H.R. 3572 — what changed
DHS Headquarters Reform and Improvement Act of 2015
From Reported in House to Engrossed in House. 8 sections amended, 1 added, and 1 removed between Reported in House and Engrossed in House.
Sec. 2 Prohibition on additional authorization of appropriations
addedadded No additional funds are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this Act and the amendments made by this Act. This Act and such amendments shall be carried out using amounts otherwise available for such purposes.
Sec. 104 Office of Policy
“VI POLICY AND PLANNING
“601. Office of Policy
“(a) Establishment of office—There shall be in the Department an Office of Policy. The Office of Policy shall be headed by an Under Secretary for Policy, who shall be appointed by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate.
“(b) Mission—The mission of the Office of Policy is to lead, conduct, and coordinate Department-wide policy, strategic planning, and relationships with organizations or persons that are not part of the Department.
“(c) Components of Office—The Office of Policy shall include the following components:
“(1) The Office of Partnership and Engagement under section 602.
“(2) The Office of International Affairs under section 603.
“(3) The Office of Policy Implementation under section 604.
“(4) The Office of Strategy and Planning under section 605.
“(d) Responsibilities of the Under Secretary—Subject to the direction and control of the Secretary, the Under Secretary for Policy shall—
“(1) serve as the principal policy advisor to the Secretary;
“(2) coordinate with the Under Secretary for Management and the General Counsel of the Department to ensure that development of the Department’s budget is compatible with the priorities, strategic plans, and policies established by the Secretary, including those priorities identified through the Quadrennial Homeland Security Review required under section 707;
“(3) incorporate relevant feedback from, and oversee and coordinate relationships with, organizations and other persons that are not part of the Department to ensure effective communication of outside stakeholders’ perspectives to components of the Department;
“(4) establish a process to ensure that organizations and other persons that are not part of the Department can communicate with Department components without compromising adherence by the officials of such components to the Department’s ethics and policies;
“(5) manage and coordinate the Department’s international engagement activities;
“(6) advise, inform, and assist the Secretary on the impact of the Department’s policy, processes, and actions on State, local, tribal, and territorial governments;
“(7) oversee the Department’s engagement and development of partnerships with nonprofit organizations and academic institutions;
“(8) administer the Homeland Security Advisory Council and make studies available to the Committee on Homeland Security of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate on an annual basis; and
“(9) carry out such other responsibilities as the Secretary determines are appropriate, consistent with this section.
“(e) Coordination by Department components
“(1) In general—To ensure consistency with the Secretary’s policy priorities, the head of each component of the Department shall coordinate with the Office of Policy, as appropriate, in establishing new policies or strategic planning guidance.
“(2) International activities
“(A) Foreign negotiations—Each component of the Department shall coordinate with the Under Secretary for Policy plans and efforts of the component before pursuing negotiations with foreign governments, to ensure consistency with the Department’s policy priorities.
“(B) Notice of international travel by senior officers—Each component of the Department shall notify the Under Secretary for Policy of the international travel of senior officers of the Department.
“(f) Assignment of personnel—The Secretary shall assign to the Office of Policy permanent staff and, as appropriate and consistent with sections 506(c)(2), 821, and 888(d), other appropriate personnel detailed from other components of the Department to carry out the responsibilities under this section.
“(g) Deputy Under Secretary for Policy
“(1) In general—The Secretary may—
“(A) establish within the Department of Homeland Security a position, to be called the Deputy Under Secretary for Policy, to support the Under Secretary for Policy in carrying out the Under Secretary’s responsibilities; and
“(B) appoint a career employee to such position.
“(2) Limitation on establishment of Deputy Under Secretary positions—A Deputy Under Secretary position (or any substantially similar position) within the Department of Homeland Security may not be established except for the position provided for by paragraph (1) unless the Secretary of Homeland Security receives prior authorization from Congress.
“(3) Definitions—For purposes of paragraph (1)—
“(A) the term “career employee” means any employee (as that term is defined in section 2105 of title 5, United States Code), but does not include a political appointee; and
“(B) the term “political appointee” means any employee who occupies a position which has been excepted from the competitive service by reason of its confidential, policy-determining, policy-making, or policy-advocating character.
“602. Office of Partnership and Engagement
“(a) In general—There shall be in the Office of Policy an Office of Partnership and Engagement.
“(b) Head of Office—The Secretary shall appoint an Assistant Secretary for Partnership and Engagement to serve as the head of the Office.
“(c) Responsibilities—The Assistant Secretary for Partnership and Engagement shall—
“(1) lead the coordination of Department-wide policies relating to the role of State and local law enforcement in preventing, preparing for, protecting against, and responding to natural disasters, acts of terrorism, and other man-made disasters within the United States;
“(2) serve as a liaison between State, local, and tribal law enforcement agencies and the Department, including through consultation with such agencies regarding Department programs that may impact such agencies;
“(3) coordinate with the Office of Intelligence and Analysis to certify the intelligence and information sharing requirements of State, local, and tribal law enforcement agencies are being addressed;
“(4) work with the Administrator to ensure that law enforcement and terrorism-focused grants to State, local, and tribal government agencies, including grants under sections 2003 and 2004, the Commercial Equipment Direct Assistance Program, and other grants administered by the Department to support fusion centers and law enforcement-oriented programs, are appropriately focused on terrorism prevention activities;
“(5) coordinate with the Science and Technology Directorate, the Federal Emergency Management Agency, the Department of Justice, the National Institute of Justice, law enforcement organizations, and other appropriate entities to support the development, promulgation, and updating, as necessary, of national voluntary consensus standards for training and personal protective equipment to be used in a tactical environment by law enforcement officers;
“(6) create and foster strategic communications with the private sector to enhance the primary mission of the Department to protect the American homeland;
“(7) advise the Secretary on the impact of the Department's policies, regulations, processes, and actions on the private sector;
“(8) interface with other relevant Federal agencies with homeland security missions to assess the impact of these agencies' actions on the private sector;
“(9) create and manage private sector advisory councils composed of representatives of industries and associations designated by the Secretary to—
“(A) advise the Secretary on private sector products, applications, and solutions as they relate to homeland security challenges;
“(B) advise the Secretary on homeland security policies, regulations, processes, and actions that affect the participating industries and associations; and
“(C) advise the Secretary on private sector preparedness issues, including effective methods for—
“(i) promoting voluntary preparedness standards to the private sector; and
“(ii) assisting the private sector in adopting voluntary preparedness standards;
“(10) promote existing public-private partnerships and developing new public-private partnerships to provide for collaboration and mutual support to address homeland security challenges;
“(11) assist in the development and promotion of private sector best practices to secure critical infrastructure;
“(12) provide information to the private sector regarding voluntary preparedness standards and the business justification for preparedness and promoting to the private sector the adoption of voluntary preparedness standards;
“(13) coordinate industry efforts, with respect to functions of the Department of Homeland Security, to identify private sector resources and capabilities that could be effective in supplementing Federal, State, and local government agency efforts to prevent or respond to a terrorist attack;
“(14) coordinate with the Commissioner of Customs and Border Protection and the appropriate senior official of the Department of Commerce on issues related to the travel and tourism industries;
“(15) coordinate the activities of the Department relating to State and local government;
“(16) assess, and advocate for, the resources needed by State and local governments to implement the national strategy for combating terrorism;
“(17) provide State and local governments with regular information, research, and technical support to assist local efforts at securing the homeland;
“(18) develop a process for receiving meaningful input from State and local governments to assist the development of the national strategy for combating terrorism and other homeland security activities; and
“(19) perform such other functions as are established by law or delegated to such Assistant Secretary by the Under Secretary for Policy.
“603. Office of International Affairs
“(a) In general—There shall be in the Office of Policy an Office of International Affairs.
“(b) Head of Office—The Secretary shall appoint an Assistant Secretary for International Affairs to serve as the head of the Office and as the chief diplomatic officer of the Department.
“(c) Functions
“(1) In general—The Assistant Secretary for International Affairs shall—
“(A) coordinate international activities within the Department, including activities carried out by the components of the Department, in consultation with other Federal officials with responsibility for counterterrorism and homeland security matters;
“(B) advise, inform, and assist the Secretary with respect to the development and implementation of Departmental policy priorities, including strategic priorities for the deployment of assets, including personnel, outside the United States;
“(C) develop, in consultation with the Under Secretary for Management, guidance for selecting, assigning, training, and monitoring overseas deployments of Department personnel, including minimum standards for predeployment training;
“(D) develop and update, in coordination with all components of the Department engaged in international activities, a strategic plan for the international activities of the Department, establish a process for managing its implementation, and establish mechanisms to monitor the alignment between assets, including personnel, deployed by the Department outside the United States and the plan required by this subparagraph;
“(E) develop and distribute guidance on Department policy priorities for overseas activities to personnel deployed overseas, that, at a minimum, sets forth the regional and national priorities being advanced by their deployment, and establish mechanisms to foster better coordination of Department personnel, programs, and activities deployed outside the United States;
“(F) maintain awareness regarding the international travel of senior officers of the Department and their intent to pursue negotiations with foreign government officials, and review resulting draft agreements;
“(G) develop, in consultation with the components of the Department, including, as appropriate, with the Under Secretary for the Science and Technology Directorate, programs to support the overseas programs conducted by the Department, including training, technical assistance, and equipment to ensure that Department personnel deployed abroad have proper resources and receive adequate and timely support;
“(H) conduct the exchange of homeland security information, in consultation with the Under Secretary of the Office of Intelligence and Analysis, and best practices relating to homeland security with foreign nations that, in the determination of the Secretary, reciprocate the sharing of such information in a substantially similar manner;
“(I) submit information to the Under Secretary for Policy for oversight purposes, including preparation of the quadrennial homeland security review and on the status of overseas activities, including training and technical assistance and information exchange activities and the Department’s resources dedicated to these activities;
“(J) promote, when appropriate, and oversee the exchange of education, training, and information with nations friendly to the United States in order to share best practices relating to homeland security; and
“(K) perform such other functions as are established by law or delegated by the Under Secretary for Policy.
“(2) Inventory of assets deployed abroad—For each fiscal year, the Assistant Secretary for International Affairs, in coordination with the Under Secretary for Management, shall provide to the Committee on Homeland Security of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate with the annual budget request for the Department, an annual accounting of all assets of the Department, including personnel, deployed outside the United States on behalf of the Department.
“(3) Standardized framework for cost data—The Assistant Secretary for International Affairs shall utilize a standardized framework to collect and maintain comparable cost data for all assets of the Department, including personnel, deployed outside the United States to prepare the annual accounting required by paragraph (2).
“(4) Exclusions—This subsection does not apply to international activities related to the protective mission of the United States Secret Service, or to the Coast Guard when operating under the direct authority of the Secretary of Defense or the Secretary of the Navy.
“604. Office of Policy Implementation
“(a) In general—There shall be in the Office of Policy an Office of Policy Implementation.
“(b) Head of Office—The Secretary shall appoint a Director of the Office of Policy Implementation to serve as the head of the Office.
“(c) Responsibilities—The Director of the Office of Policy Implementation shall lead, conduct, coordinate, and provide overall direction and supervision of Department-wide policy development for the programs, offices, and activities of the Department, in consultation with relevant officials of the Department, to ensure quality, consistency, and integration across the Department, as appropriate.
“605. Office of Strategy and Planning
“(a) In general—There shall be in the Office of Policy of the Department an Office of Strategy and Planning.
“(b) Head of Office—The Secretary shall appoint a Director of the Office of Strategy and Planning who shall serve as the head of the Office.
“(c) Responsibilities—The Director of the Office of Strategy and Planning shall—
“(1) lead and conduct long-term Department-wide strategic planning, including the Quadrennial Homeland Security Review and planning guidance for the Department, and translate the Department’s statutory responsibilities, strategic plans, and long-term goals into risk-based policies and procedures that improve operational effectiveness; and
“(2) develop strategies to address unconventional threats to the homeland.”
“(2) Assistant Secretaries
“(A) Advice and consent appointments—The Department shall have the following Assistant Secretaries appointed by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate:
“(i) The Assistant Secretary, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.
“(ii) The Assistant Secretary, Transportation Security Administration.
“(B) Other Presidential appointments—The Department shall have the following Assistant Secretaries appointed by the President:
“(i) The Assistant Secretary, Infrastructure Protection.
“(ii) The Assistant Secretary, Office of Public Affairs.
“(iii) The Assistant Secretary, Office of Legislative Affairs.
“(C) Secretarial appointments—The Department shall have the following Assistant Secretaries appointed by the Secretary:
“(i) The Assistant Secretary, Office of Cybersecurity and Communications.
“(ii) The Assistant Secretary for International Affairs under section 602.
“(iii) The Assistant Secretary for Partnership and Engagement under section 603.
“(D) Limitation on creation of positions—No Assistant Secretary position may be created in addition to the positions provided for by this section unless such position is authorized by a statute enacted after the date of the enactment of the DHS Headquarters Reform and Improvement Act of 2015.”
“(4) shall establish a Homeland Security Advisory Council to provide advice and recommendations on homeland-security-related matters.”
Sec. 105 Quadrennial homeland security review
Section 707 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 347) is amended—
“(1) Review required—In fiscal year 2017, and every 4 years thereafter, the Secretary shall conduct a review of the homeland security of the Nation (in this section referred to as a “quadrennial homeland security review”). Such review shall be conducted so that it is completed, and the report under subsection (c) is issued, by no later than December 31, 2017, and by December 31 of every fourth year thereafter.”
“(7) leverage analytical tools and resources developed as part of the quadrennial homeland security review to support the Department’s ongoing programs and missions.”
“(I) a description of how the conclusions under the quadrennial homeland security review will inform efforts to develop capabilities and build capacity of States, local governments, Indian tribes, and private entities, and of individuals, families, and communities;
“(J) as appropriate, proposed changes to the authorities, organization, governance structure, or business processes (including acquisition processes) of the Department in order to better fulfill responsibilities of the Department;
changed “(K) where appropriate, a classified annex, including materials prepared pursuant to section 306 of title 5, United States Code, relating to the preparation of an agency strategic plan, to satisfy, in whole or in part, the reporting requirements of this paragraph; and”
Sec. 110 Chief Information Officer
“(b) Responsibilities—In addition to the functions under section 3506 of title 44, United States Code, the Chief Information Officer, in consultation with the Under Secretary for Management, shall—
“(1) advise and assist the Secretary, heads of the components of the Department, and other senior officers in carrying out the responsibilities of the Department for all activities relating to the budgets, programs, and operations of the information technology functions of the Department;
“(2) to the extent delegated by the Secretary—
“(A) exercise leadership and authority over Department information technology management; and
“(B) establish the information technology priorities, policies, processes, standards, guidelines, and procedures of the Department to ensure interoperability and standardization of information technology;
“(3) serve as the lead technical authority for information technology programs;
“(4) maintain a consolidated inventory of the Department’s mission critical and mission essential information systems, and develop and maintain contingency plans for responding to a disruption in the operation of any of those information systems;
“(5) maintain the security, visibility, reliability, integrity, and availability of data and information technology of the Department including the security of the Homeland Security Data Network;
“(6) in coordination with relevant officials of the Department, ensure that the Department is in compliance with subchapter II of chapter 35 of title 44, United States Code;
“(7) establish policies and procedures to effectively monitor and manage vulnerabilities in the supply chain for purchases of information technology;
“(8) in coordination with relevant officials of the Department, ensure Department compliance with Homeland Security Presidential Directive 12;
“(9) in coordination with relevant officials of the Department, ensure that information technology systems of the Department meet the standards established under the information sharing environment, as defined in section 1016 of the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 (6 U.S.C. 485);
“(10) develop measures to monitor the performance of Department components’ use and implementation of information technology systems and consistently monitor such performance to ensure that such systems are used effectively;
“(11) ensure that Department components report to the Chief Information Officer of the Department a complete inventory of information systems and fully adhere to Department guidance related to information technology;
“(12) carry out any other responsibilities delegated by the Secretary consistent with an effective information system management function; and
“(13) carry out authorities over Department information technology consistent with section 113419 of title 40, United States Code.
changed “(c) Strategic plans—In coordination with the Chief Financial Officer, the Chief Information Officer shall develop an information technology strategic plan every 5 years and report to the Committee on Homeland Security and the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs and the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate on—
“(1) how the information technology strategic plans developed under this subsection are used to help inform the Department’s budget process;
“(2) how the Department’s budget aligns with priorities specified in the information technology strategic plans;
“(3) in cases in which it is not possible to fund all information technology strategic plan activities for a given fiscal year, the rationale as to why certain activities are not being funded in lieu of higher priorities;
“(4) what decisionmaking process was used to arrive at these priorities and the role of Department components in that process; and
“(5) examine the extent to which unnecessary duplicate information technology within and across the components of the Department has been eliminated.
“(d) Software licensing
changed
“(1) In general—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of the DHS Headquarters Reform and Improvement Act of 2015, and every 2 years thereafter, thereafter until 2020, the Chief Information Officer, in consultation with Department component chief information officers, shall—
“(A) conduct a Department-wide inventory of all existing software licenses held by the Department, including utilized and unutilized licenses;
“(B) assess the needs of the Department and the components of the Department for software licenses for the subsequent 2 fiscal years;
“(C) examine how the Department can achieve the greatest possible economies of scale and cost savings in the procurement of software licenses;
“(D) determine how the use of shared cloud-computing services will impact the needs for software licenses for the subsequent 2 fiscal years; and
“(E) establish plans and estimated costs for eliminating unutilized software licenses for the subsequent 2 fiscal years.
“(2) Excess software licensing
“(A) Plan to reduce software licenses—If the Chief Information Officer determines through the inventory conducted under paragraph (1) that the number of software licenses held by the Department and the components of the Department exceed the needs of the Department as assessed under paragraph (1), the Secretary, not later than 90 days after the date on which the inventory is completed, shall establish a plan for bringing the number of such software licenses into balance with such needs of the Department.
“(B) Prohibition on procurement of new software licenses
“(i) In general—Except as provided in clause (ii), upon completion of a plan established under paragraph (1), no additional resources may be obligated for the procurement of new software licenses for the Department until such time as the need of the Department exceeds the number of used and unused licenses held by the Department.
“(ii) Exception—The Chief Information Officer may authorize the purchase of additional licenses and amend the number of needed licenses as necessary.
“(3) GAO review—The Comptroller General of the United States shall review the inventory conducted under paragraph (1)(A) and the plan established under paragraph (2)(A).
“(4) Submission to Congress—The Chief Information Officer shall submit a copy of each inventory conducted under paragraph (1)(A) and each plan established under paragraph (2)(A) to the Committee on Homeland Security of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate.”
Sec. 113 Cost savings and efficiency reviews
Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security, acting through the Under Secretary for Management of the Department of Homeland Security, shall submit to the Committee on Homeland Security of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate a report that—
Sec. 114 Field efficiencies plan
Sec. 202 Prohibition on additional authorization of appropriations
removed
removed
No additional funds are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this title and the amendments made by this title. This title and such amendments shall be carried out using amounts otherwise available for such purposes.
Sec. 214 Requirements to ensure greater accountability for acquisition programs
“710. Requirements to ensure greater accountability for acquisition programs
“(a) Requirement To establish mechanism—Within the Management Directorate, the Under Secretary for Management shall establish a mechanism to prioritize improving the accountability, standardization, and transparency of major acquisition programs of the Department in order to increase opportunities for effectiveness and efficiencies and to serve as the central oversight function of all Department acquisition programs.
“(b) Responsibilities of executive director—The Under Secretary for Management shall designate an Executive Director to oversee the requirement under subsection (a). The Executive Director shall report directly to the Under Secretary and shall carry out the following responsibilities:
“(1) Monitor the performance of Department acquisition programs regularly between acquisition decision events to identify problems with cost, performance, or schedule that components may need to address to prevent cost overruns, performance issues, or schedule delays.
changed
“(2) Assist the Chief Acquisition Officer Under Secretary for Management in managing the Department’s acquisition portfolio.
“(3) Conduct oversight of individual acquisition programs to implement Department acquisition program policy, procedures, and guidance with a priority on ensuring the data it collects and maintains from its components is accurate and reliable.
“(4) Serve as the focal point and coordinator for the acquisition life cycle review process and as the executive secretariat for the Acquisition Review Board established under section 836 of this Act.
“(5) Advise the persons having acquisition decision authority in making acquisition decisions consistent with all applicable laws and in establishing clear lines of authority, accountability, and responsibility for acquisition decisionmaking within the Department.
“(6) Engage in the strategic planning and performance evaluation process required under section 306 of title 5, United States Code, and sections 1105(a)(28), 1115, 1116, and 9703 of title 31, United States Code, by supporting the Chief Procurement Officer in developing strategies and specific plans for hiring, training, and professional development in order to rectify any deficiency within the Department’s acquisition workforce.
“(7) Oversee the Component Acquisition Executive structure to ensure it has sufficient capabilities and complies with Department policies.
“(8) Develop standardized certification standards in consultation with the Component Acquisition Executives for all acquisition program managers.
“(9) In the event that a program manager’s certification or actions need review for purposes of promotion or removal, provide input, in consultation with the relevant Component Acquisition Executive, into the relevant program manager’s performance evaluation, and report positive or negative experiences to the relevant certifying authority.
“(10) Provide technical support and assistance to Department acquisitions and acquisition personnel in conjunction with the Chief Procurement Officer.
“(11) Prepare the Department’s Comprehensive Acquisition Status Report, as required by the Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2013 (division D of Public Law 113–6; 127 Stat. 343) and section 840 of this Act, and make such report available to congressional homeland security committees.
“(12) Prepare the Department’s Quarterly Program Accountability Report as required by section 840 of this Act, and make such report available to the congressional homeland security committees.
“(c) Responsibilities of components—Each head of a component shall comply with Federal law, the Federal Acquisition Regulation, and Department acquisition management directives established by the Under Secretary for Management. For each major acquisition program, each head of a component shall—
“(1) define baseline requirements and document changes to those requirements, as appropriate;
“(2) establish a complete life cycle cost estimate with supporting documentation, including an acquisition program baseline;
“(3) verify each life cycle cost estimate against independent cost estimates, and reconcile any differences;
“(4) complete a cost-benefit analysis with supporting documentation;
“(5) develop and maintain a schedule that is consistent with scheduling best practices as identified by the Comptroller General of the United States, including, in appropriate cases, an integrated master schedule; and
“(6) ensure that all acquisition program information provided by the component is complete, accurate, timely, and valid.
“711. Acquisition documentation
“(a) In general—For each major acquisition program, the Executive Director responsible for the preparation of the Comprehensive Acquisition Status Report, pursuant to paragraph (11) of section 710(b), shall require certain acquisition documentation to be submitted by Department components or offices.
“(b) Waiver—The Secretary may waive the requirement for submission under subsection (a) for a program for a fiscal year if either—
“(1) the program has not—
“(A) entered the full rate production phase in the acquisition life cycle;
“(B) had a reasonable cost estimate established; and
“(C) had a system configuration defined fully; or
“(2) the program does not meet the definition of “capital asset”, as defined by the Director of the Office of Management and Budget.
“(c) Congressional oversight—At the same time the President’s budget is submitted for a fiscal year under section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Homeland Security of the House of Representatives and Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate information on the exercise of authority under subsection (b) in the prior fiscal year that includes the following specific information regarding each program for which a waiver is issued under subsection (b):
“(1) The grounds for granting a waiver for that program.
“(2) The projected cost of that program.
“(3) The proportion of a component’s annual acquisition budget attributed to that program, as available.
“(4) Information on the significance of the program with respect to the component’s operations and execution of its mission.”
Sec. 222 Requirements to reduce duplication in acquisition programs
“837. Requirements to reduce duplication in acquisition programs
changed
“(a) Requirement To to establish policies—In an effort to reduce unnecessary duplication and inefficiency for all Department investments, including major acquisition programs, the Deputy Secretary, in consultation with the Under Secretary for Management, shall establish Department-wide policies to integrate all phases of the investment life cycle and help the Department identify, validate, and prioritize standards for common component requirements for major acquisition program requirements programs in order to increase opportunities for effectiveness and efficiencies. The policies shall also include strategic alternatives for developing and facilitating a Department component-driven requirements process that includes oversight of a development test and evaluation capability; identification of priority gaps and overlaps in Department capability needs; and provision of feasible technical alternatives, including innovative commercially available alternatives, to meet capability needs.
changed
“(b) Mechanisms To to carry out requirement—The Under Secretary for Management shall coordinate the actions necessary to carry out subsection (a), using such mechanisms as considered necessary by the Secretary to help the Department reduce unnecessary duplication and inefficiency for all Department investments, including major acquisition programs.
“(c) Coordination—In coordinating the actions necessary to carry out subsection (a), the Deputy Secretary shall consult with the Under Secretary for Management, Component Acquisition Executives, and any other Department officials, including the Under Secretary for Science and Technology or his designee, with specific knowledge of Department or component acquisition capabilities to prevent unnecessary duplication of requirements.
“(d) Advisors—The Deputy Secretary, in consultation with the Under Secretary for Management, shall seek and consider input within legal and ethical boundaries from members of Federal, State, local, and tribal governments, nonprofit organizations, and the private sector, as appropriate, on matters within their authority and expertise in carrying out the Department’s mission.
changed
“(e) Meetings—The Deputy Secretary, in consultation with the Under Secretary for Management, shall meet at least quarterly and communicate with components often to ensure that components do not overlap or duplicate spending or priorities activities on major investments and acquisition programs within their areas of responsibility.
“(f) Responsibilities—In carrying out this section, the responsibilities of the Deputy Secretary, in consultation with the Under Secretary for Management, are as follows:
“(1) To review and validate the requirements documents of major investments and acquisition programs prior to acquisition decision events of the investments or programs.
“(2) To ensure the requirements and scope of a major investment or acquisition program are stable, measurable, achievable, at an acceptable risk level, and match the resources planned to be available.
“(3) Before any entity of the Department issues a solicitation for a new contract, coordinate with other Department entities as appropriate to prevent unnecessary duplication and inefficiency and—
changed
“(A) to implement portfolio reviews to identify common mission requirements and crosscutting opportunities among components to harmonize investments and requirements and prevent unnecessary overlap and unnecessary duplication among components; and
“(B) to the extent practicable, to standardize equipment purchases, streamline the acquisition process, improve efficiencies, and conduct best practices for strategic sourcing.
“(4) To ensure program managers of major investments and acquisition programs conduct analyses, giving particular attention to factors such as cost, schedule, risk, performance, and operational efficiency in order to determine that programs work as intended within cost and budget expectations.
“(5) To propose schedules for delivery of the operational capability needed to meet each Department investment and major acquisition program.
“(g) Best practices defined—In this section, the term best practices has the meaning provided in section 4(b) of the DHS Headquarters Reform and Improvement Act of 2015.”
Sec. 231 Congressional notification and other requirements for major acquisition program breach
“838. Congressional notification and other requirements for major acquisition program breach
“(a) Breach defined—The term breach, with respect to a major acquisition program, means a failure to meet any cost, schedule, or performance parameter specified in the acquisition program baseline.
“(b) Requirements within department if breach occurs
“(1) Notifications
changed
“(A) Notification of breach—If a breach occurs in a major acquisition program, the program manager for that program shall notify the head of the component concerned, the Component Acquisition Executive for the program, the head of the component concerned, the Executive Director referred to in section 710(b) of this Act, the Under Secretary for Management, and the Deputy Secretary.
“(B) Notification to Secretary—If a major acquisition program has a breach with a cost overrun greater than 15 percent or a schedule delay greater than 180 days from the costs or schedule set forth in the acquisition program baseline for the program, the Secretary and the Inspector General of the Department shall be notified not later than 5 business days after the breach is identified.
“(2) Remediation plan and root cause analysis
“(A) In general—In the case of a breach with a cost overrun greater than 15 percent or a schedule delay greater than 180 days from the costs or schedule set forth in the acquisition program baseline, a remediation plan and root cause analysis is required, and the Under Secretary for Management or his designee shall establish a date for submission within the Department of a breach remediation plan and root cause analysis in accordance with this subsection.
“(B) Remediation plan—The remediation plan required under this subsection shall be submitted in writing to the head of the component concerned, the Executive Director referred to in section 710(b) of this Act, and the Under Secretary for Management. The plan shall—
“(i) explain the circumstances of the breach;
“(ii) provide prior cost estimating information;
“(iii) propose corrective action to control cost growth, schedule delays, or performance issues;
“(iv) in coordination with Component Acquisition Executive, discuss all options considered, including the estimated impact on cost, schedule, or performance of the program if no changes are made to current requirements, the estimated cost of the program if requirements are modified, and the extent to which funding from other programs will need to be reduced to cover the cost growth of the program; and
“(v) explain the rationale for why the proposed corrective action is recommended.
“(C) Root cause analysis—The root cause analysis required under this subsection shall determine the underlying cause or causes of shortcomings in cost, schedule, or performance of the program, including the role, if any, of the following:
“(i) Unrealistic performance expectations.
“(ii) Unrealistic baseline estimates for cost or schedule or changes in program requirements.
“(iii) Immature technologies or excessive manufacturing or integration risk.
“(iv) Unanticipated design, engineering, manufacturing, or technology integration issues arising during program performance.
“(v) Changes in procurement quantities.
“(vi) Inadequate program funding or changes in planned out-year funding from 1 5-year funding plan to the next 5-year funding plan as outlined in the Future Years Homeland Security Program required under section 874 of this Act.
“(vii) Legislative, legal, or regulatory changes.
“(viii) Inadequate program management personnel, including lack of training, credentials, certifications, or use of best practices.
“(3) Correction of breach—The Under Secretary for Management or his designee shall establish a date for submission within the Department of a program of corrective action that ensures that 1 of the following actions has occurred:
“(A) The breach has been corrected and the program is again in compliance with the original acquisition program baseline parameters.
“(B) A revised acquisition program baseline has been approved.
“(C) The program has been halted or cancelled.
“(c) Requirements relating to congressional notification if breach occurs
“(1) Notification to congress—If a notification is made under subsection (b)(1)(B) for a breach in a major acquisition program with a cost overrun greater than 15 percent or a schedule delay greater than 180 days from the costs or schedule set forth in the acquisition program baseline, or with an anticipated failure for any key performance threshold or parameter specified in the acquisition program baseline, the Under Secretary for Management shall notify the congressional homeland security committees of the breach in the next quarterly Comprehensive Acquisition Status Report after the Under Secretary for Management receives the notification from the program manager under subsection (b)(1)(B).
“(2) Substantial variances in costs or schedule—If a likely cost overrun is greater than 20 percent or a likely delay is greater than 12 months from the costs and schedule set forth in the acquisition program baseline for a major acquisition program, the Under Secretary for Management shall include in the notification required in (c)(1) a written certification, with supporting explanation, that—
“(A) the acquisition is essential to the accomplishment of the Department’s mission;
“(B) there are no alternatives to such capability or asset that will provide equal or greater capability in both a more cost-effective and timely manner;
“(C) the new acquisition schedule and estimates for total acquisition cost are reasonable; and
“(D) the management structure for the acquisition program is adequate to manage and control performance, cost, and schedule.
“(3) Submissions to Congress—Not later than 30 calendar days after submission to such committees of a breach notification under paragraph (1) of this section for a major acquisition program, the Under Secretary for Management shall submit to such committees the following:
“(A) A copy of the remediation plan and the root cause analysis prepared under subsection (b)(2) for the program.
“(B) A statement describing the corrective action or actions that have occurred pursuant to subsection (b)(3) for the program, with a justification for the action or actions.
“(d) Additional actions if breach occurs
“(1) Prohibition on obligation of funds—During the 90-day period following submission under subsection (c)(3) of a remediation plan, root cause analysis, and statement of corrective actions with respect to a major acquisition program, the Under Secretary for Management shall submit a certification described in paragraph (2) of this subsection to the congressional homeland security committees. If the Under Secretary for Management does not submit such certification by the end of such 90-day period, then funds appropriated to the major acquisition program shall not be obligated until the Under Secretary for Management submits such certification.
“(2) Certification—For purposes of paragraph (1), the certification described in this paragraph is a certification that—
“(A) the Department has adjusted or restructured the program in a manner that addresses the root cause or causes of the cost growth in the program; and
“(B) the Department has conducted a thorough review of the breached program’s acquisition decision event approvals and the current acquisition decision event approval for the breached program has been adjusted as necessary to account for the restructured program.”