US Codex
Bill
Notes

H.R. 1735 — what changed

National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016

From Reported in House to Engrossed in House. 61 sections amended and 106 added between Reported in House and Engrossed in House.

Sec. 113 Report on options to accelerate replacement of UH–60A Blackhawk helicopters of Army National Guard

Not later than March 1, 2016, the Secretary of the Army shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report containing detailed options for the potential acceleration of the replacement of all UH–60A helicopters of the Army National Guard by not later than September 30, 2020. The report shall include the following:

(1)
changed The additional funding and quantities required, listed by each of fiscal years 2017 through 2020, for H–60M production, UH–60A-to-L RECAP, and UH-60L-to-V UH–60L-to-V RECAP that is necessary to achieve such replacement of all UH-60A UH–60A helicopters by September 30, 2020.
(2)
Any industrial base limitations that may affect such acceleration, including with respect to the production schedules for the other variants of the UH–60 helicopter.
(3)
The potential effects of such acceleration on the planned replacement of all UH–60A helicopters of the regular components of the Armed Forces by September 30, 2025.
(4)
changed Identification of any additional funding or resources required to train members of the National Guard to operate and maintain UH–60M aircraft in order to achieve such replacement of all UH-60A UH–60A helicopters by September 30, 2020.
(5)
Any other matters the Secretary determines appropriate.

Sec. 114 Sense of Congress on tactical wheeled vehicle protection kits

added

added It is the sense of Congress that—

(1)
added Army personnel face an increasingly complex and evolving threat environment that requires advanced and effective technology to protect our soldiers while allowing them to effectively carry out their mission;
(2)
added the heavy tactical vehicle protection kits program provides the Army with improved and necessary ballistic protection for the heavy tactical vehicle fleet;
(3)
added a secure heavy tactical vehicle fleet provides the Army with greater logistical tractability and offers soldiers the necessary flexibility to tailor armor levels based on threat levels and mission requirements; and
(4)
added as Congress provides for a modern and secure Army, it is necessary to provide the appropriate funding levels to meet its tactical wheeled vehicle protection kits acquisition objectives.

Sec. 133 Prohibition on availability of funds for retirement of A–10 aircraft

(a)
Prohibition on availability of funds for retirement— Except as provided by section 132, none of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2016 for the Air Force may be obligated or expended to retire, prepare to retire, or place in storage or on backup aircraft inventory status any A–10 aircraft.
(b)
Additional limitations on retirement—
(1)
In general— Except as provided by section 132, and in addition to the limitation in subsection (a), during the period before December 31, 2016, the Secretary of the Air Force may not retire, prepare to retire, or place in storage or on backup flying status any A–10 aircraft.
(2)
Minimum inventory requirement— The Secretary of the Air Force shall ensure the Air Force maintains a minimum of 171 A–10 aircraft designated as primary mission aircraft inventory.
(c)
Prohibition on availability of funds for significant reductions in manning levels— None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2016 for the Air Force may be obligated or expended to make significant reductions to manning levels with respect to any A–10 aircraft squadrons or divisions.
(d)
changed Additional limitation on significant reductions in manning levels— -In In addition to the limitation in subsection (c), during the period before December 31, 2016, the Secretary of the Air Force may not make significant reductions to manning levels with respect to any A–10 aircraft squadrons or divisions.
(e)
Study on replacement capability requirements or mission platform for the A–10 aircraft—
(1)
Independent assessment required—
(A)
In general— The Secretary of the Air Force shall commission an appropriate entity outside the Department of Defense to conduct an assessment of the required capabilities or mission platform to replace the A–10 aircraft. This assessment would represent preparatory work to inform an analysis of alternatives.
(B)
Elements— The assessment required under subparagraph (A) shall include each of the following:
(i)
Future needs analysis for the current A–10 aircraft mission set to include troops-in-contact/close air support, air interdiction, strike control and reconnaissance, and combat search and rescue support in both contested and uncontested battle environments. At a minimum, the needs analysis should specifically address the following areas:
(I)
The ability to safely and effectively conduct troops-in-contact/danger close missions or missions in close proximity to civilians in the presence of the air defenses found with enemy ground maneuver units.
(II)
The ability to effectively target and destroy moving, camouflaged, or dug-in troops, and artillery.
(III)
The ability to engage, target, and destroy tanks and armored personnel carriers, including with respect to the carrying capacity of armor-piercing weaponry, including mounted cannons and missiles.
(IV)
The ability to remain within visual range of friendly forces and targets to facilitate responsiveness to ground forces and minimize re-attack times.
(V)
The ability to safely conduct close air support beneath low cloud ceilings and in reduced visibilities at low airspeeds in the presence of the air defenses found with enemy ground maneuver units.
(VI)
The ability of the pilot and aircraft to survive direct hits from small arms, machine guns, MANPADs, and lower caliber anti-aircraft artillery organic or attached to enemy ground forces and maneuver units.
(VII)
The ability to communicate effectively with ground forces and downed pilots, including in communications jamming or satellite-denied environments.
(VIII)
The ability to execute the missions described in subclauses (I), (II), (III), and (IV) in a GPS- or satellite-denied environment with or without sensors.
(IX)
The ability to deliver multiple lethal firing passes and sustain long loiter endurance to support friendly forces throughout extended ground engagements.
(X)
The ability to operate from unprepared dirt, grass, and narrow road runways and to generate high sortie rates under these austere conditions.
(ii)
Identification and assessment of gaps in the ability of existing and programmed mission platforms in providing required capabilities to conduct missions specified in clause (i) in both contested and uncontested battle environments.
(iii)
Assessment of operational effectiveness of existing and programmed mission platforms to conduct missions specified in clause (i) in both contested and uncontested battle environments.
(iv)
Assessment of probability of likelihood of conducting missions requiring troops-in-contact/close air support operations specified in clause (i) in contested environments as compared to uncontested environments.
(v)
Any other matters the independent entity or the Secretary of the Air Force determines to be appropriate.
(2)
Report—
(A)
In general— Not later than September 30, 2016, the Secretary of the Air Force shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that includes the assessment required under paragraph (1).
(B)
Form— The report required under subparagraph (A) may be submitted in classified form, but shall also contain an unclassified executive summary and may contain an unclassified annex.
(3)
Nonduplication of effort— If any information required under paragraph (1) has been included in another report or notification previously submitted to Congress by law, the Secretary of the Air Force may provide a list of such reports and notifications at the time of submitting the report required under paragraph (2) in lieu of including such information in the report required under paragraph (2).

Sec. 136 Sense of Congress regarding the OCONUS basing of the F–35A aircraft

added
(a)
added Findings— Congress makes the following findings:
(1)
added The Department of Defense is continuing its process of permanently stationing the F–35 aircraft at installations in the Continental United States (in this section referred to as “CONUS”) and forward-basing Outside the Continental United States (in this section referred to as “OCONUS”).
(2)
added The Secretary of the Air Force has, from a list of bases which included two United States candidate bases in Alaska and three foreign OCONUS candidate bases, selected Eielson Air Force Base as the preferred alternative for two of Pacific Air Force's F–35A Lightning II squadrons in Alaska.
(b)
added Sense of Congress— It is the sense of Congress that the Secretary of the Air Force, in the strategic basing process for the F–35A aircraft, should continue to place emphasis on the benefits derived from sites that—
(1)
added are capable of hosting fighter-based bilateral and multilateral training opportunities with international partners;
(2)
added have sufficient airspace and range capabilities and capacity to meet the training requirements;
(3)
added have existing facilities to support personnel, operations, and logistics associated with the flying mission;
(4)
added have limited encroachment that would adversely impact training or operations; and
(5)
added minimize the overall construction and operational costs.

Sec. 222 Strategies for engagement with historically black colleges and universities and minority-serving institutions of higher education

(a)
Military departments—
(1)
Strategy— The Secretaries of the military departments shall each develop a strategy for how to engage with and support the development of scientific, technical, engineering, and mathematics capabilities of covered educational institutions in carrying out section 2362 of title 10, United States Code.
(2)
Elements— Each strategy under paragraph (1) shall include the following:
(A)
Goals and vision for maintaining a credible and sustainable program relating to the engagement and support under the strategy.
(B)
Metrics to enhance scientific, technical, engineering, and mathematics capabilities at covered educational institutions, including with respect to measuring progress towards increasing the success of such institutions to compete for broader research funding sources other than set-aside funds.
(C)
Promotion of mentoring opportunities between covered educational institutions and other research institutions.
(D)
Regular assessment of activities that are used to develop, maintain, and grow scientific, technical, engineering, and mathematics capabilities.
(E)
Inclusion of faculty of covered educational institutions into program reviews, peer reviews, and other similar activities.
(F)
Targeting of undergraduate, graduate, and postgraduate students at covered educational institutions for inclusion into research or internship opportunities within the military department.
(b)
Office of the Secretary— The Secretary of Defense shall develop and implement a strategy for how to engage with and support the development of scientific, technical, engineering, and mathematics capabilities of covered educational institutions pursuant to the strategies developed under subsection (a).
(c)
added In implementing the requirements of this section, the Secretary of Defense may seek information from the directorates of the Louis Stokes Alliances for Minority Participation program (LSAMP) and Historically Black Colleges and Universities Undergraduate Program (HBCU-UP) of the National Science Foundation; the American Association for the Advancement of Science; the Emerging Researchers National Conference in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics; the University of Florida Institute for African-American Mentoring in Computing Sciences (iAAMCS); the Hispanic Association of Colleges and Universities; the National Indian Education Association; and such other institutions, organizations, or associations as the Secretary deems useful.
(d)
added Submission—
(c)
removed Submission—
(1)
renumbered was (4)(2) Military departments— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretaries of the military departments shall each submit to the congressional defense committees the strategy developed by the Secretary under subsection (a)(1).
(2)
renumbered was (4)(3) Office of the Secretary— Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees the strategy developed under subsection (b).
(e)
renumbered was (5) Covered institution defined— In this section, the term “covered educational institution” has the meaning given that term in section 2362(e) of title 10, United States Code.

Sec. 226 Report on graduate fellowships in support of science, mathematics, and engineering education

added

added Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on—

(1)
added the number of individuals from racial or ethnic minority groups, women, and disabled individuals who have participated in the graduate fellowship program under section 2191 of title 10, United States Code, over the ten-year period preceding the date of the report;
(2)
added barriers encountered in recruiting individuals from racial and ethnic minority groups, women, and disabled individuals to participate in such programs; and
(3)
added recommended policy changes to increase such participation.

Sec. 227 Sense of Congress Regarding FFRDC Facilitation of a High Quality Technical Workforce

added
(a)
added Findings— Congress makes the following findings:
(1)
added The quality of the United States’ future scientific and technical workforce is a matter of national security concern.
(2)
added Department of Defense support for science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education programs facilitates the training of a future scientific and technical workforce that will contribute significantly to Department of Defense research, development, test, and evaluation functions, and the readiness of the future force.
(3)
added Federally Funded Research and Development Centers sponsored by the Department of Defense employ a highly skilled workforce that is qualified to support science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education initiatives, including through meaningful volunteer opportunities in primary and secondary educational settings, and through cooperative relationships and arrangements with private sector organizations and State and local governments, to facilitate the training of a future scientific and technical workforce.
(b)
added Sense of Congress— It is the Sense of Congress that the Department of Defense should explore using existing authorities for promoting science, technology, engineering, and mathematics programs, such as section 233 of the Carl Levin and Howard P. “Buck” McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291), to allow Federally Funded Research and Development Centers to help facilitate and shape a high quality scientific and technical future workforce that can support Department of Defense needs.

Sec. 228 Funding for MV–22A digital interoperability program

added
(a)
added Increase— Notwithstanding the amounts set forth in the funding tables in division D—
(1)
added the amount authorized to be appropriated in section 101 for aircraft procurement, Navy, for the V–22, line 059, as specified in the corresponding funding table in section 4101, for the digital interoperability program is hereby increased by $64,300,000; and
(2)
added the amount authorized to be appropriated in section 201 for research, development, test, and evaluation, Navy, for the V–22A, line 099, as specified in the corresponding funding table in section 4201, for the digital interoperability program is hereby increased by $10,700,000.
(b)
added Offset— Notwithstanding the amounts set forth in the funding tables in division D, the amounts authorized to be appropriated in section 101 for aircraft procurement, Navy, for spares and repair parts, line 063, as specified in the corresponding funding table in section 4101, is hereby reduced by $75,000,000.

Sec. 229 Commercial-off-the-shelf wide-area surveillance systems for Army tactical unmanned aerial systems

added
(a)
added Sense of congress— Congress finds that—
(1)
added unmanned aerial systems provide the military services with high-endurance, wide-area surveillance;
(2)
added wide-area surveillance has proven to be a significant force multiplier for intelligence gathering and dismounted infantry operations;
(3)
added currently fielded wide-area surveillance sensors are too heavy to be incorporated into tactical unmanned aerial systems; and
(4)
added the growing commercial market for unmanned aerial systems with full-motion video sensors may offer a commercial-off-the-shelf solution suitable for use on the military services’ tactical unmanned aerial systems.
(b)
added Report— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Army shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that contains the findings of a market survey and flight assessment of commercial-off-the-shelf wide-area surveillance sensors suitable for insertion into Army tactical unmanned aerial systems.
(c)
added Elements— The market survey and flight assessment required by subsection (b) shall include—
(1)
added specific details regarding the capabilities of current and commercial-off-the-shelf wide-area surveillance sensors utilized on the Army unmanned aerial systems, including—
(A)
added daytime and nighttime monitoring coverage;
(B)
added video resolution outputs;
(C)
added bandwidth requirements;
(D)
added activity-based intelligence and forensic capabilities;
(E)
added simultaneous region of interest monitoring capability;
(F)
added interoperability with other sensors and subsystems currently utilized on Army tactical unmanned aerial systems;
(G)
added sensor weight;
(H)
added sensor cost; and
(I)
added any other factors the Secretary deems relevant;
(2)
added an assessment of the impact on Army tactical unmanned aerial systems due to the insertion of commercial-off-the-shelf wide-area surveillance sensors; and
(3)
added recommendations to upgrade or enhance the wide-area surveillance sensors of Army tactical unmanned aerial systems, as deemed appropriate by the Secretary.
(d)
added Form— The report required under subsection (b) may contain a classified annex.
(e)
added Definition— In this section, the term “Army tactical unmanned aerial systems” includes, at minimum, the MQ–1C Grey Eagle, the MQ–1 Predator, and the MQ–9 Reaper.

Sec. 230 Report on Tactical Combat Training System Increment II

added
(a)
added Report to Congress— Not later than January 29, 2016, the Secretary of Navy and the Secretary of the Air Force shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the baseline and alternatives to the Navy’s Tactical Air Combat Training System (TCTS) Increment II.
(b)
added Contents— The report required by subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1)
added An explanation of the rationale for a new start TCTS II program as compared to an incremental upgrade to the existing TCTS system.
(2)
added An estimate of total cost to develop, procure, and replace the existing Department of the Navy TCTS architecture with an encrypted TCTS II compared to upgrades to existing TCTS.
(3)
added A cost estimate and schedule comparison of achieving encryption requirements into the existing TCTS program as compared to TCTS II.
(4)
added A review of joint Department of the Air Force and the Department of the Navy investment in live-virtual-constructive advanced air combat training and planned timeline for inclusion into TCTS II architecture.
(5)
added A cost estimate to integrate F-35 aircraft with TCTS II and achieve interoperability between the Department of the Navy and Department of the Air Force.
(6)
added A cost estimate for coalition partners to achieve TCTS II interoperability within the Department of Defense.
(7)
added An assessment of risks posed by non-interoperable TCTS systems within the Department of the Navy and the Department of the Air Force.
(8)
added An explanation of the acquisition strategy for the TCTS program.
(9)
added An explanation of key performance parameters for the TCTS II program.
(10)
added Any other information the Secretary of the Navy and Secretary of the Air Force determine is appropriate to include.
(c)
added Limitation— The Secretary of the Navy shall not proceed with the approval or designation of a contract award for TCTS II until 15 days after the date of the submittal of the report required by subsection (a).

Sec. 231 Improvement to coordination and communication of defense research activities

added
(a)
added In general— Section 2364 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
added by striking subsection (a) and inserting the following new subsection:

added “(a) Coordination of Department of Defense Research, Development, and Technological Data—The Secretary of Defense shall promote, monitor, and evaluate programs for the communication and exchange of research, development, and technological data—

added “(1) among the Defense research facilities, combatant commands, and other organizations that are involved in developing for the Department of Defense the technological requirements for new items for use by combat forces;

added “(2) among Defense research facilities and other offices, agencies, and bureaus in the Department that are engaged in related technological matters;

added “(3) among other research facilities and other departments or agencies of the Federal Government that are engaged in research, development, and technological matters;

added “(4) among private commercial, research institution, and university entities engaged in research, development, and technological matters potentially relevant to defense on a voluntary basis; and

added “(5) to the extent practicable, to achieve full awareness of scientific and technological advancement and innovation wherever it may occur, whether funded by the Department of Defense, another element of the Federal Government, or other entities.”

(2)
added in subsection (b), by striking paragraph (3) and inserting the following new paragraph:

added “(3) that the managers of such facilities have broad latitude to choose research and development projects based on awareness of activities throughout the technology domain, including within the Federal Government, the Department of Defense, public and private research institutions and universities, and the global commercial marketplace;”

(3)
added in the section heading, by inserting “and technology domain awareness” after “activities”.
(b)
added Clerical amendment— The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 139 of such title is amended by striking the item relating to section 2364 and inserting the following:

Sec. 302 Additional authorization of appropriations for the Office of Economic Adjustment

added
(a)
added Authorization of appropriations— There is authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary of Defense an additional $25,000,000 for the Office of Economic Adjustment to be available, until expended and notwithstanding any other provision of law, for transportation infrastructure improvements associated with congestion mitigation in urban areas related to recommendations of the 2005 Defense Base Closure and Realignment Commission.
(b)
added Funding offset— Notwithstanding the amounts set forth in the funding tables in division D, the amounts specified in the funding table in section 4301 of division D, relating to Operation and Maintenance, are each hereby reduced by $5,000,000 (for a total of $25,000,000), as follows:
(1)
added Army, Line 540.
(2)
added Navy, Line 720.
(3)
added Marine Corps, Line 210.
(4)
added Air Force, Line 470.
(5)
added Defense-wide, Line 340.

Sec. 317 Comprehensive study on impact of proposed ozone rule

added

added Not earlier than 5 years after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall conduct a comprehensive study on the impact of any final rule that succeeds the proposed regulation entitled National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Ozone (published at 79 Fed. Reg. 75234) on military readiness, including the impact of such rule on training exercises, military installations, land owned and operated by the Department of Defense, the infrastructure upon which the national security system relies, and the impact military activities may have on attainment designations.

Sec. 318 Report on merger of Office of Assistant Secretary for Operational Energy Plans and Deputy Under Secretary for Installations and Environment

added

added The Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress a report on the merger of the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Operational Energy Plans and the Office of the Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Installations and Environment under section 901 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3462. Such report shall include—

(1)
added a description of how the office is implementing its responsibilities under sections 138(b)(9), 138(c), and 2925(b) of title 10, United States Code, and Department of Defense Directives 5134.15 (Assistant Secretary of Defense for Operational Energy Plans and Programs) and 4280.01 (Department of Defense Energy Policy);
(2)
added a description of any efficiencies achieved as a result of the merger; and
(3)
added the number of Department of Defense personnel whose responsibilities are focused on energy matters specifically.

Sec. 321 Assignment of certain new requirements based on determinations of cost-efficiency

(a)
Amendment— Chapter 146 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 2463 the following new section:

changed “2463a. “§ 2463a. Assignment of certain new requirements based on determinations of cost-efficiency

“(a) Assignments based on determinations of cost-efficiency

changed “(1) Except as provided in paragraph (2) and subject to subsection (b), the assignment of performance of a new requirement by the Department of Defense to members of the Armed Forces, armed forces, civilian employees, or contractors shall be based on a determination of which sector of the Department’s workforce can perform the new requirement in the most cost-efficient manner, based on an analysis of the costs to the Federal Government in accordance with Department of Defense Instruction 7041.04 (““Estimating (“Estimating and Comparing the Full Costs of Civilian and Active Duty Military Manpower and Contract Support””) Support”) or successor guidance, consistent with the needs of the Department with respect to factors other than cost, including quality, reliability, and timeliness.

changed “(2) Paragraph (1) shall not apply in the case of a new requirement that is inherently governmental, closely associated with inherently governmental functions, critical, or required by law to be performed by members of the Armed Forces armed forces or Department of Defense civilian employees.

“(3) Nothing in this section may be construed as affecting the requirements of the Department of Defense under policies and procedures established by the Secretary of Defense under section 129a of this title for determining the most appropriate and cost-efficient mix of military, civilian, and contractor personnel to perform the mission of the Department of Defense.

“(b) Waiver During an Emergency or Exigent Circumstances—The head of an agency may waive subsection (a) for a specific new requirement in the event of an emergency or exigent circumstances, as long as the head of an agency, within 60 days of exercising the waiver, submits to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives notice of the specific new requirement involved, where such new requirement is being performed, and the date on which it would be practical to subject such new requirement to the requirements of subsection (a).

“(c) Provisions relating to assignment of civilian personnel—If a new requirement is assigned to a Department of Defense civilian employee consistent with the requirements of this section—

“(1) the Secretary of Defense may not—

“(A) impose any constraint or limitation on the size of the civilian workforce in terms of man years, end strength, full-time equivalent positions, or maximum number of employees; or

“(B) require offsetting funding for civilian pay or benefits or require a reduction in civilian full-time equivalents or civilian end-strengths; and

“(2) the Secretary may assign performance of such requirement without regard to whether the employee is a temporary, term, or permanent employee.

“(d) New requirement described—For purposes of this section, a new requirement is an activity or function that is not being performed, as of the date of consideration for assignment of performance under this section, by military personnel, civilian personnel, or contractor personnel at a Department of Defense component, organization, installation, or other entity. For purposes of the preceding sentence, an activity or function that is performed at such an entity and that is re-engineered, reorganized, modernized, upgraded, expanded, or changed to become more efficient but is still essentially providing the same service shall not be considered a new requirement.”

(b)
Clerical amendment— The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 2463 the following new item:

Sec. 334 Access to wireless high-speed Internet and network connections for certain members of the Armed Forces deployed overseas

added

added Consistent with section 2492a of title 10, United States Code, the Secretary of Defense is encouraged to enter into contracts with third-party vendors in order to provide members of the Armed Forces who are deployed overseas at any United States military facility, at which wireless high-speed Internet and network connections are otherwise available, with access to such Internet and network connections without charge.

Sec. 335 Temporary authority to extend contracts and leases under the ARMS Initiative

added

added Contracts or subcontracts entered into pursuant to section 4554(a)(3)(A) of title 10, United States Code, on or before the date that is five years after the date of the enactment of this Act may include an option to extend the term of the contract or subcontract for an additional 25 years.

Sec. 336 Assessment of outreach for small business concerns owned and controlled by women and minorities required before conversion of certain functions to contractor performance

added

added No Department of Defense function that is performed by Department of Defense civilian employees and is tied to a certain military base may be converted to performance by a contractor until the Secretary of Defense conducts an assessment to determine if the Department of Defense has carried out sufficient outreach programs to assist small business concerns owned and controlled by women (as such term is defined in section 8(d)(3)(D) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 637(d)(3)(D))) and small business concerns owned and controlled by socially and economically disadvantaged individuals (as such term is defined in section 8(d)(3)(C) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 637(d)(3)(C))) that are located in the geographic area near the military base.

Sec. 422 Report on force structure of the Army

added
(a)
added Report Required— Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress a report containing the following:
(1)
added An assessment by the Secretary of Defense of reports by the Secretary of the Army on the force structure of the Army submitted to Congress under section 1066 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1943) and section 1062 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291).
(2)
added An evaluation of the adequacy of the Army force structure proposed for the future-years defense program for fiscal years 2017 through 2021 to meet the goals of the national military strategy of the United States.
(3)
added An independent risk assessment by the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff of the proposed Army force structure and the ability of such force structure to meet the operational requirements of combatant commanders.
(4)
added A description of the planning assumptions and scenarios used by the Department of Defense to validate the size and force structure of the Army, including the Army Reserve and the Army National Guard.
(5)
added A certification by the Secretary of Defense that the Secretary has reviewed the reports by the Secretary of the Army and the assessments of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and determined that an end strength for active duty personnel of the Army below the end strength level authorized in section 401(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291) will be adequate to meet the national military strategy of the United States.
(6)
added A description of various alternative options for allocating funds to ensure that the end strengths of the Army do not fall below levels of significant risk, as determined pursuant to the risk assessment conducted by the Chairman of the Joint Chief under paragraph (3).
(7)
added Such other information or updates as the Secretary of Defense considers appropriate.
(b)
added Form— The report required by subsection (a) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.

Sec. 515 National Guard civil and defense support activities and related matters

(a)
Operational use of the national guard—
(1)
In general— Chapter 1 of title 32, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

changed “116. “§ 116. Operational use of the National Guard

“(a) In general—This section authorizes the operational use of the National Guard and recognizes that the basic premise of both the National Incident Management System and the National Response Framework is that—

“(1) incidents are typically managed at the local level first; and

“(2) local jurisdictions retain command, control, and authority over response activities for their jurisdictional areas.

“(b) Assistance to Civilian Firefighting Organizations

“(1) Assistance authorized—Members and units of the National Guard shall be authorized to support firefighting operations, missions, or activities, including aerial firefighting employment of the Modular Airborne Firefighting System (MAFFS), undertaken in support of a civilian authority or a State or Federal agency.

“(2) Role of governor and state adjutant general—For the purposes of paragraph (1)—

“(A) the Governor of a State shall be the principal civilian authority; and

“(B) the adjutant general of the State shall be the principal military authority, when acting in his or her State capacity, and has the primary authority to mobilize members and units of the National Guard of the State in any duty status under this title the adjutant general deems appropriate to employ necessary forces when funds to perform such operations, missions, or activities are reimbursed.”

(2)
Clerical amendment— The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by adding at the end the following new item:
(b)
Active Guard and Reserve (AGR) support— Section 328(b) of title 32, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
by inserting “duty as specified in section 116(b) of this title or may perform” after “subsection (a) may perform”; and
(2)
by inserting “(A) and (B) ” after “ specified in section 502(f)(2)”.
(c)
Federal technicians support— Section 709(a)(3) of title 32, United States Code, is amended by inserting “duty as specified in section 116(b) of this title or” after “(3) the performance of”.

Sec. 516 Electronic tracking of operational active-duty service performed by members of the Ready Reserve of the Armed Forces

added

added The Secretary of Defense shall establish an electronic means by which members of the Ready Reserve of the Armed Forces can track their operational active-duty service performed after January 28, 2008, under section 12301(a), 12301(d), 12301(g), 12302, or 12304 of title 10, United States Code. The tour calculator shall specify early retirement credit authorized for each qualifying tour of active duty, as well as cumulative early reserve retirement credit authorized to date under section 12731(f) of such title.

Sec. 522 Reserve duty authorities

(a)
In general— Chapter 1209 of title 10, United States Code, is further amended by inserting after section 12323, as added by section 521(7) of this Act, the following new subchapter:

removed “II Reserve Duty Authorities

removed “12341. Active duty

removed “(a) Authority to order a member to perform active duty—At any time, the Secretary concerned may order a member of a reserve component under the Secretary’s jurisdiction to active duty, or retain the member on active duty, subject to the purpose and limitations described in subsections (b) and (c).

removed “(b) Purpose and limitations—The purposes and limitations referred to in subsection (a) are as follows:

removed “(1) Purpose of order—To account for manpower utilization and expenditure of appropriations, each order shall cite the purpose of the order to active duty as provided under subchapter III of this chapter.

removed “(2) Limitations—A member of a reserve component shall not be ordered to active duty or retained on active duty beyond the limitations and restrictions specified in the purpose of the order to active duty.

removed “(c) Continuous period of duty

removed “(1) In general—When the purpose for the member to serve on active duty changes, the order to active duty shall be amended to cite the new purpose and applicable funding code, but the member shall remain on the same order to active duty.

removed “(2) Continuous Federal service—If a member is released from active duty and subsequently ordered to active duty or full-time National Guard duty with a break in service of 24 hours or fewer, the period of service shall be treated as continuous Federal service for the purposes of pay and benefits, unless otherwise specified in law.

removed “12342. Call to Federal service

removed “(a) Authority to call a member into Federal service

removed “(1) In general—The President may call into Federal service the militia of any State, and use such of the armed forces, as the President considers necessary for the purposes specified in chapter 15 of this title.

removed “(2) State request required—A call into Federal service for the purposes specified in section 331 of this title shall only be made upon the request of the legislature of a State or of the Governor of a State if the legislature cannot be convened.

removed “(b) National guard in Federal service—The President may call into Federal service members and units of the National Guard of any State in such numbers as the President considers necessary for the purposes specified in section 12406 of this title.

removed “12343. Inactive duty

removed “(a) Authority to order a member to perform inactive duty—Under regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Defense or the Secretary of the Department in which the Coast Guard is operating, the Secretary concerned may, at any time, order a member of a reserve component under the Secretary’s jurisdiction to perform inactive duty, subject to the purpose and limitations described in subsection (b).

removed “(b) Purpose and limitations—The purpose and limitations referred to in subsection (a) are as follows:

removed “(1) Purpose—To account for manpower utilization and expenditure of appropriations, the Secretary concerned shall document the purpose for inactive duty.

removed “(2) Hostile fire or imminent danger area—Inactive duty shall not be performed in designated hostile fire or imminent danger area.

removed “(3) Duration—Each period of inactive duty shall be for duration of at least two hours.

removed “(4) Compensation—Compensation under section 206 of title 37 and service credit under section 12732(a)(2)(E) of this title shall not exceed two periods of inactive duty in a calendar day.”

(b)
Redesignation of inactive duty to encompass operational and other duties performed while in an active duty status—
(1)
References— Any reference that is made in any law, regulation, document, paper, or other record of the United States to inactive-duty training, as such term applies to members of the reserve components of the uniformed services, shall be deemed to be a reference to inactive duty.
(2)
changed Definition of uniformed services— In this subsection the term “uniformed services” has the meaning given the term in section 101 101(a)(5) of title 10, United States Code.

Sec. 525 Conforming and clerical amendments

(a)
Conforming amendments to title 5, united states code—
(1)
Paragraph (2) of section 5517(d) of title 5, United States Code, is amended by striking “under section 10147” and inserting “as provided under section 12352”.
(2)
Section 6323 of title 5, United States Code, is amended—
(A)
in paragraph (1) of subsection (a)—
(i)
by striking “inactive-duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”; and
(ii)
by striking “funeral honors duty (as described in section 12503 of title 10 and section 115 of title 32)” and inserting “funeral honors functions (as described in section 12353 of title 10 and section 114 of title 32)”; and
(B)
in paragraph (1) subsection (d), by striking “section 12301(b) or 12301(d)” and inserting “section 12341 of title 10 for the purposes specified in section 12351(d) or 12353(a)”.
(b)
Conforming amendments to title 7, united states code— Paragraph (1) of section 332(a) of the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act (7 U.S.C. 1982(a)) is amended by striking “12301(a), 12301(g), 12302, 12304, 12306, or 12406,” and inserting “12341 for the purpose specified in section 12306, 12342, 12351(a)(1), 12351(b), 12351(c), or 12351(f), 12342 for the purpose specified in section 12406,”.
(c)
Conforming amendments to title 10, united states code—
(1)
Section 101 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(A)
changed in subparagraph (B) of subsection (a)(13), by striking “section 688, 12301(a), 12302, 12304, 12304a, 12305, or12406 or 12406 of this title, chapter 15 of this title” and inserting “section 688 or 12341 of this title for the purpose specified in section 12304a, 12305, 12351(a)(1), 12351(b), 12351(c) of this title, section 12342 of this title for the purpose specified in section 12406, chapter 15 of this title”;
(B)
in paragraph (16) of subsection (b), by striking “section 12301(d) of this title” and inserting “section 12341 of this title for the purpose specified in section 12353(c) of this title”;
(C)
in paragraph (5) of subsection (d)—
(i)
by inserting “502(f) of title 32 for the purpose specified in section” after “under section”; and
(ii)
by striking “505 of title 32” and inserting “505 of such title”;
(D)
in paragraph (7) of subsection (d)—
(i)
in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking “inactive-duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”;
(ii)
in subparagraph (A), by striking “section 206 of title 37” and inserting “section 12352(a)(1) of this title, section 502(a)(1) of title 32,”; and
(iii)
in subparagraph (B)—
(I)
by inserting “under section 12353(d) of this title or section 502(g) of title 32” after “special additional duties authorized”; and
(II)
by inserting “, or other activities that a member may perform when authorized by the designated authority” before the period.
(2)
Section 115 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(A)
in subsection (b)(1)—
(i)
in subparagraph (A), by striking “section 12301(d)” and inserting “section 12341”;
(ii)
in subparagraph (C), by striking “section 12301(d)” and inserting “section 12341”;
(iii)
in subparagraph (D)—
(I)
by striking “section 12301(g)” and inserting “section 12341”; and
(II)
by inserting “as provided under section 12351(f) of such title” before the semicolon; and
(iv)
in subparagraph (E)—
(I)
by striking “12301(h) or 12322” and inserting “section 12341”; and
(II)
changed by inserting “as provided under section 12353(b) of this title” before the semicolon;period;
(B)
in subsection (i)—
(i)
in paragraph (1), by striking “section 12301(a) of this title” and inserting “section 12341 of this title for the purpose specified in section 12351(a) of this title”;
(ii)
in paragraph (2), by striking “section 12301(b) of this title” and inserting “section 12341 of this title for the purpose specified in section 12351(d) of this title”;
(iii)
in paragraph (3), by striking “section 12302 of this title” and inserting “section 12341 of this title for the purpose specified in section 12351(b) of this title”;
(iv)
in paragraph (4), by striking “section 12304 of this title” and inserting “section 12341 of this title for the purpose specified in section 12351(c) of this title”;
(v)
in paragraph (5), by inserting “section 12342 of this title for the purpose specified in” after “Federal service under”;
(vi)
in paragraph (6), by inserting “section 12342 of this title for the purpose specified in” after “ Federal service under”; and
(vii)
in paragraph (11), by inserting “12341 for the purpose specified in section” after “active duty under section”.
(3)
Section 331 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting “under section 12342 of this title” after “call into Federal service”.
(4)
Section 332 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting “under section 12342 of this title” after “call into Federal service”.
(5)
Paragraph (3) of section 511(d) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “section 10147(a)(1)” and inserting “section 12352(a)(1)”.
(6)
Subparagraph (B) of section 523(b)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting “12341 of this title for the purpose specified in section” after “on active duty under section”.
(7)
Subparagraph (B) of section 641(1) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting “section 12341 for the purpose described in” after “on active duty under”.
(8)
Section 802 of title 10, United States Code, is amended in each of subsections (a)(3), (d)(2)(B), and (d)(5)(B), by striking “inactive-duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”.
(9)
Subsection (d) of section 803 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “inactive-duty training” each place the term appears and inserting “inactive duty”.
(10)
The matter preceding paragraph (1) of subsection (a) and the matter preceding paragraph (1) of subsection (b) of section 936 of title 10, United States Code, are each amended by striking “inactive-duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”.
(11)
Paragraph (1) of section 976(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “inactive-duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”.
(12)
Paragraphs (1) and (2) of section 1061(b) of title 10, United States Code, are each amended by striking “inactive-duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”.
(13)
Subsection (a) of section 1074a of title 10, United States Code, is amended in each of paragraphs (1)(B), (2)(B), and (3) by striking “inactive-duty training” each place the term appears and inserting “inactive duty”.
(14)
Subsection (a) of section 1074a of title 10, United States Code, is amended further—
(A)
in paragraph (1)—
(i)
in subparagraph (A), by inserting “or” after the semicolon;
(ii)
in subparagraph (B), by striking “; or” and inserting a period; and
(iii)
by striking subparagraph (C);
(B)
in paragraph (2)—
(i)
in subparagraph (A), by inserting “or” after the semicolon;
(ii)
in subparagraph (B), by striking “; or” and inserting a period; and
(iii)
by striking subparagraph (C); and
(C)
by striking paragraph (4).
(15)
Subsection (a) of section 1076 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(A)
in each paragraphs (2)(B)(i), (2)(B)(ii), and (2)(C), by striking “inactive-duty training” each place the term appears and inserting “inactive duty”; and
(B)
in paragraph (2), by striking subparagraph (E).
(16)
Clauses (i) and (ii) of section 1086(c)(2)(B) of title 10, United States Code, are each amended by striking “inactive duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”.
(17)
Paragraph (2) of section 1175(e) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “inactive duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”.
(18)
Section 1175a(j) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(A)
in paragraph (2)—
(i)
by inserting “under section 12341 of this title for the purpose specified in section 12351(a)(1), 12351(b), 12351(c), 12351(d), 12351(e)(1), or 12351(f) of this title” after “involuntarily recalled to active duty”; and
(ii)
by striking “in accordance with section 12301(a), 12301(b), 12301(g), 12302, 12303, or 12304 of this title or” and inserting “under”; and
(B)
in paragraph (3)—
(i)
by striking “12301(d)” and inserting “12353(a)”;
(ii)
by striking “12319, or 12503” and inserting “12351(g)”; and
(iii)
by striking “, 115,”.
(19)
Paragraph (2) of section 1201(c) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “under section 10148(a)” and inserting “pursuant to section 12351(e)(2)”.
(20)
Section 1204 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(A)
in the section heading, by striking “inactive-duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”; and
(B)
in paragraph (2)—
(i)
in each of subparagraphs (A)(i), (A)(iii), (B)(i), and (B)(iii), by striking “inactive-duty training” each place the term appears and inserting “inactive duty”;
(ii)
in clause (iii) of subparagraph (A), by inserting “or” after the semicolon;
(iii)
in clause (iii) of subparagraph (B), by striking “; or” and inserting a period; and
(iv)
by striking subparagraph (C).
(21)
Section 1206 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(A)
in the section heading, by striking “inactive-duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”;
(B)
by amending paragraph (2) to read as follows:

“(2) the disability is a result of an injury, illness, or disease incurred or aggravated in line of duty while—

“(A) performing active duty or inactive duty;

“(B) traveling directly to or from the place at which such duty is performed; or

“(C) remaining overnight immediately before the commencement of inactive duty, or while remaining overnight between successive periods of inactive duty, at or in the vicinity of the site of the inactive duty, if the site is outside reasonable commuting distance of the member’s residence;”

(C)
in paragraph (5), by striking “inactive-duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”;
(22)
Subparagraph (B) of section 1448(f)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “inactive-duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”.
(23)
Clauses (ii) and (iii) of section 1471(b)(3)(A) of title 10, United States Code, are each amended by striking “inactive duty for training” and inserting “inactive duty”.
(24)
Section 1475 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(A)
in the section heading, by striking “inactive-duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”; and
(B)
in each of paragraphs (2) and (3) of subsection (a), by striking “inactive duty training” each place the term appears and inserting “inactive duty”.
(25)
Paragraphs (1)(B) and (2)(A) of section 1476(a) of title 10, United States Code, are each amended by striking “inactive-duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”.
(26)
Paragraphs (3), (4), (8), and (9) of section 1478(a) of title 10, United States Code, are each amended by striking “inactive duty training” each place the term appears and inserting “inactive duty”.
(27)
Section 1481(a)(2) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(A)
in each of subparagraphs (B), (C), (D), and (F), by striking “inactive-duty training” each place the term appears and inserting “inactive duty”; and
(B)
in subparagraph (E), by striking “inactive duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”.
(28)
Paragraph (2) of section 1481(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended further—
(A)
in subparagraph (E) (as amended by paragraph (27)(B)), by inserting “or” after the semicolon;
(B)
in subparagraph (F) (as amended by paragraph (27)(A)), by striking “; or” and inserting a period; and
(C)
by striking subparagraph (G).
(29)
Subsections (d)(2) and (e)(5) of section 2031 of title 10, United States Code, are each amended by striking “inactive duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”.
(30)
Subparagraph (D) of section 2107(c)(5) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “inactive duty for training” and inserting “inactive duty”.
(31)
Subparagraph (D) of section 2107a(c)(4) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “inactive duty for training” and inserting “inactive duty”.
(32)
The matter preceding paragraph (1) of section 2601a(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “inactive-duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”.
(33)
Paragraph (3) of section 9446(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “inactive-duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”.
(34)
Subsection (a) of section 10142 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “as provided in sections 12301 and 12302 of this title” and inserting “under section 12341 of this title for the purposes specified in sections 12351(a) and 12351(b) of this title”.
(35)
Subsection (a) of section 10143 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “10147(a)(1)” and inserting “12352”.
(36)
The matter preceding subparagraph (A) of section 10144(b)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “in accordance with section 12304” and inserting “under section 12341 of this title for the purpose specified in section 12351(c)”.
(37)
Chapter 1005 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(A)
by repealing section 10147; and
(B)
by repealing section 10148.
(38)
Section 10151 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “sections 12301 and 12306” and inserting “section 12351(a)”.
(39)
Subsection (b) of section 10204 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “inactive duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”.
(40)
Subsection (a) of section 10215 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(A)
in subparagraph (A) of paragraph (1), by striking “section 12301(d)” and inserting “section 12341 of this title as provided in section 12353(a)”; and
(B)
in subparagraph (A) of paragraph (2), by striking “section 12301(d)” and inserting “section 12341 of this title as provided in section 12353(a)”.
(41)
Paragraph (9) of section 10541(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “12304(b)” and inserting “12351(c)(2)”.
(42)
Paragraph (1) of section 12011(e) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “12310” and inserting “12353(c)”.
(43)
Subsection (a) of section 12012 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “section 10211 or 12310” and inserting “section 12341 of this title for the purpose specified in section 10211 or 12353(c) of this title”.
(44)
removed Section 12305 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(A)
removed in subsection (a), by striking “section 12301, 12302, or 12304” and inserting “section 12341 of this title for the purpose specified in section 12351(a), 12351(b), or 12351(c)”; and
(B)
removed in subsection (b), by striking “section 12301, 12302, or 12304” and inserting “section 12341 of this title for the purpose specified in section 12351(a), 12351(b), or 12351(c)”.
(45)
removed Section 12306 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(A)
removed in subsection (a), by striking “section 12301” and inserting “section 12341 of this title for the purpose specified in section 12351(a), 12351(d), 12351(f), 12353(a), or 12353(b)”; and
(B)
removed in paragraph (1) of subsection (b)—
(i)
removed by striking “section 12301(a)” and inserting “section 12341 of this title for the purpose specified in section 12351(a)(1) of this title”; and
(ii)
removed in paragraph (2) of subsection (b), by striking “12301(a)” and inserting “12351(a)”.
(46)
removed Section 12307 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “12301(a)” and inserting “12351(a)”.
(44)
renumbered was (4)(49) Section 12317 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “inactive duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”.
(48)
removed Section 12318 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(A)
removed in subsection (a), by striking “section 12302 or 12304” and inserting “section 12341 of this title for the purpose specified in section 12351(b) or 12351(c)”; and
(B)
removed in subsection (b)—
(i)
removed by striking “referred to section 12310” and inserting “performing duty referred to in section 12353(c)”; and
(ii)
removed by striking “section 12302 or 12304” and inserting “section 12351(b) or 12351(c)”.
(45)
renumbered was (4)(51) Section 12321 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “of organizing, administering, recruiting, instructing, or training the reserve components” and inserting “specified in section 12353(c) of this title”.
(46)
renumbered was (4)(52) Section 12408 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “section 12301(a), 12302, or 12304 of this title” and inserting “12341 of this title for the purpose specified in section 12351(a)(1), 12351(b) or 12351(c) of this title”.
(47)
renumbered was (4)(53) Section 12503 of title 10, United States Code, is repealed.
(48)
renumbered was (4)(54) Section 12552 of title 10, United States Code, is repealed.
(49)
renumbered was (4)(55) Subsections (a)(3) and (b)(3) of section 12602 of title 10, United States Code, are each amended by striking “inactive-duty training” each place the term appears and inserting “inactive duty”.
(50)
renumbered was (4)(56) Section 12603 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(A)
renumbered was (4)(56)(2) in the section heading, by striking “inactive-duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”; and
(B)
renumbered was (4)(56)(3) in subsection (a), by striking “inactive duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”.
(51)
renumbered was (4)(57) Section 12604 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(A)
renumbered was (4)(57)(2) in the section heading, by striking “inactive-duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”; and
(B)
renumbered was (4)(57)(3) in subsection (a), by striking “inactive-duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”.
(52)
renumbered was (4)(58) Subsection (b) of section 12686 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “section 12301” and inserting “section 12341 of this title for the purpose specified in section 12351(a), 12351(d), 12351(f), 12353(a) or 12353(b)”.
(53)
renumbered was (4)(59) Subparagraph (B) of section 12731(f)(2) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(A)
renumbered was (4)(59)(2) in clause (i)—
(i)
renumbered was (4)(59)(2)(2) by striking “under section 12301(d)” and inserting “for the purpose specified in section 12353(a)”; and
(ii)
renumbered was (4)(59)(2)(3) by striking “under section 12310” and inserting “for the purpose specified in 12353(c)”; and
(B)
renumbered was (4)(59)(3) in clause (iii), by striking “section 12301(h)(1)” and inserting “section 12341 of this title for the purpose specified in section 12353(b)(1)”.
(54)
renumbered was (4)(60) Section 12732(a)(2) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(A)
added in the matter following subparagraph (E), by striking “clauses (A), (B), (C), (D), and (E)” and inserting “subparagraphs (A), (B), (C), and (D)”; and
(A)
removed in the matter following subparagraph (E), by striking “clauses (A), (B), (C), (D) and (E)” and inserting “subparagraphs (A), (B), (C) and (D)”; and
(B)
renumbered was (4)(60)(3) by striking subparagraph (E).
(55)
renumbered was (4)(61) Clause (i) of section 16131(c)(3)(B) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “section 12301(a), 12301(d), 12301(g), 12302, or 12304” and inserting “section 12341 of this title for the purpose specified in section 12351(a)(1), 12351(b), 12351(c), 12351(f), or 12353(a)”.
(56)
renumbered was (4)(62) The matter preceding subparagraph (A) of section 16133(b)(4) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “section 12301(a), 12301(d), 12301(g), 12302, or 12304” and inserting “section 12341 of this title for the purpose specified in section 12351(a)(1), 12351(b), 12351(c), 12351(f), or 12353(a)”.
(57)
renumbered was (4)(63) Clause (i) of section 16162(d)(2)(B) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “section 12301(a), 12301(d), 12301(g), 12302, or 12304 of this title” and inserting “section 12341 of this title for the purpose specified in section 12351(a)(1), 12351(b), 12351(c), 12351(f), or 12353(a) of this title”.
(58)
renumbered was (4)(64) Section 18505 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(A)
renumbered was (4)(64)(2) in the section heading, by striking “inactive-duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”; and
(B)
renumbered was (4)(64)(3) in subsection (a), by striking “inactive-duty training” each place the term appears and inserting “inactive duty”.
(d)
Conforming amendments to title 14, united states code—
(1)
Section 704 of title 14, United States Code, is amended by striking “inactive-duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”.
(2)
Subsection (a) of section 705 of title 14, United States Code, is amended by striking “inactive-duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”.
(3)
Paragraph (1) of section 712(c) of title 14, United States Code, is amended by striking “10147” and inserting “12352”.
(e)
Conforming amendments to title 20, united states code—
(1)
Subsection (c) of section 1404 of the Defense Dependents’ Education Act of 1978 (20 U.S.C. 923) is amended—
(A)
in clause (i) of paragraph (2)(B), by striking “section 12301 or 12302” and inserting “section 12341 of title 10, United States Code, for a purpose specified in section 12351(a), 12351(b), 12351(d), 12351(f), 12353(a) or 12353(b)”; and
(B)
in clause (i) of paragraph (2)(C), by striking “section 12301 or 12302” and inserting “section 12341 of title 10, United States Code, for a purpose specified in section 12351(a), 12351(b), 12351(d), 12351(f), 12353(a) or 12353(b)”.
(2)
Subparagraph (A) of section 481(d)(4) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1088(d)(4)) is amended by striking “section 12301(a), 12301(g), 12302, 12304, or 12306” and inserting “section 12341 of title 10, United States Code, for a purpose specified in section 12306, 12351(a), 12351(b), 12351(c), or 12351(f)”.
(3)
Subparagraph (C) of section 484C(c)(3) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1091c(c)) is amended—
(A)
in clause (i), by striking “, 12301(a), 12301(g), 12302, 12304, or 12305 of title 10, United States Code,” and inserting “of title 10, United States Code, under section 12341 of such title for the purpose specified in section 12305, 12351(a), 12351(b), 12351(c), or 12351(f) of such title,”; and
(B)
in clause (iii), by striking “section 12304 of title 10, United States Code” and inserting “section 12341 of title 10, United States Code, for the purpose specified in section 12351(c) of such title”.
(4)
Subparagraph (A) of section 5 of Higher Education Relief Opportunities for Students Act of 2003 (20 U.S.C. 1098ee(5)) is amended by striking “section 12301(a), 12301(g), 12302, 12304, or 12306 of title 10, United States Code,” and inserting “section 12341 of title 10, United States Code, for the purpose specified in section 12306, 12351(a), 12351(b), 12351(c), or 12351(f) of such title,”.
(f)
changed Conforming amendments to Internal Revenue Code— Subsection (m) of section 206 3121 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (26 U.S.C. 3121) is amended—
(1)
in each of paragraphs (1)(B) and (3), by striking “inactive duty training” each place the term appears and inserting “inactive duty”; and
(2)
in the heading for paragraph (3), by striking “Inactive Duty Training” and inserting “Inactive Duty”.
(g)
Conforming amendments to title 32, united states code—
(1)
Paragraph (19) of section 101 of title 32, United States Code, is amended by striking “section 316, 502, 503, 504, or 505” and inserting “section 502(f) of this title for the purpose specified under section in section 112, 114, 316, 502, 503, 504, 505, 509, or 904”.
(2)
Section 114 of title 32, United States Code, is amended by striking “may not be considered to be a period of drill or training, but may be performed as funeral honors duty under section 115 of this title.” and inserting “may be performed under section 502 of this title.”.
(3)
Section 115 of title 32, United States Code, is repealed.
(h)
Conforming amendments to title 37, united states code—
(1)
The matter preceding subparagraph (A) of section 101(22) of title 37, United States Code, is amended by striking “inactive-duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”.
(2)
Section 204 of title 37, United States Code, is amended—
(A)
in paragraph (1) of subsections (g)—
(i)
in each of subparagraphs (B) and (D), by striking “inactive-duty training” each place the term appears and inserting “inactive duty”;
(ii)
by striking subparagraph (E);
(iii)
in subparagraph (C), by inserting “or” after the semicolon; and
(iv)
in subparagraph (D), by striking “; or” and inserting a period; and
(B)
in paragraph (1) of subsections (h)—
(i)
in each of subparagraphs (B) and (D), by striking “inactive-duty training” each place the term appears and inserting “inactive duty”;
(ii)
by striking subparagraph (E);
(iii)
in subparagraph (C), by inserting “or” after the semicolon; and
(iv)
in subparagraph (D), by striking “; or” and inserting a period.
(3)
Subparagraph (A) of section 205(e)(2) of title 37, United States Code, is amended by striking “inactive-duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”.
(4)
Section 206 of title 37, United States Code, is amended—
(A)
in the section heading, by striking “inactive-duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”; and
(B)
in each of paragraphs (3)(A)(ii) and (3)(C) of subsection (a), by striking “inactive-duty training” each place the term appears and inserting “inactive duty”.
(5)
Section 305b of title 37, United States Code, is amended—
(A)
in the heading for subsection (c), by striking “Inactive Duty Training” and inserting “Inactive Duty”; and
(B)
in subsection (e), by striking “12310(c)” and inserting “12353(c)(4)”.
(6)
Subsection (a) of section 308d of title 37, United States Code, is amended by striking “inactive duty for training” and inserting “inactive duty”.
(7)
The heading for subsection (e) of section 320 of title 37, United States Code, is amended by striking “Inactive Duty Training” and inserting “Inactive Duty”.
(8)
Section 334 of title 37, United States Code, is amended—
(A)
in the heading for subsection (e), by striking “Inactive Duty Training” and inserting “Inactive Duty”; and
(B)
in subsection (e), by striking “for inactive-duty training” and inserting “for inactive duty”.
(9)
Section 352 of title 37, United States Code, is amended—
(A)
in the heading for subsection (d), by striking “Inactive Duty Training” and inserting “Inactive Duty”; and
(B)
in subsection (d), by striking “for inactive-duty training” and inserting “for inactive duty”.
(10)
Subparagraph (B) of section 353(c)(1) of title 37, United States Code, is amended by striking “inactive-duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”.
(11)
Section 415 of title 37, United States Code, is amended—
(A)
in paragraph (3) of subsection (a), by striking “inactive-duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”; and
(B)
in paragraph (1) of subsection (c), by striking “inactive duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”.
(12)
Section 433 of title 37, United States Code, is amended—
(A)
in subsection (a), by striking “12319” and inserting “12351(g)”; and
(B)
in subsection (d), by striking “inactive-duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”.
(13)
Subsection (a) of section 433a of title 37, United States Code, is amended by striking “12319” and inserting “12351(g)”.
(14)
Paragraph (1) of section 474(i) of title 37, United States Code, is amended by striking “inactive-duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”.
(15)
Section 478a of title 37, United States Code, is amended—
(A)
in the section heading, by striking “inactive duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”; and
(B)
in subsection (a), by striking “inactive duty training” each place the term appears and inserting “inactive duty”.
(16)
Paragraph (1) of section 495(a) of title 37, United States Code, is amended by striking “funeral honors duty pursuant to section 12503 of title 10 or section 115 of title 32” and inserting “funeral honors functions pursuant to section 12353(d)(2) of title 10 or section 502(g)(7) of title 32”.
(17)
The matter preceding paragraph (1) of subsection (a), the matter following paragraph (2) of subsection (a), and subsection (d), of section 552 of title 37, United States Code, are each amended by striking “inactive-duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”.
(18)
Subparagraph (B) of section 910(b)(2) of title 37, United States Code, is amended by striking “subparagraph (A) or (B) of section 12301(h)(1) of title 10” and inserting “section 12341 of title 10 pursuant to subparagraph (A) or (B) of section 12353(b)(1) of such title”.
(i)
Conforming amendments to title 38, united states code—
(1)
Section 101 of title 38, United States Code, is amended—
(A)
in subparagraph (C) of paragraph (22), by striking “section 316, 502, 503, 504, or 505 of title 32” and inserting “section 502(f) of title 32”;
(B)
in paragraph (23)—
(i)
by striking “inactive duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”; and
(ii)
in the matter following paragraph (C), by striking “sections 316, 502, 503, 504, or 505 of title 32” and inserting “section 502(g) of title 32”; and
(C)
in the matter preceding clause (i) of paragraph (24)(C), by striking “inactive duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”.
(2)
Subparagraph (B) and the matter following subparagraph (B) of section 106(d)(1) of title 38, United States Code, are each amended by striking “inactive duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”.
(3)
Clause (ii) of section 1112(c)(3)(A) of title 38, United States Code, is amended by striking “inactive duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”.
(4)
Paragraph (2) of section 1302(b) of title 38, United States Code, is amended by striking “inactive duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”.
(5)
Subparagraph (A) of section 1312(a)(2) of title 38, United States Code, is amended by striking “inactive duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”.
(6)
Section 1965 of title 38, United States Code, is amended—
(A)
in subparagraph (D) of paragraph (2), by striking “sections 316, 502, 503, 504, or 505 of title 32” and inserting “section 502(f) of title 32”;
(B)
in paragraph (3)—
(i)
in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking “inactive duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”; and
(ii)
in subparagraph (B), by striking “sections 316, 502, 503, 504, or 505 of title 32” and inserting “section 502(g) of title 32”;
(C)
in paragraph (4), by striking “inactive duty training” each place the term appears and inserting “inactive duty”;
(D)
in each of subparagraphs (A) and (B) of paragraph (5), by striking “inactive duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”; and
(E)
in subparagraph (C) of paragraph (5), by striking “a mobilization category in the Individual Ready Reserve, as defined in section 12304(i)(1)” and inserting “a mobilization category in the Individual Ready Reserve, as defined in section 12351(i)(2)”.
(7)
Section 1967 of title 38, United States Code, is amended—
(A)
in subsection (a)—
(i)
in subparagraph (B) of paragraph (1), by striking “inactive duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”; and
(ii)
in subparagraph (B) of paragraph (5), by striking “inactive duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”; and
(B)
in subsection (b)—
(i)
in each of paragraphs (1) and (2), by striking “inactive duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”; and
(ii)
in the matter following paragraph (2), by striking “inactive duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”.
(8)
Section 1968 of title 38, United States Code, is amended—
(A)
in subsection (a)—
(i)
in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking “inactive duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”; and
(ii)
in paragraph (3)—
(I)
by striking “inactive duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”;
(II)
by striking “scheduled training period” and inserting “scheduled period of duty”; and
(III)
by striking “such training” each place the term appears and inserting “such duty”; and
(B)
in paragraph (2) of subsection (b), by striking “inactive duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”.
(9)
Paragraph (3) of section 1969(a) of title 38, United States Code, is amended by striking “inactive duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”.
(10)
Subsection (e) of section 1977 of title 38, United States Code, is amended by striking “inactive duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”.
(11)
Paragraph (2) of section 2402(a) of title 38, United States Code, is amended by striking “inactive duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”.
(12)
Paragraph (3) of section 3011(d) of title 38, United States Code, is amended by striking “which an individual in the Selected Reserve was ordered to perform under section 12301, 12302, 12304, 12306, or 12307 of title 10” and inserting “under section 12341 of title 10, which an individual in the Selected Reserve was ordered to perform duty for a purpose specified in section 12351(a), 12351(b), 12351(c), 12351(f), 12353(a), or 12353(b) of title 10 ”.
(13)
Subparagraph (A) of section 3013(f)(2) of title 38, United States Code, is amended by striking “, 12301(a), 12301(d), 12301(g), 12302, or 12304 of title 10” and inserting “or 12341 of title 10 for a purpose specified in section 12351(a), 12351(b), 12351(c), 12351(f) or 12353(a) of such title”.
(14)
Subsection (f) of section 3103 of title 38, United States Code, is amended by striking “, 12301(a), 12301(d), 12301(g), 12302, or 12304 of title 10” and inserting “or 12341 of title 10 for a purpose specified in section 12351(a), 12351(b), 12351(c), 12351(f) or 12353(a) of such title”.
(15)
Paragraph (2) of section 3105(e) of title 38, United States Code, is amended by striking “, 12301(a), 12301(d), 12301(g), 12302, or 12304 of title 10” and inserting “or 12341 of title 10 for a purpose specified in section 12351(a), 12351(b), 12351(c), 12351(f) or 12353(a) of such title”.
(16)
Clause (i) of section 3231(a)(5)(B) of title 38, United States Code, is amended by striking “, 12301(a), 12301(d), 12301(g), 12302, or 12304 of title 10” and inserting “or 12341 of title 10 for a purpose specified in section 12351(a), 12351(b), 12351(c), 12351(f) or 12353(a) of such title”.
(17)
Subparagraph (B) of section 3301(1) of title 38, United States Code, is amended by striking “, 12301(a), 12301(d), 12301(g), 12302, or 12304 of title 10 or” and inserting “or 12341 of title 10 for a purpose specified in section 12351(a), 12351(b), 12351(c), 12351(f) or 12353(a) of such title, or under”.
(18)
Clause (i) of section 3312(c)(2)(A) of title 38, United States Code, is amended by striking “, 12301(a), 12301(d), 12301(g), 12302, or 12304 of title 10” and inserting “or 12341 of title 10 for a purpose specified in section 12351(a), 12351(b), 12351(c), 12351(f) or 12353(a) of such title”.
(19)
Clause (i) of section 3511(a)(2)(B) of title 38, United States Code, is amended by striking “, 12301(a), 12301(d), 12301(g), 12302, or 12304 of title 10” and inserting “or 12341 of title 10 for a purpose specified in section 12351(a), 12351(b), 12351(c), 12351(f) or 12353(a) of such title”.
(20)
Subsection (h) of section 3512 of title 38, United States Code, is amended by striking “, 12301(a), 12301(d), 12301(g), 12302, or 12304 of title 10” and inserting “or 12341 of title 10 for a purpose specified in section 12351(a), 12351(b), 12351(c), 12351(f) or 12353(a) of such title”.
(21)
Subparagraph (C) of section 4211(4) of title 38, United States Code, is amended by striking “section 12301(a), (d), or (g), 12302, or 12304 of title 10” and inserting “section 12341 of title 10 for a purpose specified in section 12351(a), 12351(b), 12351(c), 12351(f) or 12353(a) of such title”.
(22)
Section 4303 of title 38, United States Code, is amended—
(A)
in paragraph (13)—
(i)
by striking “inactive duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”; and
(ii)
by striking “funeral honors duty as authorized by section 12503 of title 10 or section 115 of title 32” and inserting “funeral honors functions as provided under section 12353 of title 10 or section 114 of title 32”; and
(B)
in paragraphs (16), by striking “inactive duty training” and inserting “inactive duty”.
(23)
Subsection (c) of section 4312 of title 38, United States Code, is amended—
(A)
in paragraph (3), by striking “10147”; and inserting “12352”;
(B)
in subparagraph (A) of paragraph (4), by striking “, 12301(a), 12301(g), 12302, 12304, or 12305 of title 10” and inserting “or 12341 of title 10 for a purpose specified in section 12351(a), 12351(b), 12351(c), 12351(f) or 12353(a) of such title”;
(C)
in paragraph (4)—
(i)
in subparagraph (C), by striking “12304 of title 10” and inserting “12341 of title 10 for the purpose specified in section 12351(c) of such title”;
(ii)
in subparagraph (E)—
(I)
by inserting “under section 12342 of title 10” after “Federal service”; and
(II)
by inserting “for a purpose specified” following “National Guard”; and
(iii)
by striking “under” each place the term appears and inserting “in”.
(24)
Paragraph (1) of section 4316(e) of title 38, United States Code, is amended by striking “funeral honors duty as authorized by section 12503 of title 10 or section 115 of title 32” and inserting “funeral honors functions as provided under section 12353 of title 10 or section 114 of title 32”.
(j)
Conforming amendments to title 42, united states code—
(1)
Subparagraph (D) of section 202(t)(4) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 402(t)(4)) is amended—
(A)
by striking “or inactive duty training” each place the term appears and inserting “or inactive duty”; and
(B)
by striking “on inactive duty training” and inserting “performing inactive duty”.
(2)
Subsection (l) of section 210 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 410) is amended—
(A)
in subparagraph (B) of paragraph (1), by striking “on inactive duty training” and inserting “performing inactive duty”; and
(B)
in paragraph (3), by striking “inactive duty training” each place the term appears and inserting “inactive duty”.
(k)
Conforming amendments to title 50, appendix, united states code—
(1)
Section 6 of the Military Selective Service Act (50 U.S.C. App. 456) is amended—
(A)
in the matter following subsection (c)(2)(A)(iii), by striking “10147” and inserting “12352”; and
(B)
in paragraph (1) of subsection (d), by striking “under section 10147” and inserting “pursuant to section 12352”.
(2)
Paragraph (1) of section 703(a) of the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (50 U.S.C. App. 593(a)) is amended—
(A)
by striking “sections 688, 12301(a), 12301(g), 12302, 12304, 12306, or 12307 of title 10, United States Code,” and inserting “section 688 or 12341 of title 10, United States Code, for a purpose specified in section 12306, 12307, 12351(a), 12351(b), 12351(c), or 12351(f) of such title,”; and
(B)
by striking “12301(d)” and inserting “12341 for the purpose specified in section 12353(a)”.
(l)
Clerical amendments—
(1)
The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 61 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(A)
by striking the item related to section 1204 and inserting the following:
(B)
by striking the item relating to section 1206 and inserting the following:
(2)
The table of sections at the beginning of subchapter II of chapter 75 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking the item related to section 1475 and inserting the following:
(3)
The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 1005 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking the items relating to sections 10147 and 10148.
(4)
The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 1209 of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:
(5)
The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 1213 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking the item relating to section 12503.
(6)
The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 1215 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking the item relating to section 12552.
(7)
The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 1217 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking the items related to sections 12603 and 12604 and inserting the following:
(8)
The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 1805 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking the item related to section 18505 and inserting the following:
(9)
The table of chapters at the beginning of title 32, United States Code, is amended by striking the item relating to chapter 5 and inserting the following new item:
(10)
The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 1 of title 32, United States Code, is amended by striking the item relating to section 115.
(11)
The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 5 of title 32, United States Code, is amended by striking the item relating to section 502 and inserting the following:

Sec. 538 Sense of Congress recognizing the diversity of the members of the Armed Forces

(a)
added Findings— Congress finds the following:
(1)
added The United States military includes individuals with a variety of national, ethnic, and cultural backgrounds that have roots all over the world.
(2)
added In addition to diverse backgrounds, members of the Armed Forces come from numerous religious traditions, including Christian, Hindu, Jewish, Muslim, Sikh, non-denominational, non-practicing, and many more.
(3)
added Members of the Armed Forces from diverse backgrounds and religious traditions have lost their lives or been injured defending the national security of the United States.
(4)
added Diversity contributes to the strength of the Armed Forces, and service members from different backgrounds and religious traditions share the same goal of defending the United States.
(5)
added The unity of the Armed Forces reflects the strength in diversity that makes the United States a great nation.
(b)
added Sense of congress— It is the sense of Congress that the United States should—
(1)
added continue to recognize and promote diversity in the Armed Forces; and
(2)
added honor those from all diverse backgrounds and religious traditions who have made sacrifices in serving the United States through the Armed Services.

removed It is the sense of the House of Representatives that the Secretary of Defense should review section 504 of title 10, United States Code, for the purpose of making a determination and authorization pursuant to subsection (b)(2) of such section regarding the enlistment in the Armed Forces of an alien who possesses an employment authorization document issued under the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program of the Department of Homeland Security established pursuant to the memorandum of the Secretary of Homeland Security dated June 15, 2012.

Sec. 539 Establishment of process by which members of the Armed Forces may carry a concealed personal firearm on a military installation

added
(a)
added Process required— The Secretary of Defense, taking into consideration the views of senior leadership of military installations in the United States, shall establish a process by which the commander of a military installation in the United States may authorize a member of the Armed Forces who is assigned to duty at the installation to carry a concealed personal firearm on the installation if the commander determines it to be necessary as a personal- or force-protection measure.
(b)
added Relation to State and local law— In establishing the process under subsection (a) for a military installation, the commander of the installation shall consult with elected officials of the State and local jurisdictions in which the installation is located and take into consideration the law of the State and such jurisdictions regarding carrying a concealed personal firearm.
(c)
added Member qualifications— To be eligible to be authorized to carry a concealed personal firearm on a military installation pursuant to the process established under subsection (a), a member of the Armed Forces—
(1)
added must complete any training and certification required by any State in which the installation is located that would permit the member to carry concealed in that State;
(2)
added must not be subject to disciplinary action under the Uniform Code of Military Justice for any offense that could result in incarceration or separation from the Armed Forces;
(3)
added must not be prohibited from possessing a firearm because of conviction of a crime of domestic violence; and
(4)
added must meet such service-related qualification requirements for the use of firearms, as established by the Secretary of the military department concerned.
(d)
added State defined— In this section, the term “State” includes the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and any territory or possession of the United States.

Sec. 546 Participation by victim in punitive proceedings and access to records

(a)
Victim submission of matters for consideration by commanding officer in nonjudicial punishment proceedings— Section 815 of title 10, United States Code (article 15 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice) is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

“(h) Victim Participation in Nonjudicial Punishment Proceedings

“(1) For any offense that involves a victim, in any case in which a commanding officer or other person authorized to act under this section (article) is considering imposing a punishment authorized in subsection (b) on a member of the command, mitigation of a punishment under subsection (d), or an appeal of a punishment under subsection (e), the victim shall be provided an opportunity to submit written matters for consideration by the person authorized to act under this section (article).

“(2) The victim shall be notified of a commander’s decision to consider a punishment, consider mitigating a punishment, or consider an appeal under this section (article). The victim shall also be notified of the opportunity to submit matters for consideration under this subsection.

“(3) The submission of matters under paragraph (1) shall be made within the three-day period the accused is given to seek legal counsel.

“(4) A victim may waive the right under this subsection to make a submission to the commanding officer or other person taking action under this section (article). Such a waiver shall be made in writing and may not be revoked.

“(5) In the case of proceedings under this section (article) for an offense that involved a victim, a copy of all prepared records of the proceedings, including a written copy of any admonition or reprimand, shall be given to the victim without charge and as soon as a decision is finalized. The victim shall be notified of the opportunity to receive the records of the proceedings under this subsection.

“(6) In this section, the term “victim” means a person who has suffered a direct physical, emotional, or pecuniary loss as a result of a commission of an offense under this chapter (the Uniform Code of Military Justice) and on which a commanding officer or other person authorized to take action under this section (article) is taking action under this section (article).

“(7) This subsection applies only with respect to the Department of Defense.”

(b)
Victim submission of matters for consideration in administrative separation proceedings— Chapter 59 of title 10, United States Code is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

“1159. Victim participation in administrative separation proceedings

“(a)

“(1) Under regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of the military department concerned shall ensure that, when administrative separation is considered for a member of the of the Army, Navy, Air Force, or Marine Corps in connection to an offense that involved a victim, the person or board authorized to provide recommendations and act on recommendations for retention or separation under this chapter must consider the impact of the offense on the victim and the views of the victim on retention.

“(2) Such regulations shall ensure that victims are provided an opportunity to submit written matters for consideration, including, but not limited to, written testimony, to the person or board authorized to provide recommendations and act on recommendations for administrative separation proceedings under this chapter. A victim may waive the right under this section to make a submission.

“(b) Under regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of the military department concerned shall ensure that a copy of all prepared records of the proceedings, including, but not limited to, the decision on retention or separation and any written explanation thereof, shall be given to the victim without charge and as soon as a decision is finalized. The victim shall be notified of the opportunity to receive the records of the proceedings under this subsection.

“(c) In this section, the term “victim” means a person who has suffered a direct physical, emotional, or pecuniary loss as a result of a commission of an offense under chapter 47 of this title (the Uniform Code of Military Justice) and on which the armed forces are considering administrative separation or retention.”

(c)
Victim submission of matters for consideration in administrative separation proceedings of officers— Section 1185 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsections:

“(c) Under regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Defense, when a board of inquiry is held under this section for an officer of the Army, Navy, Air Force, or Marine Corps in connection with an offense that involved a victim, the board of inquiry—

“(1) shall consider the impact of the offense on the victim and the views of the victim on retention;

“(2) shall provide victims an opportunity to submit matters for consideration, including in-person testimony, although a victim may waive the right under this subsection to make a submission; and

“(3) shall provide victims with all prepared records of the proceedings, including the decision on retention or separation and any written explanation thereof.

“(d) When a record is withheld under subsection (a)(4), the victim shall, to the extent that the interest of national security permits, be furnished a summary of the record so withheld.

changed “(e) In this section, the term “victim” means a person who has suffered a direct physical, emotional, or pecuniary loss as a result of a commission of an offense under chapter 47 of this title (the Uniform Code of Military Justice) and on which an officer is required to show cause for retention on active duty under section 1181 of this title.””title.”

Sec. 557 Revision of Department of Defense Directive-type Memorandum 15–003, relating to Registered Sex Offender Identification, Notification, and Monitoring in the Department of Defense

(a)
changed Revision required; database— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall revise Department of Defense Directive-type Memorandum 15-003, 15–003, relating to Registered Sex Offender Identification, Notification, and Monitoring in the Department of Defense, and all subsequent directive and guidance to ensure the following:
(1)
changed All provisions of the Department of Defense Directive-type Memorandum 15-003 15–003 shall go into effect not later than 180 days after its revision under this section.
(2)
The Department of Defense shall create a database (in this section referred to as the “database”) to track the following sex offenders:
(A)
Sex offenders who are active-duty or reserve component members of the Army, Navy, Air Force, or Marine Corps or civilian employees of the Department of Defense.
(B)
Former active-duty or reserve component members of the Army, Navy, Air Force, or Marine Corps who have been convicted of a sex offense under chapter 47 of title 10, United States Code (the Uniform Code of Military Justice), if not already covered by subparagraph (A).
(3)
For each individual identified in the database pursuant to paragraph (2)(A), the database shall contain the following information:
(A)
The name of the sex offender (including any alias used by the individual).
(B)
The Social Security number of the sex offender.
(C)
A physical description of the sex offender.
(D)
A current photograph of the sex offender.
(E)
The address of each residence at which the sex offender resides.
(F)
The name and address of any place where the sex offender is an employee, including the sex offender’s current assignment, duty station, physical place of work, and deployment status, if applicable.
(G)
The name and address of any place where the sex offender is a student.
(H)
The text of the provision of law defining the criminal offense for which the sex offender is registered in accordance with the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006 (Public Law 109–248; 120 Stat. 587) or other Federal, State, or local laws.
(I)
The criminal history of the sex offender, including the date of all arrests and convictions; the status of parole, probation, or supervised release; registration status in accordance with the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006 (Public Law 109–248; 120 Stat. 587) or other applicable Federal, State, or local laws; and the existence of any outstanding arrest warrants for the sex offender.
(J)
Any other information required by Secretary of Defense.
(4)
For each individual identified in the database pursuant to paragraph (2)(B), the database shall contain the following information:
(A)
The name of the sex offender (including any alias used by the individual).
(B)
The Social Security number of the sex offender.
(C)
A physical description of the sex offender.
(D)
A current photograph of the sex offender.
(E)
The last known address of each residence of the sex offender and, if released or about to be released from a military correctional facility, the intended address of residence of the sex offender.
(F)
The text of the provision of law defining the criminal offense for which the sex offender is registered in accordance with the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006 (Public Law 109–248; 120 Stat. 587) or other Federal, State, or local laws.
(G)
The criminal history of the sex offender, including the date of all arrests and convictions; the status of parole, probation, or supervised release; registration status in accordance with the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006 (Public Law 109–248; 120 Stat. 587) or other Federal, State, or local laws; and the existence of any outstanding arrest warrants for the sex offender.
(H)
Any other information required by Secretary of Defense.
(5)
The database shall be available to local, State, and Federal law enforcement agencies. In the case of each individual identified in the database pursuant to paragraph (2)(B) who fails to register with a sex offender registry in accordance with the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006 (Public Law 109–248; 120 Stat. 587) or other applicable Federal, State, or local laws, the Secretary of Defense shall make available on the Internet, in a manner that is readily accessible to the public, the following information:
(A)
The name of the sex offender (including any alias used by the individual).
(B)
A physical description of the sex offender.
(C)
A most recent photograph of the sex offender.
(D)
The last known address of each residence of the sex offender and, if applicable, the intended address of residence of the sex offender.
(E)
The criminal offense for which the sex offender is registered in accordance with the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006 (Public Law 109–248; 120 Stat. 587) or other applicable Federal, State, or local laws.
(F)
Notification that the sex offender has failed to register on a sex offender registry in accordance with Federal, State, or local laws.
(G)
Any other information required by Secretary of Defense, in accordance with existing laws and regulations.
(b)
Reporting requirements— Section 1631(b) of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 10 U.S.C. 1561 note) is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

“(12) The number of individuals released from active-duty as a members of the Army, Navy, Air Force, or Marine Corps as a result of a conviction of a sex-related offense, including the number who have registered with a local sex offender registry in accordance with local, State, and Federal law and the number who have failed to register with a local sex offender registry in accordance with local, State, and Federal law.”

(c)
Definitions— In this section:
(1)
In this section, the term “sex offender” means an individual who is required to be placed on a sexual offender registry by Federal, State, or local laws, including the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006 (Public Law 109–248; 120 Stat. 587).
(2)
In this section, the term “sex offense” means an offense in a category of conduct punishable under the Uniform Code of Military Justice specified by the Secretary of Defense pursuant to section 115(a)(8)(C)(i) of Public Law 105–119 (10 U.S.C. 951 note).

Sec. 567 Direct employment pilot program for members of the National Guard and Reserve

(a)
Program authority— The Secretary of Defense may carry out a pilot program to enhance the efforts of the Department of Defense to provide job placement assistance and related employment services directly to members in the National Guard and Reserves.
(b)
Administration— The pilot program shall be offered to, and administered by, the adjutants general appointed under section 314 of title 32, United States Code.
(c)
Cost-sharing requirement— As a condition on the provision of funds under this section to a State to support the operation of the pilot program in the State, the State must agree to contribute an amount, derived from non-Federal sources, equal to at least 30 percent of the funds provided by the Secretary of Defense under this section.
(d)
Direct Employment Program Model— The pilot program should follow a job placement program model that focuses on working one-on-one with a member of a reserve component to cost-effectively provide job placement services, including services such as identifying unemployed and under employed members, job matching services, resume editing, interview preparation, and post-employment follow up. Development of the pilot program should be informed by State direct employment programs for members of the reserve components, such as the programs conducted in California and South Carolina.
(e)
Evaluation— The Secretary of Defense shall develop outcome measurements to evaluate the success of the pilot program.
(f)
Reporting requirements—
(1)
Report Required— Not later than March 1, 2019, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report describing the results of the pilot program. The Secretary shall prepare the report in coordination with the Chief of the National Guard Bureau.
(2)
Elements of Report— A report under paragraph (1) shall include the following:
(A)
A description and assessment of the effectiveness and achievements of the pilot program, including the number of members of the reserve components hired and the cost-per-placement of participating members.
(B)
An assessment of the impact of the pilot program and increased reserve component employment levels on the readiness of members of the reserve components.
(C)
added A comparison of the pilot program to other programs conducted by the Department of Defense and Department of Veterans Affairs to provide unemployment and underemployment support to members of the reserve components and veterans.
(D)
renumbered was (7)(3)(5) Any other matters considered appropriate by the Secretary.
(g)
Limitation on total fiscal-year obligations— The total amount obligated by the Secretary of Defense to carry out the pilot program for any fiscal year may not exceed $20,000,000.
(h)
Duration of Authority—
(1)
In general— The authority to carry out the pilot program expires September 30, 2018.
(2)
Extension— Upon the expiration of the authority under paragraph (1), the Secretary of Defense may extend the pilot program for not more than two additional fiscal years.

Sec. 569 Mariner training

added

added Section 2015 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—

(1)
added by redesignating subsection (d) as subsection (e); and
(2)
added by inserting after subsection (c) the following new subsection (d):

added “(d) Special rules for mariner duties

added “(1) The program required by subsection (a) shall ensure to the greatest extent practicable that—

added “(A) members of the armed forces whose duties are primarily as a mariner receive training opportunities necessary to meet the requirements for licenses, certificates of registry, and merchant mariners’ documents issued under part E of subtitle II of title 46, and to acquire a Convention on Standards of Training, Certification, and Watchkeeping for Seafarers endorsement to such licenses and documents;

added “(B) such members assigned to a vessel’s deck and engineering departments have a designated path to meet the requirements for such licenses, documents, and endorsement commensurate with their positional responsibilities;

added “(C) courses in marine navigation, leadership, operation, and maintenance taken while such a member is in the armed forces are submitted to the National Maritime Center for use in assessments of the fulfillment by the member of the requirements for receiving such licenses, documents, and endorsement; and

added “(D) such members in the deck and engineering departments have the opportunity to attend merchant mariner credentialing programs that meet training requirements not offered by the armed forces.

added “(2) The Secretary of the department in which the Coast Guard is operating shall ensure that any assessment of the training and experience of an applicant who is or has been a member of the armed forces is conducted without any limitation related to the member’s military pay grade.”

Sec. 570 Report on civilian and military education to respond to future threats

added
(a)
added In general— Not later than June 1, 2016, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report describing both civilian and military education requirements necessary to meet any threats anticipated in the future security environment as described in the quadrennial defense review. Such report shall include—
(1)
added an assessment of the learning outcomes required of future members of the Armed Forces and senior military leaders to meet such threats;
(2)
added an assessment of the shortfalls in current professional military education requirements in meeting such threats;
(3)
added an assessment of successful professional military education programs that further the ability of the Department of Defense to meet such threats;
(4)
added recommendations of subjects to be covered by civilian elementary and secondary schools in order to better prepare students for potential military service;
(5)
added recommendations of subjects to be included in professional military education programs;
(6)
added recommendations on whether partnerships between the Department of Defense and private institutions of higher education (as defined in section 101(a) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1001(a))) would help meet such threats; and
(7)
added an identification of opportunities for the United States to strengthen its leadership role in the future security environment and a description of how the recommendations made in this report contribute to capitalizing on such opportunities.
(b)
added Updated reports— Not later than 10 months after date of the publication of each subsequent quadrennial defense review, the Secretary of Defense shall update the report described under subsection (a) and shall submit such report to the congressional defense committees.

Sec. 570a Availability of cyber security and IT certifications for Department of Defense personnel critical to network defense

added
(a)
added In general— Section 2015 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
added in subsection (a)—
(A)
added by striking “to obtain” and inserting “and when appropriate, other Department of Defense personnel, to obtain”; and
(B)
added by adding “or industry recognized” between “professional” and “credentials”; and
(2)
added in subsection (b), by adding at the end the following:

added “(3) The authority under paragraph (1) may be used to pay the expenses of a member of the active Air Force, Army, Navy, Coast Guard, the reserve components, defense contractors, or civilians with access to information systems and identified as critical to network defense to obtain professional and industry recognized credentials related to information technology and cyber security functions.”

(b)
added Construction— No additional funds are authorized to be appropriated to carry out the amendments made by this section, and such amendments shall be carried out using amounts otherwise made available for such purposes.

Sec. 584 Atomic veterans service medal

added
(a)
added Service medal required— The Secretary of Defense shall design and produce a military service medal, to be known as the “Atomic Veterans Service Medal”, to honor retired and former members of the Armed Forces who are radiation-exposed veterans (as such term is defined in section 1112(c)(3) of title 38, United States Code).
(b)
added Distribution of medal—
(1)
added Issuance to retired and former members— At the request of a radiation-exposed veteran, the Secretary of Defense shall issue the Atomic Veterans Service Medal to the veteran.
(2)
added Issuance to next-of-kin— In the case of a radiation-exposed veteran who is deceased, the Secretary may provide for issuance of the Atomic Veterans Service Medal to the next-of-kin of the person.
(3)
added Application— The Secretary shall prepare and disseminate as appropriate an application by which radiation-exposed veterans and their next-of-kin may apply to receive the Atomic Veterans Service Medal.

Sec. 585 Posthumous commission as captain in the regular Army for Milton Holland

added
(a)
added Posthumous commission— Milton Holland, who, while sergeant major of the 5th Regiment, United States Colored Infantry, was awarded the Medal of Honor in recognition of his action on September 29, 1864, during the Battle of Chapin’s Farm, Virginia, when, as the citation for the medal states, he “took command of Company C, after all the officers had been killed or wounded, and gallantly led it”, shall be deemed for all purposes to have held the grade of captain in the regular Army, effective as of that date and continuing until his separation from the Army.
(b)
added Prohibition of benefits— Section 1523 of title 10, United States Code, applies in the case of the posthumous commission described in subsection (a).

Sec. 586 Sense of Congress supporting the decision of the Army to posthumously promote Master Sergeant (retired) Naomi Horwitz to Sergeant Major

added
(a)
added Findings— Congress finds the following:
(1)
added Naomi Horwitz was born in Milwaukee, Wisconsin in 1916.
(2)
added In 1942, Ms. Horwitz marched into the Army recruiters office and asked to join.
(3)
added Ms. Horwitz served with the Women's Army Auxiliary Corps, the Women’s Army Corps, and the Reserves.
(4)
added Ms. Horwitz served from 1942 until 1946 and reenlisted a few years later.
(5)
added On October 24, 1965, one of the proudest moments of her military career, Ms. Horwitz’s was promoted to the rank of Sergeant Major in the U.S. Army Reserve.
(6)
added As women were only eligible to hold the rank of Sergeant Major since 1960, Ms. Horwitz was one of only a handful of women to hold such rank during that time period.
(7)
added Despite her promotion, Ms. Horwitz was not allowed to hold the rank of Sergeant Major.
(8)
added Ms. Horwitz retired from the military in 1976 at a lower rank.
(9)
added After her retirement from the military, Ms. Horwitz was a tireless veteran’s advocate serving for decades with AMVETS Post 60, Jewish War Veterans, the American Legion Milwaukee Women's Post 448, the Allied Veterans Council of Milwaukee and the Veterans Day Parade Committee.
(10)
added Ms. Horwitz was named Veteran of the Year in Milwaukee County in 2004.
(11)
added In October 2014, Ms. Horwitz died at the age of 98.
(12)
added One of Ms. Horwitz’s final wishes was that one of the proudest moment of her Army career be reflected on her gravestone.
(13)
added In March 2015, the Secretary of the Army corrected this injustice and approved a request to posthumously promote Sergeant Major Horwitz.
(b)
added Sense of Congress— Congress—
(1)
added joins the Army and our Nation in expressing our gratitude to Sergeant Major Naomi Horwitz for her 26 years of honorable military service and continued civilian service; and
(2)
added supports the decision of the Army to posthumously promote Master Sergeant (retired) Naomi Horwitz to Sergeant Major.

Sec. 591 Authority for United States Air Force Institute of Technology to charge and retain tuition for instruction of persons other than Air Force personnel detailed for instruction at the Institute

(a)
Institute instruction of persons other than air force personnel— Section 9314a of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
by redesignating subsections (a), (c), (d), (e), and (f) as subsections (d), (e), (f), (g), and (h), respectively;
(2)
by redesignating subsection (b) as paragraph (4) of subsection (d), as so redesignated; and
(3)
by inserting before subsection (d), as so redesignated, the following new subsections:

“(a) Members of the Armed Forces Other Than the Air Force Who Are Detailed to the Institute

“(1) The Department of the Army, the Department of the Navy, and the Department of Homeland Security shall bear the cost of the instruction at the Air Force Institute of Technology that is received by members of the armed forces detailed for that instruction by the Secretaries of the Army, Navy, and Homeland Security, respectively.

“(2) Members of the Army, Navy, Marine Corps, and Coast Guard may only be detailed for instruction at the Institute on a space-available basis.

“(3) In the case of an enlisted member of the Army, Navy, Marine Corps, or Coast Guard detailed to receive instruction at the Institute, the Secretary of the Air Force shall charge the Secretary concerned only for such costs and fees as the Secretary considers appropriate (taking into consideration the admission of enlisted members on a space-available basis).

“(b) Federal civilian employees other than air force employees who are detailed to the institute

“(1) The Institute shall charge tuition for the cost of providing instruction at the Institute for any civilian employee of a military department (other than a civilian employee of the Department of the Air Force), of another component of the Department of Defense, or of another Federal agency who is detailed to receive instruction at the Institute.

“(2) The cost of any tuition charged an individual under this subsection shall be borne by the department, agency, or component that details the individual for instruction at the Institute.

“(c) Non-detailed persons

“(1) The Secretary of the Air Force may permit persons described in paragraph (2) to receive instruction at the United States Air Force Institute of Technology on a space-available basis.

“(2) Paragraph (1) applies to any of the following persons:

“(A) A member of the armed forces not detailed for that instruction by the Secretary concerned.

“(B) A civilian employee of a military department, of another component of the Department of Defense, of another Federal agency, or of a State’s National Guard not detailed for that instruction by the Secretary concerned or head of the other Department of Defense component, other Federal agency, or the National Guard.

“(C) A United States citizen who is the recipient of a competitively selected Federal or Department of Defense sponsored scholarship or fellowship with a defense focus in areas of study related to the academic disciplines offered by the Air Force Institute of Technology and which requires a service commitment to the Federal government in exchange for educational financial assistance.

“(3) If a scholarship or fellowship described in paragraph (2)(C) includes a stipend, the Institute may accept the stipend payment from the scholarship or fellowship sponsor and make a direct payment to the individual.”

(b)
Conforming amendments related to redesignation and other conforming amendments— Section 9314a of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
in subsection (d), as redesignated by subsection (a)(1)—
(A)
by striking “Admission Authorized” and inserting “Defense Industry Employees”;
(B)
in paragraph (1), by striking “subsection (b)” and inserting “paragraph (4)”; and
(C)
in paragraph (4), as redesignated by subsection (a)(2), by striking “Eligible Defense Industry Employees.—”;
(2)
in subsection (f)(1), as redesignated by subsection (a)(1), by striking “subsection (a)(1)” and inserting “subsection (d)(1)”;
(3)
in subsection (g)(1), as redesignated by subsection (a)(1)—
(A)
by striking “under this section” and inserting “under subsections (c) and (d)”; and
(B)
by inserting before the period at the end the following: “who are detailed to receive instruction at the Institute under subsection (b)”; and
(4)
in subsection (h), as redesignated by subsection (a)(1), by striking “defense industry employees enrolled under this section” and inserting “persons enrolled under this section who are not members of the armed forces or Government civilian employees”.
(c)
changed Conditions on admission of defense industry civilians— Subsection (e)(1) (e)(2) of section 9314a of title 10, United States Code, as redesignated by subsection (a)(1), is amended by striking “will be done on a space-available basis and not require an increase in the size of the faculty” and inserting “will not require an increase in the permanently authorized size of the faculty”.
(d)
Statutory reorganization— Chapter 901 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
by transferring subsections (d) and (f) of section 9314 to the end of section 9314b and redesignating those subsections as subsections (c) and (d), respectively; and
(2)
by striking subsection (e) of section 9314.
(e)
Clerical amendments—
(1)
Section headings—
(A)
The heading of section 9314 of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:

“9314. United States Air Force Institute of Technology: degree granting authority”

(B)
The heading of section 9314a of such title is amended to read as follows:

“9314a. United States Air Force Institute of Technology: reimbursement and tuition; instruction of persons other than Air Force personnel”

(2)
Table of sections— The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 901 of such title is amended by striking the items relating to sections 9314 and 9314a and inserting the following new items:

Sec. 593 Sense of Congress regarding support for military divers

(a)
Findings— Congress finds the following:
(1)
Military divers are serving and have served in the noble and self-sacrificing profession of military diving in the Armed Forces.
(2)
Military divers were created at the turn of the twentieth century, the trademark of diving is the Mark Five Dive Helmet created in 1915.
(3)
Military divers perform a dangerous and selfless task often without recognition, risking their lives on behalf of the United States.
(4)
The United States will forever be in debt to personnel in the profession of military diving for their bravery and sacrifice in times of peace and war.
(4)
People in the United States should express their recognition and gratitude for military divers and the diving profession.
(5)
In 1939, when the submarine U.S.S. Squalus sank, Navy divers used an experimental rig to rescue all 33 sailors aboard the vessel who survived the initial sinking, and the divers were awarded the Medal of Honor for their role in the rescue.
(6)
In 1941, after the attack on Pearl Harbor, Navy divers raised every battleship that was sunk at Pearl Harbor, to the surface (with the exception of the U.S.S. Arizona, U.S.S. Utah, and the U.S.S. Oklahoma).
(7)
The raised ships were repaired and sent back out to fight the Imperial Japanese Navy.
(8)
In 1986, when Space Shuttle Challenger exploded, Navy divers recovered the remains and debris.
(9)
When TWA Flight 800, Swissair Flight 111, and EgyptAir Flight 990 crashed, among others, Navy divers recovered the remains and debris.
(10)
In 1999, when John F. Kennedy Jr., Carolyn Bessette, and Lauren Bessette died in a plane crash, Navy divers recovered their remains and debris.
(11)
In 2003, during the Quecreek Mine Rescue in Somerset County, Pennsylvania, Navy divers treated the recovered miners in Fly Away Recompression Chambers.
(12)
removed 2015 would be an appropriate year to highlight the achievements of the military diver.
(b)
Sense of Congress— In light of the findings under subsection (a), Congress—
(1)
reaffirms its support for the sacrifices made by military divers during the past 100 years;
(2)
recognizes the sacrifices of those who have volunteered as military divers for their bravery; and
(3)
changed encourages and supports the Department of Defense to designate 2015 as the Year of the Military Diver to honor those who are serving and have served in the noble and self-sacrificing profession of military diving in the Armed Forces.

Sec. 596 Sense of Congress on desirability of service-wide adoption of Gold Star Installation Access Card

added

added It is the sense of Congress that the Secretary of each military department and the Secretary of the Department in which the Coast Guard is operating should—

(1)
added provide for the issuance of a Gold Star Installation Access Card to Gold Star family members who are the survivors of deceased members of the Armed Forces in order to expedite the ability of a Gold Star family member to gain unescorted access to military installations for the purpose of obtaining the on-base services and benefits for which the Gold Star family member is entitled or eligible;
(2)
added work jointly to ensure that a Gold Star Installation Access Card issued to a Gold Star family member by one Armed Force is accepted for access to military installations of another Armed Force; and
(3)
added in developing, issuing, and accepting the Gold Star Installation Access Card—
(A)
added prevent fraud in the procurement or use of the Gold Star Installation Access Card;
(B)
added limit installation access to those areas that provide the services and benefits for which the Gold Star family member is entitled or eligible; and
(C)
added ensure that the availability and use of the Gold Star Installation Access Card does not adversely affect military installation security.

Sec. 597 Annual report on performance of regional offices of the Department of Veterans Affairs

added

added Section 7734 of title 38, United States Code, is amended—

(1)
added in the first sentence, by inserting before the period the following: “and on the performance of any regional office that fails to meet its administrative goals”;
(2)
added in paragraph (2), by striking “and”;
(3)
added by redesignating paragraph (3) as paragraph (4); and
(4)
added by inserting after paragraph (2) the following new paragraph (3):

added “(3) in the case of any regional office that, for the year covered by the report, did not meet the administrative goal of no claim pending for more than 125 days and an accuracy rating of 98 percent—

added “(A) a signed statement prepared by the individual serving as director of the regional office as of the date of the submittal of the report containing—

added “(i) an explanation for why the regional office did not meet the goal;

added “(ii) a description of the additional resources needed to enable the regional office to reach the goal; and

added “(iii) a description of any additional actions planned for the subsequent year that are proposed to enable the regional office to meet the goal; and

added “(B) a statement prepared by the Under Secretary for Benefits explaining how the failure of the regional office to meet the goal affected the performance evaluation of the director of the regional office; and”

Sec. 598 Preliminary mental health screenings for individuals becoming members of the Armed Forces

added
(a)
added In general— Chapter 31 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

added “520d. Preliminary mental health screenings

added “(a) Provision of mental health screening—Before any individual enlists in an armed force or is commissioned as an officer in an armed force, the Secretary concerned shall provide the individual with a mental health screening.

added “(b) Use of screening

added “(1) The Secretary shall use the results of a mental screening conducted under subsection (a) as a baseline for any subsequent mental health examinations of the individual, including such examinations provided under sections 1074f and 1074m of this title.

added “(2) The Secretary may not consider the results of a mental health screening conducted under subsection (a) in determining the promotion of a member of the armed forces.

added “(c) Application of privacy laws—With respect to applicable laws and regulations relating to the privacy of information, the Secretary shall treat a mental health screening conducted under subsection (a) in the same manner as the medical records of a member of the armed forces.”

(b)
added Clerical amendment— The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by adding after the item relating to section 520c the following new item:
(c)
added Reports—
(1)
added Initial report—
(A)
added In general— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the National Institute of Mental Health of the National Institutes of Health shall submit to Congress and the Secretary of Defense a report on preliminary mental health screenings of members of the Armed Forces.
(B)
added Matters included— The report under subparagraph (A) shall include the following:
(i)
added Recommendations with respect to establishing a preliminary mental health screening of members of the Armed Forces to bring mental health screenings to parity with physical screenings of members.
(ii)
added Recommendations with respect to the composition of the mental health screening, evidenced-based best practices, and how to track changes in mental health screenings relating to traumatic brain injuries, post-traumatic stress disorder, and other conditions.
(C)
added Coordination— The National Institute of Mental Health shall carry out subparagraph (A) in coordination with the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, the surgeons general of the military departments, and other relevant experts.
(2)
added Reports on efficacy of screenings—
(A)
added Secretary of Defense— Not later than one year after the date on which the Secretary of Defense begins providing preliminary mental health screenings under section 520d(a) of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a), the Secretary shall submit to Congress a report on the efficacy of such preliminary mental health screenings.
(B)
added Comptroller General— Not later than one year after the submittal of the report under subparagraph (A), the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to Congress a report on the efficacy of the preliminary mental health screenings described in such subparagraph.
(C)
added Matters included— The reports required by subparagraphs (A) and (B) shall include the following:
(i)
added An evaluation of the evidence-based best practices used by the Secretary in composing and conducting preliminary mental health screenings of members of the Armed Forces under such section 520d(a).
(ii)
added An evaluation of the evidence-based best practices used by the Secretary in tracking changes in mental health screenings relating to traumatic brain injuries, post-traumatic stress disorder, and other conditions among members of the Armed Forces.
(d)
added Implementation of preliminary mental health screening— The Secretary of Defense may not provide a preliminary mental health screening under section 520d(a) of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a), until the Secretary receives and evaluates the initial report required by subsection (c)(1).
(e)
added Report on efficacy of physical examinations for certain members of the Armed Forces upon separation from active duty—
(1)
added In general— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress a report on the efficacy of the mental health components of the physical examinations provided under paragraph (5) of section 1145(a) of title 10, United States Code, to members of the Armed Forces who are separated from active duty as described in paragraph (2) of such section.
(2)
added Evaluation of effectiveness— The report required by paragraph (1) shall include an evaluation of the effectiveness of the physical examinations described in such subsection in—
(A)
added identifying members of the Armed Forces with traumatic brain injury, post-traumatic stress disorder, and other mental health conditions; and
(B)
added ensuring that health care is provided for such members.

Sec. 599 Report regarding new rulemaking under the Military Lending Act and Defense Manpower Data Center reports and meetings

added
(a)
added Report on new Military Lending Act rulemaking— After the issuance by the Secretary of Defense of the regulation issued with regard to section 987 of title 10, United States Code (commonly known as the Military Lending Act), and part of 232 of title 32, Code of Federal Regulations (its implementing regulation), but before the relevant compliance date for any provisions of such regulation that relate to the identification of a covered borrower under the Military Lending Act, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a report that discusses—
(1)
added the ability and reliability of the Defense Manpower Data Center in meeting real-time requests for accurate information needed to make a determination regarding whether a borrower is covered by the Military Lending Act; or
(2)
added an alternate mechanism or mechanisms for identifying such covered borrowers.
(b)
added Defense Manpower Data Center reports and meetings—
(1)
added Reports on accuracy, reliability, and integrity of systems— The Director of the Defense Manpower Data Center shall submit to Congress reports on the accuracy, reliability, and integrity of the Defense Manpower Data Center systems used to identify covered borrowers and covered policyholders under military consumer protection laws. The first report is due six months after the date of the enactment of this Act, and the Director shall submit additional reports every six months thereafter as necessary to show improvements in the accuracy, reliability, and integrity of such systems.
(2)
added Report on plan to strengthen capabilities— Not later than six months after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director of the Defense Manpower Data Center shall submit to Congress a report on plans to strengthen the capabilities of the Defense Manpower Data Center systems, including staffing levels and funding, in order to improve the identification of covered borrowers and covered policyholders under military consumer protection laws.
(3)
added Meetings with private sector users of systems— The Director of the Defense Manpower Data Center shall meet regularly with private sector users of Defense Manpower Data Center systems used to identify covered borrowers and covered policyholders under military consumer protection laws to learn about issues facing such users and to develop ways of addressing such issues. The first meeting pursuant to this requirement shall take place with three months after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Sec. 652 Availability for purchase of Department of Veterans Affairs memorial headstones and markers for members of reserve components who performed certain training

added

added Section 2306 of title 38, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

added “(i)

added “(1) The Secretary shall make available for purchase a memorial headstone or marker for the marked or unmarked grave of an individual described in paragraph (2) or for the purpose of commemorating such an individual whose remains are unavailable.

added “(2) An individual described in this paragraph is an individual who—

added “(A) as a member of a National Guard or Reserve component performed inactive duty training or active duty for training for at least six years but did not serve on active duty; and

added “(B) is not otherwise ineligible for a memorial headstone or marker on account of the nature of the individual’s separation from the Armed Forces or other cause.

added “(3) A headstone or marker for the grave of an individual may be purchased under this subsection by—

added “(A) the individual;

added “(B) the surviving spouse, child, sibling, or parent of the individual; or

added “(C) an individual other than the next of kin, as determined by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs.

added “(4) In establishing the prices of the headstones and markers made available for purchase under this section, the Secretary shall ensure the prices are sufficient to cover the costs associated with the production and delivery of such headstones and markers.

added “(5) No person may receive any benefit under the laws administered by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs solely by reason of this subsection.

added “(6) This subsection does not authorize any new burial benefit for any person or create any new authority for any individual to be buried in a national cemetery.

added “(7) The Secretary shall coordinate with the Secretary of Defense in establishing procedures to determine whether an individual is an individual described in paragraph (2).”

Sec. 705 Access to TRICARE Prime for certain beneficiaries

added
(a)
added Access— Section 732(c)(3) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (10 U.S.C. 1097a note) is amended to read as follows:

added “(3) Residence at time of election

added “(A) Except as provided by subparagraph (B), an affected eligible beneficiary may not make the one-time election under paragraph (1) if, at the time of such election, the beneficiary does not reside—

added “(i) in a ZIP code that is in a region described in subsection (d)(1)(B); and

added “(ii) within 100 miles of a military medical treatment facility.

added “(B) Subparagraph (A)(ii) shall not apply with respect to an affected eligible beneficiary who—

added “(i) as of December 25, 2013, resides farther than 100 miles from a military medical treatment facility; and

added “(ii) is such an eligible beneficiary by reason of service in the Army, Navy, Air Force, or Marine Corps.”

(b)
added Funding—
(1)
added Increase— Notwithstanding the amounts set forth in the funding tables in division D, the amount authorized to be appropriated in section 1406 for the Defense Health Program, as specified in the corresponding funding table in section 4501, is hereby increased by $4,000,000.
(2)
added Offset— Notwithstanding the amounts set forth in the funding tables in division D, the amounts authorized to be appropriated in section 301 for operation and maintenance, Navy, Line 040, Air Operations and Safety Support, MV–22 Fleet Engineering Support Unfunded Requirement, as specified in the corresponding funding table in section 4301, is hereby reduced by $4,000,000.

Sec. 714 Pilot program for operation of network of retail pharmacies under TRICARE pharmacy benefits program

(a)
Authority to establish pilot program— The Secretary of Defense may conduct a pilot program to evaluate whether, in carrying out the TRICARE pharmacy benefits program under section 1074g of title 10, United States Code, operating a network of preferred retail pharmacies will generate cost savings for the Department of Defense.
(b)
Elements of pilot program— In conducting the pilot program under subsection (a), the Secretary shall—
(1)
incorporate “best practices” to enhance patient access from non-TRICARE health plans that are using a preferred retail network of pharmacies along with the mail-order pharmacy program of the plans and preferred pharmacy networks in Medicare Part D;
(2)
allow beneficiaries to obtain prescription medication that is available through the TRICARE pharmacy benefits program, including maintenance medication, through the network of preferred retail pharmacies and the national mail-order pharmacy program under section 1074g(a)(2)(E)(iii) of title 10 United States Code;
(3)
changed allow retail pharmacies participating in the network of preferred retail pharmacies to purchase prescription medication for beneficiaries in the pilot program at rates available to the Federal government pursuant to section 1074g(f) of title 10, United States Code;through its Prime Vendor contracting process;
(4)
changed ensure that retail pharmacies participating in the network of preferred retail pharmacies shall be comprised of include small business pharmacies (as defined by the Small Business Administration) at a rate no lower than the current TRICARE pharmacy program participation rate;rate provided there are sufficient number of small business pharmacies willing to participate in the pilot program;
(5)
study the potential, viability, cost efficiency, and health care effectiveness of the TRICARE pharmacy benefits program administering prescription medication through a network of preferred retail pharmacies in addition to the methods available pursuant to section 1074g(a)(2)(E) of title 10, United States Code; and
(6)
determine the opportunities for and barriers to coordinating and leveraging the use of a network of preferred retail pharmacies in addition to such methods available pursuant to such section 1074g(a)(2)(E).
(c)
changed Selection of retail pharmacies— The Secretary shall select the retail pharmacies to participate in the preferred network of preferred retail pharmacies pursuant to subsection (a). (a) and shall work with small business pharmacies to participate in the pilot program. In making such selection the Secretary may—
(1)
require that retail pharmacies opt-in to the network and agree to the reimbursement rates paid by the Secretary;
(2)
determine specific criteria for each retail pharmacy to meet or that a certain number of retail pharmacies must meet;
(3)
use a competitive process; and
(4)
require the preferred pharmacy network to comply with the existing TRICARE retail pharmacy access standards.
(d)
changed Selection of military communities— In carrying out the pilot program under subsection (a), the Secretary shall give preference to regions with high small business pharmacy participation rates and shall select at least one region in which to carry out the pilot program. The Secretary shall ensure that any region selected meets the following criteria:
(1)
The region has a certain number or percentage, as determined by the Secretary, of—
(A)
members of the Armed Forces serving on active duty;
(B)
members of the Armed Forces serving in a reserve component; and
(C)
retired members of the Armed Forces.
(2)
The number of beneficiaries under paragraph (1) is sufficient to produce statistically significant results.
(3)
The region has at least one retail pharmacy that operates at least 10 pharmacy locations in the region.
(4)
The region has at least one military installation that has a military medical treatment facility with a pharmacy.
(e)
Consultation— The Secretary shall develop the pilot program under subsection (a) in consultation with—
(1)
the Secretaries of the military departments;
(2)
added retail pharmacies;
(3)
renumbered was (6)(4) representatives from the military installations within the region selected under subsection (d); and
(4)
renumbered was (6)(5) the TRICARE-managed pharmacy contractor with responsibility for the national pharmacy mail-order program.
(f)
Duration of pilot program— If the Secretary of Defense carries out the pilot program under subsection (a), the Secretary shall commence such pilot program by not later than May 1, 2016, and shall terminate such program on September 30, 2018.
(g)
Reports— If the Secretary of Defense carries out the pilot program under subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees reports on the pilot program as follows:
(1)
Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, a report containing an implementation plan for the pilot program.
(2)
Not later than 90 days after the date on which the pilot program commences, and semiannually thereafter during the period in which the pilot program is carried out, an interim report on the pilot program.
(3)
Not later than 90 days after the date on which the pilot program terminates, a final report describing the results of the pilot program, including any recommendations of the Secretary to expand such program.

Sec. 723 Limitation on availability of funds for Department of Defense Healthcare Management Systems Modernization

added

added Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2016 for the Department of Defense Healthcare Management Systems Modernization, not more than 75 percent may be obligated or expended until the date on which the Secretary of Defense makes the certification required by section 713(g)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 10 U.S.C. 1071 note).

Sec. 724 Primary blast injury research

added

added The peer-reviewed Psychological Health and Traumatic Brain Injury Research Program shall conduct a study on blast injury mechanics covering a wide range of primary blast injury conditions, including traumatic brain injury, in order to accelerate solution development in this critical area.

Sec. 725 Sense of Congress regarding mental health counseling for members of the Armed Forces and families

added
(a)
added Findings— Congress finds the following:
(1)
added It has been shown that some members of the Armed Forces struggle with post-traumatic stress and other behavioral health disorders from traumatic events experienced during combat.
(2)
added It has also been shown that emotional distress and trauma from life events can be exacerbated by traumatic events experienced during combat.
(3)
added Members of the Armed Forces who struggle with post-traumatic stress and other behavioral health disorders are often unable to provide emotional support to spouses and children, causing emotional distress and the risk of behavioral health disorders among the dependents of the members.
(b)
added Sense of Congress— It is the sense of Congress that—
(1)
added the Department of Defense should continue to support members of the Armed Forces and their families by providing family counseling and individual counseling services that reduce the symptoms of post-traumatic stress and other behavioral health disorders and empowers members to be emotionally available to their spouses and children;
(2)
added such services should be readily available at branches of the Department and military bases;
(3)
added the Department should rely on industry standards established by the medical community when developing standards for their own practice of family and individual counseling; and
(4)
added the Department should conduct a five-year study of the progress of members of the Armed Forces that are treated for mental health disorders, including with respect to—
(A)
added difficulty keeping up with treatment;
(B)
added familial status before and after treatment; and
(C)
added access to mental health counseling at Department facilities and military installations.

Sec. 726 Provision of transportation of dependent patients relating to obstetrical anesthesia services

added

added Section 1040(a)(2) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking subparagraph (F).

Sec. 803 Independent study of matters related to bid protests

(a)
changed Requirement for study— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall enter into a contract with an independent research entity that is a not-for-profit entity or a federally funded research and development center with appropriate expertise and analytical capability to carry out a comprehensive study of factors leading to the filing of bid protests. The study shall cover the entire Federal Government and examine issues such as the following:
(1)
The variable influences on the net benefit (monetary and non-monetary) to contractors either filing a protest or indicating intent to file a protest.
(2)
The extent to which protests are filed by incumbent contractors for purposes of extending a contract’s period of performance.
(3)
The extent to which companies file protests even when those companies do not believe there was an error in the procurement process.
(4)
The time it takes agencies to implement corrective actions after a ruling or decision.
(b)
changed Report— Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the independent entity shall provide to the Secretary and Secretary, the congressional defense committees committees, the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform of the House of Representatives, and the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate a report on the results of the study, along with any recommendations it may have.

Sec. 804 Procurement of commercial items

(a)
Commercial Item Determinations by Department of Defense—
(1)
In general— Chapter 140 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

“2380. Commercial item determinations by Department of Defense

“The Secretary of Defense shall—

“(1) establish and maintain a centralized capability with necessary expertise and resources to oversee the making of commercial item determinations for the purposes of procurements by the Department of Defense; and

“(2) provide public access to Department of Defense commercial item determinations for the purposes of procurements by the Department of Defense.”

(2)
Clerical amendment— The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by adding at the end the following new item:
(b)
Commercial item exception to submission of cost and pricing data— Section 2306a(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

“(4) Commercial item determination

“(A) For purposes of applying the commercial item exception under paragraph (1)(B) to the required submission of certified cost or pricing data, the contracting officer may presume that a prior commercial item determination made by a military department, a Defense Agency, or another component of the Department of Defense shall serve as a determination for subsequent procurements of such item.

“(B) If the contracting officer does not make the presumption described in subparagraph (A) and instead chooses to proceed with a procurement of an item previously determined to be a commercial item using procedures other than the procedures authorized for the procurement of a commercial item, the contracting officer shall request a review of the commercial item determination by the head of the contracting activity.

“(C) Not later than 30 days after receiving a request for review of a commercial item determination under subparagraph (B), the head of a contracting activity shall—

“(i) confirm that the prior determination was appropriate and still applicable; or

“(ii) issue a revised determination with a written explanation of the basis for the revision.”

(c)
changed Definition of commercial item— Nothing in this section or the amendments made by this section shall affect the meaning of the term “commercial item” under subsection (a)(5) of section 2464 of title 10, United States Code, or any requirement under subsection (a)(3) or subsection (c) of such section.

Sec. 805 Modification to information required to be submitted by offeror in procurement of major weapon systems as commercial items

(a)
Requirement for determination— Subsection (a) of section 2379 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
changed in subsection (1)(B), by inserting “; and” “and” after the semicolon;
(2)
by striking paragraph (2); and
(3)
by redesignating paragraph (3) as paragraph (2).
(b)
Treatment of subsystems as commercial items— Subsection (b) of such section is amended—
(1)
in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking “only if” and inserting “if either”;
(2)
in paragraph (2)—
(A)
by striking “that—” and all that follows through “the subsystem is a” and inserting “that the subsystem is a”;
(B)
by striking “; and” and inserting a period; and
(C)
by striking subparagraph (B).
(c)
Treatment of components as commercial items— Subsection (c)(1) of such section is amended—
(1)
by striking “title only if” and inserting “title if either”; and
(2)
in subparagraph (B)—
(A)
by striking “that—” and all that follows through “the component or” and inserting “that the component or”;
(B)
by striking “; and” and inserting a period; and
(C)
by striking clause (ii).
(d)
Information submitted— Subsection (d) of such section is amended—
(1)
by striking “submit—” and all that follows through “prices paid” and inserting “submit prices paid”;
(2)
by striking “; and” and inserting a period; and
(3)
by striking paragraph (2).

Sec. 835 Review of Government access to intellectual property rights of private sector firms

(a)
changed Review required— Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall enter into a contract with an independent entity with appropriate expertise to conduct a review of (1) Department of Defense regulations regulations, practices, and practices sustainment requirements related to Government access to and use of intellectual property rights of private sector firms. firms; and (2) Department of Defense practices related to the procurement, management, and use of intellectual property rights to facilitate competition in sustainment of weapon systems throughout their life-cycle. The contract shall require that in conducting the review, the independent entity shall consult with the National Defense Technology and Industrial Base Council (described in section 2502 of title 10, United States Code) and each Center of Industrial and Technical Excellence (described in section 2474 of title 10, United States Code).
(b)
Report— Not later than March 1, 2016, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the findings of the independent entity, along with a description of any actions that the Secretary proposes to revise and clarify laws or that the Secretary may take to revise or clarify regulations related to intellectual property rights.

Sec. 840 Certification requirements for procurement center representatives, Business Opportunity Specialists, and commercial market representatives

(a)
Procurement center representative requirements— Section 15(l)(5)(A)(iii) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 644(l)(5)(A)(iii)) is amended by striking “except that” and all that follows through the period at the end and inserting the following:

“(I) any person serving in such a position on or before January 3, 2013, may continue to serve in that position for a period of 5 years beginning on such date without the required certification; and

“(II) any person hired for such position after January 3, 2013, may have up to one calendar year from the date of employment to obtain the required certification.”

(b)
Business Opportunity Specialist requirements—
(1)
In general— Section 4 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 633) is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

“(g) Certification requirements for Business Opportunity Specialists—A Business Opportunity Specialist described under section 7(j)(10)(D) shall have a Level I Federal Acquisition Certification in Contracting (or any successor certification) or the equivalent Department of Defense certification, except that—

“(1) a Business Opportunity Specialist who was serving on or before January 3, 2013, may continue to serve as a Business Opportunity Specialist for a period of 5 years beginning on such date without such a certification; and

“(2) any person hired as a Business Opportunity Specialist after January 3, 2013, may have up to one calendar year from the date of employment to obtain the required certification.”

(2)
Conforming amendment— Section 7(j)(10)(D)(i) of such Act (15 U.S.C. 636(j)(10)(D)(i)) is amended by striking the second sentence.
(c)
changed Commercial market representative requirements— Section 4 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 633), as amended by section 9 of this Act, subsection (b)(1), is further amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

“(h) Certification requirements for commercial market representatives—A commercial market representative referred to in section 15(q)(3) shall have a Level I Federal Acquisition Certification in Contracting (or any successor certification) or the equivalent Department of Defense certification, except that—

“(1) a commercial market representative who was serving on or before the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 may continue to serve as a commercial market representative for a period of 5 years beginning on such date without such a certification; and

“(2) any person hired as a commercial market representative after the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 may have up to one calendar year from the date of employment to obtain the required certification.”

Sec. 844 Modification to and scorecard program for small business contracting goals

added
(a)
added Amendment to Governmentwide goal for small business participation in procurement contracts— Section 15(g)(1)(A)(i) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 644(g)(1)(A)(i) is amended by adding at the end the following: “In meeting this goal, the Government shall ensure the participation of small business concerns from a wide variety of industries and from a broad spectrum of small business concerns within each industry.”.
(b)
added Scorecard program for evaluating federal agency compliance with small business contracting goals—
(1)
added In general— Not later than September 30, 2016, the Administrator of the Small Business Administration, in consultation with the Federal agencies, shall—
(A)
added develop a methodology for calculating a score to be used to evaluate the compliance of each Federal agency with meeting the goals established pursuant to section 15(g)(1)(B) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 644(g)(1)(B)); and
(B)
added develop a scorecard based on such methodology.
(2)
added Agency annual goal— In developing the methodology for calculating a score described in paragraph (1), the Administrator shall consider each annual goal established by each Federal agency pursuant to section 15(g)(1)(B) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 644(g)(1)(B)).
(3)
added Use of scorecard— Beginning in fiscal year 2017, the Administrator shall establish and carry out a program to use the scorecard developed under paragraph (1) to evaluate whether each Federal agency is creating the maximum practicable opportunities for the award of prime contracts and subcontracts to small business concerns, small business concerns owned and controlled by service-disabled veterans, qualified HUBZone small business concerns, small business concerns owned and controlled by socially and economically disadvantaged individuals, and small business concerns owned and controlled by women, by assigning a score to each Federal agency. If the Administrator fails to establish and carry out this program before the end of fiscal year 2017, the Administrator may not exercise the authority under section 7(a)(25)(A) until such time as the program is implemented.
(4)
added Contents of scorecard— The scorecard developed under paragraph (1) shall include, for each Federal agency, the following information:
(A)
added A determination of whether the Federal agency met each of the prime contract goals established pursuant to section 15(g)(1)(B) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 644(g)(1)(B)) with respect to small business concerns, small business concerns owned and controlled by service-disabled veterans, qualified HUBZone small business concerns, small business concerns owned and controlled by socially and economically disadvantaged individuals, and small business concerns owned and controlled by women.
(B)
added A determination of whether the Federal agency met each of the subcontract goals established pursuant to such section with respect to small business concerns, small business concerns owned and controlled by service-disabled veterans, qualified HUBZone small business concerns, small business concerns owned and controlled by socially and economically disadvantaged individuals, and small business concerns owned and controlled by women.
(C)
added The number of small business concerns, small business concerns owned and controlled by service-disabled veterans, qualified HUBZone small business concerns, small business concerns owned and controlled by socially and economically disadvantaged individuals, and small business concerns owned and controlled by women awarded prime contracts in each North American Industrial Classification System code during the fiscal year and a comparison to the number awarded contracts during the prior fiscal year, if available.
(D)
added The number of small business concerns, small business concerns owned and controlled by service-disabled veterans, qualified HUBZone small business concerns, small business concerns owned and controlled by socially and economically disadvantaged individuals, and small business concerns owned and controlled by women awarded subcontracts in each North American Industrial Classification System code during the fiscal year and a comparison to the number awarded contracts during the prior fiscal year, if available.
(E)
added Any other factors that the Administrator deems important to achieve the maximum practicable utilization of small business concerns, small business concerns owned and controlled by service-disabled veterans, qualified HUBZone small business concerns, small business concerns owned and controlled by socially and economically disadvantaged individuals, and small business concerns owned and controlled by women.
(5)
added Weighted factors— In using the scorecard to evaluate and assign a score to a Federal agency, the Administrator shall base—
(A)
added fifty percent of the score on the dollar value of prime contracts described in paragraph (4)(A); and
(B)
added fifty percent of the score on the information provided in subparagraphs (B) through (E) of paragraph (4), weighted in a manner determined by the Administrator to encourage the maximum practicable opportunity for the award of prime contracts and subcontracts to small business concerns, small business concerns owned and controlled by service-disabled veterans, qualified HUBZone small business concerns, small business concerns owned and controlled by socially and economically disadvantaged individuals, and small business concerns owned and controlled by women.
(6)
added Publication— The scorecard used by the Administrator under this subsection shall be submitted to the President and Congress along with the report submitted under section 15(h)(2) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 644(h)(2)).
(7)
added Report— After the Administrator submits the scorecard for fiscal year 2018, but not later than March 31, 2019, the Administrator shall report to the Committee on Small Business of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship of the Senate. Such report shall include the following:
(A)
added A description of any increase in the dollar amount of prime contracts and subcontracts awarded to small business concerns, small business concerns owned and controlled by service-disabled veterans, qualified HUBZone small business concerns, small business concerns owned and controlled by socially and economically disadvantaged individuals, and small business concerns owned and controlled by women.
(B)
added A description of any increase in the dollar amount of prime contracts and subcontracts awarded to small business concerns, small business concerns owned and controlled by service-disabled veterans, qualified HUBZone small business concerns, small business concerns owned and controlled by socially and economically disadvantaged individuals, and small business concerns owned and controlled by women in each North American Industrial Classification System code.
(C)
added A description of any increase to the number of small business concerns, small business concerns owned and controlled by service-disabled veterans, qualified HUBZone small business concerns, small business concerns owned and controlled by socially and economically disadvantaged individuals, and small business concerns owned and controlled by women awarded contracts in each North American Industrial Classification System code.
(D)
added The recommendation of the Administrator on continuing, modifying, expanding, or terminating the program established under this subsection.
(8)
added GAO report on scorecard methodology— Not later than September 30, 2018, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the Committee on Small Business of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship of the Senate a report that—
(A)
added evaluates whether the methodology used to calculate a score under this subsection accurately and effectively—
(i)
added measures the compliance of each Federal agency with meeting the goals established pursuant to section 15(g)(1)(B) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 644(g)(1)(B)); and
(ii)
added encourages Federal agencies to expand opportunities for mall business concerns, small business concerns owned and controlled by service-disabled veterans, qualified HUBZone small business concerns, small business concerns owned and controlled by socially and economically disadvantaged individuals, and small business concerns owned and controlled by women to compete for and be awarded Federal procurement contracts across North American Industrial Classification System Codes; and
(B)
added if warranted, makes recommendations on how to improve such methodology to improve its accuracy and effectiveness.
(9)
added Definitions— In this subsection:
(A)
added Administrator— The term Administrator means the Administrator of the Small Business Administration.
(B)
added Federal agency— The term Federal agency has the meaning given the term agency by section 551(1) of title 5, United States Code, but does not include the United States Postal Service or the Government Accountability Office.
(C)
added Scorecard— The term scorecard shall mean any summary using a rating system to evaluate a Federal agency’s efforts to meet goals established under section 15(g)(1)(B) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 644(g)(1)(B)) that—
(i)
added includes the measures described in paragraph (4); and
(ii)
added assigns a score to each Federal agency evaluated.
(D)
added Small Business Act definitions—
(i)
added In general— The terms small business concern, small business concern owned and controlled by service-disabled veterans, qualified HUBZone small business concern, and small business concern owned and controlled by women shall have the meanings given such terms under section 3 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632).
(ii)
added Small business concerns owned and controlled by socially and economically disadvantaged individuals— The term small business concern owned and controlled by socially and economically disadvantaged individuals has the meaning given that term under section 8(d)(3)(C) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 637(d)(3)(C)).

Sec. 845 Establishment of an Office of Hearings and Appeals in the Small Business Administration; petitions for reconsideration of size standards

added
(a)
added Establishment of an Office of Hearings and Appeals in the Small Business Administration—
(1)
added In general— Section 5 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 634) is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

added “(i) Office of Hearings and Appeals

added “(1) Establishment

added “(A) Office—There is established in the Administration an Office of Hearings and Appeals—

added “(i) to impartially decide matters relating to program decisions of the Administrator—

added “(I) for which Congress requires a hearing on the record; or

added “(II) that the Administrator designates for hearing by regulation; and

added “(ii) which shall contain the office of the Administration that handles requests submitted pursuant to sections 552 of title 5, United States Code (commonly referred to as the “Freedom of Information Act”) and maintains records pursuant to section 552a of title 5, United States Code (commonly referred to as the “Privacy Act of 1974”).

added “(B) Jurisdiction—The Office of Hearings and Appeals shall only hear appeals of matters as described in this Act, the Small Business Investment Act of 1958 (15 U.S.C. 661 et seq.), and title 13 of the Code of Federal Regulations.

added “(C) Associate administrator—The head of the Office of Hearings and Appeals shall be the Chief Hearing Officer appointed under section 4(b)(1), who shall be responsible to the Administrator.

added “(2) Chief Hearing Officer duties

added “(A) In general—The Chief Hearing Officer shall—

added “(i) be a career appointee in the Senior Executive Service and an attorney licensed by a State, commonwealth, territory or possession of the United States, or the District of Columbia; and

added “(ii) be responsible for the operation and management of the Office of Hearings and Appeals.

added “(B) Alternative dispute resolution—The Chief Hearing Officer may assign a matter for mediation or other means of alternative dispute resolution.

added “(3) Hearing Officers

added “(A) In general—The Office of Hearings and Appeals shall appoint Hearing Officers to carry out the duties described in paragraph (1)(A)(i).

added “(B) Conditions of employment—A Hearing Officer appointed under this paragraph—

added “(i) shall serve in the excepted service as an employee of the Administration under section 2103 of title 5, United States Code, and under the supervision of the Chief Hearing Officer;

added “(ii) shall be classified at a position to which section 5376 of title 5, United States Code, applies; and

added “(iii) shall be compensated at a rate not exceeding the maximum rate payable under such section.

added “(C) Authority; powers—Notwithstanding section 556(b) of title 5, United States Code, a Hearing Officer—

added “(i) shall have the authority to hear claims arising under section 554 of such title;

added “(ii) shall have the powers described in section 556(c) of such title; and

added “(iii) shall conduct hearings and issue decisions in the manner described under sections 555, 556, and 557 of such title, as applicable.

added “(D) Treatment of current personnel—An individual serving as a Judge in the Office of Hearings and Appeals (as that position and office are designated in section 134.101 of title 13, Code of Federal Regulations) on the effective date of this subsection shall be considered as qualified to be, and redesignated as, a Hearing Officer.

added “(4) Hearing Officer defined—In this subsection, the term Hearing Officer means an individual appointed or redesignated under this subsection who is an attorney licensed by a State, commonwealth, territory or possession of the United States, or the District of Columbia.”

(2)
added Associate Administrator as Chief Hearing Officer— Section 4(b)(1) of such Act (15 U.S.C. 633(b)) is amended by adding at the end the following: “One such Associate Administrator shall be the Chief Hearing Officer, who shall administer the Office of Hearings and Appeals established under section 5(i).”.
(3)
added Repeal of regulation— Section 134.102(t) of title 13, Code of Federal Regulations, as in effect on January 1, 2015, (relating to types of hearings within the jurisdiction of the Office of Hearings and Appeals) shall have no force or effect.
(b)
added Petitions for reconsideration of size standards for small business concerns— Section 3(a) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632(a)) is amended by adding at the end the following:

added “(9) Petitions for reconsideration of size standards

added “(A) In general—A person may file a petition for reconsideration with the Office of Hearings and Appeals (as established under section 5(i)) of a size standard revised, modified, or established by the Administrator pursuant to this subsection.

added “(B) Time limit—A person filing a petition for reconsideration described in subparagraph (A) shall file such petition not later than 30 days after the publication in the Federal Register of the notice of final rule to revise, modify, or establish size standards described in paragraph (6).

added “(C) Process for agency review—The Office of Hearings and Appeals shall use the same process it uses to decide challenges to the size of a small business concern to decide a petition for review pursuant to this paragraph.

added “(D) Judicial review—The publication of a final rule in the Federal Register described in subparagraph (B) shall be considered final agency action for purposes of seeking judicial review. Filing a petition for reconsideration under subparagraph (A) shall not be a condition precedent to judicial review of any such size standard.”

Sec. 846 Limitations on reverse auctions

added
(a)
added Sense of Congress— It is the sense of Congress that, when used appropriately, reverse auctions may improve the Federal Government's procurement of commercially available commodities by increasing competition, reducing prices, and improving opportunities for small businesses.
(b)
added Limitations on reverse auctions— The Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 631 et seq.) is amended—
(1)
added by redesignating section 47 (15 U.S.C. 631 note) as section 48; and
(2)
added by inserting after section 46 the following new section:

added “47. Limitations on reverse auctions

added “(a) Prohibition on using reverse auctions for covered contracts—In the case of a covered contract described in subsection (c), a reverse auction may not be used if the award of the contract is to be made under—

added “(1) section 8(a);

added “(2) section 8(m);

added “(3) section 15(a);

added “(4) section 15(j);

added “(5) section 31; or

added “(6) section 36.

added “(b) Limitations on using reverse auctions—In the case of the award of a contract made under paragraphs (1) through (6) of subsection (a) that is not a covered contract, a reverse auction may be used for the award of such a contract, but only if the following requirements are met:

added “(1) Decisions regarding use of a reverse auction—Subject to paragraph (2), the following decisions with respect to such a contract shall be made only by a contracting officer:

added “(A) A decision to use a reverse auction as part of the competition for award of such a contract.

added “(B) Any decision made after the decision described in subsection (A) regarding the appropriate evaluation criteria, the inclusion of vendors, the acceptability of vendor submissions (including decisions regarding timeliness), and the selection of the winner.

added “(2) Training required—Only a contracting officer who has received training on the appropriate use and supervision of reverse auctions may use or supervise a reverse auction for the award of such a contract. The training shall be provided by, or similar to the training provided by, the Defense Acquisition University as described in section 824 of the Carl Levin and Howard P. “Buck” McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291).

added “(3) Number of offers; revisions to bids—A Federal agency may not award such a contract using a reverse auction if only one offer is received or if offerors do not have the ability to submit revised bids with lower prices throughout the course of the auction.

added “(4) Technically acceptable offers—A Federal agency awarding such a contract using a reverse auction shall evaluate the technical acceptability of offers only as technically acceptable or unacceptable.

added “(5) Use of price rankings—A Federal agency may not award such a contract using a reverse auction if at any time during the award process the Federal agency misinforms an offeror about the price ranking of the offeror’s last offer submitted in relation to offers submitted by other offerors.

added “(6) Use of third-party agents—If a Federal agency uses a third party agent to assist with the award of such a contract using a reverse auction, the Federal agency shall ensure that—

added “(A) inherently governmental functions (as such term is used in section 2303 of title 41, United States Code) are not performed by private contractors, including by the third party agent;

added “(B) information on the past contract performance of offerors created by the third party agent and shared with the Federal agency is collected, maintained, and shared in compliance with section 1126 of title 41, United States Code;

added “(C) information on whether an offeror is a responsible source (as defined in section 113 of title 41, United States Code) that is created by the third party agent and shared with the Federal agency is shared with the offeror and complies with section 8(b)(7) of this Act; and

added “(D) disputes between the third party agent and an offeror may not be used to justify a determination that an offeror is not a responsible source (as defined in section 113 of title 41, United States Code) or to otherwise restrict the ability of an offeror to compete for the award of such a contract or task or delivery order.

added “(c) Definitions—In this section:

added “(1) Contracting officer—The term contracting officer has the meaning given that term in section 2101(1) of title 41, United States Code.

added “(2) Covered contract—The term covered contract means a contract—

added “(A) for design and construction services;

added “(B) for goods purchased to protect Federal employees, members of the Armed Forces, or civilians from bodily harm; or

added “(C) for goods or services other than those goods or services described in subparagraph (A) or (B)—

added “(i) to be awarded based on factors other than price and technical responsibility; or

added “(ii) if awarding the contract requires the contracting officer to conduct discussions with the offerors about their offer.

added “(3) Design and construction services—The term design and construction services means—

added “(A) site planning and landscape design;

added “(B) architectural and interior design;

added “(C) engineering system design;

added “(D) performance of construction work for facility, infrastructure, and environmental restoration projects;

added “(E) delivery and supply of construction materials to construction sites;

added “(F) construction, alteration, or repair, including painting and decorating, of public buildings and public works; and

added “(G) architectural and engineering services as defined in section 1102 of title 40, United States Code.

added “(4) Reverse auction—The term reverse auction, with respect to procurement by an agency, means an auction between a group of offerors who compete against each other by submitting offers for a contract or task or delivery order with the ability to submit revised offers with lower prices throughout the course of the auction.”

Sec. 847 Sense of Congress on procurement of fire hoses

added
(a)
added Findings—
(1)
added The General Services Administration has historically procured specialized fire hoses designed for combating wildfires used by the Forest Service.
(2)
added A memorandum of agreement was signed on February 5, 2014, by the Administrator of General Services and the Director of the Defense Logistics Agency designating the Defense Logistics Agency as the integrated material manager and source of supply for such fire hoses.
(3)
added While the intent of this agreement was to secure efficiencies in procurement and cost savings for the Government, the transfer of procurement authority to the Department of Defense had the unintentional effect of requiring all suppliers of such fire hoses to comply with the domestic sourcing requirements of section 2533a of title 10, United States Code, also known as the Berry Amendment.
(4)
added There is currently only one known provider of such fire hoses and that provider is not fully compliant with the domestic sourcing requirements of the Berry Amendment.
(5)
added As a result of the designation of the Defense Logistic Agency as the integrated material manager for the procurement of such fire hoses and the new requirement for compliance with the Berry Amendment, the Forest Service does not anticipate the ability to procure the necessary number of fire hoses before the fire season begins in early June and is currently facing a shortfall of 56,000 hoses out of the 93,000 required. According to the Chief of the Forest Service, this shortfall represents a critical risk to a number of States that are likely to experience a season of above average wildfire activity.
(6)
added During the period of May 1, 2014, through May 5, 2015, less than 9 percent of quantities of such hoses purchased by the Defense Logistics Agency were procured for the purposes of the Department of Defense.
(b)
added Sense of Congress— Based on the findings in subsection (a), it is the sense of Congress that procurement authority for specialized fire hoses for the United States Forest Service should be reestablished as an activity of the General Services Administration.

Sec. 854 Amendments to certain acquisition thresholds

(a)
Simplified acquisition threshold generally— Section 134 of title 41, United States Code, is amended by striking “$100,000” and inserting “$500,000”.
(b)
Micro-purchase threshold— Section 1902(a) of title 41, United States Code, is amended by striking “$3,000” and inserting “$5,000”.
(c)
Special emergency procurement authority— Section 1903(b)(2) of title 41, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
in subparagraph (A), by striking “$250,000” and inserting “$750,000”; and
(2)
in subparagraph (B), by striking “$1,000,000” and inserting “$1,500,000”.
(d)
Small business concern reservation— Section 15(j)(1) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 644(j)(1)) is amended by striking “$100,000” and inserting “$500,000”.
(e)
added Limitation— Subsection (a) shall not apply to a covered item as defined in subparagraphs of (B), (C), (D), or (E) of section 2533a(b)(1) of title 10, United States Code.

Sec. 858 Streamlining of requirements relating to defense business systems

(a)
In general—
(1)
Revision— Section 2222 of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:

“2222. Defense business systems: business process reengineering; enterprise architecture; management

“(a) Defense business systems generally—The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that each covered defense business system developed, deployed, and operated by the Department of Defense—

“(1) supports efficient business processes that have been reviewed, and as appropriate revised, through business process reengineering;

“(2) is integrated into a comprehensive defense business enterprise architecture; and

“(3) is managed in a manner that provides visibility into, and traceability of, expenditures for the system.

“(b) Issuance of guidance

“(1) Secretary of defense guidance—The Secretary shall issue guidance to provide for the coordination of, and decision making for, the planning, programming, and control of investments in covered defense business systems.

“(2) Supporting guidance—The Secretary shall direct the Deputy Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, the Chief Information Officer, and the Chief Management Officer of each of the military departments to issue and maintain supporting guidance, as appropriate, for the guidance of the Secretary issued under paragraph (1).

“(c) Guidance elements—The guidance issued under subsection (b)(1) shall include the following elements:

“(1) Policy to ensure that the business processes of the Department of Defense are continuously reviewed and revised—

changed “(A) to implement the most streamlined and efficient business processes practicable; andpracticable;

changed “(B) to enable the use of commercial off-the-shelf business systems with the fewest changes necessary to accommodate requirements and interfaces that are unique to the Department of Defense.Defense;

added “(C) to evaluate commercial off-the-shelf business systems for security, resilience, reliability, interoperability, and integration with existing interrelated systems where such system integration and interoperability are essential to Department of Defense operations;

added “(D) to work with commercial off-the-shelf business system developers and owners in adapting systems for Department of Defense use;

added “(E) to work with commercial off-the-shelf business system developers and owners where necessary to evaluate the feasibility of making the necessary changes where needed to adapt systems for Department of Defense use;

added “(F) to perform Department of Defense system audits to determine which systems are related to or rely upon the system to be replaced or integrated with commercial off-the-shelf business systems;

added “(G) to include data mapping as a step in the testing of commercial off-the-shelf business systems prior to deployment; and

added “(H) to perform full backup of systems that will be changed or replaced by the installation of commercial off-the-shelf business systems prior to installation and deployment to ensure reconstitution of the system to a functioning state should it become necessary.

“(2) A process to establish requirements for covered defense business systems.

“(3) Mechanisms for the planning and control of investments in covered defense business systems, including a process for the collection and review of programming and budgeting information for covered defense business systems.

“(4) Policy requiring the periodic review of covered defense business systems that have been fully deployed, by portfolio, to ensure that investments in such portfolios are appropriate.

“(d) Defense business enterprise architecture

“(1) Blueprint—The Secretary, working through the Deputy Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense, shall develop and maintain a blueprint to guide the development of integrated business processes within the Department of Defense. Such blueprint shall be known as the “defense business enterprise architecture”.

“(2) Purpose—The defense business enterprise architecture shall be sufficiently defined to effectively guide implementation of interoperable defense business system solutions and shall be consistent with the policies and procedures established by the Director of the Office of Management and Budget.

“(3) Elements—The defense business enterprise architecture shall—

“(A) include policies, procedures, business data standards, business performance measures, and business information requirements that apply uniformly throughout the Department of Defense; and

“(B) enable the Department of Defense to—

“(i) comply with all applicable law, including Federal accounting, financial management, and reporting requirements;

“(ii) routinely produce verifiable, timely, accurate, and reliable business and financial information for management purposes; and

“(iii) integrate budget, accounting, and program information and systems.

“(4) Integration into information technology architecture

“(A) The defense business enterprise architecture shall be integrated into the information technology enterprise architecture required under subparagraph (B).

“(B) The Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense shall develop an information technology enterprise architecture. The architecture shall describe a plan for improving the information technology and computing infrastructure of the Department of Defense, including for each of the major business processes conducted by the Department of Defense.

“(e) Defense business council

“(1) Requirement for council—The Secretary shall establish a Defense Business Council to provide advice to the Secretary on developing the defense business enterprise architecture, reengineering the Department’s business processes, and requirements for defense business systems. The Council shall be chaired by the Deputy Chief Management Officer and the Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense.

“(2) Membership—The membership of the Council shall include the following:

“(A) The Chief Management Officers of the military departments, or their designees.

“(B) The following officials of the Department of Defense, or their designees:

“(i) The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics with respect to acquisition, logistics, and installations management processes.

“(ii) The Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) with respect to financial management and planning and budgeting processes.

“(iii) The Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness with respect to human resources management processes.

“(f) Approvals required for development

“(1) Initial approval required—The Secretary shall ensure that a covered defense business system program cannot proceed into development (or, if no development is required, into production or fielding) unless the appropriate approval official (as specified in paragraph (2)) approves the program by determining that the covered defense business system concerned—

“(A) supports a business process that has been, or is being as a result of the acquisition program, reengineered to be as streamlined and efficient as practicable consistent with the guidance issued pursuant to subsection (b), including business process mapping;

“(B) is in compliance with the defense business enterprise architecture developed pursuant to subsection (d) or will be in compliance as a result of modifications planned;

“(C) has valid, achievable requirements; and

“(D) is in compliance with the Department’s auditability requirements.

“(2) Appropriate official—For purposes of paragraph (1), the appropriate approval official with respect to a covered defense business system is the following:

“(A) In the case of a system of a military department, the Chief Management Officer of that military department.

“(B) In the case of a system of a Defense Agency or Defense Field Activity or a system that will support the business process of more than one military department or Defense Agency or Defense Field Activity, the Deputy Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense.

“(C) In the case of any system, such official other than the applicable official under subparagraph (A) or (B) as the Secretary designates for such purpose.

“(3) Annual certification—For any fiscal year in which funds are expended for development pursuant to a covered defense business system program, the Defense Business Council shall review the system and certify (or decline to certify as the case may be) that it continues to satisfy the requirements of paragraph (1). If the Council determines that certification cannot be granted, the chairman of the Council shall notify the appropriate approval official and the acquisition Milestone Decision Authority for the program and provide a recommendation for corrective action.

“(4) Obligation of funds in violation of requirements—The obligation of Department of Defense funds for a covered defense business system program that has not been certified in accordance with paragraph (3) is a violation of section 1341(a)(1)(A) of title 31.

“(g) Responsibility of milestone decision authority—The Secretary shall ensure that, as part of the defense acquisition system, the requirements of this section are fully addressed by the Milestone Decision Authority for a covered defense business system program as acquisition process approvals are considered for such system.

“(h) Annual report—Not later than March 15 of each year from 2016 through 2020, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on activities of the Department of Defense pursuant to this section. Each report shall include the following:

“(1) A description of actions taken and planned with respect to the guidance required by subsection (b) and the defense business enterprise architecture developed pursuant to subsection (d).

“(2) A description of actions taken and planned for the reengineering of business processes by the Defense Business Council established pursuant to subsection (e).

“(3) A summary of covered defense business system funding and covered defense business systems approved pursuant to subsection (f).

“(4) Identification of any covered defense business system program that during the preceding fiscal year was reviewed and not approved pursuant to subsection (f) and the reasons for the lack of approval.

“(5) Identification of any covered defense business system program that during the preceding fiscal year failed to achieve initial operational capability within five years after the date the program received Milestone B approval.

“(6) For any program identified under paragraph (5), a description of the plan to address the issues that caused the failure.

“(7) A discussion of specific improvements in business operations and cost savings resulting from successful covered defense business systems programs.

“(8) A copy of the most recent report of the Chief Management Officer of each military department on implementation of business transformation initiatives by such military department in accordance with section 908 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4569; 10 U.S.C. 2222 note).

“(i) Definitions—In this section:

“(1)

“(A) Defense business system—The term “defense business system” means an information system that is operated by, for, or on behalf of the Department of Defense, including any of the following:

“(i) A financial system.

“(ii) A financial data feeder system.

“(iii) A contracting system.

“(iv) A logistics system.

“(v) A planning and budgeting system.

“(vi) An installations management system.

“(vii) A human resources management system.

“(viii) A training and readiness system.

“(B) The term does not include—

“(i) a national security system; or

“(ii) an information system used exclusively by and within the defense commissary system or the exchange system or other instrumentality of the Department of Defense conducted for the morale, welfare, and recreation of members of the armed forces using nonappropriated funds.

“(2) Covered defense business system—The term “covered defense business system” means a defense business system that is expected to have a total amount of budget authority, over the period of the current future-years defense program submitted to Congress under section 221 of this title, in excess of the threshold established for the use of special simplified acquisition procedures pursuant to section 2304(g)(1)(B) of this title.

“(3) Covered defense business system program—The term “covered defense business system program” means a defense acquisition program to develop and field a covered defense business system or an increment of a covered defense business system.

“(4) Enterprise architecture—The term “enterprise architecture” has the meaning given that term in section 3601(4) of title 44.

“(5) Information system—The term “information system” has the meaning given that term in section 11101 of title 40.

“(6) National security system—The term “national security system” has the meaning given that term in section 3542(b)(2) of title 44.

“(7) Milestone decision authority—The term “Milestone Decision Authority”, with respect to a defense acquisition program, means the individual within the Department of Defense designated with the responsibility to grant milestone approvals for that program.

“(8) Business process mapping—The term “business process mapping” means a procedure in which the steps in a business process are clarified and documented in both written form and in a flow chart.”

(2)
changed Clerical amendment— The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by adding at striking the end item relating to section 2222 and inserting the following new item:
(b)
Deadline for guidance— The guidance required by subsection (b)(1) of section 2222 of title 10, United States Code, as amended by subsection (a)(1), shall be issued not later than December 31, 2016.
(c)
Repeal— Section 811 of the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109–364; 10 U.S.C. 2222 note) is repealed.

Sec. 865 Exception for AbilityOne products from authority To acquire products and services produced in Afghanistan, Central Asian States, and Djibouti

added
(a)
added Exception for certain items not produced in Afghanistan— Section 886 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended—
(1)
added in subsection (a), by inserting “and except as provided in subsection (d),” after “subsection (b),”; and
(2)
added by adding at the end the following new subsection:

added “(d) Exception for items on the AbilityOne procurement list—The requirements of this section shall not apply to any product that is included in the procurement list described in section 8503(a) of title 41.”

(b)
added Exception for certain items not produced in Central Asian States— Section 801 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2400) is amended—
(1)
added in subsection (a), by inserting “and except as provided in subsection (h),” after “subsection (b),”; and
(2)
added by adding at the end the following new subsection:

added “(h) Exception for items on the AbilityOne procurement list—The requirements of this section shall not apply to any product that is included in the procurement list described in section 8503(a) of title 41.”

(c)
added Exception for certain items not produced in Djibouti— Section 1263 of the Carl Levin and Howard P. “Buck” McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291) is amended—
(1)
added in subsection (b), by inserting “and except as provided in subsection (g),” after “subsection (c),”; and
(2)
added by adding at the end the following new subsection:

added “(g) Exception for items on the AbilityOne procurement list—The requirements of this section shall not apply to any product that is included in the procurement list described in section 8503(a) of title 41.”

Sec. 866 Effective communication between government and industry

added

added Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Federal Acquisition Regulatory Council shall prescribe a regulation making clear that agency acquisition personnel are permitted and encouraged to engage in responsible and constructive exchanges with industry, so long as those exchanges are consistent with existing law and regulation and do not promote an unfair competitive advantage to particular firms.

Sec. 867 Strengthening program and project management performance

added
(a)
added Plan on strengthening program and project management performance— Not later than 180 days following the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director of the Office of Management and Budget, in consultation with the Director of the Office of Personnel Management, shall submit to the relevant congressional committees a plan for improving management of IT programs and projects.
(b)
added Matters covered— The plan required by subsection (a) shall include, at a minimum, the following:
(1)
added Creation of a specialized career path for program management.
(2)
added The development of a competency model for program management consistent with the IT project manager model.
(3)
added A career advancement model that requires appropriate expertise and experience for advancement.
(4)
added A career advancement model that is more competitive with the private sector and that recognizes both Government and private sector experience.
(c)
added Combination with other cadres plan— The Director may combine the plan required by subsection (a) with the acquisition human capital plans that were developed pursuant to the October 27, 2009, guidance issued by the Administrator for Federal Procurement Policy in furtherance of section 1704(g) of title 41, United States Code (originally enacted as section 869 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4553)), to address how the agencies are meeting their human capital requirements to support the timely and effective acquisition of information technology.

Sec. 868 Sychronization of defense acquisition curricula

added

added Section 1746(c) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—

(1)
added by striking “The” and inserting “(1) The”; and
(2)
added by adding at the end the following:

added “(2) The President of such University shall also convene a review board annually with faculty representatives from relevant professional schools and degree-granting institutions of the Department of Defense and military departments, such as the service academies, the Naval Postgraduate School, and other similar schools and institutions, in order to review and synchronize defense acquisition curricula across the entire Department of Defense.”

Sec. 869 Research and analysis of defense acquisition policy

added

added Section 1746(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking paragraph (2) and inserting the following:

added “(2) research and analysis of defense acquisition policy issues from academic institutions, such as the Naval Postgraduate School and other Department of Defense schools, that offer in-depth analysis of the entire defense acquisition decision support system from both a business and public policy perspective and from an operational and information sciences perspective.”

Sec. 870 Standards for orocurement of secure information technology and cyber security systems

added
(a)
added Assessment required— The Secretary of Defense shall conduct an assessment of the application of the Open Trusted Technology Provider Standard to Department of Defense procurements for information technology and cyber security acquisitions and provide a briefing to the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act.
(b)
added Elements— The assessment and briefing required by subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1)
added Assessment of the current Open Trusted Technology Provider Standard to determine what aspects might be adopted by the Department of Defense and where additional development of the standard may be required.
(2)
added Identification of the types or classes of programs where the standard might be applied most effectively, as well as identification of types or classes of programs that should specifically be excluded from consideration.
(3)
added Assessment of the impact on current acquisition regulations or policies of the adoption of the standard.
(4)
added Recommendations the Secretary may have related to the adoption of the standard or improvement in the standard to support Department acquisitions.
(5)
added Any other matters the Secretary may deem appropriate.

Sec. 871 Modifications to the justification and approval process for certain sole-source contracts for small business concerns

added
(a)
added Repeal of simplified justification and approval process— Section 811 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2405; 41 U.S.C. 3304 note) is repealed.
(b)
added Requirements for justification and approval process—
(1)
added Defense procurements— Section 2304(f)(2)(D)(ii) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting “if such procurement is for property or services in an amount less than $20,000,000” before the semicolon at the end.
(2)
added Civilian procurements— Section 3304(e)(4) of title 41, United States Code, is amended—
(A)
added in subparagraph (C), by striking “or” at the end;
(B)
added in subparagraph (D), by striking “or section 8(a) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 637(a)).” and inserting “; or”; and
(C)
added by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:

added “(E) the procurement is for property or services in an amount less than $20,000,000 and is conducted under section 8(a) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 637(a)).”

Sec. 905 Additional requirements for streamlining of Department of Defense management headquarters

(a)
Findings—
(1)
On July 31, 2013, the then Secretary of Defense stated that the Department would “reduc[e] the Department’s major headquarters budgets by 20 percent…Although the 20 percent cut applies to budget dollars, organizations will strive for a goal of 20 percent reductions in government civilians and military personnel.” The then Secretary further stated that “these management reforms…will reduce the Department’s overhead and operating costs by...$10 billion over the next five years.”.
(2)
changed Furthermore, the President’s budget request for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2015 stated that reductions to management headquarters staff and consolidation of duplicative efforts across the Department would result in a savings of $5.3 billion over 5 years—through fiscal year 2019. However, as noted by the Government Accountability Office in a January 2015 report (GAO-15-10), (GAO–15–10), the Department accounted for $5.3 billion as efficiency savings in its budget request, but has not provided specific details on the reductions to management headquarters’ staff it plans to make.
(3)
changed In June 2014, the Government Accountability Office found (in GAO-14-439) GAO–14–439) that the Department did not have an accurate accounting of the resources being devoted to management headquarters to use as a starting point for tracking reductions to such headquarters. In April 2015, the Government Accountability Office reported (in GAO-15-404SP) GAO–15–404SP) that focusing reductions on management headquarters budgets and personnel, which tend to be inconsistently defined and often represent a small portion of the overall headquarters, shields much of the resources identified for potential reduction.
(b)
Sense of congress— It is the sense of Congress that—
(1)
the Secretary of Defense’s commitment in July 2013 to a goal of a 20 percent reduction in headquarters budgets and personnel and a goal of $10 billion in cost savings over five years is worthwhile and should be fully implemented;
(2)
without a clear baseline for management headquarters, it is difficult to demonstrate and track progress achieving actual savings;
(3)
any reduction in personnel should not be implemented as an across-the-board cut, but rather should be strategically designed to retain critical functions, capabilities, and skill sets—including but not limited to depots and the acquisition workforce—and eliminate unnecessary or redundant functions or skill sets that do not benefit or support mission requirements;
(4)
functions should be performed at the lowest appropriate organizational level and those organizations should be empowered and held accountable;
(5)
duplicative functions at higher level organizations should be eliminated; and
(6)
the movement of a function from a management headquarters to a different Department of Defense organization or a lower level organization does not result in an efficiency, since the same budget is still required to perform that function.
(c)
Requirement to implement 20 percent reduction in management headquarters functions— Section 904 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 10 U.S.C. 111 note) is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

“(e) Implementation of management headquarters reduction—The Secretary of Defense shall implement the 20 percent reduction directed by the Secretary in July 2013 in management headquarters budget and personnel by September 30, 2019, for the covered organizations in the National Capital Region (as defined in section 2674(f) of title 10, United States Code). Such reductions shall be strategically designed to retain critical functions, capabilities, and skill sets. Management, functions, programs, or offices shall be moved to the lowest appropriate organizational level. In any report issued pursuant to subsection (d), the Secretary may not claim a cost savings solely based on moving management, functions, programs, or offices from one organization to another.”

(d)
Limitation on working-capital fund positions— Section 904 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 10 U.S.C. 111 note) is further amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

“(f) Limitation on working-capital fund positions—In implementing the 20 percent reduction referred to in subsection (e), the Secretary of Defense may not reduce the number of Department of Defense civilian employees whose salaries are funded from working-capital funds except in accordance with section 2472 of title 10, United States Code.”

(e)
Change in deadline for required plan— Section 904(a) of the such Act is amended by striking “180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act” and inserting “March 31, 2016”.
(f)
Additional elements of plan— Section 904(b) of such Act is amended—
(1)
by redesignating paragraphs (1), (2), and (3) as paragraphs (2), (3), and (4), respectively;
(2)
by inserting before paragraph (2), as so redesignated, the following new paragraph (1):

“(1) An accurate baseline accounting of defense headquarters budgets and personnel as of fiscal year 2014, including what is and is not included as part of management headquarters accounting, and a detailed description of the number of personnel, budgets, functions, capabilities, and skill sets.”

(3)
in paragraph (2), as so redesignated—
(A)
by inserting “actual and” before “planned changes”;
(B)
by striking “staffing” and inserting “personnel”; and
(C)
by inserting before the period at the end the following: “, set forth separately by fiscal year, from fiscal year 2014 through fiscal year 2019”;
(4)
in paragraph (3), as so redesignated—
(A)
by striking “description of the planned changes” and inserting “detailed description of the actual and planned changes”; and
(B)
by inserting before the period at the end the following: “, set forth separately by fiscal year, from fiscal year 2014 through fiscal year 2019”; and
(5)
in paragraph (4), as so redesignated, by striking “fiscal year 2015, and estimated savings to be achieved for each of fiscal years 2015 through 2024” and inserting “fiscal year 2014, and estimated savings to be achieved, along with associated changes or reductions in budget, for each of fiscal years 2014 through 2024”.
(g)
Additional report requirements— Section 904(d) of such Act is amended—
(1)
in paragraph (1), by striking “180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act” and inserting “March 31, 2016”; and
(2)
in paragraph (2)—
(A)
in subparagraph (C), by striking “including” and all that follows through the end of the subparagraph and inserting the following: “and specific detailed information on how the changes, consolidations, or reductions were prioritized and resulted in functions no longer being performed, in the fiscal year covered by such report.”;
(B)
in subparagraph (F), by striking “, including” and all that follows through “management review”; and
(C)
by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:

“(H) A separate description of—

“(i) the management functions, programs, or offices that were eliminated and how each represents a redundant management or oversight function; and

“(ii) the management, functions, programs, or offices that were moved, and how moving each will result in efficiency.”

Sec. 1004 Report on auditable financial statements

added

added Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report ranking all military departments and Defense Agencies in order of how advanced they are in achieving auditable financial statements as required by law. The report should not include information otherwise available in other reports to Congress.

Sec. 1036 Prohibition on the use of funds for the transfer or release of individuals detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba

changed No amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available to the Department any department or agency of Defense the United States Government may be used during the period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act and ending on December 31, 2016, the date that is two years after the date of the enactment of this Act to transfer, release, or assist in the transfer or release to or within the United States, its territories, or possessions of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed or any other detainee who—

(1)
is not a United States citizen or a member of the Armed Forces of the United States; and
(2)
is or was held on or after January 20, 2009, at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, by the Department of Defense.

Sec. 1037 Prohibition on use of funds to construct or modify facilities in the United States to house detainees transferred from United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba

(a)
changed In general— No amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available to the Department any department or agency of Defense the United States Government may be used during the period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act and ending on December 31, 2016, the date that is two years after the date of the enactment of this Act to construct or modify any facility in the United States, its territories, or possessions to house any individual detained at Guantanamo for the purposes of detention or imprisonment in the custody or under the control of the Department of Defense.
(b)
Exception— The prohibition in subsection (a) shall not apply to any modification of facilities at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.
(c)
Individual detained at Guantanamo defined— In this section, the term “individual detained at Guantanamo” has the meaning given that term in section 1039(f)(2).

Sec. 1039 Requirements for certifications relating to the transfer of detainees at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to foreign countries and other foreign entities

(a)
Certification required prior to transfer—
(1)
In general— Except as provided in paragraph (2) and subsection (d), the Secretary of Defense may not use any amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise available to the Department of Defense during the period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act and ending on December 31, 2016, to transfer any individual detained at Guantanamo to the custody or control of the individual’s country of origin, any other foreign country, or any other foreign entity unless the Secretary submits to Congress the certification described in subsection (b) not later than 30 days before the transfer of the individual.
(2)
Exception— Paragraph (1) shall not apply to any action taken by the Secretary to transfer any individual detained at Guantanamo to effectuate an order affecting the disposition of the individual that is issued by a court or competent tribunal of the United States having lawful jurisdiction (which the Secretary shall notify Congress of promptly after issuance).
(b)
Certification— A certification described in this subsection is a written certification made by the Secretary of Defense that—
(1)
the government of the foreign country or the recognized leadership of the foreign entity to which the individual detained at Guantanamo is to be transferred—
(A)
is not a designated state sponsor of terrorism or a designated foreign terrorist organization;
(B)
maintains control over each detention facility in which the individual is to be detained if the individual is to be housed in a detention facility;
(C)
is not, as of the date of the certification, facing a threat that is likely to substantially affect its ability to exercise control over the individual;
(D)
has taken or agreed to take effective actions to ensure that the individual cannot take action to threaten the United States, its citizens, or its allies in the future;
(E)
has taken or agreed to take such actions as the Secretary of Defense determines are necessary to ensure that the individual cannot engage or reengage in any terrorist activity; and
(F)
has agreed to share with the United States any information that—
(i)
is related to the individual or any associates of the individual; and
(ii)
could affect the security of the United States, its citizens, or its allies; and
(2)
changed includes an assessment, assessment conducted by the Director of National Intelligence, in classified or unclassified form, of that such government or entity has the capacity, capacity and willingness, and demonstrated past practices (if applicable) of the foreign country or entity in relation to comply with the Secretary’s certifications.requirements under paragraph (1).
(c)
Prohibition in cases of prior confirmed recidivism—
(1)
Prohibition— Except as provided in paragraph (2) and subsection (d), the Secretary of Defense may not use any amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available to the Department of Defense to transfer any individual detained at Guantanamo to the custody or control of the individual’s country of origin, any other foreign country, or any other foreign entity if there is a confirmed case of any individual who was detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, at any time after September 11, 2001, who was transferred to such foreign country or entity and subsequently engaged in any terrorist activity.
(2)
Exception— Paragraph (1) shall not apply to any action taken by the Secretary to transfer any individual detained at Guantanamo to effectuate an order affecting the disposition of the individual that is issued by a court or competent tribunal of the United States having lawful jurisdiction (which the Secretary shall notify Congress of promptly after issuance).
(d)
National security waiver—
(1)
changed In general— The Except as provided in paragraph (3), the Secretary of Defense may waive the applicability to a detainee transfer of a certification requirement specified in subparagraph (D) or (E) of subsection (b)(1) or the prohibition in subsection (c), if the Secretary certifies the rest of the criteria required by subsection (b) for transfers prohibited by (c) and determines that—
(A)
alternative actions will be taken to address the underlying purpose of the requirement or requirements to be waived;
(B)
in the case of a waiver of subparagraph (D) or (E) of subsection (b)(1), it is not possible to certify that the risks addressed in the paragraph to be waived have been completely eliminated, but the actions to be taken under subparagraph (A) will substantially mitigate such risks with regard to the individual to be transferred;
(C)
in the case of a waiver of subsection (c), the Secretary has considered any confirmed case in which an individual who was transferred to the country subsequently engaged in terrorist activity, and the actions to be taken under subparagraph (A) will substantially mitigate the risk of recidivism with regard to the individual to be transferred; and
(D)
the transfer is in the national security interests of the United States.
(2)
Reports— Whenever the Secretary makes a determination under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress, not later than 30 days before the transfer of the individual concerned, the following:
(A)
A copy of the determination and the waiver concerned.
(B)
A statement of the basis for the determination, including—
(i)
an explanation why the transfer is in the national security interests of the United States;
(ii)
in the case of a waiver of paragraph (D) or (E) of subsection (b)(1), an explanation why it is not possible to certify that the risks addressed in the paragraph to be waived have been completely eliminated; and
(iii)
a classified summary of—
(I)
the individual’s record of cooperation while in the custody of or under the effective control of the Department of Defense; and
(II)
the agreements and mechanisms in place to provide for continuing cooperation.
(C)
A summary of the alternative actions to be taken to address the underlying purpose of, and to mitigate the risks addressed in, the paragraph or subsection to be waived.
(D)
The assessment required by subsection (b)(2).
(3)
added Exception— The Secretary may not exercise the waiver authority under paragraph (1) with respect to any individual detained at Guantanamo, who has ever been determined or assessed to be a detainee referred for prosecution, a detainee approved for detention, or a detainee approved for conditional detention by the Guantanamo Detainee Review Task Force established pursuant to Executive Order number 13492.
(e)
Record of cooperation— In assessing the risk that an individual detained at Guantanamo will engage in terrorist activity or other actions that could affect the security of the United States if released for the purpose of making a certification under subsection (b) or a waiver under subsection (d), the Secretary of Defense may give favorable consideration to any such individual—
(1)
who has substantially cooperated with United States intelligence and law enforcement authorities, pursuant to a pre-trial agreement, while in the custody of or under the effective control of the Department of Defense; and
(2)
for whom agreements and effective mechanisms are in place, to the extent relevant and necessary, to provide for continued cooperation with United States intelligence and law enforcement authorities.
(f)
added Coordination with prohibition on transfer to Yemen— During the period when section 1042 is in effect, the exception in subsection (c)(2) and the waiver authority under subsection (d) shall not apply to the transfer of any individual detained at Guantanamo to Yemen.
(g)
added Coordination with prohibition on transfer to combat zones— During the period when section 1038 is in effect, the exception in subsection (c)(2) and the waiver authority under subsection (d) shall not apply to the transfer of any individual detained at Guantanamo to a combat zone, as such term is defined in subsection (b) of such section.
(h)
renumbered was (7) Definitions— In this section:
(1)
renumbered was (7)(3) The term “appropriate committees of Congress” means—
(A)
renumbered was (7)(3)(2) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Appropriations, the Committee on Foreign Relations, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate; and
(B)
renumbered was (7)(3)(3) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Appropriations, the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives.
(2)
renumbered was (7)(4) The term “individual detained at Guantanamo” means any individual located at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, as of October 1, 2009, who—
(A)
renumbered was (7)(4)(2) is not a citizen of the United States or a member of the Armed Forces of the United States; and
(B)
renumbered was (7)(4)(3) is—
(i)
renumbered was (7)(4)(3)(2) in the custody or under the control of the Department of Defense; or
(ii)
renumbered was (7)(4)(3)(3) otherwise under detention at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.
(3)
renumbered was (7)(5) The term “foreign terrorist organization” means any organization so designated by the Secretary of State under section 219 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1189).
(i)
renumbered was (8) Repeal of superseded requirements and limitations— Section 1035 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 851; 10 U.S.C. 801 note) is repealed.

Sec. 1042 Prohibition on use of funds for transfer or release of individuals detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to Yemen

added

added No amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available to any department or agency of the United States Government may be used during the period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act and ending on the date that is two years after the date of the enactment of this Act to transfer, release, or assist in the transfer or release of any individual detained in the custody or under the control of the Department of Defense at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to the custody or control of the Republic of Yemen or any entity within Yemen.

Sec. 1051 Enhancement of authority of Secretary of Navy to use National Sea-Based Deterrence Fund

(a)
In general— Section 2218a of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
in subsection (c)(1), by striking “national sea-based deterrence vessels” and inserting “a class of twelve national sea-based deterrence vessels, and cross-program coordinated procurement efforts with other nuclear powered vessels”;
(2)
in subsection (d), by inserting before the period at the end the following: “and cross program coordinated procurement efforts with other nuclear powered vessels”;
(3)
by redesignating subsections (f) and (g) as subsections (j) and (l), respectively;
(4)
by inserting after subsection (e) the following new subsections:

“(f) Authority to enter into economic order quantity contracts

“(1) The Secretary of the Navy may use funds deposited in the Fund to enter into contracts known as “economic order quantity contracts” with private shipyards and other commercial or government entities to achieve economic efficiencies based on production economies for major components or subsystems. The authority under this subsection extends to the procurement of parts, components, and systems (including weapon systems) common with and required for other nuclear powered vessels under joint economic order quantity contracts.

“(2) A contract entered into under paragraph (1) shall provide that any obligation of the United States to make a payment under the contract is subject to the availability of appropriations for that purpose, and that total liability to the Government for termination of any contract entered into shall be limited to the total amount of funding obligated at time of termination.

“(g) Authority to begin manufacturing and fabrication efforts prior to ship authorization

“(1) The Secretary of the Navy may use funds deposited into the Fund to enter into contracts for advance construction of national sea-based deterrence vessels to support achieving cost savings through workload management, manufacturing efficiencies, or workforce stability, or to phase fabrication activities within shipyard and manage sub-tier manufacturer capacity.

“(2) A contract entered into under paragraph (1) shall provide that any obligation of the United States to make a payment under the contract is subject to the availability of appropriations for that purpose, and that total liability to the Government for termination of any contract entered into shall be limited to the total amount of funding obligated at time of termination.

“(h) Authority to use incremental funding to enter into contracts for certain items

“(1) The Secretary of the Navy may use funds deposited into the Fund to enter into incrementally funded contracts for advance procurement of high value, long lead time items for nuclear powered vessels to better support construction schedules and achieve cost savings through schedule reductions and properly phased installment payments.

“(2) A contract entered into under paragraph (1) shall provide that any obligation of the United States to make a payment under the contract is subject to the availability of appropriations for that purpose, and that total liability to the Government for termination of any contract entered into shall be limited to the total amount of funding obligated at time of termination.

“(i) Facilities funding—The Secretary of the Navy may use funds deposited into the Fund to provide incentives for investments in critical infrastructure at nuclear capable shipyards and critical sub-tier vendors. Additionally, the Secretary of the Navy may use such funds for certain cancellation costs in the event of significant changes to the Long Range Shipbuilding Strategy for nuclear powered vessels.”

(5)
by inserting after subsection (j), as redesignated by paragraph (3), the following new subsection:

“(k) Report to Congress

“(1) The Secretary of the Navy shall submit to the congressional defense committees, by March 1, 2016, and annually through the year 2025, a report on the Fund. Each such report shall identify separately the amount allocated by ship for programs, projects, and activities for construction (including design of vessels), purchase, alteration, and conversion. At a minimum, each such report shall include—

“(A) information about the activities carried out using funds deposited into the Fund during the fiscal year covered by the report, including the status of class design and construction efforts, including programmatic schedules, procurement schedules, and funding requirements.

“(B) a plan detailing forecasted obligations and expenditures for construction (including design of vessels), purchase, alteration, and conversion of vessels by ship for the fiscal year following the fiscal year during which the report is submitted; and

“(C) the identification of the stable need and design for items, together with a description of any savings associated with the authorities provided in subsections (e) and (f), as documented in cost estimates.

“(2) The Secretary of the Navy shall provide to the congressional defense committees notice in writing at least 30 days before executing any significant deviation to the annual plan required under paragraph (1)(B).”

(6)
changed in subsection (m), (l), as so redesignated, by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

“(3) The term “advance construction” means shipyard manufacturing and fabrication activities (including sub-tier manufacturing of major components or subsystems).”

(b)
Availability of certain unobligated funds for transfer— Section 1022(b)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3487) is amended by striking “for the Navy for the Ohio Replacement Program” and inserting “to the Department of Defense”.

Sec. 1052 Department of Defense excess property program

(a)
Website required— Section 2576a of title 10, United States Code is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

“(e) Publicly accessible website

“(1) The Secretary of Defense, acting through the Director of the Defense Logistics Agency, shall create and maintain a publicly available Internet website that provides information on the property transferred under this section and the recipients of such property.

“(2) The contents of the Internet website required under paragraph (1) shall include all unclassified information pertaining to the request, transfer, denial, and repossession of controlled property under this section, including—

“(A) a current inventory of all controlled property transferred to law enforcement agencies under this section, listed by recipient, that includes the recipient’s location, by county and State, and the year of the transfer;

“(B) all outstanding requests for transfers of controlled property under this section; and

“(C) information provided by the law enforcement agencies requesting transfers referred to in subparagraph (B).

“(3) The Secretary may not authorize the transfer of any property under this section to a Federal or State agency to which property has been transferred previously unless the agency submits to the Secretary for publication on the Internet website required under paragraph (1) each of the following:

“(A) A description of any controlled property transferred to the agency under this section, which shall be submitted by not later than 30 days after the date on which the agency takes possession of the property.

“(B) An annual report on the use of any controlled property so transferred to the agency, including a description of the context in which the property was used.

“(4) The Secretary may not authorize the transfer of any property under this section to a Federal or State agency until 30 days after a request for the transfer has been published on the Internet website required under paragraph (1).”

(b)
Eligibility requirements— Subsection (b) of such section is amended—
(1)
in paragraph (3), by striking “and” at the end;
(2)
in paragraph (4), by striking the period and inserting “; and”; and
(3)
by adding at the end the following new paragraphs:

“(5) in the case of property that is controlled property, the recipient submits to the Secretary written notice of the intent of the recipient to apply for the controlled property, including authorization of such application by the entity charged with legal oversight of the recipient agency; and

“(6) the recipient agency is located in a State with a State coordinator for the program under this section who—

“(A) has law enforcement experience and is employed by a law enforcement agency or entity with oversight of law enforcement functions;

“(B) serves as the custodian of controlled property transferred to recipients located in that State; and

“(C) has the authority to non-concur with proposed uses of such property.”

(c)
Definition of controlled property— Such section is further amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

changed “(f) Controlled property—In this section, the term “controlled property” means any item assigned a demilitarization code of B, C, D, E, F, G, or Q under Department of Defense Manual 4160.21-M, 4160.21–M, “Defense Materiel Disposition Manual”, or any successor document.”

(d)
Examination of training requirements— The Director of the Defense Logistics Agency shall enter into an agreement with a federally funded research and development center to conduct an assessment of the Department of Defense excess property program under section 2576a of title 10, United States Code, as amended by this section. Such assessment shall include an evaluation of the policies and controls governing the determination of the suitability of recipients of controlled property transferred under the program, including specific recommendations relating to the training that law enforcement agencies that receive such property should receive, at no cost to the Department of Defense, to ensure end-user proficiency in the use, maintenance, and sustainment of such property.
(e)
One-year mandatory use policy assessment— The Director of the Defense Logistics Agency shall enter into an agreement with a federally funded research and development center for the conduct of an assessment of the Department of Defense excess property program under section 2576a of title 10, United States Code, to determine if the requirement that all controlled property transferred under the program be used within one year of being transferred is achieving its intended effect. Such assessment shall also include recommendations on process improvement, including legislative proposals.
(f)
Comptroller General assessment— Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall conduct an assessment of the Department of Defense excess property program under section 2576a of title 10, United States Code. Such assessment shall include—
(1)
an evaluation of the transfer of controlled property under the program, including the manner in which the property was used in community law enforcement and the effectiveness of the Internet website required under subsection (e) of section 2576a, as added by subsection (a), in providing transparency to the public; and
(2)
a determination of whether the transfer of property under the program enhances the ability of law enforcement agencies to carry out counter-drug and counter-terrorism activities in accordance with the purposes of the program as set forth in section 2576a of title 10, United States Code.

Sec. 1053 Limitation on transfer of certain AH–64 apache helicopters from Army National Guard to regular Army and related personnel levels

changed Section 1712(b) 1712 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291) is amended by striking “before March 31, 2016” and inserting “before the later of March 31, 2016, or the end of the 60-day period beginning on the date on which the congressional defense committees receive the report of the Commission under section 1703(c)”.amended—

(1)
added in subsection (b), by striking “March 31, 2016” and inserting “June 30, 2016”; and
(2)
added in subsection (e), by striking “March 31, 2016” and inserting “June 30, 2016” both places it appears.

Sec. 1054 Space available travel for environmental morale leave by certain spouses and children of deployed members of the Armed Forces

changed The Secretary of Defense shall revise the Air Transportation Eligibility Regulation, DOD 4515.13-R, 4515.13–R, to authorize space-available travel for environmental morale leave by unaccompanied spouses and dependent children of members of the Armed Forces who are deployed for at least 30 consecutive days under priority category IV. The Secretary shall also update any other instructions, directives, or internal policies necessary to facilitate such revision.

Sec. 1056 Prohibition on use of funds for retirement of helicopter sea combat squadron 84 and 85 aircraft

(a)
Prohibitions— Except as provided by subsection (b), none of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2016 for the Navy may be obligated or expended to—
(1)
changed retire, prepare to retire, transfer, or place in storage any Helicopter Sea Combat Squadron 84 (HSC 84) (HSC–84) or Helicopter Sea Combat Squadron 85 (HSC-85) (HSC–85) aircraft; or
(2)
changed make any changes to manning levels with respect to any HSC-84 HSC–84 or HSC-85 HSC–85 aircraft squadron.
(b)
Waiver— The Secretary of the Navy may waive subsection (a), if the Secretary certifies to the congressional defense committees that the Secretary has—
(1)
changed conducted a cost-benefit analysis identifying savings to Department of the Navy regarding decommissioning or deactivation of an HSC-84 HSC–84 or HSC-85 HSC–85 squadron;
(2)
changed identified a replacement capability to meet all operational requirements, including special operational-peculiar requirements of the combatant commands, currently being met by the HSC-84 HSC–84 or HSC-85 HSC–85 squadrons and aircraft to be retired, transferred, or placed in storage; and
(3)
deployed such capability.

Sec. 1060 Prohibition on use of funds for realignment of forces at or closure of United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba

added

added No amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available for the Department of Defense may be used, during the period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act and ending on December 31, 2016, to—

(1)
added close or abandon United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba;
(2)
added relinquish control of Guantanamo Bay to the Republic of Cuba; or
(3)
added modify the Treaty Between the United States of America and Cuba signed at Washington, D.C. on May 29, 1934, including a modification of the boundaries of Guantanamo Bay, unless ratified with the advice and consent of the Senate.

Sec. 1060a Civilian Aviation Asset Military Partnership Pilot Program

added
(a)
added Participation— The Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration, may participate in a Civilian Aviation Asset Military Partnership Pilot Program (in this section referred to as the “Program”) in accordance with this section.
(b)
added Grant authority— Subject to the availability of appropriations to carry out this section, the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration, may make a grant under the Program, on a competitive basis, to an eligible airport to assist a project—
(1)
added to improve aviation infrastructure; or
(2)
added to repair, replace, or otherwise improve an eligible tower facility at that airport.
(c)
added Number— Not more than three eligible airports may receive a grant under the Program for a fiscal year.
(d)
added Amount— The amount provided to each eligible airport that receives a grant under the Program may not exceed $2,500,000.
(e)
added Eligibility— To be eligible for a grant under the Program, an eligible airport shall submit to the Secretary of Defense an application at such time, in such form, and containing such information as the Secretary, in coordination with the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration, determines is appropriate. An application shall include, at a minimum, a description of—
(1)
added the proposed project with respect to which a grant is requested, including estimated costs;
(2)
added the need for the project at the eligible airport, including how the project will assist both civil aircraft and military aircraft; and
(3)
added the non-Federal funding available for the project.
(f)
added Selection and terms— The Secretary of Defense and the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration shall jointly—
(1)
added select eligible airports to receive grants under the Program; and
(2)
added establish the terms of each grant made under the Program.
(g)
added Funding—
(1)
added Federal share— The Federal share of the cost of a project assisted with a grant under the Program may not exceed 70 percent. Prioritization shall be given to projects with the lowest Federal share.
(2)
added Coordination— With respect to the Federal share of the cost of a project assisted with a grant under the Program, 50 percent of that Federal share shall be paid by the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration and 50 percent shall be paid by the Secretary of Defense.
(h)
added Termination— The Program shall terminate at the end of the third fiscal year in which a grant is made under the Program.
(i)
added Definitions— In this section, the following definitions apply:
(1)
added Eligible airport— The term “eligible airport” means an airport at which—
(A)
added military aircraft conducts operations; and
(B)
added civil aircraft operations are conducted.
(2)
added Eligible tower facility— The term “eligible tower facility” means a tower facility that—
(A)
added is located at an eligible airport;
(B)
added is greater than 30 years of age; and
(C)
added has demonstrated failings.
(3)
added Aviation infrastructure— The term “aviation infrastructure” means any activity defined under the term “airport development” in section 47102 of title 49, United States Code.

Sec. 1060b Sale or donation of excess personal property for border security activities

added

added Section 2576a of title 10, United States Code, is amended—

(1)
added in subsection (a)—
(A)
added in paragraph (1)(A), by striking “counter-drug and counter-terrorism activities” and inserting “counterdrug, counterterrorism, and border security activities”; and
(B)
added in paragraph (2), by striking “the Attorney General and the Director of National Drug Control Policy” and inserting “the Attorney General, the Director of National Drug Control Policy, and the Secretary of Homeland Security, as appropriate.”; and
(2)
added in subsection (d), by striking “counter-drug and counter-terrorism activities” and inserting “counterdrug, counterterrorism, or border security activities”.

Sec. 1060c Limitation on use of funds to deactivate 440th airlift wing

added

added None of the funds authorized to be appropriated in this Act or otherwise made available for the Department of Defense may be used to deactivate the 440th airlift wing, or to move the personnel or aircraft of the 440th airlift wing, or to otherwise degrade the capabilities of the 440th airlift wing until the Secretary of Defense certifies that the deactivation of the 440th airlift wing will not affect the military readiness for the airborne and special operations units stationed at Fort Bragg, North Carolina.

Sec. 1063 Report on implementation of the geographically distributed force laydown in the area of responsibility of United States Pacific Command

(a)
Report required— Not later than March 1, 2016, the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Commander of the United States Pacific Command, shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on Department of Defense plans for implementing the geographically distributed force laydown in the area of responsibility of United States Pacific Command.
(b)
Matters to be included— The report required under subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1)
A description of the force laydown.
(2)
A discussion of how the force laydown affects the operational and contingency plans in the area of responsibility of United States Pacific Command, including a discussion on how timeliness, availability of forces, and risk in meeting the military objectives contained in those plans are affected.
(3)
changed A discussion of the specific support asset requirements derived from the force laydown, including logistical sustainment, pre-positioned stocks, sea and air lift, lift and, command and control, and intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance.control.
(4)
A discussion of the specific infrastructure and military construction requirements derived from the force laydown.
(5)
A discussion on how Department of Defense plans to meet the requirements identified in paragraphs (3) and (4), including the ability of United States Transportation Command, the United States Combat Logistics Force, and the Armed Forces to meet those requirements.
(6)
Any other matters the Secretary of Defense determines to be appropriate.
(c)
Form— The report required under subsection (a) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.

Sec. 1067 Report on the status of detection, identification, and disablement capabilities related to remotely piloted aircraft

added

added Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report addressing the suitability of existing capabilities to detect, identify, and disable remotely piloted aircraft operating within special use and restricted airspace. The report shall include the following:

(1)
added An assessment of the degree to which existing capabilities to detect, identify, and potentially disable remotely piloted aircraft within special use and restricted airspace are able to be deployed and combat prevailing threats.
(2)
added An assessment of existing gaps in capabilities related to the detection, identification, or disablement of remotely piloted aircraft within special use and restricted airspace.
(3)
added A plan that outlines the extent to which existing research and development programs within the Department of Defense can be leveraged to fill identified capability gaps and/or the need to establish new programs to address such gaps as are identified pursuant to paragraph (2).

Sec. 1068 Report on options to accelerate the training of remotely piloted aircraft pilots

added

added Not later than February 1, 2016, the Secretary of the Air Force shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report addressing the immediate and critical training and operational needs of the remotely piloted aircraft community. The report shall include the following:

(1)
added An assessment of the viability of using non-rated, civilian, contractor, or enlisted pilots to execute remotely piloted aircraft missions.
(2)
added An assessment of the availability and existing utilization of special use airspace available for remotely piloted aircraft training and a plan for accessing additional special use airspace in order to meet anticipated training requirements for remotely piloted aircraft.
(3)
added A comprehensive training plan aimed at increasing the throughput of undergraduate remotely piloted aircraft training without sacrificing quality and standards.
(4)
added Establishment of an optimum ratio for the mix of training airframes to operational airframes in the remotely piloted aircraft inventory necessary to achieve manning requirements for pilots and sensor operators and, to the extent practicable, a plan for fielding additional remotely piloted aircraft airframes at the formal training units in the active, National Guard, and reserve components in accordance with optimum ratios for MQ–9 and Global Hawk remotely piloted aircraft.
(5)
added Establishment of optimum and minimum crew ratios to combat air patrols taking into account all tasks remotely piloted aircraft units execute and, to the extent practicable, a plan for conducting missions in accordance with optimum ratios.
(6)
added Identification of any resource, legislative, or departmental policy challenges impeding the corrective action needed to reach a sustainable remotely piloted aircraft operations tempo.
(7)
added An assessment, to the extent practicable, of the direct and indirect impacts that the integration of remotely piloted aircraft into the national airspace system has on the ability to generate remotely piloted aircraft crews.
(8)
added Any other matters the Secretary determines appropriate.

Sec. 1069 Expedited meetings of the National Commission on the Future of the Army

added

added Section 1702(f) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3665) is amended by adding at the end the following new sentence: “Section 10 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App. I) shall not apply to a meeting of the Commission unless the meeting is attended by five or more members of the Commission.”.

Sec. 1072 Repeal or revision of reporting requirements relating to readiness

(a)
Biannual reports on allocation of funds within operation and maintenance budget subactivities—
(1)
In general— Chapter 9 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking section 228.
(2)
Clerical amendment— The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by striking the item relating to section 228.
(b)
Annual report on naval petroleum reserves— Section 7431 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking subsection (c).
(c)
Annual report on Army national guard combat readiness—
(1)
In general— Chapter 1013 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking section 10542.
(2)
Clerical amendment— The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by striking the item relating to section 10542.
(d)
Insider threat detection budget submission— Section 922 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 10 U.S.C. 2224 note) is amended by striking subsection (f).
(e)
Price trend analysis— Section 892 of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 10 U.S.C. 2306a) is repealed.
(f)
Report on authority for airlift transportation at Department of Defense rates for non-Department of Defense Federal cargoes— Section 351 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2262) is amended by striking subsection (b).
(g)
Biennial report on procurement of military working dogs— Section 358 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended—
(1)
by striking subsection (c); and
(2)
by redesignating subsection (d) as subsection (c).
(h)
Report on foreign language proficiency— Section 958 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 297) is repealed.
(i)
changed Report on Arsenal Support Program Initiative— Section 343 of the Floyd D. Spence National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2001 (Public (as enacted into law by Public Law 106–398; 10 U.S.C. 4551 note) is amended by striking subsection (g).
(j)
changed GAO review of contractor-operated civil engineering supply stores program— Section 345 of the Strom Thurmond National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1999 (Public Law 105–26; 105–261; 112 Stat. 1978) is amended—
(1)
by striking subsection (d); and
(2)
by redesignating subsection (e) as subsection (d).
(k)
Quarterly report on end strength— Section 8104 of the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2014 (Division C of Public Law 113–76) is repealed.
(l)
Quarterly report on end strength— Section 8105 of the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2013 (Division C of Public Law 113–6) is repealed.
(m)
Report on David L. Boren National Security Education Act of 1991— Section 806 of the David L. Boren National Security Education Act of 1991 (title VIII of Public Law 102–183; 50 U.S.C. 1906) is repealed.

Sec. 1074 Repeal or revision of reporting requirements related to nuclear, proliferation, and related matters

(a)
Report on Nuclear Weapons Council— Section 179 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking subsection (g).
(b)
Report on Proliferation Security Initiative— Section 1821(b) of the Implementing Recommendations of the 9/11 Commission Act of 2007 (50 U.S.C. 2911) is amended—
(1)
by striking “(1) In general.—”; and
(2)
by striking paragraphs (2) and (3).
(c)
Briefings on dialogue between United States and Russian Federation on nuclear arms— Section 1282 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 22 U.S.C. 5951 note) is amended—
(1)
by striking subsection (a); and
(2)
by redesignating subsections (b) and (c) as subsections (a) and (b), respectively.
(d)
changed Implementation plan for whole-of- government vision prescribed in the national security strategy— Section 1072 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 50 U.S.C. 3043 note) is amended—
(1)
by striking subsection (b); and
(2)
by redesignating subsection (c) as subsection (b).

Sec. 1076 Repeal or revision of reporting requirements related to acquisition

(a)
changed Report on foreign purchases— Section 8305 of title 41, United States Code, is repealed.repealed, and the table of sections at the beginning of chapter 83 of such title is amended by striking the item relating to that section.
(b)
Report on cost assessment activities— Section 2334 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
by striking subsection (f); and
(2)
by redesignating subsection (g) as subsection (f).
(c)
Report on performance assessments and root cause analyses— Section 2438 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking subsection (f).

Sec. 1081 Technical and clerical amendments

(a)
Amendments To title 10, United States Code— Title 10, United States Code, is amended as follows:
(1)
The heading of section 153(a)(5) is amended to read as follows: “Joint Force Development Activities.—”.
(2)
changed The table of sections at the beginning of subchapter I of chapter 21 is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 429 the following new item:
(3)
Section 2679, as transferred, redesignated, and amended by section 351 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3346), is amended in subsection (a)(1) by striking “with” before “, on a sole source”.
(4)
Section 2687a(d)(2) is amended by inserting “fair market” before “value”.
(5)
Section 2926, as added and amended by section 901(g) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3464), is amended in subsections (a), (b), (c), and (d) by striking “for Installations, Energy,” each place it appears and inserting “for Energy, Installations,”.
(6)
changed Section 9314a(b) Subsection (d)(4) of section 9314a, as redesignated by section 591(a) of this Act, is amended by striking “only so long at” and inserting “only so long as”.
(b)
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015— Effective as of December 19, 2014, and as if included therein as enacted, the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291) is amended as follows:
(1)
Section 351(b)(1) (128 Stat. 3346) is amended by striking the period at the end of subparagraph (C) and inserting “; and”.
(2)
Section 901(g)(1)(F) (128 Stat. 3465) is amended by inserting “paragraph (4) of” before “subsection (b) of section 2926”.
(3)
Section 1072(a)(2) (128 Stat. 3516) is amended by inserting “in the table of sections” before “at the beginning of”.
(4)
Section 1079(a)(1) (128 Stat. 3521) is amended by striking “section 12102 of title 42, United States Code” and inserting “section 3 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 12102)”.
(5)
Section 1104(b)(2) (128 Stat. 3526) is amended by striking “paragraph (2)” and inserting “paragraph (1)(A)”.
(6)
Section 1208 (128 Stat. 3541) is amended by striking “of Fiscal Year” each place it appears and inserting “for Fiscal Year”.
(7)
Section 2803(a) (128 Stat. 3696) is amended in paragraph (2) of the subsection (f) being added by the amendment to be made by that section by inserting “section” before “1105 of title 31”.
(8)
Section 2832(c)(3) (128 Stat. 3704) is amended by striking “United State Code” and inserting “United States Code”.
(9)
Section 3006(i) (128 Stat. 3744) is amended—
(A)
in paragraph (1), by striking “Section 8” and inserting “Section 18”; and
(B)
in paragraph (2), by striking “S1/2 N1/2 SE” and inserting “S1/2 N1/2 SE1/4”.
(10)
Section 3023 (128 Stat. 3762) is amended—
(A)
by redesignating paragraphs (1), (2), and (3) as paragraphs (2), (3), and (4), respectively;
(B)
in paragraph (2), as so redesignated, in the matter being added by subparagraph (C)—
(i)
by inserting “has been waived,” after “expired,”; and
(ii)
by striking “the permit or lease required” and inserting “the allotment management plan, permit, or lease required”;
(C)
in paragraph (4), as so redesignated, in the matter being added as subsection (h)(1)—
(i)
by striking “a grazing permit or lease” in the matter preceding subparagraph (A) of such subsection and inserting “an allotment management plan or grazing permit or lease”;
(ii)
in subparagraph (A) of such subsection, by striking “permit or lease” and inserting “allotment management plan, permit, or lease”; and
(iii)
in subparagraph (B)(i) of such subsection, by striking “lease or permit” and inserting “allotment management plan, permit, or lease”; and
(D)
by inserting before paragraph (2), as so redesignated, the following new paragraph:

“(1) in subsection (a), by striking “by the Secretary of Agriculture, with respect to lands within National Forests in the sixteen contiguous Western States” and inserting “on National Forest System land by the Secretary of Agriculture (notwithstanding, for purposes of this section, the definition in section 103(p))”;”

(11)
Section 3024 (16 U.S.C. 6214; 128 Stat. 3764) is amended—
(A)
in subsection (e), by inserting before the period at the end the following: “report using National Median Price values”; and
(B)
in subsection (f)(3)—
(i)
in subparagraph (A), by striking “by regulation establish criteria pursuant to which the annual fee determined in accordance with this section may be suspended or reduced temporarily” and inserting “provide for suspension or reduction temporarily of the annual fee determined in accordance with this section”; and
(ii)
in subparagraph (B), by striking “by regulation”.
(c)
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009— Section 943(d)(1) of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4578) by striking the second period at the end of the first sentence.
(d)
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005— Section 1208(f)(2) of the Ronald W. Reagan National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005 (Public Law 108–375; 118 Stat. 2086), as amended by section 1202(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 363) and section 1202(c) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat 2512), is further amended—
(1)
by redesignating the paragraphs (1) through (8) added by section 1202(c) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat 2512) as subparagraphs (A) through (H), respectively; and
(2)
by moving the margins of such subparagraphs, as so redesignated, two ems to the right.
(e)
Coordination with other amendments made by this act— For purposes of applying amendments made by provisions of this Act other than this section, the amendments made by this section shall be treated as having been enacted immediately before any such amendments by other provisions of this Act.

Sec. 1087 Reestablishment of Commission to Assess the Threat to the United States from Electromagnetic Pulse Attack

(a)
changed Reestablishment— The commission established pursuant to title XIV of the Floyd D. Spence National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2001 (as enacted into law by Public Law 106–398; 114 Stat. 1654A-345), 1654A–345), and reestablished pursuant to section 1052 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 (Public Law 109–163; 50 U.S.C. 2301 note), known as the Commission to Assess the Threat to the United States from Electromagnetic Pulse Attack, is hereby reestablished.
(b)
Membership— The Commission as reestablished shall have the same membership as the Commission had as of the date of the submission of the report of the Commission pursuant to section 1403(a) of such Act, as amended by such section 1052. Service on the Commission is voluntary, and Commissioners may elect to terminate their service on the Commission. If a Commissioner is unwilling or unable to serve on the Commission, the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the chairmen and ranking members of the Committees on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the Senate, shall appoint a new member to fill that vacancy.
(c)
changed Commission charter defined— In this section, the term “Commission charter” means title XIV of the Floyd D. Spence National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2001 (as enacted into law by Public Law 106–398; 114 Stat. 1654A-345 1654A–345 et seq.), as amended by section 1052 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 (Public Law 109–163; 50 U.S.C. 2301 note) and section 1073 of the John Warner National Defense Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109–364; 120 Stat. 2403).
(d)
changed Expanded purpose— Section 1401(b) of the Commission charter (114 Stat. 1654A-345) 1654A–345) is amended by inserting before the period at the end the following: “, from non-nuclear EMP weapons, from natural EMP generated by geomagnetic storms, and from proposed uses in the military doctrines of potential adversaries of using EMP weapons in combination with other attack vectors.”.
(e)
changed Duties of commission— Section 1402 of the Commission charter (114 Stat. 1654A-346) 1654A–346) is amended to read as follows:

“1402. Duties of commission

“The Commission shall assess the following:

“(1) The vulnerability of electric-dependent military systems in the United States to a manmade or natural EMP event, giving special attention to the progress made by the Department of Defense, other Government departments and agencies of the United States, and entities of the private sector in taking steps to protect such systems from such an event.

“(2) The evolving current and future threat from state and non-state actors of a manmade EMP attack employing nuclear or non-nuclear weapons.

“(3) New technologies, operational procedures, and contingency planning that can protect electronics and electric-dependent military systems from a manmade or natural EMP event.

“(4) Among the States, if State grids are islanded for protection against manmade or natural EMP, which States should receive highest priority for protecting critical defense assets and for maximizing survival of the national population.”

(f)
changed Report— Section 1403 of the Commission charter (114 Stat. 1654A-345) 1654A–345) is amended by striking “September 30, 2007” and inserting “June 30, 2017”.
(g)
changed Termination— Section 1049 of the Commission charter (114 Stat. 1654A-348) 1654A–348) is amended by inserting before the period at the end the following: “, as amended by the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016”.

Sec. 1089 Mine countermeasures master plan

(a)
Plan required—
(1)
In general— At the same time the budget is submitted to Congress for each of fiscal years 2018 through 2023, the Secretary of the Navy shall submit to the congressional defense committees a mine countermeasures (hereinafter in this section referred to as “MCM”) master plan. Each such plan shall include each of the following:
(A)
An evaluation of the capabilities, capacities, requirements, and readiness levels of the defensive capabilities of the Navy for MCM, including an assessment of the dedicated MCM force as well as the capabilities of ships, aircraft, and submarines that are not yet dedicated to MCM but could be modified to carry mine warfare capabilities.
(B)
An evaluation of the ability of units to properly command and control air and surface MCM forces from fleet level down through to element level and to provide necessary operational and tactical control and awareness of such forces to facilitate mission accomplishment and defense.
(C)
An assessment of technologies having promising potential for use for improving mine warfare and of programs for transitioning such technologies from the testing and evaluation phases to procurement.
(D)
A fiscal plan to support the master plan through the Future Years Defense Plan.
(E)
A plan for inspection of each asset with mine warfare responsibilities, requirements, and capabilities, which shall include proposed methods to ensure the material readiness of each asset and the training level of the force, a general summary, and readiness trends.
(2)
Form of submission— Each plan submitted under paragraph (1)(E) shall be in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex addressing the capability and capacity to meet operational plans and contingency requirements.
(b)
changed Report to Congress— Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Navy shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report containing the recommendations of the Secretary regarding the force structure and ensuring the operational effectiveness of the surface mine warfare force through 2025 based on current capabilities and capacity, replacement schedules, and service life extensions or retirement schedules. Such report shall include an assessment of the MCM vessels, including the decommissioned MCM-1 MCM–1 and MCM-2 MCM–2 ships and the potential of such ships for reserve operating status.

Sec. 1090 Congressional notification and briefing requirement on ordered evacuations of United States embassies and consulates involving the use of United States Armed Forces

(a)
added Sense of Congress— It is the sense of Congress that in order to ensure the safety and security of members of the Armed Forces of the United States overseas—
(1)
added members of the Armed Forces of the United States should have the proper authorized resources at all times to protect themselves while participating in an ordered evacuation of a United States embassy or consulate abroad; and
(2)
added no restrictions should be placed on the ability of members of the Armed Forces of the United States to maintain on their person and use authorized weapons and equipment for personal and evacuee security at all times and to take authorized protective actions subject to applicable law and orders from the chain of command, during an ordered evacuation of a United States embassy or consulate.
(b)
renumbered was (2) Notification requirement— The Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of State shall provide joint notification to the appropriate congressional committees as soon as practicable after the initiation of an ordered evacuation of a United States embassy or consulate involving the use of United States Armed Forces.
(c)
renumbered was (3) Briefing requirement— The Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of State shall provide a joint briefing to the appropriate congressional committees not later than 15 days after the initiation of an ordered evacuation of a United States embassy or consulate involving the use of the United States Armed Forces.
(d)
renumbered was (4) Elements— Each notification under subsection (a) and briefing under subsection (b) shall include the following:
(1)
renumbered was (4)(3) An overview of the ordered evacuation.
(2)
renumbered was (4)(4) The status of all personnel assigned to the embassy or consulate, including United States citizens and locally-employed staff.
(3)
renumbered was (4)(5) The status of the embassy or consulate, including whether the embassy or consulate was secured and all classified or otherwise sensitive material destroyed upon departure.
(4)
renumbered was (4)(6) An overview of the manner and location from which the Department of State will continue to conduct the duties and responsibilities of the embassy or consulate.
(5)
renumbered was (4)(7) A description of the disposition of United States Government property and whether such property was destroyed, disabled, abandoned or otherwise left behind, or remains in the possession of United States Government personnel.
(6)
renumbered was (4)(8) Any other matters the Secretary of Defense and Secretary of State determine to be relevant.
(e)
renumbered was (5) Appropriate congressional committees defined— In this section, the term “appropriate congressional committees” means—
(1)
renumbered was (5)(3) the congressional defense committees; and
(2)
renumbered was (5)(4) the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives.

Sec. 1092 Interagency Hostage Recovery Coordinator

added
(a)
added Interagency Hostage Recovery Coordinator—
(1)
added In general— Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the President shall designate an existing Federal officer to coordinate efforts to secure the release of United States persons who are hostages of hostile groups or state sponsors of terrorism. For purposes of carrying out the duties described in paragraph (2), such officer shall have the title of “Interagency Hostage Recovery Coordinator”.
(2)
added Duties— The Coordinator shall have the following duties:
(A)
added Coordinate and direct all activities of the Federal Government relating to each hostage situation described in paragraph (1) to ensure efforts to secure the release of all hostages in the hostage situation are properly resourced and correct lines of authority are established and maintained.
(B)
added Establish and direct a fusion cell consisting of appropriate personnel of the Federal Government with purview over each hostage situation described in paragraph (1).
(C)
added Develop a strategy to keep family members of hostages described in paragraph (1) informed of the status of such hostages and inform such family members of updates, procedures, and policies that do not compromise the national security of the United States.
(b)
added Limitation on authority— The authority of the Interagency Hostage Recovery Coordinator shall be limited to countries that are state sponsors of terrorism and areas designated as hazardous for which hostile fire and imminent danger pay are payable to members of the Armed Forces for duty performed in such area.
(c)
added Quarterly report—
(1)
added In general— On a quarterly basis, the Coordinator shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees and the members of Congress described in paragraph (2) a report that includes a summary of each hostage situation described in subsection (a)(1) and efforts to secure the release of all hostages in such hostage situation.
(2)
added Members of Congress described— The members of Congress described in this subparagraph are, with respect to a United States person hostage covered by a report under paragraph (1), the Senators representing the State, and the Member, Delegate, or Resident Commissioner of the House of Representatives representing the district, where a hostage described in subjection (a)(1) resides.
(3)
added Form of report— Each report under this subsection may be submitted in classified or unclassified form.
(d)
added Rule of construction— Nothing in this section shall be construed as authorizing the Federal Government to negotiate with a state sponsor of terrorism or an organization that the Secretary of State has designated as a foreign terrorist organization pursuant to section 219 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1189).
(e)
added Definitions— In this section:
(1)
added Coordinator— The term Coordinator means the Interagency Hostage Recovery Coordinator designated under subsection (a).
(2)
added Hostile group— The term hostile group means—
(A)
added a group that is designated as a foreign terrorist organization under section 219(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1189(a));
(B)
added a group that is engaged in armed conflict with the United States; or
(C)
added any other group that the President determines to be a hostile group for purposes of this paragraph.
(3)
added State sponsor of terrorism— The term state sponsor of terrorism—
(A)
added means a country the government of which the Secretary of State has determined, for purposes of section 6(j) of the Export Administration Act of 1979, section 620A of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, section 40 of the Arms Export Control Act, or any other provision of law, to be a government that has repeatedly provided support for acts of international terrorism; and
(B)
added includes North Korea.

Sec. 1093 Situations involving bombings of places of public use, Government facilities, public transportation systems, and infrastructure facilities

added
(a)
added In general— Chapter 18 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

added “383. Situations involving bombings of places of public use, Government facilities, public transportation systems, and infrastructure facilities

added “(a) In general—The direct participation of members of the Armed Forces assigned to explosive ordnance disposal (EOD) units providing support to civilian law enforcement agencies does not involve search, seizure, arrest or other similar activity. Upon the request of the Attorney General, the Secretary of Defense may provide such assistance in Department of Justice activities related to the enforcement of section 2332f of title 18 during situations involving bombings of places of public use, Government facilities, public transportation systems, and infrastructure facilities.

added “(b) Mutual aid agreement—The Secretary of Defense, through mutual aid agreement with the Attorney General shall, in the interest of public safety, waive reimbursement on military EOD support of Department of Justice activities related to the enforcement of section 2332f of title 18 for situations involving bombings of places of public use, Government facilities, public transportation systems, and infrastructure facilities.

added “(c) Rendering-safe support—Military EOD units providing rendering-safe support to Department of Justice activities relating to the enforcement of section 175, 229, or 2332a of title 18 emergency situations involving weapons of mass destruction shall be consistent with the provisions of section 382 of this title.

added “(d) Definitions—In this section:

added “(1) The term “explosive ordnance”—

added “(A) means—

added “(i) bombs and warheads;

added “(ii) guided and ballistic missiles;

added “(iii) artillery, mortar, rocket, and small arms ammunition;

added “(iv) all mines, torpedoes, and depth charges;

added “(v) grenades demolition charges;

added “(vi) pyrotechnics;

added “(vii) clusters and dispensers;

added “(viii) cartridge- and propellant– actuated devices;

added “(ix) electroexplosives devices;

added “(x) clandestine and improvised explosive devices (IEDs); and

added “(xi) all similar or related items or components explosive in nature; and

added “(B) includes all munitions containing explosives, propellants, nuclear fission or fusion materials, and biological and chemical agents.

added “(2) The term “explosive ordnance disposal procedures” means those particular courses or modes of action for access to, recovery, rendering–safe, and final disposal of explosive ordnance or any hazardous material associated with an EOD incident, including—

added “(A) access procedures;

added “(B) recovery procedures;

added “(C) render-safe procedures; and

added “(D) final disposal procedures.”

(b)
added Clerical amendment— The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by adding at the end the following new item:

Sec. 1094 Sense of Congress regarding technical correction

added

added It is the sense of Congress that a technical correction to the Carl Levin and Howard P. “Buck” McKeon National Defense Authorization Act of Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3881) should be enacted in order to expeditiously carry out the intent of such section 3095.

Sec. 1095 Observance of Veterans Day

added
(a)
added Two minutes of silence— Chapter 1 of title 36, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

added “145. Veterans Day

added “The President shall issue each year a proclamation calling on the people of the United States to observe two minutes of silence on Veterans Day in honor of the service and sacrifice of veterans throughout the history of the Nation, beginning at—

added “(1) 3:11 pm Atlantic standard time;

added “(2) 2:11 pm eastern standard time;

added “(3) 1:11 pm central standard time;

added “(4) 12:11 pm mountain standard time;

added “(5) 11:11 am Pacific standard time;

added “(6) 10:11 am Alaska standard time; and

added “(7) 9:11 am Hawaii-Aleutian standard time.”

(b)
added Clerical amendment— The table of sections for chapter 1 of title 36, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new item:

Sec. 1096 Business case analysis of decision to maintain C130J aircraft at Keesler Air Force Base, Mississippi

added

added Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Air Force shall conduct a business case analysis of the decision to maintain 10 C-130J aircraft at Keesler Air Force Base, Mississippi. Such analysis shall include consideration of—

(1)
added any efficiencies or cost savings that would be achieved by transferring such aircraft to Little Rock Air Force Base, Arkansas;
(2)
added any effects of such decision on the operation of the air mobility command; and
(3)
added the short-term and long-term costs of maintaining such aircraft at Keesler Air Force Base.

Sec. 1097 Sense of Congress regarding cyber resiliency of National Guard networks and communications systems

added

added It is the sense of Congress that—

(1)
added National Guard personnel need to have situational awareness and reliable communications in the event of an emergency, terrorist attack, or natural or man-made disaster;
(2)
added in the event of such an emergency, attack, or disaster, the ability of the National Guard personnel to communicate and coordinate response is vital;
(3)
added current communications and networking systems for the National Guard, including commercial wireless solutions, such as mobile wireless kinetic mesh and other systems that are interoperable with the systems of civilian first responders, should provide the necessary robustness, interoperability, reliability, and resilience to extend needed situational awareness and communications to all users and under all operating conditions, including in degraded communications environments where infrastructure is damaged, destroyed, or under cyber attack or disruption; and
(4)
added the National Guard should be constantly seeking ways to improve and expand its communications and networking capabilities to provide for enhanced performance and resilience in the face of cyber attacks or disruptions, as well as other instances of degradation.

Sec. 1098 Sense of congress on paid-for patriotism

added

added It is the sense of Congress that—

(1)
added while recruitment and advertising in support of the Armed Forces, including the National Guard and Reserves, is appropriate, the taxpayer should not have to pay any organization to honor the service of members of the Armed Forces;
(2)
added instead of being paid by the Department of Defense to honor the service of members of the Armed Forces, these organizations should be motivated by patriotism to honor the service of members of the Armed Forces out of their own free will; and
(3)
added any funds that the Department of Defense would have used for purposes described in paragraph (1) should be redirected toward post-traumatic stress disorder research and treatment for members of the Armed Forces.

Sec. 1205 Monitoring and evaluation of overseas humanitarian, disaster, and civic aid programs of the Department of Defense

added
(a)
added In general— Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated by this Act to carry out sections 401, 402, 404, 407, 2557, and 2561 of title 10, United States Code, up to 5 percent of such amounts may be made available to conduct monitoring and evaluation of programs conducted pursuant to such authorities during fiscal year 2016.
(b)
added Briefing— Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall provide a briefing to the appropriate congressional committees on mechanisms to evaluate the programs conducted pursuant to the authorities listed in subsection (a). The briefing shall include the following:
(1)
added A description of how the Department of Defense evaluates program and project outcomes and impact, including cost effectiveness and extent to which programs meet designated goals.
(2)
added An analysis of steps taken to implement the recommendations from the following reports:
(A)
added The Government Accountability Office’s Report entitled “Project Evaluations and Better Information Sharing Needed to Manage the Military’s Efforts”.
(B)
added The Department of Defense Inspector General Report numbered “DODIG–2012–119”.
(C)
added The RAND Corporation’s Report prepared for the Office of the Secretary of Defense entitled “Developing a Prototype Handbook for Monitoring and Evaluating Department of Defense Humanitarian Assistance Projects”.
(c)
added Definition— In this section, the term “appropriate congressional committees” means the following:
(1)
added The congressional defense committees.
(2)
added The Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate.

Sec. 1213 Sense of Congress on United States policy and strategy in Afghanistan

It is the sense of Congress that—

(1)
the United States continues to have vital national security interests in ensuring that Afghanistan is a stable, sovereign country;
(2)
President Ashraf Ghani of Afghanistan should be applauded for his leadership and commitment to ensuring that Afghanistan remains stable, secure, and a friend of the United States;
(3)
the decision by the President of the United States to maintain 9,800 United States troops in Afghanistan through all of 2015 to train, advise, and assist and conduct counterterrorism missions in Afghanistan is the appropriate approach, is consistent with United States national security interests, and should be supported by Congress;
(4)
the President should withdraw United States troops only on a pace that is consistent with the ability of the Afghan National Security Forces to sustain itself and secure Afghanistan and should review maintaining the United States advisory mission in Afghanistan beyond 2016;
(5)
changed the United States should provide monetary and advisory support for the 352,000 Afghan National Security Forces personnel and 30,000 Afghan Local Police, including intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance support, through 2018;2018 while also maintaining a focus on the protection of human rights;
(6)
the Afghan National Security Forces should have the independent capability to prevent groups such as al-Qaeda, the Haqqani Network, the Quetta Shura Taliban, and other terrorist and insurgent groups from being able to conduct de-stabilizing attacks and military operations inside Afghanistan or against the United States and its allies and holding or governing territory; and
(7)
the United States should continue to vigorously conduct counterterrorism operations in Afghanistan beyond 2016, including against the Haqqani Network, to preserve the vital national security interests of the United States.

Sec. 1216 Assistance for Afghan translators, interpreters, and administrative aids

(a)
added Sense of Congress— It is the sense of Congress that it is in the interest of the United States to continue to assist Afghan partners, and their immediate families, who have served as translators or interpreters and those who have performed sensitive and trusted activities for United States forces.
(b)
added Special immigrant status for certain Afghans— Section 602(b) of the Afghan Allies Protection Act of 2009 (8 U.S.C. 1101 note) is amended—
(1)
added in paragraph (2)(A)(ii)(II), by striking “International Security Assistance Force” each place such term appears and inserting “International Security Assistance Force, the Resolute Support Mission, or any successor organization”;
(2)
added in paragraph (3)(F)(i), by striking “September 30, 2015;” and inserting “December 31, 2015;”; and
(3)
added by adding at the end the following:

added “(15) Additional report—Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this paragraph, and every 2 years thereafter, the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of State jointly shall submit a report to the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on the Judiciary of the Senate containing the following:

added “(A) The number of citizens or nationals of Afghanistan employed in Afghanistan by, or on behalf of, entities or organizations described in paragraph (2)(A)(ii).

added “(B) A prediction of the number of such individuals who will be so employed on the date that is 2 years after the date used for the count under subparagraph (A).”

removed It is the sense of Congress that it is in the interest of the United States to continue to assist Afghan partners, and their immediate families, who have served as translators or interpreters and those who have performed sensitive and trusted activities for United States forces.

Sec. 1217 Report on efforts to engage United States manufacturers in procurement opportunities related to equipping the Afghan National Security Forces

added

added Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of State shall submit to Congress a report on efforts of the Secretaries to engage United States manufacturers in procurement opportunities related to equipping the Afghan National Security Forces.

Sec. 1218 Report on access to financial records of the Government of Afghanistan to audit the use of funds for assistance for Afghanistan

added

added Not later than December 31, 2016, the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction shall submit to Congress a report on the extent to which the Office of the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction has adequate access to financial records of the Government of Afghanistan to audit the use of funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2016 for assistance for Afghanistan.

Sec. 1219 Sense of Congress relating to Dr. Shakil Afridi

added
(a)
added Findings— Congress finds the following:
(1)
added The attacks of September 11, 2001, killed approximately 3,000 people, most of whom were Americans, but also included hundreds of individuals with foreign citizenships, nearly 350 New York Fire Department personnel, and about 50 law enforcement officers.
(2)
added Downed United Airlines flight 93 was reportedly intended, under the control of the al-Qaeda high-jackers, to crash into the White House or the Capitol in an attempt to kill the President of the United States or Members of the United States Congress.
(3)
added The September 11, 2001, attacks were largely planned and carried out by the al-Qaeda terrorist network led by Osama bin Laden and his deputy Ayman al Zawahiri, after which Osama bin Laden enjoyed safe haven in Pakistan from where he continued to plot deadly attacks against the United States and the world.
(4)
added The United States has obligated nearly $30 billion between 2002 and 2014 in United States taxpayer money for security and economic aid to Pakistan.
(5)
added The United States very generously and swiftly responded to the 2005 Kashmir Earthquake in Pakistan with more than $200 million in emergency aid and the support of several United States military aircraft, approximately 1,000 United States military personnel, including medical specialists, thousands of tents, blankets, water containers and a variety of other emergency equipment.
(6)
added The United States again generously and swiftly contributed approximately $150 million in emergency aid to Pakistan following the 2010 Pakistan flood, in addition to the service of nearly twenty United States military helicopters, their flight crews, and other resources to assist the Pakistan Army’s relief efforts.
(7)
added The United States continues to work tirelessly to support Pakistan’s economic development, including millions of dollars allocated towards the development of Pakistan’s energy infrastructure, health services and education system.
(8)
added The United States and Pakistan continue to have many critical shared interests, both economic and security related, which could be the foundation for a positive and mutually beneficial partnership.
(9)
added Dr. Shakil Afridi, a Pakistani physician, is a hero to whom the people of the United States, Pakistan and the world owe a debt of gratitude for his help in finally locating Osama bin Laden before more innocent American, Pakistani and other lives were lost to this terrorist leader.
(10)
added Pakistan, the United States and the international community had failed for nearly 10 years following attacks of September 11, 2001, to locate and bring Osama bin Laden, who continued to kill innocent civilians in the Middle East, Asia, Europe, Africa and the United States, to justice without the help of Dr. Afridi.
(11)
added The Government of Pakistan’s imprisonment of Dr. Afridi presents a serious and growing impediment to the United States’ bilateral relations with Pakistan.
(12)
added The Government of Pakistan has leveled and allowed baseless charges against Dr. Afridi in a politically motivated, spurious legal process.
(13)
added Dr. Afridi is currently imprisoned by the Government of Pakistan, a deplorable and unconscionable situation which calls into question Pakistan’s actual commitment to countering terrorism and undermines the notion that Pakistan is a true ally in the struggle against terrorism.
(b)
added Sense of Congress— It is the sense of Congress that Dr. Shakil Afridi is an international hero and that the Government of Pakistan should release him immediately from prison.

Sec. 1222 Comprehensive strategy for the Middle East and to counter Islamic extremism

(a)
Findings— Congress finds the following:
(1)
In testimony before the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives, General Martin Dempsey, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff stated, “The global security environment is as uncertain as I have seen in my 40 years of service.”.
(2)
In testimony before the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate, the Director of National Intelligence, James Clapper, stated: “Sunni violent extremists are gaining momentum and the number of Sunni violent extremist groups, members, and safe havens is greater than at any other point in history.”.
(3)
In testimony to the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives, Lieutenant General Michael Flynn, former Director of the Defense Intelligence Agency stated, “…whether it be the number of violent Islamist groups, the territory which they control, the scale and scope of the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) and associated movements, the number of terrorist attacks they perpetrate, the numbers of causalities they inflict, their broad expansion and use of the internet, or just their sheer barbarism; I can draw no other conclusion than to say that the threat of Islamic extremism has reached an unacceptable level and that it is growing.”.
(4)
In testimony before the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate, James Clapper, the Director of National Intelligence, stated the following:
(A)
“When the final counting is done, 2014 will have been the most lethal year for global terrorism in the 45 years such data has been compiled . . . about half of all attacks, as well as fatalities, in 2014 occurred in just three countries: Iraq, Pakistan and Afghanistan . . . the Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) conducted more attacks than any other terrorist group in the first nine months of 2014.”.
(B)
“Since the conflict began, more than 20,000 Sunni foreign fighters have traveled to Syria from more than 90 countries to fight the Assad regime . . . of that number, at least 13,600 have extremist ties.”.
(C)
“More than 3,400 Western fighters have gone to Syria and Iraq. Hundreds have returned home to Europe.”.
(D)
“About 180 Americans or so have been involved in various stages of travel to Syria . . . and some number have come back.”.
(E)
“ISIL, al-Qaeda and al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP), and, most recently, al-Shabaab are calling on their supporters to conduct lone-wolf attacks against the United States and other Western countries. Of the 13 attacks in the West since last May, 12 were conducted by individual extremists.”.
(5)
AQAP continues to be one of al-Qaeda’s most capable affiliates, has the intent and capability to attack the United States and its allies, and attempted attacks inside the United States on December 25, 2009, and October 27, 2010.
(6)
Iran has been a Department of State-designated state sponsor of terrorism since January 19, 1984, and continues to sponsor and support terrorism throughout the Middle East region and around the world.
(7)
In testimony before the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate, former Vice Chief of Staff of the Army, General Jack Keane (retired), stated, “Is it possible to . . . claim that the United States policy and strategy is working or that al-Qaeda is on the run? It is unmistakable that our policies have failed . . . And the unequivocal explanation is U.S. policy has focused on disengaging from the Middle East.”.
(8)
In testimony before the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate, former commander of United States Central Command, General James Mattis (retired), stated, “We have lived too long in a strategy-free mode . . . America needs a refreshed national strategy . . . And our Nation’s strategy demands a comprehensive approach.”.
(b)
Sense of congress— It is the sense of Congress that—
(1)
Islamic extremism is growing in the Middle East and elsewhere;
(2)
Iran continues to be a leading state sponsor of terrorism in the Middle East and across the globe and continues to actively work against United States interests;
(3)
the threat of terrorist attacks in the United States and threats against United States interests have increased due to the growth of Islamic extremism, the proliferation of terrorist groups across the world, and the instability in the Middle East in countries such as Libya, Yemen, Iraq, and Syria;
(4)
the approach of Building Partnership Capacity (BPC) and conducting limited counterterrorism operations has had some positive effects in some locations, but has not prevented the proliferation and violence of terrorist groups or instability in the Middle East;
(5)
the United States should articulate, develop, and implement an effective strategy to work with its allies and partners to defeat Islamic extremist groups that threaten the interests of the Unites States and its allies;
(6)
added the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with Secretary of State, shall continue to pursue efforts to shut down ISIL’s illicit oil revenues;
(7)
renumbered was (3)(8) support for United States allies and partners in the Middle East is a critical component of the effort to prevent the spread of Islamic extremism;
(8)
renumbered was (3)(9) other actors, such as Russia, China, and Iran are trying to work against United States interests in the Middle East;
(9)
renumbered was (3)(10) the United States should take a greater leadership role in fighting Islamic extremism and supporting stability in the Middle East to include coordinating actions of United States allies and partners in the region;
(10)
renumbered was (3)(11) the United States plays a vital leadership role in coordinating the activities of the United States and its allies and partners and should seek opportunities to expand such cooperation to contribute to greater stability in the Middle East;
(11)
renumbered was (3)(12) the United States should continue to take steps to prevent the spread of malign Iranian influence in Iraq, Syria, Yemen, and the region;
(12)
renumbered was (3)(13) the United States remains an indispensable actor in the Middle East, and the President should ensure that United States Armed Forces remain forward postured in the region to deter adversaries, fight threats to the United States and its interests, and support United States allies and partners in the region.
(c)
Strategy required—
(1)
In general— Not later than February 15, 2016, the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of State shall submit to the specified congressional committees a comprehensive strategy for the Middle East and to counter Islamic extremism.
(2)
Matters to be included— The strategy required by paragraph (1) shall include the following:
(A)
A detailed description of the objectives and end state for the United States in the Middle East and with respect to Islamic extremism.
(B)
A description of the roles and responsibilities of the Department of State in such strategy.
(C)
A description of the roles and responsibilities of the Department of Defense in such strategy.
(D)
A detailed description of actions to prevent the weakening and failing of states in the Middle East.
(E)
A detailed description of actions to counter Islamic extremism, including Islamic ideology, strategy, and tactics globally.
(F)
added A detailed description of the resources required by the Secretary of Defense to counter ISIL’s illicit oil revenues
(G)
renumbered was (4)(3)(8) A detailed definition of those states and non-state actors the United States will address to counter Islamic extremism.
(H)
renumbered was (4)(3)(9) A detailed description of actions to establish a coalition to carry out the strategy.
(I)
added An assessment of United States’ efforts to disrupt and prevent foreign fighters traveling to Syria and Iraq and disrupt and prevent foreign fighters in Syria and Iraq traveling to the United States.
(3)
Specified congressional committees— In the section, the term specified congressional committees means—
(A)
the congressional defense committees; and
(B)
the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives.

Sec. 1223 Modification of authority to provide assistance to counter the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant

(a)
Quarterly progress report— Subsection (d) of section 1236 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3561) is amended by striking “30 days” and inserting “90 days”.
(b)
Funding— Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated in this Act for Overseas Contingency Operations in title XV for fiscal year 2016, there are authorized to be appropriated $715,000,000 to carry out such section.
(c)
Waiver authority— Subsection (j)(1)(B) of such section is amended—
(1)
by striking “the following:” and all that follows through “Any provision of law” and inserting “any provision of law”; and
(2)
by striking clause (ii).
(d)
Requirements relating to assistance for fiscal year 2016— Such section, as so amended, is further amended by adding at the end the following:

“(l) Requirements relating to assistance for fiscal year 2016

“(1) Assessment

“(A) In general—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this subsection, the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of State shall jointly submit to the appropriate congressional committees an assessment of the extent to which the Government of Iraq is meeting the conditions described in subparagraph (B).

“(B) Conditions—The conditions described in this subparagraph are that the Government of Iraq—

“(i) is addressing the grievances of ethnic and sectarian minorities;

“(ii) is increasing political inclusiveness;

“(iii) is conducting efforts sufficient to reduce support for the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant and improve stability in Iraq;

“(iv) is legislating the Iraqi Sunni National Guard;

“(v) is ensuring that minorities are represented in adequate numbers, trained, and equipped in government security organizations;

“(vi) is ending support to Shia militias and stopping abuses of elements of the Iraqi population by such militias;

“(vii) is ensuring that supplies, equipment, and weaponry supplied by the United States are appropriately distributed to security forces with a national security mission in Iraq, including the Kurdish Peshmerga, Sunni tribal security forces with a national security mission, and the Iraqi Sunni National Guard;

“(viii) is releasing prisoners from ethnic or sectarian minorities who have been arrested and held without trial or to charge and try such prisoners in a fair, transparent, and prompt manner; and

“(ix) is taking such other actions as the Secretaries consider appropriate.

“(C) Update—The Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of State may submit an update of the assessment required under subparagraph (A) to the extent necessary.

“(D) Submission—The assessment required under subparagraph (A) and the update of the assessment authorized under subparagraph (C) may be submitted as part of the quarterly report required under subsection (d).

“(2) Restriction on direct assistance to Government of Iraq—If the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of State do not submit the assessment required by paragraph (1) or if the Secretaries submit the assessment required by paragraph (1) but the assessment indicates that the Government of Iraq has not substantially achieved the conditions contained in the assessment, the Secretaries shall withhold the provision of assistance pursuant to subsection (a) directly to the Government of Iraq for fiscal year 2016 until such time as the Secretaries submit an update of the assessment that indicates that the Government of Iraq has substantially achieved the conditions contained in the assessment.

“(3) Direct assistance to certain covered groups

“(A) In general—Of the funds authorized to be appropriated under this section for fiscal year 2016, not less than 25 percent of such funds shall be obligated and expended for assistance directly to the groups described in subparagraph (E) (of which not less than 12.5 percent of such funds shall be obligated and expended for assistance directly to the group described in clause (i) of such subparagraph).

“(B) Additional direct assistance—If the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of State withhold the provision of assistance pursuant to subsection (a) directly to the Government of Iraq for fiscal year 2016 in accordance with paragraph (2) of this subsection, the Secretaries shall obligate and expend not less than an additional 60 percent of all unobligated funds authorized to be appropriated under this section for fiscal year 2016 for assistance directly to the groups described in subparagraph (E).

“(C) Cost-sharing requirement inapplicable—The cost-sharing requirement of subsection (k) shall not apply with respect to funds that are obligated or expended for assistance directly to the groups described in subparagraph (E).

changed “(D) Rule of construction—Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the groups described in subparagraph (E) shall each be deemed to be a country for purposes of meeting meet the eligibility requirements of section 3 of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2753) and chapter 2 of part II of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2311 et seq.).

“(E) Covered groups—The groups described in this subparagraph are—

“(i) the Kurdish Peshmerga;

“(ii) Sunni tribal security forces with a national security mission; and

“(iii) the Iraqi Sunni National Guard.”

Sec. 1225 Modification of authority to provide assistance to the vetted Syrian opposition

(a)
added Modification—
(1)
added In general— Section 1209(f) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3543) is amended—
(A)
added by striking “The Secretary of Defense” and inserting the following:

added “(1) In general—Subject to paragraph (2), the Secretary of Defense”

(B)
added by striking “for Overseas Contingency Operations” and inserting “under the Syria Train and Equip Fund”; and
(C)
added by further adding at the end the following:

added “(2) Report required—At the same time the Secretary of Defense submits a request for a reprogramming or transfer of funds under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report that contains the following:

added “(A) Update—An update of the comprehensive strategy required under section 1225(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016.

added “(B) Certification—A certification that—

added “(i) a required number and type of United States Armed Forces have been established to meet the objectives of the strategy and such Armed Forces, including support and enablers, have been or will be deployed to meet the objectives of the strategy; and

added “(ii) a required amount of support, including support provided by United States Armed Forces and enablers, has been or will be provided by the United States to the elements of the Syrian opposition that are to be trained and equipped under this section to ensure that such elements are able to defend themselves from attacks by ISIL and Government of Syria forces consistent with the purposes set forth in subsection (a).

added “(C) Use of funds—A detailed description of how the funds subject to the request for a reprogramming or transfer of funds under paragraph (1) will be used to meet the objectives of the strategy.”

(2)
added Effective date— The amendments made by this subsection take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act and apply with respect to any request for a reprogramming or transfer of funds under section 1209(f) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015, as amended by paragraph (1), that is submitted on or after such date of enactment.
(b)
added Comprehensive strategy required—
(1)
added In general— Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a comprehensive strategy for Syria and Iraq.
(2)
added Matters to be included— The comprehensive strategy shall contain the following:
(A)
added An identification of requirements that have been established to ensure that assistance provided to appropriately vetted elements of the Syrian opposition and other appropriately vetted Syrian groups and individuals achieve the purposes set forth in section 1209(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3541).
(B)
added A description of United States policy and strategy for addressing the Assad regime in Syria and the post-Assad regime in Syria.
(C)
added A detailed explanation of how the military campaigns in Syria and Iraq are integrated and a description of the goals, objectives, and the end states for Syria and Iraq, including a description of how the train and equip programs in Iraq and Syria support the goals, objectives, and end states in Iraq and Syria.
(D)
added A description of the roles and responsibilities of each coalition country under the strategy.
(E)
added A description of the relevant agency roles and responsibilities and interagency coordination under the strategy.
(3)
added Definition— In this subsection, the term “appropriate congressional committees” has the meaning given the term in section 1209(e)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3543).

removed Section 1209 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3541) is amended by striking subsection (f) and inserting the following:

removed “(f) Funding—Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated in this Act for Overseas Contingency Operations in title XV for fiscal year 2016, there are authorized to be appropriated $531,500,000 to carry out this section.”

Sec. 1228 Report to assess the potential effectiveness of and requirements for the establishment of safe zones or a no-fly zone in Syria

added
(a)
added Findings— Congress makes the following findings:
(1)
added March 2015 marked the fourth year of the crisis in Syria, which has resulted in the world’s largest ongoing humanitarian disaster.
(2)
added Syrian President Bashar al-Assad and supporting militias, including Hezbollah, continue to carry out sectarian mass atrocities, which have included mass targeted killings, mass graves, the extermination of entire families, including their children, incidents of ethnic cleansing, sexual violence, widespread torture, aerial bombardment of residential areas, and forced displacement of certain Syrian civilians especially from areas in western Syria where Assad is attempting to increase the dominance of his own loyalists.
(3)
added Approximately 220,000 people have been killed, including thousands of children, many more have been seriously wounded, and civilian casualties continue to mount as widespread and systematic attacks on schools, hospitals, and other civilian facilities persist in violation of international norms and principles.
(4)
added Assad’s forces and supporting militias have used air power to target Syrian civilians, including the deployment of barrel bombs filled with explosives, shrapnel, and chemical weapons.
(5)
added Assad’s forces, supporting militias, and other parties to the conflict are systematically blocking humanitarian aid delivery, including food and medical care, from many civilian areas in violation of international norms and principles.
(b)
added Report—
(1)
added In General— Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of State, shall submit to the specified congressional committees a report that—
(A)
added assesses the potential effectiveness, risks, and operational requirements of the establishment and maintenance of a no-fly zone over part or all of Syria, including—
(i)
added the operational and legal requirements for United States and coalition air power to establish a no-fly zone in Syria;
(ii)
added the impact a no-fly zone in Syria would have on humanitarian and counterterrorism efforts in Syria and the surrounding region;
(iii)
added the potential for force contributions from other countries to establish a no-fly zone in Syria; and
(iv)
added the impact of the establishment of a no-fly zone in Syria on the recipients of training provided by section 1209 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3541); and
(B)
added assesses the potential effectiveness, risks, and operational requirements for the establishment of one or more safe zones in Syria for internally displaced people or for the facilitation of humanitarian assistance, including—
(i)
added the operational and legal requirements for United States and coalition forces to establish one or more safe zones in Syria;
(ii)
added the impact one or more safe zones in Syria would have on humanitarian and counterterrorism efforts in Syria and the surrounding region;
(iii)
added the potential for contributions from other countries and vetted non-state actor partners to establish and maintain one or more safe zones in Syria; and
(iv)
added the impact of the establishment of one or more safe zones in Syria on the recipients of training provided by section 1209 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3541).
(2)
added Form— The report required by paragraph (1) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may contain a classified annex if necessary.
(3)
added Definition— In this subsection, the term “specified congressional committees” means—
(A)
added the congressional defense committees; and
(B)
added the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives.

Sec. 1232 Sense of Congress on the Government of Iran’s nuclear program and its malign military activities

(a)
Findings— Congress finds the following:
(1)
The understanding announced on April 2, 2015, between the countries of the P5+1 (the United States, the United Kingdom, France, Germany, Russia, and China) and Iran on a Comprehensive Joint Plan of Action (CJPOA) provides sanctions relief in exchange for constraints on Iran’s nuclear program for a limited period of time.
(2)
Iran continues to develop ballistic missiles in violation of United Nations Security Council Resolutions 1747 (2007) and 1929 (2010), has developed medium-range ballistic missiles to target Israel and other United States allies, is working towards an intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) capability and the CJPOA places no limitations on Iran’s ballistic and cruise missile development efforts.
(3)
The Secretary of State has designated Iran as a state-sponsor of terrorism since 1984 and for the past decade has characterized Iran as the “most active state sponsor of terrorism” in the world.
(4)
Iran continues to support Hezbollah in Lebanon, the Bashar al-Assad regime in Syria, Shia militias in Iraq, Hamas in Gaza, the Houthi rebels in Yemen, and other terrorist organizations and extremists globally.
(5)
Iran continues to conduct malign military activities across the Middle East and around the globe, which has and will continue to destabilize the region. As the Commander of United States Central Command testified to the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives on March 3, 2015, “the leaders in the region… are also equally concerned about Iran’s ability to mine the Straits, Iran’s cyber capabilities, Iran’s… ballistic missile capability, as well as the activity of their Quds forces... And so whether we get a deal or don’t get a deal, I think they will still share those concerns.”.
(6)
Iran’s destabilizing activities throughout the region pose a threat to United States interests, the interests of United States allies in the region, and international security.
(b)
Sense of Congress— It is the sense of Congress that—
(1)
Iran’s illicit pursuit, development, or acquisition of a nuclear weapons capability and its malign military activities overall constitute a grave threat to regional stability and the national security interests of the United States and its allies and partners;
(2)
Iran continues to expand its malign activities in the Middle East and globally, which may well increase under a CJPOA;
(3)
sanctions relief under the CJPOA will provide Iran the ability to increase funding for its ballistic missile development programs, acquisition of destabilizing types and amounts of conventional weapons, support for terrorism, and other malign activities throughout the Middle East and globally;
(4)
United States bilateral and multilateral sanctions against Iran, once relieved, will be extremely difficult to reconstitute in response to Iranian violations of its international obligations;
(5)
Iran would be an internationally-approved nuclear-threshold state under the framework of the CJPOA, which will likely lead to the proliferation of nuclear weapons across the Middle East;
(6)
Congress should review and assess all elements of any agreement entered into between the countries of the P5+1 and Iran and it should approve or disapprove of any sanctions relief that results from such an agreement;
(7)
the United States must continue to support the defense of allies and partners in the region, including Israel, strengthening ballistic missile defense capabilities, and increasing security assistance;
(8)
changed Congress supports efforts to reach a peaceful, diplomatic solution to permanently and verifiably end Iran’s pursuit, development, and acquisition of a nuclear weapons capability, and it reaffirms that it is United States policy that Iran will not be allowed to develop a nuclear weapons capability and that all instruments of United States power must be considered to prevent Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon; andweapon;
(9)
changed Congress reaffirms the rights of United States allies to exercise their legitimate right to self-defense against the Government of Iran.Iran;
(10)
added the sale of advanced weaponry to Iran, particularly advanced air defenses, encourages bad behavior by Iran and poses a high risk of destabilizing the region and should be opposed; and
(11)
added no terrorism-related sanctions should be lifted or loosened as a part of any nuclear agreement and additional sanctions should be considered against Iran due to Iran’s continued state sponsorship of terrorism, its development and proliferation of ballistic missile technology, its continued biological and chemical weapons programs, and the egregious violation of the human rights of the Iranian people.

Sec. 1234 Limitation on military-to-military exchanges and contacts with Iran

added
(a)
added Limitation— The Secretary of Defense may not authorize any military-to-military exchange or contact described in subsection (b) to be conducted by the Armed Forces or Department of Defense civilians with representatives of the military or paramilitary forces (including the IRGC) of the Islamic Republic of Iran until the Secretary certifies that Iran—
(1)
added has ended its ballistic missile program;
(2)
added is no longer listed by the Secretary of State as a state sponsor of terrorism; and
(3)
added has recognized the Israel as a Jewish state.
(b)
added Covered exchanges and contacts— Subsection (a) applies to any military-to-military exchange or contact that includes inappropriate exposure to any of the following:
(1)
added Force projection operations.
(2)
added Nuclear operations.
(3)
added Advanced combined-arms and joint combat operations.
(4)
added Advanced logistical operations.
(5)
added Chemical and biological defense and other capabilities related to weapons of mass destruction.
(6)
added Surveillance and reconnaissance operations.
(7)
added Joint warfighting experiments.
(8)
added Military space operations.
(9)
added Other advanced capabilities of the Armed Forces.
(10)
added Arms sales or military-related technology transfers.
(11)
added Release of classified or restricted information.
(12)
added Access to a Department of Defense laboratory or base.
(13)
added Military operations or exercises with allies and partners.
(c)
added Exceptions— Subsection (a) does not apply to any search-and-rescue or humanitarian operation or exercise.
(d)
added Annual certification by Secretary— The Secretary of Defense shall, without delegation, submit to the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives, not later than December 31 each year, a certification in writing as to whether or not any military-to-military exchange or contact during that calendar year was conducted in violation of subsection (a).

Sec. 1235 Security guarantees associated with Iran’s nuclear weapons program

added
(a)
added In general— Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of State, shall provide the appropriate congressional committees a copy of any security agreement or commitment provided by the United States to any country in the Middle East, including the member countries of the Gulf Cooperation Council, associated with Iran’s nuclear weapons program.
(b)
added Analysis— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of staff shall provide the Secretary of Defense with a detailed analysis of the United States military force structure and posture, as well as the estimated costs associated with such force structure and posture, required to meet any security agreement or commitment in the Middle East, including member countries of the Gulf Cooperation Council. The Secretary shall provide such analysis, without change, along with any additional views the Secretary may offer, when the Secretary submits the materials required under subsection (a).
(c)
added Limitation on certain expenditures— The Secretary of Defense may not obligate or expend any funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available to the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2016 for meeting any security agreements or commitments described in this section unless the Secretary certifies to the appropriate congressional committees that the Secretary has provided a copy of such agreement as required under subsection (a).
(d)
added Appropriate congressional committees defined— In this section, the term “appropriate congressional committees” means the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate.

Sec. 1236 Rule of construction

added

added Nothing in this Act shall be construed as authorizing the use of force against Iran.

Sec. 1247 Prohibition on availability of funds relating to sovereignty of the Russian Federation over Crimea

added
(a)
added In general— None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2016 for the Department of Defense may be obligated or expended—
(1)
added to implement any action or policy that recognizes the de jure or de facto sovereignty of the Russian Federation over Crimea, its airspace, or its territorial waters; or
(2)
added to provide assistance for the central government of a country that has taken affirmative steps intended to recognize or otherwise be supportive of the Russian Federation’s forcible and illegal occupation of Crimea.
(b)
added Waiver— The Secretary of Defense may waive the restriction on assistance required by subsection (a)(2) if the Secretary certifies and reports to the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives that to do so is in the national interest of the United States.
(c)
added Sunset— The requirements of subsection (a) shall cease to be in effect if the Secretary of Defense certifies and reports to the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives that the armed forces of the Russian Federation have withdrawn from Crimea and the Government of Ukraine has reestablished sovereignty over Crimea.

Sec. 1248 Limitation on military contact and cooperation between the United States and the Russian Federation

added
(a)
added Limitation— None of the funds authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2016 for the Department of Defense may be used for any bilateral military-to-military contact or cooperation between the Governments of the United States and the Russian Federation until the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of State, certifies to the appropriate congressional committees that—
(1)
added the armed forces of the Russian Federation are no longer illegally occupying Ukrainian territory;
(2)
added the Russian Federation is respecting the sovereignty of all Ukrainian territory;
(3)
added the Russian Federation is no longer taking actions that are inconsistent with the INF Treaty; and
(4)
added the Russian Federation has not sold or otherwise transferred the Club-K land attack cruise missile system to any foreign country or foreign person during fiscal year 2015.
(b)
added Waiver— The Secretary of Defense may waive the limitation in subsection (a) with respect to a certification requirement specified in paragraph (1), (2), or (3) if—
(1)
added the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of State, submits to the appropriate congressional committees—
(A)
added a notification that such a waiver is in the national security interest of the United States and a description of the national security interest covered by the waiver; and
(B)
added a report explaining why the Secretary of Defense cannot make the certification under subsection (a); and
(2)
added a period of 30 days has elapsed following the date on which the Secretary of Defense submits the information in the report under paragraph (1)(B).
(c)
added Additional waiver— The Secretary of Defense may waive the limitation required by subsection (a)(4) with respect to the sale or other transfer of the Club-K land attack cruise missile system if—
(1)
added the United States has imposed sanctions against the manufacturer of such system by reason of such sale or other transfer; or
(2)
added the Secretary has developed and submitted to the appropriate congressional committees a plan to prevent the sale or other transfer of such system in the future.
(d)
added Exception for certain military bases— The certification requirement specified in paragraph (1) of subsection (a) shall not apply to military bases of the Russian Federation in Ukraine’s Crimean peninsula operating in accordance with its 1997 agreement on the Status and Conditions of the Black Sea Fleet Stationing on the Territory of Ukraine.
(e)
added Definitions— In this section:
(1)
added Appropriate congressional committees— The term “appropriate congressional committees” means—
(A)
added the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate; and
(B)
added the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives.
(2)
added Bilateral military-to-military contact or cooperation— The term “bilateral military-to-military contact or cooperation”—
(A)
added means—
(i)
added reciprocal visits and meetings by high-ranking delegations;
(ii)
added information sharing, policy consultations, security dialogues or other forms of consultative discussions;
(iii)
added exchanges of military instructors, training personnel, and students;
(iv)
added exchanges of information;
(v)
added defense planning; and
(vi)
added military training or exercises; but
(B)
added does not include any contact or cooperation that is in support of United States stability operations.
(3)
added Inf treaty— The term “INF Treaty” means the Treaty Between the United States of America and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics on the Elimination of Their Intermediate-Range and Shorter-Range Missiles, commonly referred to as the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty, signed at Washington December 8, 1987, and entered into force June 1, 1988.
(f)
added Effective date— This section takes effect on the date of the enactment of this Act and applies with respect to funds described in subsection (a) that are unobligated as of such date of enactment.

Sec. 1249 Limitation on funds for implementation of the New START Treaty

added
(a)
added Limitation— None of the funds authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2016 for the Department of Defense may be used for implementation of the New START Treaty until the President certifies to the appropriate congressional committees that—
(1)
added the armed forces of the Russian Federation are no longer illegally occupying Ukrainian territory;
(2)
added the Russian Federation is respecting the sovereignty of all Ukrainian territory;
(3)
added the Russian Federation is no longer taking actions that are inconsistent with the INF Treaty;
(4)
added the Russian Federation is in compliance with the CFE Treaty and has lifted its suspension of Russian observance of its treaty obligations; and
(5)
added there have been no inconsistencies by the Russian Federation with New START Treaty requirements.
(b)
added Definitions— In this section:
(1)
added Appropriate congressional committees— The term appropriate congressional committees means—
(A)
added the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate; and
(B)
added the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives.
(2)
added CFE Treaty— The term CFE Treaty means the Treaty on Conventional Armed Forces in Europe, signed at Paris November 19, 1990, and entered into force July 17, 1992.
(3)
added INF Treaty— The term INF Treaty means the Treaty Between the United States of America and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics on the Elimination of Their Intermediate-Range and Shorter-Range Missiles, commonly referred to as the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty, signed at Washington December 8, 1987, and entered into force June 1, 1988.
(4)
added New START Treatu— The term “New START Treaty” means the Treaty between the United States of America and the Russian Federation on Measures for the Further Reduction and Limitation of Strategic Offensive Arms, signed on April 8, 2010, and entered into force on February 5, 2011
(c)
added Effective date— This section takes effect on the date of the enactment of this Act and applies with respect to funds described in subsection (a) that are unobligated as of such date of enactment.

Sec. 1255 Sense of Congress on opportunities to enhance the United States alliance with the Republic of Korea

added

added It is the sense of Congress that—

(1)
added the alliance between the United States and the Republic of Korea has served as an anchor for stability, security, and prosperity on the Korean Peninsula, in the Asia-Pacific region, and around the world;
(2)
added the United States and the Republic of Korea continue to strengthen and adapt the comprehensive strategic alliance of bilateral, regional, and global scope to serve as a linchpin of peace and stability in the Asia-Pacific region, recognizing the shared values of democracy, human rights, free and open market, and the rule of law, as reaffirmed in the May 2013 “Joint Declaration in Commemoration of the 60th Anniversary of the Alliance between the Republic of Korea and the United States of America”;
(3)
added the United States and the Republic of Korea continue to broaden and deepen the scope and level of alliance cooperation by strengthening the combined defense posture on the Korean Peninsula, enhancing mutual security based on the Republic of Korea-United States Mutual Defense Treaty, and promoting cooperation for regional and global security in the 21st century, recognizing the significance of 2015 as it marks the 70th anniversary of the end of World War II;
(4)
added the United States and the Republic of Korea share deep concerns that North Korea’s nuclear and ballistic missiles programs and its repeated provocations pose grave threats to peace and stability on the Korean Peninsula and Northeast Asia and recognize that both nations are determined to achieve the peaceful denuclearization of North Korea, and remain fully committed to continuing close cooperation on the full range of issues related to North Korea;
(5)
added the United States supports the vision of a Korean Peninsula free of nuclear weapons, free from the fear of war, and peacefully reunited on the basis of democratic and free market principles, as articulated in President Park’s Dresden address; and
(6)
added the United States and the Republic of Korea share the future interests of both nations in securing peace and stability on the Korean Peninsula and in Northeast Asia.

Sec. 1256 Requirement to submit Department of Defense policy regarding foreign disclosure or technology release of Aegis Ashore capability to allies

added
(a)
added Sense of Congress— It is the sense of Congress that a decision by the Government of Japan to purchase Aegis Ashore for its self-defense, given that it already possesses sea-based Aegis weapons system-equipped naval vessels, could create a significant opportunity for promoting interoperability and integration of air- and missile defense capability with close allies, could provide for force multiplication benefits, and could potentially alleviate force posture requirements on multi-mission assets.
(b)
added Requirement to submit policy— Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a copy of the Department of Defense policy regarding foreign disclosure or technology release of Aegis Ashore capability to allies, including Japan, that possess sea-based Aegis weapons system-equipped naval vessels.
(c)
added Definition— In this section, the term “appropriate congressional committees” means—
(1)
added the congressional defense committees; and
(2)
added the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives.

Sec. 1257 Requirement to invite the military forces of Taiwan to participate in RIMPAC Exercises

added
(a)
added In general— The Secretary of Defense shall invite the military forces of Taiwan to participate in any maritime exercise known as the Rim of the Pacific Exercise if the Secretary has invited the military forces of the People’s Republic of China to participate in such maritime exercise.
(b)
added Effective date— This section takes effect on the date of the enactment of this Act and applies with respect to any maritime exercise described in subsection (a) that begins on or after such date of enactment.

Sec. 1268 Efforts of the Department of Defense to prevent and respond to gender-based violence globally

(a)
Findings and statement of policy—
(1)
Findings— Congress finds the following:
(A)
Gender-based violence reaches every corner of the world, affecting millions of people ever year and one in three women in her lifetime. This epidemic not only undermines the safety, dignity, and human rights of the individual, family and community, it affects public health, economic stability, and security of nations, which in turn has a direct impact upon United States foreign policy, defense interests, democracy, governance, and peace-building efforts.
(B)
With one of the largest international footprints in the United States government, the Department of Defense is an integral part of combating the epidemic of gender-based violence, especially in conflict regions.
(C)
Section 7061 of the Joint Explanatory Statement of the Committee of Conference accompanying the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2012 directed the Secretary of State and the Administrator of the United States Agency for International Development to develop and submit to Congress a multi-year strategy to prevent and respond to gender-based violence.
(D)
changed Executive Order No. 13623 of August 10, 2012 (77 Fed. Reg. 49345) established the United States Strategy to Prevent and Respond to Gender-Based Violence Globally, which required the Department of Defense to participate in an Interagency Working Group co-chaired by the Department of State and the United States Agency for International Development to implement the Strategy.
(E)
The Joint Explanatory Statement of the Committee of Conference accompanying the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (H.R. 3979, Public Law 113–291), encouraged the Department of Defense to support the continued implementation of the United States Strategy to Prevent and Respond to Gender-Based Violence Globally and to participate in the Interagency Working Group.
(F)
changed Executive Order No. 13623 requires within 3 years of August 12, 2012, that the Interagency Working Group shall complete a final evaluation of the Strategy and within 180 days of completing its final evaluation, the Interagency Working Group shall update or revise the Strategy to take into account the information learned and the progress made during and through the implementation of the Strategy.
(2)
Statement of policy— It is in the national security interest of the United States to—
(A)
prevent gender-based violence which will promote regional and global stability and advance sustainable peace and security;
(B)
have a multi-year strategy in place that will effectively prevent and respond to gender-based violence globally; and
(C)
ensure that existing laws and regulations relating to the Department of Defense are fully implemented to prevent gender-based violence globally.
(b)
Requirement to continue implementation of a United States global strategy on gender-based violence prevention and response— The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that the Department of Defense—
(1)
continues to implement the United States Strategy to Prevent and Respond to Gender-Based Violence Globally, as appropriate; and
(2)
changed pursuant to the intent laid out in Executive Order No. 13623, continues to participate in any Interagency Working Group described in subsection (a)(1)(D) or in interagency collaborative efforts to develop or update a United States Strategy to Prevent and Respond to Gender-Based Violence Globally, as appropriate
(c)
Department of Defense gender-based training— The Secretary of Defense is authorized to—
(1)
provide training for the United States Armed Forces, Department of Defense personnel, and contractors and military observers on preventing and responding to violence against women and girls globally in conflict, post-conflict, and humanitarian relief settings; and
(2)
utilize the Department of Defense’s operational capabilities to train professional foreign military, police forces, and judicial officials on preventing and responding to violence against women and girls globally.
(d)
Report—
(1)
In general— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the specified congressional committees a report on efforts to prevent and respond to gender-based violence globally made under a United States strategy.
(2)
Content— The report required under paragraph (1) shall—
(A)
describe the efforts of the Department of Defense in the Interagency Working Group described in subsection (a)(1)(D) to implement the international gender-based violence prevention and response strategy, funding allocations, programming, and associated outcomes; and
(B)
provide an assessment of human and financial resources necessary to fulfill the purposes and duties of such strategy.
(3)
Public availability— The report required under paragraph (1) shall be made publicly accessible in a timely manner.
(4)
Definition— In this subsection, the term “specified congressional committees” means—
(A)
the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate; and
(B)
the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives.

Sec. 1269 Combating crime through intelligence capabilities

added

added The Secretary of Defense is authorized to deploy assets, personnel, and resources to United States Southern Command, in coordination with the Joint Interagency Task Force South, to combat the following by supplying sufficient intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance capabilities:

(1)
added Transnational criminal organizations.
(2)
added Drug trafficking.
(3)
added Bulk shipments of narcotics or currency.
(4)
added Narco-terrorism and terrorist financing.
(5)
added Human trafficking.
(6)
added The presence and influence of Iran, Russia, and China in the Western Hemisphere.
(7)
added The national security threat posed by the presence and influence of the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL), Hezbollah, or any other foreign terrorist organization in the Western Hemisphere.

Sec. 1270 Limitation on availability of funds to implement the Arms Trade Treaty

added
(a)
added In general— None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2016 for the Department of Defense may be obligated or expended to fund a Secretariat or any other international organization established to support the implementation of the Arms Trade Treaty, to sustain domestic prosecutions based on any charge related to the Treaty, or to implement the Treaty until the Senate approves a resolution of ratification for the Treaty and implementing legislation for the Treaty has been enacted into law.
(b)
added Rule of construction— Nothing in this section shall be construed to preclude the Department of Defense from assisting foreign countries in bringing their laws, regulations, and practices related to export control up to United States standards.

Sec. 1271 Assessment of the military capability of the Republic of Cyprus

added
(a)
added In general— Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of State shall jointly submit to the appropriate congressional committees an assessment of the military capability of the Republic of Cyprus to defend against threats to its national security, including threats posed by hostile foreign governments and international terrorist groups.
(b)
added Matters to be included— The assessment required under subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1)
added An analysis of the effect on the national security of Cyprus of the United States policy to deny applications for licenses and other approvals for the export of defense articles and defense services to the armed forces of Cyprus.
(2)
added An analysis of the extent to which such United States policy is consistent with overall United States security and policy objectives in the region.
(3)
added An assessment of the potential impact of lifting such United States policy.
(c)
added Definition— In this section, the term “appropriate congressional committees” means—
(1)
added the congressional defense committees; and
(2)
added the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives.

Sec. 1272 Sense of congress on the defense relationship between the United States and the Republic of India

added
(a)
added Findings— Congress finds the following:
(1)
added The United States has an upgraded, strategic-plus relationship with India based on regional cooperation, space science cooperation, and defense cooperation.
(2)
added The defense relationship between the United States and the Republic of India is strengthened by the common commitment of both countries to democracy.
(3)
added The United States and the Republic of India share a common and long-standing commitment to civilian control of the military.
(4)
added The United States and the Republic of India have increasingly worked together on defense cooperation across a range of activities, exercises, initiatives, and research.
(b)
added Sense of Congress— It is the sense of Congress that the United States should—
(1)
added continue to expand defense cooperation with the Republic of India;
(2)
added welcome the role of the Republic of India in providing security and stability in the Indo-Pacific region and beyond;
(3)
added work cooperatively with the Republic of India on matters relating to our common defense;
(4)
added vigorously support the implementation of the United States-India Defense Framework Agreement; and
(3)
added support the India Defense Trade and Technology Initiative.

Sec. 1273 Sense of Congress on evacuation of United States citizens and nationals from Yemen

added
(a)
added Findings— Congress finds the following:
(1)
added The ongoing conflict in Yemen, including airstrikes conducted by Saudi Arabia and a no-fly zone imposed over Yemen by Saudi Arabia, has made it difficult for Yemeni-Americans to depart Yemen.
(2)
added United States citizen Jamal al-Labani of Hayward, California, was killed in Yemen after the closure of the United States Embassy while attempting to bring his pregnant wife and 2-year-daughter back to the United States.
(3)
added Over 550 Yemeni-Americans have registered as being unable to leave Yemen after the closure of the United States Embassy in Yemen in February 2015.
(4)
added In 2006, the Department of Defense helped the Department of State remove 15,000 Americans from Lebanon during Hezbollah’s war against Israel.
(5)
added Many other nations, including China, Ethiopia, India, and Russia are evacuating or have evacuated their citizens from Yemen.
(b)
added Sense of Congress— It is the sense of Congress that the President should exercise all available authorities as expeditiously as possible to evacuate United States citizens and nationals from Yemen.

Sec. 1274 Report on impact of any significant reduction in United States troop levels or materiel in Europe on NATO’s ability to credibly address external threats to any NATO member State

added
(a)
added Sense of Congress— It is the sense of Congress that—
(1)
added in order to demonstrate United States commitment to North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) allies, especially those NATO allies under pressure on the Eastern flank of the Alliance, and to enhance the United States deterrent presence and resolve to countering threats to NATO’s collective security, United States Armed Forces stationed and deployed in Europe should be increased in number and combat power; and
(2)
added the “current and foreseeable security environment”, as referenced in paragraph 12 of Section IV on Political-Military Matters of the Founding Act on Mutual Relations, Cooperation and Security between NATO and the Russian Federation (NATO-Russia Founding Act), has changed significantly since the signing of such Act in 1997 and thus such Act should not be read, interpreted, or implemented so as to constrain or in any way limit additional permanent stationing of substantial combat forces anywhere on the territory of any NATO member State in furtherance of NATO’s core mission of collective defense and other missions.
(b)
added Report—
(1)
added In general— In order to ensure that the United States contribution to NATO’s core mission of collective defense remains robust and ready to meet any future challenges, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on the impact of any significant reduction in United States troop levels or materiel in Europe on NATO’s ability to credibly deter, resist, and, if necessary, repel external threats to any NATO member State.
(2)
added Deadline— The report required under paragraph (1) shall be submitted not later than 30 days prior to the date on which any significant reduction described in paragraph (1) is scheduled to take place.
(3)
added Form— The report required under paragraph (1) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may contain a classified annex if necessary to protect the national security interests of the United States.
(4)
added Definition— In this subsection, the term “appropriate congressional committees” means—
(A)
added the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate; and
(B)
added the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives.

Sec. 1275 Report on violence and cartel activity in Mexico

added

added The Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on violence and cartel activity in Mexico and the impact of such on United States national security.

Sec. 1276 Report on actions to ensure Qatar is preventing terrorist leaders and financiers from operating in its country

added
(a)
added Sense of Congress— It is the sense of Congress that—
(1)
added Qatar is an important partner in the region and has played a significant role in fighting ISIS;
(2)
added Qatar has provided significant enablers to the United States in its wars in Iraq and Afghanistan by hosting United States forces;
(3)
added Qatar has unfortunately allowed the leaders of Hamas, a United States-designated foreign terrorist organization, to operate freely in its country;
(4)
added Qatar has also allowed United States-designated terrorist financiers to operate in its country; and
(5)
added the United States should do everything in its power to encourage Qatar to crack down on terrorist leaders and financiers who are operating in its country.
(b)
added Report— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the President shall submit to Congress a report on actions taken by the United States Government to ensure that Qatar is preventing terrorist leaders and financiers from operating in its country.

Sec. 1277 United States support for Jordan

added
(a)
added Findings— Congress finds the following:
(1)
added The Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan remains a steadfast partner and the armed forces of Jordan are among the United States’ strongest military partners.
(2)
added Jordan’s civil and military leadership continue to provide a positive example of professionalism and moderation.
(3)
added The Colorado National Guard’s relationship with the Jordanian military provides a significant benefit to both the United States and Jordan.
(4)
added The armed forces of Jordan fought alongside United States forces in Afghanistan and are currently flying combat sorties as part of the counter-ISIL Coalition.
(5)
added Jordan continues to provide critical basing support for Operation Inherent Resolve missions.
(b)
added Sense of Congress— It is the sense of Congress that—
(1)
added Jordan is one of our most important allies in the region and the United States should support Jordan’s military efforts to the greatest extent possible, including by providing military equipment and training; and
(2)
added the President should make every effort to ensure rapid responses to any military requests for assistance from Jordan.

Sec. 1278 Report on United States efforts to combat Boko Haram and support regional allies and other partners

added
(a)
added Sense of Congress— It is the sense of Congress that—
(1)
added combating Boko Haram is in the national security interest of the United States;
(2)
added the United States should support regional partners, including the African Union-authorized Multinational Joint Task Force, through training and advice and the provision of key enablers to strengthen operations against Boko Haram; and
(3)
added United States support for these regional efforts should be integrated into a comprehensive strategy to support security and stability in the region.
(b)
added Report required—
(1)
added In general— Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of State shall jointly submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on the following:
(A)
added An assessment of the threat of Boko Haram to United States national security interests.
(B)
added A description of United States efforts to combat Boko Haram, including the authorities to carry out such efforts and the roles and missions of the Department of Defense and Department of State.
(C)
added An assessment of the capabilities, shortfalls, and progress made by United States-supported regional partners, including the African Union-authorized Multinational Joint Task Force, to combat Boko Haram.
(D)
added A description of military equipment, supplies, training, and other defense articles and services, including by type, quantity, and prioritization of such items, required to combat Boko Haram effectively and the gaps within regional allies to engage in the mission to combat Boko Haram.
(E)
added A description of military equipment, supplies, training, and other defense articles and services, including by type, quantity, and actual or estimated delivery date, that the United States Government has provided, is providing, and plans to provide to regional allies and other partners to combat Boko Haram.
(2)
added Form— The report required under paragraph (1) shall be submitted in unclassified in form, but may contain a classified annex.
(3)
added Definition— In this subsection, the term “appropriate congressional committees” means—
(A)
added the congressional defense committees; and
(B)
added the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives.

Sec. 1279 Sense of Congress on United States support for Tunisia

added

added It is the sense of Congress that it is a national security priority of the United States to support the Republic of Tunisia and to cooperate with Tunisia by providing assistance to combat the growing terrorist threat from the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) or other terrorist organizations.

Sec. 1280 Sense of Congress on future of NATO and enlargement initiatives

added
(a)
added Statement of policy— Congress declares that—
(1)
added the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) has been the cornerstone of transatlantic security cooperation and an enduring instrument for promoting stability in Europe and around the world for over 65 years;
(2)
added the incorporation of the Czech Republic, Poland, Hungary, Bulgaria, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Albania, and Croatia has been essential to the success of NATO in this modern era;
(3)
added these countries have over time added to and strengthened the list of key European allies of the United States;
(4)
added since joining NATO, these member states have remained committed to the collective defense of the Alliance and have demonstrated their will and ability to contribute to transatlantic solidarity and assume increasingly more responsibility for international peace and security;
(5)
added since joining the Alliance, these NATO members states have contributed to numerous NATO-led peace, security, and stability operations, including participation in the International Security Assistance Force’s (ISAF) mission in Afghanistan;
(6)
added these NATO member states have become reliable partners and supporters of aspiring members and the United States recognizes their continued efforts to aid in further enlargement initiatives;
(7)
added at the 2014 Summit in Wales, NATO declared that “The Open Door Policy under Article 10 of the Washington Treaty is one of the Alliance’s great successes.”; and
(8)
added at the 2014 Summit in Wales, NATO declared that “NATO’s door will remain open to all European democracies which share the values of our Alliance, which are willing and able to assume the responsibilities and obligations of membership, which are in a position to further the principles of the Treaty, and whose inclusion will contribute to the security of the North Atlantic area.”.
(b)
added Sense of Congress— It is the sense of Congress that—
(1)
added the United States should—
(A)
added continue to work with aspirant countries to prepare such countries for entry into NATO;
(B)
added seek NATO membership for Montenegro;
(C)
added continue supporting a Membership Action Plan (MAP) for Georgia;
(D)
added encourage the leaders of Macedonia and Greece to find a mutually agreeable solution to the name dispute between the two countries;
(E)
added seek a Dayton II agreement to resolve the constitutional issues of Bosnia and Herzegovina;
(F)
added work with the Republic of Kosovo to prepare the country for entrance into the Partnership for Peace (PfP) program;
(G)
added take a leading role in working with NATO member states to identify, through consensus, the current and future security threats facing the Alliance; and
(H)
added take a leading role to work with NATO allies to ensure the Alliance maintains the required capabilities, including the gains in interoperability from combat in Afghanistan, necessary to meet the security threats to the Alliance;
(2)
added NATO member states should review defense spending to ensure sufficient funding is obligated to meet NATO responsibilities; and
(3)
added the United States should remain committed to maintaining a military presence in Europe as a means of promoting allied interoperability and providing visible assurance to NATO allies in the region.

Sec. 1301 Specification of Cooperative Threat Reduction funds

(a)
changed Fiscal year 2016 cooperative threat reduction funds defined— In this title, the term fiscal year 2016 Cooperative Threat Reduction funds means the funds appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 301 1504 and made available by the funding table in section 4301 4303 for the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program established under section 1321 of the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Act (50 U.S.C. 3711).
(b)
changed Availability of funds— Funds appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 301 1504 and made available by the funding table in section 4301 4303 for the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program shall be available for obligation for fiscal years 2016, 2017, and 2018.

Sec. 1302 Funding allocations

changed Of the $358,496,000 authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2016 in section 301 1504 and made available by the funding table in section 4301 4303 for the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program established under section 1321 of the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Act (50 U.S.C. 3711), the following amounts may be obligated for the purposes specified:

(1)
For strategic offensive arms elimination, $1,289,000.
(2)
For chemical weapons destruction, $942,000.
(3)
For global nuclear security, $20,555,000.
(4)
For cooperative biological engagement, $264,618,000.
(5)
For proliferation prevention, $38,945,000.
(6)
For threat reduction engagement, $2,827,000.
(7)
For activities designated as Other Assessments/Administrative Costs, $29,320,000.

Sec. 1421 Limitation on furlough of Department of Defense employees paid through working-capital funds

Section 2208 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

“(s) Furlough of employees

“(1) Except as provided under paragraph (2), the Secretary of Defense or the Secretary of a military department may not furlough any employee of the Department of Defense whose salary is funded by a working-capital fund unless the Secretary determines that—

“(A) the working-capital fund is insolvent; or

“(B) there are insufficient funds in the working-capital fund to pay the labor costs of the employee.

“(2) The Secretary of Defense or the Secretary of a military department may waive the restriction under paragraph (1) if the Secretary determines such a waiver is in the interest of the national security of the United States.

changed “(3) In this subsection, the term “furlough” means If the placement, for nondisciplinary reasons, of an Secretary furloughs any employee referred to in paragraph (1), the Secretary shall submit to Congress, by no later than 30 days before initiating the furlough, notice of the furlough that includes a temporary status in which certification that, as a result of the proposed furlough, none of the work performed by any employee has no duties and is not paid, but does not include administrative leave of the Department of Defense will be shifted to any Department of Defense civilian employee, contractor, or an excused absence.”member of the Armed Forces.

added “(4) In this subsection, the term “furlough” means the placement, for nondisciplinary reasons, of an employee in a temporary status in which the employee has no duties and is not paid, but does not include administrative leave or an excused absence.”

Sec. 1504 Operation and maintenance

(a)
added Authorization of appropriations— Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2016 for the use of the Armed Forces and other activities and agencies of the Department of Defense for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for operation and maintenance, as specified in—

removed Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2016 for the use of the Armed Forces and other activities and agencies of the Department of Defense for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for operation and maintenance, as specified in—

(1)
renumbered was (3) the funding table in section 4302, or
(2)
renumbered was (4) the funding table in section 4303.
(b)
added Condition on use of funds for Iraq and Syria Train and Equip programs— Amounts authorized to be appropriated by this section for the Syria and Iraq Train and Equip programs, as specified in the funding table in section 4302, may not be provided to any recipient that the Secretary of Defense has reported, pursuant to a quarterly progress report submitted pursuant to section 1209 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3541), as having misused provided training and equipment.

Sec. 1543 Comptroller General report on use of funds provided for overseas contingency operations

added

added The Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to Congress a report on how funds authorized to be appropriated for overseas contingency operations were ultimately used.

Sec. 1641 Codification and addition of liability protections relating to reporting on cyber incidents or penetrations of networks and information systems of certain contractors

(a)
Codification and amendment— Section 941 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1889; 10 U.S.C. 2224 note) is transferred to chapter 19 of title 10, United States Code, inserted so as to appear after section 392, redesignated as section 393, and amended—
(1)
by amending the section heading to read as follows:

“393. Reporting on penetrations of networks and information systems of certain contractors”

(2)
added by striking paragraph (3) of subsection (c) and inserting the following new paragraph (3):

added “(3) Dissemination of information—The procedures established pursuant to subsection (a) shall limit the dissemination of information obtained or derived through such procedures to entities—

added “(A) with missions that may be affected by such information;

added “(B) that may be called upon to assist in the diagnosis, detection, or mitigation of cyber incidents;

added “(C) that conduct counterintelligence or law enforcement investigations; or

added “(D) for national security purposes, including cyber situational awareness and defense purposes.”

(3)
renumbered was (2)(4) by striking subsection (d) and inserting the following new subsection (d):

“(d) Protection from liability of cleared defense contractors

“(1) No cause of action shall lie or be maintained in any court against any cleared defense contractor, and such action shall be promptly dismissed, for compliance with this section that is conducted in accordance with the procedures established pursuant to subsection (a).

“(2)

“(A) Nothing in this section shall be construed—

“(i) to require dismissal of a cause of action against a cleared defense contractor that has engaged in willful misconduct in the course of complying with the procedures established pursuant to subsection (a); or

“(ii) to undermine or limit the availability of otherwise applicable common law or statutory defenses.

“(B) In any action claiming that paragraph (1) does not apply due to willful misconduct described in subparagraph (A), the plaintiff shall have the burden of proving by clear and convincing evidence the willful misconduct by each cleared defense contractor subject to such claim and that such willful misconduct proximately caused injury to the plaintiff.

“(C) In this subsection, the term “willful misconduct” means an act or omission that is taken—

“(i) intentionally to achieve a wrongful purpose;

“(ii) knowingly without legal or factual justification; and

“(iii) in disregard of a known or obvious risk that is so great as to make it highly probable that the harm will outweigh the benefit.”

(b)
Addition of liability protections for reporting on cyber incidents— Section 391 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
by redesignating subsection (d) as subsection (e); and
(2)
by inserting after subsection (c) the following new subsection (d):

“(d) Protection from liability of operationally critical contractors

“(1) No cause of action shall lie or be maintained in any court against any operationally critical contractor, and such action shall be promptly dismissed, for compliance with this section that is conducted in accordance with procedures established pursuant to subsection (b).

“(2)

“(A) Nothing in this section shall be construed—

“(i) to require dismissal of a cause of action against an operationally critical contractor that has engaged in willful misconduct in the course of complying with the procedures established pursuant to subsection (b); or

“(ii) to undermine or limit the availability of otherwise applicable common law or statutory defenses.

“(B) In any action claiming that paragraph (1) does not apply due to willful misconduct described in subparagraph (A), the plaintiff shall have the burden of proving by clear and convincing evidence the willful misconduct by each operationally critical contractor subject to such claim and that such willful misconduct proximately caused injury to the plaintiff.

“(C) In this subsection, the term “willful misconduct” means an act or omission that is taken—

“(i) intentionally to achieve a wrongful purpose;

“(ii) knowingly without legal or factual justification; and

“(iii) in disregard of a known or obvious risk that is so great as to make it highly probable that the harm will outweigh the benefit.”

(c)
Conforming and technical amendments—
(1)
Section 391 of title 10, United States Code, is amended in subsection (a) by striking “with section 941 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (10 U.S.C. 2224 note)” and inserting “and section 393 of this title”.
(2)
changed The table of sections for at the beginning of chapter 19 of such title is amended—
(A)
by amending the item relating to section 391 to read as follows:
(B)
changed by inserting adding at the end the following new item:

Sec. 1654 Annual briefing on the costs of forward-deploying nuclear weapons in Europe

(a)
changed In general— Not later than 30 days after the date on which the President submits to Congress the budget for each of fiscal years 2016 2017 through 2020 2021 under section 1105 of title 31, United States Code, the Secretary of Defense shall provide to the congressional defense committees a briefing on the costs of forward-deploying nuclear weapons in Europe.
(b)
Elements— Each briefing required under paragraph (1) shall include the following:
(1)
The contributions of the United States, including with respect to sustainment (operations and maintenance) and manpower, to support forward-deployed nuclear weapons in Europe, during the fiscal year following the date of the briefing and the period covered by the future-years defense program submitted to Congress under section 221 of title 10, United States Code, for that fiscal year.
(2)
Recent or planned contributions of the United States for security enhancements relating to such forward-deployed nuclear weapons.
(3)
Any other contributions, including burden-share costs by the United States, for other security enhancements and upgrades relating to such forward-deployed nuclear weapons, including infrastructure upgrades at weapons storage sites in Europe.

Sec. 1657 Prohibition on de-alerting intercontinental ballistic missiles

added
(a)
added Sense of congress— It is the Sense of Congress that—
(1)
added the responsiveness and alert levels of intercontinental ballistic missiles are a unique feature of the ground-based leg of the United States nuclear triad;
(2)
added such responsiveness and alert levels are critical to providing robust nuclear deterrence and assurance; and
(3)
added any action to reduce the responsiveness and alert levels of United States intercontinental ballistic missiles would be contrary to longstanding United States policy, and deeply harmful to national security and strategic stability in a crisis.
(b)
added In general—
(1)
added Prohibition— None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2016 shall be obligated or expended for reducing, or preparing to reduce, the responsiveness or alert level of United States intercontinental ballistic missiles.
(2)
added Clarification relating to maintenance, safety, security, etc— Paragraph (1) shall not apply to any of the following activities:
(A)
added Maintenance or sustainment of intercontinental ballistic missiles.
(B)
added Ensuring the safety, security, or reliability of intercontinental ballistic missiles.

Sec. 1658 Sense of Congress on Plan for Implementation of Nuclear Enterprise Reviews

added

added It is the sense of Congress that the Secretary of Defense should submit to Congress a plan on how the Secretary plans to implement the full recommendations of the two nuclear enterprise reviews, conducted and then validated by the Air Force, one of which was conducted by Assistant Secretary Madelyn Creedon and Rear Admiral Peter Fanta and one of which was conducted by General Walsh and Admiral Harvey. The plan submitted under this section should include a timeline for when each recommendation shall be implemented and how the additional manpower recommendations shall be allocated.

Sec. 1659 Report on the number of planned nuclear-armed cruise missiles

added

added Not later than 120 days after the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress a report on the justification of the number of planned nuclear-armed cruise missiles, known as the Long Range Standoff Weapon, to the U.S. arsenal. The report shall include—

(1)
added the rationale for procuring the expected number of cruise missiles;
(2)
added how the number of planned missiles aligns with U.S. nuclear employment strategy;
(3)
added an estimate of the annual and total cost for research, development, test, and evaluation and procurement for the total number of planned cruise missiles; and
(4)
added an estimate of the proportional annual cost of the cruise missiles as compared to the annual cost of nuclear triad and annual defense spending.

Sec. 1669 Availability of funds for Iron Dome short-range rocket defense system

(a)
Availability of funds— Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by section 101 for procurement, Defense-wide, and available for the Missile Defense Agency, not more than $41,400,000 may be provided to the Government of Israel to procure radars for the Iron Dome short-range rocket defense system as specified in the funding table in section 4101, including for co-production of such radars in the United States by industry of the United States.
(b)
Conditions—
(1)
changed Agreement— Funds described in subsection (a) to produce the Iron Dome short-range rocket defense program shall be available subject to the terms, conditions, terms and co-production targets specified for fiscal year 2015 conditions in the “Agreement Between the Department of Defense of the United States of America and the Ministry of Defense of the State of Israel Concerning Iron Dome Defense System Procurement,” signed on March 5, 2014. 2014, subject to an amended agreement for coproduction for radar components. In negotiations by the Missile Defense Agency and the Missile Defense Organization of the Government of Israel regarding such production, the goal of the United States is to maximize opportunities for co-production of the radars described subsection (a) in the United States by industry of the United States.
(2)
Certification— Not later than 30 days prior to the initial obligation of funds described in subsection (a), the Director of the Missile Defense Agency and the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics shall jointly submit to the appropriate congressional committees—
(A)
a certification that the agreement specified in paragraph (1) is being implemented as provided in such agreement; and
(B)
an assessment detailing any risks relating to the implementation of such agreement.
(c)
Appropriate congressional committees defined— In this section, the term “appropriate congressional committees” means the following:
(1)
The congressional defense committees.
(2)
The Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate.

Sec. 1670 Israeli Cooperative Missile Defense Program co-development and potential co-production

(a)
Availability of funds for certain programs—
(1)
In general— Subject to subsections (b) and (c), of the funds authorized to be appropriated by section 101 for procurement, Defense-wide, and available for the Missile Defense Agency, as specified in the funding table in section 4101—
(A)
not more than $150,000,000 may be provided to the Government of Israel to procure the David’s Sling weapon system; and
(B)
not more than $15,000,000 may be provided to the Government of Israel to procure the Arrow 3 upper tier development program.
(2)
Procurement and co-production— The use of funds under subparagraphs (A) and (B) of paragraph (1) shall—
(A)
be carried out only with respect to procurement activities; and
(B)
include the co-production of parts and components in the United States by United States industry.
(b)
Condition on use of funds— The Director of the Missile Defense Agency may not carry out subparagraphs (A) or (B) of subsection (a)(1) unless—
(1)
the Director and the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics jointly certify to the appropriate congressional committees that—
(A)
changed the knowledge points and production readiness agreements of the research, development, test, and evaluation agreements that inform a production decision for the David’s Sling weapon system or the Arrow 3 upper tier development program, respectively, have been successfully completed;
(B)
changed such subparagraphs shall be carried out with the Government of Israel matching funds in an amount equal to the amount of funds provided by the United States; States or in an amount that meets best efforts, as mutually agreed by the United States and Israel; and
(C)
the United States and the Government of Israel have entered into a bilateral agreement that—
(i)
establishes the terms of co-production of parts and components described in subsection (a)(2) pursuant to the teaming agreements previously entered into regarding the co-development of such weapon system and development program in a manner that minimizes non-recurring engineering and facilitization expenses;
(ii)
establishes complete transparency on the requirement of Israel for the number of interceptors and batteries of such weapon system and development program that will be procured;
(iii)
allows the Director and Under Secretary to establish technical milestones for co-production and procurement of the such weapon system and development program; and
(iv)
establishes joint approval processes for third-party sales of such weapon system and development program; and
(2)
a period of 90 days has elapsed following the date of such certification.
(c)
added Waiver— The Director may waive the requirements of subsection (b) to carry out subparagraphs (A) or (B) of subsection (a)(1) if the Under Secretary certifies to the appropriate congressional committees that the Under Secretary has sufficient data from the Government of Israel to demonstrate the following:
(1)
added Such subparagraphs will be carried out solely for funding procurement of long-lead components in accordance with a production plan, including a funding profile detailing Israeli contributions for production of either David’s Sling or Arrow 3.
(2)
added Such long-lead components have completed the research and development technology development phase.
(3)
added The long-lead procurement will be conducted in a manner that maximizes co-production in the United States without incurring additional non-recurring engineering activity or cost.
(d)
renumbered was (4) Appropriate congressional committees defined— In this section, the term “appropriate congressional committees” means the following:
(1)
renumbered was (4)(3) The congressional defense committees.
(2)
renumbered was (4)(4) The Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate.

Sec. 1674 Plan for medium range ballistic missile defense sensor alternatives for enhanced defense of Hawaii

(a)
Sense of Congress— It is the sense of Congress that—
(1)
expanding persistent midcourse and terminal ballistic missile defense system discrimination capability is critically important to the defense of the Nation;
(2)
such discrimination capability is needed to respond to emerging ballistic missile threats involving countermeasures and decoys; and
(3)
the Department of Defense should take all appropriate steps to ensure Hawaii has adequate missile defense coverage.
(b)
Evaluation and plan—
(1)
changed Evaluation— The Director of the Missile Defense Agency shall conduct an evaluation of potential options for fielding a medium range ballistic missile defense sensor alternatives for the defense of Hawaii, including—
(A)
the use of the Aegis Ashore Missile Defense Test Complex land-based system at the Pacific Missile Range Facility in Hawaii;
(B)
the use of existing sensor assets in the region; and
(C)
other options the Director determines appropriate.
(2)
Submittal of plan— Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director shall submit to the congressional defense committees a plan for the missile defense of Hawaii, which shall include—
(A)
a summary of the findings of the evaluation conducted under paragraph (1);
(B)
estimated acquisition and operating costs for each sensor option; and
(C)
a timeline for deployment of the sensor.

Sec. 1675 Research and development of non-terrestrial missile defense layer

(a)
In general— Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director of the Missile Defense Agency shall commence the concept definition, design, research, development, and engineering evaluation of a space-based ballistic missile intercept and defeat layer to the ballistic missile defense system that—
(1)
shall provide increased access to ballistic missile targets, independent of adversary country size and threat trajectory;
(2)
may provide a boost-phase layer for missile defense; and
(3)
may provide additional defensive options against direct ascent anti-satellite weapons and hypersonic glide vehicles and maneuvering re-entry vehicles.
(b)
Elements— The activities carried out under subsection (a) shall include, at a minimum the following:
(1)
Initiate formal steps for potential integration into the architecture of the ballistic missile defense system.
(2)
Mature planning for early proof of concept component demonstrations.
(3)
Draft operation concepts in the context of a multi-layer architecture.
(4)
Identification of proof of concept vendor sources for demo components and subassemblies.
(5)
The development of a multiyear technology and risk reduction investment plan.
(6)
Commence development of proof of concept master program phasing schedule.
(7)
Identification of proof of concept long lead items.
(8)
Mature options for an acquisition strategy.
(c)
Report— Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that includes—
(1)
the findings of the concept development required by subsection (a);
(2)
changed a plan for developing one or more programs of record for a non-terrestrial missile defense layer; layer, including estimates of the appropriate identifiable costs of each such potential program of record; and
(3)
the views of the Director regarding such findings and plan.
(d)
Briefing— Not later the March 31, 2016, the Director shall provide to the congressional defense committees an interim briefing on the plan described in subsection (c)(2).

Sec. 1678 Designation of preferred location of additional missile defense site in the United States

added

added Not later than 30 days after the date on which the Secretary of Defense publishes the draft environmental impact statements pursuant to section 227 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1678), the Director of the Missile Defense Agency, in consultation with the Commander of the United States Northern Command, shall designate the preferred location in the United States for the potential future deployment of a missile defense site.

Sec. 1679 Report relating to the costs associated with extending the life of the Minuteman III intercontinental ballistic missile

added

added Not later than 90 days after the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Air Force shall submit to Congress a report examining the costs associated with extending the life of the Minuteman III intercontinental ballistic missile compared to the costs associated with procuring a new ground based strategic deterrent.

Sec. 2310 Limitation on project authorization to carry out certain fiscal year 2016 project

(a)
Project conditioned on submission of report— No amounts may be expended for the construction of the Joint Intelligence Analysis Complex Consolidation, Phase 2, at Royal Air Force Croughton, United Kingdom, as authorized by section 2301(b) until the Secretary of the Air Force, in coordination with the Director of the Defense Intelligence Agency, submits a report to the congressional defense committees that provides—
(1)
a summary of the alternatives considered to support continuity of operations of critical communications and intelligence capabilities located at, and to be consolidated to, Royal Air Force Croughton, United Kingdom; and
(2)
a list of critical communications and intelligence capabilities that were considered under continuity of operations planning.
(b)
changed Limitation on related realignment actions— On and after the date of the enactment of this Act, no additional action to realign forces at Lajes Air Force Base, Azores, shall be taken until the Secretary of Defense certifies to the congressional defense committees that the Secretary of Defense has determined, based on an analysis of United States operational requirements, not including the requirements of any other organization or country, that Lajes Air Force Base is not an optimal location for the Joint Intelligence Analysis Complex, or any of the critical communications or intelligence capabilities considered pursuant to subsection (a)(2). The certification shall include a discussion of the basis for the Secretary’s determination.

Sec. 2804 Special authority for minor military construction projects for child development program facilities

added

added Section 2805 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—

(1)
added by redesignating subsection (e) as subsection (f); and
(2)
added by inserting after subsection (d) the following new subsection (e):

added “(e) Child development program facilities

added “(1) Using such amounts as may be appropriated to the Secretary concerned in advance for operation and maintenance to carry out this subsection, the Secretary concerned may carry out an unspecified minor military construction project that—

added “(A) has an approved cost equal to or less than $15,000,000, notwithstanding subsections (a) and (c); and

added “(B) creates, expands, or modifies a child development program facility serving children under 13 years of age.

added “(2) The approval and congressional notification requirements of subsection (b) shall apply to an unspecified minor military construction project carried out pursuant to paragraph (1), except that, paragraph (1) of subsection (b) shall be applied by substituting “$7,500,000” for “$1,000,000”.

added “(3) The authority to commence an unspecified minor military construction project pursuant to paragraph (1) expires September 30, 2018.”

Sec. 2805 Sense of Congress regarding base housing projects

added

added It is the sense of Congress that the Department of Defense should take into consideration, when prioritizing base housing projects, commuting times for base personnel and land available for development on the base.

Sec. 2811 Enhancement of authority to accept conditional gifts of real property on behalf of military service academies

Section 2601 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—

(1)
changed by redesigning redesignating subsections (e), (f), (g), (h), and (i) as subsections (f), (g), (h), (i), and (j), respectively; and
(2)
by inserting after subsection (d) the following new subsection (e):

“(e) Acceptance of real property gifts; naming rights

“(1) The Secretary concerned may accept a gift under subsection (a) or (b) consisting of the provision, acquisition, enhancement, or construction of real property offered to the United States Military Academy, the Naval Academy, the Air Force Academy, or the Coast Guard Academy even though the gift will be subject to the condition that the real property, or a portion thereof, bear a specified name.

“(2) A gift may not be accepted under paragraph (1) if—

“(A) the acceptance of the gift or the imposition of the naming-rights condition would reflect unfavorably upon the United States, as provided in subsection (d)(2); or

“(B) the real property to be subject to the condition, or portion thereof, has been named by an act of Congress.

“(3) The Secretaries concerned shall issue uniform regulations governing the circumstances under which gifts conditioned on naming rights may be accepted, appropriate naming conventions, and suitable display standards.”

Sec. 2815 Arsenal Installation Reutilization Authority

added
(a)
added In general— Section 2667 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
added by redesignating subsections (h), (i), and (j) as subsections (i), (j), and (k), respectively; and
(2)
added by inserting after subsection (g) the following new subsection:

added “(h) Arsenal installation reutilization authority

added “(1) In the case of a military manufacturing arsenal, the Secretary concerned may authorize leases and contracts for a term of up to 25 years, notwithstanding subsection (b)(1), if the Secretary determines that a lease or contract of that duration will promote the national defense or be in the public interest for the purpose of—

added “(A) helping to maintain the viability of the military manufacturing arsenal and any military installations on which it is located;

added “(B) eliminating, or at least reducing, the cost of Government ownership of the military manufacturing arsenal, including the costs of operations and maintenance, the costs of environmental remediation, and other costs; and

added “(C) leveraging private investment at the military manufacturing arsenal through long-term facility use contracts, property management contracts, leases, or other agreements that support and advance the preceding purposes.

added “(2)

added “(A) The Secretary concerned my delegate the authority provided by this subsection to the commander of the military manufacturing arsenal or, if part of a larger military installation, the installation commander.

added “(B) The delegated authority does not include the authority to enter into a lease or contract under this section to carry out any activity covered by section 4544(b) of this title related to—

added “(i) the sale of articles manufactured by a military manufacturing arsenal;

added “(ii) the sale of services performed by a military manufacturing arsenal; or

added “(iii) the performance of manufacturing work at the military manufacturing arsenal.

added “(3) In this subsection, the term “military manufacturing arsenal” means a Government-owned, Government-operated defense plant of the Department of the Defense that manufactures weapons, weapon components, or both.”

(b)
added Cross references—
(1)
added Section 2662(b)(3)(E) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “2667(h)(2)” and inserting “2667(i)(2)”.
(2)
added Section 6981(a)(2) of such title is amended by striking “2667(h)(2)” and inserting “2667(i)(2)”.

Sec. 2831 Land exchange authority, Mare Island Army Reserve Center, Vallejo, California

(a)
Exchange authorized— Subject to subsection (b), the Secretary of the Army may carry out a real property exchange with Touro University California (in this section referred to as the “University”), under which the Secretary will convey all right, title, and interest of the United States in and to a parcel of real property, including any improvements thereon, consisting of approximately 3.42 acres of the former Mare Island Naval Shipyard on Azuar Drive in the City of Vallejo, California, and administered by the Secretary as part of the 63rd Regional Support Command, for the purpose of permitting the University to use the parcel for educational and administrative purposes.
(b)
changed Conveyance authority conditional— The conveyance authority provided by subsection (a) shall take effect only if the real property exchange process initiated by the Secretary of the Army in a notice of availability (DACW05-8-15-512) (DACW05–8–15–512) issued on January 28, 2015, and involving the real property described in subsection (a) is terminated unsuccessfully.
(c)
Conveyance process— The Secretary shall carry out the real property exchange authorized by subsection (a) using the authority available to the Secretary under section 18240 of title 10, United States Code.
(d)
Facilities to be acquired— In exchange for the conveyance of the real property under subsection (a), the Secretary of the Army shall acquire, consistent with subsections (c) and (d) of section 18240 of title 10, United States Code, a facility, or addition to an existing facility, needed to rectify the parking shortage for the Mare Island Army Reserve Center.
(e)
Payment of costs of conveyance—
(1)
Payment required— The Secretary of the Army shall require the University to cover costs (except costs for environmental remediation of the property) to be incurred by the Secretary, or to reimburse the Secretary for such costs incurred by the Secretary, to carry out the conveyance under subsection (a), including survey costs, costs for environmental documentation related to the conveyance, and any other administrative costs related to the conveyance. If amounts are collected from the University in advance of the Secretary incurring the actual costs, and the amount collected exceeds the costs actually incurred by the Secretary to carry out the conveyance, the Secretary shall refund the excess amount to the University.
(2)
Treatment of amounts received— Amounts received as reimbursement under paragraph (1) shall be credited to the fund or account that was used to cover those costs incurred by the Secretary in carrying out the conveyance or, if the period of availability for obligations for that appropriation has expired, to the appropriations or fund that is currently available to the Secretary for the same purpose. Amounts so credited shall be merged with amounts in such fund or account, and shall be available for the same purposes, and subject to the same conditions and limitations, as amounts in such fund or account.
(f)
Description of property— The exact acreage and legal description of the property to be conveyed under subsection (a) and acquired under subsection (d) shall be determined by a survey satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army.

Sec. 2834 Release of property interests retained in connection with land conveyance, Camp Villere, Louisiana

added
(a)
added Release of retained interests— With respect to a parcel of real property at Camp Villere, Louisiana, consisting of approximately 48.04 acres and conveyed by quit-claim deed for National Guard purposes by the United States to the State of Louisiana pursuant to section 616 of the Military Construction Authorization Act, 1975 (titles I through VI of Public Law 93–553; 88 Stat. 1768), the Secretary of the Army may release the terms and conditions imposed by the United States under subsection (b) of such section and the reversionary interest retained by the United States under subsection (c) of such section. The release of such terms and conditions and retained interests with respect to any portion of that parcel shall not be construed to alter the rights or interests retained by the United States with respect to the remainder of the real property conveyed to the State under such section.
(b)
added Condition of release— The release authorized by subsection (a) of terms and conditions and retained interests shall be subject to the condition that the State of Louisiana—
(1)
added transfer the parcel of real property described in such subsection from the Louisiana Military Department to the Louisiana Agricultural Finance Authority for the purpose of permitting the Louisiana Agricultural Finance Authority to use the parcel for any purposes allowed by State law; and
(2)
added make available to the Louisiana Military Department real property to replace the transferred parcel that is suitable for use for National Guard training and operational support for emergency management and homeland defense activities.
(c)
added Instrument of release and description of property— The Secretary of the Army may execute and file in the appropriate office a deed of release, amended deed, or other appropriate instrument reflecting the release of terms and conditions and retained interests under subsection (a). The exact acreage and legal description of the property described in such subsection shall be determined by a survey satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army.
(d)
added Payment of administrative costs—
(1)
added Payment required— The Secretary of the Army may require the State of Louisiana to cover costs to be incurred by the Secretary, or to reimburse the Secretary for costs incurred by the Secretary, to carry out the release of retained interests under subsection (a), including survey costs, costs related to environmental documentation, and other administrative costs related to the conveyance. If amounts paid to the Secretary in advance exceed the costs actually incurred by the Secretary to carry out the conveyance, the Secretary shall refund the excess amount to the State.
(2)
added Treatment of amounts received— Amounts received under paragraph (1) as reimbursement for costs incurred by the Secretary to carry out the release of retained interests under subsection (a) shall be credited to the fund or account that was used to cover the costs incurred by the Secretary in carrying out the release of retained interests. Amounts so credited shall be merged with amounts in such fund or account and shall be available for the same purposes, and subject to the same conditions and limitations, as amounts in such fund or account.
(e)
added Additional terms and conditions— The Secretary of the Army may require such additional terms and conditions in connection with the release of retained interests under subsection (a) as the Secretary considers appropriate to protect the interests of the United States.

Sec. 2835 Land conveyance, Campion Air Force Radar Station, Galena, Alaska

added
(a)
added Conveyance authorized— The Secretary of the Interior may convey, without consideration, to the Town of Galena, Alaska (in this section referred to as the “Town”), all right, title, and interest of the United States in and to public land, including improvements thereon, at the former Campion Air Force Station, Alaska, as further described in subsection (b), for the purpose of permitting the Town to use the conveyed land for public purposes.
(b)
added Description of property— The property to be conveyed under subsection (a) consists of approximately 1290 acres of the approximately 1613 acres of public land withdrawn by the Secretary of the Interior under Public Land Order 843 for use by the Secretary of the Air Force as the former Campion Air Force Station. The portions of the former Air Force Station that are not authorized to be conveyed under subsection (a) are those portions that are subject to environmental land use restrictions or are currently undergoing environmental remediation by the Secretary of the Air Force.
(c)
added Consultation— The Secretary of the Interior shall consult with the Secretary of the Air Force on the exact acreage and legal description of the public land to be conveyed under subsection (a) and conditions to be included in the conveyance that are necessary to protect human health and the environment.
(d)
added Payment of costs of conveyance—
(1)
added Payment required— The Secretary of the Interior shall require the Town to cover costs (except costs for environmental remediation of the property) to be incurred by the Secretary of the Interior and by the Secretary of the Air Force, or to reimburse the appropriate Secretary for such costs incurred by the Secretary, to carry out the conveyance under this section, including survey costs, costs for environmental documentation, and any other administrative costs related to the conveyance. If amounts are collected in advance of the Secretary of Interior or Secretary of the Air Force incurring the actual costs, and the amount collected exceeds the costs actually incurred by the Secretary to carry out the conveyance, the appropriate Secretary shall refund the excess amount to the Town.
(2)
added Treatment of amounts received—
(A)
added Secretary of the interior— Amounts received by the Secretary of the Interior as reimbursement under paragraph (1) shall be credited, at the option of the Secretary, to the appropriation, fund, or account from which the expenses were paid, or to an appropriate appropriation, fund, or account currently available to the Secretary for the purposes for which the expenses were paid. Amounts so credited shall be merged with funds in such appropriation, fund, or account and shall be available for the same purposes and subject to the same limitations as the funds with which merged.
(B)
added Secretary of the air force— Amounts received by the Secretary of the Air Force as reimbursement under paragraph (1) shall be credited, at the option of the Secretary, to the appropriation, fund, or account from which the expenses were paid, or to an appropriate appropriation, fund, or account currently available to the Secretary for the purposes for which the expenses were paid. Amounts so credited shall be merged with funds in such appropriation, fund, or account and shall be available for the same purposes and subject to the same limitations as the funds with which merged.
(e)
added Conveyance agreement— The conveyance of public land under this section shall be accomplished using a quit claim deed or other legal instrument and upon terms and conditions mutually satisfactory to the Secretary of the Interior, after consulting with the Secretary of the Air Force, and the Town, including such additional terms and conditions as the Secretary of the Interior, after consulting with the Secretary of the Air Force, considers appropriate to protect the interests of the United States.

Sec. 2861 Modification of Department of Defense guidance on use of airfield pavement markings

changed The Secretary of Defense shall require such modifications of Unified Facilities Guide Specifications for pavement markings (UFGS 32 17 23.00 20 Pavement Markings, UFGS 32 17 24.00 10 Pavement Markings), Air Force Engineering Technical Letter ETL 97-18 97–18 (Guide Specification for Airfield and Roadway Marking), and any other Department of Defense guidance on airfield pavement markings as may be necessary to permit the use of Type III category of retro-reflective beads to reflectorize airfield markings. The Secretary shall develop appropriate policy to ensure that the determination of the category of retro-reflective beads used on an airfield is determined on an installation-by-installation basis, taking into consideration local conditions and the life-cycle maintenance costs of the pavement markings.

Sec. 2863 Use of Military Operations Areas for national security activities

added

added The expansion or establishment of a national monument by the President under the authority of chapter 3203 of title 54, United States Code (commonly known as the Antiquities Act of 1906; 54 U.S.C. 320301 et seq.), after the date of the enactment of this Act on land located beneath or associated with a Military Operations Area (MOA) shall not be construed to prohibit or constrain any activities on or above the land conducted by the Department of Defense or other Federal agencies for national security purposes, including training and readiness activities.

Sec. 2864 Renaming of the Captain William Wylie Galt Great Falls Armed Forces Readiness Center in honor of Captain John E. Moran, a recipient of the Medal of Honor

added
(a)
added Renaming— The Captain William Wylie Galt Great Falls Armed Forces Readiness Center in Great Falls, Montana, shall hereafter be known and designated as the “Captain John E. Moran and Captain William Wylie Galt Armed Forces Reserve Center”.
(b)
added References— Any reference in any law, map, regulation, map, document, paper, other record of the United States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall be considered to be a reference to the Captain John E. Moran and Captain William Wylie Galt Armed Forces Reserve Center.

Sec. 2865 Implementation of lesser prairie-chicken range-wide conservation plan and other conservation measures

added
(a)
added Definitions— In this section:
(1)
added Candidate conservation agreements— The terms “Candidate Conservation Agreement” and “Candidate and Conservation Agreement With Assurances” have the meaning given those terms in—
(A)
added the announcement of the Department of the Interior and the Department of Commerce entitled “Announcement of Final Policy for Candidate Conservation Agreements with Assurances” (64 Fed. Reg. 32726 (June 17, 1999)); and
(B)
added sections 17.22(d) and 17.32(d) of title 50, Code of Federal Regulations (as in effect on the date of enactment of this Act).
(2)
added Range-wide plan— The term “Range-Wide Plan” means the Lesser Prairie-Chicken Range-Wide Conservation Plan of the Western Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies, as endorsed by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service on October 23, 2013, and published for comment on January 29, 2014 (79 Fed. Reg. 4652).
(3)
added Secretary— The term “Secretary” means the Secretary of the Interior.
(b)
added Prohibition on treatment as threatened or endangered species—
(1)
added In general— Notwithstanding any prior action by the Secretary, the lesser prairie chicken shall not be treated as a threatened species or endangered species under the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) before January 31, 2021.
(2)
added Prohibition on proposal— Beginning on January 31, 2021, the lesser prairie chicken may not be treated as a threatened species or endangered species under the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) unless the Secretary publishes a determination, based on the totality of the scientific evidence, that conservation (as that term is used in that Act) under the Range-Wide Plan and the agreements, programs, and efforts referred to in subsection (c) have not achieved the conservation goals established by the Range-Wide Plan.
(c)
added Monitoring of progress of conservation programs— The Secretary shall monitor and annually submit to Congress a report on progress in conservation of the lesser prairie chicken under the Range-Wide Plan and all related—
(1)
added Candidate Conservation Agreements and Candidate and Conservation Agreements With Assurances;
(2)
added other Federal conservation programs administered by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, the Bureau of Land Management, and the Department of Agriculture;
(3)
added State conservation programs; and
(4)
added private conservation efforts.

Sec. 2866 Removal of endangered species status for American burying beetle

added

added Notwithstanding the final rule of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service entitled “Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Determination of Endangered Status for the American Burying Beetle” (54 Fed. Reg. 29652 (July 13, 1989)), the American burying beetle shall not be listed as a threatened or endangered species under the Endangered Species Act (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).

Sec. 3104 Nuclear energy

added

added Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Energy for fiscal year 2016 for nuclear energy as specified in the funding table in section 4701.

Sec. 3119 Limitation on authorization of production of special nuclear material outside the United States by foreign country with nuclear naval propulsion program

changed Section 57 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2077), as amended by section 3118, 2077) is further amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:subsections:

“f.

changed “(1) The In accordance with paragraph (2), the Secretary may not make an authorization under subsection b.(2) with respect to a covered foreign country with a nuclear naval propulsion program unless—

“(A) the Director of National Intelligence and the Chief of Naval Operations jointly submit to the appropriate congressional committees an assessment of the risks of diversion, and the likely consequences of such diversion, of the technology and material covered by such authorization;

changed “(B) following the date on which such assessment is submitted, and, to the extent practicable, concurrently during the process under which the Secretary evaluates such authorization, the Administrator for Nuclear Security certifies to the appropriate congressional committees that—

changed “(i) there is sufficient diversion control as part of the transfer under such transfer; authorization; and

“(ii) such transfer presents a minimal risk of diversion of such technology to a military program that would degrade the technical advantage of the United States; and

changed “(C) a period of 90 14 days has elapsed following the date of such certification.

changed “(2) In this subsection, the term “appropriate congressional committees” means the following:The limitation in paragraph (1) shall apply as follows:

changed “(A) The congressional defense committees (as defined in section 101(a)(16) During the period preceding the date on which the Chief of title 10, United States Code).Naval Operations first makes a determination under paragraph (3), with respect to technology and material covered by an authorization under subsection b.(2).

changed “(B) The Select Committee on Intelligence of During the Senate and period beginning on the Permanent Select Committee date on Intelligence of which the House Chief first makes such determination, with respect to the critical civil nuclear technologies of Representatives.the United States covered by a determination made under paragraph (3).

changed “(C) The Committee on Foreign Relations “(3) Not later than June 1, 2016, and quinquennially thereafter, the Chief of Naval Operations shall determine the Senate and critical civil nuclear technologies of the Committee on Foreign Affairs United States that should be protected from diversion to a military program of a covered foreign country, including with respect to naval propulsion and weapons. The Chief shall notify the House appropriate congressional committees of Representatives.”each such determination.

added “(4) Not later than 30 days after the date on which the Director of National Intelligence determines that there is evidence to believe that critical civil nuclear technology of the United States has been diverted to a foreign country not covered by an authorization made pursuant to subsection b., including an agreement for cooperation made pursuant to section 123, the Director shall notify the appropriate congressional committees of such determination.

added “(5) The Secretary shall annually notify the appropriate congressional committees that each covered foreign country is in compliance with its obligations under any authorization made pursuant to subsection b., including an agreement for cooperation made pursuant to section 123.

added “(6) In this subsection:

added “(A) The term “appropriate congressional committees” means—

added “(i) the congressional defense committees (as defined in section 101(a)(16) of title 10, United States Code);

added “(ii) the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives; and

added “(iii) the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives.

added “(B) The term “covered foreign country” means a foreign country that is a nuclear-weapon state, as defined by Article IX (3) of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, signed at Washington, London, and Moscow on July 1, 1968, but does not include the United Kingdom or France.

added “g.

added “(1) The Secretary may not make an authorization under subsection b.(2) with respect to a covered foreign country if a foreign person of the covered foreign country has been sanctioned under the Iran, North Korea, and Syria Nonproliferation Act (Public Law 106–178; 50 U.S.C. 1701 note) during the five-year period preceding the date of the transfer being sought unless the President certifies to the appropriate congressional committees that the covered foreign country is taking adequate measures to prevent, or is making significant progress in preventing, transfers or acquisitions covered by section 2(a) of the Iran, North Korea, and Syria Nonproliferation Act.

added “(2) The terms “appropriate congressional committees” and “covered foreign country” have the meanings given those terms in subsection f.(6).”

Sec. 3120 Limitation on availability of funds for development of certain nuclear nonproliferation technologies

(a)
Limitation— Except as provided by subsection (b), none of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2016 for defense nuclear nonproliferation for nonproliferation or arms control verification or monitoring technologies may be obligated or expended to develop such technologies beyond technology readiness level 5 unless, not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Energy submits to the appropriate congressional committees the following:
(1)
Written certification that such technologies are being developed to fulfill the rights or obligations of the United States under—
(A)
a current arms control or nonproliferation treaty or agreement requiring verification or monitoring that has entered into force with respect to the United States; or
(B)
an arms control or nonproliferation treaty or agreement that—
(i)
will require verification or monitoring; and
(iii)
the Secretary expects will enter into force with respect to the United States during the two-year period beginning on the date of the certification.
(2)
With respect to each technology developed beyond technology readiness level 5 pursuant to this subsection—
(A)
an identification of the amount of such funds made available for fiscal year 2016 for defense nuclear nonproliferation that will be used for such development; and
(B)
how such development helps to fulfill the rights or obligations of the United States as described in subparagraphs (A) or (B) of paragraph (1).
(b)
Waiver— The Secretary may waive the limitation in subsection (a) if—
(1)
the Secretary—
(A)
determines that the waiver is necessary in the national security interests of the United States; and
(B)
submits to the appropriate congressional committees a written certification of such determination; and
(2)
a period of 15 days elapses following the date on which the Secretary submits such certification.
(c)
Definitions— In this section:
(1)
The term “appropriate congressional committees” means—
(A)
the congressional defense committees; and
(B)
the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate.
(2)
changed The term “technology readiness level 5” has the meaning given that term in the Department of Energy Guide 413.3-4A 413.3–4A titled “Technology Readiness Assessment Guide” and approved on September 15, 2011.

Sec. 3123 Life extension programs covered by selected acquisition reports

added

added Section 4217 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2537) is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

added “(d) Treatment of certain systems—For purposes of this section, an existing nuclear weapon system is deemed to be undergoing life extension if the expected total cost of the associated activities, including activities considered alterations, will exceed $1,000,000,000.”

Sec. 3136 Establishment of microlab pilot program

added
(a)
added In general— The Secretary, in collaboration with the directors of national laboratories, may establish a microlab pilot program under which the Secretary establishes a microlab that is located in close proximity to a national laboratory and that is accessible to the public for the purposes of—
(1)
added enhancing collaboration with regional research groups, such as institutions of higher education and industry groups; and
(2)
added accelerating technology transfer from national laboratories to the marketplace.
(3)
added promoting regional workforce development through science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) instruction and training.
(b)
added Criteria— In determining the placement of a microlab under subsection (a), the Secretary shall consider—
(1)
added the commitment of a national laboratory to establishing a microlab;
(2)
added the existence of a joint research institute or a new facility that—
(A)
added is not on the main site of a national laboratory;
(B)
added is in close proximity to a national laboratory; and
(C)
added has the capability to house a microlab;
(3)
added whether employees of a national laboratory and persons from academia, industry, and government are available to be assigned to the microlab; and
(4)
added cost-sharing or in-kind contributions from State and local governments and private industry.
(c)
added Timing— If the Secretary, in collaboration with the directors of national laboratories, elects to establish a microlab pilot program under this section, the Secretary, in collaboration with the directors of national laboratories, shall—
(1)
added not later than 60 days after the date of enactment of this Act, begin the process of determining the placement of the microlab under subsection (a); and
(2)
added not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, implement the microlab pilot program under this section.
(d)
added Initial report— Not later than 60 days after the date of implementation of the microlab pilot program under subsection (a), the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate, the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives, the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate, and the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology of the House of Representatives a report that provides an update on the implementation of the microlab pilot program under subsection (a).
(e)
added Progress report— Not later than 1 year after the date of implementation of the microlab pilot program under subsection (a), the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate, the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives, the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate, and the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology of the House of Representatives a report on the microlab pilot program under subsection (a), including findings and recommendations of the Secretary.
(f)
added Definitions— In this section:
(1)
added The term “microlab” means a small laboratory established by the Secretary under section 3.
(2)
added The term “national laboratory” means a national security laboratory, as defined in section 3281 of the National Nuclear Security Administration Act (50 U.S.C. 2471).
(3)
added The term “Secretary” means the Secretary of Energy.

Sec. 3505 Payment for Maritime Security Fleet vessels

added
(a)
added Per-vessel authorization— Notwithstanding section 53106(a)(1)(C) of title 46, United States Code, and subject to the availability of appropriations, there is authorized to be paid to each contractor for an operating agreement (as those terms are used in that section) for fiscal year 2016, $3,500,000 for each vessel that is covered by the operating agreement.
(b)
added Repeal of other authorization— Section 53111(3) of title 46, United States Code, is amended by striking “2016,”.
(c)
added Funding—
(1)
added Funding increase— The amount authorized to be appropriated pursuant to section 3501(5) for expenses to maintain and preserve a United States-flag merchant marine to serve the national security needs of the United States under chapter 531 of title 46, United States Code, is hereby increased by $24,000,000.
(2)
added Funding offset— Notwithstanding the amounts set forth in the funding tables in division D, the amount authorized to be appropriated in section 101, as specified in the corresponding funding table in section 4101 for Shipbuilding and Conversion, Navy, Auxiliaries, Craft and Prior Yr Program Cost, Outfitting (Line 020) is hereby reduced by $24,000,000.

Sec. 3506 Melville Hall of United States Merchant Marine Academy

added
(a)
added Gift to the Merchant Marine Academy— The Maritime Administrator may accept a gift of money from the Foundation under section 51315 of title 46, United States Code, for the purpose of renovating Melville Hall on the campus of the United States Merchant Marine Academy.
(b)
added Covered gifts— A gift described in this subsection is a gift under subsection (a) that the Maritime Administrator determines exceeds the sum of—
(1)
added the minimum amount that is sufficient to ensure the renovation of Melville Hall in accordance with the capital improvement plan of the United States Merchant Marine Academy that was in effect on the date of enactment of this Act; and
(2)
added 25 percent of the amount described in paragraph (1).
(c)
added Operation contracts— Subject to subsection (d), in the case that the Maritime Administrator accepts a gift of money described in subsection (b), the Maritime Administrator may enter into a contract with the Foundation for the operation of Melville Hall to make available facilities for, among other possible uses, official academy functions, third-party catering functions, and industry events and conferences.
(d)
added Contract terms— The contract described in subsection (c) shall be for such period and on such terms as the Maritime Administrator considers appropriate, including a provision, mutually agreeable to the Maritime Administrator and the Foundation, that—
(1)
added requires the Foundation—
(A)
added at the expense solely of the Foundation through the term of the contract to maintain Melville Hall in a condition that is as good as or better than the condition Melville Hall was in on the later of—
(i)
added the date that the renovation of Melville Hall was completed; or
(ii)
added the date that the Foundation accepted Melville Hall after it was tendered to the Foundation by the Maritime Administrator; and
(B)
added to deposit all proceeds from the operation of Melville Hall, after expenses necessary for the operation and maintenance of Melville Hall, into the account of the Regimental Affairs Non-Appropriated Fund Instrumentality or successor entity, to be used solely for the morale and welfare of the cadets of the United States Merchant Marine Academy; and
(2)
added prohibits the use of Melville Hall as lodging or an office by any person for more than 4 days in any calendar year other than—
(A)
added by the United States; or
(B)
added for the administration and operation of Melville Hall.
(e)
added Definitions— In this section:
(1)
added Contract— The term contract includes any modification, extension, or renewal of the contract.
(2)
added Foundation— In this section, the term Foundation means the United States Merchant Marine Academy Alumni Association and Foundation, Inc.
(f)
added Rule of construction— Nothing in this section may be construed under section 3105 of title 41, United States Code, as requiring the Maritime Administrator to award a contract for the operation of Melville Hall to the Foundation.