretary shall—
(i)
determine the predominant modal component of the project; and
(ii)
apply the applicable requirements of such predominant modal component to the project.
(B)
Exceptions—
(i)
Passenger or freight rail component— For any passenger or freight rail component of a project, the requirements of section 22907(j)(2) of title 49, United States Code, shall apply.
(ii)
Public transportation component— For any public transportation component of a project, the requirements of section 5333 of title 49, United States Code, shall apply.
(C)
Buy America— In applying the Buy America requirements under section 313 of title 23, United States Code, and sections 5320, 22905(a), and 24305(f) of title 49, United States Code, to a multimodal project under this paragraph, the Secretary shall—
(i)
consider the various modal components of the project; and
(ii)
seek to maximize domestic jobs.
(m)
Treatment of funds— Except as provided in subsection (l), funds authorized for the purposes described in this section shall be available for obligation in the same manner as if the funds were apportioned under chapter 1 of title 23, United States Code.

Sec. 1307 Rebuild rural bridges program

(a)
Establishment— The Secretary of Transportation shall establish a rebuild rural bridges program to improve the safety and state of good repair of bridges in rural communities.
(b)
Grant authority— In carrying out the program established in subsection (a), the Secretary shall make grants, on a competitive basis, to eligible applicants in accordance with this section.
(c)
Applications— To be eligible for a grant under this section, an eligible entity shall submit to the Secretary an application in such form, at such time, and containing such information as the Secretary determines appropriate.
(d)
Eligible projects— The Secretary—
(1)
shall provide grants under this section to projects eligible under title 23, United States Code, including projects on and off of the Federal-aid highway system, to inspect, replace, rehabilitate, or preserve—
(A)
an off-system bridge;
(B)
a bridge on Tribal land; or
(C)
a bridge in poor condition located in a rural community; and
(2)
may provide a grant for a bundle of bridges described in paragraph (1).
(e)
Eligible project costs— A recipient of a grant under this section may use such grant for—
(1)
development phase activities, including planning, feasibility analysis, revenue forecasting, environmental review, preliminary engineering and design work, and other preconstruction activities;
(2)
construction, reconstruction, rehabilitation, acquisition of real property (including land related to the project and improvements to the land), environmental mitigation, and construction contingencies; and
(3)
bridge inspection, evaluation, and preservation.
(f)
Federal share—
(1)
In general— The Federal share of the cost of a project carried out using a grant under this section may not exceed 80 percent of the total cost of such project.
(2)
Maximum Federal assistance— Federal assistance other than a grant under this section may be used to satisfy up to 100 percent of the total cost of such project.
(g)
Considerations— In making grants under this section, the Secretary shall consider—
(1)
whether the project can be completed without additional Federal funding or financial assistance available to the project sponsor, beyond existing Federal apportionments; and
(2)
the level of benefits the project is expected to generate, including—
(A)
the costs avoided by the prevention of closure or reduced use of the asset to be improved by the project;
(B)
reductions in maintenance costs over the life of the asset;
(C)
safety benefits, including the reduction of accidents and related costs; and
(D)
benefits to the economy of the rural or Tribal community.
(h)
Investments in colonias—
(1)
changed In general— Of the grants made available under this section, not less than $10,000,000 for fiscal years 2023 through 2026 2026, a total of not less than $10,000,000 shall be made available to provide grants that improve the safety, state of good repair, or connectivity through bridge investments in and providing access to, colonias.
(2)
Colonia defined— In this section, the term colonia means any identifiable community that—
(A)
is in the State of Arizona, California, New Mexico, or Texas;
(B)
is in the area of the United States within 150 miles of the border between the United States and Mexico, except that the term does not include any standard metropolitan statistical area that has a population exceeding 1,000,000;
(C)
is determined to be a colonia on the basis of objective criteria, including lack of potable water supply, lack of adequate sewage systems, and lack of decent, safe, and sanitary housing; and
(D)
was in existence as a colonia before November 28, 1990.
(i)
Notification— Not later than 3 business days before awarding a grant under this section, the Secretary shall notify the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate of the intention to award such a grant.
(j)
Definitions— In this section:
(1)
Eligible applicant— The term eligible applicant means—
(A)
a State;
(B)
a metropolitan planning organization or a regional transportation planning organization;
(C)
a unit of local government;
(D)
a Federal land management agency;
(E)
an Indian Tribe or Tribal organization;
(F)
a territory; and
(G)
a multijurisdictional group of entities described in subparagraph (A) through (F).
(2)
Off system bridge— The term off-system bridge has the meaning given such term in section 133(f) of title 23, United States Code, (as added by this Act).
(3)
Rural community— The term rural community means an area that is not an urbanized area, as such term is defined in section 101(a) of title 23, United States Code.

Sec. 1311 Reconnecting neighborhoods program

(a)
Establishment— The Secretary of Transportation shall establish a reconnecting neighborhoods program under which an eligible entity may apply for funding in order to identify, remove, replace, retrofit, or remediate the effects from eligible facilities and restore or improve connectivity, mobility, and access in disadvantaged and underserved communities, including—
(1)
studying the feasibility and impacts of removing, retrofitting, or remediating the effects on community connectivity from an existing eligible facility;
(2)
changed conducting preliminary engineering and final design activities for a project to remove, retrofit, or remediate the effects on community connectivity from an existing eligible facility; andfacility;
(3)
changed conducting construction activities necessary to carry out a project to remove, retrofit, or remediate the effects on community connectivity from an existing eligible facility.facility; and
(4)
added ensuring any activities carried out under this section—
(A)
added focus on improvements that will benefit the populations impacted by or previously displaced by the eligible facility; and
(B)
added emphasize equity by garnering community engagement, avoiding future displacement, and ensuring local participation in the planning process.
(b)
Eligible entities—
(1)
In general— The Secretary may award a planning grant or a capital construction grant to—
(A)
a State;
(B)
a unit of local government;
(C)
an Indian Tribe or Tribal organization;
(D)
a territory;
(F)
a metropolitan planning organization;
(G)
a transit agency;
(H)
a special purpose district with a transportation function; and
(I)
a group of entities described in this paragraph.
(2)
changed Nonprofits—Partnerships— An eligible entity may enter into an agreement with a nonprofit organization the following entities to carry out the eligible activities under this section.section:
(A)
added A nonprofit organization.
(B)
added An institution of higher education, as such term is defined in section 101 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1001), including historically black colleges and universities, defined as the term “Predominantly Black institution” is defined in section 371(c) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1067q(c)).
(c)
Planning grants—
(1)
In general— The Secretary may award grants (referred to in this section as a “planning grants”) to carry out planning activities described in paragraph (2).
(2)
Eligible activities described— The planning activities referred to in paragraph (1) are—
(A)
planning studies to evaluate the feasibility of removing, retrofitting, or remediating an existing eligible facility to restore community connectivity, including evaluations of—
(i)
current traffic patterns on the eligible facility proposed for removal, retrofit, or remediation and the surrounding street network;
(ii)
the capacity of existing transportation networks to maintain mobility needs;
(iii)
an analysis of alternative roadway designs or other uses for the right-of-way of the eligible facility, including an analysis of whether the available right-of-way would suffice to create an alternative roadway design;
(iv)
the effect of the removal, retrofit, or remediation of the eligible facility on the mobility of freight and people;
(v)
the effect of the removal, retrofit, or remediation of the eligible facility on the safety of the traveling public;
(vi)
the cost to remove, retrofit, or remediate the eligible facility—
(I)
to restore community connectivity; and
(II)
to convert the eligible facility to a roadway design or use that increases safety, mobility, and access for all users, compared to any expected costs for necessary maintenance or reconstruction of the eligible facility; and
(vii)
the environmental impacts of retaining or reconstructing the eligible facility and the anticipated effect of the proposed alternative use or roadway design;
(B)
changed public engagement activities to provide opportunities for public input into a plan to remove, replace, retrofit, or remediate the effects from an eligible facility;facility, including—
(i)
added building organizational or community capacity to, and educating community members on how to, engage in and contribute to eligible planning activities described in subsection (c)(2);
(ii)
added identifying community needs and desires for community improvements and developing community driven solutions in carrying out eligible planning activities described in subsection (c)(2);
(iii)
added conducting assessments of equity, mobility and access, environmental justice, affordability, economic opportunity, health outcomes, and other local goals to be used in carrying out eligible planning activities described in subsection (c)(2); and
(iv)
added forming a community advisory board in accordance with subsection (d)(7);
(C)
other transportation planning activities required in advance of a project to remove, retrofit, or remediate an existing eligible facility to restore community connectivity, as determined by the Secretary;
(D)
evaluating land use and zoning changes necessary to improve equity and maximize transit-oriented development in connection with project eligible for a capital construction grant, including activities eligible under section 5327 of title 49, United States Code; and
(E)
changed establishment of anti-displacement and equitable neighborhood revitalization strategies in connection with project eligible for a capital construction grant, including establishment of a community land trust for land acquisition, land banking, and equitable transit-oriented development.
(3)
Technical assistance—
(A)
In general— The Secretary may provide technical assistance described in subparagraph (B) to an eligible entity.
(B)
Technical assistance described— The technical assistance referred to in subparagraph (A) is technical assistance in building organizational or community capacity—
(i)
to conduct transportation planning; and
(ii)
to identify innovative solutions to challenges posed by existing eligible facilities, including reconnecting communities that—
(I)
are bifurcated by eligible facilities; or
(II)
lack safe, reliable, and affordable transportation choices.
(4)
Selection— The Secretary shall—
(A)
solicit applications for—
(i)
changed planning grants; andgrants;
(ii)
technical assistance under paragraph (3); and
(iii)
added the activities would benefit populations impacted by or previously displaced by an eligible facility; and
(B)
evaluate applications for a planning grant on the basis of the demonstration by the applicant that—
(i)
the eligible facility—
(I)
creates barriers to mobility, access, or economic development; or
(II)
is not justified by current and forecast future travel demand; and
(ii)
on the basis of preliminary assessment into the feasibility of removing, retrofitting, or remediating the eligible facility to restore community connectivity, and increase safety, mobility, and access for all users, further planning activities are necessary and likely to be productive.
(5)
Award amounts— A planning grant may not exceed $2,000,000 for any recipient.
(6)
Federal share— The total Federal share of the cost of a planning activity for which a planning grant is used may not exceed 80 percent.
(7)
removed Priorities— In selecting recipients of planning grants and technical assistance under this subsection, the Secretary shall give priority to an application from a community that is economically disadvantaged, including an underserved community or a community located in an area of persistent poverty (as such term is defined in section 101 of title 23, United States Code).
(d)
Capital construction grants—
(1)
Eligible entities— The Secretary may award grants (referred to in this section as a “capital construction grants”) to eligible entities to carry out eligible projects described in paragraph (3).
(2)
Partnerships— In the case that the owner of an eligible facility that is the subject of the capital construction grant is not an eligible entity, an eligible entity shall demonstrate the existence of a partnership with the owner of the eligible facility.
(3)
Eligible projects— A project eligible to be carried out with a capital construction grant includes the following:
(A)
The removal, retrofit, or remediation of the effects on community connectivity from of an eligible facility.
(B)
The replacement of an eligible facility with a new facility that—
(i)
restores community connectivity;
(ii)
employs context sensitive solutions appropriate for the surrounding community; and
(iii)
is otherwise eligible for funding under title 23, United States Code.
(C)
Support for community partnerships, including a community advisory board described under paragraph (7), in connection with a capital construction grant awarded under this subsection.
(D)
Other activities required to remove, replace, retrofit, or remediate an existing eligible facility, as determined by the Secretary.
(4)
Selection— The Secretary shall—
(A)
changed solicit applications for capital construction grants; andgrants;
(B)
evaluate applications on the basis of—
(i)
the degree to which the project will improve mobility and access through the removal of barriers;
(ii)
the appropriateness of removing, retrofitting, or remediating the effects on community connectivity from the eligible facility, based on current traffic patterns and the ability of the project and the regional transportation network to absorb transportation demand and provide safe mobility and access;
(iii)
the impact of the project on freight movement;
(iv)
the results of a cost-benefit analysis of the project;
(v)
changed the opportunities extent to which the grantee has plans for inclusive economic development, development in place, including the existing land use and whether the zoning provides for equitable and transit-oriented development of underutilized land;
(vi)
the degree to which the eligible facility is out of context with the current or planned land use;
(vii)
the results of any feasibility study completed for the project;
(viii)
whether the eligible facility is likely to need replacement or significant reconstruction within the 20-year period beginning on the date of the submission of the application;
(ix)
changed whether the project is consistent with the relevant long-range transportation plan and included in the relevant statewide transportation improvement program; andprogram;
(x)
changed whether the project is consistent with, and how the project would impact, the relevant transportation performance management targets.targets; and
(xi)
added the extent to which the project benefits populations impacted by or previously displaced by the eligible facility;
(C)
added ensure that the project has conducted sufficient community engagement, such as the activities described in subsection (c)(2)(B); and
(D)
added ensure that the jurisdiction in which the eligible facility is located has an anti-displacement policy or a community land trust in place.
(5)
Minimum award amounts— A capital construction grant shall be in an amount not less than $5,000,000 for each recipient.
(6)
Federal share—
(A)
In general— Subject to subparagraph (B), the Federal share of the total cost of a project carried out using a capital construction grant may not exceed 80 percent.
(B)
Maximum Federal involvement— Federal assistance other than a capital construction grant may be used to satisfy the non-Federal share of the cost of a project for which the grant is awarded.
(7)
Community advisory board—
(A)
In general— To help achieve inclusive economic development benefits with respect to the project for which a grant is awarded, a grant recipient may form a community advisory board, which, if formed, shall—
(i)
facilitate community engagement with respect to the project; and
(ii)
track progress with respect to commitments of the grant recipient to inclusive employment, contracting, and economic development under the project.
(B)
Membership— If a grant recipient forms a community advisory board under subparagraph (A), the community advisory board shall be composed of representatives of—
(i)
changed the community;community, including residents in the immediate vicinity of the project;
(ii)
owners of businesses that serve the community;
(iii)
labor organizations that represent workers that serve the community;
(iv)
State and local government; and
(v)
private and non-profit organizations that represent local community development.
(C)
added Diversity— The community advisory board shall be representative of the community served by the project.
(e)
added Priorities— In selecting recipients of planning grants, capital construction grants, and technical assistance under this section, the Secretary shall give priority to—
(1)
added an application from a community that is economically disadvantaged, including an environmental justice community, an underserved community, or a community located in an area of persistent poverty (as such term is defined in section 101 of title 23, United States Code); and
(2)
added an eligible entity that has—
(A)
added entered into a community benefits agreement with representatives of the community or formed a community advisory board under paragraph (7) of subsection (d);
(B)
added demonstrated a plan for employing residents in the area impacted by the activity or project through targeted hiring programs; and
(C)
added demonstrated a plan for improving transportation system access.
(f)
renumbered was (6) Administrative expenses— Of amounts made available to carry out this section, the Secretary may set aside not more than $5,000,000 in each fiscal year for the costs of administering the program under this section.
(g)
renumbered was (7) Technical assistance— Of amounts made available to carry out this section, the Secretary may set aside not more than $5,000,000 in each fiscal year to provide technical assistance to eligible entities under subsection (c)(3).
(h)
added Report— Not later than 2 years after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate a report that—
(1)
added identifies and creates an online mapping tool showing any examples of potential projects to remove eligible facilities, and assesses the potential impacts of carrying out such projects; and
(2)
added assesses projects funded under subsection (d) to provide best practices.
(i)
added Definitions— In this section:
(1)
added Anti-displacement policy— The term “anti-displacement policy” means a policy that limits the displacement of low-income, disadvantaged, and underserved communities from neighborhoods due to new investments in housing, businesses, and infrastructure.
(2)
added Community Land Trust— The term “community land trust” means a nonprofit organization established or with the responsibility, as applicable—
(A)
added to develop the real estate created by the removal or capping of an eligible facility; and
(B)
added to carry out anti-displacement or community development strategies, including—
(i)
added affordable housing preservation and development;
(ii)
added homeownership and property improvement programs;
(iii)
added the development or rehabilitation of park space or recreation facilities; and
(iv)
added community revitalization and economic development projects.
(3)
added Eligible facility—
(A)
added In general— The term eligible facility means a highway or other transportation facility that creates a barrier to community connectivity, including barriers to mobility, access, or economic development, due to high speeds, grade separations, or other design factors.
(g)
removed Eligible facility defined—
(1)
removed In general— In this section, the term eligible facility means a highway or other transportation facility that creates a barrier to community connectivity, including barriers to mobility, access, or economic development, due to high speeds, grade separations, or other design factors.
(B)
renumbered was (8)(3) Inclusions— In this section, the term eligible facility may include—
(i)
renumbered was (8)(3)(3) a limited access highway;
(ii)
renumbered was (8)(3)(4) a railway;
(iii)
renumbered was (8)(3)(5) a viaduct;
(iv)
renumbered was (8)(3)(6) a principal arterial facility; or
(v)
renumbered was (8)(3)(7) any other transportation facility for which the high speeds, grade separation, or other design factors create an obstacle to connectivity.

Sec. 1403 National goals and performance management measures

(a)
In general— Section 150 of title 23, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
in subsection (b)—
(A)
in paragraph (1) by inserting “or elimination” after “significant reduction”;
(B)
by redesignating paragraph (7) as paragraph (8); and
(C)
by inserting after paragraph (6) the following:

“(7) Combating climate change—To reduce carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gas emissions and reduce the climate impacts of the transportation system.”

(2)
in subsection (c)—
(A)
in paragraph (1) by striking “Not later than 18 months after the date of enactment of the MAP–21, the Secretary” and inserting “The Secretary”; and
(B)
by adding at the end the following:

“(7) Greenhouse gas emissions—The Secretary shall establish, in consultation with the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, measures for States to use to assess—

“(A) carbon dioxide emissions per capita on public roads;

“(B) carbon dioxide emissions using different parameters than described in subparagraph (A) that the Secretary determines to be appropriate; and

“(C) any other greenhouse gas emissions on public roads that the Secretary determines to be appropriate.”

(3)
in subsection (d)—
(A)
in paragraph (1)—
(i)
by striking “Not later than 1 year after the Secretary has promulgated the final rulemaking under subsection (c), each” and inserting “Each”; and
(ii)
by striking “and (6)” and inserting “(6), and (7)”; and
(B)
by adding at the end the following:

“(3) Regressive targets

“(A) In general—A State may not establish a regressive target for the measures described under paragraph (4) or paragraph (7) of subsection (c).

“(B) Regressive target defined—In this paragraph, the term regressive target means a target that fails to demonstrate constant or improved performance for a particular measure.”

(4)
in subsection (e)—
(A)
by striking “Not later than 4 years after the date of enactment of the MAP–21 and biennially thereafter, a” and inserting “A”; and
(B)
by inserting “biennial” after “the Secretary a”; and
(5)
by adding at the end the following:

“(f) Transportation system access

“(1) In general—The Secretary shall establish measures for States and metropolitan planning organizations to use to assess the level of safe, reliable, and convenient transportation system access to—

“(A) employment; and

“(B) services.

“(2) Considerations—The measures established pursuant to paragraph (1) shall include the ability for States and metropolitan planning organizations to assess—

“(A) the change in the level of transportation system access for various modes of travel, including connection to other modes of transportation, that would result from new transportation investments;

“(B) the level of transportation system access for economically disadvantaged communities, including to affordable housing; and

“(C) the extent to which transportation access is impacted by zoning policies and land use planning practices that effect the affordability, elasticity, and diversity of the housing supply.

“(3) Definition of services—In this subsection, the term services includes healthcare facilities, child care, education and workforce training, food sources, banking and other financial institutions, and other retail shopping establishments.”

(b)
Metropolitan transportation planning; title 23— Section 134 of title 23, United States Code, is further amended—
(1)
in subsection (j)(2)(D)—
(A)
by striking “Performance target achievement” in the heading and inserting “Performance management”;
(B)
by striking “The TIP” and inserting the following:

“(i) In general—The TIP”

(C)
by adding at the end the following:

“(ii) Transportation management areas—For metropolitan planning areas that represent an urbanized area designated as a transportation management area under subsection (k), the TIP shall include—

“(I) a discussion of the anticipated effect of the TIP toward achieving the performance targets established in the metropolitan transportation plan, linking investment priorities to such performance targets; and

“(II) a description of how the anticipated effect of the TIP would improve the overall level of transportation system access, consistent with section 150(f).”

(2)
in subsection (k)—
(A)
in paragraph (3)(A)—
(i)
by striking “shall address congestion management” and inserting the following:

“(i) congestion management”

(ii)
by striking the period at the end and inserting “; and”; and
(iii)
by adding at the end the following:

“(ii) the overall level of transportation system access for various modes of travel within the metropolitan planning area, including the level of access for economically disadvantaged communities, consistent with section 150(f), that is based on a cooperatively developed and implemented metropolitan-wide strategy, assessing both new and existing transportation facilities eligible for funding under this title and chapter 53 of title 49.”

(B)
in paragraph (5)(B)—
(i)
in clause (i) by striking “; and” and inserting a semicolon;
(ii)
in clause (ii) by striking the period and inserting “; and”; and
(iii)
by adding at the end the following:

“(iii) the TIP approved under clause (ii) makes progress towards improving the level of transportation system access, consistent with section 150(f).”

(3)
in subsection (l)(2)—
(A)
by striking “5 years after the date of enactment of the MAP–21” and inserting “2 years after the date of enactment of the INVEST in America Act, and every 2 years thereafter”;
(B)
in subparagraph (C) by striking “and whether metropolitan planning organizations are developing meaningful performance targets; and” and inserting a semicolon; and
(C)
by striking subparagraph (D) and inserting the following:

“(D) a listing of all metropolitan planning organizations that are establishing performance targets and whether such performance targets established by the metropolitan planning organization are meaningful or regressive (as defined in section 150(d)(3)(B)); and

“(E) the progress of implementing the measure established under section 150(f).”

(c)
Statewide and nonmetropolitan transportation planning; title 23— Section 135(g)(4) of title 23, United States Code, is further amended—
(1)
by striking “Performance target achievement” in the heading and inserting “Performance management”;
(2)
by striking “shall include, to the maximum extent practicable, a discussion” and inserting the following:

“(A) a discussion”

(3)
by striking the period at the end and inserting “; and”; and
(4)
by adding at the end the following:

“(B) a consideration of the anticipated effect of the STIP on the overall level of transportation system access, consistent with section 150(f).”

(d)
Metropolitan transportation planning; title 49— Section 5303 of title 49, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
in subsection (j)(2)(D)—
(A)
by striking “Performance target achievement” and inserting “Performance management”;
(B)
by striking “The transportation improvement plan” and inserting the following:

“(i) In general—The TIP”

(C)
by adding at the end the following:

“(ii) Transportation management areas—For metropolitan planning areas that represent an urbanized area designated as a transportation management area under subsection (k), the TIP shall include—

“(I) a discussion of the anticipated effect of the TIP toward achieving the performance targets established in the metropolitan transportation plan, linking investment priorities to such performance targets; and

“(II) a description of how the anticipated effect of the TIP would improve the overall level of transportation system access, consistent with section 150(f) of title 23.”

(2)
in subsection (k)—
(A)
in paragraph (3)(A)—
(i)
by striking “shall address congestion management” and inserting the following:

“(i) congestion management”

(ii)
by striking the period at the end and inserting “; and”; and
(iii)
by adding at the end the following:

“(ii) the overall level of transportation system access for various modes of travel within the metropolitan planning area, including the level of access for economically disadvantaged communities, consistent with section 150(f) of title 23, that is based on a cooperatively developed and implemented metropolitan-wide strategy, assessing both new and existing transportation facilities eligible for funding under this chapter and title 23.”

(B)
in paragraph (5)(B)—
(i)
in clause (i) by striking “; and” and inserting a semicolon;
(ii)
in clause (ii) by striking the period and inserting “; and”; and
(iii)
by adding at the end the following:

“(iii) the TIP approved under clause (ii) makes progress towards improving the level of transportation system access, consistent with section 150(f) of title 23.”

(3)
in subsection (l)(2)—
(A)
changed by striking “5 years after the date of enactment of the Federal Public Transportation Act of 2012” and inserting “2 years after the date of enactment of the INVEST in America Act, and every 2 years thereafter,”;thereafter”;
(B)
in subparagraph (C) by striking “and whether metropolitan planning organizations are developing meaningful performance targets; and” and inserting a semicolon; and
(C)
by striking subparagraph (D) and inserting the following:

“(D) a listing of all metropolitan planning organizations that are establishing performance targets and whether such performance targets established by the metropolitan planning organization are meaningful or regressive (as defined in section 150(d)(3)(B) of title 23); and

“(E) the progress of implementing the measure established under section 150(f) of title 23.”

(e)
Statewide and nonmetropolitan transportation planning; title 49— Section 5304(g)(4) of title 49, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
by striking “Performance target achievement” and inserting “Performance management”;
(2)
by striking “shall include, to the maximum extent practicable, a discussion” and inserting the following:

“(A) a discussion”

(3)
by striking the period at the end and inserting “; and”;
(4)
by striking “statewide transportation improvement program” and inserting “STIP” each place it appears; and
(5)
by adding at the end the following:

“(B) a consideration of the anticipated effect of the STIP on the overall level of transportation system access, consistent with section 150(f) of title 23.”

(f)
Savings clause—
(1)
Regressive targets— The prohibition in the amendment made by subsection (a)(3)(B) shall apply to States beginning on the date that is 1 year before the subsequent State target and reporting deadlines related to safety performance management established pursuant to section 150 of title 23, United States Code.
(2)
Access planning requirements— The requirements in the amendments made by subsections (b), (c), (d), and (e) shall apply beginning on the date on which the requirements for the measure described in section 150(f) of title 23, United States Code, take effect.
(g)
Development of greenhouse gas measure— Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Transportation shall issue such regulations as are necessary to carry out paragraph (7) of section 150(c) of title 23, United States Code, as added by this Act.
(h)
Development of transportation system access measure—
(1)
Establishment— Not later than 120 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Transportation shall establish a working group to assess the provisions of paragraphs (1) and (2) of section 150(f) and make recommendations regarding the establishment of measures for States and metropolitan planning organizations to use to assess the level of transportation system access for various modes of travel, consistent with section 150(f) of title 23, United States Code.
(2)
Members— The working group established pursuant to paragraph (1) shall include representatives from—
(A)
the Department of Transportation;
(B)
State departments of transportation, including representatives that specialize in pedestrian and bicycle safety;
(C)
the Bureau of Transportation Statistics;
(D)
metropolitan planning organizations representing transportation management areas (as those terms are defined in section 134 of title 23, United States Code);
(E)
other metropolitan planning organizations or local governments;
(F)
providers of public transportation;
(G)
nonprofit entities related to transportation, including relevant safety groups;
(H)
experts in the field of transportation access data; and
(I)
any other stakeholders, as determined by the Secretary.
(3)
Report—
(A)
Submission— Not later than 1 year after the establishment of the working group pursuant to paragraph (1), the working group shall submit to the Secretary a report of recommendations regarding the establishment of measures for States and metropolitan planning organizations to use to assess the level of transportation system access, consistent with section 150(f) of title 23, United States Code.
(B)
Publication— Not later than 30 days after the date on which the Secretary receives the report under subparagraph (A), the Secretary shall publish the report on a publicly accessible website of the Department of Transportation.
(4)
Rulemaking— Not later than 2 years after the date on which the Secretary receives the report under paragraph (3), the Secretary shall issue such regulations as are necessary to implement the requirements of section 150(f) of title 23, United States Code.
(5)
Termination— The Secretary shall terminate the working group established pursuant to paragraph (1) on the date on which the regulation issued pursuant to paragraph (4) takes effect.
(i)
Transportation system access data—
(1)
In general— Not later than 90 days after the date on which the Secretary of Transportation establishes the measure required under section 150(f) of title 23, United States Code, the Secretary shall develop or procure eligible transportation system access data sets and analytical tools and make such data sets and analytical tools available to State departments of transportation and metropolitan planning areas that represent transportation management areas.
(2)
Requirements— An eligible transportation system access data set and analytical tool shall have the following characteristics:
(A)
The ability to quantify the level of safe, reliable, and convenient transportation system access to—
(i)
employment;
(ii)
services; and
(iii)
connections to other modes of transportation.
(B)
The ability to quantify transportation system access for various modes of travel, including—
(i)
driving;
(ii)
public transportation;
(iii)
walking (including conveyance for persons with disabilities); and
(iv)
cycling (including micromobility).
(C)
The ability to disaggregate the level of transportation system access by various transportation modes by a variety of population categories, including—
(i)
low-income populations;
(ii)
minority populations;
(iii)
age;
(iv)
disability; and
(v)
geographical location.
(D)
The ability to assess the change in the level of transportation system access that would result from new transportation investments.
(3)
Consideration— An eligible transportation system access data set and analytical tool shall take into consideration safe and connected networks for walking, cycling, and persons with disabilities.
(j)
Definitions— In this section:
(1)
Transportation system access— The term transportation system access has the meaning given such term in section 101 of title 23, United States Code.
(2)
Services— The term services has the meaning given such term in section 150(f) of title 23, United States Code.

Sec. 1603 Dig Once for broadband infrastructure deployment

(a)
Definitions— In this section:
(1)
Appropriate State agency— The term appropriate State agency means a State governmental agency that is recognized by the executive branch of the State as having the experience necessary to evaluate and facilitate the installation and operation of broadband infrastructure within the State.
(2)
Broadband— The term broadband has the meaning given the term advanced telecommunications capability in section 706 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. 1302).
(3)
Broadband conduit— The term broadband conduit means a conduit or innerduct for fiber optic cables (or successor technology of greater quality and speed) that supports the provision of broadband.
(4)
Broadband infrastructure— The term broadband infrastructure means any buried or underground facility and any wireless or wireline connection that enables the provision of broadband.
(5)
Broadband provider— The term broadband provider means an entity that provides broadband to any person, including, with respect to such entity—
(A)
a corporation, company, association, firm, partnership, nonprofit organization, or any other private entity;
(B)
a State or local broadband provider;
(C)
an Indian Tribe; and
(D)
a partnership between any of the entities described in subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C).
(6)
Covered highway construction project—
(A)
In general— The term covered highway construction project means, without regard to ownership of a highway, a project funded under title 23, United States Code, and administered by a State department of transportation to construct a new highway or an additional lane for an existing highway, to reconstruct an existing highway, or new construction, including construction of a paved shoulder.
(B)
Exclusions— The term covered highway construction project excludes any project—
(i)
awarded before the date on which regulations required under subsection (b) take effect;
(ii)
that does not include work beyond the edge of pavement or current paved shoulder;
(iii)
that is less than a mile in length; or
(iv)
that is—
(I)
a project primarily for resurfacing, restoration, rehabilitation, or maintenance;
(II)
a bicycle, pedestrian, transportation alternatives, sidewalk, recreational trails, or safe routes to school project;
(III)
an operational improvement (as such term is defined in section 101 of title 23, United States Code);
(IV)
a project primarily to install signage; or
(V)
a culvert project.
(7)
Dig once requirement— The term dig once requirement means a requirement designed to reduce the cost and accelerate the deployment of broadband by minimizing the number and scale of repeated excavations for the installation and maintenance of broadband conduit or broadband infrastructure in rights-of-way.
(8)
Indian Tribe— The term Indian Tribe has the meaning given such term in section 4(e) of the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act (25 U.S.C. 5304(e)).
(9)
NTIA administrator— The term NTIA Administrator means the Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Communications and Information.
(10)
Project— The term project has the meaning given such term in section 101 of title 23, United States Code.
(11)
Secretary— The term Secretary means the Secretary of Transportation.
(12)
State— The term State has the meaning given such term in section 401 of title 23, United States Code.
(13)
State or local broadband provider— The term State or local broadband provider means a State or political subdivision thereof, or any agency, authority, or instrumentality of a State or political subdivision thereof, that provides broadband to any person or facilitates the provision of broadband to any person in such State.
(b)
Dig once requirement— Not later than 12 months after the date of enactment of this Act, to facilitate the installation of broadband infrastructure, the Secretary shall issue such regulations as may be necessary to ensure that each State that receives funds under chapter 1 of title 23, United States Code, complies with the following provisions:
(1)
Broadband planning and notice— The State department of transportation, in consultation with appropriate State agencies, shall—
(A)
review existing State broadband plans, including existing dig once requirements of the State, municipal governments incorporated under State law, and Indian tribes within the State, to determine opportunities to coordinate covered highway construction projects occurring within or across highway rights-of-way with planned broadband infrastructure projects;
(B)
identify a broadband coordinator, who may have additional responsibilities in the State department of transportation or in another State agency, that is responsible for facilitating the broadband infrastructure right-of-way efforts within the State; and
(C)
establish a process—
(i)
for the registration of broadband providers that seek to be included in the advance notification of, and opportunity to participate in, broadband infrastructure right-of-way facilitation efforts within the State; and
(ii)
to electronically notify all broadband providers registered under clause (i)—
(I)
of the State transportation improvement program on at least an annual basis; and
(II)
of covered highway construction projects within the highway right-of-way for which Federal funding is expected to be obligated in the subsequent fiscal year.
(2)
Coordination and compliance—
(A)
Mobile now act— A State department of transportation shall be considered to meet the requirements of subparagraphs (B) and (C) of paragraph (1) if such State department of transportation has been determined to be in compliance with the requirements established under section 607 of division P of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2018 (47 U.S.C. 1504).
(B)
Website— A State department of transportation shall be considered to meet the requirements of paragraph (1)(C) if the State publishes on a public website—
(i)
the State transportation improvement program on at least an annual basis; and
(ii)
covered highway construction projects within the highway right-of-way for which Federal funding is expected to be obligated in the subsequent fiscal year.
(C)
Coordination— The State department of transportation, in consultation with appropriate State agencies, shall by rule or regulation establish a process for a broadband provider to commit to installing broadband conduit or broadband infrastructure as part of any covered highway construction project.
(D)
Appropriate state agency— In lieu of the State department of transportation, at the discretion of the State, an appropriate State agency, in consultation with the State department of transportation, may carry out the requirements of paragraph (1).
(3)
Required installation of broadband conduit—
(A)
In general— The State department of transportation shall install broadband conduit, in accordance with this paragraph (except as described in subparagraph (F)), as part of any covered highway construction project, unless a broadband provider has committed to install broadband conduit or broadband infrastructure as part of such project in a process described under paragraph (2)(C).
(B)
Installation requirements— In installing broadband conduit or broadband infrastructure as part of a covered highway construction project, the State department of transportation shall ensure that—
(i)
installation pursuant to this paragraph of broadband conduit, broadband infrastructure, and means or points of access to such conduit or infrastructure (such as poles, hand holes, manholes, pull tape, or ducts) shall provide for the current and future safe operation of the traveled way, is consistent with part 645 of title 23, Code of Federal Regulations, and any accommodation policies of the State under such part to reasonably enable deployment of such conduit, infrastructure, and means or points of access, and any Damage Prevention and Underground Facilities Protection or related requirements of the State;
(ii)
an appropriate number of broadband conduits, as determined in consultation with the appropriate State agencies, are installed along the right-of-way of a covered highway construction project to accommodate multiple broadband providers, with consideration given to the availability of existing broadband conduits;
(iii)
the size of each broadband conduit is consistent with industry best practices, consistent with the requirements of part 645 of title 23, Code of Federal Regulations, and sufficient to accommodate anticipated demand, as determined in consultation with the appropriate State agencies;
(iv)
any hand holes and manholes necessary for fiber access and pulling with respect to such conduit are placed at intervals consistent with standards determined in consultation with the appropriate State agencies (which may differ by type of road, topologies, and rurality) the requirements of part 645 of title 23, Code of Federal Regulations, and other applicable safety requirements;
(v)
each broadband conduit installed pursuant to this paragraph includes a pull tape and is capable of supporting fiber optic cable placement techniques consistent with best practices and the requirements of part 645 of title 23, Code of Federal Regulations;
(vi)
broadband conduit is placed at a depth consistent with requirements of the covered highway construction project and best practices and that, in determining the depth of placement, consideration is given to the location of existing utilities and cable separation requirements of State and local electrical codes; and
(vii)
installation of broadband conduit shall not preclude the installation of other specific socially, environmentally, or economically beneficial uses of the right-of-way, such as planned energy transmission or renewable energy generation projects.
(C)
Programmatic review— The State department of transportation may make determinations on the implementation of the requirements described in subparagraph (B) on a programmatic basis.
(D)
Access—
(i)
In general— The State department of transportation shall ensure that any requesting broadband provider has access to each broadband conduit installed by the State pursuant to this paragraph, on a competitively neutral and nondiscriminatory basis and in accordance with State permitting, licensing, leasing, or other similar laws and regulations.
(ii)
Socially beneficial use— The installation of broadband conduit as part of a covered highway construction project shall be considered a socially-beneficial use of the right-of-way under section 156(b) of title 23, United States Code.
(iii)
In-kind compensation— The State department of transportation may negotiate in-kind compensation with any broadband provider requesting access to broadband conduit installed under the provisions of this paragraph.
(iv)
Safety considerations— The State department of transportation shall provide for a process for a broadband provider to safely access to the highway right-of-way during installation and on-going maintenance of the broadband conduit and broadband infrastructure, including a traffic control safety plan.
(v)
Communication— A broadband provider with access to the conduit installed pursuant to this subsection shall notify, and receive permission from, the relevant agencies of State responsible for the installation of such broadband conduit prior to accessing any highway or highway right-of-way, in accordance with applicable Federal requirements.
(E)
changed Treatment of projects— Notwithstanding any other provision of law, broadband conduit and broadband infrastructure installation projects installed by a State under this paragraph under this paragraph shall comply with section 113(a) of title 23, United States Code.
(F)
Waiver authority—
(i)
In general— A State department of transportation may waive the required installation of broadband conduit for part or all of any covered highway construction project under this paragraph if, in the determination of the State department of transportation—
(I)
broadband infrastructure, terrestrial broadband infrastructure, aerial broadband fiber cables, or broadband conduit is present near a majority of the length of the covered highway construction project;
(II)
installation of terrestrial or aerial broadband fiber cables associated with the covered highway construction project is more appropriate for the context or a more cost-effective means to facilitate broadband service to an area not adequately served by broadband and such installation is present or planned;
(III)
the installation of broadband conduit increases overall costs of a covered highway construction project by 1.5 percent or greater;
(IV)
the installation of broadband conduit associated with the covered highway construction project is not reasonably expected to be utilized or connected to future broadband infrastructure in the 20 years following the date on which such determination is made, as determined by the State department of transportation, in consultation with appropriate State agencies and potentially affected local governments and Indian tribes;
(V)
the requirements of this paragraph would require installation of conduit redundant with a dig once requirement of a local government or Indian tribe;
(VI)
there exists a circumstance involving force majeure; or
(VII)
the installation of conduit is not appropriate based on other relevant factors established by the Secretary in consultation with the NTIA Administrator through regulation.
(ii)
Contents of waiver— A waiver authorized under this subparagraph shall—
(I)
identify the covered highway construction project; and
(II)
include a brief description of the determination of the State for issuing such waiver.
(iii)
Availability of waiver— Notification of a waiver authorized under this subparagraph shall be made publicly available, such as on a public website of the State department of transportation described in paragraph (2)(B).
(iv)
Waiver determination—
(I)
In general— The State department of transportation shall be responsible for the waiver determination described under this paragraph, consistent with the regulation issued pursuant to this subsection, and may grant a programmatic waiver for categories of projects excluded under this subparagraph.
(II)
No private cause of action— The waiver determination described under this paragraph shall be final and conclusive. Nothing in this section shall provide a private right or cause of action to challenge such determination in any court of law.
(4)
Priority— If a State provides for the installation of broadband infrastructure or broadband conduit in the right-of-way of a covered highway construction project, the State department of transportation, along with appropriate State agencies, shall carry out appropriate measures to ensure that an existing broadband provider is afforded access that is non-discriminatory, competitively neutral, and equal in opportunity, as compared to other broadband providers, with respect to the program under this subsection.
(c)
Guidance for the installation of broadband conduit— The Secretary, in consultation with the NTIA Administrator, shall issue guidance for best practices related to the installation of broadband conduit as described in subsection (b)(2) and of conduit and similar infrastructure for intelligent transportation systems (as such term is defined in section 501 of title 23, United States Code) that may utilize broadband conduit installed pursuant to subsection (b)(2).
(d)
Consultation—
(1)
In general— In issuing regulations required by this subsection or to implement any part of this section, the Secretary shall consult—
(A)
the NTIA Administrator;
(B)
the Federal Communications Commission;
(C)
State departments of transportation;
(D)
appropriate State agencies;
(E)
agencies of local governments responsible for transportation and rights-of-way, utilities, and telecommunications and broadband;
(F)
Indian tribes;
(G)
broadband providers; and
(H)
manufacturers of optical fiber, conduit, pull tape, and related items.
(2)
Broadband users— The Secretary shall ensure that the entities consulted under subparagraphs (C) through (F) of paragraph (1) include entities that have expertise with rural areas and populations with limited access to broadband infrastructure.
(3)
Broadband providers— The Secretary shall ensure that the entities consulted under subparagraph (G) of paragraph (1) include entities that provide broadband to rural areas and populations with limited access to broadband infrastructure.
(4)
added Consulting small municipalities— The Secretary shall ensure that the agencies of local governments consulted under subparagraph (E) of paragraph (1) include rural areas, specifically agencies of local governments with populations less than 50,000.
(e)
Oversight—
(1)
In general— The Secretary shall periodically review compliance with the regulations issued pursuant to this section and ensure that State waiver determinations are consistent with such regulations.
(2)
Efficient review— The review described under paragraph (1) may be carried out through the risk-based stewardship and oversight program described under section 106(g) of title 23, United States Code.
(3)
Effect of subsection— Nothing in this subsection shall affect or discharge any oversight responsibility of the Secretary specifically provided for under title 23, United States Code, or any other Federal law.
(f)
Additional provisions—
(1)
Applicability—
(A)
In general— The portion of the regulation issued pursuant to subsection (b) relating to the provisions under paragraph (3) of such subsection shall not take effect until a source of dedicated funding for the installation and long term maintenance of broadband conduit described in subsection (g)(2) is established.
(B)
Applicability date— Paragraphs (2) through (4) of subsection (b) and subsection (d) shall apply only to covered highway construction projects for which Federal obligations or expenditures are initially approved on or after the date on which regulations required under this subsection take effect.
(2)
Rules of construction—
(A)
State law— Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to require a State to install or allow the installation of broadband conduit or broadband infrastructure—
(i)
that is otherwise inconsistent with what is allowable under State law; or
(ii)
where the State lacks the authority for such installation, such as any property right or easement necessary for such installation.
(B)
No requirement for installation of mobile services equipment— Nothing in this section shall be construed to require a State, a municipal government incorporated under State law, or an Indian Tribe to install or allow for the installation of equipment essential for the provision of commercial mobile services (as defined in section 332(d) of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 332(d))) or commercial mobile data service (as defined in section 6001 of the Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012 (47 U.S.C. 1401)), other than broadband conduit and associated equipment described in paragraph (3)(B).
(3)
Relation to State dig once requirements— Nothing in subsections (b), (c), (d), or (e) or any regulations issued pursuant to subsection (b) shall be construed to alter or supersede any provision of a State law or regulation that provides for a dig once requirement that includes similar or more stringent requirements to the provisions of subsections (b), (c), (d), or (e) and any regulations promulgated under subsection (b).
(g)
Dig once funding task force—
(1)
Establishment— The Secretary and the NTIA Administrator shall jointly establish an independent task force on funding the nationwide dig once requirement described in this section to be known as the “Dig Once Funding Task Force” (hereinafter referred to as the “Task Force”).
(2)
Duties— The duties of the Task Force shall be to—
(A)
estimate the annual cost for implementing, administering, and maintaining a nationwide dig once requirement;
(B)
propose and evaluate options for funding a nationwide dig once requirement described in this section that includes—
(i)
a discussion of the role and potential share of costs of—
(I)
the Federal Government;
(II)
State and local governments and Indian tribes; and
(III)
broadband providers installing broadband conduit or broadband infrastructure under this section;
(ii)
consideration of the role of existing dig once requirements on States, local governments, and Indian tribes and the role of private broadband investment, with a goal to not discourage or disincentivize such dig once requirements or such investment; and
(iii)
evaluating the appropriate entity or entities responsible for maintaining the broadband infrastructure and conduit installed pursuant to a dig once requirement; and
(C)
propose a cost-based model fee schedule for a State to charge a broadband provider to access and use conduit installed by such State pursuant to this section that—
(i)
shall consider costs (including administrative costs) associated with installation and long-term maintenance of the broadband conduit installed pursuant to this section;
(ii)
may vary by topography, location, type of road, rurality, and other factors; and
(iii)
may consider financial and market incentives for expanding broadband infrastructure.
(3)
Reports—
(A)
Interim report and briefing— Not later than 9 months after the appointment of Members to the Task Force under paragraph (4)(D), the Task Force shall—
(i)
submit to Congress an interim report on the findings of the Task Force; and
(ii)
provide briefings for Congress on the findings of the Task Force.
(B)
Final report— Not later than 3 months after the submission of the interim report under subparagraph (A), the Task Force shall submit to Congress a final report on the findings of the Task Force.
(4)
Members—
(A)
Appointments— The Task Force shall consist of 14 members, comprising—
(i)
2 co-chairs described in subparagraph (B);
(ii)
6 members jointly appointed by the Speaker and minority leader of the House of Representatives, in consultation with the respective Chairs and Ranking Members of—
(I)
the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives;
(II)
the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives; and
(III)
the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives; and
(iii)
6 members jointly appointed by the majority leader and minority leader of the Senate, in consultation with the respective Chairs and Ranking Members of the—
(I)
the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate;
(II)
the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate; and
(III)
the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate.
(B)
Co-chairs— The Task Force shall be co-chaired by the Secretary and the NTIA Administrator, or the designees of the Secretary and NTIA Administrator.
(C)
Composition— The Task Force shall include at least—
(i)
1 representative from a State department of transportation;
(ii)
1 representative from a local government;
(iii)
1 representative from an Indian tribe;
(iv)
1 representative from a broadband provider;
(v)
1 representative from a State or local broadband provider;
(vi)
1 representative from a labor union; and
(vii)
1 representative from a public interest organization.
(D)
Appointment deadline— Members shall be appointed to the Task Force not later than 60 days after the date of enactment of this Act.
(E)
Terms— Members shall be appointed for the life of the Task Force. A vacancy in the Task Force shall not affect the powers of the Task Force and the vacancy shall be filled in the same manner as the initial appointment was made.
(5)
Consultations— In carrying out the duties required under this subsection, the Task Force shall consult, at a minimum—
(A)
the Federal Communications Commission;
(B)
agencies of States including—
(i)
State departments of transportation; and
(ii)
appropriate State agencies;
(C)
agencies of local governments responsible for transportation and rights-of-way, utilities, and telecommunications and broadband;
(D)
Indian tribes;
(E)
broadband providers and other telecommunications providers;
(F)
labor unions; and
(G)
State or local broadband providers and Indian tribes that act as broadband providers.
(6)
Additional provisions—
(A)
Expenses for non-Federal members— Non-Federal members of the Task Force shall be allowed travel expenses, including per diem in lieu of subsistence, at rates authorized for employees under subchapter I of chapter 57 of title 5, United States Code, while away from the homes or regular places of business of such members in the performance of services for the Task Force.
(B)
Staff— Staff of the Task Force shall comprise detailees with relevant expertise from the Department of Transportation and the National Telecommunications and Information Administration, or another Federal agency that the co-chairpersons consider appropriate, with the consent of the head of the Federal agency, and such detailees shall retain the rights, status, and privileges of the regular employment of such detailees without interruption.
(C)
Administrative assistance— The Secretary and NTIA Administrator shall provide to the Task Force on a reimbursable basis administrative support and other services for the performance of the functions of the Task Force.
(7)
Termination— The Task Force shall terminate not later than 90 days after submission of the final report required under paragraph (3)(B).

Sec. 1613 Working group on construction resources

(a)
Establishment— Not later than 120 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Transportation shall establish a working group (in this section referred to as the “Working Group”) to conduct a study on access to covered resources for infrastructure projects.
(b)
Membership—
(1)
Appointment— The Secretary shall appoint to the Working Group individuals with knowledge and expertise in the production and transportation of covered resources.
(2)
Representation— The Working Group shall include at least one representative of each of the following:
(A)
State departments of transportation.
(B)
State agencies associated with covered resources protection.
(C)
State planning and geologic survey and mapping agencies.
(D)
Commercial motor vehicle operators, including small business operators and operators who transport covered resources.
(E)
Covered resources producers.
(F)
Construction contractors.
(G)
Labor organizations.
(H)
Metropolitan planning organizations and regional planning organizations.
(I)
Indian Tribes.
(J)
added Professional surveying, mapping, and geospatial organizations.
(K)
renumbered was (3)(3)(12) Any other stakeholders that the Secretary determines appropriate.
(3)
Termination— The Working Group shall terminate 6 months after the date on which the Secretary receives the report under subsection (e)(1).
(c)
Duties— In carrying out the study required under subsection (a), the Working Group shall analyze—
(1)
the use of covered resources in transportation projects funded with Federal dollars;
(2)
how the proximity of covered resources to such projects affects the cost and environmental impact of such projects;
(3)
whether and how State, Tribal, and local transportation and planning agencies consider covered resources when developing transportation projects; and
(4)
any challenges for transportation project sponsors regarding access and proximity to covered resources.
(d)
Consultation— In carrying out the study required under subsection (a), the Working Group shall consult with, as appropriate—
(1)
chief executive officers of States;
(2)
State and local transportation planning agencies;
(3)
Indian Tribes;
(4)
other relevant State, Tribal, and local agencies, including State agencies associated with covered resources protection;
(5)
members of the public with industry experience with respect to covered resources;
(6)
other Federal entities that provide funding for transportation projects; and
(7)
any other stakeholder the Working Group determines appropriate.
(e)
Reports—
(1)
Working group report— Not later than 2 years after the date on which the Working Group is established, the Working Group shall submit to the Secretary a report that includes—
(A)
the findings of the study required under subsection (a), including a summary of comments received during the consultation process under subsection (d); and
(B)
any recommendations to preserve access to and reduce the costs and environmental impacts of covered resources for infrastructure projects.
(2)
Departmental report— Not later than 3 months after the date on which the Secretary receives the report under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate a summary of the findings under such report and any recommendations, as appropriate.
(f)
Definitions— In this section:
(1)
Covered resources— The term covered resources means common variety materials used in transportation infrastructure construction and maintenance, including stone, sand, and gravel.
(2)
State— The term State means each of the several States, the District of Columbia, and each territory or possession of the United States.

Sec. 1618 Climate resilient transportation infrastructure study

(a)
changed Climate resilient transportation infrastructure study— Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Transportation shall seek to enter into an agreement with the Transportation Research Board of the National Academies to conduct a study of the actions needed to ensure that Federal agencies are taking into account current and future climate conditions in planning, designing, building, operating, maintaining, investing in, and upgrading any federally funded transportation infrastructure investments.
(b)
Methodologies— In conducting the study, the Transportation Research Board shall build on the methodologies examined and recommended in—
(1)
the 2018 report issued the American Society of Civil Engineers, titled “Climate-Resilient Infrastructure: Adaptive Design and Risk Management”; and
(2)
the report issued by the California Climate-Safe Infrastructure Working Group, titled “Paying it Forward: The Path Toward Climate-Safe Infrastructure in California”.
(c)
Contents of study— The study shall include specific recommendations regarding the following:
(1)
Integrating scientific knowledge of projected climate change impacts, and other relevant data and information, into Federal infrastructure planning, design, engineering, construction, operation and maintenance.
(2)
Addressing critical information gaps and challenges.
(3)
Financing options to help fund climate-resilient infrastructure.
(4)
A platform or process to facilitate communication between climate scientists and other experts with infrastructure planners, engineers and other relevant experts.
(5)
A stakeholder process to engage with representatives of State, local, tribal and community groups.
(6)
A platform for tracking Federal funding of climate-resilient infrastructure.
(7)
Labor and workforce needs to implement climate-resilient transportation infrastructure projects including new and emerging skills, training programs, competencies and recognized postsecondary credentials that may be required to adequately equip the workforce.
(8)
Outlining how Federal infrastructure planning, design, engineering, construction, operation, and maintenance impact the environment and public health of disproportionately exposed communities. For purposes of this paragraph, the term disproportionately exposed communities means a community in which climate change, pollution, or environmental destruction have exacerbated systemic racial, regional, social, environmental, and economic injustices by disproportionately affecting indigenous peoples, communities of color, migrant communities, deindustrialized communities, depopulated rural communities, the poor, low-income workers, women, the elderly, people experiencing homelessness, people with disabilities, people who are incarcerated, or youth.
(d)
Considerations— In carrying out the study, the Transportation Research Board shall determine the need for information related to climate resilient transportation infrastructure by considering—
(1)
the current informational and institutional barriers to integrating projected infrastructure risks posed by climate change into federal infrastructure planning, design, engineering, construction, operation and maintenance;
(2)
the critical information needed by engineers, planners and those charged with infrastructure upgrades and maintenance to better incorporate climate change risks and impacts over the lifetime of projects;
(3)
how to select an appropriate, adaptive engineering design for a range of future climate scenarios as related to infrastructure planning and investment;
(4)
how to incentivize and incorporate systems thinking into engineering design to maximize the benefits of multiple natural functions and emissions reduction, as well as regional planning;
(5)
how to take account of the risks of cascading infrastructure failures and develop more holistic approaches to evaluating and mitigating climate risks;
(6)
how to ensure that investments in infrastructure resilience benefit all communities, including communities of color, low-income communities and Indian Tribes that face a disproportionate risk from climate change and in many cases have experienced long-standing unmet needs and underinvestment in critical infrastructure;
(7)
how to incorporate capital assessment and planning training and techniques, including a range of financing options to help local and State governments plan for and provide matching funds;
(8)
how federal agencies can track and monitor federally funded resilient infrastructure in a coordinated fashion to help build the understanding of the cost-benefit of resilient infrastructure and to build the capacity for implementing resilient infrastructure; and
(9)
the occupations, skillsets, training programs, competencies and recognized postsecondary credentials that will be needed to implement such climate-resilient transportation infrastructure projects, and how to ensure that any new jobs created by such projects ensure that priority hiring considerations are given to individuals facing barriers to employment, communities of color, low-income communities and Indian Tribes that face a disproportionate risk from climate change and have been excluded from job opportunities.
(e)
Consultation— In carrying out the study, the Transportation Research Board—
(1)
shall convene and consult with a panel of national experts, including operators and users of Federal transportation infrastructure and private sector stakeholders; and
(2)
is encouraged to consult with—
(A)
representatives from the thirteen federal agencies that comprise the United States Global Change Research Program;
(B)
representatives from the Department of the Treasury;
(C)
professional engineers with relevant expertise in infrastructure design;
(D)
scientists from the National Academies with relevant expertise;
(E)
scientists, social scientists and experts from academic and research institutions who have expertise in climate change projections and impacts; engineering; architecture; or other relevant areas of expertise;
(F)
licensed architects with relevant experience in infrastructure design;
(G)
certified planners;
(H)
representatives of State and local governments and Indian Tribes;
(I)
representatives of environmental justice groups; and
(J)
representatives of labor unions that represent key trades and industries involved in infrastructure projects.
(f)
Report— Not later than 3 years after the date of enactment of this Act, the Transportation Research Board shall submit to the Secretary, the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives, and the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate a report on the results of the study conducted under this section.

Sec. 1620 Guidance on evacuation routes

(a)
In general—
(1)
changed Guidance— The Administrator of the Federal Highway Administration, in coordination with the Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, and consistent with guidance issued by the Federal Emergency Management Agency pursuant to section 1209 of the Disaster Recovery Reform Act of 2018 (Public Law 115–254), shall revise existing guidance or issue new guidance as appropriate for State and local governments and Indian Tribes regarding the design, construction, maintenance, retrofit, and repair of evacuation routes.
(2)
Considerations— In revising or issuing guidance under subsection (a)(1), the Administrator of the Federal Highway Administration shall consider—
(A)
methods that assist evacuation routes to—
(i)
changed withstand likely risks to the effects of hydrostatic and hydrodynamic forces on viability, including flammability recommendations regarding appropriate drainage structures or other flood prevention mechanisms to manage stormwater, runoff, and hydrostatic forces;the effect of storm surge;
(ii)
added withstand the risks that flammability poses to viability;
(iii)
renumbered was (2)(3)(3)(3) improve durability, strength (including the ability to withstand tensile stresses and compressive stresses), and sustainability; and
(iv)
renumbered was (2)(3)(3)(4) provide for long-term cost savings;
(B)
the ability of evacuation routes to effectively manage contraflow operations;
(C)
for evacuation routes on public lands, the viewpoints of the applicable Federal land management agency regarding emergency operations, sustainability, and resource protection; and
(D)
such other items the Administrator of the Federal Highway Administration considers appropriate.
(3)
Report— In the case in which the Administrator of the Federal Highway Administration, in consultation with the Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, concludes existing guidance addresses the considerations in paragraph (2), The Administrator of the Federal Highway Administration shall submit to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate a detailed report describing how existing guidance addresses such considerations.
(b)
added Study—
(1)
added In general— The Administrator of the Federal Highway Administration, in coordination with the Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, shall study the vulnerability of evacuation routes that are part of the national highway system to the risks of extreme weather, including flooding and storm surge.
(b)
removed Study— The Administrator of the Federal Highway Administration, in coordination with the Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency and State, local, territorial governments, and Indian Tribes, shall—
(2)
changed Contents— conduct a study of In conducting the adequacy of available evacuation routes to accommodate study under paragraph (1), the flow of evacuees; andAdministrator shall examine—
(A)
added the likelihood of Federal evacuation routes flooding during a 100-year, 500-year, and 1000-year weather event;
(B)
added whether Federal evacuation routes that have historically flooded have recovered quickly from extreme weather events;
(C)
added the availability of alternative evacuation routes to accommodate the flow of evacuees in the event of an evacuation route becoming impassable due to flooding; and
(D)
added the impact of impassable evacuation routes on vulnerable individuals, with consideration of the return of evacuees after an extreme weather event, including—
(i)
added individuals with a physical or mental disability;
(ii)
added individuals in schools, daycare centers, mobile home parks, prisons, nursing homes, and other long-term care facilities and detention centers;
(iii)
added individuals with limited proficiency in English;
(iv)
added the elderly; and
(v)
added individuals who are tourists, seasonal workers, or homeless.
(3)
changed Report— Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall submit recommendations to Congress the Committee on how to help with anticipated evacuation route flow, based Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate a report summarizing the study conducted under paragraph (1).and the results of such study, including identifying which segments of Federal evacuation routes are most vulnerable to becoming impassable due to flooding.

Sec. 1621 High priority corridors on National Highway System

(a)
Identification—
(1)
Central Texas Corridor— Section 1105(c)(84) of the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 is amended to read as follows:

“(84) The Central Texas Corridor, including the route—

“(A) commencing in the vicinity of Texas Highway 338 in Odessa, Texas, running eastward generally following Interstate Route 20, connecting to Texas Highway 158 in the vicinity of Midland, Texas, then following Texas Highway 158 eastward to United States Route 87 and then following United States Route 87 southeastward, passing in the vicinity of San Angelo, Texas, and connecting to United States Route 190 in the vicinity of Brady, Texas;

“(B) commencing at the intersection of Interstate Route 10 and United States Route 190 in Pecos County, Texas, and following United States Route 190 to Brady, Texas;

“(C) following portions of United States Route 190 eastward, passing in the vicinity of Fort Hood, Killeen, Belton, Temple, Bryan, College Station, Huntsville, Livingston, Woodville, and Jasper, to the logical terminus of Texas Highway 63 at the Sabine River Bridge at Burrs Crossing and including a loop generally encircling Bryan/College Station, Texas;

“(D) following United States Route 83 southward from the vicinity of Eden, Texas, to a logical connection to Interstate Route 10 at Junction, Texas;

“(E) following United States Route 69 from Interstate Route 10 in Beaumont, Texas, north to United States Route 190 in the vicinity of Woodville, Texas;

“(F) following United States Route 96 from Interstate Route 10 in Beaumont, Texas, north to United States Route 190 in the vicinity of Jasper, Texas; and

“(G) following United States Route 190, State Highway 305, and United States Route 385 from Interstate Route 10 in Pecos County, Texas to Interstate 20 at Odessa, Texas.”

(2)
Central Louisiana Corridor— Section 1105(c) of the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 is amended by adding at the end the following:

“(91) The Central Louisiana Corridor commencing at the logical terminus of Louisiana Highway 8 at the Sabine River Bridge at Burrs Crossing and generally following portions of Louisiana Highway 8 to Leesville, Louisiana, and then eastward on Louisiana Highway 28, passing in the vicinity of Alexandria, Pineville, Walters, and Archie, to the logical terminus of United States Route 84 at the Mississippi River Bridge at Vidalia, Louisiana.”

(3)
Central Mississippi Corridor— Section 1105(c) of the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991, as amended by this Act, is further amended by adding at the end the following:

“(92) The Central Mississippi Corridor, including the route—

“(A) commencing at the logical terminus of United States Route 84 at the Mississippi River and then generally following portions of United States Route 84 passing in the vicinity of Natchez, Brookhaven, Monticello, Prentiss, and Collins, to Interstate 59 in the vicinity of Laurel, Mississippi, and continuing on Interstate Route 59 north to Interstate Route 20 and on Interstate Route 20 to the Mississippi-Alabama State Border; and

“(B) commencing in the vicinity of Laurel, Mississippi, running south on Interstate Route 59 to United States Route 98 in the vicinity of Hattiesburg, connecting to United States Route 49 south then following United States Route 49 south to Interstate Route 10 in the vicinity of Gulfport and following Mississippi Route 601 southerly terminating near the Mississippi State Port at Gulfport.”

(4)
Middle Alabama Corridor— Section 1105(c) of the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991, as amended by this Act, is further amended by adding at the end the following:

“(93) The Middle Alabama Corridor including the route—

“(A) beginning at the Alabama-Mississippi Border generally following portions of I–20 until following a new interstate extension paralleling United States Highway 80 specifically:

“(B) crossing Alabama Route 28 near Coatopa, Alabama, traveling eastward crossing United States Highway 43 and Alabama Route 69 near Selma, Alabama, traveling eastwards closely paralleling United States Highway 80 to the south crossing over Alabama Routes 22, 41, and 21, until its intersection with I–65 near Hope Hull, Alabama;

“(C) continuing east along the proposed Montgomery Outer Loop south of Montgomery, Alabama where it would next join with I–85 east of Montgomery, Alabama;

“(D) continuing along I–85 east bound until its intersection with United States Highway 280 near Opelika, Alabama or United States Highway 80 near Tuskegee, Alabama; and

“(E) generally following the most expedient route until intersecting with existing United States Highway 80 (JR Allen Parkway) through Phenix City until continuing into Columbus, Georgia.”

(5)
Middle Georgia Corridor— Section 1105(c) of the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991, as amended by this Act, is further amended by adding at the end the following:

“(94) The Middle Georgia Corridor including the route—

“(A) beginning at the Alabama-Georgia Border generally following the Fall Line Freeway from Columbus Georgia to Augusta, Georgia specifically:

“(B) travelling along United States Route 80 (JR Allen Parkway) through Columbus, Georgia and near Fort Benning, Georgia, east to Talbot County, Georgia where it would follow Georgia Route 96, then commencing on Georgia Route 49C (Fort Valley Bypass) to Georgia Route 49 (Peach Parkway) to its intersection with Interstate route 75 in Byron, Georgia;

“(C) continuing north along Interstate Route 75 through Warner Robins and Macon, Georgia where it would meet Interstate Route 16. Following Interstate 16 east it would next join United States Route 80 and then onto State Route 57; and

“(D) commencing with State Route 57 which turns into State Route 24 near Milledgeville, Georgia would then bypass Wrens, Georgia with a newly constructed bypass. After the bypass it would join United States Route 1 near Fort Gordon into Augusta, Georgia where it will terminate at Interstate Route 520.”

(6)
Louisiana Capital Region— Section 1105(c) of the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991, as amended by this Act, is further amended by adding at the end the following:

“(95) The Louisiana Capital Region High Priority Corridor, which shall generally follow—

“(A) Interstate 10, between its intersections with Interstate 12 and Louisiana Highway 415;

“(B) Louisiana Highway 415, between its intersections with Interstate 10 and United States route 190;

“(C) United States route 190, between its intersections with Louisiana Highway 415 and intersection with Interstate 110;

“(D) Interstate 110, between its intersections with United States route 190 and Interstate 10;

“(E) Louisiana Highway 30, near St. Gabriel, LA and its intersections with Interstate 10;

“(F) Louisiana Highway 1, near White Castle, LA and its intersection with Interstate 10; and

“(G) A bridge connecting Louisiana Highway 1 with Louisiana Highway 30, south of the Interstate described in subparagraph (A).”

(b)
Inclusion of certain segments on interstate system— Section 1105(e)(5)(A) of the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 is amended—
(1)
by inserting “subclauses (I) through (IX) of subsection (c)(38)(A)(i), subsection (c)(38)(A)(iv),” after “subsection (c)(37),”;
(2)
by inserting “subsection (c)(84),” after “subsection (c)(83),”; and
(3)
changed by striking “and subsection (c)(90)” (c)(91)” and inserting “subsection (c)(90), subsection (c)(91), subsection (c)(92), subsection (c)(93), subsection (c)(94), subsection (c)(95), and subsection (c)(95)”.(c)(96)”.
(c)
Designation— Section 1105(e)(5)(C) of the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 is amended by striking “The route referred to in subsection (c)(84) is designated as Interstate Route I–14.” and inserting “The route referred to in subsection (c)(84)(A) is designated as Interstate Route I–14 North. The route referred to in subsection (c)(84)(B) is designated as Interstate Route I–14 South. The Bryan/College Station, Texas loop referred to in subsection (c)(84) is designated as Interstate Route I–214. The routes referred to in subparagraphs (C), (D), (E), (F), and (G) of subsection (c)(84) and in subsections (c)(91), (c)(92), (c)(93), and (c)(94) are designated as Interstate Route I–14.”.

Sec. 1622 Guidance on inundated and submerged roads

(a)
added Guidance— The Administrator of the Federal Highway Administration, in coordination with the Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, shall review the guidance issued pursuant to section 1228 of the Disaster Recovery Reform Act of 2018 (Public Law 115–254), and revise or issue new guidance regarding repair, restoration, and replacement of inundated and submerged roads damaged or destroyed by a major disaster declared pursuant to the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq.) with respect to roads eligible for assistance under Federal Highway Administration programs.
(b)
added Considerations— In revising or issuing new guidance under subsection (a), the Administrator shall consider methods of repair, restoration, and replacement of damaged or destroyed roads that—
(1)
added improve the ability of a previously inundated or submerged road to withstand the effects of hydrostatic and hydrodynamic forces, including stormwater, runoff, or storm surge; and
(2)
added provide for long-term cost savings.

removed The Administrator of the Federal Highway Administration, in coordination with the Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, shall review the guidance issued pursuant to section 1228 of the Disaster Recovery Reform Act of 2018 (Public Law 115–254), and issue guidance regarding repair, restoration, and replacement of inundated and submerged roads damaged or destroyed by a major disaster declared pursuant to the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq.) with respect to roads eligible for assistance under Federal Highway Administration programs.

Sec. 1633 Transportation planning activities

changed Section 325 of title 23, United States Code, is repealed.The Secretary or Transportation shall take all reasonable efforts to provide assistance for an Olympic or Paralympic event, or a Special Olympics International event, including the following:

(1)
added Planning activities of States and metropolitan planning organizations and transportation projects relating to an international Olympic or Paralympic event, or a Special Olympics International event, under sections 134 and 135 of title 23, United States Code.
(2)
added Developing intermodal transportation plans necessary for the projects, in coordination with State and local transportation agencies.
(3)
added Efforts to expedite review and comment by the Department of Transportation on any required submittals pertaining to an Olympic or Paralympic event or a Special Olympics International event.
(4)
added Providing technical assistance.

Sec. 1634 Better Utilizing Infrastructure for Lasting Development of Veterans Businesses Act

(a)
changed In general—Definitions— Title 23, United States Code, is amended as follows:In this section, the following definitions apply:
(1)
changed Name correction—Small business concern— Section 101(a)(16)(C),as amended, is amended by striking “United States Customs and Immigration Services” and inserting “ U.S. Customs and Border Protection”.The term “small business concern” has the meaning given the term in section 3 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632).
(2)
changed Transfer of funds—Veteran— Section 104(f)(3) is amended—The term “veteran” has the meaning given the term in section 101(2) of title 38, United States Code.
(A)
removed in subparagraph (A), by striking “the Federal Highway Administration” and inserting “an operating administration of the Department of Transportation”; and
(B)
removed in the paragraph heading, by striking “Federal Highway Administration” and inserting “an operating administration of the Department of Transportation”.
(3)
changed Terms and conditions—Veteran owned small business concern— Section 108(c)(3)(F) is amended—The term “veteran owned small business concern” has the meaning given the term “small business concern owned and controlled by veterans” in section 3(q) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632 (q)).
(b)
added Amounts for veteran owned small business concerns— Except to the extent that the Secretary of Transportation determines otherwise, not less than 3 percent of the amounts made available for any program under titles I, II, V, and VII of this division and section 403 of title 23, United States Code, shall be expended through veteran owned small business concerns.
(c)
added Uniform criteria— The Secretary shall establish minimum uniform criteria for use by State governments in certifying whether a concern qualifies as a veteran owned small business concern for the purpose of this section. Such criteria shall include a limit on the personal net worth of the veterans who own and control the small business concern.
(d)
added Reporting— The Secretary shall establish minimum requirements for use by State government in reporting to the Secretary—
(1)
added information concerning veteran owned small business concern awards, commitments, and achievement; and
(2)
added such other information as the Secretary determined to be appropriate for the proper monitoring of the veterans business enterprise program.
(A)
removed by inserting “of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.)” after “Policy Act”; and
(B)
removed by striking “this Act” and inserting “this title”.
(4)
removed Exclusion— Section 112(b)(2) is amended in subparagraph (F) by striking “(F)” and all that follows through “Subparagraphs” and inserting “(F) Subparagraphs”.
(5)
removed Reference to statewide transportation improvement program— Section 115(c) is amended by striking “135(f)” and inserting “135(g)”.
(6)
removed Opportunity for comment— Section 134(j) is amended by striking “subsection (i)(5)” both places it appears and inserting “subsection (i)(6)”.
(7)
removed Performance-based approach— Section 135(f)(7)(B) is amended by striking the semicolon at the end and inserting a period.
(8)
removed Efficient environmental reviews for project decisionmaking— Section 139 is amended—
(A)
removed in subsection (b)(1) by inserting “(42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.)” after “of 1969”;
(B)
removed in subsection (c) by inserting “(42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.)” after “of 1969” each place it appears; and
(C)
removed in subsection (k)(2) by inserting “(42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.)” after “of 1969”.
(9)
removed Nondiscrimination— Section 140(a) is amended, in the third sentence, by inserting a comma after “Secretary”.
(10)
removed Public transportation— Section 142 is amended by striking subsection (i).
(11)
removed Congestion mitigation and air quality improvement program— Section 149 is amended—
(A)
removed in subsection (b)(1)(A)(ii) by striking “; or,” and inserting “; or”; and
(B)
removed in subsection (g)(2)(B) by striking the semicolon at the end and inserting “; and”.
(12)
removed Tribal transportation program data collection— Section 201(c)(6)(A)(ii) is amended by striking “(25 U.S.C. 450 et seq.)” and inserting “(25 U.S.C. 5301 et seq.)”.
(13)
removed Tribal transportation program— Section 202 is amended—
(A)
removed by striking “(25 U.S.C. 450 et seq.)” each place it appears and inserting “(25 U.S.C. 5301 et seq.)”;
(B)
removed in subsection (a)(10)(B) by striking “(25 U.S.C. 450e(b))” and inserting “(25 U.S.C. 5307(b))”; and
(C)
removed in subsection (b)—
(i)
removed in paragraph (5) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A) by inserting “the” after “agreement under”; and
(ii)
removed in paragraph (6)(A) by inserting “the” after “in accordance with”.
(14)
removed Permissible uses of recreational trails program apportioned funds— Section 206(d)(2)(G) is amended by striking “use of recreational trails” and inserting “uses of recreational trails”.
(15)
removed Tribal transportation self-governance program— Section 207 is amended—
(A)
removed in subsection (g)—
(i)
removed by striking “(25 U.S.C. 450j–1)” and inserting “(25 U.S.C. 5325)”; and
(ii)
removed by striking “(25 U.S.C. 450j-1(f))” and inserting “(25 U.S.C. 5325(f))”;
(B)
removed in subsection (l)—
(i)
removed in paragraph (1), by striking “(25 U.S.C. 458aaa–5)” and inserting “(25 U.S.C. 5386)”;
(ii)
removed in paragraph (2), by striking “(25 U.S.C. 458aaa–6)” and inserting “(25 U.S.C. 5387)”;
(iii)
removed in paragraph (3), by striking “(25 U.S.C. 458aaa–7)” and inserting “(25 U.S.C. 5388)”;
(iv)
removed in paragraph (4), by striking “(25 U.S.C. 458aaa–9)” and inserting “(25 U.S.C. 5390)”;
(v)
removed in paragraph (5), by striking “(25 U.S.C. 458aaa–10)” and inserting “(25 U.S.C. 5391)”;
(vi)
removed in paragraph (6), by striking “(25 U.S.C. 458aaa–11)” and inserting “(25 U.S.C. 5392)”;
(vii)
removed in paragraph (7), by striking “(25 U.S.C. 458aaa–14)” and inserting “(25 U.S.C. 5395)”;
(viii)
removed in paragraph (8), by striking “(25 U.S.C. 458aaa–15)” and inserting “(25 U.S.C. 5396)”; and
(ix)
removed in paragraph (9), by striking “(25 U.S.C. 458aaa–17)” and inserting “(25 U.S.C. 5398)”; and
(C)
removed in subsection (m)(2)—
(i)
removed by striking “505” and inserting “501”; and
(ii)
removed by striking “(25 U.S.C. 450b; 458aaa)” and inserting “(25 U.S.C. 5304; 5381)”.
(16)
removed Buy America— Section 313 is amended—
(A)
removed in subsection (e)(2) by striking “States;” and inserting “States,”; and
(B)
removed in subsection (f)(1) by striking “, and” and inserting “; and”.
(17)
removed Procedures for a gift or donation— Section 323(d) is amended in the matter preceding paragraph (1) by inserting “(42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.)” after “of 1969”.
(18)
removed Highway safety programs— Section 402(b)(1)(E) is amended by striking the semicolon at the end and inserting “; and”.
(19)
removed Use of freight capacity building program funds— Section 504(g)(6) is amended by striking “make grants or to” and inserting “make grants to”.
(20)
removed Development phase activities— Section 602(e) is amended by striking “601(a)(1)(A)” and inserting “601(a)(2)(A)”.
(b)
removed Clerical amendments—
(1)
removed In general— The table of contents for title 23, United States Code, is amended in the item relating to chapter 1 by striking “Federal Aid Highways” and inserting “Federal-aid Highways”.
(2)
removed Chapter 3— The analysis for chapter 3 of title 23, United States Code, is amended by striking the item relating to section 325.

Sec. 1635 Vehicle weight limitations

added

added Section 127(i)(1)(A) of title 23, United States Code, is amended by inserting “an emergency or” before “a major disaster”.

Sec. 1636 Roadway worker protection working group

added
(a)
added Establishment— Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Transportation shall establish a working group (in this section referred to as the “Working Group”) to review the methods, practices, and technologies necessary to protect workers in roadway work zones.
(b)
added Membership—
(1)
added Appointment— The Secretary shall appoint to the Working Group individuals with knowledge and expertise in roadway safety.
(2)
added Representation— The Working group shall include at least one representative of each of the following:
(A)
added State departments of transportation.
(B)
added Local governments or metropolitan planning organizations.
(C)
added Temporary traffic control organizations.
(D)
added Roadway user organizations.
(E)
added Vehicle and commercial vehicle manufacturers.
(F)
added Labor organizations.
(G)
added Traffic safety organizations.
(H)
added Motor carrier and independent owner-operator organizations.
(I)
added Law enforcement and first responder organizations.
(J)
added Autonomous vehicle technology companies.
(K)
added Any other stakeholders that the Secretary determines appropriate.
(3)
added Termination— The Working Group shall terminate 6 months after the date on which the Secretary receives the report under subsection (f)(1).
(c)
added Duties— In carrying out the review required under subsection (a), the Working Group shall—
(1)
added evaluate and analyze current work zone safety and worker protection traffic control best practices;
(2)
added identify causes of work zone injuries and fatalities;
(3)
added identify and evaluate technologies related to vehicle interaction with work zones and workers in work zones; and
(4)
added identify challenges for transportation construction project sponsors regarding improving work zone safety.
(d)
added Consultation— In carrying out the review required under subsection (a), the Working Group shall consult with—
(1)
added transportation construction contractor organizations;
(2)
added roadway and roadway safety equipment manufacturer organizations;
(3)
added academic experts; and
(4)
added any other stakeholder the Working Group determines appropriate.
(e)
added Reports—
(1)
added Working group report— Not later than 2 years after the date on which the Working Group is established, the Working Group shall submit to the Secretary a report that includes—
(A)
added the findings of the review required under subsection (a), including a summary of any comments received during the consultation process under subsection (d); and
(B)
added recommendations on safety countermeasures, technologies, programs and policies for the Department of Transportation to improve roadway work zone safety and practices.
(2)
added Report to Congress— Not later than 1 month after the date on which the Secretary receives a report under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate a summary of the report.

Sec. 1637 GAO study on nature-based solutions for coastal highway resilience

added
(a)
added Study— The Comptroller General of the United States shall conduct a study on the utilization of nature-based solutions for improving the resilience of coastal highways and bridges.
(b)
added Contents— In conducting the study under subsection (a), the Comptroller General shall examine—
(1)
added the resiliency benefits of nature-based features that work in conjunction with structural features to protect coastal highways and bridges by reducing the impacts of floods or other risks of extreme weather;
(2)
added the ecological benefits of nature-based features for habitat restoration, water quality improvements, and recreational aesthetics;
(3)
added any potential savings to taxpayers over the lifecycles of roadways produced by an integrated approach to resilience against extreme weather;
(4)
added the utilization rates for integrated nature-based solutions among transportation agencies; and
(5)
added any barriers to the use of nature-based solutions by transportation agencies to improve the resilience of coastal roads and bridges.
(c)
added Report— Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General shall submit to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate a report summarizing the study under subsection (a) and the results of such study, including recommendations for how the Federal Highway Administration can encourage transportation agencies to use natural and nature-based features to improve the resilience of coastal highways and bridges.

Sec. 1638 Prohibition on the use of civil penalties for campaign finance

added

added No amounts may be assessed on funds collected pursuant to section 5309 of this Act or section 20704, 20171, 20174, or 80502 of title 49, United States Code, (as added by this Act) for purposes of making payments in support of a campaign for election for the office of Senator or Representative in, or Delegate or Resident Commissioner to, Congress.

Sec. 1639 Repeal of pilot program

added

added Section 325 of title 23, United States Code, is repealed.

Sec. 1640 Technical corrections

added
(a)
added In general— Title 23, United States Code, is amended as follows:
(1)
added Name correction— Section 101(a)(16)(C),as amended, is amended by striking “United States Customs and Immigration Services” and inserting “ U.S. Customs and Border Protection”.
(2)
added Transfer of funds— Section 104(f)(3) is amended—
(A)
added in subparagraph (A), by striking “the Federal Highway Administration” and inserting “an operating administration of the Department of Transportation”; and
(B)
added in the paragraph heading, by striking “Federal Highway Administration” and inserting “an operating administration of the Department of Transportation”.
(3)
added Terms and conditions— Section 108(c)(3)(F) is amended—
(A)
added by inserting “of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.)” after “Policy Act”; and
(B)
added by striking “this Act” and inserting “this title”.
(4)
added Exclusion— Section 112(b)(2) is amended in subparagraph (F) by striking “(F)” and all that follows through “Subparagraphs” and inserting “(F) Subparagraphs”.
(5)
added Reference to statewide transportation improvement program— Section 115(c) is amended by striking “135(f)” and inserting “135(g)”.
(6)
added Opportunity for comment— Section 134(j) is amended by striking “subsection (i)(5)” both places it appears and inserting “subsection (i)(6)”.
(7)
added Performance-based approach— Section 135(f)(7)(B) is amended by striking the semicolon at the end and inserting a period.
(8)
added Efficient environmental reviews for project decisionmaking— Section 139 is amended—
(A)
added in subsection (b)(1) by inserting “(42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.)” after “of 1969”;
(B)
added in subsection (c) by inserting “(42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.)” after “of 1969” each place it appears; and
(C)
added in subsection (k)(2) by inserting “(42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.)” after “of 1969”.
(9)
added Nondiscrimination— Section 140(a) is amended, in the third sentence, by inserting a comma after “Secretary”.
(10)
added Public transportation— Section 142 is amended by striking subsection (i).
(11)
added Congestion mitigation and air quality improvement program— Section 149 is amended—
(A)
added in subsection (b)(1)(A)(ii) by striking “; or,” and inserting “; or”; and
(B)
added in subsection (g)(2)(B) by striking the semicolon at the end and inserting “; and”.
(12)
added Tribal transportation program data collection— Section 201(c)(6)(A)(ii) is amended by striking “(25 U.S.C. 450 et seq.)” and inserting “(25 U.S.C. 5301 et seq.)”.
(13)
added Tribal transportation program— Section 202 is amended—
(A)
added by striking “(25 U.S.C. 450 et seq.)” each place it appears and inserting “(25 U.S.C. 5301 et seq.)”;
(B)
added in subsection (a)(10)(B) by striking “(25 U.S.C. 450e(b))” and inserting “(25 U.S.C. 5307(b))”; and
(C)
added in subsection (b)—
(i)
added in paragraph (5) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A) by inserting “the” after “agreement under”; and
(ii)
added in paragraph (6)(A) by inserting “the” after “in accordance with”.
(14)
added Permissible uses of recreational trails program apportioned funds— Section 206(d)(2)(G) is amended by striking “use of recreational trails” and inserting “uses of recreational trails”.
(15)
added Tribal transportation self-governance program— Section 207 is amended—
(A)
added in subsection (g)—
(i)
added by striking “(25 U.S.C. 450j–1)” and inserting “(25 U.S.C. 5325)”; and
(ii)
added by striking “(25 U.S.C. 450j-1(f))” and inserting “(25 U.S.C. 5325(f))”;
(B)
added in subsection (l)—
(i)
added in paragraph (1), by striking “(25 U.S.C. 458aaa–5)” and inserting “(25 U.S.C. 5386)”;
(ii)
added in paragraph (2), by striking “(25 U.S.C. 458aaa–6)” and inserting “(25 U.S.C. 5387)”;
(iii)
added in paragraph (3), by striking “(25 U.S.C. 458aaa–7)” and inserting “(25 U.S.C. 5388)”;
(iv)
added in paragraph (4), by striking “(25 U.S.C. 458aaa–9)” and inserting “(25 U.S.C. 5390)”;
(v)
added in paragraph (5), by striking “(25 U.S.C. 458aaa–10)” and inserting “(25 U.S.C. 5391)”;
(vi)
added in paragraph (6), by striking “(25 U.S.C. 458aaa–11)” and inserting “(25 U.S.C. 5392)”;
(vii)
added in paragraph (7), by striking “(25 U.S.C. 458aaa–14)” and inserting “(25 U.S.C. 5395)”;
(viii)
added in paragraph (8), by striking “(25 U.S.C. 458aaa–15)” and inserting “(25 U.S.C. 5396)”; and
(ix)
added in paragraph (9), by striking “(25 U.S.C. 458aaa–17)” and inserting “(25 U.S.C. 5398)”; and
(C)
added in subsection (m)(2)—
(i)
added by striking “505” and inserting “501”; and
(ii)
added by striking “(25 U.S.C. 450b; 458aaa)” and inserting “(25 U.S.C. 5304; 5381)”.
(16)
added Buy America— Section 313 is amended—
(A)
added in subsection (e)(2) by striking “States;” and inserting “States,”; and
(B)
added in subsection (f)(1) by striking “, and” and inserting “; and”.
(17)
added Procedures for a gift or donation— Section 323(d) is amended in the matter preceding paragraph (1) by inserting “(42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.)” after “of 1969”.
(18)
added Highway safety programs— Section 402(b)(1)(E) is amended by striking the semicolon at the end and inserting “; and”.
(19)
added Use of freight capacity building program funds— Section 504(g)(6) is amended by striking “make grants or to” and inserting “make grants to”.
(20)
added Development phase activities— Section 602(e) is amended by striking “601(a)(1)(A)” and inserting “601(a)(2)(A)”.
(b)
added Clerical amendments—
(1)
added In general— The table of contents for title 23, United States Code, is amended in the item relating to chapter 1 by striking “Federal Aid Highways” and inserting “Federal-aid Highways”.
(2)
added Chapter 3— The analysis for chapter 3 of title 23, United States Code, is amended by striking the item relating to section 325.

Sec. 2101 Authorizations

(a)
In general— Section 5338 of title 49, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:

“5338. Authorizations

“(a) Grants

“(1) In general—There shall be available from the Mass Transit Account of the Highway Trust Fund to carry out sections 5305, 5307, 5308, 5310, 5311, 5312, 5314, 5318, 5320, 5328, 5335, 5337, 5339, and 5340—

“(A) $17,894,460,367 for fiscal year 2023;

“(B) $18,201,940,770 for fiscal year 2024;

“(C) $18,551,676,708 for fiscal year 2025; and

“(D) $18,901,573,693 for fiscal year 2026.

“(2) Allocation of funds—Of the amounts made available under paragraph (1)—

“(A) $189,879,151 for fiscal year 2023, $192,841,266 for fiscal year 2024, $195,926,726 for fiscal year 2025, and $199,002,776 for fiscal year 2026, shall be available to carry out section 5305;

“(B) $7,505,830,848 for fiscal year 2023, $7,622,921,809 for fiscal year 2024, $7,744,888,558 for fiscal year 2025, and $7,866,483,309 for fiscal year 2026 shall be allocated in accordance with section 5336 to provide financial assistance for urbanized areas under section 5307;

“(C) $101,510,000 for fiscal year 2023, $103,093,556 for fiscal year 2024, $104,743,053 for fiscal year 2025, and $106,387,519 for fiscal year 2026 shall be available for grants under section 5308;

“(D) $434,830,298 for fiscal year 2023, $441,613,651 for fiscal year 2024, $448,679,469 for fiscal year 2025, and $455,723,737 for fiscal year 2026 shall be available to carry out section 5310, of which not less than—

“(i) $5,075,500 for fiscal year 2023, $5,154,678 for fiscal year 2024, $5,237,153 for fiscal year 2025, and $5,319,376 for fiscal year 2026 shall be available to carry out section 5310(j); and

“(ii) $20,302,000 for fiscal year 2023, $20,618,711 for fiscal year 2024, $20,948,611 for fiscal year 2025, and $21,277,504 for fiscal year 2026 shall be available to carry out section 5310(k);

“(E) $1,025,199,724 for fiscal year 2023, $1,041,192,839 for fiscal year 2024, $1,057,851,925 for fiscal year 2025, and $1,074,460,200 for fiscal year 2026 shall be available to carry out section 5311, of which not less than—

“(i) $55,679,500 for fiscal year 2023, $56,392,100 for fiscal year 2024, $57,134,374 for fiscal year 2025, and $57,874,383 for fiscal year 2026 shall be available to carry out section 5311(c)(1); and

“(ii) $50,755,000 for fiscal year 2023, $51,546,778 for fiscal year 2024, $52,371,526 for fiscal year 2025, and $53,193,759 for fiscal year 2026 shall be available to carry out section 5311(c)(2);

“(F) $53,498,300 for fiscal year 2023; $54,020,873 for fiscal year 2024; $54,565,207 for fiscal year 2025; $55,107,881 for fiscal year 2026 shall be available to carry out section 5312, of which not less than—

“(i) $5,075,500 for fiscal year 2023, $5,154,678 for fiscal year 2024, $5,237,153 for fiscal year 2025, and $5,319,376 for fiscal year 2026 shall be available to carry out each of sections 5312(d)(3) and 5312(d)(4);

“(ii) $3,045,300 for fiscal year 2023, $3,092,807 for fiscal year 2024, $3,142,292 for fiscal year 2025, and $3,191,626 for fiscal year 2026 shall be available to carry out section 5312(h);

“(iii) $10,151,000 for fiscal year 2023, $10,309,356 for fiscal year 2024, $10,474,305 for fiscal year 2025, and $10,638,752 for fiscal year 2026 shall be available to carry out section 5312(i); and

“(iv) $10,075,500 for fiscal year 2023, $10,154,678 for fiscal year 2024, $10,237,153 for fiscal year 2025, and $10,319,376 shall be available to carry out section 5312(j);

“(G) $23,347,300 for fiscal year 2023, $23,711,518 for fiscal year 2024, $24,090,902 for fiscal year 2025, and $24,469,129 for fiscal year 2026 shall be available to carry out section 5314, of which not less than—

“(i) $4,060,400 for fiscal year 2023, $4,123,742 for fiscal year 2024, $4,189,722 for fiscal year 2025, and $4,255,501 for fiscal year 2026 shall be available to carry out section of 5314(a);

“(ii) $5,075,500 for fiscal year 2023, $5,154,678 for fiscal year 2024, $5,237,153 for fiscal year 2025, and $5,319,376 for fiscal year 2026 shall be available to carry out section 5314(c); and

“(iii) $12,181,200 for fiscal year 2023, $12,371,227 for fiscal year 2024, $12,569,166 for fiscal year 2025, and $12,766,502 for fiscal year 2026 shall be available to carry out section 5314(b)(2);

“(H) $5,075,500 for fiscal year 2023, $5,154,678 for fiscal year 2024, $5,237,153 for fiscal year 2025, and $5,319,376 for fiscal year 2026 shall be available to carry out section 5318;

“(I) $30,453,000 for fiscal year 2023, $30,928,067 for fiscal year 2024, $31,422,916 for fiscal year 2025, and $31,916,256 for fiscal year 2026 shall be available to carry out section 5328, of which not less than—

“(i) $25,377,500 for fiscal year 2023, $25,773,389 for fiscal year 2024, $26,185,763 for fiscal year 2025, and $26,596,880 for fiscal year 2026 shall be available to carry out section of 5328(b); and

“(ii) $2,537,750 for fiscal year 2023, $2,577,339 for fiscal year 2024, $2,618,576 for fiscal year 2025, and $2,659,688 for fiscal year 2026 shall be available to carry out section 5328(c);

“(J) $4,060,400 for fiscal year 2023, $4,123,742 for fiscal year 2024, $4,189,722 for fiscal year 2025, and $4,255,501 for fiscal year 2026 shall be available to carry out section 5335;

“(K) $5,366,233,728 for fiscal year 2023, $5,460,789,084 for fiscal year 2024, $5,560,170,578 for fiscal year 2025, and $5,660,288,417 for fiscal year 2026 shall be available to carry out section 5337;

“(L) to carry out the bus formula program under section 5339(a)—

“(i) $1,240,328,213 for fiscal year 2023, $1,259,667,334 for fiscal year 2024, $1,279,832,171 for fiscal year 2025, and $1,299,925,536 for fiscal year 2026; except that

“(ii) 15 percent of the amounts under clause (i) shall be available to carry out 5339(d);

“(M) $437,080,000 for fiscal year 2023, $424,748,448 for fiscal year 2024, $387,944,423 for fiscal year 2025, and $351,100,151 for fiscal year 2026 shall be available to carry out section 5339(b);

“(N) $890,000,000 for fiscal year 2023, $950,000,000 for fiscal year 2024, $1,065,000,000 for fiscal year 2025, and $1,180,000,000 for fiscal year 2026 shall be available to carry out section 5339(c); and

“(O) $587,133,905 for each of fiscal years 2023 through 2026 shall be available to carry out section 5340 to provide financial assistance for urbanized areas under section 5307 and rural areas under section 5311, of which—

“(i) $309,688,908 for each of fiscal years 2023 through 2026 shall be for growing States under section 5340(c); and

“(ii) $277,444,997 for each of fiscal years 2023 through 2026 shall be for high density States under section 5340(d).

“(b) Capital investment grants—There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out section 5309 $3,500,000,000 for fiscal year 2023, $4,250,000,000 for fiscal year 2024, $5,000,000,000 for fiscal year 2025, and 5,500,000,000 for fiscal year 2026.

“(c) Administration

“(1) In general—There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out section 5334, $142,060,785 for fiscal year 2023, $144,191,696 for fiscal year 2024, $146,412,248 for fiscal year 2025, and 148,652,356 for fiscal year 2026.

“(2) Section 5329—Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated under paragraph (1), not less than $6,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2023 through 2026 shall be available to carry out section 5329.

“(3) Section 5326—Of the amounts made available under paragraph (2), not less than $2,500,000 for each of fiscal years 2023 through 2026 shall be available to carry out section 5326.

“(d) Oversight

“(1) In general—Of the amounts made available to carry out this chapter for a fiscal year, the Secretary may use not more than the following amounts for the activities described in paragraph (2):

“(A) 0.5 percent of amounts made available to carry out section 5305.

“(B) 0.75 percent of amounts made available to carry out section 5307.

“(C) 1 percent of amounts made available to carry out section 5309.

“(D) 1 percent of amounts made available to carry out section 601 of the Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act of 2008 (Public Law 110–432; 126 Stat. 4968).

“(E) 0.5 percent of amounts made available to carry out section 5310.

“(F) 0.5 percent of amounts made available to carry out section 5311.

“(G) 1 percent of amounts made available to carry out section 5337, of which not less than 25 percent of such amounts shall be available to carry out section 5329 and of which not less than 10 percent of such amounts shall be made available to carry out section 5320.

“(H) 1 percent of amounts made available to carry out section 5339 of which not less than 10 percent of such amounts shall be made available to carry out section 5320.

“(I) 1 percent of amounts made available to carry out section 5308.

“(2) Activities—The activities described in this paragraph are as follows:

“(A) Activities to oversee the construction of a major capital project.

“(B) Activities to review and audit the safety and security, procurement, management, and financial compliance of a recipient or subrecipient of funds under this chapter.

“(C) Activities to provide technical assistance generally, and to provide technical assistance to correct deficiencies identified in compliance reviews and audits carried out under this section.

changed “(3) Government share of costs—The Government shall pay the entire cost of carrying out a contract under this subsection/activities described in paragraph (2).subsection.

“(4) Availability of certain funds—Funds made available under paragraph (1)(C) shall be made available to the Secretary before allocating the funds appropriated to carry out any project under a full funding grant agreement.

“(e) Grants as contractual obligations

“(1) Grants financed from Highway Trust Fund—A grant or contract that is approved by the Secretary and financed with amounts made available from the Mass Transit Account of the Highway Trust Fund pursuant to this section is a contractual obligation of the Government to pay the Government share of the cost of the project.

“(2) Grants financed from general fund—A grant or contract that is approved by the Secretary and financed with amounts from future appropriations from the general fund of the Treasury pursuant to this section is a contractual obligation of the Government to pay the Government share of the cost of the project only to the extent that amounts are appropriated for such purpose by an Act of Congress.

“(f) Availability of amounts—Amounts made available by or appropriated under this section shall remain available until expended.

“(g) Limitation on financial assistance for State-Owned enterprises

“(1) In general—Funds provided under this section may not be used in awarding a contract, subcontract, grant, or loan to an entity that is owned or controlled by, is a subsidiary of, or is otherwise related legally or financially to a corporation based in a country that—

“(A) is identified as a nonmarket economy country (as defined in section 771(18) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1677(18))) as of the date of enactment of the INVEST in America Act;

“(B) was identified by the United States Trade Representative in the most recent report required by section 182 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2242) as a priority foreign country under subsection (a)(2) of that section; and

“(C) is subject to monitoring by the Trade Representative under section 306 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2416).

“(2) Exception—For purposes of paragraph (1), the term otherwise related legally or financially does not include a minority relationship or investment.

“(3) International agreements—This subsection shall be applied in a manner consistent with the obligations of the United States under international agreements.”

(b)
Conforming amendments—
(1)
removed Section 5311 of title 49, United States Code, is amended by striking “5338(a)(2)(F)” and inserting “5338(a)(2)(E)”.
(1)
renumbered was (3)(3) Section 5312(i)(1) of title 49, United States Code, is amended by striking “5338(a)(2)(G)(ii)” and inserting “5338(a)(2)(F)(iii)”.
(2)
renumbered was (3)(4) Section 5333(b) of title 49, United States Code, is amended by striking “5328, 5337, and 5338(b)” each place it appears and inserting “and 5337”.
(3)
added Section 5336 of title 49, United States Code, is amended in subsection (d)(1) by striking “5338(a)(2)(C)” and inserting “5338(a)(2)(B)”.
(4)
removed Section 5336 of title 49, United States Code, is amended—
(A)
removed in subsection (d)(1) by striking “5338(a)(2)(C)” and inserting “5338(a)(2)(B)”; and
(B)
removed in subsection (h) by striking “5338(a)(2)(C)” and inserting “5338(a)(2)(B)”.
(4)
renumbered was (3)(6) Subsections (c) and (d)(1) of section 5327 of title 49, United States Code, are amended by striking “5338(f)” and inserting “5338(d)”.
(5)
renumbered was (3)(7) Section 5340(b) of title 49, United States Code, is amended by striking “5338(b)(2)(N)” and inserting “5338(a)(2)(O)”.

Sec. 2102 Chapter 53 definitions

Section 5302 of title 49, United States Code, is amended—

(1)
in paragraph (1)(E)—
(A)
by striking “and the installation” and inserting “, the installation”; and
(B)
by inserting “, charging stations and docks for electric micromobility devices, and bikeshare projects” after “public transportation vehicles”;
(2)
in paragraph (3)—
(A)
in subparagraph (G) by striking clause (iii) and inserting the following:

“(iii) provides a fair share of revenue established by the Secretary that will be used for public transportation, except for a joint development that is a community service (as defined by the Federal Transit Administration), publicly operated facility, or offers a minimum of 50 percent of units as affordable housing, meaning legally binding affordability restricted housing units available to tenants with incomes below 60 percent of the area median income or owners with incomes below the area median;”

(B)
added in subparagraph (M) strike “; or” and insert a semicolon;
(C)
renumbered was (4)(3) in subparagraph (N)—
(i)
renumbered was (4)(3)(2) by striking “no emission” and inserting “zero emission”; and
(ii)
added by striking “(as defined in section 5339(c)) or facilities.” and inserting “or facilities; or”; and
(ii)
removed by striking “(as defined in section 5339(c))”; and
(D)
renumbered was (5) by adding at the end the following:

added “(O) the employment of forensic consultants, cybersecurity experts, or third-party penetration testers to identify, evaluate, test, and patch ransomware attack vulnerabilities.”

(3)
added by adding at the end the following:

“(25) Resilience

“(A) In general—The term resilience means, with respect to a facility, the ability to—

“(i) anticipate, prepare for, or adapt to conditions; or

“(ii) withstand, respond to, or recover rapidly from disruptions.

“(B) Inclusions—Such term includes, with respect to a facility, the ability to—

“(i) resist hazards or withstand impacts from disruptions;

“(ii) reduce the magnitude, duration, or impact of a disruption; or

“(iii) have the absorptive capacity, adaptive capacity, and recoverability to decrease vulnerability to a disruption.

“(26) Assault on a transit worker—The term assault on a transit worker means any circumstance in which an individual knowingly, without lawful authority or permission, and with intent to endanger the safety of any individual, or with a reckless disregard for the safety of human life, interferes with, disables, or incapacitates any transit worker while the transit worker is performing his or her duties.”

Sec. 2104 Miscellaneous provisions

(a)
State of good repair grants— Section 5337(e) of title 49, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:

“(3) Accessibility costs—Notwithstanding paragraph (1), the Federal share of the net project cost of a project to provide accessibility improvements consistent with standards in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 12101 et seq.) shall be 90 percent.”

(b)
Apportionments based on growing States and high density States formula factors— Section 5340(a) of title 49, United States Code, is amended by inserting “and the District of Columbia” after “United States”.
(c)
Technical assistance and workforce development— Section 5314 of title 49, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
in subsection (a)(1)(B)—
(A)
in clause (i) by striking “; and” and inserting a semicolon;
(B)
changed in clause (ii) by striking the period “and vehicle electronics.” and inserting “; “cybersecurity and mitigating the threat of ransomware, and vehicle electronics; and”; and
(C)
by adding at the end the following:

“(iii) technical assistance to assist recipients with the impacts of a new census count.”

(2)
added in subsection (a)(2)—
(A)
added by redesignating subparagraphs (H) and (I) as subparagraphs (J) and (K), respectively; and
(B)
added by inserting after subparagraph (G) the following:

added “(H) cybersecurity and mitigating the threat of ransomware;”

(3)
renumbered was (4)(4) in subsection (b)(1)(B) by striking “females” and inserting “women”; and
(4)
added in subsection (c)(4)(A) by inserting “, and not more than 2 percent of amounts under 5311,” after “5339”.
(3)
removed in subsection (c)(4)(A) by inserting “, and not more than 2 percent of amounts under 5311” after “5339”.
(d)
National transit database— Section 5335 of title 49, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
in subsection (a) by inserting “, including information on transit routes and ridership on those routes” after “public sector investment decision”; and
(2)
in subsection (c) by inserting “, any data on each assault on a transit worker, and pedestrian injuries and fatalities as a result of an impact with a bus. Each of the data sets shall be publicly reported without aggregating the data with other safety data” after “by the recipient”.
(e)
Urbanized area formula grants— Section 5307 of title 49, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
in subsection (a)(2)(A)—
(A)
in clause (i) by striking “or” at the end; and
(B)
by adding at the end the following:

“(iii) operate a minimum of 101 buses and a maximum of 125 buses in fixed route service or demand response service, excluding ADA complementary paratransit service, during peak service hours, in an amount not to exceed 25 percent of the share of the apportionment which is attributable to such systems within the urbanized area, as measured by vehicle revenue hours; or”

(2)
in subsection (a)(2)(B)—
(A)
in clause (i) by striking “or” at the end;
(B)
in clause (ii) by striking the period at the end and inserting “; or”; and
(C)
by adding at the end the following:

“(iii) operate a minimum of 101 buses and a maximum of 125 buses in fixed route service or demand response service, excluding ADA complementary paratransit service, during peak service hours, in an amount not to exceed 25 percent of the share of the apportionment allocated to such systems within the urbanized area, as determined by the local planning process and included in the designated recipient's final program of projects prepared under subsection (b).”

(3)
in subsection (b)—
(A)
in paragraph (6) by striking “and” at the end;
(B)
by redesignating paragraph (7) as paragraph (8); and
(C)
by inserting after paragraph (6) the following:

“(7) ensure that the proposed program of projects provides improved access to transit for the individuals described in section 5336(j); and”

(f)
Technical correction— Section 5307(a)(2)(B)(ii) of title 49, United States Code, is amended by striking “service during peak” and inserting “service, during peak”.
(g)
Transportation development credits as local match—
(1)
Section 5307— Section 5307(d)(3) of title 49, United States Code, is amended—
(A)
in subparagraph (D) by striking “; and” and inserting a semicolon;
(B)
in subparagraph (E) by striking the period and inserting “; and”; and
(C)
by adding at the end the following:

“(F) transportation development credits.”

(2)
Section 5309— Section 5309 of title 49, United States Code, is amended—
(A)
in subsection (f) by adding at the end the following:

“(3) Transportation development credits—For purposes of assessments and determinations under this subsection or subsection (h), transportation development credits that are included as a source of local financing or match shall be treated the same as other sources of local financing.”

(B)
in subsection (l)(4)—
(i)
in subparagraph (B) by striking “; or” and inserting a semicolon;
(ii)
in subparagraph (C) by striking the period and inserting a semicolon; and
(iii)
by adding at the end the following:

“(D) transportation development credits; or”

(3)
Section 5339— Section 5339(a)(7)(B) of title 49, United States Code, is amended—
(A)
in clause (iv) by striking “; or” and inserting a semicolon;
(B)
in clause (v) by striking the period and inserting “; or”; and
(C)
by adding at the end the following:

“(vi) transportation development credits.”

(h)
Clarification of incidental use— Section 5310(b)(7) of title 49, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
in the header by inserting “and incidental use” after “individuals”;
(2)
by inserting “or providing other incidental services” after “individuals”; and
(3)
by striking “delivery service does not conflict” and inserting “service does not conflict”.

Sec. 2107 Metropolitan transportation planning

Section 5303 of title 49, United States Code, is further amended—

(1)
by amending subsection (a)(1) to read as follows:

“(1) to encourage and promote the safe and efficient management, operation, and development of surface transportation systems that will serve the mobility needs of people and freight, foster economic growth and development within and between States and urbanized areas, and take into consideration resiliency and climate change adaptation needs while reducing transportation-related fuel consumption, air pollution, and greenhouse gas emissions through metropolitan and statewide transportation planning processes identified in this chapter; and”

(2)
in subsection (b)—
(A)
by redesignating paragraphs (6) and (7) as paragraphs (7) and (8), respectively; and
(B)
by inserting after paragraph (5) the following:

“(6) STIP—The term STIP means a statewide transportation improvement program developed by a State under section 135(g).”

(3)
in subsection (c)—
(A)
in paragraph (1) by striking “and transportation improvement programs” and inserting “and TIPs”; and
(B)
by adding at the end the following:

“(4) Consideration—In developing the plans and TIPs, metropolitan planning organizations shall consider direct and indirect emissions of greenhouse gases.”

(4)
in subsection (d)—
(A)
in paragraph (2) by striking “Not later than 2 years after the date of enactment of the Federal Public Transportation Act of 2012, each” and inserting “Each”;
(B)
in paragraph (3) by adding at the end the following:

“(D) Equitable and proportional representation

“(i) In general—In designating officials or representatives under paragraph (2), the metropolitan planning organization shall ensure the equitable and proportional representation of the population of the metropolitan planning area.

“(ii) Savings clause—Nothing in this paragraph shall require a metropolitan planning organization in existence on the date of enactment of this subparagraph to be restructured.

“(iii) Redesignation—Notwithstanding clause (ii), the requirements of this paragraph shall apply to any metropolitan planning organization redesignated under paragraph (6).”

(C)
in paragraph (6)(B) by striking “paragraph (2)” and inserting “paragraphs (2) or (3)(D)”; and
(D)
in paragraph (7)—
(i)
by striking “an existing metropolitan planning area” and inserting “an urbanized area”; and
(ii)
by striking “the existing metropolitan planning area” and inserting “the area”;
(5)
in subsection (g)—
(A)
in paragraph (1) by striking “a metropolitan area” and inserting “an urbanized area”;
(B)
changed in paragraph (2) by striking “MPOs” “mpos” and inserting “Metropolitan “metropolitan planning areas”
(C)
in paragraph (3)(A) by inserting “emergency response and evacuation, climate change adaptation and resilience,” after “disaster risk reduction,”; and
(D)
by adding at the end the following:

“(4) Coordination between MPOs

“(A) In general—If more than one metropolitan planning organization is designated within an urbanized area under subsection (d)(7), the metropolitan planning organizations designated within the area shall ensure, to the maximum extent practicable, the consistency of any data used in the planning process, including information used in forecasting transportation demand.

“(B) Savings clause—Nothing in this paragraph requires metropolitan planning organizations designated within a single urbanized area to jointly develop planning documents, including a unified long-range transportation plan or unified TIP.”

(6)
in subsection (h)(1)—
(A)
by striking subparagraph (E) and inserting the following:

“(E) protect and enhance the environment, promote energy conservation, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, improve the quality of life and public health, and promote consistency between transportation improvements and State and local planned growth and economic development patterns, including housing and land use patterns;”

(B)
in subparagraph (H) by striking “and” at the end;
(C)
in subparagraph (I) by striking the period at the end and inserting “and reduce or mitigate stormwater, sea level rise, extreme weather, and climate change impacts of surface transportation;”; and
(D)
by inserting after subparagraph (I) the following:

“(J) support emergency management, response, and evacuation and hazard mitigation;

“(K) improve the level of transportation system access; and

“(L) support inclusive zoning policies and land use planning practices that incentivize affordable, elastic, and diverse housing supply, facilitate long-term economic growth by improving the accessibility of housing to jobs, and prevent high housing costs from displacing economically disadvantaged households.”

(7)
in subsection (h)(2) by striking subparagraph (A) and inserting the following:

changed “(A) In general—Through the use of a performance-based approach, transportation investment decisions made as a part of the metropolitan transportation planning process shall support the national goals described in section 150(b), 150(b) of title 23, the achievement of metropolitan and statewide targets established under section 150(d), 150(d) of title 23, the improvement of transportation system access (consistent with section 150(f)), 150(f)) of title 23, and the general purposes described in section 5301 of title 49.”this title.”

(8)
in subsection (i)—
(A)
in paragraph (2)(D)(i) by inserting “reduce greenhouse gas emissions and” before “restore and maintain”;
(B)
in paragraph (2)(G) by inserting “and climate change” after “infrastructure to natural disasters”;
(C)
in paragraph (2)(H) by inserting “greenhouse gas emissions,” after “pollution,”;
(D)
in paragraph (5)—
(i)
in subparagraph (A) by inserting “air quality, public health, housing, transportation, resilience, hazard mitigation, emergency management,” after “conservation,”; and
(ii)
by striking subparagraph (B) and inserting the following:

“(B) Issues—The consultation shall involve, as appropriate, comparison of transportation plans to other relevant plans, including, if available—

“(i) State conservation plans or maps; and

“(ii) inventories of natural or historic resources.”

(E)
by amending paragraph (6)(C) to read as follows:

“(C) Methods

“(i) In general—In carrying out subparagraph (A), the metropolitan planning organization shall, to the maximum extent practicable—

“(I) hold any public meetings at convenient and accessible locations and times;

“(II) employ visualization techniques to describe plans; and

“(III) make public information available in electronically accessible format and means, such as the internet, as appropriate to afford reasonable opportunity for consideration of public information under subparagraph (A).

“(ii) Additional methods—In addition to the methods described in clause (i), in carrying out subparagraph (A), the metropolitan planning organization shall, to the maximum extent practicable—

“(I) use virtual public involvement, social media, and other web-based tools to encourage public participation and solicit public feedback; and

“(II) use other methods, as appropriate, to further encourage public participation of historically underrepresented individuals in the transportation planning process.”

(9)
in subsection (j) by striking “transportation improvement program” and inserting “TIP” each place it appears; and
(10)
by striking “Federally” each place it appears and inserting “federally”.

Sec. 2108 Statewide and nonmetropolitan transportation planning

Section 5304 of title 49, United States Code, is amended—

(1)
in subsection (a)—
(A)
in paragraph (1) by striking “statewide transportation improvement program” and inserting “STIP”;
(B)
in paragraph (2)—
(i)
by striking “The statewide transportation plan and the” and inserting the following:

“(A) In general—The statewide transportation plan and the”

(ii)
by striking “transportation improvement program” and inserting “STIP”; and
(iii)
by adding at the end the following:

“(B) Consideration—In developing the statewide transportation plans and STIPs, States shall consider direct and indirect emissions of greenhouse gases.”

(C)
in paragraph (3) by striking “transportation improvement program” and inserting “STIP”;
(2)
in subsection (d)—
(A)
in paragraph (1)—
(i)
in subparagraph (E)—
(I)
by inserting “reduce greenhouse gas emissions,” after “promote energy conservation,”;
(II)
by inserting “and public health” after “improve the quality of life”; and
(III)
by inserting “, including housing and land use patterns” after “economic development patterns”;
(ii)
in subparagraph (H) by striking “and”;
(iii)
in subparagraph (I) by striking the period at the end and inserting “and reduce or mitigate stormwater, sea level rise, extreme weather, and climate change impacts of surface transportation;”; and
(iv)
by adding at the end the following:

“(J) facilitate emergency management, response, and evacuation and hazard mitigation;

“(K) improve the level of transportation system access; and

“(L) support inclusive zoning policies and land use planning practices that incentivize affordable, elastic, and diverse housing supply, facilitate long-term economic growth by improving the accessibility of housing to jobs, and prevent high housing costs from displacing economically disadvantaged households.”

(B)
in paragraph (2)—
(i)
by striking subparagraph (A) and inserting the following:

“(A) In general—Through the use of a performance-based approach, transportation investment decisions made as a part of the statewide transportation planning process shall support—

changed “(i) the national goals described in section 150(b);150(b) of title 23;

changed “(ii) the consideration of transportation system access (consistent with section 150(f));150(f) of title 23);

changed “(iii) the achievement of statewide targets established under section 150(d); 150(d) of title 23; and

changed “(iv) the general purposes described in section 5301 of title 49.”this title.”

(ii)
in subparagraph (D) by striking “statewide transportation improvement program” and inserting “STIP”; and
(C)
in paragraph (3) by striking “statewide transportation improvement program” and inserting “STIP”;
(3)
in subsection (e)(3) by striking “transportation improvement program” and inserting “STIP”;
(4)
in subsection (f)—
(A)
in paragraph (2)(D)—
(i)
in clause (i) by inserting “air quality, public health, housing, transportation, resilience, hazard mitigation, emergency management,” after “conservation,”; and
(ii)
by amending clause (ii) to read as follows:

“(ii) Comparison and consideration—Consultation under clause (i) shall involve the comparison of transportation plans to other relevant plans and inventories, including, if available—

“(I) State and tribal conservation plans or maps; and

“(II) inventories of natural or historic resources.”

(B)
in paragraph (3)(B)—
(i)
by striking “In carrying out” and inserting the following:

“(i) In general—in carrying out”

(ii)
by redesignating clauses (i) through (iv) as subclauses (I) through (IV), respectively; and
(iii)
by adding at the end the following:

“(ii) Additional methods—In addition to the methods described in clause (i), in carrying out subparagraph (A), the State shall, to the maximum extent practicable—

“(I) use virtual public involvement, social media, and other web-based tools to encourage public participation and solicit public feedback; and

“(II) use other methods, as appropriate, to further encourage public participation of historically underrepresented individuals in the transportation planning process.”

(C)
in paragraph (4)(A) by inserting “reduce greenhouse gas emissions and” after “potential to”; and
(D)
in paragraph (8) by inserting “including consideration of the role that intercity buses may play in reducing congestion, pollution, greenhouse gas emissions, and energy consumption in a cost-effective manner and strategies and investments that preserve and enhance intercity bus systems, including systems that are privately owned and operated” after “transportation system”;
(5)
in subsection (g)—
(A)
in paragraph (1)(A) by striking “statewide transportation improvement program” and inserting “STIP”;
(B)
in paragraph (5)—
(i)
in subparagraph (A) by striking “transportation improvement program” and inserting “STIP”;
(ii)
in subparagraph (B)(ii) by striking “metropolitan transportation improvement program” and inserting “TIP”;
(iii)
in subparagraph (C) by striking “transportation improvement program” and inserting “STIP” each place it appears;
(iv)
in subparagraph (E) by striking “transportation improvement program” and inserting “STIP”;
(v)
in subparagraph (F)(i) by striking “transportation improvement program” and inserting “STIP” each place it appears;
(vi)
in subparagraph (G)(ii) by striking “transportation improvement program” and inserting “STIP”; and
(vii)
in subparagraph (H) by striking “transportation improvement program” and inserting “STIP”;
(C)
in paragraph (6)—
(i)
in subparagraph (A)—
(I)
by striking “transportation improvement program” and inserting “STIP”; and
(II)
by striking “and projects carried out under the bridge program or the Interstate maintenance program under title 23”; and
(ii)
in subparagraph (B)—
(I)
by striking “or under the bridge program or the Interstate maintenance program”; and
(II)
by striking “statewide transportation improvement program” and inserting “STIP”;
(D)
in paragraph (7)—
(i)
in the heading by striking “Transportation improvement program” and inserting “STIP”; and
(ii)
by striking “transportation improvement program” and inserting “STIP”;
(E)
in paragraph (8) by striking “statewide transportation plans and programs” and inserting “statewide transportation plans and STIPs”; and
(F)
in paragraph (9) by striking “transportation improvement program” and inserting “STIP”;
(6)
in subsection (h)(2)(A) by striking “Not later than 5 years after the date of enactment of the Federal Public Transportation Act of 2012,” and inserting “Not less frequently than once every 4 years,”;
(7)
in subsection (j) by striking “transportation improvement program” and inserting “STIP” each place it appears; and
(8)
in subsection (l) by striking “transportation improvement programs” and inserting “STIPs”.

Sec. 2110 Public transportation emergency relief funds

changed Section 5324 of title 49, United States Code, is further amended by adding at the end the following:

changed “(g) “(f) Imposition of deadline

“(1) In general—Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Secretary may not require any project funded pursuant to this section to advance to the construction obligation stage before the date that is the last day of the sixth fiscal year after the later of—

“(A) the date on which the Governor declared the emergency, as described in subsection (a)(2); or

“(B) the date on which the President declared a major disaster, as described in such subsection.

“(2) Extension of deadline—If the Secretary imposes a deadline for advancement to the construction obligation stage pursuant to paragraph (1), the Secretary may, upon the request of the Governor of the State, issue an extension of not more than 1 year to complete such advancement, and may issue additional extensions after the expiration of any extension, if the Secretary determines the Governor of the State has provided suitable justification to warrant an extension.”

Sec. 2203 Mobility innovation

(a)
In general— Chapter 53 of title 49, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 5315 the following new section:

“5316. Mobility innovation

“(a) In general—Amounts made available to a covered recipient to carry out sections 5307, 5310, and 5311 may be used by such covered recipient under this section to assist in the financing of—

“(1) mobility as a service; and

“(2) mobility on demand services.

“(b) Federal share

“(1) In general—Except as provided in paragraphs (2) and (3), the Federal share of the net cost of a project carried out under this section shall not exceed 70 percent.

“(2) Insourcing incentive—Notwithstanding paragraph (1), the Federal share of the net cost of a project described in paragraph (1) shall, at the request of the project sponsor, be increased by up to 10 percent for mobility on demand service operated exclusively by personnel employed by the recipient.

“(3) Zero emission incentive—Notwithstanding paragraph (1), the Federal share of the net cost of a project described in paragraph (1) shall, at the request of the project sponsor, be increased by up to 10 percent if such project involves an eligible use that uses a vehicle that produces zero carbon dioxide or particulate matter.

“(c) Eligible uses

“(1) In general—The Secretary shall publish guidance describing eligible activities that are demonstrated to—

“(A) increase transit ridership;

“(B) be complementary to fixed route transit service;

“(C) demonstrate meaningful improvements in—

“(i) environmental metrics, including standards established pursuant to the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.) and greenhouse gas performance targets established pursuant to section 150(d) of title 23;

“(ii) traffic congestion;

“(iii) compliance with the requirements under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 12101 et seq.);

“(iv) low-income service to increase access to employment, healthcare, and other essential services;

“(v) service during times of the day when regular transit service is not operating, as long as regular transit service hours are not reduced;

“(vi) new service that operates in areas of lower density that are unserved or underserved by regular transit service;

“(vii) rural service; and

“(viii) improvement in paratransit service quality.

changed “(D) “(2) Fare collection modernization—In developing guidance referred to in this section, the Secretary shall ensure that—

changed “(i) “(A) all costs associated with installing, modernizing, and managing fare collection, including touchless payment systems, shall be considered eligible expenses under this title and subject to the applicable Federal share; and

changed “(ii) “(B) such guidance includes guidance on how agencies shall provide unbanked and underbanked users with an opportunity to benefit from mobility as a service platforms.

changed “(2) “(3) Prohibition on use of funds—Amounts used by a covered recipient for projects eligible under this section may not be used for—

“(A) single passenger vehicle miles (in a passenger motor vehicle, as such term is defined in section 32101, that carries less than 9 passengers), unless the trip—

“(i) meets the definition of public transportation; and

“(ii) begins or completes a fixed route public transportation trip;

“(B) deadhead vehicle miles; or

“(C) any service considered a taxi service that operates under an exemption from testing requirements under section 5331.

“(d) Federal requirements—A project carried out under this section shall be treated as if such project were carried out under the section from which the funds were provided to carry out such project, including the application of any additional requirements provided for by law that apply to section 5307, 5310, or 5311, as applicable.

“(e) Waiver

“(1) Individual waiver—Except as provided in paragraphs (2) and (3), the Secretary may waive any requirement applied to a project carried out under this section pursuant to subsection (d) if the Secretary determines that the project would—

“(A) not undermine labor standards;

“(B) increase employment opportunities of the recipient unless the Secretary determines that such a waiver does not affect employment opportunities; and

“(C) be consistent with the public interest.

“(2) Waiver under other sections—The Secretary may not waive any requirement under paragraph (1) for which a waiver is otherwise available.

“(3) Prohibition of waiver—Notwithstanding paragraph (1), the Secretary may not waive any requirement of—

“(A) section 5333;

“(B) section 5331;

“(C) section 5302(14); and

“(D) chapter 53 that establishes a maximum Federal share for operating costs.

“(4) Application of section 5320—Notwithstanding paragraphs (1) and (2), the Secretary may only waive the requirements of section 5320 with respect to—

“(A) a passenger vehicle owned by an individual;

“(B) subsection (q) of such section for any passenger vehicle not owned by an individual for the period beginning on the date of enactment of this section and ending 3 years after such date;

“(C) any shared micromobility device for the period beginning on the date of enactment of this section and ending on the date that is 3 years after such date; and

“(D) rolling stock that is part of a dedicated fleet of vehicles for the provision of microtransit that is operated by, or exclusively on behalf of, the covered recipient for the period beginning on the date of enactment of this section and ending on the date that is 3 years after such date.

“(5) Limitation—A waiver issued under subparagraphs (B), (C), or (D) of paragraph (4) may only be issued on an individual project basis at the request of the covered recipient and may not be renewed or extended beyond the initial 3-year period of the waiver.

“(f) Open data standards

“(1) In general—Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this section, the Secretary shall initiate procedures under subchapter III of chapter 5 of title 5 to develop an open data standard and an application programming interface necessary to carry out this section.

“(2) Regulations—The regulations required under paragraph (1) shall require public transportation agencies, mobility on demand providers, mobility as a service technology providers, other non-government actors, and local governments the efficient means to transfer data to—

“(A) foster the efficient use of transportation capacity;

“(B) enhance the management of new modes of mobility;

“(C) enable the use of innovative planning tools;

“(D) enable single payment systems for all mobility on demand services;

“(E) establish metropolitan planning organization, State, and local government access to anonymized data for transportation planning, real time operations data, and rules;

“(F) prohibit the transfer of personally identifiable information;

“(G) protect confidential business information;

“(H) enhance cybersecurity protections; and

“(I) allow data governance, including but not limited to licensing and terms of information sharing, periodic risk assessments, policies regarding data retention and information handling policies, and anonymization techniques.

“(3) Prohibition on for profit activity—Any data received by an entity under this subsection may not be sold, leased, or otherwise used to generate profit, except for the direct provision of the related mobility on demand services and mobility as a service.

“(4) Committee—A negotiated rulemaking committee established pursuant to section 565 of title 5 to carry out this subsection shall have a maximum of 17 members limited to representatives of the Department of Transportation, State and local governments, metropolitan planning organizations, urban and rural covered recipients, associations that represent public transit agencies, representatives from at least 3 different organizations engaged in collective bargaining on behalf of transit workers in not fewer than 3 States, mobility on demand providers, and mobility as a service technology providers.

“(5) Publication of proposed regulations—Proposed regulations to implement this section shall be published in the Federal Register by the Secretary not later than 18 months after such date of enactment.

“(6) Extension of deadlines—A deadline set forth in paragraph (4) may be extended up to 180 days if the negotiated rulemaking committee referred to in paragraph (5) concludes that the committee cannot meet the deadline and the Secretary so notifies the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate.

“(g) Application of recipient vehicle revenue miles—With respect to vehicle revenue miles with one passenger of a covered recipient using amounts under this section, such miles—

“(1) shall be included in the National Transit Database under section 5335; and

“(2) shall be excluded from vehicle revenue miles data used in the calculation described in section 5336.

“(h) Savings clause—Subsection (c)(2) and subsection (g) shall not apply to any eligible activities under this section if such activities are—

“(1) being carried out in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 12101 et seq.); or

“(2) projects eligible under section 5310 that exceed the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 12101 et seq.).

“(i) Definitions—In this section:

“(1) Covered recipient—The term covered recipient means a State or local government entity, private nonprofit organization, or Tribe that—

“(A) operates a public transportation service; and

“(B) is a recipient or subrecipient of funds under section 5307, 5310, or 5311.

“(2) Deadhead vehicle miles—The term deadhead vehicle miles means the miles that a vehicle travels when out of revenue service, including leaving or returning to the garage or yard facility, changing routes, when there is no expectation of carrying revenue passengers, and any miles traveled by a private operator without a passenger.

“(3) Mobility as a service—The term mobility as a service means services that constitute the integration of mobility on demand services and public transportation that are available and accessible to all travelers, provide multimodal trip planning, and a unified payment system.

“(4) Mobility on demand—The term mobility on demand means an on-demand transportation service shared among individuals, either concurrently or one after another.”

(b)
Clerical amendment— The analysis for chapter 53 of title 49, United States Code, is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 5315 the following new item:
(c)
Effective date— This section and the amendments made by this section shall take effect on the date on which the Secretary of Transportation has finalized both—
(1)
the guidance required under section 5316(c) of title 49, United States Code; and
(2)
the regulations required under section 5316(f) of title 49, United States Code.
(d)
Savings clause— Nothing in this section, or the amendments made by this section, shall prohibit the use of funds for an eligible activity or pilot project of a covered recipient authorized under the law in effect on the day before the date of enactment of this Act before the effective date described in subsection (c).

Sec. 2204 Formula grants for rural areas

Section 5311 of title 49, United States Code, is amended—

(1)
in subsection (b)—
(A)
in paragraph (2) by adding at the end the following:

“(D) Census designation—The Secretary may approve a State program that allocates not more than 5 percent of such State’s apportionment to assist rural areas that were redesignated as urban areas not more than 2 fiscal years after the last census designation of urbanized area boundaries.”

(B)
in paragraph (3) by striking “section 5338(a)(2)(F)” and inserting “section 5338(a)(2)(E)”;
(2)
in subsection (c)—
(A)
in paragraph (1)—
(i)
in the matter preceding subparagraph (A) by striking “section 5338(a)(2)(F)” and inserting “section 5338(a)(2)(E)”;
(ii)
in subparagraph (A) by striking “$5,000,000” and inserting “$10,000,000”; and
(iii)
in subparagraph (B) by striking “$30,000,000” and inserting “the amount remaining under section 5338(a)(2)(E)(i) after the amount under subparagraph (A) is distributed”;
(B)
in paragraph (2)(C) by striking “section 5338(a)(2)(F)” and inserting “section 5338(a)(2)(E)”; and
(C)
in paragraph (3)—
(i)
in subparagraph (A) by striking “section 5338(a)(2)(F)” and inserting “section 5338(a)(2)(E)”; and
(ii)
by striking subparagraphs (B) and (C) and inserting the following:

“(B) Land area

“(i) In general—Subject to clause (ii), each State shall receive an amount that is equal to 15 percent of the amount apportioned under this paragraph, multiplied by the ratio of the land area in rural areas in that State and divided by the land area in all rural areas in the United States, as shown by the most recent decennial census of population.

“(ii) Maximum apportionment—No State shall receive more than 5 percent of the amount apportioned under clause (i).

“(C) Population—Each State shall receive an amount equal to 50 percent of the amount apportioned under this paragraph, multiplied by the ratio of the population of rural areas in that State and divided by the population of all rural areas in the United States, as shown by the most recent decennial census of population.

“(D) Vehicle revenue miles

“(i) In general—Subject to clause (ii), each State shall receive an amount that is equal to 25 percent of the amount apportioned under this paragraph, multiplied by the ratio of vehicle revenue miles in rural areas in that State and divided by the vehicle revenue miles in all rural areas in the United States, as determined by national transit database reporting.

“(ii) Maximum apportionment—No State shall receive more than 5 percent of the amount apportioned under clause (i).

“(E) Low-income individuals—Each State shall receive an amount that is equal to 10 percent of the amount apportioned under this paragraph, multiplied by the ratio of low-income individuals in rural areas in that State and divided by the number of low-income individuals in all rural areas in the United States, as shown by the Bureau of the Census.”

(3)
in subsection (f)—
(A)
changed in paragraph (1) by inserting “A State may expend funds to continue service into another State to extend a route.” before “Eligible activities under”; andunder”;
(B)
in paragraph (2) by inserting “and makes the certification and supporting documents publicly available” before the period at the end; and
(C)
added by adding at the end the following:

added “(3) Meaningful connections—All projects funded under this subsection shall directly serve, or make meaningful scheduled connections to, the national intercity bus network.”

(4)
in subsection (g) by adding at the end the following:

“(6) Allowance for volunteer hours

“(A) Applicable regulations—For any funds provided by a department or agency of the Government under paragraph (3)(D) or by a service agreement under paragraph (3)(C), and such department or agency has regulations in place that provide for the valuation of volunteer hours as allowable in-kind contributions toward the non-Federal share of project costs, such regulations shall be used to determine the allowable valuation of volunteer hours as an in-kind contribution toward the non-Federal remainder of net project costs for a transit project funded under this section.

“(B) Limitations—Subparagraph (A) shall not apply to the provision of fixed-route bus services funded under this section.”

Sec. 2301 Buy America

(a)
Buy America—
(1)
In general— Chapter 53 of title 49, United States Code, is amended by inserting before section 5321 the following:

“5320. Buy America

“(a) In general—The Secretary may obligate an amount that may be appropriated to carry out this chapter for a project only if the steel, iron, and manufactured goods used in the project are produced in the United States.

“(b) Waiver—The Secretary may waive subsection (a) if the Secretary finds that—

“(1) applying subsection (a) would be inconsistent with the public interest;

“(2) the steel, iron, and goods produced in the United States are not produced in a sufficient and reasonably available amount or are not of a satisfactory quality;

“(3) when procuring rolling stock (including train control, communication, traction power equipment, and rolling stock prototypes) under this chapter—

“(A) the cost of components and subcomponents produced in the United States is more than 70 percent of the cost of all components of the rolling stock; and

“(B) final assembly of the rolling stock has occurred in the United States; or

“(4) including domestic material will increase the cost of the overall project by more than 25 percent.

“(c) Written waiver determination and annual report

“(1) Waiver procedure—Not later than 120 days after the submission of a request for a waiver, the Secretary shall make a determination under subsection (b)(1), (b)(2), or (b)(4) as to whether to waive subsection (a).

“(2) Public notification and comment

“(A) In general—Not later than 30 days before making a determination regarding a waiver described in paragraph (1), the Secretary shall provide notification and an opportunity for public comment on the request for such waiver.

“(B) Notification requirements—The notification required under subparagraph (A) shall—

“(i) describe whether the application is being made for a waiver described in subsection (b)(1), (b)(2) or (b)(4); and

“(ii) be provided to the public by electronic means, including on a public website of the Department of Transportation.

“(3) Determination—Before a determination described in paragraph (1) takes effect, the Secretary shall publish a detailed justification for such determination that addresses all public comments received under paragraph (2)—

“(A) on the public website of the Department of Transportation; and

“(B) if the Secretary issues a waiver with respect to such determination, in the Federal Register.

“(4) Annual report—Annually, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives a report listing any waiver issued under paragraph (1) during the preceding year.

“(d) Rolling stock waiver conditions

“(1) Labor costs for final assembly—In this section, highly skilled labor costs involved in final assembly shall be included as a separate component in the cost of components and subcomponents under subsection (b)(3)(A).

“(2) High domestic content component bonus—In this section, in calculating the domestic content of the rolling stock under subsection (b)(3)(A), the percent, rounded to the nearest whole number, of the domestic content in components of such rolling stock, weighted by cost, shall be used in calculating the domestic content of the rolling stock, except—

“(A) with respect to components that exceed—

“(i) 70 percent domestic content, the Secretary shall add 10 additional percent to the component’s domestic content when calculating the domestic content of the rolling stock; and

“(ii) 75 percent domestic content, the Secretary shall add 15 additional percent to the component’s domestic content when calculating the domestic content of the rolling stock; and

“(B) in no case may a component exceed 100 percent domestic content when calculating the domestic content of the rolling stock.

“(3) Rolling stock frames or car shells

“(A) Inclusion of costs—Subject to the substantiation requirement of subparagraph (B), in calculating the cost of the domestic content of the rolling stock under subsection (b)(3), in the case of a rolling stock procurement receiving assistance under this chapter in which the average cost of a rolling stock vehicle in the procurement is more than $300,000, if rolling stock frames or car shells are not produced in the United States, the Secretary shall include in the calculation of the domestic content of the rolling stock the cost of the steel or iron that is produced in the United States and used in the rolling stock frames or car shells.

“(B) Substantiation—If a rolling stock vehicle manufacturer wishes to include in the calculation of the vehicle’s domestic content the cost of steel or iron produced in the United States and used in the rolling stock frames and car shells that are not produced in the United States, the manufacturer shall maintain and provide upon request a mill certification that substantiates the origin of the steel or iron.

“(4) Treatment of waived components and subcomponents—In this section, a component or subcomponent waived under subsection (b) shall be excluded from any part of the calculation required under subsection (b)(3)(A).

“(5) Zero-emission vehicle domestic battery cell incentive—The Secretary shall add 2.5 percent to the total domestic content when calculating the domestic content of the rolling stock for any zero-emission vehicle that uses only battery cells for propulsion that are manufactured domestically.

“(6) Prohibition on double counting

“(A) In general—No labor costs included in the cost of a component or subcomponent by the manufacturer of rolling stock may be treated as rolling stock assembly costs for purposes of calculating domestic content.

“(B) Violation—A violation of this paragraph shall be treated as a false claim under subchapter III of chapter 37 of title 31.

“(7) Definition of highly skilled labor costs—In this subsection, the term highly skilled labor costs—

“(A) means the apportioned value of direct wage compensation associated with final assembly activities of workers directly employed by a rolling stock original equipment manufacturer and directly associated with the final assembly activities of a rolling stock vehicle that advance the value or improve the condition of the end product;

“(B) does not include any temporary or indirect activities or those hired via a third-party contractor or subcontractor;

“(C) are limited to metalworking, fabrication, welding, electrical, engineering, and other technical activities requiring training;

“(D) are not otherwise associated with activities required under section 661.11 of title 49, Code of Federal Regulations; and

“(E) includes only activities performed in the United States and does not include that of foreign nationals providing assistance at a United States manufacturing facility.

“(e) Certification of domestic supply and disclosure

“(1) Certification of domestic supply—If the Secretary denies an application for a waiver under subsection (b)(2), the Secretary shall provide to the applicant a written certification that—

“(A) the steel, iron, or manufactured goods, as applicable, (referred to in this paragraph as the “item”) is produced in the United States in a sufficient and reasonably available amount;

“(B) the item produced in the United States is of a satisfactory quality; and

“(C) includes a list of known manufacturers in the United States from which the item can be obtained.

“(2) Disclosure—The Secretary shall disclose the waiver denial and the written certification to the public in the manner described in subsection (c).

“(f) Waiver prohibited—The Secretary may not make a waiver under subsection (b) for goods produced in a foreign country if the Secretary, in consultation with the United States Trade Representative, decides that the government of that foreign country—

“(1) has an agreement with the United States Government under which the Secretary has waived the requirement of this section; and

“(2) has violated the agreement by discriminating against goods to which this section applies that are produced in the United States and to which the agreement applies.

“(g) Penalty for mislabeling and misrepresentation—A person is ineligible under subpart 9.4 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation, or any successor thereto, to receive a contract or subcontract made with amounts authorized under title II of division B of the INVEST in America Act if a court or department, agency, or instrumentality of the Government decides the person intentionally—

“(1) affixed a “Made in America” label, or a label with an inscription having the same meaning, to goods sold in or shipped to the United States that are used in a project to which this section applies but not produced in the United States; or

“(2) represented that goods described in paragraph (1) were produced in the United States.

“(h) State requirements—The Secretary may not impose any limitation on assistance provided under this chapter that restricts a State from imposing more stringent requirements than this subsection on the use of articles, materials, and supplies mined, produced, or manufactured in foreign countries in projects carried out with that assistance or restricts a recipient of that assistance from complying with those State-imposed requirements.

“(i) Opportunity To correct inadvertent error—The Secretary may allow a manufacturer or supplier of steel, iron, or manufactured goods to correct after bid opening any certification of noncompliance or failure to properly complete the certification (but not including failure to sign the certification) under this subsection if such manufacturer or supplier attests under penalty of perjury that such manufacturer or supplier submitted an incorrect certification as a result of an inadvertent or clerical error. The burden of establishing inadvertent or clerical error is on the manufacturer or supplier.

“(j) Administrative review—A party adversely affected by an agency action under this subsection shall have the right to seek review under section 702 of title 5.

“(k) Steel and iron—For purposes of this section, steel and iron meeting the requirements of section 661.5(b) of title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, may be considered produced in the United States.

“(l) Definition of small purchase—For purposes of determining whether a purchase qualifies for a general public interest waiver under subsection (b)(1), including under any regulation promulgated under such subsection, the term small purchase means a purchase of not more than $150,000.

“(m) Preaward and postdelivery review of rolling stock purchases

“(1) In general—The Secretary shall prescribe regulations requiring a preaward and postdelivery certification of a rolling stock vehicle that meets the requirements of this section and Government motor vehicle safety requirements to be eligible for a grant under this chapter. For compliance with this section—

“(A) Federal inspections and review are required;

“(B) a manufacturer certification is not sufficient; and

“(C) a rolling stock vehicle that has been certified by the Secretary remains certified until the manufacturer makes a material change to the vehicle, or adjusts the cost of all components of the rolling stock, that reduces, by more than half, the percentage of domestic content above 70 percent.

“(2) Certification of percentage

“(A) In general—The Secretary may, at the request of a component or subcomponent manufacturer, certify the percentage of domestic content and place of manufacturing for a component or subcomponent.

“(B) Period of certification—Any component or subcomponent certified by the Secretary shall remain certified until the manufacturer makes a material change to the domestic content or the place of manufacturing of such component or subcomponent.

“(3) Freedom of information act—In carrying out this subsection, the Secretary shall apply the provisions of section 552 of title 5, including subsection (b)(4) of such section.

“(4) Noncompliance—The Secretary shall prohibit recipients from procuring rolling stock, components, or subcomponents from a supplier that intentionally provides false information to comply with this subsection.

“(n) Scope—The requirements of this section apply to all contracts for a public transportation project carried out within the scope of the applicable finding, determination, or decision under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), regardless of the funding source of such contracts, if at least one contract for the public transportation project is funded with amounts made available to carry out this chapter.

“(o) Buy America conformity—The Secretary shall ensure that all Federal funds for new commuter rail projects shall comply with this section and shall not be subject to section 22905(a).

“(p) Audits and reporting of waste, fraud, and abuse

“(1) In general—The Inspector General of the Department of Transportation shall conduct an annual audit on certifications under subsection (m) regarding compliance with Buy America.

“(2) Report fraud, waste, and abuse—The Secretary shall display a “Report Fraud, Waste, and Abuse” button and link to Department of Transportation’s Office of Inspector General Hotline on the Federal Transit Administration’s Buy America landing page.

“(3) Contract requirement—The Secretary shall require all recipients who enter into contracts to purchase rolling stock with funds provided under this chapter to include in such contract information on how to contact the Department of Transportation’s Office of Inspector General Hotline to report suspicions of fraud, waste, and abuse.

“(q) Passenger motor vehicles

“(1) In general—Any domestically manufactured passenger motor vehicle shall be considered to be produced in the United States under this section.

“(2) Domestically manufactured passenger motor vehicle—In this subsection, the term domestically manufactured passenger motor vehicle means any passenger motor vehicle, as such term is defined in section 32304(a) that—

“(A) has under section 32304(b)(1)(B) its final assembly place in the United States; and

“(B) the percentage (by value) of passenger motor equipment under section 32304(b)(1)(A) equals or exceeds 60 percent value added.

“(r) Rolling stock components and subcomponents—No bus shell, railcar frame, or other component or subcomponent that is primarily made of steel or iron shall be treated as produced in the United States for purposes of subsection (b)(3) or determined to be of domestic origin under section 661.11 of title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, if the material inputs of such component or subcomponent were imported into the United States and the processes performed in the United States on the imported articles would not result in a change in the article’s classification to chapter 86 or 87 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States from another chapter or a new heading of any chapter from the heading under which the article was classified upon entry.

changed “(s) Treatment of steel and iron components as produced in the United States—Notwithstanding any other provision of any law or any rule, regulation, or policy of the Federal Transit Administration, steel and iron components of a system, as defined in section 661.3 of title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, and of manufactured end products referred to in Appendix A of such section, may not be considered to be produced in the United States unless such components meet the requirements of section 661.5(b) of title 49, Code of Federal Regulations.”Regulations.

added “(t) Requirement for transit agencies—Notwithstanding the provisions of this section, if a transit agency accepts Federal funds, such agency shall adhere to the requirements of this section in procuring rolling stock.”

(2)
Clerical amendment— The analysis for chapter 53 of title 49, United States Code, is amended by inserting before the item relating to section 5321 the following:
(3)
Conforming amendments—
(A)
Technical assistance and workforce development— Section 5314(a)(2)(G) of title 49, United States Code, is amended by striking “sections 5323(j) and 5323(m)” and inserting “section 5320”.
(B)
Urbanized area formula grants— Section 5307(c)(1)(E) of title 49, United States Code, is amended by inserting “, 5320,” after “5323”.
(C)
Innovative procurement— Section 3019(c)(2)(E)(ii) of the FAST Act (49 U.S.C. 5325 note) is amended by striking “5323(j)” and inserting “5320”.
(b)
Bus rolling stock— Not later than 18 months after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Transportation shall issue such regulations as are necessary to revise Appendix B and Appendix D of section 661.11 of title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, with respect to bus rolling stock to maximize job creation and align such section with modern manufacturing techniques.
(c)
Rail rolling stock— Not later than 30 months after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall issue such regulations as are necessary to revise subsections (t), (u), and (v) of section 661.11 of title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, with respect to rail rolling stock to maximize job creation and align such section with modern manufacturing techniques.
(d)
Rule of applicability—
(1)
In general— Except as otherwise provided in this subsection, the amendments made by this section shall apply to any contract entered into on or after the date of enactment of this Act.
(2)
Delayed applicability of certain provisions— Contracts described in paragraph (1) shall be subject to the following delayed applicability requirements:
(A)
Section 5320(m)(2) shall apply to contracts entered into on or after the date that is 30 days after the date of enactment of this Act.
(B)
Notwithstanding subparagraph (A), section 5320(m) shall apply to contracts for the procurement of bus rolling stock beginning on the earlier of—
(i)
180 days after the date on which final regulations are issued pursuant to subsection (b); or
(ii)
the date that is 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act.
(C)
Notwithstanding subparagraph (A), section 5320(m) shall apply to contracts for the procurement of rail rolling stock beginning on the earlier of—
(i)
180 days after the date on which final regulations are issued pursuant to subsection (c); or
(ii)
the date that is 2 years after the date of enactment of this Act.
(D)
Section 5320(p)(1) shall apply on the date that is 1 year after the latest of the application dates described in subparagraphs (A) through (C).
(3)
Special rule for certain contracts— For any contract described in paragraph (1) for which the delivery for the first production vehicle occurs before October 1, 2024, paragraphs (1) and (4) of section 5320(d) shall not apply.
(4)
Special rule for battery cell incentives— For any contract described in paragraph (1) for which the delivery for the first production vehicle occurs before October 1, 2023, section 5320(d)(5) shall not apply.
(5)
Application of existing law— During any periods described in this subsection, the Secretary shall apply the requirements of sections 5323(j) and 5323(m) of title 49, United States Code, as in effect on the day before the date of enactment of this Act, as applicable.
(e)
Special rule for domestic content—
(1)
In general— For the calculation of the percent of domestic content calculated under section 5320(d)(2) for a contract for rolling stock entered into on or after October 1, 2021—
(A)
if the delivery of the first production vehicle occurs in fiscal year 2023 or fiscal year 2024, for components that exceed 70 percent domestic content, the Secretary shall add 20 additional percent to the component's domestic content; and
(B)
if the delivery of the first production vehicle occurs in fiscal year 2025 or fiscal year 2026—
(i)
for components that exceed 70 percent but do not exceed 75 percent domestic content, the Secretary shall add 15 additional percent to the component's domestic content; or
(ii)
for components that exceed 75 percent domestic content, the Secretary shall add 20 additional percent to the component's domestic content.
(2)
Contracts after October 1, 2021— For the calculation of the percent of domestic content calculated under section 5320(d)(2) for a contract for rolling stock entered into on or after October 1, 2021 for a vehicle described in section 5339(c)(1)(D), and notwithstanding subsection (e)(1), if the delivery of the first production vehicle occurs in fiscal year 2023 or 2024, for components that exceed 70 percent domestic content, the Secretary shall add 30 additional percent to the component’s domestic content.
(3)
Battery cells— Paragraph (1) and paragraph (2) of this subsection shall not apply to any contract for rolling stock if the manufacturer of the rolling stock or the manufacturer of the battery cells used for propulsion of the rolling stock is an entity described in 49 USC 5323(u)(1) and (u)(2).

Sec. 2302 Bus procurement streamlining

changed Section 5323 of title 49, United States Code, as is amended by adding at the end the following:

“(x) Bus procurement streamlining

“(1) In general—The Secretary may only obligate amounts for acquisition of buses under this chapter to a recipient that issues a request for proposals for an open market procurement that meets the following criteria:

“(A) Such request for proposals is limited to performance specifications, except for components or subcomponents identified in the negotiated rulemaking carried out pursuant to this subsection.

“(B) Such request for proposals does not seek any alternative design or manufacture specification of a bus offered by a manufacturer, except to require a component or subcomponent identified in the negotiated rulemaking carried out pursuant to this subsection.

“(2) Specific bus component negotiated rulemaking

“(A) Initiation—Not later than 120 days after the date of enactment of the INVEST in America Act, the Secretary shall initiate procedures under subchapter III of chapter 5 of title 5 to negotiate and issue such regulations as are necessary to establish as limited a list as is practicable of bus components and subcomponents described in subparagraph (B).

“(B) List of components—The regulations required under subparagraph (A) shall establish a list of bus components and subcomponents that may be specified in a request for proposals described in paragraph (1) by a recipient. The Secretary shall ensure the list is limited in scope and limited to only components and subcomponents that cannot be selected with performance specifications to ensure interoperability.

“(C) Publication of proposed regulations—Proposed regulations to implement this section shall be published in the Federal Register by the Secretary not later than 18 months after such date of enactment.

“(D) Committee—A negotiated rulemaking committee established pursuant to section 565 of title 5 to carry out this paragraph shall have a maximum of 11 members limited to representatives of the Department of Transportation, urban and rural recipients (including State government recipients), and transit vehicle manufacturers.

“(E) Extension of deadlines—A deadline set forth in subparagraph (C) may be extended up to 180 days if the negotiated rulemaking committee referred to in subparagraph (D) concludes that the committee cannot meet the deadline and the Secretary so notifies the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate.

“(3) Savings clause—Nothing in this section shall be construed to provide additional authority for the Secretary to restrict what a bus manufacturer offers to sell to a public transportation agency.”

Sec. 2306 Special rule for certain rolling stock procurements

(a)
Certification— Section 5323(u)(4) of title 49, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
changed in subparagraph (A) in the heading by striking“rail”; striking “rail”; and
(2)
by adding at the end the following:

“(C) Nonrail rolling stock—Notwithstanding subparagraph (B) of paragraph (5), as a condition of financial assistance made available in a fiscal year under section 5339, a recipient shall certify in that fiscal year that the recipient will not award any contract or subcontract for the procurement of rolling stock for use in public transportation with a rolling stock manufacturer described in paragraph (1).”

(b)
changed Special Rule— Section 5323(u)(5)(A) of title 49, United States Code, (as redesignated by this Act) is amended by striking “made by a public transportation agency with a rail rolling stock manufacturer described in paragraph (1)” and all that follows through the period at the end and inserting “as of December 20, 2019, including options and other requirements tied to these contracts or subcontracts, made by a public transportation agency with a restricted rail rolling stock manufacturer.”.

Sec. 2403 Zero emission bus grants

(a)
In general— Section 5339(c) of title 49, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
in the heading by striking “Low or no emission grants” and inserting “Zero emission grants”;
(2)
in paragraph (1)—
(A)
in subparagraph (B)—
(i)
in the matter preceding clause (i) by striking “in an eligible area”;
(ii)
in clause (i) by striking “low or no emission” and inserting “zero emission”;
(iii)
in clause (ii) by striking “low or no emission” and inserting “zero emission”;
(iv)
in clause (iii) by striking “low or no emission” and inserting “zero emission”;
(v)
in clause (iv) by striking “facilities and related equipment for low or no emission” and inserting “related equipment for zero emission”;
(vi)
in clause (v) by striking “facilities and related equipment for low or no emission vehicles;” and inserting “related equipment for zero emission vehicles; or”;
(vii)
in clause (vii) by striking “low or no emission” and inserting “zero emission”;
(viii)
by striking clause (vi); and
(ix)
by redesignating clause (vii) as clause (vi);
(B)
by striking subparagraph (D) and inserting the following:

“(D) the term zero emission bus means a bus that is a zero emission vehicle;”

(C)
by striking subparagraph (E) and inserting the following:

“(E) the term zero emission vehicle means a vehicle used to provide public transportation that produces no carbon dioxide or particulate matter;”

(D)
in subparagraph (F) by striking “and” at the end;
(E)
by striking subparagraph (G) and inserting the following:

“(G) the term priority area means an area that is—

“(i) designated as a nonattainment area for ozone or particulate matter under section 107(d) of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7407(d));

“(ii) a maintenance area, as such term is defined in section 5303, for ozone or particulate matter; or

“(iii) in a State that has enacted a statewide zero emission bus transition requirement, as determined by the Secretary; and”

(F)
by adding at the end the following:

“(H) the term low-income community means any population census tract if—

“(i) the poverty rate for such tract is at least 20 percent; or

“(ii) in the case of a tract—

“(I) not located within a metropolitan area, the median family income for such tract does not exceed 80 percent of statewide median family income; or

“(II) located within a metropolitan area, the median family income for such tract does not exceed 80 percent of the greater statewide median family income or the metropolitan area median family income.”

(3)
added in paragraph (3)—
(A)
added by striking subparagraph (B); and
(B)
added by redesignating subparagraph (C) as subparagraph (B);
(4)
renumbered was (2)(5) by striking paragraph (5) and inserting the following:

“(5) Grant eligibility—In awarding grants under this subsection, the Secretary shall make grants to eligible projects relating to the acquisition or leasing of equipment for zero-emission buses or zero-emission buses—

“(A) that procure—

“(i) at least 10 zero emission buses;

“(ii) if the recipient operates less than 50 buses in peak service, at least 5 zero emission buses; or

“(iii) hydrogen buses;

“(B) for which the recipient’s board of directors has approved a long-term integrated fleet management plan that—

“(i) establishes—

“(I) a goal by a set date to convert the entire bus fleet to zero emission buses; or

“(II) a goal that within 10 years from the date of approval of such plan the recipient will convert a set percentage of the total bus fleet of such recipient to zero emission buses; and

added “(ii) examines the impact of the transition on the applicant’s current workforce, by identifying skills gaps, training needs, and retraining needs of the existing workers of such applicant to operate and maintain zero-emission vehicles and related infrastructure, and avoids the displacement of the existing workforce; and

removed “(ii) examines the impact of the transition on the applicant’s current workforce, with a goal of identifying skills gaps, retraining existing workers to operate and maintain zero-emission vehicles and related infrastructure, and avoiding the displacement of the existing workforce; and

“(C) for which the recipient has performed a fleet transition study that includes optimal route planning and an analysis of how utility rates may impact the recipient’s operations and maintenance budget.”

(5)
added in paragraph (7)(A) by striking “80” and inserting “90”; and
(6)
renumbered was (2)(6) by adding at the end the following:

“(8) Low and moderate community grants—Not less than 10 percent of the amounts made available under this subsection in a fiscal year shall be distributed to projects serving predominantly low-income communities.

“(9) Priority set-aside—Of the amounts made available under this subsection in a fiscal year, not less than—

“(A) 20 percent shall be distributed to applicants in priority areas; and

“(B) 10 percent shall be distributed to applicants not located in priority areas whose board of directors have approved a long-term integrated fleet management plan that establishes a goal to convert 100 percent of their bus fleet to zero-emission buses within 15 years.”

(b)
Metropolitan transportation planning— Section 5303(b) of title 49, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:

“(9) Maintenance area—The term maintenance area has the meaning given the term in sections 171(2) and 175A of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7501(2); 7505a).”

Sec. 2404 Restoration to state of good repair formula subgrant

Section 5339 of title 49, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:

“(d) Restoration to state of good repair formula subgrant

“(1) General authority—The Secretary may make grants under this subsection to assist eligible recipients and subrecipients described in paragraph (2) in financing capital projects to replace, rehabilitate, and purchase buses and related equipment.

“(2) Eligible recipients and subrecipients—Not later than September 1 annually, the Secretary shall make public a list of eligible recipients and subrecipients based on the most recent data available in the National Transit Database to calculate the 20 percent of eligible recipients and subrecipients with the highest percentage of asset vehicle miles for buses beyond the useful life benchmark established by the Federal Transit Administration.

“(3) Urban apportionments—Funds allocated under section 5338(a)(2)(L)(ii) shall be—

“(A) distributed to—

changed “(i) designated recipients in an urbanized area with a population of more than at least 200,000 made eligible by paragraph (1); and

“(ii) States based on subrecipients made eligible by paragraph (1) in an urbanized area under 200,000; and

“(B) allocated pursuant to the formula set forth in section 5336 other than subsection (b), using the data from the 20 percent of eligible recipients and subrecipients.

“(4) Rural allocation—The Secretary shall—

“(A) calculate the percentage of funds under section 5338(a)(2)(L)(ii) to allocate to rural subrecipients by dividing—

“(i) the asset vehicle miles for buses beyond the useful life benchmark (established by the Federal Transit Administration) of the rural subrecipients described in paragraph (2); by

“(ii) the total asset vehicle miles for buses beyond such benchmark of all eligible recipients and subrecipients described in paragraph (2); and

“(B) prior to the allocation described in paragraph (3)(B), apportion to each State the amount of the total rural allocation calculated under subparagraph (A) attributable to such State based the proportion that—

“(i) the asset vehicle miles for buses beyond the useful life benchmark (established by the Federal Transit Administration) for rural subrecipients described in paragraph (2) in such State; bears to

“(ii) the total asset vehicle miles described in subparagraph (A)(i).

“(5) Application of other provisions—Paragraphs (3), (7), and (8) of subsection (a) shall apply to eligible recipients and subrecipients described in paragraph (2) of a grant under this subsection.

“(6) Prohibition—No eligible recipient or subrecipient outside the top 5 percent of asset vehicle miles for buses beyond the useful life benchmark established by the Federal Transit Administration may receive a grant in both fiscal year 2023 and fiscal year 2024.

“(7) Requirement—The Secretary shall require—

“(A) States to expend, to the benefit of the subrecipients eligible under paragraph (2), the apportioned funds attributed to such subrecipients; and

“(B) designated recipients to provide the allocated funds to the recipients eligible under paragraph (2) the apportioned funds attributed to such recipients.”

Sec. 2405 Workforce development training grants

Section 5339 of title 49, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:

“(e) Workforce development training grants

“(1) In general—Not less than 12.5 percent of funds authorized to be made available for subsection (c) shall be available to fund workforce development training eligible under section 5314(b)(2) (including registered apprenticeships and other labor-management training programs), related to operations or maintenance of zero emission vehicles.

“(2) Eligible recipients—Recipients eligible under subsection (c) shall be eligible to receive a grant under this subsection.

changed “(3) Federal share—The Federal share of the cost of an eligible project carried out under this subsection shall be 100 percent.”percent.

added “(4) Prioritization—In making grants under this subsection, the Secretary shall prioritize applications that jointly fund training as part of a vehicle procurement application under subsection (c).”

Sec. 2501 Low-income urban formula funds

Section 5336(j) of title 49, United States Code, is amended—

(1)
in paragraph (1) by striking “75 percent” and inserting “50 percent”;
(2)
in paragraph (2) by striking “25 percent” and inserting “12.5 percent”; and
(3)
by adding at the end the following:

“(3) 30 percent of the funds shall be apportioned among designated recipients for urbanized areas with a population of 200,000 or more in the ratio that—

“(A) the number of individuals in each such urbanized area residing in an urban census tract with a poverty rate of at least 20 percent during the 5 years most recently ending; bears to

changed “(B) the number of individuals in all such urbanized areas residing in an urban census tract with a poverty rate of at least 20 percent during the 5 years most recently ending; andending.

“(4) 7.5 percent of the funds shall be apportioned among designated recipients for urbanized areas with a population less than 200,000 in the ratio that—

“(A) the number of individuals in each such urbanized area residing in an urban census tract with a poverty rate of at least 20 percent during the 5 years most recently ending; bears to

“(B) the number of individuals in all such areas residing in an urban census tract with a poverty rate of at least 20 percent during the 5 years most recently ending.”

Sec. 2503 Demonstration grants to support reduced fare transit

Section 5312 of title 49, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:

“(j) Demonstration grants To support reduced fare transit

“(1) In general—Not later than 300 days after the date of enactment of the INVEST in America Act, the Secretary shall award grants (which shall be known as “Access to Jobs Grants”) to eligible entities, on a competitive basis, to implement reduced fare transit service.

“(2) Notice—Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of the INVEST in America Act, the Secretary shall provide notice to eligible entities of the availability of grants under paragraph (1).

“(3) Application—To be eligible to receive a grant under this subsection, an eligible recipient shall submit to the Secretary an application containing such information as the Secretary may require, including, at a minimum, the following:

“(A) A description of how the eligible entity plans to implement reduced fare transit access with respect to low-income individuals, including any eligibility requirements for such transit access.

“(B) A description of how the eligible entity will consult with local community stakeholders, labor unions, local education agencies and institutions of higher education, public housing agencies, and workforce development boards in the implementation of reduced fares.

“(C) A description of the eligible entity’s current fare evasion enforcement policies, including how the eligible entity plans to use the reduced fare program to reduce fare evasion.

“(D) An estimate of additional costs to such eligible entity as a result of reduced transit fares.

“(E) A plan for a public awareness campaign of the transit agency’s ability to provide reduced fares, including in foreign languages, based on—

“(i) data from the Bureau of the Census, consistent with the local area demographics where the transit agency operates, including the languages that are most prevalent and commonly requested for translation services; or

“(ii) qualitative and quantitative observation from community service providers including those that provide health and mental health services, social services, transportation, and other relevant social services.

“(F) Projected impacts on ridership.

“(G) Projected benefits in closing transit equity gaps.

added “(H) Projected impact on the ability of students to access education or workforce training programs.

“(4) Grant duration—Grants awarded under this subsection shall be for a 2-year period.

“(5) Selection of eligible recipients—In carrying out the program under this subsection, the Secretary shall award not more than 20 percent of grants to eligible entities located in rural areas.

“(6) Uses of funds—An eligible entity receiving a grant under this subsection shall use such grant to implement a reduced fare transit program and offset lost fare revenue.

“(7) Rule of construction—Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit the eligibility of an applicant if a State, local, or Tribal governmental entity provides reduced fare transportation to low-income individuals.

“(8) Definitions—In this subsection:

“(A) Eligible entity—The term eligible entity means a State, local, or Tribal governmental entity that operates a public transportation service and is a recipient or subrecipient of funds under this chapter.

“(B) Low-income individual—The term low-income individual means an individual—

“(i) that has qualified for—

“(I) any program of medical assistance under a State plan or under a waiver of the plan under title XIX of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396 et seq.);

“(II) supplemental nutrition assistance program (SNAP) under the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 (7 U.S.C. 2011 et seq.);

“(III) the program of block grants for States for temporary assistance for needy families (TANF) established under part A of title IV of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);

“(IV) the free and reduced price school lunch program established under the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. 1751 et seq.);

“(V) a housing voucher through section 8(o) of the United States Housing Act of 1937 (42 U.S.C. 1437f(o));

“(VI) benefits under the Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Act of 1981;

“(VII) special supplemental food program for women, infants and children (WIC) under section 17 of the Child Nutrition Act of 1966 (42 U.S.C. 1786); or

removed “(VIII) a Federal Pell Grant under section 401 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1070a); or

changed “(ii) whose family income is at or below “(VIII) a set percent (as determined by the eligible recipient) of the poverty line (as that term is defined in Federal Pell Grant under section 673(2) 401 of the Community Service Block Grant Higher Education Act (42 U.S.C. 9902(2)), including any revision required by that section) for a family of the size involved.1965 (20 U.S.C. 1070a);

added “(ii) whose family income is at or below a set percent (as determined by the eligible recipient) of the poverty line (as that term is defined in section 673(2) of the Community Service Block Grant Act (42 U.S.C. 9902(2)), including any revision required by that section) for a family of the size involved; or

added “(iii) that is a low-income veteran or member of the military.

“(9) Report—The Secretary shall designate a university transportation center under section 5505 to collaborate with the eligible entities receiving a grant under this subsection to collect necessary data to evaluate the effectiveness of meeting the targets described in the application of such recipient, including increased ridership, impacts on fare evasion, and progress towards significantly closing transit equity gaps.”

Sec. 2602 Public transportation safety program

Section 5329 of title 49, United States Code, is amended—

(1)
in subsection (b)(2)(C)(ii)—
(A)
in subclause (I) by striking “and” at the end;
(B)
in subclause (II) by striking the semicolon and inserting “; and”; and
(C)
by adding at the end the following:

“(III) innovations in driver assistance technologies and driver protection infrastructure where appropriate, and a reduction in visibility impairments that contribute to pedestrian fatalities;”

(2)
in subsection (b)(2)—
(A)
by redesignating subparagraphs (D) and (E) as subparagraphs (E) and (F), respectively; and
(B)
changed by adding at the end after subparagraph (C) the following:

changed “(D) in consultation with the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, precautionary and reactive actions required to ensure public and personnel safety and health during an emergency as defined in section 5324.”5324;”

(3)
in subsection (d)—
(A)
in paragraph (1)—
(i)
in subparagraph (A) by inserting “the safety committee established under paragraph (4), and subsequently,” before “the board of directors”;
(ii)
in subparagraph (C) by striking “public, personnel, and property” and inserting “public and personnel to injuries, assaults, fatalities, and, consistent with guidelines by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, infectious diseases, and strategies to minimize the exposure of property”;
(iii)
added in subparagraph (F) by striking “and” at the end; and
(iv)
renumbered was (5)(2)(4) by striking subparagraph (G) and inserting the following:

“(G) a comprehensive staff training program for the operations and maintenance personnel and personnel directly responsible for safety of the recipient that includes—

“(i) the completion of a safety training program;

“(ii) continuing safety education and training; and

“(iii) de-escalation training;

“(H) a requirement that the safety committee only approve a safety plan under subparagraph (A) if such plan stays within such recipient’s fiscal budget; and

“(I) a risk reduction program for transit operations to improve safety by reducing the number and rates of accidents, injuries, and assaults on transit workers using data submitted to the National Transit Database, including—

“(i) a reduction of vehicular and pedestrian accidents involving buses that includes measures to reduce visibility impairments for bus operators that contribute to accidents, including retrofits to buses in revenue service and specifications for future procurements that reduce visibility impairments; and

added “(ii) transit worker assault mitigation, including the deployment of assault mitigation infrastructure and technology on buses, including barriers to restrict the unwanted entry of individuals and objects into bus operators’ workstations when a recipient’s risk analysis performed by the safety committee established in paragraph (4) determines that such barriers or other measures would reduce assaults on and injuries to transit workers.”

removed “(ii) transit worker assault mitigation, including the deployment of assault mitigation infrastructure and technology on buses, including barriers to restrict the unwanted entry of individuals and objects into bus operators’ workstations when a recipient’s risk analysis performed by the safety committee established in paragraph (4) determines that such barriers or other measures would reduce assaults on and injuries to transit workers; and”

(B)
by adding at the end the following:

“(4) Safety committee—For purposes of the approval process of an agency safety plan under paragraph (1), the safety committee shall be convened by a joint labor-management process and consist of an equal number of—

“(A) frontline employee representatives, selected by the labor organization representing the plurality of the frontline workforce employed by the recipient or if applicable a contractor to the recipient; and

“(B) employer or State representatives.”

(4)
in subsection (e)(4)(A)(v) by inserting “, inspection,” after “has investigative”.

Sec. 2605 U.S. Employment Plan

(a)
In general— Chapter 53 of title 49, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:

“5341. U.S. Employment Plan

“(a) Definitions—In this section:

“(1) Commitment to high-quality career and business opportunities—The term commitment to high-quality career and business opportunities means participation in a registered apprenticeship program.

changed “(2) Covered infrastructure program—The term covered infrastructure program means any activity under a program or project under this chapter for the purchase or acquisition of rolling stock.

“(3) U.S. Employment Plan—The term U.S. Employment Plan means a plan under which an entity receiving Federal assistance for a project under a covered infrastructure program shall—

“(A) include in a request for proposal an encouragement for bidders to include, with respect to the project—

“(i) high-quality wage, benefit, and training commitments by the bidder and the supply chain of the bidder for the project; and

“(ii) a commitment to recruit and hire individuals described in subsection (e) if the project results in the hiring of employees not currently or previously employed by the bidder and the supply chain of the bidder for the project;

“(B) give preference for the award of the contract to a bidder that includes the commitments described in clauses (i) and (ii) of subparagraph (A); and

“(C) ensure that each bidder that includes the commitments described in clauses (i) and (ii) of subparagraph (A) that is awarded a contract complies with those commitments.

“(4) Registered apprenticeship program—The term registered apprenticeship program means an apprenticeship program registered under the Act of August 16, 1937 (commonly known as the “National Apprenticeship Act”; 50 Stat. 664, chapter 663; 29 U.S.C. 50 et seq.), including any requirement, standard, or rule promulgated under such Act, as such requirement, standard, or rule was in effect on December 30, 2019.

“(b) Best-Value framework—To the maximum extent practicable, a recipient of assistance under a covered infrastructure program is encouraged—

“(1) to ensure that each dollar invested in infrastructure uses a best-value contracting framework to maximize the local value of federally funded contracts by evaluating bids on price and other technical criteria prioritized in the bid, such as—

“(A) equity;

“(B) environmental and climate justice;

“(C) impact on greenhouse gas emissions;

“(D) resilience;

“(E) the results of a 40-year life-cycle analysis;

“(F) safety;

“(G) commitment to creating or sustaining high-quality job opportunities affiliated with registered apprenticeship programs (as defined in subsection (a)(3)) for disadvantaged or underrepresented individuals in infrastructure industries in the United States; and

“(H) access to jobs and essential services by all modes of travel for all users, including individuals with disabilities; and

“(2) to ensure community engagement, transparency, and accountability in carrying out each stage of the project.

“(c) Preference for registered apprenticeship programs—To the maximum extent practicable, a recipient of assistance under a covered infrastructure program, with respect to the project for which the assistance is received, shall give preference to a bidder that demonstrates a commitment to high-quality job opportunities affiliated with registered apprenticeship programs.

“(d) Use of U.S. employment plan—Notwithstanding any other provision of law, in carrying out a project under a covered infrastructure program that receives assistance under this chapter, the recipient shall use a U.S. Employment Plan for each contract of $10,000,000 or more for the purchase of manufactured goods or of services, based on an independent cost estimate.

“(e) Priority—The Secretary shall ensure that the entity carrying out a project under the covered infrastructure program gives priority to—

“(1) individuals with a barrier to employment (as defined in section 3 of the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (29 U.S.C. 3102)), including ex-offenders and disabled individuals;

“(2) veterans; and

“(3) individuals that represent populations that are traditionally underrepresented in the infrastructure workforce, such as women and racial and ethnic minorities.

“(f) Report—Not less frequently than once each fiscal year, the Secretary shall jointly submit to Congress a report describing the implementation of this section.

“(g) Intent of Congress

“(1) In general—It is the intent of Congress—

“(A) to encourage recipients of Federal assistance under covered infrastructure programs to use a best-value contracting framework described in subsection (b) for the purchase of goods and services;

“(B) to encourage recipients of Federal assistance under covered infrastructure programs to use preferences for registered apprenticeship programs as described in subsection (c) when evaluating bids for projects using that assistance;

“(C) to require that recipients of Federal assistance under covered infrastructure programs use the U.S. Employment Plan in carrying out the project for which the assistance was provided; and

“(D) that full and open competition under covered infrastructure programs means a procedural competition that prevents corruption, favoritism, and unfair treatment by recipient agencies.

“(2) Inclusion—A best-value contracting framework described in subsection (b) is a framework that authorizes a recipient of Federal assistance under a covered infrastructure program, in awarding contracts, to evaluate a range of factors, including price, the quality of products, the quality of services, and commitments to the creation of good jobs for all people in the United States.”

(b)
Clerical amendment— The analysis for chapter 53 of title 49, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:

Sec. 2606 Technical assistance and workforce development

changed Section 5314(a) of title 49, Unites United States Code, is amended—

(1)
changed in paragraph (2)—(2) by inserting after subparagraph (H) (as added by section 2104 of this Act) the following:
(A)
removed in subparagraph (H) by striking “and” at the end;
(B)
removed by redesignating subparagraph (I) as subparagraph (J); and
(C)
removed by inserting after subparagraph (H) the following:

“(I) provide innovation and capacity-building to rural and tribal public transportation recipients that do not duplicate the activities of sections 5311(b) or 5312; and”

(2)
by adding at the end the following:

changed “(4) Availability of amounts—Of the amounts made available to carry out this section under section 5338(c), 5338(a)(2)(G)(i), $1,500,000 shall be available to carry out activities described in paragraph (2)(I).”

Sec. 2607 Resilient public transportation study

added
(a)
added Study— The Secretary of Transportation shall conduct a study on resilience planning and innovative resilience strategies for public transportation and shared mobility.
(b)
added Contents— In carrying out the study under subsection (a), the Secretary shall assess—
(1)
added best practices for making public transportation more resilient to external shocks, such as pandemics and natural hazards; and
(2)
added new materials and technologies that may improve the resilience of public transportation and shared mobility, including innovative transit vehicles, emerging electric vehicle chassis platforms, and smart air quality control systems.
(c)
added Partnerships— In carrying out the study under subsection (a), the Secretary shall consult with institutions of higher education, as such term is defined in section 101 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1001), academic experts, and nonprofit organizations with expertise in engineering, travel behavior, artificial intelligence, policy analysis, planning, public healthy and safety, and social and racial equity.
(d)
added Report— Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate a report containing the results of the study conducted under subsection (a).

Sec. 2701 Transit-supportive communities

(a)
In general— Chapter 53 of title 49, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 5327 the following:

“5328. Transit-supportive communities

“(a) Establishment—The Secretary shall establish within the Federal Transit Administration, an Office of Transit-Supportive Communities to make grants, provide technical assistance, and assist in the coordination of transit and housing policies within the Federal Transit Administration, the Department of Transportation, and across the Federal Government.

“(b) Transit Oriented Development Planning Grant Program

“(1) Definition—In this subsection the term eligible project means—

“(A) a new fixed guideway capital project or a core capacity improvement project as defined in section 5309;

“(B) an existing fixed guideway system, or an existing station that is served by a fixed guideway system; or

“(C) the immediate corridor along the highest 25 percent of routes by ridership as demonstrated in section 5336(b)(2)(B).

“(2) General authority—The Secretary may make grants under this subsection to a State, local governmental authority, or metropolitan planning organization to assist in financing comprehensive planning associated with an eligible project that seeks to—

“(A) enhance economic development, ridership, equity, reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, or other goals established during the project development and engineering processes or the grant application;

“(B) facilitate multimodal connectivity and accessibility;

“(C) increase access to transit hubs for pedestrian and bicycle traffic;

“(D) enable mixed-use development;

“(E) identify infrastructure needs associated with the eligible project; and

“(F) include private sector participation.

“(3) Eligibility—A State, local governmental authority, or metropolitan planning organization that desires to participate in the program under this subsection shall submit to the Secretary an application that contains at a minimum—

“(A) an identification of an eligible project;

“(B) a schedule and process for the development of a comprehensive plan;

“(C) a description of how the eligible project and the proposed comprehensive plan advance the metropolitan transportation plan of the metropolitan planning organization;

“(D) proposed performance criteria for the development and implementation of the comprehensive plan;

“(E) a description of how the project will advance equity and reduce and mitigate social and economic impacts on existing residents and businesses and communities historically excluded from economic opportunities vulnerable to displacement; and

“(F) identification of—

“(i) partners;

“(ii) availability of and authority for funding; and

“(iii) potential State, local or other impediments to the implementation of the comprehensive plan.

“(4) Cost share—A grant under this subsection shall not exceed an amount in excess of 80 percent of total project costs, except that a grant that includes an affordable housing component shall not exceed an amount in excess of 90 percent of total project costs.

changed “(c) Technical assistance—The Secretary shall provide technical assistance to States, local governmental authorities, and metropolitan planning organizations in the planning and development of transit-oriented development projects and transit supportive transit-supportive corridor policies, including—

“(1) the siting, planning, financing, and integration of transit-oriented development projects;

“(2) the integration of transit-oriented development and transit-supportive corridor policies in the preparation for and development of an application for funding under section 602 of title 23;

changed “(3) the siting, planning, financing, and integration of transit-oriented development and transit supportive transit-supportive corridor policies associated with projects under section 5309;

“(4) the development of housing feasibility assessments as allowed under section 5309(g)(3)(B);

“(5) the development of transit-supportive corridor policies that promote transit ridership and transit-oriented development;

“(6) the development, implementation, and management of land value capture programs; and

“(7) the development of model contracts, model codes, and best practices for the implementation of transit-oriented development projects and transit-supportive corridor policies.

“(d) Value capture policy requirements

“(1) Value capture policy—Not later than October 1 of the fiscal year that begins 2 years after the date of enactment of this section, the Secretary, in collaboration with State departments of transportation, metropolitan planning organizations, and regional council of governments, shall establish voluntary and consensus-based value capture standards, policies, and best practices for State and local value capture mechanisms that promote greater investments in public transportation and affordable transit-oriented development.

“(2) Report—Not later than 15 months after the date of enactment of this section, the Secretary shall make available to the public a report cataloging examples of State and local laws and policies that provide for value capture and value sharing that promote greater investment in public transportation and affordable transit-oriented development.

changed “(d) “(e) Equity—In providing technical assistance under subsection (c), the Secretary shall incorporate strategies to promote equity for underrepresented and underserved communities, including—

“(1) preventing displacement of existing residents and businesses;

“(2) mitigating rent and housing price increases;

“(3) incorporating affordable rental and ownership housing in transit-oriented development;

changed “(4) engaging under-served, limited English proficiency, low income, low-income, and minority communities in the planning process;

“(5) fostering economic development opportunities for existing residents and businesses; and

“(6) targeting affordable housing that help lessen homelessness.

changed “(d) “(f) Authority To request staffing assistance—In fulfilling the duties of this section, the Secretary shall, as needed, request staffing and technical assistance from other Federal agencies, programs, administrations, boards, or commissions.

changed “(e) “(g) Review existing policies and programs—Not later than 24 months after the date of enactment of this section, the Secretary shall review and evaluate all existing policies and programs within the Federal Transit Administration that support or promote transit-oriented development to ensure their coordination and effectiveness relative to the goals of this section.

changed “(f) “(h) Reporting—Not later than February 1 of each year beginning the year after the date of enactment of this section, the Secretary shall prepare a report detailing the grants and technical assistance provided under this section, the number of affordable housing units constructed or planned as a result of projects funded in this section, and the number of affordable housing units constructed or planned as a result of a property transfer under section 5334(h)(1). The report shall be provided to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate.

changed “(g) “(i) Savings clause—Nothing in this section authorizes the Secretary to provide any financial assistance for the construction of housing.

changed “(h) “(j) Priority for low-Income areas—In awarding grants under this section, the Secretary shall give priority to projects under this section that expand or build transit in low-income areas or that provide access to public transportation to low-income areas that do not have access to public transportation.”

(b)
Clerical amendment— The analysis for chapter 53 of title 49, United States Code, is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 5327 the following:
(c)
Technical and conforming amendment— Section 20005 of the MAP–21 (Public Law 112–141) is amended—
(1)
by striking “(a) Amendment.—”; and
(2)
by striking subsection (b).

Sec. 2702 Property disposition for affordable housing

Section 5334(h)(1) of title 49, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:

“(1) In general—If a recipient of assistance under this chapter decides an asset acquired under this chapter at least in part with that assistance is no longer needed for the purpose for which such asset was acquired, the Secretary may authorize the recipient to transfer such asset to—

“(A) a local governmental authority to be used for a public purpose with no further obligation to the Government if the Secretary decides—

“(i) the asset will remain in public use for at least 5 years after the date the asset is transferred;

“(ii) there is no purpose eligible for assistance under this chapter for which the asset should be used;

“(iii) the overall benefit of allowing the transfer is greater than the interest of the Government in liquidation and return of the financial interest of the Government in the asset, after considering fair market value and other factors; and

“(iv) through an appropriate screening or survey process, that there is no interest in acquiring the asset for Government use if the asset is a facility or land; or

“(B) a local governmental authority, nonprofit organization, or other third party entity to be used for the purpose of transit-oriented development with no further obligation to the Government if the Secretary decides—

“(i) the asset is a necessary component of a proposed transit-oriented development project;

“(ii) the transit-oriented development project will increase transit ridership;

changed “(iii) at least 40 percent of the housing units offered in the transit-oriented development , development, including housing units owned by nongovernmental entities, are legally binding affordability restricted to tenants with incomes at or below 60 percent of the area median income and/or owners with incomes at or below 60 percent the area median income;

“(iv) the asset will remain in use as described in this section for at least 30 years after the date the asset is transferred; and

“(v) with respect to a transfer to a third party entity—

“(I) a local government authority or nonprofit organization is unable to receive the property;

“(II) the overall benefit of allowing the transfer is greater than the interest of the Government in liquidation and return of the financial interest of the Government in the asset, after considering fair market value and other factors; and

“(III) the third party has demonstrated a satisfactory history of construction or operating an affordable housing development.”

Sec. 2802 Transit bus operator compartment redesign program

Section 5312(d) of title 49, United States Code, is further amended by adding at the end the following:

“(4) Transit bus operator compartment redesign program

“(A) In general—The Secretary may make funding available under this subsection to carry out research on redesigning transit bus operator compartments to improve safety, operational efficiency, and passenger accessibility.

“(B) Objectives—Research objectives under this paragraph shall include—

“(i) increasing bus operator safety from assaults;

“(ii) optimizing operator visibility and reducing operator distractions to improve safety of bus passengers, pedestrians, bicyclists, and other roadway users;

“(iii) expanding passenger accessibility for positive interactions between operators and passengers, including assisting passengers in need of special assistance;

changed “(iv) accommodating compliance for passenger boarding, alighting, and securement consistent with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 12101 et seq.); and

“(v) improving ergonomics to reduce bus operator work-related health issues and injuries, as well as locate key instrument and control interfaces to improve operational efficiency and convenience.

“(C) Activities—Eligible activities under this paragraph shall include—

“(i) measures to reduce visibility impairments and distractions for bus operators that contribute to accidents, including retrofits to buses in revenue service and specifications for future procurements that reduce visibility impairments and distractions;

“(ii) the deployment of assault mitigation infrastructure and technology on buses, including barriers to restrict the unwanted entry of individuals and objects into bus operators’ workstations;

changed “(iii) technologies to improve passenger accessibility, including boarding, alighting, and securement in compliance consistent with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 12101 et seq.);

“(iv) installation of seating and modification to design specifications of bus operator workstations that reduce or prevent injuries from ergonomic risks; or

“(v) other measures that align with the objectives under subparagraph (B).

“(D) Eligible entities—Entities eligible to receive funding under this paragraph shall include consortia consisting of, at a minimum:

“(i) recipients of funds under this chapter that provide public transportation services;

“(ii) transit vehicle manufacturers;

“(iii) representatives from organizations engaged in collective bargaining on behalf of transit workers in not fewer than three States; and

“(iv) any nonprofit institution of higher education, as defined in section 101 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1001).”

Sec. 2804 Technical corrections

Section 5312 of title 49, United States Code, as amended in section 2503 and 2803, is further amended—

(1)
in subsection (e)—
(A)
in paragraph (3)(C) by striking “low or no emission vehicles, zero emission vehicles,” and inserting “zero emission vehicles”; and
(B)
by striking paragraph (6) and inserting the following:

“(6) Zero emission vehicle defined—In this subsection, the term zero emission vehicle means a passenger vehicle used to provide public transportation that produces no carbon or particulate matter.”

(2)
by redesignating the first subsection (g) as subsection (f); and
(3)
in subsection (h)—
(A)
in the header by striking “Low or no emission” and inserting “Zero emission”;
(B)
in paragraph (1)—
(i)
by striking subparagraph (B) and inserting the following:

“(B) the term zero emission vehicle has the meaning given such term in subsection (e)(6);”

(ii)
in subparagraph (D) by striking “low or no emission vehicle” and inserting “zero emission vehicle” each place such term appears;
(C)
in paragraph (2)—
(i)
in the heading by striking “low or no emission” and inserting “zero emission”; and
(ii)
by striking “low or no emission” and inserting “zero emission” each place such term appears;
(D)
changed in paragraph (3) by striking “low or no emission” and inserting “zero emission” each place such term appears; appears (including in the heading); and
(E)
in paragraph (5)(A) by striking “low or no emission” and inserting “zero emission”.

Sec. 2805 National advanced technology transit bus development program

(a)
Establishment— The Secretary of Transportation shall establish a national advanced technology transit bus development program to facilitate the development and testing of commercially viable advanced technology transit buses that do not exceed a Level 3 automated driving system and related infrastructure.
(b)
changed Authorization— There shall be available $20,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2021 2022 through 2025.2026.
(c)
Grants— The Secretary may enter into grants, contracts, and cooperative agreements with no more than three geographically diverse nonprofit organizations and recipients under chapter 53 of title 49, United States Code, to facilitate the development and testing of commercially viable advance technology transit buses and related infrastructure.
(d)
Considerations—
(1)
In general— The Secretary shall consider the applicant’s—
(A)
ability to contribute significantly to furthering advanced technologies as it relates to transit bus operations, including advanced driver assistance systems, automatic emergency braking, accessibility, and energy efficiency;
(B)
financing plan and cost share potential;
(C)
technical experience developing or testing advanced technologies in transit buses;
(D)
commitment to frontline worker involvement; and
(E)
other criteria that the Secretary determines are necessary to carry out the program.
(2)
Rule of construction— Nothing in this subsection may be construed to allow the Secretary to waive any requirement under any other provision of Federal law.
(e)
Competitive grant selection— The Secretary shall conduct a national solicitation for applications for grants under the program. Grant recipients shall be selected on a competitive basis. The Secretary shall give priority consideration to applicants that have successfully managed advanced transportation technology projects, including projects related to public transportation operations for a period of not less than 5 years.
(f)
Consortia— As a condition of receiving an award in (c), the Secretary shall ensure—
(1)
that the selected non-profit recipients subsequently establish a consortia for each proposal submitted, including representatives from a labor union, transit agency, an FTA-designated university bus and component testing center, a Buy America compliant transit bus manufacturer, and others as determined by the Secretary;
(2)
that no proposal selected would decrease workplace or passenger safety; and
(3)
that no proposal selected would undermine the creation of high-quality jobs or workforce support and development programs.
(g)
Federal share— The Federal share of costs of the program shall be provided from funds made available to carry out this section. The Federal share of the cost of a project carried out under the program shall not exceed 80 percent of such cost.

Sec. 2911 Fixed guideway capital investment grants

Section 5309 of title 49, United States Code, as amended by section 2703 of this Act, is further amended—

(1)
in subsection (a)—
(A)
in paragraph (7)—
(i)
in subparagraph (A) by striking “$100,000,000” and inserting “$320,000,000”; and
(ii)
in subparagraph (B) by striking “$300,000,000” and inserting “$400,000,000”;
(B)
by striking paragraph (6); and
(C)
by redesignating paragraph (7), as so amended, as paragraph (6);
(2)
in subsection (b)(2) by inserting “expanding station capacity,” after “construction of infill stations,”;
(3)
in subsection (d)(1)—
(A)
in subparagraph (C)(i) by striking “2 years” and inserting “3 years”; and
(B)
by adding at the end the following:

“(D) Optional project development activities—An applicant may perform cost and schedule risk assessments with technical assistance provided by the Secretary.

“(E) Statutory construction—Nothing in this section shall be construed as authorizing the Secretary to require cost and schedule risk assessments in the project development phase.”

(4)
in subsection (e)(1)—
(A)
in subparagraph (C)(i) by striking “2 years” and inserting “3 years”; and
(B)
by adding at the end the following:

“(D) Optional project development activities—An applicant may perform cost and schedule risk assessments with technical assistance provided by the Secretary.

“(E) Statutory construction—Nothing in this section shall be construed as authorizing the Secretary to require cost and schedule risk assessments in the project development phase.”

(5)
in subsection (e)(2)(A)(iii)(II) by striking “5 years” and inserting “10 years”;
(6)
in subsection (f)—
(A)
in paragraph (1) by striking “subsection (d)(2)(A)(v)” and inserting “subsection (d)(2)(A)(iv)”;
(B)
in paragraph (2)—
(i)
by striking “subsection (d)(2)(A)(v)” and inserting “subsection (d)(2)(A)(iv)”;
(ii)
in subparagraph (D) by adding “and” at the end;
(iii)
by striking subparagraph (E); and
(iv)
by redesignating subparagraph (F) as subparagraph (E); and
(C)
by adding at the end the following:

“(4) Cost-share incentives—For a project for which a lower CIG cost share is elected by the applicant under subsection (l)(1)(C), the Secretary shall apply the following requirements and considerations in lieu of paragraphs (1) and (2):

“(A) Requirements—In determining whether a project is supported by local financial commitment and shows evidence of stable and dependable financing sources for purposes of subsection (d)(2)(A)(iv) or (e)(2)(A)(v), the Secretary shall require that—

“(i) the proposed project plan provides for the availability of contingency amounts that the applicant determines to be reasonable to cover unanticipated cost increases or funding shortfalls;

“(ii) each proposed local source of capital and operating financing is stable, reliable, and available within the proposed project timetable; and

changed “(iii) an applicant certifies that local resources are available to recapitalize, maintain, and operate the overall existing and proposed public transportation system, including essential feeder bus and other services necessary to achieve the projected ridership levels without requiring a reduction in existing public transportation services or level of service to operate the project.project, or that the annual operating cost of the proposed project does not exceed 5 percent of the annual cost to operate and maintain the overall public transportation system of the applicant.

“(B) Considerations—In assessing the stability, reliability, and availability of proposed sources of local financing for purposes of subsection (d)(2)(A)(iv) or (e)(2)(A)(v), the Secretary shall consider—

“(i) the reliability of the forecasting methods used to estimate costs and revenues made by the recipient and the contractors to the recipient;

“(ii) existing grant commitments;

“(iii) any debt obligation that exists, or is proposed by the recipient, for the proposed project or other public transportation purpose; and

“(iv) private contributions to the project, including cost-effective project delivery, management or transfer of project risks, expedited project schedule, financial partnering, and other public-private partnership strategies.”

(7)
in subsection (g)—
(A)
in paragraph (2)(A) by striking “degree of local financial commitment” and inserting “criteria in subsection (f)” each place it appears;
(B)
in paragraph (3) by striking “The Secretary shall,” and all that follows through “to carry out this subsection.” and inserting the following:

changed “(A) to the maximum extent practicable, develop and use special warrants for making a project justification determination under subsection (d)(2) or (e)(2), as applicable, for a project proposed to be funded using a grant under this section if——if—

“(i) the share of the cost of the project to be provided under this section—

“(I) does not exceed $500,000,000 and the total project cost does not exceed $1,000,000,000; or

“(II) complies with subsection (l)(1)(C);

“(ii) the applicant requests the use of the warrants;

“(iii) the applicant certifies that its existing public transportation system is in a state of good repair; and

changed “(iv) the applicant meets any other requirements that the Secretary considers appropriate to carry out this subsection.”subsection; and”

(C)
by striking paragraph (5) and inserting the following:

“(5) Policy guidance—The Secretary shall issue policy guidance on the review and evaluation process and criteria not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of the INVEST in America Act.”

(D)
by striking paragraph (6) and inserting the following:

“(6) Transparency—Not later than 30 days after the Secretary receives a written request from an applicant for all remaining information necessary to obtain 1 or more of the following, the Secretary shall provide such information to the applicant:

“(A) Project advancement.

“(B) Medium or higher rating.

“(C) Warrant.

“(D) Letter of intent.

“(E) Early systems work agreement.”

(E)
in paragraph (7) by striking “the Federal Public Transportation Act of 2012” and inserting “the INVEST in America Act”;
(8)
in subsection (h)—
(A)
in paragraph (5) by inserting “, except that for a project for which a lower local cost share is elected under subsection (l)(1)(C), the Secretary shall enter into a grant agreement under this subsection for any such project that establishes contingency amounts that the applicant determines to be reasonable to cover unanticipated cost increases or funding shortfalls” before the period at the end; and
(B)
in paragraph (7)(C) by striking “10 days” and inserting “3 days”;
(9)
by striking subsection (i) and inserting the following:

“(i) Interrelated projects

“(1) Ratings improvement—The Secretary shall grant a rating increase of 1 level in mobility improvements to any project being rated under subsection (d), (e), or (h), if the Secretary certifies that the project has a qualifying interrelated project that meets the requirements of paragraph (2).

“(2) Interrelated project—A qualifying interrelated project is a transit project that—

“(A) is adopted into the metropolitan transportation plan required under section 5303;

“(B) has received a class of action designation under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.);

“(C) will likely increase ridership on the project being rated in subsection (d), (e), or (h), respectively, as determined by the Secretary; and

“(D) meets one of the following criteria:

“(i) Extends the corridor of the project being rated in subsection (d), (e), or (h), respectively.

“(ii) Provides a direct passenger transfer to the project being rated in subsection (d), (e), or (h), respectively.”

(10)
in subsection (k)—
(A)
in paragraph (2)(D) by adding at the end the following:

“(v) Local funding commitment—For a project for which a lower CIG cost share is elected by the applicant under subsection (l)(1)(C), the Secretary shall enter into a full funding grant agreement that has at least 75 percent of local financial commitment committed and the remaining percentage budgeted for the proposed purposes.”

(B)
in paragraph (5) by striking “30 days” and inserting “3 days”;
(11)
in subsection (l)—
(A)
in paragraph (1) by striking subparagraph (B) and inserting the following:

“(B) Cap—Except as provided in subparagraph (C), a grant for a project under this section shall not exceed 80 percent of the net capital project cost, except that a grant for a core capacity improvement project shall not exceed 80 percent of the net capital project cost of the incremental cost to increase the capacity in the corridor.

“(C) Applicant election of lower local CIG cost share—An applicant may elect a lower local CIG cost share for a project under this section for purposes of application of the cost-share incentives under subsection (f)(3). Such cost share shall not exceed 60 percent of the net capital project cost, except that for a grant for a core capacity improvement project such cost share shall not exceed 60 percent of the net capital project cost of the incremental cost to increase the capacity in the corridor.”

(B)
by striking paragraph (5) and inserting the following:

“(5) Limitation on statutory construction—Nothing in this section shall be construed as authorizing the Secretary to require, incentivize (in any manner not specified in this section), or place additional conditions upon a non-Federal financial commitment for a project that is more than 20 percent of the net capital project cost or, for a core capacity improvement project, 20 percent of the net capital project cost of the incremental cost to increase the capacity in the corridor.”

(C)
by striking paragraph (8) and inserting the following:

“(8) Contingency share—The Secretary shall provide funding for the contingency amount equal to the proportion of the CIG cost share. If the Secretary increases the contingency amount after a project has received a letter of no prejudice or been allocated appropriated funds, the federal share of the additional contingency amount shall be 25 percent higher than the original proportion the CIG cost share and in addition to the grant amount set in subsection (k)(2)(C)(ii).”

(12)
in subsection (o) by adding at the end the following:

“(4) CIG program dashboard—Not later than the fifth day of each month, the Secretary shall make publicly available on a website data on, including the status of, each project under this section that is in the project development phase, in the engineering phase, or has received a grant agreement and remains under construction. Such data shall include, for each project—

“(A) the amount and fiscal year of any funding appropriated, allocated, or obligated for the project;

“(B) the date on which the project—

“(i) entered the project development phase;

“(ii) entered the engineering phase, if applicable; and

“(iii) received a grant agreement, if applicable; and

“(C) the status of review by the Federal Transit Administration and the Secretary, including dates of request, dates of acceptance of request, and dates of a decision for each of the following, if applicable:

“(i) A letter of no prejudice.

“(ii) An environmental impact statement notice of intent.

“(iii) A finding of no significant environmental impact.

“(iv) A draft environmental impact statement.

“(v) A final environmental impact statement.

“(vi) A record of decision on the final environmental impact statement.

“(vii) The status of the applicant in securing the non-Federal match, based on information provided by the applicant, including the amount committed, budgeted, planned, and undetermined.”

(13)
by striking “an acceptable degree of” and inserting “a” each place it appears.

Sec. 2912 Rural and small urban apportionment deadline

Section 5336(d) of title 49, United States Code, is amended—

(1)
changed by redesignating paragraph (2) as paragraph (3); and(3);
(2)
added in paragraph (1) by striking “and” at the end; and
(3)
renumbered was (4) by inserting after paragraph (1) the following:

“(2) notwithstanding paragraph (1), apportion amounts to the States appropriated under section 5338(a)(2) to carry out sections 5307, 5310, and 5311 not later than December 15 for which any amounts are appropriated; and”

Sec. 2919 Disposition of rolling stock to improve air quality goals

added

added Section 5334 of title 49, United States Code, is further amended by adding at the end the following:

added “(m) Disposition of rolling stock to meet air quality goals

added “(1) In general—If a recipient, or subrecipient, for assistance under this chapter disposes of rolling stock with a current market value, or proceeds from the disposition of such rolling stock, acquired under this chapter at least in part with such assistance, before such rolling stock has reached its useful life, the Secretary may allow the recipient, or subrecipient, to use the proceeds attributable to the Federal share of such rolling stock calculated under paragraph (3) for capital projects under section 5307, 5310, or 5311 without need for repayment of the Federal financial interest.

added “(2) Covered rolling stock—This subsection shall only apply to rolling stock disposed of—

added “(A) which are replaced by rolling stock that will help improve attainment of air quality goals compared to the rolling stock being replaced; and

added “(B) for which the recipient is located in an area that is designated as a nonattainment area for particulate matter under section 107(d) of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7407(d)).

added “(3) Calculation of Federal share attributable—The proceeds attributable to the Federal share of rolling stock described in paragraph (1) shall be calculated by multiplying—

added “(A) the current market value of, or the proceeds from the disposition of, such asset; and

added “(B) the Federal share percentage for the acquisition of such asset at the time of acquisition of such asset.”

Sec. 3003 Fair and equitable traffic safety enforcement

(a)
In general— The Secretary of Transportation shall make grants under this section to an eligible nonprofit institution of higher education with demonstrated expertise in promoting fair and equitable traffic safety enforcement to establish and operate a national center of excellence for fair and equitable traffic safety enforcement (in this section referred to as the “Center”).
(b)
Purpose— The purpose of the Center shall be to promote fair and equitable traffic safety enforcement with the goal of reducing traffic fatalities and injuries.
(c)
Role of Center— The role of the Center shall be to establish and operate a national fair and equitable traffic safety enforcement clearinghouse to—
(1)
develop data collection systems to promote fair and equitable traffic safety enforcement solutions, including assisting States participating in the program established under section 403(j) of title 23, United States Code, (as added by this Act) share data collected to a national database;
(2)
develop recommendations for States to improve data collection on law enforcement programs carried out under sections 402 and 405 of this title in order to promote fair and equitable traffic safety enforcement programs;
(3)
provide technical assistance to States on the implementation of the program established under section 403(j) of title 23, United States Code, as added by this Act;
(4)
research and disseminate best practices for implementing equitable traffic safety enforcement programs; and
(5)
develop information and educational programs on implementing equitable traffic safety enforcement best practices.
(d)
Consultation— In carrying out the activities under paragraphs (4) and (5) of subsection (c), the Center shall consult with relevant stakeholders, including—
(1)
civil rights organizations;
(2)
traffic safety advocacy groups;
(3)
changed law enforcement representatives; andrepresentatives;
(4)
added State highway safety offices; and
(5)
renumbered was (5)(6) such other surface transportation stakeholders and industry experts as the Center considers appropriate.
(e)
Report to Congress— Not later than 2 years after the establishment of the Center under subsection (a), the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate a report on progress made toward meeting the goals established under subsection (b).

Sec. 3006 National safety campaigns

(a)
added In general— Section 404 of title 23, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:

added “404. National safety campaigns

added “(a) In general—The Secretary shall establish and administer a program under which not less than 3 high-visibility enforcement campaigns and not less than 3 public awareness campaigns will be carried out in each of fiscal years 2023 through 2026.

added “(b) High-visibility enforcement—In carrying out the requirements under paragraph (a), the Secretary shall ensure that in each fiscal year not less than 1 high-visibility enforcement campaign is carried out to—

added “(1) reduce alcohol-impaired operation of a motor vehicle;

added “(2) reduce alcohol-impaired and drug-impaired operation of a motor vehicle; and

added “(3) increase use of seatbelts by occupants of motor vehicles.

added “(c) Public awareness—The purpose of each public awareness campaign carried out under this section shall be to achieve outcomes related to not less than 1 of the following objectives:

added “(1) Increase the proper use of seatbelts and child restraints by occupants of motor vehicles.

added “(2) Reduce instances of distracted driving.

added “(3) Reduce instances of speeding by drivers.

added “(d) Advertising—The Secretary may use, or authorize the use of, funds available to carry out this section to pay for the development, production, and use of broadcast and print media advertising and Internet-based outreach in carrying out campaigns under this section. In allocating such funds, consideration shall be given to advertising directed at non-English speaking populations, including those who listen to, read, or watch nontraditional media.

added “(e) Coordination with States—The Secretary shall coordinate with States in carrying out the high-visibility enforcement campaigns under this section, including advertising funded under subsection (d), with consideration given to—

added “(1) relying on States to provide law enforcement resources for the campaigns out of funding made available under sections 402 and 405; and

added “(2) providing, out of National Highway Traffic Safety Administration resources, most of the means necessary for national advertising and education efforts associated with the campaigns.

added “(f) Coordination of dynamic highway message signs—During national high-visibility enforcement emphasis periods supported by these funds, the Federal Highway Administration and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration shall coordinate with State departments of transportation on the use of dynamic highway message signs to support high-visibility national emphasis activities.

added “(g) Use of funds—Funds made available to carry out this section may be used only for activities described in subsections (c) and (d).

added “(h) Definition—In this section:

added “(1) Campaign—The term campaign means a high-visibility traffic safety law enforcement campaign or a traffic safety public awareness campaign.

added “(2) Dynamic highway—The term dynamic highway message sign means a traffic control device that is capable of displaying one or more alternative messages which convey information to travelers.

added “(3) State—The “State” has the meaning given that term in section 401.

added “(b) Clerical amendment—The item relating to section 404 in the analysis for chapter 4 of title 23, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:”

removed Section 404 of title 23, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:

removed “404. National safety campaigns

removed “(a) In general—The Secretary shall establish and administer a program under which not less than 3 high-visibility enforcement campaigns and not less than 3 public awareness campaigns will be carried out in each of fiscal years 2023 through 2026.

removed “(b) High-visibility enforcement—In carrying out the requirements under paragraph (a), the Secretary shall ensure that in each fiscal year not less than 1 high-visibility enforcement campaign is carried out to—

removed “(1) reduce alcohol-impaired operation of a motor vehicle;

removed “(2) reduce alcohol-impaired and drug-impaired operation of a motor vehicle; and

removed “(3) increase use of seatbelts by occupants of motor vehicles.

removed “(c) Public awareness—The purpose of each public awareness campaign carried out under this section shall be to achieve outcomes related to not less than 1 of the following objectives:

removed “(1) Increase the proper use of seatbelts and child restraints by occupants of motor vehicles.

removed “(2) Reduce texting through a personal wireless communication device by drivers while operating a motor vehicle.

removed “(3) Reduce violations of State move over laws which require motorists to change lanes or slow down when emergency or other vehicles are stopped or parked on or next to a roadway.

removed “(d) Advertising—The Secretary may use, or authorize the use of, funds available to carry out this section to pay for the development, production, and use of broadcast and print media advertising and Internet-based outreach in carrying out campaigns under this section. In allocating such funds, consideration shall be given to advertising directed at non-English speaking populations, including those who listen to, read, or watch nontraditional media.

removed “(e) Coordination with States—The Secretary shall coordinate with States in carrying out the high-visibility enforcement campaigns under this section, including advertising funded under subsection (d), with consideration given to—

removed “(1) relying on States to provide law enforcement resources for the campaigns out of funding made available under sections 402 and 405; and

removed “(2) providing, out of National Highway Traffic Safety Administration resources, most of the means necessary for national advertising and education efforts associated with the campaigns.

removed “(f) Coordination of dynamic highway message signs—During national high-visibility enforcement emphasis periods supported by these funds, the Federal Highway Administration and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration shall coordinate with State departments of transportation on the use of dynamic highway message signs to support high-visibility national emphasis activities.

removed “(g) Use of funds—Funds made available to carry out this section may be used only for activities described in subsections (c) and (d).

removed “(h) Definition—In this section:

removed “(1) Campaign—The term campaign means a high-visibility traffic safety law enforcement campaign or a traffic safety public awareness campaign.

removed “(2) Dynamic highway—The term dynamic highway message sign means a traffic control device that is capable of displaying one or more alternative messages which convey information to travelers.

removed “(3) State—The “State” has the meaning given that term in section 401.”

Sec. 3007 National priority safety programs

(a)
In general— Section 405 of title 23, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
in subsection (a)—
(A)
in paragraph (1) by striking “13 percent” and inserting “12.85 percent”;
(B)
in paragraph (2) by striking “14.5 percent” and inserting “14.3 percent”;
(C)
in paragraph (3) by striking “52.5 percent” and inserting “51.75 percent”;
(D)
in paragraph (4) by striking “8.5 percent” and inserting “8.3 percent”;
(E)
in paragraph (6) by striking “5 percent” and inserting “4.9 percent”;
(F)
in paragraph (7) by striking “5 percent” and inserting “4.9 percent”;
(G)
in paragraph (8)—
(i)
by striking “paragraphs (1) through (7)” and inserting “paragraphs (1) through (8)”;
(ii)
changed by striking “subsection “subsections (b) through (h)” and inserting “subsections (b) through (i)”; and
(iii)
changed by inserting “to carry out any of the other activities described in such subsections, or the amount made available” before “under section 402(c)(2)”;402”;
(H)
in paragraph (9)(A) by striking “date of enactment of the FAST Act” and inserting “date of enactment of the INVEST in America Act”;
(I)
changed by redesignating paragraphs (8) (8), (9), and (9) (10) as paragraphs (9) and (9), (10), and (11), respectively; and
(J)
by inserting after paragraph (7) the following:

“(8) Driver and officer safety education—In each fiscal year, 1.5 percent of the funds provided under this section shall be allocated among States that meet the requirements with respect to driver and officer safety education (as described in subsection (i)).”

(2)
in subsection (c)(3)(E) by striking “5” and inserting “10”;
(3)
in subsection (b)(4)—
(A)
in subparagraph (A) by striking clause (v) and inserting the following:

“(v) implement programs in low-income and underserved populations to—

“(I) recruit and train occupant protection safety professionals, nationally certified child passenger safety technicians, police officers, fire and emergency medical personnel, and educators serving low-income and underserved populations;

“(II) educate parents and caregivers in low-income and underserved populations about the proper use and installation of child safety seats; and

“(III) purchase and distribute child safety seats to low-income and underserved populations; and”

(B)
in subparagraph (B)—
(i)
by striking “100 percent” and inserting “90 percent”; and
(ii)
by inserting “The remaining 10 percent of such funds shall be used to carry out subsection (A)(v).” after “section 402.”;
(4)
by striking subsection (c)(4) and inserting the following:

“(4) Use of grant amounts—Grant funds received by a State under this subsection shall be used for—

“(A) making data program improvements to core highway safety databases related to quantifiable, measurable progress in any of the 6 significant data program attributes set forth in paragraph (3)(D);

“(B) developing or acquiring information technology for programs to identify, collect, and report data to State and local government agencies, and enter data, including crash, citation and adjudication, driver, emergency medical services or injury surveillance system, roadway, and vehicle, into the core highway safety databases of a State;

“(C) purchasing equipment used to identify, collect, and report State safety data to support State efforts to improve State traffic safety information systems;

“(D) linking core highway safety databases of a State with such databases of other States;

“(E) improving the compatibility and interoperability of the core highway safety databases of the State with national data systems and data systems of other States;

“(F) costs associated with training State and local personnel on ways to improve State traffic safety information systems;

“(G) hiring a Fatality Analysis Reporting System liaison for a State; and

“(H) conducting research on State traffic safety information systems, including developing and evaluating programs to improve core highway safety databases of such State and processes by which data is identified, collected, reported to State and local government agencies, and entered into such core safety databases.”

(5)
by striking subsection (d)(6)(A) and inserting the following:

“(A) Grants to States with alcohol-ignition interlock laws—The Secretary shall make a separate grant under this subsection to each State that—

“(i) adopts and is enforcing a mandatory alcohol-ignition interlock law for all individuals at the time of, or prior to, a conviction of driving under the influence of alcohol or of driving while intoxicated;

“(ii) does not allow any individual required to have an ignition interlock for driving privileges to drive a motor vehicle unless such individual installs an ignition interlock for a minimum 180-day interlock period; or

“(iii) has—

“(I) enacted and is enforcing a state law requiring all individuals convicted of, or whose driving privilege is revoked or denied for, refusing to submit to a chemical or other test for the purpose of determining the presence or concentration of any intoxicating substance to install an ignition interlock for a minimum 180-day interlock period unless the driver successfully completes an appeal process; and

“(II) a compliance-based removal program in which an individual required to install an ignition interlock for a minimum 180-day interlock period and have completed a minimum consecutive period of not less than 60 days of the required interlock period immediately preceding the date of release, without a confirmed violation, as defined by State law or regulations, of driving under the influence of alcohol or driving while intoxicated.”

(6)
in subsection (e)—
(A)
in paragraph (1) by striking “paragraphs (2) and (3)” and inserting “paragraph (2)”;
(B)
in paragraph (4)—
(i)
by striking “paragraph (2) or (3)” and inserting “paragraph (3) or (4)”;
(ii)
in subparagraph (A) by striking “communications device to contact emergency services” and inserting “communications device during an emergency to contact emergency services or to prevent injury to persons or property”;
(iii)
in subparagraph (C) by striking “; and” and inserting a semicolon;
(iv)
by redesignating subparagraph (D) as subparagraph (E); and
(v)
by inserting after subparagraph (C) the following:

“(D) a driver who uses a personal wireless communication device for navigation; and”

(C)
in paragraph (5)(A)(i) by striking “texting or using a cell phone while” and inserting “distracted”;
(D)
in paragraph (7) by striking “Of the amounts” and inserting “In addition to the amounts authorized under section 404 and of the amounts”;
(E)
in paragraph (9)—
(i)
by striking subparagraph (B) and inserting the following:

“(B) Personal wireless communications device—The term personal wireless communications device means—

“(i) until the date on which the Secretary issues a regulation pursuant to paragraph (8)(A), a device through which personal services (as such term is defined in section 332(c)(7)(C)(i) of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 332(c)(7)(C)(i)) are transmitted, but not including the use of such a device as a global navigation system receiver used for positioning, emergency notification, or navigation purposes; and

“(ii) on and after the date on which the Secretary issues a regulation pursuant to paragraph (8)(A), the definition described in such regulation.”

(ii)
by striking subparagraph (E) and inserting the following:

“(E) Texting—The term texting means—

“(i) until the date on which the Secretary issues a regulation pursuant to paragraph (8)(A), reading from or manually entering data into a personal wireless communications device, including doing so for the purpose of SMS texting, emailing, instant messaging, or engaging in any other form of electronic data retrieval or electronic data communication; and

“(ii) on and after the date on which the Secretary issues a regulation pursuant to paragraph (8)(A), the definition described in such regulation.”

(F)
by striking paragraphs (2), (3), (6), and (8);
(G)
by redesignating paragraphs (4) and (5) as paragraphs (5) and (6), respectively;
(H)
by inserting after paragraph (1) the following:

“(2) Allocation

“(A) In general—Subject to subparagraphs (B), (C), and (D), the allocation of grant funds to a State under this subsection for a fiscal year shall be in proportion to the State’s apportionment under section 402 for fiscal year 2009.

“(B) Primary offense laws—A State that has enacted and is enforcing a law that meets the requirements set forth in paragraphs (3) and (4) as a primary offense shall be allocated 100 percent of the amount calculated under subparagraph (A).

“(C) Secondary offense laws—A State that has enacted and is enforcing a law that meets the requirements set forth in paragraphs (3) and (4) as a secondary offense shall be allocated 50 percent of the amount calculated under subparagraph (A).

“(D) Texting while driving—Notwithstanding subparagraphs (B) and (C), a State shall be allocated 25 percent of the amount calculated under subparagraph (A) if such State has enacted and is enforcing a law that prohibits a driver from viewing a personal wireless communication device, except for the purpose of navigation.

“(3) Prohibition on handheld personal wireless communication device use while driving—A State law meets the requirements set forth in this paragraph if the law—

“(A) prohibits a driver from holding or using, including texting, a personal wireless communications device while driving, except for the use of a personal wireless communications device—

“(i) in a hands-free manner or with a hands-free accessory; or

“(ii) to activate or deactivate a feature or function of the personal wireless communications device;

“(B) establishes a fine for a violation of the law; and

“(C) does not provide for an exemption that specifically allows a driver to hold or use a personal wireless communication device while stopped in traffic.

“(4) Prohibition on personal wireless communication device use while driving or stopped in traffic—A State law meets the requirements set forth in this paragraph if the law—

“(A) prohibits a driver from holding or using a personal wireless communications device while driving if the driver is—

“(i) younger than 18 years of age; or

“(ii) in the learner’s permit or intermediate license stage described in subparagraph (A) or (B) of subsection (g)(2);

“(B) establishes a fine for a violation of the law; and

“(C) does not provide for an exemption that specifically allows a driver to use a personal wireless communication device while stopped in traffic.”

(I)
by inserting after paragraph (7) the following:

“(8) Rulemaking—Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this paragraph, the Secretary shall issue such regulations as are necessary to account for diverse State approaches to combating distracted driving that—

“(A) defines the terms personal wireless communications device and texting for the purposes of this subsection; and

“(B) determines additional permitted exceptions that are appropriate for a State law that meets the requirements under paragraph (3) or (4).”

(7)
in subsection (g)—
(A)
in paragraph (1) by inserting “subparagraphs (A) and (B) of” before “paragraph (2)”;
(B)
by striking paragraph (2) and inserting the following:

“(2) Minimum requirements

“(A) Tier 1 state—A State shall be eligible for a grant under this subsection as a Tier 1 State if such State requires novice drivers younger than 18 years of age to comply with a 2-stage graduated driver licensing process before receiving an unrestricted driver’s license that includes—

“(i) a learner’s permit stage that—

“(I) is at least 180 days in duration;

“(II) requires that the driver be accompanied and supervised at all times; and

“(III) has a requirement that the driver obtain at least 40 hours of behind-the-wheel training with a supervisor; and

“(ii) an intermediate stage that—

“(I) commences immediately after the expiration of the learner’s permit stage;

“(II) is at least 180 days in duration; and

“(III) for the first 180 days of the intermediate stage, restricts the driver from—

“(aa) driving at night between the hours of 11:00 p.m. and at least 4:00 a.m. except—

“(AA) when a parent, guardian, driving instructor, or licensed driver who is at least 21 years of age is in the motor vehicle; and

“(BB) when driving to and from work, school and school-related activities, religious activities, for emergencies, or as a member of voluntary emergency service; and

“(bb) operating a motor vehicle with more than 1 nonfamilial passenger younger than 18 years of age, except when a parent, guardian, driving instructor, or licensed driver who is at least 21 years of age is in the motor vehicle.

“(B) Tier 2 state—A State shall be eligible for a grant under this subsection as a Tier 2 State if such State requires novice drivers younger than 18 years of age to comply with a 2-stage graduated driver licensing process before receiving an unrestricted driver’s license that includes—

“(i) a learner’s permit stage that—

“(I) is at least 180 days in duration;

“(II) requires that the driver be accompanied and supervised at all times; and

“(III) has a requirement that the driver obtain at least 50 hours of behind-the-wheel training, with at least 10 hours at night, with a supervisor; and

“(ii) an intermediate stage that—

“(I) commences immediately after the expiration of the learner’s permit stage;

“(II) is at least 180 days in duration; and

“(III) for the first 180 days of the intermediate stage, restricts the driver from—

“(aa) driving at night between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and at least 4:00 a.m. except—

“(AA) when a parent, guardian, driving instructor, or licensed driver who is at least 21 years of age is in the motor vehicle; and

“(BB) when driving to and from work, school and school-related activities, religious activities, for emergencies, or as a member of voluntary emergency service; and

“(bb) operating a motor vehicle with any nonfamilial passenger younger than 18 years of age, except when a parent, guardian, driving instructor, or licensed driver who is at least 21 years of age is in the motor vehicle.”

(C)
in paragraph (3)—
(i)
in subparagraph (A) by inserting “subparagraphs (A) and (B) of” before “paragraph (2)”; and
(ii)
in subparagraph (B) by inserting “subparagraphs (A) and (B) of” before “paragraph (2)” each place such term appears;
(D)
in paragraph (4) by striking “such fiscal year” and inserting “fiscal year 2009”; and
(E)
by striking paragraph (5) and inserting the following:

“(5) Use of funds

“(A) Tier 1 States—A Tier 1 State shall use grant funds provided under this subsection for—

“(i) enforcing a 2-stage licensing process that complies with paragraph (2);

“(ii) training for law enforcement personnel and other relevant State agency personnel relating to the enforcement described in clause (i);

“(iii) publishing relevant educational materials that pertain directly or indirectly to the State graduated driver licensing law;

“(iv) carrying out other administrative activities that the Secretary considers relevant to the State’s 2-stage licensing process; or

“(v) carrying out a teen traffic safety program described in section 402(m).

“(B) Tier 2 States—Of the grant funds made available to a Tier 2 State under this subsection—

“(i) 25 percent shall be used for any activity described in subparagraph (A); and

“(ii) 75 percent may be used for any project or activity eligible under section 402.”

(8)
by amending subsection (h)(4) to read as follows:

“(4) Use of grant amounts—Grant funds received by a State under this subsection may be used for the safety of pedestrians and bicyclists, including—

“(A) training of law enforcement officials on pedestrian and bicycle safety, State laws applicable to pedestrian and bicycle safety, and infrastructure designed to improve pedestrian and bicycle safety;

“(B) carrying out a program to support enforcement mobilizations and campaigns designed to enforce State traffic laws applicable to pedestrian and bicycle safety;

“(C) public education and awareness programs designed to inform motorists, pedestrians, and bicyclists about—

“(i) pedestrian and bicycle safety, including information on nonmotorized mobility and the important of speed management to the safety of pedestrians and bicyclists;

“(ii) the value of the use of pedestrian and bicycle safety equipment, including lighting, conspicuity equipment, mirrors, helmets and other protective equipment, and compliance with any State or local laws requiring their use;

“(iii) State traffic laws applicable to pedestrian and bicycle safety, including motorists’ responsibilities towards pedestrians and bicyclists; and

“(iv) infrastructure designed to improve pedestrian and bicycle safety; and

“(D) data analysis and research concerning pedestrian and bicycle safety.”

(9)
by adding at the end the following:

“(i) Driver and officer safety education

“(1) General authority—Subject to the requirements under this subsection, the Secretary shall award grants to—

“(A) States that enact a commuter safety education program; and

“(B) States qualifying under paragraph (5)(A).

“(2) Federal share—The Federal share of the costs of activities carried out using amounts from a grant awarded under this subsection may not exceed 80 percent.

“(3) Eligibility—To be eligible for a grant under this subsection, a State shall enact a law or adopt a program that requires the following:

“(A) Driver education and driving safety courses—Inclusion, in driver education and driver safety courses provided to individuals by educational and motor vehicle agencies of the State, of instruction and testing concerning law enforcement practices during traffic stops, including information on—

“(i) the role of law enforcement and the duties and responsibilities of peace officers;

“(ii) an individual’s legal rights concerning interactions with peace officers;

“(iii) best practices for civilians and peace officers during such interactions;

“(iv) the consequences for an individual’s or officer’s failure to comply with those laws and programs; and

“(v) how and where to file a complaint against or a compliment on behalf of a peace officer.

“(B) Peace officer training programs—Development and implementation of a training program, including instruction and testing materials, for peace officers and reserve law enforcement officers (other than officers who have received training in a civilian course described in subparagraph (A)) with respect to proper interaction with civilians during traffic stops.

“(4) Grant amount—The allocation of grant funds to a State under this subsection for a fiscal year shall be in proportion to the State’s apportionment under section 402 for fiscal year 2009.

“(5) Special rule for certain States

“(A) Qualifying state—A State qualifies pursuant to this subparagraph if—

“(i) the Secretary determines such State has taken meaningful steps toward the full implementation of a law or program described in paragraph (3);

“(ii) the Secretary determines such State has established a timetable for the implementation of such a law or program; and

“(iii) such State has received a grant pursuant to this subsection for a period of not more than 5 years.

“(B) Withholding—With respect to a State that qualifies pursuant to subparagraph (A), the Secretary shall—

“(i) withhold 50 percent of the amount that such State would otherwise receive if such State were a State described in paragraph (1)(A); and

“(ii) direct any such amounts for distribution among the States that are enforcing and carrying out a law or program described in paragraph (3).

“(6) Use of grant amounts—A State receiving a grant under this subsection may use such grant—

“(A) for the production of educational materials and training of staff for driver education and driving safety courses and peace officer training described in paragraph (3); and

“(B) for the implementation of the law described in paragraph (3).”

(b)
Conforming amendment— Sections 402, 403, and 405 of title 23, United States Code, are amended—
(1)
by striking “accidents” and inserting “crashes” each place it appears; and
(2)
by striking “accident” and inserting “crash” each place it appears.

Sec. 3016 Report on impaired driving

added

added Not later than 2 years after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Transportation, in consultation with the heads of appropriate Federal agencies, State highway safety offices, State toxicologists, traffic safety advocates, and other interested parties, shall submit to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives a report that, using the National Safety Council model guidelines for toxicology testing—

(1)
added identifies any barriers that States encounter in submitting the alcohol and drug toxicology results to the Fatality Analysis Reporting System;
(2)
added provides recommendations on how to address any barriers identified under paragraph (1);
(3)
added provides further steps that the Secretary, acting through the Administrator of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, shall take to assist States in improving—
(A)
added toxicology testing in cases of motor vehicle crashes; and
(B)
added the reporting of alcohol and drug toxicology results in cases of motor vehicle crashes.

Sec. 3017 Impaired driving countermeasure

added
(a)
added Sense of congress— It is the sense of Congress that—
(1)
added a priority should be placed on creating State systems, programs, and processes that improve impaired driving detection in cases in which alcohol, drugs, and especially multiple substances are involved;
(2)
added States and communities should have access to a broader range of countermeasures, technologies, and resources to address multiple substance impaired driving; and
(3)
added increased Federal funding should be made available for efforts to improve public safety through the approaches described in paragraphs (1) and (2).
(b)
added Purpose— The purpose of this section is to increase national investment in, and maximize the use of, innovative programs and technologies to eliminate multiple substance impaired driving.
(c)
added Impaired driving countermeasures— Section 405(d) of title 23, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
added in paragraph (4)—
(A)
added in subparagraph (B)—
(i)
added by striking clause (iii) and inserting the following:

added “(iii)

added “(I) court support of high-visibility enforcement efforts;

added “(II) hiring criminal justice professionals, including law enforcement officers, prosecutors, traffic safety resource prosecutors, judges, judicial outreach liaisons, and probation officers;

added “(III) training and education of the criminal justice professionals described in subclause (II) to assist those professionals in preventing impaired driving and handling impaired driving cases, including by providing compensation to a law enforcement officer to replace a law enforcement officer who is—

added “(aa) receiving such drug recognition expert training; or

added “(bb) participating as an instructor in such drug recognition expert training; and

added “(IV) establishing driving while intoxicated courts;”

(ii)
added by striking clauses (v) and (vi) and inserting the following:

added “(v) improving—

added “(I) blood alcohol concentration screening and testing;

added “(II) the detection of potentially impairing drugs, including through the use of oral fluid as a specimen; and

added “(III) reporting relating to the testing and detection described in subclauses (I) and (II);

added “(vi)

added “(I) paid and earned media in support of high-visibility enforcement efforts;

added “(II) conducting initial and continuing—

added “(aa) standardized field sobriety training, advanced roadside impaired driving enforcement training, and drug recognition expert training for law enforcement; and

added “(bb) law enforcement phlebotomy training; and

added “(III) to purchase equipment to carry out impaired driving enforcement activities authorized by this subsection;”

(iii)
added in clause (ix), by striking “and” at the end;
(iv)
added in clause (x), by striking the period at the end and inserting “; and”; and
(v)
added by adding at the end the following:

added “(xi) testing and implementing programs and purchasing technologies to better identify, monitor, or treat impaired drivers, including—

added “(I) oral fluid screening technologies;

added “(II) electronic warrant programs;

added “(III) equipment to increase the scope, quantity, quality, and timeliness of forensic toxicology chemical testing;

added “(IV) case management software to support the management of impaired driving offenders; and

added “(V) technology to monitor impaired driving offenders.”

(B)
added in subparagraph (C)—
(i)
added in the second sentence, by striking “Medium-range” and inserting the following:

added “(ii) Medium-range and high-range states—Subject to clause (iii), medium-range”

(ii)
added in the first sentence, by striking “Low-range” and inserting the following:

added “(i) Low-range states—Subject to clause (iii), low-range”

(iii)
added by adding at the end the following:

added “(iii) All states

added “(I) Reporting of impaired driving criminal justice information—A State may use grant funds for any expenditure designed to increase the timely and accurate reporting of crash information, including electronic crash reporting systems that allow accurate real-time or near real-time uploading of crash information, and impaired driving criminal justice information to Federal, State, and local databases.

added “(II) Impaired driving countermeasures—A State may use grant funds for any expenditure to research or evaluate impaired driving countermeasures.”

(2)
added in paragraph (7)(A), in the matter preceding clause (i), by inserting “or local” after “authorizes a State”.

Sec. 4104 Operation of small commercial vehicles study

(a)
In general— Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Transportation shall initiate a review of the prevalence of, characteristics of, and safe operation of commercial vehicles that have a gross vehicle weight rating or gross vehicle weight below 10,000 pounds, and are utilized in package delivery of goods moving in interstate commerce.
(b)
Independent research— If the Secretary decides to enter into a contract with a third party to perform the research required under subsection (a), the Secretary shall—
(1)
solicit applications from research institutions that conduct objective, fact-based research to conduct the study; and
(2)
ensure that such third party does not have any financial or contractual ties with an entity engaged in interstate commerce utilizing commercial vehicles or commercial motor vehicles.
(c)
Entities included— As part of the review, the Secretary shall collect information from a cross-section of companies that use fleets of such vehicles for package delivery in interstate commerce, including companies that—
(1)
directly perform deliveries;
(2)
use contracted entities to perform work; and
(3)
utilize a combination of direct deliveries and contract entities.
(d)
Evaluation factors— The review shall include an evaluation of the following:
(1)
Fleet characteristics, including fleet structure, and vehicle miles traveled.
(2)
Fleet management, including scheduling of deliveries and maintenance practices.
(3)
Driver employment characteristics, including the basis of compensation and classification.
(4)
How training, medical fitness, hours on duty, and safety of drivers is evaluated and overseen by companies, including prevention of occupational injuries and illnesses.
(5)
Safety performance metrics, based on data associated with the included entities, including crash rates, moving violations, failed inspections, and other related data points.
(6)
Financial responsibility and liability for safety or maintenance violations among companies, fleet managers, and drivers.
(7)
Loading and unloading practices, and how package volume and placement in the vehicle is determined.
(8)
added Information on the use of driver safety applications, if applicable.
(9)
added Information on work-related injury and illness data of drivers.
(10)
renumbered was (5)(10) Other relevant information determined necessary by the Secretary in order to make recommendations under subsection (e).
(e)
Report and Recommendations— Upon completion of the review, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce of the Senate a report containing—
(1)
the findings of the Secretary on each of the factors in (d);
(2)
a list of regulations applicable to commercial motor vehicles and commercial motor vehicle operators that are not applicable to commercial vehicle operations described in this section; and
(3)
recommendations, based on the findings, on changes to laws or regulations at the Federal, State, or local level to promote safe operations and safe and fair working conditions for commercial vehicle operators.

Sec. 5102 Materials to reduce greenhouse gas emissions program

Section 503 of title 23, United States Code, as amended by section 5101, is further amended by adding at the end the following:

“(d) Materials To reduce greenhouse gas emissions program

changed “(1) In general—Not later than 6 months after the date of enactment of this subsection, the Secretary shall establish and implement a program under which the Secretary shall award grants to eligible entities to research and support the development and deployment of materials that will reduce capture, absorb, adsorb, reduce, or sequester the amount of greenhouse gas emissions generated during the production of highway materials and the construction and use of highways.

“(2) Activities—Activities under this section may include—

changed “(A) carrying out research to determine the materials proven to most effectively reduce capture, absorb, adsorb, reduce, or sequester greenhouse gas emissions;

changed “(B) evaluating and improves the ability of materials to most effectively reduce capture, absorb, adsorb, reduce, or sequester greenhouse gas emissions; andemissions;

changed “(C) supporting the development and deployment of materials that will reduce capture, absorb, adsorb, reduce, or sequester greenhouse gas emissions.emissions; and

added “(D) in coordination with standards-setting organizations, such as the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, carrying out research on—

added “(i) the extent to which existing state materials procurement standards enable the deployment of materials proven to most effectively reduce or sequester greenhouse gas emissions;

added “(ii) opportunities for States to adapt procurement standards to more frequently procure materials proven to most effectively reduce or sequester greenhouse gas emissions; and

added “(iii) how to support or incentivize States to adapt procurement standards to incorporate more materials proven to most effectively reduce or sequester greenhouse gas emissions.

“(3) Competitive selection process

“(A) Applications—To be eligible to receive a grant under this subsection, an eligible entity shall submit to the Secretary an application in such form and containing such information as the Secretary may require.

added “(B) Consideration—In making grants under this subsection, the Secretary shall consider the degree to which applicants presently carry out research on materials that capture, absorb, adsorb, reduce, or sequester greenhouse gas emissions.

removed “(B) Consideration—In making grants under this subsection, the Secretary shall consider the degree to which applicants presently carry out research on materials that reduce or sequester greenhouse gas emissions.

“(C) Selection criteria—The Secretary may make grants under this subsection to any eligible entity based on the demonstrated ability of the applicant to fulfill the activities described in paragraph (2).

“(D) Transparency—The Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate a report describing the overall review process for a grant under this subsection, including—

“(i) specific criteria of evaluation used in the review;

“(ii) descriptions of the review process; and

“(iii) explanations of the grants awarded.

“(4) Grants

“(A) Restrictions

“(i) In general—For each fiscal year, a grant made available under this subsection shall be not greater than $4,000,000 and not less than $2,000,000 per recipient.

“(ii) Limitation—An eligible entity may only receive one grant in a fiscal year under this subsection.

“(B) Matching requirements—As a condition of receiving a grant under this subsection, a grant recipient shall match 50 percent of the amounts made available under the grant.

“(5) Program coordination

“(A) In general—The Secretary shall—

“(i) coordinate the research, education, and technology transfer activities carried out by grant recipients under this subsection;

“(ii) disseminate the results of that research through the establishment and operation of a publicly accessible online information clearinghouse; and

“(iii) to the extent practicable, support the deployment and commercial adoption of effective materials researched or developed under this subsection to relevant stakeholders.

“(B) Annual review and evaluation—Not later than 2 years after the date of enactment of this subsection, and not less frequently than annually thereafter, the Secretary shall, consistent with the activities in paragraph (3)—

added “(i) review and evaluate the programs carried out under this subsection by grant recipients, describing the effectiveness of the program in identifying materials that capture, absorb, adsorb, reduce, or sequester greenhouse gas emissions;

removed “(i) review and evaluate the programs carried out under this subsection by grant recipients, describing the effectiveness of the program in identifying materials that reduce or sequester greenhouse gas emissions;

“(ii) submit to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate a report describing such review and evaluation; and

“(iii) make the report in clause (ii) available to the public on a website.

“(6) Limitation on availability of amounts—Amounts made available to carry out this subsection shall remain available for obligation by the Secretary for a period of 3 years after the last day of the fiscal year for which the amounts are authorized.

“(7) Information collection—Any survey, questionnaire, or interview that the Secretary determines to be necessary to carry out reporting requirements relating to any program assessment or evaluation activity under this subsection, including customer satisfaction assessments, shall not be subject to chapter 35 of title 44 (commonly known as the “Paperwork Reduction Act”).

added “(8) Definition of eligible entity—In this subsection, the term eligible entity means—

added “(A) a nonprofit institution of higher education, as such term is defined in section 101 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1001); and

added “(B) a State department of transportation.”

removed “(8) Definition of eligible entity—In this subsection, the term eligible entity means a nonprofit institution of higher education, as such term is defined in section 101 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1001).”

Sec. 5112 Integrated project delivery

added
(a)
added In general— The Secretary of Transportation shall seek to enter into an agreement with the National Academy of Sciences to support and carry out a study of the effectiveness of integrated project delivery in delivering large infrastructure projects.
(b)
added Contents—
(1)
added Areas of study— The study shall—
(A)
added identify best practices for surface transportation project delivery with a focus on delivery of large or complex projects;
(B)
added determine whether there are any regulatory requirements that limit the use of integrated project delivery and the purpose of such regulations; and
(C)
added analyze the effectiveness of integrated project delivery compared to traditional project delivery methods, including an analysis of outcomes related to safety, cost effectiveness, environmental impacts, and on-time project delivery.
(2)
added Methods— In carrying out the study, the National Academy of Sciences shall consult with entities with experience managing, administering, or implementing integrated project delivery projects.
(c)
added Report— Not later than 1 year after the completion of the study under subsection (a), the Secretary shall publish a report on the results of the study under this section.

Sec. 5113 Accelerated implementation and deployment of advanced digital construction management systems

added

added Section 503(c) of title 23, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:

added “(5) Accelerated implementation and deployment of advanced digital construction management systems

added “(A) In general—The Secretary shall, to the extent practicable, under the technology and innovation deployment program established under paragraph (1), promote, support, and document the application of advanced digital construction management systems, practices, performance, and benefits.

added “(B) Goals—The goals of promoting the accelerated implementation and deployment of advanced digital construction management systems established under subparagraph (A) shall include—

added “(i) accelerated State and local government adoption of advanced digital construction management systems applied throughout the project delivery process (including through the design and engineering, construction, and operations phases) that—

added “(I) maximize interoperability with other systems, products, tools, or applications;

added “(II) boost productivity;

added “(III) manage complexity and risk;

added “(IV) reduce project delays and cost overruns;

added “(V) enhance safety and quality; and

added “(VI) support sustainable design and construction;

added “(ii) more timely and productive information-sharing among stakeholders through digital collaboration platforms that connect workflows, teams, and data and reduced reliance on paper to manage construction processes and deliverables;

added “(iii) deployment of digital management systems that enable and leverage the use of digital technologies on construction sites by contractors;

added “(iv) the development and deployment of best practices for use in digital construction management;

added “(v) increased technology adoption and deployment by States and units of local government that enables project sponsors—

added “(I) to integrate the adoption of digital management systems and technologies in contracts; and

added “(II) to weigh the cost of digitization and technology in setting project budgets;

added “(vi) technology training and workforce development to build the capabilities of project managers and sponsors that enables States and units of local government—

added “(I) to better manage projects using advance digital construction management technologies; and

added “(II) to properly measure and reward technology adoption across projects of the State or unit of local government;

added “(vii) development of guidance to assist States in updating regulations of the State to allow project sponsors and contractors—

added “(I) to report data relating to the project in digital formats; and

added “(II) to fully capture the efficiencies and benefits of advanced digital construction management systems and related technologies;

added “(viii) reduction in the environmental footprint of construction projects using advanced digital construction management systems resulting from elimination of congestion through more efficient projects;

added “(ix) development of more sustainable infrastructure that is designed to be more resilient to climate impacts, constructed with less material waste and made with more low-emissions construction materials; and

added “(x) enhanced worker and pedestrian safety resulting from increased transparency.”

Sec. 5301 Mobility through advanced technologies

Section 503(c)(4) of title 23, United States Code, is amended—

(1)
in subparagraph (A)—
(A)
by striking “Not later than 6 months after the date of enactment of this paragraph, the” and inserting “The”;
(B)
by striking “establish an advanced transportation and congestion management technologies deployment” and inserting “establish a mobility through advanced technologies”;
(C)
by inserting “mobility,” before “efficiency,”; and
(D)
by inserting “environmental impacts,” after “system performance,”;
(2)
in subparagraph (B)—
(A)
by striking clause (i) and inserting the following:

“(i) reduce costs, improve return on investments, and improve person throughput and mobility, including through the optimization of existing transportation capacity;”

(B)
in clause (iv) by inserting “bicyclist, and” before “pedestrian”;
(C)
changed in clause (vii) by striking “; or” and inserting a semicolon;(vii)—
(i)
added by inserting “increasing job opportunities,” after “performance,”; and
(ii)
added by striking “; or” and inserting a semicolon;
(D)
in clause (viii)—
(i)
changed by striking “accelerate” “accelerate the deployment” and inserting “prepare for”; for the safe deployment”; and
(ii)
by striking the period and inserting “; or”; and
(E)
by adding at the end the following:

“(ix) reduce greenhouse gas emissions and limit the effects of climate change.”

(3)
in subparagraph (C)—
(A)
changed in clause (ii)(II)(aa) by striking “congestion” and inserting “congestion and delays, greenhouse gas emissions”; and(ii)—
(i)
added in subclause (II)(aa) by striking “congestion” and inserting “congestion and delays, greenhouse gas emissions”;
(ii)
added in subclause (III) by inserting “economic,” after “mobility,”; and
(iii)
added in subclause (IV) by inserting “organizations representing the surface transportation workforce,” after “leaders,”; and
(B)
by adding at the end the following:

“(iii) Considerations—An application submitted under this paragraph may include a description of how the proposed project would support the national goals described in section 150(b), the achievement of metropolitan and statewide targets established under section 150(d), or the improvement of transportation system access consistent with section 150(f), including through—

“(I) the congestion and on-road mobile-source emissions performance measures established under section 150(c)(5); or

“(II) the greenhouse gas emissions performance measures established under section 150(c)(7).”

(4)
in subparagraph (D) by adding at the end the following:

“(iv) Prioritization—In awarding a grant under this paragraph, the Secretary shall prioritize projects that, in accordance with the criteria described in subparagraph (B)—

“(I) improve person throughput and mobility, including through the optimization of existing transportation capacity;

“(II) deliver environmental benefits;

“(III) reduce the number and severity of traffic crashes and increase driver, passenger, bicyclist, and pedestrian safety; or

“(IV) reduce greenhouse gas emissions and limit the effects of climate change.

changed “(v) Grant distribution—In each fiscal year, the Secretary shall award not fewer than 3 grants under this paragraph based on the potential of the project to reduce the number and severity of traffic crashes and increase, driver, passenger, bicyclist, and pedestrian safety.”safety.

added “(vi) Workforce partnerships—In awarding a grant under this paragraph, the Secretary shall consider, to the extent practicable, any demonstrated partnership of the applicant with representatives of the surface transportation workforce.”

(5)
in subparagraph (E)—
(A)
added in clause (iv) by inserting “consistent with section 5312 of title 49” after “systems”;
(B)
renumbered was (7)(2) in clause (vi)—
(i)
renumbered was (7)(2)(2) by inserting “, vehicle-to-pedestrian,” after “vehicle-to-vehicle”; and
(ii)
renumbered was (7)(2)(3) by inserting “systems to improve vulnerable road user safety,” before “technologies associated with” ;
(C)
renumbered was (7)(3) in clause (viii) by striking “; or” and inserting a semicolon;
(D)
added in clause (ix) by striking “disabled individuals.” and inserting “disabled individuals, including activities under section 5316 of title 49;”; and
(C)
removed in clause (ix) by striking “disabled individuals.” and inserting “disabled individuals, including activities under section 5316 of title 49; or”; and
(E)
renumbered was (7)(5) by adding at the end the following:

added “(x) measures to safeguard surface transportation system technologies under this subparagraph from cybersecurity threats; or

added “(xi) retrofitting dedicated short-range communications technology deployed as part of an existing pilot program to cellular vehicle-to-everything technology.”

removed “(x) measures to safeguard surface transportation system technologies under this subparagraph from cybersecurity threats.”

(6)
by striking subparagraph (G) and inserting the following:

“(G) Reporting

“(i) Applicability of law—The program under this paragraph shall be subject to the accountability and oversight requirements in section 106(m).

“(ii) Report—Not later than 3 years after the date that the first grant is awarded under this paragraph, and each year thereafter, the Secretary shall make available to the public on a website a report that describes the effectiveness of grant recipients in meeting their projected deployment plans, including data provided under subparagraph (F) on how the program has provided benefits, such as how the program has—

“(I) reduced traffic-related fatalities and injuries;

“(II) reduced traffic congestion and improved travel time reliability;

“(III) reduced transportation-related emissions;

“(IV) optimized multimodal system performance;

“(V) improved access to transportation alternatives;

“(VI) provided the public with access to real-time integrated traffic, transit, and multimodal transportation information to make informed travel decisions;

“(VII) provided cost savings to transportation agencies, businesses, and the traveling public;

“(VIII) created or maintained transportation jobs and supported transportation workers; or

changed “(IX) provided other benefits to transportation users users, workers, and the general public.

“(iii) Considerations—If applicable, the Secretary shall ensure that the activities described in subclauses (I) and (IV) of clause (ii) reflect—

“(I) any information described in subparagraph (C)(iii) that is included by an applicant; or

“(II) the project prioritization guidelines under subparagraph (D)(iv).”

(7)
in subparagraph (I) by striking “Funding” and all that follows through “the Secretary may set aside” and inserting the following: “Funding.—Of the amounts made available to carry out this paragraph, the Secretary may set aside”;
(8)
in subparagraph (J) by striking the period at the end and inserting “, except that the Federal share of the cost of a project for which a grant is awarded under this paragraph shall not exceed 80 percent.”;
(9)
in subparagraph (K) by striking “amount described under subparagraph (I)” and inserting “funds made available to carry out this paragraph”;
(10)
by striking subparagraph (M) and inserting the following:

“(M) Grant flexibility—If, by August 1 of each fiscal year, the Secretary determines that there are not enough grant applications that meet the requirements described in subparagraph (C) to carry out this paragraph for a fiscal year, the Secretary shall transfer to the technology and innovation deployment program—

“(i) any of the funds made available to carry out this paragraph in a fiscal year that the Secretary has not yet awarded under this paragraph; and

“(ii) an amount of obligation limitation equal to the amount of funds that the Secretary transfers under clause (i).”

(11)
in subparagraph (N)—
(A)
in clause (i) by inserting “an urbanized area with” before “a population of”; and
(B)
in clause (iii) by striking “a any” and inserting “any”.

Sec. 5309 Automated commercial vehicle reporting

(a)
Establishment— Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Transportation shall establish a repository for submitting entities to submit information to the Secretary on operations of automated commercial motor vehicles in interstate commerce.
(b)
Purposes— The purpose of this section shall be to ensure automated commercial motor vehicle safety and transparency in developing and maintaining the repository under this section.
(c)
Information required—
(1)
Submissions— Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall develop a process for submitting entities operating automated commercial motor vehicles in interstate commerce to provide the following information in accordance with paragraph (2):
(A)
The name of the submitting entity responsible for the operation of an automated commercial motor vehicle or vehicles.
(B)
The make, model, and weight class of such vehicle or vehicles.
(C)
The intended level of automation of such vehicle or vehicles, according to the taxonomy described in subsection (f)(1).
(D)
The Department of Transportation number or operating authority assigned to the submitting entity described in subparagraph (A), if applicable.
(E)
A list of States in which the operation of such vehicle or vehicles will occur and a list of Federal-aid highways (as defined in section 101(a) of title 23, United States Code) on which the operation will occur, as well as total miles traveled in the previous year on a biannual basis.
(F)
Any cargo classifications or passengers to be transported in such vehicle or vehicles, including whether the submitting entity is transporting such cargo or passengers under contract with another entity.
(G)
Documentation of training or certifications provided to any drivers, or other individuals directly involved in the performance of the dynamic driving task or fallback during operation of the vehicle, if any.
(H)
Any fatigue management plans or work hour limitations applicable to drivers, if any, consistent with such standards of the Department regarding automated commercial motor vehicle drivers.
(I)
Law enforcement interaction plans for automated commercial motor vehicles submitted to State transportation agencies or State and local law enforcement agencies.
(J)
Proof of insurance coverage.
(2)
Submission and updates—
(A)
In general— A submitting entity responsible for the operation of an automated commercial motor vehicle shall provide the information required under this subsection not later than 60 days after the Secretary has published the notice establishing the process described in paragraph (1).
(B)
Material change of information— The submitting entity responsible for the operation of an automated commercial motor vehicle shall notify the Secretary of any material changes to the information previously provided pursuant to this subsection on an annual basis, or on a more frequent basis specified by the Secretary.
(C)
Amendment and correction— If a submitting entity responsible for the operation of an automated commercial motor vehicle submits incomplete or inaccurate information pursuant to subsection (c), the submitting entity shall be given an opportunity to amend or correct the submission within a reasonable timeframe to be established by the Secretary.
(d)
Public availability of information—
(1)
In general— The Secretary shall make available on a publicly accessible website of the Department of Transportation the following information on automated commercial motor vehicles:
(A)
The prevalence of planned operations of such vehicles.
(B)
The characteristics of such operations.
(C)
The geographic location of such operations in a safe manner that reflects only the most significant public road or roads on which the majority of the route takes place, as determined appropriate by the Secretary.
(2)
Protection of information— Any data collected under subsection (c) and made publicly available pursuant to this subsection shall be made available in a manner that—
(A)
precludes the connection of the data to any individual motor carrier, shipper, company, vehicle manufacturer, or other submitting entity submitting data;
(B)
protects the safety, privacy, and confidentiality of individuals, operators, and submitting entities submitting the data; and
(C)
protects from disclosing—
(i)
trade secrets; and
(ii)
information obtained from a submitting entity that is commercial or financial and privileged or confidential, in accordance with section 552(b)(4) of title 5, United States Code.
(e)
Crash data—
(1)
In general— Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall require submitting entities to submit information regarding collisions which occur during the operation of an automated commercial motor vehicle on public roads while the vehicle’s automated driving system is engaged, including—
(A)
fatalities or bodily injury to persons who, as a result of the injury, immediately receive medical treatment away from the scene of a collision involving the automated commercial motor vehicle;
(B)
collisions or damage to property involving an automated commercial motor vehicle that results in an automated commercial motor vehicle or a motor vehicle being transported away from the scene by a tow truck or other motor vehicle;
(C)
a full description of how the collision or damage to property occurred, including, if applicable, the role of the automated driving system; and
(D)
the mode of transportation used by any road users involved in the collision, including general road users, as such term is defined under section 5304 of this Act.
(2)
Data availability— The Secretary shall ensure that any submitting entity submitting information under this subsection that has a Department of Transportation number or operating authority from the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration—
(A)
shall be subject to safety monitoring and oversight under the Compliance, Safety, and Accountability program of the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration; and
(B)
shall be included when the Secretary restores the public availability of relevant safety data under such program under section 4202(b) of this Act.
(3)
Rulemaking—
(A)
In general— Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall initiate a rulemaking to define the term safety incident, including collisions, with respect to automated commercial motor vehicle safety.
(B)
Update— Notwithstanding paragraph (1), the Secretary shall carry out this subsection to require submitting entities to submit information regarding safety incidents instead of collisions upon issuing a final rule under subparagraph (A).
(C)
Voluntary reporting—
(i)
In general— To support the rulemaking under this paragraph, the Secretary shall establish a mechanism through which entities may voluntarily report safety data or other information regarding automated commercial motor vehicles.
(ii)
Use of data— The data collected under this subparagraph may only be used to support the rulemaking under this paragraph.
(iii)
Protection from disclosure— Data or other information submitted under this subparagraph—
(I)
shall not be made publicly available; and
(II)
shall not be disclosed to the public by the Secretary pursuant to section 552(b)(4) of title 5, United States Code, if the data or other information is submitted to the Secretary voluntarily and is not required to be submitted to the Secretary under any other provision of law.
(f)
Definitions— In this section:
(1)
Automated commercial motor vehicle— The term Automated commercial motor vehicle means a commercial motor vehicle (as such term is defined in section 31132 of title 49, United States Code) that is designed to be operated by a level 3 or level 4 automated driving system for trips within its operational design domain or a level 5 automated driving system for all trips according to the recommended taxonomy published in April 2021, by the Society of Automotive Engineers International (J3016_202104) or, when adopted, equivalent standards established by the Secretary under chapter 301 of title 49, United States Code, with respect to automated motor vehicles.
(2)
Broker— The term broker has the meaning given such term under section 13102 of title 49, United States Code.
(3)
Employer— The term employer has the meaning given such term under section 31132 of title 49, United States Code.
(4)
Freight forwarder— The term freight forwarder has the meaning given such term in section 13102 of title 49, United States Code.
(5)
Motor carrier— The term motor carrier has the meaning given such term in section 13102 of title 49, United States Code.
(6)
Submitting entity— The term submitting entity means either—
(A)
a motor carrier; or
(B)
changed a technology company that is carrying out motor carrier-related operations in interstate commerce on public roads or an employer thereof, such as a motor carrier, freight forwarder, or broker.
(7)
Truck platooning— The term truck platooning means a series of commercial motor vehicles traveling in a unified manner with electronically coordinated braking, acceleration, and steering with a driver in the lead commercial motor vehicle.
(g)
Duplicative reporting—
(1)
In general— The Secretary may not require duplicative reporting.
(2)
Joint submissions— Submitting entities working in partnership on the same automated commercial motor vehicle operational trips shall make 1 submission of the information required under this section for each general route, as determined appropriate by the Secretary.
(3)
Information— In developing the reporting process required under subsection (c), the Secretary shall ensure, to the extent practicable, that submitting entities are not required to submit information previously reported to the Secretary under chapters 139 or 311 of title 49, United States Code.
(h)
Savings provision— Nothing in this section shall add to or detract from any existing—
(1)
enforcement authority of the Department of Transportation; or
(2)
authority to operate automated commercial motor vehicles in interstate commerce on public roads.
(i)
Penalties— An entity that violates any provision of this section shall be subject to civil penalties under section 521(b)(2)(B), of title 49, United States Code, and criminal penalties under section 521(b)(6)(A) of such title, and any other applicable civil and criminal penalties, as determined by the Secretary.
(j)
Treatment— In carrying out this section, the Secretary shall treat truck platooning operations the same as automated commercial motor vehicles.

Sec. 5310 Task Force to Promote American Vehicle Competitiveness

added
(a)
added In general— Subtitle III of title 49, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:

added “66 Domestic Production of Electric Vehicles

added “6601. Task force

added “(a) Establishment—The Secretary of Transportation shall establish a Task Force to Promote American Vehicle Competitiveness (hereinafter referred to as the “Task Force”) in accordance with this section.

added “(b) Membership

added “(1) In general—The Task Force shall be composed of the following officers:

added “(A) The Secretary of Transportation.

added “(B) The Secretary of the Interior.

added “(C) The Secretary of Commerce.

added “(D) The Secretary of Energy.

added “(E) The Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency.

added “(2) Additional members—The Secretary may designate additional members to serve on the Task Force.

added “(3) Officers—The Secretary of Transportation shall serve as Chair and may designate officials to serve as the Vice Chair, and on any working groups of the task force.

added “(c) Duties—The Task Force shall—

added “(1) identify and resolve any jurisdictional or regulatory gaps or inconsistencies associated with domestic sourcing and production of electric vehicle batteries to eliminate, so far as practicable, impediments to the prompt and safe deployment of domestically produced electric vehicle batteries, including with respect to safety regulation and oversight, environmental review, and funding issues;

added “(2) coordinate agency oversight of nontraditional and emerging electric vehicle battery sourcing and production technologies, projects, and engagement with external stakeholders;

added “(3) within applicable statutory authority other than this subsection, develop, recommend, and establish processes, solutions, and best practices for identifying, managing, and resolving issues regarding domestic sourcing and production of electric vehicle batteries; and

added “(4) carry out such additional duties as the Secretary of Transportation may prescribe, to the extend consistent with this title.

added “(d) Report—Not later than 12 months after the date of enactment of this section, and annually thereafter, the Task Force shall submit to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on the Environment and Public Works of the Senate a report containing findings on electric vehicle battery sourcing and production issues in the United States, recommended strategies or measures to streamline sourcing and production and promote American competitiveness, and any recommended legislative solutions.

added “6602. Critical mineral sourcing

added “(a) In general—The Secretary of Transportation, in conjunction with the Task Force to Promote American Vehicle Competitiveness, shall coordinate with the appropriate agencies to increase domestic sourcing of critical minerals and domestic production of electric vehicle batteries.

added “(b) Department coordination—The Department of Transportation shall coordinate with the Task Force and prioritize accordingly when making awards under section 5339(c) and sections 151 and 155 of title 23.”

(b)
added Clerical amendment— The table of chapters for subtitle III of title 49, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new item:

Sec. 6008 Transportation equity advisory committee

added
(a)
added Establishment—
(1)
added In general— Not later than 120 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Transportation shall establish an advisory committee, to be known as the Transportation Equity Committee (referred to in this section as the “Committee”), regarding comprehensive and interdisciplinary issues related to transportation equity from a variety of stakeholders in transportation planning, design, research, policy, and advocacy.
(2)
added Purpose of the advisory committee— The Committee established under paragraph (1) shall provide independent advice and recommendations to the Secretary on transportation equity, including developing a strategic plan with recommendations to the Secretary on national transportation metrics and the effect on such factors as economic development, connectivity, and public engagement.
(b)
added Duties— The Committee shall evaluate the work of the Department of Transportation in connecting people to economic and related forms of opportunity and revitalize communities in carrying out its strategic, research, technological, regulatory, community engagement, and economic policy activities related to transportation and opportunity. Decisions directly affecting implementation of transportation policy remain with the Secretary.
(c)
added Membership—
(1)
added In general— The Secretary shall appoint an odd number of members of not less than 9 but not more than 15 members (with a quorum consisting of a majority of members rounded up to the nearest odd number), to include balanced representation from academia, community groups, industry and business, non-governmental organizations, State and local governments, federally recognized Tribal Governments, advocacy organizations, and indigenous groups with varying points of view.
(2)
added Broad representation— To the extent practicable, members of the Committee shall reflect a variety of backgrounds and experiences, geographic diversity, including urban, rural, tribal, territories, and underserved and marginalized communities throughout the country, and individuals with expertise in related areas such as housing, health care, and the environment.
(3)
added Replacement for non-active members— The Secretary may remove a non-active member who misses 3 consecutive meetings and appoint a replacement to service for the period of time set forth in paragraph (5).
(4)
added Meetings— The Committee shall meet not less than 2 times each year with not more than 9 months between meetings at a reasonable time, in a place accessible to the public, and in a room large enough to accommodate the Committee members, staff, and reasonable number of interested members of the public. The room in which the Committee meets shall be large enough to accommodate at least 100 and shall be compliant with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 12101 et seq.).
(5)
added Term— Each member of the Committee shall serve a 2-year term with not more than 2 consecutive term reappointments, but may continue service until a replacement is appointed.
(6)
added Support— The Office of the Under Secretary for Policy of the Department of the Department of Transportation shall provide necessary funding, logistics, and administrative support for the Committee.
(d)
added Application of FACA— The Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.) shall apply to the Committee established under this section, with the exception of section 14 of such Act.

Sec. 6009 Sense of Congress

added

added It is the sense of the Congress that walking, bicycling, and public transportation are complementary modes of transportation, and that pedestrian and bicycle pathways and related improvements within the right-of-way of public transportation are an appropriate use of the right-of-way for the benefit of the public, do not exceed the reasonable use of the right-of-way, and every effort should be made to support the development and safe operation of such pedestrian and bicycle pathways.

Sec. 8101 Authorization of appropriations

Section 5128 of title 49, United States Code, is amended—

(1)
in subsection (a) by striking paragraphs (1) through (5) and inserting the following:

“(1) $75,000,000 for fiscal year 2022;

“(2) $70,000,000 for fiscal year 2023;

“(3) $71,000,000 for fiscal year 2024;

“(4) $73,000,000 for fiscal year 2025; and

changed “(5) $74,000,000 for fiscal year 2026;”2026.”

(2)
in subsection (b)—
(A)
changed by striking “fiscal years 2016 through 2020” and inserting “fiscal years 2022 through 2026”; and2026”;
(B)
changed in paragraph (1) by striking “$21,988,000” and inserting “$24,025,000”;“$24,025,000”; and
(C)
added in paragraph (4) by striking “$1,000,000” and inserting “$2,000,000”;
(3)
in subsection (c) by striking “$4,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2016 through 2020” and inserting “$5,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2022 through 2026”;
(4)
in subsection (d) by striking “$1,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2016 through 2020” and inserting “$4,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2022 through 2026”;
(5)
by redesignating subsection (e) as subsection (f); and
(6)
by inserting after subsection (d) the following:

“(e) Assistance with local emergency responder training grants—From the Hazardous Materials Emergency Preparedness Fund established under section 5116(h), the Secretary may expend $1,800,000 for each of fiscal years 2022 through 2026 to carry out the grant program under section 5107(j).”

Sec. 8204 Lithium battery approval

(a)
In general— Chapter 51 of title 49, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:

“5129. Lithium battery approval

“(a) Approval to transport certain batteries in commerce—A person may not transport in commerce a specified lithium battery that is determined by the Secretary to be a high safety or security risk unless—

“(1) the manufacturer of such battery receives an approval from the Secretary; and

“(2) the manufacture of such battery meets the requirements of this section and the regulations issued under subsection (d).

“(b) Term of approval—An approval granted to a manufacturer under this section shall not exceed 5 years.

“(c) Approval process—To receive an approval for a specified lithium battery under this section, a manufacturer shall—

“(1) allow the Secretary, or an entity designated by the Secretary, to inspect the applicant's manufacturing process and procedures;

“(2) bear the cost of any inspection carried out under paragraph (1); and

“(3) develop and implement, with respect to the manufacture of such battery—

“(A) a comprehensive quality management program; and

“(B) appropriate product identification, marking, documentation, lifespan, and tracking measures.

“(d) Regulations required—Not later than 2 years after the date of enactment of this section, the Secretary shall issue regulations to carry out this section. Such regulations shall include—

“(1) parameters for, and a process for receiving, an approval under this section; and

“(2) a determination of the types of specified lithium batteries that pose a high safety or security risk in transport, including battery or cell type, size, and energy storage capacity.

changed “(e) Specified lithium battery defined—In Rule of construction—Nothing in this section, the term specified lithium battery means—section shall be construed—

added “(1) to affect any provision, limitation, or prohibition with respect to the transportation of a specified lithium battery in effect as of the date of enactment of this section; or

added “(2) to authorize transportation of any such battery if such transportation is not already authorized as of the date of enactment of this section.

added “(f) Specified lithium battery defined—In this section, the term specified lithium battery means—

“(1) a lithium ion cell or battery; or

“(2) a lithium metal cell or battery.”

(b)
Clerical amendment— The analysis for chapter 51 of title 49, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:

Sec. 9101 Authorization of appropriations

(a)
Authorization of grants to Amtrak—
(1)
Northeast Corridor— There are authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary of Transportation for the use of Amtrak for activities associated with the Northeast Corridor the following amounts:
(A)
For fiscal year 2022, $2,500,000,000.
(B)
For fiscal year 2023, $2,600,000,000.
(C)
For fiscal year 2024, $2,700,000,000.
(D)
For fiscal year 2025, $2,800,000,000.
(E)
For fiscal year 2026, $2,900,000,000.
(2)
National Network— There are authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary for the use of Amtrak for activities associated with the National Network the following amounts:
(A)
For fiscal year 2022, $3,500,000,000.
(B)
For fiscal year 2023, $3,600,000,000.
(C)
For fiscal year 2024, $3,700,000,000.
(D)
For fiscal year 2025, $3,800,000,000.
(E)
changed For fiscal year 2026, $3,900,000,000$3,900,000,000.
(b)
Project management oversight— The Secretary may withhold up to one-half of one percent annually from the amounts made available under subsection (a) for oversight.
(c)
Amtrak common benefit costs for State-Supported routes— For fiscal year 2022, if funds are made available under subsection (a)(2) in excess of the amounts authorized for fiscal year 2020 under section 11101(b) of the FAST Act (Public Law 114–94), Amtrak shall use up to $250,000,000 of the excess funds to defray the share of operating costs of Amtrak’s national assets (as such term is defined in section 24320(c)(5) of title 49, United States Code) and corporate services (as such term is defined pursuant to section 24317(b) of title 49, United States Code) that is allocated to the State-supported services. After the update of the cost methodology policy required under section 24712(a)(7)(B) of title 49, United States Code, is implemented, there are authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary for the use of Amtrak such sums as may be necessary for each of the fiscal years 2023 through 2026 for the implementation of the updated policy.
(d)
State-Supported Route Committee— Of the funds made available under subsection (a)(2), the Secretary may make available up to $4,000,000 for each fiscal year for the State-Supported Route Committee established under section 24712 of title 49, United States Code.
(e)
Northeast Corridor Commission— Of the funds made available under subsection (a)(1), the Secretary may make available up to $6,000,000 for each fiscal year for the Northeast Corridor Commission established under section 24905 of title 49, United States Code.
(f)
Authorization of appropriations for Amtrak Office of Inspector General— There are authorized to be appropriated to the Office of Inspector General of Amtrak the following amounts:
(1)
For fiscal year 2022, $26,500,000.
(2)
For fiscal year 2023, $27,000,000.
(3)
For fiscal year 2024, $27,500,000.
(4)
For fiscal year 2025, $28,000,000.
(5)
For fiscal year 2026, $28,500,000.
(g)
Passenger rail improvement, modernization, and expansion grants—
(1)
There are authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary to carry out section 22906 of title 49, United States Code, the following amounts:
(A)
For fiscal year 2022, $4,800,000,000.
(B)
For fiscal year 2023, $4,900,000,000.
(C)
For fiscal year 2024, $5,000,000,000.
(D)
For fiscal year 2025, $5,100,000,000.
(E)
For fiscal year 2026, $5,200,000,000.
(2)
Project management oversight— The Secretary may withhold up to 1 percent of the total amount appropriated under paragraph (1) for the costs of program management oversight, including providing technical assistance and project planning guidance, of grants carried out under section 22906 of title 49, United States Code.
(3)
High-speed rail corridor planning— The Secretary shall withhold at least 4 percent of funding in paragraph (1) for the purposes described in section 22906(a)(1)(B) of title 49, United States Code. Any funds withheld by this paragraph that remain unobligated at the end of the fiscal year following the fiscal year in which such funds are made available may be used for any eligible project under section 22906 of such title.
(h)
Consolidated rail infrastructure and safety improvements—
(1)
In general— There are authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary to carry out section 22907 of title 49, United States Code, the following amounts:
(A)
For fiscal year 2022, $1,200,000,000.
(B)
For fiscal year 2023, $1,300,000,000.
(C)
For fiscal year 2024, $1,400,000,000.
(D)
For fiscal year 2025, $1,500,000,000.
(E)
For fiscal year 2026, $1,600,000,000.
(2)
Project management oversight— The Secretary may withhold up to 2 percent of the total amount appropriated under paragraph (1) for the costs of program management oversight, including providing technical assistance and project planning guidance, of grants carried out under section 22907 of title 49, United States Code.
(3)
Rail safety public awareness— Of the amounts made available under paragraph (1), the Secretary may make available up to $5,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2022 through 2026 to make grants under section 22907(o) of title 49, United States Code.
(4)
Railroad trespassing enforcement— Of the amounts made available under paragraph (1), the Secretary may make available up to $250,000 for each of fiscal years 2022 through 2026 to make grants under section 22907(p) of title 49, United States Code.
(5)
Railroad trespassing suicide prevention— Of the amounts made available under paragraph (1), the Secretary may make available up to $1,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2022 through 2026 to make grants under section 22907(q) of title 49, United States Code.
(i)
Bridges, stations, and tunnels grants—
(1)
In general— There are authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary to carry out section 22909 of title 49, United States Code, the following amounts:
(A)
For fiscal year 2022, $4,800,000,000.
(B)
For fiscal year 2023, $4,900,000,000.
(C)
For fiscal year 2024, $5,000,000,000.
(D)
For fiscal year 2025, $5,100,000,000.
(E)
For fiscal year 2026, $5,200,000,000.
(2)
Project management oversight— The Secretary may withhold up to one half of 1 percent of the total amount appropriated under paragraph (1) for the costs of program management oversight, including providing technical assistance and project planning guidance, of grants carried out under section 22909 of title 49, United States Code.
(j)
Railroad rehabilitation and improvement financing—
(1)
In general— There are authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary for payment of credit risk premiums in accordance with section 502(f)(1) of the Railroad Revitalization and Regulatory Reform Act of 1976 (45 U.S.C. 822(f)(1)) the following amounts, to remain available until expended:
(A)
For fiscal year 2022, $160,000,000.
(B)
For fiscal year 2023, $170,000,000.
(C)
For fiscal year 2024, $180,000,000.
(D)
For fiscal year 2025, $190,000,000.
(E)
For fiscal year 2026, $200,000,000.
(2)
Refund of premium— There are authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary $70,000,000 to repay the credit risk premium under section 502 of the Railroad Revitalization and Regulatory Reform Act of 1976 (45 U.S.C. 822) for each loan in cohort 3, as defined by the memorandum to the Office of Management and Budget of the Department of Transportation dated November 5, 2018, with interest accrued thereon, not later than 60 days after the date on which all obligations attached to each such loan have been satisfied. For each such loan for which obligations have been satisfied as of the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall repay the credit risk premium of each such loan, with interest accrued thereon, not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act.
(k)
Restoration and enhancement grants—
(1)
In general— There are authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary to carry out section 22908 of title 49, United States Code, $20,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2022 through 2026.
(2)
Project management oversight— The Secretary may withhold up to 1 percent from the total amounts appropriated under paragraph (1) for the costs of project management oversight of grants carried out under section 22908 of title 49, United States Code.
(l)
Grade crossing separation grants—
(1)
changed In general— There are authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary to carry out section 20171 22912 of title 49, United States Code, (as added by section 9551 of this Act) the following amounts:
(A)
For fiscal year 2022, $450,000,000.
(B)
For fiscal year 2023, $475,000,000.
(C)
For fiscal year 2024, $500,000,000.
(D)
For fiscal year 2025, $525,000,000.
(E)
For fiscal year 2026, $550,000,000.
(2)
changed Project management oversight— The Secretary may withhold up to 2 percent from the total amounts appropriated under paragraph (1) for the costs of project management oversight, including providing technical assistance and project planning guidance, of grants carried out under section 20171 22912 of title 49, United States Code.
(m)
Authorization of appropriations to the Federal Railroad Administration— Section 20117 of title 49, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:

“20117. Authorization of appropriations

“(a) Safety and operations

“(1) In general—There are authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary of Transportation for the operations of the Federal Railroad Administration and to carry out railroad safety activities authorized or delegated to the Administrator—

“(A) $290,500,000 for fiscal year 2022;

“(B) $303,300,000 for fiscal year 2023;

“(C) $316,100,000 for fiscal year 2024;

“(D) $324,400,000 for fiscal year 2025; and

“(E) $332,900,000 for fiscal year 2026.

“(2) Automated Track Inspection Program and data analysis—From the funds made available under paragraph (1) for each of fiscal years 2022 through 2026, not more than $17,000,000 may be expended for the Automated Track Inspection Program and data analysis related to track inspection. Such funds shall remain available until expended.

“(3) State participation grants—Amounts made available under paragraph (1) for grants under section 20105(e) shall remain available until expended.

“(4) Regional planning guidance—The Secretary may withhold up to $20,000,000 from the amounts made available for each fiscal year under paragraph (1) to facilitate and provide guidance for regional planning processes, including not more than $500,000 annually for each interstate rail compact.

“(5) Railroad safety inspectors

“(A) In general—The Secretary shall ensure that the number of full-time equivalent railroad safety inspection personnel employed by the Office of Railroad Safety of the Federal Railroad Administration does not fall below the following:

“(i) 379 for fiscal year 2022;

“(ii) 403 for fiscal year 2023;

“(iii) 422 for fiscal year 2024;

“(iv) 424 for fiscal year 2025; and

“(v) 426 for fiscal year 2026.

“(B) Consideration—In meeting the minimum railroad safety inspector levels under subparagraph (A), the Secretary shall consider the ability of railroad safety inspectors to analyze railroad safety data.

“(C) Funding—From the amounts made available to the Secretary under subsection (a)(1), the Secretary shall use the following amounts to carry out subparagraph (A):

“(i) $3,244,104 for fiscal year 2022.

“(ii) $6,488,208 for fiscal year 2023.

“(iii) $9,056,457 for fiscal year 2024.

“(iv) $9,326,799 for fiscal year 2025.

“(v) $9,597,141 for fiscal year 2026.

“(6) Other safety personnel

“(A) Increase in number of support employees—The Secretary shall, for each of fiscal years 2022 and 2023, increase by 10 the total number of full-time equivalent employees working as specialists, engineers, or analysts in the field supporting inspectors compared to the number of such employees employed in the previous fiscal year.

“(B) Funding—From the amounts made available to the Secretary under subsection (a)(1), the Secretary shall use the following amounts to carry out subparagraph (A):

“(i) $1,631,380 for fiscal year 2022.

“(ii) $3,262,760 for fiscal year 2023.

“(iii) $3,262,760 for fiscal year 2024.

“(iv) $3,262,760 for fiscal year 2025.

“(v) $3,262,760 for fiscal year 2026.

“(b) Railroad research and development

“(1) Authorization of appropriations—There are authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary of Transportation for necessary expenses for carrying out railroad research and development activities the following amounts which shall remain available until expended:

“(A) $67,000,000 for fiscal year 2022.

“(B) $69,000,000 for fiscal year 2023.

“(C) $71,000,000 for fiscal year 2024.

“(D) $73,000,000 for fiscal year 2025.

“(E) $75,000,000 for fiscal year 2026.

“(2) Short line safety—From funds made available under paragraph (1) for each of fiscal years 2022 through 2026, the Secretary may expend not more than $4,000,000—

“(A) for grants to improve safety practices and training for Class II and Class III freight, commuter, and intercity passenger railroads; and

“(B) to develop safety management systems for Class II and Class III freight, commuter, and intercity passenger railroads through the continued development of safety culture assessments, transportation emergency response plans, training and education, outreach activities, best practices for trespassing prevention and employee trauma response, and technical assistance.

changed “(3) University rail climate innovation grant program—Of the amounts made available under paragraph (1), the Secretary may make available up to $20,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2022 through 2026 to make grants under section 22912.institute

added “(A) In general—Of the amounts made available under paragraph (1), the Secretary may make available up to $20,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2022 through 2026 to establish the University Rail Climate Innovation Institute under section 22913.

added “(B) Project management oversight—The Secretary may withhold up to 1 percent from the total amounts appropriated under subparagraph (A) for the costs of project management oversight of the grant carried out under section 22913.

“(4) Suicide prevention research funding—From funds made available under paragraph (1) for each of fiscal years 2022 through 2026, the Secretary may make available not less than $1,000,000 for human factors research undertaken by the Federal Railroad Administration, including suicide countermeasure evaluation, data exploration and quality improvement, and other initiatives as appropriate.”

(n)
Limitation on financial assistance for State-Owned enterprises—
(1)
In general— Funds provided under this section and the amendments made by this section may not be used in awarding a contract, subcontract, grant, or loan to an entity that is owned or controlled by, is a subsidiary of, or is otherwise related legally or financially to a corporation based in a country that—
(A)
is identified as a nonmarket economy country (as defined in section 771(18) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1677(18))) as of the date of enactment of this Act;
(B)
was identified by the United States Trade Representative in the most recent report required by section 182 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2242) as a priority foreign country under subsection (a)(2) of that section; and
(C)
is subject to monitoring by the Trade Representative under section 306 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2416).
(2)
Exception— For purposes of paragraph (1), the term otherwise related legally or financially does not include a minority relationship or investment.
(3)
International agreements— This subsection shall be applied in a manner consistent with the obligations of the United States under international agreements.
(o)
Rail trust fund—
(1)
In general—
(A)
Funding— Beginning on the date on which a rail trust fund is established, any amounts made available under subsections (a), (g), (h), (i), (j)(1), (k), and (l) shall be derived from such fund.
(B)
Rail trust fund defined— In this subsection, the term rail trust fund means a trust fund established under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 for making certain expenditures for the benefit of rail and for crediting certain taxes and penalties collected relating to rail.
(2)
Sense of Committee on need for rail trust fund— The following is the sense of the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives:
(A)
There is a discrepancy in historical Federal investment between highways, aviation, and intercity passenger rail. Between 1949 and 2017, the Federal Government invested more than $2 trillion in our nation’s highways and over $777 billion in aviation. The Federal Government has invested $96 billion in intercity passenger rail, beginning in 1971 with the creation of the National Railroad Passenger Corporation. Intercity passenger rail Federal investment is only 12 percent of Federal aviation investment and less than 5 percent of Federal highway investment.
(B)
Congress has recognized the value and importance of a predictable, dedicated funding source through a trust fund for all other modes of transportation including for aviation, highways, transit, and waterways. The Highway Trust Fund was created in 1956. The Airport and Aviation Trust Fund was created in 1970. The Inland Waterways Trust Fund was created in 1978. Mass transit was added to the Highway Trust Fund in 1983. The Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund was created in 1986. With regard to Federal transportation investment, only intercity passenger and freight rail do not have a predictable, dedicated funding source through a trust fund.
(C)
changed The Federal Railroad Administration has identified more than $300 billion worth of investment needed to develop both high-speed and higher speed intercity passenger rail corridors around the United States. In addition, a Federal Railroad Administration report from 2014 found that shortline and regional railroads need $7 billion of investment. The federally owned Northeast Corridor has a $40 billion state of good repair backlog.
(D)
A rail trust fund would provide a predictable, dedicated funding source to high-speed and intercity passenger rail projects and for the public benefits of shortline and regional railroad freight rail projects. A trust fund provides essential longer term funding certainty to allow the United States to develop quality intercity passenger rail service in corridors across the country, eliminate the state of good repair backlog on the Northeast Corridor, allow for accessible equipment and stations for passengers with disabilities, move more freight on rail, redevelop an American passenger rail car manufacturing base, create good paying, middle class jobs, and reduce our nation’s transportation carbon emissions.

Sec. 9102 Passenger rail improvement, modernization, and expansion grants

(a)
In general— Section 22906 of title 49, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:

“22906. Passenger rail improvement, modernization, and expansion grants

“(a) In general

“(1) Establishment—The Secretary of Transportation shall establish a program to make grants to eligible applicants for—

“(A) capital projects that—

“(i) provide high-speed rail or intercity rail passenger transportation;

“(ii) improve high-speed rail or intercity rail passenger performance, including congestion mitigation, reliability improvements, achievement of on-time performance standards established under section 207 of the Rail Safety Improvement Act of 2008 (49 U.S.C. 24101 note), reduced trip times, increased train frequencies, higher operating speeds, electrification, and other improvements, as determined by the Secretary; and

“(iii) expand or establish high-speed rail or intercity rail passenger transportation and facilities; or

“(B) corridor planning activities for high-speed rail described in section 26101(b).

“(2) Purposes—Grants under this section shall be for projects that improve mobility, operational performance, or growth of high-speed rail or intercity rail passenger transportation.

“(b) Definitions—In this section:

“(1) Eligible applicant—The term eligible applicant means—

“(A) a State;

“(B) a group of States;

“(C) an Interstate Compact;

“(D) a public agency or publicly chartered authority established by 1 or more States;

“(E) a political subdivision of a State;

“(F) Amtrak, acting on its own behalf or under a cooperative agreement with 1 or more States; or

“(G) an Indian Tribe.

“(2) Capital project—The term capital project means—

“(A) a project or program for acquiring, constructing, or improving—

“(i) passenger rolling stock;

“(ii) infrastructure assets, including tunnels, bridges, stations, track and track structures, communication and signalization improvements; and

“(iii) a facility of use in or for the primary benefit of high-speed or intercity rail passenger transportation;

“(B) project planning, development, design, engineering, location surveying, mapping, environmental analysis or studies;

“(C) acquiring right-of-way or payments for rail trackage rights agreements;

“(D) making highway-rail grade crossing improvements related to high-speed rail or intercity rail passenger transportation service;

“(E) electrification;

“(F) mitigating environmental impacts; or

“(G) a project relating to other assets determined appropriate by the Secretary.

“(3) Intercity rail passenger transportation—The term intercity rail passenger transportation has the meaning given such term in section 24102.

“(4) High-speed rail—The term high-speed rail has the meaning given such term in section 26105.

“(5) State—The term State means each of the 50 States and the District of Columbia.

“(6) Socially disadvantaged individuals—The term socially disadvantaged individuals has the meaning given the term socially and economically disadvantaged individuals in section 8(d) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 637(d)).

“(c) Project requirements

“(1) Requirements—To be eligible for a grant under this section, an eligible applicant shall demonstrate that such applicant has or will have—

“(A) the legal, financial, and technical capacity to carry out the project;

“(B) satisfactory continuing control over the use of the equipment or facilities that are the subject of the project; and

“(C) an agreement in place for maintenance of such equipment or facilities.

“(2) High-speed rail requirements

“(A) Corridor planning activities—Notwithstanding paragraph (1), the Secretary shall evaluate projects described in subsection (a)(1)(B) based on the criteria under section 26101(c).

“(B) High-speed rail project requirements—To be eligible for a grant for a high-speed rail project, an eligible applicant shall demonstrate compliance with section 26106(e)(2)(A).

“(d) Project selection criteria

“(1) Priority—In selecting a project for a grant under this section, the Secretary shall give preference to projects that—

“(A) are supported by multiple States or are included in a multi-state regional plan or planning process;

“(B) achieve environmental benefits such as a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions or an improvement in local air quality; or

“(C) improve service to and investment in socially disadvantaged individuals.

“(2) Additional considerations—In selecting an applicant for a grant under this section, the Secretary shall consider—

“(A) the proposed project’s anticipated improvements to high-speed rail or intercity rail passenger transportation, including anticipated public benefits on the—

“(i) effects on system and service performance;

“(ii) effects on safety, competitiveness, reliability, trip or transit time, and resilience;

“(iii) overall transportation system, including efficiencies from improved integration with other modes of transportation or benefits associated with achieving modal shifts;

“(iv) ability to meet existing, anticipated, or induced passenger or service demand; and

“(v) projected effects on regional and local economies along the corridor, including increased competitiveness, productivity, efficiency, and economic development;

“(B) the eligible applicant’s past performance in developing and delivering similar projects;

“(C) if applicable, the consistency of the project with planning guidance and documents set forth by the Secretary or required by law; and

“(D) if applicable, agreements between all stakeholders necessary for the successful delivery of the project.

“(3) Additional screening for high-speed rail—In selecting an applicant for a grant under this section, for high-speed rail projects, the Secretary shall, in addition to the application of paragraphs (1) and (2), apply the selection and consideration criteria described in subparagraphs (B) and (C) of section 26106(e)(2).

“(e) Federal share of total project costs

“(1) Total project cost estimate—The Secretary shall estimate the total cost of a project under this section based on the best available information, including engineering studies, studies of economic feasibility, environmental analyses, and information on the expected use of equipment or facilities.

“(2) Federal share—The Federal share of total project costs under this section shall not exceed 90 percent.

“(3) Treatment of revenue—Applicants may use ticket and other revenues generated from operations and other sources to satisfy the non-Federal share requirements.

“(f) Letters of intent

“(1) In general—The Secretary shall, to the maximum extent practicable, issue a letter of intent to a recipient of a grant under this section that—

“(A) announces an intention to obligate, for a project under this section, an amount that is not more than the amount stipulated as the financial participation of the Secretary in the project, regardless of authorized amounts; and

“(B) states that the contingent commitment—

“(i) is not an obligation of the Federal Government; and

“(ii) is subject to the availability of appropriations for grants under this section and subject to Federal laws in force or enacted after the date of the contingent commitment.

“(2) Congressional notification

“(A) In general—Not later than 3 days before issuing a letter of intent under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall submit written notification to—

“(i) the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives;

“(ii) the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives;

“(iii) the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate; and

“(iv) the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate.

“(B) Contents—The notification submitted under subparagraph (A) shall include—

“(i) a copy of the letter of intent;

“(ii) the criteria used under subsection (d) for selecting the project for a grant; and

“(iii) a description of how the project meets such criteria.

“(g) Appropriations required—An obligation may be made under this section only when amounts are appropriated for such purpose.

“(h) Availability—Amounts made available to carry out this section shall remain available until expended.

“(i) Grant conditions—Except as specifically provided in this section, the use of any amounts appropriated for grants under this section shall be subject to the grant conditions under section 22905, except that the domestic buying preferences of section 24305(f) shall apply to Amtrak in lieu of the requirements of section 22905(a).”

(b)
Clerical amendment— The item relating to section 22906 in the analysis for chapter 229 of title 49, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:
(c)
added Definition of satisfactory continuing control— Section 22901 of title 49, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:

added “(4) Satisfactory continuing control—The term “satisfactory continuing control” means the continuing ability to utilize and ensure maintenance of an asset as a result of full or partial ownership, lease, operating or other enforceable contractual agreements, or statutory access rights.”

Sec. 9103 Consolidated rail infrastructure and safety improvement grants

Section 22907 of title 49, United States Code, is amended—

(1)
in subsection (b)—
(A)
in the matter preceding paragraph (1) by striking “The following” and inserting “Except as provided in subsections (o), (p), and (q), the following”;
(B)
in paragraph (1) by inserting “or the District of Columbia” before the period;
(C)
in paragraph (10) by striking “transportation center”; and
(D)
by adding at the end the following:

“(12) A commuter authority (as such term is defined in section 24102).

“(13) An Indian Tribe.”

(2)
in subsection (c)—
(A)
in paragraph (1) by inserting “and upgrades” after “Deployment”;
(B)
by striking paragraph (2);
(C)
by redesignating paragraphs (3) through (12) as paragraphs (2) through (11), respectively;
(D)
in paragraph (2), as so redesignated, by inserting “or safety” after “address congestion”;
(E)
changed in paragraph (3), as so redesignated, by striking “identified by the Secretary” and all that follows through “rail transportation” and inserting “to improve service or facilitate ridership growth in intercity rail passenger transportation or commuter rail passenger transportation (as such term is defined in section 24102”;24102)”;
(F)
in paragraph (4), as so redesignated, by inserting “to establish new quiet zones or” after “engineering improvements”;
(G)
in paragraph (9), as so redesignated, by inserting “, including for suicide prevention and other rail trespassing prevention” before the period;
(3)
in subsection (e)—
(A)
by striking paragraph (1) and inserting the following:

“(1) In general—In selecting a recipient of a grant for an eligible project, the Secretary shall give preference to—

“(A) projects that will maximize the net benefits of the funds made available for use under this section, considering the cost-benefit analysis of the proposed project, including anticipated private and public benefits relative to the costs of the proposed project and factoring in the other considerations described in paragraph (2); and

“(B) projects that improve service to, or provide direct benefits to, socially disadvantaged individuals (as defined in section 22906(b)), including relocating or mitigating infrastructure that limits community connectivity, including mobility, access, or economic development of such individuals.”

(B)
in paragraph (3) by striking “paragraph (1)(B)” and inserting “paragraph (1)(A)”;
(4)
in subsection (h)(2) by inserting “, except that a grant for a capital project involving zero-emission locomotive technologies shall not exceed an amount in excess of 90 percent of the total project costs” before the period.
(5)
by redesignating subsections (i), (j), and (k) as subsections (l), (m), and (n) respectively; and
(6)
by inserting after subsection (h) the following:

“(i) Large projects—Of the amounts made available under this section, at least 25 percent shall be for projects that have total project costs of greater than $100,000,000.

“(j) Commuter rail

“(1) Administration of funds—The amounts awarded under this section for commuter rail passenger transportation projects shall be transferred by the Secretary, after selection, to the Federal Transit Administration for administration of funds in accordance with chapter 53.

“(2) Grant condition

“(A) In general—Notwithstanding section 22905(f)(1) and 22907(j)(1), as a condition of receiving a grant under this section that is used to acquire, construct, or improve railroad right-of-way or facilities, any employee covered by the Railway Labor Act (45 U.S.C. 151 et seq.) and the Railroad Retirement Act of 1974 (45 U.S.C. 231 et seq.) who is adversely affected by actions taken in connection with the project financed in whole or in part by such grant shall be covered by employee protective arrangements established under section 22905(e).

“(B) Application of protective arrangement—The grant recipient and the successors, assigns, and contractors of such recipient shall be bound by the protective arrangements required under subparagraph (A). Such recipient shall be responsible for the implementation of such arrangement and for the obligations under such arrangement, but may arrange for another entity to take initial responsibility for compliance with the conditions of such arrangement.

“(3) Application of law—Subsection (g) of section 22905 shall not apply to grants awarded under this section for commuter rail passenger transportation projects.

“(k) Definition of capital project—In this section, the term capital project means a project or program for—

“(1) acquiring, constructing, improving, or inspecting equipment, track and track structures, or a facility, expenses incidental to acquisition or construction (including project-level planning, designing, engineering, location surveying, mapping, environmental studies, and acquiring right-of-way), payments for rail trackage rights agreements, highway-rail grade crossing improvements, mitigating environmental impacts, communication and signalization improvements, relocation assistance, acquiring replacement housing sites, and acquiring, constructing, relocating, and rehabilitating replacement housing;

“(2) rehabilitating, remanufacturing, or overhauling rail rolling stock and facilities;

“(3) costs associated with developing State or multi-State regional rail plans; and

“(4) the first-dollar liability costs for insurance related to the provision of intercity passenger rail service under section 22904.”

(7)
by striking subsection (l).

Sec. 9104 Railroad rehabilitation and improvement financing

(a)
In general— Section 502 of the Railroad Revitalization and Regulatory Reform Act of 1976 (45 U.S.C. 822) is amended—
(1)
in subsection (b)—
(A)
in paragraph (1)—
(i)
in subparagraph (A) by inserting “civil works such as cuts and fills, stations, tunnels,” after “components of track,”; and
(ii)
in subparagraph (D) by inserting “, permitting,” after “reimburse planning”; and
(B)
by striking paragraph (3);
(2)
by striking subsection (e)(1) and inserting the following:

“(1) Direct loans—The interest rate on a direct loan under this section shall be not less than the yield on United States Treasury securities of a similar maturity to the maturity of the direct loan on the date of execution of the loan agreement.”

(3)
in subsection (f)—
(A)
in paragraph (1) by adding “The Secretary shall only apply appropriations of budget authority to cover the costs of direct loans and loan guarantees as required under section 504(b)(1) of the Federal Credit Reform Act of 1990 (2 U.S.C. 661c(b)(1)), including the cost of a modification thereof, in whole or in part, for entities described in paragraphs (1) through (3) of subsection (a).” at the end;
(B)
in paragraph (3) by striking subparagraph (C) and inserting the following:

“(C) An investment-grade rating on the direct loan or loan guarantee, as applicable, if the total amount of the direct loan or loan guarantee is less than $100,000,000.

“(D) In the case of a total amount of a direct loan or loan guarantee greater than $100,000,000, an investment-grade rating from at least 2 rating agencies on the direct loan or loan guarantee, or an investment-grade rating on the direct loan or loan guarantee and a projection of freight or passenger demand for the project based on regionally developed economic forecasts, including projections of any modal diversion resulting from the project.”

(C)
by adding at the end the following:

“(5) Repayment of Credit Risk Premiums—The Secretary shall return credit risk premiums paid, and interest accrued thereon, to the original source when all obligations of a loan or loan guarantee have been satisfied. This paragraph applies to any project that has been granted assistance under this section after the date of enactment of the TRAIN Act.”

(4)
by adding at the end the following:

changed “(n) Non-Federal share—The proceeds of a loan provided under this section may be used as the non-Federal share of project costs under this title or chapter 53 of and title 49 if such loan is repayable from non-Federal funds.

“(o) Buy America

“(1) In general—In awarding direct loans or loan guarantees under this section, the Secretary shall require each recipient to comply with section 22905(a) of title 49, United States Code.

“(2) Specific compliance—Notwithstanding paragraph (1), the Secretary shall require—

“(A) Amtrak to comply with section 24305(f) of title 49, United States Code; and

“(B) a commuter authority (as defined in section 24102 of title 49, United States Code) to comply with section 5320 of title 49, United States Code.”

(b)
Guidance— Not later than 9 months after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall publish guidance that provides applicants for assistance under section 502 of the Railroad Revitalization and Regulatory Reform Act of 1976 (45 U.S.C. 822) information regarding the types of data, assumptions, and other factors typically used to calculate credit risk premiums required under subsection (f) of such section. Such guidance shall include information to help applicants understand how different factors may increase or decrease such credit risk premiums.

Sec. 9105 Bridges, stations, and tunnels (BeST) grant program

(a)
In general— Chapter 229 of title 49, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:

“22909. Bridges, stations, and tunnels (BeST) grant program

changed “(a) In general—The Secretary of Transportation shall establish a program (in this section referred to as the “BeST Program”) to provide grants to eligible entities for major capital projects included in the BeST Inventory established under subsection (b) for rail bridges, stations, and tunnels that are publicly owned or owned by Amtrak to enable make safety, capacity, and mobility improvements.

changed “(b) BeST Inventory

changed “(1) Establishment—Not later than 90 120 days after the date of enactment of the TRAIN Act, the Secretary shall establish, and publish on the website of the Department of Transportation an inventory (in this section referred to as the “BeST Inventory”) for publicly owned and Amtrak owned major capital projects designated by the Secretary to be eligible for funding under this section. The BeST Inventory shall include major capital projects to acquire, refurbish, rehabilitate, or replace rail bridges, stations, or tunnels and any associated and co-located projects.

changed “(2) Considerations—In selecting projects for inclusion in the BeST Inventory, the Secretary shall give priority to projects that provide the most benefit for intercity passenger rail service in relation to projected estimated costs and that are less likely to secure all of the funding required from other sources.

changed “(3) Updates to BeST Inventory—Every 2 years after the establishment of the BeST Inventory under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall update the BeST Inventory and include it in its annual budget justification.

“(4) Eligibility for BeST Inventory—Projects included in the BeST Inventory—

“(A) shall be—

“(i) consistent with the record of decision issued by the Federal Railroad Administration in July 2017 titled “NEC FUTURE: A Rail Investment Plan for the Northeast Corridor” (known as the “Selected Alternative”);

“(ii) consistent with the most recent service development plan under section 24904(a) (hereinafter in this section referred to as the “Service Development Plan”); and

changed “(iii) located in a territory for which a cost allocation policy is maintained pursuant to section 24905(c) of such title; 24905(c); or

changed “(B) shall be consistent with a multi-state regional planning document equivalent to the document referred to in subparagraph (A)(i) (A)(ii) with a completed Tier I environmental review of such document pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.).

changed “(5) Project funding sequencing—The Secretary shall determine the order of priority for projects in the BeST Inventory based on projects identified in paragraph (4) and project management plans as described in subsection (d). The Secretary may alter the BeST Inventory as necessary if applicants eligible entities are not carrying out the schedule identified in the Inventory.

“(6) Terms—The Secretary shall ensure the BeST Inventory establishes, for each project included in such Inventory—

changed “(A) the roles and terms of participation by any rail railroad bridge, station, or tunnel owners and railroad carriers in the project; and

changed “(B) the timeline schedule for such project that ensures efficient completion of the project.

“(7) Special financial rules

“(A) In general—Projects listed in the BeST Inventory may include an agreement with a commitment, contingent on future amounts to be specified in law for commitments under this paragraph, to obligate an additional amount from future available budget authority specified in law.

“(B) Statement of contingent commitment—An obligation or administrative commitment under this paragraph may be made only when amounts are appropriated. An agreement shall state that any contingent commitment is not an obligation of the Federal Government, and is subject to the availability of appropriations under Federal law and to Federal laws in force or enacted after the date of the contingent commitment.

“(C) Financing costs—Financing costs of carrying out the project may be considered a cost of carrying out the project under the BeST Inventory.

“(c) Expenditure of funds

changed “(1) Application Federal share of law—The non-Federal total project costs—The Federal share for the total cost of a grant provided project under this section shall be calculated in accordance with section 24905(c) or section 24712(a)(7) if either such section are applicable to the railroad territory at the project location.not exceed 90 percent.

changed “(2) Federal share of total project costs—The Federal share for the total cost of a project under this section shall be 90 percent. A Non-Federal share—A recipient of funds under this section may use any source of funds, including other Federal financial assistance assistance, to satisfy the non-Federal funds requirement.requirement. The non-Federal share for a grant provided under this section shall be consistent with section 24905(c) or section 24712(a)(7) if either such section are applicable to the railroad territory at the project location.

“(3) Availability of funds—Funds made available under this section shall remain available for obligation by the Secretary for a period of 10 years after the last day of the fiscal year for which the funds are appropriated, and remain available for expenditure by the recipient of grant funds without fiscal year limitation.

“(4) Eligible uses—Funds made available under this section may be used for projects contained in the most recent BeST Inventory, including pre-construction expenses and the acquisition of real property interests.

changed “(5) Funds awarded to Amtrak—Grants made to Amtrak shall be provided in accordance with the requirements of section 24319.chapter 243.

“(6) Grant conditions—Except as provided in this section, the use of any amounts made available for grants under this section shall be subject to the grant requirements in section 22905.

changed “(d) Program Project management

“(1) Submission of project management plans—The Secretary shall establish a process, including specifying formats, methods, and procedures, for applicants to submit a project management plan to the Secretary for a project in the BeST Inventory. Consistent with requirements in section 22903, project management plans shall—

“(A) describe the schedules, management actions, workforce availability, interagency agreements, permitting, track outage availability, and other factors that will determine the entity’s ability to carry out a project included in the BeST Inventory; and

“(B) be updated and resubmitted in accordance with this subsection every 2 years according to the schedule in the most recent Service Development Plan, or equivalent multi-state regional planning document with a completed Tier I environmental review conducted pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.).

“(2) Northeast Corridor projects—For projects on the Northeast Corridor, an applicant shall submit such project management plan to the Northeast Corridor Commission. Upon receipt of such plan, the Northeast Corridor Commission shall submit to the Secretary an updated Service Development Plan that describes the schedule and sequencing of all capital projects on the Northeast Corridor, including estimates of the amount each sponsor entity will need in program funding for each of the next 2 fiscal years to carry out the entity’s projects according to the Service Development Plan.

“(e) Cost methodology policy requirements

changed “(1) In general—The Secretary shall ensure that recipients ensure, as a condition of funds a grant agreement under this section adhere to the policies for any project located in a railroad territory where a policy established pursuant to section 24905(c) or section 209 of the Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act of 2008 (49 U.S.C. 24101 note), note) applies, that a recipient of funds under either such section maintain compliance with the policies, or any updates to any such applicable cost methodology policy.policy, for the railroad territory encompassing the project location.

changed “(2) Penalty for noncompliance—If such recipient does not maintain adherence to compliance with the policies described in paragraph (1), the Secretary may withhold funds under this subsection from such recipient up to the amount of the recipient’s shortfall, and, if the shortfall is not remedied after a reasonable period, may permanently reallocate such funds to other recipients.may—

added “(A) withhold funds under this subsection from such recipient up to the amount the recipient owes, but has not paid; and

added “(B) permanently reallocate such funds to other recipients after a reasonable period.

“(f) Definitions—In this section:

“(1) Eligible entity—The term eligible entity means—

added “(A) a State, including the District of Columbia;

removed “(A) a State;

“(B) a group of States;

“(C) an Interstate Compact;

“(D) a public agency or publicly chartered authority established by one or more States;

“(E) a political subdivision of a State;

removed “(F) Amtrak acting on its own behalf or in partnership with 1 or more States; or

removed “(G) any combination of the entities listed in subparagraphs (A) through (F).

changed “(2) Major capital project—The term major capital project means a rail bridge, station, or tunnel project related to intercity passenger rail service that has a total project cost of at least $500,000,000.“(F) Amtrak;

added “(G) An Indian Tribe; or

added “(H) any combination of the entities listed in subparagraphs (A) through (G).

added “(2) Major capital project—The term major capital project means a rail bridge, station, or tunnel project used for intercity passenger rail service that has a total project cost of at least $500,000,000.

“(3) Northeast Corridor—The term Northeast Corridor has the meaning given the term in section 24904(e).

“(4) Publicly owned—The term publicly owned means major capital projects that are at least partially owned or planned to be owned by the Federal Government or an eligible entity.

“(5) Co-located project—The term co-located project means a capital project that is adjacent to a major capital project and can be carried out during the same period.”

(b)
Clerical amendment— The analysis for chapter 229 of title 49, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:

Sec. 9201 Amtrak findings, mission, and goals

Section 24101 of title 49, United States Code, is amended—

(1)
in subsection (a)—
(A)
in paragraph (1)—
(i)
by striking “, to the extent its budget allows,”; and
(ii)
by striking “between crowded urban areas and in other areas of” and inserting “throughout”;
(B)
in paragraph (2) by striking the period and inserting “, thereby providing additional capacity for the traveling public and widespread air quality benefits.”;
(C)
in paragraph (4)—
(i)
by striking “greater” and inserting “high”; and
(ii)
by striking “to Amtrak to achieve a performance level sufficient to justify expending public money” and inserting “in order to meet the intercity passenger rail needs of the United States”;
(D)
in paragraph (5)—
(i)
by inserting “intercity and” after “efficient”; and
(ii)
by striking “the energy conservation and self-sufficiency” and inserting “addressing climate change, energy conservation, and self-sufficiency”;
(E)
in paragraph (6) by striking “through its subsidiary, Amtrak Commuter,”; and
(F)
by adding at the end the following:

“(9) Long-distance intercity passenger rail provides economic benefits to rural communities and offers intercity travel opportunities where such options are often limited, making long-distance intercity passenger rail an important part of the national transportation system.

“(10) The Northeast Corridor, long-distance routes, and State-supported routes are interconnected and collectively provide national rail passenger transportation.

“(11) Investments in intercity and commuter rail passenger transportation support jobs that provide a pathway to the middle class.”

(2)
in subsection (b) by striking “The” and all that follows through “consistent” and inserting “The mission of Amtrak is to provide a safe, efficient, and high-quality national intercity passenger rail system that is trip-time competitive with other intercity travel options, consistent”;
(3)
in subsection (c)—
(A)
by striking paragraph (1) and inserting the following:

“(1) use its best business judgment in acting to maximize the benefits of public funding;”

(B)
in paragraph (2)—
(i)
by striking “minimize Government subsidies by encouraging” and inserting “work with”; and
(ii)
by striking the semicolon and inserting “and improvements to service;”;
(C)
by striking paragraph (3) and inserting the following:

“(3) manage the passenger rail network in the interest of public transportation needs, including current and future Amtrak passengers;”

(D)
in paragraph (7) by striking “encourage” and inserting “work with”;
(E)
in paragraph (11) by striking “and” the last place it appears; and
(F)
by striking paragraph (12) and inserting the following:

“(12) utilize and manage resources with a long-term perspective, including sound investments that take into account the overall lifecycle costs of an asset;

changed “(13) ensure that service is accessible accessible, equitable, and accommodating to passengers with disabilities; disabilities and members of underserved communities; and

“(14) maximize the benefits Amtrak generates for the United States by creating quality jobs and supporting the domestic workforce.”

(4)
by striking subsection (d).

Sec. 9205 Use of facilities and providing services to Amtrak

Section 24308(e) of title 49, United States Code, is amended—

(1)
by striking paragraph (1) and inserting the following:

“(1)

“(A) When a rail carrier does not agree to allow Amtrak to operate additional trains in accordance with proposed schedules over any rail line of the carrier on which Amtrak is operating or seeks to operate, Amtrak may submit an application to the Board for an order requiring the carrier to allow for the operation of the requested trains. Not later than 90 days after receipt of such application, the Board shall determine whether the additional trains would unreasonably impair freight transportation and—

“(i) upon a determination that such trains do not unreasonably impair freight transportation, order the rail carrier to allow for the operation of such trains on a schedule established by the Board; or

“(ii) upon a determination that such trains do unreasonably impair freight transportation, initiate a proceeding to determine any additional infrastructure investments required by, or on behalf of, Amtrak.

“(B) If Amtrak seeks to resume operation of a train that Amtrak operated during the 5-year period preceding an application described in subparagraph (A), the Board shall apply a presumption that the resumed operation of such train will not unreasonably impair freight transportation unless the Board finds that there are substantially changed circumstances.”

(2)
in paragraph (2)—
(A)
by striking “The Board shall consider” and inserting “The Board shall”;
(B)
by striking subparagraph (A) and inserting the following:

“(A) in making the determination under paragraph (1), take into account any infrastructure investments previously made by, or on behalf of, Amtrak, or proposed in Amtrak’s application, with the rail carrier having the burden of demonstrating that the additional trains will unreasonably impair the freight transportation; and”

(C)
in subparagraph (B) by inserting “consider investments described in subparagraph (A) and” after “times,”; and
(3)
by adding at the end the following:

changed “(4) In a proceeding initiated by the Board under paragraph (1)(A)(ii), the Board shall solicit the views of the parties and require the parties to provide any necessary data or information. Not later than 180 days after the date on which the Board makes a determination under paragraph (1)(A)(ii), the Board shall issue an order requiring the rail carrier to allow for the operation of the requested trains provided that any conditions enumerated by the Board are met. In determining the necessary level of additional infrastructure or other investments needed to mitigate unreasonable interference, impairment of freight transportation, the Board shall use any criteria, assumptions, and processes it considers appropriate.

“(5) The provisions of this subsection shall be in addition to any other statutory or contractual remedies Amtrak may have with respect to operating the additional trains.”

Sec. 9209 State-supported routes operated by Amtrak

Section 24712 of title 49, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:

“24712. State-supported routes operated by Amtrak

“(a) State-Supported Route Committee

changed “(1) Establishment—Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of the Passenger Rail Reform and Investment Act of 2015, the Secretary of Transportation shall establish the Establishment—There is established a State-Supported Route Committee (referred to in this section as the “Committee”) to promote mutual cooperation and planning pertaining to the current and future rail operations of Amtrak and related activities of trains operated by Amtrak on State-supported routes and to further implement section 209 of the Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act of 2008 (49 U.S.C. 24101 note).

“(2) Membership

“(A) In general—The Committee shall consist of—

“(i) members representing Amtrak;

“(ii) members representing the Department of Transportation, including the Federal Railroad Administration; and

“(iii) members representing States.

“(B) Non-voting members—The Committee may invite and accept other non-voting members to participate in Committee activities, as appropriate.

“(3) Decisionmaking—The Committee shall establish a bloc voting system under which, at a minimum—

“(A) there are 3 separate voting blocs to represent the Committee’s voting members, including—

“(i) 1 voting bloc to represent the members described in paragraph (2)(A)(i);

“(ii) 1 voting bloc to represent the members described in paragraph (2)(A)(ii); and

“(iii) 1 voting bloc to represent the members described in paragraph (2)(A)(iii);

“(B) each voting bloc has 1 vote;

“(C) the votes of the voting bloc representing the members described in paragraph (2)(A)(iii) requires the support of at least two-thirds of that voting bloc’s members; and

“(D) the Committee makes decisions by unanimous consent of the 3 voting blocs.

“(4) Ability to conduct certain business—If all members of a voting bloc described in paragraph (3) abstain from a Committee decision, agreement between the other voting blocs consistent with the procedures set forth in paragraph (3) shall be deemed unanimous consent.

“(5) Meetings; rules and procedures—The Committee shall define and periodically update the rules and procedures governing the Committee’s proceedings. The rules and procedures shall—

“(A) incorporate and further describe the decisionmaking procedures to be used in accordance with paragraph (3); and

“(B) be adopted in accordance with such decisionmaking procedures.

“(6) Committee decisions—Decisions made by the Committee in accordance with the Committee’s rules and procedures, once established, are binding on all Committee members.

“(7) Cost methodology policy

“(A) In general—Subject to subparagraph (B), the Committee may amend the cost methodology policy required and previously approved under section 209 of the Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act of 2008 (49 U.S.C. 24101 note).

“(B) Revisions to cost methodology policy

“(i) Requirement to revise and update—Subject to the requirements of clause (iii), the Committee shall, not later than March 31, 2022, update the cost methodology policy required and previously approved under section 209 of the Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act of 2008 (49 U.S.C. 24101 note). Such update shall be consistent with the principles for revision of the Committee pursuant to such section and consistent with any subsequent changes to such principles approved by the Committee. The Committee shall implement the updated policy beginning in fiscal year 2023 and shall submit to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate a report documenting and explaining any changes to the policy and plans for implementation not later than 30 days after the adoption of the updated policy.

“(ii) Implementation impacts on Federal funding—To the extent that a policy implemented pursuant to clause (i) assigns to Amtrak costs that were previously allocated to States, Amtrak shall request such costs in the general and legislative annual report required by section 24315 or in any appropriate subsequent Federal funding request for the fiscal year in which the revised policy is implemented.

“(iii) Procedures for changing methodology—The rules and procedures implemented under paragraph (5) shall include procedures for changing the cost methodology policy under this subparagraph, notwithstanding section 209(b) of the Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act (49 U.S.C. 22 24101 note), and procedures or broad guidelines for conducting financial planning, including operating and capital forecasting, reporting, and data sharing and governance.

“(C) Requirements—The cost methodology policy shall—

“(i) ensure equal treatment in the provision of like services of all States and groups of States;

“(ii) assign to each route the costs incurred only for the benefit of that route and a proportionate share, based upon factors that reasonably reflect relative use, of costs incurred for the common benefit of more than 1 route; and

“(iii) promote increased efficiency in Amtrak’s operating and capital activities.

“(b) Invoices and reports

changed “(1) Monthly invoice—Not later than April 15, 2016, and monthly thereafter, Amtrak invoice—Amtrak shall provide to each State that sponsors a State-supported route a monthly invoice of the cost of operating such route, including fixed costs and third-party costs.

“(2) Planning and demand reports—A State shall provide to the Committee and Amtrak planning and demand reports with respect to a planned or existing State-supported route.

“(3) Financial and performance reports—The Committee shall require Amtrak to provide to the States and the Committee financial and performance reports at a frequency, and containing such information, as determined appropriate by the Committee.

“(c) Dispute resolution

“(1) Request for dispute resolution—If a dispute arises with respect to the rules and procedures implemented under subsection (a)(5), an invoice or a report provided under subsection (b), implementation or compliance with the cost methodology policy developed under section 209 of the Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act of 2008 (49 U.S.C. 24101 note) or amended under subsection (a)(7) of this section, either Amtrak or the State may request that the Surface Transportation Board conduct dispute resolution under this subsection.

“(2) Procedures—The Surface Transportation Board shall establish procedures for resolution of disputes brought before it under this subsection, which may include provision of professional mediation services.

“(3) Binding effect—A decision of the Surface Transportation Board under this subsection shall be binding on the parties to the dispute.

“(4) Obligation—Nothing in this subsection shall affect the obligation of a State to pay an amount related to a State-supported route that a State sponsors that is not in dispute.

“(d) Assistance

“(1) In general—The Secretary may provide assistance to the parties in the course of negotiations for a contract for operation of a State-supported route.

“(2) Financial assistance—From among available funds, the Secretary shall provide—

“(A) financial assistance to Amtrak or 1 or more States to perform requested independent technical analysis of issues before the Committee; and

“(B) administrative expenses that the Secretary determines necessary.

“(e) Performance metrics—In negotiating a contract for operation of a State-supported route, Amtrak and the State or States that sponsor the route shall consider including provisions that provide penalties and incentives for performance, including incentives to—

“(1) increase revenue;

“(2) reduce costs;

“(3) finalize contracts by the beginning of the Federal fiscal year; and

“(4) require States to promptly make payments for services delivered.

“(f) Statement of goals and objectives

“(1) In general—The Committee shall develop and annually review and update, as necessary, a statement of goals, objectives, and associated recommendations concerning the future of State-supported routes operated by Amtrak. The statement shall identify the roles and responsibilities of Committee members and any other relevant entities, such as host railroads, in meeting the identified goals and objectives, or carrying out the recommendations. The statement shall include a list of capital projects, including infrastructure, fleet, station, and facility initiatives, needed to support the growth of State-supported routes. The Committee may consult with such relevant entities, as the Committee considers appropriate, when developing the statement.

“(2) Transmission of statement of goals and objectives—Not later than March 31 of each year, the Committee shall submit to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives the most recent annual update to the statement developed under paragraph (1).

“(g) New or expanded State-supported routes

“(1) Coordination and consultation—In developing a new State-supported route or expanding an existing State-supported route, Amtrak shall closely coordinate with all States in which such route operates, and shall consult with the following:

“(A) The local municipalities in which the proposed route operates.

“(B) Commuter authorities and regional transportation authorities (as such terms are defined in section 24102) in the areas proposed to be served by such route.

“(C) The owner of any rail infrastructure over which the proposed route operates.

“(D) Administrator of the Federal Railroad Administration.

“(E) Other stakeholders, as appropriate.

changed “(2) State commitments—Notwithstanding any other provision of law, before beginning construction necessary for, or beginning operation of, a State-supported route that is initiated or expanded on or after the date of enactment of the TRAIN Act, Amtrak shall enter into an agreement with the State in which the proposed route operates for sharing ongoing fully allocated operating costs and capital costs in accordance with—

“(A) the cost methodology policy described under subsection (a)(7); or

“(B) the alternative cost methodology schedule described in paragraph (3).

“(3) Alternative cost methodology—Under the cost methodology schedule described in this paragraph, with respect to costs not covered by revenues for the operation of a State-supported route, Amtrak shall pay—

“(A) the share Amtrak otherwise would have paid under the cost methodology under subsection (a); and

“(B) a percentage of the share that the State otherwise would have paid under the cost methodology policy under subsection (a) according to the following:

“(i) Amtrak shall pay up to 100 percent of the capital costs and planning costs necessary to initiate a new State-supported route or expand an existing State-supported route, including planning and development, design, and environmental analysis costs, prior to beginning operations on the new route.

“(ii) For the first 2 years of operation, Amtrak shall pay for 100 percent of operating costs and capital costs.

“(iii) For the third year of operation, Amtrak shall pay 90 percent of operating costs and capital costs and the State shall pay the remainder.

“(iv) For the fourth year of operation, Amtrak shall pay 80 percent of operating costs and capital costs and the State shall pay the remainder

“(v) For the fifth year of operation, Amtrak shall pay 50 percent of operating costs and capital costs and the State shall pay the remainder.

“(vi) For the sixth year of operation and thereafter, operating costs and capital costs shall be allocated in accordance with the cost methodology policy described under subsection (a) as applicable.

“(4) Definitions—In this subsection, the terms capital cost and operating cost shall apply in the same manner as such terms apply under the cost methodology policy developed under subsection (a).

“(h) Cost methodology update and implementation report—Not later than 18 months after an updated cost methodology policy required under subsection (a)(7)(B) is implemented, the Committee shall submit to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate a report assessing the implementation of the updated policy.

“(i) Identification of State-supported route changes—Amtrak shall provide an update in the general and legislative annual report required by 24315(b) of planned or proposed changes to State-supported routes, including the introduction of new State-supported routes. In identifying routes to be considered planned or proposed under this subsection, Amtrak shall—

“(1) identify the timeframe in which such changes could take effect and whether Amtrak has entered into a commitment with a State under subsection (g)(2); and

“(2) consult with the Committee and any additional States in which a planned or proposed route may operate, not less than 120 days before an annual grant request is transmitted to the Secretary.

“(j) Rule of construction—The decisions of the Committee—

“(1) shall pertain to the rail operations of Amtrak and related activities of trains operated by Amtrak on State-sponsored routes; and

“(2) shall not pertain to the rail operations or related activities of services operated by other rail carriers on State-supported routes.

“(k) Definition of State—In this section, the term State means any of the 50 States, including the District of Columbia, that sponsor or propose to sponsor the operation of trains by Amtrak on a State-supported route, or a public entity that sponsors or proposes to sponsor such operation on such a route.”

Sec. 9210 Amtrak Police Department

(a)
Department mission— Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, Amtrak shall identify the mission of the Amtrak Police Department (in this section referred to as the “Department”), including the scope of the role and priorities of the Department, in mitigating risks to and ensuring the safety and security of Amtrak passengers, employees, trains, stations, facilities, and other infrastructure. In identifying such mission, Amtrak shall consider—
(1)
the unique needs of maintaining the safety and security of Amtrak’s network; and
(2)
comparable passenger rail systems and the mission of the police departments of such rail systems.
(b)
Workforce planning process— Not later than 120 days after identifying the mission of the Department under subsection (a), Amtrak shall develop a workforce planning process that—
(1)
ensures adequate employment levels and allocation of sworn and civilian personnel, including patrol officers, necessary for fulfilling the Department’s mission; and
(2)
sets performance goals and metrics for the Department that align with the mission of the Department and monitors and evaluates the Department’s progress toward such goals and metrics.
(c)
Considerations— In developing the workforce planning process under subsection (b), Amtrak shall—
(1)
identify critical positions, skills, and competencies necessary for fulfilling the Department’s mission;
(2)
analyze employment levels and ensure that—
(A)
an adequate number of civilian and sworn personnel are allocated across the Department’s 6 geographic divisions, including patrol officers, detectives, canine units, special operations unit, strategic operations, intelligence, corporate security, the Office of Professional Responsibilities, and the Office of Chief of Polices; and
(B)
patrol officers have an adequate presence on trains and route segments, and in stations, facilities, and other infrastructure;
(3)
analyze workforce gaps and develop strategies to address any such gaps;
(4)
consider risks, including those identified by Amtrak’s triannual risk assessments;
(5)
consider variables, including ridership levels, miles of right-of-way, crime data, call frequencies, interactions with vulnerable populations, and workload, that comparable passenger rail systems with similar police departments consider in the development of the workforce plans of such systems; and
(6)
consider collaboration or coordination with local, State, Tribal, and Federal agencies, and public transportation agencies to support the safety and security of the Amtrak network.
(d)
changed Consultation— In carrying out this section, Amtrak shall consult with the Amtrak Police Department Labor Committee, public safety experts, foreign or domestic entities providing passenger rail service comparable to Amtrak, and any other relevant entities, as determined by Amtrak.
(e)
Reports—
(1)
Report on mission of department— Not later than 10 days after Amtrak identifies the mission of the Department under subsection (a), Amtrak shall submit to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate a report containing a description of the mission of the Department and the reasons for the content of such mission.
(2)
Report on workforce planning process— Not later than 10 days after Amtrak completes the workforce planning process under subsection (b), Amtrak shall submit to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate a report containing the workforce planning process, the underlying data used to develop such process, and how such process will achieve the Department’s mission.

Sec. 9213 Amtrak staffing

Section 24312 of title 49, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:

“(c) Call center staffing

“(1) Outsourcing—Amtrak may not renew or enter into a contract to outsource call center customer service work on behalf of Amtrak, including through a business process outsourcing group.

“(2) Training—Amtrak shall make available appropriate training programs to any Amtrak call center employee carrying out customer service activities using telephone or internet platforms.

“(d) Station agent staffing

“(1) In general—Amtrak shall ensure that at least one Amtrak ticket agent is employed at each station building where at least one Amtrak ticket agent was employed on or after October 1, 2017.

“(2) Locations—Amtrak shall ensure that at least one Amtrak ticket agent is employed at each station building—

“(A) that Amtrak owns, or operates service through, as part of a passenger service route; and

“(B) for which the number of passengers boarding or deboarding an Amtrak long-distance train in the previous fiscal year exceeds the average of at least 40 passengers per day over all days in which the station was serviced by Amtrak, regardless of the number of Amtrak vehicles servicing the station per day. For fiscal year 2021, ridership from fiscal year 2019 shall be used to determine qualifying stations.

“(3) Exception—This subsection does not apply to any station building in which a commuter rail ticket agent has the authority to sell Amtrak tickets.

“(4) Amtrak ticket agent—For purposes of this section, the term Amtrak ticket agent means an Amtrak employee with authority to sell Amtrak tickets onsite and assist in the checking of Amtrak passenger baggage.

changed “(3) “(5) Effective date—This subsection shall take effect on the earlier of—

“(A) the date of the expiration of the emergency declaration issued by the President on March 13, 2020, pursuant to section 501(b) of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5191(b)); or

“(B) the day after the period that is the first 6 consecutive months within a calendar year for which Amtrak ridership exceeds the Amtrak ridership for the same 6 consecutive calendar months in 2019.”

Sec. 9302 Northeast Corridor planning

(a)
In general— Section 24904 of title 49, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
by redesignating subsection (e) as subsection (f);
(2)
by striking subsection (c);
(3)
by redesignating subsections (a) and (b) as subsections (b) and (c), respectively;
(4)
by inserting before subsection (b), as so redesignated, the following:

“(a) Service development plan

“(1) Requirement—Not later than December 31, 2021, the Northeast Corridor Commission established under section 24905 (referred to in this section as the “Commission”) shall submit to Congress a service development plan that identifies key state-of-good-repair, capacity expansion, and capital improvement projects planned for the Northeast Corridor, to upgrade aging infrastructure and improve the reliability, capacity, connectivity, performance, and resiliency of passenger rail service on the Northeast Corridor.

“(2) Contents—The service development plan required under paragraph (1) shall—

“(A) provide a coordinated and consensus-based plan covering a period of 15 years;

“(B) identify service objectives and capital investments needs;

“(C) provide a delivery-constrained strategy that identifies capital investment phasing, an evaluation of workforce needs, and strategies for managing resources and mitigating construction impacts on operations;

“(D) describe the anticipated outcomes of each project or program, including an assessment of improved capacity, travel time, and other benefits and costs of proposed investments;

“(E) include a financial strategy that incorporates available funding and identifies funding needs and potential sources of such funding; and

“(F) be updated at least every 5 years.”

(5)
in subsection (b) (as redesignated by paragraph (3))—
(A)
removed by striking “Not later than” and all that follows through “shall” and inserting “Not later than November 1 of each year, the Commission shall”;
(A)
renumbered was (2)(7)(3) in paragraph (1)—
(i)
added in the matter preceding subparagraph (A) by striking “Not later than” and all that follows through “shall” and inserting “Not later than November 1 of each year, the Commission shall”;
(ii)
renumbered was (2)(7)(3)(2) in subparagraph (A) by striking “a capital investment plan” and inserting “an annual capital investment plan”; and
(iii)
renumbered was (2)(7)(3)(3) in subparagraph (B) by inserting “for the Northeast Corridor” after “capital investment plan”;
(B)
added in paragraph (1)—
(i)
added in subparagraph (A) by striking “a capital investment plan” and inserting “an annual capital investment plan”; and
(ii)
added in subparagraph (B) by inserting “for the Northeast Corridor” after “capital investment plan”;
(C)
in paragraph (2)—
(i)
in subparagraph (A) by striking “and network optimization”;
(ii)
in subparagraph (B) by striking “and service”;
(iii)
in subparagraph (C) by striking “first fiscal year after the date on which” and inserting “fiscal year during which”;
(iv)
in subparagraph (D)—
(I)
by striking “identify, prioritize,” and all that follows through “and consider” and inserting “document the projects and programs being undertaken to achieve the service outcomes identified in the Northeast Corridor service development plan, once available, and the asset condition needs identified in the Northeast Corridor asset management system described in subsection (e) and consider”; and
(II)
in clause (i) by inserting “overall estimated” before “benefits”;
(v)
in subparagraph (E)(i) by striking “normalized capital replacement and”;
(vi)
in subparagraph (F) by adding “and” at the end;
(vii)
by striking subparagraph (G); and
(viii)
by redesignating subparagraph (H) as subparagraph (G); and
(D)
in paragraph (3)—
(i)
by striking “paragraph (2)(H)” and inserting “paragraph (2)(G)”;
(ii)
in subparagraph (A)—
(I)
by inserting “anticipated” before “funding sources”; and
(II)
by inserting “and, in the absence of an authorization or appropriation of funds for a fiscal year, be based on the amount of funding available in the previous fiscal year, plus inflation” after “methods”;
(iii)
in subparagraph (B) by striking “expected allocated shares of costs” and inserting “status of cost sharing agreements”;
(iv)
in subparagraph (C) by striking “and” at the end;
(v)
by redesignating subparagraph (D) as subparagraph (E); and
(vi)
by inserting after subparagraph (C) the following:

“(D) include any funding needs in excess of amounts authorized or otherwise available in a fiscal year; and”

(6)
in subsection (c) (as redesignated by paragraph (3)) by striking “may be spent only on” and all that follows through the end and inserting “may be spent only on capital projects and programs contained in the Commission’s capital investment plan from the previous year.”; and
(7)
by striking subsection (d) and inserting the following:

“(d) Review and coordination—The Commission shall gather information from Amtrak, the States in which the Northeast Corridor is located, and commuter rail authorities to support development of the capital investment plan. The Commission may specify a format and other criteria for the information submitted. Submissions to the plan from Amtrak, States in which the Northeast Corridor are located, and commuter rail authorities shall be provided to the Commission in a manner that allows for a reasonable period of review by, and coordination with, affected agencies.

“(e) Northeast corridor asset management—With regard to existing infrastructure, Amtrak and other infrastructure owners that provide or support intercity rail passenger transportation on the Northeast Corridor shall develop an asset management system, and use and update such system as necessary, to develop submissions to the Northeast Corridor capital investment plan described in subsection (b). Such system shall—

“(1) be timed consistent with the Federal Transit Administration process, as authorized under section 5326, when implemented; and

“(2) include, at a minimum—

“(A) an inventory of all capital assets owned by the developer of the plan;

“(B) an assessment of asset condition;

“(C) a description of the resources and processes necessary to bring or maintain those assets in a state of good repair; and

“(D) a description of changes in asset condition since the previous version of the plan.”

(b)
Conforming amendments—
(1)
Accounts— Section 24317(d)(1) of title 49, United States Code, is amended—
(A)
in subparagraph (B) by striking “24904(a)(2)(E)” and inserting “24904(b)(2)(E)”; and
(B)
in subparagraph (F) by striking “24904(b)” and inserting “24904(c)”.
(2)
Federal-State partnership for state of good repair— Section 24911(e)(2) of title 49, United States Code, is amended by striking “24904(a)” and inserting “24904(b)”.

Sec. 9304 Interstate rail compacts

(a)
Identification— Section 410 of the Amtrak Reform and Accountability Act of 1997 (Public Law 105–134; 49 U.S.C. 24101 note) is amended—
(1)
in subsection (b)(2) by striking “(except funds made available for Amtrak)”; and
(2)
by adding at the end the following:

“(c) Interstate rail compacts program—The Secretary of Transportation shall—

“(1) make available on a publicly accessible website a list of interstate rail compacts established in accordance with subsection (a);

“(2) provide information to the public regarding interstate rail compacts, including how States may establish interstate rail compacts under subsection (a); and

“(3) annually update the information provided under paragraph (2).”

(b)
Grants authorized— Chapter 229 of title 49, United States Code, is further amended by adding at the end the following:

“22910. Interstate rail compacts support program

changed “(a) In general—The Secretary shall develop and implement a competitive grant program for providing administrative assistance grants assistance, including salaries, benefits, travel, and other administrative expenses, to an applicant, on a competitive basis, eligible applicants to support interstate and regional efforts—

“(1) to improve the safety, efficiency, or reliability of intercity passenger rail; and

“(2) to promote and develop intercity passenger rail service, including through initiating, restoring, or enhancing intercity passenger rail service.

“(b) Applicant selection criteria

“(1) In general—In awarding grants under this section, the Secretary shall consider—

changed “(A) the amount of other funding received by an applicant (including funding from railroads) or other significant participation by State, local, and regional governmental and private entities;

“(B) the applicant’s work to facilitate and encourage regional planning for passenger rail improvement, enhancement, and development;

“(C) the applicant’s work to foster, through rail transportation systems, economic development, particularly in rural communities, for socially disadvantaged individuals, and for disadvantaged populations;

“(D) the applicant’s efforts to provide guidance to local communities on public and private resources relate to community concerns, such as congestion, rail and grade crossing safety, trespasser prevention, quiet zones, idling, and rail line relocations;

“(E) whether the applicant seeks to restore service over routes formerly operated by Amtrak, including routes described in section 11304(a) of the Passenger Rail Reform and Investment Act of 2015 (title XI of division A of Public Law 114–94);

changed “(F) the applicant’s dedication intent to providing provide intercity passenger rail service to regions and communities that are underserved or not served by other intercity public transportation;

“(G) whether the applicant is enhancing connectivity and geographic coverage of the existing national network of intercity rail passenger service;

“(H) the applicant’s efforts to engage with entities to deploy railroad safety technology or programs, including trespassing prevention, rail integrity inspection systems, or grade crossing safety;

“(I) whether the applicant prepares regional rail and corridor service development plans and corresponding environmental analysis; and

“(J) whether the applicant has engaged with the Federal, local, or State government and transportation planning agencies to identify projects necessary to enhance multimodal connections or facilitate service integration between rail service and other modes, including between intercity rail passenger transportation and intercity bus service, commercial air service, or commuter rail service.

“(2) Preference—In selecting grant recipients, the Secretary shall give preference to applicants that are initiating, restoring, or enhancing intercity rail passenger transportation.

changed “(c) Application process—The Secretary shall prescribe the form and manner of filing submitting applications under this section.

“(d) Performance measures

“(1) In general—The Secretary shall establish performance measures for each grant recipient to assess progress in achieving strategic goals and objectives.

“(2) Annual report—The Secretary shall require grant recipients to submit an annual report of the activities of such recipient and information related to applicable performance measures, which may include—

changed “(A) a demonstration of progress to achieve or advance the relevant criteria described in subsection (c); (b); and

changed “(B) receipt the amount of non-Federal matching funds provided from each member State at least once during each fiscal year.State.

changed “(e) Federal share of total project cost—The Secretary shall require each recipient of a grant under this subsection to provide a non-Federal match of not less than 50 percent of the administrative costs of assistance to the interstate rail compact.

“(f) Applicable requirements—The use of any amounts appropriated for grants under this section shall be subject to the applicable requirements under this chapter.

“(g) Applicability—Amounts appropriated to carry out this section shall remain available until expended.

“(h) Limitations

changed “(1) Maximum funding per applicant—The Secretary may not award a grant grants under this section in an amount exceeding $500,000 annually for each applicant in any fiscal year.applicant.

“(2) Numeric limitation—The Secretary may not provide grants under this section to more than 10 interstate rail compacts in any fiscal year.

changed “(i) Use of interstate rail compact grants and other Federal funding—A recipient of an interstate rail compact grant under Definitions—In this section may use such grant in combination with other Federal grants awarded that would benefit the applicable use.section:

removed “(j) Definitions—In this section:

“(1) Applicant—The term applicant means an interstate rail compact or an interstate commission composed of 2 or more States that has been established to promote, develop, or operate intercity passenger rail transportation systems.

“(2) Intercity passenger rail service—The term intercity passenger rail service has the meaning given the term intercity rail passenger transportation in section 24102.”

(c)
Clerical amendment— The analysis for chapter 229 of title 49, United States Code, is further amended by adding at the end the following:

Sec. 9305 High-speed rail updates

(a)
High-speed rail corridor planning— Section 26101 of title 49, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
in subsection (b)(1)—
(A)
in the matter preceding subparagraph (A) by striking “, or if it is an activity described in subparagraph (M)”;
(B)
in subparagraph (J) by striking “right-of-way improvements” and inserting “right-of-way acquisition or improvement needs”;
(C)
in subparagraph (K) by inserting “and” at the end; and
(D)
by striking subparagraphs (L) and (M) and inserting the following:

“(L) public costs in the creation of public private partnerships.”

(2)
in subsection (c)—
(A)
by striking paragraphs (1) through (3) and inserting the following:

“(1) the extent to which the proposed planning focuses on systems which will provide for high-speed rail;

“(2) the integration of the corridor into metropolitan area and statewide transportation planning, including State rail plans;

“(3) the use of rail stations within urbanized areas that are located in a geographic area with a greater density population than the urbanized area as a whole;”

(B)
in paragraph (4) by inserting before the semicolon “, passenger rail, transit, and other multimodal options”;
(C)
in paragraph (6) by inserting “and reduce greenhouse gas emissions” before the semicolon; and
(D)
in paragraph (11) by inserting “, including access to affordable housing” before the semicolon.
(b)
Definitions— Section 26105(2) of title 49, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
by inserting “made available to members of the general public as passengers and reasonably expected to reach speeds of” after “service which is”;
(2)
in subparagraph (A) by striking “reasonably expected to reach sustained speeds of more than 125 miles per hour; and” and inserting “160 miles per hour or more on shared-use right-of-way; or”; and
(3)
in subparagraph (B) by striking “made available to members of the general public as passengers” and inserting “186 miles per hour or more on dedicated right-of-way”.
(c)
High-speed rail corridor development— Section 26106(e)(2) of title 49, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
in subparagraph (A)(i) by striking “section 211 of the Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act of 2008” and inserting “section 24904(a)”; and
(2)
in subparagraph (C)(i)—
(A)
by striking subclause (III);
(B)
by redesignating subclause (II) as subclause (III);
(C)
by inserting after subclause (I) the following:

changed “(II) connectivity to rail stations within urbanized areas that are located in an a geographic area with a greater density population than the urbanized area as a whole;”

(D)
by striking subclause (IV) and inserting the following:

“(IV) environmental benefits, including projects that—

“(aa) reduce greenhouse gas emissions; and

“(bb) involve electrification or the purchase of environmentally sensitive, fuel-efficient, and cost-effective passenger rail equipment;”

Sec. 9401 Sense of Congress regarding commuter rail liability insurance

(a)
added Findings— Congress finds the following:
(1)
added Prior to the COVID–19 pandemic, 32 commuter railroads across the United States safely carried passengers on more than 500,000,000 trips each year.
(2)
added Commuter rail is a $9,900,000,000 industry that creates and supports more than 200,000 public- and private-sector jobs, and continues to grow.
(3)
added Most commuter rail agencies are required to maintain liability insurance up to statutory liability limits.
(4)
added Commuter rail agencies face significant obstacles to finding and obtaining liability insurance.
(5)
added Only a handful of insurers offer this coverage, and a significant percentage of the railroad liability insurance marketplace is provided by foreign companies.
(6)
added The number of insurers in the American and foreign markets willing to even offer potential capacity for this coverage has drastically decreased over the past several years, and, regardless of cost, it is becoming extremely difficult for commuter railroads to obtain the needed coverage.
(7)
added Despite the exceptional safety record of commuter railroads and recent full compliance with positive train control, a 2021 survey of the American Public Transportation Association’s commuter rail agencies revealed that there has been a 60 percent increase in premium costs over the last 3 years.
(8)
added The increase in premiums is largely due to factors outside the control of the commuter rail industry, including major forest fires, hurricanes, and insurers exiting the market.
(9)
added The cost of liability insurance severely impacts the operating budgets of many commuter rail agencies and potentially affects their ability to offer these critical public transportation services.
(b)
added Sense of Congress— It is the sense of Congress that Congress should address the capacity and cost issues associated with the commuter rail liability insurance market and consider establishing a commuter rail insurance program within the Department of Transportation.

removed Section 28502 of title 49, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:

removed “28502. Surface Transportation Board mediation of trackage use requests

removed “A rail carrier shall provide good faith consideration to a reasonable request from a provider of commuter rail passenger transportation for access to trackage and provision of related services. If, after a reasonable period of negotiation, a public transportation authority cannot reach agreement with a rail carrier to use trackage of, and have related services provided by, the rail carrier for purposes of commuter rail passenger transportation, the public transportation authority or the rail carrier may apply to the Board for nonbinding mediation. In any case in which dispatching for the relevant trackage is controlled by a rail carrier other than the trackage owner, both shall be subject to the requirements of this section and included in the Board’s mediation process. The Board shall conduct the nonbinding mediation in accordance with the mediation process of section 1109.4 of title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, as in effect on the date of enactment of the TRAIN Act. During such mediation process, the Board shall determine whether the consideration a rail carrier provided to a request was in good faith and whether the request from a provider of commuter rail passenger transportation was reasonable. The determinations made in the preceding sentence shall have no effect on the nonbinding nature of the mediation.”

Sec. 9402 Surface Transportation Board mediation of trackage use requests

changed Section 28503 28502 of title 49, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:

changed “28503. “28502. Surface Transportation Board mediation of rights-of-way trackage use requests

changed “A rail carrier shall provide good faith consideration to a reasonable request from a provider of commuter rail passenger transportation for access to rail right-of-way for the construction trackage and operation provision of a segregated fixed guideway facility. related services. If, after a reasonable period of negotiation, a public transportation authority cannot reach agreement with a rail carrier to acquire an interest in a railroad right-of-way for the construction use trackage of, and operation have related services provided by, the rail carrier for purposes of a segregated fixed guideway facility to provide commuter rail passenger transportation, the public transportation authority or the rail carrier may apply to the Board for nonbinding mediation. In any case in which dispatching for the relevant trackage is controlled by a rail carrier other than the right-of-way trackage owner, both shall be subject to the requirements of this section and included in the Board’s mediation process. The Board shall conduct the nonbinding mediation in accordance with the mediation process of section 1109.4 of title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, as in effect on the date of enactment of the TRAIN Act. During such mediation process, the Board shall determine whether the consideration a rail carrier provided to a request was in good faith and whether the request from a provider of commuter rail passenger transportation was reasonable. The determinations made in the preceding sentence shall have no effect on the nonbinding nature of the mediation.”

Sec. 9403 Surface Transportation Board mediation of rights-of-way use requests

added

added Section 28503 of title 49, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:

added “28503. Surface Transportation Board mediation of rights-of-way use requests

added “A rail carrier shall provide good faith consideration to a reasonable request from a provider of commuter rail passenger transportation for access to rail right-of-way for the construction and operation of a segregated fixed guideway facility. If, after a reasonable period of negotiation, a public transportation authority cannot reach agreement with a rail carrier to acquire an interest in a railroad right-of-way for the construction and operation of a segregated fixed guideway facility to provide commuter rail passenger transportation, the public transportation authority or the rail carrier may apply to the Board for nonbinding mediation. In any case in which dispatching for the relevant trackage is controlled by a rail carrier other than the right-of-way owner, both shall be subject to the requirements of this section and included in the Board’s mediation process. The Board shall conduct the nonbinding mediation in accordance with the mediation process of section 1109.4 of title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, as in effect on the date of enactment of the TRAIN Act. During such mediation process, the Board shall determine whether the consideration a rail carrier provided to a request was in good faith and whether the request from a provider of commuter rail passenger transportation was reasonable. The determinations made in the preceding sentence shall have no effect on the nonbinding nature of the mediation.”

Sec. 9504 Notice of FRA comprehensive safety compliance assessments

(a)
changed Initial notice— If the Federal Railroad Administration initiates a comprehensive safety culture compliance assessment of an entity providing regularly scheduled intercity or commuter rail passenger transportation, the Administration shall notify in electronic format the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate of such comprehensive safety culture compliance assessment not later than 10 business days after the date on which commencement of any field investigation activity that is part of such assessment occurs.
(b)
changed Findings— Not later than 180 days after completion of a comprehensive safety culture compliance assessment described in subsection (a), the Federal Railroad Administration shall transmit in electronic format to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate a summary report of the findings of such assessment.
(c)
changed Definition of comprehensive safety culture compliance assessment— In this section, the term comprehensive safety culture compliance assessment means a focused review initiated and managed by the Federal Railroad Administration based on findings from an accident investigation and involving at least 2 technical disciplines, with the purpose of examining the safety culture compliance of an entity providing regularly scheduled intercity or commuter rail passenger transportation.transportation with safety standards.

Sec. 9506 Freight train crew size safety standards

(a)
In general— Subchapter II of chapter 201 of title 49, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:

“20169. Freight train crew size safety standards

changed “(a) Minimum crew size—No freight train may be operated unless such train has a 2-person crew comprised of at least 1 appropriately qualified and certified conductor and one 1 appropriately qualified and certified locomotive engineer.

“(b) Exceptions—Except as provided in subsection (d), the prohibition in subsection (a) shall not apply in any of the following circumstances:

changed “(1) Train operations on track that is not a main line track.

“(2) A train operated—

“(A) by a railroad carrier that has fewer than 400,000 total employee work hours annually and less than $40,000,000 annual revenue (adjusted for inflation as measured by the Surface Transportation Board Railroad Inflation-Adjusted Index);

“(B) at a speed of not more than 25 miles per hour; and

“(C) on a track with an average track grade of less than 2 percent for any segment of track that is at least 2 continuous miles.

“(3) Locomotives performing assistance to a train that has incurred mechanical failure or lacks the power to traverse difficult terrain, including traveling to or from the location where assistance is provided.

“(4) Locomotives that—

“(A) are not attached to any equipment or attached only to a caboose; and

“(B) do not travel farther than 30 miles from the point of origin of such locomotive.

“(5) Train operations staffed with fewer than a two-person crew at least 1 year prior to the date of enactment of this section, if the Secretary determines that the operation achieves an equivalent level of safety.

“(c) Trains ineligible for exception—The exceptions under subsection (b) may not be applied to—

changed “(1) a train transporting 1 or more loaded cars carrying high-level radioactive waste, spent nuclear fuel, or material toxic by inhalation, as defined in section 171.8 of title 49, Code of Federal Regulations;inhalation;

“(2) a train carrying 20 or more loaded tank cars of a Class 2 material or a Class 3 flammable liquid in a continuous block or a single train carrying 35 or more loaded tank cars of a Class 2 material or a Class 3 flammable liquid throughout the train consist; or

“(3) a train with a total length of 7,500 feet or greater.

“(d) Waiver—A railroad carrier may seek a waiver of the requirements of this section pursuant to section 20103(d).”

(b)
Clerical amendment— The analysis for subchapter II of chapter 201 of title 49, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:

Sec. 9507 Border crossings

(a)
Border crossings— The Secretary of Transportation shall require that—
(1)
any railroad carrier that is operating a freight train across the southern border into the United States operates the train continually until the last car of the train passes through the scanning facility used for nonintrusive inspection by U.S. Customs and Border Protection located at such border;
(2)
when the last car of such train passes through such facility, the railroad carrier shall stop such train to conduct a crew interchange and any federally-mandated safety testing; and
(3)
the railroad carrier ensures that the only individuals that operate such trains after carrying out the activities described in paragraph (2) are individuals—
(A)
who are United States nationals or aliens lawfully admitted for permanent residence in the United States; and
(B)
whose primary reporting point is in the United States.
(b)
Funding—
(1)
Set-aside— From the amounts made available to carry out section 22907 of title 49, United States Code, the Secretary shall set aside, for each of fiscal years 2022 through 2026, $60,000,000 for projects to prevent blocked crossing incidents as a result of operations made necessary by subsection (a). Projects eligible for funding under this paragraph are—
(A)
highway-rail grade crossing separation projects eligible under such section that are located not further than 1.5 miles from a scanning facility described in subsection (a)(1); and
(B)
projects eligible under such section to relocate a rail line to prevent blocked crossing incidents resulting from trains crossing the southern border.
(2)
Unobligated funds— Any funds provided under paragraph (1) that are unobligated at the end of the second fiscal year following the fiscal year in which such funds are set aside may be used for any eligible project under section 22907.
(c)
Agreement— The Secretary shall ensure that a recipient of funds made available under subsection (b)(1)(A) has a written agreement with any railroad carrier operating over the infrastructure constructed or improved with such funds that includes a requirement that any such railroad carrier may not operate trains over such infrastructure that, due to the length of the train, are likely to cause blocked crossing incidents.
(d)
Rule of construction— Nothing in this section shall be construed as amending any safety regulation of the Federal Railroad Administration or amending or revoking any waivers such Administration has granted under section 20103 of title 49, United States Code.
(e)
Definitions— In this section:
(1)
Railroad carrier— The term railroad carrier has the meaning given such term in section 20102 of title 49, United States Code.
(2)
Southern border— The term southern border means the international border between the United States and Mexico.
(3)
changed Blocked crossing incident— The term blocked crossing incident has the meaning given such term in section 20174(f) 20173 of title 49, United States Code.

Sec. 9509 Leaking brakes

(a)
In general— The Administrator of the Federal Railroad Administration shall take such actions as are necessary to prohibit the use of any service air brake control valve or emergency air brake control valve in any location north of the 37th parallel during the period beginning on November 1 and ending on March 31 of any year if—
(1)
the period between the date on which the air brake control valve is in use and the date of the manufacture or recondition of such valve exceeds 15 years; and
(2)
the air brake control valve is operated in—
(A)
a unit train on or after August 1, 2023;
(B)
a train transporting 1 or more materials poisonous by inhalation, as such term is defined in section 171.8 of title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, on or after August 1, 2023; or
(C)
a non-unit train on or after August 1, 2025.
(b)
Reports— Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, and every year thereafter until air brake control valves described in subsection (a) are no longer operating in trains as required under subparagraphs (A) and (B) of subsection (a)(1), the Administrator shall transmit to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate a report that identifies—
(1)
the estimated number of such air brake control valves in use on—
(A)
changed unit trains operating north of the 37th parallel between November 1 and April 1; March 31; and
(B)
trains transporting 1 or more material poisonous-by-inhalation operating north of the 37th parallel during the period beginning on November 1 and ending on March 31;
(2)
any issues affecting the industry’s progress toward ensuring that such air brake control valves are phased out in accordance with the requirements of subsection (a); and
(3)
efforts the Administrator has taken since the previous report to ensure such air brake control valves are phased out in accordance with the requirements of subsection (a).
(c)
added Rulemaking— If, after collecting data through a science-based methodology, the Administrator determines the prohibition under subsection (a) does not ensure a sufficient level of safety, the Administrator may propose alternative actions in a rulemaking addressing the air brake control valves subject to this section.

Sec. 9510 Report on PTC system failures

Section 20157 of title 49, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:

changed “(m) Report of system failures—The Secretary shall require railroad carriers and other entities subject to subsection (a) to regularly report to the Secretary Administrator failures of positive train control systems. The Secretary shall prescribe the type of failure, format, interval, and detail required for reports submitted under this subsection.”

Sec. 9514 Crewmember certification and qualification

(a)
Audit of programs—
(1)
In general— Subchapter II of chapter 201 of title 49, United States Code, as amended by this division, is further amended by adding at the end the following:

“20171. Audit of qualification and certification programs

“(a) In general—Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of the TRAIN Act, and not less frequently than every 5 years thereafter, the Secretary shall conduct an audit of—

“(1) the qualification and certification program of locomotive engineers of each Class I railroad carrier subject to the requirements of part 240 of title 49, Code of Federal Regulations; and

“(2) the qualification and certification program of conductors of each Class I railroad carrier subject to the requirements of part 242 of title 49, Code of Federal Regulations.

“(b) Contents of audit—In carrying out the audit required under subsection (a), the Secretary shall—

“(1) consider whether the training, qualification, and continuing education components of the programs described in subsection (a) comply with regulations in parts 240 and 242 of title 49, Code of Federal Regulations;

“(2) assess the quality of the training that railroad carriers provide locomotive engineers and conductors under such programs;

“(3) determine whether such programs provide locomotive engineers and conductors the knowledge, skill, and ability to safely operate the types of locomotives or trains a railroad carrier may require a locomotive engineer and conductor to operate, including all associated technology used on such locomotives or trains;

“(4) determine whether the training, qualification, and continuing education components of such programs reflect the operating practices of the railroad carrier carrying out such components;

changed “(5) assess whether a railroad carrier conducting such programs provides locomotive engineers or conductors adequate at-controls training before certification; andcertification;

changed “(6) address any assess how a railroad carrier uses a simulator or other safety issues the Secretary determines appropriate for preparing technology to train, familiarize, or provide recurrent training to a locomotive engineers and conductors.engineer or conductor, including how the use of a simulator or other such technology compares to international experience or practice; and

added “(7) address any other safety issues the Secretary determines appropriate for preparing locomotive engineers and conductors.

“(c) Deficiency in qualification and certification program—If, in conducting the audit required under this section, the Secretary identifies a deficiency in a railroad carrier’s qualification and certification program of locomotive engineers or the qualification and certification program of conductors, the Secretary shall require the railroad carrier to update such program to eliminate the deficiency.

“(d) Consultation—In conducting the audit required under this section, the Secretary shall consult with representatives of each railroad carrier and representatives of the employees of the railroad carrier, including any nonprofit employee labor organization representing engineers or conductors of the railroad carrier.

“(e) Cooperation

“(1) In general—A railroad carrier and employees of the railroad carrier, including any nonprofit employee labor organization representing engineers or conductors of the railroad carrier, shall cooperate fully with the Secretary during an audit required under this section.

“(2) Documents; interviews—A railroad carrier shall provide any documents requested by the Secretary or make available any employee for interview with the Secretary without undue delay or obstruction.

added “(f) Report to Congress—Not later than 90 days after the date on which the Secretary completes an audit under subsection (a), the Secretary shall—

added “(1) publish on the website of the Federal Railroad Administration a report that summarizes the results of the audit and any updates made in accordance with subsection (c); and

added “(2) notify of such report the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate.

added “(g) Civil penalty—The Secretary is authorized to assess a civil penalty or to take other authorized enforcement action, as appropriate, pursuant to chapter 213 for a failure to comply with the requirements of this section.”

removed “(f) Report to Congress—Not later than 90 days after the date on which the Secretary completes an audit under subsection (a), the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate a report that summarizes the results of the audit.”

(2)
Clerical amendment— The analysis for subchapter II of chapter 201 of title 49, United States Code, as amended by this division, is further amended by adding at the end the following:
(b)
Review of regulations—
(1)
In general— The Secretary of Transportation shall determine whether any update to part 240 or 242, of title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, is necessary to prepare locomotive engineers and conductors to safely operate trains.
(2)
Requirements— In making a determination under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall—
(A)
evaluate, taking into account the requirements of section 20169 of title 49, United States Code, whether such parts establish Federal standards for railroad carriers to—
(i)
provide locomotive engineers and conductors the knowledge, skill and ability to safely operate trains under conditions that reflect industry practices;
(ii)
adequately address locomotive engineer and conductor situational awareness;
(iii)
require adequate at-controls training before a locomotive engineer or conductor is certified;
(iv)
adequately prepare locomotive engineers and conductors to understand all locomotive operating characteristics;
(v)
sufficiently require locomotive engineers and conductors to demonstrate knowledge on the physical characteristics of a territory under various conditions and using various resources; and
(vi)
address any other safety issue the Secretary determines appropriate for better preparing locomotive engineers and conductors; and
(B)
consider the results of the audit required by section 20171 of title 49, United States Code.
(3)
Report to Congress— Not later than 180 days after the date on which the Secretary submits the report required under section 20171(f) of title 49, United States Code, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate a report that includes the findings of the review required under paragraph (1) and a description of any action the Secretary intends to take to improve, or increase the effectiveness of the requirements of, part 240 or 242 of title 49, Code of Federal Regulations.
(4)
Rulemaking— If the Secretary determines under paragraph (1) that any update to part 240 or 242 is necessary to prepare locomotive engineers or conductors to safely operate locomotives or trains, the Secretary shall issue a rulemaking to carry out such update.
(5)
Application of law— Any action the Secretary takes as a result of a determination made under paragraph (1) shall be consistent with section 20169 of title 49, United States Code.
(6)
Definition of railroad carrier— In this subsection, the term railroad carrier has the meaning given such term in section 20102 of title 49, United States Code.

Sec. 9516 GAO study on reorganization of Office of Railroad Safety

(a)
Study— The Comptroller General of the United States shall conduct a study comparing the Office of Railroad Safety of the Federal Railroad Administration before and after the reorganization of such Office that took effect on June 8, 2020.
(b)
Contents— The study conducted under subsection (a) shall evaluate—
(1)
the differences in the structure of the Office before and after such reorganization;
(2)
any differences in the communication between the Office and railroad carriers and the employees of railroad carriers before and after such reorganization;
(3)
any differences in the communication between Federal Railroad Administration safety inspectors and other specialists before and after such reorganization, and the impacts of such differences;
(4)
whether the structure before or after such reorganization better protects against regulatory capture;
(5)
whether the structure before or after such reorganization is better at promoting and ensuring safety;
(6)
whether the structure before or after such reorganization more closely resembles the structure of other Department of Transportation modal agencies that have enforcement authority similar to the Federal Railroad Administration; and
(7)
any other issues the Comptroller General determines are relevant.
(c)
Information collection— In conducting the study required under this section, the Comptroller General shall collect information from the following entities:
(1)
The Federal Railroad Administration.
(2)
Freight rail carriers and passenger rail carriers.
(3)
Employees of freight rail carriers and passenger rail carriers.
(4)
Other entities the Comptroller General determines are relevant.
(d)
changed Report— Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General shall transmit to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate a report that includes the findings of the study conducted under subsection (a) and any recommendations for improving safety and communication within the Office of Railroad Safety or between the Office of Railroad Safety and the entities identified in paragraphs (2) and (3) of subsection (c).

Sec. 9551 Highway-rail grade crossing separation grants

(a)
changed In general— Subchapter II of chapter 201 Chapter 229 of title 49, United States Code, as amended by this division, is further amended by adding at the end the following:

changed “20173. “22912. Highway-rail grade crossing separation grants

“(a) General authority—The Secretary of Transportation shall make grants under this section to eligible entities to assist in funding the cost of highway-rail grade crossing separation projects.

“(b) Application requirements—To be eligible for a grant under this section, an eligible entity shall submit to the Secretary an application in such form, in such manner, and containing such information as the Secretary may require, including—

“(1) an agreement between the entity that owns or controls the railroad right-of-way and the applicant addressing access to the railroad right-of-way throughout the project; and

“(2) a cost-sharing agreement with the funding amounts that the entity that owns or controls the railroad right-of-way shall contribute to the project, which shall be not less than 10 percent of the total project cost.

“(c) Eligible projects—The following projects are eligible to receive a grant under this section:

changed “(1) Installation, repair, or improvement improvement, including necessary acquisition of real property interests, of highway-rail grade crossing separations.

“(2) Highway-rail grade crossing elimination incidental to eligible grade crossing separation projects.

“(3) Project planning, development, and environmental work related to a project described in paragraph (1) or (2).

“(d) Project selection criteria—In awarding grants under this section, the Secretary—

changed “(1) shall give priority to projects that maximize the safety benefits of Federal funding; andfunding;

changed “(2) may evaluate applications on the safety profile of the existing crossing, 10-year history of accidents at shall give priority to projects that provide direct benefits to socially disadvantaged individuals (as such crossing, inclusion of the proposed project on a State highway-rail grade crossing action plan required under term is defined in section 11401(b) of the FAST Act (49 U.S.C. 22501(b)), average daily vehicle traffic, total number of trains per day, average daily number of crossing closures, the challenges of grade crossings located near international borders, proximity to established emergency evacuation routes, and proximity of community resources, including schools, hospitals, fire stations, police stations, and emergency medical service facilities.22906(b)); and

added “(3) may evaluate applications on the safety profile of the existing crossing, 10-year history of accidents at such crossing, inclusion of the proposed project on a State highway-rail grade crossing action plan, average daily vehicle traffic, total number of trains per day, average daily number of crossing closures, the challenges of grade crossings located near international borders, proximity to established emergency evacuation routes, and proximity of community resources, including schools, hospitals, fire stations, police stations, and emergency medical service facilities.

“(e) Federal share of total project costs

“(1) Total project costs—The Secretary shall estimate the total costs of a project under this section based on the best available information, including any available engineering studies, studies of economic feasibility, environmental analysis, and information on the expected use of equipment or facilities.

“(2) Federal share—The Federal share for a project carried out under this section shall not exceed 85 percent.

removed “(f) Grant conditions—An eligible entity may not receive a grant for a project under this section unless such project is in compliance with section 22905.

changed “(g) Two-Year letters of intent“(f) Grant conditions—An eligible entity may not receive a grant for a project under this section unless such project complies with section 22905.

added “(g) Letters of intent

“(1) In general—The Secretary shall, to the maximum extent practicable, issue a letter of intent to a recipient of a grant under this section that—

added “(A) announces an intention to obligate for a project an amount that is not more than the amount stipulated as the financial participation of the Secretary for the project; and

removed “(A) announces an intention to obligate for no more than 2 years for a project an amount that is not more than the amount stipulated as the financial participation of the Secretary for the project; and

“(B) states that the contingent commitment—

“(i) is not an obligation of the Federal Government; and

“(ii) is subject to the availability of appropriations for grants under this section and subject to Federal laws in force or enacted after the date of the contingent commitment.

“(2) Congressional notification

“(A) In general—Not later than 3 days before issuing a letter of intent under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall submit written notification to—

“(i) the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives;

“(ii) the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives;

“(iii) the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate; and

“(iv) the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate.

“(B) Contents—The notification submitted under subparagraph (A) shall include—

“(i) a copy of the letter of intent;

“(ii) the criteria used under subsection (d) for selecting the project for a grant; and

“(iii) a description of how the project meets such criteria.

added “(h) Appropriations required—An obligation or contingent commitment may be made under subsection (g) only after amounts are appropriated for such purpose.

removed “(h) Appropriations required—An obligation or administrative commitment may be made under subsection (g) only after amounts are appropriated for such purpose.

“(i) Definitions—In this section:

“(1) Eligible entity—The term eligible entity means—

“(A) a State;

“(B) a public agency or publicly chartered authority;

“(C) a metropolitan planning organization;

“(D) a political subdivision of a State; and

“(E) a Tribal government.

“(2) Metropolitan planning organization—The term metropolitan planning organization has the meaning given such term in section 134(b) of title 23.

“(3) State—The term State means a State of the United States or the District of Columbia.”

(b)
changed Clerical amendment— The analysis for subchapter II of chapter 201 229 of title 49, United States Code, as amended by this division, is further amended by adding at the end the following:

Sec. 9552 Rail safety public awareness grant

Section 22907 of title 49, United States Code (as amended by this Act), is further amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

“(o) Rail safety public awareness grants

changed “(1) Grant—Of the amounts made available to carry out this section, the Secretary shall make grants to nonprofit organizations to carry out public information and education programs to help prevent and reduce rail-related pedestrian, motor vehicle, and other incidents, injuries, and fatalities, and to improve awareness along railroad right-of-way and at railway-highway highway-rail grade crossings.

“(2) Selection—Programs eligible for a grant under this subsection—

“(A) shall include, as appropriate—

“(i) development, placement, and dissemination of public service announcements in appropriate media;

“(ii) school presentations, driver and pedestrian safety education, materials, and public awareness campaigns; and

“(iii) disseminating information to the public on how to identify and report to the appropriate authorities—

“(I) unsafe or malfunctioning highway-rail grade crossings and equipment; and

“(II) high-risk and unsafe behavior and trespassing around railroad right-of-way; and

“(B) may include targeted and sustained outreach in communities at greatest risk to develop measures to reduce such risk.

“(3) Coordination—Eligible entities shall coordinate program activities with local communities, law enforcement and emergency responders, and railroad carriers, as appropriate, and ensure consistency with State highway-rail grade crossing action plans required under section 11401(b) of the FAST Act (49 U.S.C. 22501 note) and the report titled “National Strategy to Prevent Trespassing on Railroad Property” issued by the Federal Railroad Administration in October 2018.

“(4) Prioritization—In awarding grants under this subsection, the Administrator shall give priority to applications for programs that—

“(A) are nationally recognized;

“(B) are targeted at schools in close proximity to railroad right-of-way;

“(C) partner with nearby railroad carriers; or

“(D) focus on communities with a recorded history of repeated pedestrian and motor vehicle accidents, incidents, injuries, and fatalities at highway-rail grade crossings and along railroad right-of-way.

“(5) Applicability—Section 22905 shall not apply to contracts and agreements made under this subsection.”

Sec. 9553 Establishment of 10-minute time limit for blocking public highway-rail grade crossings

(a)
In general— Subchapter II of chapter 201 of title 49, United States Code, as amended by this division, is further amended by adding at the end the following:

changed “20174. “20173. Time limit for blocking public highway-rail grade crossing

“(a) Time limit—A railroad carrier may not cause a blocked crossing incident that is longer than 10 minutes in duration, unless the blocked crossing incident is caused by—

“(1) a casualty or serious injury;

“(2) an accident;

“(3) a track obstruction;

“(4) actions necessary to comply with Federal rail safety laws, regulations, or orders issued thereunder unless the action to comply could reasonably occur at a different time or location;

“(5) actions necessary to adhere to section 24308;

“(6) a train fully contained within rail yard limits or fully contained in a rail siding;

“(7) an act of God; or

“(8) a derailment or a safety appliance equipment failure that prevents the train from advancing.

“(b) Investigation of frequently blocked crossings—For any public highway-rail grade crossing that has had 3 or more blocked crossing incidents that exceed the time limit set forth in subsection (a) and are reported to the blocked crossing database, and such incidents have occurred on at least 3 calendar days within a 30-day period, the Secretary shall—

changed “(1) provide an electronic notice of the number of reported blocked crossing incidents to the railroad carrier that owns the public highway-rail grade crossing; andcrossing;

“(2) investigate the causes of the blocked crossing incidents; and

“(3) investigate possible measures to reduce the frequency and duration of blocked crossing incidents at such grade crossing.

“(c) Recordkeeping

“(1) In general—A railroad carrier shall, upon receiving a notice under subsection (b), maintain train location data records for the public highway-rail grade crossing that was the subject of the notice.

“(2) Contents of records—The train location data records required under paragraph (1) shall include—

“(A) a list of all blocked crossing incidents at the public highway-rail grade crossing that is the subject of the report exceeding 10 minutes;

“(B) the cause of the blocked crossing incident (to the extent available);

“(C) train length; and

“(D) the estimated duration of each blocked crossing incident.

“(3) Consultation—Beginning on the date on which a railroad carrier receives a notice under subsection (b), the Secretary may consult with the carrier for a period of 60 days to address concerns with blocked crossing incidents at the public highway-rail grade crossing that is the subject of the notice.

“(4) Expiration of data collection—The requirement to maintain records under paragraph (1) shall cease with respect to a public highway-rail grade crossing noticed under subsection (b)(2) if there are no reports submitted to the blocked crossing database for blocked crossing incidents reported to occur at such grade crossing during the previous 365 consecutive calendar days.

“(d) Civil penalties

“(1) In general—The Secretary may issue civil penalties in accordance with section 21301 to railroad carriers for violations of subsection (a) occurring 60 days after the date of submission of a notice under subsection (b).

“(2) Release of records—Upon the request of, and under requirements set by, the Secretary, railroad carriers shall provide the records maintained pursuant to subsection (c)(1) to the Administrator of the Federal Railroad Administration.

changed “(3) Alternate route exemption—Civil penalties may not be issued for violations of subsection (a) that occur at a public highway-rail grade crossing if no an alternate route created by a public highway-rail grade separation exists within a half mile by road mileage of such public highway-rail grade crossing.

“(4) Grade separation project—Civil penalties may not be issued for violations of subsection (a) if the violation occurs at a public highway-rail grade crossing for which there is a proposed grade separation project—

“(A) that has received written agreement from the relevant local authorities; and

“(B) for which railroad carrier and project funding from all parties has been budgeted.

“(5) Considerations—In determining civil penalties under this section, the Secretary shall consider increased penalties in a case in which a pattern of the blocked crossing incidents continue to cause delays to State or local emergency services.

“(e) Application to Amtrak and commuter railroads—This section shall not apply to Amtrak or commuter authorities, including Amtrak and commuter authorities’ operations run or dispatched by a Class I railroad.

“(f) Definitions—In this section:

“(1) Blocked crossing database—The term blocked crossing database means the national blocked crossing database established under section 20174.

“(2) Blocked crossing incident—The term blocked crossing incident means a circumstance in which a train, locomotive, rail car, or other rail equipment is stopped in a manner that obstructs travel at a public highway-rail grade crossing.

“(3) Public highway-rail grade crossing—The term public highway-rail grade crossing means a location within a State in which a public highway, road, or street, including associated sidewalks and pathways, crosses 1 or more railroad tracks at grade.”

(b)
Clerical amendment— The analysis for subchapter II of chapter 201 of title 49, United States Code, is further amended by adding at the end the following new item:

Sec. 9554 National blocked crossing database

(a)
In general— Subchapter II of chapter 201 of title 49, United States Code, as amended by this division, is further amended by adding at the end the following:

changed “20175. “20174. National blocked crossing database

“(a) Database—Not later than 45 days after the date of enactment of the TRAIN Act, the Secretary of Transportation shall establish a national blocked crossings database for the public to report blocked crossing incidents.

“(b) Public awareness—Not later than 60 days after the date of enactment of the TRAIN Act, the Secretary shall require each railroad carrier to publish the active link to report blocked crossing incidents on the website of the national blocked crossings database described in subsection (a) on the home page of the publicly-available website of the railroad carrier.

changed “(c) Blocked crossing incident; public highway-rail grade crossing—In this section, the terms blocked crossing incident and public highway-rail grade crossing have the meanings given the terms in section 20174.”20173.”

(b)
Clerical amendment— The analysis for subchapter II of chapter 201 of title 49, United States Code, is further amended by adding at the end the following new item:

Sec. 9555 Railroad point of contact for blocked crossing matters

Section 20152 of title 49, United States Code, is amended—

(1)
in subsection (a)—
(A)
in paragraph (1)—
(i)
in subparagraph (C) by striking “or” at the end;
(ii)
by redesignating subparagraph (D) as subparagraph (E); and
(iii)
by inserting the following after subparagraph (C):

changed “(D) blocked crossing incident, as defined in section 20174; 20173; or”

(B)
in paragraph (4)—
(i)
by striking “paragraph (1)(C) or (D)” and inserting “subparagraph (C), (D), or (E) of paragraph (1)”; and
(ii)
by striking “and” at the end;
(C)
in paragraph (5) by striking the period at the end and inserting a semicolon ; and
(D)
by adding at the end the following:

“(6) upon receiving a report of a blocked crossing pursuant to paragraph (1)(D), the railroad carrier shall, within 14 days of receipt of the report—

changed “(A) verify that the public highway-rail grade crossing, as defined in section 20174, 20173, was blocked for a period of at least 10 minutes; and

“(B) upon positive verification of the report, enter the report into the national blocked crossings database established in section 20174; and

“(7) promptly inform the Secretary of any update to the number maintained under paragraph (1).”

(2)
by adding at the end the following:

“(c) Publication of telephone numbers—The Secretary shall make any telephone number established under subsection (a) publicly available on the website of the Department of Transportation.”

Sec. 9556 National highway-rail crossing inventory review

(a)
In general— Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Transportation shall expend such sums as are necessary to conduct a comprehensive review of the national highway-rail crossing inventory of the Department of Transportation established under section 20160 of title 49, United States Code.
(b)
Contents— In conducting the review required under subsection (a), the Secretary shall—
(1)
changed verify the accuracy of the geographical location data contained in the inventory described in subsection (a) using mapping technologies and other methods; and
(2)
changed correct notify the relevant railroad and State agencies of the erroneous data in the inventory and require such inventory.entities to correct the erroneous data within 30 days of notification.
(c)
changed Report—State reports— Not later than 30 days after the completion of the review required under subsection (a), the The Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate a report detailing corrections made require State agencies to ensure that any geographic data contained in the inventory described in subsection (a) and the Secretary’s plans to ensure continued accuracy remains consistent with any geographic data identified in biennial State reports required under section 130 of such inventory.title 23, United States Code.
(d)
added Report— Not later than 120 days after the completion of the review required under subsection (a), the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate a report summarizing the corrections made to the inventory described in subsection (a) and the Secretary’s plans to ensure continued accuracy of such inventory.

Sec. 9601 Rail network climate change vulnerability assessment

(a)
In general— The Secretary of Transportation shall seek to enter into an agreement with the National Academies to conduct an assessment of the potential impacts of climate change on the national rail network.
(b)
Assessment— At a minimum, the assessment conducted pursuant to subsection (a) shall—
(1)
changed cover the entire freight freight, commuter, and intercity passenger rail network of the United States;
(2)
evaluate risk to the network over 5-, 30-, and 50-year outlooks;
(3)
examine and describe potential effects of climate change and extreme weather events on passenger and freight rail infrastructure, trackage, and facilities, including facilities owned by rail shippers;
(4)
identify and categorize the assets described in paragraph (3) by vulnerability level and geographic area; and
(5)
recommend strategies or measures to mitigate any adverse impacts of climate change, including—
(A)
emergency preparedness measures;
(B)
resiliency best practices for infrastructure planning; and
(C)
coordination with State and local authorities.
(c)
Report— Not later than 18 months after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate a report containing the findings of the assessment conducted pursuant to subsection (a).
(d)
Further coordination— The Secretary shall make the report publicly available on the website of the Department of Transportation and communicate the results of the assessment with stakeholders.
(e)
Regulatory authority— If the Secretary finds in the report required under subsection (c) that regulatory measures are warranted and such measures are otherwise under the existing authority of the Secretary, the Secretary may issue such regulations as are necessary to implement such measures.
(f)
Funding— From the amounts made available for fiscal year 2022 under section 20117(b) of title 49, United States Code, the Secretary shall expend not less than $1,500,000 to carry out the study required under subparagraph (a).

Sec. 9602 Advance acquisition

(a)
In general— Chapter 242 of title 49, United States Code, is amended by inserting the following after section 24202:

“24203. Advance acquisition

“(a) Rail corridor preservation—The Secretary of Transportation may assist a recipient of Federal financial assistance provided by the Secretary for an intercity passenger rail project in acquiring a right-of-way and adjacent real property interests before or during the completion of the environmental reviews for a project that may use such property interests if the acquisition is otherwise permitted under Federal law.

“(b) Certification—Before authorizing advance acquisition under this section, the Secretary shall verify that—

changed “(1) the recipient has authority to acquire the real property interest;interest; and

“(2) the acquisition of the real property interest—

“(A) is for a transportation purpose;

“(B) will not cause significant adverse environmental impact;

“(C) will not limit the choice of reasonable alternatives for the proposed project or otherwise influence the decision of the Secretary on any approval required for the project;

“(D) does not prevent the lead agency from making an impartial decision as to whether to accept an alternative that is being considered;

“(E) complies with other applicable Federal laws and regulations; and

“(F) will not result in elimination or reduction of benefits or assistance to a displaced person required by the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 4601 et seq.) and title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000d et seq.).

“(c) Environmental reviews

“(1) Completion of NEPA review—Before reimbursing or approving the expenditure of Federal funding for an acquisition of a real property interest, the Secretary shall complete all review processes otherwise required under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act of 1966 (49 U.S.C. 303), and section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (16 U.S.C. 470f) with respect to the acquisition.

“(2) Timing of development acquisition—A real property interest acquired under subsection (a) may not be developed in anticipation of the proposed project until all required environmental reviews for the project have been completed.

“(d) Inclusion in non-Federal share of project costs—Non-Federal funds used to acquire right-of-way and adjacent real property interests under this section before or during the environmental review, or before the award of a grant by the Secretary, shall be included in determining the non-Federal share of the costs of the underlying intercity passenger rail project.

“(e) Savings clause—The advance acquisition process described in this section—

“(1) is in addition to processes in effect on or before the date of enactment of the TRAIN Act; and

“(2) does not affect—

“(A) any right of the recipient described in subsection (a) to acquire property; or

“(B) any other environmental review process, program, agreement, or funding arrangement related to the acquisition of real property, in effect on the date of enactment of the TRAIN Act.”

(b)
Clerical amendment— The analysis for chapter 242 of title 49, United States Code, is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 24202 the following new item:

Sec. 9603 University Rail Climate Innovation Institute

(a)
In general— Chapter 229 of title 49, United States Code, is further amended by adding at the end the following:

changed “22912. “22913. University rail climate innovation grant programRail Climate Innovation Institute

changed “(a) Establishment—The Secretary of Transportation shall establish may make a university rail climate innovation grant program to an institution of higher education to establish a University Rail Climate Innovation Institute (in this section referred to as the “Program”) to make grants to institutions of higher education ‘Institute’) for the research and development of low- and zero-emission rail technologies.technologies. Such grant agreement shall not exceed 5 years.

changed “(b) Qualifications—To Eligible applicants—To be eligible for a grant under the Program, subsection (a), an institution of higher education shall have an active research program to study the development of low- and zero-emission rail technologies.shall—

changed “(c) Applications—To be eligible for a grant under the Program, “(1) have an institution of higher education shall submit active research program to study the Secretary an application development of low- and zero-emission rail technologies or be able to demonstrate sufficient expertise in such form, at such time, relevant rail research and containing such information as the Secretary may require.development;

changed “(d) Eligible projects—The Secretary may award grants under the Program to applicants that submit “(2) enter into a comprehensive proposal cost-sharing agreement for a low- and zero-emission rail project that includes activities to carry out the research, design, development, and demonstration of 1 or more purposes of the following:Institute with a railroad or rail supplier; and

added “(3) submit to the Secretary an application in such form, at such time, and containing such information as the Secretary may require.

added “(c) Eligible projects—A recipient of this grant under this section may carry out the research, design, development, and demonstration of 1 or more of the following:

“(1) Hydrogen-powered locomotives and associated locomotive technologies.

“(2) Battery-powered locomotives and associated locomotive technologies.

removed “(3) Rail technologies that significantly reduce greenhouse gas emissions, as determined appropriate by the Secretary.

removed “(e) Funding requirement—The Federal share of the total cost of a project for which a grant is awarded under this section shall not exceed 50 percent.

changed “(f) Project prioritization—In making grants for projects under the Program, the Secretary shall give priority to institutions “(3) Deployment of higher education that enter into a cost-sharing agreement for purposes revenue service testing and demonstration program to accelerate commercial adoption of the Program with a railroad low- or rail supplier.zero-emission locomotives.

changed “(g) Considerations—In making grants for projects under the Program, the Secretary shall consider—“(4) Development or deployment of an operating prototype low- or zero-emission locomotive.

changed “(1) the extent to which a project maximizes “(5) Rail technologies that significantly reduce greenhouse gas reductions;emissions, as determined appropriate by the Secretary.

changed “(2) the potential of a project to increase the use “(d) Buy america applicability—For purposes of low- and zero- emission rail technologies among subsection (c)(4), the United States freight and passenger rail industry; andrecipient shall be in compliance with section 22905(a).

changed “(3) “(e) Funding requirement—The Federal share of the anticipated public benefits total cost of a project.the Institute shall not exceed 50 percent.

added “(f) Considerations—In selecting an applicant to receive funding to establish the Institute, the Secretary shall consider—

added “(1) the extent to which the proposed activities maximize greenhouse gas reductions;

added “(2) the potential of the proposed activities to increase the use of low- and zero- emission rail technologies among the United States freight and passenger rail industry; and

added “(3) the anticipated public benefits of the proposed activities.

added “(g) Consideration of HBCUs—In selecting an institution of higher education for a grant award under this section, the Secretary shall consider historically black colleges and universities, as such term is defined in section 371(a)of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (2010 U.S.C. 1067q), and other minority institutions, as such term is defined by section 365 of such Act (20 U.S.C. 1067k).

“(h) Notification

removed “(1) Notice—Not later than 3 days after grants are awarded in any fiscal year under the Program, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate—

removed “(A) a list of all grant recipients under the Program; and

removed “(B) a summary of activities to be carried out by each recipient.

removed “(2) Report—Not later than 1 year after grants are awarded for projects under the Program, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate a report summarizing the projects on low- and zero-emission rail technologies.

removed “(i) Project management oversight—The Secretary may withhold up to 1 percent of the total amount appropriated under this section for the costs of program management oversight.

changed “(j) Institution “(1) Notice—Not less than 3 days before an applicant has been selected, the Secretary shall notify the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of higher education defined—In this section, the term institution House of higher education has Representatives and the meaning given such term in section 101 Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Higher Education Act Senate of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1001).”the intention to award such a grant.

added “(2) Report—The Institute shall submit to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives, the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate, and the Secretary an annual report summarizing the activities undertaken by the Institute on low- and zero-emission rail technologies.

added “(i) Institution of higher education defined—In this section, the term ‘institution of higher education’ has the meaning given such term in section 101 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1001).”

(b)
Clerical amendment— The analysis for chapter 229 of title 49, United States Code, is further amended by adding at the end the following:

Sec. 9604 Workforce diversity and development

(a)
changed In general— The Secretary of Transportation shall carry out at least one workforce development pilot program with a railroad carrier or an entity providing regularly scheduled intercity rail passenger transportation.carrier.
(b)
Types of pilot programs— A workforce development pilot program described in subsection (a) may be in the form of—
(1)
an outreach program to increase employment opportunities for socially disadvantaged individuals;
(2)
the development of a partnership with high schools, vocational schools, community colleges, or secondary education institutions to address future workforce needs; and
(3)
an apprenticeship program to train railroad employees in needed skills.
(c)
changed Apprenticeship— In carrying out a workforce development pilot program described in subsection (b)(3), the Secretary shall partner with an entity a railroad carrier providing intercity rail passenger transportation.
(d)
Report to Congress— For a workforce development pilot program carried out under this section, the Secretary shall transmit to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate a report that describes—
(1)
the activities carried out under the pilot program;
(2)
the diversity of individuals participating in the pilot program;
(3)
an evaluation of the pilot program;
(4)
employment outcomes, including job placement, job retention, and wages, using performance metrics established by the Secretary of Transportation, in consultation with the Secretary of Labor, and consistent with performance indicators used by programs under the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (29 U.S.C. 3101 et seq.), as applicable; and
(5)
any recommendations for increasing diversity in the railroad workforce, addressing future workforce needs, or enhancing workforce skills.
(e)
Definition— In this section:
(1)
Intercity rail passenger transportation— The term intercity rail passenger transportation has the meaning given such term in section 24102 of title 49, United States Code.
(2)
Railroad carrier— The term railroad carrier has the meaning given such term in section 20102 of title 49, United States Code.
(3)
Socially disadvantaged individuals— The term socially disadvantaged individuals has the meaning given the term socially and economically disadvantaged individuals in section 8(d) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 637(d)).
(f)
Funding— From the amounts made available under section 20117(b) of title 49, United States Code, the Secretary may expend up to $1,300,000 for fiscal year 2022 and $1,300,000 for 2023 to carry out this section.

Sec. 9605 Requirements for railroad freight cars entering service in United States

(a)
In general— Chapter 207 of title 49, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:

“20704. Requirements for railroad freight cars entering service in United States

“(a) Definitions—In this section, the following definitions apply:

“(1) Component—The term component means a part or subassembly of a railroad freight car.

“(2) Control—The term control means the power, whether direct or indirect and whether or not exercised, through the ownership of a majority or a dominant minority of the total outstanding voting interest in an entity, representation on the board of directors of an entity, proxy voting on the board of directors of an entity, a special share in the entity, a contractual arrangement with the entity, a formal or informal arrangement to act in concert with an entity, or any other means, to determine, direct, make decisions, or cause decisions to be made for the entity.

“(3) Cost of sensitive technology—The term cost of sensitive technology means the aggregate cost of the sensitive technology located on a railroad freight car.

“(4) Country of concern—The term country of concern means a country that—

“(A) is identified by the Department of Commerce as a nonmarket economy country (as defined in section 771(18) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1677(18))) as of the date of enactment of the TRAIN Act;

“(B) was identified by the United States Trade Representative in the most recent report required by section 182 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2242) as a foreign country included on the priority watch list defined in subsection (g)(3) of that section; and

“(C) is subject to monitoring by the Trade Representative under section 306 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C.2416).

“(5) Net cost—The term net cost has the meaning given the term in chapter 4 of the USMCA or any subsequent free trade agreement between the United States, Mexico, and Canada.

“(6) Qualified facility—The term qualified facility means a facility that is not owned or under the control of a state-owned enterprise.

“(7) Qualified manufacturer—The term qualified manufacturer means a railroad freight car manufacturer that is not owned or under the control of a state-owned enterprise.

“(8) Railroad freight car—The term railroad freight car means a car designed to carry freight or railroad personnel by rail, including—

“(A) box car;

“(B) refrigerator car;

“(C) ventilator car;

“(D) intermodal well car;

“(E) gondola car;

“(F) hopper car;

“(G) auto rack car;

“(H) flat car;

“(I) special car;

“(J) caboose car;

“(K) tank car; and

“(L) yard car.

“(9) Sensitive technology—The term sensitive technology means any device embedded with electronics, software, sensors, or other connectivity, that enables the device to connect to, collect data from, or exchange data with another device, including—

“(A) onboard telematics;

“(B) remote monitoring software;

“(C) firmware;

“(D) analytics;

“(E) GPS satellite and cellular location tracking systems;

“(F) event status sensors;

“(G) predictive component condition and performance monitoring sensors; and

“(H) similar sensitive technologies embedded into freight railcar components and subassemblies.

“(10) State-owned enterprise—The term state-owned enterprise means—

“(A) an entity that is owned by, or under the control of, a national, provincial, or local government of a country of concern, or an agency of such government; or

“(B) an individual acting under the direction or influence of a government or agency described in subparagraph (A).

“(11) Substantially transformed—The term substantially transformed means a component of a railroad freight car that undergoes an applicable change in tariff classification as a result of the manufacturing process, as described in chapter 4 and related Annexes of the USMCA or any subsequent free trade agreement between the United States, Mexico, and Canada.

“(12) USMCA—The term USMCA has the meaning given the term in section 3 of the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement Implementation Act (19 U.S.C. 4502).

“(b) Requirements for railroad freight cars entering service in the United States

changed “(1) Limitation on railroad freight cars—A railroad freight car wholly manufactured on or after the date that is 1 year after the date of enactment of the TRAIN Act, may only operate on the United States freight railroad interchange system if—

“(A) the railroad freight car is manufactured, assembled, and substantially transformed, as applicable, by a qualified manufacturer in a qualified facility;

“(B) none of the sensitive technology located on the railroad freight car, including components necessary to the functionality of the sensitive technology, originates from a country of concern or is sourced from state-owned enterprise; and

“(C) none of the content of the railroad freight car, excluding sensitive technology, originates from a country of concern or is sourced from a state-owned enterprise that has been determined by a recognized court or administrative agency of competent jurisdiction and legal authority to have violated or infringed valid United States intellectual property rights of another including such a finding by a Federal district court under title 35 or the U.S. International Trade Commission under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337).

changed “(2) Immediate limitationLimitation on railroad freight car content

changed “(A) Percentage limitation—Not later than 12 months after the date of enactment of the TRAIN Act and ending on the date on which paragraph (1) takes effect, Act, a railroad freight car manufactured may operate on the United States freight railroad interchange system only if—

changed “(i) not more than 20 percent of the content of the railroad freight car, calculated by the net cost of all components of the car and excluding the cost of sensitive technology, originates from a country of concern or is sourced from a state-owned enterprise;enterprise; and

changed “(ii) not later than 24 months after the date of enactment of the TRAIN Act, the percentage described in clause (i) shall be no more than 15 percent; andpercent

“(B) Conflict—The percentages specified in this paragraph apply notwithstanding any apparent conflict with provisions of chapter 4 of the USMCA.

“(c) Regulations and Penalties

“(1) Regulations required—Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of the TRAIN Act, the Secretary of Transportation shall issue such regulations as are necessary to carry out this section, including for the monitoring, enforcement, and sensitive technology requirements of this section.

“(2) Certification required—To be eligible to provide a railroad freight car for operation on the United States freight railroad interchange system, the manufacturer of such car shall certify to the Secretary annually that any railroad freight cars to be so provided meet the requirements of this section.

“(3) Compliance

“(A) Valid certification required—At the time a railroad freight car begins operation on the United States freight railroad interchange system, the manufacturer of such railroad freight car shall have valid certification describe under paragraph (2) for the year in which such car begins operation.

“(B) Registration of noncompliant cars prohibited—A railroad freight car manufacturer may not register, or cause to be registered, a railroad freight car that does not comply with the requirements of this section in the Association of American Railroad’s Umler system.

“(4) Civil penalties

“(A) In general—A railroad freight car manufacturer that has manufactured a railroad freight car for operation on the United States freight railroad interchange system that the Secretary of Transportation determines, after written notice and an opportunity for a hearing, has violated this section is liable to the United States Government for a civil penalty of at least $100,000 but not more than $250,000 for each violation for each railroad freight car.

“(B) Prohibition for violations—The Secretary of Transportation may prohibit a railroad freight car manufacturer with respect to which the Secretary has assessed more than 3 violations under subparagraph (A) from providing additional railroad freight cars for operation on the United States freight railroad interchange system until the Secretary determines—

“(i) such manufacturer is in compliance with this section; and

“(ii) all civil penalties assessed to such manufacturer under subparagraph (A) have been paid in full.”

(b)
Clerical amendment— The analysis for chapter 207 of title 49, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:

Sec. 9606 Rail research and development Center of Excellence

added

added Section 20108 of title 49, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:

added “(d) Rail research and development center of excellence

added “(1) Center of excellence—The Secretary may provide a grant to an entity described in paragraph (2) to establish a Center of Excellence to advance research and development that improves the safety, efficiency, and reliability of passenger and freight rail transportation.

added “(2) Eligibility—An institution of higher education (as defined in section 101 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1002)) or a consortium of nonprofit institutions of higher education shall be eligible to receive a grant under this subsection.

added “(3) Selection criteria—In awarding a grant under this subsection, the Secretary may—

added “(A) give preference to an applicant with strong past performance related to rail research, education, and workforce development activities;

added “(B) consider the extent to which the applicant would involve public passenger and private and public freight railroad operators; and

added “(C) consider the regional and national impacts of the applicant’s proposal.

added “(4) Use of funds—Amounts awarded under this subsection may be used to establish and operate the Center of Excellence described in paragraph (1) and for research, evaluation, education, and workforce development and training efforts related to safety, environmental sustainability, and reliability of rail transportation, including—

added “(A) rolling stock;

added “(B) positive train control;

added “(C) human factors, systems design, or fatigue;

added “(D) rail infrastructure;

added “(E) shared corridors;

added “(F) grade crossings;

added “(G) rail systems maintenance;

added “(H) network resiliency;

added “(I) programs to train railroad workers in needed skills; and

added “(J) the development of programs or partnerships to raise awareness of railroad employment opportunities, in coordination with the Federal Railroad Administration.

added “(5) Federal share—The Federal share of the cost of an activity carried out with a grant under this subsection shall be 50 percent.”

Sec. 9607 Freight railroad locomotive requirements

added
(a)
added Requirements for class I locomotives— A Class I railroad may only operate a locomotive on the freight railroad interchange system on or after January 1, 2030, if—
(1)
added the locomotive was manufactured on or after January 1, 2008;
(2)
added the primary NOx and PM emissions on the Environmental Protection Agency certificate of conformity for the locomotive are equal to or cleaner than the cleanest available locomotive; or
(3)
added the locomotive has not exceeded a total of 89,100 MWhs of operation since its original engine build date.
(b)
added Certification required— To be eligible to own or operate a locomotive covered by subsection (a) on the United States freight railroad interchange system on or after January 1, 2030, a Class I railroad shall certify to the Secretary of Transportation that such locomotive meets the requirements of this section.
(c)
added Effectuation— The Secretary is authorized to issue such regulations as are necessary to carry out this section.
(d)
added Definitions— In this section:
(1)
added Certificate of conformity— The term “certificate of conformity” means the document that the Environmental Protection Agency issues to an engine manufacturer to certify that an engine class conforms to Environmental Protection Agency requirements.
(2)
added Cleanest available locomotive— The term “cleanest available locomotive” means the strictest standard set by the Environmental Protection Agency for the applicable locomotive under section 213 of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7547).