Division I — Department of State Authorizations
DIVISION I Department of State Authorizations
SEC. 9002. Definitions.
TITLE XCI Organization and Operations of the Department of State
SEC. 9101. Modernizing the Bureau of Arms Control, Verification, and Compliance and the Bureau of International Security and Nonproliferation.
SEC. 9102. Notification to Congress for United States Nationals Unlawfully or Wrongfully Detained Abroad.
“(b) Referrals to Special Envoy; Notification to Congress.—
“(1) In general.—Upon a determination by the Secretary of State, based on the totality of the circumstances, that there is credible information that the detention of a United States national abroad is unlawful or wrongful, and regardless of whether the detention is by a foreign government or a nongovernmental actor, the Secretary shall—
“(A) expeditiously transfer responsibility for such case from the Bureau of Consular Affairs of the Department of State to the Special Presidential Envoy for Hostage Affairs; and
“(B) not later than 14 days after such determination, notify the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate, the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate, the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives, and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives of such determination and provide such committees with a summary of the facts that led to such determination.
“(2) Form.—The notification described in paragraph (1)(B) may be classified, if necessary.”
SEC. 9103. Family Engagement Coordinator.
“(d) Family Engagement Coordinator.—There shall be, in the Office of the Special Presidential Envoy for Hostage Affairs, a Family Engagement Coordinator, who shall ensure—
“(1) for a United States national unlawfully or wrongfully detained abroad, that—
“(A) any interaction by executive branch officials with any family member of such United States national occurs in a coordinated fashion;
“(B) such family member receives consistent and accurate information from the United States Government; and
“(C) appropriate coordination with the Family Engagement Coordinator described in section 304(c)(2); and
“(2) for a United States national held hostage abroad, that any engagement with a family member is coordinated with, consistent with, and not duplicative of the efforts of the Family Engagement Coordinator described in section 304(c)(2).”
SEC. 9104. Rewards for Justice.
“(14) the prevention, frustration, or resolution of the hostage taking of a United States person, the identification, location, arrest, or conviction of a person responsible for the hostage taking of a United States person, or the location of a United States person who has been taken hostage, in any country.”
SEC. 9105. Ensuring Geographic Diversity and Accessibility of Passport Agencies.
SEC. 9106. Cultural Antiquities Task Force.
SEC. 9107. Office of Sanctions Coordination.
SEC. 9108. Sense of Congress and Strategic Plan Regarding the Department of State’s Unit for Subnational Diplomacy.
TITLE XCII Personnel Issues
SEC. 9201. Department of State Paid Student Internship Program.
SEC. 9202. Improvements to the Prevention of, and the Response to, Harassment, Discrimination, Sexual Assault, and Related Retaliation.
SEC. 9203. Increasing the Maximum Amount Authorized for Science and Technology Fellowship Grants and Cooperative Agreements.
SEC. 9204. Additional Personnel to Address Backlogs in Hiring and Investigations.
SEC. 9205. Foreign Affairs Training.
“(c) Training and Professional Development Prioritization.—In order to provide the Civil Service and the Foreign Service with the level of professional development and training needed to effectively advance United States interests across the world, the Secretary of State shall—
“(1) increase relevant offerings provided by the Department of State—
“(A) of interactive virtual instruction to make training and professional development more accessible and useful to personnel deployed throughout the world; or
“(B) at partner organizations, including universities, industry entities, and nongovernmental organizations, throughout the United States to provide useful outside perspectives to Department of State personnel by providing such personnel—
“(i) a more comprehensive outlook on different sectors of United States society;
“(ii) practical experience dealing with commercial corporations, universities, labor unions, and other institutions critical to United States diplomatic success; and
“(iii) courses specifically focused on commercial diplomacy that increase the understanding of private sector needs that arise as United States companies enter and compete in the international market;
“(2) provide the opportunity to participate in courses using computer-based or computer-assisted simulations, allowing civilian officers to lead decision making in a crisis environment, and encourage officers of the Department of State, and reciprocally, officers of other Federal departments to participate in similar exercises held by the Department of State or other government organizations and the private sector;
“(3) increase the duration and expand the focus of certain training and professional development courses, including by extending—
“(A) the A–100 entry-level course to as long as 12 weeks, which better matches the length of entry-level training and professional development provided to the officers in other national security departments and agencies; and
“(B) the Chief of Mission course to as long as 6 weeks for first time Chiefs of Mission and creating comparable courses for new Assistant Secretaries and Deputy Assistant Secretaries to more accurately reflect the significant responsibilities accompanying such roles; and
“(4) ensure that Foreign Service officers who are assigned to a country experiencing significant population displacement due to the impacts of climatic and non-climatic shocks and stresses, including rising sea levels and lack of access to affordable and reliable energy and electricity, receive specific instruction on United States policy with respect to resiliency and adaptation to such climatic and non-climatic shocks and stresses.”
SEC. 9206. Facilitation and Encouragement of Training and Professional Development for Foreign Service and Civil Service Personnel.
SEC. 9207. Security Clearance Approval Process.
SEC. 9208. Addendum for Study on Foreign Service Allowances.
SEC. 9209. Curtailments, Removals from Post, and Waivers of Privileges and Immunities.
SEC. 9210. Report on Worldwide Availability.
SEC. 9211. Professional Development.
SEC. 9212. Management Assessments at Diplomatic and Consular Posts.
SEC. 9213. Independent Review of Promotion Policies.
SEC. 9214. Third Party Verification of Permanent Change of Station (pcs) Orders.
SEC. 9215. Post-Employment Restrictions on Senate-Confirmed Officials at the Department of State.
“(m) Extended Post-employment Restrictions for Certain Senate-confirmed Officials.—
“(1) Definitions.—In this subsection:
“(A) Country of concern.—The term ‘country of concern’ means—
“(i) the People’s Republic of China;
“(ii) the Russian Federation;
“(iii) the Islamic Republic of Iran;
“(iv) the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea;
“(v) the Republic of Cuba; and
“(vi) the Syrian Arab Republic.
“(B) Foreign government entity.—The term ‘foreign governmental entity’ includes—
“(i) any person employed by—
“(I) any department, agency, or other entity of a foreign government at the national, regional, or local level;
“(II) any governing party or coalition of a foreign government at the national, regional, or local level; or
“(III) any entity majority-owned or majority-controlled by a foreign government at the national, regional, or local level; and
“(ii) in the case of a country of concern, any company, economic project, cultural organization, exchange program, or nongovernmental organization that is more than 33 percent owned or controlled by the government of such country.
“(C) Representation.—The term ‘representation’ does not include representation by an attorney, who is duly licensed and authorized to provide legal advice in a United States jurisdiction, of a person or entity in a legal capacity or for the purposes of rendering legal advice.
“(2) Secretary of state and deputy secretary of state.—With respect to a person serving as the Secretary of State or the Deputy Secretary of State, the restrictions described in section 207(f)(1) of title 18, United States Code, shall apply to any such person who knowingly represents, aids, or advises a foreign governmental entity before an officer or employee of the executive branch of the United States with the intent to influence a decision of such officer or employee in carrying out his or her official duties at any time after the termination of such person’s service as Secretary or Deputy Secretary.
“(3) Under secretaries, assistant secretaries, and ambassadors.—With respect to a person serving as an Under Secretary, Assistant Secretary, or Ambassador at the Department of State or as the United States Permanent Representative to the United Nations, the restrictions described in section 207(f)(1) of title 18, United States Code, shall apply to any such person who knowingly represents, aids, or advises—
“(A) a foreign governmental entity before an officer or employee of the executive branch of the United States with the intent to influence a decision of such officer or employee in carrying out his or her official duties for 3 years after the termination of such person’s service in a position described in this paragraph, or the duration of the term or terms of the President who appointed that person to their position, whichever is longer; or
“(B) a foreign governmental entity of a country of concern before an officer or employee of the executive branch of the United States with the intent to influence a decision of such officer or employee in carrying out his or her official duties at any time after the termination of such person’s service in a position described in this paragraph.
“(4) Penalties and injunctions.—Any violations of the restrictions under paragraphs (2) or (3) shall be subject to the penalties and injunctions provided for under section 216 of title 18, United States Code.
“(5) Notice of restrictions.—Any person subject to the restrictions under this subsection shall be provided notice of these restrictions by the Department of State—
“(A) upon appointment by the President; and
“(B) upon termination of service with the Department of State.
“(6) Effective date.—The restrictions under this subsection shall apply only to persons who are appointed by the President to the positions referenced in this subsection on or after 120 days after the date of the enactment of the Department of State Authorization Act of 2022.
“(7) Sunset.—The restrictions under this subsection shall expire on the date that is 5 years after the date of the enactment of the Department of State Authorization Act of 2022.”
SEC. 9216. Expansion of Authorities Regarding Special Rules for Certain Monthly Workers’ Compensation Payments and Other Payments.
“(j) Expansion of Authorities.—The head of any Federal agency may exercise the authorities of this section, including to designate an incident, whether the incident occurred in the United States or abroad, for purposes of subparagraphs (A)(ii) and (B)(ii) of subsection (e)(4) when the incident affects United States Government employees of the agency or their dependents who are not under the security responsibility of the Secretary of State as set forth in section 103 of the Omnibus Diplomatic Security and Antiterrorism Act of 1986 (22 U.S.C. 4802) or when operational control of overseas security responsibility for such employees or dependents has been delegated to the head of the agency.”
SEC. 9217. Report on Pilot Program for Lateral Entry into the Foreign Service.
SEC. 9218. Report on Changes to the Foreign Service Officer Test.
SEC. 9219. Dignity for People with Disabilities Serving in the Foreign Service.
SEC. 9220. Expanding Scope of Fellowship Programs to Include Civil Servants.
TITLE XCIII Embassy Security and Construction
SEC. 9301. Amendments to Secure Embassy Construction and Counterterrorism Act of 1999.
“SEC. 603. UNITED STATES DIPLOMATIC FACILITY DEFINED.
“In this title, the terms ‘United States diplomatic facility’ and ‘diplomatic facility’ mean any chancery, consulate, or other office that—
“(1) is considered by the Secretary of State to be diplomatic or consular premises, consistent with the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, done at Vienna April 18, 1961, and the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations, done at Vienna April 24, 1963, and was notified to the host government as such; or
“(2) is otherwise subject to a publicly available bilateral agreement with the host government (contained in the records of the United States Department of State) that recognizes the official status of the United States Government personnel present at the facility.”
“(a) In General.—In order to preserve public diplomacy facilities that are accessible to the publics of foreign countries, not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of the Secure Embassy Construction and Counterterrorism Act of 2022, the Secretary of State shall adopt guidelines to collect and utilize information from each diplomatic post at which the construction of a new embassy compound or new consulate compound could result in the closure or co-location of an American Space that is owned and operated by the United States Government, generally known as an American Center, or any other public diplomacy facility under the Secure Embassy Construction and Counterterrorism Act of 1999 (22 U.S.C. 4865 et seq.).”
“(i) In general.—Subject to clause (ii), the Secretary of State may waive subparagraph (A) if the Secretary, in consultation with, as appropriate, the head of each agency employing personnel that would not be located at the site, if applicable, determines that it is in the national interest of the United States after taking account of any considerations the Secretary in his or her discretion considers relevant, which may include security conditions.”
; and
“(ii) Chancery or consulate building.—Prior”
; and
“(A) Requirement.—
“(i) In general.—Each newly acquired United States diplomatic facility in a location that has certain minimum ratings under the Security Environment Threat List as determined by the Secretary of State in his or her discretion shall—
“(I) be constructed or modified to meet the measured building blast performance standard applicable to a diplomatic facility sited not less than 100 feet from the perimeter of the property on which the facility is situated; or
“(II) fulfill the criteria described in clause (ii).
“(ii) Alternative engineering equivalency standard requirement.—Each facility referred to in clause (i) may, instead of meeting the requirement under such clause, fulfill such other criteria as the Secretary is authorized to employ to achieve an engineering standard of security and degree of protection that is equivalent to the numerical perimeter distance setback described in such clause seeks to achieve.”
; and
“(ii) Chancery or consulate building.—Prior”
; and
SEC. 9302. Diplomatic Support and Security.
“(3) to promote strengthened security measures, institutionalize a culture of learning, and, in the case of apparent gross negligence or breach of duty, recommend that the Secretary investigate accountability for United States Government personnel with security-related responsibilities under chief of mission authority;”
“(4) to support a culture of risk management, instead of risk avoidance, that enables the Department of State to pursue its vital goals with full knowledge that it is neither desirable nor possible for the Department to avoid all risks;”
“(1) Convening the security review committee.—In any case of a serious security incident involving loss of life, serious injury, or significant destruction of property at, or related to, a United States Government diplomatic mission abroad (referred to in this title as a ‘Serious Security Incident’), and in any case of a serious breach of security involving intelligence activities of a foreign government directed at a United States Government mission abroad, the Secretary of State shall convene a Security Review Committee, which shall issue a report providing a full account of what occurred, consistent with section 304.”
“(2) Committee composition.—The Secretary shall designate a Chairperson and may designate additional personnel of commensurate seniority to serve on the Security Review Committee, which shall include—
“(A) the Director of the Office of Management Strategy and Solutions;
“(B) the Assistant Secretary responsible for the region where the incident occurred;
“(C) the Assistant Secretary of State for Diplomatic Security;
“(D) the Assistant Secretary of State for Intelligence and Research;
“(E) an Assistant Secretary-level representative from any involved United States Government department or agency; and
“(F) other personnel determined to be necessary or appropriate.”
“(A) In general.—The Secretary of State is not required to convene a Security Review Committee—
“(i) if the Secretary determines that the incident involves only causes unrelated to security, such as when the security at issue is outside of the scope of the Secretary of State’s security responsibilities under section 103;
“(ii) if operational control of overseas security functions has been delegated to another agency in accordance with section 106;
“(iii) if the incident is a cybersecurity incident and is covered by other review mechanisms; or
“(iv) in the case”
; and
“(B) Department of defense investigations.—In the case of an incident described in subparagraph (A)(iv)”
; and
“(5) Rulemaking.—The Secretary of State shall promulgate regulations defining the membership and operating procedures for the Security Review Committee and provide such guidance to the Chair and ranking members of the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives.”
“(1) In general.—The Secretary of State shall convene a Security Review Committee not later than 60 days after the occurrence of an incident described in subsection (a)(1), or 60 days after the Department first becomes aware of such an incident, whichever is earlier, except that the 60-day period for convening a Security Review Committee may be extended for one additional 60-day period if the Secretary determines that the additional period is necessary.”
; and
“(c) Congressional Notification.—Whenever the Secretary of State convenes a Security Review Committee, the Secretary shall promptly inform the chair and ranking member of—
“(1) the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate;
“(2) the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate;
“(3) the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate;
“(4) the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives;
“(5) the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives; and
“(6) the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives.”
“SEC. 303. SERIOUS SECURITY INCIDENT INVESTIGATION PROCESS.
“(a) Investigation Process.—
“(1) Initiation upon reported incident.—A United States mission shall submit an initial report of a Serious Security Incident not later than 3 days after such incident occurs, whenever feasible, at which time an investigation of the incident shall be initiated.
“(2) Investigation.—Not later than 10 days after the submission of a report pursuant to paragraph (1), the Secretary shall direct the Diplomatic Security Service to assemble an investigative team to investigate the incident and independently establish what occurred. Each investigation under this subsection shall cover—
“(A) an assessment of what occurred, who perpetrated or is suspected of having perpetrated the Serious Security Incident, and whether applicable security procedures were followed;
“(B) in the event the Serious Security Incident involved a United States diplomatic compound, motorcade, residence, or other facility, an assessment of whether adequate security countermeasures were in effect based on a known threat at the time of the incident;
“(C) if the incident involved an individual or group of officers, employees, or family members under Chief of Mission security responsibility conducting approved operations or movements outside the United States mission, an assessment of whether proper security briefings and procedures were in place and whether weighing of risk of the operation or movement took place; and
“(D) an assessment of whether the failure of any officials or employees to follow procedures or perform their duties contributed to the security incident.
“(3) Investigative team.—The investigative team assembled pursuant to paragraph (2) shall consist of individuals from the Diplomatic Security Service who shall provide an independent examination of the facts surrounding the incident and what occurred. The Secretary, or the Secretary’s designee, shall review the makeup of the investigative team for a conflict, appearance of conflict, or lack of independence that could undermine the results of the investigation and may remove or replace any members of the team to avoid such an outcome.
“(b) Report of Investigation.—Not later than 90 days after the occurrence of a Serious Security Incident, the investigative team investigating the incident shall prepare and submit a Report of Investigation to the Security Review Committee that includes—
“(1) a detailed description of the matters set forth in subparagraphs (A) through (D) of subsection (a)(2), including all related findings;
“(2) a complete and accurate account of the casualties, injuries, and damage resulting from the incident; and
“(3) a review of security procedures and directives in place at the time of the incident.
“(c) Confidentiality.—The investigative team investigating a Serious Security Incident shall adopt such procedures with respect to confidentiality as determined necessary, including procedures relating to the conduct of closed proceedings or the submission and use of evidence in camera, to ensure in particular the protection of classified information relating to national defense, foreign policy, or intelligence matters. The Director of National Intelligence shall establish the level of protection required for intelligence information and for information relating to intelligence personnel included in the report required under subsection (b). The Security Review Committee shall determine the level of classification of the final report prepared pursuant to section 304(b), and shall incorporate the same confidentiality measures in such report to the maximum extent practicable.”
“SEC. 304. SECURITY REVIEW COMMITTEE FINDINGS AND REPORT.
“(a) Findings.—The Security Review Committee shall—
“(1) review the Report of Investigation prepared pursuant to section 303(b), and all other evidence, reporting, and relevant information relating to a Serious Security Incident at a United States mission abroad, including an examination of the facts and circumstances surrounding any serious injuries, loss of life, or significant destruction of property resulting from the incident; and
“(2) determine, in writing—
“(A) whether the incident was security related and constituted a Serious Security Incident;
“(B) if the incident involved a diplomatic compound, motorcade, residence, or other mission facility—
“(i) whether the security systems, security countermeasures, and security procedures operated as intended; and
“(ii) whether such systems worked to materially mitigate the attack or were found to be inadequate to mitigate the threat and attack;
“(C) if the incident involved an individual or group of officers conducting an approved operation outside the mission, whether a valid process was followed in evaluating the requested operation and weighing the risk of the operation, which determination shall not seek to assign accountability for the incident unless the Security Review Committee determines that an official breached his or her duty;
“(D) the impact of intelligence and information availability, and whether the mission was aware of the general operating threat environment or any more specific threat intelligence or information and took that into account in ongoing and specific operations; and
“(E) any other facts and circumstances that may be relevant to the appropriate security management of United States missions abroad.
“(b) Report.—
“(1) Submission to secretary of state.—Not later than 60 days after receiving the Report of Investigation prepared pursuant to section 303(b), the Security Review Committee shall submit a report to the Secretary of State that includes—
“(A) the findings described in subsection (a); and
“(B) any related recommendations.
“(2) Submission to congress.—Not later than 90 days after receiving the report pursuant to paragraph (1), the Secretary of State shall submit a copy of the report to—
“(A) the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate;
“(B) the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate;
“(C) the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate;
“(D) the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives;
“(E) the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives; and
“(F) the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives.
“(c) Personnel Recommendations.—If in the course of conducting an investigation under section 303, the investigative team finds reasonable cause to believe any individual described in section 303(a)(2)(D) has breached the duty of that individual or finds lesser failures on the part of an individual in the performance of his or her duties related to the incident, it shall be reported to the Security Review Committee. If the Security Review Committee finds reasonable cause to support the determination, it shall be reported to the Secretary for appropriate action.”
“(b) Future Inquiries.—Nothing in this title may be construed to preclude the Secretary of State from convening a follow-up public board of inquiry to investigate any security incident if the incident was of such magnitude or significance that an internal process is deemed insufficient to understand and investigate the incident. All materials gathered during the procedures provided under this title shall be provided to any related board of inquiry convened by the Secretary.”
“(3) other demonstrated experience in public diplomacy; or”
“(2) a willingness and ability to regularly and meaningfully engage with civil society and other local actors in country;”
; and
“(4) the ability to effectively manage and assess risk associated with the conduct of diplomatic operations.”
SEC. 9303. Establishment of United States Embassies in Solomon Islands, Kiribati, and Tonga and a Diplomatic Presence in Vanuatu.
TITLE XCIV A Diverse Workforce: Recruitment, Retention, and Promotion
SEC. 9401. Report on Barriers to Applying for Employment with the Department of State.
SEC. 9402. Collection, Analysis, and Dissemination of Workforce Data.
SEC. 9403. Centers of Excellence in Foreign Affairs and Assistance.
SEC. 9404. Promoting Transparency and Accountability in the Department of State Workforce.
SEC. 9405. Rule of Construction.
TITLE XCV Information Security and Cyber Diplomacy
SEC. 9501. United States International Cyberspace Policy.
SEC. 9502. Bureau of Cyberspace and Digital Policy.
“(i) Bureau of Cyberspace and Digital Policy.—
“(1) In general.—There is established, within the Department of State, the Bureau of Cyberspace and Digital Policy (referred to in this subsection as the ‘Bureau’). The head of the Bureau shall have the rank and status of ambassador and shall be appointed by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate.
“(2) Duties.—
“(A) In general.—The head of the Bureau shall perform such duties and exercise such powers as the Secretary of State shall prescribe, including implementing the diplomatic and foreign policy aspects of the policy described in section 9501(a) of the Department of State Authorization Act of 2022.
“(B) Duties described.—The principal duties and responsibilities of the head of the Bureau shall, in furtherance of the diplomatic and foreign policy mission of the Department of State, be—
“(i) to serve as the principal cyberspace policy official within the senior management of the Department of State and as the advisor to the Secretary of State for cyberspace and digital issues;
“(ii) to lead, coordinate, and execute, in coordination with other relevant bureaus and offices, the Department of State’s diplomatic cyberspace, and cybersecurity efforts (including efforts related to data privacy, data flows, internet governance, information and communications technology standards, and other issues that the Secretary has assigned to the Bureau);
“(iii) to coordinate with relevant Federal agencies and the Office of the National Cyber Director to ensure the diplomatic and foreign policy aspects of the cyber strategy in section 9501 of the Department of State Authorization Act of 2022 and any other subsequent strategy are implemented in a manner that is fully integrated with the broader strategy;
“(iv) to promote an open, interoperable, reliable, and secure information and communications technology infrastructure globally;
“(v) to represent the Secretary of State in interagency efforts to develop and advance Federal Government cyber priorities and activities, including efforts to develop credible national capabilities, strategies, and policies to deter and counter cyber adversaries, and carry out the purposes of title V of the Department of State Authorization Act of 2022;
“(vi) to engage civil society, the private sector, academia, and other public and private entities on relevant international cyberspace and international information and communications technology issues;
“(vii) to support United States Government efforts to uphold and further develop global deterrence frameworks for malicious cyber activity;
“(viii) to advise the Secretary of State and coordinate with foreign governments regarding responses to national security-level cyber incidents, including coordination on diplomatic response efforts to support allies and partners threatened by malicious cyber activity, in conjunction with members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization and like-minded countries;
“(ix) to promote the building of foreign capacity relating to cyberspace policy priorities;
“(x) to promote an open, interoperable, reliable, and secure information and communications technology infrastructure globally and an open, interoperable, secure, and reliable internet governed by the multi-stakeholder model;
“(xi) to promote an international environment for technology investments and the internet that benefits United States economic and national security interests;
“(xii) to promote cross-border flow of data and combat international initiatives seeking to impose unreasonable requirements on United States businesses;
“(xiii) to promote international policies to protect the integrity of United States and international telecommunications infrastructure from foreign-based threats, including cyber-enabled threats;
“(xiv) to lead engagement, in coordination with relevant executive branch agencies, with foreign governments on relevant international cyberspace, cybersecurity, cybercrime, and digital economy issues described in title V of the Department of State Authorization Act of 2022;
“(xv) to promote international policies, in coordination with the Department of Commerce, to secure radio frequency spectrum in the best interests of the United States;
“(xvi) to promote and protect the exercise of human rights, including freedom of speech and religion, through the internet;
“(xvii) to build capacity of United States diplomatic officials to engage on cyberspace issues;
“(xviii) to encourage the development and adoption by foreign countries of internationally recognized standards, policies, and best practices;
“(xix) to support efforts by the Global Engagement Center to counter cyber-enabled information operations against the United States or its allies and partners; and
“(xx) to conduct such other matters as the Secretary of State may assign.
“(3) Qualifications.—The head of the Bureau should be an individual of demonstrated competency in the fields of—
“(A) cybersecurity and other relevant cyberspace and information and communications technology policy issues; and
“(B) international diplomacy.
“(4) Organizational placement.—
“(A) Initial placement.—Except as provided in subparagraph (B), the head of the Bureau shall report to the Deputy Secretary of State.
“(B) Subsequent placement.—The head of the Bureau may report to an Under Secretary of State or to an official holding a higher position than Under Secretary if, not later than 15 days before any change in such reporting structure, the Secretary of State—
“(i) consults with the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives; and
“(ii) submits a report to such committees that—
“(I) indicates that the Secretary, with respect to the reporting structure of the Bureau, has consulted with and solicited feedback from—
“(aa) other relevant Federal entities with a role in international aspects of cyber policy; and
“(bb) the elements of the Department of State with responsibility for aspects of cyber policy, including the elements reporting to—
“(AA) the Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs;
“(BB) the Under Secretary of State for Civilian Security, Democracy, and Human Rights;
“(CC) the Under Secretary of State for Economic Growth, Energy, and the Environment;
“(DD) the Under Secretary of State for Arms Control and International Security Affairs;
“(EE) the Under Secretary of State for Management; and
“(FF) the Under Secretary of State for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs;
“(II) describes the new reporting structure for the head of the Bureau and the justification for such new structure; and
“(III) includes a plan describing how the new reporting structure will better enable the head of the Bureau to carry out the duties described in paragraph (2), including the security, economic, and human rights aspects of cyber diplomacy.
“(5) Special hiring authorities.—The Secretary of State may—
“(A) appoint up to 25 employees to cyber positions in the Bureau without regard to the provisions of subchapter I of chapter 33 of title 5, United States Code, regarding appointments in the competitive service; and
“(B) fix the rates of basic pay of such employees without regard to chapter 51 and subchapter III of chapter 53 of such title regarding classification and General Schedule pay rates, provided that the rates for such positions do not exceed the annual rate of basic pay in effect for a position at level IV of the Executive Schedule under section 5315 of title 5, United States Code.
“(6) Coordination.—In implementing the duties prescribed under paragraph (2), the head of the Bureau shall coordinate with the heads of other Federal agencies, including the Department of Commerce, the Department of Homeland Security, and other Federal agencies that the National Cyber Director deems appropriate.
“(7) Rule of construction.—Nothing in this subsection may be construed—
“(A) to preclude the head of the Bureau from being designated as an Assistant Secretary, if such an Assistant Secretary position does not increase the number of Assistant Secretary positions at the Department above the number authorized under subsection (c)(1); or
“(B) to alter or modify the existing authorities of any other Federal agency or official.”
SEC. 9503. International Cyberspace and Digital Policy Strategy.
SEC. 9504. Government Accountability Office Report on Cyber Diplomacy.
SEC. 9505. Report on Diplomatic Programs to Detect and Respond to Cyber Threats Against Allies and Partners.
SEC. 9506. Cybersecurity Recruitment and Retention.
SEC. 9507. Short Course on Emerging Technologies for Senior Officials.
SEC. 9508. Establishment and Expansion of Regional Technology Officer Program.
SEC. 9509. Vulnerability Disclosure Policy and Bug Bounty Program Report.
TITLE XCVI Public Diplomacy
SEC. 9601. United States Participation in International Fairs and Expositions.
SEC. 9602. Under Secretary for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs.
“(F) coordinate the allocation and management of the financial and human resources for public diplomacy, including for—
“(i) the Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs;
“(ii) the Bureau of Global Public Affairs;
“(iii) the Office of Policy, Planning, and Resources for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs;
“(iv) the Global Engagement Center; and
“(v) the public diplomacy functions within the regional and functional bureaus.”
SEC. 9603. Report on Public Diplomacy.
SEC. 9604. Promoting Peace, Education, and Cultural Exchange Through Music Diplomacy.
“(10) exchange programs, including in coordination and consultation with the private sector, focused on music and the performing arts that provide opportunities for foreign nationals and Americans to build cross-cultural understanding and advance peace abroad.”
TITLE XCVII Other Matters
SEC. 9701. Supporting the Employment of United States Citizens by International Organizations.
SEC. 9702. Increasing Housing Availability for Certain Employees Assigned to the United States Mission to the United Nations.
SEC. 9703. Limitation on United States Contributions to Peacekeeping Operations Not Authorized by the United Nations Security Council.
“SEC. 12. LIMITATION ON UNITED STATES CONTRIBUTIONS TO PEACEKEEPING OPERATIONS NOT AUTHORIZED BY THE UNITED NATIONS SECURITY COUNCIL.
“None of the funds authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available to pay assessed and other expenses of international peacekeeping activities under this Act may be made available for an international peacekeeping operation that has not been expressly authorized by the United Nations Security Council.”
SEC. 9704. Boards of Radio Free Europe/radio Liberty, Radio Free Asia, the Middle East Broadcasting Networks, and the Open Technology Fund.
“SEC. 307. GRANTEE CORPORATE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS.
“(a) In General.—The corporate board of directors of each grantee under this title—
“(1) shall be bipartisan;
“(2) shall, except as otherwise provided in this Act, have the sole responsibility to operate their respective grantees within the jurisdiction of their respective States of incorporation;
“(3) shall be composed of not fewer than 5 members, who shall be qualified individuals who are not employed in the public sector; and
“(4) shall appoint successors in the event of vacancies on their respective boards, in accordance with applicable bylaws.
“(b) Not Federal Employees.—No employee of any grantee under this title may be a Federal employee.”
SEC. 9705. Broadcasting Entities No Longer Required to Consolidate into a Single Private, Nonprofit Corporation.
“SEC. 310. INCORPORATION AND NON-FEDERAL STATUS OF BROADCASTING ENTITIES.
“(a) Defined Term.—In this chapter—
“(1) the term ‘grant’ includes agreements under section 6305 of title 31, United States Code; and
“(2) the term ‘grantee’ includes recipients of an agreement described in paragraph (1).
“(b) Incorporation.—The Chief Executive Officer is authorized to incorporate grantees in accordance with the regular notification procedures of—
“(1) the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate;
“(2) the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate;
“(3) the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives; and
“(4) the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives.
“(c) Federal Status.—Nothing in this chapter or in any other Act, and no action taken pursuant to this chapter or any other Act, may be construed to make a grantee incorporated pursuant to subsection (b), or any other grantee or entity provided funding by the Agency, a Federal agency or instrumentality.
“(d) Leadership of Grantee Organizations.—The chief executive officer or the equivalent official of RFE/RL Inc., Radio Free Asia, the Open Technology Fund, and the Middle East Broadcasting Networks, and any other organization that is established or authorized under this chapter, shall serve at the pleasure of, and may be named by, the Chief Executive Officer of the Agency, with the concurrence of the Grantee Board and subject to the approval of the Advisory Board pursuant to section 306.”