US Codex
Bill
Notes

H.R. 1735 — what changed

National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016

From Introduced in House to Reported in House. 55 sections amended, 426 added, and 18 removed between Introduced in House and Reported in House.

Sec. 2 Organization of Act into divisions; table of contents

(a)
changed Divisions— This Act is organized into two four divisions as follows:
(1)
Division A—Department of Defense Authorizations.
(2)
Division B—Military Construction Authorizations.
(3)
added Division C—Department of Energy National Security Authorizations and Other Authorizations.
(4)
added Division D—Funding Tables.
(b)
Table of contents— The table of contents for this Act is as follows:

Sec. 3 Congressional defense committees

added

added In this Act, the term “congressional defense committees” has the meaning given that term in section 101(a)(16) of title 10, United States Code.

Sec. 101 Authorization of appropriations

changed Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2016 for procurement for the Army Army, the Navy and the Marine Corps, the Air Force, and Defense-wide activities, as follows:specified in the funding table in section 4101.

(1)
removed For aircraft, $5,689,357,000.
(2)
removed For missiles, $1,419,957,000.
(3)
removed For weapons and tracked combat vehicles, $1,887,073,000.
(4)
removed For ammunition, $1,233,378,000.
(5)
removed For other procurement, $5,899,028,000.

Sec. 102 Navy and Marine Corps

removed

removed Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2016 for procurement for the Navy and Marine Corps as follows:

(1)
removed For aircraft, $16,126,405,000.
(2)
removed For weapons, including missiles and torpedoes, $3,154,154,000.
(3)
removed For ammunition procurement, Navy and Marine Corps, $723,741,000.
(4)
removed For shipbuilding and conversion, $16,597,457,000.
(5)
removed For other procurement, $6,614,715,000.
(6)
removed For procurement, Marine Corps, $1,131,418,000.

Sec. 103 Air Force

removed

removed Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2016 for procurement for the Air Force as follows:

(1)
removed For aircraft, $15,657,769,000.
(2)
removed For missiles, $2,987,045,000.
(3)
removed For space procurement, $2,584,061,000.
(4)
removed For ammunition, $1,758,843,000.
(5)
removed For other procurement, $18,272,438,000.

Sec. 104 Defense-wide activities

removed

removed Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2016 for Defense-wide procurement in the amount of $5,130,853,000.

Sec. 105 Multiyear procurement authority for Standard Missile-3 Block IB guided missiles

removed
(a)
removed Authority for multiyear procurement— Subject to section 2306b of title 10, United States Code, the Secretary of Defense may enter into one or more multiyear contracts, beginning with the fiscal year 2016 program year, for the procurement of Standard Missile-3 Block IB guided missiles.
(b)
removed Authority for advance procurement— The Secretary may enter into one or more contracts for advance procurement associated with the SM–3 Block IB missiles for which authorization to enter into a multiyear procurement contract is provided under subsection (a).
(c)
removed Condition for out-Year contract payments— A contract entered into under subsection (a) shall provide that any obligation of the United States to make a payment under the contract for a fiscal year after fiscal year 2016 is subject to the availability of appropriations for that purpose for such later fiscal year.

Sec. 106 Availability of Air Force procurement funds for certain commercial-off-the-shelf parts for intercontinental ballistic missile fuzes

removed
(a)
removed Availability of procurement funds— Notwithstanding section 1502(a) of title 31, United States Code, of the amount authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2016 by section 103 for Missile Procurement, Air Force, $13,700,000 shall be available for the procurement of covered parts pursuant to contracts entered into under section 1645 of the Carl Levin and Howard P. “Buck” McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. YYY).
(b)
removed Covered parts defined— In this section, the term “covered parts” has the meaning given that term in section 1645(c) of such Act.

Sec. 111 Limitation on availability of funds for AN/TPQ–53 radar systems

added
(a)
added Limitation— Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2016 for AN/TPQ–53 radar systems, not more than 75 percent may be obligated or expended until a period of 30 days has elapsed following the date on which the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics submits to the congressional defense committees the review under subsection (b).
(b)
added Review— The Assistant Secretary of the Army for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics shall—
(1)
added review the appropriateness of the current delegation of milestone decision authority for the AN/TPQ–53 radar program to the Program Executive Officer for Missiles and Space; and
(2)
added submit to the congressional defense committees such review.

Sec. 112 Prioritization of upgraded UH-60 Blackhawk helicopters within Army National Guard

added
(a)
added Prioritization of upgrades— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Chief of the National Guard Bureau shall issue guidance regarding the fielding of upgraded UH–60 Blackhawk helicopters to units of the Army National Guard. Such guidance shall prioritize for such fielding the units of the Army National Guard with assigned UH–60 helicopters that have the most flight hours and the highest annual usage rates within the UH–60 fleet of the Army National Guard, consistent with the force generation unit readiness requirements of the Army.
(b)
added Report— Not later than 30 days after which the Chief of the National Guard Bureau issues the guidance under subsection (a), the Chief shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that details such guidance.

Sec. 113 Report on options to accelerate replacement of UH–60A Blackhawk helicopters of Army National Guard

added

added Not later than March 1, 2016, the Secretary of the Army shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report containing detailed options for the potential acceleration of the replacement of all UH–60A helicopters of the Army National Guard by not later than September 30, 2020. The report shall include the following:

(1)
added The additional funding and quantities required, listed by each of fiscal years 2017 through 2020, for H–60M production, UH–60A-to-L RECAP, and UH-60L-to-V RECAP that is necessary to achieve such replacement of all UH-60A helicopters by September 30, 2020.
(2)
added Any industrial base limitations that may affect such acceleration, including with respect to the production schedules for the other variants of the UH–60 helicopter.
(3)
added The potential effects of such acceleration on the planned replacement of all UH–60A helicopters of the regular components of the Armed Forces by September 30, 2025.
(4)
added Identification of any additional funding or resources required to train members of the National Guard to operate and maintain UH–60M aircraft in order to achieve such replacement of all UH-60A helicopters by September 30, 2020.
(5)
added Any other matters the Secretary determines appropriate.

Sec. 121 Modification to multiyear procurement authority for Arleigh Burke class destroyers and associated systems

added

added Section 123(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1655) is amended by inserting “or Flight III” after “Flight IIA”.

Sec. 122 Procurement authority for aircraft carrier programs

added
(a)
added Procurement authority in support of construction of Ford class aircraft carriers—
(1)
added Authority for economic order quantity— The Secretary of the Navy may procure materiel and equipment in support of the construction of the Ford class aircraft carriers designated CVN–80 and CVN–81 in economic order quantities when cost savings are achievable.
(2)
added Liability— Any contract entered into under paragraph (1) shall provide that any obligation of the United States to make a payment under the contract is subject to the availability of appropriations for that purpose, and that total liability to the Government for termination of any contract entered into shall be limited to the total amount of funding obligated at time of termination.
(b)
added Refueling and complex overhaul of Nimitz class aircraft carriers—
(1)
added In general— The Secretary of the Navy may carry out the nuclear refueling and complex overhaul of each of the following Nimitz class aircraft carriers:
(A)
added U.S.S. George Washington (CVN–73).
(B)
added U.S.S. John C. Stennis (CVN–74).
(C)
added U.S.S. Harry S. Truman (CVN–75).
(D)
added U.S.S. Ronald Reagan (CVN–76).
(E)
added U.S.S. George H.W. Bush (CVN–77).
(2)
added Use of incremental funding— With respect to any contract entered into under paragraph (1) for the nuclear refueling and complex overhaul of a Nimitz class aircraft carrier, the Secretary may use incremental funding for a period not to exceed six years after advance procurement funds for such nuclear refueling and complex overhaul effort are first obligated.
(3)
added Condition for out-year contract payments— Any contract entered into under paragraph (1) shall provide that any obligation of the United States to make a payment under the contract for a fiscal year after fiscal year 2016 is subject to the availability of appropriations for that purpose for that later fiscal year.

Sec. 131 Limitation on availability of funds for executive communications upgrades for C–20 and C–37 aircraft

added
(a)
added Limitation— Except as provided by subsection (b), none of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2016 for the Air Force may be obligated or expended to upgrade the executive communications of C–20 and C–37 aircraft until the date on which the Secretary of the Air Force certifies in writing to the congressional defense committees that such upgrades do not—
(1)
added cause such aircraft to exceed any weight limitation; or
(2)
added reduce the operational capability of such aircraft.
(b)
added Waiver— The Secretary may waive the limitation in subsection (a) if the Secretary—
(1)
added determines that such waiver is necessary for the national security interests of the United States; and
(2)
added notifies the congressional defense committees of such waiver.

Sec. 132 Backup inventory status of A–10 aircraft

added
(a)
added Maximum number— In carrying out section 133(b)(2)(A) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3315), the Secretary of the Air Force may not move more than 18 A–10 aircraft in the active component to backup flying status pursuant to an authorization made by the Secretary of Defense under such section.
(b)
added Conforming amendment— Such section 133(b)(2)(A) is amended by striking “36” and inserting “18”.

Sec. 133 Prohibition on availability of funds for retirement of A–10 aircraft

added
(a)
added Prohibition on availability of funds for retirement— Except as provided by section 132, none of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2016 for the Air Force may be obligated or expended to retire, prepare to retire, or place in storage or on backup aircraft inventory status any A–10 aircraft.
(b)
added Additional limitations on retirement—
(1)
added In general— Except as provided by section 132, and in addition to the limitation in subsection (a), during the period before December 31, 2016, the Secretary of the Air Force may not retire, prepare to retire, or place in storage or on backup flying status any A–10 aircraft.
(2)
added Minimum inventory requirement— The Secretary of the Air Force shall ensure the Air Force maintains a minimum of 171 A–10 aircraft designated as primary mission aircraft inventory.
(c)
added Prohibition on availability of funds for significant reductions in manning levels— None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2016 for the Air Force may be obligated or expended to make significant reductions to manning levels with respect to any A–10 aircraft squadrons or divisions.
(d)
added Additional limitation on significant reductions in manning levels— -In addition to the limitation in subsection (c), during the period before December 31, 2016, the Secretary of the Air Force may not make significant reductions to manning levels with respect to any A–10 aircraft squadrons or divisions.
(e)
added Study on replacement capability requirements or mission platform for the A–10 aircraft—
(1)
added Independent assessment required—
(A)
added In general— The Secretary of the Air Force shall commission an appropriate entity outside the Department of Defense to conduct an assessment of the required capabilities or mission platform to replace the A–10 aircraft. This assessment would represent preparatory work to inform an analysis of alternatives.
(B)
added Elements— The assessment required under subparagraph (A) shall include each of the following:
(i)
added Future needs analysis for the current A–10 aircraft mission set to include troops-in-contact/close air support, air interdiction, strike control and reconnaissance, and combat search and rescue support in both contested and uncontested battle environments. At a minimum, the needs analysis should specifically address the following areas:
(I)
added The ability to safely and effectively conduct troops-in-contact/danger close missions or missions in close proximity to civilians in the presence of the air defenses found with enemy ground maneuver units.
(II)
added The ability to effectively target and destroy moving, camouflaged, or dug-in troops, and artillery.
(III)
added The ability to engage, target, and destroy tanks and armored personnel carriers, including with respect to the carrying capacity of armor-piercing weaponry, including mounted cannons and missiles.
(IV)
added The ability to remain within visual range of friendly forces and targets to facilitate responsiveness to ground forces and minimize re-attack times.
(V)
added The ability to safely conduct close air support beneath low cloud ceilings and in reduced visibilities at low airspeeds in the presence of the air defenses found with enemy ground maneuver units.
(VI)
added The ability of the pilot and aircraft to survive direct hits from small arms, machine guns, MANPADs, and lower caliber anti-aircraft artillery organic or attached to enemy ground forces and maneuver units.
(VII)
added The ability to communicate effectively with ground forces and downed pilots, including in communications jamming or satellite-denied environments.
(VIII)
added The ability to execute the missions described in subclauses (I), (II), (III), and (IV) in a GPS- or satellite-denied environment with or without sensors.
(IX)
added The ability to deliver multiple lethal firing passes and sustain long loiter endurance to support friendly forces throughout extended ground engagements.
(X)
added The ability to operate from unprepared dirt, grass, and narrow road runways and to generate high sortie rates under these austere conditions.
(ii)
added Identification and assessment of gaps in the ability of existing and programmed mission platforms in providing required capabilities to conduct missions specified in clause (i) in both contested and uncontested battle environments.
(iii)
added Assessment of operational effectiveness of existing and programmed mission platforms to conduct missions specified in clause (i) in both contested and uncontested battle environments.
(iv)
added Assessment of probability of likelihood of conducting missions requiring troops-in-contact/close air support operations specified in clause (i) in contested environments as compared to uncontested environments.
(v)
added Any other matters the independent entity or the Secretary of the Air Force determines to be appropriate.
(2)
added Report—
(A)
added In general— Not later than September 30, 2016, the Secretary of the Air Force shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that includes the assessment required under paragraph (1).
(B)
added Form— The report required under subparagraph (A) may be submitted in classified form, but shall also contain an unclassified executive summary and may contain an unclassified annex.
(3)
added Nonduplication of effort— If any information required under paragraph (1) has been included in another report or notification previously submitted to Congress by law, the Secretary of the Air Force may provide a list of such reports and notifications at the time of submitting the report required under paragraph (2) in lieu of including such information in the report required under paragraph (2).

Sec. 134 Prohibition on retirement of EC–130H aircraft

added
(a)
added Prohibition on availability of funds for retirement— None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2016 for the Air Force may be obligated or expended to retire, prepare to retire, or place in storage or on backup aircraft inventory status any EC–130H aircraft.
(b)
added Additional limitation on retirement— In addition to the limitation in subsection (a), the Secretary of the Air Force may not retire, prepare to retire, or place in storage or on backup flying status any EC–130H aircraft until a period of 60 days has elapsed following the date on which the Secretary submits the report under subsection (c)(3)(A).
(c)
added Study on replacement capability requirements or mission platform for the EC–130H aircraft—
(1)
added In general— The Secretary of the Air Force shall commission an assessment of the required capabilities or mission platform to replace the EC–130H aircraft. This assessment would represent preparatory work to inform an analysis of alternatives.
(2)
added Elements— The assessment required under paragraph (1) shall include each of the following:
(A)
added Future needs analysis for the current EC–130H aircraft electronic warfare mission set to include suppression of sophisticated enemy air defense systems, advanced radar jamming, avoiding radar detection, communications, sensing, satellite navigation, command and control, and battlefield awareness.
(B)
added A review of operating concepts for airborne electronic attack.
(C)
added An assessment of upgrades to the electronic warfare systems of EC–130H aircraft, the costs of such upgrades, and expected upgrades through 2025, and the expected service life of EC–130H aircraft.
(D)
added A review of the global proliferation of more sophisticated air defenses and advanced commercial digital electronic devices which counter the airborne electronic attack capabilities of the United States by state and non-state actors.
(E)
added An assessment of the ability of the current EC–130H fleet to meet to meet tasking requirements of the combatant commanders.
(F)
added Any other matters the Secretary determines appropriate.
(3)
added Report—
(A)
added In general— Not later than September 30, 2016, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that includes the assessments required under subparagraph (1).
(B)
added Form— The report under subparagraph (A) may be submitted in classified form, but shall also contain an unclassified executive summary and may contain an unclassified annex.
(4)
added Nonduplication of effort— If any information required under paragraph (1) has been included in another report or notification previously submitted to the congressional defense committees by law, the Secretary of the Air Force may provide a list of such reports and notifications at the time of submitting the report required under paragraph (1) instead of including such information in such report.

Sec. 135 Limitation on availability of funds for divestment or transfer of KC–10 aircraft

added

added None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2016 for the Air Force may be obligated or expended during such fiscal year to divest or transfer, or prepare to divest or transfer, KC–10 aircraft.

Sec. 141 Limitation on availability of funds for Joint Battle Command–Platform

added
(a)
added Limitation— Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2016 for joint battle command–platform equipment, not more than 75 percent may be obligated or expended until a period of 30 days has elapsed following the date on which the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics submits to the congressional defense committees the report under subsection (b).
(b)
added Report— Not later than March 1, 2016, the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that provides a detailed test and evaluation plan to address the effectiveness, suitability, and survivability shortfalls of the joint battle command–platform identified by the Director of Operational Test and Evaluation in the fiscal year 2014 report of the Director submitted to Congress.

Sec. 142 Strategy for replacement of A/MH–6 Mission Enhanced Little Bird aircraft to meet special operations requirements

added
(a)
added Strategy— Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a strategy for replacing A/MH–6 Mission Enhanced Little Bird aircraft to meet the rotary-wing, light attack, reconnaissance requirements particular to special operations.
(b)
added Elements— The strategy under subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1)
added An updated schedule and display of programmed A/MH–6 Block 3.0 modernization and upgrades, showing usable life of the fleet, and the anticipated service life extensions of all A/MH–6 platforms.
(2)
added A description of current and future rotary-wing, light attack, reconnaissance requirements and platforms particular to special operations, including key performance parameters of future platforms.
(3)
added The feasibility of military department-common platforms satisfying future rotary-wing, light attack, reconnaissance requirements particular to special operations.
(4)
added The feasibility of commercially available platforms satisfying future rotary-wing, light attack, reconnaissance requirements particular to special operations.
(5)
added The anticipated funding requirements for the special operation forces major force program for the development and procurement of an A/MH–6 replacement platform if military department-common platforms described in paragraph (3) are not available or if commercially available platforms described in paragraph (4) are leveraged.
(6)
added Any other matters the Secretary considers appropriate.

Sec. 143 Independent assessment of United States Combat Logistic Force requirements

added
(a)
added Assessment required—
(1)
added In general— The Secretary of Defense shall seek to enter into an agreement with a federally funded research and development center with appropriate expertise and analytical capability to conduct an assessment of the anticipated future demands of the combat logistics force ships of the Navy and the challenges such ships may face when conducting and supporting future naval operations in contested maritime environments.
(2)
added Elements— The assessment under paragraph (1) shall include the following:
(A)
added An assessment of the programmed ability of the United States Combat Logistic Force to support the Navy and the naval forces of allies of the United States that are operating in a dispersed manner and not concentrated in carrier or expeditionary strike groups, in accordance with the concept of distributed lethality of the Navy.
(B)
added An assessment of the programmed ability of the United States Combat Logistic Force to support the Navy and the naval forces of allies of the United States that are engaged in major combat operations against an adversary possessing maritime anti-access and area-denial capabilities, including anti-ship ballistic and cruise missiles, land-based maritime strike aircraft, submarines, and sea mines.
(C)
added An assessment of the programmed ability of the United States Combat Logistic Force to support distributed and expeditionary air operations from an expanded set of alternative and austere air bases in accordance with concepts under development by the Air Force and the Marine Corps.
(D)
added An assessment of gaps and deficiencies in the capability and capacity of the United States Combat Logistic Force to conduct and support operations of the United States and allies under the conditions described in subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C).
(E)
added Recommendations for adjustments to the programmed ability of the United States Combat Logistic Force to address capability and capacity gaps and deficiencies described in subparagraph (D).
(F)
added Any other matters the federally funded research and development center considers appropriate.
(b)
added Report required—
(1)
added In general— Not later than April 1, 2016, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that includes the assessment under subsection (a) and any other matters the Secretary considers appropriate.
(2)
added Form— The report required under paragraph (1) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.
(c)
added Support— The Secretary of Defense shall provide the federally funded research and development center that conducts the assessment under subsection (a) with timely access to appropriate information, data, resources, and analyses necessary for the center to conduct such assessment thoroughly and independently.

Sec. 144 Report on use of different types of enhanced 5.56 mm ammunition by the Army and the Marine Corps

added
(a)
added Report— Not later than March 1, 2016, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the use in combat of two different types of enhanced 5.56 mm ammunition by the Army and the Marine Corps.
(b)
added Elements— The report under subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1)
added An explanation of the reasons for the Army and the Marine Corps to use in combat two different types of enhanced 5.56 mm ammunition.
(2)
added An explanation of the appropriateness, effectiveness, and suitability issues that may arise from the use of such different types of ammunition.
(3)
added An explanation of any additional costs that have resulted from the use of such different types of ammunition.
(4)
added An explanation of any future plans of the Army or the Marine Corps to eventually transition to using in combat one standard type of enhanced 5.56 mm ammunition.
(5)
added If there are no plans described in paragraph (4), an analysis of the potential benefits of a transition described in such paragraph, including the timeline for such a transition to occur.
(6)
added Any other matters the Secretary determines appropriate.

Sec. 201 Authorization of appropriations

changed Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2016 for the use of the Department of Defense for research, development, test, and evaluation as follows:specified in the funding table in section 4201.

(1)
removed For the Army, $6,924,959,000.
(2)
removed For the Navy, $17,885,916,000.
(3)
removed For the Air Force, $26,473,669,000.
(4)
removed For Defense-wide activities, $18,329,861,000.
(5)
removed For the Director of Operational Test and Evaluation, $170,558,000.

Sec. 202 Repeal of requirement for initial operating capability of a conventional long-range standoff weapon before retirement of the conventionally Armed AGM–86 Missile

removed

removed Section 217(a)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 706) is amended—

(1)
removed by striking subparagraph (A);
(2)
removed in subparagraph (B), by striking “and”;
(3)
removed by redesignating subparagraph (B) as subparagraph (A); and
(4)
removed by inserting after subparagraph (A), as so redesignated, the following new subparagraph (B):

removed “(B) is capable of being modified to carry a conventional warhead; and”

Sec. 211 Extension of defense research and development rapid innovation program

added

added Subsection (d) of section 1073 of the Ike Skeleton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (10 U.S.C. 2359 note) is amended by striking “through 2015” and inserting “through 2020”.

Sec. 212 Limitation on availability of funds for medical countermeasures program

added
(a)
added Limitation— Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2016 for research, development, test, and evaluation, Defense-wide, for advanced development and manufacturing activities under the medical countermeasure program, not more than 50 percent may be obligated or expended until 45 days after the date on which the Secretary of Defense submits to the congressional defense committees the report under subsection (b).
(b)
added Report— The Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the advanced development and manufacturing activities under the medical countermeasure program that includes the following:
(1)
added An overall description of the program, including validated Department of Defense requirements.
(2)
added Program goals, proposed metrics of performance, and anticipated procurement and operations and maintenance costs during the period covered by the current future years defense program under section 221 of title 10, United States Code.
(3)
added The results of any analysis of alternatives and efficiency reviews conducted by the Secretary that justifies the manufacturing and privately financed construction of an advanced manufacturing and development facility rather than using other programs and facilities of the Federal Government or industry facilities for advanced development and manufacturing of medical countermeasures.
(4)
added An independent cost-benefit analysis that justifies the manufacturing and privately financed construction of an advanced manufacturing and development facility described in paragraph (3).
(5)
added If no independent cost-benefit analysis makes the justification described in paragraph (4), an explanation for why such manufacturing and privately financed construction cannot be so justified.
(6)
added Any other matters the Secretary of Defense determines appropriate.
(c)
added Comptroller General review— Not later than 60 days after the date on which the Secretary submits the report under subsection (b), the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the congressional defense committees a review of such report.

Sec. 213 Limitation on availability of funds for F–15 infrared search and track capability development

added
(a)
added Limitation— Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2016 for research, development, test, and evaluation, Air Force, for F–15 infrared search and track capability, not more than 50 percent may be obligated or expended until a period of 30 days has elapsed following the date on which the Secretary of Defense submits to the congressional defense committees the report under subsection (b).
(b)
added Report— Not later than March 1, 2016, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the requirements and cost estimates for the development and procurement of infrared search and track capability for F/A–18 and F–15 aircraft of the Navy and the Air Force. The report shall include the following:
(1)
added A comparison of the requirements between the F/A–18 and F–15 aircraft infrared search and track development efforts of the Navy and the Air Force.
(2)
added An explanation of any differences between the F/A–18 and F–15 aircraft infrared search and track capability development efforts of the Navy and the Air Force.
(3)
added A summary of the schedules and required funding to develop and field such capability.
(4)
added An explanation of any need for the Navy and the Air Force to field different F/A–18 and F–15 aircraft infrared search and track systems.
(5)
added Any other matters the Secretary determines appropriate.

Sec. 214 Independent assessment of F135 engine program

added
(a)
added Assessment— The Secretary of Defense shall seek to enter into a contract with a federally funded research and development center to conduct an assessment of the F135 engine program.
(b)
added Elements— The assessment under subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1)
added An assessment of the reliability, growth, and cost reduction efforts with respect to the F135 engine program, including—
(A)
added a detailed description of the reliability and cost history of the engine;
(B)
added the identification of key reliability and cost challenges to the program as of the date of the assessment; and
(C)
added the identification of any potential options for addressing such challenges.
(2)
added In accordance with subsection (c), a thorough assessment of the incident on June 23, 2014, consisting of an F135 engine failure and subsequent fire, including—
(A)
added the identification and definition of the root cause of the incident;
(B)
added the identification of potential actions or design changes needed to address such root cause; and
(C)
added the associated cost, schedule, and performance implications of such incident to both the F135 engine program and the F–35 Joint Strike Fighter program.
(c)
added Conduct of assessment— The federally funded research and development center selected to conduct the assessment under subsection (a) shall carry out subsection (b)(2) by analyzing data collected by the F–35 Joint Program Office, other elements of the Federal Government, or contractors. Nothing in this section may be construed as affecting the plans of the Secretary to dispose of the aircraft involved in the incident described in such subsection (b)(2).
(d)
added Report— Not later than March 15, 2016, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report containing the assessment conducted under subsection (a).

Sec. 221 Expansion of education partnerships to support technology transfer and transition

added

added Section 2194(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after “mathematics,” the following: “technology transfer or transition,”.

Sec. 222 Strategies for engagement with historically black colleges and universities and minority-serving institutions of higher education

added
(a)
added Military departments—
(1)
added Strategy— The Secretaries of the military departments shall each develop a strategy for how to engage with and support the development of scientific, technical, engineering, and mathematics capabilities of covered educational institutions in carrying out section 2362 of title 10, United States Code.
(2)
added Elements— Each strategy under paragraph (1) shall include the following:
(A)
added Goals and vision for maintaining a credible and sustainable program relating to the engagement and support under the strategy.
(B)
added Metrics to enhance scientific, technical, engineering, and mathematics capabilities at covered educational institutions, including with respect to measuring progress towards increasing the success of such institutions to compete for broader research funding sources other than set-aside funds.
(C)
added Promotion of mentoring opportunities between covered educational institutions and other research institutions.
(D)
added Regular assessment of activities that are used to develop, maintain, and grow scientific, technical, engineering, and mathematics capabilities.
(E)
added Inclusion of faculty of covered educational institutions into program reviews, peer reviews, and other similar activities.
(F)
added Targeting of undergraduate, graduate, and postgraduate students at covered educational institutions for inclusion into research or internship opportunities within the military department.
(b)
added Office of the Secretary— The Secretary of Defense shall develop and implement a strategy for how to engage with and support the development of scientific, technical, engineering, and mathematics capabilities of covered educational institutions pursuant to the strategies developed under subsection (a).
(c)
added Submission—
(1)
added Military departments— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretaries of the military departments shall each submit to the congressional defense committees the strategy developed by the Secretary under subsection (a)(1).
(2)
added Office of the Secretary— Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees the strategy developed under subsection (b).
(d)
added Covered institution defined— In this section, the term “covered educational institution” has the meaning given that term in section 2362(e) of title 10, United States Code.

Sec. 223 Plan for advanced weapons technology war games

added
(a)
added Plan required— The Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, shall develop a plan for integrating advanced weapons technologies into exercises carried out individually and jointly by the military departments to improve the development and experimentation of various concepts for employment by the Armed Forces.
(b)
added Elements— The plan under subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1)
added Identification of specific exercises to be carried out individually or jointly by the military departments under the plan.
(2)
added Identification of emerging advanced weapons technologies based on joint and individual recommendations of the military departments, including with respect to directed-energy weapons, hypersonic strike systems, autonomous systems, or other technologies as determined by the Secretary.
(3)
added A schedule for integrating either prototype capabilities or table-top exercises into relevant exercises.
(4)
added A method for capturing lessons learned and providing feedback both to the developers of the advanced weapons technology and the military departments.
(c)
added Submission— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees the plan under subsection (a).

Sec. 224 Comptroller General Review of autonomic logistics information system for F–35 Lightening II aircraft

added
(a)
added Report— Not later than April 1, 2016, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the autonomic logistics information system for the F–35 Lightening II aircraft program.
(b)
added Elements— The report under subsection (a) shall include, at a minimum, the following:
(1)
added The fielding status, in terms of units equipped with various software and hardware configurations, for the autonomic logistics information system element of the F–35 Lightening II aircraft program, as of the date of the report.
(2)
added The development schedule for upgrades to the autonomic logistics information system, and an assessment of the ability of the F–35 Lightening II aircraft program to maintain such schedule.
(3)
added The views of maintenance personnel and other personnel involved in operating and maintaining F–35 Lightening II aircraft in testing and operational units.
(4)
added The effect of the autonomic logistics information system program on the operational availability of the F–35 Lightening II aircraft program.
(5)
added Improvements, if any, regarding the time required for maintenance personnel to input data and use the autonomic logistics information system.
(6)
added The ability of the autonomic logistics information system to be deployed on both ships and to forward land-based locations, including any limitations of such a deployable version.
(7)
added The cost estimates for development and fielding of the autonomic logistics information system program and an assessment of the capability of the program to address performance problems within the planned resources.
(8)
added Other matters regarding the autonomic logistics information system that the Comptroller General determines of critical importance to the long-term viability of the system.

Sec. 225 Briefing on shallow water combat submersible program

added
(a)
added In general— Not later than the first article delivery date of the shallow water combat submersible program of the United States Special Operations Command, the Secretary of Defense shall provide to the congressional defense committees a briefing on such program.
(b)
added Elements— The briefing required under subsection (a) shall include the following elements:
(1)
added An updated acquisition strategy, schedule, and costs for the shallow water combat submersible program.
(2)
added Major milestones for the program during the period beginning with the delivery of additional articles and ending on the full operational capability date.
(3)
added Performance of contractors and subcontractors under the program.
(4)
added Integration with dry deck shelter and other diving technologies.
(5)
added Any other element the Secretary or the Commander of the United States Special Operations Command determine appropriate.

Sec. 301 Authorization of appropriations

changed Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2016 for the use of the Armed Forces and other activities and agencies of the Department of Defense for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for operation and maintenance, in amounts as follows:specified in the funding table in section 4301.

(1)
removed For the Army, $35,107,546,000.
(2)
removed For the Navy, $42,200,756,000.
(3)
removed For the Marine Corps, $6,228,782,000.
(4)
removed For the Air Force, $38,191,929,000.
(5)
removed For Defense-wide activities, $32,440,843,000.
(6)
removed For the Army Reserve, $2,665,792,000.
(7)
removed For the Navy Reserve, $1,001,758,000.
(8)
removed For the Marine Corps Reserve, $277,036,000.
(9)
removed For the Air Force Reserve, $3,064,257,000.
(10)
removed For the Army National Guard, $6,717,977,000.
(11)
removed For the Air National Guard, $6,956,210,000.
(12)
removed For the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, $14,078,000.
(13)
removed For the Department of Defense Acquisition Workforce Development Fund, $84,140,000.
(14)
removed For Environmental Restoration, Army, $234,829,000.
(15)
removed For Environmental Restoration, Navy, $292,453,000.
(16)
removed For Environmental Restoration, Air Force, $368,131,000.
(17)
removed For Environmental Restoration, Defense-wide, $8,232,000.
(18)
removed For Environmental Restoration, Formerly Used Defense Sites, $203,717,000.
(19)
removed For Overseas Humanitarian, Disaster, and Civic Aid programs, $100,266,000.
(20)
removed For Cooperative Threat Reduction programs, $358,496,000.

Sec. 311 Limitation on procurement of drop-in fuels

added
(a)
added In general— Subchapter II of chapter 173 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

added “2922h. Limitation on procurement of drop-in fuels

added “(a) Limitation—Except as provided in subsection (b), the Secretary of Defense may not make a bulk purchase of a drop-in fuel for operational purposes unless the fully burdened cost of that drop-in fuel is cost-competitive with the fully burdened cost of a traditional fuel available for the same purpose.

added “(b) Waiver

added “(1) Subject to the requirements of paragraph (2), the Secretary of Defense may waive the limitation under subsection (a) with respect to a purchase.

added “(2) Not later than 30 days after issuing a waiver under this subsection, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees notice of the waiver. Any such notice shall include each of the following:

added “(A) The rationale of the Secretary for issuing the waiver.

added “(B) A certification that the waiver is in the national security interest of the United States.

added “(C) The expected fully burdened cost of the purchase for which the waiver is issued.

added “(c) Definitions—In this section:

added “(1) The term “drop-in fuel” means a neat or blended liquid hydrocarbon fuel designed as a direct replacement for a traditional fuel with comparable performance characteristics and compatible with existing infrastructure and equipment.

added “(2) The term “traditional fuel” means a liquid hydrocarbon fuel derived or refined from petroleum.

added “(3) The term “operational purposes”—

added “(A) means for the purposes of conducting military operations, including training, exercises, large scale demonstrations, and moving and sustaining military forces and military platforms; and

added “(B) does not include research, development, testing, evaluation, fuel certification, or other demonstrations.

added “(4) The term “fully burdened cost” means the commodity price of the fuel plus the total cost of all personnel and assets required to move and, when necessary, protect the fuel from the point at which the fuel is received from the commercial supplier to the point of use.”

(b)
added Clerical amendment— The table of sections at the beginning of such subchapter is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 2922g the following new item:

Sec. 312 Southern Sea Otter Military Readiness Areas

added
(a)
added Establishment of the Southern Sea Otter Military Readiness Areas— Chapter 631 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

added “7235. Establishment of the Southern Sea Otter Military Readiness Areas

added “(a) Establishment—The Secretary of the Navy shall establish areas, to be known as “Southern Sea Otter Military Readiness Areas”, for national defense purposes. Such areas shall include each of the following:

added “(1) The area that includes Naval Base Ventura County, San Nicolas Island, and Begg Rock and the adjacent and surrounding waters within the following coordinates:

added “(2) The area that includes Naval Base Coronado, San Clemente Island and the adjacent and surrounding waters running parallel to shore to 3 nautical miles from the high tide line designated by part 165 of title 33, Code of Federal Regulations, on May 20, 2010, as the San Clemente Island 3NM Safety Zone.

added “(b) Activities within the Southern Sea Otter Military Readiness Areas

added “(1) Incidental takings under Endangered Species Act of 1973—Sections 4 and 9 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1533, 1538) shall not apply with respect to the incidental taking of any southern sea otter in the Southern Sea Otter Military Readiness Areas in the course of conducting a military readiness activity.

added “(2) Incidental takings under Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972—Sections 101 and 102 of the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972 (16 U.S.C. 1371, 1372) shall not apply with respect to the incidental taking of any southern sea otter in the Southern Sea Otter Military Readiness Areas in the course of conducting a military readiness activity.

added “(3) Treatment as species proposed to be listed—For purposes of conducting a military readiness activity, any southern sea otter while within the Southern Sea Otter Military Readiness Areas shall be treated for the purposes of section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1536) as a member of a species that is proposed to be listed as an endangered species or a threatened species under section 4 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1533).

added “(c) Removal—Nothing in this section or any other Federal law shall be construed to require that any southern sea otter located within the Southern Sea Otter Military Readiness Areas be removed from the Areas.

added “(d) Revision or termination of exceptions—The Secretary of the Interior may revise or terminate the application of subsection (b) if the Secretary of the Interior, in consultation with the Secretary of the Navy, determines that military activities occurring in the Southern Sea Otter Military Readiness Areas are impeding the southern sea otter conservation or the return of southern sea otters to optimum sustainable population levels.

added “(e) Monitoring

added “(1) In general—The Secretary of the Navy shall conduct monitoring and research within the Southern Sea Otter Military Readiness Areas to determine the effects of military readiness activities on the growth or decline of the southern sea otter population and on the near-shore ecosystem. Monitoring and research parameters and methods shall be determined in consultation with the Service.

added “(2) Reports—Not later than 24 months after the date of the enactment of this section and every three years thereafter, the Secretary of the Navy shall report to Congress and the public on monitoring undertaken pursuant to paragraph (1).

added “(f) Definitions—In this section:

added “(1) Southern sea otter—The term “southern sea otter” means any member of the subspecies Enhydra lutris nereis.

added “(2) Take—The term “take”—

added “(A) when used in reference to activities subject to regulation by the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), shall have the meaning given such term in that Act; and

added “(B) when used in reference to activities subject to regulation by the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972 (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.) shall have the meaning given such term in that Act.

added “(3) Incidental taking—The term “incidental taking” means any take of a southern sea otter that is incidental to, and not the purpose of, the carrying out of an otherwise lawful activity.

added “(4) Military readiness activity—The term “military readiness activity” has the meaning given that term in section 315(f) of the Bob Stump National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2003 (16 U.S.C. 703 note) and includes all training and operations of the armed forces that relate to combat and the adequate and realistic testing of military equipment, vehicles, weapons, and sensors for proper operation and suitability for combat use.

added “(5) Optimum sustainable population—The term “optimum sustainable population” means, with respect to any population stock, the number of animals that will result in the maximum productivity of the population or the species, keeping in mind the carrying capacity of the habitat and the health of the ecosystem of which they form a constituent element.”

(b)
added Clerical amendment— The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by adding at the end the following new item:
(c)
added Conforming amendment— Section 1 of Public Law 99–625 (16 U.S.C. 1536 note) is repealed.

Sec. 313 Revision to scope of statutorily required review of projects relating to potential obstructions to aviation so as to apply only to energy projects

added
(a)
added Scope of section— Section 358 of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4200; 49 U.S.C. 44718 note) is amended—
(1)
added in subsection (c)(3), by striking “from State and local officials or the developer of a renewable energy development or other energy project” and inserting “from a State government, an Indian tribal government, a local government, a landowner, or the developer of an energy project”;
(2)
added in subsection (c)(4), by striking “readiness, and” and all that follows and inserting “readiness and to clearly communicate actions being taken by the Department of Defense to the party requesting an early project review under this section.”;
(3)
added in subsection (d)(2)(B), by striking “as high, medium, or low”;
(4)
added by redesignating subsection (j) as subsection (k); and
(5)
added by inserting after subsection (i) the following new subsection (j):

added “(j) Applicability of section—This section does not apply to a non-energy project.”

(b)
added Definitions— Subsection (k) of such section, as redesignated by paragraph (4) of subsection (a), is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraphs:

added “(4) The term “energy project” means a project that provides for the generation or transmission of electrical energy.

added “(5) The term “non-energy project” means a project that is not an energy project.

added “(6) The term “landowner” means a person or other legal entity that owns a fee interest in real property on which a proposed energy project is planned to be located.”

Sec. 314 Exclusions from definition of “chemical substance” under Toxic Substances Control Act

added

added Section 3(2)(B)(v) of the Toxic Substances Control Act (15 U.S.C. 2602(2)(B)(v)) is amended by striking “, and” and inserting “and any component of such an article (including, without limitation, shot, bullets and other projectiles, propellants when manufactured for or used in such an article, and primers), and”.

Sec. 315 Exemption of Department of Defense from alternative fuel procurement requirement

added

added Section 526 of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (Public Law 110–140; 42 U.S.C. 17142) is amended by adding at the end the following: “This section shall not apply to the Department of Defense.”.

Sec. 316 Limitation on plan, design, refurbishing, or construction of biofuels refineries

added

added The Secretary of Defense may not enter into a contract for the planning, design, refurbishing, or construction of a biofuels refinery any other facility or infrastructure used to refine biofuels unless such planning, design, refurbishing, or construction is specifically authorized by law.

Sec. 321 Assignment of certain new requirements based on determinations of cost-efficiency

added
(a)
added Amendment— Chapter 146 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 2463 the following new section:

added “2463a. Assignment of certain new requirements based on determinations of cost-efficiency

added “(a) Assignments based on determinations of cost-efficiency

added “(1) Except as provided in paragraph (2) and subject to subsection (b), the assignment of performance of a new requirement by the Department of Defense to members of the Armed Forces, civilian employees, or contractors shall be based on a determination of which sector of the Department’s workforce can perform the new requirement in the most cost-efficient manner, based on an analysis of the costs to the Federal Government in accordance with Department of Defense Instruction 7041.04 (““Estimating and Comparing the Full Costs of Civilian and Active Duty Military Manpower and Contract Support””) or successor guidance, consistent with the needs of the Department with respect to factors other than cost, including quality, reliability, and timeliness.

added “(2) Paragraph (1) shall not apply in the case of a new requirement that is inherently governmental, closely associated with inherently governmental functions, critical, or required by law to be performed by members of the Armed Forces or Department of Defense civilian employees.

added “(3) Nothing in this section may be construed as affecting the requirements of the Department of Defense under policies and procedures established by the Secretary of Defense under section 129a of this title for determining the most appropriate and cost-efficient mix of military, civilian, and contractor personnel to perform the mission of the Department of Defense.

added “(b) Waiver During an Emergency or Exigent Circumstances—The head of an agency may waive subsection (a) for a specific new requirement in the event of an emergency or exigent circumstances, as long as the head of an agency, within 60 days of exercising the waiver, submits to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives notice of the specific new requirement involved, where such new requirement is being performed, and the date on which it would be practical to subject such new requirement to the requirements of subsection (a).

added “(c) Provisions relating to assignment of civilian personnel—If a new requirement is assigned to a Department of Defense civilian employee consistent with the requirements of this section—

added “(1) the Secretary of Defense may not—

added “(A) impose any constraint or limitation on the size of the civilian workforce in terms of man years, end strength, full-time equivalent positions, or maximum number of employees; or

added “(B) require offsetting funding for civilian pay or benefits or require a reduction in civilian full-time equivalents or civilian end-strengths; and

added “(2) the Secretary may assign performance of such requirement without regard to whether the employee is a temporary, term, or permanent employee.

added “(d) New requirement described—For purposes of this section, a new requirement is an activity or function that is not being performed, as of the date of consideration for assignment of performance under this section, by military personnel, civilian personnel, or contractor personnel at a Department of Defense component, organization, installation, or other entity. For purposes of the preceding sentence, an activity or function that is performed at such an entity and that is re-engineered, reorganized, modernized, upgraded, expanded, or changed to become more efficient but is still essentially providing the same service shall not be considered a new requirement.”

(b)
added Clerical amendment— The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 2463 the following new item:

Sec. 322 Inclusion in annual technology and industrial capability assessments of a determination about defense acquisition program requirements

added

added Section 2505(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—

(1)
added by redesignating paragraphs (3) and (4) as paragraphs (4) and (5), respectively; and
(2)
added by inserting after paragraph (2) the following new paragraph (3):

added “(3) determine the extent to which the requirements associated with defense acquisition programs can be satisfied by the present and projected performance capacities of industries supporting the sectors or capabilities in the assessment and evaluate the reasons for any variance from applicable preceding determinations;”

Sec. 323 Amendment to limitation on authority to enter into a contract for the sustainment, maintenance, repair, or other overhaul of the F117 engine

added

added Section 341 of the Carl Levin and Howard P. “Buck” McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3345) is amended—

(1)
added by striking “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics” and all that follows through “is paying” and inserting “Senior Acquisition Executive of the Air Force has determined that the Air Force has obtained sufficient data to establish that the Air Force is paying”; and
(2)
added by striking the sentence beginning with “The Secretary may waive”.

Sec. 324 Pilot programs for availability of working-capital funds for product improvements

added
(a)
added Pilot programs required— During fiscal year 2016, each of the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Acquisition, Logistics, and Technology, the Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Research, Development, and Acquisition, and the Assistant Secretary of the Air Force for Acquisition shall initiate a pilot program pursuant to section 330 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 68), as amended by section 332 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1697).
(b)
added Limitation on availability of funds— A minimum of $5,000,000 of working-capital funds shall be used for each of the pilot programs initiated under subsection (a) for fiscal year 2016.

Sec. 325 Report on equipment purchased from foreign entities that could be manufactured in United States arsenals or depots

added
(a)
added Report— Not later than 30 days after the date on which the budget of the President for fiscal year 2017 is submitted to Congress pursuant to section 1105 of title 31, Unites States Code, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the equipment, weapons, weapons systems, components, subcomponents, and end-items purchased from foreign entities that identifies those items which could be manufactured in the military arsenals of the United States or the military depots of the United States to meet the goals of subsection (a) or section 2464 of title 10, United States Code, as well as a plan for moving that workload into such arsenals or depots.
(b)
added Elements of report— The report required by subsection (a) shall include each of the following:
(1)
added An identification of items purchased by foreign manufacturers—
(A)
added described in section 8302(a)(1) of title 41, United States Code, and purchased from a foreign manufacturer by reason of an exception under section 8302(a)(2)(A) or section 8302(a)(2)(B) of such title;
(B)
added described in section 2533b(a)(1) of title 10, United States Code, and purchased from a foreign manufacturer by reason of an exception under section 2533b(b); and
(C)
added described in section 2534(a) of such title and purchased from a foreign manufacturer by reason of a waiver exercised under paragraph (1), (2), (4), or (5) of section 2534(d) of such title.
(2)
added An assessment of the skills required to manufacture the items identified in paragraph (1) and a comparison of those skills with skills required to meet the critical capabilities identified by the Army Report to Congress on Critical Manufacturing Capabilities and Capacities dated August 2013 and the core logistics capabilities identified by each military service pursuant to section 2464 of title 10, United States Code, as of the date of the enactment of this Act.
(3)
added An identification of the tooling, equipment, and facilities upgrades necessary for a military arsenal or depot to perform the manufacturing workload identified under paragraph (1).
(4)
added An identification of workload identified in paragraph (1) most appropriate for transfer to military arsenals or depots to meet the goals of subsection (a) or the requirements of section 2464 of title 10, United States Code.
(5)
added Such other information the Secretary considers necessary for adherence to paragraphs (4) and (5).
(6)
added An explanation of the rationale for continuing to sole-source manufacturing workload identified in paragraph (1) from a foreign source rather than a military arsenal, depot, or other organic facility.

Sec. 333 Improvements to Department of Defense excess property disposal

added
(a)
added Plan required— Not later than June 30, 2016, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a plan for the improved management and oversight of the systems, processes, and controls involved in the disposition of excess non-mission essential equipment and materiel by the Defense Logistics Agency Disposition Services.
(b)
added Contents of plan— At a minimum, the plan shall address each of the following:
(1)
added Backlogs of unprocessed property at disposition sites that do not meet Defense Logistics Agency Disposition Services goals.
(2)
added Customer wait times.
(3)
added Procedures governing the disposal of serviceable items in order to prevent the destruction of excess property eligible for utilization, transfer, or donation before potential recipients are able to view and obtain the property.
(4)
added Validation of materiel release orders.
(5)
added Assuring adequate physical security for the storage of equipment.
(6)
added The number of personnel required to effectively manage retrograde sort yards.
(7)
added Managing any potential increase in the amount of excess property to be processed.
(8)
added Improving the reliability of Defense Logistics Agency Disposition Services data.
(9)
added Procedures for ensuring no property is offered for public sale until all requirements for utilization, transfer, and donation are met.
(10)
added Validation of physical inventory against database entries.
(c)
added Congressional briefing— By not later than September 30, 2016, the Secretary shall provide to the congressional defense committees a briefing on the actions taken to implement the plan required under subsection (a).

Sec. 401 End strengths for active forces

The Armed Forces are authorized strengths for active duty personnel as of September 30, 2016, as follows:

(1)
The Army, 475,000.
(2)
The Navy, 329,200.
(3)
The Marine Corps, 184,000.
(4)
changed The Air Force, 317,000.320,715.

Sec. 402 Revisions in permanent active duty end strength minimum levels

added

added Section 691(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking paragraphs (1) through (4) and inserting the following new paragraphs:

added “(1) For the Army, 475,000.

added “(2) For the Navy, 329,200.

added “(3) For the Marine Corps, 184,000.

added “(4) For the Air Force, 317,000.”

Sec. 411 End strengths for Selected Reserve

(a)
In general— The Armed Forces are authorized strengths for Selected Reserve personnel of the reserve components as of September 30, 2016, as follows:
(1)
The Army National Guard of the United States, 342,000.
(2)
The Army Reserve, 198,000.
(3)
The Navy Reserve, 57,400.
(4)
The Marine Corps Reserve, 38,900.
(5)
The Air National Guard of the United States, 105,500.
(6)
The Air Force Reserve, 69,200.
(7)
The Coast Guard Reserve, 7,000.
(b)
End strength reductions— The end strengths prescribed by subsection (a) for the Selected Reserve of any reserve component shall be proportionately reduced by—
(1)
the total authorized strength of units organized to serve as units of the Selected Reserve of such component which are on active duty (other than for training) at the end of the fiscal year; and
(2)
the total number of individual members not in units organized to serve as units of the Selected Reserve of such component who are on active duty (other than for training or for unsatisfactory participation in training) without their consent at the end of the fiscal year.
(c)
changed End strength increases— Whenever units or individual members of the Selected Reserve for of any reserve component are released from active duty during any fiscal year, the end strength prescribed for such fiscal year for the Selected Reserve of such reserve component shall be increased proportionately by the total authorized strengths of such units and by the total number of such individual members.

Sec. 421 Military personnel

added
(a)
added Authorization of appropriations— Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2016 for the use of the Armed Forces and other activities and agencies of the Department of Defense for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for military personnel, as specified in the funding table in section 4401.
(b)
added Construction of authorization— The authorization of appropriations in subsection (a) supersedes any other authorization of appropriations (definite or indefinite) for such purpose for fiscal year 2016.

Sec. 501 Equitable treatment of junior officers excluded from an all-fully-qualified-officers list because of administrative error

added
(a)
added Officers on active-duty list— Section 624(a)(3) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:

added “(E) If the Secretary of the military department concerned determines that one or more officers or former officers were not placed on an all-fully-qualified-list under this paragraph because of administrative error, the Secretary may prepare a supplemental all-fully-qualified-officers list containing the names of any such officers for approval in accordance with this paragraph.”

(b)
added Officers on reserve active-Status list— Section 14308(b)(4) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:

added “(E) If the Secretary of the military department concerned determines that one or more officers or former officers were not placed on an all-fully-qualified-list under this paragraph because of administrative error, the Secretary may prepare a supplemental all-fully-qualified-officers list containing the names of any such officers for approval in accordance with this paragraph.”

(c)
added Conforming amendments to special selection board authority—
(1)
added Regular components— Section 628(a)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “or the name of a person that should have been placed on an all-fully-qualified-officers list under section 624(a)(3) of this title was not so placed,”.
(2)
added Reserve components— Section 14502(a)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “or whose name was not placed on an all-fully-qualified-officers list under section 14308(b)(4) of this title because of administrative error,”.

Sec. 502 Authority to defer until age 68 mandatory retirement for age of a general or flag officer serving as Chief or Deputy Chief of Chaplains of the Army, Navy, or Air Force

added
(a)
added Deferral authority— Section 1253 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

added “(c) Deferred retirement of chaplains

added “(1) The Secretary of the military department concerned may defer the retirement under subsection (a) of an officer serving in a general or flag officer grade who is the Chief of Chaplains or Deputy Chief of Chaplains of that officer’s armed force.

added “(2) A deferment of the retirement of an officer referred to in paragraph (1) may not extend beyond the first day of the month following the month in which the officer becomes 68 years of age.

added “(3) The authority to defer the retirement of an officer referred to in paragraph (1) expires December 31, 2020. Subject to paragraph (2), a deferment granted before that date may continue on and after that date.”

(b)
added Clerical amendments—
(1)
added Section heading— The heading of section 1253 of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:

added “1253. Age 64: regular commissioned officers in general and flag officer grades; exceptions”

(2)
added Table of sections— The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 63 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking the item relating to section 1253 and inserting the following new item:

Sec. 503 Implementation of Comptroller General recommendation on the definition and availability of costs associated with general and flag officers and their aides

added
(a)
added Definition of costs— The Secretary of Defense shall direct the Director, Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation, in coordination with the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness and the Secretaries of the military departments, to define the costs that could be associated with general and flag officers, such as security details, Government air travel, enlisted and officer aide housing costs, additional support staff, official residences, and any other associated costs incurred due to the nature of their position, for the purpose of providing a consistent approach to estimating and managing the full costs associated with these officers and aides.
(b)
added Report On Costs Associated With General And Flag Officers and Aides— Not later than June 30, 2016, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report describing the costs associated with general and flag officers and their enlisted and officer aides.

Sec. 511 Clarification of purpose of reserve component special selection boards as limited to correction of error at a mandatory promotion board

added

added Section 14502(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—

(1)
added in paragraph (1)—
(A)
added in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking “a selection board” and inserting “a mandatory promotion board convened under section 14101(a) of this title”; and
(B)
added in subparagraphs (A) and (B), by striking “selection board” and inserting “mandatory promotion board”; and
(2)
added in the first sentence of paragraph (3)—
(A)
added by striking “Such board” and inserting “The special selection board”; and
(B)
added by striking “selection board” and inserting “mandatory promotion board”.

Sec. 512 Ready Reserve continuous screening regarding key positions disqualifying Federal officials from continued service in the Ready Reserve

added

added Section 10149 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—

(1)
added in subsection (a), by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

added “(6) That members who also occupy a Federal key position whose mobilization in an emergency would seriously impair the capability of the parent Federal agency or office to function effectively are not retained in the Ready Reserve.”

(2)
added by adding at the end the following new subsection:

added “(c) In this section, the term “Federal key position” means a Federal position that shall not be vacated during a national emergency or mobilization without seriously impairing the capability of the parent Federal agency or office to function effectively. There are four categories of Federal key positions, the first three of which are, by definition, key positions while the fourth category requires a case-by-case determination and designation, as follows:

added “(1) The Vice President of the United States or any official specified in the order of presidential succession in section 19 of title 3.

added “(2) The heads of the Federal agencies appointed by the President with the consent of the Senate, except that this paragraph does not include any position on a multi-member board or commission. Such a position may be designated as a Federal key position only in accordance with paragraph (4).

added “(3) Article III Judges. However, each Article III Judge, who is a member of the Ready Reserve and desires to remain in the Ready Reserve, must have his or her position reviewed by the Chief Judge of the affected Judge's Circuit. If the Chief Judge determines that mobilization of the Article III Judge concerned will not seriously impair the capability of the Judge's court to function effectively, the Chief Judge will provide a certification to that effect to the Secretary concerned. Concurrently, the affected Judge will provide a statement to the Secretary concerned requesting continued service in the Ready Reserve and acknowledging that he or she may be involuntarily called to active duty under the laws of the United States and the directives and regulations of the Department of Defense and pledging not to seek to be excused from such orders based upon his or her judicial duties.

added “(4) Other Federal positions determined by the head of a Federal Agency.”

Sec. 513 Exemption of military technicians (dual status) from civilian employee furloughs

added

added Section 10216(b)(3) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after “reductions” the following: “(including temporary reductions by furlough or otherwise)”.

Sec. 514 Annual report on personnel, training, and equipment requirements for the non-Federalized National Guard to support civilian authorities in prevention and response to non-catastrophic domestic disasters

added
(a)
added Annual report required— Section 10504 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
added in subsection (a), by striking “Report.—” and inserting “Report on State of the National Guard.—(1)”;
(2)
added by striking “(b) Submission of report to congress.—” and inserting “(2)”;
(3)
added by striking “annual report of the Chief of the National Guard Bureau” and inserting “annual report required by paragraph (1)”; and
(4)
added by adding at the end the following new subsection (b):

added “(b) Annual report on Non-Federalized service National Guard personnel, training, and equipment requirements

added “(1) Not later than January 31 of each of calendar years 2016 through 2022, the Chief of the National Guard Bureau shall submit to the congressional defense committees and the officials specified in paragraph (5) a report setting forth the personnel, training, and equipment required by the National Guard during the next fiscal year to carry out its mission, while not Federalized, to provide prevention, protection mitigation, response, and recovery activities in support of civilian authorities in connection with non-catastrophic natural and man-made disasters.

added “(2) To determine the annual personnel, training, and equipment requirements of the National Guard referred to in paragraph (1), the Chief of the National Guard Bureau shall take into account, at a minimum, the following:

added “(A) Core civilian capabilities gaps for the prevention, protection, mitigation, response, and recovery activities in connection with natural and man-made disasters, as collected by the Department of Homeland Security from the States.

added “(B) Threat and hazard identifications and risk assessments of the Department of Defense, the Department of Homeland Security, and the States.

added “(3) Personnel, training, and equipment requirements shall be collected from the States, validated by the Chief of the National Guard Bureau, and be categorized in the report required by paragraph (1) by each of the following:

added “(A) Emergency support functions of the National Response Framework.

added “(B) Federal Emergency Management Agency regions.

added “(4) The annual report required by paragraph (1) shall be prepared in consultation with the chief executive of each State, other appropriate civilian authorities, and the Council of Governors.

added “(5) In addition to the congressional defense committees, the annual report required by paragraph (1) shall be submitted to the following officials:

added “(A) The Secretary of Defense.

added “(B) The Secretary of Homeland Security.

added “(C) The Council of Governors.

added “(D) The Secretary of the Army.

added “(E) The Secretary of the Air Force.

added “(F) The Commander of the United States Northern Command.

added “(G) The Commander of the United States Cyber Command.”

(b)
added Clerical amendments—
(1)
added Section heading— The heading of such section is amended to read as follows:

added “10504. Chief of the National Guard Bureau: annual reports”

(2)
added Table of contents— The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 1011 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking the item relating to section 10504 and inserting the following new section:

Sec. 515 National Guard civil and defense support activities and related matters

added
(a)
added Operational use of the national guard—
(1)
added In general— Chapter 1 of title 32, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

added “116. Operational use of the National Guard

added “(a) In general—This section authorizes the operational use of the National Guard and recognizes that the basic premise of both the National Incident Management System and the National Response Framework is that—

added “(1) incidents are typically managed at the local level first; and

added “(2) local jurisdictions retain command, control, and authority over response activities for their jurisdictional areas.

added “(b) Assistance to Civilian Firefighting Organizations

added “(1) Assistance authorized—Members and units of the National Guard shall be authorized to support firefighting operations, missions, or activities, including aerial firefighting employment of the Modular Airborne Firefighting System (MAFFS), undertaken in support of a civilian authority or a State or Federal agency.

added “(2) Role of governor and state adjutant general—For the purposes of paragraph (1)—

added “(A) the Governor of a State shall be the principal civilian authority; and

added “(B) the adjutant general of the State shall be the principal military authority, when acting in his or her State capacity, and has the primary authority to mobilize members and units of the National Guard of the State in any duty status under this title the adjutant general deems appropriate to employ necessary forces when funds to perform such operations, missions, or activities are reimbursed.”

(2)
added Clerical amendment— The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by adding at the end the following new item:
(b)
added Active Guard and Reserve (AGR) support— Section 328(b) of title 32, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
added by inserting “duty as specified in section 116(b) of this title or may perform” after “subsection (a) may perform”; and
(2)
added by inserting “(A) and (B) ” after “ specified in section 502(f)(2)”.
(c)
added Federal technicians support— Section 709(a)(3) of title 32, United States Code, is amended by inserting “duty as specified in section 116(b) of this title or” after “(3) the performance of”.

Sec. 521 Administration of reserve duty

added

added Chapter 1209 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—

(1)
added by inserting before section 12301 the following subchapter heading:

added “I Administration of Reserve Duty”

(2)
added by striking sections 12301, 12302, 12303, 12304, 12310, 12319 and 12322;
(3)
added in subsections (a) and (b) of section 12305, by striking “section 12301, 12302, or 12304 of this title” and inserting “section 12341 of this title for a purpose specified under subsections (a) through (e) of section 12351(a) of this title”;
(4)
added in section 12306—
(A)
added in subsection (a), by striking “section 12301” and inserting “section 12351”; and
(B)
added in subsection (b)—
(i)
added in paragraph (1), by striking “section 12301(a) of this title” and inserting “section 12341 of this title for the purpose specified in section 12351(a) of this title”; and
(ii)
added in paragraph (2), by striking “section 12301(a)” and inserting “section 12351(a)”;
(5)
added in section 12307, by striking “12301(a)” and inserting “12351(a)”;
(6)
added in section 12318—
(A)
added in subsection (a), by striking “section 12302 or 12304 of this title” and inserting “section 12341 of this title for a purpose specified under subsection (b) or (c) of section 12351”; and
(B)
added in subsection (b)—
(i)
added by striking “section 12310” and inserting “section 12353(c)”; and
(ii)
added by striking “section 12302 or 12304” and inserting “subsection (b) or (c) of section 12351”; and
(7)
added by inserting after section 12321 the following new section:

added “12323. Policies and procedures

added “(a) In general—The Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of the Department in which the Coast Guard is operating shall prescribe such policies and procedures for the armed forces under their respective jurisdictions as the Secretary considers necessary to carry out this chapter.

added “(b) Report to congress—When members of the Ready Reserve are ordered to active duty pursuant to section 12351(b) of this title, the Secretary of Defense shall submit a report, at least once a year, to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives describing the policies and procedures prescribed under subsection (a).”

Sec. 522 Reserve duty authorities

added
(a)
added In general— Chapter 1209 of title 10, United States Code, is further amended by inserting after section 12323, as added by section 521(7) of this Act, the following new subchapter:

added “II Reserve Duty Authorities

added “12341. Active duty

added “(a) Authority to order a member to perform active duty—At any time, the Secretary concerned may order a member of a reserve component under the Secretary’s jurisdiction to active duty, or retain the member on active duty, subject to the purpose and limitations described in subsections (b) and (c).

added “(b) Purpose and limitations—The purposes and limitations referred to in subsection (a) are as follows:

added “(1) Purpose of order—To account for manpower utilization and expenditure of appropriations, each order shall cite the purpose of the order to active duty as provided under subchapter III of this chapter.

added “(2) Limitations—A member of a reserve component shall not be ordered to active duty or retained on active duty beyond the limitations and restrictions specified in the purpose of the order to active duty.

added “(c) Continuous period of duty

added “(1) In general—When the purpose for the member to serve on active duty changes, the order to active duty shall be amended to cite the new purpose and applicable funding code, but the member shall remain on the same order to active duty.

added “(2) Continuous Federal service—If a member is released from active duty and subsequently ordered to active duty or full-time National Guard duty with a break in service of 24 hours or fewer, the period of service shall be treated as continuous Federal service for the purposes of pay and benefits, unless otherwise specified in law.

added “12342. Call to Federal service

added “(a) Authority to call a member into Federal service

added “(1) In general—The President may call into Federal service the militia of any State, and use such of the armed forces, as the President considers necessary for the purposes specified in chapter 15 of this title.

added “(2) State request required—A call into Federal service for the purposes specified in section 331 of this title shall only be made upon the request of the legislature of a State or of the Governor of a State if the legislature cannot be convened.

added “(b) National guard in Federal service—The President may call into Federal service members and units of the National Guard of any State in such numbers as the President considers necessary for the purposes specified in section 12406 of this title.

added “12343. Inactive duty

added “(a) Authority to order a member to perform inactive duty—Under regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Defense or the Secretary of the Department in which the Coast Guard is operating, the Secretary concerned may, at any time, order a member of a reserve component under the Secretary’s jurisdiction to perform inactive duty, subject to the purpose and limitations described in subsection (b).

added “(b) Purpose and limitations—The purpose and limitations referred to in subsection (a) are as follows:

added “(1) Purpose—To account for manpower utilization and expenditure of appropriations, the Secretary concerned shall document the purpose for inactive duty.

added “(2) Hostile fire or imminent danger area—Inactive duty shall not be performed in designated hostile fire or imminent danger area.

added “(3) Duration—Each period of inactive duty shall be for duration of at least two hours.

added “(4) Compensation—Compensation under section 206 of title 37 and service credit under section 12732(a)(2)(E) of this title shall not exceed two periods of inactive duty in a calendar day.”

(b)
added Redesignation of inactive duty to encompass operational and other duties performed while in an active duty status—
(1)
added References— Any reference that is made in any law, regulation, document, paper, or other record of the United States to inactive-duty training, as such term applies to members of the reserve components of the uniformed services, shall be deemed to be a reference to inactive duty.
(2)
added Definition of uniformed services— In this subsection the term “uniformed services” has the meaning given the term in section 101 of title 10, United States Code.

Sec. 523 Purpose of reserve duty

added

added Chapter 1209 of title 10, United States Code, is further amended by inserting after section 12343, as added by section 522(a), the following new subchapter:

added “III Purpose of Reserve Duty

added “12351. Reserve component: required duty

added “(a) Mobilization of the reserve components

added “(1) In general—In time of war or of national emergency declared by Congress, or when otherwise authorized by law, an authority designated by the Secretary concerned may, without the consent of the persons affected, order any unit, and any member not assigned to a unit organized to serve as a unit, of a reserve component under the jurisdiction of that Secretary to active duty under section 12341 of this title for the duration of the war or emergency and for six months thereafter. However a member on an inactive status list or in a retired status may not be ordered to active duty under this subsection unless the Secretary concerned, with the approval of the Secretary of Defense in the case of the Secretary of a military department, determines that there are not enough qualified Reserves in an active status or in the inactive National Guard in the required category who are readily available.

added “(2) Expansions—So far as practicable, during any expansion of the active armed forces that requires that units and members of the reserve components be ordered to active duty as provided in paragraph (1), members of units organized and trained to serve as units who are ordered to that duty without their consent shall be so ordered with their units. However, members of those units may be reassigned after being so ordered to active duty.

added “(3) Period of time—The period of time allowed between the date when a Reserve ordered to active duty pursuant to paragraph (1) is alerted for that duty and the date when the Reserve is required to enter upon that duty shall be determined by the Secretary concerned based upon military requirements at that time.

added “(b) Ready reserve mobilization—In time of national emergency declared by the President after January 1, 1953, or when otherwise authorized by law, an authority designated by the Secretary concerned may, without the consent of the persons concerned, order any unit, and any member not assigned to a unit organized to serve as a unit, in the Ready Reserve under the jurisdiction of that Secretary to active duty under section 12341 of this title for not more than 24 consecutive months. Not more than 1,000,000 members of the Ready Reserve may be on active duty, without their consent, under this section at any one time.

added “(c) Call-up of the selected reserve and certain individual ready reserve members; other than during war or national emergency

added “(1) In general—Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection (b) or any other provision of law, when the President determines that it is necessary to augment the active forces for any operational mission or that it is necessary to provide assistance referred to in paragraph (2), the President may authorize the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of the Department in which the Coast Guard is operating, without the consent of the members concerned, to order any unit, and any member not assigned to a unit organized to serve as a unit, of the Selected Reserve, or any member in the Individual Ready Reserve mobilization category and designated as essential under regulations prescribed by the Secretary concerned, under their respective jurisdictions, to active duty under section 12341 of this title for not more than 365 days.

added “(2) Emergencies—The augmentation under paragraph (1) includes providing assistance in responding to an emergency involving—

added “(A) a use or threatened use of a weapon of mass destruction; or

added “(B) a terrorist attack or threatened terrorist attack in the United States that results, or could result, in significant loss of life or property.

added “(3) Function limitation—No unit or member of a reserve component may be ordered to active duty pursuant to this subsection to perform any of the functions authorized by chapter 15 of this title or section 12406 of this title or, except as provided in paragraph (2), to provide assistance to the Federal Government or a State in time of a serious natural or manmade disaster, accident, or catastrophe.

added “(4) Numerical limitation—Not more than 200,000 members of the Selected Reserve and the Individual Ready Reserve may be on active duty pursuant to this subsection at any one time, of whom not more than 30,000 may be members of the Individual Ready Reserve.

added “(5) Response capabilities—No unit or member of a reserve component may be ordered to active duty pursuant to this subsection to provide assistance referred to in paragraph (2) unless the President determines that the requirements for responding to an emergency referred to in that subsection have exceeded, or will exceed, the response capabilities of local, State, and Federal civilian agencies.

added “(6) Termination—Whenever any unit of the Selected Reserve or any member of the Selected Reserve not assigned to a unit organized to serve as a unit, or any member of the Individual Ready Reserve, is ordered to active duty pursuant to paragraph (1), the service of all units or members so ordered to active duty may be terminated by—

added “(A) order of the President; or

added “(B) law.

added “(7) Report—Whenever the President authorizes the Secretary of Defense or the Secretary of the Department in which the Coast Guard is operating to order any unit or member of the Selected Reserve or Individual Ready Reserve to active duty, pursuant to paragraph (1), the President shall, within 24 hours after exercising such authority, submit to Congress a report setting forth the circumstances necessitating the action taken under this section and describing the anticipated use of these units or members.

added “(8) Rule of construction—Nothing contained in this subsection shall be construed as amending or limiting the application of the provisions of the War Powers Resolution (50 U.S.C. 1541 et seq.).

added “(d) Annual active duty—At any time, an authority designated by the Secretary concerned may, without the consent of the persons affected, order any unit, and any member not assigned to a unit organized to serve as a unit, in an active status in a reserve component under the jurisdiction of that Secretary to active duty under section 12341 of this title for not more than 15 days a year. However, units and members of the Army National Guard of the United States or the Air National Guard of the United States may not be ordered to active duty under this subsection without the consent of the governor of the State (or, in the case of the District of Columbia National Guard, the commanding general of the District of Columbia National Guard). The consent of a Governor may not be withheld (in whole or in part) with regard to active duty outside the United States, its territories, and its possessions, because of any objection to the location, purpose, type, or schedule of such active duty.

added “(e) Ready reserve: unsatisfactory participation

added “(1) Authority to order to active duty

added “(A) In general—Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the President may order to active duty under section 12341 of this title any member of the Ready Reserve of an armed force who—

added “(i) is not assigned to, or participating satisfactorily in, a unit of the Ready Reserve;

added “(ii) has not fulfilled the member’s statutory reserve obligation; and

added “(iii) has not served on active duty for a total of 24 months.

added “(B) Duration and extension—A member who is ordered to active duty pursuant to paragraph (1) may be required to serve on active duty until the member’s total service on active duty equals 24 months. If the member’s enlistment or other period of military service would expire before the member has served the required period under this paragraph, the enlistment or other period of military service may be extended until the member has served the required period.

added “(2) Failure to perform satisfactorily

added “(A) In general—A member of the Ready Reserve covered by section 12352 of this title who fails in any year to perform satisfactorily the training duty prescribed in that section, as determined by the Secretary concerned under regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Defense, may be ordered without the member’s consent to perform additional active duty for training under section 12341 of this title for not more than 45 days. If the failure occurs during the last year of the member’s required membership in the Ready Reserve, the member’s membership is extended until the member performs that additional active duty for training, but not for more than six months.

added “(B) Army national guard or air national guard—A member of the Army National Guard of the United States or the Air National Guard of the United States who fails in any year to perform satisfactorily the training duty prescribed by or under law for members of the Army National Guard or the Air National Guard, as the case may be, as determined by the Secretary concerned, may, upon the request of the Governor of the State (or, in the case of the District of Columbia, the commanding general of the District of Columbia National Guard) be ordered, without the member’s consent, to perform additional active duty for training under section 12341 of this title for not more than 45 days. A member ordered to active duty under this subsection shall be ordered to duty as a Reserve of the Army or as a Reserve of the Air Force, as the case may be. However, the consent of a Governor may not be withheld (in whole or in part) with regard to active duty outside the United States, its territories, and its possessions, because of any objection to the location, purpose, type, or schedule of such active duty.

added “(f) Captive status—A member of a reserve component may be ordered to active duty under section 12341 of this title without the member’s consent if the Secretary concerned determines that the member is in a captive status. A member ordered to active duty under this section may not be retained on active duty, without the member’s consent, for more than 30 days after the member’s captive status is terminated.

added “(g) Muster duty—A member of the Ready Reserve may be ordered without the member’s consent to muster duty under section 12343 of this title one time each year. A member ordered to muster duty under this section shall be required to perform a minimum of two hours of muster duty on the day of muster. The muster duty shall be subject to the following requirements:

added “(1) Period of time—The period which a member may be required to devote to muster duty under this section, including round-trip travel to and from the location of that duty, may not total more than one day each calendar year.

added “(2) Treatment as inactive duty and travel—Except as specified in paragraph (3), muster duty (and travel directly to and from that duty) under this section shall be treated as inactive duty (and travel directly to and from that duty) for the purposes of this title and the provisions of title 37 (other than section 206(a) of title 37) and title 38, including provisions relating to the determination of eligibility for and the receipt of benefits and entitlements provided under those titles for Reserves performing inactive duty and for their dependents and survivors.

added “(3) Not credited for retired pay purposes—Muster duty under this subsection shall not be credited in determining entitlement to, or in computing, retired pay under chapter 1223 of this title.

added “(h) Consideration for mobilization—To achieve fair treatment between members in the Ready Reserve who are being considered for recall to duty without their consent pursuant to subsection (b), (c) or (e)(1), consideration shall be given to—

added “(1) the length and nature of previous service, to assure such sharing of exposure to hazards as the national security and military requirements will reasonably allow;

added “(2) the frequency of assignments during service career;

added “(3) family responsibilities; and

added “(4) employment necessary to maintain the national health, safety, or interest.

added “(j) Definitions—In this section:

added “(1) Captive status—The term “captive status” means the status of a member of the armed forces who is in a missing status (as defined in section 551(2) of title 37) which occurs as the result of a hostile action and is related to the member’s military status.

added “(2) Individual ready reserve mobilization category—The term “Individual Ready Reserve mobilization category” means, in the case of any reserve component, the category of the Individual Ready Reserve described in section 10144(b) of this title.

added “(3) Weapons of mass destruction—The term “weapon of mass destruction” has the meaning given that term in section 1403 of the Defense Against Weapons of Mass Destruction Act of 1996 (50 U.S.C. 2302).

added “12352. Reserve component: required training

added “(a) Purpose—Except as specifically provided in regulations to be prescribed by the Secretary of Defense, or by the Secretary of the Department in which the Coast Guard is operating, each person who is enlisted, inducted, or appointed in an armed force, and who becomes a member of the Ready Reserve under any provision of law except section 513 or 10145(b) of this title, shall be required, while in the Ready Reserve, to maintain readiness as determined by the Secretary concerned by—

added “(1) participating in at least 48 scheduled drills or training periods during each year pursuant to section 12343 of this title and serve on active duty for training under section 12341 of this title for not less than 14 days (exclusive of travel time) during each year; or

added “(2) serving on active duty for training under section 12341 of this title for not more than 30 days during each year.

added “(b) Exception for certain members—A member who has served on active duty for one year or longer may not be required to perform a period of active duty for training if the first day of that period falls during the last 120 days of the member’s required membership in the Ready Reserve.

added “12353. Reserve component: optional duty

added “(a) Active duty

added “(1) In general—At any time, an authority designated by the Secretary concerned may order a member of a reserve component under his jurisdiction to active duty under section 12341 of this title, or retain the member on active duty, with the consent of that member for training, to provide operational support or perform other duty as determined by the Secretary concerned.

added “(2) Purposes—Such duty includes service on active duty for the purpose specified in section or section 802(d), 1491, 3038, 5143, 5144, 8038, 10211, 10301 through 10305, 10502, 10505, 10506, 10507, 12402, or 12405 of this title.

added “(3) Army national guard or air national guard—However, a member of the Army National Guard of the United States or the Air National Guard of the United States may not be ordered to active duty under this subsection without the consent of the Governor or other appropriate authority of the State concerned. The consent of a Governor may not be withheld (in whole or in part) with regard to active duty outside the United States, its territories, and its possessions, because of any objection to the location, purpose, type, or schedule of such active duty.

added “(b) Active duty for health care

added “(1) In general—When authorized by the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of a military department may, with the consent of the member, order a member of a reserve component to active duty under section 12341 of this title—

added “(A) to receive authorized medical care;

added “(B) to be medically evaluated for disability or other purposes; or

added “(C) to complete a required Department of Defense health care study, which may include an associated medical evaluation of the member.

added “(2) Treatment for or recovery from an injury, illness or disease—A member of a uniformed service described in paragraph (1)(B) or (2)(B) of section 1074a(a) of this title may be ordered to active duty under section 12341 of this title, and a member of a uniformed service described in paragraph (1)(A) or (2)(A) of section 1074a may be continued on active duty under section 12341 of this title, for a period of more than 30 days while the member is being treated for (or recovering from) an injury, illness, or disease incurred or aggravated in the line of duty as described in any of such paragraphs.

added “(3) Retention on active duty—A member ordered to active duty under this subsection may, with the member’s consent, be retained on active duty, if the Secretary concerned considers it appropriate, for medical treatment for a condition associated with the study or evaluation, if that treatment of the member is otherwise authorized by law.

added “(4) Army national guard or air national guard—However, a member of the Army National Guard of the United States or the Air National Guard of the United States may not be ordered to active duty under this subsection without the consent of the Governor or other appropriate authority of the State concerned.

added “(c) Organizing, administering, etc., reserve components

added “(1) In general—The Secretary concerned may order a member of a reserve component under the Secretary’s jurisdiction to active duty pursuant to section 12341 of this title to perform Active Guard and Reserve duty to organize, administer, recruit, instruct, or train the reserve components.

added “(2) Reserve grade; eligibility for promotion—A Reserve ordered to active duty under paragraph (1) shall be ordered in the Reserve’s reserve grade. While so serving, the Reserve continues to be eligible for promotion as a Reserve, if otherwise qualified.

added “(3) Additional duties—A Reserve on active duty under this subsection may perform the following additional duties to the extent that the performance of those duties does not interfere with the performance of the Reserve’s primary Active Guard and Reserve duties described in paragraph (1):

added “(A) Supporting reserve components—Supporting operations or missions assigned in whole or in part to the reserve components.

added “(B) Supporting units—Supporting operations or missions performed or to be performed by—

added “(i) a unit composed of elements from more than one component of the same armed force; or

added “(ii) a joint forces unit that includes—

added “(I) one or more reserve component units; or

added “(II) a member of a reserve component whose reserve component assignment is in a position in an element of the joint forces unit.

added “(C) Advising—Advising the Secretary of Defense, the Secretaries of the military departments, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the commanders of the combatant commands regarding reserve component matters.

added “(D) Instruction or training—Instructing or training in the United States, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, or possessions of the United States of—

added “(i) active-duty members of the armed forces;

added “(ii) members of foreign military forces (under the same authorities and restrictions applicable to active-duty members providing such instruction or training);

added “(iii) Department of Defense contractor personnel; or

added “(iv) Department of Defense civilian employees.

added “(4) Operations relating to defense against weapons of mass destruction and terrorist attacks

added “(A) In general—Notwithstanding paragraph (3), a Reserve on active duty as described in paragraph (1), or a Reserve who is a member of the National Guard serving on full-time National Guard duty under section 502(f) of title 32 in connection with functions referred to in paragraph (1), may, subject to subparagraph (C), perform duties in support of emergency preparedness programs to prepare for or to respond to any emergency involving any of the following:

added “(i) Weapons of mass destruction—The use or threatened use of a weapon of mass destruction (as defined in section 1403 of the Defense Against Weapons of Mass Destruction Act of 1996 (50 U.S.C. 2302) in the United States.

added “(ii) Terrorist attack or threatened terrorist attack—A terrorist attack or threatened terrorist attack in the United States that results, or could result, in catastrophic loss of life or property.

added “(iii) Release of certain materials—The intentional or unintentional release of nuclear, biological, radiological, or toxic or poisonous chemical, materials in the United States that results, or could result, in catastrophic loss of life or property.

added “(iv) Natural or man-made disaster—A natural or manmade disaster in the United States that results in, or could result in, catastrophic loss of life or property.

added “(B) Costs—The costs of the pay, allowances, clothing, subsistence, gratuities, travel, and related expenses for a Reserve performing duties under the authority of paragraph (1) shall be paid from the appropriation that is available to pay such costs for other members of the reserve component of that Reserve who are performing duties as described in paragraph (1).

added “(C) Civil support team—A Reserve may perform duty described in subparagraph (A) only while assigned to a reserve component weapons of mass destruction civil support team.

added “(D) Annual end strength authorization and justification material—Reserves on active duty who are performing duties described in subparagraph (A) shall be counted against the annual end strength authorizations required by sections 115(a)(1)(B) and 115(a)(2) of this title. The justification material for the defense budget request for a fiscal year shall identify the number and component of the Reserves programmed to be performing duties described in subparagraph (A) during that fiscal year.

added “(E) Certification required—A reserve component weapons of mass destruction civil support team, and any Reserve assigned to such a team, may not be used to respond to an emergency described in subparagraph (A) unless the Secretary of Defense has certified to the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives of that team, or that Reserve, possesses the requisite skills, training, and equipment to be proficient in all mission requirements.

added “(F) Request for legislation—If the Secretary of Defense submits to Congress any request for the enactment of legislation to modify the requirements of subparagraphs (A) and (C), the Secretary shall provide with the request—

added “(i) justification for each such requested modification; and

added “(ii) the Secretary’s plan for sustaining the qualifications of the personnel and teams described in subparagraph (C).

added “(G) Definition of united states—In this subsection, the term “United States” includes the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Guam, and the Virgin Islands.

added “(5) Training—A Reserve on active duty as described in this subsection may be provided training consistent with training provided to other members on active duty, as the Secretary concerned sees fit.

added “(d) Inactive duty

added “(1) In general—At any time, an authority designated by the Secretary concerned may require a member of a reserve component under the Secretary’s jurisdiction, with the consent of the member, to perform inactive duty under section 12343 of this title to provide readiness training, perform administrative function to prepare for unit training, perform funeral honors functions at the funeral of a veteran as defined in section 1491 of this title (other than for members of the Army National Guard of the United States or the Air National Guard of the United States who perform funeral honors duty under section 502(g) of title 32), or perform other inactive duty as determined by the Secretary concerned.

added “(2) Pay—As directed by the Secretary concerned, a member performing funeral honors functions may be paid—

added “(A) the allowance under section 495 of title 37; or

added “(B) compensation under section 206 of title 37.

added “(3) Travel and transportation expenses—A member who performs funeral honors functions may be reimbursed for travel and transportation expenses incurred in conjunction with such duty as authorized under section 495 of title 37 if such duty is performed at a location 50 miles or more from the member’s residence.”

Sec. 524 Training and other duty performed by members of the National Guard

added
(a)
added Chapter heading— The chapter heading for chapter 5 of title 32, United States Code, is amended by inserting “And Other Duty” after “Training”;
(b)
added Other amendments— Section 502 of title 32, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
added by striking the section heading and inserting the following:

added “502. Required training, field exercises, and other duty”

(2)
added in subsection (a)—
(A)
added in paragraph (1)—
(i)
added by striking “drill” and inserting “training”; and
(ii)
added by inserting “under subsection (g)” before “at least”;
(B)
added in paragraph (2), by inserting “under subsection (f)(1)” before “at least”;
(3)
added in subsection (b), by striking “drill” each place the term appears and inserting “training”;
(4)
added in subsection (d)—
(A)
added in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking “drill” and inserting “training”; and
(B)
added in paragraph (2), by striking “one and one-half hours” and inserting “two hours”;
(5)
added in subsection (e), by striking “drill” each place the term appears and inserting “training”;
(6)
added in subsection (f)—
(A)
added in paragraph (1)—
(i)
added in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by inserting “, which regulations shall conform to regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Defense for Reserve component members,” after “as the case may be,”; and
(ii)
added in the matter following subparagraph (B), by inserting “to full-time National Guard duty” after “be ordered”; and
(B)
added in paragraph (2), by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:

added “(C) Support for funerals of veterans of the armed forces pursuant to section 1491 of title 10.”

(C)
added by redesignating paragraph (3) as paragraph (8); and
(D)
added by inserting after paragraph (2), as amended by subparagraph (B), the following new paragraphs:

added “(3) Full-time national guard duty—Full-time National Guard duty shall not be performed on land outside the United States, its territories or possessions.

added “(4) Purpose of call order—To account for manpower utilization and expenditure of appropriations, each order to full-time National Guard duty shall cite the purpose of the call or order as provided in this section or section 112, 114, 316, 503, 504, 505, 509, or 904 of this title.

added “(5) Limitations and restrictions—A member of the National Guard shall not be ordered to full-time National Guard duty or retained on full-time National Guard duty beyond the limitations and restrictions specified in the purpose of the order to full-time National Guard duty.

added “(6) Amended orders—When the purpose for the member to serve on full-time National Guard duty changes, the order to full-time National Guard duty shall be amended to cite the new purpose and applicable funding code, but the member shall remain on the same order to full-time National Guard duty.

added “(7) Continuous Federal service—If a member is released from full-time National Guard duty and subsequently ordered to active duty with a break in service of 24 hours or fewer, the period of service shall be treated as continuous Federal service for the purposes of pay and benefits unless otherwise specified in law.”

(7)
added by adding at the end the following new subsection:

added “(g) Inactive duty

added “(1) In general—Under regulations to be prescribed by the Secretary of the Army or the Secretary of the Air Force, as the case may be, which shall conform to regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Defense for reserve component members, a member of the National Guard may be required to perform inactive duty, in addition to that prescribed under subsection (a), to provide additional readiness training, perform administrative function to prepare for unit training, perform funeral honors functions for veterans of the armed forces pursuant to section 1491 of title 10, or perform other inactive duty as authorized by the Secretary concerned.

added “(2) Documentation—To account for manpower utilization and expenditure of appropriations, the purpose for inactive duty and the associated funding code shall be documented.

added “(3) Designated hostile fire or imminent danger area—Inactive duty shall not be performed in designated hostile fire or imminent danger area.

added “(4) Land outside the united states, its territories or possessions—Inactive duty shall not be performed on land outside the United States, its territories or possessions.

added “(5) Duration of inactive duty—Each period of inactive duty shall be for duration of at least two hours.

added “(6) Duration of compensation and service credit—Compensation under section 206 of title 37 and service credit under section 12732(a)(2)(E) of title 10 shall not exceed two periods of inactive duty in a calendar day.

added “(7) Pay for performing funeral honors—As directed by the Secretary concerned, a member performing funeral honors functions may be paid—

added “(A) the allowance under section 495 of title 37; or

added “(B) compensation under section 206 of title 37.”

Sec. 525 Conforming and clerical amendments

added
(a)
added Conforming amendments to title 5, united states code—
(1)
added Paragraph (2) of section 5517(d) of title 5, United States Code, is amended by striking “under section 10147” and inserting “as provided under section 12352”.
(2)
added Section 6323 of title 5, United States Code, is amended—
(A)
added in paragraph (1) of subsection (a)—
(i)
added by striking “inactive-duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”; and
(ii)
added by striking “funeral honors duty (as described in section 12503 of title 10 and section 115 of title 32)” and inserting “funeral honors functions (as described in section 12353 of title 10 and section 114 of title 32)”; and
(B)
added in paragraph (1) subsection (d), by striking “section 12301(b) or 12301(d)” and inserting “section 12341 of title 10 for the purposes specified in section 12351(d) or 12353(a)”.
(b)
added Conforming amendments to title 7, united states code— Paragraph (1) of section 332(a) of the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act (7 U.S.C. 1982(a)) is amended by striking “12301(a), 12301(g), 12302, 12304, 12306, or 12406,” and inserting “12341 for the purpose specified in section 12306, 12342, 12351(a)(1), 12351(b), 12351(c), or 12351(f), 12342 for the purpose specified in section 12406,”.
(c)
added Conforming amendments to title 10, united states code—
(1)
added Section 101 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(A)
added in subparagraph (B) of subsection (a)(13), by striking “section 688, 12301(a), 12302, 12304, 12304a, 12305, or12406 of this title, chapter 15 of this title” and inserting “section 688 or 12341 of this title for the purpose specified in section 12304a, 12305, 12351(a)(1), 12351(b), 12351(c) of this title, section 12342 of this title for the purpose specified in section 12406, chapter 15 of this title”;
(B)
added in paragraph (16) of subsection (b), by striking “section 12301(d) of this title” and inserting “section 12341 of this title for the purpose specified in section 12353(c) of this title”;
(C)
added in paragraph (5) of subsection (d)—
(i)
added by inserting “502(f) of title 32 for the purpose specified in section” after “under section”; and
(ii)
added by striking “505 of title 32” and inserting “505 of such title”;
(D)
added in paragraph (7) of subsection (d)—
(i)
added in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking “inactive-duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”;
(ii)
added in subparagraph (A), by striking “section 206 of title 37” and inserting “section 12352(a)(1) of this title, section 502(a)(1) of title 32,”; and
(iii)
added in subparagraph (B)—
(I)
added by inserting “under section 12353(d) of this title or section 502(g) of title 32” after “special additional duties authorized”; and
(II)
added by inserting “, or other activities that a member may perform when authorized by the designated authority” before the period.
(2)
added Section 115 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(A)
added in subsection (b)(1)—
(i)
added in subparagraph (A), by striking “section 12301(d)” and inserting “section 12341”;
(ii)
added in subparagraph (C), by striking “section 12301(d)” and inserting “section 12341”;
(iii)
added in subparagraph (D)—
(I)
added by striking “section 12301(g)” and inserting “section 12341”; and
(II)
added by inserting “as provided under section 12351(f) of such title” before the semicolon; and
(iv)
added in subparagraph (E)—
(I)
added by striking “12301(h) or 12322” and inserting “section 12341”; and
(II)
added by inserting “as provided under section 12353(b) of this title” before the semicolon;
(B)
added in subsection (i)—
(i)
added in paragraph (1), by striking “section 12301(a) of this title” and inserting “section 12341 of this title for the purpose specified in section 12351(a) of this title”;
(ii)
added in paragraph (2), by striking “section 12301(b) of this title” and inserting “section 12341 of this title for the purpose specified in section 12351(d) of this title”;
(iii)
added in paragraph (3), by striking “section 12302 of this title” and inserting “section 12341 of this title for the purpose specified in section 12351(b) of this title”;
(iv)
added in paragraph (4), by striking “section 12304 of this title” and inserting “section 12341 of this title for the purpose specified in section 12351(c) of this title”;
(v)
added in paragraph (5), by inserting “section 12342 of this title for the purpose specified in” after “Federal service under”;
(vi)
added in paragraph (6), by inserting “section 12342 of this title for the purpose specified in” after “ Federal service under”; and
(vii)
added in paragraph (11), by inserting “12341 for the purpose specified in section” after “active duty under section”.
(3)
added Section 331 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting “under section 12342 of this title” after “call into Federal service”.
(4)
added Section 332 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting “under section 12342 of this title” after “call into Federal service”.
(5)
added Paragraph (3) of section 511(d) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “section 10147(a)(1)” and inserting “section 12352(a)(1)”.
(6)
added Subparagraph (B) of section 523(b)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting “12341 of this title for the purpose specified in section” after “on active duty under section”.
(7)
added Subparagraph (B) of section 641(1) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting “section 12341 for the purpose described in” after “on active duty under”.
(8)
added Section 802 of title 10, United States Code, is amended in each of subsections (a)(3), (d)(2)(B), and (d)(5)(B), by striking “inactive-duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”.
(9)
added Subsection (d) of section 803 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “inactive-duty training” each place the term appears and inserting “inactive duty”.
(10)
added The matter preceding paragraph (1) of subsection (a) and the matter preceding paragraph (1) of subsection (b) of section 936 of title 10, United States Code, are each amended by striking “inactive-duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”.
(11)
added Paragraph (1) of section 976(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “inactive-duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”.
(12)
added Paragraphs (1) and (2) of section 1061(b) of title 10, United States Code, are each amended by striking “inactive-duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”.
(13)
added Subsection (a) of section 1074a of title 10, United States Code, is amended in each of paragraphs (1)(B), (2)(B), and (3) by striking “inactive-duty training” each place the term appears and inserting “inactive duty”.
(14)
added Subsection (a) of section 1074a of title 10, United States Code, is amended further—
(A)
added in paragraph (1)—
(i)
added in subparagraph (A), by inserting “or” after the semicolon;
(ii)
added in subparagraph (B), by striking “; or” and inserting a period; and
(iii)
added by striking subparagraph (C);
(B)
added in paragraph (2)—
(i)
added in subparagraph (A), by inserting “or” after the semicolon;
(ii)
added in subparagraph (B), by striking “; or” and inserting a period; and
(iii)
added by striking subparagraph (C); and
(C)
added by striking paragraph (4).
(15)
added Subsection (a) of section 1076 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(A)
added in each paragraphs (2)(B)(i), (2)(B)(ii), and (2)(C), by striking “inactive-duty training” each place the term appears and inserting “inactive duty”; and
(B)
added in paragraph (2), by striking subparagraph (E).
(16)
added Clauses (i) and (ii) of section 1086(c)(2)(B) of title 10, United States Code, are each amended by striking “inactive duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”.
(17)
added Paragraph (2) of section 1175(e) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “inactive duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”.
(18)
added Section 1175a(j) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(A)
added in paragraph (2)—
(i)
added by inserting “under section 12341 of this title for the purpose specified in section 12351(a)(1), 12351(b), 12351(c), 12351(d), 12351(e)(1), or 12351(f) of this title” after “involuntarily recalled to active duty”; and
(ii)
added by striking “in accordance with section 12301(a), 12301(b), 12301(g), 12302, 12303, or 12304 of this title or” and inserting “under”; and
(B)
added in paragraph (3)—
(i)
added by striking “12301(d)” and inserting “12353(a)”;
(ii)
added by striking “12319, or 12503” and inserting “12351(g)”; and
(iii)
added by striking “, 115,”.
(19)
added Paragraph (2) of section 1201(c) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “under section 10148(a)” and inserting “pursuant to section 12351(e)(2)”.
(20)
added Section 1204 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(A)
added in the section heading, by striking “inactive-duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”; and
(B)
added in paragraph (2)—
(i)
added in each of subparagraphs (A)(i), (A)(iii), (B)(i), and (B)(iii), by striking “inactive-duty training” each place the term appears and inserting “inactive duty”;
(ii)
added in clause (iii) of subparagraph (A), by inserting “or” after the semicolon;
(iii)
added in clause (iii) of subparagraph (B), by striking “; or” and inserting a period; and
(iv)
added by striking subparagraph (C).
(21)
added Section 1206 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(A)
added in the section heading, by striking “inactive-duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”;
(B)
added by amending paragraph (2) to read as follows:

added “(2) the disability is a result of an injury, illness, or disease incurred or aggravated in line of duty while—

added “(A) performing active duty or inactive duty;

added “(B) traveling directly to or from the place at which such duty is performed; or

added “(C) remaining overnight immediately before the commencement of inactive duty, or while remaining overnight between successive periods of inactive duty, at or in the vicinity of the site of the inactive duty, if the site is outside reasonable commuting distance of the member’s residence;”

(C)
added in paragraph (5), by striking “inactive-duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”;
(22)
added Subparagraph (B) of section 1448(f)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “inactive-duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”.
(23)
added Clauses (ii) and (iii) of section 1471(b)(3)(A) of title 10, United States Code, are each amended by striking “inactive duty for training” and inserting “inactive duty”.
(24)
added Section 1475 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(A)
added in the section heading, by striking “inactive-duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”; and
(B)
added in each of paragraphs (2) and (3) of subsection (a), by striking “inactive duty training” each place the term appears and inserting “inactive duty”.
(25)
added Paragraphs (1)(B) and (2)(A) of section 1476(a) of title 10, United States Code, are each amended by striking “inactive-duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”.
(26)
added Paragraphs (3), (4), (8), and (9) of section 1478(a) of title 10, United States Code, are each amended by striking “inactive duty training” each place the term appears and inserting “inactive duty”.
(27)
added Section 1481(a)(2) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(A)
added in each of subparagraphs (B), (C), (D), and (F), by striking “inactive-duty training” each place the term appears and inserting “inactive duty”; and
(B)
added in subparagraph (E), by striking “inactive duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”.
(28)
added Paragraph (2) of section 1481(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended further—
(A)
added in subparagraph (E) (as amended by paragraph (27)(B)), by inserting “or” after the semicolon;
(B)
added in subparagraph (F) (as amended by paragraph (27)(A)), by striking “; or” and inserting a period; and
(C)
added by striking subparagraph (G).
(29)
added Subsections (d)(2) and (e)(5) of section 2031 of title 10, United States Code, are each amended by striking “inactive duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”.
(30)
added Subparagraph (D) of section 2107(c)(5) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “inactive duty for training” and inserting “inactive duty”.
(31)
added Subparagraph (D) of section 2107a(c)(4) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “inactive duty for training” and inserting “inactive duty”.
(32)
added The matter preceding paragraph (1) of section 2601a(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “inactive-duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”.
(33)
added Paragraph (3) of section 9446(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “inactive-duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”.
(34)
added Subsection (a) of section 10142 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “as provided in sections 12301 and 12302 of this title” and inserting “under section 12341 of this title for the purposes specified in sections 12351(a) and 12351(b) of this title”.
(35)
added Subsection (a) of section 10143 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “10147(a)(1)” and inserting “12352”.
(36)
added The matter preceding subparagraph (A) of section 10144(b)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “in accordance with section 12304” and inserting “under section 12341 of this title for the purpose specified in section 12351(c)”.
(37)
added Chapter 1005 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(A)
added by repealing section 10147; and
(B)
added by repealing section 10148.
(38)
added Section 10151 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “sections 12301 and 12306” and inserting “section 12351(a)”.
(39)
added Subsection (b) of section 10204 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “inactive duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”.
(40)
added Subsection (a) of section 10215 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(A)
added in subparagraph (A) of paragraph (1), by striking “section 12301(d)” and inserting “section 12341 of this title as provided in section 12353(a)”; and
(B)
added in subparagraph (A) of paragraph (2), by striking “section 12301(d)” and inserting “section 12341 of this title as provided in section 12353(a)”.
(41)
added Paragraph (9) of section 10541(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “12304(b)” and inserting “12351(c)(2)”.
(42)
added Paragraph (1) of section 12011(e) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “12310” and inserting “12353(c)”.
(43)
added Subsection (a) of section 12012 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “section 10211 or 12310” and inserting “section 12341 of this title for the purpose specified in section 10211 or 12353(c) of this title”.
(44)
added Section 12305 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(A)
added in subsection (a), by striking “section 12301, 12302, or 12304” and inserting “section 12341 of this title for the purpose specified in section 12351(a), 12351(b), or 12351(c)”; and
(B)
added in subsection (b), by striking “section 12301, 12302, or 12304” and inserting “section 12341 of this title for the purpose specified in section 12351(a), 12351(b), or 12351(c)”.
(45)
added Section 12306 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(A)
added in subsection (a), by striking “section 12301” and inserting “section 12341 of this title for the purpose specified in section 12351(a), 12351(d), 12351(f), 12353(a), or 12353(b)”; and
(B)
added in paragraph (1) of subsection (b)—
(i)
added by striking “section 12301(a)” and inserting “section 12341 of this title for the purpose specified in section 12351(a)(1) of this title”; and
(ii)
added in paragraph (2) of subsection (b), by striking “12301(a)” and inserting “12351(a)”.
(46)
added Section 12307 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “12301(a)” and inserting “12351(a)”.
(47)
added Section 12317 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “inactive duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”.
(48)
added Section 12318 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(A)
added in subsection (a), by striking “section 12302 or 12304” and inserting “section 12341 of this title for the purpose specified in section 12351(b) or 12351(c)”; and
(B)
added in subsection (b)—
(i)
added by striking “referred to section 12310” and inserting “performing duty referred to in section 12353(c)”; and
(ii)
added by striking “section 12302 or 12304” and inserting “section 12351(b) or 12351(c)”.
(49)
added Section 12321 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “of organizing, administering, recruiting, instructing, or training the reserve components” and inserting “specified in section 12353(c) of this title”.
(50)
added Section 12408 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “section 12301(a), 12302, or 12304 of this title” and inserting “12341 of this title for the purpose specified in section 12351(a)(1), 12351(b) or 12351(c) of this title”.
(51)
added Section 12503 of title 10, United States Code, is repealed.
(52)
added Section 12552 of title 10, United States Code, is repealed.
(53)
added Subsections (a)(3) and (b)(3) of section 12602 of title 10, United States Code, are each amended by striking “inactive-duty training” each place the term appears and inserting “inactive duty”.
(54)
added Section 12603 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(A)
added in the section heading, by striking “inactive-duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”; and
(B)
added in subsection (a), by striking “inactive duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”.
(55)
added Section 12604 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(A)
added in the section heading, by striking “inactive-duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”; and
(B)
added in subsection (a), by striking “inactive-duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”.
(56)
added Subsection (b) of section 12686 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “section 12301” and inserting “section 12341 of this title for the purpose specified in section 12351(a), 12351(d), 12351(f), 12353(a) or 12353(b)”.
(57)
added Subparagraph (B) of section 12731(f)(2) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(A)
added in clause (i)—
(i)
added by striking “under section 12301(d)” and inserting “for the purpose specified in section 12353(a)”; and
(ii)
added by striking “under section 12310” and inserting “for the purpose specified in 12353(c)”; and
(B)
added in clause (iii), by striking “section 12301(h)(1)” and inserting “section 12341 of this title for the purpose specified in section 12353(b)(1)”.
(58)
added Section 12732(a)(2) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(A)
added in the matter following subparagraph (E), by striking “clauses (A), (B), (C), (D) and (E)” and inserting “subparagraphs (A), (B), (C) and (D)”; and
(B)
added by striking subparagraph (E).
(59)
added Clause (i) of section 16131(c)(3)(B) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “section 12301(a), 12301(d), 12301(g), 12302, or 12304” and inserting “section 12341 of this title for the purpose specified in section 12351(a)(1), 12351(b), 12351(c), 12351(f), or 12353(a)”.
(60)
added The matter preceding subparagraph (A) of section 16133(b)(4) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “section 12301(a), 12301(d), 12301(g), 12302, or 12304” and inserting “section 12341 of this title for the purpose specified in section 12351(a)(1), 12351(b), 12351(c), 12351(f), or 12353(a)”.
(61)
added Clause (i) of section 16162(d)(2)(B) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “section 12301(a), 12301(d), 12301(g), 12302, or 12304 of this title” and inserting “section 12341 of this title for the purpose specified in section 12351(a)(1), 12351(b), 12351(c), 12351(f), or 12353(a) of this title”.
(62)
added Section 18505 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(A)
added in the section heading, by striking “inactive-duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”; and
(B)
added in subsection (a), by striking “inactive-duty training” each place the term appears and inserting “inactive duty”.
(d)
added Conforming amendments to title 14, united states code—
(1)
added Section 704 of title 14, United States Code, is amended by striking “inactive-duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”.
(2)
added Subsection (a) of section 705 of title 14, United States Code, is amended by striking “inactive-duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”.
(3)
added Paragraph (1) of section 712(c) of title 14, United States Code, is amended by striking “10147” and inserting “12352”.
(e)
added Conforming amendments to title 20, united states code—
(1)
added Subsection (c) of section 1404 of the Defense Dependents’ Education Act of 1978 (20 U.S.C. 923) is amended—
(A)
added in clause (i) of paragraph (2)(B), by striking “section 12301 or 12302” and inserting “section 12341 of title 10, United States Code, for a purpose specified in section 12351(a), 12351(b), 12351(d), 12351(f), 12353(a) or 12353(b)”; and
(B)
added in clause (i) of paragraph (2)(C), by striking “section 12301 or 12302” and inserting “section 12341 of title 10, United States Code, for a purpose specified in section 12351(a), 12351(b), 12351(d), 12351(f), 12353(a) or 12353(b)”.
(2)
added Subparagraph (A) of section 481(d)(4) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1088(d)(4)) is amended by striking “section 12301(a), 12301(g), 12302, 12304, or 12306” and inserting “section 12341 of title 10, United States Code, for a purpose specified in section 12306, 12351(a), 12351(b), 12351(c), or 12351(f)”.
(3)
added Subparagraph (C) of section 484C(c)(3) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1091c(c)) is amended—
(A)
added in clause (i), by striking “, 12301(a), 12301(g), 12302, 12304, or 12305 of title 10, United States Code,” and inserting “of title 10, United States Code, under section 12341 of such title for the purpose specified in section 12305, 12351(a), 12351(b), 12351(c), or 12351(f) of such title,”; and
(B)
added in clause (iii), by striking “section 12304 of title 10, United States Code” and inserting “section 12341 of title 10, United States Code, for the purpose specified in section 12351(c) of such title”.
(4)
added Subparagraph (A) of section 5 of Higher Education Relief Opportunities for Students Act of 2003 (20 U.S.C. 1098ee(5)) is amended by striking “section 12301(a), 12301(g), 12302, 12304, or 12306 of title 10, United States Code,” and inserting “section 12341 of title 10, United States Code, for the purpose specified in section 12306, 12351(a), 12351(b), 12351(c), or 12351(f) of such title,”.
(f)
added Conforming amendments to Internal Revenue Code— Subsection (m) of section 206 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (26 U.S.C. 3121) is amended—
(1)
added in each of paragraphs (1)(B) and (3), by striking “inactive duty training” each place the term appears and inserting “inactive duty”; and
(2)
added in the heading for paragraph (3), by striking “Inactive Duty Training” and inserting “Inactive Duty”.
(g)
added Conforming amendments to title 32, united states code—
(1)
added Paragraph (19) of section 101 of title 32, United States Code, is amended by striking “section 316, 502, 503, 504, or 505” and inserting “section 502(f) of this title for the purpose specified under section in section 112, 114, 316, 502, 503, 504, 505, 509, or 904”.
(2)
added Section 114 of title 32, United States Code, is amended by striking “may not be considered to be a period of drill or training, but may be performed as funeral honors duty under section 115 of this title.” and inserting “may be performed under section 502 of this title.”.
(3)
added Section 115 of title 32, United States Code, is repealed.
(h)
added Conforming amendments to title 37, united states code—
(1)
added The matter preceding subparagraph (A) of section 101(22) of title 37, United States Code, is amended by striking “inactive-duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”.
(2)
added Section 204 of title 37, United States Code, is amended—
(A)
added in paragraph (1) of subsections (g)—
(i)
added in each of subparagraphs (B) and (D), by striking “inactive-duty training” each place the term appears and inserting “inactive duty”;
(ii)
added by striking subparagraph (E);
(iii)
added in subparagraph (C), by inserting “or” after the semicolon; and
(iv)
added in subparagraph (D), by striking “; or” and inserting a period; and
(B)
added in paragraph (1) of subsections (h)—
(i)
added in each of subparagraphs (B) and (D), by striking “inactive-duty training” each place the term appears and inserting “inactive duty”;
(ii)
added by striking subparagraph (E);
(iii)
added in subparagraph (C), by inserting “or” after the semicolon; and
(iv)
added in subparagraph (D), by striking “; or” and inserting a period.
(3)
added Subparagraph (A) of section 205(e)(2) of title 37, United States Code, is amended by striking “inactive-duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”.
(4)
added Section 206 of title 37, United States Code, is amended—
(A)
added in the section heading, by striking “inactive-duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”; and
(B)
added in each of paragraphs (3)(A)(ii) and (3)(C) of subsection (a), by striking “inactive-duty training” each place the term appears and inserting “inactive duty”.
(5)
added Section 305b of title 37, United States Code, is amended—
(A)
added in the heading for subsection (c), by striking “Inactive Duty Training” and inserting “Inactive Duty”; and
(B)
added in subsection (e), by striking “12310(c)” and inserting “12353(c)(4)”.
(6)
added Subsection (a) of section 308d of title 37, United States Code, is amended by striking “inactive duty for training” and inserting “inactive duty”.
(7)
added The heading for subsection (e) of section 320 of title 37, United States Code, is amended by striking “Inactive Duty Training” and inserting “Inactive Duty”.
(8)
added Section 334 of title 37, United States Code, is amended—
(A)
added in the heading for subsection (e), by striking “Inactive Duty Training” and inserting “Inactive Duty”; and
(B)
added in subsection (e), by striking “for inactive-duty training” and inserting “for inactive duty”.
(9)
added Section 352 of title 37, United States Code, is amended—
(A)
added in the heading for subsection (d), by striking “Inactive Duty Training” and inserting “Inactive Duty”; and
(B)
added in subsection (d), by striking “for inactive-duty training” and inserting “for inactive duty”.
(10)
added Subparagraph (B) of section 353(c)(1) of title 37, United States Code, is amended by striking “inactive-duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”.
(11)
added Section 415 of title 37, United States Code, is amended—
(A)
added in paragraph (3) of subsection (a), by striking “inactive-duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”; and
(B)
added in paragraph (1) of subsection (c), by striking “inactive duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”.
(12)
added Section 433 of title 37, United States Code, is amended—
(A)
added in subsection (a), by striking “12319” and inserting “12351(g)”; and
(B)
added in subsection (d), by striking “inactive-duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”.
(13)
added Subsection (a) of section 433a of title 37, United States Code, is amended by striking “12319” and inserting “12351(g)”.
(14)
added Paragraph (1) of section 474(i) of title 37, United States Code, is amended by striking “inactive-duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”.
(15)
added Section 478a of title 37, United States Code, is amended—
(A)
added in the section heading, by striking “inactive duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”; and
(B)
added in subsection (a), by striking “inactive duty training” each place the term appears and inserting “inactive duty”.
(16)
added Paragraph (1) of section 495(a) of title 37, United States Code, is amended by striking “funeral honors duty pursuant to section 12503 of title 10 or section 115 of title 32” and inserting “funeral honors functions pursuant to section 12353(d)(2) of title 10 or section 502(g)(7) of title 32”.
(17)
added The matter preceding paragraph (1) of subsection (a), the matter following paragraph (2) of subsection (a), and subsection (d), of section 552 of title 37, United States Code, are each amended by striking “inactive-duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”.
(18)
added Subparagraph (B) of section 910(b)(2) of title 37, United States Code, is amended by striking “subparagraph (A) or (B) of section 12301(h)(1) of title 10” and inserting “section 12341 of title 10 pursuant to subparagraph (A) or (B) of section 12353(b)(1) of such title”.
(i)
added Conforming amendments to title 38, united states code—
(1)
added Section 101 of title 38, United States Code, is amended—
(A)
added in subparagraph (C) of paragraph (22), by striking “section 316, 502, 503, 504, or 505 of title 32” and inserting “section 502(f) of title 32”;
(B)
added in paragraph (23)—
(i)
added by striking “inactive duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”; and
(ii)
added in the matter following paragraph (C), by striking “sections 316, 502, 503, 504, or 505 of title 32” and inserting “section 502(g) of title 32”; and
(C)
added in the matter preceding clause (i) of paragraph (24)(C), by striking “inactive duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”.
(2)
added Subparagraph (B) and the matter following subparagraph (B) of section 106(d)(1) of title 38, United States Code, are each amended by striking “inactive duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”.
(3)
added Clause (ii) of section 1112(c)(3)(A) of title 38, United States Code, is amended by striking “inactive duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”.
(4)
added Paragraph (2) of section 1302(b) of title 38, United States Code, is amended by striking “inactive duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”.
(5)
added Subparagraph (A) of section 1312(a)(2) of title 38, United States Code, is amended by striking “inactive duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”.
(6)
added Section 1965 of title 38, United States Code, is amended—
(A)
added in subparagraph (D) of paragraph (2), by striking “sections 316, 502, 503, 504, or 505 of title 32” and inserting “section 502(f) of title 32”;
(B)
added in paragraph (3)—
(i)
added in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking “inactive duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”; and
(ii)
added in subparagraph (B), by striking “sections 316, 502, 503, 504, or 505 of title 32” and inserting “section 502(g) of title 32”;
(C)
added in paragraph (4), by striking “inactive duty training” each place the term appears and inserting “inactive duty”;
(D)
added in each of subparagraphs (A) and (B) of paragraph (5), by striking “inactive duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”; and
(E)
added in subparagraph (C) of paragraph (5), by striking “a mobilization category in the Individual Ready Reserve, as defined in section 12304(i)(1)” and inserting “a mobilization category in the Individual Ready Reserve, as defined in section 12351(i)(2)”.
(7)
added Section 1967 of title 38, United States Code, is amended—
(A)
added in subsection (a)—
(i)
added in subparagraph (B) of paragraph (1), by striking “inactive duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”; and
(ii)
added in subparagraph (B) of paragraph (5), by striking “inactive duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”; and
(B)
added in subsection (b)—
(i)
added in each of paragraphs (1) and (2), by striking “inactive duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”; and
(ii)
added in the matter following paragraph (2), by striking “inactive duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”.
(8)
added Section 1968 of title 38, United States Code, is amended—
(A)
added in subsection (a)—
(i)
added in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking “inactive duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”; and
(ii)
added in paragraph (3)—
(I)
added by striking “inactive duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”;
(II)
added by striking “scheduled training period” and inserting “scheduled period of duty”; and
(III)
added by striking “such training” each place the term appears and inserting “such duty”; and
(B)
added in paragraph (2) of subsection (b), by striking “inactive duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”.
(9)
added Paragraph (3) of section 1969(a) of title 38, United States Code, is amended by striking “inactive duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”.
(10)
added Subsection (e) of section 1977 of title 38, United States Code, is amended by striking “inactive duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”.
(11)
added Paragraph (2) of section 2402(a) of title 38, United States Code, is amended by striking “inactive duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”.
(12)
added Paragraph (3) of section 3011(d) of title 38, United States Code, is amended by striking “which an individual in the Selected Reserve was ordered to perform under section 12301, 12302, 12304, 12306, or 12307 of title 10” and inserting “under section 12341 of title 10, which an individual in the Selected Reserve was ordered to perform duty for a purpose specified in section 12351(a), 12351(b), 12351(c), 12351(f), 12353(a), or 12353(b) of title 10 ”.
(13)
added Subparagraph (A) of section 3013(f)(2) of title 38, United States Code, is amended by striking “, 12301(a), 12301(d), 12301(g), 12302, or 12304 of title 10” and inserting “or 12341 of title 10 for a purpose specified in section 12351(a), 12351(b), 12351(c), 12351(f) or 12353(a) of such title”.
(14)
added Subsection (f) of section 3103 of title 38, United States Code, is amended by striking “, 12301(a), 12301(d), 12301(g), 12302, or 12304 of title 10” and inserting “or 12341 of title 10 for a purpose specified in section 12351(a), 12351(b), 12351(c), 12351(f) or 12353(a) of such title”.
(15)
added Paragraph (2) of section 3105(e) of title 38, United States Code, is amended by striking “, 12301(a), 12301(d), 12301(g), 12302, or 12304 of title 10” and inserting “or 12341 of title 10 for a purpose specified in section 12351(a), 12351(b), 12351(c), 12351(f) or 12353(a) of such title”.
(16)
added Clause (i) of section 3231(a)(5)(B) of title 38, United States Code, is amended by striking “, 12301(a), 12301(d), 12301(g), 12302, or 12304 of title 10” and inserting “or 12341 of title 10 for a purpose specified in section 12351(a), 12351(b), 12351(c), 12351(f) or 12353(a) of such title”.
(17)
added Subparagraph (B) of section 3301(1) of title 38, United States Code, is amended by striking “, 12301(a), 12301(d), 12301(g), 12302, or 12304 of title 10 or” and inserting “or 12341 of title 10 for a purpose specified in section 12351(a), 12351(b), 12351(c), 12351(f) or 12353(a) of such title, or under”.
(18)
added Clause (i) of section 3312(c)(2)(A) of title 38, United States Code, is amended by striking “, 12301(a), 12301(d), 12301(g), 12302, or 12304 of title 10” and inserting “or 12341 of title 10 for a purpose specified in section 12351(a), 12351(b), 12351(c), 12351(f) or 12353(a) of such title”.
(19)
added Clause (i) of section 3511(a)(2)(B) of title 38, United States Code, is amended by striking “, 12301(a), 12301(d), 12301(g), 12302, or 12304 of title 10” and inserting “or 12341 of title 10 for a purpose specified in section 12351(a), 12351(b), 12351(c), 12351(f) or 12353(a) of such title”.
(20)
added Subsection (h) of section 3512 of title 38, United States Code, is amended by striking “, 12301(a), 12301(d), 12301(g), 12302, or 12304 of title 10” and inserting “or 12341 of title 10 for a purpose specified in section 12351(a), 12351(b), 12351(c), 12351(f) or 12353(a) of such title”.
(21)
added Subparagraph (C) of section 4211(4) of title 38, United States Code, is amended by striking “section 12301(a), (d), or (g), 12302, or 12304 of title 10” and inserting “section 12341 of title 10 for a purpose specified in section 12351(a), 12351(b), 12351(c), 12351(f) or 12353(a) of such title”.
(22)
added Section 4303 of title 38, United States Code, is amended—
(A)
added in paragraph (13)—
(i)
added by striking “inactive duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”; and
(ii)
added by striking “funeral honors duty as authorized by section 12503 of title 10 or section 115 of title 32” and inserting “funeral honors functions as provided under section 12353 of title 10 or section 114 of title 32”; and
(B)
added in paragraphs (16), by striking “inactive duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”.
(23)
added Subsection (c) of section 4312 of title 38, United States Code, is amended—
(A)
added in paragraph (3), by striking “10147”; and inserting “12352”;
(B)
added in subparagraph (A) of paragraph (4), by striking “, 12301(a), 12301(g), 12302, 12304, or 12305 of title 10” and inserting “or 12341 of title 10 for a purpose specified in section 12351(a), 12351(b), 12351(c), 12351(f) or 12353(a) of such title”;
(C)
added in paragraph (4)—
(i)
added in subparagraph (C), by striking “12304 of title 10” and inserting “12341 of title 10 for the purpose specified in section 12351(c) of such title”;
(ii)
added in subparagraph (E)—
(I)
added by inserting “under section 12342 of title 10” after “Federal service”; and
(II)
added by inserting “for a purpose specified” following “National Guard”; and
(iii)
added by striking “under” each place the term appears and inserting “in”.
(24)
added Paragraph (1) of section 4316(e) of title 38, United States Code, is amended by striking “funeral honors duty as authorized by section 12503 of title 10 or section 115 of title 32” and inserting “funeral honors functions as provided under section 12353 of title 10 or section 114 of title 32”.
(j)
added Conforming amendments to title 42, united states code—
(1)
added Subparagraph (D) of section 202(t)(4) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 402(t)(4)) is amended—
(A)
added by striking “or inactive duty training” each place the term appears and inserting “or inactive duty”; and
(B)
added by striking “on inactive duty training” and inserting “performing inactive duty”.
(2)
added Subsection (l) of section 210 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 410) is amended—
(A)
added in subparagraph (B) of paragraph (1), by striking “on inactive duty training” and inserting “performing inactive duty”; and
(B)
added in paragraph (3), by striking “inactive duty training” each place the term appears and inserting “inactive duty”.
(k)
added Conforming amendments to title 50, appendix, united states code—
(1)
added Section 6 of the Military Selective Service Act (50 U.S.C. App. 456) is amended—
(A)
added in the matter following subsection (c)(2)(A)(iii), by striking “10147” and inserting “12352”; and
(B)
added in paragraph (1) of subsection (d), by striking “under section 10147” and inserting “pursuant to section 12352”.
(2)
added Paragraph (1) of section 703(a) of the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (50 U.S.C. App. 593(a)) is amended—
(A)
added by striking “sections 688, 12301(a), 12301(g), 12302, 12304, 12306, or 12307 of title 10, United States Code,” and inserting “section 688 or 12341 of title 10, United States Code, for a purpose specified in section 12306, 12307, 12351(a), 12351(b), 12351(c), or 12351(f) of such title,”; and
(B)
added by striking “12301(d)” and inserting “12341 for the purpose specified in section 12353(a)”.
(l)
added Clerical amendments—
(1)
added The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 61 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(A)
added by striking the item related to section 1204 and inserting the following:
(B)
added by striking the item relating to section 1206 and inserting the following:
(2)
added The table of sections at the beginning of subchapter II of chapter 75 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking the item related to section 1475 and inserting the following:
(3)
added The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 1005 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking the items relating to sections 10147 and 10148.
(4)
added The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 1209 of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:
(5)
added The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 1213 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking the item relating to section 12503.
(6)
added The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 1215 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking the item relating to section 12552.
(7)
added The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 1217 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking the items related to sections 12603 and 12604 and inserting the following:
(8)
added The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 1805 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking the item related to section 18505 and inserting the following:
(9)
added The table of chapters at the beginning of title 32, United States Code, is amended by striking the item relating to chapter 5 and inserting the following new item:
(10)
added The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 1 of title 32, United States Code, is amended by striking the item relating to section 115.
(11)
added The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 5 of title 32, United States Code, is amended by striking the item relating to section 502 and inserting the following:

Sec. 526 Effective date and implementation

added
(a)
added Effective date— The amendments made by this subtitle shall take effect on October 1, 2017.
(b)
added Implementation plan— Not later than March 1, 2016, the Secretary of Defense, and the Secretary of Homeland Security with respect to the Coast Guard, shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report containing a plan to implement the amendments made by this subtitle when they take effect on the date specified in subsection (a).
(c)
added Additional technical and conforming amendments— The report required by subsection (b) shall contain a draft of such legislation as may be necessary to make any additional technical and conforming changes to titles 10, 14, 32, and 37, United States Code, and other provisions of law that are required or should be made by reason of the amendments made by this subtitle.

Sec. 531 Temporary authority to develop and provide additional recruitment incentives

added
(a)
added Additional recruitment incentives authorized— The Secretary of a military department may develop and provide incentives, not otherwise authorized by law, to encourage individuals to accept an appointment as a commissioned officer, to accept an appointment as a warrant officer, or to enlist in an Armed Force under the jurisdiction of the Secretary.
(b)
added Relation to other personnel authorities— A recruitment incentive developed under subsection (a) may be provided—
(1)
added without regard to the lack of specific authority for the recruitment incentive under title 10 or 37, United States Code; and
(2)
added notwithstanding any provision of such titles, or any rule or regulation prescribed under such provision, relating to methods of providing incentives to individuals to accept appointments or enlistments in the Armed Forces, including the provision of group or individual bonuses, pay, or other incentives.
(c)
added Notice and wait requirement— The Secretary of a military department may not provide a recruitment incentive developed under subsection (a) until—
(1)
added the Secretary submits to the congressional defense committees a plan regarding provision of the recruitment incentive, which includes—
(A)
added a description of the incentive, including the purpose of the incentive and the potential recruits to be addressed by the incentive;
(B)
added a description of the provisions of titles 10 and 37, United States Code, from which the incentive would require a waiver and the rationale to support the waiver;
(C)
added a statement of the anticipated outcomes as a result of providing the incentive; and
(D)
added a description of the method to be used to evaluate the effectiveness of the incentive; and
(2)
added the expiration of the 30-day period beginning on the date on which the plan was received by Congress.
(d)
added Limitation on number of incentives— The Secretary of a military department may not provide more than three recruitment incentives under the authority of this section.
(e)
added Limitation on number of individuals receiving incentives— The number of individuals who receive one or more of the recruitment incentives provided under subsection (a) by the Secretary of a military department during a fiscal year for an Armed Force under the jurisdiction of the Secretary may not exceed 20 percent of the accession objective of that Armed Force for that fiscal year.
(f)
added Duration of developed incentive— A recruitment incentive developed under subsection (a) may be provided for not longer than a three-year period beginning on the date on which the incentive is first provided, except that the Secretary of the military department concerned may extend the period if the Secretary determines that additional time is needed to fully evaluate the effectiveness of the incentive.
(g)
added Reporting requirements— If the Secretary of a military department provides an recruitment incentive under subsection (a) for a fiscal year, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report, not later than 60 days after the end of the fiscal year, containing—
(1)
added a description of each incentive provided under subsection (a) during that fiscal year; and
(2)
added an assessment of the impact of the incentives on the recruitment of individuals for an Armed Force under the jurisdiction of the Secretary.
(h)
added Termination of authority to provide incentives— Notwithstanding subsection (f); the authority to provide recruitment incentives under this section expires on December 31, 2020.

Sec. 532 Expansion of authority to conduct pilot programs on career flexibility to enhance retention of members of the Armed Forces

added
(a)
added Repeal of limitation on eligible participants— Subsection (b) of section 533 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 10 U.S.C. prec. 701 note) is repealed.
(b)
added Repeal of limitation on number of participants— Subsection (c) of section 533 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 10 U.S.C. prec. 701 note) is repealed.
(c)
added Conforming amendments— Section 533 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 10 U.S.C. prec. 701 note) is further amended—
(1)
added by redesignating subsections (d) through (m) as subsections (b) through (k), respectively; and
(2)
added in subsections (b)(1), (d), and (f)(3)(D) (as so redesignated), by striking “subsection (e)” each place it appears and inserting “subsection (c)”.

Sec. 533 Modification of notice and wait requirements for change in ground combat exclusion policy for female members of the Armed Forces

added
(a)
added Rule for Ground Combat Personnel Policy— Section 652(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
added in paragraph (1)—
(A)
added in the first sentence, by striking “before any such change is implemented” and inserting “not less than 30 calendar days before such change is implemented”; and
(B)
added by striking the second sentence; and
(2)
added by striking paragraph (5).
(b)
added Conforming amendment— Section 652(b)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting “calendar” before “days”.

Sec. 534 Role of Secretary of Defense in development of gender-neutral occupational standards

added

added Section 524(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3361; 10 U.S.C. 113 note) is amended—

(1)
added by striking “and” at the end of paragraph (1);
(2)
added by striking the period at the end of paragraph (2) and inserting “; and”; and
(3)
added by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

added “(3) measure the combat readiness of combat units, including special operations forces.”

Sec. 535 Burdens of proof applicable to investigations and reviews related to protected communications of members of the Armed Forces and prohibited retaliatory actions

added
(a)
added Burdens of Proof— Section 1034 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
added by redesignating subsections (i) and (j) as subsections (j) and (k), respectively; and
(2)
added by inserting after subsection (h) the following new subsection (i):

added “(i) Burdens of Proof—The burdens of proof specified in section 1221(e) of title 5 shall apply in any investigation conducted by an Inspector General under subsection (c) or (d), any review performed by a board for the correction of military records under subsection (g), and any review conducted by the Secretary of Defense under subsection (h).”

(b)
added Effective date— The amendments made by subsection (a) shall take effect on the date that is 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and shall apply with respect to allegations pending or submitted under section 1034 of title 10, United States Code, on or after that date.

Sec. 536 Revision of name on military service record to reflect change in gender identity after separation from the Armed Forces

added
(a)
added Revision required— Section 1551 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
added by inserting “(a) Service under assumed name.—” before “The Secretary”; and
(2)
added by adding at the end the following new subsection:

added “(b) Change in gender identity—The Secretary concerned shall reissue a certificate of discharge or an order of acceptance of resignation in the new name of any person who, after separation from the armed forces, undergoes a change in gender identity and assumes a different name.”

(b)
added Clerical amendments—
(1)
added Section heading— The heading of section 1551 of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:

added “1551. Correction of name after separation from service”

(2)
added Table of sections— The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 79 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking the item relating to section 1551 and inserting the following new item:

Sec. 537 Establishment of breastfeeding policy for the Department of the Army

added

added The Secretary of the Army shall develop a comprehensive policy regarding breastfeeding by female members of the Army who are breastfeeding. At a minimum, the policy shall address the following:

(1)
added The provision of a designated room or area that will provide the member with adequate privacy and cleanliness and that includes an electrical outlet to facilitate the use of a breast pump. Restrooms should not be considered an appropriate location.
(2)
added An allowance for appropriate breaks, when practicable, to permit the member to breastfeed or utilize a breast pump.

Sec. 538 Sense of the House of Representatives regarding Secretary of Defense review of section 504 of title 10, United States Code, regarding enlisting certain aliens in the Armed Forces

added

added It is the sense of the House of Representatives that the Secretary of Defense should review section 504 of title 10, United States Code, for the purpose of making a determination and authorization pursuant to subsection (b)(2) of such section regarding the enlistment in the Armed Forces of an alien who possesses an employment authorization document issued under the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program of the Department of Homeland Security established pursuant to the memorandum of the Secretary of Homeland Security dated June 15, 2012.

Sec. 541 Improvements to Special Victims’ Counsel program

added
(a)
added Qualifications and designation— Section 1044e(d) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
added by inserting “(1)” before “An individual”;
(2)
added by designating existing paragraphs (1) and (2) as subparagraphs (A) and (B), respectively; and
(3)
added by adding at the end the following new paragraphs:

added “(2) The Secretary of Defense shall direct the Secretary of each military department to implement additional selection criteria requiring that judge advocates have adequate criminal justice experience before they are assigned as Special Victims’ Counsel.

added “(3) The Secretary of Defense shall develop a policy to standardize both the time frame within which Special Victims’ Counsel receive training and the training that each Special Victims’ Counsel receives.”

(b)
added Administrative Responsibility— Section 1044e(e) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraphs

added “(3) The Secretary of Defense shall establish appropriate program performance measures and standards, including evaluating, monitoring, and reporting on the Special Victims’ Counsel programs, establishing guiding principles for the military departments, and ensuring centralized, standardized assessment of program effectiveness and client satisfaction.

added “(4) The Secretary of Defense shall direct the Secretary of each military department to perform regular evaluations to ensure that Special Victims’ Counsel are assigned to locations that maximize the opportunity for face-to-face interactions between counsel and clients and to develop effective means by which a Special Victims’ Counsel may communicate with a client when face-to-face communication is not feasible.”

Sec. 542 Department of Defense civilian employee access to Special Victims’ Counsel

added

added Section 1044e(a)(2) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding the following new subparagraph:

added “(C) A civilian employee of the Department of Defense who is not eligible for military legal assistance under section 1044(a)(7) of this title, but who is the victim of an alleged sex-related offense, and the Secretary of Defense or the Secretary of the military department concerned waives the condition in such section for the purposes of offering Special Victims’ Counsel services to the employee.”

Sec. 543 Access to Special Victims’ Counsel for former dependents of members and former members of the Armed Forces

added

added Section 1044e(a)(2) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after subparagraph (C), as added by section 542, the following new subparagraph:

added “(D) An individual who is a former dependent of a member or former member of the armed forces described in subparagraph (A) or (B), if the alleged sex-related offense—

added “(i) was perpetrated by a person who is, or is reasonably believed to be, a person subject to chapter 47 of this title (the Uniform Code of Military Justice) pursuant to section 802 of this title (article 2(a) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice); and

added “(ii) occurred while the individual was a dependent of the member or former member.”

Sec. 544 Representation and assistance from Special Victims’ Counsel in retaliatory proceedings

added

added Section 1044e(b) of title 10, United States Code is amended—

(1)
added by redesignating paragraph (9) as paragraph (10); and
(2)
added by inserting after paragraph (8) the following new paragraph:

added “(9) Legal representation and assistance in any action or proceeding that, in the judgment of the Special Victims’ Counsel, may have been undertaken in retaliation for the victim’s report of an alleged sex-related offense or for the victim’s involvement in related military justice proceedings.”

Sec. 545 Timely notification to victims of sex-related offenses of the availability of assistance from Special Victims’ Counsel

added Section 1044e(f)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new sentence: “Notice of the availability of a Special Victims’ Counsel shall be provided to the victim before any of the personnel identified or designated by the Secretary concerned under this paragraph interviews, or requests any statement from, the victim regarding the alleged sex-related offense.”.

(a)
removed Clarification of requirement for 180 continuous days of active duty service— Subparagraph (A) of section 1142(a)(4) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting “continuous” after “first 180”.
(b)
removed Exclusion of training from periods of active duty— Such section is further amended by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:

removed “(C) For purposes of subparagraph (A), the term “active duty” does not include full-time training duty, annual training duty, and attendance, while in the active military service, at a school designated as a service school by law or by the Secretary of the military department concerned.”

Sec. 546 Participation by victim in punitive proceedings and access to records

added
(a)
added Victim submission of matters for consideration by commanding officer in nonjudicial punishment proceedings— Section 815 of title 10, United States Code (article 15 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice) is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

added “(h) Victim Participation in Nonjudicial Punishment Proceedings

added “(1) For any offense that involves a victim, in any case in which a commanding officer or other person authorized to act under this section (article) is considering imposing a punishment authorized in subsection (b) on a member of the command, mitigation of a punishment under subsection (d), or an appeal of a punishment under subsection (e), the victim shall be provided an opportunity to submit written matters for consideration by the person authorized to act under this section (article).

added “(2) The victim shall be notified of a commander’s decision to consider a punishment, consider mitigating a punishment, or consider an appeal under this section (article). The victim shall also be notified of the opportunity to submit matters for consideration under this subsection.

added “(3) The submission of matters under paragraph (1) shall be made within the three-day period the accused is given to seek legal counsel.

added “(4) A victim may waive the right under this subsection to make a submission to the commanding officer or other person taking action under this section (article). Such a waiver shall be made in writing and may not be revoked.

added “(5) In the case of proceedings under this section (article) for an offense that involved a victim, a copy of all prepared records of the proceedings, including a written copy of any admonition or reprimand, shall be given to the victim without charge and as soon as a decision is finalized. The victim shall be notified of the opportunity to receive the records of the proceedings under this subsection.

added “(6) In this section, the term “victim” means a person who has suffered a direct physical, emotional, or pecuniary loss as a result of a commission of an offense under this chapter (the Uniform Code of Military Justice) and on which a commanding officer or other person authorized to take action under this section (article) is taking action under this section (article).

added “(7) This subsection applies only with respect to the Department of Defense.”

(b)
added Victim submission of matters for consideration in administrative separation proceedings— Chapter 59 of title 10, United States Code is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

added “1159. Victim participation in administrative separation proceedings

added “(a)

added “(1) Under regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of the military department concerned shall ensure that, when administrative separation is considered for a member of the of the Army, Navy, Air Force, or Marine Corps in connection to an offense that involved a victim, the person or board authorized to provide recommendations and act on recommendations for retention or separation under this chapter must consider the impact of the offense on the victim and the views of the victim on retention.

added “(2) Such regulations shall ensure that victims are provided an opportunity to submit written matters for consideration, including, but not limited to, written testimony, to the person or board authorized to provide recommendations and act on recommendations for administrative separation proceedings under this chapter. A victim may waive the right under this section to make a submission.

added “(b) Under regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of the military department concerned shall ensure that a copy of all prepared records of the proceedings, including, but not limited to, the decision on retention or separation and any written explanation thereof, shall be given to the victim without charge and as soon as a decision is finalized. The victim shall be notified of the opportunity to receive the records of the proceedings under this subsection.

added “(c) In this section, the term “victim” means a person who has suffered a direct physical, emotional, or pecuniary loss as a result of a commission of an offense under chapter 47 of this title (the Uniform Code of Military Justice) and on which the armed forces are considering administrative separation or retention.”

(c)
added Victim submission of matters for consideration in administrative separation proceedings of officers— Section 1185 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsections:

added “(c) Under regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Defense, when a board of inquiry is held under this section for an officer of the Army, Navy, Air Force, or Marine Corps in connection with an offense that involved a victim, the board of inquiry—

added “(1) shall consider the impact of the offense on the victim and the views of the victim on retention;

added “(2) shall provide victims an opportunity to submit matters for consideration, including in-person testimony, although a victim may waive the right under this subsection to make a submission; and

added “(3) shall provide victims with all prepared records of the proceedings, including the decision on retention or separation and any written explanation thereof.

added “(d) When a record is withheld under subsection (a)(4), the victim shall, to the extent that the interest of national security permits, be furnished a summary of the record so withheld.

added “(e) In this section, the term “victim” means a person who has suffered a direct physical, emotional, or pecuniary loss as a result of a commission of an offense under chapter 47 of this title (the Uniform Code of Military Justice) and on which an officer is required to show cause for retention on active duty under section 1181 of this title.””

Sec. 547 Victim access to report of results of preliminary hearing under Article 32 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice

added

added Section 832(c) of title 10, United States Code (article 32(c) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended—

(1)
added by inserting “(1)” after “Report of Results.—”; and
(2)
added by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

added “(2) The report prepared under paragraph (1) shall be provided to the victim, without charge, at the same time as the report is delivered to the accused.”

Sec. 548 Minimum confinement period required for conviction of certain sex-related offenses committed by members of the Armed Forces

added
(a)
added Mandatory Punishments— Section 856(b)(1) of title 10, United States Code (article 56(b)(1) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice) is amended by striking “at a minimum” and all that follows through the period at the end of the paragraph and inserting the following:

added “(A) dismissal or dishonorable discharge; and

added “(B) confinement for two years.”

(b)
added Effective date— Subparagraph (B) of paragraph (1) of section 856(b) of title 10, United States Code (article 56(b) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), as added by subsection (a), shall apply to offenses specified in paragraph (2) of such section committed on or after the date that is 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Sec. 549 Strategy to prevent retaliation against members of the Armed Forces who report or intervene on behalf of the victim in instances of sexual assault

added
(a)
added Strategy required— The Secretary of Defense shall establish a comprehensive strategy to prevent retaliation carried out by members of the Armed Forces against other members who report or otherwise intervene on behalf of the victim in instances of sexual assault.
(b)
added Elements— The comprehensive strategy required by subsection (a) shall include, at a minimum, the following:
(1)
added Bystander intervention programs emphasizing the importance of guarding against such retaliation.
(2)
added Department of Defense and military department policies and requirements to ensure protection from retaliation against victims of sexual assault and members who intervene on behalf of a victim.
(3)
added Additional training for commanders on methods and procedures to combat attitudes and beliefs that lead to retaliation acts by members.
(c)
added Retaliation described— For purposes of this section, the term “retaliation” has the meaning given that term in the regulations issued by the Secretary of Defense pursuant to section 1709(b)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 10 U.S.C. 113 note) and shall include ostracism and other acts of maltreatment designated by the Secretary pursuant to subparagraph (B) of such section.
(d)
added Briefing— Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall brief the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives on the comprehensive strategy required by subsection (a).

Sec. 550 Improved Department of Defense prevention and response to sexual assaults in which the victim is a male member of the Armed Forces

added
(a)
added Plan to improve prevention and response— The Secretary of Defense, in collaboration with the Secretaries of the military departments, shall develop a plan to improve Department of Defense prevention and response to sexual assaults in which the victim is a male member of the Armed Forces.
(b)
added Elements— The plan required by subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1)
added Sexual assault prevention and response training to more comprehensively and directly address the incidence of male members of the Armed Forces who are sexually assaulted and how certain behavior and activities, such as hazing, can constitute a sexual assault.
(2)
added Methods to evaluate the extent to which differences exist in the medical and mental health-care needs of male and female sexual assault victims, and the care regimen, if any, that will best meet those needs.
(3)
added Data-driven decision making to improve male-victim sexual assault prevention and response program efforts.
(4)
added Goals with associated metrics to drive the changes needed to address sexual assaults of male members of the Armed Forces.
(5)
added Information about the sexual victimization of males in communications to members that are used to raise awareness of sexual assault and efforts to prevent and respond to it.
(6)
added Guidance for the department’s medical and mental health providers, and other personnel as appropriate, based on the results of the evaluation described in paragraph (2), that delineates these gender-specific distinctions and the care regimen that is recommended to most effectively meet those needs.

Sec. 551 Sexual assault prevention and response training for administrators and instructors of the Junior and Senior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps

added
(a)
added Training and education required— The Secretary of a military department shall ensure that the commander of each unit of the Junior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps or Senior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps and all Professors of Military Science, senior military instructors, and civilian employees detailed, assigned, or employed as administrators and instructors of the Reserve Officers’ Training Corps receive regular sexual assault prevention and response training and education.
(b)
added Additional information— The Secretary of a military department shall ensure that information regarding the availability of legal assistance and the sexual assault prevention and response program is made available to the Reserve Officers’ Training Corps personnel referred to in subsection (a).

Sec. 552 Modification of Manual for Courts-Martial to require consistent preparation of the full record of trial

added

added Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, Rule 1103 of the Manual for Courts-Martial (relating to preparation of the record of trial) shall be amended to ensure that, for any general or special court-martial proceeding under chapter 47 of title 10, United States Code (the Uniform Code of Military Justice), trial counsel shall prepare a complete record of trial, consisting of each available content item, matter, or attachment specified in the Rule. No content item, matter, or attachment may be exempted based on the outcome of the court-martial proceeding.

Sec. 553 Inclusion of additional information in annual reports regarding Department of Defense sexual assault prevention and response

added
(a)
added Role of Department of Defense Family Advocacy Program— Section 1631(b) of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 10 U.S.C. 1561 note) is amended—
(1)
added in paragraph (1), by inserting after “by the report,” the following: “including all cases under the purview of the Department of Defense Family Advocacy Program pursuant to section 1058 of title 10, United States Code,”;
(2)
added in paragraph (2), by inserting after “by the report,” the following: “including all cases under the purview of the Department of Defense Family Advocacy Program pursuant to such section 1058,”; and
(3)
added in paragraph (3), by inserting after “substantiated case,” the following: “including each case under the purview of the Department of Defense Family Advocacy Program pursuant to such section 1058,”.
(b)
added Inclusion of information regarding sexual harassment involving members of the Armed Forces—
(1)
added In general— Section 1631(b) of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 10 U.S.C. 1561 note) is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

added “(12) Information and data collected on sexual harassment involving members of the Armed Forces during the year covered by the report. The information shall include the number of substantiated and unsubstantiated cases, a synopsis of each such substantiated case, and the action taken in each substantiated case, including the type of disciplinary or administrative sanction imposed, if any, such as conviction and sentence by court-martial, imposition of non-judicial punishment under section 815 of title 10, United States Code (article 15 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), or administrative separation or other type administrative action imposed.”

(2)
added Secretary of Defense assessment of information in reports to Congress— Section 1631(d)(2) of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 10 U.S.C. 1561 note) is amended by striking “subsection (b)(11)” and inserting “paragraphs (11) and (12) of subsection (b)”.
(c)
added Retaliation against alleged victims of sexual assault— Section 1631(b) of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 10 U.S.C. 1561 note) is amended by inserting after paragraph (12), as added by subsection (b), the following new paragraph:

added “(13)

added “(A) Information and data collected on reports of retaliation against alleged victims of sexual assault, including the number of substantiated and unsubstantiated cases.

added “(B) In this paragraph, the term “retaliation” has the meaning given such term by the Secretary of Defense as required by section 1709(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 962; 10 U.S.C. 113 note).”

(d)
added Application of amendments— The amendments made by this section shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act and apply beginning with the reports required to be submitted by March 1, 2016, under section 1631 of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 10 U.S.C. 1561 note).

Sec. 554 Retention of case notes in investigations of sex-related offenses involving members of the Army, Navy, Air Force, or Marine Corps

added
(a)
added Retention of all investigative records required— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall update Department of Defense records retention policies to ensure that, for all investigations relating to an alleged sex-related offense (as defined in section 1044e(g) of title 10, United States Code) involving a member of the Army, Navy, Air Force, or Marine Corps, all elements of the case file shall be retained as part of the investigative records retained in accordance with section 3500 of title 18, United States Code, and section 586 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 10 U.S.C. 1561 note).
(b)
added Elements— In updating records retention policies as required by subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall address, at a minimum, the following matters:
(1)
added The elements of the case file to be retained must include, at a minimum, the case activity record, case review record, investigative plans, and all case notes made by an investigating agent or agents.
(2)
added All investigative records must be retained for no less than 50 years.
(3)
added No element of the case file may be destroyed until the expiration of the time that investigative records must be kept.
(4)
added Records may be stored digitally or in hard copy, in accordance with existing law or regulations or additionally prescribed policy considered necessary by the Secretary of the military department concerned.
(c)
added Consistent education and policy— The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that existing policy, education, and training are updated to reflect policy changes in accordance with subsection (a).
(d)
added Uniform application to military departments— The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that, to the maximum extent practicable, the policy developed under subsections (a) is implemented uniformly by the military departments.

Sec. 555 Additional guidance regarding release of mental health records of Department of Defense medical treatment facilities in cases involving any sex-related offense

added

added The Secretary of Defense shall establish and issue uniform guidance to ensure that, with respect to any case involving any sex-related offense, mental health records of the alleged victim of the sex-related offense and communications related to such mental health records that are maintained by a Department of Defense medical treatment facility are neither sought by investigators or military justice practitioners nor acknowledged or released by the medical treatment facility unless and until the production of such mental health records or communications has been ordered by a military judge or a hearing officer described in section 832(b) of title 10, United States Code (article 32 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice).

Sec. 556 Public availability of records of certain proceedings under the Uniform Code of Military Justice

added
(a)
added Public availability required— The Secretary of Defense shall make available, electronically through a website of the Department of Defense, to the public all information specified in subsection (c) (subject to such exceptions as may apply under subsection (d)) for all of the proceedings under the Uniform Code of Military Justice specified in subsection (b).
(b)
added Covered proceedings— The system established under subsection (a) shall contain information for the following proceedings under chapter 47 of title 10, United States Code (the Uniform Code of Military Justice):
(1)
added Special and general courts-martial under subchapter IV of such chapter.
(2)
added Actions by the convening authority under section 860 of such title (article 60).
(3)
added Reviews conducted by the Courts of Criminal Appeals under section 866 of such title (article 66).
(4)
added Reviews conducted by the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces under section 867 of such title (article 67).
(c)
added Covered information— Except as provided in subsection (d), the following information, either directly or through links to another website, shall be made available through the system established under subsection (a) as soon as the information is reasonably available:
(1)
added The location of the proceeding and contact information for each base and court jurisdiction, including, when applicable, the name and telephone number of the legal office with jurisdiction over the proceeding.
(2)
added The calendar of proceedings.
(3)
added The docket information for the proceeding.
(4)
added Any motions and documents filed in connection with the proceeding.
(5)
added The substance of all written rulings and opinions issued in the proceeding, in a text-searchable format.
(6)
added The authenticated record of the proceeding.
(7)
added Any other information related to the proceeding that the Secretary of Defense determines to be useful to the public.
(d)
added Protection of privacy and security—
(1)
added Revision of manual for courts-martial— The Manual for Courts-Martial shall be updated to address privacy and security concerns related to the electronic filing of documents and the public availability of documents made available through the system established under subsection (a). Such guidance must consider, at minimum, the protection of privacy of individuals named in records and status of records under section 552 of title 5, United States Code (commonly referred to as the Freedom of Information Act), section 552a of such title (commonly referred to as the Privacy Act), restricted reporting cases, and laws and guidance related to privilege. Such guidance shall provide to the extent practicable for uniform treatment of privacy and security issues throughout each proceeding specified in subsection (b) and across all branches of the Armed Forces. To the extent that such guidance provide for the redaction of certain categories of information to address privacy and security concerns, such guidance shall provide that a party that wishes to file an otherwise proper document containing such information may file an unredacted document under seal, which shall be retained as part of the proceeding as part of the record, and which, at the discretion of the court and subject to any applicable guidance issued in the Manual for Courts Martial, shall be either in lieu of, or in addition, to, a redacted copy in the public file.
(2)
added Interim guidance— The Secretary of Defense may issue interim guidance, and interpretive statements relating to the application of such guidance, which conform to the requirements of paragraph (1) and which shall cease to have effect upon the effective date of the guidance required under paragraph (1). Pending issuance of the guidance required under paragraph (1), any guidance or order of any court, or of the Secretary of Defense, providing for the redaction of certain categories of information in order to address privacy and security concerns arising from electronic filing shall comply with, and be construed in conformity with, the last sentence of paragraph (1).
(e)
added Electronic filings—
(1)
added In general— Except as provided in subsection (d) or under paragraph (2), each court-martial and the courts specified in paragraphs (4) and (5) of subsection (b) shall make each document that is filed electronically with the court available to the public through a website of the Department of Defense. To the extent practicable, the court shall convert any document that is filed in paper form to electronic form. To the extent such conversions are made, all such electronic versions of the document shall be made available to the public.
(2)
added Exception— Paragraph (1) does not apply to any filed document that is not otherwise available to the public, such as a document filed under seal.
(f)
added Maintenance of data— The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that the information in the system established under subsection (a) is updated regularly and kept reasonably current. Electronic files and docket information for a proceeding closed for more than five years are not required to be made available through the system, except all written opinions with a date of issuance after the date specified in subsection (h) shall remain available to the public through the system.
(g)
added Authorization to charge fees— The Secretary of Defense may prescribe reasonable fees for access to information made available through the system established under subsection (a). These fees may distinguish between classes of persons, and shall provide for exempting persons or classes of persons from the fees, in order to avoid unreasonable burdens and to promote public access to such information. The Secretary of Defense shall prescribe a schedule of reasonable fees for electronic access to information which the Secretary is required to maintain and make available to the public. The Secretary of Defense shall transmit each schedule of fees prescribed under this subsection to the Congress at least 30 days before the schedule of fees becomes effective.
(h)
added Effective date and applicability— The information system required by this section shall be available to the public no later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act and apply to all proceedings under the Uniform Code of Military Justice specified in subsection (b) that have begun or been completed since the date of enactment of this Act.

Sec. 557 Revision of Department of Defense Directive-type Memorandum 15-003, relating to Registered Sex Offender Identification, Notification, and Monitoring in the Department of Defense

added
(a)
added Revision required; database— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall revise Department of Defense Directive-type Memorandum 15-003, relating to Registered Sex Offender Identification, Notification, and Monitoring in the Department of Defense, and all subsequent directive and guidance to ensure the following:
(1)
added All provisions of the Department of Defense Directive-type Memorandum 15-003 shall go into effect not later than 180 days after its revision under this section.
(2)
added The Department of Defense shall create a database (in this section referred to as the “database”) to track the following sex offenders:
(A)
added Sex offenders who are active-duty or reserve component members of the Army, Navy, Air Force, or Marine Corps or civilian employees of the Department of Defense.
(B)
added Former active-duty or reserve component members of the Army, Navy, Air Force, or Marine Corps who have been convicted of a sex offense under chapter 47 of title 10, United States Code (the Uniform Code of Military Justice), if not already covered by subparagraph (A).
(3)
added For each individual identified in the database pursuant to paragraph (2)(A), the database shall contain the following information:
(A)
added The name of the sex offender (including any alias used by the individual).
(B)
added The Social Security number of the sex offender.
(C)
added A physical description of the sex offender.
(D)
added A current photograph of the sex offender.
(E)
added The address of each residence at which the sex offender resides.
(F)
added The name and address of any place where the sex offender is an employee, including the sex offender’s current assignment, duty station, physical place of work, and deployment status, if applicable.
(G)
added The name and address of any place where the sex offender is a student.
(H)
added The text of the provision of law defining the criminal offense for which the sex offender is registered in accordance with the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006 (Public Law 109–248; 120 Stat. 587) or other Federal, State, or local laws.
(I)
added The criminal history of the sex offender, including the date of all arrests and convictions; the status of parole, probation, or supervised release; registration status in accordance with the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006 (Public Law 109–248; 120 Stat. 587) or other applicable Federal, State, or local laws; and the existence of any outstanding arrest warrants for the sex offender.
(J)
added Any other information required by Secretary of Defense.
(4)
added For each individual identified in the database pursuant to paragraph (2)(B), the database shall contain the following information:
(A)
added The name of the sex offender (including any alias used by the individual).
(B)
added The Social Security number of the sex offender.
(C)
added A physical description of the sex offender.
(D)
added A current photograph of the sex offender.
(E)
added The last known address of each residence of the sex offender and, if released or about to be released from a military correctional facility, the intended address of residence of the sex offender.
(F)
added The text of the provision of law defining the criminal offense for which the sex offender is registered in accordance with the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006 (Public Law 109–248; 120 Stat. 587) or other Federal, State, or local laws.
(G)
added The criminal history of the sex offender, including the date of all arrests and convictions; the status of parole, probation, or supervised release; registration status in accordance with the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006 (Public Law 109–248; 120 Stat. 587) or other Federal, State, or local laws; and the existence of any outstanding arrest warrants for the sex offender.
(H)
added Any other information required by Secretary of Defense.
(5)
added The database shall be available to local, State, and Federal law enforcement agencies. In the case of each individual identified in the database pursuant to paragraph (2)(B) who fails to register with a sex offender registry in accordance with the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006 (Public Law 109–248; 120 Stat. 587) or other applicable Federal, State, or local laws, the Secretary of Defense shall make available on the Internet, in a manner that is readily accessible to the public, the following information:
(A)
added The name of the sex offender (including any alias used by the individual).
(B)
added A physical description of the sex offender.
(C)
added A most recent photograph of the sex offender.
(D)
added The last known address of each residence of the sex offender and, if applicable, the intended address of residence of the sex offender.
(E)
added The criminal offense for which the sex offender is registered in accordance with the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006 (Public Law 109–248; 120 Stat. 587) or other applicable Federal, State, or local laws.
(F)
added Notification that the sex offender has failed to register on a sex offender registry in accordance with Federal, State, or local laws.
(G)
added Any other information required by Secretary of Defense, in accordance with existing laws and regulations.
(b)
added Reporting requirements— Section 1631(b) of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 10 U.S.C. 1561 note) is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

added “(12) The number of individuals released from active-duty as a members of the Army, Navy, Air Force, or Marine Corps as a result of a conviction of a sex-related offense, including the number who have registered with a local sex offender registry in accordance with local, State, and Federal law and the number who have failed to register with a local sex offender registry in accordance with local, State, and Federal law.”

(c)
added Definitions— In this section:
(1)
added In this section, the term “sex offender” means an individual who is required to be placed on a sexual offender registry by Federal, State, or local laws, including the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006 (Public Law 109–248; 120 Stat. 587).
(2)
added In this section, the term “sex offense” means an offense in a category of conduct punishable under the Uniform Code of Military Justice specified by the Secretary of Defense pursuant to section 115(a)(8)(C)(i) of Public Law 105–119 (10 U.S.C. 951 note).

Sec. 558 Improved implementation of changes to Uniform Code of Military Justice

added

added The Secretary of Defense shall examine the Department of Defense and interagency review process for implementing statutory changes to the Uniform Code of Military Justice for the purpose of developing options for streamlining such process. The Secretary shall adopt procedures to ensure that legal guidance is published at the same time as statutory changes to the Uniform Code of Military Justice are implemented.

Sec. 561 Availability of preseparation counseling for members of the Armed Forces discharged or released after limited active duty

added

added Section 1142(a)(4) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—

(1)
added in subparagraph (A), by striking “that member's first 180 days of active duty” and inserting “the first 180 continuous days of active duty of the member”; and
(2)
added by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:

added “(C) For purposes of calculating the days of active duty of a member under subparagraph (A), the Secretary concerned shall exclude any day on which—

added “(i) the member performed full-time training duty or annual training duty; and

added “(ii) the member attended, while in the active military service, a school designated as a service school by law or by the Secretary concerned.”

Sec. 562 Availability of additional training opportunities under Transition Assistance Program

added

added Section 1144 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

added “(f) Additional training opportunities

added “(1) As part of the program carried out under this section, the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of the Department in which the Coast Guard is operating, when the Coast Guard is not operating within the Department of the Navy, shall permit a member of the armed forces eligible for assistance under the program to elect to receive additional training in any of the following subjects:

added “(A) Preparation for higher education or training.

added “(B) Preparation for career or technical training.

added “(C) Preparation for entrepreneurship.

added “(D) Other training options determined by the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of the Department in which the Coast Guard is operating, when the Coast Guard is not operating within the Department of the Navy.

added “(2) The Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of the Department in which the Coast Guard is operating, when the Coast Guard is not operating within the Department of the Navy, shall ensure that a member of the armed forces who elects to receive additional training in subjects available under paragraph (1) is able to receive the training.”

Sec. 563 Enhancements to Yellow Ribbon Reintegration Program

added
(a)
added Scope and purpose— Section 582(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 10 U.S.C. 10101 note) is amended by striking “combat veteran”.
(b)
added Eligibility—
(1)
added Definition— Section 582 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 10 U.S.C. 10101 note) is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

added “(l) Eligible individuals defined—For the purposes of this section, the term “eligible individual” means a member of a reserve component, a member of their family, or a designated representative who the Secretary of Defense determines to be eligible for the Yellow Ribbon Reintegration Program.”

(2)
added Conforming amendments— Section 582 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 10 U.S.C. 10101 note) is amended—
(A)
added in subsection (a), by striking “National Guard and Reserve members and their families” and inserting “eligible individuals”;
(B)
added in subsection (b), by striking “members of the reserve components of the Armed Forces, their families,” and inserting “eligible individuals”;
(C)
added in subsection (d)(2)(C), by striking “members of the Armed Forces and their families” and inserting “eligible individuals”;
(D)
added in subsection (h), in the matter preceding paragraph (1)—
(i)
added by striking “members of the Armed Forces and their family members” and inserting “eligible individuals”; and
(ii)
added by striking “such members and their family members” and inserting “such eligible individuals”;
(E)
added in subsection (j), by striking “members of the Armed Forces and their families” and inserting “eligible individuals”; and
(F)
added in subsection (k), by striking “individual members of the Armed Forces and their families” and inserting “eligible individuals”.
(c)
added Office for reintegration programs— Section 582(d) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 10 U.S.C. 10101 note) is amended—
(1)
added in subparagraph (1)(B), by striking “substance abuse and mental health treatment services” and inserting “substance abuse, mental health treatment, and other quality of life services”; and
(2)
added by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

added “(3) Grants—The Office for Reintegration Programs may make grants to conduct data collection, trend analysis, and curriculum development and to prepare reports in support of activities under this section.”

(d)
added Operation of program—
(1)
added Enhanced flexibility— Subsection (g) of section 582 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 10 U.S.C. 10101 note) is amended to read as follows:

added “(g) Operation of program

added “(1) In general—The Office for Reintegration Programs shall assist State National Guard and Reserve organizations with the development and provision of information, events, and activities to support the health and well-being of eligible individuals before, during, and after periods of activation, mobilization, or deployment.

added “(2) Focus of information, events, and activities

added “(A) Before activation, mobilization, or deployment—Before a period of activation, mobilization, or deployment, the information, events, and activities described in paragraph (1) should focus on preparing eligible individuals and affected communities for the rigors of activation, mobilization, and deployment.

added “(B) During activation, mobilization, or deployment—During such a period, the information, events, and activities described in paragraph (1) should focus on—

added “(i) helping eligible individuals cope with the challenges and stress associated with such period;

added “(ii) decreasing the isolation of eligible individuals during such period; and

added “(iii) preparing eligible individuals for the challenges associated with reintegration.

added “(C) After activation, mobilization, or deployment—After such a period, but no earlier than 30 days after demobilization, the information, events, and activities described in paragraph (1) should focus on—

added “(i) reconnecting the member with their families, friends, and communities;

added “(ii) providing information on employment opportunities;

added “(iii) helping eligible individuals deal with the challenges of reintegration;

added “(iv) ensuring that eligible individuals understand what benefits they are entitled to and what resources are available to help them overcome the challenges of reintegration; and

added “(v) providing a forum for addressing negative behaviors related to operational stress and reintegration.

added “(3) Member pay—Members shall receive appropriate pay for days spent attending such events and activities.

added “(4) Minimum number of events and activities—The State National Guard and Reserve Organizations shall provide to eligible individuals—

added “(A) one event or activity before a period of activation, mobilization, or deployment;

added “(B) one event or activity during a period of activation, mobilization, or deployment; and

added “(C) two events or activities after a period of activation, mobilization, or deployment.”

(2)
added Conforming amendments— Section 582 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 10 U.S.C. 10101 note) is amended—
(A)
added in subsection (a), by striking “throughout the entire deployment cycle”;
(B)
added in subsection (b)—
(i)
added by striking “well-being through the 4 phases” through the end of the subsection and inserting “well-being.”;
(ii)
added in the heading, by striking “; Deployment Cycle”;
(C)
added in subsection (d)(2)(C), by striking “throughout the deployment cycle described in subsection (g)”; and
(D)
added in the heading of subsection (f), by striking “State Deployment Cycle”.
(e)
added Additional permitted outreach service— Section 582(h) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 10 U.S.C. 10101 note) is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

added “(16) Stress management and positive coping skills.”

(f)
added Support of department-wide suicide prevention efforts— Section 582 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 10 U.S.C. 10101 note) is amended by inserting after subsection (h) the following new subsection:

added “(i) Support of suicide prevention efforts—The Office for Reintegration Programs shall assist the Defense Suicide Prevention Office and the Defense Centers of Excellence for Psychological Health and Traumatic Brain Injury to collect and analyze information, suggestions, and best practices from State National Guard and Reserve organizations with suicide prevention and community response programs.”

(g)
added Name change— Section 582(d)(1)(B) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 10 U.S.C. 10101 note) is amended by striking “Substance Abuse and the Mental Health Services Administration” and inserting “Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration”.

Sec. 564 Appointments to military service academies from nominations made by Delegates in Congress from the Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands

added
(a)
added United States Military Academy— Section 4342(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
added in paragraph (6), by striking “Three” and inserting “Four”;
(2)
added in paragraph (8), by striking “Three” and inserting “Four”;
(3)
added in paragraph (9), by striking “Two” and inserting “Three”; and
(4)
added in paragraph (10), by striking “Two” and inserting “Three”.
(b)
added United States Naval Academy— Section 6954(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
added in paragraph (6), by striking “Three” and inserting “Four”;
(2)
added in paragraph (8), by striking “Three” and inserting “Four”;
(3)
added in paragraph (9), by striking “Two” and inserting “Three”; and
(4)
added in paragraph (10), by striking “Two” and inserting “Three”.
(c)
added United States Air Force Academy— Section 9342(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
added in paragraph (6), by striking “Three” and inserting “Four”;
(2)
added in paragraph (8), by striking “Three” and inserting “Four”;
(3)
added in paragraph (9), by striking “Two” and inserting “Three”; and
(4)
added in paragraph (10), by striking “Two” and inserting “Three”.
(d)
added Effective Date— The amendments made by this section shall apply with respect to the nomination of candidates for appointment to the United States Military Academy, the United States Naval Academy, and the United States Air Force Academy for classes entering these military service academies after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Sec. 565 Recognition of additional involuntary mobilization duty authorities exempt from five-year limit on reemployment rights of persons who serve in the uniformed services

added

added Section 4312(c)(4)(A) of title 38, United States Code, is amended by inserting after “12304,” the following: “12304a, 12304b,”.

Sec. 566 Job Training and Post-Service Placement Executive Committee

added

added Section 320 of title 38, United States Code, is amended—

(1)
added in subsection (b)(2), by inserting “a subordinate Job Training and Post-Service Placement Executive Committee,” before “and such other committees”;
(2)
added by adding at the end the following new subsection:

added “(e) Job Training and Post-Service Placement Executive Committee—The Job Training and Post-Service Placement Executive Committee described in subsection (b)(2) shall—

added “(1) review existing policies, procedures, and practices of the Departments (including the military departments) with respect to job training and post-service placement programs; and

added “(2) identify changes to such policies, procedures, and practices to improve job training and post-service placement.”

(3)
added in subsection (d)(2), by inserting “, including with respect to job training and post-service placement” before the period at the end.

Sec. 567 Direct employment pilot program for members of the National Guard and Reserve

added
(a)
added Program authority— The Secretary of Defense may carry out a pilot program to enhance the efforts of the Department of Defense to provide job placement assistance and related employment services directly to members in the National Guard and Reserves.
(b)
added Administration— The pilot program shall be offered to, and administered by, the adjutants general appointed under section 314 of title 32, United States Code.
(c)
added Cost-sharing requirement— As a condition on the provision of funds under this section to a State to support the operation of the pilot program in the State, the State must agree to contribute an amount, derived from non-Federal sources, equal to at least 30 percent of the funds provided by the Secretary of Defense under this section.
(d)
added Direct Employment Program Model— The pilot program should follow a job placement program model that focuses on working one-on-one with a member of a reserve component to cost-effectively provide job placement services, including services such as identifying unemployed and under employed members, job matching services, resume editing, interview preparation, and post-employment follow up. Development of the pilot program should be informed by State direct employment programs for members of the reserve components, such as the programs conducted in California and South Carolina.
(e)
added Evaluation— The Secretary of Defense shall develop outcome measurements to evaluate the success of the pilot program.
(f)
added Reporting requirements—
(1)
added Report Required— Not later than March 1, 2019, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report describing the results of the pilot program. The Secretary shall prepare the report in coordination with the Chief of the National Guard Bureau.
(2)
added Elements of Report— A report under paragraph (1) shall include the following:
(A)
added A description and assessment of the effectiveness and achievements of the pilot program, including the number of members of the reserve components hired and the cost-per-placement of participating members.
(B)
added An assessment of the impact of the pilot program and increased reserve component employment levels on the readiness of members of the reserve components.
(C)
added Any other matters considered appropriate by the Secretary.
(g)
added Limitation on total fiscal-year obligations— The total amount obligated by the Secretary of Defense to carry out the pilot program for any fiscal year may not exceed $20,000,000.
(h)
added Duration of Authority—
(1)
added In general— The authority to carry out the pilot program expires September 30, 2018.
(2)
added Extension— Upon the expiration of the authority under paragraph (1), the Secretary of Defense may extend the pilot program for not more than two additional fiscal years.

Sec. 568 Program regarding civilian credentialing for skills required for certain military occupational specialties

added

added Section 558 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 10 U.S.C. 2015 note) is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

added “(e) Inclusion of specified military occupational specialties—The pilot program required by this section shall include at a minimum the following military occupational specialties:

added “(1) Army 31B Military Police.

added “(2) Navy MA Master-At-Arms.

added “(3) Air Force 3P0X1 Security Forces.

added “(4) Marine Corps 5811 Military Police.

added “(5) Army 11B Infantryman.

added “(6) Marine Corps 0311 Rifleman.”

Sec. 571 Continuation of authority to assist local educational agencies that benefit dependents of members of the Armed Forces and Department of Defense civilian employees

added
(a)
added Assistance to schools with significant numbers of military dependent students— Of the amount authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2016 by section 301 and available for operation and maintenance for Defense-wide activities as specified in the funding table in section 4301, $30,000,000 shall be available only for the purpose of providing assistance to local educational agencies under subsection (a) of section 572 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 (Public Law 109–163; 20 U.S.C. 7703b).
(b)
added Local educational agency defined— In this section, the term local educational agency has the meaning given that term in section 8013(9) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7713(9)).

Sec. 572 Extension of authority to conduct family support programs for immediate family members of members of the Armed Forces assigned to special operations forces

added

added Section 554(f) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 10 U.S.C. 1785 note) is amended by striking “2016” and inserting “2018”.

Sec. 573 Support for efforts to improve academic achievement and transition of military dependent students

added

added The Secretary of Defense may make grants to nonprofit organizations that provide services to improve the academic achievement of military dependent students, including those nonprofit organizations whose programs focus on improving the civic responsibility of military dependent students and their understanding of the Federal Government through direct exposure to the operations of the Federal Government.

Sec. 574 Study regarding feasibility of using DEERS to track dependents of members of the Armed Forces and Department of Defense civilian employees who are elementary or secondary education students

added

added Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report containing the results of a study regarding the feasibility of using the Defense Enrollment Eligibility Reporting System (DEERS) to maintain records of where students who are dependents of members of the Armed Forces or Department of Defense civilian employees are enrolled in elementary or secondary education, be it private, public, or home-schooled.

Sec. 575 Sense of Congress regarding support for dependents of members of the Armed Forces attending specialized camps

added
(a)
added Findings— Congress makes the following findings:
(1)
added It has been shown that some members of the Armed Forces have a difficult time transitioning back into civilian life due to post-traumatic stress and other behavioral health disorders from traumatic events they experienced during combat.
(2)
added The children of returning members of the Armed Forces who suffer from post-traumatic stress and other behavioral health disorders often also suffer from severe distress due to the lack of a stable home environment and loss of a strong parental figure for guidance.
(3)
added The children of members of the Armed Forces who are in severe distress can be helped by being given the opportunity to participate in intensive specialized programs outside of their regular environment with other children who are going through similar situations.
(b)
added Sense of Congress— It is the sense of Congress that the Department of Defense should continue to support dependents of members of the Armed Forces in attending camps offered by nonprofit organizations that are using evidence-based practices to provide support to children grieving the loss of a parent, guardian, or sibling, or who have a parent, guardian, or sibling who suffers from post-traumatic stress or a behavioral health disorder.

Sec. 581 Authorization for award of the Distinguished-Service Cross for acts of extraordinary heroism during the Korean War

added

added Notwithstanding the time limitations specified in section 3744 of title 10, United States Code, or any other time limitation with respect to the awarding of certain medals to persons who served in the Armed Forces, the Secretary of the Army may award the Distinguished-Service Cross under section 3742 of such title to Edward Halcomb who, while serving in Korea as a member of the United States Army in the grade of Private First Class in Company B, 1st Battalion, 29th Infantry Regiment, 24th Infantry Division, distinguished himself by acts of extraordinary heroism from August 20, 1950, to October 19, 1950, during the Korean War.

Sec. 582 Limitation on authority of Secretaries of the military departments regarding revocation of combat valor awards

added
(a)
added Prohibition— Chapter 57 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 1133 the following new section:

added “1133a. Limitation on revocation of combat valor awards

added “The Secretary of a military department may not revoke a combat valor award awarded to a member of the armed forces under the jurisdiction of that Secretary unless the conduct of the member during the period of service during which the distinguished act occurred was not honorable. The Secretary may not consider the characterization of the member’s service outside of the actual time period covered by the award.”

(b)
added Clerical amendment— The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 57 of such title is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 1133 the following new item:

Sec. 583 Award of Purple Heart to members of the Armed Forces who were victims of the Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, bombing

added

added Notwithstanding section 571(a)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3387), the Secretary of the military department concerned shall award the Purple Heart pursuant to section 1129a of title 10, United States Code, to the following members of the Armed Forces who were killed in the bombing that occurred at the Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, on April 19, 1995:

(1)
added Sergeant First Class Lola Renee Bolden, United States Army.
(2)
added Sergeant Benjamin Laranzo Davis, United States Marine Corps.
(3)
added Captain Randolph Albert Guzman, United States Marine Corps.
(4)
added Airman First Class Lakesha Racquel Levy, United States Air Force.
(5)
added Airman First Class Cartney Jean Mcraven, United States Air Force.
(6)
added Master Sergeant Victoria Lee Sohn, United States Army.

Sec. 591 Authority for United States Air Force Institute of Technology to charge and retain tuition for instruction of persons other than Air Force personnel detailed for instruction at the Institute

added
(a)
added Institute instruction of persons other than air force personnel— Section 9314a of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
added by redesignating subsections (a), (c), (d), (e), and (f) as subsections (d), (e), (f), (g), and (h), respectively;
(2)
added by redesignating subsection (b) as paragraph (4) of subsection (d), as so redesignated; and
(3)
added by inserting before subsection (d), as so redesignated, the following new subsections:

added “(a) Members of the Armed Forces Other Than the Air Force Who Are Detailed to the Institute

added “(1) The Department of the Army, the Department of the Navy, and the Department of Homeland Security shall bear the cost of the instruction at the Air Force Institute of Technology that is received by members of the armed forces detailed for that instruction by the Secretaries of the Army, Navy, and Homeland Security, respectively.

added “(2) Members of the Army, Navy, Marine Corps, and Coast Guard may only be detailed for instruction at the Institute on a space-available basis.

added “(3) In the case of an enlisted member of the Army, Navy, Marine Corps, or Coast Guard detailed to receive instruction at the Institute, the Secretary of the Air Force shall charge the Secretary concerned only for such costs and fees as the Secretary considers appropriate (taking into consideration the admission of enlisted members on a space-available basis).

added “(b) Federal civilian employees other than air force employees who are detailed to the institute

added “(1) The Institute shall charge tuition for the cost of providing instruction at the Institute for any civilian employee of a military department (other than a civilian employee of the Department of the Air Force), of another component of the Department of Defense, or of another Federal agency who is detailed to receive instruction at the Institute.

added “(2) The cost of any tuition charged an individual under this subsection shall be borne by the department, agency, or component that details the individual for instruction at the Institute.

added “(c) Non-detailed persons

added “(1) The Secretary of the Air Force may permit persons described in paragraph (2) to receive instruction at the United States Air Force Institute of Technology on a space-available basis.

added “(2) Paragraph (1) applies to any of the following persons:

added “(A) A member of the armed forces not detailed for that instruction by the Secretary concerned.

added “(B) A civilian employee of a military department, of another component of the Department of Defense, of another Federal agency, or of a State’s National Guard not detailed for that instruction by the Secretary concerned or head of the other Department of Defense component, other Federal agency, or the National Guard.

added “(C) A United States citizen who is the recipient of a competitively selected Federal or Department of Defense sponsored scholarship or fellowship with a defense focus in areas of study related to the academic disciplines offered by the Air Force Institute of Technology and which requires a service commitment to the Federal government in exchange for educational financial assistance.

added “(3) If a scholarship or fellowship described in paragraph (2)(C) includes a stipend, the Institute may accept the stipend payment from the scholarship or fellowship sponsor and make a direct payment to the individual.”

(b)
added Conforming amendments related to redesignation and other conforming amendments— Section 9314a of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
added in subsection (d), as redesignated by subsection (a)(1)—
(A)
added by striking “Admission Authorized” and inserting “Defense Industry Employees”;
(B)
added in paragraph (1), by striking “subsection (b)” and inserting “paragraph (4)”; and
(C)
added in paragraph (4), as redesignated by subsection (a)(2), by striking “Eligible Defense Industry Employees.—”;
(2)
added in subsection (f)(1), as redesignated by subsection (a)(1), by striking “subsection (a)(1)” and inserting “subsection (d)(1)”;
(3)
added in subsection (g)(1), as redesignated by subsection (a)(1)—
(A)
added by striking “under this section” and inserting “under subsections (c) and (d)”; and
(B)
added by inserting before the period at the end the following: “who are detailed to receive instruction at the Institute under subsection (b)”; and
(4)
added in subsection (h), as redesignated by subsection (a)(1), by striking “defense industry employees enrolled under this section” and inserting “persons enrolled under this section who are not members of the armed forces or Government civilian employees”.
(c)
added Conditions on admission of defense industry civilians— Subsection (e)(1) of section 9314a of title 10, United States Code, as redesignated by subsection (a)(1), is amended by striking “will be done on a space-available basis and not require an increase in the size of the faculty” and inserting “will not require an increase in the permanently authorized size of the faculty”.
(d)
added Statutory reorganization— Chapter 901 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
added by transferring subsections (d) and (f) of section 9314 to the end of section 9314b and redesignating those subsections as subsections (c) and (d), respectively; and
(2)
added by striking subsection (e) of section 9314.
(e)
added Clerical amendments—
(1)
added Section headings—
(A)
added The heading of section 9314 of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:

added “9314. United States Air Force Institute of Technology: degree granting authority”

(B)
added The heading of section 9314a of such title is amended to read as follows:

added “9314a. United States Air Force Institute of Technology: reimbursement and tuition; instruction of persons other than Air Force personnel”

(2)
added Table of sections— The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 901 of such title is amended by striking the items relating to sections 9314 and 9314a and inserting the following new items:

Sec. 592 Honoring certain members of the reserve components as veterans

added
(a)
added Veteran status—
(1)
added In general— Chapter 1 of title 38, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 107 the following new section:

added “107A. Honoring as veterans certain persons who performed service in the reserve components

added “Any person who is entitled under chapter 1223 of title 10 to retired pay for nonregular service or, but for age, would be entitled under such chapter to retired pay for nonregular service shall be honored as a veteran but shall not be entitled to any benefit by reason of this section.”

(2)
added Clerical amendment— The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 107 the following new item:
(b)
added Clarification regarding benefits— No person may receive any benefit under the laws administered by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs solely by reason of section 107A of title 38, United States Code, as added by subsection (a).

Sec. 593 Support for designation of 2015 as the Year of the Military Diver

added
(a)
added Findings— Congress finds the following:
(1)
added Military divers are serving and have served in the noble and self-sacrificing profession of military diving in the Armed Forces.
(2)
added Military divers were created at the turn of the twentieth century, the trademark of diving is the Mark Five Dive Helmet created in 1915.
(3)
added Military divers perform a dangerous and selfless task often without recognition, risking their lives on behalf of the United States.
(4)
added The United States will forever be in debt to personnel in the profession of military diving for their bravery and sacrifice in times of peace and war.
(4)
added People in the United States should express their recognition and gratitude for military divers and the diving profession.
(5)
added In 1939, when the submarine U.S.S. Squalus sank, Navy divers used an experimental rig to rescue all 33 sailors aboard the vessel who survived the initial sinking, and the divers were awarded the Medal of Honor for their role in the rescue.
(6)
added In 1941, after the attack on Pearl Harbor, Navy divers raised every battleship that was sunk at Pearl Harbor, to the surface (with the exception of the U.S.S. Arizona, U.S.S. Utah, and the U.S.S. Oklahoma).
(7)
added The raised ships were repaired and sent back out to fight the Imperial Japanese Navy.
(8)
added In 1986, when Space Shuttle Challenger exploded, Navy divers recovered the remains and debris.
(9)
added When TWA Flight 800, Swissair Flight 111, and EgyptAir Flight 990 crashed, among others, Navy divers recovered the remains and debris.
(10)
added In 1999, when John F. Kennedy Jr., Carolyn Bessette, and Lauren Bessette died in a plane crash, Navy divers recovered their remains and debris.
(11)
added In 2003, during the Quecreek Mine Rescue in Somerset County, Pennsylvania, Navy divers treated the recovered miners in Fly Away Recompression Chambers.
(12)
added 2015 would be an appropriate year to highlight the achievements of the military diver.
(b)
added Sense of Congress— In light of the findings under subsection (a), Congress—
(1)
added reaffirms its support for the sacrifices made by military divers during the past 100 years;
(2)
added recognizes the sacrifices of those who have volunteered as military divers for their bravery; and
(3)
added encourages and supports the Department of Defense to designate 2015 as the Year of the Military Diver to honor those who are serving and have served in the noble and self-sacrificing profession of military diving in the Armed Forces.

Sec. 594 Transfer and adoption of military animals

added
(a)
added Availability for Adoption— Section 2583(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “may” in the matter preceding paragraph (1) and inserting “shall”.
(b)
added Authorized Recipients— Subsection (c) of section 2583 of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:

added “(c) Authorized Recipients

added “(1) A military animal shall be made available for adoption under this section, in order of recommended priority—

added “(A) by former handlers of the animal;

added “(B) by law enforcement agencies; and

added “(C) by other persons capable of humanely caring for the animal.

added “(2) If the Secretary of the military department concerned determines that an adoption is justified under subsection (a)(2) under circumstances under which the handler of a military working dog is wounded in action, the dog shall be made available for adoption only by the handler. If the Secretary of the military department concerned determines that such an adoption is justified under circumstances under which the handler of a military working dog is killed in action or dies of wounds received in action, the military working dog shall be made available for adoption only by a parent, child, spouse, or sibling of the deceased handler.”

Sec. 595 Coordination with non-government suicide prevention organizations and agencies to assist in reducing suicides

added
(a)
added Policy required—
(1)
added In general— The Secretary of Defense shall develop a policy to coordinate the efforts of the Department of Defense and non-government suicide prevention organizations regarding—
(A)
added the use of such non-government organizations to reduce the number of suicides among members of the Armed Forces by comprehensively addressing the needs of members of the Armed Forces who have been identified as being at risk of suicide;
(B)
added the delineation of the responsibilities within the Department of Defense regarding interaction with such organizations; and
(C)
added the collection of data regarding the efficacy and cost of coordinating with such organizations; and
(D)
added the preparation and preservation of any reporting material the Secretary determines necessary to carry out this section.
(2)
added Selection of organizations— The policy required by paragraph (1) shall include a policy on the identification of appropriate non-government organizations by the Secretary of Defense using factors developed by the Secretary. Such factors shall include—
(A)
added the record of an organization in reducing suicide rates among participants in the programs carried out by the organization;
(B)
added the familiarity of an organization with the structure, ethos, and environment of the Armed Forces;
(C)
added the demonstrated experience of an organization in understanding and working with injured and disabled members of the Armed Forces, including those who were injured in combat;
(D)
added the expertise of an organization in improving the emotional well being, mental clarity, and ability to perform missions of program participants; and
(E)
added the expertise of an organization in improving the health and fitness of program participants.
(3)
added Authority of Secretary of Defense— The Secretary of Defense shall be authorized to take any necessary measures to prevent suicides by members of the Armed Forces, including by facilitating the access of members of the Armed Forces to successful non-governmental treatment regimen.
(4)
added Consultation— In developing the policy under this subsection, the Secretary of Defense shall consult with the Secretaries of each of the military departments and the Chief of the National Guard Bureau.
(b)
added Submission and implementation—
(1)
added Submission— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives a copy of the policy developed under this section.
(2)
added Deadline for implementation— The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that the policy developed under this section is implemented by not later than the date that is 180 days after the submission of the policy under paragraph (1).

Sec. 601 Extension of authority to provide temporary increase in rates of basic allowance for housing under certain circumstances

added

added Section 403(b)(7)(E) of title 37, United States Code, is amended by striking “December 31, 2015” and inserting “December 31, 2016”.

Sec. 602 Prohibition on per diem allowance reductions based on the duration of temporary duty assignment or civilian travel

added
(a)
added Members of the uniformed services— Section 474(d)(3) of title 37, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new sentence: “The Secretaries concerned shall not alter the amount of the per diem allowance, or the maximum amount of reimbursement, for a locality based on the duration of the temporary duty assignment of a member of the uniformed services in the locality.”.
(b)
added Civilian employees— Section 5702(a)(2) of title 5, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new sentence: “The Secretary of the Department of Defense shall not alter the amount of the per diem allowance, or the maximum amount of reimbursement, for a locality based on the duration of the travel of an employee of the Department in the locality.”.
(c)
added Repeal of policy and regulations— The policy, and any regulations issued pursuant to such policy, implemented by the Secretary of the Department of Defense on November 1, 2014, with respect to reductions in per diem allowances based on duration of temporary duty assignment or civilian travel shall have no force or effect.

Sec. 611 One-year extension of certain bonus and special pay authorities for reserve forces

added The following sections of title 37, United States Code, are amended by striking “December 31, 2015” and inserting “December 31, 2016”:

(a)
removed Authorities relating to reserve forces— The following sections of title 37, United States Code, are amended by striking “December 31, 2015” and inserting “December 31, 2016”:
(1)
renumbered was (2)(3) Section 308b(g), relating to Selected Reserve reenlistment bonus.
(2)
renumbered was (2)(4) Section 308c(i), relating to Selected Reserve affiliation or enlistment bonus.
(3)
renumbered was (2)(5) Section 308d(c), relating to special pay for enlisted members assigned to certain high-priority units.
(4)
renumbered was (2)(6) Section 308g(f)(2), relating to Ready Reserve enlistment bonus for persons without prior service.
(5)
renumbered was (2)(7) Section 308h(e), relating to Ready Reserve enlistment and reenlistment bonus for persons with prior service.
(6)
renumbered was (2)(8) Section 308i(f), relating to Selected Reserve enlistment and reenlistment bonus for persons with prior service.
(7)
added Section 478a(e), relating to reimbursement of travel expenses for inactive-duty training outside of normal commuting distance.
(8)
renumbered was (2)(9) Section 910(g), relating to income replacement payments for reserve component members experiencing extended and frequent mobilization for active duty service.
(b)
removed Title 10 authorities relating to health care professionals— The following sections of title 10, United States Code, are amended by striking “December 31, 2015” and inserting “December 31, 2016”:
(1)
removed Section 2130a(a)(1), relating to nurse officer candidate accession program.
(2)
removed Section 16302(d), relating to repayment of education loans for certain health professionals who serve in the Selected Reserve.
(c)
removed Title 37 authorities relating to health care professionals— The following sections of title 37, United States Code, are amended by striking “December 31, 2015” and inserting “December 31, 2016”:
(1)
removed Section 302c–1(f), relating to accession and retention bonuses for psychologists.
(2)
removed Section 302d(a)(1), relating to accession bonus for registered nurses.
(3)
removed Section 302e(a)(1), relating to incentive special pay for nurse anesthetists.
(4)
removed Section 302g(e), relating to special pay for Selected Reserve health professionals in critically short wartime specialties.
(5)
removed Section 302h(a)(1), relating to accession bonus for dental officers.
(6)
removed Section 302j(a), relating to accession bonus for pharmacy officers.
(7)
removed Section 302k(f), relating to accession bonus for medical officers in critically short wartime specialties.
(8)
removed Section 302l(g), relating to accession bonus for dental specialist officers in critically short wartime specialties.
(d)
removed Authorities relating to nuclear officers— The following sections of title 37, United States Code, are amended by striking “December 31, 2015” and inserting “December 31, 2016”:
(1)
removed Section 312(f), relating to special pay for nuclear-qualified officers extending period of active service.
(2)
removed Section 312b(c), relating to nuclear career accession bonus.
(3)
removed Section 312c(d), relating to nuclear career annual incentive bonus.
(e)
removed Authorities relating to title 37 consolidated special pay, incentive pay, and bonus authorities— The following sections of title 37, United States Code, are amended by striking “December 31, 2015” and inserting “December 31, 2016”:
(1)
removed Section 331(h), relating to general bonus authority for enlisted members.
(2)
removed Section 332(g), relating to general bonus authority for officers.
(3)
removed Section 333(i), relating to special bonus and incentive pay authorities for nuclear officers.
(4)
removed Section 334(i), relating to special aviation incentive pay and bonus authorities for officers.
(5)
removed Section 335(k), relating to bonus and incentive pay authorities for officers in health professions.
(6)
removed Section 336(g), relating to contracting bonus for cadets and midshipmen enrolled in the Senior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps.
(7)
removed Section 351(h), relating to hazardous duty pay.
(8)
removed Section 352(g), relating to assignment pay or special duty pay.
(9)
removed Section 353(i), relating to skill incentive pay or proficiency bonus.
(10)
removed Section 355(h), relating to retention incentives for members qualified in critical military skills or assigned to high priority units.
(f)
removed Other title 37 bonus and special pay authorities— The following sections of title 37, United States Code, are amended by striking “December 31, 2015” and inserting “December 31, 2016”:
(1)
removed Section 301b(a), relating to aviation officer retention bonus.
(2)
removed Section 307a(g), relating to assignment incentive pay.
(3)
removed Section 308(g), relating to reenlistment bonus for active members.
(4)
removed Section 309(e), relating to enlistment bonus.
(5)
removed Section 324(g), relating to accession bonus for new officers in critical skills.
(6)
removed Section 326(g), relating to incentive bonus for conversion to military occupational specialty to ease personnel shortage.
(7)
removed Section 327(h), relating to incentive bonus for transfer between the Armed Forces.
(8)
removed Section 330(f), relating to accession bonus for officer candidates.
(g)
removed Authority To provide temporary increase in rates of basic allowance for housing— Section 403(b)(7)(E) of title 37, United States Code, is amended by striking “December 31, 2015” and inserting “December 31, 2016”.

Sec. 612 One-year extension of certain bonus and special pay authorities for health care professionals

added
(a)
added Title 10 authorities— The following sections of title 10, United States Code, are amended by striking “December 31, 2015” and inserting “December 31, 2016”:
(1)
added Section 2130a(a)(1), relating to nurse officer candidate accession program.
(2)
added Section 16302(d), relating to repayment of education loans for certain health professionals who serve in the Selected Reserve.
(b)
added Title 37 authorities— The following sections of title 37, United States Code, are amended by striking “December 31, 2015” and inserting “December 31, 2016”:
(1)
added Section 302c–1(f), relating to accession and retention bonuses for psychologists.
(2)
added Section 302d(a)(1), relating to accession bonus for registered nurses.
(3)
added Section 302e(a)(1), relating to incentive special pay for nurse anesthetists.
(4)
added Section 302g(e), relating to special pay for Selected Reserve health professionals in critically short wartime specialties.
(5)
added Section 302h(a)(1), relating to accession bonus for dental officers.
(6)
added Section 302j(a), relating to accession bonus for pharmacy officers.
(7)
added Section 302k(f), relating to accession bonus for medical officers in critically short wartime specialties.
(8)
added Section 302l(g), relating to accession bonus for dental specialist officers in critically short wartime specialties.

Sec. 613 One-year extension of special pay and bonus authorities for nuclear officers

added

added The following sections of title 37, United States Code, are amended by striking “December 31, 2015” and inserting “December 31, 2016”:

(1)
added Section 312(f), relating to special pay for nuclear-qualified officers extending period of active service.
(2)
added Section 312b(c), relating to nuclear career accession bonus.
(3)
added Section 312c(d), relating to nuclear career annual incentive bonus.

Sec. 614 One-year extension of authorities relating to title 37 consolidated special pay, incentive pay, and bonus authorities

added

added The following sections of title 37, United States Code, are amended by striking “December 31, 2015” and inserting “December 31, 2016”:

(1)
added Section 331(h), relating to general bonus authority for enlisted members.
(2)
added Section 332(g), relating to general bonus authority for officers.
(3)
added Section 333(i), relating to special bonus and incentive pay authorities for nuclear officers.
(4)
added Section 334(i), relating to special aviation incentive pay and bonus authorities for officers.
(5)
added Section 335(k), relating to special bonus and incentive pay authorities for officers in health professions.
(6)
added Section 336(g), relating to contracting bonus for cadets and midshipmen enrolled in the Senior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps.
(7)
added Section 351(h), relating to hazardous duty pay.
(8)
added Section 352(g), relating to assignment pay or special duty pay.
(9)
added Section 353(i), relating to skill incentive pay or proficiency bonus.
(10)
added Section 355(h), relating to retention incentives for members qualified in critical military skills or assigned to high priority units.

Sec. 615 One-year extension of authorities relating to payment of other title 37 bonuses and special pays

added

added The following sections of title 37, United States Code, are amended by striking “December 31, 2015” and inserting “December 31, 2016”:

(1)
added Section 301b(a), relating to aviation officer retention bonus.
(2)
added Section 307a(g), relating to assignment incentive pay.
(3)
added Section 308(g), relating to reenlistment bonus for active members.
(4)
added Section 309(e), relating to enlistment bonus.
(5)
added Section 316a(g), relating to incentive pay for members of precommissioning programs pursuing foreign language proficiency.
(6)
added Section 324(g), relating to accession bonus for new officers in critical skills.
(7)
added Section 326(g), relating to incentive bonus for conversion to military occupational specialty to ease personnel shortage.
(8)
added Section 327(h), relating to incentive bonus for transfer between branches of the Armed Forces.
(9)
added Section 330(f), relating to accession bonus for officer candidates.

Sec. 616 Increase in maximum annual amount of nuclear officer bonus pay

added

added Section 333(d)(1)(A) of title 37, United States Code, is amended by striking “$35,000” and inserting “$50,000”.

Sec. 617 Modification to special aviation incentive pay and bonus authorities for officers

added
(a)
added Clarification of secretarial authority to set requirements for aviation incentive pay eligibility— Section 334(a) of title 37, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
added by striking “The Secretary” and inserting the following:

added “(1) Incentive pay authorized; eligibility—The Secretary”

(2)
added by designating existing paragraphs (1), (2), (3), (4), and (5) as subparagraphs (A), (B), (C), (D), and (E), respectively, and moving the margin of such subparagraphs, as so designated, 2 ems to the right; and
(3)
added by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

added “(2) Officers not currently engaged in flying duty—The Secretary concerned may pay aviation incentive pay under this section to an officer who is otherwise qualified for such pay but who is not currently engaged in the performance of operational flying duty or proficiency flying duty if the Secretary determines, under regulations prescribed under section 374 of this title, that payment of aviation incentive pay to that officer is in the best interests of the service.”

(b)
added Restoration of authority to pay aviation incentive pay to medical officers performing flight surgeon duties— Section 334(h)(1) of title 37, United States Code, is amended by striking “(except a flight surgeon or other medical officer)”.
(c)
added Increase in maximum amount of aviation special pays— Section 334(c)(1) of title 37, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
added in subparagraph (A), by striking “$850” and inserting “$1,000”.
(2)
added in subparagraph (B), is amended by striking “$25,000” and inserting “$35,000”.
(d)
added Authority to pay aviation bonus and skill incentive pay simultaneously to officers— Section 334(f) of title 37, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
added in paragraph (1), by striking “353” and inserting “353(a)”; and
(2)
added in paragraph (2)—
(A)
added by striking “a payment” and inserting “a bonus payment”; and
(B)
added by striking “353” and inserting “353(b)”.

Sec. 618 Repeal of obsolete special travel and transportation allowance for survivors of deceased members of the Armed Forces from the Vietnam conflict

added
(a)
added Repeal and redesignation— Section 481f of title 37, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
added by striking subsection (d); and
(2)
added by redesignating subsections (e), (f), (g), and (h) as subsections (d), (e), (f), and (g).
(b)
added Conforming amendment to cross reference— Section 2493(a)(4)(B)(ii) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “section 481f(e)” and inserting “section 481f(d)”.

Sec. 631 Full participation for members of the uniformed services in Thrift Savings Plan

added
(a)
added Modernized retirement system—
(1)
added Definitions— Section 8440e(a) of title 5, United States Code, is amended by striking paragraphs (1) and (2) and inserting the following new paragraphs:

added “(1) the term basic pay means basic pay payable under section 204 of title 37;

added “(2) the term full TSP member means a member described in subsection (e)(1);

added “(3) the term member has the meaning given the term in section 211 of title 37; and

added “(4) the term Secretary concerned has the meaning given the term in section 101 of title 37.”

(2)
added TSP matching contributions— Subsection (e) of section 8440e of title 5, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:

added “(e) Modernized retirement system

added “(1) TSP matching contributions—Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Secretary concerned shall make contributions to the Thrift Savings Fund, in accordance with section 8432 of this title (except to the extent the requirements under such section are modified by this subsection), for the benefit of a member—

added “(A) who first enters a uniformed service on or after October 1, 2017; or

added “(B) who entered a uniformed service before that date, but who makes the election described in section 1409(b)(4) of title 10 to receive Thrift Savings Plan matching contributions under this subsection in exchange for the reduced multipliers described in section 1409(b)(4)(B) of title 10 for purposes of calculating the retired pay of the member.

added “(2) Matching amount—The amount contributed under this subsection by the Secretary concerned with respect to any contribution made by a full TSP member for any pay period shall be equal to such portion of the total amount of the member’s contribution as does not exceed 5 percent of the member’s basic pay for the pay period. Such amount contributed under this subsection is instead of, and not in addition to, amounts contributed under section 8432(c)(2) of this title.

added “(3) Timing and duration of matching contributions—The Secretary concerned shall make a contribution under this subsection on behalf of a full TSP member for any pay period for the member that—

added “(A) begins on or after December 1, 2017; and

added “(B) covers any period of service by the member after the member completes two years of service.

added “(4) Protections for spouses and former spouses—Section 8435 of this title shall apply to a full TSP member in the same manner as such section is applied to an employee or Member under such section.”

(b)
added Automatic enrollment in Thrift Savings Plan— Section 8432(b)(2) of title 5, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
added in subparagraph (D)(ii), by striking “Members” and inserting “(ii) Except in the case of a full TSP member (as defined in section 8440e(a) of this title), members”;
(2)
added in subparagraph (E), by striking “8440e(a)(1)” and inserting “8440e(b)(1)”; and
(3)
added by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:

added “(F) Notwithstanding any other provision of this paragraph, if a full TSP member (as defined in section 8440e(a) of this title) has declined automatic enrollment into the Thrift Savings Plan for a year, the full TSP member shall be automatically reenrolled on January 1 of the succeeding year, with contributions under subsection (a) at the default percentage of basic pay.”

(c)
added Vesting—
(1)
added Two-years of service— Section 8432(g)(2) of title 5, United States Code, is amended—
(A)
added in subparagraph (A)(iii), by striking “or” after the semicolon;
(B)
added in subparagraph (B), by striking the period at the end and inserting “; or”; and
(C)
added by adding at the end the following:

added “(C) 2 years of service in the case of a member of the uniformed services.”

(2)
added Separation— Section 8432(g) of title 5, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

added “(6) For purposes of this subsection, a member of the uniformed services shall be considered to have separated from Government employment if the member is discharged or released from service in the uniformed services.”

(d)
added Thrift Savings Plan default investment fund— Section 8438(c)(2) of title 5, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
added in subparagraph (A), by striking “(A) Consistent with the requirements of subparagraph (B), if an” and inserting “If an”; and
(2)
added by striking subparagraph (B).
(e)
added Repeal of separate contribution agreement authority—
(1)
added Repeal— Section 211 of title 37, United States Code, is amended—
(A)
added by striking subsection (d); and
(B)
added by redesignating subsection (e) as subsection (d).
(2)
added Conforming amendment— Section 8432b(c)(2)(B) of title 5, United States Code, is amended by striking “(including pursuant to an agreement under section 211(d) of title 37)”.

Sec. 632 Modernized retirement system for members of the uniformed services

added
(a)
added Regular service— Section 1409(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

added “(4) Modernized retirement system

added “(A) Reduced multiplier for full tsp members—Notwithstanding paragraphs (1), (2), and (3), in the case of a member who first becomes a member of the uniformed services on or after October 1, 2017, or a member who makes the election described in subparagraph (B) (referred to as a “full TSP member”)—

added “(i) paragraph (1)(A) shall be applied by substituting “2” for “2½”;

added “(ii) clause (i) of paragraph (3)(B) shall be applied by substituting “60 percent” for “75 percent”; and

added “(iii) clause (ii)(I) of such paragraph shall be applied by substituting “2” for “2½”.

added “(B) Election to participate in modernized retirement system—Pursuant to subparagraph (C), a member of a uniformed service serving on September 30, 2017, may elect, in exchange for the reduced multipliers described in subparagraph (A) for purposes of calculating the retired pay of the member, to receive Thrift Savings Plan matching contributions pursuant to section 8440e(e) of title 5.

added “(C) Election period

added “(i) In general—Except as provided in clauses (ii) and (iii), a member of a uniformed service may make the election authorized by subparagraph (B) only during the period that begins on January 1, 2018, and ends on December 31, 2018.

added “(ii) Hardship extension—The Secretary concerned may extend the election period described in clause (i) for a member who experiences a hardship as determined by the Secretary concerned.

added “(iii) Effect of break in service—A member of a uniformed service who returns to service after a break in service that occurs during the election period specified in clause (i) shall make the election described in subparagraph (B) within 30 days after the date of the reentry into service of the member.

added “(D) Regulations—The Secretary concerned shall prescribe regulations to implement this paragraph.”

(b)
added Non-regular service— Section 12739 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

added “(f) Modernized retirement system

added “(1) Reduced multiplier for full tsp members—In the case of a person who first performs reserve component service on or after October 1, 2017, after not having performed regular or reserve component service on or before that date—

added “(A) subsection (a)(2) shall be applied by substituting “2 percent” for “2½ percent”;

added “(B) subparagraph (A) of subsection (c)(2) shall be applied by substituting “60 percent” for “75 percent”; and

added “(C) subparagraph (B)(ii) of such subsection shall be applied by substituting “2 percent” for “2½ percent”.

added “(2) Regulations—The Secretary concerned shall prescribe regulations to implement this subsection.”

(c)
added Coordinating amendments to other retirement authorities—
(1)
added Disability, warrant officers, and DOPMA retired pay—
(A)
added Computation of retired pay— The table in section 1401(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(i)
added in paragraph (1) in column 2 of formula number 1, by striking “2½% of years of service credited to him under section 1208” and inserting “the retired pay multiplier determined for the member under section 1409 of this title”; and
(ii)
added in paragraph (1) in column 2 of formula number 2, by striking “2½% of years of service credited to him under section 1208” and inserting “the retired pay multiplier determined for the member under section 1409 of this title”; and
(iii)
added in column 2 of each of formula number 4 and formula number 5, by striking “section 1409(a)” and inserting “section 1409”.
(B)
added Clarification regarding modernized retirement system— Section 1401a(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(i)
added by redesignating paragraph (5) as paragraph (6); and
(ii)
added by inserting after paragraph (4) the following new paragraph (5):

added “(5) Adjustments for participants in modernized retirement system—Notwithstanding paragraph (3), if a member or former member makes the election described in section 1409(b)(4) of this title, the Secretary shall increase the retired pay of such member in accordance with paragraph (2).”

(2)
added 15-year career status bonus— Section 354 of title 37, United States Code, is amended—
(A)
added in subsection (f)—
(i)
added by striking “If a” and inserting “(1) If a”; and
(ii)
added by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

added “(2) If a person who is paid a bonus under this section subsequently makes an election described in section 1409(b)(4) of title 10, the person shall repay any bonus payments received under this section in the same manner as repayments are made under section 373 of this title.”

(B)
added by adding at the end the following new subsection:

added “(g) Sunset and continuation of payments

added “(1) A Secretary concerned may not pay a new bonus under this section after September 30, 2017.

added “(2) Subject to subsection (f)(2), the Secretary concerned may continue to make payments for bonuses that were awarded under this section on or before the date specified in paragraph (1).”

(3)
added Application to National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Commissioned Corps— Paragraph (2) of section 245(a) of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Commissioned Officer Corps Act of 2002 (33 U.S.C. 3045(a)) is amended to read as follows:

added “(2) the retired pay multiplier determined under section 1409 of such title for the number of years of service that may be credited to the officer under section 1405 of such title as if the officer's service were service as a member of the Armed Forces.”

(4)
added Application to Public Health Service— Section 211(a)(4) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 212(a)(4)) is amended—
(A)
added in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking “at the rate of 2 ½ per centum of the basic pay of the highest grade held by him as such officer” and inserting “calculated by multiplying the retired pay base determined under section 1406 of title 10, United States Code, by the retired pay multiplier determined under section 1409 of such title for the numbers of years of service credited to the officer under this paragraph”; and
(B)
added in the matter following subparagraph (B)(iii)—
(i)
added in subparagraph (C), by striking “such pay, and” and inserting “such pay,”; and
(ii)
added in subparagraph (D), by striking “such basic pay.” and inserting “such basic pay, and (E) in the case of any officer who makes the election described in section 1409(b)(4) of title 10, United States Code, subparagraph (C) shall be applied by substituting “40 per centum” for “50 per centum” each place the term appears.”.
(d)
added Conforming delay in cost-of-living amendments—
(1)
added Delay— The amendments made by section 403(a) of the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2013 (Public Law 113–67; 127 Stat. 1186), as amended by section 10001 of the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2014 (division C of Public Law 113–76; 128 Stat. 151) and section 2 of Public Law 113–82 (128 Stat. 1009), shall take effect on October 1, 2017, rather than December 1, 2015.
(2)
added Covered members— Subparagraph (G) of section 1401a(b)(4) of title 10, United States Code, which shall take effect October 1, 2017, pursuant paragraph (1) and section 403(a) of the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2013 (Public Law 113–67; 127 Stat. 1186), section 10001 of the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2014 (division C of Public Law 113–76; 128 Stat. 151) and section 2 of Public Law 113–82 (128 Stat. 1009), is amended by striking “January 1, 2014” and inserting “October 1, 2017”.
(3)
added Conforming repeal— Effective on the date of the enactment of this Act, section 623 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3403) is repealed.

Sec. 633 Continuation pay for full TSP members with 12 years of service

added
(a)
added Continuation pay— Subchapter II of chapter 5 of title 37, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

added “356. Continuation pay: full TSP members with 12 years of service

added “(a) Continuation pay—The Secretary concerned shall make a payment of continuation pay to each full TSP member (as defined in section 8440e(a) of title 5) of the uniformed services under the jurisdiction of the Secretary who—

added “(1) completes 12 years of service; and

added “(2) enters into an agreement with the Secretary to serve for an additional 4 years of obligated service.

added “(b) Amount—The amount of continuation pay payable to a full TSP member under subsection (a) shall be the amount that is equal to—

added “(1) in the case of a member of a regular component—

added “(A) the monthly basic pay of the member at 12 years of service multiplied by 2.5; plus

added “(B) at the discretion of the Secretary concerned, the monthly basic pay of the member at 12 years of service multiplied by such number of months (not to exceed 13 months) as the Secretary concerned shall specify in the agreement of the member under subsection (a); and

added “(2) in the case of a member of a reserve component—

added “(A) the amount of monthly basic pay to which the member would be entitled at 12 years of service if the member were a member of a regular component multiplied by 0.5; plus

added “(B) at the discretion of the Secretary concerned, the amount of monthly basic pay described in subparagraph (A) multiplied by such number of months (not to exceed 6 months) as the Secretary concerned shall specify in the agreement of the member under subsection (a).

added “(c) Additional discretionary authority—In addition to the continuation pay required under subsection (a), the Secretary concerned may provide pay continuation pay under this subsection to a full TSP member described in subsection (a), and subject to the service agreement referred to in paragraph (2) of such subsection, in an amount determined by the Secretary concerned.

added “(d) Timing of payment—The Secretary concerned shall pay continuation pay under subsection (a) to a full TSP member when the member completes 12 years of service. If the Secretary concerned also provides continuation pay under subsection (c) to the member, that continuation pay shall be provided when the member completes 12 years of service.

added “(e) Lump sum or installments—A full TSP member may elect to receive continuation pay provided under subsection (a) or (c) in a lump sum or in a series of not more than four payments.

added “(f) Relationship to other pay and allowances—Continuation pay under this section is in addition to any other pay or allowance to which the full TSP member is entitled.

added “(g) Repayment—A full TSP member who receives continuation pay under this section (a) and fails to complete the obligated service required under such subsection shall be subject to the repayment provisions of section 373 of this title.

added “(h) Regulations—Each Secretary concerned shall prescribe regulations to carry out this section.”

(b)
added Clerical amendment— The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 5 of title 37, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new item:

Sec. 634 Effective date and implementation

added
(a)
added Effective date— Except as provided in section 632(d)(3), the amendments made by this subtitle shall take effect on October 1, 2017.
(b)
added Implementation plan— Not later than March 1, 2016, the Secretaries concerned shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report containing a plan to ensure the full and effective commencement of the implementation of the amendments made by this section on the date specified in subsection (a). The Secretaries concerned, the Director of the Office of Personnel Management, and the Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board shall take appropriate actions to ensure the full and effective implementation of the amendments.
(c)
added Additional technical and conforming amendments— The report required by subsection (b) shall contain a draft of such legislation as may be necessary to make any additional technical and conforming changes to titles 10 and 37, United States Code, and other provisions of law that are required or should be made by reason of the amendments made by this subtitle.
(d)
added Definitions— In this section:
(1)
added The term “appropriate committees of Congress” means—
(A)
added the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Energy and Commerce, the Committee on Natural Resources, and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives; and
(B)
added the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, and the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions of the Senate.
(2)
added The term Secretary concerned has the meaning given that term in section 101 of title 37, United States Code.

Sec. 641 Preserving Assured Commissary Supply to Asia and the Pacific

added
(a)
added In general— The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that there are no changes to the second destination transportation policy that currently applies to fresh fruit and vegetable supplies for commissaries in Asia and the Pacific until the Defense Commissary Agency conducts and submits to Congress a comprehensive study on fresh fruit and vegetable supply for the region.
(b)
added Elements of study— The study required by subsection (a) shall include, at a minimum, for Japan, South Korea, Okinawa, and Guam—
(1)
added an item-by-item review of the price, quality, and availability of fresh fruits and vegetables under both local sourcing models and second destination models, including an updated market survey of fresh fruits and vegetables in each location;
(2)
added an item-by-item review of fresh fruits and vegetables to determine the most cost-effective way to supply each item in each location year-round without increasing prices to commissary consumers; and
(3)
added a comprehensive review of supply models that would lower costs to the Defense Working Capital Fund, DECA, without increasing prices for commissary patrons.

Sec. 642 Prohibition on replacement or consolidation of defense commissary and exchange systems pending submission of required report on defense commissary system

added

added The Secretary of Defense shall take no action to replace or consolidate the defense commissary and exchange systems, including through the establishment of a new defense resale system, before submission of the report on the defense commissary system required by section 634 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291).

Sec. 651 Improvement of financial literacy and preparedness of members of the Armed Forces

added
(a)
added Sense of Congress on financial literacy and preparedness of members— It is the sense of Congress that—
(1)
added the Secretary of Defense should strengthen arrangements with other departments and agencies of the Federal Government and nonprofit organizations in order to improve the financial literacy and preparedness of members of the Armed Forces; and
(2)
added the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the Chief of Staff of the Army, the Chief of Naval Operations, the Chief of Staff of the Air Force, and the Commandant of the Marine Corps should provide support for the financial literacy and preparedness training carried out under section 992 of title 10, United States Code, as amended by subsections (b), (c), and (d).
(b)
added Provision of Financial literacy and preparedness training— Subsection (a) of section 992 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
added in the subsection heading, by striking “consumer education” and inserting “financial literacy training”;
(2)
added in paragraph (1), by striking “education” in the matter preceding subparagraph (A) and inserting “financial literacy training”;
(3)
added by striking paragraph (2) and inserting the following new paragraph:

added “(2) Training under this subsection shall be provided to a member of the armed forces—

added “(A) as a component of the initial entry training of the member;

added “(B) upon arrival at the first duty station of the member;

added “(C) upon arrival at each subsequent duty station, in the case of a member in pay grade E–4 or below or in pay grade O–3 or below;

added “(D) on the date of promotion of the member, in the case of a member in pay grade E–5 or below or in pay grade O–4 or below;

added “(E) when the member vests in the Thrift Savings Plan (TSP) under section 8432(g)(2)(C) of title 5;

added “(F) when the member becomes entitled to receive continuation pay under section 356 of title 37, at which time the training shall include, at a minimum, information on options available to the member regarding the use of continuation pay;

added “(G) at each major life event during the service of the member, such as—

added “(i) marriage;

added “(ii) divorce;

added “(iii) birth of first child; or

added “(iv) disabling sickness or condition;

added “(H) during leadership training;

added “(I) during pre-deployment training and during post-deployment training;

added “(J) at transition points in the service of the member, such as—

added “(i) transition from a regular component to a reserve component;

added “(ii) separation from service; or

added “(iii) retirement; and

added “(K) as a component of periodically recurring required training that is provided to the member at a military installation.”

(4)
added in paragraph (3), by striking “paragraph (2)(B)” and inserting “paragraph (2)(J)”; and
(5)
added by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

added “(4) The Secretary concerned shall prescribe regulations setting forth any other events and circumstances (in addition to the events and circumstances described in paragraph (2)) upon which the training required by this subsection will be provided.”

(c)
added Survey of Members’ financial literacy and preparedness— Section 992 of title 10, United States Code, is further amended—
(1)
added by redesignating subsection (d) as subsection (e); and
(2)
added by inserting after subsection (c) the following new subsection (d):

added “(d) Financial literacy and preparedness survey

added “(1) The Director of the Defense Manpower Data Center shall annually include in the status of forces survey a survey of the status of the financial literacy and preparedness of members of the armed forces.

added “(2) The results of the annual financial literacy and preparedness survey—

added “(A) shall be used by each of the Secretaries concerned as a benchmark to evaluate and update training provided under this section; and

added “(B) shall be submitted to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives.”

(d)
added Financial services defined— Subsection (e) of section 992 of title 10, United States Code, as redesignated by subsection (c)(1) of this section, is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

added “(4) Health insurance, budget management, Thrift Savings Plan (TSP), retirement lump sum payments (including rollover options and tax consequences), and Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) .”

(e)
added Clerical amendments—
(1)
added Section heading— The heading of section 992 of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:

added “992. Financial literacy training: financial services”

(2)
added Table of sections— The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 50 of such title is amended by striking the item related to section 992 and inserting the following new item:
(f)
added Implementation— Not later than six months after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the military department concerned and the Secretary of the Department in which the Coast Guard is operating shall commence providing financial literacy training under section 992 of title 10, United States Code, as amended by subsections (b), (c), and (d) of this section, to members of the Armed Forces.

Sec. 701 Joint uniform formulary for transition of care

added
(a)
added Joint formulary— Not later than June 1, 2016, the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall jointly establish a joint uniform formulary for the Department of Veterans Affairs and the Department of Defense with respect to pharmaceutical agents that are critical for the transition of an individual from receiving treatment furnished by the Secretary of Defense to treatment furnished by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs.
(b)
added Selection— The Secretaries shall select for inclusion on the joint uniform formulary established under subsection (a) pharmaceutical agents relating to—
(1)
added the control of pain, sleep disorders, and psychiatric conditions, including post-traumatic stress disorder; and
(2)
added any other conditions determined appropriate by the Secretaries.
(c)
added Report— Not later than July 1, 2016, the Secretaries shall jointly submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on the joint uniform formulary established under subsection (a), including a list of the pharmaceutical agents selected for inclusion on the formulary.
(d)
added Definitions— In this section:
(1)
added The term “appropriate congressional committees” means—
(A)
added the congressional defense committees; and
(B)
added the Committees on Veterans’ Affairs of the House of Representatives and the Senate.
(2)
added The term “pharmaceutical agent” has the meaning given that term in section 1074g(g) of title 10, United States Code.
(e)
added Conforming amendment— Section 1074g(a)(2)(A) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new sentence: “With respect to members of the uniformed services, such uniform formulary shall include pharmaceutical agents on the joint uniform formulary established under section 701 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016.”.

Sec. 702 Access to broad range of methods of contraception approved by the Food and Drug Administration for members of the Armed Forces and military dependents at military treatment facilities

added
(a)
added In general— Commencing not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall ensure that every military medical treatment facility has a sufficient stock of a broad range of methods of contraception approved by the Food and Drug Administration to be able to dispense any such method of contraception to any women members of the Armed Forces and female covered beneficiaries who receive care through such facility.
(b)
added Covered beneficiary defined— In this section, the term covered beneficiary has the meaning given that term in section 1072(5) of title 10, United States Code.

Sec. 703 Access to contraceptive method for duration of deployment

added

added The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that, whenever possible, a female member of the Armed Forces who uses prescription contraception on a long-term basis should be given prior to deployment a sufficient supply of the prescription contraceptive for the duration of the deployment.

Sec. 704 Access to infertility treatment for members of the Armed Forces and dependents

added
(a)
added Access— Pursuant to the findings contained in the report required by section 729 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291), the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretaries of the military departments, shall provide to members of the Armed Forces and dependents of members of the Armed Forces access to reproductive counseling and treatments for infertility.
(b)
added Continuity of services— In carrying out subsection (a), the Secretary shall ensure that members and dependents are provided continuity of services as appropriate if treatments for infertility are disrupted, including pursuant to a change of duty station.

Sec. 711 Unified medical command

added
(a)
added Unified combatant command—
(1)
added In general— Chapter 6 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 167a the following new section:

added “167b. Unified combatant command for medical operations

added “(a) Establishment—With the advice and assistance of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the President, through the Secretary of Defense, shall establish under section 161 of this title a unified command for medical operations (in this section referred to as the “unified medical command”). The principal function of the command is to provide medical services to the armed forces and other health care beneficiaries of the Department of Defense as defined in chapter 55 of this title.

added “(b) Assignment of forces—In establishing the unified medical command under subsection (a), all active military medical treatment facilities, training organizations, and research entities of the armed forces shall be assigned to such unified command, unless otherwise directed by the Secretary of Defense.

added “(c) Grade of commander—The commander of the unified medical command shall hold the grade of general or, in the case of an officer of the Navy, admiral while serving in that position, without vacating his permanent grade. The commander of such command shall be appointed to that grade by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, for service in that position. The commander of such command shall be a member of a health profession described in paragraph (1), (2), (3), (4), (5), or (6) of section 335(j) of title 37. During the five-year period beginning on the date on which the Secretary establishes the command under subsection (a), the commander of such command shall be exempt from the requirements of section 164(a)(1) of this title.

added “(d) Subordinate commands

added “(1) The unified medical command shall have the following subordinate commands:

added “(A) A command that includes all fixed military medical treatment facilities, including elements of the Department of Defense that are combined, operated jointly, or otherwise operated in such a manner that a medical facility of the Department of Defense is operating in or with a medical facility of another department or agency of the United States.

added “(B) A command that includes all medical training, education, and research and development activities that have previously been unified or combined, including organizations that have been designated as a Department of Defense executive agent.

added “(C) The Defense Health Agency.

added “(2) The commander of a subordinate command of the unified medical command shall hold the grade of lieutenant general or, in the case of an officer of the Navy, vice admiral while serving in that position, without vacating his permanent grade. The commander of such a subordinate command shall be appointed to that grade by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, for service in that position. The commander of such a subordinate command shall also be required to be a surgeon general of one of the military departments.

added “(e) Authority of combatant commander

added “(1) In addition to the authority prescribed in section 164(c) of this title, the commander of the unified medical command shall be responsible for, and shall have the authority to conduct, all affairs of such command relating to medical operations activities.

added “(2) The commander of such command shall be responsible for, and shall have the authority to conduct, the following functions relating to medical operations activities (whether or not relating to the unified medical command):

added “(A) Developing programs and doctrine.

added “(B) Preparing and submitting to the Secretary of Defense program recommendations and budget proposals for the forces described in subsection (b) and for other forces assigned to the unified medical command.

added “(C) Exercising authority, direction, and control over the expenditure of funds—

added “(i) for forces assigned to the unified medical command;

added “(ii) for the forces described in subsection (b) assigned to unified combatant commands other than the unified medical command to the extent directed by the Secretary of Defense; and

added “(iii) for military construction funds of the Defense Health Program.

added “(D) Training assigned forces.

added “(E) Conducting specialized courses of instruction for commissioned and noncommissioned officers.

added “(F) Validating requirements.

added “(G) Establishing priorities for requirements.

added “(H) Ensuring the interoperability of equipment and forces.

added “(I) Monitoring the promotions, assignments, retention, training, and professional military education of medical officers described in paragraph (1), (2), (3), (4), (5), or (6) of section 335(j) of title 37.

added “(3) The commander of such command shall be responsible for the Defense Health Program, including the Defense Health Program Account established under section 1100 of this title.

added “(g) Regulations—In establishing the unified medical command under subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall prescribe regulations for the activities of the unified medical command.”

(2)
added Clerical amendment— The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 167a the following new item:
(b)
added Plan, notification, and report—
(1)
added Plan— Not later than July 1, 2016, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a comprehensive plan to establish the unified medical command authorized under section 167b of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a), including any legislative actions the Secretary considers necessary to implement the plan.
(2)
added Notification— The Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees written notification of the time line of the Secretary to establish the unified medical command under such section 167b by not later than the date that is 30 days before establishing such command.
(3)
added Report— Not later than 180 days after submitting the notification under paragraph (2), the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the establishment of the unified medical command.

Sec. 712 Licensure of mental health professionals in TRICARE program

added
(a)
added In general— The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that a qualified mental health professional described in subsection (b) is eligible for reimbursement under the TRICARE program as a TRICARE certified mental health counselor.
(b)
added Qualified mental health care professional described— A qualified mental health care professional described in this subsection is an individual who—
(1)
added holds a masters degree or doctoral degree in counseling from a mental health counseling program or clinical mental health counseling program that is accredited by the Council for Accreditation of Counseling and Related Educational Programs;
(2)
added is licensed by a State in mental health counseling at the clinical level or, with respect to a State that has a tiered licensing scheme, at the highest level available; and
(3)
added has passed the National Clinical Mental Health Counseling Examination.
(c)
added Special rule for certain practicing professionals— During the period preceding January 1, 2027, for purposes of subsection (a), an individual who meets the following criteria is deemed to be a qualified mental health care professional described in subsection (b):
(1)
added The individual holds a masters degree or doctoral degree in counseling from a program that is accredited by a covered institution.
(2)
added The individual has been licensed by a State as a mental health counselor for a period of not less than five years.
(d)
added Definitions— In this section:
(1)
added The term “covered institution” means any of the following:
(A)
added The Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges Western Association of Schools and Colleges (ACCJC-WASC).
(B)
added The Higher Learning Commission (HLC).
(C)
added The Middle States Commission on Higher Education (MSCHE).
(D)
added The New England Association of Schools and Colleges Commission on Institutions of Higher Education (NEASC-CIHE).
(E)
added The Southern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS) Commission on Colleges.
(F)
added The WASC Senior College and University Commission (WASC-SCUC).
(G)
added The Accrediting Bureau of Health Education Schools (ABHES).
(H)
added The Accrediting Commission of Career Schools and Colleges (ACCSC).
(I)
added The Accrediting Council for Independent Colleges and Schools (ACICS).
(J)
added The Distance Education Accreditation Commission (DEAC).
(2)
added The term “State” includes the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and each possession of the United States.
(3)
added The term “TRICARE program” has the meaning given that term in section 1072 of title 10, United States Code.

Sec. 713 Reports on proposed realignments of military medical treatment facilities

added
(a)
added Limitation on realignment— Chapter 55 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 1073b the following new section:

added “1073c. Reports on proposed realignments of military medical treatment facilities

added “(a) Limitation—The Secretary of Defense may not restructure or realign a military medical treatment facility until—

added “(1) the Secretary submits to the congressional defense committees a report on such proposed restructuring or realignment; and

added “(2) a period of 90 days has elapsed following the date of such submission.

added “(b) Elements—Each report under subsection (a)(1) shall include, with respect to the military medical treatment facility covered by the report, the following:

added “(1) The average daily inpatient census.

added “(2) The average inpatient capacity.

added “(3) The top five inpatient admission diagnoses.

added “(4) Each medical specialty available.

added “(5) The average daily percent of staffing available for each medical specialty.

added “(6) The beneficiary population within the catchment area.

added “(7) The budgeted funding level.

added “(8) Whether the facility has a helipad capable of receiving medical evacuation airlift patients arriving on the primary evacuation aircraft platform for the military installation served.

added “(9) A determination of whether the civilian hospital system in which the facility resides, if any, is a Federally-designated underserved medical community and the effect on such community from any reduction in staff or functions or downgrade of the facility.

added “(10) If the facility serves a training center—

added “(A) a determination of the risk with respect to high-tempo, live-fire military operations, treating battlefield-like injuries, and the potential for a mass casualty event if the facility is downgraded to a clinic or reduced in personnel or capabilities; and

added “(B) a description of the extent to which the Secretary, in making such determination, consulted with the appropriate training directorate, training and doctrine command, and forces command of each military department.

added “(11) A site assessment by the TRICARE program to assess the network capabilities of TRICARE providers in the local area.

added “(12) The inpatient mental health availability.

added “(13) The average annual inpatient care directed to civilian medical facilities.

added “(14) The civilian capacity by medical specialty in each catchment area.

added “(15) The distance in miles to the nearest civilian emergency care department.

added “(16) The distance in miles to the closest civilian inpatient hospital, listed by level of care and whether the facility is designated a sole community hospital.

added “(17) The availability of ambulance service on the military installation and the distance in miles to the nearest civilian ambulance service, including the average response time to the military installation.

added “(18) An estimate of the cost to restructure or realign the military medical treatment facility, including with respect to bed closures and civilian personnel reductions.

added “(19) If the military medical treatment facility is restructured or realigned, an estimate of—

added “(A) the number of civilian personnel reductions, listed by series;

added “(B) the number of local support contracts terminated; and

added “(C) the increased cost of purchased care.

added “(20) An assessment of the effect of the elimination of health care services at the military medical treatment facility on civilians employed at such facility.”

(b)
added Clerical amendment— The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 1073b the following new item:

Sec. 714 Pilot program for operation of network of retail pharmacies under TRICARE pharmacy benefits program

added
(a)
added Authority to establish pilot program— The Secretary of Defense may conduct a pilot program to evaluate whether, in carrying out the TRICARE pharmacy benefits program under section 1074g of title 10, United States Code, operating a network of preferred retail pharmacies will generate cost savings for the Department of Defense.
(b)
added Elements of pilot program— In conducting the pilot program under subsection (a), the Secretary shall—
(1)
added incorporate “best practices” to enhance patient access from non-TRICARE health plans that are using a preferred retail network of pharmacies along with the mail-order pharmacy program of the plans and preferred pharmacy networks in Medicare Part D;
(2)
added allow beneficiaries to obtain prescription medication that is available through the TRICARE pharmacy benefits program, including maintenance medication, through the network of preferred retail pharmacies and the national mail-order pharmacy program under section 1074g(a)(2)(E)(iii) of title 10 United States Code;
(3)
added allow retail pharmacies participating in the network of preferred retail pharmacies to purchase prescription medication for beneficiaries at rates available to the Federal government pursuant to section 1074g(f) of title 10, United States Code;
(4)
added ensure that retail pharmacies participating in the network of preferred retail pharmacies shall be comprised of small business pharmacies at a rate no lower than the current TRICARE pharmacy program participation rate;
(5)
added study the potential, viability, cost efficiency, and health care effectiveness of the TRICARE pharmacy benefits program administering prescription medication through a network of preferred retail pharmacies in addition to the methods available pursuant to section 1074g(a)(2)(E) of title 10, United States Code; and
(6)
added determine the opportunities for and barriers to coordinating and leveraging the use of a network of preferred retail pharmacies in addition to such methods available pursuant to such section 1074g(a)(2)(E).
(c)
added Selection of retail pharmacies— The Secretary shall select the retail pharmacies to participate in the preferred network of preferred retail pharmacies pursuant to subsection (a). In making such selection the Secretary may—
(1)
added require that retail pharmacies opt-in to the network and agree to the reimbursement rates paid by the Secretary;
(2)
added determine specific criteria for each retail pharmacy to meet or that a certain number of retail pharmacies must meet;
(3)
added use a competitive process; and
(4)
added require the preferred pharmacy network to comply with the existing TRICARE retail pharmacy access standards.
(d)
added Selection of military communities— In carrying out the pilot program under subsection (a), the Secretary shall select at least one region in which to carry out the pilot program. The Secretary shall ensure that any region selected meets the following criteria:
(1)
added The region has a certain number or percentage, as determined by the Secretary, of—
(A)
added members of the Armed Forces serving on active duty;
(B)
added members of the Armed Forces serving in a reserve component; and
(C)
added retired members of the Armed Forces.
(2)
added The number of beneficiaries under paragraph (1) is sufficient to produce statistically significant results.
(3)
added The region has at least one retail pharmacy that operates at least 10 pharmacy locations in the region.
(4)
added The region has at least one military installation that has a military medical treatment facility with a pharmacy.
(e)
added Consultation— The Secretary shall develop the pilot program under subsection (a) in consultation with—
(1)
added the Secretaries of the military departments;
(2)
added representatives from the military installations within the region selected under subsection (d); and
(3)
added the TRICARE-managed pharmacy contractor with responsibility for the national pharmacy mail-order program.
(f)
added Duration of pilot program— If the Secretary of Defense carries out the pilot program under subsection (a), the Secretary shall commence such pilot program by not later than May 1, 2016, and shall terminate such program on September 30, 2018.
(g)
added Reports— If the Secretary of Defense carries out the pilot program under subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees reports on the pilot program as follows:
(1)
added Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, a report containing an implementation plan for the pilot program.
(2)
added Not later than 90 days after the date on which the pilot program commences, and semiannually thereafter during the period in which the pilot program is carried out, an interim report on the pilot program.
(3)
added Not later than 90 days after the date on which the pilot program terminates, a final report describing the results of the pilot program, including any recommendations of the Secretary to expand such program.

Sec. 721 Extension of authority for DOD-VA Health Care Sharing Incentive Fund

added

added Section 8111(d)(3) of title 38, United States Code, is amended by striking “September 30, 2015” and inserting “September 30, 2020”.

Sec. 722 Extension of authority for Joint Department of Defense-Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Facility Demonstration Fund

added

added Section 1704(e) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2573), as amended by section 722 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291;128 Stat. 3417), is amended by striking “September 30, 2016” and inserting “September 30, 2017”.

Sec. 800 Sense of Congress on the desired tenets of the defense acquisition system

added
(a)
added Findings— Congress finds the following:
(1)
added The Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives held a series of hearings in 2013, 2014, and 2015 gathering testimony from key acquisition leaders and experts. It is clear that the acquisition reform efforts of the last 50 years continue to founder because they fail to address the motivational and environmental factors in which they must be implemented. The acquisition system, though frustrating to all, is in one sense in equilibrium. The acquisition system provides enough benefits to proponents and opponents to continue, with only minor changes, despite its shortcomings.
(2)
added The Armed Forces continue to pursue too many defense acquisitions, chasing too few dollars. Consequently, there remains a vast difference between the budgeting plans of the Department and the reality of the cost of its systems or the services it acquires.
(3)
added To keep programs alive, the Department develops and Congress accepts fragile acquisition strategies that downplay technical issues and assume only successful outcomes from high-risk efforts. As a result, the Department often ends up with too few weapons, with performance that falls short, that are difficult and costly to maintain, delivered late at too high a cost. Congressional and Department of Defense leadership have limited insight into the services acquired or what services need to be acquired in the future. Furthermore, the conventional acquisition process is not agile enough for today’s demands. Finally, the Department of Defense continues to struggle with financial management and auditability, affecting its ability to control costs, ensure basic accountability, anticipate future costs and claims on the budget, and measure performance.
(4)
added Too often today, all stakeholders in the Department of Defense, Congress, and industry, accept that—
(A)
added for the acquisition process, success is defined as maximizing technical performance or protecting organizational interests, without regard to funding disruptions and delivery delays of needed capability or services to the warfighter; and
(B)
added the acquisition process is—
(i)
added reactive, meaning issues are addressed late and at great cost only after problems are realized;
(ii)
added plodding, meaning the bureaucratic processes are sclerotic and cumbersome;
(iii)
added opaque, meaning that limiting information is necessary to protect programs; and
(iv)
added traditional, meaning that customary approaches and suppliers are preferred over perceived risk of new or unique concepts and vendors.
(5)
added Today, the United States is at a cross-roads, and if changes to the acquisition system are not made soon, the trend of fewer and more costly systems and services that fall short of the needs of the Armed Forces will continue. Congress, the Department of Defense, and industry all have a stake in making positive changes. Each plays a role in contributing to the current system. Each gains benefits from that system, but each is frustrated by it as well.
(6)
added The acquisition improvement effort of the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives proposes a different approach from previous efforts by seeking to improve the environment (i.e., statutes, regulations, processes, and culture) driving acquisition decisions in the Department of Defense, industry, and Congress. The Committee has solicited input from industry and the Department of Defense, as well as others in Congress, and will continue to do so. The Committee recognizes that there are no “silver bullets” that can immediately fix the current acquisition system in a holistic and long-standing manner. Therefore, the reform effort will be an ongoing and iterative process that will result in legislation not only this year, but will be embedded in the Committee’s annual and regular work.
(b)
added Sense of congress on the tenets of an improved acquisition system— It is the sense of Congress that all stakeholders in the acquisition system—the Department of Defense, Congress, and industry—should be governed by the following tenets:
(1)
added Success— Success in the acquisition system means the timely delivery of affordable and effective military equipment and services.
(2)
added Proactive— The acquisition system should be proactive, meaning—
(A)
added the system should recognize that development and acquisition problems can occur; and
(B)
added officials at all levels should be empowered to solve problems and reduce risks by surfacing issues early and honestly and taking action to resolve them.
(3)
added Agile— The acquisition system should be agile, meaning that needed program adjustments to both respond to emerging threats and the rapid pace of technological change and to address development or production issues should be proposed and adjudicated quickly.
(4)
added Transparent— The acquisition system should be transparent, meaning that—
(A)
added all decision makers should be given useful, relevant, credible, and reliable information when making commitments;
(B)
added Government and industry communication should be clear and open; and
(C)
added the Department of Defense should produce auditable financial management statements.
(5)
added Innovative— The acquisition system should be innovative, meaning that barriers should be removed that preclude companies from undertaking defense business or officials from proposing new approaches.

Sec. 801 Report on linking and streamlining requirements, acquisition, and budget processes within Armed Forces

(a)
changed Purpose—Reports— The purpose Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this section is to provide Act, the Secretary Chief of Defense and Staff of the Administrator Army, the Chief of Naval Operations, the National Aeronautics Chief of Staff of the Air Force, and Space Administration with an effective administrative remedy to obtain recompense for the Department Commandant of Defense and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration for losses resulting from Marine Corps shall each submit to the submission congressional defense committees a report on efforts to link and streamline the Department or requirements, acquisition, and budget processes within the Administration, respectively, of false, fictitious, or fraudulent claims Army, Navy, Air Force, and statements.Marine Corps, respectively.
(b)
added Matters included— Each report under subsection (a) shall include the following:
(b)
removed Program fraud civil remedies—
(1)
removed In general— Chapter IV of subtitle A of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after chapter 163 the following new chapter:

removed “164 Administrative Remedies for False Claims and Statements

removed “2751. Applicability of chapter; definitions

removed “(a) Applicability of chapter—This chapter applies to the following agencies:

removed “(1) The Department of Defense.

removed “(2) The National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

removed “(b) Definitions—In this chapter:

removed “(1) Head of an agency—The term “head of an agency” means the Secretary of Defense and the Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

removed “(2) Claim—The term “claim” means any request, demand, or submission—

removed “(A) made to the head of an agency for property, services, or money (including money representing grants, loans, insurance, or benefits);

removed “(B) made to a recipient of property, services, or money received directly or indirectly from the head of an agency or to a party to a contract with the head of an agency—

removed “(i) for property or services if the United States—

removed “(I) provided such property or services;

removed “(II) provided any portion of the funds for the purchase of such property or services; or

removed “(III) will reimburse such recipient or party for the purchase of such property or services; or

removed “(ii) for the payment of money (including money representing grants, loans, insurance, or benefits) if the United States—

removed “(I) provided any portion of the money requested or demanded; or

removed “(II) will reimburse such recipient or party for any portion of the money paid on such request or demand; or

removed “(C) made to the head of an agency which has the effect of decreasing an obligation to pay or account for property, services, or money.

removed “(3) Knows or has reason to know—The term “knows or has reason to know”, for purposes of establishing liability under section 2752 of this title, means that a person, with respect to a claim or statement—

removed “(A) has actual knowledge that the claim or statement is false, fictitious, or fraudulent;

removed “(B) acts in deliberate ignorance of the truth or falsity of the claim or statement; or

removed “(C) acts in reckless disregard of the truth or falsity of the claim or statement, and no proof of specific intent to defraud is required.

removed “(4) Responsible official—The term “responsible official” means a designated debarring and suspending official of the agency named in subsection (a).

removed “(5) Respondent—The term “respondent” means a person who has received notice from a responsible official asserting liability under section 2752 of this title.

removed “(6) Statement—The term “statement” means any representation, certification, affirmation, document, record, or an accounting or bookkeeping entry made—

removed “(A) with respect to a claim or to obtain the approval or payment of a claim (including relating to eligibility to make a claim); or

removed “(B) with respect to (including relating to eligibility for)—

removed “(i) a contract with, or a bid or proposal for a contract with the head of an agency; or

removed “(ii) a grant, loan, or benefit from the head of an agency.

removed “(c) Claims—For purposes of paragraph (2) of subsection (b)—

removed “(1) each voucher, invoice, claim form, or other individual request or demand for property, services, or money constitutes a separate claim;

removed “(2) each claim for property, services, or money is subject to this chapter regardless of whether such property, services, or money is actually delivered or paid; and

removed “(3) a claim shall be considered made, presented, or submitted to the head of an agency, recipient, or party when such claim is actually made to an agent, fiscal intermediary, or other entity acting for or on behalf of such authority, recipient, or party.

removed “(d) Statements—For purposes of paragraph (6) of subsection (b)—

removed “(1) each written representation, certification, or affirmation constitutes a separate statement; and

removed “(2) a statement shall be considered made, presented, or submitted to the head of an agency when such statement is actually made to an agent, fiscal intermediary, or other entity acting for or on behalf of such authority.

removed “2752. False claims and statements; liability

removed “(a) False claims—Any person who makes, presents, or submits, or causes to be made, presented, or submitted, to the head of an agency a claim that the person knows or has reason to know—

removed “(1) is false, fictitious, or fraudulent;

removed “(2) includes or is supported by any written statement which asserts a material fact this is false, fictitious, or fraudulent;

removed “(3) includes or is supported by any written statement that—

removed “(A) omits a material fact;

removed “(B) is false, fictitious, or fraudulent as a result of such omission; and

removed “(C) the person making, presenting, or submitting such statement has a duty to include such material fact; or

removed “(4) is for payment for the provision of property or services which the person has not provided as claimed, shall, in addition to any other remedy that may be prescribed by law, be subject to a civil penalty of not more than $5,000 for each such claim. Such person shall also be subject to an assessment of not more than twice the amount of such claim, or the portion of such claim which is determined by the responsible official to be in violation of the preceding sentence.

removed “(b) False statements—Any person who makes, presents, submits, or causes to be made, presented, or submitted, a written statement in conjunction with a procurement program or acquisition of the an agency named in section 2751(a) of this title that—

removed “(1) the person knows or has reason to know—

removed “(A) asserts a material fact that is false, fictitious, or fraudulent; or

removed “(B)

removed “(i) omits a material fact; and

removed “(ii) is false, fictitious, or fraudulent as a result of such omission;

removed “(2) in the case of a statement described in subparagraph (B) of paragraph (1), is a statement in which the person making, presenting, or submitting such statement has a duty to include such material fact; and

removed “(3) contains or is accompanied by an express certification or affirmation of the truthfulness and accuracy of the contents of the statement, shall be subject to, in addition to any other remedy that may be prescribed by law, a civil penalty of not more than $5,000 for each such statement.

removed “2753. Hearing and determinations

removed “(a) Transmittal of notice to attorney general—If a responsible official determines that there is adequate evidence to believe that a person is liable under section 2752 of this title, the responsible official shall transmit to the Attorney General, or any other officer or employee of the Department of Justice designated by the Attorney General, a written notice of the intention of such official to initiate an action under this section. The notice shall include the following:

removed “(1) A statement of the reasons for initiating an action under this section.

removed “(2) A statement specifying the evidence which supports liability under section 2752 of this title.

removed “(3) A description of the claims or statements for which liability under section 2752 of this title is alleged.

removed “(4) An estimate of the penalties and assessments that will be demanded under section 2752 of this title.

removed “(5) A statement of any exculpatory or mitigating circumstances which may relate to such claims or statements.

removed “(b) Statement from attorney general

removed “(1) Within 90 days after receipt of a notice from a responsible official under subsection (a), the Attorney General, or any other officer or employee of the Department of Justice designated by the Attorney General, shall transmit a written statement to the responsible official which specifies—

removed “(A) that the Attorney General, or any other officer or employee of the Department of Justice designated by the Attorney General, approves or disapproves initiating an action under this section based on the allegations of liability stated in such notice; and

removed “(B) in any case in which the initiation of an action under this section is disapproved, the reasons for such disapproval.

removed “(2) If at any time after the initiation of an action under this section the Attorney General, or any other officer or employee of the Department of Justice designated by the Attorney General, transmits to a responsible official a written determination that the continuation of any action under this section may adversely affect any pending or potential criminal or civil action, such action shall be immediately stayed and may be resumed only upon written authorization from the Attorney General, or any other officer or employee of the Department of Justice designated by the Attorney General.

removed “(c) Limitation on amount of claim that may be pursued under this section—No action shall be initiated under this section, nor shall any assessment be imposed under this section, if the total amount of the claim determined by the responsible official to violate section 2752(a) of this title exceeds $500,000. The $500,000 threshold does not include penalties or any assessment permitted under 2752(a) of this title greater than the amount of the claim determined by the responsible official to violate such section.

removed “(d) Procedures for resolving claims

removed “(1) Upon receiving approval under subsection (b) to initiate an action under this section, the responsible official shall mail, by registered or certified mail, or other similar commercial means, or shall deliver, a notice to the person alleged to be liable under section 2752 of this title. Such notice shall specify the allegations of liability against such person, specify the total amount of penalties and assessments sought by the United States, advise the person of the opportunity to submit facts and arguments in opposition to the allegations set forth in the notice, advise the person of the opportunity to submit offers of settlement or proposals of adjustment, and advise the person of the procedures of the agency named in section 2751(a) of this title governing the resolution of actions initiated under this section.

removed “(2) Within 30 days after receiving a notice under paragraph (1), or any additional period of time granted by the responsible official, the respondent may submit in person, in writing, or through a representative, facts and arguments in opposition to the allegations set forth in the notice, including any additional information that raises a genuine dispute of material fact.

removed “(3) If the respondent fails to respond within 30 days, or any additional time granted by the responsible official, the responsible official may issue a written decision disposing of the matters raised in the notice. Such decision shall be based on the record before the responsible official. If the responsible official concludes that the respondent is liable under section 2752 of this title, the decision shall include the findings of fact and conclusions of law which the responsible official relied upon in determining that the respondent is liable, and the amount of any penalty and/or assessment to be imposed on the respondent. Any such determination shall be based on a preponderance of the evidence. The responsible official shall promptly send to the respondent a copy of the decision by registered or certified mail, or other similar commercial means, or shall hand deliver a copy of the decision.

removed “(4) If the respondent makes a timely submission, and the responsible official determines that the respondent has not raised any genuine dispute of material fact, the responsible official may issue a written decision disposing of the matters raised in the notice. Such decision shall be based on the record before the responsible official. If the responsible official concludes that the respondent is liable under section 2752 of this title, the decision shall include the findings of fact and conclusions of law which the responsible official relied upon in determining that the respondent is liable, and the amount of any penalty or assessment to be imposed on the respondent. Any such determination shall be based on a preponderance of the evidence. The responsible official shall promptly send to the respondent a copy of the decision by registered or certified mail, or other similar commercial means, or shall hand deliver a copy of the decision.

removed “(5) If the respondent makes a timely submission, and the responsible official determines that the respondent has raised a genuine dispute of material fact, the responsible official shall commence a hearing to resolve the genuinely disputed material facts by mailing by registered or certified mail, or other similar commercial means, or by hand delivery of, a notice informing the respondent of—

removed “(A) the time, place, and nature of the hearing;

removed “(B) the legal authority under which the hearing is to be held;

removed “(C) the material facts determined by the responsible official to be genuinely in dispute that will be the subject of the hearing; and

removed “(D) a description of the procedures for the conduct of the hearing.

removed “(6) The responsible official and any person against whom liability is asserted under this chapter may agree to a compromise or settle an action at any time. Any compromise or settlement must be in writing.

removed “(e) Respondent entitled to copy of the record—At any time after receiving a notice under paragraph (1) of subsection (d), the respondent shall be entitled to a copy of the entire record before the responsible official.

removed “(f) Hearings—Any hearing commenced under this section shall be conducted by the responsible official, or a fact-finder designated by the responsible official, solely to resolve genuinely disputed material facts identified by the responsible official and set forth in the notice to the respondent.

removed “(g) Procedures for hearings

removed “(1) Each hearing shall be conducted under procedures prescribed by the head of the agency. Such procedures shall include the following:

removed “(A) The provision of written notice of the hearing to the respondent, including written notice of—

removed “(i) the time, place, and nature of the hearing;

removed “(ii) the legal authority under which the hearing is to be held;

removed “(iii) the material facts determined by the responsible official to be genuinely in dispute that will be the subject of the hearing; and

removed “(iv) a description of the procedures for the conduct of the hearing.

removed “(B) The opportunity for the respondent to present facts and arguments through oral or documentary evidence, to submit rebuttal evidence, and to conduct such cross-examination as may be required to resolve any genuinely disputed material facts identified by the responsible official.

removed “(C) The opportunity for the respondent to be accompanied, represented, and advised by counsel or such other qualified representative as the Secretary may specify in such regulations.

removed “(2) For the purpose of conducting hearings under this section, the responsible official is authorized to administer oaths or affirmations.

removed “(3) Hearings shall be held at the responsible official’s office, or at such other place as may be agreed upon by the respondent and the responsible official.

removed “(h) Decision following hearing—The responsible official shall issue a written decision within 60 days after the conclusion of the hearing. That decision shall set forth specific findings of fact resolving the genuinely disputed material facts that were the subject of the hearing. The written decision shall also dispose of the matters raised in the notice required under paragraph (1) of subsection (d). If the responsible official concludes that the respondent is liable under section 2752 of this title, the decision shall include the findings of fact and conclusions of law which the responsible official relied upon in determining that the respondent is liable, and the amount of any penalty or assessment to be imposed on the respondent. Any decisions issued under this subparagraph shall be based on the record before the responsible official and shall be supported by a preponderance of the evidence. The responsible official shall promptly send to the respondent a copy of the decision by registered or certified mail, or other similar commercial means, or shall hand deliver a copy of the decision.

removed “2754. Payment; interest on late payments

removed “(a) Payment of assessments and penalties—A respondent shall render payment of any assessment and penalty imposed by a responsible official, or any amount otherwise agreed to as part of a settlement or adjustment, not later than the date—

removed “(1) that is 30 days after the date of the receipt by the respondent of the responsible official’s decision; or

removed “(2) as otherwise agreed to by the respondent and the responsible official.

removed “(b) Interest—If there is an unpaid balance as of the date determined under paragraph (1), interest shall accrue from that date on any unpaid balance. The rate of interest charged shall be the rate in effect as of that date that is published by the Secretary of the Treasury under section 3717 of title 31.

removed “(c) Treatment of receipts—All penalties, assessments, or interest paid, collected, or otherwise recovered under this chapter shall be deposited into the Treasury as miscellaneous receipts as provided in section 3302 of title 31.

removed “2755. Judicial review

removed “A decision by a responsible official under section 2753(d) or 2753(h) of this title shall be final. Any such final decision is subject to judicial review only under chapter 7 of title 5.

removed “2756. Collection of civil penalties and assessments

removed “(a) Judicial enforcement of civil penalties and assessments—The Attorney General shall be responsible for judicial enforcement of any civil penalty or assessment imposed under this chapter.

removed “(b) Civil actions for recovery—Any penalty or assessment imposed in a decision by a responsible official, or amounts otherwise agreed to as part of a settlement or adjustment, along with any accrued interest, may be recovered in a civil action brought by the Attorney General. In any such action, no matter that was raised or that could have been raised in a proceeding under this chapter or pursuant to judicial review under section 2755 of this title may be raised as a defense, and the determination of liability and the determination of amounts of penalties and assessments shall not be subject to review.

removed “(c) Jurisdiction of United States district courts—The district courts of the United States shall have jurisdiction of any action commenced by the United States under subsection (b).

removed “(d) Joining and consolidating actions—Any action under subsection (b) may, without regard to venue requirements, be joined and consolidated with or asserted as a counterclaim, cross-claim, or setoff by the United States in any other civil action which includes as parties the United States, and the person against whom such action may be brought.

removed “(e) Jurisdiction of united states court of federal claims—The United States Court of Federal Claims shall have jurisdiction of any action under subsection (b) to recover any penalty or assessment, or amounts otherwise agreed to as part of a settlement or adjustment, along with any accrued interest, if the cause of action is asserted by the United States as a counterclaim in a matter pending in such court. The counterclaim need not relate to the subject matter of the underlying claim.

removed “2757. Right to administrative offset

removed “The amount of any penalty or assessment that has been imposed by a responsible official, or any amount agreed upon in a settlement or compromise, along with any accrued interest, may be collected by administrative offset.

removed “2758. Limitations

removed “(a) Limitation on period for initiation of administrative action—An action under section 2752 of this title with respect to a claim or statement shall be commenced within six years after the date on which such claim or statement is made, presented, or submitted.

removed “(b) Limitation period for initiation of civil action for recovery of administrative penalty or assessment—A civil action to recover a penalty or assessment under section 2756 of this title shall be commenced within three years after the date of the decision of the responsible official imposing the penalty or assessment.

removed “2759. Effect on other laws

removed “(a) Relationship to title 44 authorities—This chapter does not diminish the responsibility of the head of an agency to comply with the provisions of chapter 35 of title 44, relating to coordination of Federal information policy.

removed “(b) Relationship to title 31 authorities—The procedures set forth in this chapter apply to the agencies named in section 2751(a) of this title in lieu of the procedures under chapter 38 of title 31, relating to administrative remedies for false claims and statements.

removed “(c) Relationship to other authorities—Any action, inaction, or decision under this chapter shall be based solely upon the information before the responsible official and shall not limit or restrict any agency of the Government from instituting any other action arising outside this chapter, including suspension or debarment, based upon the same information. Any action, inaction or decision under this chapter shall not restrict the ability of the Attorney General to bring judicial action, based upon the same information as long as such action is not otherwise prohibited by law.”

(1)
changed Clerical amendment— The tables of chapters at the beginning of subtitle A, and at the beginning of part IV of subtitle A, of such title are each amended by inserting after the item relating to chapter 163 the following new item:A specific description of—
(A)
added the management actions the Chief concerned or the Commandant has taken or plans to take to link and streamline the requirements, acquisition, and budget processes of the Armed Force concerned;
(B)
added any reorganization or process changes that will link and streamline the requirements, acquisition, and budget processes of the Armed Force concerned; and
(C)
added any cross-training or professional development initiatives of the Chief concerned or the Commandant.
(2)
added For each description under paragraph (1)—
(A)
added the specific timeline associated with implementation;
(B)
added the anticipated outcomes once implemented; and
(C)
added how to measure whether or not those outcomes are realized.
(3)
added Any other matters the Chief concerned or the Commandant considers appropriate.
(c)
removed Conforming amendments— Section 3801(a)(1) of title 31, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
removed by inserting “(other than the Department of Defense)” in subparagraph (A) after “executive department”;
(2)
removed by striking subparagraph (B);
(3)
removed by redesignating subparagraph (C) as subparagraph (B) and by inserting “(other than the National Aeronautics and Space Administration)” in that subparagraph after “not an executive department”; and
(4)
removed by redesignating subparagraphs (D), (E), and (F) as subparagraphs (C), (D), and (E), respectively.
(d)
removed Effective date— Chapter 164 of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (b), and the amendments made by subsection (c), shall apply to any claim or statement made, presented, or submitted on or after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Sec. 802 Required review of acquisition-related functions of the Chiefs of Staff of the Armed Forces

(a)
changed Elements of the fund—Review required— Subsection (d) The Chief of section 1705 Staff of the Army, the Chief of Naval Operations, the Chief of Staff of the Air Force, and the Commandant of the Marine Corps shall conduct a review of their current individual authorities provided in sections 3033, 5033, 8033, and 5043 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—and other relevant statutes and regulations related to defense acquisitions for the purpose of developing such recommendations as the Chief concerned or the Commandant considers necessary to further or advance the role of the Chief concerned or the Commandant in the development of requirements, acquisition processes, and the associated budget practices of the Department of Defense.
(1)
removed in paragraph (1)—
(A)
removed in subparagraph (A), by striking “credited to the Fund under paragraph (2)” and inserting “appropriated to the Fund”;
(B)
removed in subparagraph (B), by striking “paragraph (3)” and inserting “paragraph (2)”; and
(C)
removed by striking subparagraph (C);
(2)
removed by striking paragraphs (2) and (4);
(3)
removed by redesignating paragraph (3) as paragraph (2);
(4)
removed in paragraph (2), as so redesignated—
(A)
removed in the first sentence, by striking “24-month period” and inserting “36-month period”; and
(B)
removed in the second sentence, by striking “credited to the Fund” and inserting “credited to amounts appropriated to the Fund for the fiscal year in which such funds are transferred”; and
(5)
removed by inserting after paragraph (2), as so redesignated, the following new paragraph (3):

removed “(3) Prior notice to congressional committees of certain transfers—The Secretary of Defense may make a transfer to the Fund pursuant to paragraph (2) that increases to an amount greater than $500,000,000 the total amount made available to the Fund for a fiscal year only after the Secretary submits to the congressional defense committees notice of the Secretary’s intent to make such transfer and a period of 10 days has elapsed following the date of the notification.”

(b)
changed Availability of funds—Reports— Subsection (e) Not later than March 1, 2016, the Chief of such section is amended—Staff of the Army, the Chief of Naval Operations, the Chief of Staff of the Air Force, and the Commandant of the Marine Corps shall each submit to the congressional defense committees a report containing, at a minimum, the following:
(1)
changed in paragraph (1), The recommendations developed by inserting “appropriations available to” after “for transfer to”; andthe Chief concerned or the Commandant under subsection (a) and other results of the review conducted under such subsection.
(2)
changed in paragraph (6)—The actions the Chief concerned or the Commandant is taking, if any, within the Chief’s or Commandant’s existing authority to implement such recommendations.
(A)
removed by striking “credited to the Fund in accordance with subsection (d)(2),”;
(B)
removed by striking “subsection (d)(3),” and inserting “subsection (d)(2) or”;
(C)
removed by striking “, or deposited to the Fund”; and
(D)
removed by striking “for which credited” and all that follows and inserting “in which transferred, or for which appropriated, and the succeeding fiscal year.”.
(c)
removed Annual report— Subsection (f)(1) of such section is amended by striking “remitted” and all that follows through “credited” and inserting “transferred to the Fund in such fiscal year or appropriated”.

Sec. 803 Independent study of matters related to bid protests

added
(a)
added Requirement for study— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall enter into a contract with an independent research entity that is a not-for-profit entity or a federally funded research and development center with appropriate expertise and analytical capability to carry out a comprehensive study of factors leading to the filing of bid protests. The study shall examine issues such as the following:
(1)
added The variable influences on the net benefit (monetary and non-monetary) to contractors either filing a protest or indicating intent to file a protest.
(2)
added The extent to which protests are filed by incumbent contractors for purposes of extending a contract’s period of performance.
(3)
added The extent to which companies file protests even when those companies do not believe there was an error in the procurement process.
(4)
added The time it takes agencies to implement corrective actions after a ruling or decision.
(b)
added Report— Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the independent entity shall provide to the Secretary and the congressional defense committees a report on the results of the study, along with any recommendations it may have.

Sec. 804 Procurement of commercial items

added
(a)
added Commercial Item Determinations by Department of Defense—
(1)
added In general— Chapter 140 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

added “2380. Commercial item determinations by Department of Defense

added “The Secretary of Defense shall—

added “(1) establish and maintain a centralized capability with necessary expertise and resources to oversee the making of commercial item determinations for the purposes of procurements by the Department of Defense; and

added “(2) provide public access to Department of Defense commercial item determinations for the purposes of procurements by the Department of Defense.”

(2)
added Clerical amendment— The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by adding at the end the following new item:
(b)
added Commercial item exception to submission of cost and pricing data— Section 2306a(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

added “(4) Commercial item determination

added “(A) For purposes of applying the commercial item exception under paragraph (1)(B) to the required submission of certified cost or pricing data, the contracting officer may presume that a prior commercial item determination made by a military department, a Defense Agency, or another component of the Department of Defense shall serve as a determination for subsequent procurements of such item.

added “(B) If the contracting officer does not make the presumption described in subparagraph (A) and instead chooses to proceed with a procurement of an item previously determined to be a commercial item using procedures other than the procedures authorized for the procurement of a commercial item, the contracting officer shall request a review of the commercial item determination by the head of the contracting activity.

added “(C) Not later than 30 days after receiving a request for review of a commercial item determination under subparagraph (B), the head of a contracting activity shall—

added “(i) confirm that the prior determination was appropriate and still applicable; or

added “(ii) issue a revised determination with a written explanation of the basis for the revision.”

(c)
added Definition of commercial item— Nothing in this section or the amendments made by this section shall affect the meaning of the term “commercial item” under subsection (a)(5) of section 2464 of title 10, United States Code, or any requirement under subsection (c) of such section.

Sec. 805 Modification to information required to be submitted by offeror in procurement of major weapon systems as commercial items

added
(a)
added Requirement for determination— Subsection (a) of section 2379 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
added in subsection (1)(B), by inserting “; and” after the semicolon;
(2)
added by striking paragraph (2); and
(3)
added by redesignating paragraph (3) as paragraph (2).
(b)
added Treatment of subsystems as commercial items— Subsection (b) of such section is amended—
(1)
added in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking “only if” and inserting “if either”;
(2)
added in paragraph (2)—
(A)
added by striking “that—” and all that follows through “the subsystem is a” and inserting “that the subsystem is a”;
(B)
added by striking “; and” and inserting a period; and
(C)
added by striking subparagraph (B).
(c)
added Treatment of components as commercial items— Subsection (c)(1) of such section is amended—
(1)
added by striking “title only if” and inserting “title if either”; and
(2)
added in subparagraph (B)—
(A)
added by striking “that—” and all that follows through “the component or” and inserting “that the component or”;
(B)
added by striking “; and” and inserting a period; and
(C)
added by striking clause (ii).
(d)
added Information submitted— Subsection (d) of such section is amended—
(1)
added by striking “submit—” and all that follows through “prices paid” and inserting “submit prices paid”;
(2)
added by striking “; and” and inserting a period; and
(3)
added by striking paragraph (2).

Sec. 806 Amendment relating to multiyear contract authority for acquisition of property

added

added Paragraph (1) of section 2306b(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:

added “(1) That there is a reasonable expectation that the use of such a contract will result in lower total anticipated costs of carrying out the program than if the program were carried out through annual contracts.”

Sec. 807 Compliance with inventory of contracts for services

added

added Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2016 for the operation of the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness, not more than 75 percent may be obligated or expended in fiscal year 2016 until—

(1)
added the “Department of Defense Compliance Plan for Section 8108(c) of Public Law 112–10”, as contained in a memorandum and enclosure dated November 22, 2011, is implemented;
(2)
added the implementing direction contained in the “Enterprise-wide Contractor Manpower Reporting Application”, as contained in a memorandum dated November 28, 2012, from the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics and the (then) Acting Principal Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness is fulfilled; and
(3)
added the funds made available in March 2014 to establish the Total Force Management Support Office to define business processes for compiling, reviewing, and using the inventory required under section 2330a(c) of title 10, United States Code, have been obligated.

Sec. 811 Amendments to Department of Defense Acquisition Workforce Development Fund

(a)
added Permanent extension of fund— Section 1705(d)(2) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
added in subparagraph (C), by striking “of an amount as follows:” and all that follows through the end and inserting “of an amount of not less than $500,000,000.”; and
(2)
added in subparagraph (D), by striking “an amount that is less than” and all that follows through the end and inserting “an amount that is less than $400,000,000.”.

removed Section 1908(e)(2) of title 41, United States Code, is amended—

(b)
changed Permanent extension of expedited hiring authority— in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking “on the day before the adjustment” and inserting “as calculated under paragraph (1)”;Section 1705(g) of such title is amended—
(1)
added by striking paragraph (2);
(2)
added by striking “Authority.—” and all that follows through “For purposes of” in paragraph (1) and inserting “Authority.—For purposes of”;
(3)
added by striking “(A)” and inserting “(1)”;
(4)
added by striking “(B)” and inserting “(2)”; and
(5)
added by aligning paragraphs (1) and (2), as designated by paragraphs (3) and (4), so as to be two ems from the left margin.
(c)
changed Clarification of acquisition workforce covered— Section 1705(g) of such title, as amended by subsection (c), is further amended by striking “and” at “acquisition workforce positions” and inserting “of positions in the end of subparagraph (C); andacquisition workforce, as defined in subsection (h),”.
(3)
removed by striking subparagraph (D) and inserting the following:

removed “(D) not less than $1,000,000, but less than $10,000,000, to the nearest $500,000;

removed “(E) not less than $10,000,000, but less than $100,000,000, to the nearest $5,000,000;

removed “(F) not less than $100,000,000, but less than $1,000,000,000, to the nearest $50,000,000; and

removed “(G) $1,000,000,000 or more, to the nearest $500,000,000.”

Sec. 812 Dual-track military professionals in operational and acquisition specialities

(a)
added Requirement for service chief involvement— Section 1722a(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after “military department)” the following: “, in collaboration with the Chief of Staff of the Army, the Chief of Naval Operations, the Chief of Staff of the Air Force, and the Commandant of the Marine Corps (with respect to the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marine Corps, respectively),”.
(b)
added Dual-track career path— Section 1722a(b) of such title is amended—
(1)
added by redesignating paragraphs (2) and (3) as paragraphs (3) and (4), respectively;
(2)
added in paragraph (1), by inserting “single-track” before “career path”; and
(3)
added by inserting after paragraph (1) the following new paragraph (2):

added “(2) A dual-track career path that attracts the highest quality officers and enlisted personnel and allows them to gain experience in and receive credit for a primary career in combat arms and a functional secondary career in the acquisition field in order to more closely align the military operational, requirements, and acquisition workforces of each armed force.”

removed Section 801(f) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2399), as most recently amended by section 832 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 814), is further amended by striking “December 31, 2015” and inserting “December 31, 2018”.

Sec. 813 Provision of joint duty assignment credit for acquisition duty

added Section 668(a)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—

(a)
removed Contracting under title 41, United States Code— Section 3306(c) of title 41, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
removed in paragraph (1), by inserting “except as provided in paragraph (3),” in subparagraphs (B) and (C) after the subparagraph designation; and
(2)
removed by adding at the end the following new paragraphs:

removed “(3) Exceptions for certain indefinite delivery, indefinite quantity contracts—If the head of an agency issues a solicitation for multiple task or delivery order contracts under section 4103(d) of this title for the same or similar services and intends to make a contract award to each qualifying offeror—

removed “(A) cost or price to the Federal Government need not, at the Government’s discretion, be considered under subparagraph (B) of paragraph (1) as an evaluation factor for the contract award; and

removed “(B) if, pursuant to subparagraph (A), cost or price to the Federal Government is not considered as an evaluation factor for the contract award—

removed “(i) the disclosure requirement of subparagraph (C) of paragraph (1) shall not apply; and

removed “(ii) cost or price to the Federal Government shall be considered in conjunction with the issuance pursuant to section 4106(c) of this title of a task or delivery order under any contract resulting from the solicitation.

removed “(4) Qualifying offeror defined—In paragraph (3), the term “qualifying offeror” means an offeror that—

removed “(A) is determined to be a responsible source;

removed “(B) submits a proposal that conforms to the requirements of the solicitation; and

removed “(C) the contracting officer has no reason to believe would likely offer other than fair and reasonable pricing.”

(1)
changed Contracting under title 10, united states code— Section 2305(a)(3) by striking “or” at the end of title 10, United States Code, is amended—subparagraph (D);
(2)
added by striking the period at the end of subparagraph (E) and inserting “; or”; and
(3)
added by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:

added “(F) acquisition matters addressed by military personnel and covered under chapter 87 of this title.”

(1)
removed in subparagraph (A), by inserting “(except as provided in subparagraph (C))” in clauses (ii) and (iii) after “shall”; and
(2)
removed by adding at the end the following new subparagraphs:

removed “(C) If the head of an agency issues a solicitation for multiple task or delivery order contracts under section 2304a(d)(1)(B) of this title for the same or similar services and intends to make a contract award to each qualifying offeror—

removed “(i) cost or price to the Federal Government need not, at the Government’s discretion, be considered under clause (ii) of subparagraph (A) as an evaluation factor for the contract award; and

removed “(ii) if, pursuant to clause (i), cost or price to the Federal Government is not considered as an evaluation factor for the contract award—

removed “(I) the disclosure requirement of clause (iii) of subparagraph (A) shall not apply; and

removed “(II) cost or price to the Federal Government shall be considered in conjunction with the issuance pursuant to section 2304c(b) of this title of a task or delivery order under any contract resulting from the solicitation.

removed “(D) In subparagraph (C), the term “qualifying offeror” means an offeror that—

removed “(i) is determined to be a responsible source;

removed “(ii) submits a proposal that conforms to the requirements of the solicitation; and

removed “(iii) the contracting officer has no reason to believe would likely offer other than fair and reasonable pricing.”

Sec. 814 Requirement for acquisition skills assessment biennial strategic workforce plan

added
(a)
added Requirement— Section 115b(b)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
added by redesignating subparagraph (D) as subparagraph (E);
(2)
added in subparagraph (C), by striking “and” at the end; and
(3)
added by inserting after subparagraph (C) the following:

added “(D) new or expanded critical skills and competencies needed by the existing civilian employee workforce of the Department to address new acquisition process requirements established by law or policy during the four years preceding the year of submission of the plan; and”

(b)
added Conforming amendments— Section 115b of such title is further amended—
(1)
added in subparagraph (E) of subsection (b)(1), as redesignated by subsection (a)(1), by striking “(C)” and inserting “(D)”;
(2)
added in paragraph (2) of subsection (b), in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking “(1)(D)” and inserting “(1)(E)”; and
(3)
added in paragraph (2)(A) of each of subsections (c), (d), and (e), by striking “through (D)” and inserting “through (E)”.

Sec. 815 Mandatory requirement for training related to the conduct of market research

added
(a)
added Mandatory market research training— Section 2377 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

added “(d) Market research training required—The Secretary of Defense shall provide mandatory training for members of the armed forces and employees of the Department of Defense responsible for the conduct of market research required under subsection (c). Such mandatory training shall, at a minimum—

added “(1) provide comprehensive information on the subject of market research and the function of market research in the acquisition of commercial items;

added “(2) teach best practices for conducting and documenting market research; and

added “(3) provide methodologies for establishing standard processes and reports for collecting and sharing market research across the Department.”

(b)
added Incorporation into management certification training mandate— The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff shall ensure that the requirements of section 2377(d) of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a), are incorporated into the requirements management certification training mandate of the Joint Capabilities Integration Development System.

Sec. 816 Independent study of implementation of defense acquisition workforce improvement efforts

added
(a)
added Requirement for study— Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall enter into a contract with an independent research entity described in subsection (b) to carry out a comprehensive study of the strategic planning of the Department of Defense related to the defense acquisition workforce. The study shall provide a comprehensive examination of the Department’s efforts to recruit, develop, and retain the acquisition workforce with a specific review of the following:
(1)
added The implementation of the Defense Acquisition Workforce Improvement Act (including chapter 87 of title 10, United States Code).
(2)
added The application of the Department of Defense Acquisition Workforce Development Fund (as established under section 1705 of title 10, United States Code).
(3)
added The effectiveness of professional military education programs, including fellowships and exchanges with industry.
(b)
added Independent research entity— The entity described in this subsection is an independent research entity that is a not-for-profit entity or a federally funded research and development center with appropriate expertise and analytical capability.
(c)
added Reports—
(1)
added To Secretary— Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the independent research entity shall provide to the Secretary a report containing—
(A)
added the results of the study required by subsection (a); and
(B)
added such recommendations to improve the acquisition workforce as the independent research entity considers to be appropriate.
(2)
added To Congress— Not later than 30 days after receipt of the report under paragraph (1), the Secretary of Defense shall submit such report, together with any additional views or recommendations of the Secretary, to the congressional defense committees.

Sec. 817 Extension of demonstration project relating to certain acquisition personnel management policies and procedures

added

added Section 1762(g) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “2017” and inserting “2020”.

Sec. 821 Sense of Congress on the desired characteristics for the weapon systems acquisition system

(a)
changed Determination of contract type—Findings— Section 2306 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end Congress makes the following new subsection:findings:
(1)
added Current situation— Despite significant and repeated attempts at acquisition reform, the Department of Defense still experiences case after case of expensive weapon system acquisition failures. The Department of Defense has a track record of too many cancellations, schedule slippages, cost over-runs, and failures to deliver timely solutions to the requirements of the Armed Forces. This situation is unacceptable. For example, according to the Final Report of the 2010 Army Acquisition Review, between 1996 and 2010, the Army expended approximately $1 billion to $3 billion annually on two dozen programs that were eventually cancelled. No military service and no type of weapon acquisition has been immune.
(2)
added Problems in all phases of acquisitions—
(A)
added Despite detailed weapon acquisition processes and procedures, there is only limited discipline in starting programs. Many programs begin without a solid foundation. They have too many requirements deemed “critical”, which are driven by too many organizations and individuals. Approved requirements are often set with only a limited understanding of the technical feasibility of achieving them. The resulting compromises of good program management and engineering judgment that allow the programs to proceed are the “spackle” of the acquisition system that covers up the risks and enables the system to operate.
(B)
added As these weapon systems proceed into engineering and manufacturing development, they often encounter development problems leading to cost growth, schedule delay, and performance reductions. Industry and Government officials frequently respond by taking additional development risks to resolve basic performance issues by reducing the time to analyze and assess development results, overlapping key development efforts, and reducing testing. The Department of Defense and Congress disrupt the planned funding of stable programs to find resources for troubled programs or to fund across-the-board spending cuts. Funding instability is the inevitable price that programs pay for survival because funding disruptions actually keep more programs alive.
(C)
added Finally, these weapons are often rushed into production only to encounter production problems, and are fielded with many unknowns or deficiencies leading to significantly reduced quantities and force structure reductions. The warfighter faces the challenge of operating weapons with poor reliability, high maintenance demands, reduced performance, and many capability shortfalls.
(b)
added Sense of Congress—
(1)
added In general— It is the sense of Congress that, in accordance with the tenets described in section 800, to improve weapon system acquisitions, the Department of Defense, Congress, and industry should develop an acquisition system characterized by highly disciplined program initiation coupled with agile program execution and balanced oversight, as described in paragraphs (2), (3), and (4).
(2)
added Highly disciplined program initiation— An acquisition system characterized by highly disciplined program initiation means that programs do not begin engineering development until firm requirements are matched to a flexible acquisition strategy structured to develop militarily useful capability that can be delivered in a relevant period of time with available technologies, funding, and management capacity. Such a highly disciplined program initiation includes—
(A)
added a workforce with smart requirements setters and expert buyers, with the knowledge, skills, and experience to successfully plan for and execute highly complex acquisitions;
(B)
added requirements that are well-defined, technically feasible, and affordable;
(C)
added acquisition strategies that are designed to minimize time to market of militarily useful capability, with the program concerned being structured so that—
(i)
added lower-risk, technically mature capabilities are matched to delivering capability to the warfighter in the near term, while remaining requirements are aligned and resources are programmed to support integration into later increments to meet the requirements of the Armed Forces;
(ii)
added capabilities are approved for an increment only when their developmental risks have been appropriately reduced; and
(iii)
added increments are planned to complete engineering and manufacturing development in a reasonable period of time;
(D)
added a science and technology development enterprise that is responsive to the acquisition process before engineering and manufacturing development begins, and sufficiently resourced to reduce risks and enable programs to make smart decisions without losing critical funds; and
(E)
added redtape reduction in order to free up program and Department officials to focus on their mission of defining an executable program and understanding and addressing risks.
(3)
added Agile program execution— An acquisition system characterized by agile program execution means a system in which acquisition speed and flexibility to make trade-offs are balanced with the need to achieve desired technical performance. Such agile program execution includes—
(A)
added program managers and program officials who are expert buyers and negotiators who anticipate problems, negotiate solutions, and are empowered to manage;
(B)
added a preference for fixed price contracting where appropriate for the size and complexity of the work and for the nature and scope of the capabilities being developed;
(C)
added program managers who avoid increasing program risk by resisting the addition of new requirements or the reduction of developmental activities;
(D)
added empowering program managers and senior decisionmakers to make decisions easily in order to move forward with capabilities that mature quickly, cancel those that encounter greater difficulties than expected, and trade-off or reduce requirements to maintain cost and schedule;
(E)
added enabling program managers to focus on overcoming execution challenges and delivering success rather than concentrating on compliance with reporting, certifications, and other redtape; and
(F)
added senior decisionmakers who have knowledge of demonstrated performance as programs proceed through development, with robust developmental testing occurring before committing to production for operational use as a basis for decision making.
(4)
added Balanced Oversight— An acquisition system characterized by balanced oversight means that the focus is on ensuring discipline initiating programs and that appropriate adjustments are made during development, so that programs have the best chance to succeed. Such balanced oversight includes—
(A)
added involvement by decisionmakers early to ensure that an understanding of trade-offs, risks, and needs are considered, resourced, and validated, and that agreement is reached between the executive and legislative branches;
(B)
added acceptance by decisionmakers that complex weapon system developments are inherently risky and require expertise and flexibility to manage effectively;
(C)
added conscious decisions by decisionmakers regarding where to accept risk, while ensuring that risk mitigation plans are resourced (with time, funding, alternatives, and competent government and contractor officials);
(D)
added measuring and monitoring by decisionmakers of the right factors, such as technology maturation progress and systems engineering during risk reduction, development cost growth during engineering and manufacturing development, and reliability growth during system demonstration;
(E)
added work by Congress and the Department of Defense, once a program has begun, to resolve issues by considering trade-offs among cost, schedule, and performance necessary to best support the warfighter; and
(F)
added congressional understanding of risks and efforts to mitigate such risks even if they are through non-traditional means or other technological advances.

removed “(i) Required elements of guidance relating to contract type

removed “(1) The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that the guidance of the Department of Defense relating to major defense acquisition programs and major automated information systems includes—

removed “(A) a requirement that the acquisition strategy for such a program or system include identification of the contract type for development of the program or system; and

removed “(B) a justification of the contract type identified.

removed “(2) The contract type identified in accordance with paragraph (1)(A) may be—

removed “(A) a fixed-price type contract (including a fixed-price incentive contract); or

removed “(B) a cost-type contract (including a cost-plus-incentive-fee contract).

removed “(3) The guidance referred to in paragraph (1) shall require that the justification for the contract type selected explain—

removed “(A) how the level of program risk relates to the contract type selected; and

removed “(B) how the use of incentives (especially cost incentives) in the contract, if any, supports the objectives of the development program.

removed “(4) The guidance shall also specify that the use of contracts with target costs, target profits or fees, and profit or fee adjustment formulas, during development, where applicable, is ordinarily in the interest of the Government.”

(b)
removed Repeal— Section 818 of the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109–364; 10 U.S.C. 2306 note) is amended by striking subsections (b), (c), (d), and (e).
(c)
removed Modification of regulations— Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall modify the regulations of the Department of Defense regarding the determination of contract type for development programs to be consistent with the amendments made by this section.

Sec. 822 Acquisition strategy required for each major defense acquisition program and major system

(a)
added Consolidation of requirements relating to acquisition strategy—
(1)
added New title 10 section— Chapter 144 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 2431 the following new section:

added “2431a. Acquisition strategy

added “(a) Acquisition strategy required—There shall be an acquisition strategy for each major defense acquisition program and each major system approved by a Milestone Decision Authority.

added “(b) Responsible official—For each acquisition strategy required by subsection (a), the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics is responsible for issuing and maintaining the requirements for—

added “(1) the content of the strategy; and

added “(2) the review and approval process for the strategy.

added “(c) Considerations

added “(1) In issuing requirements for the content of an acquisition strategy for a major defense acquisition program or major system, the Under Secretary shall ensure that—

added “(A) the strategy clearly describes the proposed business and technical management approach for the program or system, in sufficient detail to allow the Milestone Decision Authority to assess the viability of the proposed approach;

added “(B) the strategy contains a clear explanation of how the strategy is designed to be implemented with available resources, such as time, funding, and management capacity; and

added “(C) the strategy considers the items listed in paragraph (2).

added “(2) Each strategy shall, at a minimum, consider the following:

added “(A) An approach that delivers required capability in increments, each depending on available mature technology, and that recognizes up front the need for future capability improvements.

added “(B) Acquisition approach, including industrial base considerations in accordance with section 2440 of this title.

added “(C) Risk management, including such methods as competitive prototyping at the system, subsystem, or component level, in accordance with section 2431b of this title.

added “(D) Business strategy, including measures to ensure competition at the system and subsystem level throughout the life-cycle of the program or system in accordance with section 2337 of this title.

added “(E) Contracting strategy, including—

added “(i) contract type and how the type selected relates to level of program risk in each acquisition phase;

added “(ii) how the plans for the program or system to reduce risk enable the use of fixed-price elements in subsequent contracts and the timing of the use of those fixed price elements;

added “(iii) market research; and

added “(iv) consideration of small business participation.

added “(F) Intellectual property strategy in accordance with section 2320 of this title.

added “(G) International involvement, including foreign military sales and cooperative opportunities, in accordance with section 2350a of this title.

added “(H) Multi-year procurement in accordance with section 2306b of this title.

added “(I) Integration of current intelligence assessments into the acquisition process.

added “(J) Requirements related to logistics, maintenance, and sustainment in accordance with sections 2464 and 2466 of this title.

added “(d) Review

added “(1) Subject to the authority, direction, and control of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, the Milestone Decision Authority shall review and approve, as appropriate, the acquisition strategy for a major defense acquisition program or major system at each of the following times:

added “(A) Milestone A approval.

added “(B) The decision to release the request for proposals for development of the program or system.

added “(C) Milestone B approval.

added “(D) Each subsequent milestone.

added “(E) Review of any decision to enter into full-rate production.

added “(F) When there has been—

added “(i) a significant change to the cost of the program or system;

added “(ii) a critical change to the cost of the program or system;

added “(iii) a significant change to the schedule of the program or system; or

added “(iv) a significant change to the performance of the program or system.

added “(G) Any other time considered relevant by the Milestone Decision Authority.

added “(2) If the Milestone Decision Authority revises an acquisition strategy for a program or system, the Milestone Decision Authority shall provide notice of the revision to the congressional defense committees.

added “(e) Definitions—In this section:

added “(1) The term “major defense acquisition program” has the meaning provided in section 2430 of this title.

added “(2) The term “major system” has the meaning provided in section 2302(5) of this title.

added “(3) The term “Milestone A approval” means a decision to enter into technology maturation and risk reduction pursuant to guidance prescribed by the Secretary of Defense for the management of Department of Defense acquisition programs.

added “(4) The term “Milestone B approval” has the meaning provided in section 2366(e)(7) of this title.

added “(5) The term “Milestone Decision Authority”, with respect to a major defense acquisition program or major system, means the official within the Department of Defense designated with the overall responsibility and authority for acquisition decisions for the program or system, including authority to approve entry of the program or system into the next phase of the acquisition process.

added “(6) The term “management capacity”, with respect to a major defense acquisition program or major system, means the capacity to manage the program or system through the use of highly qualified organizations and personnel with appropriate experience, knowledge, and skills.

added “(7) The term “significant change to the cost”, with respect to a major defense acquisition program or major system, means a significant cost growth threshold, as that term is defined in section 2433(a)(4) of this title.

added “(8) The term “critical change to the cost”, with respect to a major defense acquisition program or major system, means a critical cost growth threshold, as that term is defined in section 2433(a)(5) of this title.

added “(9) The term “significant change to the schedule”, with respect to a major defense acquisition program or major system, means any schedule delay greater than six months in a reported event.

added “(f) Submission to congressional committees—Upon request by the chairman or ranking member of the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate or the House of Representatives, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the committee the most recently approved acquisition strategy for a major defense acquisition program or major system. The strategy shall be submitted in unclassified form but may include a classified annex.”

(2)
added Clerical amendment— The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 2431 the following new item:
(b)
added Additional amendments—
(1)
added Section 2350a(e) of such title is amended—
(A)
added in the subsection heading, by striking “Document”;
(B)
added in paragraph (1), by striking “the Under Secretary of Defense for” and all that follows through “of the Board” and inserting “opportunities for such cooperative research and development shall be addressed in the acquisition strategy for the project”; and
(C)
added in paragraph (2)—
(i)
added in the matter preceding subparagraph (A)—
(I)
added by striking “document” and inserting “discussion”; and
(II)
added by striking “include” and inserting “consider”;
(ii)
added in subparagraph (A), by striking “A statement indicating whether” and inserting “Whether”;
(iii)
added in subparagraph (B)—
(I)
added by striking “by the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics”; and
(II)
added by striking “of the United States under consideration by the Department of Defense”; and
(iv)
added in subparagraph (D), by striking “The recommendation of the Under Secretary” and inserting “A recommendation to the Milestone Decision Authority”.
(a)
removed Repeal of requirement— Subsection (a)(1) of section 2434 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “and a manpower estimate for the program have” and inserting “has”.
(b)
removed Conforming amendments relating to regulations— Subsection (b) of such section is amended—
(2)
changed by striking paragraph (2);Section 803 of the Bob Stump National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2003 (Public Law 107–314; 10 U.S.C. 2430 note) is repealed.
(2)
removed by striking “shall require—” and all that follows through “that the independent” and inserting “shall require that the independent”;
(3)
removed by redesignating subparagraphs (A) and (B) as paragraphs (1) and (2), respectively, and realigning those paragraphs so as to be two ems from the left margin; and
(4)
removed in paragraph (2), as so redesignated—
(A)
removed by striking “and operations and support,” and inserting “operations and support, and manpower to operate, maintain, and support the program upon full operational deployment,”; and
(B)
removed by striking “; and” at the end and inserting a period.
(c)
removed Clerical amendments—
(1)
removed Section heading— The heading of such section is amended to read as follows:

removed “2434. Independent cost estimates”

(2)
removed Table of sections— The item relating to such section in the table of sections at the beginning of chapter 144 of such title is amended to read as follows:

Sec. 823 Revision to requirements relating to risk management in development of major defense acquisition programs and major systems

(a)
changed Revision—Risk management and mitigation requirements—
(1)
changed In general— Sections 2366a and 2366b Chapter 144 of title 10, United States Code, are is amended to read as follows:by inserting after section 2431a (as added by section 813) the following new section:

changed “2366a. Major “2431b. Risk management and mitigation in major defense acquisition programs: responsibilities at Milestone A approvalprograms and major systems

changed “(a) Responsibilities—Before granting Milestone A approval for a major defense acquisition program or a major subprogram, the Milestone Decision Authority for the program or subprogram shall ensure—Requirement

changed “(1) that information about the program or subprogram is sufficient to warrant entry of the There shall be a risk management and mitigation strategy for each major defense acquisition program or subprogram into the risk reduction phase; andmajor system.

changed “(2) The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that there are sound plans for progression the initial acquisition strategy (required under section 2431a of this title) approved by the program or subprogram to Milestone Decision Authority and any subsequent revisions include the development phase.following:

changed “(b) Considerations—In carrying out subsection (a), the Milestone Decision Authority shall consider to what extent “(A) A comprehensive strategy for managing and mitigating risk (including technical, cost, and schedule risk) during each of the program or subprogram—following periods:

changed “(1) meets a joint military requirement;“(i) The period preceding engineering manufacturing development, or its equivalent.

changed “(2) responds to an anticipated or likely threat;“(ii) The period preceding initial production.

changed “(3) has been developed in light of a review of alternative approaches;“(iii) The period preceding full-rate production.

changed “(4) is affordable;“(B) An identification of the major sources of risk in each of the periods listed in subparagraph (A).

changed “(5) has (A) identified areas of risk and, (B) for each such identified area “(3) In the case of risk, has a plan to reduce the risk that is documented in the acquisition strategy for the program or subprogram;system with separate increments of capabilities that require Milestone Decision Authority approval to begin or proceed, paragraphs (1) and (2) shall apply to each increment.

changed “(6) addresses planning for sustainment; and“(b) Strategy to manage and mitigate risks

changed “(7) meets any other considerations “(1) The comprehensive strategy to manage and mitigate risk included in the Milestone Decision Authority considers relevant.acquisition strategy for purposes of subsection (a)(2)(A) shall identify each individual risk and the risk management and mitigation activities to address each risk. For the mitigation activities identified, the strategy shall note whether they require cost and schedule margins and need to be included in funding requests.

changed “(c) Relationship to other statutes—In assessing the considerations in subsection (b), the Milestone Decision Authority “(2) The strategy shall be comprehensive and, at a minimum, include consideration of risk mitigation techniques such as the following:

changed “(1) With respect to joint military requirements, “(A) Prototyping (including prototyping at the requirements of section 181 system, subsystem, or component level and competitive prototyping, where appropriate) and, if prototyping at either the system, subsystem, or component level is not used, an explanation of this title.why it is not appropriate.

changed “(2) With respect to alternative approaches, “(B) Modeling and simulation, the requirements of section 201 areas that modeling and simulation will assess, and identification of the Weapon Systems Acquisition Reform Act need for development of 2009 (Public Law 111–23; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note).any new modeling and simulation tools in order to support the comprehensive strategy.

changed “(3) With respect to affordability and cost estimates “(C) Technology demonstrations and analyses, the requirements decision points for disciplined transition of section 2334 planned technologies into programs or the selection of this title.alternative technologies.

changed “(4) With respect to risk, the requirements of—“(D) Multiple design approaches.

changed “(A) section 138b of this title; and“(E) Alternative designs, including any designs that meet requirements but do so with reduced performance.

changed “(B) section 203 of the Weapon Systems Acquisition Reform Act “(F) Phasing of 2009 (Public Law 111–23; 10 U.S.C. 2430 note).program activities or related technology development efforts in order to address high risk areas as early as feasible.

changed “(5) With respect to sustainment, “(c) Definitions—In this section, the requirements of section 2337 terms “major defense acquisition program” and “major system” have the meanings provided in section 2464 2431a of this title.title.”

removed “(d) Notification—Not later than 30 days after granting Milestone A approval for a major defense acquisition program or major subprogram, the Milestone Decision Authority for that program or subprogram shall submit to the congressional defense committees notice of such approval in writing. The Milestone Decision Authority’s decision memorandum with respect to such approval shall be available to the congressional defense committees upon request, consistent with any relevant classification requirements.

removed “(e) Definitions—In this section:

removed “(1) The term “major defense acquisition program” means a Department of Defense acquisition program that is a major defense acquisition program for purposes of section 2430 of this title.

removed “(2) The term “major subprogram” means a major subprogram of a major defense acquisition program designated under section 2430a(a)(1) of this title.

removed “(3) The term “Milestone Decision Authority”, with respect to a major defense acquisition program or a major subprogram, means the official within the Department of Defense designated with the overall responsibility and authority for acquisitions decisions for the program or subprogram, including authority to approve entry of the program or subprogram into the next phase of the acquisition process.

removed “(4) The term “Milestone A approval” means a decision to enter into a risk reduction phase pursuant to guidance prescribed by the Secretary of Defense for the management of Department of Defense acquisition programs.

removed “(5) The term “joint military requirement” has the meaning given that term in section 181(g)(1) of this title.

removed “2366b. Major defense acquisition programs: responsibilities at Milestone B approval

removed “(a) Responsibilities—Before granting Milestone B approval for a major defense acquisition program or a major subprogram, the Milestone Decision Authority for the program or subprogram shall ensure—

removed “(1) that information about the program or subprogram is sufficient to warrant entry of the program or subprogram into the development phase; and

removed “(2) that there are sound plans in place for the program or subprogram to deliver the required capability.

removed “(b) Considerations—In carrying out subsection (a), the Milestone Decision Authority shall consider to what extent the program or subprogram will do each of the following:

removed “(1) Provide a capability that is affordable.

removed “(2) Identify and mitigate programmatic risks.

removed “(3) Deliver a capability with acceptable performance to fulfill a joint military requirement.

removed “(4) Utilize technologies assessed to be mature.

removed “(5) Effectively utilize competition.

removed “(6) Enable sustainment of the capability that is provided by the program or subprogram.

removed “(7) Continue to address, as necessary, the considerations for Milestone A approval (or in the case that the program has not previously been granted Milestone A approval, address such considerations).

removed “(8) Respond to anticipated or likely threats.

removed “(9) Meet any other considerations the Milestone Decision Authority considers relevant.

removed “(c) Relationship to other statutes—In addressing the considerations in subsection (b), the Milestone Decision Authority shall include consideration of the following:

removed “(1) With respect to affordability, the requirements of section 2334 of this title.

removed “(2) With respect to risk, the requirements of—

removed “(A) section 203 of the Weapon Systems Acquisition Reform Act of 2009 (Public Law 111–23; 10 U.S.C. 2430 note); and

removed “(B) section 138b of this title.

removed “(3) With respect to fulfilling a joint military requirement, the requirements of section 181 of this title.

removed “(4) With respect to competition, the requirements of—

removed “(A) section 202 of the Weapon Systems Acquisition Reform Act of 2009 (Public Law 111–23; 10 U.S.C. 2430 note); and

removed “(B) section 2304 of this title.

removed “(5) With respect to sustainment, the requirements of section 2337 and section 2464 of this title.

removed “(d) Notification—Not later than 30 days after granting Milestone B approval for a major defense acquisition program or major subprogram, the Milestone Decision Authority for the program or subprogram shall submit to the congressional defense committees notice of such approval in writing. The Milestone Decision Authority’s decision memorandum with respect to such approval shall be available to the congressional defense committees upon request, consistent with any relevant classification requirements.

removed “(e) Definitions—In this section:

removed “(1) The term “major defense acquisition program” means a Department of Defense acquisition program that is a major defense acquisition program for purposes of section 2430 of this title.

removed “(2) The term “major subprogram” means a major subprogram of a major defense acquisition program designated under section 2430a(a)(1) of this title.

removed “(3) The term “Milestone Decision Authority”, with respect to a major defense acquisition program or a major subprogram, means the official within the Department of Defense designated with the overall responsibility and authority for acquisition decisions for the program or subprogram, including authority to approve entry of the program or subprogram into the next phase of the acquisition process.

removed “(4) The term “Milestone A approval” means a decision to enter into a risk reduction phase pursuant to guidance prescribed by the Secretary of Defense for the management of Department of Defense acquisition programs.

removed “(5) The term “Milestone B approval” means a decision to enter into a development phase pursuant to guidance prescribed by the Secretary of Defense for the management of Department of Defense acquisition programs.

removed “(6) The term “joint military requirement” has the meaning given that term in section 181(g)(1) of this title.”

(2)
changed Clerical amendment— The items relating to such sections in the table of sections at the beginning of chapter 139 of such title are chapter is amended by inserting after the item relating to read section 2431a, as follows:so added, the following new item:
(b)
added Repeal of superseded provision— Section 203 of the Weapon Systems Acquisition Reform Act of 2009 (10 U.S.C. 2430 note) is repealed.
(b)
removed Conforming amendments—
(1)
removed Section 139b of this title is amended—
(A)
removed in subsection (a)(5)—
(i)
removed in subparagraph (B), by striking “review and approve or disapprove” and inserting “advise the milestone decision authority regarding review and approval of”; and
(ii)
removed in subparagraph (C), by inserting “in order to advise relevant technical authorities for such programs on the incorporation of best practices for developmental test from across the Department” after “programs”; and
(B)
removed in subsection (b)(5)—
(i)
removed in subparagraph (B), by striking “review and approve” and inserting “advise the milestone decision authority regarding review and approval of”; and
(ii)
removed in subparagraph (C), by inserting “in order to advise relevant technical authorities for such programs on the incorporation of best practices for systems engineering from across the Department” after “programs”.
(2)
removed Section 2334(a)(6)(A)(i) of such title is amended by striking “any certification under” and inserting “any decision to grant milestone approval pursuant to”.

Sec. 824 Modification to requirements relating to determination of contract type for major defense acquisition programs and major systems

(a)
added Determination of contract type— Section 2306 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

added “(i) Required elements of guidance relating to contract type

added “(1) The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that the guidance of the Department of Defense relating to major defense acquisition programs, major systems, and major automated information systems includes a requirement that the acquisition strategy required under section 2431a of this title for such a program or system includes—

added “(A) a separate identification of the contract type for each acquisition phase of the program or system; and

added “(B) a justification of the contract type identified.

added “(2) The contract type identified in accordance with paragraph (1)(A) may be—

added “(A) a fixed-price type contract (including a fixed-price incentive contract); or

added “(B) a cost-type contract (including a cost-plus-incentive-fee contract).

added “(3) The guidance referred to in paragraph (1) shall require that the justification for the contract type selected explain—

added “(A) how the level of program risk in each acquisition phase relates to the contract type selected;

added “(B) how the use of incentives (especially cost incentives) in the contract, if any, supports the program or system objectives during each acquisition phase; and

added “(C) how the plans for the program or system to reduce risk enable the use of fixed-price elements in subsequent contracts.

added “(4) The guidance shall also specify that the use of contracts with target costs, target profits or fees, and profit or fee adjustment formulas can be an appropriate contract type.”

(a)
removed In general—
(1)
removed Revision— Section 2222 of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:

removed “2222. Defense business systems: business process reengineering; enterprise architecture; management

removed “(a) Defense business systems generally—The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that each covered defense business system developed, deployed, and operated by the Department of Defense—

removed “(1) supports efficient business processes that have been reviewed, and as appropriate revised, through business process reengineering;

removed “(2) is integrated into a comprehensive defense business enterprise architecture; and

removed “(3) is managed in a manner that provides visibility into, and traceability of, expenditures for the system.

removed “(b) Issuance of guidance

removed “(1) Secretary of defense guidance—The Secretary shall issue guidance to provide for the coordination of, and decision making for, the planning, programming, and control of investments in covered defense business systems.

removed “(2) Supporting guidance—The Secretary shall direct the Deputy Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, the Chief Information Officer, and the Chief Management Officer of each of the military departments to issue and maintain supporting guidance, as appropriate, for the guidance of the Secretary issued under paragraph (1).

removed “(c) Guidance elements—The guidance issued pursuant to subsection (b)(1) shall include the following elements:

removed “(1) Policy to ensure that the business processes of the Department of Defense are continuously evolved to—

removed “(A) implement the most streamlined and efficient business process practicable; and

removed “(B) enable the use of commercial off-the-shelf business systems with the fewest changes necessary to accommodate requirements and interfaces that are unique to the Department of Defense.

removed “(2) A process to establish requirements for covered defense business systems.

removed “(3) Mechanisms for the planning and control of investments in covered defense business systems, including a process for the collection and review of programming and budgeting information for covered defense business systems.

removed “(4) Policy requiring the periodic review of covered defense business systems that have been fully deployed, by portfolio, to ensure that investments in such portfolios are appropriate.

removed “(d) Defense business enterprise architecture

removed “(1) Blueprint—The Secretary, working through the Deputy Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense, shall develop and maintain a blueprint to guide the development of integrated business processes within the Department of Defense Such blueprint shall be known as the “defense business enterprise architecture”.

removed “(2) Purpose—The defense business enterprise architecture shall be sufficiently defined to effectively guide implementation of interoperable defense business system solutions and shall be consistent with the policies and procedures established by the Director of the Office of Management and Budget.

removed “(3) Elements—The defense business enterprise architecture shall—

removed “(A) include policies, procedures, business data standards, business performance measures, and business information requirements that apply uniformly throughout the Department of Defense; and

removed “(B) enable the Department of Defense to—

removed “(i) comply with all applicable law, including Federal accounting, financial management, and reporting requirements;

removed “(ii) routinely produce verifiable, timely, accurate, and reliable business and financial information for management purposes; and

removed “(iii) integrate budget, accounting, and program information and systems.

removed “(4) Integration into information technology architecture—The defense business enterprise architecture shall integrate into an information technology enterprise architecture, developed by the Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense, which describes a target business systems computing environment for each of the major business processes conducted by the Department of Defense.

removed “(e) Defense business council

removed “(1) Requirement for council—The Secretary shall establish a Defense Business Council to provide advice to the Secretary on developing the defense business enterprise architecture, reengineering the Department’s business processes, and requirements for defense business systems. The Council shall be chaired by the Deputy Chief Management Officer and the Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense.

removed “(2) Membership—The membership of the Council shall include the following:

removed “(A) The Chief Management Officers of the military departments, or their designees.

removed “(B) The following officials of the Department of Defense, or their designees:

removed “(i) The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics with respect to acquisition, logistics, and installations management processes.

removed “(ii) The Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) with respect to financial management and planning and budgeting processes.

removed “(iii) The Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness with respect to human resources management processes.

removed “(f) Approvals required for development

removed “(1) Initial approval required—The Secretary shall ensure that a covered defense business system program cannot proceed into development (or, if no development is required, into production or fielding) unless the appropriate approval official (as specified in paragraph (2)) has determined that the covered defense business system concerned—

removed “(A) supports a business process that has been, or is being as a result of the acquisition program, reengineered to be as streamlined and efficient as practicable consistent with the guidance issued pursuant to subsection (b), including business process mapping;

removed “(B) is in compliance with the defense business enterprise architecture developed pursuant to subsection (d) or will be in compliance as a result of modifications planned;

removed “(C) has valid, achievable requirements; and

removed “(D) is in compliance with the Department’s auditability requirements.

removed “(2) Appropriate official—For purposes of paragraph (1), the appropriate approval official with respect to a covered defense business system is the following:

removed “(A) In the case of a system of a military department, the Chief Management Officer of that military department.

removed “(B) In the case of a system of a Defense Agency or Defense Field Activity or a system that will support the business process of more than one military department or Defense Agency or Defense Field Activity, the Deputy Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense.

removed “(C) In the case of any system, such official other than the applicable official under subparagraph (A) or (B) as the Secretary designates for such purpose.

removed “(3) Annual certification—For any fiscal year in which funds are expended for development pursuant to a covered defense business system program, the Defense Business Council shall review the system and certify (or decline to certify as the case may be) that it continues to satisfy the requirements of paragraph (1). If the Council determines that certification cannot be granted, the chairman of the Council shall notify the Appropriate Approving Official and the acquisition Milestone Decision Authority for the program and provide a recommendation for corrective action.

removed “(4) Obligation of funds in violation of requirements—The obligation of Department of Defense funds for a covered defense business system program that has not been certified in accordance with paragraph (3) is a violation of section 1341(a)(1)(A) of title 31.

removed “(g) Responsibility of milestone decision authority—The Secretary shall ensure that, as part of the defense acquisition system, the requirements of this section are fully addressed by the Milestone Decision Authority for a covered defense business system program as acquisition process approvals are considered for such system.

removed “(h) Annual report—Not later than March 15 of each year from 2016 through 2020, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on activities of the Department of Defense pursuant to this section. Each report shall include the following:

removed “(1) A description of actions taken and planned with respect to the guidance required by subsection (b) and the defense business enterprise architecture developed pursuant to subsection (d).

removed “(2) A description of actions taken and planned for the reengineering of business processes by the Defense Business Council established pursuant to subsection (e).

removed “(3) A summary of covered defense business system funding and covered defense business systems approved pursuant to subsection (f).

removed “(4) Identification of any covered defense business system program that during the preceding fiscal year was reviewed and not approved pursuant to subsection (f) and the reasons for the lack of approval.

removed “(5) Identification of any covered defense business system program that during the preceding fiscal year failed to achieve initial operational capability within five years of when the program received Milestone B approval.

removed “(6) For any program identified under paragraph (5), a description of the plan to address the issues which caused the failure.

removed “(7) A discussion of specific improvements in business operations and cost savings resulting from successful covered defense business systems programs.

removed “(8) A copy of the most recent report of the Chief Management Officer of each military department on implementation of business transformation initiatives by such military department in accordance with section 908 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4569; 10 U.S.C. 2222 note).

removed “(i) Definitions—In this section:

removed “(1)

removed “(A) Defense business system—The term “defense business system” means an information system that is operated by, for, or on behalf of the Department of Defense, including any of the following:

removed “(i) A financial system.

removed “(ii) A financial data feeder system.

removed “(iii) A contracting system.

removed “(iv) A logistics system.

removed “(v) A planning and budgeting system.

removed “(vi) An installations management system.

removed “(vii) A human resources management system.

removed “(viii) A training and readiness system.

removed “(B) The term does not include—

removed “(i) a national security system; or

removed “(ii) an information system used exclusively by and within the defense commissary system or the exchange system or other instrumentality of the Department of Defense conducted for the morale, welfare, and recreation of members of the armed forces using nonappropriated funds.

removed “(2) Covered defense business system—The term “covered defense business system” means a defense business system that is expected to have a total amount of budget authority over the period of the current future-years defense program submitted to Congress under section 221 of this title, in excess of the threshold established for the use of special simplified acquisition procedures pursuant to section 2304(g)(1)(B) of this title.

removed “(3) Covered defense business system program—The term “covered defense business system program” means a defense acquisition program to develop and field a covered defense business system or an increment of a covered defense business system.

removed “(4) Enterprise architecture—The term “enterprise architecture” has the meaning given that term in section 3601(4) of title 44.

removed “(5) Information system—The term “information system” has the meaning given that term in section 11101 of title 40.

removed “(6) National security system—The term “national security system” has the meaning given that term in section 3542(b)(2) of title 44.

removed “(7) Milestone decision authority—The term “Milestone Decision Authority”, with respect to a defense acquisition program, means the individual within the Department of Defense designated with the responsibility to grant milestone approvals for that program.

removed “(8) Business process mapping—The term “business process mapping” means a procedure in which the steps in a business process are clarified and documented in both written form and in a flow chart.”

(2)
removed Table of sections— The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 131 of such title is amended to read as follows:
(b)
changed Deadline for guidance—Repeal— The guidance required by subsection (b)(1) of section 2222 Section 818 of title 10, United States Code, as the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109–364; 10 U.S.C. 2306 note) is amended by subsection (a)(1), shall be issued not later than December 31, 2016.striking subsections (b), (c), (d), and (e).
(c)
removed Repeal— Section 811 of the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109–364; 10 U.S.C. 2222 note) is repealed.

Sec. 825 Required determination before Milestone A approval or initiation of major defense acquisition programs

(a)
changed Consolidation of certain logistics and sustainment-Related provisions—Determination rather than certification required— Section 2337(b)(2) Subsection (a) of section 2366a of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
changed in subparagraph (A), by inserting before the semicolon the following: “in order to sustain the system until either (i) a replacement system is fielded and assumes the majority of responsibility for the mission of the existing system, or (ii) the mission of the system is eliminated subsection heading, by striking “Certification” and the system is disposed of”;inserting “Written determination required”; and
(2)
changed in subparagraph (D), the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking “certifies” and inserting “sustainment of core logistics capabilities specified “determines, in section 2464 of this title and” after “ensure”;writing,”.
(3)
removed by striking “and” at the end of subparagraph (H);
(4)
removed by striking the period at the end of subparagraph (I) and inserting a semicolon; and
(5)
removed by adding at the end the following new subparagraphs:

removed “(J) make a determination regarding the applicability of preservation and storage of unique tooling associated with the production of program-specific hardware, if relevant, including a plan for the preservation, storage, or disposal of all production tooling; and

removed “(K) identify obsolete electronic parts that are included in the specifications of the system being acquired and determine suitable replacements for such parts.”

(b)
changed Core logistics capabilities—Submission of written determination to congress— Section 2464 Subsection (b) of such title section is amended—amended to read as follows:

added “(b) Submission to congress—At the request of any of the congressional defense committees, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the committee an explanation of the basis for a determination made under subsection (a) with respect to a major defense acquisition program, together with a copy of the written determination. The explanation shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.”

(c)
added Repeal of unused definitions— Subsection (c) of such section is amended—
(1)
removed by redesignating subsections (d) and (e) as subsections (e) and (f), respectively; and
(2)
removed by inserting after subsection (c) the following new subsection (d):

removed “(d) Acquisition management information requirements—The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that, when milestone approval for a major defense acquisition program is under consideration, matters relating to core logistics capabilities are considered as follows:

removed “(1) Before Milestone A approval for the program is granted, an analysis of the applicability of core logistics capabilities requirements to the program shall be considered.

removed “(2) Before Milestone B approval for the program is granted, an estimate of the requirements for core logistics capabilities for the program, and the associated sustaining workloads required to support such requirements, shall be considered.

removed “(3) Before approval is granted for the program to enter low-rate initial production, a description of requirements for core depot-level maintenance and repair capabilities, as well as the associated logistics capabilities and the associated sustaining workloads required to support such requirements, shall be considered.”

(c)
removed Conforming repeals and amendments—
(1)
removed
(A)
removed Section 2437 of title 10, United States Code, is repealed.
(B)
removed The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 144 is amended by striking the item relating to section 2437.
(1)
changed Section 815 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4530) is repealed.by striking paragraphs (2) and (4); and
(2)
changed Section 803(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 10 U.S.C. prec. 2571 note) is amended—by redesignating paragraphs (3), (5), (6), and (7) as paragraphs (2), (3), (4), and (5), respectively.
(d)
added Clerical amendments—
(1)
added Section heading— The heading of section 2366a of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:

added “2366a. Major defense acquisition programs: determination required before Milestone A approval”

(2)
added Table of sections— The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 139 of such title is amended by striking the item relating to section 2366a and inserting the following new item:
(A)
removed by inserting “and” at the end of paragraph (3);
(B)
removed striking “; and” at the end of paragraph (4) and inserting a period; and
(C)
removed by striking paragraph (5).

Sec. 826 Required certification and determination before Milestone B approval of major defense acquisition programs

(a)
added Determination required in addition to certification— Subsection (a) of section 2366b of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(a)
removed Consolidation of requirements relating to acquisition strategy—
(1)
removed New title 10 section— Chapter 144 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 2431 the following new section:

removed “2431a. Acquisition strategy

removed “(a) Requirement

removed “(1) There shall be an acquisition strategy for each major defense acquisition program. The acquisition strategy for a major defense acquisition program shall be reviewed by the Milestone Decision Authority for the program at each time specified in paragraph (2). The Milestone Decision Authority may approve, disapprove, or revise the acquisition strategy at any such time.

removed “(2) The times at which the acquisition strategy for a major defense acquisition program shall be reviewed by the Milestone Decision Authority for the program under paragraph (1) are the following:

removed “(A) Program initiation.

removed “(B) Each subsequent milestone.

removed “(C) Full-Rate Production Decision Review.

removed “(D) Any other time considered relevant by the Milestone Decision Authority.

removed “(b) Considerations—The acquisition strategy for a major defense acquisition program shall present a top-level description of the business and technical management approach designed to achieve the objectives of the program within the resource constraints imposed. The strategy shall clearly express the program manager’s approach to the program in sufficient detail to allow the Milestone Decision Authority to assess the viability of approach, implementation of laws and policies, and program objectives. The content and review and approval process for the acquisition strategy for a major defense acquisition program shall be issued and maintained by the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics; however, the acquisition strategy should consider the following:

removed “(1) Tailoring.

removed “(2) Acquisition approach, including industrial base considerations in accordance with section 2440 of this title and, if applicable, plans for increments or evolutionary acquisition.

removed “(3) Risk management, in accordance with section 203 of the Weapon Systems Acquisition Reform Act of 2009 (Public Law 111–23; 10 U.S.C. 2430 note).

removed “(4) Business strategy, including measures to ensure competition in accordance with section 202 of the Weapon Systems Acquisition Reform Act of 2009 (Public Law 111–23; 10 U.S.C. 2430 note).

removed “(5) Contracting strategy, including sources, contract bundling, if applicable, and small business participation.

removed “(6) Intellectual property strategy, in accordance with section 2320 of this title.

removed “(7) International involvement, including Foreign Military Sales and Cooperative Opportunities, in accordance with section 2350a of this title.

removed “(c) In this section, the term “Milestone Decision Authority”, with respect to a major defense acquisition program, means the official within the Department of Defense designated with the overall responsibility and authority for acquisition decisions for the program, including authority to approve entry of the program into the next phase of the acquisition process.”

(1)
changed Clerical amendment— The table of sections at in the beginning of such chapter is amended subsection heading, by striking “Certification” and inserting after the item relating to section 2431 the following new item:“Certification and determination required”;
(2)
added by redesignating paragraph (4) as paragraph (5); and
(3)
added by striking “(3) further certifies that—” and inserting the following:

added “(3) further certifies that the technology in the program has been demonstrated in a relevant environment, as determined by the Milestone Decision Authority on the basis of an independent review and assessment by the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering, in consultation with the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Developmental Test and Evaluation;

added “(4) determines, in writing, that—”

(b)
added Submission of written determination to congress— Subsection (c) of such section is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

added “(3) At the request of any of the congressional defense committees, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the committee an explanation of the basis for a determination made under subsection (a)(4) with respect to a major defense acquisition program, together with a copy of the written determination. The explanation shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.”

(c)
added National security waiver— Subsection (d) of such section is amended—
(1)
added in paragraph (1), by striking “certification requirement” and inserting “certification and determination requirements”; and
(b)
removed Conforming amendments—
(1)
removed Section 2350a(e) of such title is amended—
(A)
removed in the subsection heading, by striking “Document”;
(B)
removed in paragraph (1), by striking “the Under Secretary of Defense for” and all that follows through “of the Board” and inserting “opportunities for such cooperative research and development shall be addressed in the acquisition strategy for the project”;
(2)
renumbered was (3)(2)(4) in paragraph (2)—
(A)
added in the matter preceding subparagraph (A) and in subparagraph (A), by inserting “waiver” before “determination” each place it appears; and
(B)
added in subparagraph (B), by striking “certification components” both places it appears and inserting “certification and determination components”.
(d)
added Conforming amendments— Section 2366b of title 10, United States Code, is further amended—
(1)
added in subsection (b)(1), by striking “paragraph (1) or (2) of subsection (a)” and inserting “paragraph (1), (2), or (3) of subsection (a)”;
(2)
added in subsection (d)(1), by striking “paragraph (1), (2), or (3) of subsection (a)” and inserting “paragraph (1), (2), (3), or (4) of subsection (a)”; and
(3)
added in subsection (d)(2)(B), by striking “paragraphs (1), (2), and (3) of subsection (a)” and inserting “paragraphs (1), (2), (3) and (4) of subsection (a)”.
(e)
added Clerical amendments—
(1)
added Section heading— The heading of section 2366b of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:

added “2366b. Major defense acquisition programs: certification and determination required before Milestone B approval”

(2)
added Table of sections— The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 139 of such title is amended by striking the item relating to section 2366b and inserting the following new item:
(i)
removed in the matter preceding subparagraph (A)—
(I)
removed by striking “document” and inserting “discussion”; and
(II)
removed by striking “include” and inserting “consider”;
(ii)
removed in subparagraph (A), by striking “A statement indicating”;
(iii)
removed in subparagraph (B)—
(I)
removed by striking “by the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics”; and
(II)
removed by striking “of the United States under consideration by the Department of Defense”; and
(iv)
removed in subparagraph (D)—
(I)
removed by striking “The” and inserting “A”;
(II)
removed by striking “of” and inserting “to”; and
(III)
removed by striking “Under Secretary” and inserting “Milestone Decision Authority”.
(2)
removed Section 803 of the Bob Stump National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2003 (Public Law 107–314; 10 U.S.C. 2430 note) is repealed.

Sec. 827 Revision to requirements relating to risk reduction in development of major defense acquisition programs

removed

removed Section 203 of the Weapon Systems Acquisition Reform Act of 2009 is amended to read as follows:

removed “203. Risk reduction in major defense acquisition programs

removed “(a) Guidance on risk reduction in major defense acquisition programs—The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that the acquisition strategy for each major defense acquisition program for which development activities are required includes the following:

removed “(1) A comprehensive approach to identifying and addressing risk (including technical, cost and schedule risk) during the period preceding full rate production as a means to improve programmatic decision making and appropriately manage program concurrency.

removed “(2) Documentation of the major sources of risk identified and the approach to retiring that risk.

removed “(b) Elements of comprehensive approach to risk reduction—The elements of a comprehensive approach to identifying and addressing risk for purposes of subsection (a)(1) shall include some combination of the following as appropriate for the item or system being acquired:

removed “(1) Development planning.

removed “(2) Systems engineering.

removed “(3) Integrated developmental and operational test.

removed “(4) Preliminary and critical design reviews and technical reviews.

removed “(5) Prototyping (including prototyping at the system or subsystem level and competitive prototyping, where appropriate).

removed “(6) Modeling and simulation.

removed “(7) Technology demonstrations and technology off ramps.

removed “(8) Multiple design approaches.

removed “(9) Alternative, lower risk reduced performance designs.

removed “(10) Independent risk element assessments by outside subject matter experts.

removed “(11) Program phasing to address high risk areas as early as possible.”

Sec. 831 Codification and amendment of Mentor-Protege Program

(a)
added In general— Section 831 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1991 (Public Law 101–510; 104 Stat. 1607; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is transferred to chapter 137 of title 10, United States Code, inserted so as to appear after section 2323a, redesignated as section 2323b, and amended—
(1)
added by amending the section heading to read as follows:

added “2323b. Mentor-Protege Program”

(2)
added by striking “pilot” each place such term appears;
(3)
added by amending subsection (e)(1) to read as follows:

added “(1) A developmental program for the protege firm, in such detail as may be reasonable, including—

added “(A) factors to assess the protege firm's developmental progress under the program; and

added “(B) the anticipated number and type of subcontracts to be awarded to the protege firm.”

(4)
added in subsection (g)(2)(B), by striking “under subsection (l)(2)”;
(5)
added in subsection (h)(1), by inserting “(15 U.S.C. 631 et seq.)” after “Small Business Act”;
(6)
added by striking subsection (j) and redesignating subsections (k) and (l) as subsections (j) and (k), respectively;
(7)
added by amending subsection (j) (as so redesignated) to read as follows:

added “(j) Regulations—The regulations implementing the Mentor-Protege Pilot Program established under section 831 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1991 (Public Law 101–510; 104 Stat. 1607; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note) as in effect on the date of enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 shall apply to this section. The Secretary of Defense may revise such regulations or prescribe additional regulations necessary to carry out this section. The Department of Defense policy regarding the Mentor-Protege Program shall be published and maintained as an appendix to the Department of Defense Supplement to the Federal Acquisition Regulation.”

(8)
added by striking “prescribed pursuant to subsection (k)” each place such term appears and inserting “described in subsection (j)”; and
(9)
added in subsection (k) (as so redesignated)—
(A)
added in paragraph (1), by striking “means a business concern that meets the requirements of section 3(a) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632(a)) and the regulations promulgated pursuant thereto” and inserting “has the meaning given such term under section 3 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632)”;
(B)
added in paragraph (2)—
(i)
added in subparagraph (D), by striking “the severely disabled” and inserting “severely disabled individuals”; and
(ii)
added in subparagraph (G), by inserting “(15 U.S.C. 632(p))” after “Small Business Act”; and
(C)
added by amending paragraph (8) to read as follows:

added “(8) The term severely disabled individual means an individual who is blind (as defined in section 8501 of title 41) or a severely disabled individual (as defined in such section).”

removed Section 831(j) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1991 (10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended—

(b)
changed Clerical amendment— in paragraph (1), The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by striking “September 30, 2015” and inserting “September 30, 2020”; andafter the item relating to section 2323a the following new item:
(2)
removed in paragraph (2), by striking “September 30, 2018” and inserting “September 30, 2023”.

Sec. 832 Amendments to data quality improvement plan

(a)
changed Reporting to Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics Before Milestone B Approval—In general— Subparagraph (A) of paragraph (8) of section 138(b) of title 10, United States Code, as amended by section 901(h)(2) Section 15(s) of the Carl Levin and Howard P. “Buck” McKeon National Defense Authorization Small Business Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. YYYY), (15 U.S.C. 644(s)) is amended—
(1)
changed by striking “periodically”;redesignating paragraph (4) as paragraph (6); and
(2)
changed by striking “the major defense acquisition programs” and inserting “each major defense acquisition program”;after paragraph (3) the following new paragraphs:

added “(4) Implementation—Not later than the first day of fiscal year 2017, the Administrator of the Small Business Administration shall implement the plan described in this subsection.

added “(5) Certification—The Administrator shall annually provide to the Committee on Small Business of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship of the Senate a certification of the accuracy and completeness of data reported on bundled and consolidated contracts.”

(b)
added GAO study—
(1)
added Study— Not later than the first day of fiscal year 2018, the Comptroller General of the United States shall initiate a study on the effectiveness of the plan described in section 15(s) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 644(s)) that shall assess whether contracts were accurately labeled as bundled or consolidated.
(2)
added Contracts evaluated— For the purposes of conducting the study described in paragraph (1), the Comptroller General of the United States—
(A)
added shall evaluate, for work in each of sectors 23, 33, 54, and 56 (as defined by the North American Industry Classification System), not fewer than 100 contracts in each sector;
(B)
added shall evaluate only those contracts—
(i)
added awarded by an agency listed in section 901(b) of title 31, United States Code; and
(ii)
added that have a Base and Exercised Options Value, an Action Obligation, or a Base and All Options Value (as such terms are defined in the Federal procurement data system described in section 1122(a)(4)(A) of title 41, United States Code, or any successor system); and
(C)
added shall not evaluate contracts that have used any set aside authority.
(3)
added Report— Not later than 12 months after initiating the study required by paragraph (1), the Comptroller General of the United States shall report to the Committee on Small Business of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship of the Senate on the results from such study and, if warranted, any recommendations on how to improve the quality of data reported on bundled and consolidated contracts.
(3)
removed by inserting “before the Milestone B approval for that program” after “Department of Defense”; and
(4)
removed by striking “such reviews and assessments” and inserting “such review and assessment”.
(b)
removed Annual report to secretary of defense and congressional defense committees— Subparagraph (B) of such paragraph is amended by inserting “for which a Milestone B approval occurred during the preceding fiscal year” after “Department of Defense”.

Sec. 833 Notice of contract consolidation for acquisition strategies

(a)
changed Minimum geographic distribution—Notice requirement for the senior procurement executive or Chief Acquisition Officer— Section 2413(c) 44(c)(2) of title 10, United States Code, the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 657q(c)(2)) is amended by striking “Department of Defense contract administration services district” and inserting “State”.adding at the end the following:

added “(C) Notice—Not later than 7 days after making a determination that an acquisition strategy involving a consolidation of contract requirements is necessary and justified under subparagraph (A), the senior procurement executive or Chief Acquisition Officer shall publish a notice on a public website that such determination has been made. Any solicitation for a procurement related to the acquisition strategy may not be published earlier than 7 days after such notice is published. Along with the publication of the solicitation, the senior procurement executive or Chief Acquisition Officer shall publish a justification for the determination, which shall include the information in subparagraphs (A) through (E) of paragraph (1).”

(b)
changed Distribution—Notice requirement for the head of a contracting agency— Section 2415 15(e)(3) of such title the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 644(e)(3)) is amended—amended to read as follows:

added “(3) Strategy specifications—If the head of a contracting agency determines that an acquisition plan for a procurement involves a substantial bundling of contract requirements, the head of a contracting agency shall publish a notice on a public website that such determination has been made not later than 7 days after making such determination. Any solicitation for a procurement related to the acquisition plan may not be published earlier than 7 days after such notice is published. Along with the publication of the solicitation, the head of a contracting agency shall publish a justification for the determination, which shall include following information:

added “(A) The specific benefits anticipated to be derived from the bundling of contract requirements and a determination that such benefits justify the bundling.

added “(B) An identification of any alternative contracting approaches that would involve a lesser degree of bundling of contract requirements.

added “(C) An assessment of—

added “(i) the specific impediments to participation by small business concerns as prime contractors that result from the bundling of contract requirements; and

added “(ii) the specific actions designed to maximize participation of small business concerns as subcontractors (including suppliers) at various tiers under the contract or contracts that are awarded to meet the requirements.”

(c)
added Technical amendment— Section 44(c)(1) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 657q(c)(1)) is amended by striking “Subject to paragraph (4), the head” and inserting “The head”.
(1)
removed in the first sentence—
(A)
removed by striking “The Secretary” and inserting “After apportioning funds available for assistance under this chapter for any fiscal year for efficient coverage of distressed areas referred to in section 2411(2)(B) of this title by programs operated by eligible entities referred to in section 2411(1)(D) of this title, the Secretary”;
(B)
removed by inserting “the remaining” before “funds available”; and
(C)
removed by striking “Department of Defense contract administration services district” and inserting “State”; and
(2)
removed in the second sentence—
(A)
removed by striking “district” each place it appears and inserting “State”; and
(B)
removed by striking “districts” and inserting “States”.

Sec. 834 Clarification of requirements related to small business contracts for services

added
(a)
added Procurement contracts— Section 8(a)(17) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 637(a)(17)) is amended—
(1)
added in subparagraph (A), by striking “any procurement contract” and all that follows through “section 15” and inserting “any procurement contract, which contract has as its principal purpose the supply of a product to be let pursuant to this subsection or subsection (m), or section 15(a), 31, or 36,”; and
(2)
added by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:

added “(C) Limitation—This paragraph shall not apply to a contract that has as its principal purpose the acquisition of services or construction.”

(b)
added Subcontractor contracts— Section 46(a)(4) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 657s(a)(4)) is amended by striking “for supplies from a regular dealer in such supplies” and inserting “which is principally for supplies from a regular dealer in such supplies, and which is not a contract principally for services or construction,”.

Sec. 835 Review of Government access to intellectual property rights of private sector firms

added
(a)
added Review required— Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall enter into a contract with an independent entity with appropriate expertise to conduct a review of Department of Defense regulations and practices related to Government access to and use of intellectual property rights of private sector firms. The contract shall require that in conducting the review, the independent entity shall consult with the National Defense Technology and Industrial Base Council (described in section 2502 of title 10, United States Code).
(b)
added Report— Not later than March 1, 2016, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the findings of the independent entity, along with a description of any actions that the Secretary proposes to revise and clarify laws or that the Secretary may take to revise or clarify regulations related to intellectual property rights.

Sec. 836 Requirement that certain ship components be manufactured in the national technology and industrial base

added
(a)
added Additional procurement limitation— Section 2534(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

added “(6) Components for auxiliary ships—Subject to subsection (k), the following components:

added “(A) Auxiliary equipment, including pumps, for all shipboard services.

added “(B) Propulsion system components, including engines, reduction gears, and propellers.

added “(C) Shipboard cranes.

added “(D) Spreaders for shipboard cranes.”

(b)
added Implementation— Such section is further amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

added “(k) Implementation of auxiliary ship component limitation—Subsection (a)(6) applies only with respect to contracts awarded by the Secretary of a military department for new construction of an auxiliary ship after the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 using funds available for National Defense Sealift Fund programs or Shipbuilding and Conversion, Navy.”

Sec. 837 Policy regarding solid rocket motors used in tactical missiles

added
(a)
added Policy— The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that every tactical missile program of the Department of Defense that uses solid propellant as the primary propulsion system shall have at least one rocket motor supplier within the national technology and industrial base (as defined in section 2500(1) of title 10, United States Code).
(b)
added Waiver— The Secretary may waive subsection (a) in the case of compelling national security reasons.

Sec. 838 FAR Council membership for Administrator of Small Business Administration

added
(a)
added Addition of Administrator of Small Business Administration to Federal Acquisition Regulatory Council— Section 1302(b)(1) of title 41, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
added by striking “and” at the end of subparagraph (C);
(2)
added by striking the period and inserting “; and” at the end of subparagraph (D); and
(3)
added by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:

added “(E) the Administrator of the Small Business Administration.”

(b)
added Conforming amendments— Such title is amended—
(1)
added in section 1303(a)(1)—
(A)
added by striking “and the Administrator of National Aeronautics and Space,” and inserting “the Administrator of National Aeronautics and Space, and the Administrator of the Small Business Administration,”; and
(B)
added by striking “and the National Aeronautics and Space Act of 1958 (42 U.S.C. 2451 et seq.),” and inserting “the National Aeronautics and Space Act of 1958 (42 U.S.C. 2451 et seq.), and the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 631 et seq.),”; and
(2)
added in section 1121(d), by striking “and the General Services Administration” and inserting “the General Services Administration, and the Small Business Administration”.

Sec. 839 Surety bond requirements and amount of guarantee

added
(a)
added Surety bond requirements— Chapter 93 of subtitle VI of title 31, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
added by adding at the end the following:

added “9310. Individual sureties

added “If another applicable law or regulation permits the acceptance of a bond from a surety that is not subject to sections 9305 and 9306 and is based on a pledge of assets by the surety, the assets pledged by such surety shall—

added “(1) consist of eligible obligations described under section 9303(a); and

added “(2) be submitted to the official of the Government required to approve or accept the bond, who shall deposit the assets with a depository described under section 9303(b).”

(2)
added in the table of contents for such chapter, by adding at the end the following:
(b)
added Amount of surety bond guarantee from Small Business Administration— Section 411(c)(1) of the Small Business Investment Act of 1958 (15 U.S.C. 694b(c)(1)) is amended by striking “70” and inserting “90”.
(c)
added Comptroller General study on surety bonds—
(1)
added Study— The Comptroller General of the United States shall carry out a study on the following:
(A)
added All instances during the 10-year period beginning on January 31, 2006, in which a surety bond proposed or issued by a surety in connection with a Federal project was—
(i)
added rejected by a Federal contracting officer; or
(ii)
added accepted by a Federal contracting officer, but was later found to have been backed by insufficient collateral or to be otherwise deficient or with respect to which the surety did not perform.
(B)
added The consequences to the Federal Government, subcontractors, and suppliers of the instances described under subparagraph (A).
(C)
added The percentages of all Federal contracts that were awarded to new startup businesses (including new startup businesses that are small disadvantaged businesses or disadvantaged business enterprises), small disadvantaged businesses, and disadvantaged business enterprises as prime contractors during—
(i)
added the 2-year period beginning on January 31, 2014 and ending on January 31, 2016; and
(ii)
added the 2-year period beginning on January 31, 2016 and ending on January 31, 2018.
(D)
added An assessment of the impact of the amendments made by this section upon the percentages described in subparagraph (C).
(2)
added Report— Not later than January 31, 2019, the Comptroller General shall issue a report to the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Homeland Security and Government Affairs of the Senate containing all findings and determinations made in carrying out the study required under paragraph (1).
(3)
added Definitions— In this subsection:
(A)
added Disadvantaged business enterprise— The term “disadvantaged business enterprise” has the meaning given that term under section 26.5 of title 49, Code of Federal Regulations.
(B)
added New startup business— The term “new startup business” means a business that was formed in the 2-year period ending on the date on which the business bids on a Federal contract that requires giving a surety bond.
(C)
added Small disadvantaged business— The term “small disadvantaged business” has the meaning given the term “socially and economically disadvantaged small business concern” under section 8(a)(4) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 637(a)(4)).

Sec. 840 Certification requirements for procurement center representatives, Business Opportunity Specialists, and commercial market representatives

added
(a)
added Procurement center representative requirements— Section 15(l)(5)(A)(iii) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 644(l)(5)(A)(iii)) is amended by striking “except that” and all that follows through the period at the end and inserting the following:

added “(I) any person serving in such a position on or before January 3, 2013, may continue to serve in that position for a period of 5 years beginning on such date without the required certification; and

added “(II) any person hired for such position after January 3, 2013, may have up to one calendar year from the date of employment to obtain the required certification.”

(b)
added Business Opportunity Specialist requirements—
(1)
added In general— Section 4 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 633) is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

added “(g) Certification requirements for Business Opportunity Specialists—A Business Opportunity Specialist described under section 7(j)(10)(D) shall have a Level I Federal Acquisition Certification in Contracting (or any successor certification) or the equivalent Department of Defense certification, except that—

added “(1) a Business Opportunity Specialist who was serving on or before January 3, 2013, may continue to serve as a Business Opportunity Specialist for a period of 5 years beginning on such date without such a certification; and

added “(2) any person hired as a Business Opportunity Specialist after January 3, 2013, may have up to one calendar year from the date of employment to obtain the required certification.”

(2)
added Conforming amendment— Section 7(j)(10)(D)(i) of such Act (15 U.S.C. 636(j)(10)(D)(i)) is amended by striking the second sentence.
(c)
added Commercial market representative requirements— Section 4 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 633), as amended by section 9 of this Act, is further amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

added “(h) Certification requirements for commercial market representatives—A commercial market representative referred to in section 15(q)(3) shall have a Level I Federal Acquisition Certification in Contracting (or any successor certification) or the equivalent Department of Defense certification, except that—

added “(1) a commercial market representative who was serving on or before the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 may continue to serve as a commercial market representative for a period of 5 years beginning on such date without such a certification; and

added “(2) any person hired as a commercial market representative after the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 may have up to one calendar year from the date of employment to obtain the required certification.”

Sec. 841 Including subcontracting goals in agency responsibilities

added

added Section 1633(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2076; 15 U.S.C. 631 note) is amended by striking “assume responsibility for of the agency's success in achieving small business contracting goals and percentages” and inserting “assume responsibility for the agency's success in achieving each of the small business prime contracting and subcontracting goals and percentages”.

Sec. 842 Modifications to requirements for qualified HUBZone small business concerns located in a base closure area

added
(a)
added Period for base closure areas—
(1)
added Extension of period—
(A)
added In general— Section 152(a)(2) of title I of division K of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2005 (15 U.S.C. 632 note) is amended by striking “for a period of 5 years” and inserting

added “(A) 8 years from the date of final closure; or

added “(B) the date designated by the Administrator of the Small Business Administration that is based on data of the Bureau of the Census obtained from the first decennial census conducted after the date of final closure.”

(B)
added Conforming amendment— Section 1698(b)(2) of National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (15 U.S.C. 632 note) is amended by striking “5 years” and inserting

added “(A) 8 years; or

added “(B) the date designated by the Administrator of the Small Business Administration described in section 152(a)(2)(B) of title I of division K of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2005 (15 U.S.C. 632 note).”

(2)
added Effective date; applicability— The amendments made by paragraph (1) shall—
(A)
added take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act; and
(B)
added apply to—
(i)
added a base closure area (as defined in section 3(p)(4)(D) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632(p)(4)(D))) that, on the day before the date of the enactment of this Act, is treated as a HUBZone described in section 3(p)(1)(E) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632(p)(1)(E)) under—
(I)
added section 152(a)(2) of title I of division K of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2005 (15 U.S.C. 632 note); or
(II)
added section 1698(b)(2) of National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (15 U.S.C. 632 note); and
(ii)
added a base closure area relating to the closure of a military instillation under the authority described in clauses (i) through (iv) of section 3(p)(4)(D) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632(p)(4)(D)) that occurs on or after the date of the enactment of this Act.
(b)
added Eligible area for employee residence for base closure HUBZones— Section 3(p)(5)(A)(i)(I) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632(p)(5)(A)(i)(I)) is amended—
(1)
added in item (aa), by striking “or” at the end;
(2)
added by redesignating item (bb) as item (cc); and
(3)
added by inserting after item (aa) the following new item:

added “(bb) pursuant to subparagraph (A), (B), (C), (D), or (E) of paragraph (3), that its principal office is located within a base closure area and that not fewer than 35 percent of its employees reside in such base closure area or in another HUBZone; or”

(c)
added Expansion of area included in base area closure definition— Section 3(p)(4)(D) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632(p)(4)(D)) is amended—
(1)
added in clause (iv), by striking the period at the end and inserting “; and”;
(2)
added by redesignating clauses (i) through (iv) as subclauses (I) through (IV), respectively;
(3)
added in the matter preceding subclause (I), as so redesignated, by striking “means lands within” and inserting the following:

added “(i) lands within”

(4)
added by adding at the end the following new clause:

added “(ii) lands within 25 miles of the external boundaries of a military installation described in clause (i), excluding any such lands that are not within a qualified nonmetropolitan county.”

Sec. 843 Joint venturing and teaming

added
(a)
added Joint venture offers for bundled or consolidated contracts— Section 15(e)(4) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 644(e)(4)) is amended to read as follows:

added “(4) Contract teaming

added “(A) In general—In the case of a solicitation of offers for a bundled or consolidated contract that is issued by the head of an agency, a small business concern that provides for use of a particular team of subcontractors or a joint venture of small business concerns may submit an offer for the performance of the contract.

added “(B) Evaluation of offers—The head of the agency shall evaluate an offer described in subparagraph (A) in the same manner as other offers, with due consideration to the capabilities of all of the proposed subcontractors or members of the joint venture as follows:

added “(i) Teams—When evaluating an offer of a small business prime contractor that includes a proposed team of small business subcontractors, the head of the agency shall consider the capabilities and past performance of each first tier subcontractor that is part of the team as the capabilities and past performance of the small business prime contractor.

added “(ii) Joint ventures—When evaluating an offer of a joint venture of small business concerns, if the joint venture does not have sufficient capabilities or past performance to be considered for award of a contract opportunity, the head of the agency shall consider the capabilities and past performance of each member of the joint venture as the capabilities past performance of the joint venture.

added “(C) Status as a small business concern—Participation of a small business concern in a team or a joint venture under this paragraph shall not affect the status of that concern as a small business concern for any other purpose.”

(b)
added Team and joint ventures offers for multiple award contracts— Section 15(q)(1) of such Act (15 U.S.C. 644(q)(1)) is amended—
(1)
added in the heading, by inserting “and joint venture” before “requirements”;
(2)
added by striking “Each Federal agency” and inserting the following:

added “(A) In general—Each Federal agency”

(3)
added by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:

added “(B) Teams—When evaluating an offer of a small business prime contractor that includes a proposed team of small business subcontractors for any multiple award contract above the substantial bundling threshold of the Federal agency, the head of the agency shall consider the capabilities and past performance of each first tier subcontractor that is part of the team as the capabilities and past performance of the small business prime contractor.

added “(C) Joint ventures—When evaluating an offer of a joint venture of small business concerns for any multiple award contract above the substantial bundling threshold of the Federal agency, if the joint venture does not have sufficient capabilities or past performance to be considered for award of a contract opportunity, the head of the agency shall consider the capabilities and past performance of each member of the joint venture as the capabilities and past performance of the joint venture.”

Sec. 851 Additional responsibility for Director of Operational Test and Evaluation

added
(a)
added Additional responsibility— Section 139 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
added by redesignating subsections (c), (d), (e), (f), (g), (h), (i), (j), and (k) as subsections (d), (e), (f), (g), (h), (i), (j), (k), and (l), respectively; and
(2)
added by inserting after subsection (b) the following new subsection (c):

added “(c) The Director shall consider the potential for increases in program cost estimates or delays in schedule estimates in the implementation of policies, procedures, and activities related to operational test and evaluation and shall take appropriate action to ensure that operational test and evaluation activities do not unnecessarily increase program costs or impede program schedules.”

(b)
added Conforming amendment— Section 196(c)(1)(A)(ii) of such title is amended by striking “section 139(i)” and inserting “section 139(k)”.

Sec. 852 Use of recent prices paid by the Government in the determination of price reasonableness

added

added Section 2306a(b) of title 10, United States Code, as amended by section 804, is further amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

added “(5) A contracting officer shall consider evidence provided by an offeror of recent purchase prices paid by the Government for the same or similar commercial items in establishing price reasonableness on a subsequent purchase if the contracting officer is satisfied that the prices previously paid remain a valid reference for comparison after considering the totality of other relevant factors such as the time elapsed since the prior purchase and any differences in the quantities purchased or applicable terms and conditions.”

Sec. 853 Codification of other transaction authority for certain prototype projects

added
(a)
added In general— Section 845 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1994 (Public Law 103–160; 10 U.S.C. 2371 note) is transferred to chapter 139 of title 10, United States Code, inserted so as to appear after section 2371a, redesignated as section 2371b, and amended—
(1)
added by amending the section heading to read as follows:

added “2371b. Authority of the Advanced Research Projects Agency to carry out certain prototype projects”

(2)
added by striking “of title 10, United States Code” each place it appears and inserting “of this title”;
(3)
added by striking “of title 41, United States Code” each place it appears and inserting “of title 41”;
(4)
added by amending subparagraph (B) of subsection (d)(1) to read as follows:

added “(B) all parties to the transaction other than the Federal Government are innovative small business and nontraditional contractors with unique capabilities relevant to the prototype project.”

(5)
added by striking subsection (i).
(b)
added Clerical amendment— The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 2371a the following new item:

Sec. 854 Amendments to certain acquisition thresholds

added
(a)
added Simplified acquisition threshold generally— Section 134 of title 41, United States Code, is amended by striking “$100,000” and inserting “$500,000”.
(b)
added Micro-purchase threshold— Section 1902(a) of title 41, United States Code, is amended by striking “$3,000” and inserting “$5,000”.
(c)
added Special emergency procurement authority— Section 1903(b)(2) of title 41, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
added in subparagraph (A), by striking “$250,000” and inserting “$750,000”; and
(2)
added in subparagraph (B), by striking “$1,000,000” and inserting “$1,500,000”.
(d)
added Small business concern reservation— Section 15(j)(1) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 644(j)(1)) is amended by striking “$100,000” and inserting “$500,000”.

Sec. 855 Revision of method of rounding when making inflation adjustment of acquisition-related dollar thresholds

added

added Section 1908(e)(2) of title 41, United States Code, is amended—

(1)
added in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking “on the day before the adjustment” and inserting “as calculated under paragraph (1)”;
(2)
added by striking “and” at the end of subparagraph (C); and
(3)
added by striking subparagraph (D) and inserting the following new subparagraphs:

added “(D) not less than $1,000,000, but less than $10,000,000, to the nearest $500,000;

added “(E) not less than $10,000,000, but less than $100,000,000, to the nearest $5,000,000;

added “(F) not less than $100,000,000, but less than $1,000,000,000, to the nearest $50,000,000; and

added “(G) $1,000,000,000 or more, to the nearest $500,000,000.”

Sec. 856 Repeal of requirement for stand-alone manpower estimates for major defense acquisition programs

added
(a)
added Repeal of requirement— Subsection (a)(1) of section 2434 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “and a manpower estimate for the program have” and inserting “has”.
(b)
added Conforming amendments relating to regulations— Subsection (b) of such section is amended—
(1)
added by striking paragraph (2);
(2)
added by striking “shall require—” and all that follows through “that the independent” and inserting “shall require that the independent”;
(3)
added by redesignating subparagraphs (A) and (B) as paragraphs (1) and (2), respectively, and realigning those paragraphs so as to be two ems from the left margin; and
(4)
added in paragraph (2), as so redesignated—
(A)
added by striking “and operations and support,” and inserting “operations and support, and manpower to operate, maintain, and support the program upon full operational deployment,”; and
(B)
added by striking “; and” at the end and inserting a period.
(c)
added Clerical amendments—
(1)
added Section heading— The heading of such section is amended to read as follows:

added “2434. Independent cost estimates”

(2)
added Table of sections— The item relating to such section in the table of sections at the beginning of chapter 144 of such title is amended to read as follows:

Sec. 857 Examination and guidance relating to oversight and approval of services contracts

added

added Not later than March 1, 2016, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics shall—

(1)
added complete an examination of the decision authority related to acquisition of services; and
(2)
added develop and issue guidance to improve capabilities and processes related to requirements development and source selection for, and oversight and management of, services contracts.

Sec. 858 Streamlining of requirements relating to defense business systems

added
(a)
added In general—
(1)
added Revision— Section 2222 of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:

added “2222. Defense business systems: business process reengineering; enterprise architecture; management

added “(a) Defense business systems generally—The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that each covered defense business system developed, deployed, and operated by the Department of Defense—

added “(1) supports efficient business processes that have been reviewed, and as appropriate revised, through business process reengineering;

added “(2) is integrated into a comprehensive defense business enterprise architecture; and

added “(3) is managed in a manner that provides visibility into, and traceability of, expenditures for the system.

added “(b) Issuance of guidance

added “(1) Secretary of defense guidance—The Secretary shall issue guidance to provide for the coordination of, and decision making for, the planning, programming, and control of investments in covered defense business systems.

added “(2) Supporting guidance—The Secretary shall direct the Deputy Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, the Chief Information Officer, and the Chief Management Officer of each of the military departments to issue and maintain supporting guidance, as appropriate, for the guidance of the Secretary issued under paragraph (1).

added “(c) Guidance elements—The guidance issued under subsection (b)(1) shall include the following elements:

added “(1) Policy to ensure that the business processes of the Department of Defense are continuously reviewed and revised—

added “(A) to implement the most streamlined and efficient business processes practicable; and

added “(B) to enable the use of commercial off-the-shelf business systems with the fewest changes necessary to accommodate requirements and interfaces that are unique to the Department of Defense.

added “(2) A process to establish requirements for covered defense business systems.

added “(3) Mechanisms for the planning and control of investments in covered defense business systems, including a process for the collection and review of programming and budgeting information for covered defense business systems.

added “(4) Policy requiring the periodic review of covered defense business systems that have been fully deployed, by portfolio, to ensure that investments in such portfolios are appropriate.

added “(d) Defense business enterprise architecture

added “(1) Blueprint—The Secretary, working through the Deputy Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense, shall develop and maintain a blueprint to guide the development of integrated business processes within the Department of Defense. Such blueprint shall be known as the “defense business enterprise architecture”.

added “(2) Purpose—The defense business enterprise architecture shall be sufficiently defined to effectively guide implementation of interoperable defense business system solutions and shall be consistent with the policies and procedures established by the Director of the Office of Management and Budget.

added “(3) Elements—The defense business enterprise architecture shall—

added “(A) include policies, procedures, business data standards, business performance measures, and business information requirements that apply uniformly throughout the Department of Defense; and

added “(B) enable the Department of Defense to—

added “(i) comply with all applicable law, including Federal accounting, financial management, and reporting requirements;

added “(ii) routinely produce verifiable, timely, accurate, and reliable business and financial information for management purposes; and

added “(iii) integrate budget, accounting, and program information and systems.

added “(4) Integration into information technology architecture

added “(A) The defense business enterprise architecture shall be integrated into the information technology enterprise architecture required under subparagraph (B).

added “(B) The Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense shall develop an information technology enterprise architecture. The architecture shall describe a plan for improving the information technology and computing infrastructure of the Department of Defense, including for each of the major business processes conducted by the Department of Defense.

added “(e) Defense business council

added “(1) Requirement for council—The Secretary shall establish a Defense Business Council to provide advice to the Secretary on developing the defense business enterprise architecture, reengineering the Department’s business processes, and requirements for defense business systems. The Council shall be chaired by the Deputy Chief Management Officer and the Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense.

added “(2) Membership—The membership of the Council shall include the following:

added “(A) The Chief Management Officers of the military departments, or their designees.

added “(B) The following officials of the Department of Defense, or their designees:

added “(i) The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics with respect to acquisition, logistics, and installations management processes.

added “(ii) The Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) with respect to financial management and planning and budgeting processes.

added “(iii) The Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness with respect to human resources management processes.

added “(f) Approvals required for development

added “(1) Initial approval required—The Secretary shall ensure that a covered defense business system program cannot proceed into development (or, if no development is required, into production or fielding) unless the appropriate approval official (as specified in paragraph (2)) approves the program by determining that the covered defense business system concerned—

added “(A) supports a business process that has been, or is being as a result of the acquisition program, reengineered to be as streamlined and efficient as practicable consistent with the guidance issued pursuant to subsection (b), including business process mapping;

added “(B) is in compliance with the defense business enterprise architecture developed pursuant to subsection (d) or will be in compliance as a result of modifications planned;

added “(C) has valid, achievable requirements; and

added “(D) is in compliance with the Department’s auditability requirements.

added “(2) Appropriate official—For purposes of paragraph (1), the appropriate approval official with respect to a covered defense business system is the following:

added “(A) In the case of a system of a military department, the Chief Management Officer of that military department.

added “(B) In the case of a system of a Defense Agency or Defense Field Activity or a system that will support the business process of more than one military department or Defense Agency or Defense Field Activity, the Deputy Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense.

added “(C) In the case of any system, such official other than the applicable official under subparagraph (A) or (B) as the Secretary designates for such purpose.

added “(3) Annual certification—For any fiscal year in which funds are expended for development pursuant to a covered defense business system program, the Defense Business Council shall review the system and certify (or decline to certify as the case may be) that it continues to satisfy the requirements of paragraph (1). If the Council determines that certification cannot be granted, the chairman of the Council shall notify the appropriate approval official and the acquisition Milestone Decision Authority for the program and provide a recommendation for corrective action.

added “(4) Obligation of funds in violation of requirements—The obligation of Department of Defense funds for a covered defense business system program that has not been certified in accordance with paragraph (3) is a violation of section 1341(a)(1)(A) of title 31.

added “(g) Responsibility of milestone decision authority—The Secretary shall ensure that, as part of the defense acquisition system, the requirements of this section are fully addressed by the Milestone Decision Authority for a covered defense business system program as acquisition process approvals are considered for such system.

added “(h) Annual report—Not later than March 15 of each year from 2016 through 2020, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on activities of the Department of Defense pursuant to this section. Each report shall include the following:

added “(1) A description of actions taken and planned with respect to the guidance required by subsection (b) and the defense business enterprise architecture developed pursuant to subsection (d).

added “(2) A description of actions taken and planned for the reengineering of business processes by the Defense Business Council established pursuant to subsection (e).

added “(3) A summary of covered defense business system funding and covered defense business systems approved pursuant to subsection (f).

added “(4) Identification of any covered defense business system program that during the preceding fiscal year was reviewed and not approved pursuant to subsection (f) and the reasons for the lack of approval.

added “(5) Identification of any covered defense business system program that during the preceding fiscal year failed to achieve initial operational capability within five years after the date the program received Milestone B approval.

added “(6) For any program identified under paragraph (5), a description of the plan to address the issues that caused the failure.

added “(7) A discussion of specific improvements in business operations and cost savings resulting from successful covered defense business systems programs.

added “(8) A copy of the most recent report of the Chief Management Officer of each military department on implementation of business transformation initiatives by such military department in accordance with section 908 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4569; 10 U.S.C. 2222 note).

added “(i) Definitions—In this section:

added “(1)

added “(A) Defense business system—The term “defense business system” means an information system that is operated by, for, or on behalf of the Department of Defense, including any of the following:

added “(i) A financial system.

added “(ii) A financial data feeder system.

added “(iii) A contracting system.

added “(iv) A logistics system.

added “(v) A planning and budgeting system.

added “(vi) An installations management system.

added “(vii) A human resources management system.

added “(viii) A training and readiness system.

added “(B) The term does not include—

added “(i) a national security system; or

added “(ii) an information system used exclusively by and within the defense commissary system or the exchange system or other instrumentality of the Department of Defense conducted for the morale, welfare, and recreation of members of the armed forces using nonappropriated funds.

added “(2) Covered defense business system—The term “covered defense business system” means a defense business system that is expected to have a total amount of budget authority, over the period of the current future-years defense program submitted to Congress under section 221 of this title, in excess of the threshold established for the use of special simplified acquisition procedures pursuant to section 2304(g)(1)(B) of this title.

added “(3) Covered defense business system program—The term “covered defense business system program” means a defense acquisition program to develop and field a covered defense business system or an increment of a covered defense business system.

added “(4) Enterprise architecture—The term “enterprise architecture” has the meaning given that term in section 3601(4) of title 44.

added “(5) Information system—The term “information system” has the meaning given that term in section 11101 of title 40.

added “(6) National security system—The term “national security system” has the meaning given that term in section 3542(b)(2) of title 44.

added “(7) Milestone decision authority—The term “Milestone Decision Authority”, with respect to a defense acquisition program, means the individual within the Department of Defense designated with the responsibility to grant milestone approvals for that program.

added “(8) Business process mapping—The term “business process mapping” means a procedure in which the steps in a business process are clarified and documented in both written form and in a flow chart.”

(2)
added Clerical amendment— The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by adding at the end the following new item:
(b)
added Deadline for guidance— The guidance required by subsection (b)(1) of section 2222 of title 10, United States Code, as amended by subsection (a)(1), shall be issued not later than December 31, 2016.
(c)
added Repeal— Section 811 of the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109–364; 10 U.S.C. 2222 note) is repealed.

Sec. 859 Consideration of strategic materials in preliminary design review

added
(a)
added Consideration— The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics shall ensure that Department of Defense Instruction 5000.02 and other applicable guidance receive full consideration, during preliminary design review for a product, with respect to any strategic materials required for sustainment of the product over the life cycle of the product.
(b)
added Strategic materials— In this section, the term “strategic materials” means—
(1)
added materials critical to national security, as defined in section 187(e)(1) of title 10, United States Code; and
(2)
added any specialty metal, as defined in section 2533b(l) of such title.

Sec. 860 Procurement of personal protective equipment

added
(a)
added Requirement— The Secretary of Defense shall use best value tradeoff source selection methods to the maximum extent practicable when procuring an item of personal protective equipment or critical safety items.
(b)
added Personal protective equipment defined— In this section, the term “personal protective equipment” includes the following:
(1)
added Body armor components.
(2)
added Combat helmets.
(3)
added Combat protective eyewear.
(4)
added Environmental and fire resistant clothing.
(5)
added Footwear.
(6)
added Organizational clothing and individual equipment.
(7)
added Other critical safety items as determined appropriate by the Secretary.

Sec. 861 Amendments concerning detection and avoidance of counterfeit electronic parts

added

added Section 818(c)(2)(B) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended—

(1)
added in clause (i), by inserting “electronic” after “avoid counterfeit”;
(2)
added in clause (ii)—
(A)
added by inserting “covered” after “provided to the”; and
(B)
added by inserting “or were obtained by the covered contractor in accordance with regulations described in paragraph (3)” after “Regulation”; and
(3)
added in clause (iii), by inserting “discovers the counterfeit electronic parts or suspect counterfeit electronic parts and” after “contractor”.

Sec. 862 Revision to duties of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Developmental Test and Evaluation and the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Systems Engineering

added

added Section 139b of title 10, United States Code, is amended—

(1)
added in subsection (a)(5)—
(A)
added in subparagraph (B), by striking “review and approve or disapprove” and inserting “advise in writing the milestone decision authority regarding review and approval of”; and
(B)
added in subparagraph (C), by inserting “in order to advise relevant technical authorities for such programs on the incorporation of best practices for developmental test from across the Department” after “programs”; and
(2)
added in subsection (b)(5)—
(A)
added in subparagraph (B), by striking “review and approve” and inserting “advise in writing the milestone decision authority regarding review and approval of”; and
(B)
added in subparagraph (C), by inserting “in order to advise relevant technical authorities for such programs on the incorporation of best practices for systems engineering from across the Department” after “programs”.

Sec. 863 Extension of limitation on aggregate annual amount available for contract services

added

added Section 808 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1489), as most recently amended by section 813 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3429) is further amended—

(1)
added in subsections (a) and (b), by striking “or 2015” and inserting “2015, or 2016”;
(2)
added in subsection (c)(3), by striking “and 2015” and inserting “2015, and 2016”;
(3)
added in subsection (d)(4), by striking “or 2015” and inserting “2015, or 2016”; and
(4)
added in subsection (e), by striking “2015” and inserting “2016”.

Sec. 864 Use of lowest price, technically acceptable evaluation method for procurement of audit or audit readiness services

added
(a)
added Findings— Congress finds the following:
(1)
added Given the size and scope of the Department of Defense, the effort to finish and institutionalize auditability is one of the more challenging management tasks that has ever faced the Department.
(2)
added The acquisition of services by the Department abides by many rules and parameters, one of which is the lowest price, technically acceptable (LPTA) evaluation method.
(3)
added The Department’s audit effort is extremely complicated, requiring personnel and assistance who have the financial management and auditor skills that a non-independent public accounting firm or a non-credentialed firm offering the lowest price may not have.
(4)
added In order for the Department to meet the September 30, 2017, audit readiness statutory deadline and the March 31, 2019, audit of fiscal year 2018 statutory deadline, it is imperative that the Department not sacrifice contracts with firms who have the proper credentials and expertise to meet these deadlines.
(5)
added The LPTA evaluation method is appropriate for commercial or non-complex services or supplies where the requirement is clearly definable and the risk of unsuccessful contract performance is minimal. However, audit and audit readiness services are complex and evolving.
(b)
added Requirements before using LPTA evaluation method— Before using the lowest price, technically acceptable evaluation method for the procurement of audit or audit readiness services, the Secretary of Defense shall—
(1)
added establish the values and metrics for the services being procured, including domain expertise and experience, size and scope of offeror’s team, personnel qualifications and certifications, technology, and tools; and
(2)
added review each offeror’s past performance requirements.

Sec. 901 Redesignation of the Department of the Navy as the Department of the Navy and Marine Corps

(a)
added Redesignation of the Department of the Navy as the Department of the Navy and Marine Corps—
(1)
added Redesignation of Military Department— The military department designated as the Department of the Navy is redesignated as the Department of the Navy and Marine Corps.
(2)
added Redesignation of Secretary and Other Statutory Offices—
(A)
added Secretary— The position of the Secretary of the Navy is redesignated as the Secretary of the Navy and Marine Corps.
(B)
added Other statutory offices— The positions of the Under Secretary of the Navy, the four Assistant Secretaries of the Navy, and the General Counsel of the Department of the Navy are redesignated as the Under Secretary of the Navy and Marine Corps, the Assistant Secretaries of the Navy and Marine Corps, and the General Counsel of the Department of the Navy and Marine Corps, respectively.
(b)
added Conforming amendments to title 10, United States Code—
(1)
added Definition of “Military Department”— Paragraph (8) of section 101(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:

added “(8) The term “military department” means the Department of the Army, the Department of the Navy and Marine Corps, and the Department of the Air Force.”

(2)
added Organization of Department— The first sentence of section 5011 of such title is amended to read as follows: “The Department of the Navy and Marine Corps is separately organized under the Secretary of the Navy and Marine Corps.”.
(3)
added Position of Secretary— Section 5013(a)(1) of such title is amended by striking “There is a Secretary of the Navy” and inserting “There is a Secretary of the Navy and Marine Corps”.
(4)
added Chapter Headings—
(A)
added The heading of chapter 503 of such title is amended to read as follows:

added “503 Department of the Navy and Marine Corps”

(B)
added The heading of chapter 507 of such title is amended to read as follows:

added “507 Composition of the Department of the Navy and Marine Corps”

(5)
added Other Amendments—
(A)
added Title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “Department of the Navy” and “Secretary of the Navy” each place they appear other than as specified in paragraphs (1), (2), (3), and (4) (including in section headings, subsection captions, tables of chapters, and tables of sections) and inserting “Department of the Navy and Marine Corps” and “Secretary of the Navy and Marine Corps”, respectively, in each case with the matter inserted to be in the same typeface and typestyle as the matter stricken.
(B)
added
(i)
added Sections 5013(f), 5014(b)(2), 5016(a), 5017(2), 5032(a), and 5042(a) of such title are amended by striking “Assistant Secretaries of the Navy” and inserting “Assistant Secretaries of the Navy and Marine Corps”.
(ii)
added The heading of section 5016 of such title, and the item relating to such section in the table of sections at the beginning of chapter 503 of such title, are each amended by inserting “and Marine Corps” after “of the Navy”, with the matter inserted in each case to be in the same typeface and typestyle as the matter amended.
(c)
added Other provisions of law and other references—
(1)
added Title 37, United States Code— Title 37, United States Code, is amended by striking “Department of the Navy” and “Secretary of the Navy” each place they appear and inserting “Department of the Navy and Marine Corps” and “Secretary of the Navy and Marine Corps”, respectively.
(2)
added Other References— Any reference in any law other than in title 10 or title 37, United States Code, or in any regulation, document, record, or other paper of the United States, to the Department of the Navy shall be considered to be a reference to the Department of the Navy and Marine Corps. Any such reference to an office specified in subsection (a)(2) shall be considered to be a reference to that office as redesignated by that section.
(d)
added Effective date— This section and the amendments made by this section shall take effect on the first day of the first month beginning more than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act.

removed Section 161(b)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “two years” and inserting “four years”.

Sec. 902 Change of period for Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff review of the unified command plan

changed Section 153(a)(4) 161(b)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:striking “two years” and inserting “four years”.

removed “(H) Advising the Secretary on development of joint command, control, communications, and cyber capability, including integration and interoperability of such capability, through requirements, integrated architectures, data standards, and assessments.”

Sec. 903 Update of statutory specification of functions of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff relating to joint force development activities

added

added Section 153(a)(5) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:

added “(F) Advising the Secretary on development of joint command, control, communications, and cyber capability, including integration and interoperability of such capability, through requirements, integrated architectures, data standards, and assessments.”

Sec. 904 Sense of Congress on the United States Marine Corps

added
(a)
added Findings— Congress finds the following:
(1)
added As senior United States statesman Dr. Henry Kissinger wrote in testimony submitted to the Senate Armed Services Committee on January 29, 2015, “The United States has not faced a more diverse and complex array of crises since the end of the Second World War.”.
(2)
added The rise of non-state forces and near peer competitors has introduced destabilizing pressures around the globe.
(3)
added Advances in information and weapons technology have reduced the time available for the United States to prepare for and respond to crises against both known and unknown threats.
(4)
added The importance of the maritime domain cannot be overstated. As acknowledged in the March 2015 Navy, Marine Corps, and Coast Guard maritime strategy, “A Cooperative Strategy for 21st Century Seapower”: “Oceans are the lifeblood of the interconnected global community… 90 percent of trade by volume travels across the oceans. Approximately 70 percent of the world’s population lives within 100 miles of the coastline.”.
(5)
added The United States must be prepared to rapidly respond to crises around the world regardless of the nation’s fiscal health.
(6)
added In this global security environment, it is critical that the nation possess a maritime force whose mission and ethos is readiness—a fight tonight force, forward deployed, that can respond immediately to emergent crises across the full range of military operations around the globe either from the sea or home station.
(7)
added The need for such a force was recognized by the 82nd Congress after the major wars of the twentieth century, when it mandated a core mission for the nation’s leanest force—the Marine Corps—to be most ready when the nation is least ready.
(b)
added Sense of Congress—
(1)
added It is the sense of Congress that—
(A)
added the Marine Corps, within the Department of the Navy, remain the Nation’s expeditionary, crisis response force;
(B)
added the need for such a force with such a capability has never been greater; and
(C)
added accordingly, in recognition of this need and the wisdom of the 82nd Congress, the 114th Congress reaffirms section 5063 of title 10, United States Code, uniquely charging the United States Marine Corps with this responsibility.
(2)
added It is further the sense of Congress that the Marine Corps—
(A)
added shall—
(i)
added be organized to include not less than three combat divisions and three air wings, and such other land combat, aviation, and other services as may be organic therein;
(ii)
added be organized, trained, and equipped to provide fleet marine forces of combined arms, together with supporting air components, for service with the fleet in the seizure or defense of advanced naval bases and for the conduct of such land operations as may be essential to the prosecution of a naval campaign; and
(iii)
added provide detachments and organizations for service on armed vessels of the Navy, shall provide security detachments for the protection of naval property at naval stations and bases, and shall perform such other duties as the President may direct;
(B)
added shall develop, in coordination with the Army and the Air Force, those phases of amphibious operations that pertain to the tactics, techniques, and equipment used by landing forces; and
(C)
added is responsible, in accordance with the integrated joint mobilization plans, for the expansion of peacetime components of the Marine Corps to meet the needs of war.

Sec. 905 Additional requirements for streamlining of Department of Defense management headquarters

added
(a)
added Findings—
(1)
added On July 31, 2013, the then Secretary of Defense stated that the Department would “reduc[e] the Department’s major headquarters budgets by 20 percent…Although the 20 percent cut applies to budget dollars, organizations will strive for a goal of 20 percent reductions in government civilians and military personnel.” The then Secretary further stated that “these management reforms…will reduce the Department’s overhead and operating costs by...$10 billion over the next five years.”.
(2)
added Furthermore, the President’s budget request for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2015 stated that reductions to management headquarters staff and consolidation of duplicative efforts across the Department would result in a savings of $5.3 billion over 5 years—through fiscal year 2019. However, as noted by the Government Accountability Office in a January 2015 report (GAO-15-10), the Department accounted for $5.3 billion as efficiency savings in its budget request, but has not provided specific details on the reductions to management headquarters’ staff it plans to make.
(3)
added In June 2014, the Government Accountability Office found (in GAO-14-439) that the Department did not have an accurate accounting of the resources being devoted to management headquarters to use as a starting point for tracking reductions to such headquarters. In April 2015, the Government Accountability Office reported (in GAO-15-404SP) that focusing reductions on management headquarters budgets and personnel, which tend to be inconsistently defined and often represent a small portion of the overall headquarters, shields much of the resources identified for potential reduction.
(b)
added Sense of congress— It is the sense of Congress that—
(1)
added the Secretary of Defense’s commitment in July 2013 to a goal of a 20 percent reduction in headquarters budgets and personnel and a goal of $10 billion in cost savings over five years is worthwhile and should be fully implemented;
(2)
added without a clear baseline for management headquarters, it is difficult to demonstrate and track progress achieving actual savings;
(3)
added any reduction in personnel should not be implemented as an across-the-board cut, but rather should be strategically designed to retain critical functions, capabilities, and skill sets—including but not limited to depots and the acquisition workforce—and eliminate unnecessary or redundant functions or skill sets that do not benefit or support mission requirements;
(4)
added functions should be performed at the lowest appropriate organizational level and those organizations should be empowered and held accountable;
(5)
added duplicative functions at higher level organizations should be eliminated; and
(6)
added the movement of a function from a management headquarters to a different Department of Defense organization or a lower level organization does not result in an efficiency, since the same budget is still required to perform that function.
(c)
added Requirement to implement 20 percent reduction in management headquarters functions— Section 904 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 10 U.S.C. 111 note) is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

added “(e) Implementation of management headquarters reduction—The Secretary of Defense shall implement the 20 percent reduction directed by the Secretary in July 2013 in management headquarters budget and personnel by September 30, 2019, for the covered organizations in the National Capital Region (as defined in section 2674(f) of title 10, United States Code). Such reductions shall be strategically designed to retain critical functions, capabilities, and skill sets. Management, functions, programs, or offices shall be moved to the lowest appropriate organizational level. In any report issued pursuant to subsection (d), the Secretary may not claim a cost savings solely based on moving management, functions, programs, or offices from one organization to another.”

(d)
added Limitation on working-capital fund positions— Section 904 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 10 U.S.C. 111 note) is further amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

added “(f) Limitation on working-capital fund positions—In implementing the 20 percent reduction referred to in subsection (e), the Secretary of Defense may not reduce the number of Department of Defense civilian employees whose salaries are funded from working-capital funds except in accordance with section 2472 of title 10, United States Code.”

(e)
added Change in deadline for required plan— Section 904(a) of the such Act is amended by striking “180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act” and inserting “March 31, 2016”.
(f)
added Additional elements of plan— Section 904(b) of such Act is amended—
(1)
added by redesignating paragraphs (1), (2), and (3) as paragraphs (2), (3), and (4), respectively;
(2)
added by inserting before paragraph (2), as so redesignated, the following new paragraph (1):

added “(1) An accurate baseline accounting of defense headquarters budgets and personnel as of fiscal year 2014, including what is and is not included as part of management headquarters accounting, and a detailed description of the number of personnel, budgets, functions, capabilities, and skill sets.”

(3)
added in paragraph (2), as so redesignated—
(A)
added by inserting “actual and” before “planned changes”;
(B)
added by striking “staffing” and inserting “personnel”; and
(C)
added by inserting before the period at the end the following: “, set forth separately by fiscal year, from fiscal year 2014 through fiscal year 2019”;
(4)
added in paragraph (3), as so redesignated—
(A)
added by striking “description of the planned changes” and inserting “detailed description of the actual and planned changes”; and
(B)
added by inserting before the period at the end the following: “, set forth separately by fiscal year, from fiscal year 2014 through fiscal year 2019”; and
(5)
added in paragraph (4), as so redesignated, by striking “fiscal year 2015, and estimated savings to be achieved for each of fiscal years 2015 through 2024” and inserting “fiscal year 2014, and estimated savings to be achieved, along with associated changes or reductions in budget, for each of fiscal years 2014 through 2024”.
(g)
added Additional report requirements— Section 904(d) of such Act is amended—
(1)
added in paragraph (1), by striking “180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act” and inserting “March 31, 2016”; and
(2)
added in paragraph (2)—
(A)
added in subparagraph (C), by striking “including” and all that follows through the end of the subparagraph and inserting the following: “and specific detailed information on how the changes, consolidations, or reductions were prioritized and resulted in functions no longer being performed, in the fiscal year covered by such report.”;
(B)
added in subparagraph (F), by striking “, including” and all that follows through “management review”; and
(C)
added by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:

added “(H) A separate description of—

added “(i) the management functions, programs, or offices that were eliminated and how each represents a redundant management or oversight function; and

added “(ii) the management, functions, programs, or offices that were moved, and how moving each will result in efficiency.”

Sec. 906 Sense of Congress on performance management and workforce incentive system

added
(a)
added Findings— Congress finds the following:
(1)
added Section 1113 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84) required the Department of Defense to institute a fair, credible, and transparent performance appraisal system, given the name “New Beginnings,” for employees, which—
(A)
added links employee bonuses and other performance-based action to employee performance appraisals;
(B)
added ensures ongoing performance feedback and dialogue among supervisors, managers, and employees throughout the appraisal period, with timetables for review; and
(C)
added develops performance assistance plans to give employees formal training, on-the-job training, counseling, mentoring, and other assistance.
(2)
added The military components and defense agencies of the Department of Defense are currently reviewing the proposed “New Beginnings” performance management and workforce incentive system developed in response to section 1113 of Public Law 111–84.
(3)
added The Department of Defense anticipates it will begin implementation of the “New Beginnings” performance management and workforce incentive system in April 2016.
(4)
added The authority provided in section 1113 of Public Law 111–84 provided the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Director of the Office of Personnel Management, flexibilities in promulgating regulations to redesign the procedures which are applied by the Department of Defense in making appointments to positions within the competitive service in order to—
(A)
added better meet mission needs;
(B)
added respond to managers’ needs and the needs of applicants;
(C)
added produce high-quality applicants;
(D)
added support timely decisions;
(E)
added uphold appointments based on merit system principles; and
(F)
added promote competitive job offers.
(5)
added In implementing the “New Beginnings” performance management and workforce incentive system, section 113 of Public Law 111–84 requires the Secretary of Defense to comply with veterans’ preference requirements.
(6)
added Among the criteria for the new performance management and workforce incentive system authorized under section 1113 of Public Law 111–84, the Secretary of Defense is required to—
(A)
added adhere to merit principles;
(B)
added include a means for ensuring employee involvement (for bargaining unit employees, through their exclusive representatives) in the design and implementation of the performance management and workforce incentive system;
(C)
added provide for adequate training and retraining for supervisors, managers, and employees in the implementation and operation of the performance management and workforce incentive system;
(D)
added develop a comprehensive management succession program to provide training to employees to develop managers for the agency and a program to provide training to supervisors on actions, options, and strategies a supervisor may use in administering the performance management and workforce incentive system;
(E)
added include effective transparency and accountability measures and safeguards to ensure that the management of the performance management and workforce incentive system is fair, credible, and equitable, including appropriate independent reasonableness reviews, internal assessments, and employee surveys;
(F)
added use the annual strategic workforce plan required by section 115b of title 10; and
(G)
added ensure that adequate agency resources are allocated for the design, implementation, and administration of the performance management and workforce incentive system.
(7)
added Section 1113 of Public Law 111–84 also requires the Secretary of Defense to develop a program of training—to be completed by a supervisor every three years—on the actions, options, and strategies a supervisor may use in—
(A)
added developing and discussing relevant goals and objectives with the employee, communicating and discussing progress relative to performance goals and objectives, and conducting performance appraisals;
(B)
added mentoring and motivating employees, and improving employee performance and productivity;
(C)
added fostering a work environment characterized by fairness, respect, equal opportunity, and attention to the quality of the work of employees;
(D)
added effectively managing employees with unacceptable performance;
(E)
added addressing reports of a hostile work environment, reprisal, or harassment of or by another supervisor or employee; and
(F)
added allowing experienced supervisors to mentor new supervisors by sharing knowledge and advice in areas such as communication, critical thinking, responsibility, flexibility, motivating employees, teamwork, leadership, and professional development, and pointing out strengths and areas of development.
(b)
added Sense of congress— It is the sense of Congress that the Secretary of Defense should proceed with the collaborative work with employee representatives on the “New Beginnings” performance management and workforce incentive system and begin implementation of the new system at the earliest possible date.

Sec. 907 Guidelines for conversion of functions performed by civilian or contractor personnel to performance by military personnel

added

added Section 129a of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

added “(g) Guidelines for performance of certain functions by military personnel

added “(1) Except as provided in paragraph (2), no functions performed by civilian personnel or contractors may be converted to performance by military personnel unless—

added “(A) there is a direct link between the functions to be performed and a military occupational specialty; and

added “(B) the conversion to performance by military personnel is cost effective, based on Department of Defense instruction 7041.04 (or any successor administrative regulation, directive, or policy).

added “(2) Paragraph (1) shall not apply to the following functions:

added “(A) Functions required by law or regulation to be performed by military personnel.

added “(B) Functions related to—

added “(i) missions involving operation risks and combatant status under the Law of War;

added “(ii) specialized collective and individual training requiring military-unique knowledge and skills based on recent operational experience;

added “(iii) independent advice to senior civilian leadership in the Department of Defense requiring military-unique knowledge and skills based on recent operational experience; and

added “(iv) command and control arrangements under chapter 47 of this title (the Uniform Code of Military Justice).”

Sec. 1001 General transfer authority

(a)
added Authority to transfer authorizations—
(1)
added Authority— Upon determination by the Secretary of Defense that such action is necessary in the national interest, the Secretary may transfer amounts of authorizations made available to the Department of Defense in this division for fiscal year 2016 between any such authorizations for that fiscal year (or any subdivisions thereof). Amounts of authorizations so transferred shall be merged with and be available for the same purposes as the authorization to which transferred.
(2)
added Limitation— Except as provided in paragraph (3), the total amount of authorizations that the Secretary may transfer under the authority of this section may not exceed $5,000,000,000.
(3)
added Exception for transfers between military personnel authorizations— A transfer of funds between military personnel authorizations under title IV shall not be counted toward the dollar limitation in paragraph (2).
(a)
removed Authority— The Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of State may enter into an agreement under which each Secretary may provide covered support, supplies, and services on a reimbursement basis, or by exchange of covered support, supplies, and services, to the other Secretary during a contingency operation and related transition period for up to two years following the end of such contingency operation.
(b)
changed Agreement—Limitations— An agreement entered into under this section shall be in writing and shall include the following terms:The authority provided by subsection (a) to transfer authorizations—
(1)
changed The price charged by a supplying agency shall may only be the direct costs that such agency incurred by providing the covered support, supplies, or services used to provide authority for items that have a higher priority than the requesting agency under this section.items from which authority is transferred; and
(2)
changed Credits and liabilities of the agencies accrued as a result of acquisitions and transfers of covered support, supplies, and services under this section shall be liquidated may not less often than once every 3 months by direct payment be used to the agency supplying such support, supplies, or services provide authority for an item that has been denied authorization by the agency receiving such support, supplies, or services.Congress.
(3)
removed Exchange entitlements accrued as a result of acquisitions and transfers of covered support, supplies, and services under this section shall be satisfied within 12 months after the date of the delivery of the covered support, supplies, or services. Exchange entitlements not so satisfied shall be immediately liquidated by direct payment to the agency supplying such covered support, supplies, or services.
(c)
changed Effect of obligation and availability of funds—on authorization amounts— An order placed by an agency pursuant A transfer made from one account to an agreement another under the authority of this section is deemed to shall be an obligation in the same manner that a similar order or contract placed with a private contractor is an obligation. Appropriations remain available to pay an obligation deemed to increase the servicing agency in amount authorized for the same manner as appropriations remain available account to pay which the amount is transferred by an obligation amount equal to a private contractor.the amount transferred.
(d)
changed Definitions—Notice to congress— In this section:The Secretary shall promptly notify Congress of each transfer made under subsection (a).
(1)
removed The term “covered support, supplies, and services” means food, billeting, transportation (including airlift), petroleum, oils, lubricants, communications services, medical services, ammunition, base operations support (and construction incident to base operations support), use of facilities, spare parts and components, repair and maintenance services, and calibration services.
(2)
removed The term “contingency operation” has the meaning given that term in section 101(a)(13) of title 10, United States Code.
(e)
removed Crediting of receipts— Any receipt as a result of an agreement entered into under this section shall be credited, at the option of the Secretary of Defense with respect to the Department of Defense and the Secretary of State with respect to the Department of State, to—
(1)
removed the appropriation, fund, or account used in incurring the obligation; or
(2)
removed an appropriate appropriation, fund, or account currently available for the purposes for which the expenditures were made.

Sec. 1002 Authority to transfer funds to the National Nuclear Security Administration to sustain nuclear weapons modernization and naval reactors

added
(a)
added Transfer authorized— If the amount authorized to be appropriated for the weapons activities of the National Nuclear Security Administration under section 3101 or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2016 is less than $8,900,000,000 (the amount projected to be required for such activities in fiscal year 2016 as specified in the report under section 1251 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2549)), the Secretary of Defense may transfer, from amounts authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2016 pursuant to this Act, to the Secretary of Energy an amount, not to exceed $150,000,000, to be available only for naval reactors or weapons activities of the National Nuclear Security Administration.
(b)
added Notice to congress— In the event of a transfer under subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall promptly notify Congress of the transfer, and shall include in such notice the Department of Defense account or accounts from which funds are transferred.
(c)
added Transfer mechanism— Any funds transferred under this section shall be transferred in accordance with established procedures for reprogramming under section 1001 or successor provisions of law.
(d)
added Construction of authority— The transfer authority provided under subsection (a) is in addition to any other transfer authority provided under this Act.

Sec. 1003 Accounting standards to value certain property, plant, and equipment items

added
(a)
added Requirement for certain accounting standards— The Secretary of Defense shall work in coordination with the Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board to establish accounting standards to value large and unordinary general property, plant, and equipment items.
(b)
added Deadline— The accounting standards required by subsection (a) shall be established by not later than September 30, 2017, and be available for use for the full audit on the financial statements of the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2018, as required by section 1003(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 842; 10 U.S.C. 2222 note).

Sec. 1011 Extension of authority to provide additional support for counter-drug activities of certain foreign governments

added
(a)
added Extension— Subsection (a)(2) of section 1033 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1998 (Public Law 105–85; 111 Stat. 1881), as most recently amended by section 1013 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 844), is further amended by striking “2016” and inserting “2017”.
(b)
added Maximum amount of support— Subsection (e)(2) of such section 1033, as so amended, is further amended by striking “2016” and inserting “2017”.

Sec. 1012 Statement of policy on Plan Central America

added
(a)
added Findings— Congress makes the following findings:
(1)
added The stability and security of Central American nations have a direct impact on the stability and security of the United States.
(2)
added Over the past decade, stability and increased security in the Republic of Colombia has pushed illicit trafficking to Central America bringing increased violence and instability.
(3)
added Much of Central America has seen spikes in violence and homicides. In fiscal year 2013, the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime released its Global Study on Homicide 2013. Four of the top five countries with the highest homicide rates in the world were Central American nations including Honduras, Belize, El Salvador, and Guatemala.
(4)
added In calendar year 2014, approximately 65,000 unaccompanied alien children from Central America entered the United States through its southwest border. This number of such children who enter the United States during calendar year 2015 is expected to be approximately the same.
(5)
added The southwest border of the United States continues to be porous to illicit trafficking of narcotics, weapons, cash, and people.
(6)
added In November 2014, Guatemala, Honduras, and El Salvador announced a Plan for the Alliance for Prosperity of the Northern Triangle. This plan is a comprehensive approach to address the ongoing violence and instability facing these three nations by stimulating economic opportunities, improving public safety and rule of law, and strengthening institutions to increase trust in the state.
(7)
added The United States Government has stated its support for the Alliance for Prosperity and included in the President’s fiscal year 2016 budget request $1,000,000,000 in Department of State funds, to support the strategy for United States engagement in Central America. According to the strategy, this funding will be focused on promoting prosperity and regional economic integration, enhancing security, and promoting improved governance.
(8)
added None of the President’s $1,000,000,000 budget request for the strategy for United States engagement in Central America includes any funding for Department of Defense programs in the region.
(9)
added The Department of Defense provides training, equipment, education, and interdiction efforts to address security challenges in Central America through detection and monitoring of illicit trafficking, assistance in illicit trafficking interdictions, and building partnership capacities.
(10)
added The Department of Defense through its roles and missions, is executing a plan to address security challenges in Central America in conjunction with the United States Strategy for Engagement in Central America.
(b)
added Policy— It shall be the policy of the United States to prioritize a Plan Central America to address the threatening levels of violence, instability, illicit trafficking, and transnational organized crime that challenge the sovereignty of Central American nations and security of the United States. In order to address such issues, the Department of Defense shall—
(1)
added increase the efforts of the Department of Defense as the lead agency to detect and monitor the aerial and maritime illicit trafficking into the United States;
(2)
added increase the efforts of the Department of Defense to support aerial and maritime illicit trafficking interdiction efforts;
(3)
added increase the efforts of the Department of Defense to build partnership capacity with partner nations in Central America to confront security challenges through increased training opportunities, education, and exercises;
(4)
added enforce human rights requirements consistent with section 2249e of title 10, United States Code, and increase the training and education regarding human rights provided in Central American nations; and
(5)
added support interagency efforts in Central America addressing all levels of instability including development, education, economic, political, and security challenges.

Sec. 1021 Restrictions on the overhaul and repair of vessels in foreign shipyards

(a)
changed Extension—In general— Subsection (b) of section 1014 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4585), as amended by section 1021 Section 7310(b)(1) of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383, 124 Stat. 4348), title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “September 30, 2015” and inserting “September 30, 2020”.amended—
(1)
added by striking “In the case” and inserting “(A) Except as provided in subparagraph (B), in the case”;
(2)
added by striking “during the 15-month” and all that follows through “United States)”;
(3)
added by inserting before the period at the end the following: “, other than in the case of voyage repairs”; and
(4)
added by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:

added “(B) The Secretary of the Navy may waive the application of subparagraph (A) to a contract award if the Secretary determines that the waiver is essential to the national security interests of the United States.”

(b)
changed Technical and clarifying amendments—Effective date— Subsection The amendments made by subsection (a) shall take effect on the later of such section is amended—the following dates:
(1)
changed in The date of the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking “not more that” and inserting “not more than”; andenactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017.
(2)
changed in paragraph (2), by striking “Naval vessels” and inserting “such vessels”.October 1, 2016.

Sec. 1022 Extension of authority for reimbursement of expenses for certain Navy mess operations afloat

(a)
changed Overhaul execution authority—Extension— The Secretary Subsection (b) of section 1014 of the Navy is authorized to carry out a nuclear refueling and complex overhaul on each Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4585), as amended by section 1021 of the following Nimitz-class aircraft carriers:Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383, 124 Stat. 4348), is amended by striking “September 30, 2015” and inserting “September 30, 2020”.
(1)
removed U.S.S. George Washington (CVN–73).
(2)
removed U.S.S. John C. Stennis (CVN–74).
(3)
removed U.S.S. Harry S. Truman (CVN–75).
(4)
removed U.S.S. Ronald Reagan (CVN–76).
(5)
removed U.S.S. George H.W. Bush (CVN–77).
(b)
changed Special funding authority when a continuing resolution is in effect—Technical and clarifying amendments— Unless expressly prohibited in a continuing resolution enacted after this date, if advance procurement funds are appropriated for a fiscal year to begin a refueling and complex overhaul on a Nimitz-class aircraft carrier identified in subsection (a), then Shipbuilding and Conversion, Navy, appropriations in the amounts contained in the President’s Budget for that refueling and complex overhaul for the following Fiscal Year shall be available for obligation under a continuing resolution enacted for the following fiscal year to continue the refueling and complex overhaul on that aircraft carrier.Subsection (a) of such section is amended—
(1)
added in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking “not more that” and inserting “not more than”; and
(2)
added in paragraph (2), by striking “Naval vessels” and inserting “such vessels”.
(c)
removed Incremental funding authority— The Secretary of the Navy is authorized to incrementally fund contracts entered into for a nuclear refueling and complex overhaul authorized in subsection (a), for a period not to exceed six years after advance procurement funds for the nuclear refueling and complex overhaul effort are first obligated, from amounts appropriated or otherwise made available within Shipbuilding and Conversion, Navy for refueling the Nimitz-class aircraft carriers.
(d)
removed Condition for out-Year contract payments— A contract entered into under subsection (c) shall provide that any obligation of the United States to make a payment under a contract for carrier refueling in a fiscal year subsequent to the initial year of contract execution is subject to the availability of appropriations.

Sec. 1023 Availability of funds for retirement or inactivation of Ticonderoga class cruisers or dock landing ships

added
(a)
added Limitation on the availability of funds— Except as otherwise provided in this section, none of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2016 may be obligated or expended to retire, prepare to retire, inactivate, or place in storage a cruiser or dock landing ship.
(b)
added Cruiser modernization—
(1)
added In general— As provided by section 1026 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3490), the Secretary of the Navy shall begin the modernization of two cruisers during fiscal year 2016 only after the receipt of the materiel required to begin such modernization. Such modernization shall include—
(A)
added hull, mechanical, and electrical upgrades; and
(B)
added combat systems modernizations.
(2)
added Duration—
(A)
added In general— Except as provided in subparagraph (B), the time period for such modernization shall not exceed two years.
(B)
added Extension— If the Secretary of the Navy determines that the scope of the modernization cannot be reasonably completed in two years, the Secretary may extend the time period under subparagraph (A) for an additional six months. If the Secretary issues such an extension, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees notice of the extension and the reasons the Secretary made such determination.
(3)
added Delay— The Secretary of the Navy may delay the modernization required under paragraph (1) if the materiel required to begin the modernization has not been received.

Sec. 1024 Limitation on the use of funds for removal of ballistic missile defense capabilities from Ticonderoga class cruisers

added

added None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for the Department of Defense may be used to remove ballistic missile defense capabilities from any of the 5 Ticonderoga class cruisers equipped with such capabilities until the Secretary of the Navy certifies to the congressional defense committees that the Navy has—

(1)
added obtained the ballistic missile capabilities required by the most recent Navy Force Structure Assessment; or
(2)
added determined to upgrade such cruisers with an equal or improved ballistic missile defense capability.

Sec. 1031 Permanent authority to provide rewards through Government personnel of allied forces and certain other modifications to Department of Defense program to provide rewards

added
(a)
added In general— Section 127b(c)(3) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
added in subparagraph (A), by striking “subparagraphs (B) and (C)” and inserting “subparagraph (B)”; and
(2)
added by striking subparagraphs (C) and (D).
(b)
added Clerical amendments—
(1)
added Section heading— The section heading for section 127b of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:

added “127b. Department of Defense rewards program”

(2)
added Table of sections— The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 3 of such title is amended by striking the item relating to section 127b and inserting the following new item:

Sec. 1032 Congressional notification of sensitive military operations

added

added Section 130f of title 10, United States Code, is amended—

(1)
added by striking subsection (e); and
(2)
added by redesignating subsection (f) as subsection (e).

Sec. 1033 Repeal of semiannual reports on obligation and expenditure of funds for combating terrorism program

added

added Section 229 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—

(1)
added by striking subsection (d); and
(2)
added by redesignating subsection (e) as subsection (d).

Sec. 1034 Reports to Congress on contact between terrorists and individuals formerly detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba

added
(a)
added Section 319(c) of the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (Public Law 111–32; 123 Stat. 1874; 10 U.S.C. 801 note) is amended by inserting after paragraph (5) the following new paragraphs:

added “(6) A summary of all contact by any means of communication, including telecommunications, electronic or technical means, in person, written communications, or any other means of communication, regardless of content, between any individual formerly detained at Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and any individual known or suspected to be associated with a foreign terrorist group.

added “(7) A description of whether any of the contact described in the summary required by paragraph (6) included any information or discussion about hostilities against the United States or its allies or partners.”

(b)
added Rule of construction— Nothing in this section or the amendments made by this section shall be construed to terminate, alter, modify, override, or otherwise affect any reporting of information required under section 319(c) of the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (Public Law 111–32; 123 Stat. 1874; 10 U.S.C. 801 note) prior to the enactment of this section.

Sec. 1035 Inclusion in reports to Congress information about recidivism of individuals formerly detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba

added

added Section 319(c) of the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (Public Law 111–32; 123 Stat. 1874; 10 U.S.C. 801 note), as amended by section 1034, is further amended by inserting after paragraph (7), as added by such section, the following new paragraphs:

added “(8) For each individual described in paragraph (4), the period of time between the date on which the individual was released or transferred from Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and the date on which it is confirmed that the individual is suspected or confirmed of reengaging in terrorist activities.

added “(9) The average period of time described in paragraph (8) for all the individuals described in paragraph (4).”

Sec. 1036 Prohibition on the use of funds for the transfer or release of individuals detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba

added

added No amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available to the Department of Defense may be used during the period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act and ending on December 31, 2016, to transfer, release, or assist in the transfer or release to or within the United States, its territories, or possessions of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed or any other detainee who—

(1)
added is not a United States citizen or a member of the Armed Forces of the United States; and
(2)
added is or was held on or after January 20, 2009, at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, by the Department of Defense.

Sec. 1037 Prohibition on use of funds to construct or modify facilities in the United States to house detainees transferred from United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba

added
(a)
added In general— No amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available to the Department of Defense may be used during the period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act and ending on December 31, 2016, to construct or modify any facility in the United States, its territories, or possessions to house any individual detained at Guantanamo for the purposes of detention or imprisonment in the custody or under the control of the Department of Defense.
(b)
added Exception— The prohibition in subsection (a) shall not apply to any modification of facilities at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.
(c)
added Individual detained at Guantanamo defined— In this section, the term “individual detained at Guantanamo” has the meaning given that term in section 1039(f)(2).

Sec. 1038 Prohibition on use of funds to transfer or release individuals detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to combat zones

added
(a)
added In general— No amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available for the Department of Defense may be used, during the period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act and ending on December 31, 2016, to transfer, release, or assist in the transfer or release of any individual detained in the custody or under the control of the Department of Defense at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to a combat zone.
(b)
added Combat zone defined— In this section, the term “combat zone” means any area designated as a combat zone for purposes of section 112 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (26 U.S.C. 112) for which the income of a member of the Armed Forces was excluded during 2014, 2015, or 2016 by reason of the member’s service on active duty in such area.

Sec. 1039 Requirements for certifications relating to the transfer of detainees at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to foreign countries and other foreign entities

added
(a)
added Certification required prior to transfer—
(1)
added In general— Except as provided in paragraph (2) and subsection (d), the Secretary of Defense may not use any amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise available to the Department of Defense during the period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act and ending on December 31, 2016, to transfer any individual detained at Guantanamo to the custody or control of the individual’s country of origin, any other foreign country, or any other foreign entity unless the Secretary submits to Congress the certification described in subsection (b) not later than 30 days before the transfer of the individual.
(2)
added Exception— Paragraph (1) shall not apply to any action taken by the Secretary to transfer any individual detained at Guantanamo to effectuate an order affecting the disposition of the individual that is issued by a court or competent tribunal of the United States having lawful jurisdiction (which the Secretary shall notify Congress of promptly after issuance).
(b)
added Certification— A certification described in this subsection is a written certification made by the Secretary of Defense that—
(1)
added the government of the foreign country or the recognized leadership of the foreign entity to which the individual detained at Guantanamo is to be transferred—
(A)
added is not a designated state sponsor of terrorism or a designated foreign terrorist organization;
(B)
added maintains control over each detention facility in which the individual is to be detained if the individual is to be housed in a detention facility;
(C)
added is not, as of the date of the certification, facing a threat that is likely to substantially affect its ability to exercise control over the individual;
(D)
added has taken or agreed to take effective actions to ensure that the individual cannot take action to threaten the United States, its citizens, or its allies in the future;
(E)
added has taken or agreed to take such actions as the Secretary of Defense determines are necessary to ensure that the individual cannot engage or reengage in any terrorist activity; and
(F)
added has agreed to share with the United States any information that—
(i)
added is related to the individual or any associates of the individual; and
(ii)
added could affect the security of the United States, its citizens, or its allies; and
(2)
added includes an assessment, in classified or unclassified form, of the capacity, willingness, and past practices (if applicable) of the foreign country or entity in relation to the Secretary’s certifications.
(c)
added Prohibition in cases of prior confirmed recidivism—
(1)
added Prohibition— Except as provided in paragraph (2) and subsection (d), the Secretary of Defense may not use any amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available to the Department of Defense to transfer any individual detained at Guantanamo to the custody or control of the individual’s country of origin, any other foreign country, or any other foreign entity if there is a confirmed case of any individual who was detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, at any time after September 11, 2001, who was transferred to such foreign country or entity and subsequently engaged in any terrorist activity.
(2)
added Exception— Paragraph (1) shall not apply to any action taken by the Secretary to transfer any individual detained at Guantanamo to effectuate an order affecting the disposition of the individual that is issued by a court or competent tribunal of the United States having lawful jurisdiction (which the Secretary shall notify Congress of promptly after issuance).
(d)
added National security waiver—
(1)
added In general— The Secretary of Defense may waive the applicability to a detainee transfer of a certification requirement specified in subparagraph (D) or (E) of subsection (b)(1) or the prohibition in subsection (c), if the Secretary certifies the rest of the criteria required by subsection (b) for transfers prohibited by (c) and determines that—
(A)
added alternative actions will be taken to address the underlying purpose of the requirement or requirements to be waived;
(B)
added in the case of a waiver of subparagraph (D) or (E) of subsection (b)(1), it is not possible to certify that the risks addressed in the paragraph to be waived have been completely eliminated, but the actions to be taken under subparagraph (A) will substantially mitigate such risks with regard to the individual to be transferred;
(C)
added in the case of a waiver of subsection (c), the Secretary has considered any confirmed case in which an individual who was transferred to the country subsequently engaged in terrorist activity, and the actions to be taken under subparagraph (A) will substantially mitigate the risk of recidivism with regard to the individual to be transferred; and
(D)
added the transfer is in the national security interests of the United States.
(2)
added Reports— Whenever the Secretary makes a determination under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress, not later than 30 days before the transfer of the individual concerned, the following:
(A)
added A copy of the determination and the waiver concerned.
(B)
added A statement of the basis for the determination, including—
(i)
added an explanation why the transfer is in the national security interests of the United States;
(ii)
added in the case of a waiver of paragraph (D) or (E) of subsection (b)(1), an explanation why it is not possible to certify that the risks addressed in the paragraph to be waived have been completely eliminated; and
(iii)
added a classified summary of—
(I)
added the individual’s record of cooperation while in the custody of or under the effective control of the Department of Defense; and
(II)
added the agreements and mechanisms in place to provide for continuing cooperation.
(C)
added A summary of the alternative actions to be taken to address the underlying purpose of, and to mitigate the risks addressed in, the paragraph or subsection to be waived.
(D)
added The assessment required by subsection (b)(2).
(e)
added Record of cooperation— In assessing the risk that an individual detained at Guantanamo will engage in terrorist activity or other actions that could affect the security of the United States if released for the purpose of making a certification under subsection (b) or a waiver under subsection (d), the Secretary of Defense may give favorable consideration to any such individual—
(1)
added who has substantially cooperated with United States intelligence and law enforcement authorities, pursuant to a pre-trial agreement, while in the custody of or under the effective control of the Department of Defense; and
(2)
added for whom agreements and effective mechanisms are in place, to the extent relevant and necessary, to provide for continued cooperation with United States intelligence and law enforcement authorities.
(f)
added Definitions— In this section:
(1)
added The term “appropriate committees of Congress” means—
(A)
added the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Appropriations, the Committee on Foreign Relations, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate; and
(B)
added the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Appropriations, the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives.
(2)
added The term “individual detained at Guantanamo” means any individual located at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, as of October 1, 2009, who—
(A)
added is not a citizen of the United States or a member of the Armed Forces of the United States; and
(B)
added is—
(i)
added in the custody or under the control of the Department of Defense; or
(ii)
added otherwise under detention at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.
(3)
added The term “foreign terrorist organization” means any organization so designated by the Secretary of State under section 219 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1189).
(g)
added Repeal of superseded requirements and limitations— Section 1035 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 851; 10 U.S.C. 801 note) is repealed.

Sec. 1040 Submission to Congress of certain documents relating to transfer of individuals detained at Guantanamo to Qatar

added
(a)
added Submission to Congress— Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Attorney General and the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees and the Committees on the Judiciary of the Senate and House of Representatives all covered correspondence.
(b)
added Covered correspondence— For purposes of this section, the term “covered correspondence”—
(1)
added means any correspondence between the Department of Defense and the Department of Justice or any other agency or entity of the United States Government that—
(A)
added relates to the transfer of individuals detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to Qatar;
(B)
added is dated any time between January 1, 2013, and June 1, 2014; and
(C)
added is in the custody of the Department of Justice or the Department of Defense; and
(2)
added includes—
(A)
added all relevant correspondence, including the email exchange described in June 11, 2014, testimony to the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives by the Secretary of Defense and the General Counsel of the Department of Defense; and
(B)
added any analysis of—
(i)
added section 1035 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 851; 10 U.S.C. 801 note);
(ii)
added section 8111 of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2014 (Public Law 113–76; 128 Stat. 131);
(iii)
added section 1341 of title 31, United States Code (popularly known as “the Antideficiency Act”); or
(iv)
added Article II of the Constitution.
(c)
added Limitation on the use of funds— Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available for the Office of the Secretary of Defense for fiscal year 2016, not more than 75 percent may be obligated or expended until the date of the submission of all covered correspondence.

Sec. 1041 Submission of unredacted copies of documents relating to the transfer of certain individuals detained at Guantanamo to Qatar

(a)
added Unredacted documents required—
(1)
added Future submissions— The Secretary of Defense shall submit an unredacted copy of any document submitted to the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives in response to a request from the Committee dated June 9, 2014, for information regarding the transfer of five individuals from United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to Qatar.
(2)
added Prior submissions— Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives an unredacted copy of any redacted document that was submitted, before the date of the enactment of this Act, in response to a request dated June 9, 2014, for information regarding the transfer of five individuals from United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to Qatar.
(b)
added Limitation on the use of funds— Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available for the Office of the Secretary of Defense for fiscal year 2016, not more than 75 percent may be obligated or expended until the date of the submission of all documents required to be submitted under subsection (a)(2).

removed Section 601 of the Veterans Benefits Act of 2003 (Public Law 108–183; 117 Stat. 2667; 38 U.S.C. 1154 note) is amended to read as follows:

removed “601. Radiation Dose Reconstruction Program of the Department of Defense

removed “(a) Review and oversight—The Secretary of Veterans Affairs and the Secretary of Defense shall jointly take appropriate actions to ensure the on-going independent review and oversight of the Radiation Dose Reconstruction Program of the Department of Defense.

removed “(b) Duties—In carrying out subsection (a), the Secretaries shall—

removed “(1) conduct periodic, random audits of dose reconstructions under the Radiation Dose Reconstruction Program and of decisions by the Department of Veterans Affairs on claims for service connection of radiogenic diseases;

removed “(2) communicate to veterans information on the mission, procedures, and evidentiary requirements of the Program; and

removed “(3) carry out such other activities with respect to the review and oversight of the Program as the Secretaries shall jointly specify.

removed “(c) Recommendations—The Secretaries may make such recommendations on modifications in the mission or procedures of the Program as they consider appropriate as a result of the audits conducted under subsection (b)(1).”

Sec. 1051 Enhancement of authority of Secretary of Navy to use National Sea-Based Deterrence Fund

added
(a)
added In general— Section 2218a of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
added in subsection (c)(1), by striking “national sea-based deterrence vessels” and inserting “a class of twelve national sea-based deterrence vessels, and cross-program coordinated procurement efforts with other nuclear powered vessels”;
(2)
added in subsection (d), by inserting before the period at the end the following: “and cross program coordinated procurement efforts with other nuclear powered vessels”;
(3)
added by redesignating subsections (f) and (g) as subsections (j) and (l), respectively;
(4)
added by inserting after subsection (e) the following new subsections:

added “(f) Authority to enter into economic order quantity contracts

added “(1) The Secretary of the Navy may use funds deposited in the Fund to enter into contracts known as “economic order quantity contracts” with private shipyards and other commercial or government entities to achieve economic efficiencies based on production economies for major components or subsystems. The authority under this subsection extends to the procurement of parts, components, and systems (including weapon systems) common with and required for other nuclear powered vessels under joint economic order quantity contracts.

added “(2) A contract entered into under paragraph (1) shall provide that any obligation of the United States to make a payment under the contract is subject to the availability of appropriations for that purpose, and that total liability to the Government for termination of any contract entered into shall be limited to the total amount of funding obligated at time of termination.

added “(g) Authority to begin manufacturing and fabrication efforts prior to ship authorization

added “(1) The Secretary of the Navy may use funds deposited into the Fund to enter into contracts for advance construction of national sea-based deterrence vessels to support achieving cost savings through workload management, manufacturing efficiencies, or workforce stability, or to phase fabrication activities within shipyard and manage sub-tier manufacturer capacity.

added “(2) A contract entered into under paragraph (1) shall provide that any obligation of the United States to make a payment under the contract is subject to the availability of appropriations for that purpose, and that total liability to the Government for termination of any contract entered into shall be limited to the total amount of funding obligated at time of termination.

added “(h) Authority to use incremental funding to enter into contracts for certain items

added “(1) The Secretary of the Navy may use funds deposited into the Fund to enter into incrementally funded contracts for advance procurement of high value, long lead time items for nuclear powered vessels to better support construction schedules and achieve cost savings through schedule reductions and properly phased installment payments.

added “(2) A contract entered into under paragraph (1) shall provide that any obligation of the United States to make a payment under the contract is subject to the availability of appropriations for that purpose, and that total liability to the Government for termination of any contract entered into shall be limited to the total amount of funding obligated at time of termination.

added “(i) Facilities funding—The Secretary of the Navy may use funds deposited into the Fund to provide incentives for investments in critical infrastructure at nuclear capable shipyards and critical sub-tier vendors. Additionally, the Secretary of the Navy may use such funds for certain cancellation costs in the event of significant changes to the Long Range Shipbuilding Strategy for nuclear powered vessels.”

(5)
added by inserting after subsection (j), as redesignated by paragraph (3), the following new subsection:

added “(k) Report to Congress

added “(1) The Secretary of the Navy shall submit to the congressional defense committees, by March 1, 2016, and annually through the year 2025, a report on the Fund. Each such report shall identify separately the amount allocated by ship for programs, projects, and activities for construction (including design of vessels), purchase, alteration, and conversion. At a minimum, each such report shall include—

added “(A) information about the activities carried out using funds deposited into the Fund during the fiscal year covered by the report, including the status of class design and construction efforts, including programmatic schedules, procurement schedules, and funding requirements.

added “(B) a plan detailing forecasted obligations and expenditures for construction (including design of vessels), purchase, alteration, and conversion of vessels by ship for the fiscal year following the fiscal year during which the report is submitted; and

added “(C) the identification of the stable need and design for items, together with a description of any savings associated with the authorities provided in subsections (e) and (f), as documented in cost estimates.

added “(2) The Secretary of the Navy shall provide to the congressional defense committees notice in writing at least 30 days before executing any significant deviation to the annual plan required under paragraph (1)(B).”

(6)
added in subsection (m), as so redesignated, by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

added “(3) The term “advance construction” means shipyard manufacturing and fabrication activities (including sub-tier manufacturing of major components or subsystems).”

(b)
added Availability of certain unobligated funds for transfer— Section 1022(b)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3487) is amended by striking “for the Navy for the Ohio Replacement Program” and inserting “to the Department of Defense”.

Sec. 1052 Department of Defense excess property program

added
(a)
added Website required— Section 2576a of title 10, United States Code is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

added “(e) Publicly accessible website

added “(1) The Secretary of Defense, acting through the Director of the Defense Logistics Agency, shall create and maintain a publicly available Internet website that provides information on the property transferred under this section and the recipients of such property.

added “(2) The contents of the Internet website required under paragraph (1) shall include all unclassified information pertaining to the request, transfer, denial, and repossession of controlled property under this section, including—

added “(A) a current inventory of all controlled property transferred to law enforcement agencies under this section, listed by recipient, that includes the recipient’s location, by county and State, and the year of the transfer;

added “(B) all outstanding requests for transfers of controlled property under this section; and

added “(C) information provided by the law enforcement agencies requesting transfers referred to in subparagraph (B).

added “(3) The Secretary may not authorize the transfer of any property under this section to a Federal or State agency to which property has been transferred previously unless the agency submits to the Secretary for publication on the Internet website required under paragraph (1) each of the following:

added “(A) A description of any controlled property transferred to the agency under this section, which shall be submitted by not later than 30 days after the date on which the agency takes possession of the property.

added “(B) An annual report on the use of any controlled property so transferred to the agency, including a description of the context in which the property was used.

added “(4) The Secretary may not authorize the transfer of any property under this section to a Federal or State agency until 30 days after a request for the transfer has been published on the Internet website required under paragraph (1).”

(b)
added Eligibility requirements— Subsection (b) of such section is amended—
(1)
added in paragraph (3), by striking “and” at the end;
(2)
added in paragraph (4), by striking the period and inserting “; and”; and
(3)
added by adding at the end the following new paragraphs:

added “(5) in the case of property that is controlled property, the recipient submits to the Secretary written notice of the intent of the recipient to apply for the controlled property, including authorization of such application by the entity charged with legal oversight of the recipient agency; and

added “(6) the recipient agency is located in a State with a State coordinator for the program under this section who—

added “(A) has law enforcement experience and is employed by a law enforcement agency or entity with oversight of law enforcement functions;

added “(B) serves as the custodian of controlled property transferred to recipients located in that State; and

added “(C) has the authority to non-concur with proposed uses of such property.”

(c)
added Definition of controlled property— Such section is further amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

added “(f) Controlled property—In this section, the term “controlled property” means any item assigned a demilitarization code of B, C, D, E, F, G, or Q under Department of Defense Manual 4160.21-M, “Defense Materiel Disposition Manual”, or any successor document.”

(d)
added Examination of training requirements— The Director of the Defense Logistics Agency shall enter into an agreement with a federally funded research and development center to conduct an assessment of the Department of Defense excess property program under section 2576a of title 10, United States Code, as amended by this section. Such assessment shall include an evaluation of the policies and controls governing the determination of the suitability of recipients of controlled property transferred under the program, including specific recommendations relating to the training that law enforcement agencies that receive such property should receive, at no cost to the Department of Defense, to ensure end-user proficiency in the use, maintenance, and sustainment of such property.
(e)
added One-year mandatory use policy assessment— The Director of the Defense Logistics Agency shall enter into an agreement with a federally funded research and development center for the conduct of an assessment of the Department of Defense excess property program under section 2576a of title 10, United States Code, to determine if the requirement that all controlled property transferred under the program be used within one year of being transferred is achieving its intended effect. Such assessment shall also include recommendations on process improvement, including legislative proposals.
(f)
added Comptroller General assessment— Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall conduct an assessment of the Department of Defense excess property program under section 2576a of title 10, United States Code. Such assessment shall include—
(1)
added an evaluation of the transfer of controlled property under the program, including the manner in which the property was used in community law enforcement and the effectiveness of the Internet website required under subsection (e) of section 2576a, as added by subsection (a), in providing transparency to the public; and
(2)
added a determination of whether the transfer of property under the program enhances the ability of law enforcement agencies to carry out counter-drug and counter-terrorism activities in accordance with the purposes of the program as set forth in section 2576a of title 10, United States Code.

Sec. 1053 Limitation on transfer of certain AH–64 Apache helicopters from Army National Guard to regular Army and related personnel levels

added

added Section 1712(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291) is amended by striking “before March 31, 2016” and inserting “before the later of March 31, 2016, or the end of the 60-day period beginning on the date on which the congressional defense committees receive the report of the Commission under section 1703(c)”.

Sec. 1054 Space available travel for environmental morale leave by certain spouses and children of deployed members of the Armed Forces

added

added The Secretary of Defense shall revise the Air Transportation Eligibility Regulation, DOD 4515.13-R, to authorize space-available travel for environmental morale leave by unaccompanied spouses and dependent children of members of the Armed Forces who are deployed for at least 30 consecutive days under priority category IV. The Secretary shall also update any other instructions, directives, or internal policies necessary to facilitate such revision.

Sec. 1055 Information-related and strategic communications capabilities engagement pilot program

added
(a)
added Pilot program required— The Secretary of Defense may carry out a pilot program or multiple pilot programs under which the Secretary assesses information-related and strategic communications capabilities to support the tactical, operational, and strategic requirements of the geographic and functional combatant commanders, including the urgent and emergent operational needs and the operational and theater security cooperation plans of such combatant commanders, to further United States national security objectives and strategic communications requirements.
(b)
added Elements— Any pilot program carried out under subsection (a) shall include each of the following elements:
(1)
added Clearly defined goals and end-state objectives for the pilot program, including the traceability of such goals and objectives to the tactical, operational, or strategic requirements of the combatant commanders.
(2)
added A process for measuring the performance and effectiveness of the pilot program.
(3)
added A demonstration of a technology capability or concept to support the tactical, operational, or strategic needs of the combatant commanders.
(4)
added Supporting activities and coordinating elements with joint, interagency, intergovernmental, and multinational partners.
(c)
added Governance— The Secretary shall create a governance structure for executing any pilot program carried out under subsection (a) that allows for centralized oversight and planning of the program with program execution decentralized to the combatant commands. The Secretary shall provide a written charter for such a governance structure by not later than the date that is 30 days after the date on which the Secretary decides to carry out such a pilot program.
(d)
added Notification required— By not later than 14 days after the date on which the Secretary decides to carry out a pilot program under subsection (a), the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees written notice of the decision. Such notice shall include the scope of activities, funding required, sponsoring combatant commander, anticipated participants, and expected duration of the pilot program.
(e)
added Termination— The authority to carry out a pilot program under this section shall terminate on September 30, 2022.

Sec. 1056 Prohibition on use of funds for retirement of helicopter sea combat squadron 84 and 85 aircraft

added
(a)
added Prohibitions— Except as provided by subsection (b), none of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2016 for the Navy may be obligated or expended to—
(1)
added retire, prepare to retire, transfer, or place in storage any Helicopter Sea Combat Squadron 84 (HSC 84) or Helicopter Sea Combat Squadron 85 (HSC-85) aircraft; or
(2)
added make any changes to manning levels with respect to any HSC-84 or HSC-85 aircraft squadron.
(b)
added Waiver— The Secretary of the Navy may waive subsection (a), if the Secretary certifies to the congressional defense committees that the Secretary has—
(1)
added conducted a cost-benefit analysis identifying savings to Department of the Navy regarding decommissioning or deactivation of an HSC-84 or HSC-85 squadron;
(2)
added identified a replacement capability to meet all operational requirements, including special operational-peculiar requirements of the combatant commands, currently being met by the HSC-84 or HSC-85 squadrons and aircraft to be retired, transferred, or placed in storage; and
(3)
added deployed such capability.

Sec. 1057 Limitation on availability of funds for destruction of certain landmines

added
(a)
added Limitation— Except as provided under subsection (b), none of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2016 for the Department of Defense may be obligated or expended for the destruction of anti-personnel landmines of the United States (as defined in the announcement of the President on September 23, 2014) until—
(1)
added the Secretary of Defense publishes a comprehensive study on—
(A)
added the tactical and operational effects of a ban on such landmines; and
(B)
added the current state of research into operational alternatives to such landmines;
(2)
added such alternatives are specifically authorized by law and provided appropriations;
(3)
added such alternatives are fully deployed;
(4)
added members of the Armed Forces of the United States and allies of the United States are trained in the use of such alternatives; and
(5)
added the Secretary certifies to the congressional defense committees that the replacement of such landmines by such alternatives will not endanger members of the Armed Forces of the United States or allies of the United States or pose any operational challenges and that adequate stockpiles and manufacturing capacity exists to meet the needs of the Armed Forces of the United States and allies of the United States in current deployments and anticipated contingencies.
(b)
added Exception for safety— The limitation under subsection (a) shall not apply to any anti-personnel land mine that the Secretary certifies has become unsafe or poses a safety risk if not demilitarized or destroyed.

Sec. 1058 Limitation on availability of funds for modifying command and control of United States Pacific Fleet

added

added None of the funds authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2016 may be obligated or expended to modify command and control relationships to give Fleet Forces Command operational and administrative control of Navy forces assigned to the Pacific Fleet. The command and control relationships in effect on October 1, 2004, shall remain in effect unless a change to such relationships is specifically authorized by a law.

Sec. 1059 Prohibition on the closure of United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba

added
(a)
added Findings— Congress makes the following findings:
(1)
added The United States military presence in the Republic of Cuba began in 1898, and United States military basing began in Cuba in 1903.
(2)
added In 1934, the United States and Cuba entered into the Treaty Between the United States of America and Cuba signed at Washington, D.C. on May 29, 1934. Under Article III, the treaty stipulates the perpetual lease agreement between the United States and Cuba for the 45 square miles of land encompassing Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.
(3)
added On March 12, 2015, Commander of United States Southern Command, General John Kelly, testified before the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate, highlighting, “Its [Naval Station Guantanamo Bay] airfield and port facilities are indispensable to the Departments of Defense, Homeland Security, and State’s operational and contingency plans… As the only permanent U.S. military base in Latin America and the Caribbean, its location provides persistent U.S. presence and immediate access to the region, as well as supporting a layered defense to secure the air and maritime approaches to the United States”.
(4)
added Former Commander of United States Southern Command, retired Admiral James Stavridis, recently stated “Guantanamo Bay Naval Station has immense strategic value above and beyond its reputation as a detention facility. It is the logistic, planning, surveillance and basing linchpin for the U.S. Fourth Fleet, crucial to the military for disaster relief, humanitarian work, medical diplomacy, and counternarcotics, all key missions for the U.S. Navy in Latin America and the Caribbean. The U.S. should do all in its power to maintain its legal control over the base”.
(5)
added In testimony in front of the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives in 2012, then-Commander of United States Southern Command, General Douglas Fraser, stated, “Absent a detention facility and even following the eventual demise of the Castro regime, the strategic capability provided by the U.S. Naval Station Guantanamo Bay remains essential for executing national priorities throughout the Caribbean, Latin America, and South America”.
(6)
added As part of “normalizing” relations with the government of Cuba, announced in December 2014, ongoing negotiations are occurring to determine the diplomatic framework between the governments of the United States and Cuba.
(7)
added In January 2015, soon after negotiations began between the United States and Cuba, Cuban President Raul Castro demanded the return of United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to Cuba.
(8)
added In February 2015, Assistant Secretary of State for Western Hemisphere Affairs Roberta Jacobson, in testimony in front of the Foreign Affairs Committee of the House of Representatives, stated that the return of United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, is “not on the table in these conversations”, referencing current diplomatic negotiations. Later in her testimony Assistant Secretary Jacobson pointed out, referring to the possible closure of the Naval Station, that she is not a “high enough ranking person to know…whether it could be in the future”.
(b)
added Sense of Congress— It is the sense of Congress that—
(1)
added the strategic, logistic, and postural significance of United States Naval Station Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, is vital to the security of the United States; and
(2)
added the United States must not relinquish control of Guantanamo Bay to the Republic of Cuba.
(c)
added Prohibition— United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, may not be closed or abandoned, and the President shall ensure that the obligations of the United States under Article III of the Treaty Between the United States of America and Cuba signed at Washington, D.C. on May 29, 1934 are met, including the payment of the annual lease sum to the government of Cuba, unless otherwise specifically provided—
(1)
added by law;
(2)
added in a treaty that is ratified with the advice and consent of the Senate; or
(3)
added by a modification of the Treaty Between the United States of America and Cuba signed at Washington, D.C. on May 29, 1934, that is ratified with the advice and consent of the Senate.
(d)
added Report—
(1)
added In general— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Commander of United States Southern Command shall submit to appropriate committees of Congress, a report setting forth a military assessment of the strategic implications of United States Naval Station Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.
(2)
added Elements— The report required under paragraph (1) shall include each of the following:
(A)
added An historical analysis of the use and significance of the basing at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.
(B)
added A description of the personnel, resources, and base operations based out of United States, Naval Station Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, as of the date of the enactment of this Act.
(C)
added An assessment of United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, in support of the National Security Strategy, the National Defense Strategy, and the National Military Strategy.
(D)
added An assessment of missions and military requirements that United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, currently supports.
(E)
added A description of the uses of United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba by other United States Government agencies.
(F)
added Any other related matter at the discretion of the Commander.
(3)
added Appropriate committees of Congress— In this subsection, the term “appropriate committees of Congress” means—
(A)
added the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Appropriations, and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives; and
(B)
added the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Appropriations, and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate.

Sec. 1061 Provision of defense planning guidance and contingency planning guidance information to Congress

added
(a)
added In general— Section 113(g) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

added “(3) At the time of the budget submission by the President for a fiscal year, the Secretary of Defense shall include in the budget materials submitted to Congress for that year summaries of the guidance developed under paragraphs (1) and (2), as well as summaries of any plans developed in accordance with the guidance developed under paragraph (2). Such summaries shall be sufficient to allow the congressional defense committees to evaluate fully the requirements for military forces, acquisition programs, and operation and maintenance funding in the President’s annual budget request for the Department of Defense.”

(b)
added Report required— Notwithstanding the requirement under paragraph (3) of section 113(g) of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a), that the Secretary of Defense submit summaries under that paragraph at the time of the President’s annual budget submission, by not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report containing—
(1)
added summaries of the guidance developed under paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection (g) of section 113 of title 10, United States Code; and
(2)
added summaries of any plans developed in accordance with the guidance developed under paragraph (2) of such subsection.
(c)
added Limitation on obligation of funds pending report— Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act for Operation and Maintenance, Defense-wide, for the office of the Secretary of Defense, not more than 75 percent may be obligated or expended before the date that is 15 days after the date on which the Secretary submits the report described in subsection (b).

Sec. 1062 Modification of certain reports submitted by Comptroller General of the United States

added
(a)
added Report on NNSA budget requests— Section 3255(a)(2) of the National Nuclear Security Administration Act (50 U.S.C. 2455) is amended by inserting before “, the Comptroller General” the following: “in an even-numbered year, and not later than 150 days after the date on which the Administrator submits such materials in an odd-numbered year”.
(b)
added Report on environmental management— Section 3134 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2713), as amended by section 3134 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2193), is further amended—
(1)
added in subsection (a), by striking “a series of three reviews, as described in subsections (b), (c), and (d),” and inserting “reviews as described in subsections (b) and (c)”;
(2)
added by striking subsection (d); and
(3)
added by redesignating subsection (e) as subsection (d).

Sec. 1063 Report on implementation of the geographically distributed force laydown in the area of responsibility of United States Pacific Command

added
(a)
added Report required— Not later than March 1, 2016, the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Commander of the United States Pacific Command, shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on Department of Defense plans for implementing the geographically distributed force laydown in the area of responsibility of United States Pacific Command.
(b)
added Matters to be included— The report required under subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1)
added A description of the force laydown.
(2)
added A discussion of how the force laydown affects the operational and contingency plans in the area of responsibility of United States Pacific Command, including a discussion on how timeliness, availability of forces, and risk in meeting the military objectives contained in those plans are affected.
(3)
added A discussion of the specific support asset requirements derived from the force laydown, including logistical sustainment, pre-positioned stocks, sea and air lift, command and control, and intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance.
(4)
added A discussion of the specific infrastructure and military construction requirements derived from the force laydown.
(5)
added A discussion on how Department of Defense plans to meet the requirements identified in paragraphs (3) and (4), including the ability of United States Transportation Command, the United States Combat Logistics Force, and the Armed Forces to meet those requirements.
(6)
added Any other matters the Secretary of Defense determines to be appropriate.
(c)
added Form— The report required under subsection (a) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.

Sec. 1064 Independent study of national security strategy formulation process

added
(a)
added Requirement for study— The Secretary of Defense shall enter into a contract with an independent research entity described in subsection (c) to carry out a comprehensive study of the role of the Department of Defense and its process for the formulation of national security strategy.
(b)
added Matters covered— The study required by subsection (a) shall include, at a minimum, the following:
(1)
added Case studies of the role of the Department of Defense and its process for the formulation of previous national security strategies in place throughout the history of the United States, including an examination of the development and execution of previous strategies, as well as the factors that contributed to the development and execution of successful previous strategies with specific emphasis on—
(A)
added the frequency of strategy updates;
(B)
added the synchronization of timelines and content among different strategies;
(C)
added the prioritization of objectives;
(D)
added the assignment of roles and responsibilities among relevent agencies;
(E)
added the links between strategy and resourcing;
(F)
added the implementation of strategy within the planning documents of relevant agencies; and
(G)
added the value of a competition of ideas.
(2)
added A complete review and analysis of the current national security strategy formulation process, as it relates to the Department of Defense, including an analysis of the following:
(A)
added All major Government products and documents of national security strategy relevant to the Department of Defense and how they fit together, including—
(i)
added the National Military Strategy prepared by the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff under section 153(b)(1) of title 10, United States Code;
(ii)
added the most recent quadrennial defense review conducted by the Secretary of Defense pursuant to section 118 of title 10, United States Code;
(iii)
added the national security strategy report required under section 108 of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3043); and
(iv)
added any other relevant national security strategy products and documents.
(B)
added The time periods during which the products and documents covered by subparagraph (A) are prepared and published, and how they fit together.
(C)
added The interaction between the White House and the agencies that develop such products and documents and formulate strategy.
(D)
added All the current entities in the Federal Government that contribute to the national security strategy formulation process and how they fit together.
(c)
added Independent research entity— The entity described in this subsection is an independent research entity that is a not-for-profit entity or a federally funded research and development center with appropriate expertise and analytical capability.
(d)
added Report— Not later than 18 months after the date of the enactment of this Act, the independent research entity shall provide to the Secretary a report on the results of the study. Not later than 30 days after receipt of the report, the Secretary shall submit such report, together with any additional views or recommendations of the Secretary, to the congressional defense committees.

Sec. 1065 Study and report on role of Department of Defense in formulation of long-term strategy

added

added The Secretary of Defense shall direct the Office of Net Assessment to conduct a study on the role of the Department of Defense in the formulation of long-term strategy. Not later than two years after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the results of the study, which shall include—

(1)
added historical lessons learned, and recommendations for both the executive and legislative branch on how to create an entity or entities, programs or projects, or supporting efforts or activities to study and formulate suggestions for Department of Defense long-term strategy across the combination of military, economic, scientific, technological, geopolitical, resources, international relations, and other relevant areas of study related to the role of the Department of Defense in national security.
(2)
added key recommendations for alternative or candidate courses of action for establishing such an entity or entities, programs or projects, or supporting efforts or activities within or outside of the Government, including identification of areas or components of the Government most suited to the formulation of Department of Defense long-term strategy, or identification of new offices, organizational units, or supporting efforts within or outside of the Government focused on the development of long-term strategies for the Department; and
(3)
added an analysis of the efforts of the Department of Defense to cultivate long-term strategists within and outside of the Department and the Government, including an examination of options of best methods to improve and support the development, training, and education of strategic thinkers within and outside of the Department and the Government.

Sec. 1066 Report on potential threats to members of the Armed Forces of United States Naval Forces Central Command and United States Fifth Fleet in Bahrain

added
(a)
added In general— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report on the threat posed to members of the Armed Forces of the United States Naval Forces Central Command and the United States Fifth Fleet from Naval Support Activity Bahrain and their family members should an increase in violent clashes in Bahrain make their presence in that nation untenable.
(b)
added Content of report— The report required by subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1)
added An assessment of the current security situation in Bahrain, marked by escalating violence between security forces and protesters, and the potential impact increased instability could have on—
(A)
added the physical safety and security of United States personnel and their families living in Bahrain, both inside and outside the confines of military installations;
(B)
added the freedom of movement of United States personnel and their families living in Bahrain; and
(C)
added the future operations of Naval Support Activity in Bahrain as it relates to ongoing regional missions.
(2)
added Safety measures and contingency planning to protect Navy personnel in the event of such an increase in instability, including an analysis of viable alternative locations for both the United States Naval Forces Central Command and the United States Fifth Fleet.

Sec. 1071 Repeal or revision of reporting requirements related to military personnel issues

added
(a)
added Reports on health protection quality and health assessment data—
(1)
added Repeal— Section 1073b of title 10, United States Code, is repealed.
(2)
added Clerical amendment— The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 55 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking the item relating to section 1073b.
(b)
added Report on voting assistance programs effectiveness and compliance— Section 1566(c) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
added by striking “(1)” after the subsection heading; and
(2)
added by striking paragraphs (2) and (3).
(c)
added Report on aviation officer retention bonuses— Section 301b(i) of title 37, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
added by striking “(1)” after the subsection heading; and
(2)
added by striking paragraph (2).
(d)
added Report on foreign language proficiency incentive pay— Section 316a of title 37, United States Code, as amended by section 615(5) of this Act, is amended—
(1)
added by striking subsection (f); and
(2)
added by redesignating subsection (g) as subsection (f).
(e)
added Report on use of waiver authority for military service academy appointments— Section 553 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 10 U.S.C. 4346 note) is amended—
(1)
added by striking subsection (e); and
(2)
added by redesignating subsection (f) as subsection (e).
(f)
added Report on increase in Junior Reserve Officers' Training Corps units— Subsection (e) of section 548 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4466) is repealed.
(g)
added Report on implementation of yellow ribbon reintegration program—
(1)
added Reporting requirement— Section 582(e) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 10 U.S.C. 10101 note) is amended by striking paragraph (4).
(2)
added Conforming repeal— Section 597 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 10 U.S.C. 10101 note) is repealed.
(h)
added Report on standards of facilities— Section 1648 of the Wounded Warrior Act (title XVI of Public Law 110–181; 10 U.S.C. 1071 note) is amended by striking subsection (f).
(i)
added Report on inspections of facilities— Section 1662 of the Wounded Warrior Act (title XVI of Public Law 110–181; 10 U.S.C. 1071 note) is amended—
(1)
added by striking “(a) Required inspections of facilities.—”; and
(2)
added by striking subsection (b).
(j)
added Report on inspections of other facilities— Section 3307 of the U.S. Troop Readiness, Veterans’ Care, Katrina Recovery, and Iraq Accountability Appropriations Act, 2007 (Public Law 110–28; 10 U.S.C. 1073 note) is amended—
(1)
added by striking subsection (d); and
(2)
added by redesignating subsection (e) as subsection (d).
(k)
added Report on local educational agency Assistance related to DOD activities— Section 574 of the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109–364; 20 U.S.C. 7703b note) is amended—
(1)
added by striking subsection (c); and
(2)
added by redesignating subsections (d) and (e) as subsections (c) and (d), respectively.

Sec. 1072 Repeal or revision of reporting requirements relating to readiness

added
(a)
added Biannual reports on allocation of funds within operation and maintenance budget subactivities—
(1)
added In general— Chapter 9 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking section 228.
(2)
added Clerical amendment— The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by striking the item relating to section 228.
(b)
added Annual report on naval petroleum reserves— Section 7431 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking subsection (c).
(c)
added Annual report on Army national guard combat readiness—
(1)
added In general— Chapter 1013 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking section 10542.
(2)
added Clerical amendment— The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by striking the item relating to section 10542.
(d)
added Insider threat detection budget submission— Section 922 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 10 U.S.C. 2224 note) is amended by striking subsection (f).
(e)
added Price trend analysis— Section 892 of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 10 U.S.C. 2306a) is repealed.
(f)
added Report on authority for airlift transportation at Department of Defense rates for non-Department of Defense Federal cargoes— Section 351 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2262) is amended by striking subsection (b).
(g)
added Biennial report on procurement of military working dogs— Section 358 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended—
(1)
added by striking subsection (c); and
(2)
added by redesignating subsection (d) as subsection (c).
(h)
added Report on foreign language proficiency— Section 958 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 297) is repealed.
(i)
added Report on Arsenal Support Program Initiative— Section 343 of the Floyd D. Spence National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2001 (Public Law 106–398; 10 U.S.C. 4551 note) is amended by striking subsection (g).
(j)
added GAO review of contractor-operated civil engineering supply stores program— Section 345 of the Strom Thurmond National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1999 (Public Law 105–26; 112 Stat. 1978) is amended—
(1)
added by striking subsection (d); and
(2)
added by redesignating subsection (e) as subsection (d).
(k)
added Quarterly report on end strength— Section 8104 of the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2014 (Division C of Public Law 113–76) is repealed.
(l)
added Quarterly report on end strength— Section 8105 of the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2013 (Division C of Public Law 113–6) is repealed.
(m)
added Report on David L. Boren National Security Education Act of 1991— Section 806 of the David L. Boren National Security Education Act of 1991 (title VIII of Public Law 102–183; 50 U.S.C. 1906) is repealed.

Sec. 1073 Repeal or revision of reporting requirements related to naval vessels and Merchant Marine

added
(a)
added Report on naming of naval vessels— Section 7292 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking subsection (d).
(b)
added Report on transfer of vessels stricken from naval vessel register— Section 7306 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
added by striking subsection (d); and
(2)
added by redesignating subsections (e) and (f) as subsections (d) and (e), respectively.
(c)
added Reports on mission modules of Littoral Combat Ship— Section 126 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1657) is amended—
(1)
added by striking “(a) Designation required.—”; and
(2)
added by striking subsection (b).
(d)
added Report on assessments of first ship of a shipbuilding program— Section 124 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 10 U.S.C. 7291 note) is repealed.
(e)
added Report on cost estimate of CVN–79— Section 122 of the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109–364; 120 Stat. 2104), as most recently amended by section 121 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66), is amended by striking subsection (f).
(f)
added Annual Report of Maritime Administration—
(1)
added Elimination of report and revision of remaining requirement— Section 50111 of title 46, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:

added “50111. Submission of annual MARAD authorization request

added “(a) Submission of legislative proposal—Not later than 30 days after the date on which the President submits to Congress a budget for a fiscal year pursuant to section 1105 of title 31, the Secretary of Transportation shall submit to the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate the Maritime Administration authorization request for that fiscal year.

added “(b) Maritime Administration Request Defined—In this section, the term “Maritime Administration authorization request” means a proposal for legislation that, for a fiscal year—

added “(1) recommends authorizations of appropriations for the Maritime Administration for that fiscal year, including with respect to matters described in subsection 109(j) of title 49 or authorized in subtitle V of this title; and

added “(2) addresses any other matter with respect to the Maritime Administration that the Secretary determines is appropriate.”

(2)
added Clerical amendment— The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 501 of title 46, United States Code, is amended by striking the item relating to section 50111 and inserting the following new item:
(g)
added Discretionary reports no longer needed— The Secretary of the Navy is not required to submit to the congressional defense committees—
(1)
added a report, or updates to such a report, on open architecture as described in Senate Report 110–077; or
(2)
added a monthly report on Ford class aircraft carriers not otherwise required by law.

Sec. 1074 Repeal or revision of reporting requirements related to nuclear, proliferation, and related matters

added
(a)
added Report on Nuclear Weapons Council— Section 179 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking subsection (g).
(b)
added Report on Proliferation Security Initiative— Section 1821(b) of the Implementing Recommendations of the 9/11 Commission Act of 2007 (50 U.S.C. 2911) is amended—
(1)
added by striking “(1) In general.—”; and
(2)
added by striking paragraphs (2) and (3).
(c)
added Briefings on dialogue between United States and Russian Federation on nuclear arms— Section 1282 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 22 U.S.C. 5951 note) is amended—
(1)
added by striking subsection (a); and
(2)
added by redesignating subsections (b) and (c) as subsections (a) and (b), respectively.
(d)
added Implementation plan for whole-of- government vision prescribed in the national security strategy— Section 1072 of the National Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 50 U.S.C. 3043 note) is amended—
(1)
added by striking subsection (b); and
(2)
added by redesignating subsection (c) as subsection (b).

Sec. 1075 Repeal or revision of reporting requirements related to missile defense

added
(a)
added Report on Missile Defense Executive Board activities— Section 232 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1339) is amended—
(1)
added by striking subsection (b); and
(2)
added by redesignating subsection (c) as subsection (b).
(b)
added Report on ground-based midcourse defense program— Section 234 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1340) is amended—
(1)
added by striking “(a) Sense of Congress.—”; and
(2)
added by striking subsection (b).

Sec. 1076 Repeal or revision of reporting requirements related to acquisition

added
(a)
added Report on foreign purchases— Section 8305 of title 41, United States Code, is repealed.
(b)
added Report on cost assessment activities— Section 2334 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
added by striking subsection (f); and
(2)
added by redesignating subsection (g) as subsection (f).
(c)
added Report on performance assessments and root cause analyses— Section 2438 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking subsection (f).

Sec. 1077 Repeal or revision of reporting requirements related to civilian personnel

added
(a)
added Report on pilot program for exchange of information technology personnel— Section 1110 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2493) is amended—
(1)
added by striking subsection (i);
(2)
added by redesignating subsection (j) as subsection (i); and
(3)
added in subsection (i), as so redesignated, by striking paragraph (2) and inserting the following new paragraph:

added “(2) any employee whose assignment is allowed to continue by virtue of paragraph (1) shall be taken into account for purposes of the numerical limitation under subsection (h).”

(b)
added Report on experimental program for scientific and technical personnel— Section 1101 of the Strom Thurmond National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1999 (Public Law 105–261; 112 Stat. 2139) is amended by striking subsection (g).

Sec. 1078 Repeal or revision of miscellaneous reporting requirements

added
(a)
added Report on rewards for combating terrorism— Section 127b of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
added by striking subsection (f); and
(2)
added by redesignating subsection (g) as subsection (f).
(b)
added Report on technological maturity and integration risk of critical technologies— Section 138(b)(8) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
added by striking subparagraph (B);
(2)
added by striking “shall—” and all that follows through “assess the technological maturity” and inserting “shall periodically review and assess the technological maturity”; and
(3)
added by striking “; and” and inserting a period.
(c)
added Report on systems engineering— Section 139b(d) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
added by striking paragraph (2);
(2)
added by redesignating paragraph (3) as paragraph (2);
(3)
added in paragraph (2), as so redesignated—
(A)
added by striking “or (2)”;
(B)
added in subparagraph (A), by striking “systems engineering master plans and”;
(C)
added in subparagraph (B), by striking “, systems engineering master plans,”;
(D)
added in subparagraph (C); by striking “systems engineering, development planning,” and inserting “development planning”; and
(E)
added by redesignating subparagraph (D) as subparagraph (F);
(4)
added by transferring subparagraphs (A) and (B) of paragraph (4) to the end of paragraph (2), as so redesignated, and redesignating those subparagraphs as subparagraphs (D) and (E), respectively; and
(5)
added by striking paragraph (4).
(d)
added Report on Regional Defense Counterterrorism Fellowship Program— Section 2249c of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking subsection (c).
(e)
added Report on DARPA—
(1)
added Repeal— Section 2352 of title 10, United States Code, is repealed.
(2)
added Clerical amendment— The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 139 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking the item relating to section 2352.
(f)
added Report on airlift requirements— Section 112 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1654) is repealed.
(g)
added Report on in-kind payments— Section 2805 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2149) is repealed.
(h)
added Report on airborne signals intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance capabilities— Section 112(b) of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4153) is amended—
(1)
added by striking paragraph (3); and
(2)
added by redesignating paragraph (4) as paragraph (3).
(i)
added Reports on status of Navy Next Generation Enterprise Networks Program— Section 1034 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4593) is repealed.

Sec. 1081 Technical and clerical amendments

added
(a)
added Amendments To title 10, United States Code— Title 10, United States Code, is amended as follows:
(1)
added The heading of section 153(a)(5) is amended to read as follows: “Joint Force Development Activities.—”.
(2)
added The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 21 is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 429 the following new item:
(3)
added Section 2679, as transferred, redesignated, and amended by section 351 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3346), is amended in subsection (a)(1) by striking “with” before “, on a sole source”.
(4)
added Section 2687a(d)(2) is amended by inserting “fair market” before “value”.
(5)
added Section 2926, as added and amended by section 901(g) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3464), is amended in subsections (a), (b), (c), and (d) by striking “for Installations, Energy,” each place it appears and inserting “for Energy, Installations,”.
(6)
added Section 9314a(b) is amended by striking “only so long at” and inserting “only so long as”.
(b)
added National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015— Effective as of December 19, 2014, and as if included therein as enacted, the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291) is amended as follows:
(1)
added Section 351(b)(1) (128 Stat. 3346) is amended by striking the period at the end of subparagraph (C) and inserting “; and”.
(2)
added Section 901(g)(1)(F) (128 Stat. 3465) is amended by inserting “paragraph (4) of” before “subsection (b) of section 2926”.
(3)
added Section 1072(a)(2) (128 Stat. 3516) is amended by inserting “in the table of sections” before “at the beginning of”.
(4)
added Section 1079(a)(1) (128 Stat. 3521) is amended by striking “section 12102 of title 42, United States Code” and inserting “section 3 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 12102)”.
(5)
added Section 1104(b)(2) (128 Stat. 3526) is amended by striking “paragraph (2)” and inserting “paragraph (1)(A)”.
(6)
added Section 1208 (128 Stat. 3541) is amended by striking “of Fiscal Year” each place it appears and inserting “for Fiscal Year”.
(7)
added Section 2803(a) (128 Stat. 3696) is amended in paragraph (2) of the subsection (f) being added by the amendment to be made by that section by inserting “section” before “1105 of title 31”.
(8)
added Section 2832(c)(3) (128 Stat. 3704) is amended by striking “United State Code” and inserting “United States Code”.
(9)
added Section 3006(i) (128 Stat. 3744) is amended—
(A)
added in paragraph (1), by striking “Section 8” and inserting “Section 18”; and
(B)
added in paragraph (2), by striking “S1/2 N1/2 SE” and inserting “S1/2 N1/2 SE1/4”.
(10)
added Section 3023 (128 Stat. 3762) is amended—
(A)
added by redesignating paragraphs (1), (2), and (3) as paragraphs (2), (3), and (4), respectively;
(B)
added in paragraph (2), as so redesignated, in the matter being added by subparagraph (C)—
(i)
added by inserting “has been waived,” after “expired,”; and
(ii)
added by striking “the permit or lease required” and inserting “the allotment management plan, permit, or lease required”;
(C)
added in paragraph (4), as so redesignated, in the matter being added as subsection (h)(1)—
(i)
added by striking “a grazing permit or lease” in the matter preceding subparagraph (A) of such subsection and inserting “an allotment management plan or grazing permit or lease”;
(ii)
added in subparagraph (A) of such subsection, by striking “permit or lease” and inserting “allotment management plan, permit, or lease”; and
(iii)
added in subparagraph (B)(i) of such subsection, by striking “lease or permit” and inserting “allotment management plan, permit, or lease”; and
(D)
added by inserting before paragraph (2), as so redesignated, the following new paragraph:

added “(1) in subsection (a), by striking “by the Secretary of Agriculture, with respect to lands within National Forests in the sixteen contiguous Western States” and inserting “on National Forest System land by the Secretary of Agriculture (notwithstanding, for purposes of this section, the definition in section 103(p))”;”

(11)
added Section 3024 (16 U.S.C. 6214; 128 Stat. 3764) is amended—
(A)
added in subsection (e), by inserting before the period at the end the following: “report using National Median Price values”; and
(B)
added in subsection (f)(3)—
(i)
added in subparagraph (A), by striking “by regulation establish criteria pursuant to which the annual fee determined in accordance with this section may be suspended or reduced temporarily” and inserting “provide for suspension or reduction temporarily of the annual fee determined in accordance with this section”; and
(ii)
added in subparagraph (B), by striking “by regulation”.
(c)
added National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009— Section 943(d)(1) of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4578) by striking the second period at the end of the first sentence.
(d)
added National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005— Section 1208(f)(2) of the Ronald W. Reagan National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005 (Public Law 108–375; 118 Stat. 2086), as amended by section 1202(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 363) and section 1202(c) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat 2512), is further amended—
(1)
added by redesignating the paragraphs (1) through (8) added by section 1202(c) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat 2512) as subparagraphs (A) through (H), respectively; and
(2)
added by moving the margins of such subparagraphs, as so redesignated, two ems to the right.
(e)
added Coordination with other amendments made by this act— For purposes of applying amendments made by provisions of this Act other than this section, the amendments made by this section shall be treated as having been enacted immediately before any such amendments by other provisions of this Act.

Sec. 1082 Executive agent for the oversight and management of alternative compensatory control measures

added
(a)
added Executive agent—
(1)
added In general— Subchapter I of chapter 21 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end of the following new section:

added “430a. Executive agent for management and oversight of alternative compensatory control measures

added “(a) Executive agent—The Secretary of Defense shall designate a senior official from among the personnel of the Department of Defense to act as the Department of Defense executive agent for the management and oversight of alternative compensatory control measures.

added “(b) Roles, responsibilities, and authorities—The Secretary of Defense shall prescribe the roles, responsibilities, and authorities of the executive agent designated under subsection (a). Such roles, responsibilities, and authorities shall include the development of an annual management and oversight plan for Department-wide accountability and reporting to the congressional defense committees.”

(2)
added Clerical amendment— The table of sections at the beginning of such subchapter is amended by adding at the end the following new item:
(b)
added Report— Not later than 30 days after the close of each of fiscal years 2016 through 2020, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the oversight and management of alternative compensatory control measures. Each such report shall include—
(1)
added the annual management and oversight plan required under section 430a(b) of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a);
(2)
added a discussion of the scope and number of alternative compensatory control measures in effect; and
(3)
added any other matters the Secretary of Defense determines appropriate.

Sec. 1083 Navy support of Ocean Research Advisory Panel

added

added Section 7903 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking subsection (c).

Sec. 1084 Level of readiness of Civil Reserve Air Fleet carriers

added
(a)
added Findings— Congress finds the following:
(1)
added The National Airlift Policy states that “[t]he national defense airlift objective is to ensure that military and civil airlift resources will be able to meet defense mobilization and deployment requirements in support of US defense and foreign policies.”.
(2)
added The National Airlift Policy also emphasizes the need for “dialogue and cooperation with our national aviation industry,” and it states that “[i]t is of particular importance that the aviation industry be apprised by the Department of Defense of long-term requirements for airlift in support of national defense.”.
(3)
added The National Airlift Policy emphasizes the importance of both military and civil airlift resources and their interdependence in the fulfillment of the national defense airlift objective, and it states that the “Department of Defense shall establish appropriate levels for peacetime cargo airlift augmentation in order to promote the effectiveness of Civil Reserve Air Fleet and provide training within the military airlift system.”.
(4)
added Civil Reserve Air Fleet carriers continue to be an important component of the military airlift system in support of United States defense and foreign policies.
(b)
added Level of readiness of civil reserve air fleet carriers—
(1)
added In general— Chapter 931 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

added “9517. Level of readiness of Civil Reserve Air Fleet carriers

added “(a) Policy—The Civil Reserve Air Fleet program is an important component of the military airlift system in support of United States defense and foreign policies, and it is the policy of the United States to maintain the readiness and interoperability of Civil Reserve Air Fleet carriers by providing appropriate levels of peacetime airlift augmentation to maintain networks and infrastructure, exercise the system, and interface effectively within the military airlift system.

added “(b) Report requirement—On the day the President submits the budget for a fiscal year to Congress, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress a report that sets forth, for each fiscal year during the period covered by the current future-years defense program under section 221 of this title, each of the following, expressed separately for passenger and cargo airlift services:

added “(1) The results (including analytical and justification materials) of an assessment, conducted in consultation with the Civil Reserve Air Fleet carriers, of the level of commercial airlift augmentation necessary to maintain the readiness and interoperability of such carriers, maintain networks and infrastructure, exercise the system, and facilitate the regular interfacing between such carriers and the military airlift system, which shall include—

added “(A) a projection of the number of block hours necessary to achieve such levels of commercial airlift augmentation;

added “(B) a strategic plan for achieving such level of commercial airlift augmentation; and

added “(C) an explanation of any deviation from the previous fiscal year’s assessment of the projected number of block hours under subparagraph (A).

added “(2) A comparison (including analytical and justification materials and explanations of any deviations) of the forecasted number of block hours for each fiscal year of the period covered by the report with the projected number of block hours under paragraph (1)(A) for each such fiscal year.

added “(c) Definitions—In this section:

added “(1) The term “budget” has the meaning given that term in section 231(f) of this title.

added “(2) The term “defense budget materials” has the meaning given that term in section 231(f) of this title.”

(2)
added Clerical amendment— The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by adding at the end the following new item:
(3)
added Definition of Civil Reserve Air Fleet program— Section 9511 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

added “(12) The term “Civil Reserve Air Fleet program” means the program developed by the Department of Defense through which the Department of Defense augments its airlift capability by use of civil aircraft.”

Sec. 1085 Authorization of transfer of surplus firearms to Corporation for the Promotion of Rifle Practice and Firearms Safety

added
(a)
added In general— Section 40728 of title 36, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

added “(h) Authorized transfers—The Secretary may transfer to the corporation, in accordance with the procedure prescribed in this subchapter, surplus firearms and spare parts and related accessories for those firearms that on the date of the enactment of this subsection are under the control of the Secretary and are excess to the requirements of the Department of the Army, and such material as may be recovered by the Secretary pursuant to section 40728A(a) of this title. The Secretary shall determine a reasonable schedule for the transfer of these excess firearms.”

(b)
added Technical and conforming amendments— Such title is further amended—
(1)
added in section 40278A—
(A)
added by striking “rifles” each place it appears and inserting “surplus firearms”; and
(B)
added in subsection (a), by striking “section 40731(a)” and inserting “section 40732(a)”;
(2)
added in section 40729(a)—
(A)
added in paragraph (1), by striking “described in section 40728(a) of this title”;
(B)
added in paragraph (2), by striking “firearms described in section 40728(a) of this title” and inserting “surplus firearms”; and
(C)
added in paragraph (4), by striking “caliber .30 and caliber .22 rimfire rifles” and inserting “firearms”; and
(3)
added in section 40732—
(A)
added by striking “caliber .22 rimfire and caliber .30 surplus rifles” both places it appears and inserting “surplus firearms”; and
(B)
added in subsection (a), by striking “is over 18 years of age” and inserting “is legally of age”.

Sec. 1086 Modification of requirements for transferring aircraft within the Air Force inventory

added
(a)
added Modification of requirements— Section 345 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 10 U.S.C. 8062 note) is amended—
(1)
added in subsection (a)—
(A)
added by striking the first sentence and inserting the following: “Before making an aircraft transfer described in subsection (c), the Secretary of the Air Force shall ensure that a written agreement regarding such transfer has been entered into between the Chief of Staff of the Air Force and the Director of the Air National Guard or the Chief of Air Force Reserve.”; and
(B)
added in paragraph (3), by striking “depot”;
(2)
added by striking subsection (b) and inserting the following:

added “(b) Submittal of agreements to the Department of Defense and congress—The Secretary of the Air Force may not take any action to transfer an aircraft until the Secretary ensures that the Air Force has complied with applicable Department of Defense regulations and, for a transfer described in subsection (c)(1), until the Secretary submits to the congressional defense committees an agreement entered into pursuant to subsection (a) regarding the transfer of the aircraft.”

(3)
added by adding at the end the following new subsections:

added “(c) Covered aircraft transfers

added “(1) Covered transfers—An aircraft transfer described in this subsection is the transfer (other than as specified in paragraph (2)) from a reserve component of the Air Force to the regular component of the Air Force of—

added “(A) the permanent assignment of an aircraft that terminates a reserve component’s equitable interest in the aircraft; or

added “(B) possession of an aircraft for a period in excess of 90 days.

added “(2) Exceptions—Paragraph (1) does not apply to the following:

added “(A) A routine temporary transfer of possession of an aircraft from a reserve component that is made solely for the benefit of the reserve component for the purpose of maintenance, upgrade, conversion, modification, or testing and evaluation.

added “(B) A routine permanent transfer of assignment of an aircraft that terminates a reserve component’s equitable interest in the aircraft if notice of the transfer has previously been provided to the congressional defense committees and the transfer has been approved by the Secretary of Defense pursuant to Department of Defense regulations.

added “(C) A transfer described in paragraph (1)(A) when there is a reciprocal permanent assignment of an aircraft from the regular component of the Air Force to the reserve component that does not degrade the capability of, or reduce the total number of, aircraft assigned to the reserve component.

added “(d) Return of aircraft after routine temporary transfer—In the case of an aircraft transferred from a reserve component of the Air Force to the regular component of the Air Force for which an agreement under subsection (a) is not required by reason of subsection (c)(2)(A), possession of the aircraft shall be transferred back to the reserve component upon completion of the work described in subsection (c)(2)(A).”

(b)
added Conforming amendment— Subsection (a)(7) of such section is amended by striking “Commander of the Air Force Reserve Command” and inserting “Chief of Air Force Reserve”.
(c)
added Technical amendments to delete references to aircraft ownership— Subsection (a) of such section is further amended by striking “the ownership of” in paragraphs (2)(A), (2)(C), and (3).

Sec. 1087 Reestablishment of Commission to Assess the Threat to the United States from Electromagnetic Pulse Attack

added
(a)
added Reestablishment— The commission established pursuant to title XIV of the Floyd D. Spence National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2001 (as enacted into law by Public Law 106–398; 114 Stat. 1654A-345), and reestablished pursuant to section 1052 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 (Public Law 109–163; 50 U.S.C. 2301 note), known as the Commission to Assess the Threat to the United States from Electromagnetic Pulse Attack, is hereby reestablished.
(b)
added Membership— The Commission as reestablished shall have the same membership as the Commission had as of the date of the submission of the report of the Commission pursuant to section 1403(a) of such Act, as amended by such section 1052. Service on the Commission is voluntary, and Commissioners may elect to terminate their service on the Commission. If a Commissioner is unwilling or unable to serve on the Commission, the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the chairmen and ranking members of the Committees on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the Senate, shall appoint a new member to fill that vacancy.
(c)
added Commission charter defined— In this section, the term “Commission charter” means title XIV of the Floyd D. Spence National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2001 (as enacted into law by Public Law 106–398; 114 Stat. 1654A-345 et seq.), as amended by section 1052 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 (Public Law 109–163; 50 U.S.C. 2301 note) and section 1073 of the John Warner National Defense Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109–364; 120 Stat. 2403).
(d)
added Expanded purpose— Section 1401(b) of the Commission charter (114 Stat. 1654A-345) is amended by inserting before the period at the end the following: “, from non-nuclear EMP weapons, from natural EMP generated by geomagnetic storms, and from proposed uses in the military doctrines of potential adversaries of using EMP weapons in combination with other attack vectors.”.
(e)
added Duties of commission— Section 1402 of the Commission charter (114 Stat. 1654A-346) is amended to read as follows:

added “1402. Duties of commission

added “The Commission shall assess the following:

added “(1) The vulnerability of electric-dependent military systems in the United States to a manmade or natural EMP event, giving special attention to the progress made by the Department of Defense, other Government departments and agencies of the United States, and entities of the private sector in taking steps to protect such systems from such an event.

added “(2) The evolving current and future threat from state and non-state actors of a manmade EMP attack employing nuclear or non-nuclear weapons.

added “(3) New technologies, operational procedures, and contingency planning that can protect electronics and electric-dependent military systems from a manmade or natural EMP event.

added “(4) Among the States, if State grids are islanded for protection against manmade or natural EMP, which States should receive highest priority for protecting critical defense assets and for maximizing survival of the national population.”

(f)
added Report— Section 1403 of the Commission charter (114 Stat. 1654A-345) is amended by striking “September 30, 2007” and inserting “June 30, 2017”.
(g)
added Termination— Section 1049 of the Commission charter (114 Stat. 1654A-348) is amended by inserting before the period at the end the following: “, as amended by the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016”.

Sec. 1088 Department of Defense strategy for countering unconventional warfare

added
(a)
added Strategy required— The Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the President and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, shall develop a strategy for the Department of Defense to counter unconventional warfare threats posed by adversarial state and non-state actors.
(b)
added Elements— The strategy required under subsection (a) shall include each of the following:
(1)
added An articulation of the activities that constitute unconventional warfare being waged upon the United States and allies.
(2)
added A clarification of the roles and responsibilities of the Department of Defense in providing indications and warning of, and protection against, acts of unconventional warfare.
(3)
added The current status of authorities and command structures related to countering unconventional warfare.
(4)
added An articulation of the goals and objectives of the Department of Defense with respect to countering unconventional warfare threats.
(5)
added An articulation of related or required interagency capabilities and whole-of-Government activities required by the Department of Defense to support a counter-unconventional warfare strategy.
(6)
added Recommendations for improving the counter-unconventional warfare capabilities, authorities, and command structures of the Department of Defense.
(7)
added Recommendations for improving interagency coordination and support mechanisms with respect to countering unconventional warfare threats.
(8)
added Recommendations for the establishment of joint doctrine to support counter-unconventional warfare capabilities within the Department of Defense.
(9)
added Any other matters the Secretary of Defense and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff determine necessary.
(c)
added Submittal to Congress— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees the strategy required by subsection (a). The strategy shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.
(d)
added Definition of unconventional warfare— In this section, the term “unconventional warfare” means activities conducted to enable a resistance movement or insurgency to coerce, disrupt, or overthrow a government or occupying power by operating through or with an underground, auxiliary, or guerrilla force in a denied area.

Sec. 1089 Mine countermeasures master plan

added
(a)
added Plan required—
(1)
added In general— At the same time the budget is submitted to Congress for each of fiscal years 2018 through 2023, the Secretary of the Navy shall submit to the congressional defense committees a mine countermeasures (hereinafter in this section referred to as “MCM”) master plan. Each such plan shall include each of the following:
(A)
added An evaluation of the capabilities, capacities, requirements, and readiness levels of the defensive capabilities of the Navy for MCM, including an assessment of the dedicated MCM force as well as the capabilities of ships, aircraft, and submarines that are not yet dedicated to MCM but could be modified to carry mine warfare capabilities.
(B)
added An evaluation of the ability of units to properly command and control air and surface MCM forces from fleet level down through to element level and to provide necessary operational and tactical control and awareness of such forces to facilitate mission accomplishment and defense.
(C)
added An assessment of technologies having promising potential for use for improving mine warfare and of programs for transitioning such technologies from the testing and evaluation phases to procurement.
(D)
added A fiscal plan to support the master plan through the Future Years Defense Plan.
(E)
added A plan for inspection of each asset with mine warfare responsibilities, requirements, and capabilities, which shall include proposed methods to ensure the material readiness of each asset and the training level of the force, a general summary, and readiness trends.
(2)
added Form of submission— Each plan submitted under paragraph (1)(E) shall be in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex addressing the capability and capacity to meet operational plans and contingency requirements.
(b)
added Report to Congress— Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Navy shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report containing the recommendations of the Secretary regarding the force structure and ensuring the operational effectiveness of the surface mine warfare force through 2025 based on current capabilities and capacity, replacement schedules, and service life extensions or retirement schedules. Such report shall include an assessment of the MCM vessels, including the decommissioned MCM-1 and MCM-2 ships and the potential of such ships for reserve operating status.

Sec. 1090 Congressional notification and briefing requirement on ordered evacuations of United States embassies and consulates involving the use of United States Armed Forces

added
(a)
added Notification requirement— The Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of State shall provide joint notification to the appropriate congressional committees as soon as practicable after the initiation of an ordered evacuation of a United States embassy or consulate involving the use of United States Armed Forces.
(b)
added Briefing requirement— The Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of State shall provide a joint briefing to the appropriate congressional committees not later than 15 days after the initiation of an ordered evacuation of a United States embassy or consulate involving the use of the United States Armed Forces.
(c)
added Elements— Each notification under subsection (a) and briefing under subsection (b) shall include the following:
(1)
added An overview of the ordered evacuation.
(2)
added The status of all personnel assigned to the embassy or consulate, including United States citizens and locally-employed staff.
(3)
added The status of the embassy or consulate, including whether the embassy or consulate was secured and all classified or otherwise sensitive material destroyed upon departure.
(4)
added An overview of the manner and location from which the Department of State will continue to conduct the duties and responsibilities of the embassy or consulate.
(5)
added A description of the disposition of United States Government property and whether such property was destroyed, disabled, abandoned or otherwise left behind, or remains in the possession of United States Government personnel.
(6)
added Any other matters the Secretary of Defense and Secretary of State determine to be relevant.
(d)
added Appropriate congressional committees defined— In this section, the term “appropriate congressional committees” means—
(1)
added the congressional defense committees; and
(2)
added the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives.

Sec. 1091 Determination and disclosure of transportation costs incurred by Secretary of Defense for congressional trips outside the United States

added
(a)
added Determination and Disclosure of Costs by Secretary— In the case of a trip taken by a Member, officer, or employee of the House of Representatives or Senate in carrying out official duties outside the United States for which the Department of Defense provides transportation, the Secretary of Defense shall—
(1)
added determine the cost of the transportation provided with respect to the Member, officer, or employee;
(2)
added not later than 10 days after completion of the trip involved, provide a written statement of the cost—
(A)
added to the Member, officer, or employee involved, and
(B)
added to the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives (in the case of a trip taken by a Member, officer, or employee of the House) or the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate (in the case of a trip taken by a Member, officer, or employee of the Senate); and
(3)
added upon providing a written statement under paragraph (2), make the statement available for viewing on the Secretary’s official public website until the expiration of the 4-year period which begins on the final day of the trip involved.
(b)
added Exceptions— This section does not apply with respect to any trip the sole purpose of which is to visit one or more United States military installations or to visit United States military personnel in a war zone (or both).
(c)
added Definitions— In this section:
(1)
added Member— The term Member, with respect to the House of Representatives, includes a Delegate or Resident Commissioner to the Congress.
(2)
added United States— The term United States means the several States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, the Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, and any other territory or possession of the United States.
(d)
added Effective Date— This section shall apply with respect to trips taken on or after the date of the enactment of this Act, except that this section does not apply with respect to any trip which began prior to such date.

Sec. 1101 One-year extension of temporary authority to grant allowances, benefits, and gratuities to civilian personnel on official duty in a combat zone

changed Paragraph (2) of section 1603(a) of the Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act for Defense, the Global War on Terror, and Hurricane Recovery, 2006 (Public Law 109–234; 120 Stat. 443), as added by section 1102 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4616) and as most recently amended by section 1102 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. zzz), 3525), is further amended by striking “2016” and inserting “2017”.

Sec. 1102 Authority to provide additional allowances and benefits for defense clandestine service employees

changed Section 1603 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:following:

“(c) Additional allowances and benefits for employees of the defense clandestine service—In addition to the authority to provide compensation under subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense may provide an employee in a defense intelligence position who is assigned to the Defense Clandestine Service allowances and benefits under paragraph (1) of section 9904 of title 5 without regard to the limitations in that section—

“(1) that the employee be assigned to activities outside the United States; or

“(2) that the activities to which the employee is assigned be in support of Department of Defense activities abroad.”

Sec. 1103 Extension of rate of overtime pay for Department of the Navy employees performing work aboard or dockside in support of the nuclear-powered aircraft carrier forward deployed in Japan

changed Subparagraph (B) of section 5542(a)(6) Section 5542(a)(6)(B) of title 5, United States Code, is amended by striking “September 30, 2015” and inserting “September 30, 2017”.

Sec. 1104 Modification to temporary authorities for certain positions at Department of Defense research and engineering facilities

added

added Section 1107 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 888) is amended—

(1)
added in subsection (a), by adding at the end the following:

added “(4) Noncompetitive conversion to permanent appointment—With respect to any student appointed by the director of an STRL under paragraph (3) to an indefinite or term appointment, upon graduation from the applicable institution of higher education (as defined in such paragraph), the director may noncompetitively convert such student to a permanent appointment within the STRL without regard to the provisions of subchapter I of chapter 33 of title 5, United States Code (other than sections 3303 and 3328 of such title), provided the student meets all eligibility and Office of Personnel Management qualification requirements for the position.”

(2)
added in subsection (c)(1), by striking “3 percent” and inserting “6 percent”;
(3)
added in subsection (c)(2), by striking “1 percent” and inserting “3 percent”; and
(4)
added in subsection (f)(2), by striking “1 percent” and inserting “2 percent”.

Sec. 1105 Preference eligibility for members of reserve components of the armed forces appointed to competitive service; clarification of appeal rights

added
(a)
added Preference eligibility— Section 2108 of title 5, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
added in paragraph (3)—
(A)
added in subparagraph (G)(iii), by striking “and” at the end;
(B)
added by inserting the following after subparagraph (H):

added “(I) an individual who is a member of a reserve component of the armed forces:

added “(i) who has—

added “(I) successfully completed officer candidate training or entry level and skill training; and

added “(II) incurred, or is performing, an initial period of obligated service in a reserve component of the armed forces of not less than 6 consecutive years; or

added “(ii) who has completed at least 10 years of service in a reserve component of the armed forces in each of which the individual was credited with at least 50 points under section 12732 of title 10 toward the computation of years of service under section 12732 of title 10 for purposes of eligibility for retired pay under chapter 1223 of title 10; and

added “(J) an individual who is—

added “(i) retired from service in a reserve component of the armed forces; and

added “(ii) eligible for, but has not yet commenced receipt of, retired pay for non-regular service under chapter 1223 of title 10;”

(2)
added in paragraph (4)—
(A)
added in subparagraph (A), by striking “or” at the end;
(B)
added in subparagraph (B), by striking “and” at the end and inserting “or”; and
(C)
added by adding at the end the following:

added “(C) the individual is a retiree described in paragraph (3)(J);”

(3)
added in paragraph (5) by striking the period at the end and inserting a semicolon; and
(4)
added by adding at the end the following:

added “(6) entry level and skill training has the meaning given that term in section 3301(2) of title 38; and

added “(7) reserve component of the armed forces means a reserve component specified in section 101(27) of title 38.”

(b)
added Tiered hiring preference for members of reserve components of the armed forces— Section 3309 of title 5, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
added in paragraph (1), by striking “and” at the end; and
(2)
added by striking paragraph (2) and inserting the following:

added “(2) a preference eligible under subparagraph (A), (B), or (J) of section 2108(3) of this title-5 points;

added “(3) a preference eligible under section 2108(3)(I)(ii) of this title-4 points; and

added “(4) a preference eligible under section 2108(3)(I)(i) of this title-3 points.”

(c)
added Clarification of appeal rights—
(1)
added In general— Section 3330a of title 5, United States Code, is amended—
(A)
added in subsection (a)(1)(A), by inserting “, including a preference eligible appointed pursuant to section 7401 of title 38 or otherwise employed by the Veterans Health Administration of the Department of Veterans Affairs,” after “A preference eligible”; and
(B)
added in subsection (d)(1), by inserting “, including a complaint so filed by a preference eligible appointed pursuant to section 7401 of title 38 or otherwise employed by the Veterans Health Administration,” after “If the Secretary of Labor is unable to resolve a complaint under subsection (a)”.
(2)
added Coordination rule— Section 3330a of title 5, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

added “(f) If any part of this section is deemed to be inconsistent with any provision of chapter 74 of title 38, this section shall be deemed to supersede, override or otherwise modify such provision of chapter 74 of title 38.”

Sec. 1201 One-year extension of logistical support for coalition forces supporting certain United States military operations

added Section 1234 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 394), as most recently amended by section 1223(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3548), is further amended—

(a)
removed Extension of authority— Subsection (f)(1) of section 1215 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 10 U.S.C. 113 note) is amended by striking “fiscal year 2015” and inserting “fiscal year 2016”.
(1)
changed Amount available— Such section is further amended—in subsection (a), by striking “fiscal year 2015” and inserting “fiscal year 2016”;
(1)
removed in subsection (c), by striking “fiscal year 2015” and all that follows and inserting “fiscal year 2016 may not exceed $143,000,000.”; and
(2)
removed in subsection (d), by striking “fiscal year 2015” and inserting “fiscal year 2016”.
(2)
changed Repeal of expired reporting requirement— Subsection (g) of such section is repealed.in subsection (d), by striking “during the period beginning on October 1, 2014, and ending on December 31, 2015” and inserting “during the period beginning on October 1, 2015, and ending on December 31, 2016”; and
(3)
added in subsection (e)(1), by striking “December 31, 2015” and inserting “December 31, 2016”.

Sec. 1202 Strategic framework for Department of Defense security cooperation

(a)
added Strategic framework—
(1)
added In general— The Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of State, shall develop a strategic framework for Department of Defense security cooperation to guide prioritization of resources and activities.
(2)
added Elements— The strategic framework required by paragraph (1) shall include the following:
(A)
added Discussion of the strategic goals of Department of Defense security cooperation programs, and the extent to which these programs complement Department of State security assistance programs to achieve United States Government goals globally, regionally, and, if appropriate, within specific programs.
(B)
added Identification of the primary objectives, priorities, and desired end-states of Department of Defense security cooperation programs.
(C)
added Identification of challenges to achieving the primary objectives, priorities, and desired end-states identified under subparagraph (B), including—
(i)
added constraints on Department of Defense resources, authorities, and personnel;
(ii)
added partner nation variables, such as political will, absorptive capacity, corruption, and instability risk;
(iii)
added constraints or limitations due to bureaucratic impediments, interagency processes, or congressional requirements;
(iv)
added validation of requirements; and
(v)
added assessment, monitoring, and evaluation.
(D)
added A methodology for assessing the effectiveness of Department of Defense security cooperation programs in making progress toward achieving the primary objectives, priorities, and desired end-states identified under subparagraph (B), including an identification of key benchmarks for such progress and the implications of failing to achieve such primary objectives, priorities, and desired end-states.
(E)
added An analysis of overlap, duplication, or gaps among Department of Defense security cooperation authorities and how these authorities complement or overlap with Department of State security assistance authorities.
(F)
added Any other matters the Secretary of Defense determines appropriate.
(b)
added Report—
(1)
added In general— Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of State, shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on the strategic framework required by subsection (a).
(a)
removed Extension of authority— Subsection (a) of section 1233 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 393), as most recently amended by section 1222 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. yyy), is further amended by striking “fiscal year 2015” and inserting “fiscal year 2016”.
(b)
removed Amounts available— Subsection (d)(1) of such section is amended—
(2)
changed Form— The report required by striking “during fiscal year 2015 may not exceed $1,200,000,000” and inserting “during fiscal year 2016 paragraph (1) shall be submitted in an unclassified form, but may not exceed $1,260,000,000”; andinclude a classified annex.
(3)
changed Definition— by striking In this subsection, the third sentence.term “appropriate congressional committees” means—
(A)
added the congressional defense committees; and
(B)
added the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives.

Sec. 1203 Modification and two-year extension of National Guard State Partnership Program

(a)
changed Extension—Authority— Subsection (h) (a)(1) of section 1222 1205 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 2014 (Public Law 112–239; 126 113–66; 127 Stat. 1992), as 897; 32 U.S.C. 107 note) is amended by section 1231 adding at the end before the period the following: “to support the national interests and security cooperation goals and objectives of the Carl Levin United States, including applicable policy and Howard P. “Buck” McKeon National Defense Authorization Act guidelines for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. XXX), is further amended by striking “December 31, 2015” and inserting “December 31, 2016”.United States security sector assistance”.
(b)
changed Excess defense articles—Limitation— Subsection (i)(2) (b) of such section is amended by striking “During fiscal years 2013, 2014, and 2015” in subparagraphs (A) and (B) and inserting “Through December 31, 2016”.“that is not” after “an activity that the Secretary of Defense determines is a matter”.
(c)
added Procedures— Such section, as so amended, is further amended—
(1)
added by redesignating subsections (c) through (i) as subsections (d) through (j), respectively; and
(2)
added by inserting after subsection (b) the following:

added “(c) Procedures

added “(1) In general—The Chief of the National Guard Bureau shall—

added “(A) establish, maintain, and update as appropriate a list of core competencies to support each program established under subsection (a), collectively and for each State and territory, and shall submit for approval to the Secretary of Defense the list of core competencies and additional information needed to make use of such core competencies; and

added “(B) designate a director for each State and territory who shall be responsible for the conduct of activities under a program established under subsection (a) for such State or territory and reporting on activities under the program.

added “(2) Military-to-civilian core competencies—The Secretary of Defense, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State, may conduct an activity under a program established under subsection (a) relating to military-to-civilian core competencies.”

(d)
added National Guard State Partnership Program Fund— Subsection (e) of such section (as redesignated) is amended by adding at the end the following:

added “(3) National Guard State Partnership Program Fund

added “(A) Establishment

added “(i) In general—Except as provided in clause (ii), the Secretary of Defense shall establish on the books of the Department of Defense a National Guard State Partnership Program Fund.

added “(ii) Exception—The Secretary is not required to establish a Fund under clause (i) if, not later than February 1, 2016, the Secretary determines and reports to the appropriate congressional committees (as defined in subsection (h)(1)) that in the opinion of the Secretary such a Fund should be established on the books of the Department of the Treasury.

added “(B) Criteria—In administering the Fund established under subparagraph (A)(i), the Secretary shall, to the extent the Secretary determines it to be appropriate, provide for the following amounts to be credited to the Fund:

added “(i) Amounts authorized and appropriated to carry out the program under this section.

added “(ii) Amounts that the Secretary of Defense transfers, in such amounts as provided in appropriations Acts, to the Fund from amounts authorized and appropriated to the Department of Defense, including amounts authorized to be appropriated for the Army National Guard and the Air National Guard.

added “(C) Inclusion in annual budget—The President shall include the Fund established under subparagraph (A)(i) or such a Fund established on the books of the Department of the Treasury in the budget that the President submits to Congress under section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code for each fiscal year in which the authority under subsection (a) is in effect.”

(e)
added Annual report— Paragraph (2)(B) of subsection (f) of such section (as redesignated) is amended—
(1)
added in clause (iii), by inserting “or other government organizations” after “and security forces”;
(2)
added in clause (iv), by adding at the end before the period the following: “and country”;
(3)
added in clause (v), by striking “training” and inserting “activities”; and
(4)
added by adding at the end the following:

added “(vi) An assessment of the extent to which the activities conducted during the previous year met the objectives described in clause (v).

added “(vii) The list of core competencies required by subsection (c)(1) and any update to any changes to the list of core competencies required by subsection (c)(1).”

(f)
added Definitions— Subsection (h) of such section (as redesignated) is amended—
(1)
added in paragraph (1), by striking subparagraphs (A) and (B) and inserting the following:

added “(A) the congressional defense committees; and

added “(B) the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives.”

(2)
added by redesignating paragraph (2) as paragraph (3);
(3)
added by inserting after paragraph (1) (as amended) the following:

added “(2) Core competencies—The term “core competencies” means military-to-military and military-to-civilian skills and capabilities of the National Guard, consistent with the roles and missions of the Armed Forces as established by the Secretary of Defense.”

(4)
added by adding at the end the following:

added “(4) State—The term “State” means each of the several States and the District of Columbia.

added “(5) Territory—The term “territory” means the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Guam, and the Virgin Islands.”

(g)
added Termination— Section 1205(i) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 899; 32 U.S.C. 107 note) is amended by striking “September 30, 2016” and inserting “September 30, 2018”.

Sec. 1204 Extension of authority for non-reciprocal exchanges of defense personnel between the United States and foreign countries

added Section 1207(f) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2514; 10 U.S.C. 168 note), as amended by section 1202 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1980), is further amended by striking “September 30, 2016” and inserting “December 31, 2017”.

(a)
removed Authority— Subchapter II of chapter 138 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

removed “2350n. Construction, maintenance, and repair projects mutually beneficial to the Department of Defense and Kuwait Armed Forces

removed “(a) Authority To accept contributions—The Secretary of Defense, after consultation with the Secretary of State, may accept cash contributions from the State of Kuwait, for the purposes specified in subsection (c).

removed “(b) Accounting—Contributions accepted under subsection (a) shall be placed in an account established by the Secretary of Defense and shall remain available until expended for the purposes specified in subsection (c).

removed “(c) Availability of contributions—Contributions accepted under subsection (a) shall be available only for payment of costs in connection with mutually beneficial construction (including military construction not otherwise authorized by law), maintenance, and repair projects in Kuwait.

removed “(d) Mutually beneficial defined—A project shall be considered to be “mutually beneficial” for purposes of this section if—

removed “(1) the project is in support of a bilateral United States and Kuwait defense cooperation agreement; or

removed “(2) the Secretary of Defense determines that the United States may derive a benefit from the project, including—

removed “(A) access to and use of facilities of the Kuwait Armed Forces;

removed “(B) ability or capacity for future posture; and

removed “(C) increased interoperability between the Department of Defense and Kuwait Armed Forces.”

(b)
removed Clerical amendment— The table of sections at the beginning of such subchapter is amended by adding at the end the following new item:

Sec. 1205 Extension of commanders’ emergency response program in Afghanistan

removed

removed Section 1201 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1619), as most recently amended by section 1221 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. yyy), is further amended by striking “fiscal year 2015” in subsections (a), (b), and (f) and inserting “fiscal year 2016”.

Sec. 1206 Increase in thresholds for definition of major defense equipment for purposes of Arms Export Control Act

removed

removed Section 47(6) of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2794(6)) is amended—

(1)
removed by striking “$50,000,000” and inserting “$200,000,000”; and
(2)
removed by striking “$200,000,000”and inserting “$800,000,000”.

Sec. 1207 Maintenance of prohibition on procurement by Department of Defense of communist Chinese-origin items that meet the definition of goods and services controlled as munitions items when moved to the “600 series” of the commerce control list

removed
(a)
removed In general— Section 1211 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 (Public Law 109–163; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended—
(1)
removed in subsection (b), by inserting “or in the 600 series of the control list of the Export Administration Regulations” after “in Arms Regulations,”; and
(2)
removed in subsection (e), by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

removed “(3) The term “600 series of the control list of the Export Administration Regulations” means the 600 series of the Commerce Control List contained in Supplement No. 1 to part 774 of subtitle B of title 15 of the Code of Federal Regulations.”

(b)
removed Technical corrections to ITAR references— Subsections (b) and (e)(2) of such section are amended by striking “Trafficking” and inserting “Traffic”.

Sec. 1208 Modification of global lift and sustain to support partners and allies

removed

removed Subsection (b) of section 127d of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

removed “(3) Clause (ii) of paragraph (2)(B) does not apply in a case in which the Secretary determines that the provision of assistance is critical to the timely and effective participation of the allied forces in the combined operation.”

Sec. 1209 Reimbursements for certain counterinsurgency, counterterrorism and stabilization operations carried out by Pakistan

removed
(a)
removed Authority— From funds made available for the Department of Defense for operation and maintenance, the Secretary of Defense, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State and in consultation with the Director of the Office of Management and Budget, may provide reimbursements for counterinsurgency, counterterrorism, and stabilization operations carried out by the Government of Pakistan in its campaign against al-Qaeda, the Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan, and associated militants.
(b)
removed Types of reimbursements— Reimbursements made under the authority in subsection (a) may be made, in such amounts as the Secretary of Defense considers appropriate, for logistical, military, and other expenditures associated with the operations specified in subsection (a).
(c)
removed Limitations—
(1)
removed Prohibition on contractual obligations to make payments— The Secretary of Defense may not enter into any contractual obligation to make a reimbursement under the authority in subsection (a).
(2)
removed Prohibition on reimbursement of pakistan for support during periods closed to transshipment— The Secretary of Defense may not provide a reimbursement under the authority in subsection (a) for claims of support provided during any period when the ground lines of supply through Pakistan were closed to the transshipment of equipment and supplies in support of United States military operations in Afghanistan.
(d)
removed Notice to congressional committees— The Secretary of Defense shall notify the appropriate congressional committees not later than 15 days before making any reimbursement under the authority in subsection (a).
(e)
removed Termination— The Secretary of Defense may not use the authority in subsection (a) to provide reimbursement for any costs that are incurred after September 30, 2018.
(f)
removed Limitation on reimbursements to the Government of Pakistan under section 1233 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008— No reimbursement may be provided to the Government of Pakistan under section 1233 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181, 122 Stat. 393), as most recently amended by section 1222 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291, 128 Stat. yyy), for any period during which this section is also in effect.
(g)
removed Definitions— In this section, the term “appropriate congressional committees” means—
(1)
removed the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives; and
(2)
removed the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Foreign Relations, and the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate.

Sec. 1210 NATO Special Operations Headquarters

removed

removed Section 1244(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2541), as most recently amended by section 1272 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2023), is further amended by striking “for each of fiscal years 2013, 2014, and 2015 pursuant to section 301” and inserting “for any fiscal year”.

Sec. 1211 Commanders’ Emergency Response Program in Afghanistan

(a)
changed Continuation of prior authorities and notice and reporting requirements—One-Year extension— Funds available to the Department of Defense for the Afghanistan Security Forces Fund for fiscal year 2016 shall be subject to the conditions contained in subsections (b) through (g) of section 1513 Section 1201 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 2012 (Public Law 110–181; 122 112–81; 125 Stat. 428), 1619), as most recently amended by section 1531(b) 1221 of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 2015 (Public Law 111–383; 124 113–291; 128 Stat. 4424).3546), is further amended by striking “fiscal year 2015” each place it appears and inserting “fiscal year 2016”.
(b)
changed Extension of authority To accept certain equipment—Funds available during fiscal year 2016— Subsection (d)(1) of section 1531 (a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note) such section, as so amended, is further amended by striking “prior Acts” “$10,000,000” and inserting “Acts enacted before the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016.”.“$5,000,000” .

Sec. 1212 Extension and modification of authority for reimbursement of certain coalition nations for support provided to United States military operations

added
(a)
added Extension— Subsection (a) of section 1233 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 393), as most recently amended by section 1222 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3547), is further amended by striking “fiscal year 2015” and inserting “fiscal year 2016”.
(b)
added Limitation on amounts available— Subsection (d)(1) of such section, as so amended, is further amended—
(1)
added in the second sentence, by striking “during fiscal year 2015 may not exceed $1,200,000,000” and inserting “during fiscal year 2016 may not exceed $1,260,000,000”; and
(2)
added in the third sentence, by striking “fiscal year 2015” and inserting “fiscal year 2016”.
(c)
added Extension of notice requirement relating to reimbursement of Pakistan for support provided by Pakistan— Section 1232(b)(6) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (122 Stat. 393), as most recently amended by section 1222(d) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (128 Stat. 3548), is further amended by striking “September 30, 2015” and inserting “September 30, 2016”.
(d)
added Extension of limitation on reimbursement of Pakistan pending certification on Pakistan— Section 1227(d)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2001), as most recently amended by section 1222(e) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (128 Stat. 3548), is further amended by striking “fiscal year 2015” and inserting “fiscal year 2016”.
(e)
added Additional limitation on reimbursement of Pakistan pending certification on Pakistan— Of the total amount of reimbursements and support authorized for Pakistan during fiscal year 2016 pursuant to the third sentence of section 1233(d)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (as amended by subsection (b)(2)), $400,000,000 shall not be eligible for the waiver under section 1227(d)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (126 Stat. 2001) unless the Secretary of Defense certifies to the congressional defense committees that—
(1)
added Pakistan continues to conduct military operations in North Waziristan to disrupt the safe haven and freedom of movement of the Haqqani Network in Pakistan;
(2)
added Pakistan has prevented the Haqqani Network from using North Waziristan as a safe haven; and
(3)
added the Government of Pakistan actively coordinates with the Government of Afghanistan to restrict the movement of militants, such as the Haqqani Network, along the Afghanistan-Pakistan border.

Sec. 1213 Sense of Congress on United States policy and strategy in Afghanistan

added

added It is the sense of Congress that—

(1)
added the United States continues to have vital national security interests in ensuring that Afghanistan is a stable, sovereign country;
(2)
added President Ashraf Ghani of Afghanistan should be applauded for his leadership and commitment to ensuring that Afghanistan remains stable, secure, and a friend of the United States;
(3)
added the decision by the President of the United States to maintain 9,800 United States troops in Afghanistan through all of 2015 to train, advise, and assist and conduct counterterrorism missions in Afghanistan is the appropriate approach, is consistent with United States national security interests, and should be supported by Congress;
(4)
added the President should withdraw United States troops only on a pace that is consistent with the ability of the Afghan National Security Forces to sustain itself and secure Afghanistan and should review maintaining the United States advisory mission in Afghanistan beyond 2016;
(5)
added the United States should provide monetary and advisory support for the 352,000 Afghan National Security Forces personnel and 30,000 Afghan Local Police, including intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance support, through 2018;
(6)
added the Afghan National Security Forces should have the independent capability to prevent groups such as al-Qaeda, the Haqqani Network, the Quetta Shura Taliban, and other terrorist and insurgent groups from being able to conduct de-stabilizing attacks and military operations inside Afghanistan or against the United States and its allies and holding or governing territory; and
(7)
added the United States should continue to vigorously conduct counterterrorism operations in Afghanistan beyond 2016, including against the Haqqani Network, to preserve the vital national security interests of the United States.

Sec. 1214 Extension of authority to acquire products and services produced in countries along a major route of supply to Afghanistan

added

added Section 801(f) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2399), as most recently amended by section 832 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 814), is further amended by striking “December 31, 2015” and inserting “December 31, 2016”.

Sec. 1215 Extension of authority to transfer defense articles and provide defense services to the military and security forces of Afghanistan

added
(a)
added Extension— Subsection (h) of section 1222 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1992), as amended by section 1231 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3556), is further amended by striking “December 31, 2015” and inserting “December 31, 2016”.
(b)
added Quarterly reports— Subsection (f)(1) of such section, as so amended, is further amended by striking “March 31, 2016” and inserting “March 31, 2017”.
(c)
added Excess defense articles— Subsection (i)(2) of such section, as so amended, is further amended by striking “and 2015” each place it appears and inserting “, 2015, and 2016”.

Sec. 1216 Sense of Congress regarding assistance for Afghan translators, interpreters, and administrative aids

added

added It is the sense of Congress that it is in the interest of the United States to continue to assist Afghan partners, and their immediate families, who have served as translators or interpreters and those who have performed sensitive and trusted activities for United States forces.

Sec. 1221 Extension of authority to support operations and activities of the Office of Security Cooperation in Iraq

added
(a)
added Extension of authority— Subsection (f)(1) of section 1215 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 10 U.S.C. 113 note), as most recently amended by section 1237 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3562), is further amended by striking “fiscal year 2015” and inserting “fiscal year 2016”.
(b)
added Amount available— Such section, as so amended, is further amended—
(1)
added in subsection (c), by striking “fiscal year 2015” and all that follows and inserting “fiscal year 2016 may not exceed $143,000,000.”; and
(2)
added in subsection (d), by striking “fiscal year 2015” and inserting “fiscal year 2016”.
(c)
added Report— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of State shall submit to the congressional defense committees, the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate, and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives a report on the activities of the Office of Security Cooperation in Iraq. The report shall include the following:
(1)
added A description of how the programs of the Office of Security Cooperation in Iraq, in conjunction with other United States programs, such as Foreign Military Financing program and the Foreign Military Sales program, will address the capability gaps of the Iraqi Security Forces and coordinate activities to provide for the training and equipping of the Iraqi Security Forces.
(2)
added A description of constraints, if any, caused by the operational environment in Iraq on the ability of the Office of Security Cooperation in Iraq to carry out its mission.

Sec. 1222 Comprehensive strategy for the Middle East and to counter Islamic extremism

added
(a)
added Findings— Congress finds the following:
(1)
added In testimony before the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives, General Martin Dempsey, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff stated, “The global security environment is as uncertain as I have seen in my 40 years of service.”.
(2)
added In testimony before the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate, the Director of National Intelligence, James Clapper, stated: “Sunni violent extremists are gaining momentum and the number of Sunni violent extremist groups, members, and safe havens is greater than at any other point in history.”.
(3)
added In testimony to the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives, Lieutenant General Michael Flynn, former Director of the Defense Intelligence Agency stated, “…whether it be the number of violent Islamist groups, the territory which they control, the scale and scope of the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) and associated movements, the number of terrorist attacks they perpetrate, the numbers of causalities they inflict, their broad expansion and use of the internet, or just their sheer barbarism; I can draw no other conclusion than to say that the threat of Islamic extremism has reached an unacceptable level and that it is growing.”.
(4)
added In testimony before the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate, James Clapper, the Director of National Intelligence, stated the following:
(A)
added “When the final counting is done, 2014 will have been the most lethal year for global terrorism in the 45 years such data has been compiled . . . about half of all attacks, as well as fatalities, in 2014 occurred in just three countries: Iraq, Pakistan and Afghanistan . . . the Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) conducted more attacks than any other terrorist group in the first nine months of 2014.”.
(B)
added “Since the conflict began, more than 20,000 Sunni foreign fighters have traveled to Syria from more than 90 countries to fight the Assad regime . . . of that number, at least 13,600 have extremist ties.”.
(C)
added “More than 3,400 Western fighters have gone to Syria and Iraq. Hundreds have returned home to Europe.”.
(D)
added “About 180 Americans or so have been involved in various stages of travel to Syria . . . and some number have come back.”.
(E)
added “ISIL, al-Qaeda and al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP), and, most recently, al-Shabaab are calling on their supporters to conduct lone-wolf attacks against the United States and other Western countries. Of the 13 attacks in the West since last May, 12 were conducted by individual extremists.”.
(5)
added AQAP continues to be one of al-Qaeda’s most capable affiliates, has the intent and capability to attack the United States and its allies, and attempted attacks inside the United States on December 25, 2009, and October 27, 2010.
(6)
added Iran has been a Department of State-designated state sponsor of terrorism since January 19, 1984, and continues to sponsor and support terrorism throughout the Middle East region and around the world.
(7)
added In testimony before the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate, former Vice Chief of Staff of the Army, General Jack Keane (retired), stated, “Is it possible to . . . claim that the United States policy and strategy is working or that al-Qaeda is on the run? It is unmistakable that our policies have failed . . . And the unequivocal explanation is U.S. policy has focused on disengaging from the Middle East.”.
(8)
added In testimony before the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate, former commander of United States Central Command, General James Mattis (retired), stated, “We have lived too long in a strategy-free mode . . . America needs a refreshed national strategy . . . And our Nation’s strategy demands a comprehensive approach.”.
(b)
added Sense of congress— It is the sense of Congress that—
(1)
added Islamic extremism is growing in the Middle East and elsewhere;
(2)
added Iran continues to be a leading state sponsor of terrorism in the Middle East and across the globe and continues to actively work against United States interests;
(3)
added the threat of terrorist attacks in the United States and threats against United States interests have increased due to the growth of Islamic extremism, the proliferation of terrorist groups across the world, and the instability in the Middle East in countries such as Libya, Yemen, Iraq, and Syria;
(4)
added the approach of Building Partnership Capacity (BPC) and conducting limited counterterrorism operations has had some positive effects in some locations, but has not prevented the proliferation and violence of terrorist groups or instability in the Middle East;
(5)
added the United States should articulate, develop, and implement an effective strategy to work with its allies and partners to defeat Islamic extremist groups that threaten the interests of the Unites States and its allies;
(6)
added support for United States allies and partners in the Middle East is a critical component of the effort to prevent the spread of Islamic extremism;
(7)
added other actors, such as Russia, China, and Iran are trying to work against United States interests in the Middle East;
(8)
added the United States should take a greater leadership role in fighting Islamic extremism and supporting stability in the Middle East to include coordinating actions of United States allies and partners in the region;
(9)
added the United States plays a vital leadership role in coordinating the activities of the United States and its allies and partners and should seek opportunities to expand such cooperation to contribute to greater stability in the Middle East;
(10)
added the United States should continue to take steps to prevent the spread of malign Iranian influence in Iraq, Syria, Yemen, and the region;
(11)
added the United States remains an indispensable actor in the Middle East, and the President should ensure that United States Armed Forces remain forward postured in the region to deter adversaries, fight threats to the United States and its interests, and support United States allies and partners in the region.
(c)
added Strategy required—
(1)
added In general— Not later than February 15, 2016, the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of State shall submit to the specified congressional committees a comprehensive strategy for the Middle East and to counter Islamic extremism.
(2)
added Matters to be included— The strategy required by paragraph (1) shall include the following:
(A)
added A detailed description of the objectives and end state for the United States in the Middle East and with respect to Islamic extremism.
(B)
added A description of the roles and responsibilities of the Department of State in such strategy.
(C)
added A description of the roles and responsibilities of the Department of Defense in such strategy.
(D)
added A detailed description of actions to prevent the weakening and failing of states in the Middle East.
(E)
added A detailed description of actions to counter Islamic extremism, including Islamic ideology, strategy, and tactics globally.
(F)
added A detailed definition of those states and non-state actors the United States will address to counter Islamic extremism.
(G)
added A detailed description of actions to establish a coalition to carry out the strategy.
(3)
added Specified congressional committees— In the section, the term specified congressional committees means—
(A)
added the congressional defense committees; and
(B)
added the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives.

Sec. 1223 Modification of authority to provide assistance to counter the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant

added
(a)
added Quarterly progress report— Subsection (d) of section 1236 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3561) is amended by striking “30 days” and inserting “90 days”.
(b)
added Funding— Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated in this Act for Overseas Contingency Operations in title XV for fiscal year 2016, there are authorized to be appropriated $715,000,000 to carry out such section.
(c)
added Waiver authority— Subsection (j)(1)(B) of such section is amended—
(1)
added by striking “the following:” and all that follows through “Any provision of law” and inserting “any provision of law”; and
(2)
added by striking clause (ii).
(d)
added Requirements relating to assistance for fiscal year 2016— Such section, as so amended, is further amended by adding at the end the following:

added “(l) Requirements relating to assistance for fiscal year 2016

added “(1) Assessment

added “(A) In general—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this subsection, the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of State shall jointly submit to the appropriate congressional committees an assessment of the extent to which the Government of Iraq is meeting the conditions described in subparagraph (B).

added “(B) Conditions—The conditions described in this subparagraph are that the Government of Iraq—

added “(i) is addressing the grievances of ethnic and sectarian minorities;

added “(ii) is increasing political inclusiveness;

added “(iii) is conducting efforts sufficient to reduce support for the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant and improve stability in Iraq;

added “(iv) is legislating the Iraqi Sunni National Guard;

added “(v) is ensuring that minorities are represented in adequate numbers, trained, and equipped in government security organizations;

added “(vi) is ending support to Shia militias and stopping abuses of elements of the Iraqi population by such militias;

added “(vii) is ensuring that supplies, equipment, and weaponry supplied by the United States are appropriately distributed to security forces with a national security mission in Iraq, including the Kurdish Peshmerga, Sunni tribal security forces with a national security mission, and the Iraqi Sunni National Guard;

added “(viii) is releasing prisoners from ethnic or sectarian minorities who have been arrested and held without trial or to charge and try such prisoners in a fair, transparent, and prompt manner; and

added “(ix) is taking such other actions as the Secretaries consider appropriate.

added “(C) Update—The Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of State may submit an update of the assessment required under subparagraph (A) to the extent necessary.

added “(D) Submission—The assessment required under subparagraph (A) and the update of the assessment authorized under subparagraph (C) may be submitted as part of the quarterly report required under subsection (d).

added “(2) Restriction on direct assistance to Government of Iraq—If the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of State do not submit the assessment required by paragraph (1) or if the Secretaries submit the assessment required by paragraph (1) but the assessment indicates that the Government of Iraq has not substantially achieved the conditions contained in the assessment, the Secretaries shall withhold the provision of assistance pursuant to subsection (a) directly to the Government of Iraq for fiscal year 2016 until such time as the Secretaries submit an update of the assessment that indicates that the Government of Iraq has substantially achieved the conditions contained in the assessment.

added “(3) Direct assistance to certain covered groups

added “(A) In general—Of the funds authorized to be appropriated under this section for fiscal year 2016, not less than 25 percent of such funds shall be obligated and expended for assistance directly to the groups described in subparagraph (E) (of which not less than 12.5 percent of such funds shall be obligated and expended for assistance directly to the group described in clause (i) of such subparagraph).

added “(B) Additional direct assistance—If the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of State withhold the provision of assistance pursuant to subsection (a) directly to the Government of Iraq for fiscal year 2016 in accordance with paragraph (2) of this subsection, the Secretaries shall obligate and expend not less than an additional 60 percent of all unobligated funds authorized to be appropriated under this section for fiscal year 2016 for assistance directly to the groups described in subparagraph (E).

added “(C) Cost-sharing requirement inapplicable—The cost-sharing requirement of subsection (k) shall not apply with respect to funds that are obligated or expended for assistance directly to the groups described in subparagraph (E).

added “(D) Rule of construction—Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the groups described in subparagraph (E) shall each be deemed to be a country for purposes of meeting the eligibility requirements of section 3 of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2753) and chapter 2 of part II of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2311 et seq.).

added “(E) Covered groups—The groups described in this subparagraph are—

added “(i) the Kurdish Peshmerga;

added “(ii) Sunni tribal security forces with a national security mission; and

added “(iii) the Iraqi Sunni National Guard.”

Sec. 1224 Report on United States Armed Forces deployed in support of Operation Inherent Resolve

added
(a)
added Sense of Congress— It is the sense of Congress that—
(1)
added it should continue to be a top priority to provide United States Armed Forces deployed in support of Operation Inherent Resolve with the necessary force protection and combat search and rescue support;
(2)
added United States military personnel who are tasked with the mission of providing combat search and rescue support, casualty evacuation, and medical support for Operation Inherent Resolve should not be counted as part of any limitation on the number of United States ground forces for Operation Inherent Resolve;
(3)
added military assets required to support United States Armed Forces deployed in support of Operation Inherent Resolve should be staged as forward as possible and as proximate to such United States Armed Forces as practicable given the operating environment and also should not be subject to any limitation on the number of United States ground forces for Operation Inherent Resolve; and
(4)
added the President, the Secretary of Defense, and military commanders on the ground in support of Operation Inherent Resolve should continuously evaluate the force protection and combat search and rescue support requirements, and the associated measures that are being taken to support such requirements, in order to ensure that such requirements and associated measures are sufficient given the operating environment and optimally postured.
(b)
added Report required— Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and every 90 days thereafter, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on United States Armed Forces deployed in support of Operation Inherent Resolve.
(c)
added Matters to be included— The report shall include the following:
(1)
added The total number of members of the United States Armed Forces deployed in support of Operation Inherent Resolve for the most recent month for which data is available, delineated by service, component, country, and military task.
(2)
added The total number of members of the United States Armed Forces conducting force protection and combat search and rescue, delineated by country, location in such country, and capability.
(3)
added An estimate for the three-month period following the date on which the report is submitted of the total number of members of the United States Armed Forces expected to be deployed in support of Operation Inherent Resolve, delineated by service, component, country, and military task.
(4)
added A description of the authorities and limitations on the number of United States Armed Forces deployed in support of Operation Inherent Resolve.
(5)
added A description of military functions that are and are not subject to the authorities and limitations described in paragraph (3).
(6)
added Any changes to the authorities and limitations described in paragraph (3) and the rationale for such changes.
(7)
added Any changes to United States policy and authorities for United States Armed Forces deployed in support of Operation Inherent Resolve.
(8)
added Any other matters that the Secretary of Defense determines to be necessary.
(d)
added Sunset— The requirement to submit reports under this section shall terminate on the date on which Operation Inherent Resolve terminates or the date that is 5 years after the date of the enactment of this Act, whichever occurs earlier.

Sec. 1225 Modification of authority to provide assistance to the vetted Syrian opposition

added

added Section 1209 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3541) is amended by striking subsection (f) and inserting the following:

added “(f) Funding—Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated in this Act for Overseas Contingency Operations in title XV for fiscal year 2016, there are authorized to be appropriated $531,500,000 to carry out this section.”

Sec. 1226 Assistance to the Government of Jordan for border security operations

added
(a)
added Authority to provide assistance—
(1)
added In general— The Secretary of Defense, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State, may provide assistance on a reimbursement basis to the Government of Jordan for purposes of supporting and enhancing efforts of the armed forces of Jordan to sustain security along the border of Jordan with Syria and Iraq.
(2)
added Frequency— Assistance may be provided under this subsection on a quarterly basis.
(b)
added Funds available for assistance—
(1)
added In general— Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated in this Act for “Assistance for the Border Security of Jordan” in title XV for fiscal year 2016, there are authorized to be appropriated $300,000,000 to carry out this section.
(2)
added Prohibition on contractual obligations— The Secretary of Defense may not enter into any contractual obligation to provide assistance under the authority in subsection (a).
(c)
added Notice before exercise— Not later than 15 days before providing assistance under the authority in subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the specified congressional committees a report setting forth a full description of the assistance to be provided, including the amount of assistance to be provided, and the timeline for the provision of such assistance.
(d)
added Specified congressional committees— In the section, the term specified congressional committees means—
(1)
added the congressional defense committees; and
(2)
added the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives.
(e)
added Expiration of authority— No assistance may be provided under the authority in subsection (a) after December 31, 2016.

Sec. 1227 Report on efforts of Turkey to fight terrorism

added

added Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress a report on the following:

(1)
added Turkey’s bilateral and multilateral efforts to combat the flow of foreign fighters through its country into Syria.
(2)
added Turkey’s relationship with Hamas, including its harboring of leaders of Hamas.
(3)
added The efforts of Turkey to fight terrorism, including Turkey’s military and humanitarian role in the anti-ISIS coalition.

Sec. 1231 Extension of annual report on military power of Iran

added
(a)
added Matters to be included— Subsection (b) of section 1245 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2544), as amended by section 1232 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 920), is further amended by adding at the end the following:

added “(5) An assessment of transfers to Iran of military equipment, technology, and training from non-Iranian sources.”

(b)
added Termination— Subsection (d) of such section, as amended by section 1277 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3592), is further amended by striking “December 31, 2016” and inserting “December 31, 2025”.

Sec. 1232 Sense of Congress on the Government of Iran’s nuclear program and its malign military activities

added
(a)
added Findings— Congress finds the following:
(1)
added The understanding announced on April 2, 2015, between the countries of the P5+1 (the United States, the United Kingdom, France, Germany, Russia, and China) and Iran on a Comprehensive Joint Plan of Action (CJPOA) provides sanctions relief in exchange for constraints on Iran’s nuclear program for a limited period of time.
(2)
added Iran continues to develop ballistic missiles in violation of United Nations Security Council Resolutions 1747 (2007) and 1929 (2010), has developed medium-range ballistic missiles to target Israel and other United States allies, is working towards an intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) capability and the CJPOA places no limitations on Iran’s ballistic and cruise missile development efforts.
(3)
added The Secretary of State has designated Iran as a state-sponsor of terrorism since 1984 and for the past decade has characterized Iran as the “most active state sponsor of terrorism” in the world.
(4)
added Iran continues to support Hezbollah in Lebanon, the Bashar al-Assad regime in Syria, Shia militias in Iraq, Hamas in Gaza, the Houthi rebels in Yemen, and other terrorist organizations and extremists globally.
(5)
added Iran continues to conduct malign military activities across the Middle East and around the globe, which has and will continue to destabilize the region. As the Commander of United States Central Command testified to the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives on March 3, 2015, “the leaders in the region… are also equally concerned about Iran’s ability to mine the Straits, Iran’s cyber capabilities, Iran’s… ballistic missile capability, as well as the activity of their Quds forces... And so whether we get a deal or don’t get a deal, I think they will still share those concerns.”.
(6)
added Iran’s destabilizing activities throughout the region pose a threat to United States interests, the interests of United States allies in the region, and international security.
(b)
added Sense of Congress— It is the sense of Congress that—
(1)
added Iran’s illicit pursuit, development, or acquisition of a nuclear weapons capability and its malign military activities overall constitute a grave threat to regional stability and the national security interests of the United States and its allies and partners;
(2)
added Iran continues to expand its malign activities in the Middle East and globally, which may well increase under a CJPOA;
(3)
added sanctions relief under the CJPOA will provide Iran the ability to increase funding for its ballistic missile development programs, acquisition of destabilizing types and amounts of conventional weapons, support for terrorism, and other malign activities throughout the Middle East and globally;
(4)
added United States bilateral and multilateral sanctions against Iran, once relieved, will be extremely difficult to reconstitute in response to Iranian violations of its international obligations;
(5)
added Iran would be an internationally-approved nuclear-threshold state under the framework of the CJPOA, which will likely lead to the proliferation of nuclear weapons across the Middle East;
(6)
added Congress should review and assess all elements of any agreement entered into between the countries of the P5+1 and Iran and it should approve or disapprove of any sanctions relief that results from such an agreement;
(7)
added the United States must continue to support the defense of allies and partners in the region, including Israel, strengthening ballistic missile defense capabilities, and increasing security assistance;
(8)
added Congress supports efforts to reach a peaceful, diplomatic solution to permanently and verifiably end Iran’s pursuit, development, and acquisition of a nuclear weapons capability, and it reaffirms that it is United States policy that Iran will not be allowed to develop a nuclear weapons capability and that all instruments of United States power must be considered to prevent Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon; and
(9)
added Congress reaffirms the rights of United States allies to exercise their legitimate right to self-defense against the Government of Iran.

Sec. 1233 Report on military posture required in the Middle East to deter Iran from developing a nuclear weapon

added
(a)
added In general— Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress a report regarding the military posture required in the Middle East to deter Iran from developing a nuclear weapon.
(b)
added Matters to be included— The report required by subsection (a) shall include a discussion of the military forces, bases and capabilities required to—
(1)
added maintain a military option of preventing Iran from achieving a nuclear weapon;
(2)
added counter Iran’s military activities; and
(3)
added protect the United States military and other interests in the region.

Sec. 1241 Notifications and updates relating to testing, production, deployment, and sale or transfer to other states or non-state actors of the Club-K cruise missile system by the Russian Federation

added
(a)
added Notifications—
(1)
added Regarding testing, production, deployment, and sale or transfer— The Secretary of Defense shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress quarterly notifications on the testing, production, deployment, and sale or transfer to other states or non-state actors of the Club-K cruise missile system by the Russian Federation.
(2)
added Upon deployment or sale or transfer— Not later than seven days after the Secretary determines that there is reasonable grounds to believe that the Russian Federation has deployed or sold or transferred to other states or non-state actors the Club-K cruise missile system, the Secretary shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a notification of such determination.
(3)
added Form— A notification required under paragraph (1) or (2) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may contain a classified annex if necessary.
(b)
added Quarterly updates—
(1)
added In general— The Secretary shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress not less than quarterly updates on the coordination of allied responses to the deployment or sale or transfer to other states or non-state actors of the Club-K cruise missile system by the Russian Federation.
(2)
added Form— The update required under paragraph (1) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may contain a classified annex if necessary.
(c)
added Strategy—
(1)
added Development— The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff shall develop a strategy to detect, defend against, and defeat the Club-K cruise missile system, including opportunities for allied contributions to such efforts based on consultations with such allies.
(2)
added Submission— Not later than September 30, 2016, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress the strategy developed under paragraph (1).
(d)
added Definition— In this section, the term “appropriate committees of Congress” means—
(1)
added the congressional defense committees; and
(2)
added the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives.
(e)
added Sunset— The provisions of this section shall not be in effect on and after the date that is 5 years after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Sec. 1242 Notifications of deployment of nuclear weapons by Russian Federation to territory of Ukrainian Republic

added
(a)
added Notifications—
(1)
added Regarding possible deployment— The Secretary of Defense shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees quarterly notifications on the status of the Russian Federation conducting exercises with, planning or preparing to deploy, or deploying covered weapons systems onto the territory of the Ukranian Republic.
(2)
added Upon deployment— Not later than seven days after the Secretary determines that there is reasonable grounds to believe that the Russian Federation has deployed covered weapons systems onto the territory of the Ukranian Republic, the Secretary shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a notification of such determination.
(3)
added Form— A notification required under paragraph (1) or (2) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may contain a classified annex if necessary.
(b)
added Strategy—
(1)
added Development— The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff shall develop a strategy to respond to the military threat posed by the Russian Federation deploying covered weapons systems onto the territory of the Ukranian Republic, including opportunities for allied cooperation in developing such responses based on consultation with such allies.
(2)
added Submission— Not later than June 30, 2016, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff shall submit to the congressional defense committees the following:
(A)
added The strategy developed under paragraph (1).
(B)
added The views of the Secretary of Defense with respect to the strategy developed under paragraph (1), if any.
(c)
added Definitions— In this section:
(1)
added Appropriate congressional committees— The term appropriate congressional committees means—
(A)
added the congressional defense committees; and
(B)
added the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives.
(2)
added Covered weapons systems— The term “covered weapons systems” means weapons systems that can perform both conventional and nuclear missions, nuclear weapon delivery systems, and nuclear warheads.
(d)
added Sunset— The provisions of this section shall not be in effect on and after the date that is 5 years after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Sec. 1243 Non-compliance by the Russian Federation with its obligations under the INF Treaty

added
(a)
added Findings— Congress finds the following:
(1)
added The Department of State, on July 31, 2014, released the Annual Report on the “Adherence to and Compliance With Arms Control, Nonproliferation, and Disarmament Agreements and Commitments” which included the finding that, “The United States has determined that the Russian Federation is in violation of its obligations under the INF Treaty not to possess, produce, or flight-test a ground-launched cruise missile (GLCM) with a range capability of 500 km to 5,500 km, or to possess or produce launchers of such missiles.”.
(2)
added According to the testimony of senior officials of the Department of State, the Russian Federation is not complying with numerous treaties and agreements, including the INF Treaty, the Open Skies Treaty, the Biological Weapons Convention, the Chemical Weapons Convention, the Vienna Document, the Budapest Memorandum, the Istanbul Commitments, the Presidential Nuclear Initiatives, the Missile Technology Control Regime, and the Russian Federation has recently withdrawn from the Treaty on Conventional Armed Forces in Europe (CFE).
(3)
added The Commander of U.S. European Command, and Supreme Allied Commander of Europe, General Philip Breedlove, USAF, stated that “[a] weapon capability that violates the I.N.F., that is introduced into the greater European land mass is absolutely a tool that will have to be dealt with . . . I would not judge how the alliance will choose to react, but I would say they will have to consider what to do about it, [i]t can’t go unanswered.”.
(4)
added General Breedlove has further stated that “ we need to first and foremost signal that we cannot accept this change and that, if this change is continued, that we will have to change the cost calculus for Russia in order to help them to find their way to a less bellicose position.”.
(5)
added General Martin Dempsey, Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff testified that, “I think we have to make it very clear that things like their compliance with the INF treaty that there will be political, diplomatic and potentially military costs in terms of the way we posture ourselves and the way we plan and work with our allies to address those provocations…It concerns me greatly. I certainly would counsel them not to roll back the clock.”.
(6)
added The Secretary of Defense, Ashton B. Carter, testified that, “On the military side, we have begun to consider . . . what our options are, because the INF treaty is a treaty, meaning that it’s a two-way street. We accepted constraints in return for constraints of the then Soviet Union. It is a two-way street, and we need to remind them that it’s a two-way street, meaning that we, without an INF treaty, can take action also that we both decided years ago was best for neither of us to take.”.
(7)
added The Department of Defense has been considering a range of military options to respond to the Russian Federation’s violation of the INF Treaty and these options would “aim to negate any advantage Russia might gain from deploying an INF-prohibited system, and all of these would be designed to make us more secure”, and these options “fall into three broad categories: active defenses to counter intermediate-range ground-launched cruise missiles; counterforce capabilities to prevent intermediate-range ground-launched cruise missile attacks; and countervailing strike capabilities to enhance U.S. or allied forces.”.
(8)
added President Barack Obama stated in Prague in 2009 that, “Rules must be binding. Violations must be punished. Words must mean something.”.
(b)
added Sense of the congress— It is the sense of the Congress that—
(1)
added the Russian Federation should return to compliance with the INF Treaty;
(2)
added the continuing violation of the INF Treaty by the Russian Federation threatens the viability of the INF Treaty;
(3)
added the United States has reportedly been undertaking diplomatic efforts to address with the Russia Federation its violations of the INF Treaty since 2013, and the Russian Federation has failed to respond to these efforts in any meaningful way;
(4)
added not only should the Russian Federation end its cheating with respect to the INF Treaty, but also its illegal occupation of the sovereign territory of another nation, its plans for stationing nuclear weapons on that nation’s territory, and its cheating and violation of as many as eight of its 12 arms control obligations and agreements; and
(5)
added there are several United States military requirements that would be addressed by the development and deployment of systems currently prohibited by the INF Treaty.
(c)
added Notification of Russian violations of INF Treaty—
(1)
added In general— The President shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a notification of—
(A)
added whether the Russian Federation has flight-tested, deployed, or possesses a military system that has achieved an initial operating capability of a covered missile system; and
(B)
added whether the Russian Federation has begun steps to return to full compliance with the INF Treaty, including by agreeing to inspections and verification measures necessary to achieve high confidence that any covered missile system will be eliminated, as required by the INF Treaty upon its entry into force.
(2)
added Deadline— The notification required under paragraph (1) shall be submitted not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act and not later than 30 days after the date on which the Russian Federation meets any of the requirements of subparagraphs (A) and (B) of paragraph (1).
(3)
added Form— The notification required under paragraph (1) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may contain a classified annex if necessary.
(d)
added Notification of coordination with allies regarding INF Treaty—
(1)
added In general— Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment, and every 120-day period thereafter for a period of 5 years, the Secretary of Defense and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, in coordination with the Secretary of State and the Director of National Intelligence, shall jointly submit to the appropriate congressional committees a notification on the status and content of updates provided to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) and allies of the United States in East Asia, on the Russian Federation’s flight testing, operating capability and deployment of a covered missile system, including updates on the status and a description of efforts with such allies to develop collective responses, including economic and military responses, to the Russian Federation’s arms control violations, including violations of the INF Treaty.
(2)
added Form— The notification required under paragraph (1) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may contain a classified annex if necessary.
(e)
added Military response options to Russian Federation violation of the treaty on intermediate range nuclear forces—
(1)
added Development of capabilities— If, as of the date of the enactment of this Act, the President determines that the Russian Federation has not begun steps to return to full compliance with the INF Treaty, including by agreeing to inspections and verification measures necessary to achieve high confidence that any covered missile system will be eliminated, as required by the INF Treaty upon its entry into force, the President shall begin developing the following military capabilities:
(A)
added Counterforce capabilities to prevent intermediate-range ground-launched ballistic missile and cruise missile attacks, including capabilities that may be acquired from allies.
(B)
added Countervailing strike capabilities to enhance the Armed Forces of the United States or allies of the United States, including capabilities that may be acquired from allies.
(2)
added Availability of funds for recommended capabilities— The Secretary of Defense may use funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2016 for research, development, test, and evaluation, Defense-wide, as specified in the funding table in section 4201, to carry out the development of capabilities pursuant to paragraph (1) that are recommended by the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff to meet military requirements and current capability gaps. In making such a selection, the Chairman shall give priority to such capabilities that the Chairman determines could be tested and fielded most expediently, with the most priority given to capabilities that the Chairman determines could be fielded in two years.
(3)
added Reports on development—
(A)
added In general— During each 180-day period beginning on the date on which funds are first obligated to develop capabilities under paragraph (2), the Chairman shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on such capabilities, including the costs of development (and estimated total costs of each system if pursued to deployment) and the timeline for development flight testing and deployment.
(B)
added Sunset— The provisions of subparagraph (A) shall not be in effect on and after the date on which the President certifies to the appropriate congressional committees that the INF Treaty is no longer in force or the Russian Federation has fully returned to compliance with its obligations under the INF Treaty.
(4)
added Report on deployment— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of State, shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on the following:
(A)
added Potential deployment locations of the military capabilities described in paragraph (1) in East Asia and Eastern Europe, including any potential basing agreements that may be required to facilitate such deployments.
(B)
added Any required safety and security measures, estimates of potential costs of deployments described in subparagraph (A) and an assessment of whether or not such deployments in Eastern Europe may require a decision of the North Atlantic Council.
(f)
added Definitions— In this section:
(1)
added Appropriate congressional committees— The term “appropriate congressional committees” means the following:
(A)
added The congressional defense committees.
(B)
added The Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate.
(C)
added The Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate.
(2)
added Covered missile system— The term “covered missile system” means ground-launched ballistic missiles or ground-launched cruise missiles with a flight-tested range of between 500 and 5500 kilometers.
(3)
added INF Treaty— The term “INF Treaty” means the Treaty Between the United States of America and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics on the Elimination of Their Intermediate-Range and Shorter-Range Missiles, commonly referred to as the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty, signed at Washington, December 8, 1987, and entered into force June 1, 1988.

Sec. 1244 Modification of notification and assessment of proposal to modify or introduce new aircraft or sensors for flight by the Russian Federation under Open Skies Treaty

added

added Section 1242(b)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3563) is amended—

(1)
added by striking “30 days” and inserting “90 days”; and
(2)
added by striking “and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff” and inserting “, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the commander of each relevant combatant command”.

Sec. 1245 Sense of Congress on support for Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania

added
(a)
added Findings— Congress finds the following:
(1)
added The Baltic States of Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania are highly valued allies of the United States, and they have repeatedly demonstrated their commitment to advancing our mutual interests as well as those of the NATO Alliance.
(2)
added Operation Atlantic Resolve is a series of exercises and coordinating efforts meant to demonstrate the United States’ commitment to the Baltic States of Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania, and the United States-Baltic partnership’s shared goal of peace and stability in the region. Built upon the common values of peace, stability and prosperity, Operation Atlantic Resolve strengthens communication and understanding, and is an important effort to deter Russian aggression against the Baltic States.
(3)
added As part of Operation Atlantic Resolve, the European Reassurance Initiative undertakes exercises, training, and rotational presence necessary to reassure and integrate our Baltic State allies into a common defense framework.
(4)
added All three Baltic States contributed to the NATO-led International Security Assistance Force in Afghanistan, sending disproportionate numbers of troops and operating with few caveats. They also continue to engage in the Resolute Support Mission in Afghanistan.
(b)
added Sense of Congress— Congress—
(1)
added reaffirms its support for the principle of collective defense as enshrined in Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty for our NATO allies, Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania;
(2)
added supports the sovereignty, independence, territorial integrity, and inviolability of Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania as well as their internationally recognized borders, and expresses concerns over increasingly aggressive military maneuvering by Russia near their borders and airspace;
(3)
added expresses concerns over increasingly aggressive military maneuvering by the Russian Federation near Baltic state borders and airspace, and condemns reported subversive and destabilizing activities by the Russian Federation within the Baltic states; and
(4)
added encourages the Administration to further enhance defense cooperation efforts with Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania and supports the efforts of their Governments to provide for the defense of their people and sovereign territory.

Sec. 1246 Sense of Congress on support for Georgia

added
(a)
added Findings— Congress finds the following:
(1)
added Georgia is a valued friend of the United States and has repeatedly demonstrated its commitment to advancing the mutual interests of both countries, including the deployment of Georgian forces as part of the NATO-led International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) in Afghanistan and the Multi-National Force in Iraq.
(2)
added The European Reassurance Initiative builds the partnership capacity of Georgia so it can work more closely with the United States and NATO, as well as provide for their own defense.
(3)
added In addition to the European Reassurance Initiative, Georgia’s participation in the NATO initiative Partnership for Peace is paramount to interoperability with the United States and NATO, and establishing a more peaceful environment in the region.
(4)
added Despite the heavy and painful losses suffered during the ISAF, as a NATO partner Georgia is engaged in the Resolute Support Mission in Afghanistan with the second largest contingent on the ground.
(b)
added Sense of Congress— Congress—
(1)
added reaffirms United States support for Georgia’s sovereignty and territorial integrity within its internationally-recognized borders, and does not recognize the Abkhazia and South Ossetia regions, currently occupied by Russia, as independent; and
(2)
added supports continued cooperation between the United States and Georgia and the efforts of the Government of Georgia to provide for the defense of its people and sovereign territory.

Sec. 1251 Sense of Congress recognizing the 70th anniversary of the end of Allied military engagement in the Pacific theater

added
(a)
added Findings— Congress makes the following findings
(1)
added September 2, 2015, marks the 70th anniversary of the end of Allied military engagement in the Pacific theater, also marking the end of the Second World War.
(2)
added The United States entered the Second World War in December 1941, following the Empire of Japan’s attack on Pearl Harbor, and over the next four years Americans participated in what was arguably the greatest national endeavor in the Nation’s history.
(3)
added The casualty toll of Americans in the Pacific theater during the Second World War was approximately 92,904 killed, 208,333 wounded, and tens of thousands missing in action and prisoners of war, with civilians and military forces of the Allied Powers suffering equally devastating tolls.
(4)
added American military forces displayed extraordinary courage and suffered significant casualties in battles across the Pacific theater, including in the Battle of the Philippine Sea, the Battle of Leyte Gulf, the Philippines Campaign, the Battle of Iwo Jima, and the Battle of Okinawa.
(5)
added Japanese military forces and the Japanese civilian population also suffered staggering losses.
(6)
added On August 15, 1945, Emperor Hirohito of Japan announced the unconditional surrender of Japan’s military forces, made formal on September 2, 1945, aboard the U.S.S. Missouri in Tokyo Bay, Japan, thus ending the most devastating war in human history.
(7)
added Japan is now a free and prosperous democracy; a valued ally with shared values and mutual interests based on the principles of democracy, individual liberty, and the rule of law, who serves as a cornerstone for peace and security in the region and for whom the United States seeks to further enhance security, economic, and diplomatic ties.
(8)
added The bravery and sacrifice of the members of the United States Armed Forces and the military forces of the Allied Powers who served valiantly to rescue the Pacific nations from tyranny and aggression should be always remembered.
(b)
added Sense of congress— Congress—
(1)
added recognizes the 70th anniversary of the end of Allied military engagement in the Pacific theater, and also marking the end of Second World War;
(2)
added joins with a grateful nation in expressing respect and appreciation to the members of the United States Armed Forces who served in the Pacific theater during the Second World War;
(3)
added remembers and honors those Americans who made the ultimate sacrifice and gave their lives for their country during the campaigns in the Pacific theater during the Second World War; and
(4)
added preserves and applies the lessons learned from the history of the Second World War in the Pacific theater and recognizes the close alliance between the United States and Japan, codified in the 1960 Treaty of Mutual Cooperation and Security between the United States and Japan, that continues to be enhanced to maintain peace and prosperity in the region.

Sec. 1252 Sense of Congress regarding consolidation of United States military facilities in Okinawa, Japan

added
(a)
added Findings— Congress finds the following:
(1)
added The defense alliance between the United States and Japan remains important and strong.
(2)
added Progress continues to be made in the United States and Japan to fulfill the April 27, 2012, agreement of the United States-Japan Security Consultative Committee that modified the United States-Japan Roadmap for Realignment Implementation, originally codified on May 1, 2006, including the Governor of Okinawa signing the landfill permit for Henoko construction on December 27, 2013, and the elimination of restrictions on Government of Japan contributions for the realignment of Marine Corps forces in the Asia-Pacific region by section 2821 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (division B of Public Law 113–291).
(3)
added The Government of Japan has made significant and unprecedented direct financial contributions of more than $3,000,000,000 to the Support for United States Relocation to Guam Account pursuant to section 2350k of title 10, United States Code, for the relocation of Marine Corps forces from Okinawa to Guam and the relocation of certain training from Okinawa to the Marianas region, of which nearly $1,000,000,000 has already been received from the Government of Japan, and a significant amount of these funds has already been obligated and expended to support the relocation of Marine Corps forces on Guam.
(4)
added It is important to return formerly used United States military property in Okinawa to the local government.
(5)
added Consolidation of United States facilities and the return of formerly used United States military property in Okinawa will be implemented as soon as possible, while ensuring operational capability, including training capability, throughout the consolidation process.
(6)
added Under the April 27, 2012, agreement referred to in paragraph (2), the United States is authorized to establish Marine Air-Ground Task Forces at additional locations in the Asia-Pacific region, including Guam, Hawaii, and Australia, which will enhance their readiness posture through flexibility and speed to respond to regional threats and maintain regional peace, stability, and security.
(7)
added Even though realignment of Marine Corps forces from Okinawa to Guam is “de-linked” from progress on the construction of the Futenma Replacement Facility in Henoko, there must be continued progress on Guam and Okinawa to meet the agreement.
(b)
added Sense of Congress— It is the sense of Congress that the Henoko location for the Futenma Replacement Facility—
(1)
added has been studied and analyzed for several decades, reaffirmed by both the United States and Japan on several occasions, including the 2010 Futenma Replacement Facility Bilateral Experts study and the independent assessment required by section 346 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1373); and
(2)
added remains the only option for the Futenma Replacement Facility.

Sec. 1253 Strategy to promote United States interests in the Indo-Asia-Pacific region

added
(a)
added Strategy— The President shall develop an overall strategy to promote United States interests in the Indo-Asia-Pacific region. Such strategy shall be informed by the following:
(1)
added The national security strategy of the United States for 2015 set forth in the national security strategy report required under section 108(a)(3) of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 5043(a)(3)), as such strategy relates to United States interests in the Indo-Asia-Pacific region.
(2)
added The strategy to prioritize United States defense interests in the Asia-Pacific region as contained in the report required by section 1251(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291).
(3)
added The integrated, multi-year planning and budget strategy for a rebalancing of United States policy in Asia submitted to Congress pursuant to section 7043(a) of the Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2014 (division K of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2014 (Public Law 113–76)).
(b)
added Presidential policy directive— The President shall issue a Presidential Policy Directive to relevant Federal departments and agencies that contains the strategy developed under subsection (a) and includes implementing guidance to such departments and agencies.
(c)
added Relation to agency priority goals and annual budget—
(1)
added Agency priority goals— In identifying agency priority goals under section 1120(b) of title 31, United States Code, for each relevant Federal department and agency, the head of such department or agency, or as otherwise determined by the Director of the Office of Management and Budget, shall take into consideration the strategy developed under subsection (a) and the Presidential Policy Directive issued under subsection (b).
(2)
added Annual budget— The President, acting through the Director of the Office of Management and Budget, shall ensure that the annual budget submitted to Congress under section 1105 of title 31, United States Code, includes a separate section that clearly highlights programs and projects that are being funded in the annual budget that relate to the strategy developed under subsection (a) and the Presidential Policy Directive issued under subsection (b).

Sec. 1254 Sense of Congress on the United States alliance with Japan

added

added It is the sense of Congress that—

(1)
added the United States highly values its alliance with the Government of Japan as a cornerstone of peace and security in the region, based on shared values of democracy, the rule of law, free and open markets, and respect for human rights in order to promote peace, security, stability, and economic prosperity in the Asia-Pacific region;
(2)
added the United States welcomes Japan’s decision to contribute more proactively to regional and global peace and security;
(3)
added the United States supports recent changes in Japanese defense policy, including the adoption of collective self-defense and the new bilateral Guidelines for U.S.-Japan Defense Cooperation which were approved on April 27, 2015, and will promote a more balanced and effective alliance to meet the emerging security challenges of this century;
(4)
added the United States and Japan should continue to improve joint interoperability and collaborate on developing future capabilities with which to maintain regional stability in an increasingly uncertain security environment;
(5)
added the United States and Japan should continue efforts to strengthen regional multilateral institutions that promote economic and security cooperation based on internationally accepted rules and norms;
(6)
added the United States acknowledges that the Senkaku Islands are under the administration of Japan and opposes any unilateral actions that would seek to undermine such administration and remains committed under the Treaty of Mutual Cooperation and Security to respond to any armed attack in the territories under the administration of Japan; and
(7)
added the United States reaffirms its commitment to the Government of Japan under Article V of the Treaty of Mutual Cooperation and Security that “[e]ach Party recognizes that an armed attack against either Party in the territories under the administration of Japan would be dangerous to its own peace and safety and declares that it would act to meet the common danger in accordance with its constitutional provisions and processes”.

Sec. 1261 Non-conventional assisted recovery capabilities

added
(a)
added Extension— Subsection (h) of section 943 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4579), as most recently amended by section 1261 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3579), is further amended by striking “2016” and inserting “2017”.
(b)
added Revision to annual limitation on funds— Subsection (a) of such section is amended—
(1)
added by striking “Upon” and inserting the following:

added “(1) In general—Upon”

(2)
added by striking “an amount” and all that follows through “may be” and inserting “amounts appropriated or otherwise made available for the Department of Defense for operation and maintenance may be”; and
(3)
added by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

added “(2) Annual limit—The total amount made available for support of non-conventional assisted recovery activities under this subsection in any fiscal year may not exceed $25,000,000.”

Sec. 1262 Amendment to the annual report under Arms Control and Disarmament Act

added

added Subsection (e) of section 403 of the Arms Control and Disarmament Act (22 U.S.C. 2593a) is amended to read as follows:

added “(e) Annual report

added “(1) In general—Not later than June 15 of each year described in paragraph (2), the Director of National Intelligence shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report that contains a detailed assessment, consistent with the provision of classified information and intelligence sources and methods, of the adherence of other nations to obligations undertaken in all arms control, nonproliferation, and disarmament agreements or commitments to which the United States is a party, including information of cases in which any such nation has behaved inconsistently with respect to its obligations undertaken in such agreements or commitments.

added “(2) Covered year—A year described in this paragraph is a year in which the President fails to submit the report required by subsection (a) by not later than April 15 of such year.

added “(3) Form—The report required by this subsection shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may contain a classified annex if necessary.”

Sec. 1263 Permanent authority for NATO special operations headquarters

added

added Section 1244(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2541), as most recently amended by section 1272 of the National Defense Authorization Act of Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2023), is further amended by striking “for each of fiscal years 2013, 2014, and 2015 pursuant to section 301” and inserting “for any fiscal year”.

Sec. 1264 Extension of authorization to conduct activities to enhance the capability of foreign countries to respond to incidents involving weapons of mass destruction

added

added Section 1204(h) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 897; 10 U.S.C. 401 note) is amended by striking “September 30, 2017” and inserting “September 30, 2020”.

Sec. 1265 Limitation on availability of funds for research, development, test, and evaluation, Air Force, for arms control implementation

added
(a)
added In general— Not more than 50 percent of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2016 for research, development, test, and evaluation, Air Force, for arms control implementation (PE 0305145F) may be obligated or expended until the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of State, submits to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on the following:
(1)
added A description of any meetings of the Open Skies Consultative Commission during the prior year.
(2)
added A description of any agreements entered into during such meetings of the Open Skies Consultative Commission.
(3)
added A description of any future year proposals for modifications to the aircraft or sensors of any State Party to the Open Skies Treaty that will be subject to the Open Skies Treaty.
(b)
added Definitions— In this section:
(1)
added Appropriate committees of congress— The term “appropriate committees of Congress” means—
(A)
added the congressional defense committees; and
(B)
added the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives.
(2)
added Open skies treaty— The term “Open Skies Treaty” means the Treaty on Open Skies, done at Helsinki March 24, 1992, and entered into force January 1, 2002.

Sec. 1266 Modification of authority for support of special operations to combat terrorism

added
(a)
added Authority— Subsection (a) of section 1208 of the Ronald W. Reagan National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005 (Public Law 108–375; 118 Stat. 2086), as most recently amended by section 1208(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3541), is further amended by striking “$75,000,000” and inserting “$100,000,000”.
(b)
added Annual report— Subsection (f)(1) of such section 1208, as most recently amended by section 1202(c) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2512), is further amended by striking “120 days” and inserting “30 days and not later than 180 days”.
(c)
added Effective date— The amendments made by subsections (a) and (b) take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act and apply with respect to each fiscal year that begins on or after such date of enactment.

Sec. 1267 United States-Israel anti-tunnel defense cooperation

added
(a)
added Findings and sense of congress—
(1)
added Findings— Congress finds the following:
(A)
added Tunnels have been used for centuries around the world as a means of avoiding detection or circumventing defenses.
(B)
added Tunnels can be used for criminal purposes, such as smuggling drugs, weapons, or humans, or for terrorist or military purposes, such as launching surprise attacks or detonating explosives underneath infrastructure.
(C)
added Tunnels have been a growing threat on the southern border of the United States for more than 11 years, and the Department of Homeland Security has been working to address this threat.
(D)
added The conflict in Gaza in 2014 showed that terrorists are now actively using tunnels as a means of attack, and news reports indicate that tunnels are being used in Syria as well.
(E)
added Terrorist organizations are quick to adopt successful tactics, and it is only a matter of time before other terrorist organizations begin using tunnels.
(F)
added The facilities of the United States, and those of the allies of the United States, could be under threat very quickly if tunnel threats continue to proliferate.
(G)
added Hamas, Hezbollah, and the Palestinian Islamic Jihad are United States-designated terrorist organizations.
(H)
added Designated Palestinian terrorist organizations have killed hundreds of Israelis and dozens of Americans in rocket attacks and suicide bombings.
(I)
added Hamas has used underground tunnels to Israel and Egypt to smuggle weapons, money, and supplies into Gaza and to send members of Hamas out of Gaza for training and to bring trainers in to Gaza to teach Hamas how to manufacture rockets and build better tunnels. Tunnels in Gaza have also been used as underground rocket launching sites, weapons caches, bunkers, transportation networks and command and control centers.
(J)
added In 2006, Hamas kidnapped Israeli soldier Gilad Shalit through a tunnel and held him for five years.
(K)
added The Israel Defense Forces discovered 32 tunnels during the conflict with Hamas in the summer of 2014, 14 of which crossed into Israel.
(L)
added Hamas intentionally uses civilians as human shields by placing its underground tunnel network in densely populated areas and schools, hospitals, and mosques.
(M)
added Hamas’s placement of explosive material in its vast network of tunnels in Gaza has caused civilian casualties through secondary and tertiary explosions.
(N)
added While the unemployment rate in Gaza is at 38 percent, it is estimated that Hamas spends $3,000,000 per tunnel.
(O)
added United Nations Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon said he was “shocked by the tunnels used for the infiltration of terrorists”.
(P)
added Hamas has claimed to be rebuilding tunnels in Gaza after the war with Israel in the summer of 2014.
(Q)
added Hezbollah has used underground tunnels in southern Lebanon to move Hezbollah fighters and to launch attacks.
(R)
added The Palestinian Islamic Jihad claims to be digging new tunnels on the Gaza border. Israel has a right to defend itself from the violence of Palestinian terrorist groups, including the violence that is facilitated through terrorist tunnel networks.
(S)
added The United States is working cooperatively with the Government of Israel to develop technologies to detect and neutralize tunnels penetrating the territory of Israel.
(2)
added Sense of congress— It is the sense of Congress that—
(A)
added it is in the best interests of the United States to develop technology to detect and counter tunnels, and the best way to do this is to partner with other affected countries; and
(B)
added Israel is facing serious threats posed by tunnels and should be the first partner of the United States in addressing this significant challenge.
(b)
added Assistance to Israel to establish an anti-tunneling defense system—
(1)
added In General— The President, upon request of the Government of Israel, is authorized to carry out research, development, and test activities on a joint basis with Israel to establish an anti-tunneling defense system to detect, map, and neutralize underground tunnels into and directed at the territory of Israel.
(2)
added Certification— None of the funds authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section may be obligated or expended to carry out subsection (a) until the President certifies to Congress the following:
(A)
added The President has finalized a memorandum of understanding or other formal agreement between the United States and Israel regarding sharing of research and development costs for the system described in paragraph (1).
(B)
added The understanding or agreement—
(i)
added requires sharing of costs of projects, including the cost of claims and in-kind support, between the United States and Israel on an equitable basis unless the President determines, on a case-by-case basis, the Government of Israel is unable to contribute on an equitable basis;
(ii)
added requires the designation of payment of non-recurring engineering costs in connection with the establishment of a capacity for co-production in the United States;
(iii)
added establishes a framework to negotiate the rights to any intellectual property developed under the cooperative research and development projects; and
(iv)
added requires the United States Government to receive quarterly reports on expenditure of funds by the Government of Israel, including a description of what the funds have been used for, when funds were expended, and an identification of entities that expended the funds.
(3)
added Assistance— The President, upon request of the Government of Israel, is authorized to provide assistance to Israel for the procurement, maintenance, and sustainment of an anti-tunneling system described in paragraph (1).
(c)
added Assistance to other allies to establish an anti-tunneling defense system— In addition to the memorandum of understanding or other formal agreement described in subsection (b), the President is authorized to seek to enter into a similar memorandum of understanding or other formal agreement with any other ally of the United States upon request of the government of such ally.
(d)
added Designation of lead development agency— The Secretary of Defense, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State, shall designate a military department or other element of the Department of Defense to carry out subsections (b) and (c) as the lead agency of the Federal Government for developing technology to detect and counter tunnels.
(e)
added Reporting—
(1)
added Initial Report— The President shall submit to Congress a report that contains a copy of the memorandum of understanding or other formal agreement between the United States and Israel as described in subsection (b)(2)(A) or similar agreement described in subsection (c).
(2)
added Quarterly Reports— The President shall submit to Congress a quarterly report that contains a copy of the most-recent quarterly report provided by the Government of Israel to the Department of Defense pursuant to subsection (b)(2)(B)(iv).
(3)
added Comprehensive report— Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress a report containing the following:
(A)
added Instances of tunnels being used to attack installations of the United States or allies of the United States.
(B)
added Trends or developments in tunnel attacks throughout the world.
(C)
added Key technologies used and challenges faced by potential adversaries of the United States with respect to using tunnels.
(D)
added The capabilities of the Department of Defense for defending fixed or forward locations from tunnel attacks.
(E)
added Partnerships entered into with allies of the United States under this section, and potential opportunities for increased partnerships with other allies with respect to researching tunnel detection technologies and the opportunities for co-development or co-production.
(F)
added The plans, including with respect to funding, of the Secretary for countering threats posed by tunnels.

Sec. 1268 Efforts of the Department of Defense to prevent and respond to gender-based violence globally

added
(a)
added Findings and statement of policy—
(1)
added Findings— Congress finds the following:
(A)
added Gender-based violence reaches every corner of the world, affecting millions of people ever year and one in three women in her lifetime. This epidemic not only undermines the safety, dignity, and human rights of the individual, family and community, it affects public health, economic stability, and security of nations, which in turn has a direct impact upon United States foreign policy, defense interests, democracy, governance, and peace-building efforts.
(B)
added With one of the largest international footprints in the United States government, the Department of Defense is an integral part of combating the epidemic of gender-based violence, especially in conflict regions.
(C)
added Section 7061 of the Joint Explanatory Statement of the Committee of Conference accompanying the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2012 directed the Secretary of State and the Administrator of the United States Agency for International Development to develop and submit to Congress a multi-year strategy to prevent and respond to gender-based violence.
(D)
added Executive Order 13623 of August 10, 2012 (77 Fed. Reg. 49345) established the United States Strategy to Prevent and Respond to Gender-Based Violence Globally, which required the Department of Defense to participate in an Interagency Working Group co-chaired by the Department of State and the United States Agency for International Development to implement the Strategy.
(E)
added The Joint Explanatory Statement of the Committee of Conference accompanying the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (H.R. 3979, Public Law 113–291), encouraged the Department of Defense to support the continued implementation of the United States Strategy to Prevent and Respond to Gender-Based Violence Globally and to participate in the Interagency Working Group.
(F)
added Executive Order 13623 requires within 3 years of August 12, 2012, that the Interagency Working Group shall complete a final evaluation of the Strategy and within 180 days of completing its final evaluation, the Interagency Working Group shall update or revise the Strategy to take into account the information learned and the progress made during and through the implementation of the Strategy.
(2)
added Statement of policy— It is in the national security interest of the United States to—
(A)
added prevent gender-based violence which will promote regional and global stability and advance sustainable peace and security;
(B)
added have a multi-year strategy in place that will effectively prevent and respond to gender-based violence globally; and
(C)
added ensure that existing laws and regulations relating to the Department of Defense are fully implemented to prevent gender-based violence globally.
(b)
added Requirement to continue implementation of a United States global strategy on gender-based violence prevention and response— The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that the Department of Defense—
(1)
added continues to implement the United States Strategy to Prevent and Respond to Gender-Based Violence Globally, as appropriate; and
(2)
added pursuant to the intent laid out in Executive Order 13623, continues to participate in any Interagency Working Group described in subsection (a)(1)(D) or in interagency collaborative efforts to develop or update a United States Strategy to Prevent and Respond to Gender-Based Violence Globally, as appropriate
(c)
added Department of Defense gender-based training— The Secretary of Defense is authorized to—
(1)
added provide training for the United States Armed Forces, Department of Defense personnel, and contractors and military observers on preventing and responding to violence against women and girls globally in conflict, post-conflict, and humanitarian relief settings; and
(2)
added utilize the Department of Defense’s operational capabilities to train professional foreign military, police forces, and judicial officials on preventing and responding to violence against women and girls globally.
(d)
added Report—
(1)
added In general— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the specified congressional committees a report on efforts to prevent and respond to gender-based violence globally made under a United States strategy.
(2)
added Content— The report required under paragraph (1) shall—
(A)
added describe the efforts of the Department of Defense in the Interagency Working Group described in subsection (a)(1)(D) to implement the international gender-based violence prevention and response strategy, funding allocations, programming, and associated outcomes; and
(B)
added provide an assessment of human and financial resources necessary to fulfill the purposes and duties of such strategy.
(3)
added Public availability— The report required under paragraph (1) shall be made publicly accessible in a timely manner.
(4)
added Definition— In this subsection, the term “specified congressional committees” means—
(A)
added the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate; and
(B)
added the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives.

Sec. 1301 Specification of Cooperative Threat Reduction funds

added
(a)
added Fiscal year 2016 cooperative threat reduction funds defined— In this title, the term fiscal year 2016 Cooperative Threat Reduction funds means the funds appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 301 and made available by the funding table in section 4301 for the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program established under section 1321 of the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Act (50 U.S.C. 3711).
(b)
added Availability of funds— Funds appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 301 and made available by the funding table in section 4301 for the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program shall be available for obligation for fiscal years 2016, 2017, and 2018.

Sec. 1302 Funding allocations

added

added Of the $358,496,000 authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2016 in section 301 and made available by the funding table in section 4301 for the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program established under section 1321 of the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Act (50 U.S.C. 3711), the following amounts may be obligated for the purposes specified:

(1)
added For strategic offensive arms elimination, $1,289,000.
(2)
added For chemical weapons destruction, $942,000.
(3)
added For global nuclear security, $20,555,000.
(4)
added For cooperative biological engagement, $264,618,000.
(5)
added For proliferation prevention, $38,945,000.
(6)
added For threat reduction engagement, $2,827,000.
(7)
added For activities designated as Other Assessments/Administrative Costs, $29,320,000.

Sec. 1401 Working capital funds

changed Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2016 for the use of the Armed Forces and other activities and agencies of the Department of Defense for providing capital for working capital and revolving funds funds, as specified in the amount of $1,786,732,000.funding table in section 4501.

Sec. 1402 National Defense Sealift Fund

changed Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2016 for the Joint Urgent Operational Needs Fund National Defense Sealift Fund, as specified in the amount of $99,701,000.funding table in section 4501.

Sec. 1403 Chemical Agents and Munitions Destruction, Defense

(a)
changed Authorization of appropriations— Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2016 for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for Chemical Agents and Munitions Destruction, Defense, as specified in the amount of $720,721,000, of which—funding table in section 4501.
(1)
removed $139,098,000 is for Operation and Maintenance;
(2)
removed $579,342,000 is for Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation; and
(3)
removed $2,281,000 is for Procurement.
(b)
Use— Amounts authorized to be appropriated under subsection (a) are authorized for—
(1)
the destruction of lethal chemical agents and munitions in accordance with section 1412 of the Department of Defense Authorization Act, 1986 (50 U.S.C. 1521); and
(2)
the destruction of chemical warfare materiel of the United States that is not covered by section 1412 of such Act.

Sec. 1404 Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense-wide

changed Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2016 for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense-wide, as specified in the amount of $850,598,000.funding table in section 4501.

Sec. 1405 Defense Inspector General

changed Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2016 for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for the Office of the Inspector General of the Department of Defense, as specified in the amount of $316,159,000, of which—funding table in section 4501.

(1)
removed $310,459,000 is for Operation and Maintenance;
(2)
removed $4,700,000 is for Research, Development, Test and Evaluation; and
(3)
removed $1,000,000 is for Procurement.

Sec. 1406 Defense Health Program

changed Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2016 for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for the Defense Health Program, as specified in the amount funding table in section 4501, for use of $32,243,328,000, the Armed Forces and other activities and agencies of which—the Department of Defense in providing for the health of eligible beneficiaries.

(1)
removed $30,889,940,000 is for Operation and Maintenance;
(2)
removed $980,101,000 is for Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation; and
(3)
removed $373,287,000 is for Procurement.

Sec. 1407 National Sea-Based Deterrence Fund

added

added Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2016 for the National Sea-Based Deterrence Fund, as specified in the funding table in section 4501.

Sec. 1411 Extension of date for completion of destruction of existing stockpile of lethal chemical agents and munitions

added Section 1412(b)(3) of the Department of Defense Authorization Act, 1986 (Public Law 99–145; 50 U.S.C. 1521) is amended by striking “December 31, 2017” and inserting “December 31, 2023”.

(a)
removed Authority for transfer of funds— Of the funds authorized to be appropriated for section 506 and available for the Defense Health Program for operation and maintenance, $120,387,000 may be transferred by the Secretary of Defense to the Joint Department of Defense–Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Facility Demonstration Fund established by subsection (a)(1) of section 1704 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2571). For purposes of subsection (a)(2) of such section 1704, any funds so transferred shall be treated as amounts authorized and appropriated specifically for the purpose of such a transfer.
(b)
removed Use of transferred funds— For the purposes of subsection (b) of such section 1704, facility operations for which funds transferred under subsection (a) may be used are operations of the Captain James A. Lovell Federal Health Care Center, consisting of the North Chicago Veterans Affairs Medical Center, the Navy Ambulatory Care Center, and supporting facilities designated as a combined Federal medical facility under an operational agreement covered by section 706 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4500).

Sec. 1412 Authorization of appropriations for Armed Forces Retirement Home

removed

removed There is hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2016 from the Armed Forces Retirement Home Trust Fund the sum of $64,300,000 for the operation of the Armed Forces Retirement Home.

Sec. 1421 Limitation on furlough of Department of Defense employees paid through working-capital funds

added

added Section 2208 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

added “(s) Furlough of employees

added “(1) Except as provided under paragraph (2), the Secretary of Defense or the Secretary of a military department may not furlough any employee of the Department of Defense whose salary is funded by a working-capital fund unless the Secretary determines that—

added “(A) the working-capital fund is insolvent; or

added “(B) there are insufficient funds in the working-capital fund to pay the labor costs of the employee.

added “(2) The Secretary of Defense or the Secretary of a military department may waive the restriction under paragraph (1) if the Secretary determines such a waiver is in the interest of the national security of the United States.

added “(3) In this subsection, the term “furlough” means the placement, for nondisciplinary reasons, of an employee in a temporary status in which the employee has no duties and is not paid, but does not include administrative leave or an excused absence.”

Sec. 1422 Working-capital fund reserve account for petroleum market price fluctuations

added

added Section 2208 of title 10, United States Code, as amended by section 1421, is further amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

added “(t) Market fluctuation account

added “(1) From amounts available for Working Capital Fund, Defense, the Secretary shall reserve up to $1,000,000,000, to remain available without fiscal year limitation, for petroleum market price fluctuations. Such amounts may only be disbursed if the Secretary determines such a disbursement is necessary to absorb volatile market changes in fuel prices without affecting the standard price charged for fuel.

added “(2) A budget request for the anticipated costs of fuel may not take into account the availability of funds reserved under paragraph (1).”

Sec. 1431 Authority for transfer of funds to Joint Department of Defense-Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Facility Demonstration Fund for Captain James A. Lovell Health Care Center, Illinois

added
(a)
added Authority for transfer of funds— Of the funds authorized to be appropriated for section 1406 and available for the Defense Health Program for operation and maintenance, $120,387,000 may be transferred by the Secretary of Defense to the Joint Department of Defense–Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Facility Demonstration Fund established by subsection (a)(1) of section 1704 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2571). For purposes of subsection (a)(2) of such section 1704, any funds so transferred shall be treated as amounts authorized and appropriated specifically for the purpose of such a transfer.
(b)
added Use of transferred funds— For the purposes of subsection (b) of such section 1704, facility operations for which funds transferred under subsection (a) may be used are operations of the Captain James A. Lovell Federal Health Care Center, consisting of the North Chicago Veterans Affairs Medical Center, the Navy Ambulatory Care Center, and supporting facilities designated as a combined Federal medical facility under an operational agreement covered by section 706 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4500).

Sec. 1432 Authorization of appropriations for Armed Forces Retirement Home

added

added There is hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2016 from the Armed Forces Retirement Home Trust Fund the sum of $64,300,000 for the operation of the Armed Forces Retirement Home.

Sec. 1501 Purpose

(a)
added In general— The purpose of this subtitle is to authorize appropriations for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2016 to provide additional funds—
(1)
added for overseas contingency operations being carried out by the Armed Forces; and
(2)
added pursuant to section 1504, for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for operation and maintenance, as specified in the funding table in section 4303.
(b)
added Support of base budget requirements; treatment— Funds identified in subsection (a)(2) are being authorized to be appropriated in support of base budget requirements as requested by the President for fiscal year 2016 pursuant to section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code. The Director of the Office of Management and Budget shall apportion the funds identified in such subsection to the Department of Defense without restriction, limitation, or constraint on the execution of such funds in support of base requirements, including any restriction, limitation, or constraint imposed by, or described in, the document entitled “Criteria for War/Overseas Contingency Operations Funding Requests” transmitted by the Director to the Department of Defense on September 9, 2010, or any successor or related guidance.

removed The purpose of this title is to authorize appropriations for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2016 to provide additional funds for overseas contingency operations being carried out by the Armed Forces.

Sec. 1502 Procurement

changed Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2016 for procurement accounts for the Army in amounts Army, the Navy and the Marine Corps, the Air Force, and Defense-wide activities, as follows:specified in the funding table in section 4102.

(1)
removed For aircraft procurement, $164,987,000.
(2)
removed For missile procurement, $37,260,000.
(3)
removed For weapons and tracked combat vehicles, $26,030,000.
(4)
removed For ammunition procurement, $192,040,000.
(5)
removed For other procurement, $1,205,596,000.

Sec. 1503 Research, development, test, and evaluation

changed Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2016 for the Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Fund in use of the amount Department of $493,271,000.Defense for research, development, test, and evaluation, as specified in the funding table in section 4202.

Sec. 1504 Operation and maintenance

changed Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2016 for procurement for the Navy use of the Armed Forces and Marine Corps in amounts other activities and agencies of the Department of Defense for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for operation and maintenance, as follows:specified in—

(1)
changed For aircraft procurement, Navy, $217,394,000.the funding table in section 4302, or
(2)
changed For weapons procurement, Navy, $3,344,000.the funding table in section 4303.
(3)
removed For ammunition procurement, Navy and Marine Corps, $136,930,000.
(4)
removed For other procurement, Navy, $12,186,000.
(5)
removed For procurement, Marine Corps, $48,934,000.

Sec. 1505 Military personnel

changed Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2016 for procurement the use of the Armed Forces and other activities and agencies of the Department of Defense for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for military personnel, as specified in the Air Force funding table in amounts as follows:section 4402.

(1)
removed For aircraft procurement, $128,900,000.
(2)
removed For missile procurement, $289,142,000.
(3)
removed For ammunition procurement, $228,874,000.
(4)
removed For other procurement, $3,859,964,000.

Sec. 1506 Working capital funds

changed Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2016 for the procurement account for Defense-wide use of the Armed Forces and other activities in and agencies of the amount Department of $212,418,000.Defense for providing capital for working capital and revolving funds, as specified in the funding table in section 4502.

Sec. 1507 Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense-wide

changed Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2016 for the use of the Department of Defense for research, development, test, fiscal year 2016 for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for Drug Interdiction and evaluation Counter-Drug Activities, Defense-wide, as follows:specified in the funding table in section 4502.

(1)
removed For the Army, $1,500,000.
(2)
removed For the Navy, $35,747,000.
(3)
removed For the Air Force, $17,100,000.
(4)
removed For Defense-wide activities, $137,087,000.

Sec. 1508 Defense Inspector General

changed Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2016 for the use of the Armed Forces for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for operation and maintenance, in amounts the Office of the Inspector General of the Department of Defense, as follows:specified in the funding table in section 4502.

(1)
removed For the Army, $11,382,750,000.
(2)
removed For the Navy, $5,131,588,000.
(3)
removed For the Marine Corps, $952,534,000.
(4)
removed For the Air Force, $9,090,013,000.
(5)
removed For Defense-wide activities, $5,805,633,000.
(6)
removed For the Army Reserve, $24,559,000.
(7)
removed For the Navy Reserve, $31,643,000.
(8)
removed For the Marine Corps Reserve, $3,455,000.
(9)
removed For the Air Force Reserve, $58,106,000.
(10)
removed For the Army National Guard, $60,845,000.
(11)
removed For the Air National Guard, $19,900,000.
(12)
removed For the Afghanistan Security Forces Fund, $3,762,257,000.
(13)
removed For the Counterterrorism Partnerships Fund, $2,100,000,000.
(14)
removed For the Iraq Train and Equip Fund, $715,000,000.
(15)
removed For the Syria Train and Equip Fund, $600,000,000.

Sec. 1509 Defense Health program

changed Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2016 to the Department of Defense for military personnel accounts fiscal year 2016 for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for the Defense Health Program, as specified in the total amount of $3,204,758,000.funding table in section 4502.

Sec. 1510 Working capital funds

removed

removed Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2016 for the use of the Armed Forces and other activities and agencies of the Department of Defense for providing capital for Defense Working Capital Funds in the amount of $88,850,000.

Sec. 1511 Defense health program

removed

removed Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2016 for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for the Defense Health Program in the amount of $272,704,000 for operation and maintenance.

Sec. 1512 Drug interdiction and counter-drug activities, Defense-wide

removed

removed Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2016 for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense-wide in the amount of $186,000,000.

Sec. 1513 Defense Inspector General

removed

removed Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2016 for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for the Office of the Inspector General of the Department of Defense in the amount of $10,262,000.

Sec. 1521 Treatment as additional authorizations

added

added The amounts authorized to be appropriated by this title are in addition to amounts otherwise authorized to be appropriated by this Act.

Sec. 1522 Special transfer authority

added
(a)
added Authority to transfer authorizations—
(1)
added Authority— Upon determination by the Secretary of Defense that such action is necessary in the national interest, the Secretary may transfer amounts of authorizations made available to the Department of Defense in this title for fiscal year 2016 between any such authorizations for that fiscal year (or any subdivisions thereof).
(2)
added Effect of transfer— Amounts of authorizations transferred under this subsection shall be merged with and be available for the same purposes as the authorization to which transferred.
(3)
added Limitations— The total amount of authorizations that the Secretary may transfer under the authority of this subsection may not exceed $3,500,000,000.
(4)
added Exception— In the case of the authorization of appropriations contained in section 1504 that is provided for the purpose specified in section 1501(2), the transfer authority provided under section 1001, rather than the transfer authority provided by this subsection, shall apply to any transfer of amounts of such authorization.
(b)
added Terms and Conditions— Transfers under this section shall be subject to the same terms and conditions as transfers under section 1001.
(c)
added Additional Authority— The transfer authority provided by this section is in addition to the transfer authority provided under section 1001.

Sec. 1531 Statement of policy regarding European Reassurance Initiative

added
(a)
added Findings— Congress makes the following findings:
(1)
added In February 2015, Lieutenant General James Clapper (retired), Director of National Intelligence, testified to the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate that “Russian dominance over the former Soviet space is Russia’s highest foreign policy goal”.
(2)
added Russia, under the direction of President Vladimir Putin, has demonstrated its intent to expand its sphere of influence beyond its borders and limit Western influence in the region.
(3)
added The Russian military is aggressively postured on the Ukrainian boarder and continues its buildup of military personnel and material. These aggressive and unwarranted actions serve to intimidate, with a show of force, the Ukrainian people as well as the other nations in the region including Georgia, the Baltic States, and the Balkan States.
(4)
added In December 2014, Congress enacted the Ukraine Freedom Support Act of 2014 (Public Law 113–272), which gives the President the authority to expand assistance to Ukraine, increase economic sanctions on Russia, and provide equipment to counter offensive weapons.
(5)
added In February 2015, the Atlantic Council, the Brookings Institute, and the Chicago Council on Global Affairs published a report entitled “Preserving Ukraine’s Independence, Resisting Russian Aggression: What the United States and NATO Must Do” advocating for increased United States assistance to Ukraine with nonlethal and lethal defensive equipment.
(6)
added Despite Russia signing the February 2015 Minsk Agreement, it has continued to violate the terms of the agreement, as noted by Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs, Victoria Nuland, at the German Marshall Fund Brussels Forum in March 2015: “We’ve seen month on month, more lethal weaponry of a higher caliber...poured into Ukraine by the separatist Russian allies...the number one thing is for Russia to stop sending arms over the border so we can have real politics.”.
(7)
added The military of the Russian Federation continues to increase their show of force globally, including frequent international military flights, frequent snap exercises of thousands of Russian troops, increased global naval presence, and the threat of the use of nuclear weapons in defense of the annexation of Crimea in March 2014.
(8)
added The Government of the Russian Federation continues to exert and increase undue influence on the free will of sovereign nations and people with intimidation tactics, covert operations, cyber warfare, and other unconventional methods.
(9)
added In testimony to the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives in February 2015, Commander of European Command, General Philip Breedlove, United States Air Force, stated that “Russia has employed “hybrid warfare”...to illegally seize Crimea, foment separatist fever in several sovereign nations, and maintain frozen conflicts within its so-called “sphere of influence” or “near abroad””.
(10)
added The use of unconventional methods of warfare by Russia presents challenges to the United States and its partners and allies in addressing the threat.
(11)
added An enhanced United States military presence and readiness posture and the provision of security assistance in Europe are key elements to deterring further Russian aggression and reassuring United States allies and partners.
(12)
added In the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291), Congress authorized and appropriated $1 billion for the European Reassurance Initiative, which supports Operation Atlantic Resolve of the United States Armed Forces.
(13)
added The European Reassurance Initiative expands United States military presence in Europe, through—
(A)
added bolstered and continual United States military presence;
(B)
added bilateral and multilateral exercises with partners and allies;
(C)
added improved infrastructure;
(D)
added increased prepositioning of United States equipment throughout Europe; and
(E)
added building partnership capacity for allies and partners.
(14)
added The European Reassurance Initiative has served as a valuable tool in strengthening the partnerships with the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) as well as partnerships with non-member allies in the region.
(15)
added As a result of the NATO 2014 Summit in Wales, NATO has initiated a Readiness Action Plan to increase partner nation funding and resourcing to combat Russian aggression. NATO’s efforts with the Readiness Action Plan and United States investment in regional security through the European Reassurance Initiative will serve to continue and reinforce the strength and fortitude of the alliance against nefarious actors.
(16)
added The President’s Budget Request for fiscal year 2016 includes $789.3 million to continue the European Reassurance Initiative focus on increased United States military troop rotations in support of Operation Atlantic Resolve, maintaining and further expanding increasing regional exercises, and building partnership capacity.
(b)
added Statement of policy— It is the policy of the United States to continue and expand its efforts in Europe to reassure United States allies and partners and deter further aggression and intimidation by the Russian Government, in order to enhance security and stability in the region. This policy shall include—
(1)
added continued use of conventional methods, including increased United States military presence in Europe, exercises and training with allies and partners, increasing infrastructure, prepositioning of United States military equipment in Europe, and building partnership capacity;
(2)
added increased emphasis on countering unconventional warfare methods in areas such as cyber warfare, economic warfare, information operations, and intelligence operations, including increased efforts in the development of strategy, operational concepts, capabilities, and technologies; and
(3)
added increased security assistance to allies and partners in Europe, including the provision of both non-lethal equipment and lethal equipment of a defensive nature to Ukraine.

Sec. 1532 Assistance and sustainment to the military and national security forces of Ukraine

added
(a)
added Authority to provide assistance— The Secretary of Defense is authorized, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State, to provide assistance, including training, equipment, lethal weapons of a defensive nature, logistics support, supplies and services, and sustainment to the military and national security forces of Ukraine, through September 30, 2016, to assist the government of Ukraine for the following purposes:
(1)
added Securing its sovereign territory against foreign aggressors.
(2)
added Protecting and defending the Ukrainian people from attacks posed by Russian-backed separatists.
(3)
added Promoting the conditions for a negotiated settlement to end the conflict.
(b)
added Notice before provision of assistance— Of the funds authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section, not more than 10 percent of such funds may be obligated or expended until not later than 15 days after the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of State, submits to the appropriate congressional committees a report in unclassified form with a classified annex as appropriate that contains a description of the plan for providing such assistance, including a description of the types of training and equipment to be provided, the estimated number and role of United States Armed Forces personnel involved, the potential or actual locations of any training, and any other relevant details.
(c)
added Quarterly reports— Not later than 105 days after the date on which the Secretary of Defense submits the report required in subsection (b), and every 90 days thereafter, the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of State, shall provide to the appropriate congressional committees a report on the activities carried out under this section. Such report shall include a description of the following:
(1)
added Updates or changes to the plan required under subsection (b).
(2)
added A description of the forces provided with training, equipment, or other assistance under this section during the preceding 90-day period.
(3)
added A description of the equipment provided under this section during the preceding 90-day period, including a detailed breakout of any lethal assistance provided.
(4)
added A statement of the amount of funds expended during the preceding 90-day period.
(d)
added Vetting— The Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of State, shall ensure that all assistance provided under this section is carried out in full accordance with the provisions of section 2249e of title 10, United States Code.
(e)
added Definition— In this section, the term appropriate congressional committees means—
(1)
added the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives; and
(2)
added the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Foreign Relations, and the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate.
(f)
added Funding— Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2016 by this title for overseas contingency operations, $200,000,000 shall be available to carry out this section.
(g)
added Authority To accept contributions— The Secretary of Defense may accept and retain contributions, including in-kind contributions, from foreign governments, to provide assistance authorized under subsection (a). Any funds so accepted by the Secretary may be credited to the account from which funds are made available to provide assistance authorized under subsection (a) and may remain available to provide assistance authorized under subsection (a) until September 30, 2016.
(h)
added Rule of construction— Nothing in this section shall be construed to constitute a specific statutory authorization for the introduction of United States Armed Forces into hostilities or into situations in which hostilities are clearly indicated by the circumstances.
(i)
added Relationship to existing authorities— Assistance provided under the authority of subsection (a) shall be subject to the non-transfer and end-use provisions of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2751 et seq.) and the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2151 et seq.).

Sec. 1541 Continuation of existing limitation on use of Afghanistan Security Forces Fund

added
(a)
added In general— Funds available to the Department of Defense for the Afghanistan Security Forces Fund for fiscal year 2016 shall be subject to the conditions contained in subsections (b) through (g) of section 1513 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 428), as amended by section 1531(b) of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4424).
(b)
added Promotion of Recruitment and Retention of Women—
(1)
added In general— Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated in this Act for fiscal year 2016 for the Afghanistan Security Forces Fund, there are authorized to be appropriated $50,000,000 to be used for the recruitment and retention of women in the Afghanistan National Security Forces, including modification of facilities of the Ministry of the Interior and Ministry of Defense to accommodate female service members and police.
(2)
added Rule of construction— Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to modify the distribution of funds for programs and activities supported using the Afghanistan Security Forces Fund, but rather shall ensure attention to recruitment and retention of women within each program and activity.
(c)
added Inventory and plan required—
(1)
added Inventory— Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State, shall submit to the specified congressional committees an inventory of the facilities and services of the Afghan Ministry of Defense and the Ministry of the Interior that are lacking in adequate resources for Afghan female service members and police, including resources relating to training, improvement to buildings, transportation, security equipment, and new construction.
(2)
added Plan— Not later than 60 days after the submission of the inventory required under paragraph (1), the Secretary of Defense, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State, shall submit to the specified committees a plan to address the shortcomings of those facilities and services that the Secretaries consider to be most significant. In developing the plan, the Secretaries shall, to the extent possible, utilize amounts authorized to be appropriated under subsection (b) to promote the recruitment and retention of Afghan female service members and police. The Secretaries shall also identify any additional funding shortcomings that would be required to fully address the identified shortcomings of those facilities and services.
(3)
added Updates— The Secretary of Defense, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State, shall submit to the specified congressional committees updates to the inventory required under paragraph (1) and plan required under paragraph (2) at the same time the President submits the budget under section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, for each fiscal year each year through fiscal year 2020.
(4)
added Definition— In this subsection, the term “specified congressional committees” means—
(A)
added the congressional defense committees; and
(B)
added the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives.

Sec. 1542 Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Fund

added
(a)
added Use and transfer of funds— Subsections (b) and (c) of section 1514 of the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109–364; 120 Stat. 2439), as in effect before the amendments made by section 1503 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4649), but as modified by section 1533(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3615), shall apply to the funds made available for fiscal year 2016—
(1)
added to the Department of Defense for the Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Fund; or
(2)
added to the Director of the successor defense agency to the Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Organization.
(b)
added Extension of interdiction of improvised explosive device precursor chemicals authority— Section 1532(c)(4) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2057), as most recently amended by section 1533(c) of the National Defense Authorization Act For Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3616), is amended by striking “December 31, 2015” and inserting “December 31, 2016”.
(c)
added Repeal of Timeline Requirement for Consolidation of funding sources for Rapid Acquisition Organizations— Paragraph (3) of section 1533(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act For Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3615) is amended to read as follows:

added “(3) Plan implementation—The plan required by this subsection shall include a timeline for implementation of the consolidation and alignment decisions contained in the plan.”

(d)
added Repeal of prohibition on use of funds— Subsection (d) of section 1533 of the National Defense Authorization Act For Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3616) is repealed.
(e)
added Technical correction— Section 1533(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act For Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3615) is amended by striking “as amended by subsection (b)” and inserting “as modified by subsection (b)”.

Sec. 1601 Major force program and budget for national security space programs

added
(a)
added Findings— Congress finds the following:
(1)
added National security space capabilities are a key element of the national defense of the United States.
(2)
added Because of increasing foreign threats, the national security space advantage of the United States is facing the most challenging environment it has ever faced.
(3)
added To modernize and fully address the growing threat to the national security space advantage of the United States, further action is necessary to strengthen national security space leadership, management, and organization.
(4)
added Congress and independent expert commissions have previously stated the importance of establishing a major force program for space with separate authorities, as one of the elements to strengthen national security space.
(b)
added Budget matters—
(1)
added In general— Chapter 9 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

added “239. National security space programs: major force program and budget assessment

added “(a) Establishment of major force program—The Secretary of Defense shall establish a unified major force program for national security space programs pursuant to section 222(b) of this title to prioritize national security space activities in accordance with the requirements of the Department of Defense and national security.

added “(b) Budget assessment

added “(1) The Secretary shall include with the defense budget materials for each of fiscal years 2017 through 2020 a report on the budget for national security space programs of the Department of Defense.

added “(2) Each report on the budget for national security space programs of the Department of Defense under paragraph (1) shall include the following:

added “(A) An overview of the budget, including—

added “(i) a comparison between that budget, the previous budget, the most recent and prior future-years defense program submitted to Congress under section 221 of this title, and the amounts appropriated for such programs during the previous fiscal year; and

added “(ii) the specific identification, as a budgetary line item, for the funding under such programs.

added “(B) An assessment of the budget, including significant changes, priorities, challenges, and risks.

added “(C) Any additional matters the Secretary determines appropriate.

added “(3) Each report under paragraph (1) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.

added “(c) Definitions—In this section:

added “(1) The term “budget”, with respect to a fiscal year, means the budget for that fiscal year that is submitted to Congress by the President under section 1105(a) of title 31.

added “(2) The term “defense budget materials”, with respect to a fiscal year, means the materials submitted to Congress by the Secretary of Defense in support of the budget for that fiscal year.”

(2)
added Plan— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a plan to carry out the unified major force program designation required by section 239(a) of title 10, United States Code, as added by paragraph (1), including any recommendations for legislative action the Secretary determines appropriate.
(3)
added Clerical amendment— The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter 9 is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 238 the following new item:

Sec. 1602 Modification to development of space science and technology strategy

added

added Section 2272 of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:

added “2272. Space science and technology strategy: coordination

added “The Secretary of Defense and the Director of National Intelligence shall jointly develop and implement a space science and technology strategy and shall review and, as appropriate, revise the strategy biennially. Functions of the Secretary under this section shall be carried out jointly by the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering and the official of the Department of Defense designated as the Department of Defense Executive Agent for Space.”

Sec. 1603 Rocket propulsion system development program

added
(a)
added Streamlined acquisition— Section 1604 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291) is amended—
(1)
added by redesignating subsection (c) as subsection (d); and
(2)
added by inserting after subsection (b) the following new subsection:

added “(c) Streamlined acquisition—In developing the rocket propulsion system required under subsection (a), the Secretary shall—

added “(1) use a streamlined acquisition approach, including tailored documentation and review processes, that enables the effective, efficient, and expedient transition from the use of non-allied space launch engines to a domestic alternative for national security space launches; and

added “(2) prior to establishing such acquisition approach, establish well-defined requirements with a clear acquisition strategy.”

(b)
added Availability of funds— Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2016 for the rocket propulsion system required by section 1604 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291), the Secretary of Defense may obligate or expend such funds only for the development of such system, and the necessary interfaces to the launch vehicle, to replace non-allied space launch engines by 2019 as required by such section.
(c)
added Briefing— Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall provide to the Committees on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the Senate (and make available to any other congressional defense committee) a briefing on the streamlined acquisition approach, requirements, and acquisition strategy required under subsection (c) of section 1604 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291), as inserted by subsection (a).

Sec. 1604 Modification to prohibition on contracting with Russian suppliers of rocket engines for the evolved expendable launch vehicle program

added

added Section 1608 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3626; 10 U.S.C. 2271 note) is amended to read as follows:

added “1608. Prohibition on contracting with Russian suppliers of rocket engines for the evolved expendable launch vehicle program

added “(a) Prohibitions

added “(1) Award or renewal of contract—Except as provided by subsections (b) and (c), beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense may not award or renew a contract for the procurement of property or services for space launch activities under the evolved expendable launch vehicle program if such contract carries out such space launch activities using rocket engines designed or manufactured in the Russian Federation.

added “(2) Modification of certain contract—Except as provided by subsection (b), beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary may not modify the contract specified in subsection (c)(1)(A) if such modification increases the number of cores procured under such contract to a total of more than 35.

added “(b) Waiver—The Secretary may waive one or both of the prohibitions under paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection (a) with respect to a contract for the procurement of property or services for space launch activities if the Secretary determines, and certifies to the congressional defense committees not later than 30 days before the waiver takes effect, that—

added “(1) the waiver is necessary for the national security interests of the United States; and

added “(2) the space launch services and capabilities covered by the contract could not be obtained at a fair and reasonable price without the use of rocket engines designed or manufactured in the Russian Federation.

added “(c) Exception

added “(1) In general—The prohibition in subsection (a)(1) shall not apply to either—

added “(A) the placement of orders or the exercise of options under the contract numbered FA8811–13–C–0003 and awarded on December 18, 2013; or

added “(B) subject to paragraph (2), a contract awarded for the procurement of property or services for space launch activities that includes the use of rocket engines designed or manufactured in the Russian Federation if, prior to February 1, 2014, the contractor had fully paid for such rocket engines or had entered into a contract to procure such rocket engines.

added “(2) Certification—The Secretary may not award or renew a contract for the procurement of property or services for space launch activities described in paragraph (1)(B) unless the Secretary, upon the advice of the General Counsel of the Department of Defense, certifies to the congressional defense committees that the offeror has provided to the Secretary sufficient documentation to conclusively demonstrate that the offeror meets the requirements of such paragraph.”

Sec. 1605 Delegation of authority regarding purchase of Global Positioning System user equipment

added

added Section 913 of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (10 U.S.C. 2281 note) is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

added “(d) Limitation on delegation of waiver authority—The Secretary of Defense may not delegate the authority to make a waiver under subsection (c) to an official below the level of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics.”

Sec. 1606 Acquisition strategy for evolved expendable launch vehicle program

added
(a)
added Sense of Congress— It is the sense of Congress that—
(1)
added the Secretary of the Air Force needs to develop an updated phased acquisition strategy and contracting plan for the evolved expendable launch vehicle program;
(2)
added beyond the contractual requirements as of the date of the enactment of this Act, in recognition of the emerging competitive environment, the acquisition strategy and contracting plan should eliminate the currently structured evolved expendable launch vehicle launch capability arrangement;
(3)
added in further recognition of the emerging competitive environment, the Secretary should acquire launch services in a manner consistent with a full and open competition;
(4)
added the Secretary should be consistent and fair with evolved expendable launch vehicle providers regarding the requirement for certified cost and pricing data, selection of contract types, and the appropriate audits to protect the taxpayer; and
(5)
added the Secretary should—
(A)
added consider various contracting approaches, including launch capability arrangements with multiple certified providers, to meet the objectives identified in the acquisition strategy developed under subsection (d); and
(B)
added continue to provide the necessary stability in budgeting and acquisition of capabilities as well as the flexibility to the Federal Government to appropriately manage the launch manifest in case of delays in the delivery of satellites or other changes to mission requirements.
(b)
added Treatment of certain arrangement—
(1)
added Discontinuation— The Secretary of the Air Force shall discontinue the evolved expendable launch vehicle launch capability arrangement, as structured as of the date of the enactment of this Act, by the later of—
(A)
added the date on which the Secretary determines that the obligations of the contracts relating to such arrangement, as of the date of the enactment of this Act, have been met; or
(B)
added December 31, 2020.
(2)
added Waiver— The Secretary may waive paragraph (1) if the Secretary—
(A)
added determines that such waiver is necessary for the national security interests of the United States;
(B)
added notifies the congressional defense committees of such waiver; and
(C)
added a period of 90 days has elapsed following the date of such notification.
(c)
added Consistent standards— In accordance with section 2306a of title 10, United States Code, the Secretary shall—
(1)
added apply consistent and appropriate standards to certified evolved expendable launch vehicle providers with respect to certified cost and pricing data; and
(2)
added conduct the appropriate audits.
(d)
added Acquisition strategy— In accordance with subsections (b) and (c) and section 2273 of title 10, United States Code, the Secretary shall develop and carry out a ten-year phased acquisition strategy, including near and long term, for the evolved expendable launch vehicle program.
(e)
added Elements— The acquisition strategy under subsection (d) for the evolved expendable launch vehicle program shall establish a contracting plan for such program that uses competitive procedures (as defined in section 2302 of title 10, United States Code) and ensures that a contract awarded for launch services, capability, or infrastructure—
(1)
added provides the necessary—
(A)
added stability in budgeting and acquisition of capabilities; and
(B)
added flexibility to the Federal Government; and
(2)
added specifically takes into account the effect of—
(A)
added all contracts entered into by the Federal Government with, and any assistance provided by the Federal Government to, certified evolved expendable launch vehicle providers, including the evolved expendable launch vehicle launch capability;
(B)
added the requirements of the Department of Defense, including with respect to launch capabilities and pricing data, that are met by such providers;
(C)
added the cost of integrating a satellite onto a launch vehicle; and
(D)
added any other matters the Secretary considers appropriate.
(f)
added Competition— In awarding any contract for launch services in a national security space mission pursuant to a competitive acquisition, the evaluation shall account for the value of the evolved expendable launch vehicle launch capability arrangement per contract line item numbers in the bid price of the offeror as appropriate per launch.
(g)
added Report— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees, the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate a report on the acquisition strategy developed under subsection (d).

Sec. 1607 Procurement of wideband satellite communications

added
(a)
added Acquisition agent— Except as provided by subsection (b)(1), not later than September 30, 2016, the Secretary of Defense shall designate a single senior official of the Department of Defense to procure wideband satellite communications necessary to meet the requirements of the Department of Defense for such communications, including with respect to military and commercial satellite communications.
(b)
added Exception—
(1)
added In general— Notwithstanding subsection (a), an official described in paragraph (2) may carry out the procurement of commercial wideband satellite communications if the official determines that such procurement is required to meet an urgent need.
(2)
added Official described— An official described in this paragraph is any of the following:
(A)
added A Secretary of a military department.
(B)
added The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics.
(C)
added The Chief Information Office of the Department of Defense.
(D)
added A commander of a combatant command.
(3)
added Annual reports— Not later than March 1, 2017, and each year thereafter through 2021, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on procurement carried out under paragraph (1) during the year prior to the submission of the report, including—
(A)
added a brief description of the urgent need fulfilled by each such procurement;
(B)
added the date and length of the contract of each such procurement; and
(C)
added the value of each such contract.
(c)
added Plan— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a plan for the Secretary to meet the requirements of the Department of Defense for satellite communications, including with respect to—
(1)
added the roles and responsibilities of officials of the Department; and
(2)
added carrying out subsections (a) and (b).

Sec. 1608 Limitation on availability of funds for weather satellite follow-on system

added
(a)
added Limitation— None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2016 for research, development, test, and evaluation, Air Force, for the weather satellite follow-on system may be obligated or expended until the date on which—
(1)
added the Secretary of Defense provides to the congressional defense committees a briefing on the plan developed under subsection (b); and
(2)
added the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff certifies to the congressional defense committees that such plan will—
(A)
added meet the requirements of the Department of Defense for cloud characterization and theater weather imagery; and
(B)
added not negatively affect the commanders of the combatant commands.
(b)
added Plan required— The Secretary shall develop a plan to address the requirements of the Department of Defense for cloud characterization and theater weather imagery.

Sec. 1609 Modification of pilot program for acquisition of commercial satellite communication services

added

added Section 1605 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291) is amended—

(1)
added in subsection (a)—
(A)
added in paragraph (1), by striking “may develop” and all that follows through “funds by the Secretary” and inserting “shall develop and carry out a pilot program”; and
(B)
added by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

added “(4) Methods—In carrying out the pilot program under paragraph (1), the Secretary may use a variety of methods authorized by law to effectively and efficiently acquire commercial satellite communications services, including by carrying out multiple pathfinder activities under the pilot program.”

(2)
added in subsection (d)—
(A)
added in the heading, by striking “Reports.—” and inserting “Reports and briefings.—”;
(B)
added in paragraph (1)—
(i)
added in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking “90 days” and inserting “270 days”;
(ii)
added in subparagraph (A), by striking “; or” and inserting “; and”; and
(iii)
added by amending subparagraph (B) to read as follows:

added “(B) a description of the appropriate metrics established by the Secretary to meet the goals of the pilot program.”

(C)
added by redesignating paragraph (2) as paragraph (3);
(D)
added by inserting after paragraph (1) the following new paragraph (2):

added “(2) At the same time as the President submits to Congress the budget pursuant to section 1105 of title 31, for each of fiscal years 2017 through 2020, the Secretary shall provide to the congressional defense committees a briefing on the pilot program.”

(E)
added in paragraph (3) (as redesignated by subparagraph (C))—
(i)
added in subparagraph (A), by striking “expanding the use of working capital funds to effectively and efficiently acquire” and inserting “the pilot program and whether the pilot program effectively and efficiently acquires”; and
(ii)
added subparagraph (B)(ii), by striking “working capital funds as described in subparagraph (A)” and inserting “the pilot program”.

Sec. 1610 Prohibition on reliance on China and Russia for space-based weather data

added
(a)
added Prohibition— The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that the Department of Defense does not rely on, or in the future plan to rely on, space-based weather data provided by the Government of China, the Government of Russia, or an entity owned or controlled by the Government of China or the Government of Russia for national security purposes.
(b)
added Certification— Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a certification that the Secretary is in compliance with the prohibition under subsection (a).

Sec. 1611 Evaluation of exploitation of space-based infrared system against additional threats

added
(a)
added Evaluation— The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, in cooperation with the Secretary of the Navy, the Secretary of the Air Force, and the Director of National Intelligence, shall conduct an evaluation of the space-based infrared system to detect, track, and target, or to develop the capability to detect, track and target, the full range of threats to the United States, deployed members of the Armed Forces, and the allies of the United States.
(b)
added Submission— Not later than December 31, 2016, the Under Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees, the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate the evaluation under subsection (a).

Sec. 1612 Plan on full integration and exploitation of overhead persistent infrared capability

added
(a)
added Plan— Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Commander of the United States Strategic Command and the Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation shall jointly submit to the appropriate congressional committees a plan for the integration of overhead persistent infrared capabilities to support the missions specified in subsection (b)(1).
(b)
added Elements— The plan under subsection (a) shall—
(1)
added ensure that all overhead persistent infrared capabilities of the United States, including such capabilities that are planned to be developed, are integrated to allow for such capabilities to be exploited to support the requirements of the missions of the Department of Defense relating to—
(A)
added battle damage assessment;
(B)
added battlespace assessment;
(C)
added technical intelligence;
(D)
added strategic missile warning;
(E)
added tactical missile warning;
(F)
added missile defense tracking, fire control, and kill assessment; and
(G)
added collection of weather data; and
(2)
added establish clear benchmarks by which to establish acquisition plans, manning, and budget requirements.
(c)
added Annual determination— The Secretary of Defense shall include, together with, or not later than 30 days after, the budget justification materials submitted to Congress in support of the budget of the Department of Defense for a fiscal year (as submitted with the budget of the President under section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code), a written determination of how the plan under subsection (a) is being implemented.
(d)
added Appropriate congressional committees defined— In this section, the term “appropriate congressional committees” means—
(1)
added the congressional defense committees; and
(2)
added the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate.

Sec. 1613 Options for rapid space reconstitution

added
(a)
added Sense of Congress— It is the sense of Congress that—
(1)
added the United States Strategic Command has identified needs to rapidly reconstitute or replenish critical space capabilities;
(2)
added in accordance with section 915 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 826), the Department of Defense Executive Agent for Space is currently conducting a study and developing a plan regarding responsive launch in accordance with warfighter requirements; and
(3)
added rapid launch should avoid the creation of new Department of Defense-owned and operated infrastructure.
(b)
added Evaluation— The Secretary of Defense shall evaluate options for the use of current assets of the Department of Defense for the purpose of rapid reconstitution of critical space-based warfighter enabling capabilities.
(c)
added Briefing— Not later than March 31, 2016, the Secretary shall provide to the congressional defense committees a briefing on the evaluation conducted under subsection (b), including development timelines, a test plan, and technology readiness levels of key systems and technologies.

Sec. 1614 Sense of Congress on space defense

added

added It is the sense of Congress that, as outlined in the National Space Policy of 2010, the United States should employ a variety of measures to help assure the use of space for all responsible parties, and, consistent with the inherent right of self-defense, deter others from interference and attack, defend the space systems of the United States and contribute to the defense of allied space systems, and, if deterrence fails, defeat efforts to attack them.

Sec. 1615 Sense of Congress on missile defense sensors in space

added
(a)
added Findings— Congress finds the following:
(1)
added The Missile Defense Agency has run a successful space sensor program with the space tracking and surveillance system.
(2)
added The Missile Defense Agency is now executing a promising and ground-breaking space sensor system called space-based kill assessment.
(3)
added The future missile defense architecture will require significantly improved sensors in space to provide tracking, discrimination, and more.
(b)
added Sense of Congress— It is the sense of Congress that a robust multi-mission space sensor network will be vital to ensuring a strong missile defense system.

Sec. 1621 Executive agent for open-source intelligence tools

added
(a)
added Executive agent— Subchapter I of chapter 21 of title 10, United States Code, as amended by section 1082, is further amended by adding at the end the following new section:

added “430b. Executive agent for open-source intelligence tools

added “(a) Designation—Not later than April 1, 2016, the Secretary of Defense shall designate a senior official of the Department of Defense to serve as the executive agent for the Department for open-source intelligence tools.

added “(b) Roles, Responsibilities, and Authorities

added “(1) Not later than July 1, 2016, in accordance with Directive 5101.1, the Secretary shall prescribe the roles, responsibilities, and authorities of the executive agent designated under subsection (a).

added “(2) The roles and responsibilities of the executive agent designated under subsection (a) shall include the following:

added “(A) Developing and maintaining a comprehensive list of open-source intelligence tools and technical standards.

added “(B) Establishing priorities for the integration of open-source intelligence tools into the intelligence enterprise, and other command and control systems as needed.

added “(C) Certifying all open-source intelligence tools with respect to compliance with the standards required by the framework and guidance for the Intelligence Community Information Technology Enterprise, the Defense Intelligence Information Enterprise, and the Joint Information Environment.

added “(E) Performing such other assessments or analyses as the Secretary considers appropriate.

added “(c) Support within Department of Defense—In accordance with Directive 5101.1, the Secretary shall ensure that the military departments, Defense Agencies, and other components of the Department of Defense provide the executive agent designated under subsection (a) with the appropriate support and resources needed to perform the roles, responsibilities, and authorities of the executive agent.

added “(d) Definitions—In this section:

added “(1) The term “Directive 5101.1” means Department of Defense Directive 5101.1, or any successor directive relating to the responsibilities of an executive agent of the Department of Defense.

added “(2) The term “executive agent” has the meaning given the term “DoD Executive Agent” in Directive 5101.1.

added “(3) The term “open-source intelligence tools” means tools regarding relevant information derived from the systematic collection, processing, and analysis of publicly available information in response to known or anticipated intelligence requirements.”

(b)
added Clerical amendment— The table of sections at the beginning of such subchapter is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 430a, as added by section 1082, the following new item:

Sec. 1622 Waiver and congressional notification requirements related to facilities for intelligence collection or for special operations abroad

added
(a)
added Addition of congressional notification requirement— Section 2682(c) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
added by inserting “(1)” before “The Secretary of Defense”; and
(2)
added by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

added “(2) Not later than 48 hours after using the waiver authority under paragraph (1) for any facility for intelligence collection conducted under the authorities of the Department of Defense or special operations activity, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees, the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate, and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives written notification of the use of the authority, including the justification for the waiver and the estimated cost of the project for which the waiver applies.”

(b)
added Codification of sunset provision—
(1)
added Codification— Section 2682(c) of title 10, United States Code, is further amended by inserting after paragraph (2), as added by subsection (a)(2), the following new paragraph:

added “(3) The waiver authority provided by paragraph (1) expires December 31, 2017.”

(2)
added Conforming repeal— Subsection (b) of section 926 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1541; 10 U.S.C. 2682 note) is repealed.

Sec. 1623 Prohibition on National Intelligence Program consolidation

added
(a)
added Prohibition— No amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available to the Department of Defense may be used during the period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act and ending on December 31, 2016, to execute—
(1)
added the separation of the National Intelligence Program budget from the Department of Defense budget;
(2)
added the consolidation of the National Intelligence Program budget within the Department of Defense budget; or
(3)
added the establishment of a new appropriations account or appropriations account structure for the National Intelligence Program budget.
(b)
added Definitions— In this section:
(1)
added National intelligence program— The term “National Intelligence Program” has the meaning given the term in section 3 of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3003).
(2)
added National intelligence program budget— The term “National Intelligence Program budget” means the portions of the Department of Defense budget designated as part of the National Intelligence Program.

Sec. 1624 Limitation on availability of funds for Distributed Common Ground System of the Army

added
(a)
added Limitation— Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2016 for research, development, test, and evaluation, Army, for the distributed common ground system of the Army, not more than 75 percent may be obligated or expended until the Secretary of the Army—
(1)
added conducts a review of the program planning for the distributed common ground system of the Army; and
(2)
added submits to the appropriate congressional committees the report under subsection (b)(1).
(b)
added Report—
(1)
added In general— The Secretary shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on the review of the distributed common ground system of the Army conducted under subsection (a)(1).
(2)
added Matters included— The report under paragraph (1) shall include the following:
(A)
added A review of the segmentation of the distributed common ground system program of the Army into discrete software components with the associated requirements of each component.
(B)
added Identification of each component of Increment 2 of the distributed common ground system of the Army for which commercial software exists that is capable of fulfilling most or all of the system requirements for each such component.
(C)
added A cost analysis of each such commercial software that compares performance with projected cost.
(D)
added Validation of the degree to which commercial software solutions are compliant with the standards required by the framework and guidance for the Intelligence Community Information Technology Enterprise, the Defense Intelligence Information Enterprise, and the Joint Information Environment.
(E)
added Identification of each component of Increment 2 of the distributed common ground system of the Army that the Secretary determines may be acquired through competitive means.
(F)
added An acquisition plan that prioritizes the acquisition of commercial software components, including a data integration layer, in time to meet the projected deployment schedule for Increment 2 of the distributed common ground system of the Army.
(G)
added A review of the timetable for the distributed common ground system program of the Army in order to determine whether there is a practical, executable acquisition strategy, including the use of operational capability demonstrations, that could lead to an initial operating capability of Increment 2 of the distributed common ground system of the Army prior to fiscal year 2017.
(c)
added Appropriate congressional committees defined— In this section, the term “appropriate congressional committees” means—
(1)
added the congressional defense committees; and
(2)
added the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate.

Sec. 1625 Limitation on availability of funds for Distributed Common Ground System of the United States Special Operations Command

added
(a)
added Limitation— Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2016 for research, development, test, and evaluation, Defense-wide, for the United States Special Operations Command for the distributed common ground system, not more than 75 percent may be obligated or expended until the Commander of the United States Special Operations Command—
(1)
added conducts a review of the program planning for the elements of the distributed common ground system special operations forces program, including the initiative known as “DCGS-Lite”; and
(2)
added submits to the appropriate congressional committees the report under subsection (b)(1).
(b)
added Report—
(1)
added In general— The Commander shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on the review of the distributed common ground system conducted under subsection (a)(1).
(2)
added Matters included— The report under paragraph (1) shall include the following:
(A)
added A review of the segmentation of the distributed common ground system special operations forces program into discrete software components with the associated requirements of each component.
(B)
added Identification of each component of the distributed common ground system special operations forces program for which commercial software exists that is capable of fulfilling most or all of the system requirements for each such component.
(C)
added A cost analysis of each such commercial software that compares performance with projected cost.
(D)
added Validation of the degree to which commercial software solutions are compliant with the standards required by the framework and guidance for the Intelligence Community Information Technology Enterprise, the Defense Intelligence Information Enterprise, and the Joint Information Environment.
(E)
added Identification of each component of the distributed common ground system special operations forces program that the Commander determines may be acquired through competitive means.
(F)
added An assessment of the extent to which elements of the distributed common ground system special operations forces program could be modified to increase commercial acquisition opportunities.
(G)
added An acquisition plan that uses commercial software components in order to lead to initial operating capability prior to fiscal year 2017.

Sec. 1626 Limitation on availability of funds for Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence

added

added Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2016 for the Department of Defense for the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence, not more than 75 percent may be obligated or expended for such Office until the Secretary of Defense identifies the intelligence gaps and establishes the written policy required by section 922 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 828).

Sec. 1627 Clarification of annual briefing on the intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance requirements of the combatant commands

added

added Paragraph (1)(A) of section 1626 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3635) is amended by striking “each of the” and inserting “the United States Special Operations Command and each of the other”.

Sec. 1628 Department of Defense intelligence needs

added
(a)
added Report— Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director of National Intelligence shall submit to the congressional defense committees and the congressional intelligence committees a report on how the Director ensures that the National Intelligence Program budgets for the elements of the intelligence community that are within the Department of Defense are adequate to satisfy the national intelligence needs of the Department as required under section 102A(p) of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3024(p)). Such report shall include a description of how the Director incorporates the needs of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the commanders of the unified and specified commands into the metrics used to evaluate the performance of the elements of the intelligence community that are within the Department of Defense in conducting intelligence activities funded under the National Intelligence Program.
(b)
added Definitions— In this section, the terms “congressional intelligence committees”, “intelligence community”, and “National Intelligence Program” have the meanings given such terms in section 3 of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3003).

Sec. 1629 Report on management of certain programs of Defense intelligence elements

added
(a)
added Report— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on the management of science and technology research and development programs and foreign materiel exploitation programs of Defense intelligence elements.
(b)
added Matters included— The report under subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1)
added An assessment of the management of each Defense intelligence element that is responsible for work relating to the programs described in subsection (a), including with respect to the policies, procedures, and organizational structures of such element relating to the management and coordination of such work across such elements.
(2)
added Recommendations to improve the coordination and organization of such elements.
(3)
added Identification of options for realigning such elements within the Department of Defense to better meet the needs of the Department and reduce unnecessary overhead.
(c)
added Definitions— In this section:
(1)
added The term “appropriate congressional committees” means—
(A)
added the congressional defense committees;
(B)
added the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives; and
(C)
added the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate.
(2)
added The term “Defense intelligence element” has the meaning given that term in section 429(e) of title 10, United States Code.

Sec. 1630 Government Accountability Office review of intelligence input to the defense acquisition process

added
(a)
added Review— The Comptroller General of the United States shall carry out a comprehensive review of the processes and procedures for the integration of intelligence into the defense acquisition process, consistent with the provision of classified information, and intelligence sources and methods.
(b)
added Requirements— The review required by subsection (a) shall—
(1)
added identify processes and procedures for the integration of intelligence into the decision process, including with respect to the staffing and training of Defense intelligence personnel assigned to program offices, for the acquisition of weapon systems from initial requirements through the milestones process and upon final delivery; and
(2)
added include a review of processes and procedures for—
(A)
added the integration of intelligence on foreign capabilities into the acquisition process from initial requirement through deployment;
(B)
added identifying opportunities for weapons systems to collect intelligence, without regard to whether that is the primary mission of such systems, and the plans for exploiting the collection of such intelligence; and
(C)
added assessing the requirements weapon systems will place on the Defense Intelligence Enterprise once the weapons systems are deployed.
(c)
added Report— Not later than 270 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General shall submit to the congressional defense committees, the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate, and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives, a report containing the results of the review required by subsection (a).

Sec. 1641 Codification and addition of liability protections relating to reporting on cyber incidents or penetrations of networks and information systems of certain contractors

added
(a)
added Codification and amendment— Section 941 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1889; 10 U.S.C. 2224 note) is transferred to chapter 19 of title 10, United States Code, inserted so as to appear after section 392, redesignated as section 393, and amended—
(1)
added by amending the section heading to read as follows:

added “393. Reporting on penetrations of networks and information systems of certain contractors”

(2)
added by striking subsection (d) and inserting the following new subsection (d):

added “(d) Protection from liability of cleared defense contractors

added “(1) No cause of action shall lie or be maintained in any court against any cleared defense contractor, and such action shall be promptly dismissed, for compliance with this section that is conducted in accordance with the procedures established pursuant to subsection (a).

added “(2)

added “(A) Nothing in this section shall be construed—

added “(i) to require dismissal of a cause of action against a cleared defense contractor that has engaged in willful misconduct in the course of complying with the procedures established pursuant to subsection (a); or

added “(ii) to undermine or limit the availability of otherwise applicable common law or statutory defenses.

added “(B) In any action claiming that paragraph (1) does not apply due to willful misconduct described in subparagraph (A), the plaintiff shall have the burden of proving by clear and convincing evidence the willful misconduct by each cleared defense contractor subject to such claim and that such willful misconduct proximately caused injury to the plaintiff.

added “(C) In this subsection, the term “willful misconduct” means an act or omission that is taken—

added “(i) intentionally to achieve a wrongful purpose;

added “(ii) knowingly without legal or factual justification; and

added “(iii) in disregard of a known or obvious risk that is so great as to make it highly probable that the harm will outweigh the benefit.”

(b)
added Addition of liability protections for reporting on cyber incidents— Section 391 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
added by redesignating subsection (d) as subsection (e); and
(2)
added by inserting after subsection (c) the following new subsection (d):

added “(d) Protection from liability of operationally critical contractors

added “(1) No cause of action shall lie or be maintained in any court against any operationally critical contractor, and such action shall be promptly dismissed, for compliance with this section that is conducted in accordance with procedures established pursuant to subsection (b).

added “(2)

added “(A) Nothing in this section shall be construed—

added “(i) to require dismissal of a cause of action against an operationally critical contractor that has engaged in willful misconduct in the course of complying with the procedures established pursuant to subsection (b); or

added “(ii) to undermine or limit the availability of otherwise applicable common law or statutory defenses.

added “(B) In any action claiming that paragraph (1) does not apply due to willful misconduct described in subparagraph (A), the plaintiff shall have the burden of proving by clear and convincing evidence the willful misconduct by each operationally critical contractor subject to such claim and that such willful misconduct proximately caused injury to the plaintiff.

added “(C) In this subsection, the term “willful misconduct” means an act or omission that is taken—

added “(i) intentionally to achieve a wrongful purpose;

added “(ii) knowingly without legal or factual justification; and

added “(iii) in disregard of a known or obvious risk that is so great as to make it highly probable that the harm will outweigh the benefit.”

(c)
added Conforming and technical amendments—
(1)
added Section 391 of title 10, United States Code, is amended in subsection (a) by striking “with section 941 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (10 U.S.C. 2224 note)” and inserting “and section 393 of this title”.
(2)
added The table of sections for chapter 19 of such title is amended—
(A)
added by amending the item relating to section 391 to read as follows:
(B)
added by inserting at the end the following new item:

Sec. 1651 Organization of nuclear deterrence functions of the Air Force

added
(a)
added Oversight of nuclear deterrence mission— Subject to the authority, direction, and control of the Secretary of the Air Force, the Chief of Staff of the Air Force shall be responsible for overseeing the safety, security, reliability, effectiveness, and credibility of the nuclear deterrence mission of the Air Force.
(b)
added Deputy chief of staff— Not later than March 1, 2016, the Chief of Staff shall designate a Deputy Chief of Staff to carry out the following duties:
(1)
added Provide direction, guidance, integration, and advocacy regarding the nuclear deterrence mission of the Air Force.
(2)
added Conduct monitoring and oversight activities regarding the safety, security, reliability, effectiveness, and credibility of the nuclear deterrence mission of the Air Force.
(3)
added Conduct periodic comprehensive assessments of all aspects of the nuclear deterrence mission of the Air Force and provide such assessments to the Secretary of the Air Force and the Chief of Staff of the Air Force.
(c)
added Role of major command—
(1)
added Consolidation— Not later than March 30, 2016, the Secretary of the Air Force shall consolidate, to the extent the Secretary determines appropriate, under a major command commanded by a single general officer the responsibility, authority, accountability, and resources for carrying out the nuclear deterrence mission of the Air Force.
(2)
added Functions— The major command described in paragraph (1) shall be responsible, to the extent the Secretary determines appropriate, for carrying out all elements and activities relating to the nuclear deterrence mission of the Air Force. Such elements include nuclear weapons, nuclear weapon delivery systems, and the nuclear command, control, and communication system. Such activities include the following:
(A)
added Planning and execution of modernization programs.
(B)
added Procurement and acquisition.
(C)
added Research, development, test, and evaluation.
(D)
added Sustainment.
(E)
added Operations.
(F)
added Training.
(G)
added Safety and security.
(H)
added Research, education, and applied science relating to nuclear deterrence and assurance.
(I)
added Such other functions of the nuclear deterrence mission as the Secretary determines appropriate.
(d)
added Report— Not later than January 1, 2016, the Secretary of the Air Force shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the plans of the Secretary and the resources required to implement this section.

Sec. 1652 Assessment of threats to National Leadership Command, Control, and Communications System

added

added Section 171a of title 10, United States Code, is amended—

(1)
added by redesignating subsections (f), (g), and (h), as subsections (g), (h), and (i), respectively;
(2)
added by inserting after subsection (e) the following new subsection (f):

added “(f) Collection of assessments on certain threats—The Council shall collect and assess (consistent with the provision of classified information, and intelligence sources and methods) all reports and assessments otherwise conducted by the intelligence community (as defined in section 3(4) of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3003(4)) regarding foreign threats, including cyber threats, to the command, control, and communications system for the national leadership of the United States and the vulnerabilities of such system to such threats.”

(3)
added in subsection (e), by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

added “(5) An assessment of the threats and vulnerabilities described in the reports and assessments collected under subsection (f) during the period covered by the report, including any plans to address such threats and vulnerabilities.”

Sec. 1653 Procurement authority for certain parts of intercontinental ballistic missile fuzes

added
(a)
added Availability of funds— Notwithstanding section 1502(a) of title 31, United States Code, of the amount authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2016 by section 101 and available for Missile Procurement, Air Force as specified in the funding table in section 4101, $13,700,000 shall be available for the procurement of covered parts pursuant to contracts entered into under section 1645(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291).
(b)
added Covered parts defined— In this section, the term “covered parts” means commercially available off the-shelf items as defined in section 104 of title 41, United States Code.

Sec. 1654 Annual briefing on the costs of forward-deploying nuclear weapons in Europe

added
(a)
added In general— Not later than 30 days after the date on which the President submits to Congress the budget for each of fiscal years 2016 through 2020 under section 1105 of title 31, United States Code, the Secretary of Defense shall provide to the congressional defense committees a briefing on the costs of forward-deploying nuclear weapons in Europe.
(b)
added Elements— Each briefing required under paragraph (1) shall include the following:
(1)
added The contributions of the United States, including with respect to sustainment (operations and maintenance) and manpower, to support forward-deployed nuclear weapons in Europe, during the fiscal year following the date of the briefing and the period covered by the future-years defense program submitted to Congress under section 221 of title 10, United States Code, for that fiscal year.
(2)
added Recent or planned contributions of the United States for security enhancements relating to such forward-deployed nuclear weapons.
(3)
added Any other contributions, including burden-share costs by the United States, for other security enhancements and upgrades relating to such forward-deployed nuclear weapons, including infrastructure upgrades at weapons storage sites in Europe.

Sec. 1655 Sense of Congress on importance of cooperation and collaboration between United States and United Kingdom on nuclear issues

added

added It is the sense of Congress that—

(1)
added cooperation and collaboration under the 1958 Mutual Defense Agreement and the 1963 Polaris Sales Agreement are fundamental elements of the security of the United States and the United Kingdom as well as international stability;
(2)
added the recent renewal of the Mutual Defense Agreement and the continued work under the Polaris Sales Agreement underscore the enduring and long-term value of the agreements to both countries; and
(3)
added the vital efforts performed under the purview of both the Mutual Defense Agreement and the Polaris Sales Agreement are critical to sustaining and enhancing the capabilities and knowledge base of both countries regarding nuclear deterrence, nuclear nonproliferation and counterproliferation, and naval nuclear propulsion.

Sec. 1656 Sense of Congress on organization of Navy for nuclear deterrence mission

added
(a)
added Findings— Congress finds the following:
(1)
added The safety, security, reliability, and credibility of the nuclear deterrent of the United States is a vital national security priority.
(2)
added Nuclear weapons require special consideration because of the political and military importance of the weapons, the destructive power of the weapons, and the potential consequences of an accident or unauthorized act involving the weapons.
(3)
added The assured safety, security, and control of nuclear weapons and related systems are of paramount importance.
(b)
added Sense of Congress— It is the sense of Congress that—
(1)
added the Navy has repeatedly demonstrated the commitment and prioritization of the Navy to the nuclear deterrence mission of the Navy;
(2)
added the emphasis of the Navy on ensuring a safe, secure, reliable, and credible sea-based nuclear deterrent force has been matched by an equal emphasis on ensuring the assured safety, security, and control of nuclear weapons and related systems ashore; and
(3)
added the Navy is commended for the actions the Navy has taken subsequent to the 2014 Nuclear Enterprise Review to ensure continued focus on the nuclear deterrent mission by all ranks within the Navy, including the clarification and assignment of specific responsibilities and authorities within the Navy contained in OPNAV Instruction 8120.1 and SECNAV Instruction 8120.1B.

Sec. 1661 Prohibitions on providing certain missile defense information to Russian Federation

added
(a)
added Prohibitions—
(1)
added In general— Chapter 3 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

added “130g. Prohibitions on providing certain missile defense information to Russian Federation

added “(a) Certain hit-to-kill technology and telemetry data—None of the funds authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available for any fiscal year for the Department of Defense may be used to provide the Russian Federation with “hit-to-kill” technology and telemetry data for missile defense interceptors or target vehicles.

added “(b) Other sensitive missile defense information—None of the funds authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available for any fiscal year for the Department of Defense may be used to provide the Russian Federation with—

added “(1) information relating to velocity at burnout of missile defense interceptors or targets of the United States; or

added “(2) classified or otherwise controlled missile defense information.

added “(c) One-time waiver—The President, without delegation, may waive the prohibition in subsection (a) or (b) once if—

added “(1) such one-time waiver is used only to provide, in a single instance, the Russian Federation with information regarding ballistic missile early warning; and

added “(2) the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the Commander of the United States Strategic Command, and the Commander of the United States European Command, jointly certify to the President and the congressional defense committees that the provision of such information pursuant to such waiver is required because of a failure of the early warning system of the Russian Federation.

added “(d) Sunset—The prohibitions in subsection (a) and (b) shall expire on January 1, 2031.”

(2)
added Clerical amendment— The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 130f the following new item:
(b)
added Conforming repeal— Section 1246 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 923), as amended by section 1243 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3568), is further amended—
(1)
added by striking subsection (c); and
(1)
added in the heading, by striking “And Limitations” and all that follows through “Federation”.

Sec. 1662 Prohibition on integration of missile defense systems of China into missile defense systems of United States

added

added None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2016 for the Department of Defense may be obligated or expended to integrate a missile defense system of the People’s Republic of China into any missile defense system of the United States.

Sec. 1663 Prohibition on integration of missile defense systems of Russian Federation into missile defense systems of United States and NATO

added

added None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for any of fiscal years 2016 through 2031 for the Department of Defense or for contributions of the United States to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization may be obligated or expended to integrate a missile defense system of the Russian Federation into any missile defense system of the United States or NATO.

Sec. 1664 Limitation on availability of funds for long-range discriminating radar

added
(a)
added Sense of the Congress— It is the sense of the Congress that—
(1)
added the long-range discriminating radar will be a critically important addition to the ballistic missile defense system;
(2)
added such radar will offer needed capability to respond to emerging ballistic missile threats involving countermeasures and decoys; and
(3)
added the Department of Defense should take all appropriate steps to ensure that such radar is operational in 2020.
(b)
added Limitation— No funds authorized to be appropriated may be obligated or expended for military construction for the long-range discriminating radar (other than for planning and design) until—
(1)
added the Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation submits to the congressional defense committees the cost assessment conducted under subsection (c)(1);
(2)
added the Commander of the United States Strategic Command and the Commander of the United States Northern Command jointly certify to the congressional defense committees that the site for the long-range discriminating radar proposed by the Director of the Missile Defense Agency—
(A)
added best supports missile defense and space situational awareness; and
(B)
added based on the cost assessment conducted under subsection (c)(1), is the most cost-effective option; and
(3)
added a period of 60 days elapses following the date of such certification.
(c)
added Cost assessment—
(1)
added In general— The Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation shall conduct a cost assessment providing the costs of the complete ground-based radar and other sensor configurations required to provide the same or comparable missile defense tracking and discrimination data as the long-range discriminating radar sites under consideration by the Director of the Missile Defense Agency.
(2)
added Submission— Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation shall submit to the congressional defense committees, the Director of the Missile Defense Agency, the Commander of the United States Strategic Command, and the Commander of the United States Northern Command the cost assessment conducted under paragraph (1).

Sec. 1665 Limitations on availability of funds for Patriot lower tier air and missile defense capability of the Army

added
(a)
added Limitation— Except as provided by subsection (c), none of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2016 for any program described in subsection (b) may be obligated or expended unless—
(1)
added the Secretary of the Army certifies to the congressional defense committees that the analysis of alternatives regarding the Patriot lower tier air and missile defense capability of the Army has been submitted to such committees;
(2)
added a period of 60 days has elapsed following the date on which the Secretary makes the certification under paragraph (1); and
(3)
added the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics certifies to such committees that such obligation or expenditure of funds on such programs is consistent with the findings of the analysis of alternatives described in paragraph (1) to modernize the Patriot lower tier air and missile defense capability of the Army.
(b)
added Program described— A program described in this subsection are the following components and capabilities of the Patriot air and missile defense system:
(1)
added Radar capability development, radar improvements, the digital sidelobe canceller, or the radar digital processor of the lower tier air and missile defense program of the Army.
(2)
added The enhanced launcher electronic system.
(c)
added Waiver— The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics may waive the limitations in subsection (a) if the Under Secretary—
(1)
added determines that such waiver—
(A)
added is caused by the delay of the analysis of alternatives described in paragraph (1) of such subsection; and
(B)
added is necessary to avoid an unacceptable risk to mission performance;
(2)
added notifies the congressional defense committees of such waiver; and
(3)
added pursuant to such waiver, obligates or expends funds only in amounts necessary to avoid such unacceptable risk to mission performance.

Sec. 1666 Integration and interoperability of air and missile defense capabilities of the United States

added
(a)
added Interoperability of missile defense systems— The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics and the Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, acting through the Missile Defense Executive Board, shall ensure the interoperability and integration of the covered air and missile defense capabilities of the United States with such capabilities of allies of the United States, including by carrying out operational testing.
(b)
added Annual demonstration—
(1)
added Requirement— Except as provided by paragraph (2), the Director of the Missile Defense Agency and the Secretary of the Army shall jointly ensure that not less than one intercept or flight test is carried out each year that demonstrates the interoperability and integration of the covered air and missile defense capability of the United States.
(2)
added Waiver— The Director and the Secretary may waive the requirement in paragraph (1) with respect to an intercept or flight test carried out during the year covered by the waiver if the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics—
(A)
added determines that such waiver is necessary for such year; and
(B)
added submits to the congressional defense committees notification of such waiver, including an explanation for how such waiver will not negatively affect demonstrating the interoperability and integration of the covered air and missile defense capability of the United States.
(c)
added Definitions— In this section, the term “covered air and missile defense capabilities” means Patriot air and missile defense batteries and associated interceptors and systems, Aegis ships and associated ballistic missile interceptors (including Aegis Ashore capability), AN/TPY–2 radars, and terminal high altitude area defense batteries and interceptors.

Sec. 1667 Integration of allied missile defense capabilities

added
(a)
added Assessments—
(1)
added In general— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, each covered commander shall submit to the Secretary of Defense and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff an assessment on opportunities for the integration and interoperability of covered air and missile defense capabilities of the United States with such capabilities of allies of the United States located in the area of responsibility of the commander, particularly with respect to such allies who acquired such capabilities through foreign military sales by the United States. Each assessment shall include an assessment of the key technology, security, command and control, and policy requirements necessary to achieve such an integrated and interoperable air and missile defense capability in a manner that ensures burden sharing and furthers the force multiplication goals of the United States.
(2)
added Submission— Not later than 30 days after the date on which a covered commander submits to the Secretary and the Chairman an assessment under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report containing such assessment, without change.
(b)
added Integration, interoperability, and command-and-control— The Secretary and the Chairman, in coordination with the Secretary of the Army, the Chief of Staff of the Army, the Secretary of the Navy, and the Chief of Naval Operations, shall carry out the planning, risk assessments, policy development, and concepts of operations necessary for each covered commander to ensure that the integration, interoperability, and command-and-control of air and missile defense capabilities described in subsection (a)(1) occur by not later than December 31, 2017.
(c)
added Quarterly briefings— Not later than 270 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and each 90-day period thereafter through December 31, 2017, the Secretary of Defense and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff shall jointly provide to the congressional defense committees a briefing that describes the progress made by the Secretary, the Chairman, and the covered commanders with respect to carrying out subsection (b), including an identification of each required action that has not been taken as of the date of the report.
(d)
added Definitions— In this section:
(1)
added The term “covered air and missile defense capabilities” means Patriot air and missile defense batteries and associated interceptors and systems, Aegis ships and associated ballistic missile interceptors (including Aegis Ashore capability), AN/TPY–2 radars, and terminal high altitude area defense batteries and interceptors.
(2)
added The term “covered commander” means the following:
(A)
added The Commander of the United States European Command.
(B)
added The Commander of the United States Central Command.
(C)
added The Commander of the United States Pacific Command.

Sec. 1668 Missile defense capability in Europe

added
(a)
added Aegis Ashore sites—
(1)
added Poland— The Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of State, shall ensure that the Aegis Ashore site to be deployed in the Republic of Poland has anti-air warfare capability upon such site achieving full operating capability.
(2)
added Romania— The Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of State, shall develop and implement a plan to provide anti-air warfare capability to the Aegis Ashore site deployed in the Republic of Romania by not later than December 31, 2018.
(3)
added Evaluation of certain missiles— The Secretary shall evaluate the feasibility, benefit, and cost of using the evolved sea sparrow missile or the standard missile 2 in providing the anti-air warfare capability described in paragraphs (1) and (2).
(b)
added Capabilities in European Command area of responsibility—
(1)
added Rotational deployment— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall ensure that a terminal high altitude area defense battery is available for rotational deployment to the area of responsibility of the United States European Command unless the Secretary notifies the congressional defense committees that such battery is needed in the area of responsibility of another combatant command.
(2)
added Pre-positioning sites— The Secretary of Defense shall examine potential sites in the area of responsibility of the United States European Command to pre-position a terminal high altitude area defense battery.
(3)
added Studies—
(A)
added Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall conduct studies to evaluate—
(i)
added not fewer than three sites in the area of responsibility of the United States European Command for the deployment of a terminal high altitude area defense battery in the event that the deployment of such a battery is determined to be necessary; and
(ii)
added not fewer than three sites in such area for the deployment of a Patriot air and missile defense battery in the event that such a deployment is determined to be necessary.
(B)
added In evaluating sites under clauses (i) and (ii) of subparagraph (A), the Secretary shall determine which sites are best for defending—
(i)
added the Armed Forces of the United States; and
(ii)
added the member states of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization.
(4)
added Agreements— If the Secretary of Defense determines that a deployment described in clause (i) or (ii) of paragraph (3)(A) is necessary and the appropriate host nation requests such a deployment, the President shall seek to enter into the necessary agreements with the host nation to carry out such deployment.

Sec. 1669 Availability of funds for Iron Dome short-range rocket defense system

added
(a)
added Availability of funds— Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by section 101 for procurement, Defense-wide, and available for the Missile Defense Agency, not more than $41,400,000 may be provided to the Government of Israel to procure radars for the Iron Dome short-range rocket defense system as specified in the funding table in section 4101, including for co-production of such radars in the United States by industry of the United States.
(b)
added Conditions—
(1)
added Agreement— Funds described in subsection (a) to produce the Iron Dome short-range rocket defense program shall be available subject to the terms, conditions, and co-production targets specified for fiscal year 2015 in the “Agreement Between the Department of Defense of the United States of America and the Ministry of Defense of the State of Israel Concerning Iron Dome Defense System Procurement,” signed on March 5, 2014. In negotiations by the Missile Defense Agency and the Missile Defense Organization of the Government of Israel regarding such production, the goal of the United States is to maximize opportunities for co-production of the radars described subsection (a) in the United States by industry of the United States.
(2)
added Certification— Not later than 30 days prior to the initial obligation of funds described in subsection (a), the Director of the Missile Defense Agency and the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics shall jointly submit to the appropriate congressional committees—
(A)
added a certification that the agreement specified in paragraph (1) is being implemented as provided in such agreement; and
(B)
added an assessment detailing any risks relating to the implementation of such agreement.
(c)
added Appropriate congressional committees defined— In this section, the term “appropriate congressional committees” means the following:
(1)
added The congressional defense committees.
(2)
added The Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate.

Sec. 1670 Israeli Cooperative Missile Defense Program co-development and potential co-production

added
(a)
added Availability of funds for certain programs—
(1)
added In general— Subject to subsections (b) and (c), of the funds authorized to be appropriated by section 101 for procurement, Defense-wide, and available for the Missile Defense Agency, as specified in the funding table in section 4101—
(A)
added not more than $150,000,000 may be provided to the Government of Israel to procure the David’s Sling weapon system; and
(B)
added not more than $15,000,000 may be provided to the Government of Israel to procure the Arrow 3 upper tier development program.
(2)
added Procurement and co-production— The use of funds under subparagraphs (A) and (B) of paragraph (1) shall—
(A)
added be carried out only with respect to procurement activities; and
(B)
added include the co-production of parts and components in the United States by United States industry.
(b)
added Condition on use of funds— The Director of the Missile Defense Agency may not carry out subparagraphs (A) or (B) of subsection (a)(1) unless—
(1)
added the Director and the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics jointly certify to the appropriate congressional committees that—
(A)
added the knowledge points and production readiness agreements of the research, development, test, and evaluation agreements for the David’s Sling weapon system or the Arrow 3 upper tier development program, respectively, have been successfully completed;
(B)
added such subparagraphs shall be carried out with the Government of Israel matching funds in an amount equal to the amount of funds provided by the United States; and
(C)
added the United States and the Government of Israel have entered into a bilateral agreement that—
(i)
added establishes the terms of co-production of parts and components described in subsection (a)(2) pursuant to the teaming agreements previously entered into regarding the co-development of such weapon system and development program in a manner that minimizes non-recurring engineering and facilitization expenses;
(ii)
added establishes complete transparency on the requirement of Israel for the number of interceptors and batteries of such weapon system and development program that will be procured;
(iii)
added allows the Director and Under Secretary to establish technical milestones for co-production and procurement of the such weapon system and development program; and
(iv)
added establishes joint approval processes for third-party sales of such weapon system and development program; and
(2)
added a period of 90 days has elapsed following the date of such certification.
(c)
added Appropriate congressional committees defined— In this section, the term “appropriate congressional committees” means the following:
(1)
added The congressional defense committees.
(2)
added The Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate.

Sec. 1671 Development and deployment of multiple-object kill vehicle for missile defense of the United States homeland

added
(a)
added Sense of Congress— It is the sense of Congress that—
(1)
added the ballistic missile defense of the United States homeland is the highest priority of the Missile Defense Agency;
(2)
added the Missile Defense Agency is appropriately prioritizing the design, development, and deployment of the redesigned kill vehicle; and
(3)
added the multiple-object kill vehicle is critical to the future of the ballistic missile defense of the United States homeland.
(b)
added Multiple-object kill vehicle—
(1)
added Development— The Director of the Missile Defense Agency shall develop a highly reliable multiple-object kill vehicle for the ground-based midcourse defense system using best acquisition practices.
(2)
added Deployment— The Director shall—
(A)
added conduct rigorous flight testing of the multiple-object kill vehicle developed under paragraph (1) by not later than 2020; and
(B)
added recognizing the primacy of developing the redesigned kill vehicle, produce and deploy the multiple-object kill vehicle as early as practicable after the date on which the Director carries out paragraph (1).
(c)
added Capabilities and criteria— The Director shall ensure that the multiple-object kill vehicle developed under subsection (b)(1) meets, at a minimum, the following capabilities and criteria:
(1)
added Vehicle-to-vehicle communications.
(2)
added Vehicle-to-ground communications.
(3)
added Kill assessment capability.
(4)
added The ability to counter advanced counter measures, decoys and penetration aids.
(5)
added Produceability and manufacturability.
(6)
added Use of technology involving high technology readiness levels.
(7)
added Options to be integrated onto other missile defense interceptor vehicles other than the ground-based interceptors of the ground-based midcourse defense system.
(d)
added Program management— The management of the multiple-object kill vehicle program under subsection (b) shall report directly to the Deputy Director of the Missile Defense Agency.
(e)
added Report on funding profile— Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the funding profile of the multiple-object kill vehicle program under subsection (b).

Sec. 1672 Boost phase defense system

added
(a)
added In general— The Secretary of Defense shall—
(1)
added prioritize technology investments in the Department of Defense to support efforts by the Missile Defense Agency to develop and field a boost phase defense system by fiscal year 2022;
(2)
added ensure that development and fielding of a boost phase missile defense layer to the ballistic missile defense system supports multiple war fighter missile defense requirements, including, specifically, protection of the United States homeland and allies of the United States against ballistic missiles, particularly in the boost phase;
(3)
added continue development and fielding of high-energy lasers and high-power microwave systems as part of a layered architecture to defend ships and theater bases against air and cruise missile strikes; and
(4)
added encourage collaboration among the military departments and the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency with respect to high energy laser efforts carried out in support of the Missile Defense Agency.
(b)
added Research and development of boost phase missile defense—
(1)
added Senior level advisory group— The Director of the Missile Defense Agency shall establish a senior level advisory group (consisting of individuals with expertise in industry, science, and Department of Defense program management) to recommend to the Director promising technologies, including such technologies recommended by industry, that the Director can evaluate for use as a boost phase missile defense layer.
(2)
added Briefing— Not later than May 1, 2016, the Director shall provide to the congressional defense committees a briefing on—
(A)
added the recommendations of the senior level advisory group under paragraph (1);
(B)
added a plan for developing one or more programs of record for boost phase missile defense systems; and
(C)
added the views of the Director regarding such recommendations and plan.

Sec. 1673 East Coast homeport of sea-based X-band radar

added
(a)
added Homeport— Subject to subsection (b), not later than December 31, 2020, the Secretary of the Navy shall—
(1)
added reassign the homeport of the sea-based X-band radar to a homeport on the East Coast of the United States; and
(2)
added ensure that such vessel has an at-sea capability of not less than 120 days per year.
(b)
added Certification— The Secretary may not carry out subsection (a) until the date on which the Director of the Missile Defense Agency certifies to the congressional defense committees that Hawaii will have adequate missile defense coverage prior to the reassignment of the homeport of the sea-based X-band radar as described in such subsection.
(c)
added Required studies and evaluations— Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director shall commence any siting studies, environmental impact assessments or statements, homeport agreements for sea-based X-band radar support, evaluations of any needed pier modifications, and evaluations of any communications capabilities or other requirements to carry out the homeport reassignment under subsection (a)(1).

Sec. 1674 Plan for medium range ballistic missile defense sensor alternatives for enhanced defense of Hawaii

added
(a)
added Sense of Congress— It is the sense of Congress that—
(1)
added expanding persistent midcourse and terminal ballistic missile defense system discrimination capability is critically important to the defense of the Nation;
(2)
added such discrimination capability is needed to respond to emerging ballistic missile threats involving countermeasures and decoys; and
(3)
added the Department of Defense should take all appropriate steps to ensure Hawaii has adequate missile defense coverage.
(b)
added Evaluation and plan—
(1)
added Evaluation— The Director of the Missile Defense Agency shall conduct an evaluation of potential options for fielding medium range ballistic missile defense sensor alternatives for the defense of Hawaii, including—
(A)
added the use of the Aegis Ashore Missile Defense Test Complex land-based system at the Pacific Missile Range Facility in Hawaii;
(B)
added the use of existing sensor assets in the region; and
(C)
added other options the Director determines appropriate.
(2)
added Submittal of plan— Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director shall submit to the congressional defense committees a plan for the missile defense of Hawaii, which shall include—
(A)
added a summary of the findings of the evaluation conducted under paragraph (1);
(B)
added estimated acquisition and operating costs for each sensor option; and
(C)
added a timeline for deployment of the sensor.

Sec. 1675 Research and development of non-terrestrial missile defense layer

added
(a)
added In general— Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director of the Missile Defense Agency shall commence the concept definition, design, research, development, and engineering evaluation of a space-based ballistic missile intercept and defeat layer to the ballistic missile defense system that—
(1)
added shall provide increased access to ballistic missile targets, independent of adversary country size and threat trajectory;
(2)
added may provide a boost-phase layer for missile defense; and
(3)
added may provide additional defensive options against direct ascent anti-satellite weapons and hypersonic glide vehicles and maneuvering re-entry vehicles.
(b)
added Elements— The activities carried out under subsection (a) shall include, at a minimum the following:
(1)
added Initiate formal steps for potential integration into the architecture of the ballistic missile defense system.
(2)
added Mature planning for early proof of concept component demonstrations.
(3)
added Draft operation concepts in the context of a multi-layer architecture.
(4)
added Identification of proof of concept vendor sources for demo components and subassemblies.
(5)
added The development of a multiyear technology and risk reduction investment plan.
(6)
added Commence development of proof of concept master program phasing schedule.
(7)
added Identification of proof of concept long lead items.
(8)
added Mature options for an acquisition strategy.
(c)
added Report— Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that includes—
(1)
added the findings of the concept development required by subsection (a);
(2)
added a plan for developing one or more programs of record for a non-terrestrial missile defense layer; and
(3)
added the views of the Director regarding such findings and plan.
(d)
added Briefing— Not later the March 31, 2016, the Director shall provide to the congressional defense committees an interim briefing on the plan described in subsection (c)(2).

Sec. 1676 Aegis Ashore capability development

added
(a)
added Evaluation—
(1)
added In general— The Director of the Missile Defense Agency, in coordination with the Chief of Naval Operations and the Chief of Staff of the Army, shall evaluate the role, feasibility, cost, and cost benefit of additional Aegis Ashore sites and upgrades to current ballistic missile defense system sensors to offset capacity demands on current Aegis ships, Aegis Ashore sites, and Patriot and Terminal High Altitude Area Defense capability and to meet the requirements of the combatant commanders.
(2)
added Submission— Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff shall—
(A)
added review the evaluation conducted under paragraph (1); and
(B)
added submit to the congressional defense committees such evaluation and the results of such review.
(b)
added Identification of FMS obstacles—
(1)
added In general— The Under Secretary of Defense for Policy and the Secretary of State shall jointly identify any obstacles to foreign military sales of Aegis Ashore or co-financing of additional Aegis Ashore sites. Such evaluation shall include, with appropriate coordination with other agencies and departments of the Federal Government as appropriate, the feasibility of host nation manning or dual manning with the United States and such host nation.
(2)
added Submission—
(A)
added Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary shall provide to the congressional defense committees, the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives, and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate an interim briefing on the identification of obstacles under paragraph (1).
(B)
added Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary shall submit to such committees a report on such identification.
(c)
added Negotiations—
(1)
added In general— The President shall seek to enter into host nation agreements for Aegis Ashore sites and co-financing and co-development opportunities as appropriate if the sites meet the requirements of the combatant commanders.
(2)
added Submission— Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the President shall transmit to the congressional defense, the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives, and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate the status of efforts to seek to enter into agreements described in paragraph (1).

Sec. 1677 Briefings on procurement and planning of left-of-launch capability

added
(a)
added Briefing on current capability— Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff shall provide to the appropriate congressional committees a briefing on the military requirement for left-of-launch capability and any current gaps in meeting such requirement.
(b)
added Briefing on joint review and plan to develop and procure capabilities— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense and the Director of National Intelligence shall jointly provide to the appropriate congressional committees a briefing on the plan of the Secretary and the Director to develop and procure the left-of-launch capabilities as described in the briefing under subsection (a).
(c)
added Appropriate congressional committees defined— In this section, the term “appropriate congressional committees” means—
(1)
added the congressional defense committees; and
(2)
added the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate.

Sec. 2001 Short title

added

added This division may be cited as the “Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016”.

Sec. 2002 Expiration of authorizations and amounts required to be specified by law

added
(a)
added Expiration of authorizations after three years— Except as provided in subsection (b), all authorizations contained in titles XXI through XXVII and title XXIX for military construction projects, land acquisition, family housing projects and facilities, and contributions to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program (and authorizations of appropriations therefor) shall expire on the later of—
(1)
added October 1, 2018; or
(2)
added the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2019.
(b)
added Exception— Subsection (a) shall not apply to authorizations for military construction projects, land acquisition, family housing projects and facilities, and contributions to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program (and authorizations of appropriations therefor), for which appropriated funds have been obligated before the later of—
(1)
added October 1, 2018; or
(2)
added the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for fiscal year 2019 for military construction projects, land acquisition, family housing projects and facilities, or contributions to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program.

Sec. 2003 Effective date

added

added Titles XXI through XXVII and title XXIX shall take effect on the later of—

(1)
added October 1, 2015; or
(2)
added the date of the enactment of this Act.

Sec. 2101 Authorized Army construction and land acquisition projects

added
(a)
added Inside the united states— Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2104(a) and available for military construction projects inside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installations or locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:
(b)
added Outside the united states— Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2104(a) and available for military construction projects outside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may acquire real property and carry out the military construction project for the installation outside the United States, and in the amount, set forth in the following table:

Sec. 2102 Family housing

added
(a)
added Construction and acquisition— Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2104(a) and available for military family housing functions as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may construct or acquire family housing units (including land acquisition and supporting facilities) at the installations or locations, in the number of units, and in the amounts set forth in the following table:
(b)
added Planning and design— Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2104(a) and available for military family housing functions as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may carry out architectural and engineering services and construction design activities with respect to the construction or improvement of family housing units in an amount not to exceed $7,195,000.

Sec. 2103 Improvements to military family housing units

added

added Subject to section 2825 of title 10, United States Code, and using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2104(a) and available for military family housing functions as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may improve existing military family housing units in an amount not to exceed $3,500,000.

Sec. 2104 Authorization of appropriations, Army

added
(a)
added Authorization of appropriations— Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2015, for military construction, land acquisition, and military family housing functions of the Department of the Army as specified in the funding table in section 4601.
(b)
added Limitation on total cost of construction projects— Notwithstanding the cost variations authorized by section 2853 of title 10, United States Code, and any other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost of all projects carried out under section 2101 of this Act may not exceed the total amount authorized to be appropriated under subsection (a), as specified in the funding table in section 4601.

Sec. 2105 Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2013 project

added

added In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 2101(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2119) for the United States Military Academy, New York, for construction of a Cadet barracks building at the installation, the Secretary of the Army may install mechanical equipment and distribution lines sufficient to provide chilled water for air conditioning the nine existing historical Cadet barracks which are being renovated through the Cadet Barracks Upgrade Program.

Sec. 2106 Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2012 projects

added
(a)
added Extension— Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1660), the authorizations set forth in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2101 of that Act (125 Stat. 1661) and extended by section 2107 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (division B of Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3673), shall remain in effect until October 1, 2016, or the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2017, whichever is later.
(b)
added Table— The table referred to in subsection (a) as follows:

Sec. 2107 Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2013 projects

added
(a)
added Extension— Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2118), the authorizations set forth in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2101 of that Act (126 Stat. 2119), shall remain in effect until October 1, 2016, or the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2017, whichever is later:
(b)
added Table— The table referred to in subsection (a) is as follows:

Sec. 2108 Additional authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2016 projects

added
(a)
added Brussels— The Secretary of the Army may carry out a military construction project to construct a multi-sport athletic field and track and perimeter road and fencing and acquire approximately 5 acres of land adjacent to the existing Sterrebeek Dependent School site to allow relocation of Army functions to the site in support of the European Infrastructure Consolidation effort, in the amount of $6,000,000.
(b)
added Rhine ordnance barracks—
(1)
added Project authorization— The Secretary of the Army may carry out a military construction project to construct a vehicle bridge and traffic circle to facilitate traffic flow to and from the Medical Center at Rhine Ordnance Barracks, Germany, in the amount of $12,400,000.
(2)
added Use of host-nation payment-in-kind funds— The Secretary may use available host-nation payment-in-kind funding for the project described in paragraph (1).

Sec. 2201 Authorized Navy construction and land acquisition projects

added
(a)
added Inside the United States— Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2204(a) and available for military construction projects inside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installations or locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:
(b)
added Outside the United States— Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2204(a) and available for military construction projects outside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installations or locations outside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:

Sec. 2202 Family housing

added
(a)
added Construction and acquisition— Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2204(a) and available for military family housing functions as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy may construct or acquire family housing units (including land acquisition and supporting facilities) at the installation or location, in the number of units, and in the amount set forth in the following table:
(b)
added Planning and design— Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2204(a) and available for military family housing functions as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy may carry out architectural and engineering services and construction design activities with respect to the construction or improvement of family housing units in an amount not to exceed $4,588,000.

Sec. 2203 Improvements to military family housing units

added

added Subject to section 2825 of title 10, United States Code, and using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2204(a) and available for military family housing functions as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy may improve existing military family housing units in an amount not to exceed $11,515,000.

Sec. 2204 Authorization of appropriations, Navy

added
(a)
added Authorization of appropriations— Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2015, for military construction, land acquisition, and military family housing functions of the Department of the Navy, as specified in the funding table in section 4601.
(b)
added Limitation on total cost of construction projects— Notwithstanding the cost variations authorized by section 2853 of title 10, United States Code, and any other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost of all projects carried out under section 2201 of this Act may not exceed the total amount authorized to be appropriated under subsection (a), as specified in the funding table in section 4601.

Sec. 2205 Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2012 projects

added
(a)
added Extension— Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1660), the authorizations set forth in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2201 of that Act (125 Stat. 1666) and extended by section 2208 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (division B of Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3678), shall remain in effect until October 1, 2016, or the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2017, whichever is later.
(b)
added Table— The table referred to in subsection (a) is as follows:

Sec. 2206 Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2013 projects

added
(a)
added Extension— Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2118), the authorizations set forth in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2201 of that Act (126 Stat. 2122), shall remain in effect until October 1, 2016, or the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2017, whichever is later.
(b)
added Table— The table referred to in subsection (a) is as follows:

Sec. 2207 Townsend Bombing Range expansion, phase 2

added
(a)
added Conveyance authority— With respect to the authorization contained in section 2201(a) for expansion of Townsend Bombing Range to support Marine Corps Air Station, Beaufort, Georgia, the Secretary of the Navy may convey, without consideration, to McIntosh County and Long County, Georgia (in this section referred to as the “County”), all right, title, and interest of the United States in and to two fire and emergency response stations to be constructed as part of the land acquisition.
(b)
added Use of conveyed property—
(1)
added Provision of secondary fire and emergency support— As a condition for the construction and conveyance under subsection (a) of the fire and emergency response stations, each County shall enter into a mutual support agreement with the Secretary of the Navy to provide secondary fire and emergency support for the Townsend Bombing Range. Each County shall agree to equip, staff, and operate the fire and emergency response station conveyed to that County in accordance with the terms of the agreement.
(2)
added Subsequent payment of consideration— If the Secretary of the Navy determines that a fire and emergency response station conveyed to a County under subsection (a) is ever put to a primary use other than as a fire and emergency response station, that County shall pay, at the election of the Secretary, an amount equal to the then current fair market value of the fire and emergency response station, as determined by the Secretary.
(c)
added Environmental and zoning requirements— Each County shall be responsible for meeting any environmental requirements associated with the County-owned land, including any permits, or other local zoning processes, in preparation for the construction of the fire and emergency response station on the land.
(d)
added Description of property— The exact acreage and legal description of the property to be conveyed under subsection (a) shall be determined by a survey satisfactory to the Secretary of the Navy.
(e)
added Conveyance agreement— The conveyance of real property under subsection (a) shall be accomplished using a quit claim deed or other legal instrument and upon terms and conditions mutually satisfactory to the Secretary of the Navy and the County, including such additional terms and conditions as the Secretary considers appropriate to protect the interests of the United States.

Sec. 2301 Authorized Air Force construction and land acquisition projects

added
(a)
added Inside the United States— Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2304(a) and available for military construction projects inside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Air Force may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installations or locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:
(b)
added Outside the United States— Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2304(a) and available for military construction projects outside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Air Force may acquire real property and carry out the military construction projects for the installations or locations outside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:

Sec. 2302 Family housing

added

added Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2304(a) and available for military family housing functions as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Air Force may carry out architectural and engineering services and construction design activities with respect to the construction or improvement of family housing units in an amount not to exceed $9,849,000.

Sec. 2303 Improvements to military family housing units

added

added Subject to section 2825 of title 10, United States Code, and using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2304(a) and available for military family housing functions as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Air Force may improve existing military family housing units in an amount not to exceed $150,649,000.

Sec. 2304 Authorization of appropriations, Air Force

added
(a)
added Authorization of appropriations— Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2015, for military construction, land acquisition, and military family housing functions of the Department of the Air Force, as specified in the funding table in section 4601.
(b)
added Limitation on total cost of construction projects— Notwithstanding the cost variations authorized by section 2853 of title 10, United States Code, and any other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost of all projects carried out under section 2301 of this Act may not exceed the total amount authorized to be appropriated under subsection (a), as specified in the funding table in section 4601.

Sec. 2305 Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2010 project

added

added In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 2301(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (division B of Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2636) for Hickam Air Force Base, Hawaii, for construction of a ground control tower at the installation, the Secretary of the Air Force may install communications cabling.

Sec. 2306 Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2014 project

added
(a)
added Authorization— In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 2301(b) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (division B of Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 993) for Royal Air Force Lakenheath, United Kingdom, for construction of a Guardian Angel Operations Facility at the installation, the Secretary of the Air Force may construct the facility at an unspecified location within the United States European Command’s area of responsibility.
(b)
added Notice and Wait Requirement— Before the Secretary of the Air Force commences construction of the Guardian Angel Operations Facility at an alternative location, as authorized by subsection (a)—
(1)
added the Secretary shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report containing a description of the project, including the rational for selection of the project location; and
(2)
added a period of 14 days has expired following the date on which the report is received by the committees or, if over sooner, a period of 7 days has expired following the date on which a copy of the report is provided in an electronic medium pursuant to section 480 of title 10, United States Code.

Sec. 2307 Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2015 project

added

added In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 2301(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (division B of Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3679) for McConnell Air Force Base, Kansas, for construction of a KC-46A Alter Composite Maintenance Shop at the installation, the Secretary of the Air Force may construct a 696 square meter (7,500 square foot) facility consistent with Air Force guidelines for composite maintenance shops.

Sec. 2308 Extension of authorization of certain fiscal year 2012 project

added
(a)
added Extension— Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1660), the authorization set forth in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2301 of that Act (125 Stat. 1670) and extended by section 2305 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (division B of Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3680), shall remain in effect until October 1, 2016, or the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2017, whichever is later.
(b)
added Table— The table referred to in subsection (a) is as follows:

Sec. 2309 Extension of authorization of certain fiscal year 2013 project

added
(a)
added Extension— Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2118), the authorization set forth in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2301 of that Act (126 Stat. 2126), shall remain in effect until October 1, 2016, or the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2017, whichever is later.
(b)
added Table— The table referred to in subsection (a) is as follows:

Sec. 2310 Limitation on project authorization to carry out certain fiscal year 2016 project

added
(a)
added Project conditioned on submission of report— No amounts may be expended for the construction of the Joint Intelligence Analysis Complex Consolidation, Phase 2, at Royal Air Force Croughton, United Kingdom, as authorized by section 2301(b) until the Secretary of the Air Force, in coordination with the Director of the Defense Intelligence Agency, submits a report to the congressional defense committees that provides—
(1)
added a summary of the alternatives considered to support continuity of operations of critical communications and intelligence capabilities located at, and to be consolidated to, Royal Air Force Croughton, United Kingdom; and
(2)
added a list of critical communications and intelligence capabilities that were considered under continuity of operations planning.
(b)
added Limitation on related realignment actions— On and after the date of the enactment of this Act, no additional action to realign forces at Lajes Air Force Base, Azores, shall be taken until the Secretary of Defense certifies to the congressional defense committees that the Secretary of Defense has determined, based on an analysis of operational requirements, that Lajes Air Force Base is not an optimal location for the Joint Intelligence Analysis Complex, or any of the critical communications or intelligence capabilities considered pursuant to subsection (a)(2). The certification shall include a discussion of the basis for the Secretary’s determination.

Sec. 2401 Authorized Defense Agencies construction and land acquisition projects

added
(a)
added Inside the United States— Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2403(a) and available for military construction projects inside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of Defense may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installations or locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:
(b)
added Outside the United States— Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2403(a) and available for military construction projects outside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of Defense may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installations or locations outside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:

Sec. 2402 Authorized energy conservation projects

added
(a)
added Inside the United States— Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2403(a) and available for energy conservation projects as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of Defense may carry out energy conservation projects under chapter 173 of title 10, United States Code, in the amount set forth in the table:
(b)
added Outside the United States— Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2403(a) and available for energy conservation projects outside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of Defense may carry out energy conservation projects under chapter 173 of title 10, United States Code, for the installations or locations outside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:
(c)
added Limitation on Set-Aside of Facilities Restoration and Modernization Program Funds for Energy Projects— Amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriation in Section 301 for operation and maintenance and made available for facilities restoration and modernization may not be set-aside for the exclusive purpose of funding energy projects on military installations. Installation energy projects must compete in the normal process of determining installation requirements.

Sec. 2403 Authorization of appropriations, Defense Agencies

added
(a)
added Authorization of appropriations— Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2015, for military construction, land acquisition, and military family housing functions of the Department of Defense (other than the military departments), as specified in the funding table in section 4601.
(b)
added Limitation on total cost of construction projects— Notwithstanding the cost variations authorized by section 2853 of title 10, United States Code, and any other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost of all projects carried out under section 2401 of this Act may not exceed the total amount authorized to be appropriated under subsection (a), as specified in the funding table in section 4601.

Sec. 2404 Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2012 project

added

added In the case of the authorization in the table in section 2401(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1672), as amended by section 2404(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1632), for Fort Meade, Maryland, for construction of the High Performance Computing Center at the installation, the Secretary of Defense may construct a generator plant capable of producing up to 60 megawatts of back-up electrical power in support of the 60 megawatt technical load.

Sec. 2405 Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2012 projects

added
(a)
added Extension— Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1660), the authorizations set forth in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2401 of that Act (125 Stat. 1672) and extended by section 2405 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (division B of Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3685), shall remain in effect until October 1, 2016, or the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2017, whichever is later.
(b)
added Table— The table referred to in subsection (a) is as follows:

Sec. 2406 Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2013 projects

added
(a)
added Extension— Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2118), the authorizations set forth in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2401(a) of that Act (126 Stat. 2127), shall remain in effect until October 1, 2016, or the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2017, whichever is later.
(b)
added Table— The table referred to in subsection (a) is as follows:

Sec. 2407 Modification and extension of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2014 project

added
(a)
added Modification— In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 2401(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (division B of Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 995), for Fort Knox, Kentucky, for construction of an Ambulatory Care Center at the installation, the Secretary of Defense may construct a 102,000-square foot medical clinic at the installation in the amount of $80,000,000 using appropriations available for the project pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2403 of such Act (127 Stat. 998).
(b)
added Duration of authority— Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (division B of Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 985), the authorization set forth in subsection (a) shall remain in effect until October 1, 2018, or the date of enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2019, whichever is later.

Sec. 2501 Authorized NATO construction and land acquisition projects

added

added The Secretary of Defense may make contributions for the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program as provided in section 2806 of title 10, United States Code, in an amount not to exceed the sum of the amount authorized to be appropriated for this purpose in section 2502 and the amount collected from the North Atlantic Treaty Organization as a result of construction previously financed by the United States.

Sec. 2502 Authorization of appropriations, NATO

added

added Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2015, for contributions by the Secretary of Defense under section 2806 of title 10, United States Code, for the share of the United States of the cost of projects for the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program authorized by section 2501 as specified in the funding table in section 4601.

Sec. 2601 Authorized Army National Guard construction and land acquisition projects

added

added Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2606(a) and available for the National Guard and Reserve as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the Army National Guard locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:

Sec. 2602 Authorized Army Reserve construction and land acquisition projects

added
added Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2606(a) and available for the National Guard and Reserve as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the Army Reserve locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:

Sec. 2603 Authorized Navy Reserve and Marine Corps Reserve construction and land acquisition projects

added

added Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2606(a) and available for the National Guard and Reserve as specified in section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the Navy Reserve and Marine Corps Reserve locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:

Sec. 2604 Authorized Air National Guard construction and land acquisition projects

added

added Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2606(a) and available for the National Guard and Reserve as specified in section 4601, the Secretary of the Air Force may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the Air National Guard locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:

Sec. 2605 Authorized Air Force Reserve construction and land acquisition projects

added

added Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2606(a) and available for the National Guard and Reserve as specified in section 4601, the Secretary of the Air Force may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the Air Force Reserve locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:

Sec. 2606 Authorization of appropriations, National Guard and Reserve

added
(a)
added Authorization of appropriations— Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2015, for the costs of acquisition, architectural and engineering services, and construction of facilities for the Guard and Reserve Forces, and for contributions therefor, under chapter 1803 of title 10, United States Code (including the cost of acquisition of land for those facilities), as specified in the funding table in section 4601.
(b)
added Limitation on total cost of construction projects— Notwithstanding the cost variations authorized by section 2853 of title 10, United States Code, and any other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost of all projects carried out under sections 2601 through 2605 of this Act may not exceed the sum of the total amount authorized to be appropriated under subsection (a), as specified in the funding table in section 4601.

Sec. 2611 Modification and extension of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2013 project

added
(a)
added Modification— In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 2602 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2135) for Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland, for construction of an Army Reserve Center at that location, the Secretary of the Army may construct a new facility in the vicinity of Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland.
(b)
added Duration of authority— Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2118), the authorization set forth in subsection (a) shall remain in effect until October 1, 2016, or the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2017, whichever is later.

Sec. 2612 Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2012 projects

added
(a)
added Extension— Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1660), the authorizations set forth in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2602 of that Act (125 Stat. 1678), and extended by section 2611 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (division B of Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3690), shall remain in effect until October 1, 2016, or the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2017, whichever is later.
(b)
added Table— The table referred to in subsection (a) is as follows:

Sec. 2613 Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2013 projects

added
(a)
added Extension— Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2118), the authorizations set forth in the table in subsection (b), as provided in sections 2601, 2602, and 2603 of that Act (126 Stat. 2134, 2135) shall remain in effect until October 1, 2016, or the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2017, whichever is later.
(b)
added Table— The table referred to in subsection (a) is a follows:

Sec. 2701 Authorization of appropriations for base realignment and closure activities funded through Department of Defense base closure account

added

added Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2015, for base realignment and closure activities, including real property acquisition and military construction projects, as authorized by the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 (part A of title XXIX of Public Law 101–510; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note) and funded through the Department of Defense Base Closure Account established by section 2906 of such Act (as amended by section 2711 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2140)), as specified in the funding table in section 4601.

Sec. 2702 Prohibition on conducting additional Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) round

added

added Nothing in this Act shall be construed to authorize an additional Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) round.

Sec. 2801 Revision of congressional notification thresholds for reserve facility expenditures and contributions to reflect congressional notification thresholds for minor construction and repair projects

added Section 18233a of title 10, United States Code, is amended—

(1)
added in subsection (a), by striking “in an amount in excess of $750,000” and inserting “in excess of the amount specified in section 2805(b)(1) of this title”; and
(2)
added in subsection (b)(3), by striking “section 2811(e) of this title) that costs less than $7,500,000” and inserting “subsection (e) of section 2811 of this title) that costs less than the amount specified in subsection (d) of such section”.
(a)
removed Limited authority for scope of work increase— Section 2853 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
removed in subsection (b)(2), by striking “The scope of work” and inserting “Except as provided in subsection (d), the scope of work”;
(2)
removed by redesignating subsections (d) and (e) as subsections (e) and (f), respectively; and
(3)
removed by inserting after subsection (c) the following new subsection (d):

removed “(d) The limitation in subsection (b)(2) on an increase in the scope of work does not apply if—

removed “(1) the increase in the scope of work is not more than 10 percent of the amount specified for that project, construction, improvement, or acquisition in the justification data provided to Congress as part of the request for authorization of the project, construction, improvement, or acquisition;

removed “(2) the increase is approved by the Secretary concerned;

removed “(3) the Secretary concerned notifies the appropriate committees of Congress in writing of the increase in scope and the reasons therefor; and

removed “(4) a period of 21 days has elapsed after the date on which the notification is received by the committees or, if over sooner, a period of 14 days has elapsed after the date on which a copy of the notification is provided in an electronic medium pursuant to section 480 of this title.”

(b)
removed Cross-Reference amendments—
(1)
removed Subsection (a) of such section is amended by striking “subsection (c) or (d)” and inserting “subsection (c), (d), or (e)”.
(2)
removed Subsection (f) of such section, as redesignated by subsection (a)(2), is amended by striking “through (d)” and inserting “through (e)”.
(c)
removed Additional technical amendments—
(1)
removed Conformity with general title 10 style— Subsection (a) of such section is further amended by inserting “of this title” after “section 2805(a)”.
(2)
removed Deletion of surplus word— Subsection (c)(1)(A) of such section is amended by striking “be” after “Congress can”.

Sec. 2802 Authority for acceptance and use of contributions from Kuwait for construction, maintenance, and repair projects mutually beneficial to the Department of Defense and Kuwait military forces

(a)
added Authority— Subchapter II of chapter 138 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

added “2350n. Authority to accept and use contributions for construction, maintenance, and repair projects mutually beneficial to the Department of Defense and Kuwait military forces

added “(a) Authority to accept and use contributions—The Secretary of Defense, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State, may accept cash contributions from the government of Kuwait for the purpose of paying costs in connection with construction (including military construction not otherwise authorized by law), maintenance, and repair projects in Kuwait that are mutually beneficial to the Department of Defense and Kuwait military forces.

added “(b) Deposit and availability—Contributions accepted under subsection (a) shall be deposited in an account established in the Treasury and shall be available to the Secretary of Defense, in such amounts as may be provided in advance in appropriation Acts, until expended for a purpose specified in subsection (a).

added “(c) Determination of mutually beneficial—A construction, maintenance, or repair project is mutually beneficial for purposes of subsection (a) if—

added “(1) the project is in support of a bilateral United States and Kuwait defense cooperation agreement; or

added “(2) the Secretary of Defense determines, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State, that the United States may derive a benefit from the project, including—

added “(A) access to and use of facilities of Kuwait military forces;

added “(B) ability or capacity for future posture; and

added “(C) increased interoperability between United States armed forces and Kuwait military forces.

added “(d) Limitation on annual obligations—The maximum amount that the Secretary of Defense, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State, may obligate in any fiscal year under this section is $50,000,000.

added “(e) Notice and wait—When a decision is made to carry out a construction, maintenance, or repair project using contributions accepted under subsection (a) and the estimated cost of the project will exceed the thresholds prescribed by section 2805 of this title, the Secretary of Defense shall notify in writing the congressional defense committees, the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate, and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives of that decision, of the justification for the project, and of the estimated cost of the project. The project may then be carried out only after the end of the 21-day period beginning on the date the notification is received by the committees or, if earlier, the end of the 14-day period beginning on the date on which a copy of the notification is provided in an electronic medium pursuant to section 480 of this title.

added “(f) Expiration of authority—The authority to carry out construction, maintenance, and repair projects under this section expires on September 30, 2020.”

removed Section 2803 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—

(b)
changed Clerical amendment— by redesignating paragraph (2) The table of subsection (c) as subsection (d); andsections at the beginning of subchapter II of chapter 138 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new item:
(2)
removed in subsection (c)—
(A)
removed by striking “The maximum amount” and inserting “Except as provided in paragraph (2), the maximum amount”; and
(B)
removed by adding at the end the following new paragraph (2):

removed “(2) In applying the limitation under paragraph (1) for any fiscal year, the Secretary concerned may exclude any amount obligated by the Secretary under this section in that fiscal year for a military construction project that is carried out to support the requirements of the commander of a combatant command, except that the maximum amount that may be so excluded by the Secretary concerned in any fiscal year is $25,000,000.”

Sec. 2803 Defense laboratory modernization pilot program

(a)
added Program authorized— The Secretary of Defense may carry out, using amounts authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Defense for Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation, such military construction projects as are authorized in a Military Construction Authorization Act at—
(1)
added any Department of Defense Science and Technology Reinvention Laboratory (as designated by section 1105(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 10 U.S.C. 2358 note); and
(2)
added Department of Defense Federally Funded Research and Development Centers that function primarily as research laboratories located on a military installation on facilities owned by the Government.
(b)
added Scope of project authority— Authority provided by law to carry out a military construction project under this section includes authority for—
(1)
added surveys, site preparation, and advanced planning and design;
(2)
added acquisition, conversion, rehabilitation, and installation of facilities;
(3)
added acquisition and installation of equipment and appurtenances integral to the project; acquisition and installation of supporting facilities (including utilities) and appurtenances incident to the project; and
(4)
added planning, supervision, administration, and overhead expenses incident to the project.
(c)
added Submission of project requests— The Secretary of Defense shall include military construction projects proposed to be carried out under this section in the budget justification documents for the Department of Defense submitted to Congress in connection with the budget for a fiscal year submitted under 1105 of title 31, United States Code.
(d)
added Projects described— The authority provided by this section shall be used for military construction projects that—
(1)
added will support research and development activities at laboratories described in subsection (a)(1) of more than one military department or Defense Agency and centers described in subsection (a)(2);
(2)
added will establish facilities that will have significant potential for use by entities outside the Department of Defense, including universities, industrial partners, and other Federal agencies; and
(3)
added are endorsed for funding by more than one military department or Defense Agency.
(e)
added Funding limitation— The maximum amount that may be obligated in any fiscal year under the authority provided by this section is $150,000,000.
(f)
added Termination of authority— The authority provided by this section shall terminate on October 1, 2020.

removed Section 2805 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

removed “(f) Adjustment of dollar limitations for location—Each fiscal year, the Secretary concerned shall adjust the dollar limitations specified in this section applicable to an unspecified minor military construction project to reflect the area construction cost index for military construction projects published by the Department of Defense during the prior fiscal year for the location of the project.”

Sec. 2811 Enhancement of authority to accept conditional gifts of real property on behalf of military service academies

added

added Section 2601 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—

(1)
added by redesigning subsections (e), (f), (g), (h), and (i) as subsections (f), (g), (h), (i), and (j), respectively; and
(2)
added by inserting after subsection (d) the following new subsection (e):

added “(e) Acceptance of real property gifts; naming rights

added “(1) The Secretary concerned may accept a gift under subsection (a) or (b) consisting of the provision, acquisition, enhancement, or construction of real property offered to the United States Military Academy, the Naval Academy, the Air Force Academy, or the Coast Guard Academy even though the gift will be subject to the condition that the real property, or a portion thereof, bear a specified name.

added “(2) A gift may not be accepted under paragraph (1) if—

added “(A) the acceptance of the gift or the imposition of the naming-rights condition would reflect unfavorably upon the United States, as provided in subsection (d)(2); or

added “(B) the real property to be subject to the condition, or portion thereof, has been named by an act of Congress.

added “(3) The Secretaries concerned shall issue uniform regulations governing the circumstances under which gifts conditioned on naming rights may be accepted, appropriate naming conventions, and suitable display standards.”

Sec. 2812 Consultation requirement in connection with Department of Defense major land acquisitions

added

added Section 2664(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—

(1)
added by inserting “(1)” before “No military department”;
(2)
added by inserting after the first sentence the following new paragraph:

added “(2) If the real property acquisition is a major land acquisition inside a State, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, or any territory or possession of the United States, the Secretary concerned shall consult with the chief executive officer of the State, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, or the territory or possession in which the land is located to determine options for completing the real property acquisition.”

(3)
added by striking “The foregoing limitation” and inserting the following:

added “(3) The limitations imposed by paragraphs (1) and (2)”

(4)
added by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

added “(4) In this subsection, the term “major land acquisition” means any land acquisition not covered by the authority to acquire low-cost interests in land under section 2663(c) of this title.”

Sec. 2813 Additional master plan reporting requirements related to main operating bases, forward operating sites, and cooperative security locations of Central Command and Africa Command Areas of Responsibility

added

added Section 2687a(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

added “(3) In the case of each report under paragraph (1) submitted during fiscal years 2016 through 2020, the report also shall address or include the following with respect to each main operating base, forward operating site, or cooperative security location within the Area of Responsibility of the Central Command or Africa Command:

added “(A) The strategic goal and operational requirements supported by the base, site, or location, and the basis for any infrastructure improvements to the base, site, or location.

added “(B) The estimated steady-state population of the base, site, or location, including the number of military personnel, Department of Defense civilian personnel, and non-Department of Defense personnel, including contractors.

added “(C) A prioritized list of all anticipated near-term, mid-term, and long-term infrastructure projects for the base, site, or location, an estimated total cost to complete each project, and expected start and completion dates.

added “(D) A discussion of the medical services and support services, including capacities of commissaries, exchanges, or other support services, necessary to support the steady-state population of the base, site, or location, including any necessary investments in facilities to provide these services.

added “(E) Current estimated costs, including United States appropriated funds and host-nation contributions, addressing all costs associated with constructing, sustaining, repairing, or modernizing the infrastructure necessary to support the United States military posture at the base, site, or location.

added “(F) A long-term funding plan for the base, site, or location, identifying the military department or Defense Agency to be responsible for providing funding for the base, site, or location and the sources of funds for construction of new facilities, sustainment and restoration of existing facilities, and operations and maintenance costs.

added “(G) A summary of the terms of agreements with the host nation, including access agreements, status-of-forces agreements, or other implementing agreements, and their specific terms (such as timeframe and cost) and limitations on United States presence and operations.

added “(H) A comparison and explanation of any changes made from the report submitted in the previous year regarding the items required by the preceding subparagraphs.”

Sec. 2814 Force-structure plan and infrastructure inventory and assessment of infrastructure necessary to support the force structure

added
(a)
added Preparation and submission of force-structure plans and infrastructure inventory— As part of the budget justification documents submitted to Congress in support of the budget for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2017, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress the following:
(1)
added A force-structure plan for each of the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marine Corps based on an assessment by the Secretary of the probable threats to United States national security during the 20-year period beginning with fiscal year 2017, and the end-strength levels and major military force units (including land force divisions, carrier and other major combatant vessels, air wings, and other comparable units) authorized in the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81).
(2)
added A comprehensive inventory of military installations world-wide for each military department, with specifications of the number and type of facilities in the active and reserve forces of each military department.
(b)
added Relationship of plans and inventory— Using the force-structure plans and infrastructure inventory prepared under subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall prepare (and include as part of the submission of such plans and inventory) the following:
(1)
added A description of the infrastructure necessary to support the force structure described in each force-structure plan.
(2)
added A discussion of categories of excess infrastructure and infrastructure capacity, and the Secretary’s objective for the reduction of such excess capacity.
(3)
added An assessment of the value of retaining certain excess infrastructure to accommodate contingency, mobilization, or surge requirements.
(c)
added Special considerations— In determining the level of necessary versus excess infrastructure under subsection (b), the Secretary of Defense shall consider the following:
(1)
added The anticipated continuing need for and availability of military installations outside the United States, taking into account current restrictions on the use of military installations outside the United States and the potential for future prohibitions or restrictions on the use of such military installations.
(2)
added Any efficiencies that may be gained from joint tenancy by more than one branch of the Armed Forces at a military installation or the reorganization or association of two or more military installations as a single military installation.
(d)
added Comptroller general evaluation—
(1)
added Evaluation required— The Comptroller General of the United States shall prepare an evaluation of the force-structure plans and infrastructure inventory prepared under subsection (a), including an evaluation of the accuracy and analytical sufficiency of the plans and inventory.
(2)
added Submission— The Comptroller General shall submit the evaluation to Congress not later than 60 days after the date on which the force-structure plans and infrastructure inventory are submitted to Congress.

Sec. 2821 Restriction on development of public infrastructure in connection with realignment of Marine Corps forces in Asia-Pacific region

added
(a)
added Restriction— If the Secretary of Defense determines that any grant, cooperative agreement, transfer of funds to another Federal agency, or supplement of funds available under Federal programs administered by agencies other than the Department of Defense will result in the development (including repair, replacement, renovation, conversion, improvement, expansion, acquisition, or construction) of public infrastructure on Guam, the Secretary of Defense may not carry out such grant, transfer, cooperative agreement, or supplemental funding unless such grant, transfer, cooperative agreement, or supplemental funding will be used—
(1)
added to carry out a public infrastructure project—
(A)
added that was included in the report prepared by the Secretary of Defense under section 2822(d)(2) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (division B of Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 1017); and
(B)
added for which amounts have been appropriated or made available to be expended by the Department of Defense before the date of the enactment of this Act; or
(2)
added to perform planning and design work in connection with a public infrastructure project described in paragraph (1).
(b)
added Public infrastructure defined— In this section, the term “public infrastructure” means any utility, method of transportation, item of equipment, or facility under the control of a public entity or State or local government that is used by, or constructed for the benefit of, the general public.
(c)
added Repeal of Superseded Law— Subsection (b) of section 2821 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (division B of Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3701) is repealed.

Sec. 2822 Annual report on Government of Japan contributions toward realignment of Marine Corps forces in Asia-Pacific region

added
(a)
added Report required— Not later than the date of the submission of the budget of the President for each of fiscal years 2017 through 2026 under section 1105 of title 31, United States Code, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that specifies each of the following:
(1)
added The total amount contributed by the Government of Japan during the most recently concluded Japanese fiscal year under section 2350k of title 10, United States Code, for deposit in the Support for United States Relocation to Guam Account.
(2)
added The anticipated contributions to be made by the Government of Japan under such section during the current and next Japanese fiscal years.
(3)
added The projects carried out on Guam or the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands during the previous fiscal year using amounts in the Support for United States Relocation to Guam Account.
(4)
added The anticipated projects that will be carried out on Guam or the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands during the fiscal year covered by the budget submission using amounts in such Account.
(b)
added Repeal of Superseded reporting requirement— Subsection (e) of section 2824 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (division B of Public Law 110–417; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note) is repealed.

Sec. 2831 Land exchange authority, Mare Island Army Reserve Center, Vallejo, California

added
(a)
added Exchange authorized— Subject to subsection (b), the Secretary of the Army may carry out a real property exchange with Touro University California (in this section referred to as the “University”), under which the Secretary will convey all right, title, and interest of the United States in and to a parcel of real property, including any improvements thereon, consisting of approximately 3.42 acres of the former Mare Island Naval Shipyard on Azuar Drive in the City of Vallejo, California, and administered by the Secretary as part of the 63rd Regional Support Command, for the purpose of permitting the University to use the parcel for educational and administrative purposes.
(b)
added Conveyance authority conditional— The conveyance authority provided by subsection (a) shall take effect only if the real property exchange process initiated by the Secretary of the Army in a notice of availability (DACW05-8-15-512) issued on January 28, 2015, and involving the real property described in subsection (a) is terminated unsuccessfully.
(c)
added Conveyance process— The Secretary shall carry out the real property exchange authorized by subsection (a) using the authority available to the Secretary under section 18240 of title 10, United States Code.
(d)
added Facilities to be acquired— In exchange for the conveyance of the real property under subsection (a), the Secretary of the Army shall acquire, consistent with subsections (c) and (d) of section 18240 of title 10, United States Code, a facility, or addition to an existing facility, needed to rectify the parking shortage for the Mare Island Army Reserve Center.
(e)
added Payment of costs of conveyance—
(1)
added Payment required— The Secretary of the Army shall require the University to cover costs (except costs for environmental remediation of the property) to be incurred by the Secretary, or to reimburse the Secretary for such costs incurred by the Secretary, to carry out the conveyance under subsection (a), including survey costs, costs for environmental documentation related to the conveyance, and any other administrative costs related to the conveyance. If amounts are collected from the University in advance of the Secretary incurring the actual costs, and the amount collected exceeds the costs actually incurred by the Secretary to carry out the conveyance, the Secretary shall refund the excess amount to the University.
(2)
added Treatment of amounts received— Amounts received as reimbursement under paragraph (1) shall be credited to the fund or account that was used to cover those costs incurred by the Secretary in carrying out the conveyance or, if the period of availability for obligations for that appropriation has expired, to the appropriations or fund that is currently available to the Secretary for the same purpose. Amounts so credited shall be merged with amounts in such fund or account, and shall be available for the same purposes, and subject to the same conditions and limitations, as amounts in such fund or account.
(f)
added Description of property— The exact acreage and legal description of the property to be conveyed under subsection (a) and acquired under subsection (d) shall be determined by a survey satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army.

Sec. 2832 Land exchange, Navy outlying landing field, Naval Air Station, Whiting Field, Florida

added
(a)
added Land exchange authorized— The Secretary of the Navy (in this section referred to as the “Secretary”) may convey to Escambia County, Florida (in this section referred to as the “County”), all right, title, and interest of the United States in and to a parcel of real property, including any improvements thereon, containing Navy Outlying Landing Field Site 8 in Escambia County associated with Naval Air Station, Whiting Field, Milton, Florida.
(b)
added Land to be acquired— In exchange for the property described in subsection (a), the County shall convey to the Secretary of the Navy land and improvements thereon in Santa Rosa County, Florida, that is acceptable to the Secretary and suitable for use as a Navy outlying landing field to replace Navy Outlying Landing Field Site 8.
(c)
added Payment of costs of conveyance—
(1)
added Payment required— The Secretary of the Navy shall require the County to fund costs to be incurred by the Secretary, or to reimburse the Secretary for such costs incurred by the Secretary, to carry out the land exchange under this section, including survey costs, costs for environmental documentation, other administrative costs related to the land exchange, and all costs associated with relocation of activities and facilities from Navy Outlying Landing Field Site 8 to the replacement location. If amounts are collected from the County in advance of the Secretary incurring the actual costs, and the amount collected exceeds the costs actually incurred by the Secretary to carry out the land exchange, the Secretary shall refund the excess amount to the County.
(2)
added Treatment of amounts received— Amounts received as reimbursement under paragraph (1) shall be credited to the fund or account that was used to cover those costs incurred by the Secretary in carrying out the land exchange. Amounts so credited shall be merged with amounts in such fund or account, and shall be available for the same purposes, and subject to the same conditions and limitations, as amounts in such fund or account.
(d)
added Description of property— The exact acreage and legal description of the property to be exchanged under this section shall be determined by surveys satisfactory to the Secretary of the Navy.
(e)
added Conveyance agreement— The exchange of real property under this section shall be accomplished using a quit claim deed or other legal instrument and upon terms and conditions mutually satisfactory to the Secretary of the Navy and the County, including such additional terms and conditions as the Secretary considers appropriate to protect the interests of the United States.

Sec. 2833 Release of property interests retained in connection with land conveyance, Fort Bliss Military Reservation, Texas

added
(a)
added Release of retained interests— With respect to a parcel of real property in El Paso, Texas, consisting of approximately 20 acres and conveyed by deed for National Guard and military purposes by the United States to the State of Texas pursuant to section 708 of the Military Construction Authorization Act, 1972 (Public Law 92–145; 85 Stat. 412), the Secretary of the Army may release the rights reserved by the United States under subsections (d) and (e)(2) of such section and the reversionary interest retained by the United States under subsection (e)(1) of such section. The release of such rights and retained interests with respect to any portion of that parcel shall not be construed to alter the rights or interests retained by the United States with respect to the remainder of the real property conveyed to the State under such section.
(b)
added Condition of release— The release authorized by subsection (a) of rights and retained interests shall be subject to the condition that—
(1)
added the State of Texas sell the parcel of real property covered by the release for fair market value; and
(2)
added all proceeds from the sale shall be used to fund improvements or repairs for National Guard and military purposes on the remainder of the property conveyed under section 708 of the Military Construction Authorization Act, 1972 (Public Law 92–145; 85 Stat. 412) and retained by the State.
(c)
added Instrument of release and description of property— The Secretary of the Army may execute and file in the appropriate office a deed of release, amended deed, or other appropriate instrument reflecting the release of rights and retained interests under subsection (a). The exact acreage and legal description of the property for which rights and retained interests are released under subsection (a) shall be determined by a survey satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army.
(d)
added Payment of administrative costs—
(1)
added Payment required— The Secretary of the Army may require the State of Texas to cover costs to be incurred by the Secretary, or to reimburse the Secretary for costs incurred by the Secretary, to carry out the release of retained interests under subsection (a), including survey costs, costs related to environmental documentation, and other administrative costs related to the conveyance. If amounts paid to the Secretary in advance exceed the costs actually incurred by the Secretary to carry out the conveyance, the Secretary shall refund the excess amount to the State.
(2)
added Treatment of amounts received— Amounts received under paragraph (1) as reimbursement for costs incurred by the Secretary to carry out the release of retained interests under subsection (a) shall be credited to the fund or account that was used to cover the costs incurred by the Secretary in carrying out the release of retained interests. Amounts so credited shall be merged with amounts in such fund or account and shall be available for the same purposes, and subject to the same conditions and limitations, as amounts in such fund or account.
(e)
added Additional terms and conditions— The Secretary of the Army may require such additional terms and conditions in connection with the release of retained interests under subsection (a) as the Secretary considers appropriate to protect the interests of the United States, to include necessary munitions response actions by the State of Texas in accordance with subsection (e)(3) of section 708 of the Military Construction Authorization Act, 1972 (Public Law 92–145; 85 Stat. 412).

Sec. 2841 Withdrawal and reservation of public land, Naval Air Weapons Station China Lake, California

added
(a)
added Withdrawal and reservation of additional public land— Section 2971(b) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (division B of Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 1044) is amended—
(1)
added by striking “The public land” and inserting the following:

added “(1) Initial withdrawal—The public land”

(2)
added by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

added “(2) Additional withdrawal

added “(A) In general—Except as provided in subparagraph (B), the public land (including interests in land) referred to in subsection (a) also includes the approximately 21,060 acres of public land in San Bernardino County, California, identified as “Proposed Navy Land” on the map entitled “Proposed Navy Withdrawal”, dated March 10, 2015, and filed in accordance with section 2912.

added “(B) Excluded lands—The withdrawal area referred to in subparagraph (A) specifically excludes section 36, township 29 south, range 43 east, San Bernardino meridian.

added “(C) Existing rights and access—The withdrawal and reservation of public land pursuant to subparagraph (A) is subject to valid existing rights. The Secretary of the Navy shall ensure that the owners of the excluded private land identified in subparagraph (B) continue to have reasonable access to such land.”

(b)
added Permanent Withdrawal or Transfer of Administrative Jurisdiction— Section 2979 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (division B of Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 1044) is amended by striking “on March 31, 2039.” and inserting the following:

added “(1) If the Secretary of the Navy makes an election to terminate the withdrawal and reservation of the public land.

added “(2) If the Secretary of the Interior, upon request by the Secretary of the Navy, transfers administrative jurisdiction over the public land to the Secretary of the Navy. A transfer under this paragraph may consist of a portion of the land, in which case the termination of the withdrawal and reservation applies only with respect to the land so transferred.”

Sec. 2842 Bureau of Land Management withdrawn military lands efficiency and savings

added
(a)
added Elimination of termination date and authorization for transfer of administrative jurisdiction— Subsection (a) of section 3015 of the Military Lands Withdrawal Act of 1999 (title XXX of Public Law 106–65; 113 Stat. 892) is amended to read as follows:

added “(a) Permanent withdrawal and reservation; effect of transfer on withdrawal—The withdrawal and reservation of lands by section 3011 shall terminate only as follows:

added “(1) Upon an election by the Secretary of the military department concerned to relinquish any or all of the land withdrawn and reserved by section 3011.

added “(2) Upon a transfer by the Secretary of the Interior, under section 3016 and upon request by the Secretary of the military department concerned, of administrative jurisdiction over the land to the Secretary of the military department concerned. Such a transfer may consist of a portion of the land, in which case the termination of the withdrawal and reservation applies only with respect to the land so transferred.”

(b)
added Transfer process and management and use of lands— The Military Lands Withdrawal Act of 1999 (title XXX of Public Law 106–65) is further amended—
(1)
added by redesignating sections 3022 and 3023 as sections 3027 and 3028, respectively; and
(2)
added by striking sections 3016 through 3021 and inserting the following new sections:

added “3016. Transfer process

added “(a) Transfer authorized—The Secretary of the Interior shall, upon the request of the Secretary concerned, transfer to the Secretary concerned administrative jurisdiction over the land withdrawn and reserved by section 3011, or a portion of the land as the Secretary concerned may request.

added “(b) Valid existing rights—The transfer of administrative jurisdiction under subsection (a) shall be subject to any valid existing rights.

added “(c) Time for conveyance—The transfer of administrative jurisdiction under subsection (a) shall occur pursuant to a schedule agreed upon by the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary concerned.

added “(d) Map and legal description

added “(1) Preparation and publication—The Secretary of the Interior shall publish in the Federal Register a legal description of the public land to be transferred under subsection (a).

added “(2) Submission to congress—The Secretary of the Interior shall file with the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate and the Committee on Natural Resources of the House of Representatives—

added “(A) a copy of the legal description prepared under paragraph (1); and

added “(B) the map referred to in subsection (a).

added “(3) Availability for public inspection—Copies of the legal description and map filed under paragraph (2) shall be available for public inspection in the appropriate offices of—

added “(A) the Bureau of Land Management;

added “(B) the commanding officer of the installation; and

added “(C) the Secretary concerned.

added “(4) Force of law—The legal description and map filed under paragraph (2) shall have the same force and effect as if included in this Act, except that the Secretary of the Interior may correct clerical and typographical errors in the legal description or map.

added “(5) Reimbursement of costs—Any transfer entered into pursuant to subsection (a) shall be made without reimbursement, except that the Secretary concerned shall reimburse the Secretary of the Interior for any costs incurred by the Secretary of the Interior to prepare the legal description and map under this subsection.

added “3017. Administration of transferred land

added “(a) Treatment and use of transferred land—Upon the transfer of administrative jurisdiction of land under section 3016—

added “(1) the land shall be treated as property (as defined in section 102(9) of title 40, United States Code) under the administrative jurisdiction of the Secretary concerned; and

added “(2) the Secretary concerned shall administer the land for military purposes.

added “(b) Withdrawal of mineral estate—Subject to valid existing rights, land for which the administrative jurisdiction is transferred under section 3016 is withdrawn from all forms of appropriation under the public land laws, including the mining laws, the mineral leasing laws, and the geothermal leasing laws, for as long as the land is under the administrative jurisdiction of the Secretary concerned.

added “(c) Integrated natural resources management plan—Not later than one year after the transfer of land under section 3016, the Secretary concerned, in cooperation with the Secretary of the Interior, shall prepare an integrated natural resources management plan pursuant to the Sikes Act (16 U.S.C. 670a et seq.) for the transferred land.

added “(d) Relation to general provisions—Sections 3018 through 3026 do not apply to lands transferred under section 3016 or to the management of such land.

added “(e) Transfers between armed forces—Nothing in this subtitle shall be construed as limiting the authority to transfer administrative jurisdiction over the land transferred under section 3016 to another armed force pursuant to section 2696 of title 10, United States Code, and the provisions of this section shall continue to apply to any such lands.

added “3018. General applicability; definitions

added “(a) Applicability—Sections 3014 through 3028 apply to the lands withdrawn and reserved by section 3011 except—

added “(1) to the B-16 Range referred to in section 3011(a)(3)(A), for which only section 3019 applies;

added “(2) to the “Shoal Site” referred to in section 3011(a)(3)(B), for which sections 3014 through 3028 apply only to the surface estate;

added “(3) to the “Pahute Mesa” area referred to in section 3011(b)(2); and

added “(4) to the Desert National Wildlife Refuge referred to in section 3011(b)(5)—

added “(A) except for section 3024(b); and

added “(B) for which sections 3014 through 3028 shall only apply to the authorities and responsibilities of the Secretary of the Air Force under section 3011(b)(5).

added “(b) Rules of construction—Nothing in this subtitle assigns management of real property under the administrative jurisdiction of the Secretary concerned to the Secretary of the Interior.

added “(c) Definitions—In this subtitle:

added “(1) Indian tribe—The term “Indian tribe” has the meaning given the term in section 102 of the Federally Recognized Indian Tribe List Act of 1994 (25 U.S.C. 479a).

added “(2) Manage; management

added “(A) Inclusions—The terms “manage” and “management” include the authority to exercise jurisdiction, custody, and control over the lands withdrawn and reserved by section 3011.

added “(B) Exclusions—Such terms do not include authority for disposal of the lands withdrawn and reserved by section 3011.

added “(3) Secretary concerned—The term “Secretary concerned” has the meaning given the term in section 101(a) of title 10, United States Code.

added “3019. Access restrictions

added “(a) Authority to impose restrictions—If the Secretary concerned determines that military operations, public safety, or national security require the closure to the public of any road, trail, or other portion of land withdrawn and reserved by section 3011, the Secretary may take such action as the Secretary determines to be necessary to implement and maintain the closure.

added “(b) Limitation—Any closure under subsection (a) shall be limited to the minimum area and duration that the Secretary concerned determines are required for the purposes of the closure.

added “(c) Consultation required

added “(1) In general—Subject to paragraph (3), before a closure is implemented under this section, the Secretary concerned shall consult with the Secretary of the Interior.

added “(2) Indian tribe—Subject to paragraph (3), if a closure proposed under this section may affect access to or use of sacred sites or resources considered to be important by an Indian tribe, the Secretary concerned shall consult, at the earliest practicable date, with the affected Indian tribe.

added “(3) Limitation—No consultation shall be required under paragraph (1) or (2)—

added “(A) if the closure is provided for in an integrated natural resources management plan, an installation cultural resources management plan, or a land use management plan; or

added “(B) in the case of an emergency, as determined by the Secretary concerned.

added “(d) Notice—Immediately preceding and during any closure implemented under subsection (a), the Secretary concerned shall post appropriate warning notices and take other appropriate actions to notify the public of the closure.

added “3020. Changes in use

added “(a) Other uses authorized—In addition to the purposes described in section 3011, the Secretary concerned may authorize the use of land withdrawn and reserved by section 3011 for defense-related purposes.

added “(b) Notice to secretary of the interior

added “(1) In general—The Secretary concerned shall promptly notify the Secretary of the Interior if the land withdrawn and reserved by section 3011 is used for additional defense-related purposes.

added “(2) Requirements—A notification under paragraph (1) shall specify—

added “(A) each additional use;

added “(B) the planned duration of each additional use; and

added “(C) the extent to which each additional use would require that additional or more stringent conditions or restrictions be imposed on otherwise-permitted nondefense-related uses of the withdrawn and reserved land or portions of withdrawn and reserved land.

added “3021. Brush and range fire prevention and suppression

added “(a) Required activities—Consistent with any applicable land management plan, the Secretary concerned shall take necessary precautions to prevent, and actions to suppress, brush and range fires occurring as a result of military activities on the land withdrawn and reserved by section 3011, including fires that occur on other land that spread from the withdrawn and reserved land.

added “(b) Cooperation of secretary of the interior

added “(1) In general—At the request of the Secretary concerned, the Secretary of the Interior shall provide assistance in the suppression of fires under subsection (a). The Secretary concerned shall reimburse the Secretary of the Interior for the costs incurred by the Secretary of the Interior in providing such assistance.

added “(2) Transfer of funds—Notwithstanding section 2215 of title 10, United States Code, the Secretary concerned may transfer to the Secretary of the Interior, in advance, funds to be used to reimburse the costs of the Department of the Interior in providing assistance under this subsection.

added “3022. Ongoing decontamination

added “(a) Program of decontamination required—During the period of a withdrawal and reservation of land by section 3011, the Secretary concerned shall maintain, to the extent funds are available to carry out this subsection, a program of decontamination of contamination caused by defense-related uses on the withdrawn land. The decontamination program shall be carried out consistent with applicable Federal and State law.

added “(b) Annual report—The Secretary of Defense shall include in the annual report required by section 2711 of title 10, United States Code, a description of decontamination activities conducted under subsection (a).

added “3023. Water rights

added “(a) No reservation of water rights—Nothing in this subtitle—

added “(1) establishes a reservation in favor of the United States with respect to any water or water right on the land withdrawn and reserved by section 3011; or

added “(2) authorizes the appropriation of water on the land withdrawn and reserved by section 3011, except in accordance with applicable State law.

added “(b) Effect on previously acquired or reserved water rights

added “(1) In general—Nothing in this section affects any water rights acquired or reserved by the United States before October 5, 1999, on the land withdrawn and reserved by section 3011.

added “(2) Authority of secretary concerned—The Secretary concerned may exercise any water rights described in paragraph (1).

added “3024. Hunting, fishing, and trapping

added “(a) In general—Section 2671 of title 10, United States Code, shall apply to all hunting, fishing, and trapping on the land—

added “(1) that is withdrawn and reserved by section 3011; and

added “(2) for which management of the land has been assigned to the Secretary concerned.

added “(b) Desert national wildlife refuge—Hunting, fishing, and trapping within the Desert National Wildlife Refuge shall be conducted in accordance with the National Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act of 1966 (16 U.S.C. 668dd et seq.), the Recreation Use of Wildlife Areas Act of 1969 (16 U.S.C. 460k et seq.), and other laws applicable to the National Wildlife Refuge System.

added “3025. Relinquishment

added “(a) Notice of intention to relinquish—If, during the period of withdrawal and reservation made by section 3011, the Secretary concerned decides to relinquish any or all of the land withdrawn and reserved by section 3011, the Secretary concerned shall submit to the Secretary of the Interior notice of the intention to relinquish the land.

added “(b) Determination of contamination—The Secretary concerned shall include in the notice submitted under subsection (a) a written determination concerning whether and to what extent the land that is to be relinquished is contaminated with explosive materials or toxic or hazardous substances.

added “(c) Public notice—The Secretary of the Interior shall publish in the Federal Register the notice of intention to relinquish the land under this section, including the determination concerning the contaminated state of the land.

added “(d) Decontamination of land to be relinquished

added “(1) Decontamination required—The Secretary concerned shall decontaminate land subject to a notice of intention under subsection (a) to the extent that funds are appropriated for that purpose, if—

added “(A) the land subject to the notice of intention is contaminated, as determined by the Secretary concerned; and

added “(B) the Secretary of the Interior, in consultation with the Secretary concerned, determines that—

added “(i) decontamination is practicable and economically feasible, after taking into consideration the potential future use and value of the contaminated land; and

added “(ii) on decontamination of the land, the land could be opened to operation of some or all of the public land laws, including the mining laws, the mineral leasing laws, and the geothermal leasing laws.

added “(2) Alternatives to relinquishment—The Secretary of the Interior shall not be required to accept the land proposed for relinquishment under subsection (a), if—

added “(A) the Secretary of the Interior, after consultation with the Secretary concerned, determines that—

added “(i) decontamination of the land is not practicable or economically feasible; or

added “(ii) the land cannot be decontaminated sufficiently to be opened to operation of some or all of the public land laws; or

added “(B) sufficient funds are not appropriated for the decontamination of the land.

added “(3) Status of contaminated land proposed to be relinquished—If, because of the contaminated state of the land, the Secretary of the Interior declines to accept land withdrawn and reserved by section 3011 that has been proposed for relinquishment—

added “(A) the Secretary concerned shall take appropriate steps to warn the public of—

added “(i) the contaminated state of the land; and

added “(ii) any risks associated with entry onto the land;

added “(B) the Secretary concerned shall submit to the Secretary of the Interior and Congress a report describing—

added “(i) the status of the land; and

added “(ii) any actions taken under this paragraph.

added “(e) Revocation authority

added “(1) In general—If the Secretary of the Interior determines that it is in the public interest to accept the land proposed for relinquishment under subsection (a), the Secretary of the Interior may order the revocation of a withdrawal and reservation made by section 3011.

added “(2) Revocation order—To carry out a revocation under paragraph (1), the Secretary of the Interior shall publish in the Federal Register a revocation order that—

added “(A) terminates the withdrawal and reservation;

added “(B) constitutes official acceptance of the land by the Secretary of the Interior; and

added “(C) specifies the date on which the land will be opened to the operation of some or all of the public land laws, including the mining laws, the mineral leasing laws, and the geothermal leasing laws.

added “(f) Acceptance by secretary of the interior

added “(1) In general—Nothing in this section requires the Secretary of the Interior to accept the land proposed for relinquishment if the Secretary determines that the land is not suitable for return to the public domain.

added “(2) Notice—If the Secretary makes a determination that the land is not suitable for return to the public domain, the Secretary shall provide notice of the determination to Congress.

added “3026. Effect of termination of military use

added “(a) Notice and effect—Upon a determination by the Secretary concerned that there is no longer a military need for all or portions of the land for which administrative jurisdiction was transferred under section 3016, the Secretary concerned shall notify the Secretary of the Interior of such determination. Subject to subsections (b), (c), and (d), the Secretary concerned shall transfer administrative jurisdiction over the land subject to such a notice back to the administrative jurisdiction of the Secretary of the Interior.

added “(b) Contamination—Before transmitting a notice under subsection (a), the Secretary concerned shall prepare a written determination concerning whether and to what extent the land to be transferred is contaminated with explosive materials or toxic or hazardous substances. A copy of the determination shall be transmitted with the notice. Copies of the notice and the determination shall be published in the Federal Register.

added “(c) Decontamination—The Secretary concerned shall decontaminate any contaminated land that is the subject of a notice under subsection (a) if—

added “(1) the Secretary of the Interior, in consultation with the Secretary concerned, determines that—

added “(A) decontamination is practicable and economically feasible (taking into consideration the potential future use and value of the land); and

added “(B) upon decontamination, the land could be opened to operation of some or all of the public land laws, including the mining laws; and

added “(2) funds are appropriated for such decontamination.

added “(d) No required acceptance—The Secretary of the Interior is not required to accept land proposed for transfer under subsection (a) if the Secretary of the Interior is unable to make the determinations under subsection (c)(1) or if Congress does not appropriate a sufficient amount of funds for the decontamination of the land.

added “(e) Alternative disposal—If the Secretary of the Interior declines to accept land proposed for transfer under subsection (a), the Secretary concerned shall dispose of the land in accordance with property disposal procedures established by law.”

(c)
added Conforming and clerical amendments—
(1)
added Conforming amendments— Section 3014 of the Military Lands Withdrawal Act of 1999 (title XXX of Public Law 106–65; 113 Stat. 890) is amended by striking subsections (b), (d), and (f).
(2)
added Clerical amendments— The table of sections at the beginning of the Military Lands Withdrawal Act of 1999 (title XXX of Public Law 106–65; 113 Stat. 885) is amended by striking the items relating to sections 3016 through 3023 and inserting the following new items:

Sec. 2851 Renaming site of the Dayton Aviation Heritage National Historical Park, Ohio

added

added Section 101(b)(5) of the Dayton Aviation Heritage Preservation Act of 1992 (16 U.S.C. 410ww(b)(5)) is amended by striking “Aviation Center” and inserting “National Museum”.

Sec. 2852 Extension of authority for establishment of commemorative work in honor of Brigadier General Francis Marion

added

added Notwithstanding section 8903(e) of title 40, United States Code, the authority provided by section 331 of the Consolidated Natural Resources Act of 2008 (Public Law 110–229; 122 Stat. 781; 40 U.S.C. 8903 note) shall continue to apply through May 8, 2018.

Sec. 2853 Amendments to the National Historic Preservation Act

added
(a)
added Criteria and regulations relating to National Register, National Historic Landmarks, and World Heritage List— Section 302103 of title 54, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
added in subparagraph (E), by striking “and”;
(2)
added in subparagraph (F), by striking the period and inserting “; and”; and
(3)
added by adding at the end the following:

added “(G) notifying the Committee on Natural Resources of the United States House of Representatives and the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate if the property is owned by the Federal Government when the property is being considered for inclusion on the National Register, for designation as a National Historic Landmark, or for nomination to the World Heritage List.”

(b)
added Regulations— Section 302107 of title 54, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
added in paragraph (2), by striking “and”;
(2)
added in paragraph (3), by striking the period and inserting “; and”; and
(3)
added by adding at the end the following:

added “(4) to allow for expedited removal of Federal property listed on the National Register of Historic Places if the managing agency of that Federal property submits to the Secretary a written request to remove the Federal property from the National Register of Historic Places for reasons of national security, such as any impact the inclusion or designation would have on use of the property for military training or readiness purposes.”

(c)
added Objection to inclusion or designation for reasons of national security— Chapter 3021 of title 54, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:

added “302109. Objection to inclusion or designation for reasons of national security

added “If the head of the agency managing any Federal property objects to such inclusion or designation for reasons of national security, such as any impact the inclusion or designation would have on use of the property for military training or readiness purposes, that Federal property shall be neither included on the National Register nor designated as a National Historic Landmark until the objection is withdrawn”

(d)
added Conforming amendment— The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 3021 of title 54, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new item:

Sec. 2861 Modification of Department of Defense guidance on use of airfield pavement markings

added

added The Secretary of Defense shall require such modifications of Unified Facilities Guide Specifications for pavement markings (UFGS 32 17 23.00 20 Pavement Markings, UFGS 32 17 24.00 10 Pavement Markings), Air Force Engineering Technical Letter ETL 97-18 (Guide Specification for Airfield and Roadway Marking), and any other Department of Defense guidance on airfield pavement markings as may be necessary to permit the use of Type III category of retro-reflective beads to reflectorize airfield markings. The Secretary shall develop appropriate policy to ensure that the determination of the category of retro-reflective beads used on an airfield is determined on an installation-by-installation basis, taking into consideration local conditions and the life-cycle maintenance costs of the pavement markings.

Sec. 2862 Protection and recovery of Greater Sage Grouse

added
(a)
added Definitions— In this section:
(1)
added The term Federal resource management plan means—
(A)
added a land use plan prepared by the Bureau of Land Management for public lands pursuant to section 202 of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1712); or
(B)
added a land and resource management plan prepared by the Forest Service for National Forest System lands pursuant to section 6 of the Forest and Rangeland Renewable Resources Planning Act of 1974 (16 U.S.C. 1604).
(2)
added The term “Greater Sage Grouse” means a sage grouse of the species Centrocercus urophasianus.
(3)
added The term “State management plan” means a State-approved plan for the protection and recovery of the Greater Sage Grouse.
(b)
added Purpose— The purpose of this section is—
(1)
added to facilitate implementation of State management plans over a period of multiple, consecutive sage grouse life cycles; and
(2)
added to demonstrate the efficacy of the State management plans for the protection and recovery of the Greater Sage Grouse.
(c)
added Endangered Species Act of 1973 findings—
(1)
added Delay required— Any finding by the Secretary of the Interior under clause (i), (ii), or (iii) of section 4(b)(3)(B) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1533(b)(3)(B)) with respect to the Greater Sage Grouse made during the period beginning on September 30, 2015, and ending on the date of the enactment of this Act shall have no force or effect in law or in equity, and the Secretary of the Interior may not make any such finding during the period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act and ending on September 30, 2025.
(2)
added Effect on other laws— The delay imposed by paragraph (1) is, and shall remain, effective without regard to any other statute, regulation, court order, legal settlement, or any other provision of law or in equity.
(3)
added Effect on conservation status— Until the date specified in paragraph (1), the conservation status of the Greater Sage Grouse shall remain warranted for listing under the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), but precluded by higher-priority listing actions pursuant to clause (iii) of section 4(b)(3)(B) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1533(b)(3)(B)).
(d)
added Coordination of Federal land management and state conservation and management plans—
(1)
added Prohibition on modification of federal resource management plans— In order to foster coordination between a State management plan and Federal resource management plans that affect the Greater Sage Grouse, upon notification by the Governor of a State with a State management plan, the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of Agriculture may not amend or otherwise modify any Federal resource management plan applicable to Federal lands in the State in a manner inconsistent with the State management plan for a period, to be specified by the Governor in the notification, of at least five years beginning on the date of the notification.
(2)
added Retroactive effect— In the case of any State that provides notification under paragraph (1), if any amendment or modification of a Federal resource management plan applicable to Federal lands in the State was issued during the one-year period preceding the date of the notification and the amendment or modification altered management of the Greater Sage Grouse or its habitat, implementation and operation of the amendment or modification shall be stayed to the extent that the amendment or modification is inconsistent with the State management plan. The Federal resource management plan, as in effect immediately before the amendment or modification, shall apply instead with respect to management of the Greater Sage Grouse and its habitat, to the extent consistent with the State management plan.
(3)
added Determination of inconsistency— Any disagreement regarding whether an amendment or other modification of a Federal resource management plan is inconsistent with a State management plan shall be resolved by the Governor of the affected State.
(e)
added Relation to National Environmental Policy Act of 1969— With regard to any Federal action consistent with a State management plan, any findings, analyses, or conclusions regarding the Greater Sage Grouse or its habitat under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4331 et seq.) shall not have a preclusive effect on the approval or implementation of the Federal action in that State.
(f)
added Reporting requirement— Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act and annually thereafter through 2021, the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of Agriculture shall jointly submit to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate and the Committee on Natural Resources of the House of Representatives a report on the Secretaries’ implementation and effectiveness of systems to monitor the status of Greater Sage Grouse on Federal lands under their jurisdiction.
(g)
added Judicial review— Notwithstanding any other provision of statute or regulation, this section, including determinations made under subsection (d)(3), shall not be subject to judicial review.

Sec. 2901 Authorized Army construction and land acquisition project

added

added The Secretary of the Army may acquire real property and carry out the military construction project for the installation outside the United States, and in the amount, set forth in the following table:

Sec. 2902 Authorized Navy construction and land acquisition projects

added

added The Secretary of the Navy may acquire real property and carry out the military construction projects for the installations outside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:

Sec. 2903 Authorized Air Force construction and land acquisition projects

added

added The Secretary of the Air Force may acquire real property and carry out the military construction projects for the installations outside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:

Sec. 2904 Authorized Defense Agencies construction and land acquisition projects

added

added The Secretary of Defense may acquire real property and carry out the military construction projects for the installations outside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:

Sec. 2905 Authorization of appropriations

added

added Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2015, for the military construction projects outside the United States authorized by this title as specified in the funding table in section 4602.

Sec. 3101 National Nuclear Security Administration

added
(a)
added Authorization of appropriations— Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Energy for fiscal year 2016 for the activities of the National Nuclear Security Administration in carrying out programs as specified in the funding table in section 4701.
(b)
added Authorization of new plant projects— From funds referred to in subsection (a) that are available for carrying out plant projects, the Secretary of Energy may carry out new plant projects for the National Nuclear Security Administration as follows:

Sec. 3102 Defense environmental cleanup

added

added Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Energy for fiscal year 2016 for defense environmental cleanup activities in carrying out programs as specified in the funding table in section 4701.

Sec. 3103 Other defense activities

added

added Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Energy for fiscal year 2016 for other defense activities in carrying out programs as specified in the funding table in section 4701.

Sec. 3111 Authorized personnel levels of National Nuclear Security Administration

added
(a)
added Full-time equivalent personnel levels— Subsection (a) of section 3241A of the National Nuclear Security Administration Act (50 U.S.C. 2441a) is amended—
(1)
added in paragraph (1)—
(A)
added by striking “2015” and inserting “2016”; and
(B)
added by striking “1,690” and inserting “1,350”; and
(2)
added in paragraph (2)—
(A)
added by striking “2016” and inserting “2017”; and
(B)
added by striking “1,690” and inserting “1,350”.
(b)
added Counting rule for certain positions— Subsection (b)(3) of such section is amended by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:

added “(E) Employees appointed under section 3241.”

(c)
added Certain contracting and technical positions— Section 3241 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2441) is amended by striking “600” and inserting “450”.
(d)
added Budget information—
(1)
added In general— Such section 3241A is further amended—
(A)
added by redesignating subsection (e) as subsection (f); and
(B)
added by inserting after subsection (d) the following new subsection (e):

added “(e) Budget display—In the budget justification materials submitted to Congress in support of each budget submitted by the President to Congress under section 1105 of title 31, United States Code, the Administrator shall include information regarding the number of employees of the Office of the Administrator, including the number of employees who are described in each of subparagraphs (A) through (E) of subsection (b)(3).”

(2)
added Conforming amendment— Section 3251(b)(2) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 3251(b)(2)) is amended—
(A)
added by striking “ testing, and” and inserting “testing,”; and
(B)
added by inserting before the period at the end the following: “, and the information regarding employees of the Administration required by section 3241A(e)”.

Sec. 3112 Full-time equivalent contractor personnel levels

added

added Section 3241A of the National Nuclear Security Administration Act (50 U.S.C. 2441a), as amended by section 3111, is further amended by adding at the end the following new subsections:

added “(g) Full-time equivalent contractor personnel levels

added “(1) Total number—The total number of full-time equivalent contractor employees working under a service support contract of the Administration may not exceed the number that is 30 percent of the number of employees of the Office of the Administrator authorized under subsection (a)(1).

added “(2) Excess—The Administrator may not exceed the total number of full-time equivalent contractor employees authorized under paragraph (1) unless, during each fiscal year in which such total number of contractor employees exceeds such authorized number, the Administrator submits to the congressional defense committees a report justifying such excess.

added “(g) Annual report—Together with each budget submitted by the President to Congress under section 1105 of title 31, United States Code, the Administrator shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report containing the following information as of the date of the report:

added “(1) The number of full-time equivalent employees of the Office of the Administrator, as counted under subsection (a).

added “(2) The number of service support contracts of the Administration.

added “(3) The number of full-time equivalent contractor employees working under each contract identified under paragraph (2).

added “(4) The number of full-time equivalent contractor employees described in paragraph (2) that have been employed under such a contract for a period greater than two years.”

Sec. 3113 Improvement to accountability of Department of Energy employees and projects

added
(a)
added Notifications—
(1)
added In general— Subtitle C of the National Nuclear Security Administration Act (50 U.S.C. 2441 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

added “3245. Notification of employee practices affecting national security

added “(a) Annual notification—At or about the time that the President’s budget is submitted to Congress under section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, the Secretary and the Administrator shall jointly notify the appropriate congressional committees of—

added “(1) the number of covered employees whose security clearance was revoked during the year prior to the year in which the notification is made; and

added “(2) for each employee counted under paragraph (1), the length of time such employee has been employed at the Department or the Administration, respectively, since such revocation.

added “(b) Notification to congressional committees—Whenever the Secretary or the Administrator terminates the employment of a covered employee or removes and reassigns a covered employee for cause, the Secretary or the Administrator, as the case may be, shall notify the appropriate congressional committees of such termination or reassignment by not later than 30 days after the date of such termination or reassignment.

added “(c) Definitions—In this section:

added “(1) The term “appropriate congressional committees” means—

added “(A) the congressional defense committees; and

added “(B) the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate.

added “(2) The term “covered employee” means—

added “(A) an employee of the Administration; or

added “(B) an employee of an element of the Department of Energy (other than the Administration) involved in nuclear security.”

(2)
added Clerical amendment— The table of contents at the beginning of such Act is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 3244 the following new items:
(3)
added One-time certification— Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Energy and the Administrator for Nuclear Security shall jointly submit to the congressional defense committees, the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives, and the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate written certification that the Secretary and the Administrator possess the authorities needed to terminate the employment of an employee for cause relating to improper program management (as defined in section 3246(c) of the National Nuclear Security Administration Act, as added by subsection (b)(1)).
(b)
added Limitation on bonuses—
(1)
added In general— Such subtitle, as amended by subsection (a)(1), is further amended by adding at the end the following:

added “3246. Limitation on bonuses

added “(a) Limitation—The Secretary or the Administrator may not pay to a covered employee a bonus during the one-year period beginning on the date on which the Secretary or the Administrator determines that the covered employee committed improper program management.

added “(b) Waiver—The Secretary or the Administrator may waive the limitation in subsection (a) on a case-by-case basis if—

added “(1) the Secretary or the Administrator notifies the appropriate congressional committees of such waiver; and

added “(2) a period of 60 days elapses following such notification.

added “(c) Definitions—In this section:

added “(1) The term “appropriate congressional committees” means—

added “(A) the congressional defense committees; and

added “(B) the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate.

added “(2) The term “bonus” means a bonus or award paid under title 5, United States Code, including under chapters 45 or 53 of such title, or any other provision of law.

added “(3) The term “covered employee” has the meaning given that term in section 3245.

added “(4) The term “covered project” means—

added “(A) a construction project of the Administration that is not covered under section 4703(d) of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2743(d));

added “(D) a life extension program;

added “(E) a defense nuclear nonproliferation project or program; or

added “(F) an activity of the Office of the Administrator.

added “(5) The term “improper program management” means actions relating to the management of a covered project that significantly—

added “(A) delays the project;

added “(B) reduce the scope of the project;

added “(C) increase the cost of the project; or

added “(D) undermines health, safety, or security.”

(2)
added Clerical amendment— The table of contents at the beginning of such Act, as amended by subsection (a), is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 3245 the following new items:
(c)
added Improvement to program management—
(1)
added In general— Subtitle A of title XLVII of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2741 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

added “4715. Completion of projects on time, on budget, within planned scope, and while protecting health, safety, and security

added “(a) Sense of Congress—It is the sense of Congress that the Administrator should use all contractual remedies available to the Administrator, including through the withholding of all award fees, in cases in which the Administrator determines that a contractor of a covered project is responsible for significantly—

added “(1) delaying the project;

added “(2) reducing the scope of the project;

added “(3) increasing the cost of the project; or

added “(4) undermines health, safety, or security.

added “(b) Annual certifications—In addition to the requirements under section 4713, at or about the time that the President’s budget is submitted to Congress under section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, the Administrator shall certify to the appropriate congressional committees that each covered project is being carried out on time, on budget, within the planned scope of the project, and while protecting health, safety, and security.

added “(c) Notifications of deficiencies—Not later than 30 days after the date on which the Administrator makes each certification under subsection (b), the Administrator shall notify the appropriate congressional committees of the following:

added “(1) Any covered project for which the Administrator could not make such a certification.

added “(2) Except as provided by paragraph (3), with respect to a covered project for which the Administrator could not make such a certification by reason of the actions of a contractor that the Administrator determines significantly delayed the project, reduced the scope of the project, increased the cost of the project, or undermined health, safety, or security—

added “(A) an explanation as to whether termination of contract for the project is an appropriate remedy;

added “(B) a description of the terms of the contract regarding award fees and performance; and

added “(C) a description of how the Administrator plans to exercise contractual options.

added “(3) In the case of a covered project described in paragraph (2) for which the Administrator is not able to submit the information described in subparagraphs (A) through (C) of such paragraph by reason of a contract enforcement action, a notification of such contract enforcement action and the date on which the Administrator plans to submit the information described in such subparagraphs.

added “(d) Definitions—In this section:

added “(1) The term “appropriate congressional committees” means—

added “(A) the congressional defense committees; and

added “(B) the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate.

added “(2) The term “covered project” means—

added “(A) a construction project of the Administration that is not covered under section 4703(d);

added “(B) a life extension program;

added “(C) a defense nuclear nonproliferation project or program; or

added “(D) an activity of the Office of the Administrator.”

(3)
added Clerical amendment— The table of contents for such Act is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 4714 the following new item:

Sec. 3114 Cost-benefit analyses for competition of management and operating contracts

added
(a)
added Elements of reports— Subsection (b) of section 3121 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2175), as amended by section 3124 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 1062), is further amended—
(1)
added in paragraph (4), by striking “; and” and inserting a semicolon;
(2)
added by redesignating paragraph (5) as paragraph (7); and
(3)
added by inserting after paragraph (4) the following new paragraphs:

added “(5) the factors considered and processes used by the Administrator to determine—

added “(A) whether to compete or extend the contract; and

added “(B) which activities at the facility should be covered under the contract rather than under a different contract;

added “(6) with respect to the matters included under paragraphs (1) through (5), a detailed description of the analyses conducted by the Administrator to reach the conclusions presented in the report, including any assumptions, limitations, and uncertainties relating to such conclusions; and”

(b)
added Fiscal years covered— Subsection (d) of such section 3121 is amended by striking “2017” and inserting “2019”.
(c)
added Technical amendments— Such section 3121 is further amended—
(1)
added in subsection (c), by striking “or (d)(2)”; and
(2)
added in subsection (d)—
(A)
added by striking paragraph (2);
(B)
added by redesignating paragraph (3) as paragraph (2); and
(C)
added in paragraph (2), as so redesignated, by striking “subsections (a) and (d)(2)” and inserting “subsection (a)”.
(d)
added Sense of Congress— It is the sense of Congress that—
(1)
added in the past decade, competition of the management and operating contracts for the national security laboratories has resulted in significant increases in fees paid to the contractors—funding that otherwise could be used to support program and mission activities of the National Nuclear Security Administration;
(2)
added competition of the management and operating contracts of the nuclear security enterprise is an important mechanism to help realize cost savings, seek efficiencies, improve performance, and hold contractors accountable;
(3)
added when the Administrator for Nuclear Security considers it appropriate to achieve these goals, the Administrator should conduct competition of these contracts while recognizing the unique nature of federally funded research and development centers; and
(4)
added the Administrator should ensure that fixed fees and performance-based fees contained in management and operating contracts are as low as possible to maintain a focus on national service while attracting high-quality contractors and achieving the goals of the competition.

Sec. 3115 Nuclear weapon design responsiveness program

added
(a)
added Sense of Congress— It is the sense of Congress that—
(1)
added a modern and responsive nuclear weapons infrastructure is only one component of a nuclear posture that is agile, flexible, and responsive to change; and
(2)
added to ensure the nuclear deterrent of the United States remains safe, secure, reliable, credible, and responsive, the United States must continually exercise all capabilities required to conceptualize, study, design, develop, engineer, certify, produce, and deploy nuclear weapons.
(b)
added Establishment of program—
(1)
added In general— Subtitle A of title XLII of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2521 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

added “4220. Nuclear weapon design responsiveness program

added “(a) Statement of policy—It is the policy of the United States to sustain, enhance, and continually exercise all capabilities required to conceptualize, study, design, develop, engineer, certify, produce, and deploy nuclear weapons to ensure the nuclear deterrent of the United States remains safe, secure, reliable, credible, and responsive.

added “(b) Program required—The Secretary of Energy, acting through the Administrator and in consultation with the Secretary of Defense, shall carry out a program, along with the stockpile stewardship program under section 4201 and the stockpile management program under section 4204, to sustain, enhance, and continually exercise all capabilities required to conceptualize, study, design, develop, engineer, certify, produce, and deploy nuclear weapons.

added “(c) Objectives—The program under subsection (b) shall have the following objectives:

added “(1) Correct deficiencies in, identify, sustain, enhance, and continually exercise all capabilities required to carry out all phases of the joint nuclear weapons life cycle process, with respect to both the nuclear security enterprise and relevant elements of the Department of Defense.

added “(2) Identify, enhance, and transfer knowledge, skills, and direct experience with respect to all phases of the joint nuclear weapons life cycle process from one generation of nuclear weapon designers and engineers to the following generation.

added “(3) Identify, sustain, and enhance the capabilities, infrastructure, tools, and technologies required for all phases of the joint nuclear weapons life cycle process.

added “(4) Periodically demonstrate nuclear weapon design responsiveness throughout the range of capabilities required, including prototypes, flight testing, and development of plans for certification without the need for nuclear explosive testing.

added “(5) Continually exercise processes for the integration and coordination of all relevant elements and processes of the Administration and the Department of Defense required to ensure nuclear weapon design responsiveness.

added “(d) Joint nuclear weapons life cycle process defined—In this section, the term “joint nuclear weapons life cycle process” means the process developed and maintained by the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Energy for the development, production, maintenance, and retirement of nuclear weapons.”

(2)
added Clerical amendment— The table of contents for such Act is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 4219 the following new item:
(c)
added Inclusion in stockpile stewardship, management, and infrastructure plan— Section 4203 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2523) is amended—
(1)
added in subsection (a), by inserting “design responsiveness,” after “stockpile management,”;
(2)
added in subsection (c)—
(A)
added by redesignating paragraphs (5) and (6) as paragraphs (6) and (7), respectively; and
(B)
added by inserting after paragraphs (4) the following new paragraph (5):

added “(5) A summary of the status, plans, and budgets for carrying out the nuclear weapons design responsiveness program under section 4220.”

(3)
added in subsection (d)(1)—
(A)
added in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking “stewardship and management” and inserting “stewardship, stockpile management, and design responsiveness”;
(B)
added in subparagraph (K), by striking “; and” and inserting a semicolon;
(C)
added in subparagraph (L), by striking the period and inserting a semicolon; and
(D)
added by adding at the end the following new subparagraphs:

added “(M) the status, plans, activities, budgets, and schedules for carrying out the nuclear weapons design responsiveness program under section 4220; and

added “(N) for each of the five fiscal years following the fiscal year in which the report is submitted, an identification of the funds needed to carry out the program required under section 4220.”

(4)
added in subsection (e)(1)(A)—
(A)
added in clause (i), by striking “; and” and inserting a semicolon;
(B)
added in clause (ii), by striking the period and inserting “; and”; and
(C)
added by adding at the end the following new clause:

added “(iii) whether the plan supports the nuclear weapons design responsiveness program under section 4220 in a manner that meets the objectives of such program and an identification of any improvements that may be made to the plan to better carry out such program.”

(d)
added Report by STRATCOM— Section 4205(e)(4) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2525(e)(4)) is amended—
(1)
added in subparagraph (A), by striking “; and” and inserting a semicolon;
(2)
added in subparagraph (B), by striking the period and inserting “; and”; and
(3)
added by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:

added “(C) the views of the Commander on the nuclear weapons design responsiveness program under section 4220, the activities conducted under such program, and any suggestions to improve such program.”

Sec. 3116 Disposition of weapons-usable plutonium

added
(a)
added Mixed oxide fuel fabrication facility—
(1)
added In general— Using funds described in paragraph (2), the Secretary of Energy shall carry out construction and project support activities relating to the MOX facility.
(2)
added Funds described— The funds described in this paragraph are the following:
(A)
added Funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2016 for the National Nuclear Security Administration for the MOX facility for construction and project support activities.
(B)
added Funds authorized to be appropriated for a fiscal year prior to fiscal year 2016 for the National Nuclear Security Administration for the MOX facility for construction and project support activities that are unobligated as of the date of the enactment of this Act.
(b)
added Updated performance baseline— The Secretary shall include in the budget justification materials submitted to Congress in support of the Department of Energy budget (as submitted with the budget of the President under section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code) for fiscal year 2017 an updated performance baseline for construction and project support activities relating to the MOX facility conducted in accordance with Department of Energy Order 413.3B.
(c)
added Definitions— In this section:
(1)
added The term MOX facility means the mixed-oxide fuel fabrication facility at the Savannah River Site, Aiken, South Carolina.
(2)
added The term project support activities means activities that support the design, long-lead equipment procurement, and site preparation of the MOX facility.

Sec. 3117 Prohibition on availability of funds for fixed site radiological portal monitors in foreign countries

added
(a)
added Prohibition— None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2016 or any fiscal year thereafter for the National Nuclear Security Administration may be obligated or expended for the research and development, installation, or sustainment of fixed site radiological portal monitors or equipment for use in foreign countries.
(b)
added Mobile radiological inspection equipment— The prohibition in subsection (a) may not be construed to apply to mobile radiological inspection equipment.

Sec. 3118 Prohibition on availability of funds for provision of defense nuclear nonproliferation assistance to Russian Federation

added
(a)
added Prohibition— None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2016 for defense nuclear nonproliferation activities may be obligated or expended to enter into a contract with, or otherwise provide assistance to, the Russian Federation.
(b)
added Waiver— The Secretary of Energy, without delegation, may waive the prohibition in subsection (a) if the Secretary—
(1)
added submits to the appropriate congressional committees a report containing—
(A)
added notification that such a waiver is in the national security interest of the United States; and
(B)
added justification for such a waiver; and
(2)
added a period of 15 days elapses following the date on which the Secretary submits such report.
(c)
added Appropriate congressional committees defined— In this section, the term “appropriate congressional committees” means the following:
(1)
added The congressional defense committees.
(2)
added The Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives.

Sec. 3119 Limitation on authorization of production of special nuclear material outside the United States by foreign country with nuclear naval propulsion program

added

added Section 57 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2077), as amended by section 3118, is further amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

added “f.

added “(1) The Secretary may not make an authorization under subsection b.(2) with respect to a foreign country with a nuclear naval propulsion program unless—

added “(A) the Director of National Intelligence and the Chief of Naval Operations jointly submit to the appropriate congressional committees an assessment of the risks of diversion, and the likely consequences of such diversion, of the technology and material covered by such authorization;

added “(B) following the date on which such assessment is submitted, the Administrator for Nuclear Security certifies to the appropriate congressional committees that—

added “(i) there is sufficient diversion control as part of such transfer; and

added “(ii) such transfer presents a minimal risk of diversion of such technology to a military program that would degrade the technical advantage of the United States; and

added “(C) a period of 90 days has elapsed following the date of such certification.

added “(2) In this subsection, the term “appropriate congressional committees” means the following:

added “(A) The congressional defense committees (as defined in section 101(a)(16) of title 10, United States Code).

added “(B) The Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives.

added “(C) The Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives.”

Sec. 3120 Limitation on availability of funds for development of certain nuclear nonproliferation technologies

added
(a)
added Limitation— Except as provided by subsection (b), none of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2016 for defense nuclear nonproliferation for nonproliferation or arms control verification or monitoring technologies may be obligated or expended to develop such technologies beyond technology readiness level 5 unless, not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Energy submits to the appropriate congressional committees the following:
(1)
added Written certification that such technologies are being developed to fulfill the rights or obligations of the United States under—
(A)
added a current arms control or nonproliferation treaty or agreement requiring verification or monitoring that has entered into force with respect to the United States; or
(B)
added an arms control or nonproliferation treaty or agreement that—
(i)
added will require verification or monitoring; and
(iii)
added the Secretary expects will enter into force with respect to the United States during the two-year period beginning on the date of the certification.
(2)
added With respect to each technology developed beyond technology readiness level 5 pursuant to this subsection—
(A)
added an identification of the amount of such funds made available for fiscal year 2016 for defense nuclear nonproliferation that will be used for such development; and
(B)
added how such development helps to fulfill the rights or obligations of the United States as described in subparagraphs (A) or (B) of paragraph (1).
(b)
added Waiver— The Secretary may waive the limitation in subsection (a) if—
(1)
added the Secretary—
(A)
added determines that the waiver is necessary in the national security interests of the United States; and
(B)
added submits to the appropriate congressional committees a written certification of such determination; and
(2)
added a period of 15 days elapses following the date on which the Secretary submits such certification.
(c)
added Definitions— In this section:
(1)
added The term “appropriate congressional committees” means—
(A)
added the congressional defense committees; and
(B)
added the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate.
(2)
added The term “technology readiness level 5” has the meaning given that term in the Department of Energy Guide 413.3-4A titled “Technology Readiness Assessment Guide” and approved on September 15, 2011.

Sec. 3121 Limitation on availability of funds for unilateral disarmament

added
(a)
added Limitation on maximum amount for dismantlement— Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for any of fiscal years 2016 through 2020 for the National Nuclear Security Administration, not more than $50,000,000 may be obligated or expended in each such fiscal year to carry out the nuclear weapons dismantlement and disposition activities of the Administration.
(b)
added Limitation on unilateral disarmament—
(1)
added In general— Except as provided by paragraph (2) and subsection (d), none of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for any of fiscal years 2016 through 2020 for the National Nuclear Security Administration may be obligated or expended to dismantle a nuclear weapon of the United States.
(2)
added Authorized dismantlement— The limitation in paragraph (1) shall not apply with respect to a nuclear weapon of the United States that meets at least one of the following criteria:
(A)
added The nuclear weapon was retired on or before September 30, 2008.
(B)
added The Administrator for Nuclear Security certifies in writing to the congressional defense committees that the components of the nuclear weapon are directly required for the purposes of a current life extension program.
(C)
added The President certifies in writing to the congressional defense committees that the nuclear weapon is being dismantled pursuant to a nuclear arms reduction treaty or similar international agreement that—
(i)
added has entered into force after the date of the enactment of this Act; and
(ii)
added was approved—
(I)
added with the advice and consent of the Senate pursuant to Article II, section 2, clause 2 of the Constitution after the date of the enactment of this Act; or
(II)
added by an Act of Congress, as described in section 303(b) of the Arms Control and Disarmament Act (22 U.S.C. 2573(b)).
(c)
added Limitation on unilateral disarmament of certain cruise missile warheads— Except as provided by subsection (d), and notwithstanding subsection (b)(2), none of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for any of fiscal years 2016 through 2020 for the National Nuclear Security Administration may be obligated or expended to dismantle or dispose a W84 nuclear weapon.
(d)
added Exception— The limitations in subsection (b) and (c) shall not apply to activities necessary to conduct maintenance or surveillance of the nuclear weapons stockpile or activities to ensure the safety or reliability of the nuclear weapons stockpile.

Sec. 3122 Use of best practices for capital asset projects and nuclear weapon life extension programs

added
(a)
added Analyses of alternatives— Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Energy, in coordination with the Administrator for Nuclear Security, shall ensure that analyses of alternatives are conducted (including through contractors, as appropriate) in accordance with best practices for capital asset projects and life extension programs of the National Nuclear Security Administration and capital asset projects relating to defense environmental management.
(b)
added Cost estimates— Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary, in coordination with the Administrator, shall develop cost estimates in accordance with cost estimating best practices for capital asset projects and life extension programs of the National Nuclear Security Administration and capital asset projects relating to defense environmental management.
(c)
added Revisions to Departmental project management order and nuclear weapon life extension requirements— As soon as practicable after the date of the enactment of this Act, but not later than two years after such date of enactment, the Secretary shall revise—
(1)
added the capital asset project management order of the Department of Energy to require the use of best practices for preparing cost estimates and for conducting analyses of alternatives for National Nuclear Security Administration and defense environmental management capital asset projects; and
(2)
added the nuclear weapon life extension program procedures of the Department to require the use of use of best practices for preparing cost estimates and conducting analyses of alternatives for National Nuclear Security Administration life extension programs.

Sec. 3131 Root cause analyses for certain cost overruns

added

added Section 4713(c) of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2753) is amended—

(1)
added in the heading, by inserting “and Root Cause Analyses” after “Projects”;
(2)
added in paragraph (1), by striking “and”;
(3)
added in paragraph (2)(C), by striking the period at the end and inserting “; and”; and
(4)
added by adding at the end the following paragraph:

added “(3) submit to the congressional defense committees an assessment of the root cause or causes of the growth in the total cost of the project, including the contribution of any shortcomings in cost, schedule, or performance of the program, including the role, if any, of—

added “(A) unrealistic performance expectations;

added “(B) unrealistic baseline estimates for cost or schedule;

added “(C) immature technologies or excessive manufacturing or integration risk;

added “(D) unanticipated design, engineering, manufacturing, or technology integration issues arising during program performance;

added “(E) changes in procurement quantities;

added “(F) inadequate program funding or funding instability;

added “(G) poor performance by personnel of the Federal Government or contractor personnel responsible for program management; or

added “(H) any other matters.”

Sec. 3132 Extension and modification of certain annual reports on nuclear nonproliferation

added

added Section 3122(c) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1710) is amended—

(1)
added in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking “2016” and inserting “2020”; and
(2)
added in paragraph (2), by inserting after “world,” the following: “including an identification of such uranium that is obligated by the United States,”; and
(3)
added by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

added “(3) A list, by country and site, reflecting the total amount of separated plutonium around the world, including an identification of such plutonium that is obligated by the United States, and an assessment of the vulnerability of the plutonium to theft or diversion.”

Sec. 3133 Governance and management of nuclear security enterprise

added
(a)
added Sense of congress— It is the sense of Congress that—
(1)
added correcting the longstanding problems with the governance and management of the nuclear security enterprise will require robust, personal, and long-term engagement by the President, the Secretary of Energy, the Administrator for Nuclear Security, and leaders from the appropriate congressional committees;
(2)
added recent and past studies of the governance and management of the nuclear security enterprise have provided a list of reasonable, practical, and actionable steps that the Secretary and the Administrator should take to make the nuclear security enterprise more efficient and more effective; and
(3)
added lasting and effective change to the nuclear security enterprise will require personal engagement by senior leaders, a clear plan, and mechanisms for ensuring follow-through and accountability.
(b)
added Implementation plan—
(1)
added Implementation action team—
(A)
added The Secretary and the Administrator shall jointly establish a team of senior officials from the Department of Energy and the National Nuclear Security Administration to develop and carry out an implementation plan to reform the governance and management of the nuclear security enterprise to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of the nuclear security enterprise. Such plan shall be developed and implemented in accordance with the National Nuclear Security Administration Act (50 U.S.C. 2401 et seq.), the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2501 et seq.), and any other provision of law.
(B)
added The team established under paragraph (1) shall be co-chaired by the Deputy Secretary of Energy and the Administrator.
(C)
added In developing and carrying out the implementation plan, the team shall consult with the implementation assessment panel established under subsection (c)(1).
(2)
added Elements— The implementation plan developed under paragraph (1)(A) shall address all recommendations contained in the covered study (except such recommendations that require legislative action to carry out) by identifying specific actions, milestones, timelines, and responsible personnel to implement such plan.
(3)
added Submission— Not later than January 30, 2016, the Secretary of Energy and the Administrator for Nuclear Security shall jointly submit to the appropriate congressional committees the implementation plan developed under paragraph (1)(A).
(c)
added Implementation assessment panel—
(1)
added Agreement— Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall seek to enter into a joint agreement with the National Academy of Sciences and the National Academy of Public Administration to establish a panel of external, independent experts to evaluate the implementation plan developed under subsection (b)(1)(A) and the implementation of such plan.
(2)
added Duties— The panel established under paragraph (1) shall—
(A)
added provide guidance to the Secretary and the Administrator with respect to the implementation plan developed under subsection (b)(1)(A), including how such plan compares or contrasts with the covered study;
(B)
added track the implementation of such plan; and
(C)
added assess the effectiveness of such plan.
(3)
added Reports—
(A)
added Not later than March 1, 2016, the panel established under paragraph (1) shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees, the Secretary, and the Administrator an initial assessment of the implementation plan developed under subsection (b)(1)(A), including with respect to the completeness of the plan, how the plan aligns with the intent and recommendations made by the covered study, and the prospects for success for the plan.
(B)
added Beginning August 1, 2016, and semiannually thereafter until September 30, 2018, the panel established under paragraph (1) shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees, the Secretary, and the Administrator a report on the efforts of the Secretary and the Administrator to implement the implementation plan developed under subsection (b)(1)(A).
(C)
added Not later than September 30, 2018, the panel established under paragraph (1) shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees, the Secretary, and the Administrator a final report on the efforts of the Secretary and the Administrator to implement the implementation plan developed under subsection (b)(1)(A), including an assessment of the effectiveness of the reform efforts under such plan and whether further action is needed.
(4)
added Cooperation— The Secretary and the Administrator shall provide to the panel established under paragraph (1) full and timely access to all information, personnel, and systems of the Department of Energy and the National Nuclear Security Administration that the panel determines necessary to carry out this subsection.
(d)
added Definitions— In this section:
(1)
added The term nuclear security enterprise has the meaning given that term in section 4002(6) of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2501).
(2)
added The term appropriate congressional committees means—
(A)
added the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Appropriations, and the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate; and
(B)
added the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Appropriations, and the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives.
(5)
added The term covered study means the following:
(A)
added The final report of the Congressional Advisory Panel on the Governance of the Nuclear Security Enterprise established by section 3166 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2208).
(B)
added Any other study not conducted by the Secretary or the Administrator that the Secretary determines appropriate for purposes of this section.
(e)
added Rules of construction— Nothing in this section shall be construed to authorize any action—
(1)
added in contravention of section 3220 of the National Nuclear Security Administration Act (50 U.S.C. 2410); or
(2)
added that would undermine or weaken health, safety, or security.

Sec. 3134 Assessments on nuclear proliferation risks and nuclear nonproliferation opportunities

added
(a)
added Reports— Not later than March 1, 2016, and each year thereafter through 2020, the Director of National Intelligence shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report, consistent with the provision of classified information and intelligence sources and methods, containing—
(1)
added an assessment and prioritization of international nuclear proliferation risks and nuclear nonproliferation opportunities; and
(2)
added an assessment of the effectiveness of various means and programs for addressing such risks and opportunities.
(b)
added Appropriate congressional committees defined— In this section, the term “appropriate congressional committees” means—
(1)
added the congressional defense committees;
(2)
added the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate; and
(3)
added the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate.

Sec. 3135 Independent review of laboratory-directed research and development programs

added
(a)
added Review—
(1)
added In general— The Administrator for Nuclear Security shall seek to enter into a contract with the JASON Defense Advisory Panel to conduct a review of the laboratory-directed research and development programs authorized under section 4811 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2791). Such review shall include assessments of the following:
(A)
added Whether and how such programs support the mission of the National Nuclear Security Administration, including whether such programs are carried out pursuant to the requirements of section 4812(a) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2792(a)) or other similar requirements established by the Secretary of Energy or the Administrator.
(B)
added Whether the science conducted under such programs underpin the advancement of scientific understanding necessary for nuclear weapons, nuclear nonproliferation, and naval nuclear propulsion programs.
(C)
added Whether the science conducted under such programs help attract and retain highly qualified technical personnel.
(D)
added The scientific and programmatic opportunities and challenges in such programs, including recent significant accomplishments and failures of such programs.
(E)
added How projects are selected for funding under such programs.
(2)
added Submission— Not later than November 1, 2016, the Administrator shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report containing the review of the JASON Defense Advisory Panel conducted under paragraph (1).
(b)
added Comptroller General briefing— Not later than November 1, 2016, the Comptroller General of the United States shall provide to the congressional defense committees a briefing on the following:
(1)
added How funding limits for laboratory-directed research and development programs of the National Nuclear Security Administration compare to funding limits for other laboratories of the Department of Energy and laboratories and federally funded research and development centers of the Department of Defense.
(2)
added How many personnel are supported by laboratory-directed research and development programs, including—
(A)
added how many personnel receive 50 percent or more of their funding from such programs; and
(B)
added how many personnel devote more than 50 percent of their time to such programs for more than three years.

Sec. 3141 Transfer, decontamination, and decommissioning of nonoperational facilities

added
(a)
added Plan— The Secretary of Energy shall establish and carry out a plan under which the Administrator for Nuclear Security shall transfer to the Assistant Secretary of Energy for Environmental Management the responsibility for decontaminating and decommissioning facilities of the National Nuclear Security Administration that the Secretary of Energy determines—
(1)
added are nonoperational as of the date of the enactment of this Act; and
(2)
added meet the requirements of the Office of Environmental Management for such transfer.
(b)
added Elements— The plan under subsection (a) shall include—
(1)
added a schedule for transferring the facilities as described in such subsection by not later than three years after the date of the enactment of this Act;
(2)
added a prioritized list and schedule for decontaminating and decommissioning such facilities, including how such priority and schedule is treated in light of the other facility disposition priorities of the Office of Environmental Management; and
(3)
added a description of the estimated life cycle costs for all such facilities and how such information is factored into the prioritized list and schedule under paragraph (2).
(c)
added Submission— Not later than February 15, 2016, the Secretary of Energy shall submit to the congressional defense committees, the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate, and the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives the plan under subsection (a), including any additional views of the Secretary regarding such plan.

Sec. 3142 Research and development of advanced naval nuclear fuel system based on low-enriched uranium

added
(a)
added Availability of funds— Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2016 for defense nuclear nonproliferation for material management and minimization, not more than $5,000,000 shall be made available to the Deputy Administrator for Naval Reactors for initial planning and early research and development of an advanced naval nuclear fuel system based on low-enriched uranium, as specified in the funding table in section 4701.
(b)
added Determination of continued research and development—
(1)
added Determination— At the same time that the President submits to Congress the budget for fiscal year 2017 under section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, the Secretary of Energy and the Secretary of the Navy shall jointly submit to the congressional defense committees the determination of the Secretaries as to whether the United States should continue to pursue research and development of an advanced naval nuclear fuel system based on low-enriched uranium.
(2)
added Budget request— If the Secretaries determine under paragraph (1) that research and development of an advanced naval nuclear fuel system based on low-enriched uranium should continue, the Secretaries shall ensure that the budget described in such paragraph includes amounts for defense nuclear nonproliferation for material management and minimization necessary to carry out the plan under subsection (c).
(c)
added Plan— Not later than 30 days after the date of the submission of the determination under subsection (b)(1), the Deputy Administrator for Naval Reactors shall submit to the congressional defense committees a plan for research and development of an advanced naval nuclear fuel system based on low-enriched uranium to meet military requirements. Such plan shall include the following:
(1)
added Timelines.
(2)
added Costs (including an analysis of the cost of such research and development as compared to the cost of maintaining current naval nuclear reactor technology).
(3)
added Milestones, including an identification of decision points in which the Deputy Administrator shall determine whether further research and development of a low-enriched uranium naval nuclear fuel system is warranted.
(4)
added Identification of any benefits or risks for nuclear nonproliferation of such research and development and eventual deployment.
(5)
added Identification of any military benefits or risks of such research and development and eventual deployment.
(6)
added A discussion of potential security cost savings from using low-enriched uranium in future naval nuclear fuels, including for transporting and using low-enriched uranium fuel, and how such cost savings relate to the cost of fuel fabrication.
(7)
added The distinguishment between requirements for aircraft carriers from submarines.
(8)
added Any other matters the Deputy Administrator determines appropriate.
(d)
added Memorandum of understanding— If the Secretaries determine under subsection (b)(1) that research and development of an advanced naval nuclear fuel system based on low-enriched uranium should continue, not later than 60 days after the date on which the Deputy Administrator submits the plan under subsection (c), the Deputy Administrator shall enter into a memorandum of understanding with the Deputy Administrator for Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation regarding such research and development, including with respect to how funding for such research and development will be requested for the “Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation” account for material management and minimization and provided to the “Naval Reactors” account to carry out the program.

Sec. 3143 Plutonium pit production capacity

added
(a)
added Sense of congress— It is the sense of Congress that—
(1)
added the requirement to create a modern, responsive nuclear infrastructure that includes the capability and capacity to produce, at minimum, 50 to 80 pits per year, is a national security priority;
(2)
added delaying creation of a modern, responsive nuclear infrastructure until the 2030s is an unacceptable risk to the nuclear deterrent and the national security of the United States; and
(3)
added timelines for creating certain capacities for production of plutonium pits and other nuclear weapons components must be driven by the requirement to hedge against technical and geopolitical risk and not solely by the needs of life extension programs.
(b)
added Briefing—
(1)
added In general— Not later than March 1, 2016, the Chairman of the Nuclear Weapons Council established under section 179 of title 10, United States Code, in consultation with the Administrator for Nuclear Security and the Commander of the United States Strategic Command, shall provide to the congressional defense committees a briefing on the annual plutonium pit production capacity of the nuclear security enterprise (as defined in section 4002(6) of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2501)).
(2)
added Elements— The briefing under paragraph (1) shall describe the following:
(A)
added The pit production capacity requirement, including the numbers of pits produced that are needed for nuclear weapons life extension programs.
(B)
added The annual pit production requirement, including the numbers of pits produced, to support a responsive nuclear weapons infrastructure to hedge against technical and geopolitical risk.

Sec. 3144 Analysis of alternatives for Mobile Guardian Transporter program

added
(a)
added Submission of analysis of alternatives— Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Administrator for Nuclear Security shall submit to the congressional defense committees the analysis of alternatives conducted by the Administrator for the mobile guardian transporter program.
(b)
added Independent assessment—
(1)
added In general— Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall seek to enter into a contract with a federally funded research and development center to conduct an independent assessment of the analysis of alternatives for the mobile guardian transporter program.
(2)
added Matters included— The assessment under paragraph (1) of the analysis of alternatives for the mobile guardian transporter program shall include an assessment of the following:
(A)
added The engineering, operations, logistics, cost, cost-benefit, policy, threat, safety, security, and risk analysis used to inform the analysis of alternatives.
(B)
added The options considered by the analysis of alternatives and whether such options represent a comprehensive set of options.
(C)
added The constraints and assumptions used to frame and bound the analysis of alternatives.
(3)
added Submission— Not later than March 1, 2016, the Administrator shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report containing—
(A)
added the assessment conducted by the federally funded research and development center under paragraph (1), without change; and
(B)
added any views of the Administrator regarding such assessment or the mobile guardian transporter program.
(c)
added Identification in budget materials— The Secretary of Energy shall include in the budget justification materials submitted to Congress in support of the Department of Energy budget (as submitted with the budget of the President under section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code) for any fiscal year in which the mobile guardian transporter program is carried out a separate, dedicated program element for such program.

Sec. 3145 Development of strategy on risks to nonproliferation caused by additive manufacturing

added
(a)
added Strategy— The President shall develop and pursue a strategy to address the risks to the goals and policies of the United States regarding nuclear nonproliferation that are caused by the increased use of additive manufacture technology (commonly referred to as “3D printing”), including such technology that does not originate in the United States.
(b)
added Briefings— Not later than March 31, 2016, and each 120-day period thereafter through January 1, 2019, the President shall provide to the appropriate congressional committees a briefing on the strategy developed under subsection (a).
(c)
added Pursuit of strategy— The President shall pursue the strategy developed under subsection (a) at the Nuclear Security Summit in Chicago in 2016.
(d)
added Appropriate congressional committees defined— In this section, the term “appropriate congressional committees” means the following:
(1)
added The congressional defense committees.
(2)
added The Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate.
(3)
added The Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate.

Sec. 3201 Authorization

added

added There is authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2016 $29,150,000 for the operation of the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board under chapter 21 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2286 et seq.).

Sec. 3202 Administration of Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board

added
(a)
added Provision of information to Board members— Section 311(c) of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2286(c)) is amended—
(1)
added in paragraph (2), in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking “paragraph (5)” and inserting “paragraphs (5), (6), and (7)”; and
(2)
added by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

added “(6) In carrying out paragraph (5)(B), the Chairman may not withhold from any member of the Board any information that is made available to the Chairman regarding the Board's functions, powers, and mission (including with respect to the management and evaluation of employees of the Board).”

(b)
added Senior employees—
(1)
added Appointment and removal— Such section 311(c), as amended by subsection (a), is further amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

added “(7)

added “(A) The Chairman, subject to the approval of the Board, shall appoint the senior employees described in subparagraph (C).

added “(B) The Chairman, subject to the approval of the Board, may remove a senior employee described in subparagraph (C).

added “(C) The senior employees described in this subparagraph are the following senior employees of the Board:

added “(i) The senior employee responsible for budgetary and general administration matters.

added “(ii) The general counsel.

added “(iii) The senior employee responsible for technical matters.”

(2)
added Conforming amendment— Section 313(b)(1)(A) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 2286b(b)(1)) is amended by striking “hire” and inserting “in accordance with section 311(c)(7), hire”.

Sec. 3401 Authorization of appropriations

added
(a)
added Amount— There are hereby authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary of Energy $17,500,000 for fiscal year 2016 for the purpose of carrying out activities under chapter 641 of title 10, United States Code, relating to the naval petroleum reserves.
(b)
added Period of availability— Funds appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in subsection (a) shall remain available until expended.

Sec. 3501 Authorization of appropriations for national security aspects of the Merchant Marine for fiscal year 2016

added

added Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2016, to be available without fiscal year limitation if so provided in appropriations Acts, for the use of the Department of Transportation for Maritime Administration programs associated with maintaining national security aspects of the merchant marine, as follows:

(1)
added For expenses necessary for operations of the United States Merchant Marine Academy, $96,028,000, of which—
(A)
added $71,306,000 shall remain available until expended for Academy operations;
(B)
added $24,722,000 shall remain available until expended for capital asset management at the Academy.
(2)
added For expenses necessary to support the State maritime academies, $34,550,000, of which—
(A)
added $2,400,000 shall remain available until expended for student incentive payments;
(B)
added $3,000,000 shall remain available until expended for direct payments to such academies;
(C)
added $1,800,000 shall remain available until expended for training ship fuel assistance payments;
(D)
added $22,000,000 shall remain available until expended for maintenance and repair of State maritime academy training vessels;
(E)
added $5,000,000 shall remain available until expended for the National Security Multi-Mission Vessel Design; and
(F)
added $350,000 shall remain available until expended for improving the monitoring of graduates’ service obligation.
(3)
added For expenses necessary to support Maritime Administration operations and programs, $54,059,000.
(4)
added For expenses necessary to dispose of vessels in the National Defense Reserve Fleet, $8,000,000, to remain available until expended.
(5)
added For expenses to maintain and preserve a United States-flag merchant marine to serve the national security needs of the United States under chapter 531 of title 46, United States Code, $186,000,000.
(6)
added For the cost (as defined in section 502(5) of the Federal Credit Reform Act of 1990 (2 U.S.C. 661a(5)) of loan guarantees under the program authorized by chapter 537 of title 46, United States Code, $3,135,000, of which $3,135,000 shall remain available until expended for administrative expenses of the program.

Sec. 3502 Sense of Congress regarding Maritime Security Fleet program

added

added It is the sense of Congress that dedicated and enhanced support is necessary to stabilize and preserve the Maritime Security Fleet program, a program that provides the Department of Defense with on-demand access to world class, economical commercial sealift capacity, assures a United States-flag presence in international commerce, supports a pool of qualified United States merchant mariners needed to crew United States-flag vessels during times of war or national emergency, and serves as a critical component of our national security infrastructure.

Sec. 3503 Update of references to the Secretary of Transportation regarding unemployment insurance and vessel operators

added

added Sections 3305 and 3306(n) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 are each amended by striking “Secretary of Commerce” each place that it appears and inserting “Secretary of Transportation”.

Sec. 3504 Reliance on classification society certification for purposes of eligibility for certificate of inspection

added

added Section 53102(e)(3)(A) of title 46, United States Code, is amended by striking “may” and inserting “shall”.

Sec. 4001 Authorization of amounts in funding tables

added
(a)
added In general— Whenever a funding table in this division specifies a dollar amount authorized for a project, program, or activity, the obligation and expenditure of the specified dollar amount for the project, program, or activity is hereby authorized, subject to the availability of appropriations.
(b)
added Merit-based decisions— A decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds with or to a specific entity on the basis of a dollar amount authorized pursuant to subsection (a) shall—
(1)
added be based on merit-based selection procedures in accordance with the requirements of sections 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States Code, or on competitive procedures; and
(2)
added comply with other applicable provisions of law.
(c)
added Relationship to transfer and programming authority— An amount specified in the funding tables in this division may be transferred or reprogrammed under a transfer or reprogramming authority provided by another provision of this Act or by other law. The transfer or reprogramming of an amount specified in such funding tables shall not count against a ceiling on such transfers or reprogrammings under section 1001 or section 1522 of this Act or any other provision of law, unless such transfer or reprogramming would move funds between appropriation accounts.
(d)
added Applicability to classified annex— This section applies to any classified annex that accompanies this Act.
(e)
added Oral and written communications— No oral or written communication concerning any amount specified in the funding tables in this division shall supersede the requirements of this section.

Sec. 4101 Procurement

added

Sec. 4102 Procurement for overseas contingency operations

added

Sec. 4201 Research, development, test, and evaluation

added

Sec. 4202 Research, development, test, and evaluation for overseas contingency operations

added

Sec. 4301 Operation and maintenance

added

Sec. 4302 Operation and maintenance for overseas contingency operations

added

Sec. 4303 Operation and maintenance for overseas contingency operations for base requirements

added

Sec. 4401 Military personnel

added

Sec. 4402 Military personnel for overseas contingency operations

added

Sec. 4501 Other authorizations

added

Sec. 4502 Other authorizations for overseas contingency operations

added

Sec. 4601 Military construction

added

Sec. 4602 Military construction for overseas contingency operations

added

Sec. 4701 Department of Energy national security programs

added