15 U.S.C. § 7504
(a)
In general— The Director of the National
Nanotechnology Coordination Office shall enter into an arrangement with the National Research
Council of the National Academy of Sciences to conduct a quadrennial evaluation of the
Program,
including—
(1)
an evaluation of the technical accomplishments of the
Program, including a review of whether the
Program has achieved the goals under the metrics established by the
Council;
(2)
a review of the
Program’s management and coordination across agencies and disciplines;
(3)
a review of the funding levels at each agency for the
Program’s activities and the ability of each agency to achieve the
Program’s stated goals with that funding;
(4)
an evaluation of the
Program’s success in transferring technology to the private sector;
(5)
an evaluation of whether the
Program has been successful in fostering interdisciplinary research and development;
(6)
an evaluation of the extent to which the
Program has adequately considered ethical, legal, environmental, and other appropriate societal concerns;
(7)
recommendations for new or revised
Program goals;
(8)
recommendations for new research areas, partnerships, coordination and management mechanisms, or
programs to be established to achieve the
Program’s stated goals;
(9)
recommendations on policy,
program, and budget changes with respect to
nanotechnology research and development activities;
(10)
recommendations for improved metrics to evaluate the success of the
Program in accomplishing its stated goals;
(11)
a review of the performance of the National
Nanotechnology Coordination Office and its efforts to promote access to and early
application of the technologies, innovations, and expertise derived from
Program activities to agency missions and systems across the Federal Government and to United States industry;
(12)
an analysis of the relative position of the United States compared to other nations with respect to
nanotechnology research and development, including the identification of any critical research areas where the United States should be the world leader to best achieve the goals of the
Program; and
(13)
an analysis of the current impact of
nanotechnology on the United States economy and recommendations for increasing its future impact.
(b)
Study on molecular self-assembly— As part of the first quadrennial review conducted in accordance with
subsection (a), the National Research
Council shall conduct a one-time study to determine the technical feasibility of molecular self-assembly for the manufacture of materials and devices at the molecular scale.
(c)
Study on the responsible development of nanotechnology— As part of the first quadrennial review conducted in accordance with
subsection (a), the National Research
Council shall conduct a one-time study to assess the need for standards, guidelines, or strategies for ensuring the responsible development of
nanotechnology, including, but not limited
to—
(1)
self-replicating nanoscale machines or devices;
(2)
the release of such machines in natural environments;
(4)
the development of defensive technologies;
(d)
Report—
(2)
Congress— Not later than 30 days after the date the President receives the report under
paragraph (1), the Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy shall transmit a copy of the report to Congress.
Notes, amendments, and revision history
(Pub. L. 108–153, § 5, Dec. 3, 2003, 117 Stat. 1928; Pub. L. 114–329, title II, § 204(b)(3), Jan. 6, 2017, 130 Stat. 2999.)
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2017—Pub. L. 114–329, § 204(b)(3)(A)–(D), substituted “Quadrennial” for “Triennial” in section catchline and “quadrennial” for “triennial” in subsecs. (a) to (c).
Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 114–329, § 204(b)(3)(E), amended subsec. (d) generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows: “The Director of the National Nanotechnology Coordination Office shall transmit the results of any evaluation for which it made arrangements under subsection (a) to the Advisory Panel, the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation and the House of Representatives Committee on Science upon receipt. The first such evaluation shall be transmitted no later than June 10, 2005, with subsequent evaluations transmitted to the Committees every 3 years thereafter.”