US Codex
Pub. L.
Notes

Division E — Non-Department of Defense Matters

117th Congress · Approved Dec 23, 2022 · 136 Stat. 2395 · Lineage

DIVISION E Non-Department of Defense Matters

TITLE LI Veterans Affairs Matters

Subtitle A Advisory Committees

SEC. 5102. Department of Veterans Affairs Advisory Committee on United States Outlying Areas and Freely Associated States.

(a)
Establishment of Advisory Committee.— Subchapter III of chapter 5 of title 38, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section (and conforming the table of sections at the beginning of such chapter accordingly):

“§ 548. Advisory Committee on United States Outlying Areas and Freely Associated States

“(a) Establishment.—The Secretary shall establish an advisory committee, to be known as the ‘Advisory Committee on United States Outlying Areas and Freely Associated States’, to provide advice and guidance to the Secretary on matters relating to covered veterans.

“(b) Duties.—The duties of the Committee shall be the following:

“(1) To advise the Secretary on matters relating to covered veterans, including how the Secretary may improve the programs and services of the Department to better serve such veterans.

“(2) To identify for the Secretary evolving issues of relevance to covered veterans.

“(3) To propose clarifications, recommendations, and solutions to address issues raised by covered veterans.

“(4) To provide a forum for covered veterans, veterans service organizations serving covered veterans, and the Department to discuss issues and proposals for changes to regulations, policies, and procedures of the Department.

“(5) To identify priorities for and provide advice to the Secretary on appropriate strategies for consultation with veterans service organizations serving covered veterans.

“(6) To encourage the Secretary to work with the heads of other Federal departments and agencies, and Congress, to ensure covered veterans are provided the full benefits of their status as covered veterans.

“(7) To highlight contributions of covered veterans in the Armed Forces.

“(8) To conduct other duties as determined appropriate by the Secretary.

“(c) Membership.—

(1) The Committee shall be comprised of 15 voting members appointed by the Secretary.

“(2) In appointing members pursuant to paragraph (1), the Secretary shall ensure the following:

“(A) At least one member is appointed to represent covered veterans in each of the following areas:

“(i) American Samoa.

“(ii) Guam.

“(iii) Puerto Rico.

“(iv) The Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands.

“(v) The Virgin Islands of the United States.

“(vi) The Federated States of Micronesia.

“(vii) The Republic of the Marshall Islands.

“(viii) The Republic of Palau.

“(B) Not fewer than half of the members appointed are covered veterans, unless the Secretary determines that an insufficient number of qualified covered veterans are available.

“(C) Each member appointed resides in an area specified in subparagraph (A).

“(3) In appointing members pursuant to paragraph (1), the Secretary may consult with any Member of Congress who represents an area specified in paragraph (2)(A).

“(4) In addition to the members appointed pursuant to paragraph (1), the Committee shall be comprised of such ex officio members as the Secretary of State and the Secretary of the Interior shall appoint from among employees of the Department of State and the Department of the Interior, respectively.

“(d) Terms; Vacancies.—

(1) A member of the Committee—

“(A) shall be appointed for a term of two years; and

“(B) may be reappointed to serve an additional two-year term.

“(2) Not later than 180 days after the Secretary (or in the case of an ex officio member, the Secretary of State or the Secretary of the Interior, as the case may be) receives notice of a vacancy in the Committee, the vacancy shall be filled in the same manner as the original appointment.

“(e) Meeting Format and Frequency.—

(1) Except as provided in paragraph (2), the Committee shall meet in-person with the Secretary not less frequently than once each year and hold monthly conference calls as necessary.

“(2) Meetings held under paragraph (1) may be conducted virtually if determined necessary based on—

“(A) Department protocols; and

“(B) timing and budget considerations.

“(f) Additional Representation.—

(1) Representatives of relevant Federal departments and agencies may attend meetings of the Committee and provide information to the Committee.

“(2) One representative of the Department shall attend each meeting of the Committee.

“(3) Representatives attending meetings under this subsection—

“(A) may not be considered voting members of the Committee; and

“(B) may not receive additional compensation for services performed with respect to the Committee.

“(g) Subcommittees.—

(1) The Committee may establish subcommittees.

“(2) The Secretary may, in consultation with the Committee, appoint a member to a subcommittee established under paragraph (1) who is not a member of the Committee.

“(3) A subcommittee established under paragraph (1) may enhance the function of the Committee, but may not supersede the authority of the Committee or provide direct advice or work products to the Secretary.

“(h) Reports.—

(1) Not less frequently than once every two years, the Committee shall submit to the Secretary and the appropriate congressional committees a report—

“(A) containing such recommendations as the Committee may have for legislative or administrative action; and

“(B) describing the activities of the Committee during the previous two years.

“(2) Not later than 120 days after the date on which the Secretary receives a report under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a written response to the report after—

“(A) giving the Committee an opportunity to review such written response; and

“(B) including in such written response any comments the Committee considers appropriate.

“(3) The Secretary shall make publicly available on an internet website of the Department—

“(A) each report the Secretary receives under paragraph (1); and

“(B) each written response the Secretary submits under paragraph (2).

“(i) Committee Personnel Matters.—A member of the Committee shall be allowed travel expenses, including per diem in lieu of subsistence, at rates authorized for an employee of an agency under subchapter I of chapter 57 of title 5 while away from the home or regular place of business of the member in the performance of the duties of the Committee.

“(j) Consultation.—In carrying out this section, the Secretary shall consult with veterans service organizations serving covered veterans.

“(k) Termination.—The Committee shall terminate on the date that is 10 years after the date of the enactment of this section.

“(l) Definitions.—In this section:

“(1) The term ‘appropriate congressional committees’ means—

“(A) the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs of the House of Representatives; and

“(B) the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs of the Senate.

“(2) The term ‘Committee’ means the Advisory Committee on United States Outlying Areas and Freely Associated States established under subsection (a).

“(3) The term ‘covered veteran’ means a veteran residing in an area specified in subsection (c)(2)(A).

“(4) The term ‘veterans service organization serving covered veterans’ means any organization that—

“(A) serves the interests of covered veterans;

“(B) has covered veterans in substantive and policymaking positions within the organization; and

“(C) has demonstrated experience working with covered veterans.”

(b)
Deadline for Establishment.— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall establish the advisory committee required by section 548 of title 38, United States Code, as added by subsection (a) of this section.
(c)
Deadline for Initial Appointments.— Not later than 90 days after the date on which the Secretary establishes the advisory committee required by such section 548, the members of such advisory committee shall be appointed.
(d)
Initial Meeting.— Not later than 180 days after the date on which the Secretary establishes the advisory committee required by such section 548, such advisory committee shall hold its first meeting.

Subtitle B Studies and Reports

SEC. 5111. Secretary of Veterans Affairs Study on Dissemination of Information on Department of Veterans Affairs Home Loan Benefits.

(a)
Study.— The Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall conduct a study to identify the means by which the Secretary informs lenders and veterans about the availability of loans guaranteed by the Department of Veterans Affairs under chapter 37 of title 38, United States Code, for any purpose described in section 3710(a) of such title.
(b)
Report.— Not later than six months after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall—
(1)
submit to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs of the Senate and the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs of the House of Representatives a report on the results of the study conducted under subsection (a); and
(2)
make such report publicly available on an appropriate website of the Department of Veterans Affairs.

SEC. 5112. Gao Study on Post-Market Surveillance of Medical Devices by Department of Veterans Affairs.

(a)
Study.— The Comptroller General of the United States shall conduct a study on the efforts of the Under Secretary of Veterans Affairs for Health relating to post-market surveillance of implantable medical devices.
(b)
Report.— Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General shall submit to the Committees on Veterans’ Affairs of the House of Representatives and the Senate a report on the findings of the study under subsection (a). Such report shall include the following:
(1)
A description of the process used by the Under Secretary of Veterans Affairs for Health for documenting implantable medical devices issued to patients.
(2)
An evaluation of the capability of the Under Secretary of Veterans Affairs for Health to identify, in a timely manner, adverse events and safety issues relating to implantable medical devices.
(3)
An evaluation of the process for, and potential barriers to, the Under Secretary of Veterans Affairs for Health notifying patients of an implantable medical device recall.
(4)
An evaluation of the accessibility of the adverse event reporting systems of the Veterans Health Administration for patients with disabilities.
(5)
Recommendations to address gaps in such adverse event reporting systems, to better identify adverse events and safety issues from implantable medical devices.

SEC. 5113. Department of Veterans Affairs Report on Supportive Services and Housing Insecurity.

Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, in coordination with the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development and the Secretary of Labor, shall submit to Congress a report on how often and what type of supportive services (including career transition and mental health services and services for elderly veterans) are being offered to and used by veterans, and any correlation between a lack of supportive services programs and the likelihood of veterans falling back into housing insecurity. The Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall ensure that any medical information included in the report is de-identified.

SEC. 5114. Report on Handling of Certain Records of the Department of Veterans Affairs.

(a)
Report.— Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Inspector General of the Department of Veterans Affairs, in coordination with the Secretary of Defense, shall submit to Congress a report on the extent to which the procedures outlined in provision M21-1 III.ii.2.F.1 of the Adjudication Procedures Manual of the Department of Veterans Affairs, or any successor document, are followed in assisting veterans obtain or reconstruct service records or medical information damaged or destroyed in the fire that occurred at the National Processing Records Center in St. Louis, Missouri, in July of 1973.
(b)
Elements.— The report under subsection (a) shall include the following elements:
(1)
The determination of the Inspector General as to whether employees of the Department of Veterans Affairs receive sufficient training on the procedures specified in such subsection.
(2)
The determination of the Inspector General as to whether veterans are informed of actions necessary to adhere to such procedures.
(3)
The percentage of cases regarding such service records and medical information in which employees of the Department of Veterans Affairs follow such procedures.
(4)
The average duration of time to resolve an issue using such procedures.
(5)
Recommendations on how to improve the implementation of such procedures.

Subtitle C Other Matters

SEC. 5121. Improved Application of Employment and Reemployment Rights of All Members of Uniformed Services.

(a)
In General.— Paragraph (5) of section 4303 of title 38, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:

“(5) The term ‘Federal executive agency’—

“(A) except as provided in subparagraph (B), includes—

“(i) the United States Postal Service;

“(ii) the Postal Regulatory Commission;

“(iii) any nonappropriated fund instrumentality of the United States;

“(iv) any Executive agency (as defined in section 105 of title 5); and

“(v) any military department (as defined in section 102 of title 5) with respect to the civilian employees of that department; and

“(B) does not include—

“(i) an agency referred to in section 2302(a)(2)(C)(ii) of title 5;

“(ii) the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration with respect to members of the commissioned officer corps of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; or

“(iii) the Public Health Service with respect to members of the Commissioned Corps of the Public Health Service serving on active duty, active duty for training, or inactive duty training.”

(b)
Technical Correction.— Paragraph (17) of such section is amended by striking “ commissioned corps of the Public Health Service” and inserting “ Commissioned Corps of the Public Health Service”.

SEC. 5122. Competitive Pay for Health Care Providers of Department of Veterans Affairs.

Section 7451(c) of title 38, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

“(4)

(A) The director of each medical center of the Department shall submit to the Secretary an annual locality pay survey and rates of basic pay for covered positions at such medical center to ensure that pay rates remain competitive in the local labor market.

“(B) Not less than once per fiscal year, the Secretary shall submit to the Committees on Veterans’ Affairs of the House of Representatives and the Senate a report on rates of basic pay for covered positions at medical centers of the Department.”

SEC. 5123. Definition of Land Use Revenue under West Los Angeles Leasing Act of 2016.

Section 2(d)(2) of the West Los Angeles Leasing Act of 2016 (Public Law 114–226) is amended—
(1)
in subparagraph (A), by striking “ ; and” and inserting a semicolon;
(2)
by redesignating subparagraph (B) as subparagraph (C); and
(3)
by inserting after subparagraph (A) the following new subparagraph:

“(B) to the extent specified in advance in an appropriations Act for a fiscal year, any funds received as compensation for an easement described in subsection (e); and”

SEC. 5124. Technical Corrections to Honoring Our Pact Act of 2022.

(a)
Presumption of Service Connection for Certain Diseases Associated With Exposure to Burn Pits and Other Toxins.— Section 1120(b)(2) of title 38, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
by striking subparagraph (G); and
(2)
by redesignating subparagraphs (H) through (K) as subparagraphs (G) through (J), respectively.
(b)
Congressional Approval of Certain Medical Facility Acquisitions.— Section 703(c)(5)(C) of the Honoring our PACT Act of 2022 (Public Law 117–168; 136 Stat. 1797) is amended to read as follows:

“(C) by striking ‘or a major medical facility lease (as defined in subsection (a)(3)(B))’;”

(c)
Use of Competitive Procedures to Acquire Space for the Purpose of Providing Health-care Resources to Veterans.— Section 8103(h)(1) of title 38, United States Code, is amended by striking “ section 2304 of title 10” and inserting “ section 3301 of title 41”.
(d)
Effective Date.— The amendments made by this section shall take effect as if included in the enactment of the Honoring our PACT Act of 2022 (Public Law 117–168).

SEC. 5125. Improving Pilot Program on Acceptance by the Department of Veterans Affairs of Donated Facilities and Related Improvements.

(a)
In General.— Section 2 of the Communities Helping Invest through Property and Improvements Needed for Veterans Act of 2016 (Public Law 114–294; 38 U.S.C. 8103 note) is amended—
(1)
in subsection (b)(1)(A), by inserting before the semicolon the following: “ or for which funds are available from the Construction, Minor Projects, or Construction, Major Projects appropriations accounts”;
(2)
in subsection (e)(1)—
(A)
in subparagraph (A)—
(i)
by striking “ The Secretary” and inserting “ Except as otherwise provided in this paragraph, the Secretary”; and
(ii)
by inserting “ or funds already generally available in the Construction, Minor Projects, or Construction, Major Projects appropriations accounts” after “ that are in addition to the funds appropriated for the facility”;
(B)
in subparagraph (B), by striking “ subparagraph (A)” and inserting “ this paragraph”;
(C)
by redesignating subparagraph (B) as subparagraph (F); and
(D)
by inserting after subparagraph (A) the following new subparagraphs:

“(B) Unobligated amounts.—The Secretary may provide additional funds to help an entity described in subsection (a)(2) finance, design, or construct a facility in connection with real property and improvements to be donated under the pilot program and proposed to be accepted by the Secretary under subsection (b)(1)(B) if—

“(i) the Secretary determines that doing so is in the best interest of the Department and consistent with the mission of the Department; and

“(ii) funding provided under this subparagraph—

“(I) is in addition to amounts that have been appropriated for the facility before the date on which the Secretary and the entity enter into a formal agreement under subsection (c) for the construction and donation of the real property and improvements; and

“(II) is derived only from amounts that—

“(aa) are unobligated balances available in the Construction, Minor Projects, or Construction, Major Projects appropriations accounts of the Department that—

“(AA) are not associated with a specific project; or

“(BB) are amounts that are associated with a specific project, but are unobligated because they are the result of bid savings; and

“(bb) were appropriated to such an account before the date described in subclause (I).

“(C) Escalation clauses.—

“(i) In general.—The Secretary may include an escalation clause in a formal agreement under subsection (c) that authorizes an escalation of not more than an annual amount based on a rate established in the formal agreement and mutually agreed upon by the Secretary and an entity to account for inflation for an area if the Secretary determines, after consultation with the head of an appropriate Federal entity that is not part of the Department, that such escalation is necessary and in the best interest of the Department.

“(ii) Use of existing amounts.—The Secretary may obligate funds pursuant to clause (i) in connection with a formal agreement under subsection (c) using amounts that—

“(I) are unobligated balances available in the Construction, Minor Projects, or Construction, Major Projects appropriations accounts of the Department that—

“(aa) are not associated with a specific project; or

“(bb) are amounts that are associated with a specific project, but are unobligated because they are the result of bid savings; and

“(II) were appropriated to such an account before the date on which the Secretary and the entity entered into the formal agreement.

“(D) Availability.—Unobligated amounts shall be available pursuant to subparagraphs (B) and (C) only to the extent and in such amounts as provided in advance in appropriations Acts subsequent to the date of the enactment of this subparagraph, subject to subparagraph (E).

“(E) Limitation.—Unobligated amounts made available pursuant to subparagraphs (B) and (C) may not exceed 40 percent of the amount appropriated for the facility before the date on which the Secretary and the entity entered into a formal agreement under subsection (c).”

; and

(3)
in subsection (j)—
(A)
by striking “ Rule” and inserting “ Rules”;
(B)
by striking “ Nothing in” and inserting the following:

“(1) Entering arrangements and agreements.—Nothing in”

; and

(C)
by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

“(2) Treatment of assistance.—Nothing provided under this section shall be treated as Federal financial assistance as defined in section 200.40 of title 2, Code of Federal Regulations, as in effect on February 21, 2021.”

(b)
Amendments to Existing Agreements.— Each agreement entered into under section (2)(c) of such Act before the date of the enactment of this Act that was in effect on the date of the enactment of this Act may be amended to incorporate terms authorized by subparagraphs (B) and (C) of section 2(e)(1) of such Act, as added by subsection (a)(2)(D) of this section.

SEC. 5126. Improvement of Vet Centers at Department of Veterans Affairs.

(a)
Productivity Expectations for Readjustment Counselors of Vet Centers.—
(1)
Evaluation of productivity expectations.— Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall evaluate productivity expectations for readjustment counselors of Vet Centers, including by obtaining systematic feedback from counselors on such expectations, including with respect to following:
(A)
Any potential effects of productivity expectations, whether positive or negative, on client care and the welfare of readjustment counselors.
(B)
Distances readjustment counselors may travel to appointments, especially with respect to serving rural veterans.
(C)
The possibility that some veterans may not want to use nor benefit from telehealth or group counseling.
(D)
Availability and access of veteran populations to broadband and telehealth.
(E)
Any effect of productivity expectations on readjustment counselors, including with respect to recruitment, retention, and welfare.
(F)
Whether productivity expectations provide incentives or pressure to inaccurately report client visits.
(G)
Whether directors and readjustment counselors of Vet Centers need additional training or guidance on how productivity expectations are calculated.
(H)
Such other criteria as the Secretary considers appropriate.
(2)
Systematic feedback.—
(A)
In general.— The Secretary shall—
(i)
make every effort to ensure that all readjustment counselors of Vet Centers are given the opportunity to fully provide feedback, positive or negative, including through a survey containing open- and close-ended questions, on all items under paragraph (1);
(ii)
in obtaining feedback under paragraph (1), ensure that the items under paragraph (1) are adequately and completely addressed in a way that permits responses to be relevant to the evaluation of productivity expectations;
(iii)
collect and safely store the feedback obtained under paragraph (1)—
(I)
in an electronic database that cannot be altered by any party;
(II)
in an anonymized manner, in order to protect the privacy of each respondent; and
(III)
in a manner that allows for evaluation by third parties of the feedback, such as audit of the feedback by the Government Accountability Office; and
(iv)
provide the feedback obtained under paragraph (1) in an anonymized manner to the working group established under subsection (c).
(B)
Government accountability office audit.— Not less frequently than once each year during the five-year period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall audit the feedback obtained from readjustment counselors of Vet Centers under paragraph (1).
(3)
Implementation of changes.— Not later than 90 days after the date of the completion of the evaluation required by paragraph (1), the Secretary shall implement any needed changes to the productivity expectations described in such paragraph in order to ensure—
(A)
quality of care and access to care for veterans; and
(B)
the welfare of readjustment counselors.
(4)
Report to congress.— Not later than 180 days after the date of the completion of the evaluation required by paragraph (1), the Secretary shall submit to Congress a report on—
(A)
the findings of the evaluation; and
(B)
any planned or implemented changes described in paragraph (3).
(5)
Plan for reassessment and implementation.—
(A)
Plan.— Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall develop and implement a plan for—
(i)
reassessing productivity expectations for readjustment counselors of Vet Centers, in consultation with such counselors; and
(ii)
implementing any needed changes to such expectations, as the Secretary determines appropriate.
(B)
Reassessments.— Under the plan required by subparagraph (A), the Secretary shall conduct a reassessment described in such paragraph not less frequently than once each year.
(b)
Staffing Model for Vet Centers.—
(1)
In general.— Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall develop and implement a staffing model for Vet Centers that incorporates key practices in the design of such staffing model.
(2)
Elements.— In developing the staffing model under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall—
(A)
involve key stakeholders, including readjustment counselors, outreach specialists, and directors of Vet Centers;
(B)
incorporate key work activities and the frequency and time required to conduct such activities;
(C)
ensure the data used in the model is high quality to provide assurance that staffing estimates are reliable; and
(D)
incorporate—
(i)
risk factors, including case complexity;
(ii)
geography;
(iii)
availability, advisability, and willingness of veterans to use telehealth or group counseling; and
(iv)
such other factors as the Secretary considers appropriate.
(3)
Plan for assessments and updates.— Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall develop a plan for—
(A)
assessing and updating the staffing model developed and implemented under paragraph (1) not less frequently than once every four years; and
(B)
implementing any needed changes to such model, as the Secretary determines appropriate.
(c)
Working Group of Readjustment Counselors, Outreach Specialists, and Directors of Vet Centers.—
(1)
In general.— In conducting the evaluation of productivity expectations under subsection (a) (1) and developing the staffing model for Vet Centers under subsection (b)(1), the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall establish a working group to assess—
(A)
the efficacy, impact, and composition of performance metrics for such expectations with respect to—
(i)
quality of care and access to care for veterans; and
(ii)
the welfare of readjustment counselors and other employees of Vet Centers; and
(B)
key considerations for the development of such staffing model, including with respect to—
(i)
quality of care and access to care for veterans and other individuals eligible for care through Vet Centers; and
(ii)
recruitment, retention, and welfare of employees of Vet Centers.
(2)
Membership.— The working group established under paragraph (1) shall be composed of readjustment counselors, outreach specialists, and directors of Vet Centers.
(3)
Feedback and recommendations.— The working group established under paragraph (1) shall provide to the Secretary—
(A)
feedback from readjustment counselors, outreach specialists, and directors of Vet Centers; and
(B)
recommendations on how to improve—
(i)
quality of care and access to care for veterans; and
(ii)
the welfare of readjustment counselors and other employees of Vet Centers.
(d)
Improvements of Hiring Practices at Vet Centers.—
(1)
Standardization of position descriptions.—
(A)
In general.— Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall standardize descriptions of position responsibilities at Vet Centers.
(B)
Reporting requirement.— In each of the first two annual reports submitted under section 7309(e) of title 38, United States Code, after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall include a description of the actions taken by the Secretary to carry out subparagraph (A).
(2)
Expansion of reporting requirements on readjustment counseling to include actions to reduce staffing vacancies and time to hire.— Section 7309(e)(2) of title 38, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:

“(D) A description of actions taken by the Secretary to reduce—

“(i) vacancies in counselor positions in the Readjustment Counseling Service; and

“(ii) the time it takes to hire such counselors.”

(e)
Report by Government Accountability Office on Vet Center Infrastructure and Future Investments.—
(1)
In general.— Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to Congress a report on physical infrastructure and future investments with respect to Vet Centers.
(2)
Elements.— The report required by paragraph (1) shall include the following:
(A)
An assessment of—
(i)
the condition of the physical infrastructure of all assets of Vet Centers, whether owned or leased by the Department of Veterans Affairs; and
(ii)
the short-, medium-, and long-term plans of the Department to maintain and upgrade the physical infrastructure of Vet Centers to address the operational needs of Vet Centers as of the date of the submittal of the report and future needs.
(B)
An assessment of management and strategic planning for the physical infrastructure of Vet Centers, including whether the Department should buy or lease existing or additional locations in areas with stable or growing populations of veterans.
(C)
An assessment of whether, as of the date of the submittal of the report, Vet Center buildings, mobile Vet Centers, community access points, and similar infrastructure are sufficient to care for veterans or if such infrastructure is negatively affecting care due to limited space for veterans and Vet Center personnel or other factors.
(D)
An assessment of the areas with the greatest need for investments in—
(i)
improved physical infrastructure, including upgraded Vet Centers; or
(ii)
additional physical infrastructure for Vet Centers, including new Vet Centers owned or leased by the Department.
(E)
A description of the authorities and resources that may be required for the Secretary to make such investments.
(F)
A review of all annual reports submitted under 7309(e) of title 38, United States Code, before the date of the submittal of the report under paragraph (1).
(f)
Pilot Program to Combat Food Insecurity Among Veterans and Family Members of Veterans.—
(1)
In general.— Not later than 18 months after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall establish a pilot program to award grants to eligible entities to support partnerships that address food insecurity among veterans and family members of veterans who receive services through Vet Centers or other facilities of the Department as determined by the Secretary.
(2)
Duration of pilot.— The Secretary shall carry out the pilot program for a three-year period beginning on the date of the establishment of the pilot program.
(3)
Training and technical assistance.— The Secretary may provide eligible entities receiving grant funding under the pilot program with training and technical assistance on the provision of food insecurity assistance services to veterans and family members of veterans.
(4)
Eligible entities.— For purposes of the pilot program, an eligible entity is—
(A)
a nonprofit organization;
(B)
an organization recognized by the Secretary for the representation of veterans under section 5902 of title 38, United States Code;
(C)
a public agency;
(D)
a community-based organization; or
(E)
an institution of higher education.
(5)
Application.— An eligible entity seeking a grant under the pilot program shall submit to the Secretary an application therefor at such time, in such manner, and containing such information and commitments as the Secretary may require.
(6)
Selection.— The Secretary shall select eligible entities that submit applications under paragraph (5) for the award of grants under the pilot program using a competitive process that takes into account the following:
(A)
Capacity of the applicant entity to serve veterans and family members of veterans.
(B)
Demonstrated need of the population the applicant entity would serve.
(C)
Demonstrated need of the applicant entity for assistance from the grant.
(D)
Such other criteria as the Secretary considers appropriate.
(7)
Distribution.— The Secretary shall ensure, to the extent practicable, an equitable geographic distribution of grants awarded under this subsection.
(8)
Minimum program requirements.— Any grant awarded under this subsection shall be used—
(A)
to coordinate with the Secretary with respect to the provision of assistance to address food insecurity among veterans and family members of veterans described in paragraph (1);
(B)
to increase participation in nutrition counseling programs and provide educational materials and counseling to veterans and family members of veterans to address food insecurity and healthy diets among those individuals;
(C)
to increase access to and enrollment in Federal assistance programs, including the supplemental nutrition assistance program under the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 (7 U.S.C. 2011 et seq.), the special supplemental nutrition program for women, infants, and children established by section 17 of the Child Nutrition Act of 1966 (42 U.S.C. 1786), the low-income home energy assistance program established under the Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Act of 1981 (42 U.S.C. 8621 et seq.), and any other assistance program that the Secretary considers advisable; and
(D)
to fulfill such other criteria as the Secretary considers appropriate to further the purpose of the grant and serve veterans.
(9)
Provision of information.— Each entity that receives a grant under this subsection shall provide to the Secretary, at least once each year during the duration of the grant term, data on—
(A)
the number of veterans and family members of veterans screened for, and enrolled in, programs described in subparagraphs (B) and (C) of paragraph (8);
(B)
other services provided by the entity to veterans and family members of veterans using funds from the grant; and
(C)
such other data as the Secretary may require.
(10)
Report on data collected.— For each year of operation of the pilot program, the Secretary shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on the data collected under paragraph (9) during such year.
(11)
Government accountability office report.—
(A)
In general.— Not later than one year after the date on which the pilot program terminates, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to Congress a report evaluating the effectiveness and outcomes of the activities carried out under this subsection in reducing food insecurity among veterans and family members of veterans.
(B)
Elements.— The report required by subparagraph (A) shall include the following:
(i)
A summary of the activities carried out under this subsection.
(ii)
An assessment of the effectiveness and outcomes of the grants awarded under this subsection, including with respect to eligibility screening contacts, application assistance consultations, and changes in food insecurity among the population served by the grant.
(iii)
Best practices regarding the use of partnerships to improve the effectiveness and outcomes of public benefit programs to address food insecurity among veterans and family members of veterans.
(iv)
An assessment of the feasibility and advisability of making the pilot program permanent and expanding to other locations.
(12)
Authorization of appropriations.—
(A)
In general.— There is authorized to be appropriated to carry out the pilot program established under paragraph (1) $15,000,000 for each fiscal year in which the program is carried out, beginning with the fiscal year in which the program is established.
(B)
Administrative expenses.— Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated under subparagraph (A), not more than ten percent may be used for administrative expenses of the Department of Veterans Affairs associated with administering grants under this subsection.
(13)
Definitions.— In this subsection:
(A)
The term “appropriate committees of Congress” means—
(i)
the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs, the Committee on Appropriations, and the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry of the Senate; and
(ii)
the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs, the Committee on Appropriations, and the Committee on Agriculture of the House of Representatives.
(B)
The term “facilities of the Department” has the meaning given that term in section 1701(3) of title 38, United States Code.
(C)
The term “institution of higher education” has the meaning given that term in section 101 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1001).
(D)
The term “public agency” means a department, agency, other unit, or instrumentality of Federal, State, Tribal, or local government.
(E)
The term “State” has the meaning given that term in section 101(20) of title 38, United States Code.
(F)
The term “veteran” means an individual who served in the Armed Forces, including an individual who served in a reserve component of the Armed Forces, and who was discharged or released therefrom, regardless of the conditions of such discharge or release.
(g)
Definition of Vet Center.— In this section, the term “Vet Center” has the meaning given that term in section 1712A(h) of title 38, United States Code.

SEC. 5127. Information on Certain Veterans with Prior Medical Occupations; Program on Intermediate Care Technicians of Department of Veterans Affairs.

(a)
Update of Web Portal to Identify Certain Veterans.—
(1)
Update.— The Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall update web portals of the Department of Veterans Affairs to provide for a method by which a veteran who served in a medical occupation while serving as a member of the Armed Forces may elect to provide the information described in paragraph (2).
(2)
Information in portal.— The information described in this paragraph is the following:
(A)
Contact information for the veteran.
(B)
A history of the medical experience and trained competencies of the veteran.
(3)
Inclusions in history.— To the extent practicable, the history of a veteran provided under paragraph (2)(B) shall include individual critical task lists specific to the military occupational specialty of the veteran that align with standard occupational codes maintained by the Commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
(4)
Sharing of information.— For purposes of facilitating civilian medical credentialing and hiring opportunities for veterans seeking to respond to a national emergency, including a public health emergency declared by the Secretary of Health and Human Services under section 319 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 247d), the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, in coordination with the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Labor, shall establish a program to share the information described in paragraph (2) with the following:
(A)
State departments of veterans affairs.
(B)
Veterans service organizations.
(C)
State credentialing bodies.
(D)
State homes.
(E)
Other stakeholders involved in State-level credentialing, as determined appropriate by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs.
(b)
Program on Training of Intermediate Care Technicians of Department of Veterans Affairs.—
(1)
Establishment.— The Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall establish a program to train, certify, and employ covered veterans as intermediate care technicians of the Department of Veterans Affairs.
(2)
Locations.— The Secretary of Veterans Affairs may assign an intermediate care technician of the Department of Veterans Affairs trained under the program under paragraph (1) to any medical center of the Department of Veterans Affairs, giving priority to locations with a significant staffing shortage.
(3)
Inclusion of information in transition assistance program.— As part of the Transition Assistance Program under sections 1142 and 1144 of title 10, United States Code, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall conduct a communications campaign to convey to appropriate members of the Armed Forces separating from active duty opportunities for training, certification, and employment under the program under paragraph (1).
(4)
Report on expansion of program.— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall submit to the Committees on Veterans’ Affairs of the House of Representatives and the Senate a report on whether the program under paragraph (1) may be replicated for other medical positions within the Department of Veterans Affairs.
(c)
Notification of Opportunities for Veterans.— The Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall notify veterans service organizations and, in coordination with the Secretary of Defense, members of the reserve components of the Armed Forces of opportunities for veterans under this section.
(d)
Definitions.— In this section:
(1)
The term “covered veteran” means a veteran whom the Secretary of Veterans Affairs determines served as a basic health care technician while serving in the Armed Forces.
(2)
The terms “State home” and “veteran” have the meanings given those terms in section 101 of title 38, United States Code.
(3)
The term “veterans service organization” means an organization that provides services to veterans, including organizations recognized by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs under section 5902 of title 38, United States Code.

TITLE LII Inspector General Independence and Empowerment Matters

Subtitle A Inspector General Independence

SEC. 5201. Short Title.

This subtitle may be cited as the “Securing Inspector General Independence Act of 2022”.

SEC. 5202. Removal or Transfer of Inspectors General; Placement on Non-Duty Status.

(a)
In General.— The Inspector General Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.) is amended—
(1)
in section 3(b)—
(A)
by inserting “ (1)(A)” after “ (b)”;
(B)
in paragraph (1), as so designated—
(i)
in subparagraph (A), as so designated, in the second sentence—
(I)
by striking “ reasons” and inserting the following: “ substantive rationale, including detailed and case-specific reasons,”; and
(II)
by inserting “ (including to the appropriate congressional committees)” after “ Houses of Congress”; and
(ii)
by adding at the end the following:

“(B) If there is an open or completed inquiry into an Inspector General that relates to the removal or transfer of the Inspector General under subparagraph (A), the written communication required under that subparagraph shall—

“(i) identify each entity that is conducting, or that conducted, the inquiry; and

“(ii) in the case of a completed inquiry, contain the findings made during the inquiry.”

; and

(C)
by adding at the end the following:

“(2)

(A) Subject to the other provisions of this paragraph, only the President may place an Inspector General on non-duty status.

“(B) If the President places an Inspector General on non-duty status, the President shall communicate in writing the substantive rationale, including detailed and case-specific reasons, for the change in status to both Houses of Congress (including to the appropriate congressional committees) not later than 15 days before the date on which the change in status takes effect, except that the President may submit that communication not later than the date on which the change in status takes effect if—

“(i) the President has made a determination that the continued presence of the Inspector General in the workplace poses a threat described in any of clauses (i) through (iv) of section 6329b(b)(2)(A) of title 5, United States Code; and

“(ii) in the communication, the President includes a report on the determination described in clause (i), which shall include—

“(I) a specification of which clause of section 6329b(b)(2)(A) of title 5, United States Code, the President has determined applies under clause (i) of this subparagraph;

“(II) the substantive rationale, including detailed and case-specific reasons, for the determination made under clause (i);

“(III) an identification of each entity that is conducting, or that conducted, any inquiry upon which the determination under clause (i) was made; and

“(IV) in the case of an inquiry described in subclause (III) that is completed, the findings made during that inquiry.

“(C) The President may not place an Inspector General on non-duty status during the 30-day period preceding the date on which the Inspector General is removed or transferred under paragraph (1)(A) unless the President—

“(i) has made a determination that the continued presence of the Inspector General in the workplace poses a threat described in any of clauses (i) through (iv) of section 6329b(b)(2)(A) of title 5, United States Code; and

“(ii) not later than the date on which the change in status takes effect, submits to both Houses of Congress (including to the appropriate congressional committees) a written communication that contains the information required under subparagraph (B), including the report required under clause (ii) of that subparagraph.

“(D) For the purposes of this paragraph—

“(i) the term ‘Inspector General’—

“(I) means an Inspector General who was appointed by the President, without regard to whether the Senate provided advice and consent with respect to that appointment; and

“(II) includes the Inspector General of an establishment, the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction, the Special Inspector General for the Troubled Asset Relief Program, and the Special Inspector General for Pandemic Recovery; and

“(ii) a reference to the removal or transfer of an Inspector General under paragraph (1), or to the written communication described in that paragraph, shall be considered to be—

“(I) in the case of the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction, a reference to section 1229(c)(6) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 378);

“(II) in the case of the Special Inspector General for the Troubled Asset Relief Program, a reference to section 121(b)(4) of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (12 U.S.C. 5231(b)(4)); and

“(III) in the case of the Special Inspector General for Pandemic Recovery, a reference to section 4018(b)(3) of the CARES Act (15 U.S.C. 9053(b)(3)).”

(2)
in section 8G(e)—
(A)
in paragraph (1), by inserting “ or placement on non-duty status” after “ a removal”;
(B)
in paragraph (2)—
(i)
by inserting “ (A)” after “ (2)”;
(ii)
in subparagraph (A), as so designated, in the first sentence—
(I)
by striking “ reasons” and inserting the following: “ substantive rationale, including detailed and case-specific reasons,”; and
(II)
by inserting “ (including to the appropriate congressional committees)” after “ Houses of Congress”; and
(iii)
by adding at the end the following:

“(B) If there is an open or completed inquiry into an Inspector General that relates to the removal or transfer of the Inspector General under subparagraph (A), the written communication required under that subparagraph shall—

“(i) identify each entity that is conducting, or that conducted, the inquiry; and

“(ii) in the case of a completed inquiry, contain the findings made during the inquiry.”

; and

(C)
by adding at the end the following:

“(3)

(A) Subject to the other provisions of this paragraph, only the head of the applicable designated Federal entity (referred to in this paragraph as the ‘covered official’) may place an Inspector General on non-duty status.

“(B) If a covered official places an Inspector General on non-duty status, the covered official shall communicate in writing the substantive rationale, including detailed and case-specific reasons, for the change in status to both Houses of Congress (including to the appropriate congressional committees) not later than 15 days before the date on which the change in status takes effect, except that the covered official may submit that communication not later than the date on which the change in status takes effect if—

“(i) the covered official has made a determination that the continued presence of the Inspector General in the workplace poses a threat described in any of clauses (i) through (iv) of section 6329b(b)(2)(A) of title 5, United States Code; and

“(ii) in the communication, the covered official includes a report on the determination described in clause (i), which shall include—

“(I) a specification of which clause of section 6329b(b)(2)(A) of title 5, United States Code, the covered official has determined applies under clause (i) of this subparagraph;

“(II) the substantive rationale, including detailed and case-specific reasons, for the determination made under clause (i);

“(III) an identification of each entity that is conducting, or that conducted, any inquiry upon which the determination under clause (i) was made; and

“(IV) in the case of an inquiry described in subclause (III) that is completed, the findings made during that inquiry.

“(C) A covered official may not place an Inspector General on non-duty status during the 30-day period preceding the date on which the Inspector General is removed or transferred under paragraph (2)(A) unless the covered official—

“(i) has made a determination that the continued presence of the Inspector General in the workplace poses a threat described in any of clauses (i) through (iv) of section 6329b(b)(2)(A) of title 5, United States Code; and

“(ii) not later than the date on which the change in status takes effect, submits to both Houses of Congress (including to the appropriate congressional committees) a written communication that contains the information required under subparagraph (B), including the report required under clause (ii) of that subparagraph.

“(D) Nothing in this paragraph may be construed to limit or otherwise modify—

“(i) any statutory protection that is afforded to an Inspector General; or

“(ii) any other action that a covered official may take under law with respect to an Inspector General.”

(3)
in section 103H(c) of the National Security Act (50 U.S.C. 3033(c))—
(A)
in paragraph (4)—
(i)
by inserting “ (A)” after “ (4)”;
(ii)
in subparagraph (A), as so designated, in the second sentence, by striking “ reasons” and inserting “ substantive rationale, including detailed and case-specific reasons,”; and
(iii)
by adding at the end the following:

“(B) If there is an open or completed inquiry into the Inspector General that relates to the removal or transfer of the Inspector General under subparagraph (A), the written communication required under that subparagraph shall—

“(i) identify each entity that is conducting, or that conducted, the inquiry; and

“(ii) in the case of a completed inquiry, contain the findings made during the inquiry.”

; and

(B)
by adding at the end the following:

“(5)

(A) Subject to the other provisions of this paragraph, only the President may place the Inspector General on nonduty status.

“(B) If the President places the Inspector General on nonduty status, the President shall communicate in writing the substantive rationale, including detailed and case-specific reasons, for the change in status to the congressional intelligence committees not later than 15 days before the date on which the change in status takes effect, except that the President may submit that communication not later than the date on which the change in status takes effect if—

“(i) the President has made a determination that the continued presence of the Inspector General in the workplace poses a threat described in any of clauses (i) through (iv) of section 6329b(b)(2)(A) of title 5, United States Code; and

“(ii) in the communication, the President includes a report on the determination described in clause (i), which shall include—

“(I) a specification of which clause of section 6329b(b)(2)(A) of title 5, United States Code, the President has determined applies under clause (i);

“(II) the substantive rationale, including detailed and case-specific reasons, for the determination made under clause (i);

“(III) an identification of each entity that is conducting, or that conducted, any inquiry upon which the determination under clause (i) was made; and

“(IV) in the case of an inquiry described in subclause (III) that is completed, the findings made during that inquiry.

“(C) The President may not place the Inspector General on nonduty status during the 30-day period preceding the date on which the Inspector General is removed or transferred under paragraph (4)(A) unless the President—

“(i) has made a determination that the continued presence of the Inspector General in the workplace poses a threat described in any of clauses (i) through (iv) of section 6329b(b)(2)(A) of title 5, United States Code; and

“(ii) not later than the date on which the change in status takes effect, submits to the congressional intelligence committees a written communication that contains the information required under subparagraph (B), including the report required under clause (ii) of that subparagraph.”

; and

(4)
in section 17(b) of the Central Intelligence Agency Act of 1949 (50 U.S.C. 3517(b))—
(A)
in paragraph (6)—
(i)
by inserting “ (A)” after “ (6)”;
(ii)
in subparagraph (A), as so designated, in the second sentence, by striking “ reasons” and inserting “ substantive rationale, including detailed and case-specific reasons,”; and
(iii)
by adding at the end the following:

“(B) If there is an open or completed inquiry into the Inspector General that relates to the removal or transfer of the Inspector General under subparagraph (A), the written communication required under that subparagraph shall—

“(i) identify each entity that is conducting, or that conducted, the inquiry; and

“(ii) in the case of a completed inquiry, contain the findings made during the inquiry.”

; and

(B)
by adding at the end the following:

“(7)

(A) Subject to the other provisions of this paragraph, only the President may place the Inspector General on nonduty status.

“(B) If the President places the Inspector General on nonduty status, the President shall communicate in writing the substantive rationale, including detailed and case-specific reasons, for the change in status to the congressional intelligence committees not later than 15 days before the date on which the change in status takes effect, except that the President may submit that communication not later than the date on which the change in status takes effect if—

“(i) the President has made a determination that the continued presence of the Inspector General in the workplace poses a threat described in any of clauses (i) through (iv) of section 6329b(b)(2)(A) of title 5, United States Code; and

“(ii) in the communication, the President includes a report on the determination described in clause (i), which shall include—

“(I) a specification of which clause of section 6329b(b)(2)(A) of title 5, United States Code, the President has determined applies under clause (i);

“(II) the substantive rationale, including detailed and case-specific reasons, for the determination made under clause (i);

“(III) an identification of each entity that is conducting, or that conducted, any inquiry upon which the determination under clause (i) was made; and

“(IV) in the case of an inquiry described in subclause (III) that is completed, the findings made during that inquiry.

“(C) The President may not place the Inspector General on non-duty status during the 30-day period preceding the date on which the Inspector General is removed or transferred under paragraph (6)(A) unless the President—

“(i) has made a determination that the continued presence of the Inspector General in the workplace poses a threat described in any of clauses (i) through (iv) of section 6329b(b)(2)(A) of title 5, United States Code; and

“(ii) not later than the date on which the change in status takes effect, submits to the congressional intelligence committees a written communication that contains the information required under subparagraph (B), including the report required under clause (ii) of that subparagraph.”

(b)
Technical and Conforming Amendment.— Section 12(3) of the Inspector General Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.) is amended by inserting “ except as otherwise expressly provided,” before “ the term”.

SEC. 5203. Vacancy in Position of Inspector General.

(a)
In General.— Section 3 of the Inspector General Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.) is amended by adding at the end the following:

“(h)

(1) In this subsection—

“(A) the term ‘first assistant to the position of Inspector General’ means, with respect to an Office of Inspector General—

“(i) an individual who, as of the day before the date on which the Inspector General dies, resigns, or otherwise becomes unable to perform the functions and duties of that position—

“(I) is serving in a position in that Office; and

“(II) has been designated in writing by the Inspector General, through an order of succession or otherwise, as the first assistant to the position of Inspector General; or

“(ii) if the Inspector General has not made a designation described in clause (i)(II)—

“(I) the Principal Deputy Inspector General of that Office, as of the day before the date on which the Inspector General dies, resigns, or otherwise becomes unable to perform the functions and duties of that position; or

“(II) if there is no Principal Deputy Inspector General of that Office, the Deputy Inspector General of that Office, as of the day before the date on which the Inspector General dies, resigns, or otherwise becomes unable to perform the functions and duties of that position; and

“(B) the term ‘Inspector General’—

“(i) means an Inspector General who is appointed by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate; and

“(ii) includes the Inspector General of an establishment, the Special Inspector General for the Troubled Asset Relief Program, and the Special Inspector General for Pandemic Recovery.

“(2) If an Inspector General dies, resigns, or is otherwise unable to perform the functions and duties of the position—

“(A) section 3345(a) of title 5, United States Code, and section 103(e) of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3025(e)) shall not apply;

“(B) subject to paragraph (4), the first assistant to the position of Inspector General shall perform the functions and duties of the Inspector General temporarily in an acting capacity subject to the time limitations of section 3346 of title 5, United States Code; and

“(C) notwithstanding subparagraph (B), and subject to paragraphs (4) and (5), the President (and only the President) may direct an officer or employee of any Office of an Inspector General to perform the functions and duties of the Inspector General temporarily in an acting capacity subject to the time limitations of section 3346 of title 5, United States Code, only if—

“(i) during the 365-day period preceding the date of death, resignation, or beginning of inability to serve of the Inspector General, the officer or employee served in a position in an Office of an Inspector General for not less than 90 days, except that—

“(I) the requirement under this clause shall not apply if the officer is an Inspector General; and

“(II) for the purposes of this subparagraph, performing the functions and duties of an Inspector General temporarily in an acting capacity does not qualify as service in a position in an Office of an Inspector General;

“(ii) the rate of pay for the position of the officer or employee described in clause (i) is equal to or greater than the minimum rate of pay payable for a position at GS–15 of the General Schedule;

“(iii) the officer or employee has demonstrated ability in accounting, auditing, financial analysis, law, management analysis, public administration, or investigations; and

“(iv) not later than 30 days before the date on which the direction takes effect, the President communicates in writing to both Houses of Congress (including to the appropriate congressional committees) the substantive rationale, including the detailed and case-specific reasons, for such direction, including the reason for the direction that someone other than the individual who is performing the functions and duties of the Inspector General temporarily in an acting capacity (as of the date on which the President issues that direction) perform those functions and duties temporarily in an acting capacity.

“(3) Notwithstanding section 3345(a) of title 5, United States Code, and subparagraphs (B) and (C) of paragraph (2), and subject to paragraph (4), during any period in which an Inspector General is on non-duty status—

“(A) the first assistant to the position of Inspector General shall perform the functions and duties of the position temporarily in an acting capacity subject to the time limitations of section 3346 of title 5, United States Code; and

“(B) if the first assistant described in subparagraph (A) dies, resigns, or becomes otherwise unable to perform those functions and duties, the President (and only the President) may direct an officer or employee in that Office of Inspector General to perform those functions and duties temporarily in an acting capacity, subject to the time limitations of section 3346 of title 5, United States Code, if—

“(i) that direction satisfies the requirements under clauses (ii), (iii), and (iv) of paragraph (2)(C); and

“(ii) that officer or employee served in a position in that Office of Inspector General for not fewer than 90 of the 365 days preceding the date on which the President makes that direction.

“(4) An individual may perform the functions and duties of an Inspector General temporarily and in an acting capacity under subparagraph (B) or (C) of paragraph (2), or under paragraph (3), with respect to only 1 Inspector General position at any given time.

“(5) If the President makes a direction under paragraph (2)(C), during the 30-day period preceding the date on which the direction of the President takes effect, the functions and duties of the position of the applicable Inspector General shall be performed by—

“(A) the first assistant to the position of Inspector General; or

“(B) the individual performing those functions and duties temporarily in an acting capacity, as of the date on which the President issues that direction, if that individual is an individual other than the first assistant to the position of Inspector General.”

(b)
Amendment to National Security Act.— Section 103H(c) of the National Security Act (50 U.S.C. 3033(c)), as amended by section 5202, is further amended by adding at the end the following:

“(6)

(A) In this subsection, the term ‘first assistant to the position of Inspector General’ has the meaning given in section 3 of the Inspector General Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.).

“(B) If the Inspector General dies, resigns, or is otherwise unable to perform the functions and duties of the position—

“(i) section 3345(a) of title 5, United States Code, and section 103(e) of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3025(e)) shall not apply;

“(ii) subject to subparagraph (D), the first assistant to the position of Inspector General shall perform the functions and duties of the Inspector General temporarily in an acting capacity subject to the time limitations of section 3346 of title 5, United States Code; and

“(iii) notwithstanding clause (ii), and subject to subparagraphs (D) and (E), the President (and only the President) may direct an officer or employee of any Office of an Inspector General to perform the functions and duties of the Inspector General temporarily in an acting capacity subject to the time limitations of section 3346 of title 5, United States Code, only if—

“(I) during the 365-day period preceding the date of death, resignation, or beginning of inability to serve of the Inspector General, the officer or employee served in a position in an Office of an Inspector General for not less than 90 days, except that—

“(aa) the requirement under this subclause shall not apply if the officer is an Inspector General; and

“(bb) for the purposes of this clause, performing the functions and duties of an Inspector General temporarily in an acting capacity does not qualify as service in a position in an Office of an Inspector General;

“(II) the rate of pay for the position of the officer or employee described in subclause (I) is equal to or greater than the minimum rate of pay payable for a position at GS–15 of the General Schedule;

“(III) the officer or employee has demonstrated ability in accounting, auditing, financial analysis, law, management analysis, public administration, or investigations; and

“(IV) not later than 30 days before the date on which the direction takes effect, the President communicates in writing to the congressional intelligence committees the substantive rationale, including the detailed and case-specific reasons, for such direction, including the reason for the direction that someone other than the individual who is performing the functions and duties of the Inspector General temporarily in an acting capacity (as of the date on which the President issues that direction) perform those functions and duties temporarily in an acting capacity.

“(C) Notwithstanding section 3345(a) of title 5, United States Code, section 103(e) of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3025(e)), and clauses (ii) and (iii) of subparagraph (B), and subject to subparagraph (D), during any period in which the Inspector General is on nonduty status—

“(i) the first assistant to the position of Inspector General shall perform the functions and duties of the position temporarily in an acting capacity subject to the time limitations of section 3346 of title 5, United States Code; and

“(ii) if the first assistant described in clause (i) dies, resigns, or becomes otherwise unable to perform those functions and duties, the President (and only the President) may direct an officer or employee in the Office of Inspector General to perform those functions and duties temporarily in an acting capacity, subject to the time limitations of section 3346 of title 5, United States Code, if—

“(I) that direction satisfies the requirements under subclauses (II), (III), and (IV) of subparagraph (B)(iii); and

“(II) that officer or employee served in a position in that Office of Inspector General for not fewer than 90 of the 365 days preceding the date on which the President makes that direction.

“(D) An individual may perform the functions and duties of the Inspector General temporarily and in an acting capacity under clause (ii) or (iii) of subparagraph (B), or under subparagraph (C), with respect to only 1 Inspector General position at any given time.

“(E) If the President makes a direction under subparagraph (B)(iii), during the 30-day period preceding the date on which the direction of the President takes effect, the functions and duties of the position of the Inspector General shall be performed by—

“(i) the first assistant to the position of Inspector General; or

“(ii) the individual performing those functions and duties temporarily in an acting capacity, as of the date on which the President issues that direction, if that individual is an individual other than the first assistant to the position of Inspector General.”

(c)
Amendment to Central Intelligence Agency Act.— Section 17(b) of the Central Intelligence Agency Act of 1949 (50 U.S.C. 3517(b)), as amended by section 5202, is further amended by adding at the end the following:

“(8)

(A) In this subsection, the term ‘first assistant to the position of Inspector General’ has the meaning given in section 3 of the Inspector General Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.).

“(B) If the Inspector General dies, resigns, or is otherwise unable to perform the functions and duties of the position—

“(i) section 3345(a) of title 5, United States Code shall not apply;

“(ii) subject to subparagraph (D), the first assistant to the position of Inspector General shall perform the functions and duties of the Inspector General temporarily in an acting capacity subject to the time limitations of section 3346 of title 5, United States Code; and

“(iii) notwithstanding clause (ii), and subject to subparagraphs (D) and (E), the President (and only the President) may direct an officer or employee of any Office of an Inspector General to perform the functions and duties of the Inspector General temporarily in an acting capacity subject to the time limitations of section 3346 of title 5, United States Code, only if—

“(I) during the 365-day period preceding the date of death, resignation, or beginning of inability to serve of the Inspector General, the officer or employee served in a position in an Office of an Inspector General for not less than 90 days, except that—

“(aa) the requirement under this subclause shall not apply if the officer is an Inspector General; and

“(bb) for the purposes of this clause, performing the functions and duties of an Inspector General temporarily in an acting capacity does not qualify as service in a position in an Office of an Inspector General;

“(II) the rate of pay for the position of the officer or employee described in subclause (I) is equal to or greater than the minimum rate of pay payable for a position at GS–15 of the General Schedule;

“(III) the officer or employee has demonstrated ability in accounting, auditing, financial analysis, law, management analysis, public administration, or investigations; and

“(IV) not later than 30 days before the date on which the direction takes effect, the President communicates in writing to the congressional intelligence committees the substantive rationale, including the detailed and case-specific reasons, for such direction, including the reason for the direction that someone other than the individual who is performing the functions and duties of the Inspector General temporarily in an acting capacity (as of the date on which the President issues that direction) perform those functions and duties temporarily in an acting capacity.

“(C) Notwithstanding section 3345(a) of title 5, United States Code and clauses (ii) and (iii) of subparagraph (B), and subject to subparagraph (D), during any period in which the Inspector General is on nonduty status—

“(i) the first assistant to the position of Inspector General shall perform the functions and duties of the position temporarily in an acting capacity subject to the time limitations of section 3346 of title 5, United States Code; and

“(ii) if the first assistant described in clause (i) dies, resigns, or becomes otherwise unable to perform those functions and duties, the President (and only the President) may direct an officer or employee in the Office of Inspector General to perform those functions and duties temporarily in an acting capacity, subject to the time limitations of section 3346 of title 5, United States Code, if—

“(I) that direction satisfies the requirements under subclauses (II), (III), and (IV) of subparagraph (B)(iii); and

“(II) that officer or employee served in a position in that Office of Inspector General for not fewer than 90 of the 365 days preceding the date on which the President makes that direction.

“(D) An individual may perform the functions and duties of the Inspector General temporarily and in an acting capacity under clause (ii) or (iii) of subparagraph (B), or under subparagraph (C), with respect to only 1 Inspector General position at any given time.

“(E) If the President makes a direction under subparagraph (B)(iii), during the 30-day period preceding the date on which the direction of the President takes effect, the functions and duties of the position of the Inspector General shall be performed by—

“(i) the first assistant to the position of Inspector General; or

“(ii) the individual performing those functions and duties temporarily in an acting capacity, as of the date on which the President issues that direction, if that individual is an individual other than the first assistant to the position of Inspector General.”

(d)
Rule of Construction.— Nothing in the amendment made by subsection (a) may be construed to limit the applicability of sections 3345 through 3349d of title 5, United States Code (commonly known as the “Federal Vacancies Reform Act of 1998”), other than with respect to section 3345(a) of that title.
(e)
Effective Date.—
(1)
Definition.— In this subsection, the term “Inspector General” has the meaning given the term in subsection (h)(1)(B) of section 3 of the Inspector General Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.), as added by subsection (a) of this section.
(2)
Applicability.—
(A)
In general.— Except as provided in subparagraph (B), this section, and the amendments made by this section, shall take effect on the date of enactment of this Act.
(B)
Existing vacancies.— If, as of the date of enactment of this Act, an individual is performing the functions and duties of an Inspector General temporarily in an acting capacity, this section, and the amendments made by this section, shall take effect with respect to that Inspector General position on the date that is 30 days after the date of enactment of this Act.

SEC. 5204. Office of Inspector General Whistleblower Complaints.

(a)
Whistleblower Protection Coordinator.— Section 3(d)(1)(C) of the Inspector General Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.) is amended—
(1)
in clause (i), in the matter preceding subclause (I), by inserting “ , including employees of that Office of Inspector General” after “ employees”; and
(2)
in clause (iii), by inserting “ (including the Integrity Committee of that Council)” after “ and Efficiency”.
(b)
Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency.— Section 11(c)(5)(B) of the Inspector General Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.) is amended by striking “ , allegations of reprisal,” and inserting the following: “ and allegations of reprisal (including the timely and appropriate handling and consideration of protected disclosures and allegations of reprisal that are internal to an Office of Inspector General)”.

Subtitle B Presidential Explanation of Failure to Nominate an Inspector General

SEC. 5221. Presidential Explanation of Failure to Nominate an Inspector General.

(a)
In General.— Subchapter III of chapter 33 of title 5, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 3349d the following:

“§ 3349e. Presidential explanation of failure to nominate an inspector general

“If the President fails to make a formal nomination for a vacant inspector general position that requires a formal nomination by the President to be filled within the period beginning on the later of the date on which the vacancy occurred or on which a nomination is rejected, withdrawn, or returned, and ending on the day that is 210 days after that date, the President shall communicate, within 30 days after the end of such period and not later than June 1 of each year thereafter, to the appropriate congressional committees, as defined in section 12 of the Inspector General Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.)—

“(1) the reasons why the President has not yet made a formal nomination; and

“(2) a target date for making a formal nomination.”

(b)
Technical and Conforming Amendment.— The table of sections for subchapter III of chapter 33 of title 5, United States Code, is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 3349d the following:

“3349e. Presidential explanation of failure to nominate an Inspector General.”.

(c)
Effective Date.— The amendment made by subsection (a) shall take effect—
(1)
on the date of enactment of this Act with respect to any vacancy first occurring on or after that date; and
(2)
on the day that is 210 days after the date of enactment of this Act with respect to any vacancy that occurred before the date of enactment of this Act.

Subtitle C Integrity Committee of the Council of Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency Transparency

SEC. 5231. Short Title.

This subtitle may be cited as the “Integrity Committee Transparency Act of 2022”.

SEC. 5232. Additional Information to Be Included in Requests and Reports to Congress.

Section 11(d) of the Inspector General Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.) is amended—
(1)
in paragraph (5)(B)(ii), by striking the period at the end and inserting “ , the length of time the Integrity Committee has been evaluating the allegation of wrongdoing, and a description of any previous written notice provided under this clause with respect to the allegation of wrongdoing, including the description provided for why additional time was needed.”; and
(2)
in paragraph (8)(A)(ii), by inserting “ or corrective action” after “ disciplinary action”.

SEC. 5233. Availability of Information to Congress on Certain Allegations of Wrongdoing Closed Without Referral.

Section 11(d)(5)(B) of the Inspector General Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.) is amended by adding at the end the following:

“(iii) Availability of information to congress on certain allegations of wrongdoing closed without referral.—With respect to an allegation of wrongdoing made by a member of Congress that is closed by the Integrity Committee without referral to the Chairperson of the Integrity Committee to initiate an investigation, the Chairperson of the Integrity Committee shall, not later than 60 days after closing the allegation of wrongdoing, provide a written description of the nature of the allegation of wrongdoing and how the Integrity Committee evaluated the allegation of wrongdoing to—

“(I) the Chair and Ranking Minority Member of the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate; and

“(II) the Chair and Ranking Minority Member of the Committee on Oversight and Reform of the House of Representatives.”

SEC. 5234. Semiannual Report.

Section 11(d)(9) of the Inspector General Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.) is amended to read as follows:

“(9) Semiannual report.—On or before May 31, 2023, and every 6 months thereafter, the Council shall submit to Congress and the President a report on the activities of the Integrity Committee during the immediately preceding 6-month periods ending March 31 and September 30, which shall include the following with respect to allegations of wrongdoing that are made against Inspectors General and staff members of the various Offices of Inspector General described in paragraph (4)(C):

“(A) An overview and analysis of the allegations of wrongdoing disposed of by the Integrity Committee, including—

“(i) analysis of the positions held by individuals against whom allegations were made, including the duties affiliated with such positions;

“(ii) analysis of the categories or types of the allegations of wrongdoing; and

“(iii) a summary of disposition of all the allegations.

“(B) The number of allegations received by the Integrity Committee.

“(C) The number of allegations referred to the Department of Justice or the Office of Special Counsel, including the number of allegations referred for criminal investigation.

“(D) The number of allegations referred to the Chairperson of the Integrity Committee for investigation, a general description of the status of such investigations, and a summary of the findings of investigations completed.

“(E) An overview and analysis of allegations of wrongdoing received by the Integrity Committee during any previous reporting period, but remained pending during some part of the six months covered by the report, including—

“(i) analysis of the positions held by individuals against whom allegations were made, including the duties affiliated with such positions;

“(ii) analysis of the categories or types of the allegations of wrongdoing; and

“(iii) a summary of disposition of all the allegations.

“(F) The number and category or type of pending investigations.

“(G) For each allegation received—

“(i) the date on which the investigation was opened;

“(ii) the date on which the allegation was disposed of, as applicable; and

“(iii) the case number associated with the allegation.

“(H) The nature and number of allegations to the Integrity Committee closed without referral, including the justification for why each allegation was closed without referral.

“(I) A brief description of any difficulty encountered by the Integrity Committee when receiving, evaluating, investigating, or referring for investigation an allegation received by the Integrity Committee, including a brief description of—

“(i) any attempt to prevent or hinder an investigation; or

“(ii) concerns about the integrity or operations at an Office of Inspector General.

“(J) Other matters that the Council considers appropriate.”

SEC. 5235. Additional Reports.

Section 5 of the Inspector General Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.) is amended—
(1)
by redesignating subsections (e) and (f) as subsections (g) and (h), respectively; and
(2)
by inserting after subsection (d) the following:

“(e) Additional Reports.—

“(1) Report to inspector general.—The Chairperson of the Integrity Committee of the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency shall, immediately whenever the Chairperson of the Integrity Committee becomes aware of particularly serious or flagrant problems, abuses, or deficiencies relating to the administration of programs and operations of an Office of Inspector General for which the Integrity Committee may receive, review, and refer for investigation allegations of wrongdoing under section 11(d), submit a report to the Inspector General who leads the Office at which the serious or flagrant problems, abuses, or deficiencies were alleged.

“(2) Report to president, congress, and the establishment.—Not later than 7 days after the date on which an Inspector General receives a report submitted under paragraph (1), the Inspector General shall submit to the President, the appropriate congressional committees, and the head of the establishment—

“(A) the report received under paragraph (1); and

“(B) a report by the Inspector General containing any comments the Inspector General determines appropriate.”

SEC. 5236. Requirement to Report Final Disposition to Congress.

Section 11(d)(8)(B) of the Inspector General Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.) is amended by inserting “ and the appropriate congressional committees” after “ Integrity Committee”.

SEC. 5237. Investigations of Offices of Inspector General of Establishments by the Integrity Committee.

Section 11(d)(7)(B)(i)(V) of the Inspector General Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.) is amended by inserting “ , and that an investigation of an Office of Inspector General of an establishment is conducted by another Office of Inspector General of an establishment” after “ size”.

Subtitle D Notice of Ongoing Investigations When There Is a Change in Status of Inspector General

SEC. 5241. Notice of Ongoing Investigations When There Is a Change in Status of Inspector General.

Section 5 of the Inspector General Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.) is amended by inserting after subsection (e), as added by section 5625 of this title, the following:

“(f)

(1) Except as provided in paragraph (2), not later than 15 days after an Inspector General is removed, placed on paid or unpaid nonduty status, or transferred to another position or location within an establishment, the officer or employee performing the functions and duties of the Inspector General temporarily in an acting capacity shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees information regarding work being conducted by the Office as of the date on which the Inspector General was removed, placed on paid or unpaid non-duty status, or transferred, which shall include—

“(A) for each investigation—

“(i) the type of alleged offense;

“(ii) the fiscal quarter in which the Office initiated the investigation;

“(iii) the relevant Federal agency, including the relevant component of that Federal agency for any Federal agency listed in section 901(b) of title 31, United States Code, under investigation or affiliated with the individual or entity under investigation; and

“(iv) whether the investigation is administrative, civil, criminal, or a combination thereof, if known; and

“(B) for any work not described in subparagraph (A)—

“(i) a description of the subject matter and scope;

“(ii) the relevant agency, including the relevant component of that Federal agency, under review;

“(iii) the date on which the Office initiated the work; and

“(iv) the expected time frame for completion.

“(2) With respect to an inspector general of an element of the intelligence community specified in section 8G(d)(2) of the Inspector General Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.), the submission required by paragraph (1) shall only be made to the committees of Congress specified in section 8G(d)(2)(E).”

Subtitle E Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency Report on Expenditures

SEC. 5251. Cigie Report on Expenditures.

Section 11(c)(3) of the Inspector General Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.) is amended by adding at the end the following:

“(D) Report on expenditures.—Not later than November 30 of each year, the Chairperson shall submit to the appropriate committees or subcommittees of Congress, including the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate and the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives, a report on the expenditures of the Council for the preceding fiscal year, including from direct appropriations to the Council, interagency funding pursuant to subparagraph (A), a revolving fund pursuant to subparagraph (B), or any other source.”

Subtitle F Notice of Refusal to Provide Inspectors General Access

SEC. 5261. Notice of Refusal to Provide Information or Assistance to Inspectors General.

Section 6(c) of the Inspector General Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.) is amended by adding at the end the following:

“(3) If the information or assistance that is the subject of a report under paragraph (2) is not provided to the Inspector General by the date that is 30 days after the report is made, the Inspector General shall submit a notice that the information or assistance requested has not been provided by the head of the establishment involved or the head of the Federal agency involved, as applicable, to the appropriate congressional committees.”

Subtitle G Training Resources for Inspectors General and Other Matters

SEC. 5271. Training Resources for Inspectors General.

Section 11(c)(1) of the Inspector General Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.) is amended—
(1)
by redesignating subparagraphs (E) through (I) as subparagraphs (F) through (J), respectively; and
(2)
by inserting after subparagraph (D) the following:

“(E) support the professional development of Inspectors General, including by providing training opportunities on the duties, responsibilities, and authorities under this Act and on topics relevant to Inspectors General and the work of Inspectors General, as identified by Inspectors General and the Council.”

SEC. 5272. Definition of Appropriate Congressional Committees.

The Inspector General Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.) is amended—
(1)
in section 5—
(A)
in subsection (b), in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking “ committees or subcommittees of the Congress” and inserting “ congressional committees”; and
(B)
in subsection (d), by striking “ committees or subcommittees of Congress” and inserting “ congressional committees”;
(2)
in section 6(h)(4)—
(A)
in subparagraph (B), by striking “ Government”; and
(B)
by amending subparagraph (C) to read as follows:

“(C) Any other relevant congressional committee or subcommittee of jurisdiction.”

(3)
in section 8—
(A)
in subsection (b)—
(i)
in paragraph (3), by striking “ the Committees on Armed Services and Governmental Affairs of the Senate and the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight of the House of Representatives and to other appropriate committees or subcommittees of the Congress” and inserting “ the appropriate congressional committees, including the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives”; and
(ii)
in paragraph (4), by striking “ and to other appropriate committees or subcommittees”; and
(B)
in subsection (f)—
(i)
in paragraph (1), by striking “ the Committees on Armed Services and on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate and the Committees on Armed Services and on Oversight and Government Reform of the House of Representatives and to other appropriate committees or subcommittees of Congress” and inserting “ the appropriate congressional committees, including the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives”; and
(ii)
in paragraph (2), by striking “ committees or subcommittees of the Congress” and inserting “ congressional committees”;
(4)
in section 8D—
(A)
in subsection (a)(3), by striking “ Committees on Governmental Affairs and Finance of the Senate and the Committees on Government Operations and Ways and Means of the House of Representatives, and to other appropriate committees or subcommittees of the Congress” and inserting “ appropriate congressional committees, including the Committee on Finance of the Senate and the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives”; and
(B)
in subsection (g)—
(i)
in paragraph (1)—
(I)
by striking “ committees or subcommittees of the Congress” and inserting “ congressional committees”; and
(II)
by striking “ Committees on Governmental Affairs and Finance of the Senate and the Committees on Government Reform and Oversight and Ways and Means of the House of Representatives” and inserting “ Committee on Finance of the Senate and the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives”; and
(ii)
in paragraph (2), by striking “ committees or subcommittees of Congress” and inserting “ congressional committees”;
(5)
in section 8E—
(A)
in subsection (a)(3), by striking “ Committees on Governmental Affairs and Judiciary of the Senate and the Committees on Government Operations and Judiciary of the House of Representatives, and to other appropriate committees or subcommittees of the Congress” and inserting “ appropriate congressional committees, including the Committee on the Judiciary of the Senate and the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives”; and
(B)
in subsection (c)—
(i)
by striking “ committees or subcommittees of the Congress” and inserting “ congressional committees”; and
(ii)
by striking “ Committees on the Judiciary and Governmental Affairs of the Senate and the Committees on the Judiciary and Government Operations of the House of Representatives” and inserting “ Committee on the Judiciary of the Senate and the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives”;
(6)
in section 8G(f)(3)—
(A)
in subparagraph (A)(iii), by striking “ Committee on Governmental Affairs of the Senate and the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight of the House of Representatives, and to other appropriate committees or subcommittees of the Congress” and inserting “ the appropriate congressional committees”; and
(B)
by striking subparagraph (C);
(7)
in section 8I—
(A)
in subsection (a)(3), in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking “ committees and subcommittees of Congress” and inserting “ congressional committees”; and
(B)
in subsection (d), by striking “ committees and subcommittees of Congress” each place it appears and inserting “ congressional committees”;
(8)
in section 8N(b), by striking “ committees of Congress” and inserting “ congressional committees”;
(9)
in section 11—
(A)
in subsection (b)(3)(B)(viii)—
(i)
by striking subclauses (III) and (IV);
(ii)
in subclause (I), by adding “ and” at the end; and
(iii)
by amending subclause (II) to read as follows:

“(II) the appropriate congressional committees.”

; and

(B)
in subsection (d)(8)(A)(iii), by striking “ to the” and all that follows through “ jurisdiction” and inserting “ to the appropriate congressional committees”; and
(10)
in section 12—
(A)
in paragraph (4), by striking “ and” at the end;
(B)
in paragraph (5), by striking the period at the end and inserting “ ; and”; and
(C)
by adding at the end the following:

“(6) the term ‘appropriate congressional committees’ means—

“(A) the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate;

“(B) the Committee on Oversight and Reform of the House of Representatives; and

“(C) any other relevant congressional committee or subcommittee of jurisdiction.”

SEC. 5273. Semiannual Reports.

The Inspector General Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.) is amended—
(1)
in section 4(a)(2)—
(A)
by inserting “ , including” after “ to make recommendations”; and
(B)
by inserting a comma after “ section 5(a)”;
(2)
in section 5—
(A)
in subsection (a)—
(i)
by striking paragraphs (1) through (12) and inserting the following:

“(1) a description of significant problems, abuses, and deficiencies relating to the administration of programs and operations of the establishment and associated reports and recommendations for corrective action made by the Office;

“(2) an identification of each recommendation made before the reporting period, for which corrective action has not been completed, including the potential costs savings associated with the recommendation;

“(3) a summary of significant investigations closed during the reporting period;

“(4) an identification of the total number of convictions during the reporting period resulting from investigations;

“(5) information regarding each audit, inspection, or evaluation report issued during the reporting period, including—

“(A) a listing of each audit, inspection, or evaluation;

“(B) if applicable, the total dollar value of questioned costs (including a separate category for the dollar value of unsupported costs) and the dollar value of recommendations that funds be put to better use, including whether a management decision had been made by the end of the reporting period;

“(6) information regarding any management decision made during the reporting period with respect to any audit, inspection, or evaluation issued during a previous reporting period;”

(ii)
by redesignating paragraphs (13) through (22) as paragraphs (7) through (16), respectively;
(iii)
by amending paragraph (13), as so redesignated, to read as follows:

“(13) a report on each investigation conducted by the Office where allegations of misconduct were substantiated involving a senior Government employee or senior official (as defined by the Office) if the establishment does not have senior Government employees, which shall include—

“(A) the name of the senior Government employee, if already made public by the Office; and

“(B) a detailed description of—

“(i) the facts and circumstances of the investigation; and

“(ii) the status and disposition of the matter, including—

“(I) if the matter was referred to the Department of Justice, the date of the referral; and

“(II) if the Department of Justice declined the referral, the date of the declination;”

; and

(iv)
by amending paragraph (15), as so redesignated, to read as follows:

“(15) information related to interference by the establishment, including—

“(A) a detailed description of any attempt by the establishment to interfere with the independence of the Office, including—

“(i) with budget constraints designed to limit the capabilities of the Office; and

“(ii) incidents where the establishment has resisted or objected to oversight activities of the Office or restricted or significantly delayed access to information, including the justification of the establishment for such action; and

“(B) a summary of each report made to the head of the establishment under section 6(c)(2) during the reporting period;”

; and

(B)
in subsection (b)—
(i)
by striking paragraphs (2) and (3) and inserting the following:

“(2) where final action on audit, inspection, and evaluation reports had not been taken before the commencement of the reporting period, statistical tables showing—

“(A) with respect to management decisions—

“(i) for each report, whether a management decision was made during the reporting period;

“(ii) if a management decision was made during the reporting period, the dollar value of disallowed costs and funds to be put to better use as agreed to in the management decision; and

“(iii) total number of reports where a management decision was made during the reporting period and the total corresponding dollar value of disallowed costs and funds to be put to better use as agreed to in the management decision; and

“(B) with respect to final actions—

“(i) whether, if a management decision was made before the end of the reporting period, final action was taken during the reporting period;

“(ii) if final action was taken, the dollar value of—

“(I) disallowed costs that were recovered by management through collection, offset, property in lieu of cash, or otherwise;

“(II) disallowed costs that were written off by management;

“(III) disallowed costs and funds to be put to better use not yet recovered or written off by management;

“(IV) recommendations that were completed; and

“(V) recommendations that management has subsequently concluded should not or could not be implemented or completed; and

“(iii) total number of reports where final action was not taken and total number of reports where final action was taken, including the total corresponding dollar value of disallowed costs and funds to be put to better use as agreed to in the management decisions;”

(ii)
by redesignating paragraph (4) as paragraph (3);
(iii)
in paragraph (3), as so redesignated, by striking “ subsection (a)(20)(A)” and inserting “ subsection (a)(14)(A)”; and
(iv)
by striking paragraph (5) and inserting the following:

“(4) a statement explaining why final action has not been taken with respect to each audit, inspection, and evaluation report in which a management decision has been made but final action has not yet been taken, except that such statement—

“(A) may exclude reports if—

“(i) a management decision was made within the preceding year; or

“(ii) the report is under formal administrative or judicial appeal or management of the establishment has agreed to pursue a legislative solution; and

“(B) shall identify the number of reports in each category so excluded.”

(C)
by redesignating subsection (h), as so redesignated by section 5625 of this title, as subsection (i); and
(D)
by inserting after subsection (g), as so redesignated by section 5625 of this title, the following:

“(h) If an Office has published any portion of the report or information required under subsection (a) to the website of the Office or on oversight.gov, the Office may elect to provide links to the relevant webpage or website in the report of the Office under subsection (a) in lieu of including the information in that report.”

SEC. 5274. Submission of Reports That Specifically Identify Non-Governmental Organizations or Business Entities.

(a)
In General.— Section 5(g) of the Inspector General Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.), as so redesignated by section 5625 of this title, is amended by adding at the end the following:

“(6)

(A) Except as provided in subparagraph (B), if an audit, evaluation, inspection, or other non-investigative report prepared by an Inspector General specifically identifies a specific non-governmental organization or business entity, whether or not the non-governmental organization or business entity is the subject of that audit, evaluation, inspection, or non-investigative report—

“(i) the Inspector General shall notify the non-governmental organization or business entity;

“(ii) the non-governmental organization or business entity shall have—

“(I) 30 days to review the audit, evaluation, inspection, or non-investigative report beginning on the date of publication of the audit, evaluation, inspection, or non-investigative report; and

“(II) the opportunity to submit a written response for the purpose of clarifying or providing additional context as it directly relates to each instance wherein an audit, evaluation, inspection, or non-investigative report specifically identifies that non-governmental organization or business entity; and

“(iii) if a written response is submitted under clause (ii)(II) within the 30-day period described in clause (ii)(I)—

“(I) the written response shall be attached to the audit, evaluation, inspection, or non-investigative report; and

“(II) in every instance where the report may appear on the public-facing website of the Inspector General, the website shall be updated in order to access a version of the audit, evaluation, inspection, or non-investigative report that includes the written response.

“(B) Subparagraph (A) shall not apply with respect to a non-governmental organization or business entity that refused to provide information or assistance sought by an Inspector General during the creation of the audit, evaluation, inspection, or non-investigative report.

“(C) An Inspector General shall review any written response received under subparagraph (A) for the purpose of preventing the improper disclosure of classified information or other non-public information, consistent with applicable laws, rules, and regulations, and, if necessary, redact such information.”

(b)
Retroactive Applicability.— During the 30-day period beginning on the date of enactment of this Act—
(1)
the amendment made by subsection (a) shall apply upon the request of a non-governmental organization or business entity named in an audit, evaluation, inspection, or other non-investigative report prepared on or after January 1, 2019; and
(2)
any written response submitted under clause (iii) of section 5(g)(6)(A) of the Inspector General Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.), as added by subsection (a), with respect to such an audit, evaluation, inspection, or other non-investigative report shall attach to the original report in the manner described in that clause.

SEC. 5275. Review Relating to Vetting, Processing, and Resettlement of Evacuees from Afghanistan and the Afghanistan Special Immigrant Visa Program.

(a)
In General.— In accordance with the Inspector General Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.), the Inspector General of the Department of Homeland Security, jointly with the Inspector General of the Department of State, and in coordination with the Inspector General of the Department of Defense and any appropriate Inspector General established by that Act or section 103H of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3033), shall conduct a thorough review of efforts to support and process evacuees from Afghanistan and the Afghanistan special immigrant visa program.
(b)
Elements.— The review required by subsection (a) shall include an assessment of the systems, staffing, policies, and programs used—
(1)
to screen and vet such evacuees, including—
(A)
an assessment of whether personnel conducting such screening and vetting were appropriately authorized and provided with training, including training in the detection of fraudulent personal identification documents;
(B)
an analysis of the degree to which such screening and vetting deviated from United States law, regulations, policy, and best practices relating to the screening and vetting of parolees, refugees, and applicants for United States visas that have been in use at any time since January 1, 2016, particularly for individuals from countries containing any active terrorist organizations; and
(C)
an identification of any risk to the national security of the United States posed by any such deviations;
(D)
an analysis of the processes used for evacuees traveling without personal identification records, including the creation or provision of any new identification records to such evacuees; and
(E)
an analysis of the degree to which such screening and vetting process was capable of detecting—
(i)
instances of human trafficking and domestic abuse;
(ii)
evacuees who are unaccompanied minors; and
(iii)
evacuees with a spouse who is a minor;
(2)
to admit and process such evacuees at United States ports of entry;
(3)
to temporarily house such evacuees prior to resettlement;
(4)
to account for the total number of individuals evacuated from Afghanistan in 2021 with support of the United States Government, disaggregated by—
(A)
country of origin;
(B)
citizenship, only if different from country of origin;
(C)
age;
(D)
gender;
(E)
the number of individuals who were holders of a special immigrant visa issued pursuant to the Afghan Allies Protection Act of 2009 (8 U.S.C. 1101 note; Public Law 111–8) or section 1059 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 (8 U.S.C. 1101 note; Public Law 109–163) at the time of evacuation;
(F)
the number of individuals who were applicants for a special immigrant visas pursuant to the Afghan Allies Protection Act of 2009 (8 U.S.C. 1101 note; Public Law 111–8) or section 1059 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 (8 U.S.C. 1101 note; Public Law 109–163) at the time of evacuation;
(G)
the number who were in possession of a valid nonimmigrant visa to enter the United States at the time of evacuation; and
(H)
familial relationship to individuals described in subparagraphs (E) through (G).
(c)
Interim Reporting.—
(1)
In general.— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Inspector General of the Department of Homeland Security and the Inspector General of the Department of State shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees not fewer than one interim report on the review conducted under this section.
(2)
Form.— Any report submitted under paragraph (1) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.
(3)
Definitions.— In this subsection:
(A)
Appropriate congressional committees.— The term “appropriate congressional committees” means—
(i)
the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Foreign Relations, the Select Committee on Intelligence, and the Committee on the Judiciary of the Senate; and
(ii)
the Committee on Oversight and Reform, the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Foreign Affairs, the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, and the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives.
(B)
Screen; screening.— The terms “screen” and “screening”, with respect to an evacuee, mean the process by which a Federal official determines—
(i)
the identity of the evacuee;
(ii)
whether the evacuee has a valid identification documentation; and
(iii)
whether any database of the United States Government contains derogatory information about the evacuee.
(C)
Vet; vetting.— The term “vet” and “vetting”, with respect to an evacuee, means the process by which a Federal official interviews the evacuee to determine whether the evacuee is who they purport to be, including whether the evacuee poses a national security risk.
(d)
Discharge of Responsibilities.— The Inspector General of the Department of Homeland Security and the Inspector General of the Department of State shall discharge the responsibilities under this section in a manner consistent with the authorities and requirements of the Inspector General Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.) and the authorities and requirements applicable to the Inspector General of the Department of Homeland Security and the Inspector General of the Department of State under that Act.
(e)
Coordination.— Upon request of an Inspector General for information or assistance under subsection (a), the head of any Federal agency involved shall, insofar as is practicable and not in contravention of any existing statutory restriction or regulation of the Federal agency from which the information is requested, furnish to such Inspector General, or to an authorized designee, such information or assistance.
(f)
Rule of Construction.— Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit the ability of the Inspector General of the Department of Homeland Security or the Inspector General of the Department of State to enter into agreements to conduct joint audits, inspections, or investigations in the exercise of the oversight responsibilities of the Inspector General of the Department of Homeland Security and the Inspector General of the Department of State, in accordance with the Inspector General Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.), with respect to oversight of the evacuation from Afghanistan, the selection, vetting, and processing of applicants for special immigrant visas and asylum, and any resettlement in the United States of such evacuees.

TITLE LIII Oversight and Reform Matters

Subtitle A General Provisions

SEC. 5301. Access for Veterans to Records.

(a)
Plan to Eliminate Records Backlog at the National Personnel Records Center.—
(1)
Plan required.— Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Archivist of the United States shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a comprehensive plan for reducing the backlog of requests for records from the National Personnel Records Center and improving the efficiency and responsiveness of operations at the National Personnel Records Center, that includes, at a minimum, the following:
(A)
An estimate of the number of backlogged record requests for veterans.
(B)
Target timeframes to reduce the backlog.
(C)
A detailed plan for using existing funds to improve the information technology infrastructure, including secure access to appropriate agency Federal records, to prevent future backlogs.
(D)
Actions to improve customer service for requesters.
(E)
Measurable goals with respect to the comprehensive plan and metrics for tracking progress toward such goals.
(F)
Strategies to prevent future record request backlogs, including backlogs caused by an event that prevents employees of the Center from reporting to work in person.
(2)
Updates.— Not later than 90 days after the date on which the comprehensive plan is submitted under paragraph (1), and biannually thereafter until the response rate by the National Personnel Records Center reaches 90 percent of all requests in 20 days or less, not including any request involving a record damaged or lost in the National Personnel Records Center fire of 1973 or any request that is subject to a fee that has not been paid in a timely manner by the requestor (provided the National Personnel Records Center issues an invoice within 20 days after the date on which the request is made), the Archivist of the United States shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees an update of such plan that—
(A)
describes progress made by the National Personnel Records Center during the preceding 90-day period with respect to record request backlog reduction and efficiency and responsiveness improvement;
(B)
provides data on progress made toward the goals identified in the comprehensive plan; and
(C)
describes any changes made to the comprehensive plan.
(3)
Consultation requirement.— In carrying out paragraphs (1) and (2), the Archivist of the United States shall consult with the Secretary of Veterans Affairs.
(4)
Appropriate congressional committees defined.— In this subsection, the term “appropriate congressional committees” means—
(A)
the Committee on Oversight and Reform, the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs, and the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives; and
(B)
the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs, and the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate.
(b)
Additional Funding to Address Records Backlog.—
(1)
Authorization of appropriations.— In addition to amounts otherwise available, there is authorized to be appropriated to the National Archives and Records Administration, $60,000,000 to address backlogs in responding to requests from veterans for military personnel records, improve cybersecurity, improve digital preservation and access to archival Federal records, and address backlogs in requests made under section 552 of title 5, United States Code (commonly referred to as the Freedom of Information Act). Such amounts may also be used for the Federal Records Center Program.
(2)
Requirement to maintain in-person staffing levels.— Subject to the availability of appropriations, and not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Archivist of the United States shall ensure, to the extent practicable, that the National Personnel Records Center maintains staffing levels and telework arrangements that enable the maximum processing of records requests possible in order to achieve the performance goal of responding to 90 percent of all requests in 20 days or less, not including any request involving a record damaged or lost in the National Personnel Records Center fire of 1973 or any request that is subject to a fee that has not been paid in a timely manner by the requestor (provided the National Personnel Records Center issues an invoice within 20 days after the date on which the request is made).
(3)
Inspector general reporting.— The Inspector General for the National Archives and Records Administration shall, for two years following the date of the enactment of this Act, include in every semiannual report submitted to Congress pursuant to the Inspector General Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.), a detailed summary of—
(A)
efforts taken by the National Archives and Records Administration to address the backlog of records requests at the National Personnel Records Center; and
(B)
any recommendations for action proposed by the Inspector General related to reducing the backlog of records requests at the National Personnel Records Center and the status of compliance with those recommendations by the National Archives and Records Administration.

SEC. 5302. Ondcp Supplemental Strategies.

Section 706(h) of the Office of National Drug Control Policy Reauthorization Act of 1998 (21 U.S.C. 1705(h)) is amended—
(1)
in paragraph (5), by striking “ ; and” and inserting a semicolon;
(2)
in paragraph (6), by striking the period at the end and inserting “ ; and”; and
(3)
by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

“(7) develops performance measures and targets for the National Drug Control Strategy for supplemental strategies (the Southwest Border, Northern Border, and Caribbean Border Counternarcotics Strategies) to effectively evaluate region- specific goals, to the extent the performance measurement system does not adequately measure the effectiveness of the strategies, as determined by the Director, such strategies may evaluate interdiction efforts at and between ports of entry, interdiction technology, intelligence sharing, diplomacy, and other appropriate metrics, specific to each supplemental strategies region, as determined by the Director.”

SEC. 5303. Performance Enhancement.

(a)
Short Title.— This section may be cited as the “Performance Enhancement Reform Act”.
(b)
In General.— Section 1115 of title 31, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
by amending subsection (b)(5) to read as follows:

“(5) provide a description of how the performance goals are to be achieved, including—

“(A) the human capital, training, data and evidence, information technology, and skill sets required to meet the performance goals;

“(B) the technology modernization investments, system upgrades, staff technology skills and expertise, stakeholder input and feedback, and other resources and strategies needed and required to meet the performance goals;

“(C) clearly defined milestones;

“(D) an identification of the organizations, program activities, regulations, policies, operational processes, and other activities that contribute to each performance goal, both within and external to the agency;

“(E) a description of how the agency is working with other agencies and the organizations identified in subparagraph (D) to measure and achieve its performance goals as well as relevant Federal Government performance goals; and

“(F) an identification of the agency officials responsible for the achievement of each performance goal, who shall be known as goal leaders;”

; and

(2)
by amending subsection (g) to read as follows:

“(g) Preparation of Performance Plan.—The Performance Improvement Officer of each agency (or the functional equivalent) shall collaborate with the Chief Human Capital Officer (or the functional equivalent), the Chief Information Officer (or the functional equivalent), the Chief Data Officer (or the functional equivalent), and the Chief Financial Officer (or the functional equivalent) of that agency to prepare that portion of the annual performance plan described under subsection (b)(5) for that agency.”

SEC. 5304. Appeals to Merit Systems Protection Board Relating to Fbi Reprisal Allegations; Salary of Special Counsel.

(a)
Appeals to Mspb.— Section 2303 of title 5, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:

“(d)

(1) An employee of the Federal Bureau of Investigation who makes an allegation of a reprisal under regulations promulgated under this section may appeal a final determination or corrective action order by the Bureau under those regulations to the Merit Systems Protection Board pursuant to section 1221.

“(2) If no final determination or corrective action order has been made or issued for an allegation described in paragraph (1) before the expiration of the 180-day period beginning on the date on which the allegation is received by the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the employee described in that paragraph may seek corrective action directly from the Merit Systems Protection Board pursuant to section 1221.”

(b)
Special Counsel Salary.—
(1)
In general.— Subchapter II of chapter 53 of title 5, United States Code, is amended—
(A)
in section 5314, by adding at the end the following new item: “ Special Counsel of the Office of Special Counsel.”; and
(B)
in section 5315, by striking “ Special Counsel of the Merit Systems Protection Board.”.
(2)
Application.— The rate of pay applied under the amendments made by paragraph (1) shall begin to apply on the first day of the first pay period beginning after date of enactment of this Act.

SEC. 5305. Fairness for Federal Firefighters.

(a)
Certain Illnesses and Diseases Presumed to Be Work-related Cause of Disability or Death for Federal Employees in Fire Protection Activities.—
(1)
Presumption relating to employees in fire protection activities.—
(A)
In general.— Subchapter I of chapter 81 of title 5, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 8143a the following:

“§ 8143b. Employees in fire protection activities

“(a) Definitions.—In this section:

“(1) Employee in fire protection activities.—The term ‘employee in fire protection activities’ means an employee employed as a firefighter (including a wildland firefighter), paramedic, emergency medical technician, rescue worker, ambulance personnel, or hazardous material worker who—

“(A) is trained in fire suppression;

“(B) has the legal authority and responsibility to engage in fire suppression;

“(C) is engaged in the prevention, control, or extinguishment of fires or response to emergency situations in which life, property, or the environment is at risk, including the prevention, control, suppression, or management of wildland fires; and

“(D) performs the activities described in subparagraph (C) as a primary responsibility of the job of the employee.

“(2) Rule.—The term ‘rule’ has the meaning given the term in section 804.

“(3) Secretary.—The term ‘Secretary’ means the Secretary of Labor.

“(b) Certain Illnesses and Diseased Deemed to Be Proximately Caused by Employment in Fire Protection Activities.—

“(1) In general.—For a claim under this subchapter of disability or death of an employee who has been employed for not less than 5 years in aggregate as an employee in fire protection activities, an illness or disease specified on the list established under paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be proximately caused by the employment of that employee, if the employee is diagnosed with that illness or disease not later than 10 years after the last activedate of employment as an employee in fire protection activities.

“(2) Establishment of initial list.—There is established under this section the following list of illnesses and diseases:

“(A) Bladder cancer.

“(B) Brain cancer.

“(C) Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

“(D) Colorectal cancer.

“(E) Esophageal cancer.

“(F) Kidney cancer.

“(G) Leukemias.

“(H) Lung cancer.

“(I) Mesothelioma.

“(J) Multiple myeloma.

“(K) Non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

“(L) Prostate cancer.

“(M) Skin cancer (melanoma).

“(N) A sudden cardiac event or stroke suffered while, or not later than 24 hours after, engaging in the activities described in subsection (a)(1)(C).

“(O) Testicular cancer.

“(P) Thyroid cancer.

“(3) Additions to the list.—

“(A) In general.—

“(i) Periodic review.—The Secretary shall—

“(I) in consultation with the Director of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health and any advisory committee determined appropriate by the Secretary, periodically review the list established under paragraph (2); and

“(II) if the Secretary determines that the weight of the best available scientific evidence warrants adding an illness or disease to the list established under paragraph (2), as described in subparagraph (B) of this paragraph, make such an addition through a rule that clearly identifies that scientific evidence.

“(ii) Classification.—A rule issued by the Secretary under clause (i) shall be considered to be a major rule for the purposes of chapter 8.

“(B) Basis for determination.—The Secretary shall add an illness or disease to the list established under paragraph (2) based on the weight of the best available scientific evidence that there is a significant risk to employees in fire protection activities of developing that illness or disease.

“(C) Available expertise.—In determining significant risk for purposes of subparagraph (B), the Secretary may accept as authoritative, and may rely upon, recommendations, risk assessments, and scientific studies (including analyses of National Firefighter Registry data pertaining to Federal firefighters) by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, the National Toxicology Program, the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, and the International Agency for Research on Cancer.”

(B)
Technical and conforming amendment.— The table of sections for subchapter I of chapter 81 of title 5, United States Code, is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 8143a the following:

“8143b. Employees in fire protection activities.”.

(C)
Application.— The amendments made by this paragraph shall apply to claims for compensation filed on or after the date of enactment of this Act.
(2)
Research cooperation.— Not later than 120 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Labor (referred to in this subsection as the “Secretary”) shall establish a process by which an employee in fire protection activities, as defined in subsection (a) of section 8143b of title 5, United States Code, as added by paragraph (1) of this subsection (referred to in this subsection as an “employee in fire protection activities”) filing a claim under chapter 81 of title 5, United States Code, as amended by this subsection, relating to an illness or disease on the list established under subsection (b)(2) of such section 8143b (referred to in this subsection as “ ‘the list”) as the list may be updated under such section 8143b, shall be informed about, and offered the opportunity to contribute to science by voluntarily enrolling in, the National Firefighter Registry or a similar research or public health initiative conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
(3)
Agenda for further review.— Not later than 3 years after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall—
(A)
evaluate the best available scientific evidence of the risk to an employee in fire protection activities of developing breast cancer, gynecological cancers, and rhabdomyolysis;
(B)
add breast cancer, gynecological cancers, and rhabdomyolysis to the list, by rule in accordance with subsection (b)(3) of section 8143b of title 5, United States Code, as added by paragraph (1) of this subsection, if the Secretary determines that such evidence supports that addition; and
(C)
submit to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate and the Committee on Education and Labor of the House of Representatives a report containing—
(i)
the findings of the Secretary after making the evaluation required under subparagraph (A); and
(ii)
the determination of the Secretary under subparagraph (B).
(4)
Report on federal wildland firefighters.—
(A)
Definition.— In this paragraph, the term “Federal wildland firefighter” means an individual occupying a position in the occupational series developed pursuant to section 40803(d)(1) of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (16 U.S.C. 6592(d)(1)).
(B)
Study.— The Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of Agriculture, in consultation with the Director of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health and the Secretary, shall conduct a comprehensive study on long-term health effects that Federal wildland firefighters who are eligible to receive compensation for work injuries under chapter 81 of title 5, United States Code, as amended by this subsection, experience after being exposed to fires, smoke, and toxic fumes when in service.
(C)
Requirements.— The study required under subparagraph (B) shall include—
(i)
the race, ethnicity, age, gender, and time of service of the Federal wildland firefighters participating in the study; and
(ii)
recommendations to Congress regarding what legislative actions are needed to support the Federal wildland firefighters described in clause (i) in preventing health issues from the toxic exposure described in subparagraph (B), similar to veterans who are exposed to burn pits.
(D)
Submission and publication.— The Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of Agriculture shall submit the results of the study conducted under this paragraph to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate and the Committee on Education and Labor of the House of Representatives and make those results publicly available.
(5)
Report on affected employees.— Beginning on the date that is 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, with respect to each annual report required under section 8152 of title 5, United States Code, the Secretary—
(A)
shall include in the report the total number of, and demographics regarding, employees in fire protection activities with illnesses and diseases described in the list (as the list may be updated under this subsection and the amendments made by this subsection), as of the date on which that annual report is submitted, which shall be disaggregated by the specific illness or disease for the purposes of understanding the scope of the problem facing those employees; and
(B)
may—
(i)
include in the report any information with respect to employees in fire protection activities that the Secretary determines to be necessary; and
(ii)
as appropriate, make recommendations in the report for additional actions that could be taken to minimize the risk of adverse health impacts for employees in fire protection activities.
(b)
Subrogation of Continuation of Pay.—
(1)
Subrogation of the united states.— Section 8131 of title 5, United States Code, is amended—
(A)
in subsection (a), in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by inserting “ continuation of pay or” before “ compensation”; and
(B)
in subsection (c), in the second sentence, by inserting “ continuation of pay or” before “ compensation already paid”.
(2)
Adjustment after recover from third person.— Section 8132 of title 5, United States Code, is amended—
(A)
in the first sentence—
(i)
by inserting “ continuation of pay or” before “ compensation is payable”;
(ii)
by inserting “ continuation of pay or” before “ compensation from the United States”;
(iii)
by striking “ in his behalf” and inserting “ on his behalf”; and
(iv)
by inserting “ continuation of pay or” before“ ‘compensation paid by the United States”; and
(B)
by striking the fourth sentence and inserting the following: “ If continuation of pay or compensation has not been paid to the beneficiary, the money or property shall be credited against continuation of pay or compensation payable to him by the United States for the same injury.”.
(c)
Increase in Time-period for FECA Claimant Supply Supporting Documentation to Office of Worker’s Compensation.— Not later than 16 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Labor shall—
(1)
amend section 10.121 of title 20, Code of Federal Regulations, or any successor regulation, by striking “ 30 days” and inserting “ 60 days”; and
(2)
modify the Federal Employees’ Compensation Act manual to reflect the changes made by the Secretary pursuant to paragraph (1).

Subtitle B PLUM Act of 2022

SEC. 5321. Short Title.

This subtitle may be cited as the “Periodically Listing Updates to Management Act of 2022” or the “PLUM Act of 2022”.

SEC. 5322. Establishment of Public Website on Government Policy and Supporting Positions.

(a)
Establishment.—
(1)
In general.— Subchapter I of chapter 33 of title 5, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:

“§ 3330f. Government policy and supporting position data

“(a) Definitions.—In this section:

“(1) Agency.—The term ‘agency’ means—

“(A) any Executive agency, the United States Postal Service, and the Postal Regulatory Commission;

“(B) the Architect of the Capitol, the Government Accountability Office, the Government Publishing Office, and the Library of Congress; and

“(C) the Executive Office of the President and any component within that Office (including any successor component), including—

“(i) the Council of Economic Advisors;

“(ii) the Council on Environmental Quality;

“(iii) the National Security Council;

“(iv) the Office of the Vice President;

“(v) the Office of Policy Development;

“(vi) the Office of Administration;

“(vii) the Office of Management and Budget;

“(viii) the Office of the United States Trade Representative;

“(ix) the Office of Science and Technology Policy;

“(x) the Office of National Drug Control Policy; and

“(xi) the White House Office, including the White House Office of Presidential Personnel.

“(2) Appointee.—The term ‘appointee’—

“(A) means an individual serving in a policy and supporting position; and

“(B) includes an individual serving in such a position temporarily in an acting capacity in accordance with—

“(i) sections 3345 through 3349d (commonly referred to as the ‘Federal Vacancies Reform Act of 1998’);

“(ii) any other statutory provision described in section 3347(a)(1); or

“(iii) a Presidential appointment described in section 3347(a)(2).

“(3) Covered website.—The term ‘covered website’ means the website established and maintained by the Director under subsection (b).

“(4) Director.—The term ‘Director’ means the Director of the Office of Personnel Management.

“(5) Policy and supporting position.—The term ‘policy and supporting position’—

“(A) means any position at an agency, as determined by the Director, that, but for this section and section 2(b)(3) of the PLUM Act of 2022, would be included in the publication entitled ‘United States Government Policy and Supporting Positions’, (commonly referred to as the ‘Plum Book’); and

“(B) may include—

“(i) a position on any level of the Executive Schedule under subchapter II of chapter 53, or another position with an equivalent rate of pay;

“(ii) a general position (as defined in section 3132(a)(9)) in the Senior Executive service;

“(iii) a position in the Senior Foreign Service;

“(iv) a position of a confidential or policy-determining character under schedule C of subpart C of part 213 of title 5, Code of Federal Regulations, or any successor regulation; and

“(v) any other position classified at or above level GS–14 of the General Schedule (or equivalent) that is excepted from the competitive service by law because of the confidential or policy-determining nature of the position duties.

“(b) Establishment of Website.—Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of the PLUM Act of 2022, the Director shall establish, and thereafter the Director shall maintain, a public website containing the following information for the President in office on the date of establishment and for each subsequent President:

“(1) Each policy and supporting position in the Federal Government, including any such position that is vacant.

“(2) The name of each individual who—

“(A) is serving in a position described in paragraph (1); or

“(B) previously served in a position described in such paragraph under the applicable President.

“(3) Information on—

“(A) any Government-wide or agency-wide limitation on the total number of positions in the Senior Executive Service under section 3133 or 3134 or the total number of positions under schedule C of subpart C of part 213 of title 5, Code of Federal Regulations; and

“(B) the total number of individuals occupying such positions.

“(c) Contents.—With respect to any policy and supporting position listed on the covered website, the Director shall include—

“(1) the agency, and agency component, (including the agency and bureau code used by the Office of Management and Budget) in which the position is located;

“(2) the name of the position;

“(3) the name of the individual occupying the position (if any);

“(4) the geographic location of the position, including the city, State or province, and country;

“(5) the pay system under which the position is paid;

“(6) the level, grade, or rate of pay;

“(7) the term or duration of the appointment (if any);

“(8) the expiration date, in the case of a time-limited appointment;

“(9) a unique identifier for each appointee;

“(10) whether the position is vacant; and

“(11) for any position that is vacant—

“(A) for a position for which appointment is required to be made by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, the name of the acting official; and

“(B) for other positions, the name of the official performing the duties of the vacant position.

“(d) Current Data.—For each agency, the Director shall indicate in the information on the covered website the date that the agency last updated the data.

“(e) Format.—The Director shall make the data on the covered website available to the public at no cost over the internet in a searchable, sortable, downloadable, and machine-readable format so that the data qualifies as an open Government data asset, as defined in section 3502 of title 44.

“(f) Authority of Director.—

“(1) Information required.—Each agency shall provide to the Director any information that the Director determines necessary to establish and maintain the covered website, including the information uploaded under paragraph (4).

“(2) Requirements for agencies.—Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of the PLUM Act of 2022, the Director shall issue instructions to agencies with specific requirements for the provision or uploading of information required under paragraph (1), including—

“(A) specific data standards that an agency shall follow to ensure that the information is complete, accurate, and reliable;

“(B) data quality assurance methods; and

“(C) the timeframe during which an agency shall provide or upload the information, including the timeframe described under paragraph (4).

“(3) Public accountability.—The Director shall identify on the covered website any agency that has failed to provide—

“(A) the information required by the Director;

“(B) complete, accurate, and reliable information; or

“(C) the information during the timeframe specified by the Director.

“(4) Annual updates.—

“(A) In general.—Not later than 90 days after the date on which the covered website is established, and not less than once during each year thereafter, the head of each agency shall upload to the covered website updated information (if any) on—

“(i) the policy and supporting positions in the agency;

“(ii) the appointees occupying such positions in the agency; and

“(iii) the former appointees who served in such positions in the agency under the President then in office.

“(B) Supplement not supplant.—Information provided under subparagraph (A) shall supplement, not supplant, previously provided information under that subparagraph.

“(5) Opm help desk.—The Director shall establish a central help desk, to be operated by not more than 1 full-time employee, to assist any agency with implementing this section.

“(6) Coordination.—The Director may designate 1 or more agencies to participate in the development, establishment, operation, and support of the covered website. With respect to any such designation, the Director may specify the scope of the responsibilities of the agency so designated.

“(7) Data standards and timing.—The Director shall make available on the covered website information regarding data collection standards, quality assurance methods, and time frames for reporting data to the Director.

“(8) Regulations.—The Director may prescribe regulations necessary for the administration of this section.

“(g) Responsibility of Agencies.—

“(1) Provision of information.—Each agency shall comply with the instructions and guidance issued by the Director to carry out this section, and, upon request of the Director, shall provide appropriate assistance to the Director to ensure the successful operation of the covered website in the manner and within the timeframe specified by the Director under subsection (f)(2).

“(2) Ensuring completeness, accuracy, and reliability.—With respect to any submission of information described in paragraph (1), the head of an agency shall include—

“(A) an explanation of how the agency ensured the information is complete, accurate, and reliable; and

“(B) a certification that the information is complete, accurate, and reliable.

“(h) Information Verification.—

“(1) Confirmation.—

“(A) In general.—On the date that is 90 days after the date on which the covered website is established, the Director, in coordination with the White House Office of Presidential Personnel, shall confirm that the information on the covered website is complete, accurate, reliable, and up-to-date.

“(B) Certification.—On the date on which the Director makes a confirmation under subparagraph (A), the Director shall publish on the covered website a certification that the confirmation has been made.

“(2) Authority of director.—In carrying out paragraph (1), the Director may—

“(A) request additional information from an agency; and

“(B) use any additional information provided to the Director or the White House Office of Presidential Personnel for the purposes of verification.

“(3) Public comment.—The Director shall establish a process under which members of the public may provide feedback regarding the accuracy of the information on the covered website.

“(i) Data Archiving.—

“(1) In general.—As soon as practicable after a transitional inauguration day (as defined in section 3349a), the Director, in consultation with the Archivist of the United States, shall archive the data that was compiled on the covered website for the preceding presidential administration.

“(2) Public availability.—The Director shall make the data described in paragraph (1) publicly available over the internet—

“(A) on, or through a link on, the covered website;

“(B) at no cost; and

“(C) in a searchable, sortable, downloadable, and machine-readable format.”

(2)
Clerical amendment.— The table of sections for subchapter I of chapter 33 of title 5, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:

“3330f. Government policy and supporting position data.”.

(b)
Other Matters.—
(1)
Definitions.— In this subsection, the terms “agency”, “covered website”, “Director”, and “policy and supporting position” have the meanings given those terms in section 3330f of title 5, United States Code, as added by subsection (a).
(2)
Gao review and report.— Not later than 1 year after the date on which the Director establishes the covered website, the Comptroller General of the United States shall conduct a review of, and issue a briefing or report on, the implementation of this subtitle and the amendments made by this subtitle, which shall include—
(A)
the quality of data required to be collected and whether the data is complete, accurate, timely, and reliable;
(B)
any challenges experienced by agencies in implementing this subtitle and the amendments made by this subtitle; and
(C)
any suggestions or modifications to enhance compliance with this subtitle and the amendments made by this subtitle, including best practices for agencies to follow.
(3)
Sunset of plum book.— Beginning on January 1, 2026—
(A)
the covered website shall serve as the public directory for policy and supporting positions in the Government; and
(B)
the publication entitled “United States Government Policy and Supporting Positions”, commonly referred to as the “Plum Book”, shall no longer be issued or published.
(4)
Funding.—
(A)
In general.— No additional amounts are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this subtitle or the amendments made by this subtitle.
(B)
Other funding.— The Director shall carry out this subtitle and the amendments made by this subtitle using amounts otherwise available to the Director.

TITLE LIV 21st Century Assistive Technology Act

SECTION 5401. Short Title.

This title may be cited as the “21st Century Assistive Technology Act”.

SEC. 5402. Reauthorization.

The Assistive Technology Act of 1998 (29 U.S.C. 3001 et seq.) is amended to read as follows:

“SEC. 1. SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF CONTENTS.

“(a) Short Title.—This Act may be cited as the ‘Assistive Technology Act of 1998’.

“(b) Table of Contents.—The table of contents of this Act is as follows:

“Sec. 1. Short title; table of contents.

“Sec. 2. Purposes.

“Sec. 3. Definitions.

“Sec. 4. Grants for State assistive technology programs.

“Sec. 5. Grants for protection and advocacy services related to assistive technology.

“Sec. 6. Technical assistance and data collection support.

“Sec. 7. Projects of national significance.

“Sec. 8. Administrative provisions.

“Sec. 9. Authorization of appropriations; reservations and distribution of funds.

“SEC. 2. PURPOSES.

“The purposes of this Act are to—

“(1) to support State efforts to improve the provision of assistive technology to individuals with disabilities of all ages, including underrepresented populations, through comprehensive statewide programs of technology-related assistance that are designed to—

“(A) increase the availability of, funding for, access to, provision of, and education about assistive technology devices and assistive technology services;

“(B) increase the ability of individuals with disabilities to secure and maintain possession of assistive technology devices as such individuals make the transition between services offered by educational or human service agencies or between settings of daily living (for example, between home and work);

“(C) increase the capacity of public agencies and private entities to provide and pay for assistive technology devices and assistive technology services on a statewide basis for individuals with disabilities;

“(D) increase the involvement of individuals with disabilities and, if appropriate, their family members, guardians, advocates, and authorized representatives, in decisions related to the provision of assistive technology devices and assistive technology services;

“(E) increase and promote coordination among and between State and local agencies and private entities (such as managed care providers), that are involved in carrying out activities under this Act;

“(F) increase the awareness and facilitate the change of laws, regulations, policies, practices, procedures, and organizational structures that facilitate the availability or provision of assistive technology devices and assistive technology services; and

“(G) increase awareness and knowledge of the benefits of assistive technology devices and assistive technology services among targeted individuals and entities and the general population; and

“(2) to provide States and protection and advocacy systems with financial assistance that supports programs designed to maximize the ability of individuals with disabilities and their family members, guardians, advocates, and authorized representatives to obtain assistive technology devices and assistive technology services.

“SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS.

“In this Act:

“(1) Adult service program.—The term ‘adult service program’ means a program that provides services to, or is otherwise substantially involved with the major life functions of, individuals with disabilities. Such term includes—

“(A) a program providing residential, supportive, or employment-related services, to individuals with disabilities;

“(B) a program carried out by a center for independent living, such as a center described in part C of title VII of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 796f et seq.);

“(C) a program carried out by an employment support agency connected to adult vocational rehabilitation, such as a one-stop partner, as defined in section 3 of the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (29 U.S.C. 3102); and

“(D) a program carried out by another organization or vender licensed or registered by the designated State agency, as defined in section 7 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 705).

“(2) American indian consortium.—The term ‘American Indian consortium’ means an entity that is an American Indian Consortium (as defined in section 102 of the Developmental Disabilities Assistance and Bill of Rights Act of 2000 (42 U.S.C. 15002)), and that is established to provide protection and advocacy services for purposes of receiving funding under subtitle C of title I of such Act (42 U.S.C. 15041 et seq.).

“(3) Assistive technology.—The term ‘assistive technology’ means technology designed to be utilized in an assistive technology device or assistive technology service.

“(4) Assistive technology device.—The term ‘assistive technology device’ means any item, piece of equipment, or product system, whether acquired commercially, modified, or customized, that is used to increase, maintain, or improve functional capabilities of individuals with disabilities.

“(5) Assistive technology service.—The term ‘assistive technology service’ means any service that directly assists an individual with a disability in the selection, acquisition, or use of an assistive technology device. Such term includes—

“(A) the evaluation of the assistive technology needs of an individual with a disability, including a functional evaluation of the impact of the provision of appropriate assistive technology devices and services to the individual in the customary environment of the individual;

“(B) a service consisting of purchasing, leasing, or otherwise providing for the acquisition of assistive technology devices by individuals with disabilities;

“(C) a service consisting of selecting, designing, fitting, customizing, adapting, applying, maintaining, repairing, replacing, or donating assistive technology devices;

“(D) coordination and use of necessary therapies, interventions, or services with assistive technology devices, such as therapies, interventions, or services associated with education and rehabilitation plans and programs;

“(E) instruction or technical assistance for an individual with a disability or, where appropriate, the family members, guardians, advocates, or authorized representatives of such an individual;

“(F) instruction or technical assistance for professionals (including individuals providing education and rehabilitation services and entities that manufacture or sell assistive technology devices), employers, providers of employment and training services, or other individuals who provide services to, employ, or are otherwise substantially involved in the major life functions of individuals with disabilities; and

“(G) a service consisting of expanding the availability of access to technology, including electronic and information technology, to individuals with disabilities.

“(6) Capacity building and advocacy activities.—The term ‘capacity building and advocacy activities’ means efforts that—

“(A) result in laws, regulations, policies, practices, procedures, or organizational structures that promote consumer-responsive programs or entities; and

“(B) facilitate and increase access to, provision of, and funding for assistive technology devices and assistive technology services, in order to empower individuals with disabilities to achieve greater independence, productivity, and integration and inclusion within the community and the workforce.

“(7) Comprehensive statewide program of technology-related assistance.—The term ‘comprehensive statewide program of technology-related assistance’ means a consumer-responsive program of technology-related assistance for individuals with disabilities that—

“(A) is implemented by a State;

“(B) is equally available to all individuals with disabilities residing in the State, regardless of their type of disability, age, income level, or location of residence in the State, or the type of assistive technology device or assistive technology service required; and

“(C) incorporates all the activities described in section 4(e) (unless excluded pursuant to section 4(e)(5)).

“(8) Consumer-responsive.—The term ‘consumer-responsive’—

“(A) with regard to policies, means that the policies are consistent with the principles of—

“(i) respect for individual dignity, personal responsibility, self-determination, and pursuit of meaningful careers, based on informed choice, of individuals with disabilities;

“(ii) respect for the privacy, rights, and equal access (including the use of accessible formats) of such individuals;

“(iii) inclusion, integration, and full participation of such individuals in society;

“(iv) support for the involvement in decisions of a family member, a guardian, an advocate, or an authorized representative, if an individual with a disability requests, desires, or needs such involvement; and

“(v) support for individual and systems advocacy and community involvement; and

“(B) with respect to an entity, program, or activity, means that the entity, program, or activity—

“(i) is easily accessible to, and usable by, individuals with disabilities and, when appropriate, their family members, guardians, advocates, or authorized representatives;

“(ii) responds to the needs of individuals with disabilities in a timely and appropriate manner; and

“(iii) facilitates the full and meaningful participation of individuals with disabilities and their family members, guardians, advocates, and authorized representatives, in—

“(I) decisions relating to the provision of assistive technology devices and assistive technology services to such individuals; and

“(II) decisions related to the maintenance, improvement, and evaluation of the comprehensive statewide program of technology-related assistance, including decisions that affect capacity building and advocacy activities.

“(9) Disability.—The term ‘disability’ has the meaning given the term under section 3 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 12102).

“(10) Individual with a disability.—The term ‘individual with a disability’ means any individual—

“(A) who has a disability; and

“(B) who is or would be enabled by an assistive technology device or an assistive technology service to minimize deterioration in functioning, to maintain a level of functioning, or to achieve a greater level of functioning in any major life activity.

“(11) Institution of higher education.—The term ‘institution of higher education’ has the meaning given such term in section 101(a) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1001(a)), and includes a community college receiving funding under the Tribally Controlled Colleges and Universities Assistance Act of 1978 (25 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.).

“(12) Protection and advocacy services.—The term ‘protection and advocacy services’ means services that—

“(A) are described in subtitle C of title I of the Developmental Disabilities Assistance and Bill of Rights Act of 2000 (42 U.S.C. 15041 et seq.), the Protection and Advocacy for Individuals with Mental Illness Act (42 U.S.C. 10801 et seq.), or section 509 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 794e); and

“(B) assist individuals with disabilities with respect to assistive technology devices and assistive technology services.

“(13) Secretary.—The term ‘Secretary’ means the Secretary of Health and Human Services, acting through the Administrator of the Administration for Community Living.

“(14) State.—

“(A) In general.—Except as provided in subparagraph (B), the term ‘State’ means each of the 50 States of the United States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the United States Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands.

“(B) Outlying areas.—In section 4(b):

“(i) Outlying area.—The term ‘outlying area’ means the United States Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands.

“(ii) State.—The term ‘State’ does not include the United States Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands.

“(15) State assistive technology program.—The term ‘State assistive technology program’ means a program authorized under section 4.

“(16) Targeted individuals and entities.—The term ‘targeted individuals and entities’ means—

“(A) individuals with disabilities and their family members, guardians, advocates, and authorized representatives;

“(B) underrepresented populations;

“(C) individuals who work for public or private entities (including centers for independent living described in part C of title VII of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 796f et seq.), insurers, or managed care providers) that have contact with, or provide services to, individuals with disabilities;

“(D) educators and related services personnel, including personnel in elementary, secondary, and postsecondary schools, and in vocational and early intervention programs;

“(E) technology experts (including web designers and procurement officials);

“(F) health, allied health, and rehabilitation professionals, and employees of hospitals, skilled nursing, intermediate care, and assisted living facilities (including discharge planners);

“(G) employers, especially small business employers, and providers of employment and training services;

“(H) entities that manufacture or sell assistive technology devices;

“(I) entities that carry out community programs designed to develop essential community services in rural and urban areas; and

“(J) other appropriate individuals and entities, including public and private entities involved in housing and transportation, as determined for a State by the State.

“(17) Underrepresented population.—The term ‘underrepresented population’ means a population that is typically underrepresented in service provision, and includes populations such as individuals who have low-incidence disabilities, racial and ethnic minorities, low income individuals, homeless individuals (including children and youth), children in foster care, individuals with limited English proficiency, individuals living in institutions seeking to transition to the community from institutional settings, youth with disabilities aging into adulthood, older individuals, or individuals living in rural areas.

“(18) Universal design.—The term ‘universal design’ means a concept or philosophy for designing and delivering products and services that are usable by people with the widest possible range of functional capabilities, which include products and services that are directly accessible (without requiring assistive technologies) and products and services that are interoperable with assistive technologies.

“SEC. 4. GRANTS FOR STATE ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAMS.

“(a) Grants to States.—The Secretary shall award grants under subsection (b) to States to maintain a comprehensive statewide program of assistive technology-related assistance described in subsection (e) through State assistive technology programs that are designed to—

“(1) maximize the ability of individuals with disabilities across the human lifespan and across the wide array of disabilities, and their family members, guardians, advocates, and authorized representatives, to obtain assistive technology; and

“(2) increase access to assistive technology.

“(b) Amount of Financial Assistance.—

“(1) In general.—From funds made available to carry out this section, the Secretary shall award a grant to each State, and outlying area, that meets the requirements of this section from an allotment determined in accordance with paragraph (2).

“(2) Calculation of state grants.—

“(A) Base year.—Except as provided in subparagraphs (B) and (C), the Secretary shall allot to each State and outlying area for a fiscal year an amount that is not less than the amount the State or outlying area received under the grants provided under section 4 of this Act (as in effect on the day before the effective date of the 21st Century Assistive Technology Act) for fiscal year 2022.

“(B) Ratable reduction.—

“(i) In general.—If funds made available to carry out this section for any fiscal year are insufficient to make the allotments required for each State and outlying area under subparagraph (A) for such fiscal year, the Secretary shall ratably reduce the allotments for such fiscal year.

“(ii) Additional funds.—If, after the Secretary makes the reductions described in clause (i), additional funds become available to carry out this section for the fiscal year, the Secretary shall ratably increase the allotments, until the Secretary has allotted the entire base year amount under subparagraph (A).

“(C) Appropriation higher than base year amount.—For a fiscal year for which the amount of funds made available to carry out this section is greater than the base year amount under subparagraph (A) and no greater than $40,000,000, the Secretary shall—

“(i) make the allotments described in subparagraph (A);

“(ii) from a portion of the remainder of the funds after the Secretary makes the allotments described in clause (i), the Secretary shall—

“(I) from 50 percent of the portion, allot to each State an equal amount; and

“(II) from 50 percent of the portion, allot to each State an amount that bears the same relationship to such 50 percent as the population of the State bears to the population of all States,

“(iii) from the remainder of the funds after the Secretary makes the allotments described in clause (ii), the Secretary shall—

“(I) from 80 percent of the remainder, allot to each State an amount that bears the same relationship to such 80 percent as the population of the State bears to the population of all States; and

“(II) from 20 percent of the remainder, allot to each State an equal amount.

“(D) Appropriation higher than threshold amount.—For a fiscal year for which the amount of funds made available to carry out this section is $40,000,000 or greater, the Secretary shall—

“(i) make the allotments described in subparagraph (A);

“(ii) from the funds remaining after the allotment described in clause (i), allot to each outlying area an amount of such funds until each outlying area has received an allotment of exactly $150,000 under clause (i) and this clause;

“(iii) from a portion of the remainder of the funds after the Secretary makes the allotments described in clauses (i) and (ii), the Secretary shall—

“(I) from 50 percent of the portion, allot to each State an equal amount; and

“(II) from 50 percent of the portion, allot to each State an amount that bears the same relationship to such 50 percent as the population of the State bears to the population of all States,

“(iv) from the remainder of the funds after the Secretary makes the allotments described in clause (iii), the Secretary shall—

“(I) from 80 percent of the remainder, allot to each State an amount that bears the same relationship to such 80 percent as the population of the State bears to the population of all States; and

“(II) from 20 percent of the remainder, allot to each State an equal amount.

“(3) Availability of funds.—Amounts made available for a fiscal year under this section shall be available for the fiscal year and the year following the fiscal year.

“(c) Lead Agency, Implementing Entity, and Advisory Council.—

“(1) Lead agency and implementing entity.—

“(A) Lead agency.—

“(i) In general.—The Governor of a State shall designate a public agency as a lead agency—

“(I) to control and administer the funds made available through the grant awarded to the State under this section; and

“(II) to submit the application described in subsection (d) on behalf of the State, to ensure conformance with Federal and State accounting requirements.

“(ii) Duties.—The duties of the lead agency shall include—

“(I) preparing the application described in subsection (d) and carrying out State activities described in that application, including making programmatic and resource allocation decisions necessary to implement the comprehensive statewide program of technology-related assistance;

“(II) coordinating the activities of the comprehensive statewide program of technology- related assistance among public and private entities, including coordinating efforts related to entering into interagency agreements and maintaining and evaluating the program; and

“(III) coordinating efforts, in a way that acknowledges the demographic characteristics of individuals, related to the active, timely, and meaningful participation by individuals with disabilities and their family members, guardians, advocates, or authorized representatives, and other appropriate individuals, with respect to activities carried out through the grant.

“(B) Implementing entity.—The Governor may designate an agency, office, or other entity to carry out State activities under this section (referred to in this section as the ‘implementing entity’), if such implementing entity is different from the lead agency. The implementing entity shall carry out responsibilities under this Act through a subcontract or another administrative agreement with the lead agency.

“(C) Change in agency or entity.—

“(i) In general.—On obtaining the approval of the Secretary—

“(I) the Governor may redesignate the lead agency of a State, if the Governor shows to the Secretary, in accordance with subsection (d)(2)(B), good cause why the agency designated as the lead agency should not serve as that agency; and

“(II) the Governor may redesignate the implementing entity of a State, if the Governor shows to the Secretary in accordance with subsection (d)(2)(B), good cause why the entity designated as the implementing entity should not serve as that entity.

“(ii) Construction.—Nothing in this paragraph shall be construed to require the Governor of a State to change the lead agency or implementing entity of the State to an agency other than the lead agency or implementing entity of such State as of the date of enactment of the ‘21st Century Assistive Technology Act’.

“(2) Advisory council.—

“(A) In general.—There shall be established an advisory council to provide consumer-responsive, consumer-driven advice to the State for planning, implementation, and evaluation of the activities carried out through the grant, including setting the measurable goals described in subsection (d)(3)(C).

“(B) Composition and representation.—

“(i) Composition.—The advisory council shall be composed of—

“(I) individuals with disabilities who use assistive technology or the family members or guardians of the individuals;

“(II) a representative of the designated State agency, as defined in section 7 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 705);

“(III) a representative of the designated State agency for individuals who are blind or that provides assistance or services to adults who are blind (within the meaning of section 101 of that Act (29 U.S.C. 721)), if such agency is separate from the agency described in subclause (II);

“(IV) a representative of a State center for independent living described in part C of title VII of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 796f et seq.), or the Statewide Independent Living Council established under section 705 of such Act (29 U.S.C. 796d);

“(V) a representative of the State workforce development board established under section 101 of the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (29 U.S.C. 3111);

“(VI) a representative of the State educational agency, as defined in section 8101 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7801);

“(VII) a representative of an alternative financing program for assistive technology if—

“(aa) there is an alternative financing program for assistive technology in the State;

“(bb) such program is separate from the State assistive technology program supported under subsection (e)(2); and

“(cc) the program described in item (aa) is operated by a nonprofit entity;

“(VIII) a representative of 1 or more of—

“(aa) the agency responsible for administering the State Medicaid program under title XIX of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396 et seq.);

“(bb) the designated State agency for purposes of section 124 of the Developmental Disabilities Assistance and Bill of Rights Act of 2000 (42 U.S.C. 15024);

“(cc) the State agency designated under section 305(a)(1) of the Older Americans Act of 1965 (42 U.S.C. 3025(a)(1)), or an organization that receives assistance under such Act (42 U.S.C. 3001 et seq.);

“(dd) an organization representing disabled veterans;

“(ee) a University Center for Excellence in Developmental Disabilities Education, Research, and Service designated under section 151(a) of the Developmental Disabilities Assistance and Bill of Rights Act of 2000 (42 U.S.C. 15061(a));

“(ff) the State protection and advocacy system established in accordance with section 143 of the Developmental Disabilities Assistance and Bill of Rights Act of 2000 (42 U.S.C. 15043); or

“(gg) the State Council on Developmental Disabilities established under section 125 of the Developmental Disabilities Assistance and Bill of Rights Act of 2000 (42 U.S.C. 15025); and

“(IX) representatives of other State agencies, public agencies, or private organizations, as determined by the State.

“(ii) Majority.—

“(I) In general.—Not less than 51 percent of the members of the advisory council shall be members appointed under clause (i)(I), a majority of whom shall be individuals with disabilities.

“(II) Representatives of agencies.—Members appointed under subclauses (II) through (IX) of clause (i) shall not count toward the majority membership requirement established in subclause (I).

“(iii) Representation.—The advisory council shall be geographically representative of the State and reflect the diversity of the State with respect to race, ethnicity, age, and types of disabilities, and users of types of services that an individual with a disability may receive, including home and community-based services (as defined in section 9817(a)(2) of the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (42 U.S.C. 1396d note)), vocational rehabilitation services (as defined in section 7 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 705)), and services through the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (20 U.S.C. 1400 et seq.).

“(C) Expenses.—The members of the advisory council shall receive no compensation for their service on the advisory council, but shall be reimbursed for reasonable and necessary expenses actually incurred in the performance of official duties for the advisory council.

“(D) Impact on existing statutes, rules, or policies.—Nothing in this paragraph shall be construed to affect State statutes, rules, or official policies relating to advisory bodies for State assistive technology programs or require changes to governing bodies of incorporated agencies that carry out State assistive technology programs.

“(d) Application.—

“(1) In general.—Any State that desires to receive a grant under this section shall submit an application to the Secretary, at such time, in such manner, and containing such information as the Secretary may require.

“(2) Lead agency and implementing entity.—

“(A) In general.—The application shall contain—

“(i) information identifying and describing the lead agency referred to in subsection (c)(1)(A);

“(ii) information identifying and describing the implementing entity referred to in subsection (c)(1)(B), if the Governor of the State designates such an entity; and

“(iii) a description of how individuals with disabilities were involved in the development of the application and will be involved in the implementation of the activities to be carried out through the grant and through the advisory council established in accordance with subsection (c)(2).

“(B) Change in lead agency or implementing entity.—In any case where—

“(i) the Governor requests to redesignate a lead agency, the Governor shall include in, or amend, the application to request the redesignation and provide a written description of the rationale for the requested change; or

“(ii) the Governor requests to redesignate an implementing entity, the Governor shall include in, or amend, the application to request the redesignation and provide a written description of the rationale for the requested change.

“(3) State plan.—The application under this subsection shall include a State plan for assistive technology consisting of—

“(A) a description of how the State will carry out a comprehensive statewide program that provides assistive technology activities described in subsection (e) (unless excluded by the State pursuant to subsection (e)(5));

“(B) a description of how the State will allocate and utilize grant funds to implement the activities described in subparagraph (A), including describing proposed budget allocations and planned procedures for tracking expenditures for the activities;

“(C) measurable goals, and a timeline for meeting the goals, that the State has set for addressing the assistive technology needs of individuals with disabilities in the State related to—

“(i) education, including goals involving the provision of assistive technology to individuals with disabilities who receive services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (20 U.S.C. 1400 et seq.);

“(ii) employment, including goals involving the State vocational rehabilitation program carried out under title I of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 720 et seq.);

“(iii) access to teleassistive technology to aid in the access of health care services, including mental health and substance use disorder services;

“(iv) accessible information and communication technology instruction for individuals with disabilities receiving assistive technology under this section; and

“(v) community living;

“(D) information describing how the State will quantifiably measure the goals, in a manner consistent with the data submitted through the progress reports under subsection (f), to determine whether the goals have been achieved; and

“(E) a description of any activities described in subsection (e) that the State will support with State or other non-Federal funds.

“(4) Involvement of public and private entities.—The application shall describe how various public and private entities, including individuals with disabilities and their families, were involved in the development of the application, including the measurable goals and timeline described in paragraph (3)(C) and the description of how the goals will be quantifiably measured described in paragraph (3)(D), and will be involved in the implementation of the activities to be carried out through the grant, including—

“(A) in cases determined to be appropriate by the State, a description of the nature and extent of resources that will be committed by public and private partners to assist in accomplishing identified goals; and

“(B) a description of the mechanisms established to ensure coordination of activities and collaboration between the implementing entity, if any, and the State.

“(5) Assurances.—The application shall include assurances that—

“(A) the State will annually collect data related to the required activities implemented by the State under this section in order to prepare the progress reports required under subsection (f);

“(B) funds received through the grant—

“(i) will be expended in accordance with this section; and

“(ii) will be used to supplement, and not supplant, funds available from other sources for technology-related assistance, including the provision of assistive technology devices and assistive technology services;

“(C) the lead agency will control and administer the funds received through the grant;

“(D) the State will adopt such fiscal control and accounting procedures as may be necessary to ensure proper disbursement of and accounting for the funds received through the grant;

“(E) the physical facility of the lead agency and implementing entity, if any, meets the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 12101 et seq.) regarding accessibility for individuals with disabilities;

“(F) a public agency or an individual with a disability holds title to any property purchased with funds received under the grant and administers that property;

“(G) activities carried out in the State that are authorized under this Act, and supported by Federal funds received under this Act, will comply with the standards established by the Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board under section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 794d); and

“(H) the State will—

“(i) prepare reports to the Secretary in such form and containing such information as the Secretary may require to carry out the Secretary’s functions under this Act; and

“(ii) keep such records and allow access to such records as the Secretary may require to ensure the correctness and verification of information provided to the Secretary under this subparagraph.

“(e) Use of Funds.—

“(1) Required activities.—

“(A) In general.—Except as provided in subparagraph (B) and paragraph (5), any State that receives a grant under this section shall—

“(i) use a portion of not more than 40 percent of the funds made available through the grant to carry out all activities described in paragraph (3), of which not less than 5 percent of such portion shall be available for activities described in paragraph (3)(A)(iii); and

“(ii) use a portion of the funds made available through the grant to carry out all of the activities described in paragraph (2).

“(B) State or other non-federal financial support.—A State receiving a grant under this section shall not be required to use grant funds to carry out the category of activities described in subparagraph (A), (B), (C), or (D) of paragraph (2) in that State if, for such category of activities, financial support is provided in that State—

“(i) from State or other non-Federal resources or entities; and

“(ii) in an amount that is comparable to, or greater than, the amount of the portion of the funds made available through the grant that the State would have expended for such category of activities, in the absence of this subparagraph.

“(2) State-level activities.—

“(A) State financing activities.—The State shall support State financing activities to increase access to, and funding for, assistive technology devices and assistive technology services (which shall not include direct payment for such a device or service for an individual with a disability but may include support and administration of a program to provide such payment), including development of systems to provide and pay for such devices and services, for targeted individuals and entities described in section 3(16)(A), including—

“(i) support for the development of systems for the purchase, lease, or other acquisition of, or payment for, assistive technology devices and assistive technology services;

“(ii) another mechanism that is approved by the Secretary; or

“(iii) support for the development of a State-financed or privately financed alternative financing program engaged in the provision of assistive technology devices, such as—

“(I) a low-interest loan fund;

“(II) an interest buy-down program;

“(III) a revolving loan fund; or

“(IV) a loan guarantee or insurance program.

“(B) Device reutilization programs.—The State shall directly, or in collaboration with public or private entities, carry out assistive technology device reutilization programs that provide for the exchange, repair, recycling, or other reutilization of assistive technology devices, which may include redistribution through device sales, loans, rentals, or donations.

“(C) Device loan programs.—The State shall directly, or in collaboration with public or private entities, carry out device loan programs that provide short-term loans of assistive technology devices to individuals, employers, public agencies, or others seeking to meet the needs of targeted individuals and entities, including others seeking to comply with the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (20 U.S.C. 1400 et seq.), the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 12101 et seq.), and section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 794).

“(D) Device demonstrations.—

“(i) In general.—The State shall directly, or in collaboration with public and private entities, such as one-stop partners, as defined in section 3 of the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (29 U.S.C. 3102), demonstrate a variety of assistive technology devices and assistive technology services (including assisting individuals in making informed choices regarding, and providing experiences with, the devices and services), using personnel who are familiar with such devices and services and their applications.

“(ii) Comprehensive information.—The State shall directly, or through referrals, provide to individuals, to the extent practicable, comprehensive information about State and local assistive technology venders, providers, and repair services.

“(3) State leadership activities.—

“(A) Educational activities and technical assistance.—

“(i) In general.—The State shall, directly or through the provision of support to public or private entities with demonstrated expertise in collaborating with public or private agencies that serve individuals with disabilities, develop and disseminate training materials, conduct educational activities, and provide technical assistance, for individuals statewide, including representatives of State and local educational agencies, State vocational rehabilitation programs, other State and local agencies, early intervention programs, adult service programs, hospitals and other health care facilities, institutions of higher education, and businesses.

“(ii) Authorized activities.—In carrying out activities under clause (i), the State shall carry out activities that enhance the knowledge, skills, and competencies of individuals from local settings described in such clause, which may include—

“(I) raising awareness and providing instruction on the benefits of assistive technology and the Federal, State, and private funding sources available to assist targeted individuals and entities in acquiring assistive technology;

“(II) skills development in assessing the need for assistive technology devices and assistive technology services;

“(III) instruction to ensure the appropriate application and use of assistive technology devices, assistive technology services, and accessible information and communication technology for e-government functions;

“(IV) instruction in the importance of multiple approaches to assessment and implementation necessary to meet the individualized needs of individuals with disabilities; and

“(V) technical instruction on integrating assistive technology into the development and implementation of service plans, including any education, health, discharge, Olmstead, employment, or other plan required under Federal or State law.

“(iii) Transition assistance to individuals with disabilities.—The State shall (directly or through the provision of support to public or private entities) develop and disseminate educational materials, conduct educational activities, facilitate access to assistive technology, and provide technical assistance, to assist—

“(I) students with disabilities, within the meaning of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (20 U.S.C. 1400 et seq.), that receive transition services; and

“(II) adults who are individuals with disabilities maintaining or transitioning to community living.

“(B) Public-awareness activities.—

“(i) In general.—The State shall conduct public-awareness activities designed to provide information to targeted individuals and entities relating to the availability, benefits, appropriateness, and costs of assistive technology devices and assistive technology services, including—

“(I) the development of procedures for providing direct communication between providers of assistive technology and targeted individuals and entities, which may include partnerships with entities in the statewide and local workforce development systems established under the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (29 U.S.C. 3101 et seq.), State vocational rehabilitation programs, public and private employers, centers for independent living described in part C of title VII of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 796f et seq.), Aging and Disability Resource Centers (as defined in section 102 of the Older Americans Act of 1965 (42 U.S.C. 3002)), or elementary schools and secondary schools (as defined in section 8101 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7801));

“(II) the development and dissemination, to targeted individuals and entities, of information about State efforts related to assistive technology; and

“(III) the distribution of materials to appropriate public and private agencies that provide social, medical, educational, employment, housing, and transportation services to individuals with disabilities.

“(ii) Statewide information and referral system.—

“(I) In general.—The State shall directly, or in collaboration with public or private entities (including nonprofit organizations), provide for the continuation and enhancement of a statewide information and referral system designed to meet the needs of targeted individuals and entities.

“(II) Content.—The system shall deliver information on assistive technology devices, assistive technology services (with specific data regarding provider availability within the State), and the availability of resources, including funding through public and private sources, to obtain assistive technology devices and assistive technology services. The system shall also deliver information on the benefits of assistive technology devices and assistive technology services with respect to enhancing the capacity of individuals with disabilities to perform activities of daily living.

“(C) Coordination and collaboration.—The State shall coordinate activities described in paragraph (2) and this paragraph, among public and private entities that are responsible for policies, procedures, or funding for the provision of assistive technology devices and assistive technology services to improve access to such devices and services in the State.

“(4) Funding rules.—

“(A) Prohibition.—Funds made available through a grant to a State under this section shall not be used for direct payment for an assistive technology device for an individual with a disability.

“(B) Federal partner collaboration.—In order to coordinate efforts regarding the availability of funding to access and acquire assistive technology through device demonstration, loan, reuse, and State financing activities, a State receiving a grant under this section shall ensure that the lead agency or implementing entity is conducting outreach to and, as appropriate, collaborating with, other State agencies that receive Federal funding for assistive technology, including—

“(i) the State educational agency receiving assistance under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (20 U.S.C. 1400 et seq.);

“(ii) the State vocational rehabilitation agency receiving assistance under title I of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 720 et seq.);

“(iii) the agency responsible for administering the State Medicaid program under title XIX of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396 et seq.);

“(iv) the State agency receiving assistance under the Older Americans Act of 1965 (42 U.S.C. 3001 et seq.); and

“(v) any other agency in a State that funds assistive technology.

“(C) Indirect costs.—Not more than 10 percent of the funds made available through a grant to a State under this section may be used for indirect costs.

“(5) State flexibility.—

“(A) In general.—Notwithstanding paragraph (1)(A) and subject to subparagraph (B), a State may use funds that the State receives under a grant awarded under this section to carry out any 2 or more of the activities described in paragraph (2).

“(B) Special rule.—Notwithstanding paragraph (1)(A), any State that exercises its authority under subparagraph (A)—

“(i) shall carry out each of the required activities described in paragraph (3); and

“(ii) shall use not more than 30 percent of the funds made available through the grant to carry out such activities.

“(6) Assistive technology device disposition.—Notwithstanding other equipment disposition policy under Federal law, an assistive technology device purchased to be used in activities authorized under this section may be reutilized to the maximum extent possible and then donated to a public agency, private nonprofit agency, or individual with a disability in need of such device.

“(f) Annual Progress Reports.—

“(1) Data collection.—Each State receiving a grant under this section shall participate in data collection as required by law, including data collection required for preparation of the reports described in paragraph (2).

“(2) Reports.—

“(A) In general.—Each State shall prepare and submit to the Secretary an annual progress report on the activities carried out by the State in accordance with subsection (e), including activities funded by State or other non-Federal sources under subsection (e)(1)(B) at such time, and in such manner, as the Secretary may require.

“(B) Contents.—The report shall include data collected pursuant to this section. The report shall document, with respect to activities carried out under this section in the State—

“(i) the type of State financing activities described in subsection (e)(2)(A) used by the State;

“(ii) the amount and type of assistance given to consumers of the State financing activities described in subsection (e)(2)(A) (which shall be classified by type of assistive technology device or assistive technology service financed through the State financing activities, and geographic distribution within the State), including—

“(I) the number of applications for assistance received;

“(II) the number of applications—

“(aa) approved;

“(bb) denied; or

“(cc) withdrawn;

“(III) the number, percentage, and dollar amount of defaults for the financing activities;

“(IV) the range and average interest rate for the financing activities;

“(V) the range and average income of approved applicants for the financing activities; and

“(VI) the types and dollar amounts of assistive technology financed;

“(iii) the number, type, and length of time of loans of assistive technology devices provided to individuals with disabilities, employers, public agencies, or public accommodations through the device loan program described in subsection (e)(2)(C), and an analysis of the types of such devices provided through the program, and how each device benefitted the individual who received such device;

“(iv) the number, type, estimated value, and scope of assistive technology devices exchanged, repaired, recycled, or reutilized (including redistributed through device sales, loans, rentals, or donations) through the device reutilization program described in subsection (e)(2)(B), and an analysis of the individuals with disabilities who have benefited from the device reutilization program;

“(v) the number and type of device demonstrations and referrals provided under subsection (e)(2)(D), and an analysis of individuals with disabilities who have benefited from the demonstrations and referrals;

“(vi)

(I) the number and general characteristics of individuals who participated in educational activities under subsection (e)(3)(A) (such as individuals with disabilities, parents, educators, employers, providers of employment services, health care workers, counselors, other service providers, or venders) and the topics of such educational activities; and

“(II) to the extent practicable, the geographic distribution of individuals who participated in the educational activities;

“(vii) the frequency of provision and nature of technical assistance provided to State and local agencies and other entities;

“(viii) the number of individuals assisted through the statewide information and referral system described in subsection (e)(3)(B)(ii) and descriptions of the public awareness activities under subsection (e)(3)(B);

“(ix) the outcomes of any improvement initiatives carried out by the State as a result of activities funded under this section, including a description of any written policies, practices, and procedures that the State has developed and implemented regarding access to, provision of, and funding for, assistive technology devices, and assistive technology services, in the contexts of education, health care, employment, community living, and accessible information and communication technology, including e-government;

“(x) the source of leveraged funding or other contributed resources, including resources provided through subcontracts or other collaborative resource-sharing agreements, from and with public and private entities to carry out State activities described in subsection (e)(3)(C), the number of individuals served with the contributed resources for which information is not reported under clauses (i) through (ix) or clause (xi), and other outcomes accomplished as a result of such activities carried out with the contributed resources; and

“(xi) the level of customer satisfaction with the services provided.

“SEC. 5. GRANTS FOR PROTECTION AND ADVOCACY SERVICES RELATED TO ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY.

“(a) Grants.—

“(1) In general.—The Secretary shall make grants under subsection (b) to protection and advocacy systems in each State for the purpose of enabling such systems to assist in the acquisition, utilization, or maintenance of assistive technology devices or assistive technology services for individuals with disabilities.

“(2) General authorities.—In providing the assistance described under paragraph (1), protection and advocacy systems shall have the same general authorities as the systems are afforded under subtitle C of title I of the Developmental Disabilities Assistance and Bill of Rights Act of 2000 (42 U.S.C. 15041 et seq.).

“(b) Reservation; Distribution.—

“(1) Reservation.—For each fiscal year, the Secretary shall reserve, from the amounts made available to carry out this section under section 9(b)(2)(B), such sums as may be necessary to carry out paragraph (4).

“(2) Population basis.—From the amounts appropriated to carry out this section for a fiscal year that remain after the reservation required under paragraph (1) has been made, the Secretary shall make a grant to a protection and advocacy system within each State in an amount bearing the same ratio to the remaining amounts as the population of the State bears to the population of all States.

“(3) Minimums.—Subject to the availability of appropriations and paragraph (5), the amount of a grant to a protection and advocacy system under paragraph (2) for a fiscal year shall—

“(A) in the case of a protection and advocacy system located in American Samoa, Guam, the United States Virgin Islands, or the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, not be less than $30,000; and

“(B) in the case of a protection and advocacy system located in a State not described in subparagraph (A), not be less than $50,000.

“(4) Payment to the system serving the american indian consortium.—

“(A) In general.—The Secretary shall make grants to the protection and advocacy system serving the American Indian consortium to provide services in accordance with this section.

“(B) Amount of grants.—The amount of a grant under subparagraph (A) shall be the same as the amount provided under paragraph (3)(A).

“(5) Adjustments.—For each fiscal year for which the total amount appropriated under section 9(b)(2)(B) to carry out this section is $8,000,000 or more and such appropriated amount exceeds the total amount appropriated to carry out this section for the preceding fiscal year, the Secretary shall increase each of the minimum grant amounts described in subparagraphs (A) and (B) of paragraph (3) and paragraph (4)(B) by a percentage equal to the percentage increase in the total amount appropriated under section 9 to carry out this section for the preceding fiscal year and such total amount for the fiscal year for which the determination is being made.

“(c) Direct Payment.—Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Secretary shall pay directly to any protection and advocacy system that complies with this section, the total amount of the grant made for such system under this section, unless the system provides otherwise for payment of the grant amount.

“(d) Carryover; Program Income.—

“(1) Carryover.—Any amount paid to a protection and advocacy system for a fiscal year under this section that remains unobligated at the end of such fiscal year shall remain available to such system for obligation during the subsequent fiscal year.

“(2) Program income.—Program income generated from any amount paid to a protection and advocacy system for a fiscal year shall—

“(A) remain available to the protection and advocacy system for 5 additional fiscal years after the year in which such amount was paid to the protection and advocacy system and be considered an addition to the grant; and

“(B) only be used to improve the awareness of individuals with disabilities about the accessibility of assistive technology and assist such individuals in the acquisition, utilization, or maintenance of assistive technology devices or assistive technology services.

“(e) Report to Secretary.—A protection and advocacy system that receives a grant under this section shall annually prepare and submit to the Secretary a report that contains documentation of the progress of the protection and advocacy system in—

“(1) conducting consumer-responsive activities, including activities that will lead to increased access for individuals with disabilities to funding for assistive technology devices and assistive technology services;

“(2) engaging in informal advocacy to assist in securing assistive technology devices and assistive technology services for individuals with disabilities;

“(3) engaging in formal representation for individuals with disabilities to secure systems change, and in advocacy activities to secure assistive technology devices and assistive technology services for individuals with disabilities;

“(4) developing and implementing strategies to enhance the long-term abilities of individuals with disabilities and their family members, guardians, advocates, and authorized representatives to advocate the provision of assistive technology devices and assistive technology services to which the individuals with disabilities are entitled under law other than this Act;

“(5) coordinating activities with protection and advocacy services funded through sources other than this Act, and coordinating activities with the capacity building and advocacy activities carried out by the lead agency; and

“(6) effectively allocating funds made available under this section to improve the awareness of individuals with disabilities about the accessibility of assistive technology and assist such individuals in the acquisition, utilization, or maintenance of assistive technology devices or assistive technology services.

“(f) Reports and Updates to State Agencies.—A protection and advocacy system that receives a grant under this section shall prepare and submit to the lead agency of the State designated under section 4(c)(1) the report described in subsection (e) and quarterly updates concerning the activities described in such subsection.

“(g) Coordination.—On making a grant under this section to a protection and advocacy system in a State, the Secretary shall solicit and consider the opinions of the lead agency of the State with respect to efforts at coordination of activities, collaboration, and promoting outcomes between the lead agency and the protection and advocacy system that receives the grant under this section.

“SEC. 6. TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE AND DATA COLLECTION SUPPORT.

“(a) Definitions.—In this section:

“(1) Qualified data collection and reporting entity.—The term ‘qualified data collection and reporting entity’ means an entity with demonstrated expertise in data collection and reporting as described in section 4(f)(2)(B), in order to—

“(A) provide recipients of grants under this Act with instruction and technical assistance; and

“(B) assist such recipients with data collection and data requirements.

“(2) Qualified protection and advocacy system technical assistance provider.—The term ‘qualified protection and advocacy system technical assistance provider’ means an entity that has experience in—

“(A) working with protection and advocacy systems established in accordance with section 143 of the Developmental Disabilities Assistance and Bill of Rights Act of 2000 (42 U.S.C. 15043); and

“(B) providing technical assistance to protection and advocacy agencies.

“(3) Qualified technical assistance provider.—The term ‘qualified technical assistance provider’ means an entity with demonstrated expertise in assistive technology and that has (directly or through grant or contract)—

“(A) experience and expertise in administering programs, including developing, implementing, and administering all of the activities described in section 4(e); and

“(B) documented experience in and knowledge about—

“(i) assistive technology device loan and demonstration;

“(ii) assistive technology device reuse;

“(iii) financial loans and microlending, including the activities of alternative financing programs for assistive technology; and

“(iv) State leadership activities.

“(b) Technical Assistance and Data Collection Support Authorized.—

“(1) Support for assistive technology educational activities and technical assistance.—From amounts made available under section 9(b)(1), the Secretary shall award, on a competitive basis, grants, contracts, or cooperative agreements—

“(A) to qualified technical assistance providers to support activities described in subsection (d)(1) for States receiving grants under section 4; and

“(B) to qualified protection and advocacy system technical assistance providers to support activities described in subsection (d)(1) for protection and advocacy systems receiving grants under section 5.

“(2) Support for data collection and reporting assistance.—From amounts made available under section 9(b)(1), the Secretary shall award, on a competitive basis, grants, contracts, or cooperative agreements—

“(A) to qualified data collection and reporting entities, to enable the qualified data collection and reporting entities to carry out the activities described in subsection (d)(2) for States receiving grants under section 4; and

“(B) to qualified protection and advocacy system technical assistance providers, to enable the providers to carry out the activities described in subsection (d)(2) for protection and advocacy systems receiving grants under section 5.

“(c) Application.—

“(1) In general.—To be eligible to receive a grant, contract, or cooperative agreement under this section, an entity shall submit an application to the Secretary at such time, in such manner, and containing the following information:

“(A) A description of the activities such entity will carry out with the grant, contract, or cooperative agreement under subsection (d).

“(B) A description of the expertise such entity has to carry out such activities.

“(C) In the case of an entity applying to receive a grant, contract, or cooperative agreement under subsection (b)(1), a description of such entity’s plan for complying with the requirements described in subsection (d)(1)(B).

“(D) A description of such entity’s plan to comply with all relevant State and Federal laws, regulations, and policies with respect to data privacy and security.

“(E) Such other information as the Secretary may require.

“(2) Input.—In developing grants, contracts, or cooperative agreements under this section, the Secretary shall consider the input of the recipients of grants under sections 4 and 5 and other individuals the Secretary determines to be appropriate, especially—

“(A) individuals with disabilities who use assistive technology and understand the barriers to the acquisition of such technology and assistive technology services;

“(B) family members, guardians, advocates, and authorized representatives of such individuals;

“(C) relevant employees from Federal departments and agencies, other than the Department of Health and Human Services;

“(D) representatives of businesses; and

“(E) venders and public and private researchers and developers.

“(d) Authorized Activities.—

“(1) Use of funds for assistive technology technical assistance.—

“(A) Technical assistance efforts.—A qualified technical assistance provider or qualified protection and advocacy system technical assistance provider receiving a grant, contract, or cooperative agreement under subsection (b)(1) shall support a technical assistance program for States or protection and advocacy systems receiving a grant under section 4 or 5, respectively, that—

“(i) addresses State-specific information requests concerning assistive technology from entities funded under this Act and public entities not funded under this Act, including—

“(I) effective approaches to Federal-State coordination of programs for individuals with disabilities related to improving funding for or access to assistive technology devices and assistive technology services for individuals with disabilities;

“(II) model State and local laws, regulations, policies, practices, procedures, and organizational structures, that facilitate, and overcome barriers to, funding for, and access to, assistive technology devices and assistive technology services;

“(III) effective approaches to developing, implementing, evaluating, and sustaining activities described in section 4 or 5, as the case may be, and related to improving acquisition and access to assistive technology devices and assistive technology services for individuals with disabilities, and requests for assistance in developing corrective action plans;

“(IV) policies, practices, procedures, regulations, or judicial decisions related to access to and acquisition of assistive technology devices and assistive technology services for individuals with disabilities;

“(V) effective approaches to the development of consumer-controlled systems that increase access to, funding for, and awareness of, assistive technology devices and assistive technology services; and

“(VI) other requests for information and technical assistance from entities funded under this Act; and

“(ii) in the case of a program that will serve States receiving grants under section 4—

“(I) assists targeted individuals and entities by disseminating information and responding to requests relating to assistive technology by providing referrals to recipients of grants under section 4 or other public or private resources; and

“(II) provides State-specific, regional, and national technical assistance concerning assistive technology to entities funded under this Act, and public and private entities not funded under this Act, including—

“(aa) annually providing a forum for exchanging information concerning, and promoting program and policy improvements in, required activities of the State assistive technology programs;

“(bb) facilitating onsite and electronic information sharing using state-of-the-art internet technologies such as real-time online discussions, multipoint video conferencing, and web-based audio or video broadcasts, on emerging topics that affect State assistive technology programs;

“(cc) convening experts from State assistive technology programs to discuss and make recommendations with regard to national emerging issues of importance to individuals with assistive technology needs;

“(dd) sharing best practice and evidence-based practices among State assistive technology programs;

“(ee) developing or maintaining an accessible, national, and public website that includes information, tools, and resources on assistive technology devices and assistive technology services and links to State assistive technology programs, appropriate Federal departments and agencies, and private resources;

“(ff) developing a resource that connects individuals from a State with the State assistive technology program in their State;

“(gg) providing access to experts in the State-level activities described in section 4(e)(2) through site visits, teleconferences, and other means, to ensure access to information for entities that are carrying out new programs or programs that are not making progress in achieving the objectives of the programs; and

“(hh) supporting and coordinating activities designed to reduce the financial costs of purchasing assistive technology for the activities described in section 4(e), and reducing duplication of activities among State assistive technology programs.

“(B) Collaboration.—In developing and providing technical assistance under this paragraph, a qualified technical assistance provider or qualified protection and advocacy system technical assistance provider receiving a grant, contract, or cooperative agreement under subsection (b)(1) shall—

“(i) collaborate with—

“(I) organizations representing individuals with disabilities;

“(II) national organizations representing State assistive technology programs;

“(III) organizations representing State officials and agencies engaged in the delivery of assistive technology;

“(IV) other qualified protection and advocacy system technical assistance providers and qualified technical assistance providers;

“(V) providers of State financing activities, including alternative financing programs for assistive technology;

“(VI) providers of device loans, device demonstrations, and device reutilization; and

“(VII) any other organizations determined appropriate by the provider or the Secretary; and

“(ii) in the case of a qualified technical assistance provider, include activities identified as priorities by State advisory councils and lead agencies and implementing entities for grants under section 4.

“(2) Use of funds for assistive technology data collection and reporting assistance.—A qualified data collection and reporting entity or a qualified protection and advocacy system technical assistance provider receiving a grant, contract, or cooperative agreement under subsection (b)(2) shall assist States or protection and advocacy systems receiving a grant under section 4 or 5, respectively, to develop and implement effective and accessible data collection and reporting systems that—

“(A) focus on quantitative and qualitative data elements;

“(B) help measure the impact of the activities to individuals who need assistive technology;

“(C) in the case of systems that will serve States receiving grants under section 4—

“(i) measure the outcomes of all activities described in section 4(e) and the progress of the States toward achieving the measurable goals described in section 4(d)(3)(C); and

“(ii) provide States with the necessary information required under this Act or by the Secretary for reports described in section 4(f)(2); and

“(D) are in full compliance with all relevant State and Federal laws, regulations, and policies with respect to data privacy and security.

“SEC. 7. PROJECTS OF NATIONAL SIGNIFICANCE.

“(a) Definition of Project of National Significance.—In this section, the term ‘project of national significance’—

“(1) means a project that—

“(A) increases access to, and acquisition of, assistive technology; and

“(B) creates opportunities for individuals with disabilities to directly and fully contribute to, and participate in, all facets of education, employment, community living, and recreational activities; and

“(2) may—

“(A) develop and expand partnerships between State Medicaid agencies and recipients of grants under section 4 to reutilize durable medical equipment;

“(B) increase collaboration between the recipients of grants under section 4 and States receiving grants under the Money Follows the Person Rebalancing Demonstration under section 6071 of the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 (42 U.S.C. 1396a note);

“(C) increase collaboration between recipients of grants under section 4 and area agencies on aging, as such term is defined in section 102 of the Older Americans Act of 1965 (42 U.S.C. 3002), which may include collaboration on emergency preparedness, safety equipment, or assistive technology toolkits;

“(D) provide aid to assist youth with disabilities to transition from school to adult life, especially in—

“(i) finding employment and postsecondary education opportunities; and

“(ii) upgrading and changing any assistive technology devices that may be needed as a youth matures;

“(E) increase access to and acquisition of assistive technology addressing the needs of aging individuals and aging caregivers in the community;

“(F) increase effective and efficient use of assistive technology as part of early intervention for infants and toddlers with disabilities from birth to age 3;

“(G) increase awareness of and access to the Disability Funds-Financial Assistance funding provided by the Community Development Financial Institutions Fund that supports acquisition of assistive technology; and

“(H) increase awareness of and access to assistive technology, such as through models described in subclauses (I) through (IV) of section 4(e)(2)(A)(iii) and other Federally funded disability programs.

“(b) Projects Authorized.—If funds are available pursuant to section 9(c) to carry out this section for a fiscal year, the Secretary may award, on a competitive basis, grants, contracts, and cooperative agreements to public or private nonprofit entities to enable the entities to carry out projects of national significance.

“(c) Application.—A public or private nonprofit entity desiring a grant under this section shall submit an application to the Secretary at such time, in such manner, and containing a description of the project of national significance the entity proposes to carry out under this section.

“(d) Award Preference.—For each grant award period, the Secretary may give preference for 1 or more categories of projects of national significance described in subparagraphs (A) through (H) of subsection (a)(2).

“(e) Minimum Funding Level Required.—The Secretary may only award grants, contracts, or cooperative agreements under this section if the amount made available under section 9 to carry out sections 4, 5, and 6 is equal to or greater than $49,000,000.

“SEC. 8. ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISIONS.

“(a) General Administration.—

“(1) In general.—Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Administrator of the Administration for Community Living of the Department of Health and Human Services (referred to in this section as the ‘Administrator’) shall be responsible for the administration of this Act.

“(2) Collaboration.—The Administrator shall consult with the Office of Special Education Programs of the Department of Education, the Rehabilitation Services Administration of the Department of Education, the Office of Disability Employment Policy of the Department of Labor, and other appropriate Federal entities in the administration of this Act.

“(3) Administration.—

“(A) In general.—In administering this Act, the Administrator shall ensure that programs funded under this Act will address—

“(i) the needs of individuals with all types of disabilities and across the lifespan; and

“(ii) the use of assistive technology in all potential environments, including employment, education, and community living.

“(B) Funding limitations.—For each fiscal year, not more than ½ of 1 percent of the total funding appropriated for this Act shall be used by the Administrator to support the administration of this Act.

“(b) Review of Participating Entities.—

“(1) In general.—The Secretary shall assess the extent to which entities that receive grants under this Act are complying with the applicable requirements of this Act and achieving measurable goals that are consistent with the requirements of the grant programs under which the entities received the grants.

“(2) Provision of information.—To assist the Secretary in carrying out the responsibilities of the Secretary under this section, the Secretary may require States to provide relevant information, including the information required under subsection (d).

“(c) Corrective Action and Sanctions.—

“(1) Corrective action.—If the Secretary determines that an entity that receives a grant under this Act fails to substantially comply with the applicable requirements of this Act, or to make substantial progress toward achieving the measurable goals described in subsection (b)(1) with respect to the grant program, the Secretary shall assist the entity, through technical assistance funded under section 6 or other means, within 90 days after such determination, to develop a corrective action plan.

“(2) Sanctions.—If the entity fails to develop and comply with a corrective action plan described in paragraph (1) during a fiscal year, the entity shall be subject to 1 of the following corrective actions selected by the Secretary:

“(A) Partial or complete termination of funding under the grant program, until the entity develops and complies with such a plan.

“(B) Ineligibility to participate in the grant program in the following fiscal year.

“(C) Reduction in the amount of funding that may be used for indirect costs under section 4 for the following fiscal year.

“(D) Required redesignation of the lead agency designated under section 4(c)(1) or an entity responsible for administering the grant program.

“(3) Appeals procedures.—The Secretary shall establish appeals procedures for entities that are determined to be in noncompliance with the applicable requirements of this Act, or have not made substantial progress toward achieving the measurable goals described in subsection (b)(1).

“(4) Secretarial action.—As part of the annual report required under subsection (d), the Secretary shall describe each such action taken under paragraph (1) or (2) and the outcomes of each such action.

“(5) Public notification.—Not later than 30 days after taking an action under paragraph (1) or (2), the Secretary shall notify the public, by posting on an easily accessible portion of the internet website of the Department of Health and Human Services, notification of each action taken by the Secretary under paragraph (1) or (2). As a part of such notification, the Secretary shall describe each such action taken under paragraph (1) or (2) and the outcomes of each such action.

“(d) Annual Report to Congress.—

“(1) In general.—Not later than December 31 of each year, the Secretary shall prepare and submit to the President, the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions of the Senate, and the Committee on Education and Labor of the House of Representatives a report on the activities funded under this Act to improve the access of assistive technology devices and assistive technology services to individuals with disabilities.

“(2) Contents.—Each report described in paragraph (1) shall include—

“(A) a compilation and summary of the information provided by the States in annual progress reports submitted under section 4(f); and

“(B) a summary of the State applications described in section 4(d) and an analysis of the progress of the States in meeting the measurable goals established in State applications under section 4(d)(3)(C).

“(e) Construction.—Nothing in this section shall be construed to affect the enforcement authority of the Secretary, another Federal officer, or a court under any other applicable law.

“(f) Effect on Other Assistance.—This Act may not be construed as authorizing a Federal or State agency to reduce medical or other assistance available, or to alter eligibility for a benefit or service, under any other Federal law.

“SEC. 9. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS; RESERVATIONS AND DISTRIBUTION OF FUNDS.

“(a) In General.—There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this Act—

“(1) $44,000,000 for fiscal year 2023;

“(2) $45,980,000 for fiscal year 2024;

“(3) $48,049,100 for fiscal year 2025;

“(4) $50,211,310 for fiscal year 2026; and

“(5) $52,470,819 for fiscal year 2027.

“(b) Reservations and Distribution of Funds.—Subject to subsection (c), for each fiscal year for which funds are made available under subsection (a) to carry out this Act, the Secretary shall—

“(1) reserve an amount equal to 3 percent of the funds made available for each such fiscal year to carry out paragraphs (1) and (2) of section 6(b); and

“(2) from the amounts remaining after making the reservation under paragraph (1)—

“(A) use 85.5 percent of such amounts to carry out section 4; and

“(B) use 14.5 percent of such amounts to carry out section 5.

“(c) Limit for Projects of National Significance.—For any fiscal year for which the amount made available under subsection (a) exceeds $49,000,000 the Secretary may—

“(1) reserve for section 7, an amount of such available funds that does not exceed the lesser of—

“(A) the excess amount made available; or

“(B) $2,000,000; and

“(2) make the reservation under paragraph (1) before carrying out subsection (b).”

SEC. 5403. Effective Date.

This title, and the amendments made by this title, shall take effect on the day that is 6 months after the date of enactment of this Act.

TITLE LV Foreign Affairs Matters

Subtitle A Taiwan Enhanced Resilience Act

SEC. 5501. Short Title.

This subtitle may be cited as the “Taiwan Enhanced Resilience Act”.

PART 1 Implementation of an Enhanced Defense Partnership Between the United States and Taiwan

SEC. 5502. Modernizing Taiwan’s Security Capabilities to Deter and, If Necessary, Defeat Aggression by the People’s Republic of China.

(a)
Appropriate Congressional Committees Defined.— In this section, the term “appropriate congressional committees” means—
(1)
the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate;
(2)
the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate;
(3)
the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate;
(4)
the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives;
(5)
the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives; and
(6)
the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives.
(b)
Taiwan Security Programs.— The Secretary of State, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense, shall use the authorities under this section to strengthen the United States-Taiwan defense relationship, and to support the acceleration of the modernization of Taiwan’s defense capabilities, consistent with the Taiwan Relations Act (Public Law 96–8).
(c)
Purpose.— In addition to the purposes otherwise authorized for Foreign Military Financing programs under the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2751 et seq.), a purpose of the Foreign Military Financing Program should be to provide assistance, including equipment, training, and other support, to build the civilian and defensive military capabilities of Taiwan—
(1)
to accelerate the modernization of capabilities that will enable Taiwan to delay, degrade, and deny attempts by People’s Liberation Army forces—
(A)
to conduct coercive or grey zone activities;
(B)
to blockade Taiwan; or
(C)
to secure a lodgment on any islands administered by Taiwan and expand or otherwise use such lodgment to seize control of a population center or other key territory in Taiwan; and
(2)
to prevent the People’s Republic of China from decapitating, seizing control of, or otherwise neutralizing or rendering ineffective Taiwan’s civilian and defense leadership.
(d)
Regional Contingency Stockpile.— Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated pursuant to subsection (h), not more than $100,000,000 may be used during each of the fiscal years 2023 through 2032 to maintain a stockpile (if established pursuant to section 5503(b)), in accordance with section 514 of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2321h).
(e)
Availability of Funds.—
(1)
Annual spending plan.— Not later than March 1, 2023, and annually thereafter, the Secretary of State, in coordination with the Secretary of Defense, shall submit a plan to the appropriate congressional committees describing how amounts authorized to be appropriated pursuant to subsection (h), if made available, would be used to achieve the purpose described in subsection (c).
(2)
Certification.—
(A)
In general.— Amounts authorized to be appropriated for each fiscal year pursuant to subsection (h) are authorized to be made available after the Secretary of State, in coordination with the Secretary of Defense, certifies not less than annually to the appropriate committees of Congress that Taiwan has increased its defense spending relative to Taiwan’s defense spending in its prior fiscal year, which includes support for an asymmetric strategy, excepting accounts in Taiwan’s defense budget related to personnel expenditures, (other than military training and education and any funding related to the All-Out Defense Mobilization Agency).
(B)
Waiver.— The Secretary of State may waive the certification requirement under subparagraph (A) if the Secretary, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense, certifies to the appropriate congressional committees that for any given year—
(i)
Taiwan is unable to increase its defense spending relative to its defense spending in its prior fiscal year due to severe hardship; and
(ii)
making available the amounts authorized under subparagraph (A) is in the national interests of the United States.
(3)
Remaining funds.— Amounts authorized to be appropriated for a fiscal year pursuant to subsection (h) that are not obligated and expended during such fiscal year shall be added to the amount that may be used for Foreign Military Financing to Taiwan in the subsequent fiscal year.
(f)
Annual Report on Advancing the Defense of Taiwan.—
(1)
Initial report.— Concurrently with the first certification required under subsection (e)(2), the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Defense shall jointly submit a report to the appropriate congressional committees that describes steps taken to enhance the United States-Taiwan defense relationship and Taiwan’s modernization of its defense capabilities.
(2)
Matters to be included.— Each report required under paragraph (1) shall include—
(A)
an assessment of the commitment of Taiwan to implement a military strategy that will deter and, if necessary, defeat military aggression by the People’s Republic of China, including the steps that Taiwan has taken and the steps that Taiwan has not taken towards such implementation;
(B)
an assessment of the efforts of Taiwan to acquire and employ within its forces counterintervention capabilities, including—
(i)
long-range precision fires;
(ii)
integrated air and missile defense systems;
(iii)
anti-ship cruise missiles;
(iv)
land-attack cruise missiles;
(v)
coastal defense;
(vi)
anti-armor;
(vii)
undersea warfare, including manned and unmanned systems;
(viii)
survivable swarming maritime assets;
(ix)
manned and unmanned aerial systems;
(x)
mining and countermining capabilities;
(xi)
intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance capabilities;
(xii)
command and control systems;
(xiii)
defensive cybersecurity capabilities; and
(xiv)
any other defense capabilities that the United States determines, including jointly with Taiwan, are crucial to the defense of Taiwan, consistent with the joint consultative mechanism with Taiwan created pursuant to section 5506;
(C)
an evaluation of the balance between conventional and counter intervention capabilities in the defense force of Taiwan as of the date on which the report is submitted;
(D)
an assessment of steps taken by Taiwan to enhance the overall readiness of its defense forces, including—
(i)
the extent to which Taiwan is requiring and providing regular and relevant training to such forces;
(ii)
the extent to which such training is realistic to the security environment that Taiwan faces; and
(iii)
the sufficiency of the financial and budgetary resources Taiwan is putting toward readiness of such forces;
(E)
an assessment of steps taken by Taiwan to ensure that the Taiwan’s reserve forces and All-Out Defense Mobilization Agency can recruit, train, equip, and mobilize its forces;
(F)
an evaluation of—
(i)
the severity of manpower shortages in the military of Taiwan, including in the reserve forces;
(ii)
the impact of such shortages in the event of a conflict scenario; and
(iii)
the efforts made by Taiwan to address such shortages;
(G)
an assessment of the efforts made by Taiwan to boost its civilian defenses, including any informational campaigns to raise awareness among the population of Taiwan of the risks Taiwan faces;
(H)
an assessment of the efforts made by Taiwan to secure its critical infrastructure, including in transportation, telecommunications networks, satellite communications, and energy;
(I)
an assessment of the efforts made by Taiwan to enhance its cybersecurity, including the security and survivability of official civilian and military networks;
(J)
an assessment of the efforts made by Taiwan to improve the image and prestige of its defense forces among the population of Taiwan;
(K)
an assessment of any significant gaps in any of the matters described in subparagraphs (A) through (J) with respect to which the United States assesses that additional action is needed;
(L)
a description of cooperative efforts between the United States and Taiwan on the matters described in subparagraphs (A) through (K); and
(M)
a description of any challenge in Taiwan to—
(i)
implement the matters described in subparagraphs (A) through (J); or
(ii)
United States support or engagement with regard to such matters.
(3)
Subsequent reports.— Concurrently with subsequent certifications required under subsection (e)(2), the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Defense shall jointly submit updates to the initial report required under paragraph (1) that provides a description of changes and developments that occurred in the prior year.
(4)
Form.— The reports required under paragraphs (1) and (3) shall be submitted in an unclassified form, but may contain a classified annex.
(5)
Sharing of summary.— The Secretary of State and the Secretary of Defense shall jointly share any unclassified portions of the reports, pursuant to paragraph (4), with Taiwan, as appropriate.
(g)
Foreign Military Financing Loan and Loan Guarantee Authority.—
(1)
Direct loans.—
(A)
In general.— Notwithstanding section 23(c)(1) of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2763), during fiscal years 2023 through 2027, the Secretary of State is authorized to make direct loans available for Taiwan pursuant to section 23 of such Act.
(B)
Maximum obligations.— Gross obligations for the principal amounts of loans authorized under subparagraph (A) may not exceed $2,000,000,000.
(C)
Source of funds.—
(i)
Defined term.— In this subparagraph, the term “cost”—
(I)
has the meaning given such term in section 502(5) of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 (2 U.S.C. 661a(5));
(II)
shall include the cost of modifying a loan authorized under subparagraph (A); and
(III)
may include the costs of selling, reducing, or cancelling any amounts owed to the United States or to any agency of the United States.
(ii)
In general.— Amounts authorized to be appropriated pursuant to subsection (g) may be made available to pay for the cost of loans authorized under subparagraph (A).
(D)
Fees authorized.—
(i)
In general.— The Government of the United States may charge processing and origination fees for a loan made pursuant to subparagraph (A), not to exceed the cost to the Government of making such loan, which shall be collected from borrowers through a financing account (as defined in section 502(7) of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 (2 U.S.C. 661a(7)).
(ii)
Limitation on fee payments.— Amounts made available under any appropriations Act for any fiscal year may not be used to pay any fees associated with a loan authorized under subparagraph (A).
(E)
Repayment.— Loans made pursuant to subparagraph (A) shall be repaid not later than 12 years after the loan is received by the borrower, including a grace period of not more than 1 year on repayment of principal.
(F)
Interest.—
(i)
In general.— Notwithstanding section 23(c)(1) of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2763(c)(1)), interest for loans made pursuant to subparagraph (A) may be charged at a rate determined by the Secretary of State, except that such rate may not be less than the prevailing interest rate on marketable Treasury securities of similar maturity.
(ii)
Treatment of loan amounts used to pay interest.— Amounts made available under this paragraph for interest costs shall not be considered assistance for the purposes of any statutory limitation on assistance to a country.
(2)
Loan guarantees.—
(A)
In general.— Amounts authorized to be appropriated pursuant to subsection (g) may be made available for the costs of loan guarantees for Taiwan under section 24 of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2764) for Taiwan to subsidize gross obligations for the principal amount of commercial loans and total loan principal, any part of which may be guaranteed, not to exceed $2,000,000,000.
(B)
Maximum amounts.— A loan guarantee authorized under subparagraph (A)—
(i)
may not guarantee a loan that exceeds $2,000,000,000; and
(ii)
may not exceed 80 percent of the loan principal with respect to any single borrower.
(C)
Subordination.— Any loan guaranteed pursuant to subparagraph (A) may not be subordinated to—
(i)
another debt contracted by the borrower; or
(ii)
any other claims against the borrower in the case of default.
(D)
Repayment.— Repayment in United States dollars of any loan guaranteed under this paragraph shall be required not later than 12 years after the loan agreement is signed.
(E)
Fees.— Notwithstanding section 24 of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2764), the Government of the United States may charge processing and origination fees for a loan guarantee authorized under subparagraph (A), not to exceed the cost to the Government of such loan guarantee, which shall be collected from borrowers, or from third parties on behalf of such borrowers, through a financing account (as defined in section 502(7) of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 (2 U.S.C. 661a(7)).
(F)
Treatments of loan guarantees.— Amounts made available under this paragraph for the costs of loan guarantees authorized under subparagraph (A) shall not be considered assistance for the purposes of any statutory limitation on assistance to a country.
(3)
Notification requirement.— Amounts authorized to be appropriated to carry out this subsection may not be expended without prior notification of the appropriate committees of Congress.
(h)
Authorization of Appropriations.—
(1)
Authorization of appropriations.— In addition to amounts otherwise authorized to be appropriated for Foreign Military Financing, there is authorized to be appropriated to the Department of State for Taiwan Foreign Military Finance grant assistance up to $2,000,000,000 for each of the fiscal years 2023 through 2027.
(2)
Training and education.— Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated under paragraph (1), the Secretary of State should use not less than $2,000,000 per fiscal year for one or more blanket order Foreign Military Financing training programs related to the defense needs of Taiwan.
(3)
Direct commercial contracting.— The Secretary of State may use amounts authorized to be appropriated under paragraph (1) for the procurement of defense articles, defense services, or design and construction services that are not sold by the United States Government under the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2751 et seq.).
(4)
Procurement in taiwan.— Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated for Foreign Military Financing and made available for Taiwan, not more than 15 percent of the amount made available for each fiscal year may be available for the procurement by Taiwan in Taiwan of defense articles and defense services, including research and development, as agreed by the United States and Taiwan.
(i)
Sunset Provision.— Assistance may not be provided under this section after September 30, 2032.

SEC. 5503. Increase in Annual Regional Contingency Stockpile Additions and Support for Taiwan.

(a)
In General.— Section 514(b)(2)(A) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2321h(b)(2)(A)) is amended by striking “ $200,000,000” and all that follows and inserting “ $500,000,000 for any of the fiscal years 2023, 2024, or 2025.”.
(b)
Establishment.— Subject to section 514 of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2321h), the President may establish a regional contingency stockpile for Taiwan that consists of munitions and other appropriate defense articles.
(c)
Inclusion of Taiwan Among Other Allies Eligible for Defense Articles.— Chapter 2 of part II of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2311 et seq.) is amended—
(1)
in section 514(c)(2) (22 U.S.C. 2321h(c)(2)), by inserting “ Taiwan,” after “ Thailand,”; and
(2)
in section 516(c)(2) (22 U.S.C. 2321j(c)(2)), by inserting “ to Taiwan,” after “ major non-NATO allies on such southern and southeastern flank,”.
(d)
Annual Briefing.— Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter for 7 years, the President shall provide a briefing to the appropriate committees of Congress regarding the status of a regional contingency stockpile established under subsection (b).

SEC. 5504. International Military Education and Training Cooperation with Taiwan.

(a)
In General.— The Secretary of State and the Secretary of Defense shall establish or expand a comprehensive training program with Taiwan designed to—
(1)
enhance interoperability and capabilities for joint operations between the United States and Taiwan;
(2)
enhance rapport and deepen partnership between the militaries of the United States and Taiwan, and foster understanding of the United States among individuals in Taiwan;
(3)
improve Taiwan’s defense capabilities; and
(4)
train future leaders of Taiwan, promote professional military education, civilian control of the military, and protection of human rights.
(b)
Elements.— The training program required by subsection (a) should prioritize relevant and realistic training, including as necessary joint United States-Taiwan contingency tabletop exercises, war games, full-scale military exercises, and an enduring rotational United States military presence that assists Taiwan in maintaining force readiness and utilizing United States defense articles and services transferred from the United States to Taiwan.
(c)
Authorization of Participation of Taiwan in the International Military Education and Training Program.— The Secretary of State is authorized to provide training and education to relevant entities in Taiwan through the International Military Education and Training program authorized under chapter 5 of part II of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2347 et seq).

SEC. 5505. Additional Authorities to Support Taiwan.

(a)
Drawdown Authority.— Section 506(a) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2318(a)) is amended by adding at the end the following paragraph:

“(3) In addition to amounts already specified in this section, the President may direct the drawdown of defense articles from the stocks of the Department of Defense, defense services of the Department of Defense, and military education and training, of an aggregate value of not to exceed $1,000,000,000 per fiscal year, to be provided to Taiwan.”

(b)
Emergency Authority.— Section 552(c) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2348a(c)) is amended by adding at the end the following: “ In addition to the aggregate value of $25,000,000 authorized in paragraph (2) of the preceding sentence, the President may direct the drawdown of commodities and services from the inventory and resources of any agency of the United States Government for the purposes of providing necessary and immediate assistance to Taiwan of a value not to exceed $25,000,000 in any fiscal year.”.
(c)
Use of Special Defense Acquisition Fund.— The Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of State, shall seek to utilize the Special Defense Acquisition Fund established under chapter 5 of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2795 et seq.) to expedite the procurement and delivery of defense articles and defense services for the purpose of assisting and supporting the armed forces of Taiwan.

SEC. 5506. Multi-Year Plan to Fulfill Defensive Requirements of Military Forces of Taiwan.

(a)
Multi-year Plan.— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of State, in consultation with the Director of National Intelligence, shall engage for the purposes of establishing a joint consultative mechanism with appropriate officials of Taiwan to develop and implement a multi-year plan to provide for the acquisition of appropriate defensive capabilities by Taiwan and to engage with Taiwan in a series of combined training, exercises, and planning activities consistent with the Taiwan Relations Act (Public Law 96–8; 22 U.S.C. 3301 et seq.).
(b)
Elements.— The plan required by subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1)
An identification of the defensive military capability gaps and capacity shortfalls of Taiwan that are required to—
(A)
allow Taiwan to respond effectively to aggression by the People’s Liberation Army or other actors from the People’s Republic of China; and
(B)
advance a strategy of denial, reduce the threat of conflict, thwart an invasion, and mitigate other risks to the United States and Taiwan.
(2)
An assessment of the relative priority assigned by appropriate departments and agencies of Taiwan to include its military to address such capability gaps and capacity shortfalls.
(3)
An explanation of the annual resources committed by Taiwan to address such capability gaps and capacity shortfalls.
(4)
A description and justification of the relative importance of overcoming each identified capability gap and capacity shortfall for deterring, delaying, or defeating military aggression by the People’s Republic of China;
(5)
An assessment of—
(A)
the capability gaps and capacity shortfalls that could be addressed in a sufficient and timely manner by Taiwan; and
(B)
the capability gaps and capacity shortfalls that are unlikely to be addressed in a sufficient and timely manner solely by Taiwan.
(6)
An assessment of the capability gaps and capacity shortfalls described in paragraph (5)(B) that could be addressed in a sufficient and timely manner by—
(A)
the Foreign Military Financing, Foreign Military Sales, and Direct Commercial Sales programs of the Department of State;
(B)
Department of Defense security assistance authorized by chapter 16 of title 10, United States Code;
(C)
Department of State training and education programs authorized by chapter 5 of part II of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2347 et seq.);
(D)
section 506 of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2318);
(E)
the provision of excess defense articles pursuant to the requirements of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2751 et seq.); or
(F)
any other authority available to the Secretary of Defense or the Secretary of State.
(7)
A description of United States or Taiwan engagement with other countries that could assist in addressing in a sufficient and timely manner the capability gaps and capacity shortfalls identified pursuant to paragraph (1).
(8)
An identification of opportunities to build interoperability, combined readiness, joint planning capability, and shared situational awareness between the United States, Taiwan, and other foreign partners and allies, as appropriate, through combined training, exercises, and planning events, including—
(A)
table-top exercises and wargames that allow operational commands to improve joint and combined planning for contingencies involving a well-equipped adversary in a counter-intervention campaign;
(B)
joint and combined exercises that test the feasibility of counter-intervention strategies, develop interoperability across services, and develop the lethality and survivability of combined forces against a well-equipped adversary;
(C)
logistics exercises that test the feasibility of expeditionary logistics in an extended campaign with a well-equipped adversary;
(D)
service-to-service exercise programs that build functional mission skills for addressing challenges posed by a well-equipped adversary in a counter-intervention campaign; and
(E)
any other combined training, exercises, or planning with Taiwan’s military forces that the Secretary of Defense and Secretary of State consider relevant.
(9)
An identification of options for the United States to use, to the maximum extent practicable, existing authorities or programs to expedite military assistance to Taiwan in the event of a crisis or conflict, including—
(A)
a list of defense articles of the United States that may be transferred to Taiwan during a crisis or conflict;
(B)
a list of authorities that may be used to provide expedited military assistance to Taiwan during a crisis or conflict;
(C)
an assessment of methods that could be used to deliver such assistance to Taiwan during a crisis or conflict, including—
(i)
the feasibility of employing such methods in different scenarios; and
(ii)
recommendations for improving the ability of the Armed Forces to deliver such assistance to Taiwan; and
(D)
an assessment of any challenges in providing such assistance to Taiwan in the event of a crisis or conflict and recommendations for addressing such challenges.
(c)
Recurrence.— The joint consultative mechanism required in subsection (a) shall convene on a recurring basis and not less than annually.

SEC. 5507. Fast-Tracking Sales to Taiwan under Foreign Military Sales Program.

(a)
Preclearance of Certain Foreign Military Sales Items.—
(1)
In general.— Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter, the Secretary of State, in coordination with the Secretary of Defense, and in conjunction with coordinating entities such as the National Disclosure Policy Committee, the Arms Transfer and Technology Release Senior Steering Group, and other appropriate entities, shall compile a list of available and emerging military platforms, technologies, and equipment that are pre-cleared and prioritized for sale and release to Taiwan through the Foreign Military Sales program.
(2)
Rules of construction.—
(A)
Selection of items.— The list compiled pursuant to paragraph (1) shall not be construed as limiting the type, timing, or quantity of items that may be requested by, or sold to, Taiwan under the Foreign Military Sales program.
(B)
Notifications required.— Nothing in this Act may be construed to supersede congressional notification requirements under the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2751 et. seq.).
(b)
Prioritized Processing of Foreign Military Sales Requests From Taiwan.—
(1)
Requirement.— The Secretary of State and the Secretary of Defense shall prioritize and expedite the processing of requests from Taiwan under the Foreign Military Sales program, and may not delay the processing of requests for bundling purposes.
(2)
Duration.— The requirement under paragraph (1) shall continue until the Secretary of State determines and certifies to the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives that the threat to Taiwan has significantly abated.
(c)
Interagency Policy.— The Secretary of State and the Secretary of Defense shall jointly review and update interagency policies and implementation guidance related to Foreign Military Sales requests from Taiwan, including incorporating the preclearance provisions of this section.

SEC. 5508. Arms Exports Delivery Solutions for Taiwan and United States Allies in the Indo-Pacific.

(a)
Appropriate Committees of Congress Defined.— In this section, the term “appropriate committees of Congress” means—
(1)
the Committee on Foreign Relations and the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate; and
(2)
the Committee on Foreign Affairs and the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives.
(b)
Report Required.— Not later than March 1, 2023, and annually thereafter for a period of 5 years, the Secretary of State, in coordination with the Secretary of Defense, shall transmit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report with respect to the transfer of all defense articles or defense services that have yet to be completed pursuant to the authorities provided by—
(1)
section 3, 21, or 36 of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2753, 2761, or 2776); or
(2)
section 516(c)(2) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2321j(c)(2)).
(c)
Elements.— The report required by subsection (b) shall include the following elements:
(1)
A list of all approved transfers of defense articles and services authorized by Congress pursuant to sections 25 and 36 of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2765, 2776) with a total value of $25,000,000 or more, to Taiwan, Japan, South Korea, Australia, the Philippines, Thailand, or New Zealand, that have not been fully delivered by the start of the fiscal year in which the report is being submitted.
(2)
The estimated start and end dates of delivery for each approved and incomplete transfer listed pursuant to paragraph (1), including additional details and dates for any transfers that involve multiple tranches of deliveries.
(3)
With respect to each approved and incomplete transfer listed pursuant to paragraph (1), a detailed description of—
(A)
any changes in the delivery dates of defense articles or services relative to the dates anticipated at the time of congressional approval of the transfer, including specific reasons for any delays related to the United States Government, defense suppliers, or a foreign partner;
(B)
the feasibility and advisability of providing the partner subject to such delayed delivery with an interim capability or solution, including drawing from United States stocks, and the mechanisms under consideration for doing so as well as any challenges to implementing such a capability or solution;
(C)
authorities, appropriations, or waiver requests that Congress could provide to improve delivery timelines or authorize the provision of interim capabilities or solutions identified pursuant to subparagraph (B); and
(D)
a description of which countries are ahead of Taiwan for delivery of each item listed pursuant to paragraph (1).
(4)
A description of ongoing interagency efforts to support attainment of operational capability of the corresponding defense articles and services once delivered, including advance training with United States or armed forces of partner countries on the systems to be received. The description of any such training shall also include an identification of the training implementer.
(5)
If a transfer listed pursuant to paragraph (1) has been terminated prior to the date of the submission of the report for any reason—
(A)
the case information for such transfer, including the date of congressional notification, delivery date of the Letter of Offer and Acceptance (LOA), final signature of the LOA, and information pertaining to delays in delivering LOAs for signature;
(B)
a description of the reasons for which the transfer is no longer in effect; and
(C)
the impact this termination will have on the intended end-user and the consequent implications for regional security, including the impact on deterrence of military action by countries hostile to the United States, the military balance in the Taiwan Strait, and other factors.
(6)
A separate description of the actions the United States is taking to expedite and prioritize deliveries of defense articles and services to Taiwan, including—
(A)
a description of what actions the Department of State and the Department of Defense have taken or are planning to take to prioritize Taiwan’s Foreign Military Sales cases;
(B)
current procedures or mechanisms for determining that a Foreign Military Sales case for Taiwan should be prioritized above a sale to another country of the same or similar item; and
(C)
whether the United States intends to divert defense articles from United States stocks to provide an interim capability or solution with respect to any delayed deliveries to Taiwan and the plan, if applicable, to replenish any such diverted stocks.
(7)
A description of other actions already undertaken by or currently under consideration by the Department of State and the Department of Defense to improve delivery timelines for the transfers listed pursuant to paragraph (1).
(d)
Form.— The report required by subsection (b) shall be submitted in unclassified form but may include a classified annex.

SEC. 5509. Assessment of Taiwan’s Needs for Civilian Defense and Resilience.

(a)
Assessment Required.— Not later than 120 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Director of National Intelligence, shall submit a written assessment, with a classified annex, of Taiwan’s needs in the areas of civilian defense and resilience to—
(1)
the Committee on Foreign Relations, the Committee on Armed Services, and Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate; and
(2)
the Committee on Foreign Affairs, the Committee on Armed Services, and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives.
(b)
Matters to Be Included.— The assessment required under subsection (a) shall—
(1)
analyze the potential role of Taiwan’s public and civilian assets in defending against various scenarios for foreign militaries to coerce or conduct military aggression against Taiwan;
(2)
carefully analyze Taiwan’s needs for enhancing its defensive capabilities through the support of civilians and civilian sectors, including—
(A)
greater utilization of Taiwan’s high tech labor force;
(B)
the creation of clear structures and logistics support for civilian defense role allocation;
(C)
recruitment and skills training for Taiwan’s defense and civilian sectors; and
(D)
other defense needs and considerations at the provincial, city, and neighborhood levels;
(3)
analyze Taiwan’s needs for enhancing resiliency among its people and in key economic sectors;
(4)
identify opportunities for Taiwan to enhance communications at all levels to strengthen trust and understanding between the military, other government departments, civilian agencies and the general public, including—
(A)
communications infrastructure necessary to ensure reliable communications in response to a conflict or crisis; and
(B)
a plan to effectively communicate to the general public in response to a conflict or crisis;
(5)
identify the areas and means through which the United States could provide training, exercises, and assistance at all levels to support the needs discovered through the assessment and fill any critical gaps where capacity falls short of such needs; and
(6)
review existing United States Government and non-United States Government programmatic and funding modalities that are meant to support Taiwan’s civilian defense professionals in pursuing professional development, educational, and cultural exchanges in the United States, including—
(A)
opportunities through Department of State-supported programs, such as the International Visitor Leaders Program;
(B)
opportunities offered through non-governmental institutions, such as think tanks, to the extent the review can practicably make such an assessment;
(C)
a description of the frequency that civilian defense professionals from Taiwan pursue or are selected for the programs reviewed in subparagraph (A);
(D)
an analysis of any funding, policy, administrative, or other barriers preventing greater participation from Taiwan’s civilian defense professionals in the opportunities identified in subparagraph (A);
(E)
an evaluation of the value expanding the opportunities reviewed in subparagraph (A) would offer for strengthening Taiwan’s existing civilian defense community, and for increasing the perceived value of the field for young professionals in Taiwan;
(F)
an assessment of options the United States Government could take individually, with partners in Taiwan, or with foreign governments or non-governmental partners, to expand the opportunities reviewed in subparagraph (A); and
(G)
a description of additional resources and authorities that may be required to execute the options described in subparagraph (E).
(c)
Sharing of Report.— The assessment required by subsection (a) shall be shared with appropriate officials of Taiwan to facilitate cooperation, as appropriate.

SEC. 5510. Annual Report on Taiwan Defensive Military Capabilities and Intelligence Support.

Section 1248 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2022 (Public Law 117–81; 135 Stat. 1988) is amended to read as follows:

“SEC. 1248. ANNUAL REPORT ON TAIWAN CAPABILITIES AND INTELLIGENCE SUPPORT.

“(a) In General.—Through fiscal year 2027, the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Director of National Intelligence and the heads of other relevant Federal departments and agencies, shall jointly perform an annual assessment, consistent with the Taiwan Relations Act (Public Law 96–8; 22 U.S.C. 3302(c)), of security matters related to Taiwan, including intelligence matters, Taiwan’s defensive military capabilities, and how defensive shortcomings or vulnerabilities of Taiwan could be mitigated through cooperation, modernization, or integration. At a minimum, the assessment shall include the following:

“(1) An intelligence assessment regarding—

“(A) conventional military and nuclear threats to Taiwan from the People’s Republic of China, including exercises, patrols, and presence intended to intimidate or coerce Taiwan; and

“(B) irregular warfare activities, including influence operations, conducted by the People’s Republic of China to interfere in or undermine the peace and stability of the Taiwan Strait.

“(2) The current military capabilities of Taiwan and the ability of Taiwan to defend itself from external conventional and irregular military threats across a range of scenarios.

“(3) The interoperability of current and future defensive capabilities of Taiwan with the military capabilities of the United States and its allies and partners.

“(4) The plans, tactics, techniques, and procedures underpinning an effective defense strategy for Taiwan, including how addressing identified capability gaps and capacity shortfalls will improve the effectiveness of such strategy.

“(5) A description of additional personnel, resources, and authorities in Taiwan or in the United States that may be required to meet any shortcomings in the development of Taiwan’s military capabilities identified pursuant to this section.

“(6) With respect to materiel capabilities and capacities the Secretary of Defense and Secretary of State jointly assess to be most effective in deterring, defeating, or delaying military aggression by the People’s Republic of China, a prioritized list of capability gaps and capacity shortfalls of the military forces of Taiwan, including—

“(A) an identification of—

“(i) any United States, Taiwan, or ally or partner country defense production timeline challenge related to potential materiel and solutions to such capability gaps;

“(ii) the associated investment costs of enabling expanded production for items currently at maximum production;

“(iii) the associated investment costs of, or mitigation strategies for, enabling export for items currently not exportable; and

“(iv) existing stocks of such capabilities in the United States and ally and partner countries;

“(B) the feasibility and advisability of procuring solutions to such gaps and shortfalls through United States allies and partners, including through co-development or co-production;

“(C) the feasibility and advisability of assisting Taiwan in the domestic production of solutions to capability gaps, including through—

“(i) the transfer of intellectual property; and

“(ii) co-development or co-production arrangements;

“(D) the estimated costs, expressed in a range of options, of procuring sufficient capabilities and capacities to address such gaps and shortfalls;

“(E) an assessment of the relative priority assigned by appropriate officials of Taiwan to each such gap and shortfall; and

“(F) a detailed explanation of the extent to which Taiwan is prioritizing the development, production, or fielding of solutions to such gaps and shortfalls within its overall defense budget.

“(7) The applicability of Department of State and Department of Defense authorities for improving the defensive military capabilities of Taiwan in a manner consistent with the Taiwan Relations Act.

“(8) A description of any security assistance provided or Foreign Military Sales and Direct Commercial Sales activity with Taiwan over the past year.

“(9) A description of each engagement between the United States and Taiwan personnel related to planning over the past year.

“(10) With respect to each to training and exercises—

“(A) a description of each such instance over the past year;

“(B) a description of how each such instance—

“(i) sought to achieve greater interoperability, improved readiness, joint planning capability, and shared situational awareness between the United States and Taiwan, or among the United States, Taiwan, and other countries;

“(ii) familiarized the militaries of the United States and Taiwan with each other; and

“(iii) improved Taiwan’s defense capabilities.

“(11) A description of the areas and means through which the United States is assisting and supporting training, exercises, and assistance to support Taiwan’s requirements related to civilian defense and resilience, and how the United States is seeking to assist Taiwan in addressing any critical gaps where capacity falls short of meeting such requirements, including those elements identified in the assessment required by section 5502(f) of the James M. Inhofe National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2023.

“(12) An assessment of the implications of current levels of pre-positioned war reserve materiel on the ability of the United States to respond to a crisis or conflict involving Taiwan with respect to—

“(A) providing military or non-military aid to Taiwan; and

“(B) sustaining military installations and other infrastructure of the United States in the Indo-Pacific region.

“(13) An assessment of the current intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance capabilities of Taiwan, including any existing gaps in such capabilities and investments in such capabilities by Taiwan since the preceding report.

“(14) A summary of changes to pre-positioned war reserve materiel of the United States in the Indo-Pacific region since the preceding report.

“(15) Any other matters the Secretary of Defense or the Secretary of State considers appropriate.

“(b) Plan.—The Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of State shall jointly develop a plan for assisting Taiwan in improving its defensive military capabilities and addressing vulnerabilities identified pursuant to subsection (a) that includes—

“(1) recommendations, if any, for new Department of State or Department of Defense authorities, or modifications to existing Department of State or Department of Defense authorities, necessary to improve the defensive military capabilities of Taiwan in a manner consistent with the Taiwan Relations Act (Public Law 96–8; 22 U.S.C. 3301 et seq.);

“(2) an identification of opportunities for key leader and subject matter expert engagement between Department personnel and military and civilian counterparts in Taiwan; and

“(3) an identification of challenges and opportunities for leveraging authorities, resources, and capabilities outside the Department of Defense and the Department of State to improve the defensive capabilities of Taiwan in accordance with the Taiwan Relations Act.

“(c) Report.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter through fiscal year 2027, the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Director of National Intelligence, shall jointly submit to the appropriate committees of Congress—

“(1) a report on the results of the assessment required by subsection (a);

“(2) the plan required by subsection (b); and

“(3) a report on—

“(A) the status of efforts to develop and implement the joint multi-year plan required under section 5506 of the James M. Inhofe National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2023 to provide for the acquisition of appropriate defensive military capabilities by Taiwan and to engage with Taiwan in a series of combined training and planning activities consistent with the Taiwan Relations Act (Public Law 96–8; 22 U.S.C. 3301 et seq.); and

“(B) any other matters the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Defense consider necessary.

“(d) Form.—The reports required by subsection (c) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.

“(e) Appropriate Committees of Congress Defined.—For purposes of this section, the term ‘appropriate committees of Congress’ means—

“(1) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Foreign Relations, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate; and

“(2) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives.”

SEC. 5511. Findings and Statement of Policy.

(a)
Findings.— Congress finds the following:
(1)
Advancing peace and stability in the Indo-Pacific has been a central element of United States foreign policy toward the region.
(2)
The Government of the People’s Republic of China (PRC), especially since the election of Tsai Ing-Wen in 2016, has conducted a coordinated campaign to weaken Taiwan diplomatically, economically, and militarily in a manner that threatens to erode United States policy and create a fait accompli on questions surrounding Taiwan’s future.
(3)
To secure United States interests and preserve the ability of the people of Taiwan to determine their own future, it is necessary to reinforce Taiwan’s diplomatic, economic, and territorial space.
(b)
Statement of Policy.— It is the policy of the United States to—
(1)
maintain the position that peace and stability in the Western Pacific are in the political, security, and economic interests of the United States, and are matters of international concern; and
(2)
work with allies and partners to promote peace and stability in the Indo-Pacific and deter military acts or other forms of coercive behavior that would undermine regional stability.

SEC. 5512. Sense of Congress on Taiwan Defense Relations.

It is the sense of Congress that—
(1)
the Taiwan Relations Act (Public Law 96–8; 22 U.S.C. et seq.) and the Six Assurances provided by the United States to Taiwan in July 1982 are the foundation for United States-Taiwan relations;
(2)
as set forth in the Taiwan Relations Act, the United States decision to establish diplomatic relations with the People’s Republic of China rests upon the expectation that the future of Taiwan will be determined by peaceful means, and that any effort to determine the future of Taiwan by other than peaceful means, including boycotts and embargoes, is of grave concern to the United States;
(3)
the increasingly coercive and aggressive behavior of the People’s Republic of China toward Taiwan is contrary to the expectation of the peaceful resolution of the future of Taiwan;
(4)
as set forth in the Taiwan Relations Act, the capacity to resist any resort to force or other forms of coercion that would jeopardize the security, or the social or economic system, of the people on Taiwan should be maintained;
(5)
the United States should continue to support the development of capable, ready, and modern defense forces necessary for Taiwan to maintain sufficient defensive capabilities, including by—
(A)
supporting acquisition by Taiwan of defense articles and services through foreign military sales, direct commercial sales, and industrial cooperation, with an emphasis on capabilities that support an asymmetric strategy;
(B)
ensuring timely review of and response to requests of Taiwan for defense articles and services;
(C)
conducting practical training and military exercises with Taiwan that enable Taiwan to maintain sufficient defensive capabilities, as described in the Taiwan Relations Act;
(D)
exchanges between defense officials and officers of the United States and Taiwan at the strategic, policy, and functional levels, consistent with the Taiwan Travel Act (Public Law 115–135; 132 Stat. 341), especially for the purposes of—
(i)
enhancing cooperation on defense planning;
(ii)
improving the interoperability of the military forces of the United States and Taiwan; and
(iii)
improving the reserve force of Taiwan;
(E)
cooperating with Taiwan to improve its ability to employ military capabilities in asymmetric ways, as described in the Taiwan Relations Act; and
(F)
expanding cooperation in humanitarian assistance and disaster relief; and
(6)
the United States should increase its support to a free and open society in the face of aggressive efforts by the Government of the People’s Republic of China to curtail or influence the free exercise of rights and democratic franchise.

PART 2 Countering People’s Republic of China’s Coercion and Influence Campaigns

SEC. 5513. Strategy to Respond to Influence and Information Operations Targeting Taiwan.

(a)
In General.— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act and annually thereafter for the following 5 years, the Secretary of State, in coordination with the Director of National Intelligence, shall develop and implement a strategy to respond to—
(1)
covert, coercive, and corrupting activities carried out to advance the Chinese Communist Party’s “United Front” work related to Taiwan, including activities directed, coordinated, or otherwise supported by the United Front Work Department or its subordinate or affiliated entities; and
(2)
information and disinformation campaigns, cyber attacks, and nontraditional propaganda measures supported by the Government of the People’s Republic of China and the Chinese Communist Party that are directed toward persons or entities in Taiwan.
(b)
Elements.— The strategy required under subsection (a) shall include descriptions of—
(1)
the proposed response to propaganda and disinformation campaigns by the People’s Republic of China and cyber-intrusions targeting Taiwan, including—
(A)
assistance in building the capacity of Taiwan’s public and private-sector entities to document and expose propaganda and disinformation supported by the Government of the People’s Republic of China, the Chinese Communist Party, or affiliated entities;
(B)
assistance to enhance Taiwan’s ability to develop a holistic strategy to respond to sharp power operations, including election interference; and
(C)
media training for Taiwan officials and other Taiwan entities targeted by disinformation campaigns;
(2)
the proposed response to political influence operations that includes an assessment of the extent of influence exerted by the Government of the People’s Republic of China and the Chinese Communist Party in Taiwan on local political parties, financial institutions, media organizations, and other entities;
(3)
support for exchanges and other technical assistance to strengthen the Taiwan legal system’s ability to respond to sharp power operations; and
(4)
programs carried out by the Global Engagement Center to expose misinformation and disinformation in the Chinese Communist Party’s propaganda.

SEC. 5514. Task Force to Counter Economic Coercion by the People’s Republic of China.

(a)
Sense of Congress.— It is the sense of Congress that—
(1)
the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) increasing use of economic coercion against foreign governments, companies, organizations, other entities, and individuals requires that the United States devise a comprehensive, effective, and multilateral response;
(2)
the private sector is a crucial partner in helping the United States Government respond to the PRC’s coercive economic practices and hold the PRC accountable;
(3)
improved engagement and communication with the private sector, including receiving information from the United States private sector about the PRC’s coercive economic practices would help the United States Government and private sector stakeholders conduct early assessments of potential pressure points and vulnerabilities; and
(4)
PRC coercive economic practices create pressures for the private sector to behave in ways antithetical to United States national interests and competitiveness.
(b)
Establishment of Task Force.— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the President shall establish an interagency task force to be known as the “Countering Economic Coercion Task Force” (referred to in this section as the “Task Force”).
(c)
Duties.—
(1)
In general.— The Task Force shall—
(A)
oversee the development and implementation of an integrated United States Government strategy to respond to People’s Republic of China (PRC) coercive economic practices, which shall include—
(i)
systematically monitoring and evaluating—
(I)
the costs of such practices on United States businesses and overall United States economic performance;
(II)
instances in which such practices taken against a non-PRC entity has benefitted other parties; and
(III)
the impacts such practices have had on United States national interests; and
(ii)
facilitating coordination among Federal departments and agencies when responding to such practices as well as proactively deterring such economic coercion, including by clarifying the roles for Federal departments and agencies identified in subsection (d) in implementing the strategy; and
(iii)
forming policy recommendations for the implementation of relevant United States authorities to respond to instances of PRC coercive economic practices;
(B)
consult with United States allies and partners on the feasibility and desirability of collectively identifying, assessing, and responding to PRC coercive economic practices, as well as actions that could be taken to expand coordination with the goal of ensuring a consistent, coherent, and collective response to such practices and establishing long-term deterrence of such practices;
(C)
effectively engage the United States private sector, particularly sectors, groups, or other entities that are susceptible to such PRC coercive economic practices, on concerns related to such practices; and
(D)
develop and implement a process for regularly sharing relevant information, including classified information to the extent appropriate and practicable, on such PRC coercive economic practices with United States allies, partners, and the private sector.
(2)
Consultation.— In carrying out its duties under this subsection, the Task Force should regularly consult, to the extent necessary and appropriate, with the following:
(A)
Relevant stakeholders in the private sector.
(B)
Federal departments and agencies that are not represented on the Task Force.
(C)
United States allies and partners.
(d)
Membership.— The President shall—
(1)
appoint the chair of the Task Force from among the staff of the National Security Council;
(2)
appoint the vice chair of the Task Force from among the staff of the National Economic Council; and
(3)
determine the Federal departments and agencies that will serve on the task force, and direct the head of those agencies to appoint personnel at the level of Assistant Secretary or above to participate in the Task Force.
(e)
Reports.—
(1)
Initial report.— Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Task Force shall submit to Congress a report that includes the following elements:
(A)
A comprehensive review of the array of economic tools the Government of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) employs or could employ in the future to coerce other governments and non-PRC companies (including United States companies) including the Government of the PRC’s continued efforts to codify informal practices into its domestic law.
(B)
The strategy required by subsection (c)(1)(A).
(C)
An interagency definition of PRC coercive economic practices that captures both—
(i)
the use of informal or extralegal PRC coercive economic practices; and
(ii)
the inappropriate use of economic tools, including those authorized under the laws and regulations of the PRC.
(D)
A comprehensive review of the array of tools the United States Government employs or could employ to respond to economic coercion against the government, companies, and other entities of the United States or its allies and partners.
(E)
A list of unilateral or multilateral—
(i)
preemptive practices to defend or deter against PRC coercive economic practices; and
(ii)
actions taken in response to the Government of the PRC’s general use of coercive economic practices, including the imposition of costs on the PRC.
(F)
An assessment of United States allies and partners key vulnerabilities to PRC coercive economic practices.
(G)
A description of gaps in existing resources or capabilities for United States Government departments and agencies to respond effectively to PRC coercive economic practices directed at United States entities and assist United States allies and partners in their responses to PRC coercive economic practices.
(H)
An analysis of the circumstances under which the PRC employs different types of economic coercion and against what kinds of targets.
(I)
An assessment of United States and international rules and norms as well as any treaty obligations the PRC has stretched, circumvented, or broken through its economically coercive practices and the United States response in each instance.
(2)
Interim reports.—
(A)
First interim report.— Not later than 1 year after the date on which the report required by paragraph (1) is submitted to Congress, the Task Force shall submit to Congress a report that includes the following elements:
(i)
Updates to information required by subparagraphs (A) through (G) of paragraph (1).
(ii)
A description of activities conducted by the Task Force to implement the strategy required by subsection (c)(1)(A).
(iii)
An assessment of the implementation and effectiveness of the strategy, lessons learned from the past year and planned changes to the strategy.
(B)
Second interim report.— Not later than 1 year after the date on which the report required by subparagraph (A) is submitted to Congress, the Task Force shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report that includes an update to the elements required under the report required by subparagraph (A).
(3)
Final report.— Not later than 30 days after the date on which the report required by paragraph (2)(B) is submitted to Congress, the Task Force shall submit to Congress a final report that includes the following elements:
(A)
An analysis of PRC coercive economic practices and the cost of such coercive practices to United States businesses.
(B)
A description of areas of possible vulnerability for United States businesses and businesses of United States partners and allies.
(C)
Recommendations on how to continue the effort to counter PRC coercive economic practices, including through further coordination with United States allies and partners.
(D)
Illustrative examples.
(4)
Form.— The reports required by this subsection shall be submitted in classified form, but may include an unclassified summary.
(f)
Sunset.—
(1)
In general.— The Task Force shall terminate at the end of the 60-day period beginning on the date on which the final report required by subsection (e)(3) is submitted to Congress.
(2)
Additional actions.— The Task force may use the 60-day period referred to in paragraph (1) for the purposes of concluding its activities, including providing testimony to Congress concerning the final report required by subsection (e)(3).
(g)
Assistance for Countries and Entities Targeted by the People’s Republic of China for Economic Coercion.— The Secretary of State, the Administrator of the United States Agency for International Development, the United States International Development Finance Corporation, the Secretary of Commerce, and the Secretary of the Treasury shall provide appropriate assistance to countries and entities that are subject to coercive economic practices by the People’s Republic of China.

SEC. 5515. China Censorship Monitor and Action Group.

(a)
Definitions.— In this section:
(1)
Appropriate congressional committees.— The term “appropriate congressional committees” means—
(A)
the Committee on Foreign Relations, the Committee on Appropriations, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate; and
(B)
the Committee on Foreign Affairs, the Committee on Appropriations, and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives.
(2)
Qualified research entity.— The term “qualified research entity” means an entity that—
(A)
is a nonpartisan research organization or a Federally funded research and development center;
(B)
has appropriate expertise and analytical capability to write the report required under subsection (c); and
(C)
is free from any financial, commercial, or other entanglements, which could undermine the independence of such report or create a conflict of interest or the appearance of a conflict of interest, with—
(i)
the Government of the People’s Republic of China;
(ii)
the Chinese Communist Party;
(iii)
any company incorporated in the People’s Republic of China or a subsidiary of such company; or
(iv)
any company or entity incorporated outside of the People’s Republic of China that is believed to have a substantial financial or commercial interest in the People’s Republic of China.
(3)
United states person.— The term “United States person” means—
(A)
a United States citizen or an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence to the United States; or
(B)
an entity organized under the laws of the United States or any jurisdiction within the United States, including a foreign branch of such an entity.
(b)
China Censorship Monitor and Action Group.—
(1)
In general.— The President shall establish an interagency task force, which shall be known as the “China Censorship Monitor and Action Group” (referred to in this subsection as the “Task Force”).
(2)
Membership.— The President shall take the following actions with respect to the membership of, and participation in, the Task Force:
(A)
Appoint the chair of the Task Force from among the staff of the National Security Council.
(B)
Appoint the vice chair of the Task Force from among the staff of the National Economic Council.
(C)
Determine the Federal departments and agencies that will serve on the Task Force, and direct the head of those agencies to appoint personnel at the level of Assistant Secretary or above to participate in the Task Force.
(3)
Responsibilities.— The Task Force shall—
(A)
oversee the development and execution of an integrated Federal Government strategy to monitor and address the impacts of efforts directed, or directly supported, by the Government of the People’s Republic of China to censor or intimidate, in the United States or in any of its possessions or territories, any United States person, including United States companies that conduct business in the People’s Republic of China, which are exercising their right to freedom of speech; and
(B)
submit the strategy developed pursuant to subparagraph (A) to the appropriate congressional committees not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act.
(4)
Meetings.— The Task Force shall meet not less frequently than twice per year.
(5)
Consultations.— The Task Force should regularly consult, to the extent necessary and appropriate, with—
(A)
Federal agencies that are not represented on the Task Force;
(B)
independent agencies of the United States Government that are not represented on the Task Force;
(C)
relevant stakeholders in the private sector and the media; and
(D)
relevant stakeholders among United States allies and partners facing similar challenges related to censorship or intimidation by the Government of the People’s Republic of China.
(6)
Reporting requirements.—
(A)
Annual report.— The Task Force shall submit an annual report to the appropriate congressional committees that describes, with respect to the reporting period—
(i)
the strategic objectives and policies pursued by the Task Force to address the challenges of censorship and intimidation of United States persons while in the United States or any of its possessions or territories, which is directed or directly supported by the Government of the People’s Republic of China;
(ii)
the activities conducted by the Task Force in support of the strategic objectives and policies referred to in clause (i); and
(iii)
the results of the activities referred to in clause (ii) and the impact of such activities on the national interests of the United States.
(B)
Form of report.— Each report submitted pursuant to subparagraph (A) shall be unclassified, but may include a classified annex.
(C)
Congressional briefings.— Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter, the Task Force shall provide briefings to the appropriate congressional committees regarding the activities of the Task Force to execute the strategy developed pursuant to paragraph (3)(A).
(c)
Report on Censorship and Intimidation of United States Persons by the Government of the People’s Republic of China.—
(1)
Report.—
(A)
In general.— Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of State shall select and seek to enter into an agreement with a qualified research entity that is independent of the Department of State to write a report on censorship and intimidation in the United States and its possessions and territories of United States persons, including United States companies that conduct business in the People’s Republic of China, which is directed or directly supported by the Government of the People’s Republic of China.
(B)
Matters to be included.— The report required under subparagraph (A) shall—
(i)
assess major trends, patterns, and methods of the Government of the People’s Republic of China’s efforts to direct or directly support censorship and intimidation of United States persons, including United States companies that conduct business in the People’s Republic of China, which are exercising their right to freedom of speech;
(ii)
assess, including through the use of illustrative examples, as appropriate, the impact on and consequences for United States persons, including United States companies that conduct business in the People’s Republic of China, that criticize—
(I)
the Chinese Communist Party;
(II)
the Government of the People’s Republic of China;
(III)
the authoritarian model of government of the People’s Republic of China; or
(IV)
a particular policy advanced by the Chinese Communist Party or the Government of the People’s Republic of China;
(iii)
identify the implications for the United States of the matters described in clauses (i) and (ii);
(iv)
assess the methods and evaluate the efficacy of the efforts by the Government of the People’s Republic of China to limit freedom of expression in the private sector, including media, social media, film, education, travel, financial services, sports and entertainment, technology, telecommunication, and internet infrastructure interests;
(v)
include policy recommendations for the United States Government, including recommendations regarding collaboration with United States allies and partners, to address censorship and intimidation by the Government of the People’s Republic of China; and
(vi)
include policy recommendations for United States persons, including United States companies that conduct business in China, to address censorship and intimidation by the Government of the People’s Republic of China.
(C)
Applicability to united states allies and partners.— To the extent practicable, the report required under subparagraph (A) should identify implications and policy recommendations that are relevant to United States allies and partners facing censorship and intimidation directed or directly supported by the Government of the People’s Republic of China.
(2)
Submission of report.—
(A)
In general.— Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of State shall submit the report written by the qualified research entity selected pursuant to paragraph (1)(A) to the appropriate congressional committees.
(B)
Publication.— The report referred to in subparagraph (A) shall be made accessible to the public online through relevant United States Government websites.
(d)
Sunset.— This section shall terminate on the date that is 5 years after the date of enactment of this Act.

PART 3 Inclusion of Taiwan in International Organizations

SEC. 5516. Findings.

Congress makes the following findings:
(1)
Since 2016, the Gambia, Sao Tome and Principe, Panama, the Dominican Republic, Burkina Faso, El Salvador, the Solomon Islands, and Kiribati have severed diplomatic relations with Taiwan in favor of diplomatic relations with China.
(2)
Taiwan was invited to participate in the World Health Assembly (WHA), the decision-making body of the World Health Organization (WHO), as an observer annually between 2009 and 2016. Since the 2016 election of President Tsai, the PRC has increasingly resisted Taiwan’s participation in the WHA. Taiwan was not invited to attend the WHA in 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, or 2021.
(3)
The Taipei Flight Information Region reportedly served 1,750,000 flights and 68,900,000 passengers in 2018, and is home to Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport, the eleventh busiest airport in the world. Taiwan has been excluded from participating at the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) since 2013.
(4)
United Nations (UN) General Assembly Resolution 2758 does not address the issue of representation of Taiwan and its people at the United Nations, nor does it give the PRC the right to represent the people of Taiwan.

SEC. 5517. Sense of Congress on Taiwan’s Meaningful Participation in the International Community.

It is the sense of Congress that—
(1)
Taiwan is an important contributor to the global community, as a model for democracy, and by providing expertise in global health, international aviation security, emerging technology development, and high environmental standards;
(2)
multiple United States Government administrations of both political parties have taken important steps to advance Taiwan’s meaningful participation in international organizations;
(3)
existing efforts to enhance United States cooperation with Taiwan to provide global public goods, including through development assistance, humanitarian assistance, and disaster relief, in trilateral and multilateral fora are laudable and should continue;
(4)
nonetheless, significant structural, policy, and legal barriers remain to advancing Taiwan’s meaningful participation in the international community; and
(5)
efforts to share Taiwan’s expertise with other parts of the global community could be further enhanced through a systematic approach, along with greater attention from Congress and the American public to such efforts.

SEC. 5518. Strategy to Support Taiwan’s Meaningful Participation in International Organizations.

(a)
In General.— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of State, in consultation with other Federal departments and agencies as appropriate, shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a strategy—
(1)
to advance Taiwan”s meaningful participation in a prioritized set of international organizations (IOs); and
(2)
that responds to growing pressure from the PRC on foreign governments, IOs, commercial actors, and civil society organizations to comply with its “One-China Principle”, with respect to Taiwan.
(b)
Matters to Be Included.— The strategy required under subsection (a) should include the following elements:
(1)
An assessment of the methods the PRC uses to coerce actors to into adhering to its “One-China Principle.” The methods should include those employed against governments, IOs, and civil society organizations. The assessment should also include pressure on commercial actors, to the extent it is relevant in the context of Taiwan’s meaningful participation in IOs.
(2)
An assessment of the policies of foreign governments toward the PRC and Taiwan, to identify likeminded allies and partners who might become public or private partners in the strategy.
(3)
A systematic analysis of all IOs, as practicable, to identify IOs that best lend themselves to advancing Taiwan’s participation.
(4)
A plan to expand economic, security, and diplomatic engagement with nations that have demonstrably strengthened, enhanced, or upgraded relations with Taiwan, in accordance with United States interests.
(5)
A survey of IOs that have allowed Taiwan’s meaningful participation, including an assessment of whether any erosion in Taiwan’s engagement has occurred within those organizations and how Taiwan’s participation has positively strengthened the capacity and activity of these organizations, thereby providing positive models for Taiwan’s inclusion in other similar forums.
(6)
A list of no more than 20 IOs at which the United States Government will prioritize for using its voice, vote, and influence to advance Taiwan’s meaningful participation over the three-year period following the date of enactment of this Act. The list should be derived from the IOs identified in paragraph (3).
(7)
A description of the diplomatic strategies and the coalitions the United States Government plans to develop to implement paragraph (6).
(c)
Form of Report.— The strategy required in subsection (a) shall be classified, but it may include an unclassified summary.
(d)
Support for Meaningful Participation.— The Permanent Representative of the United States to the United Nations and other relevant United States officials shall actively support Taiwan’s meaningful participation in all appropriate international organizations.

SEC. 5519. Meaningful Participation of Taiwan in the International Civil Aviation Organization.

(a)
Sense of Congress.— It is the sense of Congress that—
(1)
the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) should allow Taiwan to meaningfully participate in the organization, including in ICAO triennial assembly sessions, conferences, technical working groups, meetings, activities, and mechanisms;
(2)
Taiwan is a global leader and hub for international aviation, with a range of expertise, information, and resources and the fifth busiest airport in Asia (Taoyuan International Airport), and its meaningful participation in ICAO would significantly enhance the ability of ICAO to ensure the safety and security of global aviation; and
(3)
coercion by the Chinese Communist Party and the People’s Republic of China has ensured the systematic exclusion of Taiwan from meaningful participation in ICAO, significantly undermining the ability of ICAO to ensure the safety and security of global aviation.
(b)
Plan for Taiwan’s Meaningful Participation in the International Civil Aviation Organization.— The Secretary of State, in coordination with the Secretary of Commerce and the Secretary of Transportation, is authorized—
(1)
to initiate a United States plan to secure Taiwan’s meaningful participation in ICAO, including in ICAO triennial assembly sessions, conferences, technical working groups, meetings, activities, and mechanisms; and
(2)
to instruct the United States representative to the ICAO to—
(A)
use the voice and vote of the United States to ensure Taiwan’s meaningful participation in ICAO, including in ICAO triennial assembly sessions, conferences, technical working groups, meetings, activities, and mechanisms; and
(B)
seek to secure a vote at the next ICAO triennial assembly session on the question of Taiwan’s participation in that session.
(c)
Report Concerning Taiwan’s Meaningful Participation in the International Civil Aviation Organization.— Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and not later than April 1 of each year thereafter for the following 6 years, the Secretary of State, in coordination with the Secretary of Commerce, shall submit to the Committee on Foreign Relations and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs, the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives an unclassified report that—
(1)
describes the United States plan to ensure Taiwan’s meaningful participation in ICAO, including in ICAO triennial assembly sessions, conferences, technical working groups, meetings, activities, and mechanisms;
(2)
includes an account of the efforts made by the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Commerce to ensure Taiwan’s meaningful participation in ICAO, including in ICAO triennial assembly sessions, conferences, technical working groups, meetings, activities, and mechanisms; and
(3)
identifies the steps the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Commerce will take in the next year to ensure Taiwan’s meaningful participation in ICAO, including in ICAO triennial assembly sessions, conferences, technical working groups, meetings, activities, and mechanisms.

PART 4 Miscellaneous Provisions

SEC. 5520. Report on Taiwan Travel Act.

(a)
Appropriate Committees of Congress Defined.— In this section, the term “appropriate committees of Congress” means—
(1)
the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate;
(2)
the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate;
(3)
the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate;
(4)
the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives;
(5)
the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives; and
(6)
the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives.
(b)
List of High-level Visits.— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter for 5 years, the Secretary of State, in accordance with the Taiwan Travel Act (Public Law 115–135), shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress—
(1)
a list of high-level officials from the United States Government who have traveled to Taiwan on or after the date of the enactment of the Taiwan Travel Act; and
(2)
a list of high-level officials of Taiwan who have entered the United States on or after such date of enactment.
(c)
Annual Report.—
(1)
In general.— Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter for 5 years, the Secretary of State shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on the implementation of the Taiwan Travel Act (Public Law 115–135; 132 Stat. 341), including a discussion of its positive effects on United States interests in the region.
(2)
Form.— The report required under paragraph (1) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.

SEC. 5521. Amendments to the Taiwan Allies International Protection and Enhancement Initiative (taipei) Act of 2019.

The Taiwan Allies International Protection and Enhancement Initiative (TAIPEI) Act of 2019 (Public Law 116–135) is amended—
(1)
in section 2(5), by striking “ and Kiribati” and inserting “ Kiribati, and Nicaragua,”;
(2)
in section 4—
(A)
in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking “ should be” and inserting “ is”;
(B)
in paragraph (2), by striking “ and” at the end;
(C)
in paragraph (3), by striking the period at the end and inserting “ ; and”; and
(D)
by adding at the end the following:

“(4) to support Taiwan’s diplomatic relations with governments and countries”

; and

(3)
in section 5—
(A)
in subsection (a)—
(i)
in paragraph (2), by striking “ and” at the end;
(ii)
in paragraph (3), by striking the period at the end and inserting “ ; and”; and
(iii)
by adding at the end the following:

“(4) identify why governments and countries have altered their diplomatic status vis-a-vis Taiwan and make recommendations to mitigate further deterioration in Taiwan’s diplomatic relations with governments and countries.”

(B)
in subsection (b), by striking “ 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter for five years, the Secretary of State shall report” and inserting “ 90 days after the date of the enactment of the Taiwan Enhanced Resilience Act, and annually thereafter for the following 7 years, the Secretary of State shall submit an unclassified report, with a classified annex,”;
(C)
by redesignating subsection (c) as subsection (d); and
(D)
by inserting after subsection (b) the following:

“(c) Briefings.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of the Taiwan Enhanced Resilience Act, and annually thereafter for the following 7 years, the Secretary of State shall provide briefings to the appropriate congressional committees on the steps taken in accordance with section (a). The briefings required under this subsection shall take place in an unclassified setting, but may be accompanied by an additional classified briefing.”

SEC. 5522. Report on Role of People’s Republic of China’s Nuclear Threat in Escalation Dynamics.

(a)
Appropriate Congressional Committees Defined.— In this section, the term “appropriate congressional committees” means—
(1)
the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate;
(2)
the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate;
(3)
the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate;
(4)
the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives;
(5)
the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives; and
(6)
the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives.
(b)
In General.— Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of State, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense and the Director of National Intelligence, shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report assessing the role of the increasing nuclear threat of the People’s Republic of China in escalation dynamics with respect to Taiwan.
(c)
Form.— The report required by subsection (b) shall be submitted in classified form, but may include an unclassified summary.

SEC. 5523. Report Analyzing the Impact of Russia’s War Against Ukraine on the Objectives of the People’s Republic of China with Respect to Taiwan.

(a)
Appropriate Congressional Committees Defined.— In this section, the term “appropriate congressional committees” means—
(1)
the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate;
(2)
the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate;
(3)
the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate;
(4)
the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate;
(5)
the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate;
(6)
the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate;
(7)
the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives;
(8)
the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives;
(9)
the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives;
(10)
the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives;
(11)
the Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives; and
(12)
the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives.
(b)
In General.— Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of State, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense and the Director of National Intelligence, shall submit a report to the appropriate congressional committees that analyzes the impact of Russia’s war against Ukraine on the PRC’s diplomatic, military, economic, and propaganda objectives with respect to Taiwan.
(c)
Elements.— The report required by subsection (b) shall describe—
(1)
adaptations or known changes to PRC strategies and military doctrine that the United States assesses are a direct result of the Russian invasion of Ukraine or that the United States assesses represent lessons learned by the People’s Republic of China in light of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, including changes—
(A)
to PRC behavior in international forums;
(B)
within the People’s Liberation Army, with respect to the size of forces, the makeup of leadership, weapons procurement, equipment upkeep, the doctrine on the use of specific weapons, such as weapons banned under the international law of armed conflict, efforts to move weapons supply chains onto mainland PRC, or any other changes in its military strategy with respect to Taiwan;
(C)
in economic planning, such as sanctions evasion, efforts to minimize exposure to sanctions, or moves in support of the protection of currency or other strategic reserves;
(D)
to propaganda, disinformation, and other information operations originating in the PRC; and
(E)
to the PRC’s strategy for the use of force against Taiwan, including any information on preferred scenarios or operations to secure its objectives in Taiwan, adjustments based on how the Russian military has performed in Ukraine, and other relevant matters; and
(2)
United States plans to adapt policies and military planning in response to the changes referred to in paragraph (1).
(d)
Form.— The report required by subsection (b) shall be submitted in classified form.
(e)
Coordination With Allies and Partners.— The Secretary of State shall share information contained in the report required by subsection (b), as appropriate, with appropriate officials of allied and partners, including Taiwan and other partners in Europe and in the Indo-Pacific.

SEC. 5524. Expanding United States-Taiwan Development Cooperation.

(a)
In General.— No later than 120 days following the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of State, in consultation with the Administrator of the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), the United States International Development Finance Corporation (DFC), and the heads of other relevant Federal departments and agencies that provide international economic assistance and other support, shall submit to Congress a report on cooperation with Taiwan on trilateral and multilateral development initiatives through the American Institute in Taiwan as appropriate.
(b)
Matters to Be Included.— The report required by subsection (a) shall include the following elements:
(1)
A comprehensive review of existing cooperation mechanisms and initiatives among USAID, DFC, other relevant Federal agencies that provide international economic assistance and other support, and relevant departments and agencies in Taiwan, including Taiwan’s International Cooperation and Development Fund (ICDF).
(2)
An assessment of how United States development cooperation with relevant departments and agencies in Taiwan compares to comparable cooperation with partners of similar economic size and foreign assistance capacity to Taiwan.
(3)
An analysis of the opportunities and challenges the cooperation reviewed in paragraph (1) has offered to date. The analysis shall include—
(A)
opportunities that collaboration has offered to expand the United States Government’s ability to deliver support, assistance, and other international financial products into a wider range communities;
(B)
sectors where USAID, DFC, ICDF, other relevant Federal agencies that provide international economic assistance and other support in both Taiwan and the United States, or the organizations’ implementing partners have a comparative advantage in providing assistance;
(C)
opportunities to transition capacity building events with relevant departments and agencies in Taiwan, through the Global Cooperation and Training Framework as well as other forums, into enduring forms of development cooperation.
(4)
An assessment of any legal, policy, logistical, financial, or administrative barriers to expanding cooperation in trilateral or multilateral development. The analysis shall include—
(A)
availability of personnel at the American Institute in Taiwan responsible for coordinating development assistance cooperation;
(B)
volume of current cooperation initiatives and barriers to expanding them;
(C)
diplomatic, policy, or legal barriers facing the United States or other partners to including Taiwan in formal and informal multilateral development cooperation mechanisms;
(D)
resource or capacity barriers to expanding cooperation facing the United States or Taiwan; and
(E)
geopolitical barriers that complicate United States-Taiwan cooperation in third countries.
(5)
Recommendations to address the challenges identified in paragraph (4).
(6)
A description of any additional resources or authorities that expanding cooperation might require.
(c)
Form of Report.— The strategy required under subsection (a) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.

SEC. 5525. Sense of Congress on Expanding United States Economic Relations with Taiwan.

It is the sense of the Congress that—
(1)
expanding United States economic relations with Taiwan has benefitted the people of both the United States and Taiwan, as Taiwan is now the United States 10th largest goods trading partner, 13th largest export market, 13th largest source of imports, and a key destination for United States agricultural exports;
(2)
further integration would benefit both peoples and is in the strategic and diplomatic interests of the United States; and
(3)
the United States should explore opportunities to expand economic agreements between Taiwan and the United States, through dialogue, and by developing the legal templates required to support potential future agreements.

PART 5 Supporting United States Educational and Exchange Programs with Taiwan

SEC. 5526. Short Title.

This part may be cited as the “Taiwan Fellowship Act”.

SEC. 5527. Findings.

Congress makes the following findings:
(1)
The Taiwan Relations Act (Public Law 96–8; 22 U.S.C. 3301 et seq.) affirmed United States policy “to preserve and promote extensive, close, and friendly commercial, cultural, and other relations between the people of the United States and the people on Taiwan, as well as the people on the China mainland and all other peoples of the Western Pacific area”.
(2)
Consistent with the Asia Reassurance Initiative Act of 2018 (Public Law 115–409), the United States has grown its strategic partnership with Taiwan’s vibrant democracy of 23,000,000 people.
(3)
The creation of a United States fellowship program with Taiwan would support—
(A)
a key priority of expanding people-to-people exchanges, which was outlined in President Donald J. Trump’s 2017 National Security Strategy;
(B)
President Joseph R. Biden’s commitment to Taiwan, “a leading democracy and a critical economic and security partner”, as expressed in his March 2021 Interim National Security Strategic Guidance; and
(C)
April 2021 guidance from the Department of State based on a review required under the Taiwan Assurance Act of 2020 (subtitle B of title III of division FF of Public Law 116–260) to “encourage U.S. government engagement with Taiwan that reflects our deepening unofficial relationship”.

SEC. 5528. Purposes.

The purposes of this part are—
(1)
to further strengthen the United States-Taiwan strategic partnership and broaden understanding of the Indo-Pacific region by temporarily assigning officials of any agencies of the United States Government to Taiwan for intensive study in Mandarin and placement as Fellows in a Taiwanese civic institution;
(2)
to provide for eligible United States personnel—
(A)
to learn or strengthen Mandarin Chinese language skills; and
(B)
to expand their understanding of the political economy of Taiwan and the Indo-Pacific region; and
(3)
to better position the United States to advance its economic, security, and human rights interests and values in the Indo-Pacific region.

SEC. 5529. Definitions.

In this part:
(1)
Agency head.— The term “agency head” means, in the case of the executive branch of United States Government or a legislative branch agency described in paragraph (2), the head of the respective agency.
(2)
Agency of the united states government.— The term “agency of the United States Government” includes the Government Accountability Office, the Congressional Budget Office, and the Congressional Research Service of the legislative branch, as well as any agency of the executive branch.
(3)
Appropriate committees of congress.— The term “appropriate committees of Congress” means—
(A)
the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate;
(B)
the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate;
(C)
the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives; and
(D)
the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives.
(4)
Detailee.— The term “detailee” means—
(A)
an employee of an agency of the United States Government on loan to the American Institute in Taiwan, without a change of position from the agency at which the employee is employed; and
(B)
a legislative branch employee from the Government Accountability Office, Congressional Budget Office, or the Congressional Research Service.
(5)
Implementing partner.— The term “implementing partner” means any United States organization described in section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 that—
(A)
performs logistical, administrative, and other functions, as determined by the Department of State and the American Institute of Taiwan in support of the Taiwan Fellowship Program; and
(B)
enters into a cooperative agreement with the American Institute in Taiwan to administer the Taiwan Fellowship Program.
(6)
Program.— The term “Program” means the Taiwan Fellowship Program established pursuant to section 5530.

SEC. 5530. Taiwan Fellowship Program.

(a)
Establishment.— The Secretary of State shall establish the Taiwan Fellowship Program (referred to in this section as the “Program”) to provide a fellowship opportunity in Taiwan of up to 2 years for eligible United States citizens. The Department of State, in consultation with the American Institute in Taiwan and the implementing partner, may modify the name of the Program.
(b)
Cooperative Agreement.—
(1)
In general.— The American Institute in Taiwan should use amounts appropriated pursuant to section 5533(a) to enter into an annual or multi-year cooperative agreement with an appropriate implementing partner.
(2)
Fellowships.— The Department of State or the American Institute in Taiwan, in consultation with, as appropriate, the implementing partner, should award to eligible United States citizens, subject to available funding—
(A)
approximately 5 fellowships during the first 2 years of the Program; and
(B)
approximately 10 fellowships during each of the remaining years of the Program.
(c)
American Institution in Taiwan Agreement; Implementing Partner.— Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the American Institute in Taiwan, in consultation with the Department of State, should—
(1)
begin negotiations with the Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Office, or with another appropriate entity, for the purpose of entering into an agreement to facilitate the placement of fellows in an agency of Taiwan; and
(2)
begin the process of selecting an implementing partner, which—
(A)
shall agree to meet all of the legal requirements required to operate in Taiwan; and
(B)
shall be composed of staff who demonstrate significant experience managing exchange programs in the Indo-Pacific region.
(d)
Curriculum.—
(1)
First year.— During the first year of each fellowship under this section, each fellow should study—
(A)
the Mandarin Chinese language;
(B)
the people, history, and political climate on Taiwan; and
(C)
the issues affecting the relationship between the United States and the Indo-Pacific region.
(2)
Second year.— During the second year of each fellowship under this section, each fellow, subject to the approval of the Department of State, the American Institute in Taiwan, and the implementing partner, and in accordance with the purposes of this subtitle, should work in—
(A)
a parliamentary office, ministry, or other agency of Taiwan; or
(B)
an organization outside the public sector in Taiwan, whose interests are associated with the interests of the fellow and the agency of the United States Government from which the fellow is or had been employed.
(e)
Program Requirements.—
(1)
Eligibility requirements.— A United States citizen is eligible for a fellowship under this section if the citizen—
(A)
is an employee of the United States Government;
(B)
has received at least one exemplary performance review in his or her current United States Government role within at least the last three years prior to beginning the fellowship;
(C)
has at least 2 years of experience in any branch of the United States Government;
(D)
has a demonstrated professional or educational background in the relationship between the United States and countries in the Indo-Pacific region; and
(E)
has demonstrated his or her commitment to further service in the United States Government.
(2)
Responsibilities of fellows.— Each recipient of a fellowship under this section shall agree, as a condition of such fellowship—
(A)
to maintain satisfactory progress in language training and appropriate behavior in Taiwan, consistent with United States Government policy toward Taiwan, as determined by the Department of State, the American Institute in Taiwan and, as appropriate, its implementing partner;
(B)
to refrain from engaging in any intelligence or intelligence-related activity on behalf of the United States Government; and
(C)
to continue Federal Government employment for a period of not less than 4 years after the conclusion of the fellowship or for not less than 2 years for a fellowship that is 1 year or shorter.
(3)
Responsibilities of implementing partner.—
(A)
Selection of fellows.— The implementing partner, with the concurrence of the Department of State and the American Institute in Taiwan, shall—
(i)
make efforts to recruit fellowship candidates who reflect the diversity of the United States;
(ii)
select fellows for the Taiwan Fellowship Program based solely on merit, with appropriate supervision from the Department of State and the American Institute in Taiwan; and
(iii)
prioritize the selection of candidates willing to serve in a fellowship lasting 1 year or longer.
(B)
First year.— The implementing partner should provide each fellow in the first year (or shorter duration, as jointly determined by the Department of State and the American Institute in Taiwan for those who are not serving a 2-year fellowship) with—
(i)
intensive Mandarin Chinese language training; and
(ii)
courses in the politics, culture, and history of Taiwan, China, and the broader Indo-Pacific.
(C)
Waiver of first-year training.— The Department of State, in coordination with the American Institute in Taiwan and, as appropriate, the implementing partner, may waive any of the training required under paragraph (2) to the extent that a fellow has Mandarin language skills, knowledge of the topic described in subparagraph (B)(ii), or for other related reasons approved by the Department of State and the American Institute in Taiwan. If any of the training requirements are waived for a fellow serving a 2-year fellowship, the training portion of his or her fellowship may be shortened to the extent appropriate.
(D)
Office; staffing.— The implementing partner, in consultation with the Department of State and the American Institute in Taiwan, may maintain an office and at least 1 full-time staff member in Taiwan—
(i)
to liaise with the American Institute in Taiwan and institutions of Taiwan; and
(ii)
to serve as the primary in-country point of contact for the recipients of fellowships under this part and their dependents.
(E)
Other functions.— The implementing partner may perform other functions in association with support of the Taiwan Fellowship Program, including logistical and administrative functions, as prescribed by the Department of State and the American Institute in Taiwan.
(4)
Noncompliance.—
(A)
In general.— Any fellow who fails to comply with the requirements under this section shall reimburse the American Institute in Taiwan, or the appropriate United States Government agency for—
(i)
the Federal funds expended for the fellow’s participation in the fellowship, as set forth in subparagraphs (B) and (C); and
(ii)
interest accrued on such funds (calculated at the prevailing rate).
(B)
Full reimbursement.— Any fellow who violates subparagraph (A) or (B) of paragraph (2) shall reimburse the American Institute in Taiwan, or the appropriate United States Government agency, in an amount equal to the sum of—
(i)
all of the Federal funds expended for the fellow’s participation in the fellowship; and
(ii)
interest on the amount specified in subparagraph (A), which shall be calculated at the prevailing rate.
(C)
Pro rata reimbursement.— Any fellow who violates subparagraph (C) of paragraph (2) shall reimburse the American Institute in Taiwan, or the appropriate United States Government agency, in an amount equal to the difference between—
(i)
the amount specified in subparagraph (B); and
(ii)
the product of—
(I)
the amount the fellow received in compensation during the final year of the fellowship, including the value of any allowances and benefits received by the fellow; multiplied by
(II)
the percentage of the period specified in paragraph (2)(C) during which the fellow did not remain employed by the Federal Government.
(f)
Flexible Fellowship Duration.— Notwithstanding any requirement under this section, the Secretary of State, in consultation with the American Institute in Taiwan and, as appropriate, the implementing partner, may award fellowships that have a duration of less than 2 years, and may alter the curriculum requirements under subsection (d) for such purposes.
(g)
Sunset.— The fellowship program under this part shall terminate 7 years after the date of the enactment of this Act.

SEC. 5531. Reports and Audits.

(a)
Annual Report.— Not later than 90 days after the selection of the first class of fellows under this part, and annually thereafter for 7 years, the Department of State shall offer to brief the appropriate committees of Congress regarding the following issues:
(1)
An assessment of the performance of the implementing partner in fulfilling the purposes of this part.
(2)
The names and sponsoring agencies of the fellows selected by the implementing partner and the extent to which such fellows represent the diversity of the United States.
(3)
The names of the parliamentary offices, ministries, other agencies of Taiwan, and nongovernmental institutions to which each fellow was assigned during the second year of the fellowship.
(4)
Any recommendations, as appropriate, to improve the implementation of the Taiwan Fellowship Program, including added flexibilities in the administration of the program.
(5)
An assessment of the Taiwan Fellowship Program’s value upon the relationship between the United States and Taiwan or the United States and Asian countries.
(b)
Annual Financial Audit.—
(1)
In general.— The financial records of any implementing partner shall be audited annually in accordance with generally accepted government auditing standards by independent certified public accountants or independent licensed public accountants who are certified or licensed by a regulatory authority of a State or another political subdivision of the United States.
(2)
Location.— Each audit under paragraph (1) shall be conducted at the place or places where the financial records of the implementing partner are normally kept.
(3)
Access to documents.— The implementing partner shall make available to the accountants conducting an audit under paragraph (1)—
(A)
all books, financial records, files, other papers, things, and property belonging to, or in use by, the implementing partner that are necessary to facilitate the audit; and
(B)
full facilities for verifying transactions with the balances or securities held by depositories, fiscal agents, and custodians.
(4)
Report.—
(A)
In general.— Not later than 270 days after the end of each fiscal year, the implementing partner shall provide a report of the audit conducted for such fiscal year under paragraph (1) to the Department of State and the American Institute in Taiwan.
(B)
Contents.— Each audit report shall—
(i)
set forth the scope of the audit;
(ii)
include such statements, along with the auditor’s opinion of those statements, as may be necessary to present fairly the implementing partner’s assets and liabilities, surplus or deficit, with reasonable detail;
(iii)
include a statement of the implementing partner’s income and expenses during the year; and
(iv)
include a schedule of—
(I)
all contracts and cooperative agreements requiring payments greater than $5,000; and
(II)
any payments of compensation, salaries, or fees at a rate greater than $5,000 per year.
(C)
Copies.— Each audit report shall be produced in sufficient copies for distribution to the public.

SEC. 5532. Taiwan Fellows on Detail from Government Service.

(a)
In General.—
(1)
Detail authorized.— With the approval of the Secretary of State, an agency head may detail, for a period of not more than 2 years, an employee of the agency of the United States Government who has been awarded a fellowship under this part, to the American Institute in Taiwan for the purpose of assignment to Taiwan or an organization described in section 5530(d)(2)(B).
(2)
Agreement.— Each detailee shall enter into a written agreement with the Federal Government before receiving a fellowship, in which the fellow shall agree—
(A)
to continue in the service of the sponsoring agency at the end of fellowship for a period of at least 4 years (or at least 2 years if the fellowship duration is 1 year or shorter) unless the detailee is involuntarily separated from the service of such agency; and
(B)
to pay to the American Institute in Taiwan, or the United States Government agency, as appropriate, any additional expenses incurred by the Federal Government in connection with the fellowship if the detailee voluntarily separates from service with the sponsoring agency before the end of the period for which the detailee has agreed to continue in the service of such agency.
(3)
Exception.— The payment agreed to under paragraph (2)(B) may not be required from a detailee who leaves the service of the sponsoring agency to enter into the service of another agency of the United States Government unless the head of the sponsoring agency notifies the detailee before the effective date of entry into the service of the other agency that payment will be required under this subsection.
(b)
Status as Government Employee.— A detailee—
(1)
is deemed, for the purpose of preserving allowances, privileges, rights, seniority, and other benefits, to be an employee of the sponsoring agency;
(2)
is entitled to pay, allowances, and benefits from funds available to such agency, which is deemed to comply with section 5536 of title 5, United States Code; and
(3)
may be assigned to a position with an entity described in section 5530(d)(2)(A) if acceptance of such position does not involve—
(A)
the taking of an oath of allegiance to another government; or
(B)
the acceptance of compensation or other benefits from any foreign government by such detailee.
(c)
Responsibilities of Sponsoring Agency.—
(1)
In general.— The Federal agency from which a detailee is detailed should provide the fellow allowances and benefits that are consistent with Department of State Standardized Regulations or other applicable rules and regulations, including—
(A)
a living quarters allowance to cover the cost of housing in Taiwan;
(B)
a cost of living allowance to cover any possible higher costs of living in Taiwan;
(C)
a temporary quarters subsistence allowance for up to 7 days if the fellow is unable to find housing immediately upon arriving in Taiwan;
(D)
an education allowance to assist parents in providing the fellow’s minor children with educational services ordinarily provided without charge by public schools in the United States;
(E)
moving expenses to transport personal belongings of the fellow and his or her family in their move to Taiwan, which is comparable to the allowance given for American Institute in Taiwan employees assigned to Taiwan; and
(F)
an economy-class airline ticket to and from Taiwan for each fellow and the fellow’s immediate family.
(2)
Modification of benefits.— The American Institute in Taiwan and its implementing partner, with the approval of the Department of State, may modify the benefits set forth in paragraph (1) if such modification is warranted by fiscal circumstances.
(d)
No Financial Liability.— The American Institute in Taiwan, the implementing partner, and Taiwan or non-public sector entities in Taiwan at which a fellow is detailed during the second year of the fellowship may not be held responsible for the pay, allowances, or any other benefit normally provided to the detailee.
(e)
Reimbursement.— Fellows may be detailed under subsection (a)(1) without reimbursement to the United States by the American Institute in Taiwan.
(f)
Allowances and Benefits.— Detailees may be paid by the American Institute in Taiwan for the allowances and benefits listed in subsection (c).

SEC. 5533. Funding.

(a)
Authorization of Appropriations.— There are authorized to be appropriated to the American Institute in Taiwan—
(1)
for fiscal year 2023, $2,900,000, of which—
(A)
$500,000 should be used to launch the Taiwan Fellowship Program through a competitive cooperative agreement with an appropriate implementing partner;
(B)
$2,300,000 should be used to fund a cooperative agreement with an appropriate implementing partner; and
(C)
$100,000 should be used for management expenses of the American Institute in Taiwan related to the management of the Taiwan Fellowship Program; and
(2)
for fiscal year 2024, and each succeeding fiscal year, $2,400,000, of which—
(A)
$2,300,000 should be used for a cooperative agreement to the appropriate implementing partner; and
(B)
$100,000 should be used for management expenses of the American Institute in Taiwan related to the management of the Taiwan Fellowship Program.
(b)
Private Sources.— The implementing partner selected to implement the Taiwan Fellowship Program may accept, use, and dispose of gifts or donations of services or property in carrying out such program, subject to the review and approval of the American Institute in Taiwan.

SEC. 5534. Study and Report.

Not later than 1 year prior to the sunset of the fellowship program under section 5530(g), the Comptroller General of the United States shall conduct a study and submit to the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House a report that includes—
(1)
an analysis of the United States Government participants in this program, including the number of applicants and the number of fellowships undertaken, the place of employment, and an assessment of the costs and benefits for participants and for the United States Government of such fellowships;
(2)
an analysis of the financial impact of the fellowship on United States Government offices which have provided fellows to participate in the program; and
(3)
recommendations, if any, on how to improve the fellowship program.

SEC. 5535. Supporting United States Educational and Exchange Programs with Taiwan.

(a)
Establishment of the United States-Taiwan Cultural Exchange Foundation.— The Secretary of State should consider establishing an independent nonprofit entity that—
(1)
is dedicated to deepening ties between the future leaders of Taiwan and the future leaders of the United States; and
(2)
works with State and local school districts and educational institutions to send high school and university students to Taiwan to study the Chinese language, culture, history, politics, and other relevant subjects.
(b)
Partner.— State and local school districts and educational institutions, including public universities, are encouraged to partner with the Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Office in the United States to establish programs to promote more educational and cultural exchanges.

PART 6 United States-Taiwan Public Health Protection

SEC. 5536. Short Title.

This part may be cited as “United States-Taiwan Public Health Protection Act”.

SEC. 5537. Definitions.

In this part:
(1)
Appropriate congressional committees.— For the purposes of this part, the term “appropriate congressional committees” means—
(A)
the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate;
(B)
the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions of the Senate;
(C)
the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate;
(D)
the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives;
(E)
the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives; and
(F)
the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives.
(2)
Center.— The term “Center” means the Infectious Disease Monitoring Center described in section 5538(a)(2).

SEC. 5538. Study on an Infectious Disease Monitoring Center.

(a)
Study.— Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Health and Human Services, in consultation with the heads of other relevant Federal departments and agencies, shall submit to appropriate congressional committees a study that includes the following:
(1)
A description of ongoing cooperation between the United States Government and Taiwan related to public health, including public health activities supported by the United States in Taiwan.
(2)
A description how the United States and Taiwan can promote further cooperation and expand public health activities, including the feasibility and utility of establishing an Infectious Disease Monitoring Center within the American Institute of Taiwan in Taipei, Taiwan to—
(A)
regularly monitor, analyze, and disseminate open-source material from countries in the region, including viral strains, bacterial subtypes, and other pathogens;
(B)
engage in people-to-people contacts with medical specialists and public health officials in the region;
(C)
provide expertise and information on infectious diseases to the United States Government and Taiwanese officials; and
(D)
carry out other appropriate activities, as determined by the Director of the Center.
(b)
Elements.— The study required by subsection (a) shall include—
(1)
a plan on how such a Center would be established and operationalized, including—
(A)
the personnel, material, and funding requirements necessary to establish and operate the Center; and
(B)
the proposed structure and composition of Center personnel, which may include—
(i)
infectious disease experts from the Department of Health and Human Services, who are recommended to serve as detailees to the Center; and
(ii)
additional qualified persons to serve as detailees to or employees of the Center, including—
(I)
from any other relevant Federal department or agencies, to include the Department of State and the United States Agency for International Development;
(II)
qualified foreign service nationals or locally engaged staff who are considered citizens of Taiwan; and
(III)
employees of the Taiwan Centers for Disease Control;
(2)
an evaluation, based on the factors in paragraph (1), of whether to establish the Center; and
(3)
a description of any consultations or agreements between the American Institute in Taiwan and the Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Office in the United States regarding the establishment and operation of the Center, including—
(A)
the role that employees of the Taiwan Centers for Disease Control would play in supporting or coordinating with the Center; and
(B)
whether any employees of the Taiwan Centers for Disease Control would be detailed to, or co-located with, the Center.
(c)
Consultation.— The Secretary of State and the Secretary of Health and Human Services shall consult with the appropriate congressional committees before full completion of the study.

PART 7 Rules of Construction

SEC. 5539. Rule of Construction.

Nothing in this subtitle may be construed—
(1)
to restore diplomatic relations with the Republic of China; or
(2)
to alter the United States Government’s position with respect to the international status of the Republic of China.

SEC. 5540. Rule of Construction Regarding the Use of Military Force.

Nothing in this title may be construed as authorizing the use of military force or the introduction of United States forces into hostilities.

Subtitle B United States-Ecuador Partnership Act of 2022

SEC. 5541. Short Title.

This subtitle may be cited as the “United States-Ecuador Partnership Act of 2022”.

SEC. 5542. Sense of Congress.

It is the sense of Congress that—
(1)
the United States should take additional steps to strengthen its bilateral partnership with Ecuador, including by providing for robust trade and investment, increasing law enforcement cooperation, renewing the activities of the United States Agency for International Development in Ecuador, and supporting Ecuador’s response to and recovery from the COVID–19 pandemic, as necessary and appropriate; and
(2)
strengthening the United States-Ecuador partnership presents an opportunity to advance core United States national security interests and work with other democratic partners to maintain a prosperous, politically stable, and democratic Western Hemisphere that is resilient to malign foreign influence.

SEC. 5543. Facilitating Economic and Commercial Ties.

The Secretary of State, in coordination with the Secretary of Commerce, the United States Trade Representative, the Secretary of the Treasury, and the heads of other relevant Federal departments and agencies, as appropriate, shall develop and implement a strategy to strengthen commercial and economic ties between the United States and Ecuador by—
(1)
promoting cooperation and information sharing to encourage awareness of and increase trade and investment opportunities between the United States and Ecuador;
(2)
supporting efforts by the Government of Ecuador to promote a more open, transparent, and competitive business environment, including by lowering trade barriers, implementing policies to reduce trading times, and improving efficiencies to expedite customs operations for importers and exporters of all sizes, in all sectors, and at all ports of entry in Ecuador;
(3)
establishing frameworks or mechanisms to review the long term financial sustainability and security implications of foreign investments in Ecuador in strategic sectors or services;
(4)
establishing competitive and transparent infrastructure project selection and procurement processes in Ecuador that promote transparency, open competition, financial sustainability, and robust adherence to global standards and norms;
(5)
developing programs to help the Government of Ecuador improve efficiency and transparency in customs administration, including through support for the Government of Ecuador’s ongoing efforts to digitize its customs process and accept electronic documents required for the import, export, and transit of goods under specific international standards, as well as related training to expedite customs, security, efficiency, and competitiveness;
(6)
spurring digital transformation that would advance—
(A)
the provision of digitized government services with the greatest potential to improve transparency, lower business costs, and expand citizens’ access to public services and public information; and
(B)
best practices to mitigate the risks to digital infrastructure by doing business with communication networks and communications supply chains with equipment and services from companies with close ties to or susceptible to pressure from governments or security services without reliable legal checks on governmental powers; and
(7)
identifying, as appropriate, a role for the United States International Development Finance Corporation, the Millennium Challenge Corporation, the United States Agency for International Development, and the United States private sector in supporting efforts to increase private sector investment and strengthen economic prosperity.

SEC. 5544. Promoting Inclusive Economic Development.

The Administrator of the United States Agency for International Development, in coordination with the Secretary of State and the heads of other relevant Federal departments and agencies, as appropriate, shall develop and implement a strategy and related programs to support inclusive economic development across Ecuador’s national territory by—
(1)
facilitating increased access to public and private financing, equity investments, grants, and market analysis for small and medium-sized businesses;
(2)
providing technical assistance to local governments to formulate and enact local development plans that invest in Indigenous and Afro-Ecuadorian communities;
(3)
connecting rural agricultural networks, including Indigenous and Afro-Ecuadorian agricultural networks, to consumers in urban centers and export markets, including through infrastructure construction and maintenance programs that are subject to audits and carefully designed to minimize potential environmental harm;
(4)
partnering with local governments, the private sector, and local civil society organizations, including organizations representing marginalized communities and faith-based organizations, to provide skills training and investment in support of initiatives that provide economically viable, legal alternatives to participating in illegal economies; and
(5)
connecting small scale fishing enterprises to consumers and export markets, in order to reduce vulnerability to organized criminal networks.

SEC. 5545. Combating Illicit Economies, Corruption, and Negative Foreign Influence.

The Secretary of State, in coordination with the Secretary of the Treasury, shall develop and implement a strategy and related programs to increase the capacity of Ecuador’s justice system and law enforcement authorities to combat illicit economies, corruption, transnational criminal organizations, and the harmful influence of malign foreign and domestic actors by—
(1)
providing technical assistance and material support (including, as appropriate, radars, vessels, and communications equipment) to vetted specialized units of Ecuador’s national police and the armed services to disrupt, degrade, and dismantle organizations involved in illicit narcotics trafficking, transnational criminal activities, illicit mining, and illegal, unregulated, and unreported fishing, among other illicit activities;
(2)
providing technical assistance to address challenges related to Ecuador’s penitentiary and corrections system;
(3)
strengthening the regulatory framework of mining through collaboration with key Ecuadorian institutions, such as the Interior Ministry’s Special Commission for the Control of Illegal Mining and the National Police’s Investigative Unit on Mining Crimes, and providing technical assistance in support of their law enforcement activities;
(4)
providing technical assistance to judges, prosecutors, and ombudsmen to increase capacity to enforce laws against human smuggling and trafficking, illicit mining, illegal logging, illegal, unregulated, and unreported (IUU) fishing, and other illicit economic activities;
(5)
providing support to the Government of Ecuador to prevent illegal, unreported, and unregulated fishing, including through expanding detection and response capabilities, and the use of dark vessel tracing technology;
(6)
supporting multilateral efforts to stem illegal, unreported, and unregulated fishing with neighboring countries in South America and within the South Pacific Regional Fisheries Management Organisation;
(7)
assisting the Government of Ecuador’s efforts to protect defenders of internationally recognized human rights, including through the work of the Office of the Ombudsman of Ecuador, and by encouraging the inclusion of Indigenous and Afro-Ecuadorian communities and civil society organizations in this process;
(8)
supporting efforts to improve transparency, uphold accountability, and build capacity within the Office of the Comptroller General;
(9)
enhancing the institutional capacity and technical capabilities of defense and security institutions of Ecuador to conduct national or regional security missions, including through regular bilateral and multilateral cooperation, foreign military financing, international military education, and training programs, consistent with applicable Ecuadorian laws and regulations;
(10)
enhancing port management and maritime security partnerships to disrupt, degrade, and dismantle transnational criminal networks and facilitate the legitimate flow of people, goods, and services; and
(11)
strengthening cybersecurity cooperation—
(A)
to effectively respond to cybersecurity threats, including state-sponsored threats;
(B)
to share best practices to combat such threats;
(C)
to help develop and implement information architectures that respect individual privacy rights and reduce the risk that data collected through such systems will be exploited by malign state and non-state actors;
(D)
to strengthen resilience against cyberattacks; and
(E)
to strengthen the resilience of critical infrastructure.

SEC. 5546. Strengthening Democratic Governance.

(a)
Strengthening Democratic Governance.— The Secretary of State, in coordination with the Administrator of the United States Agency for International Development, should develop and implement initiatives to strengthen democratic governance in Ecuador by supporting—
(1)
measures to improve the capacity of national and subnational government institutions to govern through transparent, inclusive, and democratic processes;
(2)
efforts that measurably enhance the capacity of political actors and parties to strengthen democratic institutions and the rule of law;
(3)
initiatives to strengthen democratic governance, including combating political, administrative, and judicial corruption and improving transparency of the administration of public budgets; and
(4)
the efforts of civil society organizations and independent media—
(A)
to conduct oversight of the Government of Ecuador and the National Assembly of Ecuador;
(B)
to promote initiatives that strengthen democratic governance, anti-corruption standards, and public and private sector transparency; and
(C)
to foster political engagement between the Government of Ecuador, including the National Assembly of Ecuador, and all parts of Ecuadorian society, including women, indigenous communities, and Afro-Ecuadorian communities.
(b)
Legislative Strengthening.— The Administrator of the United States Agency for International Development, working through the Consortium for Elections and Political Process Strengthening or any equivalent or successor mechanism, shall develop and implement programs to strengthen the National Assembly of Ecuador by providing training and technical assistance to—
(1)
members and committee offices of the National Assembly of Ecuador, including the Ethics Committee and Audit Committee;
(2)
assist in the creation of entities that can offer comprehensive and independent research and analysis on legislative and oversight matters pending before the National Assembly, including budgetary and economic issues; and
(3)
improve democratic governance and government transparency, including through effective legislation.
(c)
Bilateral Legislative Cooperation.— To the degree practicable, in implementing the programs required under subsection (b), the Administrator of the United States Agency for International Development should facilitate meetings and collaboration between members of the United States Congress and the National Assembly of Ecuador.

SEC. 5547. Fostering Conservation and Stewardship.

The Administrator of the United States Agency for International Development, in coordination with the Secretary of State and the heads of other relevant Federal departments and agencies, shall develop and implement programs and enhance existing programs, as necessary and appropriate, to improve ecosystem conservation and enhance the effective stewardship of Ecuador’s natural resources by—
(1)
providing technical assistance to Ecuador’s Ministry of the Environment to safeguard national parks and protected forests and protected species, while promoting the participation of Indigenous communities in this process;
(2)
strengthening the capacity of communities to access the right to prior consultation, encoded in Article 57 of the Constitution of Ecuador and related laws, executive decrees, administrative acts, and ministerial regulations;
(3)
supporting Indigenous and Afro-Ecuadorian communities as they raise awareness of threats to biodiverse ancestral lands, including through support for local media in such communities and technical assistance to monitor illicit activities;
(4)
partnering with the Government of Ecuador in support of reforestation and improving river, lake, and coastal water quality;
(5)
providing assistance to communities affected by illegal mining and deforestation; and
(6)
fostering mechanisms for cooperation on emergency preparedness and rapid recovery from natural disasters, including by—
(A)
establishing regional preparedness, recovery, and emergency management centers to facilitate rapid response to survey and help maintain planning on regional disaster anticipated needs and possible resources; and
(B)
training disaster recovery officials on latest techniques and lessons learned from United States experiences.

SEC. 5548. Authorization to Transfer Excess Coast Guard Vessels.

(a)
Sense of Congress.— It is the sense of Congress that the United States should undertake efforts to expand cooperation with the Government of Ecuador to—
(1)
ensure protections for the Galápagos Marine Reserve;
(2)
deter illegal, unreported, and unregulated fishing; and
(3)
increase interdiction of narcotics trafficking and other forms of illicit trafficking.
(b)
Authority to Transfer Excess Coast Guard Vessels to the Government of Ecuador.— The President shall conduct a joint assessment with the Government of Ecuador to ensure sufficient capacity exists to maintain Island class cutters. Upon completion of a favorable assessment, the President is authorized to transfer up to two ISLAND class cutters to the Government of Ecuador as excess defense articles pursuant to the authority of section 516 of the Foreign Assistance Act (22 U.S.C. 2321j).
(c)
Grants Not Counted in Annual Total of Transferred Excess Defense Articles.— The value of a vessel transferred to another country on a grant basis pursuant to authority provided by subsection (b) shall not be counted against the aggregate value of excess defense articles transferred in any fiscal year under section 516 of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2321j).
(d)
Costs of Transfers.— Any expense incurred by the United States in connection with a transfer authorized by this section shall be charged to the recipient notwithstanding section 516(e) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2321j(e)).
(e)
Repair and Refurbishment in United States Shipyards.— To the maximum extent practicable, the President shall require, as a condition of the transfer of a vessel under this section, that the recipient to which the vessel is transferred have such repair or refurbishment of the vessel as is needed, before the vessel joins the naval forces of that recipient, performed at a shipyard located in the United States.
(f)
Expiration of Authority.— The authority to transfer a vessel under this section shall expire at the end of the 3-year period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act.

SEC. 5549. Reporting Requirements.

(a)
Secretary of State.— The Secretary of State, in coordination with the heads of other relevant Federal departments and agencies as described in sections 5543, 5545, and 5546(a), shall—
(1)
not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, submit to the appropriate congressional committees a comprehensive strategy to address the requirements described in sections 5543, 5545, and 5546(a); and
(2)
not later than 2 years and 4 years after submitting the comprehensive strategy under paragraph (1), submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report describing the implementation of the strategy.
(b)
Administrator of the United States Agency for International Development.— The Administrator of the United States Agency for International Development, in coordination with the heads of other relevant Federal departments and agencies as described in sections 5544, 5546(b), and 5547, shall—
(1)
not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, submit to appropriate congressional committees a comprehensive strategy to address the requirements described in sections 5544, 5546(b) and 5547; and
(2)
not later than 2 years and 4 years after submitting the comprehensive strategy under paragraph (1), submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report describing the implementation of the strategy.
(c)
Submission.— The strategies and reports required under subsections (a) and (b) may be submitted to the appropriate congressional committees as joint strategies and reports.
(d)
Appropriate Congressional Committees.— In this subtitle, the term “appropriate congressional committees” means the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs and the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives.

SEC. 5550. Sunset.

This subtitle shall terminate on the date that is 5 years after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Subtitle C FENTANYL Results Act

SEC. 5551. Short Title.

This subtitle may be cited as the “Fighting Emerging Narcotics Through Additional Nations to Yield Lasting Results Act” or the “FENTANYL Results Act”.

SEC. 5552. Prioritization of Efforts of the Department of State to Combat International Trafficking in Covered Synthetic Drugs.

(a)
In General.— The Secretary of State shall prioritize efforts of the Department of State to combat international trafficking of covered synthetic drugs by carrying out programs and activities to include the following:
(1)
Supporting increased data collection by the United States and foreign countries through increased drug use surveys among populations, increased use of wastewater testing where appropriate, and multilateral sharing of that data.
(2)
Engaging in increased consultation and partnership with international drug agencies, including the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction, regulatory agencies in foreign countries, and the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime.
(3)
Carrying out programs to provide technical assistance and equipment, as appropriate, to strengthen the capacity of foreign law enforcement agencies with respect to covered synthetic drugs, as required by section 5553.
(4)
Carrying out exchange programs for governmental and nongovernmental personnel in the United States and in foreign countries to provide educational and professional development on demand reduction matters relating to the illicit use of covered synthetic drugs and other drugs, as required by section 5554.
(b)
Report.—
(1)
In general.— Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of State shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on the implementation of this section.
(2)
Appropriate congressional committees defined.— In this subsection, the term “appropriate congressional committees” means—
(A)
the Committee on Foreign Relations, the Committee on Appropriations, and the Committee on the Judiciary of the Senate; and
(B)
the Committee on Foreign Affairs, the Committee on Appropriations, and the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives.

SEC. 5553. Program to Provide Assistance to Build the Capacity of Foreign Law Enforcement Agencies with Respect to Covered Synthetic Drugs.

(a)
In General.— Notwithstanding section 660 of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2420), the Secretary of State shall establish a program to provide assistance to strengthen the capacity of law enforcement agencies of the countries described in subsection (c) to help such agencies to identify, track, and improve their forensics detection capabilities with respect to covered synthetic drugs.
(b)
Priority.— The Secretary of State shall prioritize technical assistance, and the provision of equipment, as appropriate, under subsection (a) among those countries described in subsection (c) in which such assistance and equipment would have the most impact in reducing illicit use of covered synthetic drugs in the United States.
(c)
Countries Described.— The foreign countries described in this subsection are—
(1)
countries that are producers of covered synthetic drugs;
(2)
countries whose pharmaceutical and chemical industries are known to be exploited for development or procurement of precursors of covered synthetic drugs; or
(3)
major drug-transit countries for covered synthetic drugs as defined by the Secretary of State.
(d)
Exception.— No assistance may be provided to the People’s Republic of China or to any of its law enforcement agencies pursuant to the program authorized by this section.
(e)
Authorization of Appropriations.— There is authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary of State to carry out this section $4,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2023 through 2027.

SEC. 5554. Exchange Program on Demand Reduction Matters Relating to Illicit Use of Covered Synthetic Drugs.

(a)
In General.— The Secretary of State shall establish or continue and strengthen, as appropriate, an exchange program for governmental and nongovernmental personnel in the United States and in foreign countries to provide educational and professional development on demand reduction matters relating to the illicit use of covered synthetic drugs and other drugs.
(b)
Program Requirements.— The program required by subsection (a)—
(1)
shall be limited to individuals who have expertise and experience in matters described in subsection (a);
(2)
in the case of inbound exchanges, may be carried out as part of exchange programs and international visitor programs administered by the Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs of the Department of State, including the International Visitor Leadership Program, in coordination with the Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs; and
(3)
shall include outbound exchanges for governmental or nongovernmental personnel in the United States.
(c)
Authorization of Appropriations.— There is authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary of State to carry out this section $1,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2023 through 2027.

SEC. 5555. Amendments to International Narcotics Control Program.

(a)
International Narcotics Control Strategy Report.— Section 489(a) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2291h(a)) is amended—
(1)
by redesignating the second paragraph (10) as paragraph (11); and
(2)
by adding at the end the following:

“(12) Covered synthetic drugs and new psychoactive substances.—

“(A) Covered synthetic drugs.—Information that contains an assessment of the countries significantly involved in the manufacture, production, transshipment, or trafficking of covered synthetic drugs, to include the following:

“(i) The scale of legal domestic production and any available information on the number of manufacturers and producers of such drugs in such countries.

“(ii) Information on any law enforcement assessments of the scale of illegal production of such drugs, including a description of the capacity of illegal laboratories to produce such drugs.

“(iii) The types of inputs used and a description of the primary methods of synthesis employed by illegal producers of such drugs.

“(iv) An assessment of the policies of such countries to regulate licit manufacture and interdict illicit manufacture, diversion, distribution, shipment, and trafficking of such drugs and an assessment of the effectiveness of the policies’ implementation.

“(B) New psychoactive substances.—Information on, to the extent practicable, any policies of responding to new psychoactive substances, to include the following:

“(i) Which governments have articulated policies on scheduling of such substances.

“(ii) Any data on impacts of such policies and other responses to such substances.

“(iii) An assessment of any policies the United States could adopt to improve its response to new psychoactive substances.

“(C) Definitions.—In this paragraph, the terms ‘covered synthetic drug’ and ‘new psychoactive substance’ have the meaning given those terms in section 5558 of the FENTANYL Results Act.”

(b)
Definition of Major Illicit Drug Producing Country.— Section 481(e) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2291(e)) is amended—
(1)
in paragraph (2)—
(A)
in subparagraph (C), by striking “ ; or” and inserting a semicolon;
(B)
in subparagraph (D), by striking the semicolon at the end and inserting “ ; or”; and
(C)
by adding at the end the following:

“(E) that is a significant direct source of covered synthetic drugs or psychotropic drugs or other controlled substances, including precursor chemicals when those chemicals are used in the production of such drugs and substances, significantly affecting the United States;”

(2)
by amending paragraph (5) to read as follows:

“(5) the term ‘major drug-transit country’ means a country through which are transported covered synthetic drugs or psychotropic drugs or other controlled substances significantly affecting the United States;”

(3)
in paragraph (7), by striking “ ; and” and inserting a semicolon;
(4)
in paragraph (8), by striking the period at the end and inserting “ ; and”; and
(5)
by adding at the end the following:

“(9) the term ‘covered synthetic drug’ has the meaning given that term in section 5558 of the FENTANYL Results Act.”

SEC. 5556. Sense of Congress.

It is the sense of Congress that—
(1)
the President should direct the United States Representative to the United Nations to use the voice, vote, and influence of the United States at the United Nations to advocate for more transparent assessments of countries by the International Narcotics Control Board; and
(2)
bilateral, plurilateral, and multilateral international cooperation is essential to combating the trafficking of covered synthetic drugs.

SEC. 5557. Rule of Construction.

Nothing in this subtitle or the amendments made by this subtitle shall be construed to affect the prioritization of extradition requests.

SEC. 5558. Definitions.

In this subtitle:
(1)
Controlled substance; controlled substance analogue.— The terms “controlled substance” and “controlled substance analogue” have the meanings given those terms in section 102 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 802).
(2)
Covered synthetic drug.— The term “covered synthetic drug” means—
(A)
a synthetic controlled substance or synthetic controlled substance analogue, including fentanyl or a fentanyl analogue; or
(B)
a new psychoactive substance.
(3)
New psychoactive substance.— The term “new psychoactive substance” means a substance of abuse, or any preparation thereof, that—
(A)
is not—
(i)
included in any schedule as a controlled substance under the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 801 et seq.); or
(ii)
controlled by the Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs, done at New York March 30, 1961, or the Convention on Psychotropic Substances, done at Vienna February 21, 1971;
(B)
is new or has reemerged on the illicit market; and
(C)
poses a threat to the public health and safety.

Subtitle D International Pandemic Preparedness

SEC. 5559. Short Title.

This subtitle may be cited as the “Global Health Security and International Pandemic Prevention, Preparedness and Response Act of 2022”.

SEC. 5560. Definitions.

In this subtitle:
(1)
The term “appropriate congressional committees” means—
(A)
the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate;
(B)
the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate;
(C)
the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives; and
(D)
the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives.
(2)
The terms “Global Health Security Agenda” and “GHSA” mean the multi-sectoral initiative launched in 2014, and renewed in 2018, that brings together countries, regions, international organizations, nongovernmental organizations, and the private sector—
(A)
to elevate global health security as a national-level priority;
(B)
to share best practices; and
(C)
to facilitate national capacity to comply with and adhere to—
(i)
the International Health Regulations (2005);
(ii)
the international standards and guidelines established by the World Organisation for Animal Health;
(iii)
United Nations Security Council Resolution 1540 (2004);
(iv)
the Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production and Stockpiling of Bacteriological and Toxin Weapons and on their Destruction, done at Washington, London, and Moscow, April 10, 1972 (commonly referred to as the “Biological Weapons Convention”);
(v)
the Global Health Security Agenda 2024 Framework; and
(vi)
other relevant frameworks that contribute to global health security.
(3)
The term “Global Health Security Index” means the comprehensive assessment and benchmarking of health security and related capabilities across the countries that make up the States Parties to the International Health Regulations (2005).
(4)
The term “Global Health Security Initiative” means the informal network of countries and organizations that came together in 2001, to undertake concerted global action to strengthen public health preparedness and response to chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear threats, including pandemic influenza.
(5)
The term “IHR (2005) Monitoring and Evaluation Framework” means the framework through which the World Health Organization and the State Parties to the International Health Regulations, as amended in 2005, review, measure, and assess core country public health capacities and ensure mutual accountability for global health security under the International Health Regulations (2005), including through the Joint External Evaluations, simulation exercises, and after-action reviews.
(6)
The term “Joint External Evaluation” means the voluntary, collaborative, multi-sectoral process facilitated by the World Health Organization—
(A)
to assess country capacity to prevent, detect, and rapidly respond to public health risks occurring naturally or due to deliberate or accidental events;
(B)
to assess progress in achieving the targets under the International Health Regulations (2005); and
(C)
to recommend priority actions.
(7)
The term “key stakeholders” means actors engaged in efforts to advance global health security programs and objectives, including—
(A)
national and local governments in partner countries;
(B)
other bilateral donors;
(C)
international, regional, and local organizations, including private, voluntary, nongovernmental, and civil society organizations, including faith-based and indigenous organizations;
(D)
international, regional, and local financial institutions;
(E)
representatives of historically marginalized groups, including women, youth, and indigenous peoples;
(F)
the private sector, including medical device, technology, pharmaceutical, manufacturing, logistics, and other relevant companies; and
(G)
public and private research and academic institutions.
(8)
The term “One Health approach” means the collaborative, multi-sectoral, and transdisciplinary approach toward achieving optimal health outcomes in a manner that recognizes the interconnection between people, animals, plants, and their shared environment.
(9)
The term “pandemic preparedness” refers to the actions taken to establish and sustain the capacity and capabilities necessary to rapidly identify, prevent, protect against, and respond to the emergence, reemergence, and spread of pathogens of pandemic potential.
(10)
The term “partner country” means a foreign country in which the relevant Federal departments and agencies are implementing United States foreign assistance for global health security and pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response under this subtitle.
(11)
The term “relevant Federal departments and agencies” means any Federal department or agency implementing United States policies and programs relevant to the advancement of United States global health security and diplomacy overseas, which may include—
(A)
the Department of State;
(B)
the United States Agency for International Development;
(C)
the Department of Health and Human Services;
(D)
the Department of Defense;
(E)
the Defense Threat Reduction Agency;
(F)
the Millennium Challenge Corporation;
(G)
the Development Finance Corporation;
(H)
the Peace Corps; and
(I)
any other department or agency that the President determines to be relevant for these purposes.
(12)
The term “resilience” means the ability of people, households, communities, systems, institutions, countries, and regions to reduce, mitigate, withstand, adapt to, and quickly recover from shocks and stresses in a manner that reduces chronic vulnerability to the emergence, reemergence, and spread of pathogens of pandemic potential and facilitates inclusive growth.
(13)
The terms “respond” and “response” mean the actions taken to counter an infectious disease.
(14)
The term “USAID” means the United States Agency for International Development.

SEC. 5561. Enhancing the United States’ International Response to Pandemics.

(a)
Leveraging United States Bilateral Global Health Programs for International Pandemic Response.— Subject to the notification requirements under section 634A of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2394–1), amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available to carry out section 104 of the Foreign Assistance Act (22 U.S.C. 2151b) may be used in countries receiving such United States foreign assistance for the purpose of—
(1)
strengthening vaccine readiness;
(2)
reducing vaccine hesitancy;
(3)
delivering and administering vaccines;
(4)
strengthening health systems and global supply chains as necessary for global health security and pandemic preparedness, prevention, and response;
(5)
supporting global health workforce planning, training, and management for pandemic preparedness, prevention, and response;
(6)
enhancing transparency, quality, and reliability of public health data;
(7)
increasing bidirectional testing, including screening for symptomatic and asymptomatic cases; and
(8)
building laboratory capacity.
(b)
Roles of the Department of State, USAID, and the Department of Health and Human Services in International Pandemic Response.—
(1)
Finding.— Congress finds that different outbreaks of infectious disease threats may require flexibility and changes to the designated roles and responsibilities of relevant Federal departments and agencies.
(2)
Lead agencies for coordination of the united states’ international response to infectious disease outbreaks with severe or pandemic potential.— The President shall identify the relevant Federal departments and agencies, including the Department of State, USAID, and the Department of Health and Human Services (including the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention), leading specific aspects of the United States international operational response to outbreaks of emerging high-consequence infectious disease threats in accordance with federal law.
(3)
Notification.— Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and regularly thereafter as appropriate, the President shall notify the appropriate congressional committees, the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions of the Senate, and the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives of the roles and responsibilities of each relevant Federal department and agency with respect to the international operational response to the outbreak of an emerging high-consequence infectious disease threat.
(c)
USAID Disaster Surge Capacity.—
(1)
Disaster surge capacity.— The Administrator of the USAID is authorized to expend funds made available to carry out part I and chapter 4 of part II of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2151 and 2346), including funds made available for “Assistance for Europe, Eurasia and Central Asia”, in addition to amounts otherwise made available for such purposes, for the cost (including support costs) of individuals detailed to or employed by USAID whose primary responsibility is to carry out programs to address global health emergencies and natural or manmade disasters.
(2)
Notification.— Not later than 15 days before making funds available to address manmade disasters pursuant to paragraph (1), the Secretary of State or the Administrator of the USAID shall notify the appropriate congressional committees of such intended action.

SEC. 5562. International Pandemic Prevention and Preparedness.

(a)
United States International Activities To Advance Global Health Security and Diplomacy Strategy and Report.—
(1)
In general.— The President shall develop, update, maintain, and advance a comprehensive strategy for improving United States global health security and diplomacy for pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response which, consistent with the purposes of this subtitle, shall—
(A)
clearly articulate United States policy goals related to pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response, including through actions to strengthen diplomatic leadership and the effectiveness of United States foreign policy and international preparedness assistance for global health security through advancement of a One Health approach, the Global Health Security Agenda, the International Health Regulations (2005), and other relevant frameworks that contribute to pandemic prevention and preparedness;
(B)
establish specific and measurable goals, benchmarks, timetables, performance metrics, and monitoring and evaluation plans for United States foreign policy and assistance for global health security that promote learning and adaptation and reflect international best practices relating to global health security, transparency, and accountability;
(C)
establish transparent mechanisms to improve coordination and avoid duplication of effort between and among the relevant Federal departments and agencies, partner countries, donor countries, the private sector, multilateral organizations, and other key stakeholders;
(D)
prioritize working with partner countries with—
(i)
demonstrated need, as identified through the Joint External Evaluation process, the Global Health Security Index classification of health systems, national action plans for health security, Global Health Security Agenda, other risk-based assessments, and complementary or successor indicators of global health security and pandemic preparedness; and
(ii)
demonstrated commitment to transparency, including budget and global health data transparency, complying with the International Health Regulations (2005), investing in domestic health systems, and achieving measurable results;
(E)
reduce long-term reliance upon United States foreign assistance for global health security by—
(i)
ensuring that United States global health assistance authorized under this subtitle is strategically planned and coordinated in a manner that delivers immediate impact and contributes to enduring results, including through efforts to enhance community capacity and resilience to infectious disease threats and emergencies; and
(ii)
ensuring partner country ownership of global health security strategies, data, programs, and outcomes and improved domestic resource mobilization, co-financing, and appropriate national budget allocations for global health security and pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response;
(F)
assist partner countries in building the technical capacity of relevant ministries, systems, and networks to prepare, execute, monitor, and evaluate national action plans for global health security and pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response that are developed with input from key stakeholders, including mechanism to enhance budget and global health data transparency, as necessary and appropriate;
(G)
support and align United States foreign assistance authorized under this subtitle with such national action plans for health security and pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response, as appropriate;
(H)
facilitate communication and collaboration, as appropriate, among local stakeholders in support of country-led strategies and initiatives to better identify and prevent health impacts related to the emergence, reemergence, and spread of zoonoses;
(I)
support the long-term success of programs by building the pandemic preparedness capacity of local organizations and institutions in target countries and communities;
(J)
develop community resilience to infectious disease threats and emergencies;
(K)
support global health budget and workforce planning in partner countries, consistent with the purposes of this subtitle, including training in financial management and budget and global health data transparency;
(L)
strengthen linkages between complementary bilateral and multilateral foreign assistance programs, including efforts of the World Bank, the World Health Organization, the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria, and Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, that contribute to the development of more resilient health systems and global supply chains for global health security and pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response in partner countries with the capacity, resources, and personnel required to prevent, detect, and respond to infectious disease threats; and
(M)
support innovation and partnerships with the private sector, health organizations, civil society, nongovernmental, faith-based and indigenous organizations, and health research and academic institutions to improve pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response, including for the development and deployment of effective and accessible infectious disease tracking tools, diagnostics, therapeutics, and vaccines.
(2)
Submission of strategy.—
(A)
In general.— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the President, in consultation with the heads of the relevant Federal departments and agencies, shall submit the strategy required under paragraph (1) to—
(i)
the appropriate congressional committees;
(ii)
the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions of the Senate; and
(iii)
the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives.
(B)
Agency-specific plans.— The strategy required under paragraph (1) shall include specific implementation plans from each relevant Federal department and agency that describe—
(i)
the anticipated contributions of the Federal department or agency, including technical, financial, and in-kind contributions, to implement the strategy; and
(ii)
the efforts of the Federal department or agency to ensure that the activities and programs carried out pursuant to the strategy are designed to achieve maximum impact and long-term sustainability.
(3)
Annual report.—
(A)
In general.— Not later than 1 year after the submission of the strategy pursuant to paragraph (2)(A), and not later than October 1 of each year thereafter, the President shall submit to the committees listed in such paragraph a report that describes the status of the implementation of such strategy.
(B)
Contents.— Each report submitted pursuant to subparagraph (A) shall—
(i)
identify any substantial changes made to the strategy during the preceding calendar year;
(ii)
describe the progress made in implementing the strategy, including specific information related to the progress toward improving countries’ ability to detect, prevent, and respond to infectious disease threats;
(iii)
identify—
(I)
the indicators used to establish benchmarks and measure results over time; and
(II)
the mechanisms for reporting such results in an open and transparent manner;
(iv)
contain a transparent, open, and detailed accounting of obligations by relevant Federal departments and agencies to implement the strategy, including, to the extent practicable, for each such Federal department and agency, the statutory source of obligated funds, the amounts obligated, implementing partners and sub-partners, targeted beneficiaries, and activities supported;
(v)
the efforts of the relevant Federal department or agency to ensure that the activities and programs carried out pursuant to the strategy are designed to achieve maximum impact and enduring results, including through specific activities to strengthen health systems for global health security and pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response, as appropriate;
(vi)
assess efforts to coordinate United States global health security programs, activities, and initiatives with key stakeholders;
(vii)
incorporate a plan for regularly reviewing and updating strategies, partnerships, and programs and sharing lessons learned with a wide range of stakeholders in an open, transparent manner; and
(viii)
describe the progress achieved and challenges concerning the United States Government’s ability to advance the Global Health Security Agenda and pandemic preparedness, including data disaggregated by priority country using indicators that are consistent on a year-to-year basis and recommendations to resolve, mitigate, or otherwise address the challenges identified through such indicators.
(C)
Form.— The strategy and reports required under this subsection shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may contain a classified annex.
(b)
United States Coordinator for Global Health Security.— The President shall designate an appropriate senior official to be the United States Coordinator for Global Health Security, who shall be responsible for the coordination of the Global Health Security Agenda Interagency Review Council and who should—
(1)
have significant background and expertise in public health, health security, and emergency response management;
(2)
coordinate, through a whole-of-government approach, the efforts of relevant Federal departments and agencies to implement the strategy under subsection (a); and
(3)
seek to fully use the unique capabilities of each relevant Federal department and agency and ensure effective and appropriate United States representation at relevant international forums, while collaborating with and leveraging the contributions of other key stakeholders.
(c)
Ambassador-At-Large for Global Health Security and Diplomacy.—
(1)
Establishment.— There is established, within the Department of State, the position of Ambassador-At-Large for Global Health Security and Diplomacy (referred to in this section as the “Ambassador-At-Large”).
(2)
Appointment; qualifications.— The Ambassador-At-Large—
(A)
shall be appointed by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate;
(B)
shall report to the Secretary of State; and
(C)
shall have—
(i)
demonstrated knowledge and experience in the field of health security, development, public health, epidemiology, or medicine; and
(ii)
relevant diplomatic, policy, and political expertise.
(3)
Authorities.— The Ambassador-At-Large may—
(A)
operate internationally to carry out the purposes of this section;
(B)
ensure effective coordination, management, and oversight of United States foreign policy, diplomatic efforts, and foreign assistance funded with amounts authorized to be appropriated pursuant to section 5564(a) that are used by the Department of State to advance the relevant elements of the United States global health security and diplomacy strategy developed pursuant to subsection (a) by—
(i)
developing and updating, as appropriate, in collaboration with the Administrator of the USAID and the Secretary of Health and Human Services, related policy guidance and unified auditing, monitoring, and evaluation plans;
(ii)
avoiding duplication of effort and collaborating with other relevant Federal departments and agencies;
(iii)
leading, in collaboration with the Secretary of Health and Human Services, the Administrator of the USAID, and other relevant Federal departments and agencies, diplomatic efforts to identify and address current and emerging threats to global health security;
(iv)
working to enhance coordination with, and transparency among, the governments of partner countries and key stakeholders, including the private sector;
(v)
promoting greater donor and national investment in partner countries to build health systems and supply chains for global health security and pandemic prevention and preparedness;
(vi)
securing bilateral and multilateral financing commitments to advance the Global Health Security Agenda, in coordination with relevant Federal departments and agencies, including through funding for the Financial Intermediary Fund for Pandemic Prevention, Preparedness, and Response; and
(vii)
providing regular updates to the appropriate congressional committees, the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions of the Senate, and the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives regarding the fulfillment of the activities described in this paragraph;
(C)
ensure, in collaboration with the Secretary of the Treasury, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, and the Administrator of the USAID, effective representation of the United States in the Financial Intermediary Fund for Pandemic Prevention, Preparedness, and Response;
(D)
use detailees, on a reimbursable or nonreimbursable basis, from relevant Federal departments and agencies and hire personal service contractors, who may operate domestically and internationally, to ensure that the Ambassador-At-Large has access to the highest quality experts available to the United States Government to carry out the functions under this subtitle; and
(E)
perform such other functions as the Secretary of State may assign.
(d)
Strengthening Health Systems for Global Health Security and Pandemic Prevention and Preparedness.—
(1)
Statement of policy.— It is the policy of the United States to ensure that bilateral global health assistance programs are effectively managed and coordinated, as necessary and appropriate to achieve the purposes of this subtitle, to contribute to the strengthening of health systems for global health security and pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response in each country in which such programs are carried out.
(2)
Coordination.— The Administrator of the USAID shall work with the Global Malaria Coordinator, the Coordinator of United States Government Activities to Combat HIV/AIDS Globally, the Ambassador-at-Large for Global Health Security and Diplomacy at the Department of State, and the Secretary of Health and Human Services, to identify areas of collaboration and coordination in countries with global health programs and activities undertaken by the USAID pursuant to the United States Leadership Against HIV/AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria Act of 2003 (Public Law 108–25) and other relevant provisions of law, to ensure that such activities contribute to the strengthening of health systems for global health security and pandemic prevention and preparedness.
(e)
Coordination for International Pandemic Early Warning Network.—
(1)
Sense of congress.— It is the sense of Congress that the Secretary of Health and Human Services, in coordination with the Secretary of State, the USAID Administrator, the Director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and the heads of the other relevant Federal departments and agencies, should work with the World Health Organization and other key stakeholders to establish or strengthen effective early warning systems, at the partner country, regional, and international levels, that utilize innovative information and analytical tools and robust review processes to track, document, analyze, and forecast infectious disease threats with epidemic and pandemic potential.
(2)
Report.— Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter for the following 4 years, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, in coordination with the Secretary of State and the heads of the other relevant Federal departments and agencies, shall submit a report to the appropriate congressional committees, the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions of the Senate, and the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives that describes United States Government efforts and opportunities to establish or strengthen effective early warning systems to detect infectious disease threats internationally.
(f)
International Emergency Operations.—
(1)
Sense of congress.— It is the sense of Congress that it is essential to enhance the capacity of key stakeholders to effectively operationalize early warning and execute multi-sectoral emergency operations during an infectious disease outbreak, particularly in countries and areas that deliberately withhold critical global health data and delay access during an infectious disease outbreak, in advance of the next infectious disease outbreak with pandemic potential.
(2)
Public health emergencies of international concern.— The Secretary of Health and Human Services, in coordination with the Secretary of State, should work with the World Health Organization and like-minded member states to adopt an approach toward assessing infectious disease threats under the International Health Regulations (2005) for the World Health Organization to identify and transparently communicate, on an ongoing basis, varying levels of risk leading up to a declaration by the Director General of the World Health Organization of a Public Health Emergency of International Concern for the duration and in the aftermath of such declaration.
(3)
Emergency operations.— The Secretary of Health and Human Services, in coordination with the Secretary of State, the Administrator of the USAID, the Director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and the heads of other relevant Federal departments and agencies and consistent with the requirements under the International Health Regulations (2005) and the objectives of the World Health Organization’s Health Emergencies Programme, the Global Health Security Agenda, and national actions plans for health security, should work, in cooperation with the World Health Organization, with partner countries, and other key stakeholders, to support the establishment, strengthening, and rapid response capacity of global health emergency operations centers, at the partner country and international levels, including efforts—
(A)
to collect and share de-identified public health data, assess risk, and operationalize early warning;
(B)
to secure, including through utilization of stand-by arrangements and emergency funding mechanisms, the staff, systems, and resources necessary to execute cross-sectoral emergency operations during the 48-hour period immediately following an infectious disease outbreak with pandemic potential; and
(C)
to organize and conduct emergency simulations.

SEC. 5563. Financial Intermediary Fund for Pandemic Prevention, Preparedness, and Response.

(a)
In General.—
(1)
Finding.— Congress finds that the Financial Intermediary Fund for Pandemic Prevention, Preparedness, and Response (referred to in this section as the “Fund”) was established in September 2022 by donor countries, relevant United Nations agencies, including the World Health Organization, and other key multilateral stakeholders as a multilateral, catalytic financing mechanism for pandemic prevention and preparedness.
(2)
Objectives.— The objectives of the Fund are—
(A)
closing critical gaps in pandemic prevention and preparedness; and
(B)
working with, and building the capacity of, eligible partner countries in the areas of global health security, infectious disease control, and pandemic prevention and preparedness in order to—
(i)
prioritize capacity building and financing availability in eligible partner countries;
(ii)
incentivize countries to prioritize the use of domestic resources for global health security and pandemic prevention and preparedness;
(iii)
leverage governmental, nongovernmental, and private sector investments;
(iv)
regularly respond to and evaluate progress based on clear metrics and benchmarks, such as those developed through the IHR (2005) Monitoring and Evaluation Framework and the Global Health Security Index;
(v)
align with and complement ongoing bilateral and multilateral efforts and financing, including through the World Bank, the World Health Organization, the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria, the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness and Innovation, and Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance; and
(vi)
help countries accelerate and achieve compliance with the International Health Regulations (2005) and fulfill the Global Health Security Agenda 2024 Framework not later than 8 years after the date on which the Fund is established, in coordination with the ongoing Joint External Evaluation national action planning process.
(3)
Governing board.—
(A)
In general.— The Fund should be governed by a transparent, representative, and accountable body (referred to in this section as the “Governing Board”), which should—
(i)
function as a partnership with, and through full engagement by, donor governments, eligible partner countries, and independent civil society; and
(ii)
be composed of not more than 25 representatives of governments, foundations, academic institutions, independent civil society, indigenous people, vulnerable communities, frontline health workers, and the private sector with demonstrated commitment to carrying out the purposes of the Fund and upholding transparency and accountability requirements.
(B)
Duties.— The Governing Board should—
(i)
be charged with approving strategies, operations, and grant making authorities such that it is able to conduct effective fiduciary, monitoring, and evaluation efforts, and other oversight functions;
(ii)
determine operational procedures to enable the Fund to effectively fulfill its mission;
(iii)
provide oversight and accountability for the Fund in collaboration with a qualified and independent Inspector General;
(iv)
develop and utilize a mechanism to obtain formal input from eligible partner countries, independent civil society, and implementing entities relative to program design, review, and implementation and associated lessons learned; and
(v)
coordinate and align with other multilateral financing and technical assistance activities, and with the activities of the United States and other nations leading pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response activities in partner countries, as appropriate.
(C)
Composition.— The Governing Board should include—
(i)
representatives of the governments of founding member countries who, in addition to meeting the requirements under subparagraph (A), qualify based upon—
(I)
meeting an established initial contribution threshold, which should be not less than 10 percent of the country’s total initial contributions; and
(II)
demonstrating a commitment to supporting the International Health Regulations (2005);
(ii)
a geographically diverse group of members from donor countries, academic institutions, independent civil society, including faith-based and indigenous organizations, and the private sector who are selected on the basis of their experience and commitment to innovation, best practices, and the advancement of global health security objectives; and
(iii)
representatives of the World Health Organization, to serve in an observer status.
(D)
Contributions.— Each government or private sector foundation or for-profit entity represented on the Governing Board should agree to make annual contributions to the Fund in an amount that is not less than the minimum amount determined by the Governing Board.
(E)
Qualifications.— Individuals appointed to the Governing Board should have demonstrated knowledge and experience across a variety of sectors, including human and animal health, agriculture, development, defense, finance, research, and academia.
(F)
Conflicts of interest.— All Governing Board members should be required to recuse themselves from matters presenting conflicts of interest, including financing decisions relating to such countries, bodies, and institutions.
(G)
Removal procedures.— The Fund should establish procedures for the removal of members of the Governing Board who—
(i)
engage in a consistent pattern of human rights abuses;
(ii)
fail to uphold global health data transparency requirements; or
(iii)
otherwise violate the established standards of the Fund, including in relation to corruption.
(b)
Authority for United States Participation.—
(1)
Founding member.— The United States is authorized to participate in the Fund and shall be represented on the Governing Board by an officer or employee of the United States Government who has been appointed by the President (referred in this section as the “FIF Representative”).
(2)
Effective date; termination date.—
(A)
Effective date.— This subsection shall take effect on the date on which the Secretary of State submits to Congress a certified copy of the agreement establishing the Fund.
(B)
Termination date.— The membership authorized under paragraph (1) shall terminate on the date on which the Fund is terminated.
(3)
Enforceability.— Any agreement concluded under the authorities provided under this subsection shall be legally effective and binding upon the United States, in accordance with the terms of the agreement—
(A)
upon the enactment of appropriate implementing legislation that provides for the approval of the specific agreement or agreements, including attachments, annexes, and supporting documentation, as appropriate; or
(B)
if concluded and submitted as a treaty, upon the approval by the Senate of the resolution of ratification of such treaty.
(c)
Implementation of Program Objectives.— In carrying out the objectives described in subsection (a)(2), the Fund should work to eliminate duplication and waste by upholding strict transparency and accountability standards and coordinating its programs and activities with key partners working to advance pandemic prevention and preparedness.
(d)
Priority Countries.— In providing assistance under this section, the Fund should give priority to low- and lower middle-income countries with—
(1)
low scores on the Global Health Security Index classification of health systems;
(2)
measurable gaps in global health security and pandemic prevention and preparedness identified under the IHR (2005) Monitoring and Evaluation Framework and national action plans for health security;
(3)
demonstrated political and financial commitment to pandemic prevention and preparedness; and
(4)
demonstrated commitment to—
(A)
upholding global health budget and data transparency and accountability standards;
(B)
complying with the International Health Regulations (2005);
(C)
investing in domestic health systems; and
(D)
achieving measurable results.
(e)
Accountability; Conflicts of Interest; Criteria for Programs.— The FIF Representative shall—
(1)
take such actions as may be necessary to ensure that the Fund will have in effect adequate procedures and standards to account for and monitor the use of funds contributed to the Fund, including the cost of administering the Fund, by—
(A)
engaging Fund stakeholders; and
(B)
actively promoting transparency and accountability of Fund governance and operations;
(2)
seek to ensure there is agreement to put in place a conflict of interest policy to ensure fairness and a high standard of ethical conduct in the Fund’s decision-making processes, including proactive procedures to screen staff for conflicts of interest and measures to address any conflicts, such as—
(A)
potential divestments of interests;
(B)
prohibition from engaging in certain activities;
(C)
recusal from certain decision-making and administrative processes; and
(D)
representation by an alternate board member; and
(3)
seek agreement on the criteria that should be used to determine the programs and activities that should be assisted by the Fund.
(f)
Selection of Partner Countries, Projects, and Recipients.— The Governing Board should establish—
(1)
eligible partner country selection criteria, including transparent metrics to measure and assess global health security and pandemic prevention and preparedness strengths and vulnerabilities in countries seeking assistance;
(2)
minimum standards for ensuring eligible partner country ownership and commitment to long-term results, including requirements for domestic budgeting, resource mobilization, and co-investment;
(3)
criteria for the selection of projects to receive support from the Fund;
(4)
standards and criteria regarding qualifications of recipients of such support; and
(5)
such rules and procedures as may be necessary—
(A)
for cost-effective management of the Fund; and
(B)
to ensure transparency and accountability in the grant-making process.
(g)
Additional Transparency and Accountability Requirements.—
(1)
Inspector general.— The FIF Representative shall seek to ensure that the Fund maintains an independent Office of the Inspector General that—
(A)
is fully enabled to operate independently and transparently;
(B)
is supported by and with the requisite resources and capacity to regularly conduct and publish, on a publicly accessible website, rigorous financial, programmatic, and reporting audits and investigations of the Fund and its grantees, including subgrantees; and
(C)
establishes an investigative unit that—
(i)
develops an oversight mechanism to ensure that grant funds are not diverted to illicit or corrupt purposes or activities; and
(ii)
submits an annual report to the Governing Board describing its activities, investigations, and results.
(2)
Sense of congress on corruption.— It is the sense of Congress that—
(A)
corruption within global health programs contribute directly to the loss of human life and cannot be tolerated; and
(B)
in making financial recoveries relating to a corrupt act or criminal conduct committed by a grant recipient, as determined by the Inspector General described in paragraph (1), the responsible grant recipient should be assessed at a recovery rate of up to 150 percent of such loss.
(3)
Administrative expenses; financial tracking systems.— The FIF Representative shall seek to ensure that the Fund establishes, maintains, and makes publicly available a system to track—
(A)
the administrative and management costs of the Fund on a quarterly basis; and
(B)
the amount of funds disbursed to each grant recipient and subrecipient during each grant’s fiscal cycle.
(4)
Exemption from duties and taxes.— The FIF Representative should seek to ensure that the Fund adopts rules that condition grants upon agreement by the relevant national authorities in an eligible partner country to exempt from duties and taxes all products financed by such grants, including procurements by any principal or subrecipient for the purpose of carrying out such grants.
(h)
Reports to Congress.—
(1)
Annual report.—
(A)
In general.— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter for the duration of the Fund, the Secretary of State, in collaboration with the Administrator of the USAID and the heads of other relevant Federal departments and agencies, shall submit a report on the activities of the Fund to the appropriate congressional committees.
(B)
Report elements.— Each report required under subparagraph (A) shall describe—
(i)
the goals of the Fund;
(ii)
the programs, projects, and activities supported by the Fund;
(iii)
private and governmental contributions to the Fund; and
(iv)
the criteria utilized to determine the programs and activities that should be assisted by the Fund, including baselines, targets, desired outcomes, measurable goals, and extent to which those goals are being achieved.
(2)
GAO report on effectiveness.— Not later than 2 years after the date on which the Fund is established, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit a report to the appropriate congressional committees that evaluates the effectiveness of the Fund, including—
(A)
the effectiveness of the programs, projects, and activities supported by the Fund; and
(B)
an assessment of the merits of continued United States participation in the Fund.
(i)
United States Contributions.—
(1)
In general.— Subject to paragraph (4)(C), the President may provide contributions to the Fund.
(2)
Notification.— The Secretary of State, the Administrator of the USAID, or the head of any other relevant Federal department or agency shall submit a notification to the appropriate congressional committees not later than 15 days before making a contribution to the Fund that identifies—
(A)
the amount of the proposed contribution;
(B)
the total of funds contributed by other donors; and
(C)
the national interests served by United States participation in the Fund.
(3)
Limitation.— During the 5-year period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act, the cumulative total of United States contributions to the Fund may not exceed 33 percent of the total contributions to the Fund from all sources.
(4)
Withholdings.—
(A)
Support for acts of international terrorism.— If the Secretary of State determines that the Fund has provided assistance to a country, the government of which the Secretary of State has determined, for purposes of section 620A of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2371) has repeatedly provided support for acts of international terrorism, the United States shall withhold from its contribution to the Fund for the next fiscal year an amount equal to the amount expended by the Fund to the government of such country.
(B)
Excessive salaries.— If the Secretary of State determines that the salary during any of the first 5 fiscal years beginning after the date of the enactment of this Act of any individual employed by the Fund exceeds the salary of the Vice President of the United States for such fiscal year, the United States should withhold from its contribution for the following fiscal year an amount equal to the aggregate difference between the 2 salaries.
(C)
Accountability certification requirement.— The Secretary of State may withhold not more than 20 percent of planned United States contributions to the Fund until the Secretary certifies to the appropriate congressional committees that the Fund has established procedures to provide access by the Office of Inspector General of the Department of State, as cognizant Inspector General, the Inspector General of the Department of Health and Human Services, the USAID Inspector General, and the Comptroller General of the United States to the Fund’s financial data and other information relevant to United States contributions to the Fund (as determined by the Inspector General of the Department of State, in consultation with the Secretary of State).

SEC. 5564. General Provisions.

(a)
Authorization of Appropriations.—
(1)
In general.— There is authorized to be appropriated $5,000,000,000 for the 5-year period beginning on October 1, 2022 to carry out the purposes of sections 5562 and 5563, which may be in addition to amounts otherwise made available for such purposes, in consultation with the appropriate congressional committees and subject to the requirements under chapters 1 and 10 of part I and section 634A of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2151 et seq.).
(2)
Exception.— Section 110 of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2000 (22 U.S.C. 7107) shall not apply with respect to assistance made available under this subtitle.
(b)
Compliance With the Foreign Aid Transparency and Accountability Act of 2016.— Section 2(3) of the Foreign Aid Transparency and Accountability Act of 2016 (Public Law 114–191; 22 U.S.C. 2394c note) is amended—
(1)
in subparagraph (D), by striking “ and” at the end;
(2)
in subparagraph (E), by striking the period at the end and inserting “ ; and”; and
(3)
by adding at the end the following:

“(F) the Global Health Security and International Pandemic Prevention, Preparedness and Response Act of 2022.”

SEC. 5565. Sunset.

This subtitle shall cease to be effective on September 30, 2027.

SEC. 5566. Rule of Construction.

Nothing in this subtitle may be construed to impair or otherwise affect the authorities granted to the Administrator of the USAID, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, or the head of any other Federal department or agency under any applicable law.

Subtitle E Burma Act of 2022

SEC. 5567. Short Title.

This subtitle may be cited as the “Burma Unified through Rigorous Military Accountability Act of 2022” or the “BURMA Act of 2022”.

SEC. 5568. Definitions.

In this subtitle:
(1)
Burmese military.— The term “Burmese military”—
(A)
means the Armed Forces of Burma, including the army, navy, and air force; and
(B)
includes security services under the control of the Armed Forces of Burma, such as the police and border guards.
(2)
Executive order 14014.— The term “Executive Order 14014” means Executive Order 14014 (86 Fed. Reg. 9429; relating to blocking property with respect to the situation in Burma).
(3)
Genocide.— The term “genocide” means any offense described in section 1091(a) of title 18, United States Code.
(4)
War crime.— The term “war crime” has the meaning given the term in section 2441(c) of title 18, United States Code.

PART 1 Matters Relating to the Conflict in Burma

SEC. 5569. Statement of Policy.

It is the policy of the United States to—
(1)
continue to support the people of Burma in their struggle for democracy, human rights, and justice;
(2)
support the efforts of the National Unity Government (NUG), the National Unity Consultative Council (NUCC), the Committee Representing Pyidaungsu Hluttaw (CRPH), the Burmese Civil Disobedience Movement, and other entities in Burma and in other countries to oppose the Burmese military and bring about an end to the military junta’s rule;
(3)
support a credible process for the restoration of civilian government in Burma, with a reformed Burmese military under civilian control and the enactment of constitutional, political, and economic reform that protects the rights of minority groups and furthers a federalist form of government;
(4)
hold accountable perpetrators of human rights violations committed against ethnic groups in Burma and the people of Burma, including through the February 2022 coup d’etat;
(5)
hold accountable the Russian Federation and the People’s Republic of China for their support of the Burmese military;
(6)
continue to provide humanitarian assistance to populations impacted by violence perpetrated by the Burmese military wherever they may reside, and coordinate efforts among like-minded governments and other international donors to maximize the effectiveness of assistance and support for the people of Burma;
(7)
secure the unconditional release of all unlawfully detained individuals in Burma, including those detained for the exercise of their fundamental freedoms; and
(8)
provide humanitarian assistance to the people of Burma in Burma, Bangladesh, Thailand, and the surrounding region without going through the Burmese military.

PART 2 Sanctions and Policy Coordination with Respect to Burma

SEC. 5570. Definitions.

In this part:
(1)
Admitted; alien.— The terms “admitted” and “alien” have the meanings given those terms in section 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101).
(2)
Appropriate congressional committees.— The term “appropriate congressional committees” means—
(A)
the Committee on Foreign Relations and the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate; and
(B)
the Committee on Foreign Affairs and the Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives.
(3)
Correspondent account; payable-through account.— The terms “correspondent account” and “payable- through account” have the meanings given those terms in section 5318A of title 31, United States Code.
(4)
Foreign financial institution.— The term “foreign financial institution” has the meaning of that term as determined by the Secretary of the Treasury by regulation.
(5)
Foreign person.— The term “foreign person” means a person that is not a United States person.
(6)
Knowingly.— The term “knowingly”, with respect to conduct, a circumstance, or a result, means that a person has actual knowledge, or should have known, of the conduct, the circumstance, or the result.
(7)
Person.— The term “person” means an individual or entity.
(8)
Support.— The term “support”, with respect to the Burmese military, means to knowingly have materially assisted, sponsored, or provided financial, material, or technological support for, or goods or services to or in support of the Burmese military.
(9)
United states person.— The term “United States person” means—
(A)
a United States citizen or an alien lawfully admitted to the United States for permanent residence;
(B)
an entity organized under the laws of the United States or any jurisdiction within the United States, including a foreign branch of such an entity; or
(C)
any person in the United States.

SEC. 5571. Imposition of Sanctions with Respect to Human Rights Abuses and Perpetration of a Coup in Burma.

(a)
Mandatory Sanctions.— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the President shall impose the sanctions described in subsection (d) with respect to any foreign person that the President determines—
(1)
is a senior official of—
(A)
the Burmese military or security forces of Burma;
(B)
the State Administration Council, the military-appointed cabinet at the level of Deputy Minister or higher, or a military-appointed minister of a Burmese state or region; or
(C)
an entity that primarily operates in the defense sector of the Burmese economy; or
(2)
is a Burmese state-owned commercial enterprise (other than an entity described in subsections (c)(1) and (c)(2)) that—
(A)
is operating in the industrial or extractive sectors; and
(B)
significantly financially benefits the Burmese military.
(b)
Additional Measure Relating to Facilitation of Transactions.— The Secretary of the Treasury may, in consultation with the Secretary of State, prohibit or impose strict conditions on the opening or maintaining in the United States of a correspondent account or payable-through account by a foreign financial institution that the President determines has, on or after the date of the enactment of this Act, knowingly conducted or facilitated a significant transaction or transactions on behalf of a foreign person subject to sanctions under this section imposed pursuant to subsection (a).
(c)
Additional Sanctions.— The President may impose the sanctions described in subsection (d) with respect to—
(1)
the Myanma Oil and Gas Enterprise;
(2)
any Burmese state-owned enterprise that—
(A)
is not operating in the industrial or extractive sectors; and
(B)
significantly financially benefits the Burmese military;
(3)
a spouse or adult child of any person described in subsection (a)(1);
(4)
any foreign person that, leading up to, during, and since the February 1, 2021, coup d’etat in Burma, is responsible for or has directly and knowingly engaged in—
(A)
actions or policies that significantly undermine democratic processes or institutions in Burma;
(B)
actions or policies that significantly threaten the peace, security, or stability of Burma;
(C)
actions or policies by a Burmese person that—
(i)
significantly prohibit, limit, or penalize the exercise of freedom of expression or assembly by people in Burma; or
(ii)
limit access to print, online, or broadcast media in Burma; or
(D)
the orchestration of arbitrary detention or torture in Burma or other serious human rights abuses in Burma; or
(5)
any Burmese entity that provides materiel to the Burmese military.
(d)
Sanctions Described.— The sanctions described in this subsection are the following:
(1)
Property blocking.— The President may exercise all powers granted to the President by the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.) to the extent necessary to block and prohibit all transactions in all property and interests in property of the foreign person if such property and interests in property are in the United States, come within the United States, or are or come within the possession or control of a United States person.
(2)
Foreign exchange.— The President may, pursuant to such regulations as the President may prescribe, prohibit any transactions in foreign exchange that are subject to the jurisdiction of the United States and in which the foreign person has any interest.
(3)
Visas, admission, or parole.—
(A)
In general.— An alien who is described in subsection (a) or (c) is—
(i)
inadmissible to the United States;
(ii)
ineligible for a visa or other documentation to enter the United States; and
(iii)
otherwise ineligible to be admitted or paroled into the United States or to receive any other benefit under the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.).
(B)
Current visas revoked.—
(i)
In general.— The issuing consular officer, the Secretary of State, or the Secretary of Homeland Security (or a designee of one of such Secretaries) shall, in accordance with section 221(i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1201(i)), revoke any visa or other entry documentation issued to an alien described in subparagraph (A) regardless of when the visa or other entry documentation is issued.
(ii)
Effect of revocation.— A revocation under clause (i)—
(I)
shall take effect immediately; and
(II)
shall automatically cancel any other valid visa or entry documentation that is in the alien’s possession.
(e)
Assessment and Report on Sanctions With Respect to Burmese State-owned Enterprise Operating in the Energy Sector.—
(1)
In general.— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the President shall conduct an assessment with respect to the Burmese state-owned enterprise described in subsection (c)(1), including relevant factors pertaining to the possible application of sanctions on such enterprise.
(2)
Report required.— Upon making the determination required by paragraph (1), the President shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on the assessment.
(3)
Form of report.— The report required by paragraph (2) shall be submitted in unclassified form but may include a classified annex.
(f)
Exceptions.—
(1)
Exception for intelligence, law enforcement, and national security activities.— Sanctions under this section shall not apply to any authorized intelligence, law enforcement, or national security activities of the United States.
(2)
Exception to comply with international obligations.— Sanctions under subsection (d)(3) shall not apply with respect to the admission of an alien if admitting or paroling the alien into the United States is necessary to permit the United States to comply with the Agreement regarding the Headquarters of the United Nations, signed at Lake Success June 26, 1947, and entered into force November 21, 1947, between the United Nations and the United States, or other applicable international obligations.
(3)
Exception relating to the provision of humanitarian assistance.— Sanctions under this section may not be imposed with respect to transactions or the facilitation of transactions for—
(A)
the sale of agricultural commodities, food, medicine, or medical devices to Burma;
(B)
the provision of humanitarian assistance to the people of Burma;
(C)
financial transactions relating to humanitarian assistance or for humanitarian purposes in Burma; or
(D)
transporting goods or services that are necessary to carry out operations relating to humanitarian assistance or humanitarian purposes in Burma.
(4)
Exception relating to wind-down of projects.— Sanctions under this section shall not be imposed with respect to transactions or the facilitation of transactions related to the disposition of investments pursuant to—
(A)
agreements entered into between United States persons and the Government of Burma prior to May 21, 1997;
(B)
the exercise of rights pursuant to such agreements; or
(C)
transactions related to the subsequent operation of the assets encompassed by such disposed investments.
(g)
Waiver.— The President may, on a case-by-case basis waive the application of sanctions or restrictions imposed with respect to a foreign person under this section if the President certifies to the appropriate congressional committees at the time such waiver is to take effect that the waiver is in the national interest of the United States.
(h)
Implementation; Penalties.—
(1)
Implementation.— The President may exercise all authorities provided to the President under sections 203 and 205 of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1702 and 1704) to carry out this section.
(2)
Penalties.— The penalties provided for in subsections (b) and (c) of section 206 of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1705) shall apply to a person that violates, attempts to violate, conspires to violate, or causes a violation of this section or any regulations promulgated under this section to the same extent that such penalties apply to a person that commits an unlawful act described in section 206(a) of that Act.
(i)
Report.— Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act and annually thereafter for 8 years, the Secretary of State, in consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury, shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a classified report that—
(1)
describes the primary sources of income to which the Burmese military has access and that the United States has been unable to reach using sanctions authorities; and
(2)
assesses the impact of the sanctions imposed pursuant to the authorities under this section on the Burmese people and the Burmese military.

SEC. 5572. Sanctions and Policy Coordination for Burma.

(a)
In General.— The head of the Office of Sanctions Coordination in the Department of State should develop a comprehensive strategy for the implementation of the full range of United States diplomatic capabilities to implement Burma-related sanctions in order to promote human rights and the restoration of civilian government in Burma.
(b)
Matters to Be Included.— The strategy described in subsection (a) should include plans and steps to—
(1)
coordinate the sanctions policies of the United States with relevant bureaus and offices in the Department of State and other relevant United States Government agencies;
(2)
conduct relevant research and vetting of entities and individuals that may be subject to sanctions and coordinate with other United States Government agencies and international financial intelligence units to assist in efforts to enforce anti-money laundering and anti-corruption laws and regulations;
(3)
promote a comprehensive international effort to impose and enforce multilateral sanctions with respect to Burma;
(4)
support interagency United States Government efforts, including efforts of the United States Chief of Mission to Burma, the United States Ambassador to ASEAN, and the United States Permanent Representative to the United Nations, relating to—
(A)
identifying opportunities to exert pressure on the governments of the People’s Republic of China and the Russian Federation to support multilateral action against the Burmese military; and
(B)
working with like-minded partners to impose a coordinated arms embargo on the Burmese military and targeted sanctions on the economic interests of the Burmese military, including through the introduction and adoption of a United Nations Security Council resolution; and
(5)
provide timely input for reporting on the impacts of the implementation of sanctions on the Burmese military and the people of Burma.

SEC. 5573. Support for Greater United Nations Action with Respect to Burma.

(a)
Sense of Congress.— It is the sense of Congress that—
(1)
the United Nations Security Council has not taken adequate steps to condemn the February 1, 2021, coup in Burma, pressure the Burmese military to cease its violence against civilians, or secure the release of those unjustly detained;
(2)
countries, such as the People’s Republic of China and the Russian Federation, that are directly or indirectly shielding the Burmese military from international scrutiny and action, should be obliged to endure the reputational damage of doing so by taking public votes on resolutions related to Burma that apply greater pressure on the Burmese military to restore Burma to its democratic path; and
(3)
the United Nations Secretariat and the United Nations Security Council should take concrete steps to address the coup and ongoing crisis in Burma consistent with United Nations General Assembly resolution 75/287, “The situation in Myanmar,” which was adopted on June 18, 2021.
(b)
Support for Greater Action.— The President shall direct the United States Permanent Representative to the United Nations to use the voice, vote, and influence of the United States to spur greater action by the United Nations and the United Nations Security Council with respect to Burma by—
(1)
pushing the United Nations Security Council to consider a resolution condemning the February 1, 2021, coup and calling on the Burmese military to cease its violence against the people of Burma and release without preconditions the journalists, pro-democracy activists, and political officials that it has unjustly detained;
(2)
pushing the United Nations Security Council to consider a resolution that immediately imposes a global arms embargo against Burma to ensure that the Burmese military is not able to obtain weapons and munitions from other nations to further harm, murder, and oppress the people of Burma;
(3)
pushing the United Nations and other United Nations authorities to cut off assistance to the Government of Burma while providing humanitarian assistance directly to the people of Burma through United Nations bodies and civil society organizations, particularly such organizations working with ethnic minorities that have been adversely affected by the coup and the Burmese military’s violent crackdown; and
(4)
spurring the United Nations Security Council to consider multilateral sanctions against the Burmese military for its atrocities against Rohingya and individuals of other ethnic and religious minorities, its coup, and the atrocities it has and continues to commit in the coup’s aftermath.
(c)
Sense of Congress.— It is the sense of Congress that the United States Permanent Representative to the United Nations should use the voice, vote, and influence of the United States to—
(1)
object to the appointment of representatives to the United Nations and United Nations bodies such as the Human Rights Council that are sanctioned by the Burmese military; and
(2)
work to ensure the Burmese military is not recognized as the legitimate government of Burma in any United Nations body.

SEC. 5574. Sunset.

(a)
In General.— The authority to impose sanctions and the sanctions imposed under this part shall terminate on the date that is 8 years after the date of the enactment of this Act.
(b)
Certification for Early Sunset of Sanctions.— Sanctions imposed under this part may be removed before the date specified in subsection (a), if the President submits to the appropriate congressional committees a certification that—
(1)
the Burmese military has released all political prisoners taken into custody on or after February 1, 2021, or is providing legal recourse to those that remain in custody;
(2)
the elected government of Burma has been reinstated or new free and fair elections have been held;
(3)
all legal charges against those winning election in November 2020 are dropped; and
(4)
the 2008 constitution of Burma has been amended or replaced to place the Burmese military under civilian oversight and ensure that the Burmese military no longer automatically receives 25 percent of seats in Burma’s state, regional, and national Hluttaws.
(c)
Notification for Early Sunset of Sanctions on Individuals.—
(1)
In general.— The President may terminate the application of sanctions under this part with respect to specific individuals if the President submits to the appropriate congressional committees—
(A)
a notice of and justification for the termination; and
(B)
a notice that the individual is not engaging in the activity or is no longer occupying the position that was the basis for the sanctions or has taken significant verifiable steps toward stopping the activity.
(2)
Form.— The notice required by paragraph (1) shall be submitted in unclassified form but may include a classified annex.

PART 3 Authorizations of Appropriations for Assistance for Burma

SEC. 5575. General Authorization of Appropriations.

During each of the fiscal years 2023 through 2027, following consultation with the appropriate congressional committees and subject to the limitations described in section 5576, funds authorized to be made available to carry out chapter 4 of part II of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 may be made available, notwithstanding any other provision of law, for—
(1)
programs to strengthen federalism in and among ethnic states in Burma, including for non-lethal assistance for Ethnic Armed Organizations in Burma;
(2)
the administrative operations and programs of entities in Burma, including the political entities and affiliates of Ethnic Armed Organizations and pro-democracy movement organizations, that support efforts to establish an inclusive and representative democracy in Burma;
(3)
technical support and non-lethal assistance for Burma’s Ethnic Armed Organizations, People’s Defense Forces, and pro-democracy movement organizations to strengthen communications and command and control, and coordination of international relief and other operations between and among such entities;
(4)
programs and activities relating to former members of the Burmese military that have condemned the February 1, 2022, coup d’etat and voiced support for the restoration of civilian rule;
(5)
programs to assist civil society organizations to investigate and document atrocities in Burma for the purposes of truth, justice, and accountability;
(6)
programs to assist civil society organizations in Burma that support individuals that who are unlawfully detained in Burma for exercising their fundamental freedoms; and
(7)
programs to assist civil society organizations and ethnic groups with reconciliation activities related to Burma.

SEC. 5576. Limitations.

Except as provided for by this part, none of the funds authorized to be appropriated for assistance for Burma by this part may be made available to—
(1)
the State Administrative Council or any organization or entity controlled by, or an affiliate of, the Burmese military, or to any individual or organization that has committed a gross violation of human rights or advocates violence against ethnic or religious groups or individuals in Burma, as determined by the Secretary of State for programs administered by the Department of State and the United States Agency for International Development, or President of the National Endowment for Democracy (NED) for programs administered by NED; and
(2)
the Burmese military.

SEC. 5577. Appropriate Congressional Committees Defined.

In this part, the term “appropriate congressional committees” means—
(1)
the Committee on Foreign Relations, the Committee on Armed Services, and the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate; and
(2)
the Committee on Foreign Affairs, the Committee on Armed Services, and the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives.

PART 4 Efforts Against Human Rights Abuses

SEC. 5578. Authorization to Provide Technical Assistance for Efforts Against Human Rights Abuses.

(a)
In General.— The Secretary of State is authorized to provide assistance to support appropriate civilian or international entities that—
(1)
identify suspected perpetrators of war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide in Burma;
(2)
collect, document, and protect evidence of crimes in Burma and preserving the chain of custody for such evidence;
(3)
conduct criminal investigations of such crimes; and
(4)
support investigations related to Burma conducted by other countries, and by entities mandated by the United Nations, such as the Independent Investigative Mechanism for Myanmar.
(b)
Authorization for Transitional Justice Mechanisms.— The Secretary of State, taking into account any relevant findings in the report submitted under section 5941, is authorized to provide support for the establishment and operation of transitional justice mechanisms, including a hybrid tribunal, to prosecute individuals suspected of committing war crimes, crimes against humanity, or genocide in Burma.

PART 5 Sanctions Exception Relating to Importation of Goods

SEC. 5579. Sanctions Exception Relating to Importation of Goods.

(a)
In General.— The authorities and requirements to impose sanctions under this subtitle shall not include the authority or requirement to impose sanctions on the importation of goods.
(b)
Good Defined.— In this section, the term “good” means any article, natural or man-made substance, material, supply, or manufactured product, including inspection and test equipment, and excluding technical data.

Subtitle F Promotion of Freedom of Information and Countering of Censorship and Surveillance in North Korea

SEC. 5580. Short Title.

This subtitle may be cited as the “Otto Warmbier Countering North Korean Censorship and Surveillance Act of 2022”.

SEC. 5581. Findings; Sense of Congress.

(a)
Findings.— Congress makes the following findings:
(1)
The information landscape in North Korea is the most repressive in the world, consistently ranking last or near-last in the annual World Press Freedom Index.
(2)
Under the brutal rule of Kim Jung Un, the country’s leader since 2012, the North Korean regime has tightened controls on access to information, as well as enacted harsh punishments for consumers of outside media, including sentencing to time in a concentration camp and a maximum penalty of death.
(3)
Such repressive and unjust laws surrounding information in North Korea resulted in the death of 22-year-old United States citizen and university student Otto Warmbier, who had traveled to North Korea in December 2015 as part of a guided tour.
(4)
Otto Warmbier was unjustly arrested, sentenced to 15 years of hard labor, and severely mistreated at the hands of North Korean officials. While in captivity, Otto Warmbier suffered a serious medical emergency that placed him into a comatose state. Otto Warmbier was comatose upon his release in June 2017 and died 6 days later.
(5)
Despite increased penalties for possession and viewership of foreign media, the people of North Korean have increased their desire for foreign media content, according to a survey of 200 defectors concluding that 90 percent had watched South Korean or other foreign media before defecting.
(6)
On March 23, 2021, in an annual resolution, the United Nations General Assembly condemned “the long-standing and ongoing systematic, widespread and gross violations of human rights in the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea” and expressed grave concern at, among other things, “the denial of the right to freedom of thought, conscience, and religion . . . and of the rights to freedom of opinion, expression, and association, both online and offline, which is enforced through an absolute monopoly on information and total control over organized social life, and arbitrary and unlawful state surveillance that permeates the private lives of all citizens”.
(7)
In 2018, Typhoon Yutu caused extensive damage to 15 broadcast antennas used by the United States Agency for Global Media in Asia, resulting in reduced programming to North Korea. The United States Agency for Global Media has rebuilt 5 of the 15 antenna systems as of June 2021.
(b)
Sense of Congress.— It is the sense of Congress that—
(1)
in the event of a crisis situation, particularly where information pertaining to the crisis is being actively censored or a false narrative is being put forward, the United States should be able to quickly increase its broadcasting capability to deliver fact-based information to audiences, including those in North Korea; and
(2)
the United States International Broadcasting Surge Capacity Fund is already authorized under section 316 of the United States International Broadcasting Act of 1994 (22 U.S.C. 6216), and expanded authority to transfer unobligated balances from expired accounts of the United States Agency for Global Media would enable the Agency to more nimbly respond to crises.

SEC. 5582. Statement of Policy.

It is the policy of the United States—
(1)
to provide the people of North Korea with access to a diverse range of fact-based information;
(2)
to develop and implement novel means of communication and information sharing that increase opportunities for audiences in North Korea to safely create, access, and share digital and non-digital news without fear of repressive censorship, surveillance, or penalties under law; and
(3)
to foster and innovate new technologies to counter North Korea’s state-sponsored repressive surveillance and censorship by advancing internet freedom tools, technologies, and new approaches.

SEC. 5583. United States Strategy to Combat North Korea’s Repressive Information Environment.

(a)
In General.— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the President shall develop and submit to Congress a strategy on combating North Korea’s repressive information environment.
(b)
Elements.— The strategy required by subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1)
An assessment of the challenges to the free flow of information into North Korea created by the censorship and surveillance technology apparatus of the Government of North Korea.
(2)
A detailed description of the agencies and other government entities, key officials, and security services responsible for the implementation of North Korea’s repressive laws regarding foreign media consumption.
(3)
A detailed description of the agencies and other government entities and key officials of foreign governments that assist, facilitate, or aid North Korea’s repressive censorship and surveillance state.
(4)
A review of existing public-private partnerships that provide circumvention technology and an assessment of the feasibility and utility of new tools to increase free expression, circumvent censorship, and obstruct repressive surveillance in North Korea.
(5)
A description of and funding levels required for current United States Government programs and activities to provide access for the people of North Korea to a diverse range of fact-based information.
(6)
An update of the plan required by section 104(a)(7)(A) of the North Korean Human Rights Act of 2004 (22 U.S.C. 7814(a)(7)(A)).
(7)
A description of Department of State programs and funding levels for programs that promote internet freedom in North Korea, including monitoring and evaluation efforts.
(8)
A description of grantee programs of the United States Agency for Global Media in North Korea that facilitate circumvention tools and broadcasting, including monitoring and evaluation efforts.
(9)
A detailed assessment of how the United States International Broadcasting Surge Capacity Fund authorized under section 316 of the United States International Broadcasting Act of 1994 (22 U.S.C. 6216) has operated to respond to crisis situations in the past, and how authority to transfer unobligated balances from expired accounts would help the United States Agency for Global Media in crisis situations in the future.
(10)
A detailed plan for how the authorization of appropriations under section 5584 will operate alongside and augment existing programming from the relevant Federal agencies and facilitate the development of new tools to assist that programming.
(11)
A detailed plan for engagement and coordination with the Republic of Korea, as appropriate, necessary for implementing the objectives of the strategy required by subsection (a), including—
(A)
with regard to any new or expanded activities contemplated under paragraphs (9) and (10); and
(B)
any cooperation with or approval from the Government of the Republic of Korea required to carry out such activities.
(c)
Form of Strategy.— The strategy required by subsection (a) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include the matters required by paragraphs (2) and (3) of subsection (b) in a classified annex.

SEC. 5584. Promoting Freedom of Information and Countering Censorship and Surveillance in North Korea.

(a)
Authorization of Appropriations.— There are authorized to be appropriated to the United States Agency for Global Media an additional $10,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2024 through 2027 to provide increased broadcasting and grants for the following purposes:
(1)
To promote the development of internet freedom tools, technologies, and new approaches, including both digital and non-digital means of information sharing related to North Korea.
(2)
To explore public-private partnerships to counter North Korea’s repressive censorship and surveillance state.
(3)
To develop new means to protect the privacy and identity of individuals receiving media from the United States Agency for Global Media and other outside media outlets from within North Korea.
(4)
To bolster existing programming from the United States Agency for Global Media by restoring the broadcasting capacity of damaged antennas caused by Typhoon Yutu in 2018.
(b)
Annual Reports.— Section 104(a)(7)(B) of the North Korean Human Rights Act of 2004 (22 U.S.C. 7814(a)(7)(B)) is amended—
(1)
in the matter preceding clause (i)—
(A)
by striking “ 1 year after the date of the enactment of this paragraph” and inserting “ September 30, 2022”; and
(B)
by striking “ Broadcasting Board of Governors” and inserting “ Chief Executive Officer of the United States Agency for Global Media”; and
(2)
in clause (i), by inserting after “ this section” the following: “ and sections 5583 and 5584 of the Otto Warmbier Countering North Korean Censorship and Surveillance Act of 2022”.

Subtitle G Other Matters

SEC. 5585. Congressional Notification for Rewards Paid Using Cryptocurrencies.

(a)
In General.— Section 36(e)(6) of the State Department Basic Authorities Act of 1956 (22 U.S.C. 2708(e)(6)) is amended by adding at the end the following new sentence: “ Not later than 15 days before making a reward in a form that includes cryptocurrency, the Secretary of State shall notify the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate of such form for the reward.”.
(b)
Report.— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of State shall submit to the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate a report on the use of cryptocurrency as a part of the Department of State Rewards program established under section 36(a) of the State Department Basic Authorities Act of 1956 (22 U.S.C. 2708(a)) that—
(1)
justifies any determination of the Secretary to make rewards under such program in a form that includes cryptocurrency;
(2)
lists each cryptocurrency payment made under such program as of the date of the submission of the report;
(3)
provides evidence of the manner and extent to which cryptocurrency payments would be more likely to induce whistleblowers to come forward with information than rewards paid out in United States dollars or other forms of money or nonmonetary items; and
(4)
examines whether the Department’s use of cryptocurrency could provide bad actors with additional hard-to-trace funds that could be used for criminal or illicit purposes.

SEC. 5586. Secure Access to Sanitation Facilities for Women and Girls.

Subsection (a) of section 501 of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 1994 and 1995 (22 U.S.C. 2601 note) is amended—
(1)
by redesignating paragraphs (6) through (11) as paragraphs (7) through (12), respectively; and
(2)
by inserting after paragraph (5) the following:

“(6) the provision of safe and secure access to sanitation facilities, with a special emphasis on women and children;”

SEC. 5587. Reauthorization of the Tropical Forest and Coral Reef Conservation Act of 1998.

Section 806(d) of the Tropical Forest and Coral Reef Conservation Act of 1998 (22 U.S.C. 2431d(d)) is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraphs:

“(9) $20,000,000 for fiscal year 2023.

“(10) $20,000,000 for fiscal year 2024.

“(11) $20,000,000 for fiscal year 2025.

“(12) $20,000,000 for fiscal year 2026.

“(13) $20,000,000 for fiscal year 2027.”

SEC. 5588. Global Food Security Reauthorization Act of 2022.

(a)
Findings.— Section 2 of the Global Food Security Act of 2016 (22 U.S.C. 9301) is amended by striking “ Congress makes” and all that follows through “ (3) A comprehensive” and inserting “ Congress finds that a comprehensive”.
(b)
Statement of Policy Objectives; Sense of Congress.— Section 3(a) of such Act (22 U.S.C. 9302(a)) is amended—
(1)
in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking “ programs, activities, and initiatives that” and inserting “ comprehensive, multi-sectoral programs, activities, and initiatives that consider agriculture and food systems in their totality and that”.
(2)
in paragraph (1), by striking “ and economic freedom through the coordination” and inserting “ , economic freedom, and security through the phasing, sequencing, and coordination”;
(3)
by striking paragraphs (3) and (4) and inserting the following:

“(3) increase the productivity, incomes, and livelihoods of small-scale producers and artisanal fishing communities, especially women in these communities, by working across terrestrial and aquatic food systems and agricultural value chains, including by—

“(A) enhancing local capacity to manage agricultural resources and food systems effectively and expanding producer access to, and participation in, local, regional, and international markets;

“(B) increasing the availability and affordability of high quality nutritious and safe foods and clean water;

“(C) creating entrepreneurship opportunities and improving access to business development related to agriculture and food systems, including among youth populations, linked to local, regional, and international markets; and

“(D) enabling partnerships to facilitate the development of and investment in new agricultural technologies to support more resilient and productive agricultural practices;

“(4) build resilience to agriculture and food systems shocks and stresses, including global food catastrophes in which conventional methods of agriculture are unable to provide sufficient food and nutrition to sustain the global population, among vulnerable populations and households through inclusive growth, while reducing reliance upon emergency food and economic assistance;”

(4)
by amending paragraph (6) to read as follows:

“(6) improve the nutritional status of women, adolescent girls, and children, with a focus on reducing child stunting and incidence of wasting, including through the promotion of highly nutritious foods, diet diversification, large-scale food fortification, and nutritional behaviors that improve maternal and child health and nutrition, especially during the first 1,000-day window until a child reaches 2 years of age;”

; and

(5)
in paragraph (7)—
(A)
by striking “ science and technology,” and inserting “ combating fragility, resilience, science and technology, natural resource management”; and
(B)
by inserting “ , including deworming,” after “ nutrition,”.
(c)
Definitions.— Section 4 of the Global Food Security Act of 2016 (22 U.S.C. 9303) is amended—
(1)
in paragraph (2), by inserting “ , including in response to shocks and stresses to food and nutrition security” before the period at the end;
(2)
by redesignating paragraphs (4) through (12) as paragraphs (5) through (13), respectively;
(3)
by inserting after paragraph (3) the following:

“(4) Food system.—The term ‘food system’ means the intact or whole unit made up of interrelated components of people, behaviors, relationships, and material goods that interact in the production, processing, packaging, transporting, trade, marketing, consumption, and use of food, feed, and fiber through aquaculture, farming, wild fisheries, forestry, and pastoralism that operates within and is influenced by social, political, economic, and environmental contexts.”

(4)
in paragraph (6), as redesignated, by amending subparagraph (H) to read as follows:

“(H) local agricultural producers, including farmer and fisher organizations, cooperatives, small-scale producers, youth, and women; and”

(5)
in paragraph (7), as redesignated, by inserting “ the Inter-American Foundation,” after “ United States African Development Foundation,”;
(6)
in paragraph (9), as redesignated—
(A)
by inserting “ agriculture and food” before “ systems”; and
(B)
by inserting “ , including global food catastrophes,” after “ food security”;
(7)
in paragraph (10), as redesignated, by striking “ fishers” and inserting “ artisanal fishing communities”;
(8)
in paragraph (11), as redesignated, by amending subparagraphs (D) and (E) to read as follows:

“(D) is a marker of an environment deficient in the various needs that allow for a child’s healthy growth, including nutrition; and

“(E) is associated with long-term poor health, delayed motor development, impaired cognitive function, and decreased immunity.”

(9)
in paragraph (13), as redesignated, by striking “ agriculture and nutrition security” and inserting “ food and nutrition security and agriculture-led economic growth”; and
(10)
by adding at the end the following:

“(14) Wasting.—The term ‘wasting’ means—

“(A) a life-threatening condition attributable to poor nutrient intake or disease that is characterized by a rapid deterioration in nutritional status over a short period of time; and

“(B) in the case of children, is characterized by low weight for height and weakened immunity, increasing their risk of death due to greater frequency and severity of common infection, particularly when severe.”

(d)
Comprehensive Global Food Security Strategy.— Section 5(a) of the Global Food Security Act of 2016 (22 U.S.C. 9304) is amended—
(1)
in paragraph (4), by striking “ country-owned agriculture, nutrition, and food security policy and investment plans” and inserting “ partner country-led agriculture, nutrition, regulatory, food security, and water resources management policy and investment plans and governance systems”;
(2)
by amending paragraph (5) to read as follows:

“(5) support the locally-led and inclusive development of agriculture and food systems, including by enhancing the extent to which small-scale food producers, especially women, have access to and control over the inputs, skills, resource management capacity, networking, bargaining power, financing, market linkages, technology, and information needed to sustainably increase productivity and incomes, reduce poverty and malnutrition, and promote long-term economic prosperity;”

(3)
in paragraph (6)—
(A)
by inserting “ , adolescent girls,” after “ women”; and
(B)
by inserting “ and preventing incidence of wasting” after “ reducing child stunting”;
(4)
in paragraph (7), by inserting “ poor water resource management and” after “ including”;
(5)
in paragraph (8)—
(A)
by striking “ the long-term success of programs” and inserting “ long-term impact”; and
(B)
by inserting “ , including agricultural research capacity,” after “ institutions”;
(6)
in paragraph (9), by striking “ integrate resilience and nutrition strategies into food security programs, such that chronically vulnerable populations are better able to” and inserting “ coordinate with and complement relevant strategies to ensure that chronically vulnerable populations are better able to adapt,”;
(7)
by redesignating paragraph (17) as paragraph (22);
(8)
by redesignating paragraphs (12) through (16) as paragraphs (14) through (18), respectively;
(9)
by striking paragraphs (10) and (11) and inserting the following:

“(10) develop community and producer resilience and adaptation strategies to disasters, emergencies, and other shocks and stresses to food and nutrition security, including conflicts, droughts, flooding, pests, and diseases, that adversely impact agricultural yield and livelihoods;

“(11) harness science, technology, and innovation, including the research and extension activities supported by the private sector, relevant Federal departments and agencies, Feed the Future Innovation Labs or any successor entities, and international and local researchers and innovators, recognizing that significant investments in research and technological advances will be necessary to reduce global poverty, hunger, and malnutrition;

“(12) use evidenced-based best practices, including scientific and forecasting data, and improved planning and coordination by, with, and among key partners and relevant Federal departments and agencies to identify, analyze, measure, and mitigate risks, and strengthen resilience capacities;

“(13) ensure scientific and forecasting data is accessible and usable by affected communities and facilitate communication and collaboration among local stakeholders in support of adaptation planning and implementation, including scenario planning and preparedness using seasonal forecasting and scientific and local knowledge;”

(10)
in paragraph (15), as redesignated, by inserting “ nongovernmental organizations, including” after “ civil society,”;
(11)
in paragraph (16), as redesignated, by inserting “ and coordination, as appropriate,” after “ collaboration”;
(12)
in paragraph (18), as redesignated, by striking “ section 8(b)(4); and” and inserting “ section 8(a)(4);”; and
(13)
by inserting after paragraph (18), as redesignated, the following:

“(19) improve the efficiency and resilience of agricultural production, including management of crops, rangelands, pastures, livestock, fisheries, and aquacultures;

“(20) ensure investments in food and nutrition security consider and integrate best practices in the management and governance of natural resources and conservation, especially among food insecure populations living in or near biodiverse ecosystems;

“(21) be periodically updated in a manner that reflects learning and best practices; and”

(e)
Periodic Updates.— Section 5 of the Global Food Security Act of 2016 (22 U.S.C. 9304), as amended by subsection (d), is further amended by adding at the end the following:

“(d) Periodic Updates.—Not less frequently than quinquennially through fiscal year 2030, the President, in consultation with the head of each relevant Federal department and agency, shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees updates to the Global Food Security Strategy required under subsection (a) and the agency-specific plans described in subsection (c)(2).”

(f)
Authorization of Appropriations to Implement the Global Food Security Strategy.— Section 6(b) of such Act (22 U.S.C. 9305(b)) is amended—
(1)
by striking “ $1,000,600,000 for each of fiscal years 2017 through 2023” and inserting “ $1,200,000,000 for each of the fiscal years 2024 through 2028”; and
(2)
by adding at the end the following: “ Amounts authorized to appropriated under this subsection should be prioritized to carry out programs and activities in target countries.”.
(g)
Emergency Food Security Program.—
(1)
In general.— Section 7 of the Global Food Security Act of 2016 (22 U.S.C. 9306) is amended by striking “ (a) Sense of Congress.—” and all that follows through “ It shall be” and inserting “ It shall be”.
(2)
Authorization of appropriations.— Section 492(a) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2292a(a)) is amended by striking “ $2,794,184,000 for each of fiscal years 2017 through 2023, of which up to $1,257,382,000” and inserting “ $3,905,460,000 for each of the fiscal years 2024 through 2028, of which up to $1,757,457,000”.
(h)
Reports.— Section 8(a) of the Global Food Security Act of 2016 (22 U.S.C. 9307) is amended—
(1)
in the matter preceding paragraph (1)—
(A)
by striking “ During each of the first 7 years after the date of the submission of the strategy required under section 5(c),” and inserting “ For each of the fiscal years through 2028,”;
(B)
by striking “ reports that describe” and inserting “ a report that describes”; and
(C)
by striking “ at the end of the reporting period” and inserting “ during the preceding year”;
(2)
in paragraph (2), by inserting “ , including any changes to the target countries selected pursuant to the selection criteria described in section 5(a)(2) and justifications for any such changes” before the semicolon at the end;
(3)
in paragraph (3), by inserting “ identify and” before “ describe”;
(4)
by redesignating paragraphs (12) through (14) as paragraphs (15) through (17), respectively;
(5)
by redesignating paragraphs (5) through (11) as paragraphs (7) through (13), respectively;
(6)
by striking paragraph (4) and inserting the following:

“(4) identify and describe the priority quantitative metrics used to establish baselines and performance targets at the initiative, country, and zone of influence levels;

“(5) identify such established baselines and performance targets at the country and zone of influence levels;

“(6) identify the output and outcome benchmarks and indicators used to measure results annually, and report the annual measurement of results for each of the priority metrics identified pursuant to paragraph (4), disaggregated by age, gender, and disability, to the extent practicable and appropriate, in an open and transparent manner that is accessible to the people of the United States;”

(7)
in paragraph (7), as redesignated, by striking “ agriculture” and inserting “ food”;
(8)
in paragraph (8), as redesignated—
(A)
by inserting “ quantitative and qualitative” after “ how”; and
(B)
by inserting “ at the initiative, country, and zone of influence levels, including longitudinal data and key uncertainties” before the semicolon at the end;
(9)
in paragraph (9), as redesignated, by inserting “ within target countries, amounts and justification for any spending outside of target countries” after “ amounts spent”;
(10)
in paragraph (13), as redesignated, by striking “ and the impact of private sector investment” and inserting “ and efforts to encourage financial donor burden sharing and the impact of such investment and efforts”;
(11)
by inserting after paragraph (13), as redesignated, the following:

“(14) describe how agriculture research is prioritized within the Global Food Security Strategy to support agriculture-led growth and eventual self-sufficiency and assess efforts to coordinate research programs within the Global Food Security Strategy with key stakeholders;”

(12)
in paragraph (16), as redesignated, by striking “ and” at the end;
(13)
in paragraph (17), as redesignated—
(A)
by inserting “ , including key challenges or missteps,” after “ lessons learned”; and
(B)
by striking the period at the end and inserting “ ; and”; and
(14)
by adding at the end the following:

“(18) during the final year of each strategy required under section 5, complete country graduation reports to determine whether a country should remain a target country based on quantitative and qualitative analysis.”

SEC. 5589. Extension and Modification of Certain Export Controls.

(a)
Extension of Export Prohibition on Munitions Items to the Hong Kong Police Force.— Section 3 of the Act entitled “An Act to prohibit the commercial export of covered munitions items to the Hong Kong Police Force”, approved November 27, 2019 (Public Law 116–77; 133 Stat. 1173), is amended by striking “ shall expire” and all that follows and inserting “ shall expire on December 31, 2024.”.
(b)
Modification of Authority of President Under Export Control Reform Act of 2018.— Section 1753(a)(2)(F) of the Export Control Reform Act of 2018 (50 U.S.C. 4812(a)(2)(F)) is amended by inserting “ , security, or” before “ intelligence”.

SEC. 5590. Imposition of Sanctions with Respect to the Sale, Supply, or Transfer of Gold to or from Russia.

(a)
Identification.— Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and periodically as necessary thereafter, the President—
(1)
shall submit to Congress a report identifying foreign persons that knowingly participated in a significant transaction—
(A)
for the sale, supply, or transfer (including transportation) of gold, directly or indirectly, to or from the Russian Federation or the Government of the Russian Federation, including from reserves of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation held outside the Russian Federation; or
(B)
that otherwise involved gold in which the Government of the Russian Federation had any interest; and
(2)
shall impose the sanctions described in subsection (b)(1) with respect to each such person; and
(3)
may impose the sanctions described in subsection (b)(2) with respect to any such person that is an alien.
(b)
Sanctions Described.— The sanctions described in this subsection are the following:
(1)
Blocking of property.— The exercise of all powers granted to the President by the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.) to the extent necessary to block and prohibit all transactions in all property and interests in property of a foreign person identified in the report required by subsection (a)(1) if such property and interests in property are in the United States, come within the United States, or are or come within the possession or control of a United States person.
(2)
Ineligibility for visas, admission, or parole.—
(A)
Visas, admission, or parole.— An alien described in subsection (a)(1) is—
(i)
inadmissible to the United States;
(ii)
ineligible to receive a visa or other documentation to enter the United States; and
(iii)
otherwise ineligible to be admitted or paroled into the United States or to receive any other benefit under the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.).
(B)
Current visas revoked.—
(i)
In general.— The issuing consular officer, the Secretary of State, or the Secretary of Homeland Security (or a designee of one of such Secretaries) shall, in accordance with section 221(i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1201(i)), revoke any visa or other entry documentation issued to an alien described in subsection (a)(1).
(ii)
Immediate effect.— The revocation under clause (i) of a visa or other entry documentation issued to an alien shall—
(I)
take effect immediately; and
(II)
automatically cancel any other valid visa or entry documentation that is in the alien’s possession.
(c)
Implementation; Penalties.—
(1)
Implementation.— The President may exercise all authorities provided under sections 203 and 205 of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1702 and 1704) to carry out this section.
(2)
Penalties.— A person that violates, attempts to violate, conspires to violate, or causes a violation of this section or any regulation, license, or order issued to carry out this section shall be subject to the penalties set forth in subsections (b) and (c) of section 206 of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1705) to the same extent as a person that commits an unlawful act described in subsection (a) of that section.
(d)
National Interest Waiver.— The President may waive the imposition of sanctions under this section with respect to a person if the President—
(1)
determines that such a waiver is in the national interests of the United States; and
(2)
submits to Congress a notification of the waiver and the reasons for the waiver.
(e)
Termination.—
(1)
In general.— Except as provided in paragraph (2), the requirement to impose sanctions under this section, and any sanctions imposed under this section, shall terminate on the earlier of—
(A)
the date that is 3 years after the date of the enactment of this Act; or
(B)
the date that is 30 days after the date on which the President certifies to Congress that—
(i)
the Government of the Russian Federation has ceased its destabilizing activities with respect to the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Ukraine; and
(ii)
such termination in the national interests of the United States.
(2)
Transition rules.—
(A)
Continuation of certain authorities.— Any authorities exercised before the termination date under paragraph (1) to impose sanctions with respect to a foreign person under this section may continue to be exercised on and after that date if the President determines that the continuation of those authorities is in the national interests of the United States.
(B)
Application to ongoing investigations.— The termination date under paragraph (1) shall not apply to any investigation of a civil or criminal violation of this section or any regulation, license, or order issued to carry out this section, or the imposition of a civil or criminal penalty for such a violation, if—
(i)
the violation occurred before the termination date; or
(ii)
the person involved in the violation continues to be subject to sanctions pursuant to subparagraph (A).
(f)
Exceptions.—
(1)
Exceptions for authorized intelligence and law enforcement and national security activities.— This section shall not apply with respect to activities subject to the reporting requirements under title V of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3091 et seq.) or any authorized intelligence, law enforcement, or national security activities of the United States.
(2)
Exception to comply with international agreements.— Sanctions under subsection (b)(2) may not apply with respect to the admission of an alien to the United States if such admission is necessary to comply with the obligations of the United States under the Agreement regarding the Headquarters of the United Nations, signed at Lake Success June 26, 1947, and entered into force November 21, 1947, between the United Nations and the United States, or the Convention on Consular Relations, done at Vienna April 24, 1963, and entered into force March 19, 1967, or other international obligations.
(3)
Humanitarian exemption.— The President shall not impose sanctions under this section with respect to any person for conducting or facilitating a transaction for the sale of agricultural commodities, food, medicine, or medical devices or for the provision of humanitarian assistance.
(4)
Exception relating to importation of goods.—
(A)
In general.— The requirement or authority to impose sanctions under this section shall not include the authority or a requirement to impose sanctions on the importation of goods.
(B)
Good defined.— In this paragraph, the term “good” means any article, natural or manmade substance, material, supply, or manufactured product, including inspection and test equipment, and excluding technical data.
(g)
Definitions.— In this section:
(1)
The terms “admission”, “admitted”, “alien”, and “lawfully admitted for permanent residence” have the meanings given those terms in section 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101).
(2)
The term “foreign person” means an individual or entity that is not a United States person.
(3)
The term “knowingly”, with respect to conduct, a circumstance, or a result, means that a person has actual knowledge, or should have known, of the conduct, the circumstance, or the result.
(4)
The term “United States person” means—
(A)
a United States citizen or an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence to the United States;
(B)
an entity organized under the laws of the United States or any jurisdiction within the United States, including a foreign branch of such an entity; or
(C)
any person in the United States.

SEC. 5591. Renegotiation of Compacts of Free Association.

(a)
Sense of Congress.— It is the sense of Congress as follows:
(1)
The United States shares deep ties, history and interests with the Freely Associated States of the Republic of the Marshall Islands, Federated States of Micronesia, and Palau and continues a special, unique and mutually beneficial relationship with them under the decades-old Compacts of Free Association.
(2)
Under the Compacts, the United States has undertaken the responsibility and obligation to provide and ensure the security and defense of the Freely Associated States.
(3)
The Compacts are critical to the national security of the United States and its allies and partners and are the bedrock of the United States role in the Pacific.
(4)
Renewal of key provisions of the Compacts, now being renegotiated with each nation, is critical for regional security.
(5)
Maintaining and strengthening the Compacts supports both United States national security and the United States responsibility for the security and defense of the Freely Associated States.
(b)
Briefing on Renegotiations.— Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of State, in coordination with the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of the Interior, shall brief the following committees on the status of the renegotiations of the Compacts of Free Association described in subsection (a) and opportunities to expand its support for the renegotiations:
(1)
The congressional defense committees.
(2)
The Committee on Foreign Affairs and the Committee on Natural Resources of the House of Representatives.
(3)
The Committee on Foreign Relations and the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate.

SEC. 5592. Secretary of State Assistance for Prisoners in Islamic Republic of Iran.

(a)
Statement of Policy.— It is the policy of the United States that—
(1)
the Islamic Republic of Iran should allow the United Nations Special Rapporteur on the Situation of Human Rights in the Islamic Republic of Iran unimpeded access to facilitate the full implementation of the mandate of the United Nations Special Rapporteur, including—
(A)
investigating alleged violations of human rights that are occurring or have occurred both within prisons and elsewhere;
(B)
transmitting urgent appeals and letters to the Islamic Republic of Iran regarding alleged violations of human rights; and
(C)
engaging with relevant stakeholders in the Islamic Republic of Iran and the surrounding region;
(2)
the Islamic Republic of Iran should immediately end violations of the human rights of political prisoners or persons imprisoned for exercising the right to freedom of speech, including—
(A)
torture;
(B)
denial of access to health care; and
(C)
denial of a fair trial;
(3)
all prisoners of conscience and political prisoners in the Islamic Republic of Iran should be unconditionally and immediately released;
(4)
all diplomatic tools of the United States should be invoked to ensure that all prisoners of conscience and political prisoners in the Islamic Republic of Iran are released, including raising individual cases of particular concern; and
(5)
all officials of the government of the Islamic Republic of Iran who are responsible for human rights abuses in the form of politically motivated imprisonment should be held to account, including through the imposition of sanctions pursuant to the Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act (22 U.S.C. 10101 et seq.) and other applicable statutory authorities of the United States.
(b)
Assistance for Prisoners.— The Secretary of State is authorized to continue to provide assistance to civil society organizations that support prisoners of conscience and political prisoners in the Islamic Republic of Iran, including organizations that—
(1)
work to secure the release of such prisoners;
(2)
document violations of human rights with respect to such prisoners;
(3)
support international advocacy to raise awareness of issues relating to such prisoners;
(4)
support the health, including mental health, of such prisoners; and
(5)
provide post-incarceration assistance to enable such prisoners to resume normal lives, including access to education, employment, or other forms of reparation.
(c)
Definitions.— In this section:
(1)
The term “political prisoner” means a person who has been detained or imprisoned on politically motivated grounds.
(2)
The term “prisoner of conscience” means a person who—
(A)
is imprisoned or otherwise physically restricted solely in response to the peaceful exercise of the human rights of such person; and
(B)
has not used violence or advocated violence or hatred.

SEC. 5593. Iran Nuclear Weapons Capability and Terrorism Monitoring Act of 2022.

(a)
Short Title.— This section may be cited as the “Iran Nuclear Weapons Capability and Terrorism Monitoring Act of 2022”.
(b)
Sense of Congress.— It is the sense of Congress that—
(1)
an Islamic Republic of Iran that possesses a nuclear weapons capability would be a serious threat to the national security of the United States, Israel, and other allies and partners;
(2)
the Islamic Republic of Iran has been less than cooperative with international inspectors from the International Atomic Energy Agency and has obstructed their ability to inspect facilities as well as data and recordings collected by surveillance equipment across Iran;
(3)
the Islamic Republic of Iran continues to advance missile and drone programs, which are a threat to the national security of the United States, Israel, and other allies and partners;
(4)
the Islamic Republic of Iran continues to support proxies in the Middle East in a manner that—
(A)
undermines the sovereignty of regional governments;
(B)
threatens the safety of United States citizens;
(C)
threatens United States allies and partners; and
(D)
directly undermines the national security interests of the United States;
(5)
the Islamic Republic of Iran has engaged in assassination plots against former United States officials and has been implicated in plots to kidnap United States citizens within the United States;
(6)
the Islamic Republic of Iran is engaged in unsafe and unprofessional maritime activity that threatens the movement of naval vessels of the United States and the free flow of commerce through strategic maritime chokepoints in the Middle East and North Africa;
(7)
the Islamic Republic of Iran has delivered hundreds of armed drones to the Russian Federation, which will enable Vladimir Putin to continue the assault against Ukraine in direct opposition of the national security interests of the United States; and
(8)
the United States must—
(A)
ensure that the Islamic Republic of Iran does not acquire a nuclear weapons capability;
(B)
protect against aggression from the Islamic Republic of Iran manifested through its missiles and drone programs; and
(C)
counter regional and global terrorism of the Islamic Republic of Iran in a manner that minimizes the threat posed by state and non-state actors to the interests of the United States.
(c)
Definitions.— In this section:
(1)
Appropriate congressional committees.— The term “appropriate congressional committees” means—
(A)
the Committee on Foreign Relations, the Committee on Appropriations, the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate; and
(B)
the Committee on Foreign Affairs, the Committee on Appropriations, the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives.
(2)
Comprehensive safeguards agreement.— The term “Comprehensive Safeguards Agreement” means the Agreement between the Islamic Republic of Iran and the International Atomic Energy Agency for the Application of Safeguards in Connection with the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, done at Vienna June 19, 1973.
(3)
Intelligence community.— The term “intelligence community” has the meaning given the term in section 3 of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3003).
(4)
Task force.— The term “task force” means the task force established under subsection (d).
(5)
Unmanned aircraft system.— The term “unmanned aircraft system” has the meaning given the term in section 44801 of title 49, United States Code.
(d)
Establishment of Interagency Task Force on Nuclear Activity and Global Regional Terrorism of the Islamic Republic of Iran.—
(1)
Establishment.— The Secretary of State shall establish a task force to coordinate and synthesize efforts by the United States Government regarding—
(A)
nuclear activity of the Islamic Republic of Iran or its proxies; and
(B)
regional and global terrorism activity by the Islamic Republic of Iran or its proxies.
(2)
Composition.—
(A)
Chairperson.— The Secretary of State shall be the Chairperson of the task force.
(B)
Membership.—
(i)
In general.— The task force shall be composed of individuals, each of whom shall be an employee of and appointed to the task force by the head of one of the following agencies:
(I)
The Department of State.
(II)
The Department of Defense.
(III)
The Department of Energy.
(ii)
Additional members.— The Chairperson may appoint to the task force additional individuals from other Federal agencies, as the Chairperson considers necessary.
(iii)
Intelligence community support.— The Director of National Intelligence shall ensure that the task force receives all appropriate support from the intelligence community.
(3)
Sunset.— The task force shall terminate on December 31, 2028.
(e)
Assessments.—
(1)
Intelligence assessment on nuclear activity.—
(A)
In general.— Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and every 180 days thereafter until December 31, 2028, the Director of National Intelligence shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees an assessment regarding any uranium enrichment, nuclear weapons development, delivery vehicle development, and associated engineering and research activities of the Islamic Republic of Iran.
(B)
Contents.— The assessment required by subparagraph (A) shall include—
(i)
a description and location of current fuel cycle activities for the production of fissile material being undertaken by the Islamic Republic of Iran, including—
(I)
research and development activities to procure or construct additional advanced IR-2, IR-6 and other model centrifuges and enrichment cascades, including for stable isotopes;
(II)
research and development of reprocessing capabilities, including—
(aa)
reprocessing of spent fuel; and
(bb)
extraction of medical isotopes from irradiated uranium targets;
(III)
activities with respect to designing or constructing reactors, including—
(aa)
the construction of heavy water reactors;
(bb)
the manufacture or procurement of reactor components, including the intended application of such components; and
(cc)
efforts to rebuild the original reactor at Arak;
(IV)
uranium mining, concentration, conversion, and fuel fabrication, including—
(aa)
estimated uranium ore production capacity and annual recovery;
(bb)
recovery processes and ore concentrate production capacity and annual recovery;
(cc)
research and development with respect to, and the annual rate of, conversion of uranium; and
(dd)
research and development with respect to the fabrication of reactor fuels, including the use of depleted, natural, and enriched uranium; and
(V)
activities with respect to—
(aa)
producing or acquiring plutonium or uranium (or their alloys);
(bb)
conducting research and development on plutonium or uranium (or their alloys);
(cc)
uranium metal; or
(dd)
casting, forming, or machining plutonium or uranium;
(ii)
with respect to any activity described in clause (i), a description, as applicable, of—
(I)
the number and type of centrifuges used to enrich uranium and the operating status of such centrifuges;
(II)
the number and location of any enrichment or associated research and development facility used to engage in such activity;
(III)
the amount of heavy water, in metric tons, produced by such activity and the acquisition or manufacture of major reactor components, including, for the second and subsequent assessments, the amount produced since the last assessment;
(IV)
the number and type of fuel assemblies produced by the Islamic Republic of Iran, including failed or rejected assemblies; and
(V)
the total amount of—
(aa)
uranium–235 enriched to not greater than 5 percent purity;
(bb)
uranium–235 enriched to greater than 5 percent purity and not greater than 20 percent purity;
(cc)
uranium–235 enriched to greater than 20 percent purity and not greater than 60 percent purity;
(dd)
uranium–235 enriched to greater than 60 percent purity and not greater than 90 percent purity; and
(ee)
uranium–235 enriched greater than 90 percent purity;
(iii)
a description of any weaponization plans and weapons development capabilities of the Islamic Republic of Iran, including—
(I)
plans and capabilities with respect to—
(aa)
weapon design, including fission, warhead miniaturization, and boosted and early thermonuclear weapon design;
(bb)
high yield fission development;
(cc)
design, development, acquisition, or use of computer models to simulate nuclear explosive devices;
(dd)
design, development, fabricating, acquisition, or use of explosively driven neutron sources or specialized materials for explosively driven neutron sources; and
(ee)
design, development, fabrication, acquisition, or use of precision machining and tooling that could enable the production of nuclear explosive device components;
(II)
the ability of the Islamic Republic of Iran to deploy a working or reliable delivery vehicle capable of carrying a nuclear warhead;
(III)
the estimated breakout time for the Islamic Republic of Iran to develop and deploy a nuclear weapon, including a crude nuclear weapon; and
(IV)
the status and location of any research and development work site related to the preparation of an underground nuclear test;
(iv)
an identification of any clandestine nuclear facilities;
(v)
an assessment of whether the Islamic Republic of Iran maintains locations to store equipment, research archives, or other material previously used for a weapons program or that would be of use to a weapons program that the Islamic Republic of Iran has not declared to the International Atomic Energy Agency;
(vi)
any diversion by the Islamic Republic of Iran of uranium, carbon-fiber, or other materials for use in an undeclared or clandestine facility;
(vii)
an assessment of activities related to developing or acquiring the capabilities for the production of nuclear weapons, conducted at facilities controlled by the Ministry of Defense and Armed Forces Logistics of Iran, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, and the Organization of Defensive Innovation and Research, including an analysis of gaps in knowledge;
(viii)
a description of activities between the Islamic Republic of Iran and other countries or persons with respect to sharing information on, or providing other forms of support for, the acquisition of a nuclear weapons capability or activities related to weaponization;
(ix)
with respect to any new ballistic, cruise, or hypersonic missiles being designed and tested by the Islamic Republic of Iran or any of its proxies, a description of—
(I)
the type of missile;
(II)
the range of such missiles;
(III)
the capability of such missiles to deliver a nuclear warhead;
(IV)
the number of such missiles; and
(V)
any testing of such missiles;
(x)
an assessment of whether the Islamic Republic of Iran or any of its proxies possesses an unmanned aircraft system or other military equipment capable of delivering a nuclear weapon; and
(xi)
an assessment of the extent to which the Islamic Republic of Iran is providing drones, missiles, or related technology from other countries to its proxies or partners.
(2)
Assessment on support for regional and global terrorism of the islamic republic of iran.—
(A)
In general.— Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter until December 31, 2028, the Director of National Intelligence shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees an assessment regarding the regional and global terrorism of the Islamic Republic of Iran.
(B)
Contents.— The assessment required by subparagraph (A) shall include—
(i)
a description of the lethal support of the Islamic Republic of Iran, including training, equipment, and associated intelligence support, to regional and global non-state terrorist groups and proxies;
(ii)
a description of the lethal support of the Islamic Republic of Iran, including training and equipment, to state actors;
(iii)
an assessment of financial support of the Islamic Republic of Iran to non-state terrorist groups and proxies and associated Iranian revenue streams funding such support;
(iv)
an assessment of the threat posed by the Islamic Republic of Iran and Iranian-supported groups to members of the Armed Forces, diplomats, and military and diplomatic facilities of the United States;
(v)
a description of attacks by, or sponsored by, the Islamic Republic of Iran against members of the Armed Forces, diplomats, and military and diplomatic facilities of the United States and the associated response by the United States Government in the previous year;
(vi)
a description of attacks by, or sponsored by, the Islamic Republic of Iran against United States partners or allies and the associated response by the United States Government in the previous year;
(vii)
an assessment of interference by the Islamic Republic of Iran into the elections and political processes of sovereign countries in the Middle East and North Africa in an effort to create conditions for or shape agendas more favorable to the policies of the Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran;
(viii)
a description of any plots by the Islamic Republic of Iran against former and current United States officials;
(ix)
a description of any plots by the Islamic Republic of Iran against United States citizens both abroad and within the United States; and
(x)
a description of maritime activity of the Islamic Republic of Iran and associated impacts on the free flow of commerce and the national security interests of the United States.
(3)
Form; public availability; duplication.—
(A)
Form.— Each assessment required by this subsection shall be submitted in unclassified form but may include a classified annex for information that, if released, would be detrimental to the national security of the United States. In addition, any classified portion may contain an additional annex provided to the congressional intelligence committees that details information and analysis that would otherwise disclose sensitive sources and methods.
(B)
Public availability.— The unclassified portion of an assessment required by this subsection shall be made available to the public on an internet website of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence.
(C)
Duplication.— For any assessment required by this subsection, the Director of National Intelligence may rely upon existing products that reflect the current analytic judgment of the intelligence community, including reports or products produced in response to congressional mandate or requests from executive branch officials.
(f)
Diplomatic Strategy to Address Identified Nuclear, Ballistic Missile, and Terrorism Threats to the United States.—
(1)
In general.— Not later than 30 days after the submission of the initial assessment under subsection (e)(1), and annually thereafter until December 31, 2028, the Secretary of State, in consultation with the task force, shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a diplomatic strategy that outlines a comprehensive plan for engaging with partners and allies of the United States regarding uranium enrichment, nuclear weaponization, missile development, and drone-related activities and regional and global terrorism of the Islamic Republic of Iran.
(2)
Contents.— The diplomatic strategy required by paragraph (1) shall include—
(A)
an assessment of whether the Islamic Republic of Iran—
(i)
is in compliance with the Comprehensive Safeguards Agreement and modified Code 3.1 of the Subsidiary Arrangements to the Comprehensive Safeguards Agreement as well as the nuclear related commitments endorsed in United Nations Security Council Resolution 2231 (2015); and
(ii)
has denied access to sites that the International Atomic Energy Agency has sought to inspect during previous 1-year period;
(B)
a description of any dual-use item (as defined under section 730.3 of title 15, Code of Federal Regulations or listed on the List of Nuclear-Related Dual-Use Equipment, Materials, Software, and Related Technology issued by the Nuclear Suppliers Group or any successor list) the Islamic Republic of Iran is using to further the nuclear weapon, missile, or drone program;
(C)
a description of efforts of the United States to counter efforts of the Islamic Republic of Iran to project political and military influence into the Middle East;
(D)
a description of efforts to address the increased threat that new or evolving uranium enrichment, nuclear weaponization, missile, or drone development activities by the Islamic Republic of Iran pose to United States citizens, the diplomatic presence of the United States in the Middle East, and the national security interests of the United States;
(E)
a description of efforts to address the threat that terrorism by, or sponsored by, the Islamic Republic of Iran poses to United States citizens, the diplomatic presence of the United States in the Middle East, and the national security interests of the United States;
(F)
a description of efforts to address the impact of the influence of the Islamic Republic of Iran on sovereign governments on the safety and security of United States citizens, the diplomatic presence of the United States in the Middle East, and the national security interests of the United States;
(G)
a description of a coordinated whole-of-government approach to use political, economic, and security related tools to address such activities; and
(H)
a comprehensive plan for engaging with allies and regional partners in all relevant multilateral fora to address such activities.
(3)
Updated strategy related to notification.— Not later than 45 days after the Chairperson determines that there has been a significant development in the nuclear weapons capability or nuclear weapons delivery systems capability of the Islamic Republic of Iran, the Secretary of State shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees an update to the most recent diplomatic strategy submitted under paragraph (1).

Subtitle H Reports

SEC. 5594. Modification to Peacekeeping Operations Report.

Section 6502 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2022 (22 U.S.C. 2348 note) is amended—
(1)
in subsection (a)—
(A)
by amending paragraph (4) to read as follows:

“(4) As applicable, a description of specific training on monitoring and adhering to international human rights and humanitarian law provided to the foreign country or entity receiving the assistance.”

; and

(B)
by striking paragraphs (7) and (8);
(2)
in subsection (b)—
(A)
in the subsection heading, by striking “ on Programs Under Peacekeeping Operations Account”; and
(B)
in paragraph (1), in the matter preceding subparagraph (A)—
(i)
by inserting “ authorized under section 551 of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2348) and” after “ security assistance”; and
(ii)
by striking “ foreign countries” and all that follows through the colon and inserting “ foreign countries for any of the following purposes:”;
(3)
by redesignating subsection (c) as subsection (d); and
(4)
by inserting after subsection (b), as amended, the following:

“(c) Coordination of Submission.—The Secretary of State is authorized to integrate the elements of the report required by subsection (b) into other reports required to be submitted annually to the appropriate congressional committees.”

SEC. 5595. Report on Indo-Pacific Region.

(a)
In General.—
(1)
In general.— Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Assistant Secretary of State for the Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, in coordination with the Assistant Secretary of State for the Bureau of South and Central Asian Affairs and Assistant Administrator for the Bureau for Asia of the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), shall submit to the congressional foreign affairs committees a report that contains a 2-year strategy assessing the resources and activities required to achieve the policy objectives described in subsection (c).
(2)
Submission and update.— The report and strategy required by this subsection shall—
(A)
be submitted at the same time as the submission of the budget of the President (submitted to Congress pursuant to section 1105 of title 31, United States Code) for fiscal year 2024; and
(B)
be updated and submitted at the same time as the submission of the budget of the President (submitted to Congress pursuant to section 1105 of title 31, United States Code) for fiscal years 2026, 2028, and 2030.
(b)
Criteria.— The report and strategy required in subsection (a) shall be developed in accordance with the following criteria:
(1)
It shall reflect the objective, autonomous, and independent assessment of the activities, resources, and costs required to achieve objectives detailed in subsection (c) by the principals, the subordinate and parallel offices providing input into the assessment.
(2)
It shall cover a period of five fiscal years, beginning with the fiscal year following the fiscal year in which the report is submitted.
(3)
It shall incorporate input from United States Ambassadors in the Indo-Pacific region provided explicitly for the required report.
(4)
It may include information gathered through consultation with program offices and subject matter experts in relevant functional bureaus, as deemed necessary by the principals.
(5)
It shall not be subject to fiscal guidance or global strategic tradeoffs associated with the annual President’s budget request.
(c)
Policy Objectives.— The report and strategy required in subsection (a) shall assess the activities and resources required to achieve the following policy objectives:
(1)
Implementing the Interim National Security Strategic Guidance, or the most recent National Security Strategy, with respect to the Indo-Pacific region.
(2)
Implementing the 2022 Indo-Pacific Strategy, or successor documents, that set forth the United States Government strategy toward the Indo-Pacific region.
(3)
Implementing the State-USAID Joint Strategic Plan with respect to the Indo-Pacific region.
(4)
Enhancing meaningful diplomatic and economic relations with allies and partners in the Indo-Pacific and demonstrate an enduring United States commitment to the region.
(5)
Securing and advancing United States national interests in the Indo-Pacific, including through countering the malign influence of the Government of the People’s Republic of China.
(d)
Matters to Be Included.— The report and strategy required under subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1)
A description of the Bureaus’ bilateral and multilateral goals for the period covered in the report that the principals deem necessary to accomplish the objectives outlined in subsection (c), disaggregated by country and forum.
(2)
A timeline with annual benchmarks for achieving the objectives described in subsection (c).
(3)
An assessment of the sufficiency of United States diplomatic personnel and facilities currently available in the Indo-Pacific region to achieve the objectives outlined in subsection (c), through consultation with United States embassies in the region. The assessment shall include:
(A)
A list, in priority order, of locations in the Indo-Pacific region that require additional diplomatic personnel or facilities.
(B)
A description of locations where the United States may be able to collocate diplomatic personnel at allied or partner embassies and consulates.
(C)
A discussion of embassies or consulates where diplomatic staff could be reduced within the Indo-Pacific region, where appropriate.
(D)
A detailed description of the fiscal and personnel resources required to fill gaps identified.
(4)
A detailed plan to expand United States diplomatic engagement and foreign assistance presence in the Pacific Island nations within the next five years, including a description of “quick impact” programs that can be developed and implemented within the first fiscal year of the period covered in the report.
(5)
A discussion of the resources needed to enhance United States strategic messaging and spotlight coercive behavior by the People’s Republic of China.
(6)
A detailed description of the resources and policy tools needed to expand the United States ability to offer high-quality infrastructure projects in strategically significant parts of the Indo-Pacific region, with a particular focus on expanding investments in Southeast Asia and the Pacific Islands.
(7)
A gap assessment of security assistance by country, and of the resources needed to fill those gaps.
(8)
A description of the resources and policy tools needed to facilitate continued private sector investment in partner countries in the Indo-Pacific.
(9)
A discussion of any additional bilateral or regional assistance resources needed to achieve the objectives outlined in subsection (c), as deemed necessary by the principals.
(e)
Form.— The report required under subsection (a) shall be submitted in an unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.
(f)
Availability.— Not later than February 1 each year, the Assistant Secretary for East Asian and Pacific Affairs shall make the report and strategy available to the Secretary of State, the Administrator of the USAID, the Deputy Secretary of State, the Deputy Secretary of State for Management and Resources, the Deputy Administrator for Policy and Programming, the Deputy Administrator for Management and Resources, the Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs, the Director of the Office of Foreign Assistance at the Department of State, the Director of the Bureau of Foreign Assistance at the USAID, and the Director of Policy Planning.
(g)
Definitions.— In this section:
(1)
Indo-pacific region.— The term “Indo-Pacific region” means the countries under the jurisdiction of the Bureau for East Asian and Pacific Affairs, as well as the countries of Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Maldives, Nepal, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka.
(2)
Foreign affairs committees.— The term “foreign affairs committees” means—
(A)
the Committee on Foreign Relations and the Subcommittee on State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs of the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate; and
(B)
the Committee on Foreign Affairs and the Subcommittee on State, Foreign Operations, Related Programs of the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives.
(3)
Principals.— The term “principals” means the Assistant Secretary of State for the Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, the Assistant Secretary of State for the Bureau of South and Central Asian Affairs, and the Assistant Administrator for the Bureau for Asia of the United States Agency for International Development.

SEC. 5596. Report on Humanitarian Situation and Food Security in Lebanon.

(a)
Report Required.— Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of State, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense and in coordination with the Administrator of the United States Agency for International Development, shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report that contains an evaluation of the humanitarian situation in Lebanon, as well as the impact of the deficit of wheat imports due to Russia’s further invasion of Ukraine, initiated on February 24, 2022.
(b)
Elements.— The report required by subsection (a) shall include the following elements:
(1)
The projected increase in malnutrition in Lebanon.
(2)
The estimated increase in the number of food insecure individuals in Lebanon.
(3)
The estimated number of individuals who will be faced with acute malnutrition due to food price inflation in Lebanon.
(4)
Actions United States Government allies and partners are taking to address the matters described in paragraphs (1), (2), and (3).
(5)
The potential impact of food insecurity in Lebanon on Department of Defense goals and objectives in Lebanon.
(c)
Form of Report.— The report required by subsection (a) shall be submitted in an unclassified form, but may contain a classified annex.
(d)
Appropriate Congressional Committees Defined.— In this section, the term “appropriate congressional committees” means—
(1)
the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Foreign Relations, and the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate; and
(2)
the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives.

SEC. 5597. Statement of Policy and Report on Engaging with Niger.

(a)
Statement of Policy.— It is the policy of the United States to—
(1)
continue to support Niger’s efforts to advance democracy, good governance, human rights, and regional security within its borders through bilateral assistance and multilateral initiatives;
(2)
enhance engagement and cooperation with the Nigerien Government at all levels as a key component of stabilizing the Sahel, where frequent coups and other anti-democratic movements, food insecurity, violent extremism, and armed conflict threaten to further weaken governments throughout the region; and
(3)
work closely with partners and allies throughout the international community to elevate Niger, which experienced its first democratic transition of power in 2021, as an example of transitioning from longstanding military governance and a cycle of coups to a democratic, civilian-led form of government.
(b)
Report Required.— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of State, in consultation with the heads of relevant departments and agencies, shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on interagency efforts to enhance United States engagement with Niger as a key component of the United States Strategy toward the Sahel. Such report shall also include the following information with respect to the 2 fiscal years preceding the date of the submission of the report:
(1)
A description of United States efforts to promote democracy, political pluralism, fiscal transparency and other good governance initiatives, human rights and the rule of law, and a robust and engaged civil society.
(2)
A full, detailed breakdown of United States assistance provided to help the Nigerien Government develop a comprehensive national security strategy, including to counter terrorism, regional and transnational organized crime, intercommunal violence, and other forms of armed conflict, criminal activity, and other threats to United States and Nigerien national security.
(3)
An analysis of relevant resources at the United States Embassy in Niamey, including whether staff in place by the end of the current fiscal year will be sufficient to meet various country and regional strategic objectives.
(4)
An overview of foreign partner support for Niger’s intelligence and security sector.
(5)
A detailed description of United States and international efforts to address food insecurity in Niger, including that which is caused by deforestation, desertification, and other climate change-related issues.
(6)
A breakdown of United States funds obligated for humanitarian assistance in Niger, and an analysis of how the security situation in Niger has affected humanitarian operations and diplomatic engagement throughout the country.
(7)
An assessment of foreign malign influence in Niger, with a specific focus on the People’s Republic of China, the Russian Federation, and their proxies.
(c)
Form.— The report required by subsection (b) shall be submitted in unclassified form, and may include a classified annex.
(d)
Appropriate Congressional Committees Defined.— In this section, the term “appropriate congressional committees” means—
(1)
the Committee on Foreign Affairs and the Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives; and
(2)
the Committee on Foreign Relations and the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate.

SEC. 5598. Report on Bilateral Security and Law Enforcement Cooperation with Mexico.

(a)
In General.— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the President shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report that includes the following:
(1)
A description of past and current bilateral security and law enforcement cooperation with Mexico, including through United States Northern Command, the Department of Homeland Security, the Department of Justice (including the Drug Enforcement Administration), and the Department of State (including the Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs), including over the preceding 10 years.
(2)
A summary of efforts of the Government of Mexico to reduce impunity and strengthen judicial processes for violent crimes and cartels across Mexico and along the United States-Mexico border.
(3)
A description and mapping of increasing cartel control over Mexican territory and its impacts on United States national security.
(4)
An assessment of any changes in Mexico’s electoral and democratic institutions, including their ability to ensure accountability for human rights violations, and its impacts on national security.
(b)
Form.— The report required by subsection (a) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex. The unclassified portion of such report shall be published on a publicly available website of the Federal government.
(c)
Appropriate Congressional Committees Defined.— In this section, the term “appropriate congressional committees” means—
(1)
the congressional defense committees;
(2)
the Committee on Foreign Relations, the Select Committee on Intelligence, the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, and the Committee on the Judiciary of the Senate; and
(3)
the Committee on Foreign Affairs, the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, the Committee on Homeland Security, and the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives.

SEC. 5599. Report on Chinese Support to Russia with Respect to Its Unprovoked Invasion of and Full-Scale War Against Ukraine.

(a)
In General.— Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and every 90 days thereafter until the sunset specified in subsection (d), the Secretary of State, in consultation with the Secretary of Commerce and the Director of National Intelligence as appropriate, shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on whether and how the People’s Republic of China (PRC), including the Government of the PRC, the Chinese Communist Party, any PRC state-owned enterprise, and any other PRC entity, has provided support to the Russian Federation with respect to its unprovoked invasion of and full-scale war against Ukraine.
(b)
Matters to Be Included.— The report required by subsection (a) shall include a discussion of the support provided by the PRC to the Russian Federation with respect to—
(1)
helping the Government of Russia or Russian entities evade or circumvent United States sanctions or multilateral sanctions and export controls;
(2)
deliberately inhibiting on-site United States Government export control end-use checks, including interviews and investigations, in the PRC;
(3)
providing Russia with any technology, including semiconductors classified as EAR99, that supports Russian intelligence or military capabilities;
(4)
establishing economic or financial arrangements that will have the effect of alleviating the impact of United States sanctions or multilateral sanctions;
(5)
furthering Russia’s disinformation and propaganda efforts;
(6)
coordinating to hinder the response of multilateral organizations, including the United Nations, to provide assistance to the people or Government of Ukraine, to condemn Russia’s war, to hold Russia accountable for the invasion and its prosecution of the war, or to hold those complicit accountable; and
(7)
providing any material, technical, or logistical support, including to Russian military or intelligence agencies and state-owned or state-linked enterprises.
(c)
Form.—
(1)
In general.— The report required by subsection (a) shall be submitted in unclassified form and published on a publicly available website of the Department of State.
(2)
Exception.— If the Secretary, in consultation with the Director of National Intelligence, certifies to the appropriate congressional committees that the Secretary is unable to include an element required under any of paragraphs (1) through (7) of subsection (b) in an unclassified manner, the Secretary shall provide in unclassified form an affirmative or negative determination with respect to whether the People’s Republic of China is supporting the Russian Federation in the manner described in each applicable such paragraph and concurrently provide the discussion of that element to the appropriate congressional committees at the lowest possible classification level, consistent with the protection of sources and methods.
(d)
Sunset.— The requirement to submit the report under subsection (a) shall terminate on the earlier of—
(1)
the date on which the Secretary of State determines the conflict in Ukraine has ended; or
(2)
the date that is 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act.
(e)
Appropriate Congressional Committees Defined.— In this section, the term “appropriate congressional committees” means—
(1)
the congressional defense committees;
(2)
the Committee on Foreign Relations, the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate; and
(3)
the Committee on Foreign Affairs, the Committee on Ways and Means, and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives.

SEC. 5599A. Feasibility Study on United States Support for and Participation in the International Counterterrorism Academy in Côte D’ivoire.

(a)
Statement of Policy.— It is the policy of the United States to partner with West African governments where possible to mitigate and counter growing regional insecurity resulting from the spread of armed conflict and terrorism, including by providing assistance to train, equip, and mentor West African security services to counter threats to regional and national security through a whole-of-government approach.
(b)
Feasibility Study.— Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of State, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense, shall conduct a feasibility study regarding the provision of United States assistance for infrastructure, training, equipment, and other forms of support to institutionalize the International Counterterrorism Academy (Académie Internationale de Lutte Contre le Terrorisme or AILCT) in Jacqueville, Côte d’Ivoire that—
(1)
provides a legal analysis of existing authorities to provide United States foreign assistance dedicated to the development and establishment of AILCT programs, initiatives, and infrastructure for the purposes of training, equipping, and mentoring eligible West African security services bilaterally or in coordination with partners and allies;
(2)
identifies opportunities for the United States to leverage and support the AILCT facility to pursue national security interests in West Africa, the Sahel, sub-Saharan Africa, and the strategic Atlantic Ocean coastal and maritime environments, including through training and research activities, infrastructure development, combatting transnational terrorist and organized crime threats, and countering foreign malign influence throughout the region; and
(3)
assesses any planned and pledged contributions from other countries to ensure appropriate sustainment of the facilities and burden sharing.
(c)
Forms.— The feasibility study required by subsection (b) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may contain a classified annex.
(d)
Appropriate Congressional Committees Defined.— In this section, the term “appropriate congressional committees” means—
(1)
the Committee on Foreign Relations, the Committee on Armed Services, and the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate; and
(2)
the Committee on Foreign Affairs, the Committee on Armed Services, and the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives.

SEC. 5599B. Consultations on Reuniting Korean Americans with Family Members in North Korea.

(a)
Consultations.—
(1)
Consultations with south korea.— The Secretary of State, or a designee of the Secretary, should consult with officials of South Korea, as appropriate, on potential opportunities to reunite Korean American families with family members in North Korea from which such Korean American families were divided after the signing of the Korean War Armistice Agreement, including potential opportunities for video reunions for Korean Americans with such family members.
(2)
Consultations with korean americans.— The Special Envoy on North Korean Human Rights Issues of the Department of State should regularly consult with representatives of Korean Americans who have family members in North Korea with respect to efforts to reunite families divided after the signing of the Korean War Armistice Agreement, including potential opportunities for video reunions for Korean Americans with such family members.
(b)
Report.— Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter for three years, the Secretary of State, acting through the Special Envoy on North Korean Human Rights Issues or other appropriate designee, shall submit to the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate a report on the consultations conducted pursuant to this section during the preceding year.

Subtitle I Sense of Congress Provisions

SEC. 5599C. Sense of Congress Regarding the Status of China.

It is the sense of Congress that—
(1)
the People’s Republic of China is a fully industrialized nation and no longer a developing nation; and
(2)
any international agreement that provides or accords China a favorable status or treatment as a “developing nation” should be updated to reflect the status of China.

SEC. 5599D. Sense of Congress Regarding Israel.

It is the sense of Congress that—
(1)
since 1948, Israel has been one of the strongest friends and allies of the United States;
(2)
Israel is a stable, democratic country in a region often marred by turmoil;
(3)
it is essential to the strategic interest of the United States to continue to offer security assistance and related support to Israel; and
(4)
such assistance and support is especially vital as Israel confronts a number of potential challenges at the present time, including continuing threats from Iran.

SEC. 5599E. Sense of Congress Relating to the Nato Parliamentary Assembly.

It is the sense of Congress that the United States should—
(1)
proactively engage with the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) Parliamentary Assembly (PA) and its member delegations;
(2)
communicate with and educate the public on the benefits and importance of NATO and NATO PA; and
(3)
support increased inter-democracy and inter-parliamentary cooperation on countering misinformation and disinformation.

SEC. 5599F. Condemning Detention and Indictment of Russian Opposition Leader Vladimir Vladimirovich Kara-Murza.

(a)
Findings.— Congress finds the following:
(1)
Vladimir Vladimirovich Kara-Murza (referred to in this section as “Mr. Kara-Murza”) has tirelessly worked for decades to advance the cause of freedom, democracy, and human rights for the people of the Russian Federation.
(2)
In retaliation for his advocacy, two attempts have been made on Mr. Kara-Murza’s life, as—
(A)
on May 26, 2015, Mr. Kara-Murza fell ill with symptoms indicative of poisoning and was hospitalized; and
(B)
on February 2, 2017, he fell ill with similar symptoms and was placed in a medically induced coma.
(3)
Independent investigations conducted by Bellingcat, the Insider, and Der Spiegel found that the same unit of the Federal Security Service of the Russian Federation responsible for poisoning Mr. Kara-Murza was responsible for poisoning Russian opposition leader Alexei Navalny and activists Timur Kuashev, Ruslan Magomedragimov, and Nikita Isayev.
(4)
On February 24, 2022, Vladimir Putin launched another unprovoked, unjustified, and illegal invasion into Ukraine in contravention of the obligations freely undertaken by the Russian Federation to respect the territorial integrity of Ukraine under the Budapest Memorandum of 1994, the Minsk protocols of 2014 and 2015, and international law.
(5)
On March 5, 2022, Vladimir Putin signed a law criminalizing the distribution of truthful statements about the invasion of Ukraine by the Russian Federation and mandating up to 15 years in prison for such offenses.
(6)
Since February 24, 2022, Mr. Kara-Murza has used his voice and platform to join more than 15,000 citizens of the Russian Federation in peacefully protesting the war against Ukraine and millions more who silently oppose the war.
(7)
On April 11, 2022, five police officers arrested Mr. Kara-Murza in front of his home and denied his right to an attorney, and the next day Mr. Kara-Murza was sentenced to 15 days in prison for disobeying a police order.
(8)
On April 22, 2022, the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation charged Mr. Kara-Murza with violations under the law signed on March 5, 2022, for his fact-based statements condemning the invasion of Ukraine by the Russian Federation.
(9)
Mr. Kara-Murza was then placed into pretrial detention and ordered to be held until at least June 12, 2022.
(10)
If convicted of those charges, Mr. Kara-Murza faces detention in a penitentiary system that human rights nongovernmental organizations have criticized for widespread torture, ill-treatment, and suspicious deaths of prisoners.
(b)
Sense of Congress.— It is the sense of Congress that Congress—
(1)
condemns the unjust detention and indicting of Russian opposition leader Vladimir Vladimirovich Kara-Murza, who has courageously stood up to oppression in the Russian Federation;
(2)
expresses solidarity with Vladimir Vladimirovich Kara-Murza, his family, and all individuals in the Russian Federation imprisoned for exercising their fundamental freedoms of speech, assembly, and belief;
(3)
urges the United States Government and other allied governments to work to secure the immediate release of Vladimir Vladimirovich Kara-Murza, Alexei Navalny, and other citizens of the Russian Federation imprisoned for opposing the regime of Vladimir Putin and the war against Ukraine; and
(4)
calls on the President to increase support provided by the United States Government for those advocating for democracy and independent media in the Russian Federation, which Vladimir Vladimirovich Kara-Murza has worked to advance.

SEC. 5599G. Sense of Congress Regarding Development of Nuclear Weapons by Iran.

Congress—
(1)
reiterates its commitment to ensuring Iran will never acquire a nuclear weapon;
(2)
supports the important work of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in safeguarding nuclear material around the globe;
(3)
condemns Iran for its lack of transparency and meaningful cooperation with the IAEA on the unresolved matter of uranium particles discovered at undeclared sites in Iran and additional escalatory actions related to its nuclear program; and
(4)
applauds the IAEA Board of Governors’ resolution urging Iran’s full cooperation with the IAEA on outstanding safeguards issues on an urgent basis.

TITLE LVI Transportation and Infrastructure

SEC. 5601. Designation of Small State and Rural Advocate.

(a)
In General.— Section 326(c) of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5165d) is amended—
(1)
by striking “ and” at the end of paragraph (2);
(2)
by redesignating paragraph (3) as paragraph (4); and
(3)
by inserting after paragraph (2) the following:

“(3) assist States in the collection and presentation of material in the disaster or emergency declaration request relevant to demonstrate severe localized impacts within the State for a specific incident, including—

“(A) the per capita personal income by local area, as calculated by the Bureau of Economic Analysis;

“(B) the disaster impacted population profile, as reported by the Bureau of the Census, including—

“(i) the percentage of the population for whom poverty status is determined;

“(ii) the percentage of the population already receiving Government assistance such as Supplemental Security Income and Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program benefits;

“(iii) the pre-disaster unemployment rate;

“(iv) the percentage of the population that is 65 years old and older;

“(v) the percentage of the population 18 years old and younger;

“(vi) the percentage of the population with a disability;

“(vii) the percentage of the population who speak a language other than English and speak English less than ‘very well’; and

“(viii) any unique considerations regarding American Indian and Alaskan Native Tribal populations raised in the State’s request for a major disaster declaration that may not be reflected in the data points referenced in this subparagraph;

“(C) the impact to community infrastructure, including—

“(i) disruptions to community life-saving and life-sustaining services;

“(ii) disruptions or increased demand for essential community services; and

“(iii) disruptions to transportation, infrastructure, and utilities; and

“(D) any other information relevant to demonstrate severe local impacts; and”

(b)
GAO Review of a Final Rule.—
(1)
In general.— The Comptroller General of the United States shall conduct a review of the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s implementation of its final rule, published on March 21, 2019, amending section 206.48(b) of title 44, Code of Federal Regulations (regarding factors considered when evaluating a Governor’s request for a major disaster declaration), which revised the factors that the Agency considers when evaluating a Governor’s request for a major disaster declaration authorizing individual assistance under the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq).
(2)
Scope.— The review required under paragraph (1) shall include the following:
(A)
An assessment of the criteria used by the Agency to assess individual assistance requests following a major disaster declaration authorizing individual assistance.
(B)
An assessment of the consistency with which the Agency uses the updated Individual Assistance Declaration Factors when assessing the impact of individual communities after a major disaster declaration.
(C)
An assessment of the impact, if any, of using the updated Individual Assistance Declaration Factors has had on equity in disaster recovery outcomes.
(D)
Recommendations to improve the use of the Individual Assistance Declaration Factors to increase equity in disaster recovery outcomes.
(3)
Report.— Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General shall submit to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate a report on the review required under this section.

SEC. 5602. Flexibility.

(a)
In General.— Section 1216(a) of the Disaster Recovery Reform Act of 2018 (42 U.S.C. 5174a(a)) is amended—
(1)
by amending paragraph (2)(A) to read as follows:

“(A) except as provided in subparagraph (B), shall—

“(i) waive a debt owed to the United States related to covered assistance provided to an individual or household if the covered assistance was distributed based on an error by the Agency and such debt shall be construed as a hardship; and

“(ii) waive a debt owed to the United States related to covered assistance provided to an individual or household if such assistance is subject to a claim or legal action, including in accordance with section of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5160); and”

; and

(2)
in paragraph (3)(B)—
(A)
by striking “ Removal of” and inserting “ Report on”; and
(B)
in clause (ii) by striking “ the authority of the Administrator to waive debt under paragraph (2) shall no longer be effective” and inserting “ the Administrator shall report to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate actions that the Administrator will take to reduce the error rate”.
(b)
Report to Congress.— The Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency shall submit to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate a report containing a description of the internal processes used to make decisions regarding the distribution of covered assistance under section 1216 of the Disaster Recovery and Reform Act of 2018 (42 U.S.C. a) and any changes made to such processes.

SEC. 5603. Preliminary Damage Assessment.

(a)
Findings.— Congress finds the following:
(1)
Preliminary damage assessments play a critical role in assessing and validating the impact and magnitude of a disaster.
(2)
Through the preliminary damage assessment process, representatives from the Federal Emergency Management Agency validate information gathered by State and local officials that serves as the basis for disaster assistance requests.
(3)
Various factors can impact the duration of a preliminary damage assessment and the corresponding submission of a major disaster request, however, the average time between when a disaster occurs, and the submission of a corresponding disaster request has been found to be approximately twenty days longer for flooding disasters.
(4)
With communities across the country facing increased instances of catastrophic flooding and other extreme weather events, accurate and efficient preliminary damage assessments have become critically important to the relief process for impacted States and municipalities.
(b)
Report to Congress.—
(1)
In general.— Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency shall submit to Congress a report describing the preliminary damage assessment process, as supported by the Federal Emergency Management Agency in the 5 years before the date of enactment of this Act.
(2)
Contents.— The report described in paragraph (1) shall contain the following:
(A)
The process of the Federal Emergency Management Agency for deploying personnel to support preliminary damage assessments.
(B)
The number of Agency staff participating on disaster assessment teams.
(C)
The training and experience of such staff described in subparagraph (B).
(D)
A calculation of the average amount of time disaster assessment teams described in subparagraph (A) are deployed to a disaster area.
(E)
The efforts of the Agency to maintain a consistent liaison between the Agency and State, local, tribal, and territorial officials within a disaster area.
(c)
Preliminary Damage Assessment.—
(1)
In general.— Not later than 6 months after the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency shall convene an advisory panel consisting of emergency management personnel employed by State, local, territorial, or tribal authorities, and the representative organizations of such personnel to assist the Agency in improving critical components of the preliminary damage assessment process.
(2)
Membership.—
(A)
In general.— This advisory panel shall consist of at least 2 representatives from national emergency management organizations and at least 1 representative from each of the 10 regions of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, selected from emergency management personnel employed by State, local, territorial, or tribal authorities within each region.
(B)
Inclusion on panel.— To the furthest extent practicable, representation on the advisory panel shall include emergency management personnel from both rural and urban jurisdictions.
(3)
Considerations.— The advisory panel convened under paragraph (1) shall—
(A)
consider—
(i)
establishing a training regime to ensure preliminary damage assessments are conducted and reviewed under consistent guidelines;
(ii)
utilizing a common technological platform to integrate data collected by State and local governments with data collected by the Agency; and
(iii)
assessing instruction materials provided by the Agency for omissions of pertinent information or language that conflicts with other statutory requirements; and
(B)
identify opportunities for streamlining the consideration of preliminary damage assessments by the Agency, including eliminating duplicative paperwork requirements and ensuring consistent communication and decision making among Agency staff.
(4)
Interim report.— Not later than 18 months after the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall submit to Congress a report regarding the findings of the advisory panel, steps that will be undertaken by the Agency to implement the findings of the advisory panel, and additional legislation that may be necessary to implement the findings of the advisory panel.
(5)
Rulemaking and final report.— Not later than 2 years after the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall issue such regulations as are necessary to implement the recommendations of the advisory panel and submit to Congress a report discussing—
(A)
the implementation of recommendations from the advisory panel;
(B)
the identification of any additional challenges to the preliminary damage assessment process, including whether specific disasters result in longer preliminary damage assessments; and
(C)
any additional legislative recommendations necessary to improve the preliminary damage assessment process.

SEC. 5604. Letter of Deviation Authority.

A flight instructor, registered owner, lessor, or lessee of an aircraft shall not be required to obtain a letter of deviation authority from the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration to allow, conduct or receive flight training, checking, and testing in an experimental aircraft if—
(1)
the flight instructor is not providing both the training and the aircraft;
(2)
no person advertises or broadly offers the aircraft as available for flight training, checking, or testing; and
(3)
no person receives compensation for use of the aircraft for a specific flight during which flight training, checking, or testing was received, other than expenses for owning, operating, and maintaining the aircraft.

SEC. 5605. Recognizing Fema Support.

Congress finds the following:
(1)
The Federal Emergency Management Agency provides vital support to communities and disaster survivors in the aftermath of major disasters, including housing assistance for individuals and families displaced from their homes.
(2)
The Federal Emergency Management Agency should be encouraged to study the idea integrating collapsible shelters for appropriate non-congregate sheltering needs into the disaster preparedness stockpile.

TITLE LVII Financial Services Matters

SEC. 5701. United States Policy on World Bank Group and Asian Development Bank Assistance to the People’s Republic of China.

(a)
In General.— Title XVI of the International Financial Institutions Act (22 U.S.C. 262p et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following:

“SEC. 1632. UNITED STATES POLICY ON WORLD BANK GROUP AND ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK ASSISTANCE TO THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA.

“(a) In General.—The Secretary of the Treasury shall instruct the United States Executive Director at each international financial institution of the World Bank Group and at the Asian Development Bank to use the voice and vote of the United States at the respective institution to vote against the provision of any loan, extension of financial assistance, or technical assistance to the People’s Republic of China unless the Secretary of the Treasury has certified to the appropriate congressional committees that—

“(1) the Government of the People’s Republic of China and any lender owned or controlled by the Government of the People’s Republic of China have demonstrated a commitment—

“(A) to the rules and principles of the Paris Club, or of other similar coordinated multilateral initiatives on debt relief and debt restructuring in which the United States participates, including with respect to debt transparency and appropriate burden-sharing among all creditors;

“(B) to the practice of presumptive public disclosure of the terms and conditions on which they extend credit to other governments (without regard to the form of any such extension of credit);

“(C) not to enforce any agreement terms that may impair their own or the borrowers’ capacity fully to implement any commitment described in subparagraph (A) or (B); and

“(D) not to enter into any agreement containing terms that may impair their own or the borrowers’ capacity fully to implement any commitment described in subparagraph (A) or (B); or

“(2) the loan or assistance is important to the national interest of the United States, as described in a detailed explanation by the Secretary to accompany the certification.

“(b) Definitions.—In this section:

“(1) Appropriate congressional committees.—The term ‘appropriate congressional committees’ means the Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate.

“(2) World bank group.—The term ‘World Bank Group’ means the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, the International Development Association, the International Finance Corporation, and the Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency.”

(b)
Sunset.— The amendment made by subsection (a) is repealed effective on the date that is 7 years after the effective date of this section.

SEC. 5702. Support for International Initiatives to Provide Debt Restructuring or Relief to Developing Countries with Unsustainable Levels of Debt.

(a)
In General.— Title XVI of the International Financial Institutions Act (22 U.S.C. 262p et seq.), as amended by section 5701, is further amended by adding at the end the following:

“SEC. 1633. SUPPORT FOR INTERNATIONAL INITIATIVES TO PROVIDE DEBT RESTRUCTURING OR RELIEF TO DEVELOPING COUNTRIES WITH UNSUSTAINABLE LEVELS OF DEBT.

“(a) Debt Relief.—The Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State, shall—

“(1) engage with international financial institutions, the G20, and official and commercial creditors to advance support for prompt and effective implementation and improvement of the Common Framework for Debt Treatments beyond the DSSI (in this section referred to as the ‘Common Framework’), or any successor framework or similar coordinated international debt treatment process in which the United States participates through the establishment and publication of clear and accountable—

“(A) debt treatment benchmarks designed to achieve debt sustainability for each participating debtor;

“(B) standards for appropriate burden-sharing among all creditors with material claims on each participating debtor, without regard for their official, private, or hybrid status;

“(C) robust debt disclosure by creditors, including the People’s Republic of China, and debtor countries, including inter-creditor data-sharing and, to the maximum extent practicable, public disclosure of material terms and conditions of claims on participating debtors;

“(D) expansion of Common Framework country eligibility to lower middle-income countries who otherwise meet the existing criteria;

“(E) improvements to the Common Framework process with the aim of ensuring access to debt relief in a timely manner for those countries eligible and who request treatment; and

“(F) consistent enforcement and improvement of the policies of multilateral institutions relating to asset-based and revenue-based borrowing by participating debtors, and coordinated standards on restructuring collateralized debt;

“(2) engage with international financial institutions and official and commercial creditors to advance support, as the Secretary finds appropriate, for debt restructuring or debt relief for each participating debtor, including, on a case-by- case basis, a debt standstill, if requested by the debtor country through the Common Framework process from the time of conclusion of a staff-level agreement with the International Monetary Fund, and until the conclusion of a memorandum of understanding with its creditor committee pursuant to the Common Framework, or any successor framework or similar coordinated international debt treatment process in which the United States participates; and

“(3) instruct the United States Executive Director at the International Monetary Fund and the United States Executive Director at the World Bank to use the voice and vote of the United States to advance the efforts described in paragraphs (1) and (2).

“(b) Reporting Requirement.—Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this section, and annually thereafter, the Secretary of the Treasury, in coordination with the Secretary of State, shall submit to the Committees on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs and Foreign Relations of the Senate and the Committees on Financial Services and Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives a report that describes—

“(1) any actions that have been taken, in coordination with international financial institutions, by official creditors, including the government of, and state-owned enterprises in, the People’s Republic of China, and relevant commercial creditor groups to advance debt restructuring or relief for countries with unsustainable debt that have sought restructuring or relief under the Common Framework, any successor framework or mechanism, or under any other coordinated international arrangement for sovereign debt restructuring in which the United States participates;

“(2) any implementation challenges that hinder the ability of the Common Framework to provide timely debt restructuring for any country with unsustainable debt that seeks debt restructuring or debt payment relief, including any refusal of a creditor to participate in appropriate burden-sharing, including failure to share (or publish, as appropriate) all material information needed to assess debt sustainability; and

“(3) recommendations on how to address any challenges identified in paragraph (2).”

(b)
Sunset.— The amendment made by subsection (a) is repealed effective on the date that is 5 years after the effective date of this section.

SEC. 5703. Ukraine Debt Payment Relief.

(a)
Suspension of Multilateral Debt Payments of Ukraine.—
(1)
United states position in the international financial institutions.— The Secretary of the Treasury shall instruct the United States Executive Director at each international financial institution (as defined in section 1701(c)(2) of the International Financial Institutions Act) to use the voice, vote, and influence of the United States to advocate that the respective institution immediately provide appropriate debt service relief to Ukraine.
(2)
Official bilateral and commercial debt service payment relief.— The Secretary of the Treasury, working in coordination with the Secretary of State, shall commence immediate efforts with other governments and commercial creditor groups, through the Paris Club of Official Creditors and other bilateral and multilateral frameworks, both formal and informal, to pursue comprehensive debt payment relief for Ukraine.
(3)
Multilateral financial support for ukraine.— The Secretary of the Treasury shall direct the United States Executive Director at each international financial institution (as defined in section 1701(c)(2) of the International Financial Institutions Act) to use the voice and vote of the United States to support, to the extent practicable, the provision of concessional financial assistance for Ukraine.
(4)
Multilateral financial support for refugees.— The Secretary of the Treasury shall direct the United States Executive Director at each international financial institution (as defined in section 1701(c)(2) of the International Financial Institutions Act) to use the voice and vote of the United States to seek to provide economic support for refugees from Ukraine, including refugees of African and Asian descent, and for countries receiving refugees from Ukraine that are eligible for assistance from the multilateral development banks.
(b)
Report to the Congress.— Not later than December 31 of each year, the President shall—
(1)
submit to the Committees on Financial Services, on Appropriations, and on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives and the Committees on Foreign Relations and on Appropriations of the Senate, a report on the activities undertaken under this section; and
(2)
make public a copy of the report.
(c)
Waiver and Termination.—
(1)
Waiver.— The President may waive the application of this section if the President determines that a waiver is in the national interest of the United States and reports to the Congress an explanation of the reasons therefor.
(2)
Termination.— This section shall have no force or effect on the earlier of—
(A)
the date that is 7 years after the date of the enactment of this Act; or
(B)
the date that is 30 days after the date on which the President reports to Congress that the Government of the Russian Federation has ceased its destabilizing activities with respect to the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Ukraine.

SEC. 5704. Isolate Russian Government Officials Act of 2022.

(a)
Statement of Policy.— It is the policy of the United States to seek to exclude government officials of the Russian Federation, to the maximum extent practicable, from participation in meetings, proceedings, and other activities of the following organizations:
(1)
Group of 20.
(2)
Bank for International Settlements.
(3)
Basel Committee for Banking Standards.
(4)
Financial Stability Board.
(5)
International Association of Insurance Supervisors.
(6)
International Organization of Securities Commissions.
(b)
Implementation.— The Secretary of the Treasury, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, and the Securities and Exchange Commission, as the case may be, shall take all necessary steps to advance the policy set forth in subsection (a).
(c)
Termination.— This section shall have no force or effect on the earlier of—
(1)
the date that is 5 years after the date of the enactment of this Act; or
(2)
the date that is 30 days after the date on which the President reports to Congress that the Government of the Russian Federation has ceased its destabilizing activities with respect to the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Ukraine.
(d)
Waiver.— The President may waive the application of this section if the President reports to the Congress that the waiver is in the national interest of the United States and includes an explanation of the reasons therefor.

SEC. 5705. Fair Hiring in Banking.

(a)
Federal Deposit Insurance Act.— Section 19 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1829) is amended—
(1)
by inserting after subsection (b) the following:

“(c) Exceptions.—

“(1) Certain older offenses.—

“(A) In general.—With respect to an individual, subsection (a) shall not apply to an offense if—

“(i) it has been 7 years or more since the offense occurred; or

“(ii) the individual was incarcerated with respect to the offense and it has been 5 years or more since the individual was released from incarceration.

“(B) Offenses committed by individuals 21 or younger.—For individuals who committed an offense when they were 21 years of age or younger, subsection (a) shall not apply to the offense if it has been more than 30 months since the sentencing occurred.

“(C) Limitation.—This paragraph shall not apply to an offense described under subsection (a)(2).

“(2) Expungement and sealing.—With respect to an individual, subsection (a) shall not apply to an offense if—

“(A) there is an order of expungement, sealing, or dismissal that has been issued in regard to the conviction in connection with such offense; and

“(B) it is intended by the language in the order itself, or in the legislative provisions under which the order was issued, that the conviction shall be destroyed or sealed from the individual’s State, Tribal, or Federal record, even if exceptions allow the record to be considered for certain character and fitness evaluation purposes.

“(3) De minimis exemption.—

“(A) In general.—Subsection (a) shall not apply to such de minimis offenses as the Corporation determines, by rule.

“(B) Confinement criteria.—In issuing rules under subparagraph (A), the Corporation shall include a requirement that the offense was punishable by a term of three years or less confined in a correctional facility, where such confinement—

“(i) is calculated based on the time an individual spent incarcerated as a punishment or a sanction, not as pretrial detention; and

“(ii) does not include probation or parole where an individual was restricted to a particular jurisdiction or was required to report occasionally to an individual or a specific location.

“(C) Bad check criteria.—In setting the criteria for de minimis offenses under subparagraph (A), if the Corporation establishes criteria with respect to insufficient funds checks, the Corporation shall require that the aggregate total face value of all insufficient funds checks across all convictions or program entries related to insufficient funds checks is $2,000 or less.

“(D) Designated lesser offenses.—Subsection (a) shall not apply to certain lesser offenses (including the use of a fake ID, shoplifting, trespass, fare evasion, driving with an expired license or tag, and such other low-risk offenses as the Corporation may designate) if 1 year or more has passed since the applicable conviction or program entry.”

; and

(2)
by adding at the end the following:

“(f) Consent Applications.—

“(1) In general.—The Corporation shall accept consent applications from an individual and from an insured depository institution or depository institution holding company on behalf of an individual that are filed separately or contemporaneously with a regional office of the Corporation.

“(2) Sponsored applications filed with regional offices.—Consent applications filed at a regional office of the Corporation by an insured depository institution or depository institution holding company on behalf of an individual—

“(A) shall be reviewed by such office;

“(B) may be approved or denied by such office, if such authority has been delegated to such office by the Corporation; and

“(C) may only be denied by such office if the general counsel of the Corporation (or a designee) certifies that the denial is consistent with this section.

“(3) Individual applications filed with regional offices.—Consent applications filed at a regional office by an individual—

“(A) shall be reviewed by such office; and

“(B) may be approved or denied by such office, if such authority has been delegated to such office by the Corporation, except with respect to—

“(i) cases involving an offense described under subsection (a)(2); and

“(ii) such other high-level security cases as may be designated by the Corporation.

“(4) National office review.—The national office of the Corporation shall—

“(A) review any consent application with respect to which a regional office is not authorized to approve or deny the application; and

“(B) review any consent application that is denied by a regional office, if the individual requests a review by the national office.

“(5) Forms and instructions.—

“(A) Availability.—The Corporation shall make all forms and instructions related to consent applications available to the public, including on the website of the Corporation.

“(B) Contents.—The forms and instructions described under subparagraph (A) shall provide a sample cover letter and a comprehensive list of items that may accompany the application, including clear guidance on evidence that may support a finding of rehabilitation.

“(6) Consideration of criminal history.—

“(A) Regional office consideration.—In reviewing a consent application, a regional office shall—

“(i) primarily rely on the criminal history record of the Federal Bureau of Investigation; and

“(ii) provide such record to the applicant to review for accuracy.

“(B) Certified copies.—The Corporation may not require an applicant to provide certified copies of criminal history records unless the Corporation determines that there is a clear and compelling justification to require additional information to verify the accuracy of the criminal history record of the Federal Bureau of Investigation.

“(7) Consideration of rehabilitation.—Consistent with title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000e et seq.), the Corporation shall—

“(A) conduct an individualized assessment when evaluating consent applications that takes into account evidence of rehabilitation, the applicant’s age at the time of the conviction or program entry, the time that has elapsed since conviction or program entry, and the relationship of individual’s offense to the responsibilities of the applicable position;

“(B) consider the individual’s employment history, letters of recommendation, certificates documenting participation in substance abuse programs, successful participating in job preparation and educational programs, and other relevant mitigating evidence; and

“(C) consider any additional information the Corporation determines necessary for safety and soundness.

“(8) Scope of employment.—With respect to an approved consent application filed by an insured depository institution or depository institution holding company on behalf of an individual, if the Corporation determines it appropriate, such approved consent application shall allow the individual to work for the same employer (without restrictions on the location) and across positions, except that the prior consent of the Corporation (which may require a new application) shall be required for any proposed significant changes in the individual’s security-related duties or responsibilities, such as promotion to an officer or other positions that the employer determines will require higher security screening credentials.

“(9) Coordination with the ncua.—In carrying out this section, the Corporation shall consult and coordinate with the National Credit Union Administration as needed to promote consistent implementation where appropriate.

“(g) Definitions.—In this section:

“(1) Consent application.—The term ‘consent application’ means an application filed with Corporation by an individual (or by an insured depository institution or depository institution holding company on behalf of an individual) seeking the written consent of the Corporation under subsection (a)(1).

“(2) Criminal offense involving dishonesty.—The term ‘criminal offense involving dishonesty’—

“(A) means an offense under which an individual, directly or indirectly—

“(i) cheats or defrauds; or

“(ii) wrongfully takes property belonging to another in violation of a criminal statute;

“(B) includes an offense that Federal, State, or local law defines as dishonest, or for which dishonesty is an element of the offense; and

“(C) does not include—

“(i) a misdemeanor criminal offense committed more than one year before the date on which an individual files a consent application, excluding any period of incarceration; or

“(ii) an offense involving the possession of controlled substances.

“(3) Pretrial diversion or similar program.—The term ‘pretrial diversion or similar program’ means a program characterized by a suspension or eventual dismissal or reversal of charges or criminal prosecution upon agreement by the accused to restitution, drug or alcohol rehabilitation, anger management, or community service.”

(b)
Federal Credit Union Act.— Section 205(d) of the Federal Credit Union Act (12 U.S.C. 1785(d)) is amended by adding at the end the following:

“(4) Exceptions.—

“(A) Certain older offenses.—

“(i) In general.—With respect to an individual, paragraph (1) shall not apply to an offense if—

“(I) it has been 7 years or more since the offense occurred; or

“(II) the individual was incarcerated with respect to the offense and it has been 5 years or more since the individual was released from incarceration.

“(ii) Offenses committed by individuals 21 or younger.—For individuals who committed an offense when they were 21 years of age or younger, paragraph (1) shall not apply to the offense if it has been more than 30 months since the sentencing occurred.

“(iii) Limitation.—This subparagraph shall not apply to an offense described under paragraph (1)(B).

“(B) Expungement and sealing.—With respect to an individual, paragraph (1) shall not apply to an offense if—

“(i) there is an order of expungement, sealing, or dismissal that has been issued in regard to the conviction in connection with such offense; and

“(ii) it is intended by the language in the order itself, or in the legislative provisions under which the order was issued, that the conviction shall be destroyed or sealed from the individual’s State, Tribal, or Federal record, even if exceptions allow the record to be considered for certain character and fitness evaluation purposes.

“(C) De minimis exemption.—

“(i) In general.—Paragraph (1) shall not apply to such de minimis offenses as the Board determines, by rule.

“(ii) Confinement criteria.—In issuing rules under clause (i), the Board shall include a requirement that the offense was punishable by a term of three years or less confined in a correctional facility, where such confinement—

“(I) is calculated based on the time an individual spent incarcerated as a punishment or a sanction, not as pretrial detention; and

“(II) does not include probation or parole where an individual was restricted to a particular jurisdiction or was required to report occasionally to an individual or a specific location.

“(iii) Bad check criteria.—In setting the criteria for de minimis offenses under clause (i), if the Board establishes criteria with respect to insufficient funds checks, the Board shall require that the aggregate total face value of all insufficient funds checks across all convictions or program entries related to insufficient funds checks is $2,000 or less.

“(iv) Designated lesser offenses.—Paragraph (1) shall not apply to certain lesser offenses (including the use of a fake ID, shoplifting, trespass, fare evasion, driving with an expired license or tag, and such other low-risk offenses as the Board may designate) if 1 year or more has passed since the applicable conviction or program entry.

“(5) Consent applications.—

“(A) In general.—The Board shall accept consent applications from an individual and from an insured credit union on behalf of an individual that are filed separately or contemporaneously with a regional office of the Board.

“(B) Sponsored applications filed with regional offices.—Consent applications filed at a regional office of the Board by an insured credit union on behalf of an individual—

“(i) shall be reviewed by such office;

“(ii) may be approved or denied by such office, if such authority has been delegated to such office by the Board; and

“(iii) may only be denied by such office if the general counsel of the Board (or a designee) certifies that the denial is consistent with this section.

“(C) Individual applications filed with regional offices.—Consent applications filed at a regional office by an individual—

“(i) shall be reviewed by such office; and

“(ii) may be approved or denied by such office, if such authority has been delegated to such office by the Board, except with respect to—

“(I) cases involving an offense described under paragraph (1)(B); and

“(II) such other high-level security cases as may be designated by the Board.

“(D) National office review.—The national office of the Board shall—

“(i) review any consent application with respect to which a regional office is not authorized to approve or deny the application; and

“(ii) review any consent application that is denied by a regional office, if the individual requests a review by the national office.

“(E) Forms and instructions.—

“(i) Availability.—The Board shall make all forms and instructions related to consent applications available to the public, including on the website of the Board.

“(ii) Contents.—The forms and instructions described under clause (i) shall provide a sample cover letter and a comprehensive list of items that may accompany the application, including clear guidance on evidence that may support a finding of rehabilitation.

“(F) Consideration of criminal history.—

“(i) Regional office consideration.—In reviewing a consent application, a regional office shall—

“(I) primarily rely on the criminal history record of the Federal Bureau of Investigation; and

“(II) provide such record to the applicant to review for accuracy.

“(ii) Certified copies.—The Board may not require an applicant to provide certified copies of criminal history records unless the Board determines that there is a clear and compelling justification to require additional information to verify the accuracy of the criminal history record of the Federal Bureau of Investigation.

“(G) Consideration of rehabilitation.—Consistent with title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000e et seq.), the Board shall—

“(i) conduct an individualized assessment when evaluating consent applications that takes into account evidence of rehabilitation, the applicant’s age at the time of the conviction or program entry, the time that has elapsed since conviction or program entry, and the relationship of individual’s offense to the responsibilities of the applicable position;

“(ii) consider the individual’s employment history, letters of recommendation, certificates documenting participation in substance abuse programs, successful participating in job preparation and educational programs, and other relevant mitigating evidence; and

“(iii) consider any additional information the Board determines necessary for safety and soundness.

“(H) Scope of employment.—With respect to an approved consent application filed by an insured credit union on behalf of an individual, if the Board determines it appropriate, such approved consent application shall allow the individual to work for the same employer (without restrictions on the location) and across positions, except that the prior consent of the Board (which may require a new application) shall be required for any proposed significant changes in the individual’s security-related duties or responsibilities, such as promotion to an officer or other positions that the employer determines will require higher security screening credentials.

“(I) Coordination with fdic.—In carrying out this subsection, the Board shall consult and coordinate with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as needed to promote consistent implementation where appropriate.

“(6) Definitions.—In this subsection:

“(A) Consent application.—The term ‘consent application’ means an application filed with Board by an individual (or by an insured credit union on behalf of an individual) seeking the written consent of the Board under paragraph (1)(A).

“(B) Criminal offense involving dishonesty.—The term ‘criminal offense involving dishonesty’—

“(i) means an offense under which an individual, directly or indirectly—

“(I) cheats or defrauds; or

“(II) wrongfully takes property belonging to another in violation of a criminal statute;

“(ii) includes an offense that Federal, State, or local law defines as dishonest, or for which dishonesty is an element of the offense; and

“(iii) does not include—

“(I) a misdemeanor criminal offense committed more than one year before the date on which an individual files a consent application, excluding any period of incarceration; or

“(II) an offense involving the possession of controlled substances.

“(C) Pretrial diversion or similar program.—The term ‘pretrial diversion or similar program’ means a program characterized by a suspension or eventual dismissal or reversal of charges or criminal prosecution upon agreement by the accused to restitution, drug or alcohol rehabilitation, anger management, or community service.”

(c)
Review and Report to Congress.— Not later than the end of the 2-year period beginning on the date of enactment of this Act, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and the National Credit Union Administration shall—
(1)
review the rules issued to carry out this Act and the amendments made by this Act on—
(A)
the application of section 19 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1829) and section 205(d) of the Federal Credit Union Act (12 U.S.C. 1785(d));
(B)
the number of applications for consent applications under such sections; and
(C)
the rates of approval and denial for consent applications under such sections;
(2)
make the results of the review required under paragraph (1) available to the public; and
(3)
issue a report to Congress containing any legislative or regulatory recommendations for expanding employment opportunities for those with a previous minor criminal offense.

SEC. 5706. Banking Transparency for Sanctioned Persons Act of 2022.

(a)
In General.— Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter, the Secretary of the Treasury shall issue a report to the Committees on Financial Services and Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives and the Committees on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs and Foreign Relations of the Senate that includes a list of specific licenses issued by the Secretary in the preceding 365 days that authorizes a U.S. financial institution (as defined under section 561.309 of title 31, Code of Federal Regulations) to provide financial services to any of the following:
(1)
The government of a state sponsor of terrorism.
(2)
A person sanctioned pursuant to any of the following:
(A)
Section 404 of the Russia and Moldova Jackson-Vanik Repeal and Sergei Magnitsky Rule of Law Accountability Act of 2012 (Public Law 112–208).
(B)
Subtitle F of title XII of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 (Public Law 114–328, the Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act).
(C)
Executive Order No. 13818.
(b)
Submission of Copies of Licenses on Request.— The Secretary of the Treasury shall expeditiously provide a copy of any license identified in a report required by subsection (a) to the Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate if an appropriate Member of Congress requests a copy of that license not later than 60 days after submission of the report.
(c)
Business Confidential Information.—
(1)
In general.— The Secretary of the Treasury shall, in the report under subsection (a) and any submissions under subsection (b), identify any proprietary information submitted by any private sector representative and mark such information as “business confidential information”.
(2)
Treatment as trade secrets.— Business confidential information described under paragraph (1) shall be considered to be a matter falling within the meaning of trade secrets and commercial or financial information exemption under section 552(b)(4) of title 5, United States Code, and shall be exempt from disclosure under such section 552 of such title without the express approval of the private party.
(d)
Authorization of Appropriations.— For the purpose of carrying out the activities authorized under this section, there is authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary of the Treasury $1,000,000.
(e)
Sunset.— The section shall cease to have any force or effect after the end of the 5-year period beginning on the date of enactment of this Act.
(f)
Form of Report and Submissions.— A report or submission required under this section shall be submitted in unclassified form but may contain a classified annex.
(g)
Appropriate Member of Congress Defined.— In this section, the term “appropriate Member of Congress” has the meaning given that term under section 7132(d) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020.

SEC. 5707. Flexibility in Addressing Rural Homelessness.

Subsection (a) of section 423 of subtitle C of title IV of the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 11383(a)) is amended by adding at the end the following:

“(13) Projects in rural areas that consist of one or more of the following activities:

“(A) Payment of short-term emergency lodging, including in motels or shelters, directly or through vouchers.

“(B) Repairs to units—

“(i) in which homeless individuals and families will be housed; or

“(ii) which are currently not fit for human habitation.

“(C) Staff training, professional development, skill development, and staff retention activities.”

SEC. 5708. Master Account and Services Database.

The Federal Reserve Act is amended by inserting after section 11B (12 U.S.C. 248b et seq.) the following:

“SEC. 11C. MASTER ACCOUNT AND SERVICES DATABASE.

“(a) Definitions.—In this section:

“(1) Access request.—The term ‘access request’ means a request to a Federal reserve bank for access to a reserve bank master account and services, including any written documentation or formal indication that an entity intends to seek access to a reserve bank master account and services.

“(2) Official accountholder.—The term ‘official accountholder’ means—

“(A) a foreign state, as defined in section 25B;

“(B) a central bank, as defined in section 25B, other than a commercial bank;

“(C) a public international organization entitled to enjoy privileges, exemptions, and immunities as an international organization under the International Organizations Immunities Act (22 U.S.C. 288 et seq.); and

“(D) any governmental entity for which the Secretary of the Treasury has directed a Federal reserve bank to receive deposits as fiscal agent of the United States under section 15.

“(3) Reserve bank master account and services.—The term ‘reserve bank master account and services’ means an account in which a Federal reserve bank—

“(A) receives deposits for an entity other than an official accountholder; or

“(B) provides any service under section 11A(b) to an entity other than an official accountholder.

“(b) Publishing Master Account and Access Information.—

“(1) Online database.—The Board shall create and maintain a public, online, and searchable database that contains—

“(A) a list of every entity that currently has access to a reserve bank master account and services, including the date on which the access was granted to the extent the date is knowable;

“(B) a list of every entity that submits an access request for a reserve bank master account and services after enactment of this section (or that has submitted an access request that is pending on the date of enactment of this section), including whether, and the dates on which, a request—

“(i) was submitted; and

“(ii) was approved, rejected, pending, or withdrawn; and

“(C) for each list described in subparagraph (A) or (B), the type of entity that holds or submitted an access request for a reserve bank master account and services, including whether such entity is—

“(i) an insured depository institution, as defined in section 3 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1813);

“(ii) an insured credit union, as defined in section 101 of the Federal Credit Union Act (12 U.S.C. 1752); or

“(iii) a depository institution that is not an insured depository institution or an insured credit union.

“(2) Updates.—Not less frequently than once every quarter, the Board shall update the database to add any new information required under paragraph (1).

“(3) Deadline.—Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this section, the Board shall publish the database with the information required under paragraph (1).”

TITLE LVIII Financial Data Transparency

SEC. 5801. Short Title.

This title may be cited as the “Financial Data Transparency Act of 2022”.

Subtitle A Data Standards for Covered Agencies; Department of the Treasury Rulemaking

SEC. 5811. Data Standards.

(a)
In General.— Subtitle A of the Financial Stability Act of 2010 (12 U.S.C. 5321 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following:

“SEC. 124. DATA STANDARDS.

“(a) Definitions.—In this section—

“(1) the term ‘covered agencies’ means—

“(A) the Department of the Treasury;

“(B) the Board of Governors;

“(C) the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency;

“(D) the Bureau;

“(E) the Commission;

“(F) the Corporation;

“(G) the Federal Housing Finance Agency;

“(H) the National Credit Union Administration Board; and

“(I) any other primary financial regulatory agency designated by the Secretary;

“(2) the terms ‘data asset’, ‘machine-readable’, ‘metadata’, and ‘open license’ have the meanings given the terms in section 3502 of title 44, United States Code; and

“(3) the term ‘data standard’ means a standard that specifies rules by which data is described and recorded.

“(b) Rules.—

“(1) Proposed rules.—Not later than 18 months after the date of enactment of this section, the heads of the covered agencies shall jointly issue proposed rules for public comment that establish data standards for—

“(A) the collections of information reported to each covered agency by financial entities under the jurisdiction of the covered agency; and

“(B) the data collected from covered agencies on behalf of the Council.

“(2) Final rules.—Not later than 2 years after the date of enactment of this section, the heads of the covered agencies shall jointly promulgate final rules that establish the data standards described in paragraph (1).

“(c) Data Standards.—

“(1) Common identifiers; quality.—The data standards established in the final rules promulgated under subsection (b)(2) shall—

“(A) include common identifiers for collections of information reported to covered agencies or collected on behalf of the Council, which shall include a common nonproprietary legal entity identifier that is available under an open license for all entities required to report to covered agencies; and

“(B) to the extent practicable—

“(i) render data fully searchable and machine-readable;

“(ii) enable high quality data through schemas, with accompanying metadata documented in machine-readable taxonomy or ontology models, which clearly define the semantic meaning of the data, as defined by the underlying regulatory information collection requirements;

“(iii) ensure that a data element or data asset that exists to satisfy an underlying regulatory information collection requirement be consistently identified as such in associated machine-readable metadata;

“(iv) be nonproprietary or made available under an open license;

“(v) incorporate standards developed and maintained by voluntary consensus standards bodies; and

“(vi) use, be consistent with, and implement applicable accounting and reporting principles.

“(2) Consultation; interoperability.—In establishing data standards in the final rules promulgated under subsection (b)(2), the heads of the covered agencies shall—

“(A) consult with other Federal departments and agencies and multi-agency initiatives responsible for Federal data standards; and

“(B) seek to promote interoperability of financial regulatory data across members of the Council.

“(d) Effective Date.—The data standards established in the final rules promulgated under subsection (b)(2) shall take effect not later than 2 years after the date on which those final rules are promulgated under that subsection.”

(b)
Clerical Amendment.— The table of contents under section 1(b) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 123 the following:

“Sec. 124. Data standards.”.

SEC. 5812. Open Data Publication by the Department of the Treasury.

(a)
In General.— Subtitle A of the Financial Stability Act of 2010 (12 U.S.C. 5321 et seq.), as amended by section 5811(a), is further amended by adding at the end the following:

“SEC. 125. OPEN DATA PUBLICATION.

“All public data assets published by the Secretary under this subtitle shall be—

“(1) made available as an open Government data asset (as defined in section 3502 of title 44, United States Code);

“(2) freely available for download;

“(3) rendered in a human-readable format; and

“(4) accessible via application programming interface where appropriate.”

(b)
Clerical Amendment.— The table of contents under section 1(b) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, as amended by section 5811(b), is further amended by inserting after the item relating to section 124 the following:

“Sec. 125. Open data publication.”.

(c)
Rulemaking.—
(1)
In general.— The Secretary of the Treasury shall issue rules to carry out the amendments made by this section, which shall take effect not later than 2 years after the date on which final rules are promulgated under section 124(b)(2) of the Financial Stability Act of 2010, as added by section 5811(a) of this title.
(2)
Delegation.— Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Secretary of the Treasury may delegate the functions required under the amendments made by this subtitle to an appropriate office within the Department of the Treasury.

SEC. 5813. No New Disclosure Requirements.

Nothing in this subtitle, or the amendments made by this subtitle, shall be construed to require the Secretary of the Treasury to collect or make publicly available additional information under the Financial Stability Act of 2010 (12 U.S.C. 5311 et seq.), beyond information that was collected or made publicly available under that Act, as of the day before the date of enactment of this Act.

Subtitle B Securities and Exchange Commission

SEC. 5821. Data Standards Requirements for the Securities and Exchange Commission.

(a)
Data Standards for Investment Advisers’ Reports Under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940.— Section 204 of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80b–4) is amended—
(1)
by redesignating the second subsection (d) (relating to “ Records of Persons With Custody of Use”) as subsection (e); and
(2)
by adding at the end the following:

“(f) Data Standards for Reports Filed Under This Section.—

“(1) Requirement.—The Commission shall, by rule, adopt data standards for all reports filed by investment advisers with the Commission under this section.

“(2) Consistency.—The data standards required under paragraph (1) shall incorporate, and ensure compatibility with (to the extent feasible), all applicable data standards established in the rules promulgated under section 124 of the Financial Stability Act of 2010, including, to the extent practicable, by having the characteristics described in clauses (i) through (vi) of subsection (c)(1)(B) of such section 124.”

(b)
Data Standards for Registration Statements and Reports Under the Investment Company Act of 1940.— The Investment Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a–1 et seq.) is amended—
(1)
in section 8 (15 U.S.C. 80a–8), by adding at the end the following:

“(g) Data Standards for Registration Statements.—

“(1) Requirement.—The Commission shall, by rule, adopt data standards for all registration statements required to be filed with the Commission under this section, except that the Commission may exempt exhibits, signatures, and certifications from those data standards.

“(2) Consistency.—The data standards required under paragraph (1) shall incorporate, and ensure compatibility with (to the extent feasible), all applicable data standards established in the rules promulgated under section 124 of the Financial Stability Act of 2010, including, to the extent practicable, by having the characteristics described in clauses (i) through (vi) of subsection (c)(1)(B) of such section 124.”

; and

(2)
in section 30 (15 U.S.C. 80a–29), by adding at the end the following:

“(k) Data Standards for Reports.—

“(1) Requirement.—The Commission shall, by rule, adopt data standards for all reports required to be filed with the Commission under this section, except that the Commission may exempt exhibits, signatures, and certifications from those data standards.

“(2) Consistency.—The data standards required under paragraph (1) shall incorporate, and ensure compatibility with (to the extent feasible), all applicable data standards established in the rules promulgated under section 124 of the Financial Stability Act of 2010, including, to the extent practicable, by having the characteristics described in clauses (i) through (vi) of subsection (c)(1)(B) of such section 124.”

(c)
Data Standards for Information Required To Be Submitted or Published by Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organizations.— Section 15E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78o–7) is amended by adding at the end the following:

“(w) Data Standards for Information Required To Be Submitted or Published Under This Section.—

“(1) Requirement.—The Commission shall, by rule, adopt data standards for all collections of information required to be submitted or published by a nationally recognized statistical rating organization under this section.

“(2) Consistency.—The data standards required under paragraph (1) shall incorporate, and ensure compatibility with (to the extent feasible), all applicable data standards established in the rules promulgated under section 124 of the Financial Stability Act of 2010, including, to the extent practicable, by having the characteristics described in clauses (i) through (vi) of subsection (c)(1)(B) of such section 124.”

(d)
Data Standards for Asset-Backed Securities Disclosures.— Section 7(c) of the Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. 77g(c)) is amended by adding at the end the following:

“(3) Data standards for asset-backed securities disclosures.—

“(A) Requirement.—The Commission shall, by rule, adopt data standards for all disclosures required under this subsection.

“(B) Consistency.—The data standards required under subparagraph (A) shall incorporate, and ensure compatibility with (to the extent feasible), all applicable data standards established in the rules promulgated under section 124 of the Financial Stability Act of 2010, including, to the extent practicable, by having the characteristics described in clauses (i) through (vi) of subsection (c)(1)(B) of such section 124.”

(e)
Data Standards for Corporate Disclosures Under the Securities Act of 1933.— Title I of the Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. 77a et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following:

“SEC. 29. DATA STANDARDS.

“(a) Requirement.—The Commission shall, by rule, adopt data standards for all registration statements, and for all prospectuses included in registration statements, required to be filed with the Commission under this title, except that the Commission may exempt exhibits, signatures, and certifications from those data standards.

“(b) Consistency.—The data standards required under subsection (a) shall incorporate, and ensure compatibility with (to the extent feasible), all applicable data standards established in the rules promulgated under section 124 of the Financial Stability Act of 2010, including, to the extent practicable, by having the characteristics described in clauses (i) through (vi) of subsection (c)(1)(B) of such section 124.”

(f)
Data Standards for Periodic and Current Corporate Disclosures Under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.— Section 13 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m) is amended by adding at the end the following:

“(s) Data Standards.—

“(1) Requirement.—The Commission shall, by rule, adopt data standards for all collections of information with respect to periodic and current reports required to be filed or furnished under this section or under section 15(d), except that the Commission may exempt exhibits, signatures, and certifications from those data standards.

“(2) Consistency.—The data standards required under paragraph (1) shall incorporate, and ensure compatibility with (to the extent feasible), all applicable data standards established in the rules promulgated under section 124 of the Financial Stability Act of 2010, including, to the extent practicable, by having the characteristics described in clauses (i) through (vi) of subsection (c)(1)(B) of such section 124.”

(g)
Data Standards for Corporate Proxy and Consent Solicitation Materials Under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.— Section 14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78n) is amended by adding at the end the following:

“(k) Data Standards for Proxy and Consent Solicitation Materials.—

“(1) Requirement.—The Commission shall, by rule, adopt data standards for all information contained in any proxy or consent solicitation material prepared by an issuer for an annual meeting of the shareholders of the issuer, except that the Commission may exempt exhibits, signatures, and certifications from those data standards.

“(2) Consistency.—The data standards required under paragraph (1) shall incorporate, and ensure compatibility with (to the extent feasible), all applicable data standards established in the rules promulgated under section 124 of the Financial Stability Act of 2010, including, to the extent practicable, by having the characteristics described in clauses (i) through (vi) of subsection (c)(1)(B) of such section 124.”

(h)
Data Standards for Security-based Swap Reporting.— The Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following:

“SEC. 41. DATA STANDARDS FOR SECURITY-BASED SWAP REPORTING.

“(a) Requirement.—The Commission shall, by rule, adopt data standards for all reports related to security-based swaps that are required under this Act.

“(b) Consistency.—The data standards required under subsection (a) shall incorporate, and ensure compatibility with (to the extent feasible), all applicable data standards established in the rules promulgated under section 124 of the Financial Stability Act of 2010, including, to the extent practicable, by having the characteristics described in clauses (i) through (vi) of subsection (c)(1)(B) of such section 124.”

(i)
Rulemaking.—
(1)
In general.— The rules that the Securities and Exchange Commission are required to issue under the amendments made by this section shall take effect not later than 2 years after the date on which final rules are promulgated under section 124(b)(2) of the Financial Stability Act of 2010, as added by section 5811(a) of this title.
(2)
Scaling of regulatory requirements; minimizing disruption.— In issuing the rules required under the amendments made by this section, as described in paragraph (1), the Securities and Exchange Commission—
(A)
may scale data reporting requirements in order to reduce any unjustified burden on emerging growth companies, lending institutions, accelerated filers, smaller reporting companies, and other smaller issuers, as determined by any study required under section 5825(b), while still providing searchable information to investors; and
(B)
shall seek to minimize disruptive changes to the persons affected by those rules.

SEC. 5822. Open Data Publication by the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Section 4 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78d) is amended by adding at the end the following:

“(k) Open Data Publication.—All public data assets published by the Commission under the securities laws and the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Public Law 111–203; 124 Stat. 1376) shall be—

“(1) made available as an open Government data asset (as defined in section 3502 of title 44, United States Code);

“(2) freely available for download;

“(3) rendered in a human-readable format; and

“(4) accessible via application programming interface where appropriate.”

SEC. 5823. Data Transparency Relating to Municipal Securities.

(a)
In General.— Section 15B(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78o–4(b)) is amended by adding at the end the following:

“(8)

(A) The Commission shall adopt data standards for information submitted to the Board.

“(B) Any data standards adopted under subparagraph (A) shall incorporate, and ensure compatibility with (to the extent feasible), all applicable data standards established in the rules promulgated under section 124 of the Financial Stability Act of 2010, including, to the extent practicable, by having the characteristics described in clauses (i) through (vi) of subsection (c)(1)(B) of such section 124.

“(C) The Commission shall consult market participants in establishing data standards under subparagraph (A).

“(D) Nothing in this paragraph may be construed to affect the operation of paragraph (1) or (2) of subsection (d).”

(b)
Rulemaking.—
(1)
In general.— Not later than 2 years after the date on which final rules are promulgated under section 124(b)(2) of the Financial Stability Act of 2010, as added by section 5811(a) of this title, the Securities and Exchange Commission shall issue rules to adopt the data standards required under paragraph (8) of section 15B(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78o–4(b)), as added by subsection (a) of this section.
(2)
Scaling of regulatory requirements; minimizing disruption.— In issuing the rules described in paragraph (1) that adopt the data standards described in that paragraph, the Securities and Exchange Commission—
(A)
may scale those data standards in order to reduce any unjustified burden on smaller regulated entities; and
(B)
shall seek to minimize disruptive changes to the persons affected by those rules.

SEC. 5824. Data Transparency at National Securities Associations.

(a)
In General.— Section 15A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78o–3) is amended by adding at the end the following:

“(n) Data Standards.—

“(1) Requirement.—A national securities association registered pursuant to subsection (a) shall adopt data standards for all information that is regularly filed with or submitted to the association.

“(2) Consistency.—The data standards required under paragraph (1) shall incorporate, and ensure compatibility with (to the extent feasible), all applicable data standards established in the rules promulgated under section 124 of the Financial Stability Act of 2010, including, to the extent practicable, by having the characteristics described in clauses (i) through (vi) of subsection (c)(1)(B) of such section 124.”

(b)
Rulemaking.—
(1)
In general.— Not later than 2 years after the date on which final rules are promulgated under section 124(b)(2) of the Financial Stability Act of 2010, as added by section 5811(a) of this title, each national securities association registered pursuant to section 15A(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78o–3(a)) shall issue rules to adopt the standards required under subsection (n) of section 15A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78o–3), as added by subsection (a) of this section.
(2)
Scaling of regulatory requirements; minimizing disruption.— In issuing the rules required under paragraph (1), a national securities association described in that paragraph—
(A)
may scale data reporting requirements in order to reduce any unjustified burden on smaller regulated entities; and
(B)
shall seek to minimize disruptive changes to the persons affected by those standards.

SEC. 5825. Shorter-Term Burden Reduction and Disclosure Simplification at the Securities and Exchange Commission; Sunset.

(a)
Better Enforcement of the Quality of Corporate Financial Data Submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission.—
(1)
Data quality improvement program.—
(A)
In general.— Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Securities and Exchange Commission shall establish a program to improve the quality of corporate financial data filed or furnished by issuers under the Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. 77a et seq.), the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.), and the Investment Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a–1 et seq.).
(B)
Contents.— The program established under subparagraph (A) shall include the following:
(i)
The designation of an official in the Office of the Chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission responsible for the improvement of the quality of data filed with or furnished to the Commission by issuers.
(ii)
The issuance by the Division of Corporation Finance of the Securities and Exchange Commission of comment letters requiring correction of errors in data filings and submissions, where necessary.
(2)
Goals.— In establishing the program required under this subsection, the Securities and Exchange Commission shall seek to—
(A)
improve the quality of data filed with or furnished to the Commission to a commercially acceptable level; and
(B)
make data filed with or furnished to the Commission useful to investors.
(b)
Report on the Use of Machine-Readable Data for Corporate Disclosures.—
(1)
In general.— Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, and once every 180 days thereafter, the Securities and Exchange Commission shall submit to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate and the Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives a report regarding the public and internal use of machine-readable data for corporate disclosures.
(2)
Content.— Each report required under paragraph (1) shall include—
(A)
an identification of which corporate disclosures required under section 7 of the Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. 77g), section 13 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m), and section 14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78n) are expressed as machine-readable data and which are not;
(B)
an analysis of the costs and benefits of the use of machine-readable data in corporate disclosure to investors, markets, the Securities and Exchange Commission, and issuers;
(C)
a summary of enforcement actions that result from the use or analysis of machine-readable data collected under the provisions of law described in subparagraph (A); and
(D)
an analysis of how the Securities and Exchange Commission uses the machine-readable data collected by the Commission.
(c)
Sunset.— Beginning on the date that is 7 years after the date of enactment of this Act, this section shall have no force or effect.

SEC. 5826. No New Disclosure Requirements.

Nothing in this subtitle, or the amendments made by this subtitle, shall be construed to require the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board, or any national securities association to collect or make publicly available additional information under the provisions of law amended by this subtitle (or under any provision of law referenced in an amendment made by this subtitle), beyond information that was collected or made publicly available under any such provision, as of the day before the date of enactment of this Act.

Subtitle C Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

SEC. 5831. Data Standards Requirements for the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

The Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1811 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following:

“SEC. 52. DATA STANDARDS.

“(a) Definition.—In this section, the term ‘financial company’ has the meaning given the term in section 201(a) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (12 U.S.C. 5381(a)).

“(b) Requirement.—The Corporation shall, by rule, adopt data standards for all collections of information with respect to information received by the Corporation from any depository institution or financial company under this Act or under title II of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (12 U.S.C. 5381 et seq.).

“(c) Consistency.—The data standards required under subsection (b) shall incorporate, and ensure compatibility with (to the extent feasible), all applicable data standards established in the rules promulgated under section 124 of the Financial Stability Act of 2010, including, to the extent practicable, by having the characteristics described in clauses (i) through (vi) of subsection (c)(1)(B) of such section 124.”

SEC. 5832. Open Data Publication by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

The Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1811 et seq.), as amended by section 5831, is further amended by adding at the end the following:

“SEC. 53. OPEN DATA PUBLICATION.

“All public data assets published by the Corporation under this Act or under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Public Law 111–203; 124 Stat. 1376) shall be—

“(1) made available as an open Government data asset (as defined in section 3502 of title 44, United States Code);

“(2) freely available for download;

“(3) rendered in a human-readable format; and

“(4) accessible via application programming interface where appropriate.”

SEC. 5833. Rulemaking.

(a)
In General.— The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation shall issue rules to carry out the amendments made by this subtitle, which shall take effect not later than 2 years after the date on which final rules are promulgated under section 124(b)(2) of the Financial Stability Act of 2010, as added by section 5811(a) of this title.
(b)
Scaling of Regulatory Requirements; Minimizing Disruption.— In issuing the rules required under subsection (a), the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation—
(1)
may scale data reporting requirements in order to reduce any unjustified burden on smaller regulated entities; and
(2)
shall seek to minimize disruptive changes to the persons affected by those regulations.

SEC. 5834. No New Disclosure Requirements.

Nothing in this title, or the amendments made by this title, shall be construed to require the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation to collect or make publicly available additional information under the Acts amended by this title (or under any provision of law referenced in an amendment made by this title), beyond information that was collected or made publicly available under any such provision, as of the day before the date of enactment of this Act.

Subtitle D Office of the Comptroller of the Currency

SEC. 5841. Data Standards and Open Data Publication Requirements for the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency.

The Revised Statutes of the United States is amended by inserting after section 332 (12 U.S.C. 14) the following:

“SEC. 333. DATA STANDARDS; OPEN DATA PUBLICATION.

“(a) Data Standards.—

“(1) Requirement.—The Comptroller of the Currency shall, by rule, adopt data standards for all collections of information that are regularly filed with or submitted to the Comptroller of the Currency by any entity with respect to which the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency is the appropriate Federal banking agency (as defined in section 3 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1813)).

“(2) Consistency.—The data standards required under paragraph (1) shall incorporate, and ensure compatibility with (to the extent feasible), all applicable data standards established in the rules promulgated under section 124 of the Financial Stability Act of 2010, including, to the extent practicable, by having the characteristics described in clauses (i) through (vi) of subsection (c)(1)(B) of such section 124.

“(b) Open Data Publication.—All public data assets published by the Comptroller of the Currency under title LXII or the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Public Law 111–203; 124 Stat. 1376) shall be—

“(1) made available as an open Government data asset (as defined in section 3502 of title 44, United States Code);

“(2) freely available for download;

“(3) rendered in a human-readable format; and

“(4) accessible via application programming interface where appropriate.”

SEC. 5842. Rulemaking.

(a)
In General.— The Comptroller of the Currency shall issue rules to carry out the amendments made by section 5841, which shall take effect not later than 2 years after the date on which final rules are promulgated under section 124(b)(2) of the Financial Stability Act of 2010, as added by section 5811(a) of this title.
(b)
Scaling of Regulatory Requirements; Minimizing Disruption.— In issuing the rules required under subsection (a), the Comptroller of the Currency—
(1)
may scale data reporting requirements in order to reduce any unjustified burden on smaller regulated entities; and
(2)
shall seek to minimize disruptive changes to the persons affected by those regulations.

SEC. 5843. No New Disclosure Requirements.

Nothing in this subtitle, or the amendments made by this subtitle, shall be construed to require the Comptroller of the Currency to collect or make publicly available additional information under the Revised Statutes of the United States (or under any other provision of law referenced in an amendment made by this subtitle), beyond information that was collected or made publicly available under any such provision of law, as of the day before the date of enactment of this Act.

Subtitle E Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection

SEC. 5851. Data Standards and Open Data Publication Requirements for the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection.

(a)
In General.— Subtitle A of the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 (12 U.S.C. 5491 et seq.) is amended by—
(1)
redesignating section 1018 (12 U.S.C. 5491 note) as section 1020; and
(2)
by inserting after section 1017 (12 U.S.C. 5497) the following:

“SEC. 1018. DATA STANDARDS.

“(a) Requirement.—The Bureau shall, by rule, adopt data standards for all collections of information that are regularly filed with or submitted to the Bureau.

“(b) Consistency.—The data standards required under subsection (a) shall incorporate, and ensure compatibility with (to the extent feasible), all applicable data standards established in the rules promulgated under section 124 of the Financial Stability Act of 2010, including, to the extent practicable, by having the characteristics described in clauses (i) through (vi) of subsection (c)(1)(B) of such section 124.

“SEC. 1019. OPEN DATA PUBLICATION.

“All public data assets published by the Bureau shall be—

“(1) made available as an open Government data asset (as defined in section 3502 of title 44, United States Code);

“(2) freely available for download;

“(3) rendered in a human-readable format; and

“(4) accessible via application programming interface where appropriate.”

(b)
Clerical Amendment.— The table of contents under section 1(b) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act is amended by striking the item relating to section 1018 and inserting the following:

“Sec. 1018. Data standards.

“Sec. 1019. Open data publication.

“Sec. 1020. Effective date.”.

SEC. 5852. Rulemaking.

(a)
In General.— The Director of the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection shall issue rules to carry out the amendments made by section 5851, which shall take effect not later than 2 years after the date on which final rules are promulgated under section 124(b)(2) of the Financial Stability Act of 2010, as added by section 5811(a) of this title.
(b)
Scaling of Regulatory Requirements; Minimizing Disruption.— In issuing the rules required under subsection (a), the Director of the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection—
(1)
may scale data reporting requirements in order to reduce any unjustified burden on smaller regulated entities; and
(2)
shall seek to minimize disruptive changes to the persons affected by those regulations.

SEC. 5853. No New Disclosure Requirements.

Nothing in this subtitle, or the amendments made by this subtitle, shall be construed to require the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection to collect or make publicly available additional information under the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 (12 U.S.C. 5481 et seq.), beyond information that was collected or made publicly available under that Act, as of the day before the date of enactment of this Act.

Subtitle F Federal Reserve System

SEC. 5861. Data Standards Requirements for the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

(a)
Data Standards for Information Filed or Submitted by Nonbank Financial Companies.— Section 161(a) of the Financial Stability Act of 2010 (12 U.S.C. 5361(a)) is amended by adding at the end the following:

“(4) Data standards for reports under this subsection.—

“(A) In general.—The Board of Governors shall adopt data standards for all information that, through a collection of information, is regularly filed with or submitted to the Board of Governors under this subsection by any nonbank financial company supervised by the Board of Governors or any subsidiary thereof.

“(B) Consistency.—The data standards required under subparagraph (A) shall incorporate, and ensure compatibility with (to the extent feasible), all applicable data standards established in the rules promulgated under section 124, including, to the extent practicable, by having the characteristics described in clauses (i) through (vi) of subsection (c)(1)(B) of section 124.”

(b)
Data Standards for Information Filed or Submitted by Savings and Loan Holding Companies.— Section 10 of the Home Owners’ Loan Act (12 U.S.C. 1467a) is amended by adding at the end the following:

“(u) Data Standards.—

“(1) Requirement.—The Board shall adopt data standards for all information that, through a collection of information, is regularly filed with or submitted to the Board by any savings and loan holding company, or subsidiary of a savings and loan holding company, other than a depository institution, under this section.

“(2) Consistency.—The data standards required under paragraph (1) shall incorporate, and ensure compatibility with (to the extent feasible), all applicable data standards established in the rules promulgated under section 124 of the Financial Stability Act of 2010, including, to the extent practicable, by having the characteristics described in clauses (i) through (vi) of subsection (c)(1)(B) of such section 124.”

(c)
Data Standards for Information Filed or Submitted by Bank Holding Companies.— Section 5 of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1844) is amended by adding at the end the following:

“(h) Data Standards.—

“(1) Requirement.—The Board shall adopt data standards for all information that, through a collection of information, is regularly filed with or submitted to the Board by any bank holding company in a report under subsection (c).

“(2) Consistency.—The data standards required under paragraph (1) shall incorporate, and ensure compatibility with (to the extent feasible), all applicable data standards established in the rules promulgated under section 124 of the Financial Stability Act of 2010, including, to the extent practicable, by having the characteristics described in clauses (i) through (vi) of subsection (c)(1)(B) of such section 124.”

(d)
Data Standards for Information Submitted by Financial Market Utilities or Institutions Under the Payment, Clearing, and Settlement Supervision Act of 2010.— Section 809 of the Payment, Clearing, and Settlement Supervision Act of 2010 (12 U.S.C. 5468) is amended by adding at the end the following:

“(h) Data Standards.—

“(1) Requirement.—The Board of Governors shall adopt data standards for all information that, through a collection of information, is regularly filed with or submitted to the Board or the Council by any financial market utility or financial institution under subsection (a) or (b).

“(2) Consistency.—The data standards required under paragraph (1) shall incorporate, and ensure compatibility with (to the extent feasible), all applicable data standards established in the rules promulgated under section 124 of the Financial Stability Act of 2010, including, to the extent practicable, by having the characteristics described in clauses (i) through (vi) of subsection (c)(1)(B) of such section 124.”

SEC. 5862. Open Data Publication by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

The Federal Reserve Act (12 U.S.C. 226 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following:

“SEC. 32. OPEN DATA PUBLICATION BY THE BOARD OF GOVERNORS.

“All public data assets published by the Board of Governors under this Act, the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841 et seq.), the Financial Stability Act of 2010 (12 U.S.C. 5311 et seq.), the Home Owners’ Loan Act (12 U.S.C. 1461 et seq.), the Payment, Clearing, and Settlement Supervision Act of 2010 (12 U.S.C. 5461 et seq.), or the Enhancing Financial Institution Safety and Soundness Act of 2010 (title III of Public Law 111–203) (or any provision of law amended by that Act) shall be—

“(1) made available as an open Government data asset (as defined in section 3502 of title 44, United States Code);

“(2) freely available for download;

“(3) rendered in a human-readable format; and

“(4) accessible via application programming interface where appropriate.”

SEC. 5863. Rulemaking.

(a)
In General.— The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System shall issue rules to carry out the amendments made by this subtitle, which shall take effect not later than 2 years after the date on which final rules are promulgated under section 124(b)(2) of the Financial Stability Act of 2010, as added by section 5811(a) of this title.
(b)
Scaling of Regulatory Requirements; Minimizing Disruption.— In issuing the rules required under subsection (a), the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System—
(1)
may scale data reporting requirements in order to reduce any unjustified burden on smaller regulated entities; and
(2)
shall seek to minimize disruptive changes to the persons affected by those regulations.

SEC. 5864. No New Disclosure Requirements.

Nothing in this subtitle, or the amendments made by this subtitle, shall be construed to require the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System to collect or make publicly available additional information under any Act amended by this subtitle, any Act referenced in an amendment made by this subtitle, or any Act amended by an Act referenced in an amendment made by this subtitle, beyond information that was collected or made publicly available under any such provision of law, as of the day before the date of enactment of this Act.

Subtitle G National Credit Union Administration

SEC. 5871. Data Standards.

Title I of the Federal Credit Union Act (12 U.S.C. 1752 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following:

“SEC. 132. DATA STANDARDS.

“(a) Requirement.—The Board shall, by rule, adopt data standards for all collections of information and reports regularly filed with or submitted to the Administration under this Act.

“(b) Consistency.—The data standards required under subsection (a) shall incorporate, and ensure compatibility with (to the extent feasible), all applicable data standards established in the rules promulgated under section 124 of the Financial Stability Act of 2010, including, to the extent practicable, by having the characteristics described in clauses (i) through (vi) of subsection (c)(1)(B) of such section 124.”

SEC. 5872. Open Data Publication by the National Credit Union Administration.

Title I of the Federal Credit Union Act (12 U.S.C. 1752 et seq.), as amended by section 5701, is further amended by adding at the end the following:

“SEC. 133. OPEN DATA PUBLICATION.

“All public data assets published by the Administration under this title shall be—

“(1) made available as an open Government data asset (as defined in section 3502 of title 44, United States Code);

“(2) freely available for download;

“(3) rendered in a human-readable format; and

“(4) accessible via application programming interface where appropriate.”

SEC. 5873. Rulemaking.

(a)
In General.— The National Credit Union Administration Board shall issue rules to carry out the amendments made by this subtitle, which shall take effect not later than 2 years after the date on which final rules are promulgated under section 124(b)(2) of the Financial Stability Act of 2010, as added by section 5811(a) of this title.
(b)
Scaling of Regulatory Requirements; Minimizing Disruption.— In issuing the rules required under subsection (a), the National Credit Union Administration Board—
(1)
may scale data reporting requirements in order to reduce any unjustified burden on smaller regulated entities; and
(2)
shall seek to minimize disruptive changes to the persons affected by those regulations.

SEC. 5874. No New Disclosure Requirements.

Nothing in this subtitle, or the amendments made by this subtitle, shall be construed to require the National Credit Union Administration Board to collect or make publicly available additional information under the Federal Credit Union Act (12 U.S.C. 1751 et seq.), beyond information that was collected or made publicly available under that Act, as of the day before the date of enactment of this Act.

Subtitle H Federal Housing Finance Agency

SEC. 5881. Data Standards Requirements for the Federal Housing Finance Agency.

Part 1 of subtitle A of the Federal Housing Enterprises Financial Safety and Soundness Act of 1992 (12 U.S.C. 4511 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following:

“SEC. 1319H. DATA STANDARDS.

“(a) Requirement.—The Agency shall, by rule, adopt data standards for all collections of information that are regularly filed with or submitted to the Agency.

“(b) Consistency.—The data standards required under subsection (a) shall incorporate, and ensure compatibility with (to the extent feasible), all applicable data standards established in the rules promulgated under section 124 of the Financial Stability Act of 2010, including, to the extent practicable, by having the characteristics described in clauses (i) through (vi) of subsection (c)(1)(B) of such section 124.”

SEC. 5882. Open Data Publication by the Federal Housing Finance Agency.

Part 1 of subtitle A of the Federal Housing Enterprises Financial Safety and Soundness Act of 1992 (12 U.S.C. 4511 et seq.), as amended by section 5801, is further amended by adding at the end the following:

“SEC. 1319I. OPEN DATA PUBLICATION.

“All public data assets published by the Agency shall be—

“(1) made available as an open Government data asset (as defined in section 3502 of title 44, United States Code);

“(2) freely available for download;

“(3) rendered in a human-readable format; and

“(4) accessible via application programming interface where appropriate.”

SEC. 5883. Rulemaking.

(a)
In General.— The Director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency shall issue rules to carry out the amendments made by this subtitle, which shall take effect not later than 2 years after the date on which final rules are promulgated under section 124(b)(2) of the Financial Stability Act of 2010, as added by section 5811(a) of this title.
(b)
Minimizing Disruption.— In issuing the regulations required under subsection (a), the Director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency shall seek to minimize disruptive changes to the persons affected by those rules.

SEC. 5884. No New Disclosure Requirements.

Nothing in this subtitle, or the amendments made by this subtitle, shall be construed to require the Federal Housing Finance Agency to collect or make publicly available additional information under the Federal Housing Enterprises Financial Safety and Soundness Act of 1992 (12 U.S.C. 4501 et seq.), beyond information that was collected or made publicly available under that Act, as of the day before the date of enactment of this Act.

Subtitle I Miscellaneous

SEC. 5891. Rules of Construction.

(a)
No Effect on Intellectual Property.— Nothing in this title, or the amendments made by this title, may be construed to alter the legal protections, as in effect on the day before the date of enactment of this Act, of copyrighted material or other intellectual property rights of any non-Federal person.
(b)
No Effect on Monetary Policy.— Nothing in this title, or the amendments made by this title, may be construed to apply to activities conducted, or data standards used, in connection with monetary policy proposed or implemented by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System or the Federal Open Market Committee.
(c)
Preservation of Agency Authority To Tailor Requirements.— Nothing in this title, or the amendments made by this title, may be construed to prohibit the head of a covered agency, as defined in section 124(a) of the Financial Stability Act of 2010, as added by section 5811(a) of this title, from tailoring those standards when those standards are adopted under this title and the amendments made by this title.

SEC. 5892. Classified and Protected Information.

(a)
In General.— Nothing in this title, or the amendments made by this title, shall require the disclosure to the public of—
(1)
information that would be exempt from disclosure under section 552 of title 5, United States Code (commonly known as the “Freedom of Information Act”); or
(2)
information protected under—
(A)
section 552a of title 5, United States Code (commonly known as the “Privacy Act of 1974”);
(B)
section 6103 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986; or
(C)
any law administered, or regulation promulgated, by the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network of the Department of the Treasury.
(b)
Existing Agency Regulations.— Nothing in this title, or the amendments made by this title, shall be construed to require the Secretary of the Treasury, the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Comptroller of the Currency, the Director of the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the National Credit Union Administration Board, the Director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency, or the head of any other primary financial regulatory agency (as defined in section 2 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (12 U.S.C. 5301)) designated by the Secretary of the Treasury to amend regulations and procedures, as in effect on the day before the date of enactment of this Act, regarding the sharing and disclosure of nonpublic information, including confidential supervisory information.
(c)
Data Privacy and Personally Identifiable Information.— Nothing in this title, or the amendments made by this title, shall be construed to require the Secretary of the Treasury, the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Comptroller of the Currency, the Director of the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the National Credit Union Administration Board, the Director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency, or the head of any other primary financial regulatory agency (as defined in section 2 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (12 U.S.C. 5301)) designated by the Secretary of the Treasury to disclose to the public any information that can be used to distinguish or trace the identity of an individual, either alone or when combined with other personal or identifying information that is linked or linkable to a specific individual.

SEC. 5893. Report.

Not later than 3 years after the date of enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to Congress a report on the feasibility, costs, and potential benefits of building upon the taxonomy established by this title, and the amendments made by this title, to arrive at a Federal Governmentwide regulatory compliance standardization mechanism similar to Standard Business Reporting.

TITLE LIX Other Matters

Subtitle A Judiciary Matters

SEC. 5901. Extension of Admission to Guam or the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands for Certain Nonimmigrant H–2b Workers.

Section 6(b)(1)(B) of the Joint Resolution entitled “A Joint Resolution to approve the ‘Covenant to Establish a Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands in Political Union with the United States of America’, and for other purposes”, approved March 24, 1976 (48 U.S.C. 1806(b)(1)(B)), is amended, in the matter preceding clause (i), by striking “ December 31, 2023” and inserting “ December 31, 2024”.

SEC. 5902. Eligibility of Portuguese Traders and Investors for E–1 and E–2 Nonimmigrant Visas.

(a)
Nonimmigrant Traders and Investors.— For purposes of clauses (i) and (ii) of section 101(a)(15)(E) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(15)(E)), Portugal shall be considered to be a foreign state described in such section if the Government of Portugal provides similar nonimmigrant status to nationals of the United States.
(b)
Modification of Eligibility Criteria for E Visas.— Section 101(a)(15)(E) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(15)(E)) is amended—
(1)
in the matter preceding clause (i)—
(A)
by inserting “ (or, in the case of an alien who acquired the relevant nationality through a financial investment and who has not previously been granted status under this subparagraph, the foreign state of which the alien is a national and in which the alien has been domiciled for a continuous period of not less than 3 years at any point before applying for a nonimmigrant visa under this subparagraph)” before “ , and the spouse”; and
(B)
by striking “ him” and inserting “ such alien”; and
(2)
by striking “ he” each place such term appears and inserting “ the alien”.

SEC. 5903. Incentives for States to Create Sexual Assault Survivors’ Bill of Rights.

(a)
Incentives for States to Create Sexual Assault Survivors’ Bill of Rights.—
(1)
Definition of covered formula grant.— In this subsection, the term “covered formula grant” means a grant under part T of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (34 U.S.C. 10441 et seq.) (commonly referred to as the “STOP Violence Against Women Formula Grant Program”).
(2)
Grant increase.— The Attorney General shall increase the amount of the covered formula grant provided to a State in accordance with this subsection if the State has in effect a law that provides to sexual assault survivors the rights, at a minimum, under section 3772 of title 18, United States Code.
(3)
Application.— A State seeking an increase to a covered formula grant under this subsection shall submit an application to the Attorney General at such time, in such manner, and containing such information as the Attorney General may reasonably require, including information about the law described in paragraph (2).
(4)
Period of increase.— The Attorney General may not provide an increase in the amount of the covered formula grant provided to a State under this subsection more than 4 times.
(5)
Authorization of appropriations.— There are authorized to be appropriated $20,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2023 through 2027 to carry out this subsection.
(b)
Reauthorization of the Missing Americans Alert Program.— Section 240001(d) of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 (34 U.S.C. 12621(d)) is amended by striking “ 2018 through 2022” and inserting “ 2023 through 2027”.

SEC. 5904. Extending the Statute of Limitations for Certain Money Laundering Offenses.

(a)
In General.— Section 1956 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:

“(j) Seven-year Limitation.—Notwithstanding section 3282, no person shall be prosecuted, tried, or punished for a violation of this section or section 1957 if the specified unlawful activity constituting the violation is the activity defined in subsection (c)(7)(B) of this section, unless the indictment is found or the information is instituted not later than 7 years after the date on which the offense was committed.”

(b)
Effective Date.— The amendments made by this section shall apply to—
(1)
conduct that occurred before the date of enactment of this Act for which the applicable statute of limitations has not expired; and
(2)
conduct that occurred on or after the date of enactment of this Act.

Subtitle B Science, Space, and Technology Matters

SEC. 5911. Financial Assistance for Construction of Test Beds and Specialized Facilities.

Section 34 of the National Institute of Standards and Technology Act (15 U.S.C. 278s) is amended—
(1)
by redesignating subsections (f) through (l) as subsections (g) through (m), respectively; and
(2)
by inserting after subsection (e) the following:

“(f) Authority to Award Financial Assistance for Construction of Test Beds and Specialized Facilities.—

“(1) In general.—The Secretary may, acting through the Director, award financial assistance for the construction of test beds and specialized facilities by Manufacturing USA institutes established or supported under subsection (e) as the Secretary considers appropriate to carry out the purposes of the Program.

“(2) Requirements.—The Secretary shall exercise authority under paragraph (1) in a manner and with requirements consistent with paragraphs (3) through (8) of subsection (e).

“(3) Priority.—The Secretary shall establish preferences in selection criteria for proposals for financial assistance under this subsection from Manufacturing USA institutes that integrate as active members one or more covered entities as described in section 10262 of the Research and Development, Competition, and Innovation Act (Public Law 117–167).”

SEC. 5912. Reports on Arctic Research, Budget, and Spending.

(a)
Crosscut Report on Arctic Research Programs.—
(1)
In general.— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy, in coordination with the Director of the Office of Management and Budget, shall submit a detailed report to Congress regarding all existing Federal programs relating to Arctic research and research-related activities, including observation, modeling, monitoring, and prediction, and research infrastructure. The report shall include—
(A)
the goals of each such program;
(B)
the funding levels for each such program for each of the 5 immediately preceding fiscal years;
(C)
the anticipated funding levels for each such program for each of the 5 following fiscal years; and
(D)
the total funding appropriated for the current fiscal year for such programs.
(2)
Distribution.— Not later than 30 days after submitting the report to Congress pursuant to subsection (a), the Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy shall make a report available on a public website.
(b)
Annual Agency Budget and Spending Report.—
(1)
Annual agency budgets.— Each agency represented on the Interagency Arctic Research Policy Committee shall each include in their agency’s annual budget request to Congress a description of their agency’s projected Arctic research activities and associated budget for the fiscal year covered by the budget request.
(2)
Report to congress.— Beginning with fiscal year 2025 and annually thereafter until fiscal year 2034, not later than 60 days after the President’s budget request for such fiscal year is submitted to Congress, the Office of Science and Technology Policy shall submit an annual report to Congress summarizing each agency’s budget request related to Arctic research activities per the information submitted in accordance with paragraph (1).

SEC. 5913. National Research and Development Strategy for Distributed Ledger Technology.

(a)
Definitions.— In this section:
(1)
Director.— Except as otherwise expressly provided, the term “Director” means the Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy.
(2)
Distributed ledger.— The term “distributed ledger” means a ledger that—
(A)
is shared across a set of distributed nodes, which are devices or processes, that participate in a network and store a complete or partial replica of the ledger;
(B)
is synchronized between the nodes;
(C)
has data appended to it by following the ledger’s specified consensus mechanism;
(D)
may be accessible to anyone (public) or restricted to a subset of participants (private); and
(E)
may require participants to have authorization to perform certain actions (engaging) or require no authorization (permissionless).
(3)
Distributed ledger technology.— The term “distributed ledger technology” means technology that enables the operation and use of distributed ledgers.
(4)
Institution of higher education.— The term “institution of higher education” has the meaning given the term in section 101 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1001).
(5)
Relevant congressional committees.— The term “relevant congressional committees” means—
(A)
the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate; and
(B)
the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology of the House of Representatives.
(6)
Smart contract.— The term “smart contract” means a computer program stored in a distributed ledger system that is executed when certain predefined conditions are satisfied and wherein the outcome of any execution of the program may be recorded on the distributed ledger.
(b)
National Distributed Ledger Technology Research and Development Strategy.—
(1)
In general.— The Director, or a designee of the Director, shall, in coordination with the National Science and Technology Council, and the heads of such other relevant Federal agencies and entities as the Director considers appropriate, which may include the National Academies, and in consultation with such nongovernmental entities as the Director considers appropriate, develop a national strategy for the research and development of distributed ledger technologies and their applications, including applications of public and permissionless distributed ledgers. In developing the national strategy, the Director shall consider the following:
(A)
Current efforts and coordination by Federal agencies to invest in the research and development of distributed ledger technologies and their applications, including through programs like the Small Business Innovation Research program, the Small Business Technology Transfer program, and the National Science Foundation’s Innovation Corps programs.
(B)
(i)
The potential benefits and risks of applications of distributed ledger technologies across different industry sectors, including their potential to—
(I)
lower transactions costs and facilitate new types of commercial transactions;
(II)
protect privacy and increase individuals’ data sovereignty;
(III)
reduce friction to the interoperability of digital systems;
(IV)
increase the accessibility, auditability, security, efficiency, and transparency of digital services;
(V)
increase market competition in the provision of digital services;
(VI)
enable dynamic contracting and contract execution through smart contracts;
(VII)
enable participants to collaborate in trustless and disintermediated environments;
(VIII)
enable the operations and governance of distributed organizations;
(IX)
create new ownership models for digital items; and
(X)
increase participation of populations historically underrepresented in the technology, business, and financial sectors.
(ii)
In consideration of the potential risks of applications of distributed ledger technologies under clause (i), the Director shall take into account, where applicable—
(I)
additional risks that may emerge from distributed ledger technologies, as identified in reports submitted to the President pursuant to Executive Order 14067, that may be addressed by research and development;
(II)
software vulnerabilities in distributed ledger technologies and smart contracts;
(III)
limited consumer literacy on engaging with applications of distributed ledger technologies in a secure way;
(IV)
the use of distributed ledger technologies in illicit finance and their use in combating illicit finance;
(V)
manipulative, deceptive, and fraudulent practices that harm consumers engaging with applications of distributed ledger technologies;
(VI)
the implications of different consensus mechanisms for digital ledgers and governance and accountability mechanisms for applications of distributed ledger technologies, which may include decentralized networks;
(VII)
foreign activities in the development and deployment of distributed ledger technologies and their associated tools and infrastructure; and
(VIII)
environmental, sustainability, and economic impacts of the computational resources required for distributed ledger technologies.
(C)
Potential uses for distributed ledger technologies that could improve the operations and delivery of services by Federal agencies, taking into account the potential of digital ledger technologies to—
(i)
improve the efficiency and effectiveness of privacy-preserving data sharing among Federal agencies and with State, local, territorial, and Tribal governments;
(ii)
promote government transparency by improving data sharing with the public;
(iii)
introduce or mitigate risks that may threaten individuals’ rights or broad access to Federal services;
(iv)
automate and modernize processes for assessing and ensuring regulatory compliance; and
(v)
facilitate broad access to financial services for underserved and underbanked populations.
(D)
Ways to support public and private sector dialogue on areas of research that could enhance the efficiency, scalability, interoperability, security, and privacy of applications using distributed ledger technologies.
(E)
The need for increased coordination of the public and private sectors on the development of voluntary standards in order to promote research and development, including standards regarding security, smart contracts, cryptographic protocols, virtual routing and forwarding, interoperability, zero-knowledge proofs, and privacy, for distributed ledger technologies and their applications.
(F)
Applications of distributed ledger technologies that could positively benefit society but that receive relatively little private sector investment.
(G)
The United States position in global leadership and competitiveness across research, development, and deployment of distributed ledger technologies.
(2)
Consultation.—
(A)
In general.— In carrying out the Director’s duties under this subsection, the Director shall consult with the following:
(i)
Private industry.
(ii)
Institutions of higher education, including minority-serving institutions.
(iii)
Nonprofit organizations, including foundations dedicated to supporting distributed ledger technologies and their applications.
(iv)
State governments.
(v)
Such other persons as the Director considers appropriate.
(B)
Representation.— The Director shall ensure consultations with the following:
(i)
Rural and urban stakeholders from across the Nation.
(ii)
Small, medium, and large businesses.
(iii)
Subject matter experts representing multiple industrial sectors.
(iv)
A demographically diverse set of stakeholders.
(3)
Coordination.— In carrying out this subsection, the Director shall, for purposes of avoiding duplication of activities, consult, cooperate, and coordinate with the programs and policies of other relevant Federal agencies, including the interagency process outlined in section 3 of Executive Order 14067 (87 Fed. Reg. 14143; relating ensuring responsible development of digital assets).
(4)
National strategy.— Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Director shall submit to the relevant congressional committees and the President a national strategy that includes the following:
(A)
Priorities for the research and development of distributed ledger technologies and their applications.
(B)
Plans to support public and private sector investment and partnerships in research and technology development for societally beneficial applications of distributed ledger technologies.
(C)
Plans to mitigate the risks of distributed ledger technologies and their applications.
(D)
An identification of additional resources, administrative action, or legislative action recommended to assist with the implementation of such strategy.
(5)
Research and development funding.— The Director shall, as the Director considers necessary, consult with the Director of the Office of Management and Budget and with the heads of such other elements of the Executive Office of the President as the Director considers appropriate, to ensure that the recommendations and priorities with respect to research and development funding, as expressed in the national strategy developed under this subsection, are incorporated in the development of annual budget requests for Federal research agencies.
(c)
Distributed Ledger Technology Research.—
(1)
In general.— Subject to the availability of appropriations, the Director of the National Science Foundation shall make awards, on a competitive basis, to institutions of higher education, including minority-serving institutions, or nonprofit organizations (or consortia of such institutions or organizations) to support research, including interdisciplinary research, on distributed ledger technologies, their applications, and other issues that impact or are caused by distributed ledger technologies, which may include research on—
(A)
the implications on trust, transparency, privacy, accessibility, accountability, and energy consumption of different consensus mechanisms and hardware choices, and approaches for addressing these implications;
(B)
approaches for improving the security, privacy, resiliency, interoperability, performance, and scalability of distributed ledger technologies and their applications, which may include decentralized networks;
(C)
approaches for identifying and addressing vulnerabilities and improving the performance and expressive power of smart contracts;
(D)
the implications of quantum computing on applications of distributed ledger technologies, including long-term protection of sensitive information (such as medical or digital property), and techniques to address them;
(E)
game theory, mechanism design, and economics underpinning and facilitating the operations and governance of decentralized networks enabled by distributed ledger technologies;
(F)
the social behaviors of participants in decentralized networks enabled by distributed ledger technologies;
(G)
human-centric design approaches to make distributed ledger technologies and their applications more usable and accessible;
(H)
use cases for distributed ledger technologies across various industry sectors and government, including applications pertaining to—
(i)
digital identity, including trusted identity and identity management;
(ii)
digital property rights;
(iii)
delivery of public services;
(iv)
supply chain transparency;
(v)
medical information management;
(vi)
inclusive financial services;
(vii)
community governance;
(viii)
charitable giving;
(ix)
public goods funding;
(x)
digital credentials;
(xi)
regulatory compliance;
(xii)
infrastructure resilience, including against natural disasters; and
(xiii)
peer-to-peer transactions; and
(I)
the social, behavioral, and economic implications associated with the growth of applications of distributed ledger technologies, including decentralization in business, financial, and economic systems.
(2)
Accelerating innovation.— The Director of the National Science Foundation shall consider continuing to support startups that are in need of funding, would develop in and contribute to the economy of the United States, leverage distributed ledger technologies, have the potential to positively benefit society, and have the potential for commercial viability, through programs like the Small Business Innovation Research program, the Small Business Technology Transfer program, and, as appropriate, other programs that promote broad and diverse participation.
(3)
Consideration of national distributed ledger technology research and development strategy.— In making awards under paragraph (1), the Director of the National Science Foundation shall take into account the national strategy, as described in subsection (b)(4).
(4)
Fundamental research.— The Director of the National Science Foundation shall consider continuing to make awards supporting fundamental research in areas related to distributed ledger technologies and their applications, such as applied cryptography and distributed systems.
(d)
Distributed Ledger Technology Applied Research Project.—
(1)
Applied research project.— Subject to the availability of appropriations, the Director of the National Institute of Standards and Technology, may carry out an applied research project to study and demonstrate the potential benefits and unique capabilities of distributed ledger technologies.
(2)
Activities.— In carrying out the applied research project, the Director of the National Institute of Standards and Technology shall—
(A)
identify potential applications of distributed ledger technologies, including those that could benefit activities at the Department of Commerce or at other Federal agencies, considering applications that could—
(i)
improve the privacy and interoperability of digital identity and access management solutions;
(ii)
increase the integrity and transparency of supply chains through the secure and limited sharing of relevant supplier information;
(iii)
facilitate broader participation in distributed ledger technologies of populations historically underrepresented in technology, business, and financial sectors; or
(iv)
be of benefit to the public or private sectors, as determined by the Director in consultation with relevant stakeholders;
(B)
solicit and provide the opportunity for public comment relevant to potential projects;
(C)
consider, in the selection of a project, whether the project addresses a pressing need not already addressed by another organization or Federal agency;
(D)
establish plans to mitigate potential risks, including those outlined in subsection (b)(1)(B)(ii), if applicable, of potential projects;
(E)
produce an example solution leveraging distributed ledger technologies for 1 of the applications identified in subparagraph (A);
(F)
hold a competitive process to select private sector partners, if they are engaged, to support the implementation of the example solution;
(G)
consider hosting the project at the National Cybersecurity Center of Excellence; and
(H)
ensure that cybersecurity best practices consistent with the Cybersecurity Frame work of the National Institute of Standards and Technology are demonstrated in the project.
(3)
Briefings to congress.— Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Director of the National Institute of Standards and Technology shall offer a briefing to the relevant congressional committees on the progress and current findings from the project under this subsection.
(4)
Public report.— Not later than 12 months after the completion of the project under this subsection, the Director of the National Institute of Standards and Technology shall make public a report on the results and findings from the project.

SEC. 5914. Technical Corrections.

The Energy Policy Act of 2005 is amended—
(1)
in section 952(a)(2)(A) (42 U.S.C. 16272(a)(2)(A)), by striking “ shall evaluate the technical and economic feasibility of the establishment of” and inserting “ shall evaluate the technical and economic feasibility of establishing and, if feasible, is authorized to establish”; and
(2)
in section 954(a)(5) (42 U.S.C. 16274(a)(5)), by—
(A)
redesignating subparagraph (E) as subparagraph (F); and
(B)
by inserting after subparagraph (D) the following:

“(E) Fuel services.—The Research Reactor Infrastructure subprogram within the Radiological Facilities Management program of the Department, as authorized by paragraph (6), shall be expanded to provide fuel services to research reactors established by this paragraph.”

Subtitle C FedRamp Authorization Act

SEC. 5921. Fedramp Authorization Act.

(a)
Short Title.— This section may be cited as the “FedRAMP Authorization Act”.
(b)
Amendment.— Chapter 36 of title 44, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:

“§ 3607. Definitions

“(a) In General.—Except as provided under subsection (b), the definitions under sections 3502 and 3552 apply to this section through section 3616.

“(b) Additional Definitions.—In this section through section 3616:

“(1) Administrator.—The term ‘Administrator’ means the Administrator of General Services.

“(2) Appropriate congressional committees.—The term ‘appropriate congressional committees’ means the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate and the Committee on Oversight and Reform of the House of Representatives.

“(3) Authorization to operate; federal information.—The terms ‘authorization to operate’ and ‘Federal information’ have the meaning given those term in Circular A–130 of the Office of Management and Budget entitled ‘Managing Information as a Strategic Resource’, or any successor document.

“(4) Cloud computing.—The term ‘cloud computing’ has the meaning given the term in Special Publication 800–145 of the National Institute of Standards and Technology, or any successor document.

“(5) Cloud service provider.—The term ‘cloud service provider’ means an entity offering cloud computing products or services to agencies.

“(6) FedRAMP.—The term ‘FedRAMP’ means the Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program established under section 3608.

“(7) FedRAMP authorization.—The term ‘FedRAMP authorization’ means a certification that a cloud computing product or service has—

“(A) completed a FedRAMP authorization process, as determined by the Administrator; or

“(B) received a FedRAMP provisional authorization to operate, as determined by the FedRAMP Board.

“(8) Fedramp authorization package.—The term ‘FedRAMP authorization package’ means the essential information that can be used by an agency to determine whether to authorize the operation of an information system or the use of a designated set of common controls for all cloud computing products and services authorized by FedRAMP.

“(9) FedRAMP board.—The term ‘FedRAMP Board’ means the board established under section 3610.

“(10) Independent assessment service.—The term ‘independent assessment service’ means a third-party organization accredited by the Administrator to undertake conformity assessments of cloud service providers and the products or services of cloud service providers.

“(11) Secretary.—The term ‘Secretary’ means the Secretary of Homeland Security.

“§ 3608. Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program

“There is established within the General Services Administration the Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program. The Administrator, subject to section 3614, shall establish a Government-wide program that provides a standardized, reusable approach to security assessment and authorization for cloud computing products and services that process unclassified information used by agencies.

“§ 3609. Roles and responsibilities of the General Services Administration

“(a) Roles and Responsibilities.—The Administrator shall—

“(1) in consultation with the Secretary, develop, coordinate, and implement a process to support agency review, reuse, and standardization, where appropriate, of security assessments of cloud computing products and services, including, as appropriate, oversight of continuous monitoring of cloud computing products and services, pursuant to guidance issued by the Director pursuant to section 3614;

“(2) establish processes and identify criteria consistent with guidance issued by the Director under section 3614 to make a cloud computing product or service eligible for a FedRAMP authorization and validate whether a cloud computing product or service has a FedRAMP authorization;

“(3) develop and publish templates, best practices, technical assistance, and other materials to support the authorization of cloud computing products and services and increase the speed, effectiveness, and transparency of the authorization process, consistent with standards and guidelines established by the Director of the National Institute of Standards and Technology and relevant statutes;

“(4) establish and update guidance on the boundaries of FedRAMP authorization packages to enhance the security and protection of Federal information and promote transparency for agencies and users as to which services are included in the scope of a FedRAMP authorization;

“(5) grant FedRAMP authorizations to cloud computing products and services consistent with the guidance and direction of the FedRAMP Board;

“(6) establish and maintain a public comment process for proposed guidance and other FedRAMP directives that may have a direct impact on cloud service providers and agencies before the issuance of such guidance or other FedRAMP directives;

“(7) coordinate with the FedRAMP Board, the Director of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, and other entities identified by the Administrator, with the concurrence of the Director and the Secretary, to establish and regularly update a framework for continuous monitoring under section 3553;

“(8) provide a secure mechanism for storing and sharing necessary data, including FedRAMP authorization packages, to enable better reuse of such packages across agencies, including making available any information and data necessary for agencies to fulfill the requirements of section 3613;

“(9) provide regular updates to applicant cloud service providers on the status of any cloud computing product or service during an assessment process;

“(10) regularly review, in consultation with the FedRAMP Board—

“(A) the costs associated with the independent assessment services described in section 3611; and

“(B) the information relating to foreign interests submitted pursuant to section 3612;

“(11) in coordination with the Director, the Secretary, and other stakeholders, as appropriate, determine the sufficiency of underlying requirements to identify and assess the provenance of the software in cloud services and products;

“(12) support the Federal Secure Cloud Advisory Committee established pursuant to section 3616; and

“(13) take such other actions as the Administrator may determine necessary to carry out FedRAMP.

“(b) Website.—

“(1) In general.—The Administrator shall maintain a public website to serve as the authoritative repository for FedRAMP, including the timely publication and updates for all relevant information, guidance, determinations, and other materials required under subsection (a).

“(2) Criteria and process for fedramp authorization priorities.—The Administrator shall develop and make publicly available on the website described in paragraph (1) the criteria and process for prioritizing and selecting cloud computing products and services that will receive a FedRAMP authorization, in consultation with the FedRAMP Board and the Chief Information Officers Council.

“(c) Evaluation of Automation Procedures.—

“(1) In general.—The Administrator, in coordination with the Secretary, shall assess and evaluate available automation capabilities and procedures to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the issuance of FedRAMP authorizations, including continuous monitoring of cloud computing products and services.

“(2) Means for automation.—Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this section, and updated regularly thereafter, the Administrator shall establish a means for the automation of security assessments and reviews.

“(d) Metrics for Authorization.—The Administrator shall establish annual metrics regarding the time and quality of the assessments necessary for completion of a FedRAMP authorization process in a manner that can be consistently tracked over time in conjunction with the periodic testing and evaluation process pursuant to section 3554 in a manner that minimizes the agency reporting burden.

“§ 3610. FedRAMP Board

“(a) Establishment.—There is established a FedRAMP Board to provide input and recommendations to the Administrator regarding the requirements and guidelines for, and the prioritization of, security assessments of cloud computing products and services.

“(b) Membership.—The FedRAMP Board shall consist of not more than 7 senior officials or experts from agencies appointed by the Director, in consultation with the Administrator, from each of the following:

“(1) The Department of Defense.

“(2) The Department of Homeland Security.

“(3) The General Services Administration.

“(4) Such other agencies as determined by the Director, in consultation with the Administrator.

“(c) Qualifications.—Members of the FedRAMP Board appointed under subsection (b) shall have technical expertise in domains relevant to FedRAMP, such as—

“(1) cloud computing;

“(2) cybersecurity;

“(3) privacy;

“(4) risk management; and

“(5) other competencies identified by the Director to support the secure authorization of cloud services and products.

“(d) Duties.—The FedRAMP Board shall—

“(1) in consultation with the Administrator, serve as a resource for best practices to accelerate the process for obtaining a FedRAMP authorization;

“(2) establish and regularly update requirements and guidelines for security authorizations of cloud computing products and services, consistent with standards and guidelines established by the Director of the National Institute of Standards and Technology, to be used in the determination of FedRAMP authorizations;

“(3) monitor and oversee, to the greatest extent practicable, the processes and procedures by which agencies determine and validate requirements for a FedRAMP authorization, including periodic review of the agency determinations described in section 3613(b);

“(4) ensure consistency and transparency between agencies and cloud service providers in a manner that minimizes confusion and engenders trust; and

“(5) perform such other roles and responsibilities as the Director may assign, with concurrence from the Administrator.

“(e) Determinations of Demand for Cloud Computing Products and Services.—The FedRAMP Board may consult with the Chief Information Officers Council to establish a process, which may be made available on the website maintained under section 3609(b), for prioritizing and accepting the cloud computing products and services to be granted a FedRAMP authorization.

“§ 3611. Independent assessment

“The Administrator may determine whether FedRAMP may use an independent assessment service to analyze, validate, and attest to the quality and compliance of security assessment materials provided by cloud service providers during the course of a determination of whether to use a cloud computing product or service.

“§ 3612. Declaration of foreign interests

“(a) In General.—An independent assessment service that performs services described in section 3611 shall annually submit to the Administrator information relating to any foreign interest, foreign influence, or foreign control of the independent assessment service.

“(b) Updates.—Not later than 48 hours after there is a change in foreign ownership or control of an independent assessment service that performs services described in section 3611, the independent assessment service shall submit to the Administrator an update to the information submitted under subsection (a).

“(c) Certification.—The Administrator may require a representative of an independent assessment service to certify the accuracy and completeness of any information submitted under this section.

“§ 3613. Roles and responsibilities of agencies

“(a) In General.—In implementing the requirements of FedRAMP, the head of each agency shall, consistent with guidance issued by the Director pursuant to section 3614—

“(1) promote the use of cloud computing products and services that meet FedRAMP security requirements and other risk-based performance requirements as determined by the Director, in consultation with the Secretary;

“(2) confirm whether there is a FedRAMP authorization in the secure mechanism provided under section 3609(a)(8) before beginning the process of granting a FedRAMP authorization for a cloud computing product or service;

“(3) to the extent practicable, for any cloud computing product or service the agency seeks to authorize that has received a FedRAMP authorization, use the existing assessments of security controls and materials within any FedRAMP authorization package for that cloud computing product or service; and

“(4) provide to the Director data and information required by the Director pursuant to section 3614 to determine how agencies are meeting metrics established by the Administrator.

“(b) Attestation.—Upon completing an assessment or authorization activity with respect to a particular cloud computing product or service, if an agency determines that the information and data the agency has reviewed under paragraph (2) or (3) of subsection (a) is wholly or substantially deficient for the purposes of performing an authorization of the cloud computing product or service, the head of the agency shall document as part of the resulting FedRAMP authorization package the reasons for this determination.

“(c) Submission of Authorizations to Operate Required.—Upon issuance of an agency authorization to operate based on a FedRAMP authorization, the head of the agency shall provide a copy of its authorization to operate letter and any supplementary information required pursuant to section 3609(a) to the Administrator.

“(d) Submission of Policies Required.—Not later than 180 days after the date on which the Director issues guidance in accordance with section 3614(1), the head of each agency, acting through the chief information officer of the agency, shall submit to the Director all agency policies relating to the authorization of cloud computing products and services.

“(e) Presumption of Adequacy.—

“(1) In general.—The assessment of security controls and materials within the authorization package for a FedRAMP authorization shall be presumed adequate for use in an agency authorization to operate cloud computing products and services.

“(2) Information security requirements.—The presumption under paragraph (1) does not modify or alter—

“(A) the responsibility of any agency to ensure compliance with subchapter II of chapter 35 for any cloud computing product or service used by the agency; or

“(B) the authority of the head of any agency to make a determination that there is a demonstrable need for additional security requirements beyond the security requirements included in a FedRAMP authorization for a particular control implementation.

“§ 3614. Roles and responsibilities of the Office of Management and Budget

“The Director shall—

“(1) in consultation with the Administrator and the Secretary, issue guidance that—

“(A) specifies the categories or characteristics of cloud computing products and services that are within the scope of FedRAMP;

“(B) includes requirements for agencies to obtain a FedRAMP authorization when operating a cloud computing product or service described in subparagraph (A) as a Federal information system; and

“(C) encompasses, to the greatest extent practicable, all necessary and appropriate cloud computing products and services;

“(2) issue guidance describing additional responsibilities of FedRAMP and the FedRAMP Board to accelerate the adoption of secure cloud computing products and services by the Federal Government;

“(3) in consultation with the Administrator, establish a process to periodically review FedRAMP authorization packages to support the secure authorization and reuse of secure cloud products and services;

“(4) oversee the effectiveness of FedRAMP and the FedRAMP Board, including the compliance by the FedRAMP Board with the duties described in section 3610(d); and

“(5) to the greatest extent practicable, encourage and promote consistency of the assessment, authorization, adoption, and use of secure cloud computing products and services within and across agencies.

“§ 3615. Reports to Congress; GAO report

“(a) Reports to Congress.—Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this section, and annually thereafter, the Director shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report that includes the following:

“(1) During the preceding year, the status, efficiency, and effectiveness of the General Services Administration under section 3609 and agencies under section 3613 and in supporting the speed, effectiveness, sharing, reuse, and security of authorizations to operate for secure cloud computing products and services.

“(2) Progress towards meeting the metrics required under section 3609(d).

“(3) Data on FedRAMP authorizations.

“(4) The average length of time to issue FedRAMP authorizations.

“(5) The number of FedRAMP authorizations submitted, issued, and denied for the preceding year.

“(6) A review of progress made during the preceding year in advancing automation techniques to securely automate FedRAMP processes and to accelerate reporting under this section.

“(7) The number and characteristics of authorized cloud computing products and services in use at each agency consistent with guidance provided by the Director under section 3614.

“(8) A review of FedRAMP measures to ensure the security of data stored or processed by cloud service providers, which may include—

“(A) geolocation restrictions for provided products or services;

“(B) disclosures of foreign elements of supply chains of acquired products or services;

“(C) continued disclosures of ownership of cloud service providers by foreign entities; and

“(D) encryption for data processed, stored, or transmitted by cloud service providers.

“(b) GAO Report.—Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this section, the Comptroller General of the United States shall report to the appropriate congressional committees an assessment of the following:

“(1) The costs incurred by agencies and cloud service providers relating to the issuance of FedRAMP authorizations.

“(2) The extent to which agencies have processes in place to continuously monitor the implementation of cloud computing products and services operating as Federal information systems.

“(3) How often and for which categories of products and services agencies use FedRAMP authorizations.

“(4) The unique costs and potential burdens incurred by cloud computing companies that are small business concerns (as defined in section 3(a) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632(a)) as a part of the FedRAMP authorization process.

“§ 3616. Federal Secure Cloud Advisory Committee

“(a) Establishment, Purposes, and Duties.—

“(1) Establishment.—There is established a Federal Secure Cloud Advisory Committee (referred to in this section as the ‘Committee’) to ensure effective and ongoing coordination of agency adoption, use, authorization, monitoring, acquisition, and security of cloud computing products and services to enable agency mission and administrative priorities.

“(2) Purposes.—The purposes of the Committee are the following:

“(A) To examine the operations of FedRAMP and determine ways that authorization processes can continuously be improved, including the following:

“(i) Measures to increase agency reuse of FedRAMP authorizations.

“(ii) Proposed actions that can be adopted to reduce the burden, confusion, and cost associated with FedRAMP authorizations for cloud service providers.

“(iii) Measures to increase the number of FedRAMP authorizations for cloud computing products and services offered by small businesses concerns (as defined by section 3(a) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632(a)).

“(iv) Proposed actions that can be adopted to reduce the burden and cost of FedRAMP authorizations for agencies.

“(B) Collect information and feedback on agency compliance with and implementation of FedRAMP requirements.

“(C) Serve as a forum that facilitates communication and collaboration among the FedRAMP stakeholder community.

“(3) Duties.—The duties of the Committee include providing advice and recommendations to the Administrator, the FedRAMP Board, and agencies on technical, financial, programmatic, and operational matters regarding secure adoption of cloud computing products and services.

“(b) Members.—

“(1) Composition.—The Committee shall be comprised of not more than 15 members who are qualified representatives from the public and private sectors, appointed by the Administrator, in consultation with the Director, as follows:

“(A) The Administrator or the Administrator’s designee, who shall be the Chair of the Committee.

“(B) At least 1 representative each from the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency and the National Institute of Standards and Technology.

“(C) At least 2 officials who serve as the Chief Information Security Officer within an agency, who shall be required to maintain such a position throughout the duration of their service on the Committee.

“(D) At least 1 official serving as Chief Procurement Officer (or equivalent) in an agency, who shall be required to maintain such a position throughout the duration of their service on the Committee.

“(E) At least 1 individual representing an independent assessment service.

“(F) At least 5 representatives from unique businesses that primarily provide cloud computing services or products, including at least 2 representatives from a small business concern (as defined by section 3(a) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632(a))).

“(G) At least 2 other representatives of the Federal Government as the Administrator determines necessary to provide sufficient balance, insights, or expertise to the Committee.

“(2) Deadline for appointment.—Each member of the Committee shall be appointed not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this section.

“(3) Period of appointment; vacancies.—

“(A) In general.—Each non-Federal member of the Committee shall be appointed for a term of 3 years, except that the initial terms for members may be staggered 1-, 2-, or 3-year terms to establish a rotation in which one-third of the members are selected each year. Any such member may be appointed for not more than 2 consecutive terms.

“(B) Vacancies.—Any vacancy in the Committee shall not affect its powers, but shall be filled in the same manner in which the original appointment was made. Any member appointed to fill a vacancy occurring before the expiration of the term for which the member’s predecessor was appointed shall be appointed only for the remainder of that term. A member may serve after the expiration of that member’s term until a successor has taken office.

“(c) Meetings and Rules of Procedures.—

“(1) Meetings.—The Committee shall hold not fewer than 3 meetings in a calendar year, at such time and place as determined by the Chair.

“(2) Initial meeting.—Not later than 120 days after the date of enactment of this section, the Committee shall meet and begin the operations of the Committee.

“(3) Rules of procedure.—The Committee may establish rules for the conduct of the business of the Committee if such rules are not inconsistent with this section or other applicable law.

“(d) Employee Status.—

“(1) In general.—A member of the Committee (other than a member who is appointed to the Committee in connection with another Federal appointment) shall not be considered an employee of the Federal Government by reason of any service as such a member, except for the purposes of section 5703 of title 5, relating to travel expenses.

“(2) Pay not permitted.—A member of the Committee covered by paragraph (1) may not receive pay by reason of service on the Committee.

“(e) Applicability to the Federal Advisory Committee Act.—Section 14 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.) shall not apply to the Committee.

“(f) Detail of Employees.—Any Federal Government employee may be detailed to the Committee without reimbursement from the Committee, and such detailee shall retain the rights, status, and privileges of his or her regular employment without interruption.

“(g) Postal Services.—The Committee may use the United States mails in the same manner and under the same conditions as agencies.

“(h) Reports.—

“(1) Interim reports.—The Committee may submit to the Administrator and Congress interim reports containing such findings, conclusions, and recommendations as have been agreed to by the Committee.

“(2) Annual reports.—Not later than 540 days after the date of enactment of this section, and annually thereafter, the Committee shall submit to the Administrator and Congress a report containing such findings, conclusions, and recommendations as have been agreed to by the Committee.”

(c)
Technical and Conforming Amendment.— The table of sections for chapter 36 of title 44, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new items:

“3607. Definitions.

“3608. Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program.

“3609. Roles and responsibilities of the General Services Administration.

“3610. FedRAMP Board.

“3611. Independent assessment.

“3612. Declaration of foreign interests.

“3613. Roles and responsibilities of agencies.

“3614. Roles and responsibilities of the Office of Management and Budget.

“3615. Reports to Congress; GAO report.

“3616. Federal Secure Cloud Advisory Committee.”.

(d)
Sunset.—
(1)
In general.— Effective on the date that is 5 years after the date of enactment of this Act, chapter 36 of title 44, United States Code, is amended by striking sections 3607 through 3616.
(2)
Conforming amendment.— Effective on the date that is 5 years after the date of enactment of this Act, the table of sections for chapter 36 of title 44, United States Code, is amended by striking the items relating to sections 3607 through 3616.
(e)
Rule of Construction.— Nothing in this section or any amendment made by this section shall be construed as altering or impairing the authorities of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget or the Secretary of Homeland Security under subchapter II of chapter 35 of title 44, United States Code.

Subtitle D Judicial Security and Privacy

SEC. 5931. Short Title.

This subtitle may be cited as the “Daniel Anderl Judicial Security and Privacy Act of 2022”.

SEC. 5932. Findings and Purpose.

(a)
Findings.— Congress finds the following:
(1)
Members of the Federal judiciary perform the important function of interpreting the Constitution of the United States and administering justice in a fair and impartial manner.
(2)
In recent years, partially as a result of the rise in the use of social media and online access to information, members of the Federal judiciary have been exposed to an increased number of personal threats in connection to their role. The ease of access to free or inexpensive sources of covered information has considerably lowered the effort required for malicious actors to discover where individuals live and where they spend leisure hours and to find information about their family members. Such threats have included calling a judge a traitor with references to mass shootings and serial killings, a murder attempt on a justice of the Supreme Court of the United States, calling for an “angry mob” to gather outside a home of a judge and, in reference to a judge on the court of appeals of the United States, stating how easy it would be to “get them”.
(3)
Between 2015 and 2019, threats and other inappropriate communications against Federal judges and other judiciary personnel increased from 926 in 2015 to approximately 4,449 in 2019.
(4)
Over the past decade, several members of the Federal judiciary have experienced acts of violence against themselves or a family member in connection to their Federal judiciary role, including the murder in 2005 of the family of Joan Lefkow, a judge for the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois.
(5)
On Sunday July 19, 2020, an assailant went to the home of Esther Salas, a judge for the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, impersonating a package delivery driver, opening fire upon arrival, and killing Daniel Anderl, the 20-year-old only son of Judge Salas, and seriously wounding Mark Anderl, her husband.
(6)
In the aftermath of the recent tragedy that occurred to Judge Salas and in response to the continuous rise of threats against members of the Federal judiciary, there is an immediate need for enhanced security procedures and increased availability of tools to protect Federal judges and their families.
(b)
Purpose.— The purpose of this subtitle is to improve the safety and security of Federal judges, including senior, recalled, or retired Federal judges, and their immediate family members to ensure Federal judges are able to administer justice fairly without fear of personal reprisal from individuals affected by the decisions they make in the course of carrying out their public duties.

SEC. 5933. Definitions.

In this subtitle:
(1)
At-risk individual.— The term “at-risk individual” means—
(A)
a Federal judge;
(B)
a senior, recalled, or retired Federal judge;
(C)
any individual who is the spouse, parent, sibling, or child of an individual described in subparagraph (A) or (B);
(D)
any individual to whom an individual described in subparagraph (A) or (B) stands in loco parentis; or
(E)
any other individual living in the household of an individual described in subparagraph (A) or (B).
(2)
Covered information.— The term “covered information”—
(A)
means—
(i)
a home address, including primary residence or secondary residences;
(ii)
a home or personal mobile telephone number;
(iii)
a personal email address;
(iv)
a social security number or driver’s license number;
(v)
a bank account or credit or debit card information;
(vi)
a license plate number or other unique identifiers of a vehicle owned, leased, or regularly used by an at-risk individual;
(vii)
the identification of children of an at-risk individual under the age of 18;
(viii)
the full date of birth;
(ix)
information regarding current or future school or day care attendance, including the name or address of the school or day care, schedules of attendance, or routes taken to or from the school or day care by an at-risk individual; or
(x)
information regarding the employment location of an at-risk individual, including the name or address of the employer, employment schedules, or routes taken to or from the employer by an at-risk individual; and
(B)
does not include information regarding employment with a Government agency.
(3)
Data broker.—
(A)
In general.— The term “data broker” means an entity that collects and sells or licenses to third parties the personal information of an individual with whom the entity does not have a direct relationship..
(B)
Exclusion.— The term “data broker” does not include a commercial entity engaged in the following activities:
(i)
Engaging in reporting, news-gathering, speaking, or other activities intended to inform the public on matters of public interest or public concern.
(ii)
Providing 411 directory assistance or directory information services, including name, address, and telephone number, on behalf of or as a function of a telecommunications carrier.
(iii)
Using personal information internally, providing access to businesses under common ownership or affiliated by corporate control, or selling or providing data for a transaction or service requested by or concerning the individual whose personal information is being transferred.
(iv)
Providing publicly available information via real-time or near-real-time alert services for health or safety purposes.
(v)
A consumer reporting agency subject to the Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. 1681 et seq.).
(vi)
A financial institution subject to the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (Public Law 106–102) and regulations implementing that title.
(vii)
A covered entity for purposes of the privacy regulations promulgated under section 264(c) of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (42 U.S.C. 1320d-2 note).
(viii)
The collection and sale or licensing of covered information incidental to conducting the activities described in clauses (i) through (vii).
(4)
Federal judge.— The term “Federal judge” means—
(A)
a justice of the United States or a judge of the United States, as those terms are defined in section 451 of title 28, United States Code;
(B)
a bankruptcy judge appointed under section 152 of title 28, United States Code;
(C)
a United States magistrate judge appointed under section 631 of title 28, United States Code;
(D)
a judge confirmed by the United States Senate and empowered by statute in any commonwealth, territory, or possession to perform the duties of a Federal judge;
(E)
a judge of the United States Court of Federal Claims appointed under section 171 of title 28, United States Code;
(F)
a judge of the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims appointed under section 7253 of title 38, United States Code;
(G)
a judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces appointed under section 942 of title 10, United States Code;
(H)
a judge of the United States Tax Court appointed under section 7443 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986; and
(I)
a special trial judge of the United States Tax Court appointed under section 7443A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
(5)
Government agency.— The term “Government agency” includes—
(A)
an Executive agency, as defined in section 105 of title 5, United States Code; and
(B)
any agency in the judicial branch or legislative branch.
(6)
Immediate family member.— The term “immediate family member” means—
(A)
any individual who is the spouse, parent, sibling, or child of an at-risk individual;
(B)
any individual to whom an at-risk individual stands in loco parentis; or
(C)
any other individual living in the household of an at-risk individual.
(7)
Interactive computer service.— The term “interactive computer service” has the meaning given the term in section 230 of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 230).
(8)
Transfer.— The term “transfer” means to sell, license, trade, or exchange for consideration the covered information of an at-risk individual or immediate family member.

SEC. 5934. Protecting Covered Information in Public Records.

(a)
Government Agencies.—
(1)
In general.— Each at-risk individual may—
(A)
file written notice of the status of the individual as an at-risk individual, for themselves and immediate family members, with each Government agency that includes information necessary to ensure compliance with this section; and
(B)
request that each Government agency described in subparagraph (A) mark as private their covered information and that of their immediate family members.
(2)
No public posting.— Government agencies shall not publicly post or display publicly available content that includes covered information of an at-risk individual or immediate family member. Government agencies, upon receipt of a written request under paragraph (1)(A), shall remove the covered information of the at-risk individual or immediate family member from publicly available content not later than 72 hours after such receipt.
(3)
Exceptions.— Nothing in this section shall prohibit a Government agency from providing access to records containing the covered information of a Federal judge to a third party if the third party—
(A)
possesses a signed release from the Federal judge or a court order;
(B)
is subject to the requirements of title V of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (15 U.S.C. 6801 et seq.); or
(C)
executes a confidentiality agreement with the Government agency.
(b)
Delegation of Authority.—
(1)
In general.— An at-risk individual may directly, or through an agent designated by the at-risk individual, make any notice or request required or authorized by this section on behalf of the at-risk individual. The notice or request shall be in writing and contain information necessary to ensure compliance with this section, including information expressly referencing the prohibition on the posting or transfer of covered information, information regarding redress and penalties for violations provided in subsection (f), and contact information to allow the recipient to verify the accuracy of any notice or request and answer questions by the recipient of the notice or request.
(2)
Authorization of government agencies to make requests.—
(A)
Administrative office of the united states courts.— Upon written request of an at-risk individual described in subparagraphs (A) through (E) of section 5933(4), the Director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts is authorized to make any notice or request required or authorized by this section on behalf of the at-risk individual. The notice or request shall include information necessary to ensure compliance with this section, as determined by the Administrative Office of the United States Courts. The Director may delegate this authority under section 602(d) of title 28, United States Code. Any notice or request made under this subsection shall be deemed to have been made by the at-risk individual and comply with the notice and request requirements of this section.
(B)
United states court of appeals for veterans claims.— Upon written request of an at-risk individual described in section 5933(4)(F), the chief judge of the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims is authorized to make any notice or request required or authorized by this section on behalf of the at-risk individual. Any notice or request made under this subsection shall be deemed to have been made by the at-risk individual and comply with the notice and request requirements of this section.
(C)
United states court of appeals for the armed forces.— Upon written request of an at-risk individual described in section 5933(4)(G), the chief judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces is authorized to make any notice or request required or authorized by this section on behalf of the at-risk individual. Any notice or request made under this subsection shall be deemed to have been made by the at-risk individual and comply with the notice and request requirements of this section.
(D)
United states tax court.— Upon written request of an at-risk individual described in subparagraph (H) or (I) of section 5933(4), the chief judge of the United States Tax Court is authorized to make any notice or request required or authorized by this section on behalf of the at-risk individual. Any notice or request made under this subsection shall be deemed to have been made by the at-risk individual and comply with the notice and request requirements of this section.
(c)
State and Local Governments.—
(1)
Grant program to prevent disclosure of personal information of at-risk individuals or immediate family members.—
(A)
Authorization.— The Attorney General may make grants to prevent the release of covered information of at-risk individuals and immediate family members (in this subsection referred to as “judges’ covered information”) to the detriment of such individuals or their immediate family members to an entity that—
(i)
is—
(I)
a State or unit of local government, as defined in section 901 of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (34 U.S.C. 10251); or
(II)
an agency of a State or unit of local government; and
(ii)
operates a State or local database or registry that contains covered information.
(B)
Application.— An entity seeking a grant under this subsection shall submit to the Attorney General an application at such time, in such manner, and containing such information as the Attorney General may reasonably require.
(2)
Scope of grants.— Grants made under this subsection may be used to create or expand programs designed to protect judges’ covered information, including through—
(A)
the creation of programs to redact or remove judges’ covered information, upon the request of an at-risk individual, from public records in State agencies, including hiring a third party to redact or remove judges’ covered information from public records;
(B)
the expansion of existing programs that the State may have enacted in an effort to protect judges’ covered information;
(C)
the development or improvement of protocols, procedures, and policies to prevent the release of judges’ covered information;
(D)
the defrayment of costs of modifying or improving existing databases and registries to ensure that judges’ covered information is covered from release; and
(E)
the development of confidential opt out systems that will enable at-risk individuals to make a single request to keep judges’ covered information out of multiple databases or registries.
(3)
Report.—
(A)
In general.— Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, and biennially thereafter, the Comptroller General of the United States, shall submit to the Committee on the Judiciary of the Senate and the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives an annual report that includes—
(i)
a detailed amount spent by States and local governments on protecting judges’ covered information;
(ii)
where the judges’ covered information was found; and
(iii)
the collection of any new types of personal data found to be used to identify judges who have received threats, including prior home addresses, employers, and institutional affiliations such as nonprofit boards.
(B)
States and local governments.— States and local governments that receive funds under this subsection shall submit to the Comptroller General of the United States a report on data described in clauses (i) and (ii) of subparagraph (A) to be included in the report required under that subparagraph.
(d)
Data Brokers and Other Businesses.—
(1)
Prohibitions.—
(A)
Data brokers.— It shall be unlawful for a data broker to knowingly sell, license, trade for consideration, transfer, or purchase covered information of an at-risk individual or immediate family members.
(B)
Other persons and businesses.—
(i)
In general.— Except as provided in clause (ii), no person, business, or association shall publicly post or publicly display on the internet covered information of an at-risk individual or immediate family member if the at-risk individual has made a written request to that person, business, or association not to disclose or acquire the covered information of the at-risk individual or immediate family member.
(ii)
Exceptions.— Clause (i) shall not apply to—
(I)
the display on the internet of the covered information of an at-risk individual or immediate family member if the information is relevant to and displayed as part of a news story, commentary, editorial, or other speech on a matter of public concern;
(II)
covered information that the at-risk individual voluntarily publishes on the internet after the date of enactment of this Act; or
(III)
covered information lawfully received from a Federal Government source (or from an employee or agent of the Federal Government).
(2)
Required conduct.—
(A)
In general.— After receiving a written request under paragraph (1)(B), the person, business, or association shall—
(i)
remove within 72 hours the covered information identified in the written request from the internet and ensure that the information is not made available on any website or subsidiary website controlled by that person, business, or association and identify any other instances of the identified information that should also be removed; and
(ii)
assist the sender to locate the covered information of the at-risk individual or immediate family member posted on any website or subsidiary website controlled by that person, business, or association.
(B)
Transfer.—
(i)
In general.— Except as provided in clause (ii), after receiving a written request under paragraph (1)(B), the person, business, or association shall not transfer the covered information of the at-risk individual or immediate family member to any other person, business, or association through any medium.
(ii)
Exceptions.— Clause (i) shall not apply to—
(I)
the transfer of the covered information of the at-risk individual or immediate family member if the information is relevant to and displayed as part of a news story, commentary, editorial, or other speech on a matter of public concern;
(II)
covered information that the at-risk individual or immediate family member voluntarily publishes on the internet after the date of enactment of this Act; or
(III)
a transfer made at the request of the at-risk individual or that is necessary to effectuate a request to the person, business, or association from the at-risk individual.
(e)
Data Security.—
(1)
Recipients.— Any interactive computer service shall implement and maintain reasonable security procedures and practices to protect any information collected or received to comply with the requirements of this subtitle from unauthorized use, disclosure, access, destruction, or modification.
(2)
Government custodians.— The Administrative Office of the United States Courts and the administrators of the courts described in this subtitle shall implement and maintain reasonable security procedures and practices to protect any information they collect, receive, or transmit pursuant to the provisions of this subtitle.
(f)
Redress and Penalties.—
(1)
In general.— If the covered information of an at-risk individual described in subparagraphs (A) through (E) of section 5933(4) or their immediate family is made public as a result of a violation of this subtitle, the Director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts, or the designee of the Director, may file an action seeking injunctive or declaratory relief in any court of competent jurisdiction, through the Department of Justice.
(2)
Authority.— The respective chief judge for judges described in subparagraphs (B), (C), and (D) of section 5934(b)(2) shall have the same authority as the Director under this paragraph for at-risk individuals in their courts or their immediate family members.
(3)
Penalties and damages.— If a person, business, or association knowingly violates an order granting injunctive or declarative relief under paragraph (1), the court issuing such order may—
(A)
if the person, business, or association is a government agency—
(i)
impose a fine not greater than $4,000; and
(ii)
award to the at-risk individual or their immediate family, as applicable, court costs and reasonable attorney’s fees; and
(B)
if the person, business, or association is not a government agency, award to the at-risk individual or their immediate family, as applicable—
(i)
an amount equal to the actual damages sustained by the at-risk individual or their immediate family; and
(ii)
court costs and reasonable attorney’s fees.

SEC. 5935. Training and Education.

Amounts appropriated to the Federal judiciary for fiscal year 2022, and each fiscal year thereafter, may be used for biannual judicial security training for active, senior, or recalled Federal judges described in subparagraph (A), (B), (C), (D), or (E) of section 5933(4) and their immediate family members, including—
(1)
best practices for using social media and other forms of online engagement and for maintaining online privacy;
(2)
home security program and maintenance;
(3)
understanding removal programs and requirements for covered information; and
(4)
any other judicial security training that the United States Marshals Services and the Administrative Office of the United States Courts determines is relevant.

SEC. 5936. Vulnerability Management Capability.

(a)
Authorization.—
(1)
Vulnerability management capability.— The Federal judiciary is authorized to perform all necessary functions consistent with the provisions of this subtitle and to support existing threat management capabilities within the United States Marshals Service and other relevant Federal law enforcement and security agencies for active, senior, recalled, and retired Federal judges described in subparagraphs (A), (B), (C), (D), and (E) of section 5933(4), including—
(A)
monitoring the protection of at-risk individuals and judiciary assets;
(B)
managing the monitoring of websites for covered information of at-risk individuals and immediate family members and remove or limit the publication of such information;
(C)
receiving, reviewing, and analyzing complaints by at-risk individuals of threats, whether direct or indirect, and report such threats to law enforcement partners; and
(D)
providing training described in section 5935.
(2)
Vulnerability management for certain article i courts.— The functions and support authorized in paragraph (1) shall be authorized as follows:
(A)
The chief judge of the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims is authorized to perform such functions and support for the Federal judges described in section 5933(4)(F).
(B)
The United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces is authorized to perform such functions and support for the Federal judges described in section 5933(4)(G).
(C)
The United States Tax Court is authorized to perform such functions and support for the Federal judges described in subparagraphs (H) and (I) of section 5933(4).
(3)
Technical and conforming amendment.— Section 604(a) of title 28, United States Code is amended—
(A)
in paragraph (23), by striking “ and” at the end;
(B)
in paragraph (24) by striking “ him” and inserting “ the Director”;
(C)
by redesignating paragraph (24) as paragraph (25); and
(D)
by inserting after paragraph (23) the following:

“(24) Establish and administer a vulnerability management program in the judicial branch; and”

(b)
Expansion of Capabilities of Office of Protective Intelligence.—
(1)
In general.— The United States Marshals Service is authorized to expand the current capabilities of the Office of Protective Intelligence of the Judicial Security Division to increase the workforce of the Office of Protective Intelligence to include additional intelligence analysts, United States deputy marshals, and any other relevant personnel to ensure that the Office of Protective Intelligence is ready and able to perform all necessary functions, consistent with the provisions of this subtitle, in order to anticipate and deter threats to the Federal judiciary, including—
(A)
assigning personnel to State and major urban area fusion and intelligence centers for the specific purpose of identifying potential threats against the Federal judiciary and coordinating responses to such potential threats;
(B)
expanding the use of investigative analysts, physical security specialists, and intelligence analysts at the 94 judicial districts and territories to enhance the management of local and distant threats and investigations; and
(C)
increasing the number of United States Marshal Service personnel for the protection of the Federal judicial function and assigned to protective operations and details for the Federal judiciary.
(2)
Information sharing.— If any of the activities of the United States Marshals Service uncover information related to threats to individuals other than Federal judges, the United States Marshals Service shall, to the maximum extent practicable, share such information with the appropriate Federal, State, and local law enforcement agencies.
(c)
Report.—
(1)
In general.— Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Department of Justice, in consultation with the Administrative Office of the United States Courts, the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, and the United States Tax Court, shall submit to the Committee on the Judiciary of the Senate and the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives a report on the security of Federal judges arising from Federal prosecutions and civil litigation.
(2)
Description.— The report required under paragraph (1) shall describe—
(A)
the number and nature of threats and assaults against at-risk individuals handling prosecutions and other matters described in paragraph (1) and the reporting requirements and methods;
(B)
the security measures that are in place to protect at-risk individuals handling prosecutions described in paragraph (1), including threat assessments, response procedures, the availability of security systems and other devices, firearms licensing such as deputations, and other measures designed to protect the at-risk individuals and their immediate family members; and
(C)
for each requirement, measure, or policy described in subparagraphs (A) and (B), when the requirement, measure, or policy was developed and who was responsible for developing and implementing the requirement, measure, or policy.
(3)
Public posting.— The report described in paragraph (1) shall, in whole or in part, be exempt from public disclosure if the Attorney General determines that such public disclosure could endanger an at-risk individual.

SEC. 5937. Rules of Construction.

(a)
In General.— Nothing in this subtitle shall be construed—
(1)
to prohibit, restrain, or limit—
(A)
the lawful investigation or reporting by the press of any unlawful activity or misconduct alleged to have been committed by an at-risk individual or their immediate family member; or
(B)
the reporting on an at-risk individual or their immediate family member regarding matters of public concern;
(2)
to impair access to decisions and opinions from a Federal judge in the course of carrying out their public functions;
(3)
to limit the publication or transfer of covered information with the written consent of the at-risk individual or their immediate family member; or
(4)
to prohibit information sharing by a data broker to a Federal, State, Tribal, or local government, or any unit thereof.
(b)
Protection of Covered Information.— This subtitle shall be broadly construed to favor the protection of the covered information of at-risk individuals and their immediate family members.

SEC. 5938. Severability.

If any provision of this subtitle, an amendment made by this subtitle, or the application of such provision or amendment to any person or circumstance is held to be unconstitutional, the remainder of this subtitle and the amendments made by this subtitle, and the application of the remaining provisions of this subtitle and amendments to any person or circumstance shall not be affected.

SEC. 5939. Effective Date.

(a)
In General.— Except as provided in subsection (b), this subtitle shall take effect on the date of enactment of this Act.
(b)
Exception.— Subsections (c)(1), (d), and (e) of section 5934 shall take effect on the date that is 120 days after the date of enactment of this Act.

Subtitle E Other Matters

SEC. 5941. Secretary of Agriculture Report on Improving Supply Chain Shortfalls and Infrastructure Needs at Wholesale Produce Markets.

(a)
In General.— Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Agriculture shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on—
(1)
the 5 largest wholesale produce markets by annual sales and volume over the preceding 4 calendar years; and
(2)
a representative sample of 8 wholesale produce markets that are not among the largest wholesale produce markets.
(b)
Contents.— The report under subsection (a) shall contain the following:
(1)
An analysis of the supply chain shortfalls in each wholesale produce market identified under subsection (a), which shall include an analysis of the following:
(A)
State of repair of infrastructure, including roads, food storage units, and refueling stations.
(B)
Disaster preparedness, including with respect to cyber attacks, weather events, and terrorist attacks.
(C)
Disaster recovery systems, including coordination with State and Federal agencies.
(2)
A description of any actions the Secretary recommends be taken as a result of the analysis under paragraph (1).
(3)
Recommendations, as appropriate, for wholesale produce market owners and operators, and State and local entities to improve the supply chain shortfalls identified under paragraph (1).
(4)
Proposals, as appropriate, for legislative actions and funding needed to improve the supply chain shortfalls.
(c)
Consultation.— In completing the report under subsection (a), the Secretary of Agriculture shall consult with the Secretary of Transportation, the Secretary of Homeland Security, wholesale produce market owners and operators, State and local entities, and other agencies or stakeholders, as determined appropriate by the Secretary.
(d)
Appropriate Congressional Committees.— For the purposes of this section, the term “appropriate congressional committees” means the Committee on Agriculture, the Committee on Homeland Security, and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Technology, the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, and the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry of the Senate.

SEC. 5942. Extension of Deadline for Transfer of Parcels of Land in New Mexico.

Section 3120 of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (42 U.S.C. 2391 note) is amended by striking “ 2022” each place that it appears and inserting “ 2032”.

SEC. 5943. Ending Global Wildlife Poaching and Trafficking.

(a)
Sense of Congress.— It is the sense of Congress that—
(1)
the United States Government should continue to work with international partners, including nations, nongovernmental organizations, and the private sector, to identify long-standing and emerging areas of concern in wildlife poaching and trafficking related to global supply and demand; and
(2)
the activities and required reporting of the Presidential Task Force on Wildlife Trafficking, as established by Executive Order 13648 (78 Fed. Reg. 40621) and modified by sections 201 and 301 of the Eliminate, Neutralize, and Disrupt Wildlife Trafficking Act of 2016 (16 U.S.C. 7621 and 7631), should be reauthorized to minimize the disruption of the work of such Task Force.
(b)
Definitions.— Section 2 of the Eliminate, Neutralize, and Disrupt Wildlife Trafficking Act of 2016 (16 U.S.C. 7601) is amended—
(1)
in paragraph (3), by inserting “ involving local communities” after “ approach to conservation”;
(2)
by amending paragraph (4) to read as follows:

“(4) Country of concern.—The term ‘country of concern’ means a foreign country specially designated by the Secretary of State pursuant to section 201(b) as a major source of wildlife trafficking products or their derivatives, a major transit point of wildlife trafficking products or their derivatives, or a major consumer of wildlife trafficking products, in which—

“(A) the government has actively engaged in, or knowingly profited from, the trafficking of protected species; or

“(B) the government facilitates such trafficking through conduct that may include a persistent failure to make serious and sustained efforts to prevent and prosecute such trafficking.”

; and

(3)
in paragraph (11), by striking “ section 201” and inserting “ section 301”.
(c)
Framework for Interagency Response and Reporting.—
(1)
Reauthorization of report on major wildlife trafficking countries.— Section 201 of the Eliminate, Neutralize, and Disrupt Wildlife Trafficking Act of 2016 (16 U.S.C. 7621) is amended—
(A)
in subsection (a), by striking “ annually thereafter” and inserting “ biennially thereafter by June 1 of each year in which a report is required”;
(B)
in subsection (b), by striking “ shall identify” and all that follows through the end of the subsection and inserting “ shall also list each country determined by the Secretary of State to be a country of concern within the meaning of this Act”; and
(C)
by striking subsection (c) and inserting the following:

“(c) Procedure for Removing Countries From List.—Concurrently with the first report required under this section and submitted after the date of the enactment of this subsection, the Secretary of State, in consultation with the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of Commerce, shall publish in the Federal Register a procedure for removing from the list described in subsection (b) any country that no longer meets the definition of country of concern under section 2(4).

“(d) Sunset.—This section shall cease to have force or effect on September 30, 2028.”

(2)
Presidential task force on wildlife trafficking responsibilities.— Section 301(a) of the Eliminate, Neutralize, and Disrupt Wildlife Trafficking Act of 2016 (16 U.S.C. 7631(a)) is amended—
(A)
in paragraph (4), by striking “ and” at the end;
(B)
by redesignating paragraph (5) as paragraph (9); and
(C)
by inserting after paragraph (4) the following:

“(5) pursue programs and develop a strategy—

“(A) to expand the role of technology for anti-poaching and anti-trafficking efforts, in partnership with the private sector, foreign governments, academia, and nongovernmental organizations (including technology companies and the transportation and logistics sectors); and

“(B) to enable local governments to develop and use such technologies;

“(6) consider programs and initiatives that address the expansion of the illegal wildlife trade to digital platforms, including the use of digital currency and payment platforms for transactions by collaborating with the private sector, academia, and nongovernmental organizations, including social media, e-commerce, and search engine companies, as appropriate;

“(7)

(A) implement interventions to address the drivers of poaching, trafficking, and demand for illegal wildlife and wildlife products in focus countries and countries of concern;

“(B) set benchmarks for measuring the effectiveness of such interventions; and

“(C) consider alignment and coordination with indicators developed by the Task Force;

“(8) consider additional opportunities to increase coordination between law enforcement and financial institutions to identify trafficking activity; and”

(3)
Presidential task force on wildlife trafficking strategic review.— Section 301 of the Eliminate, Neutralize, and Disrupt Wildlife Trafficking Act of 2016 (16 U.S.C. 7631), as amended by paragraph (2), is further amended—
(A)
in subsection (d)—
(i)
in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking “ annually” and inserting “ biennially”;
(ii)
in paragraph (4), by striking “ and” at the end;
(iii)
in paragraph (5), by striking the period at the end and inserting “ ; and”; and
(iv)
by adding at the end the following:

“(6) an analysis of the indicators developed by the Task Force, and recommended by the Government Accountability Office, to track and measure inputs, outputs, law enforcement outcomes, and the market for wildlife products for each focus country listed in the report, including baseline measures, as appropriate, for each indicator in each focus country to determine the effectiveness and appropriateness of such indicators to assess progress and whether additional or separate indicators, or adjustments to indicators, may be necessary for focus countries.”

; and

(B)
in subsection (e), by striking “ 5 years after” and all that follows and inserting “ on September 30, 2028”.

SEC. 5944. Cost-Sharing Requirements Applicable to Certain Bureau of Reclamation Dams and Dikes.

Section 4309 of the America’s Water Infrastructure Act of 2018 (43 U.S.C. 377b note; Public Law 115–270) is amended—
(1)
in the section heading, by inserting “ dams and” before “ dikes”;
(2)
in subsection (a), by striking “ effective beginning on the date of enactment of this section, the Federal share of the operations and maintenance costs of a dike described in subsection (b)” and inserting “ effective during the one-year period beginning on the date of the enactment of the James M. Inhofe National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2023, the Federal share of the dam safety modifications costs of a dam or dike described in subsection (b), including repairing or replacing a gate or ancillary gate components,”; and
(3)
in subsection (b)—
(A)
in the subsection heading, by inserting “ Dams and ” before “ Dikes”;
(B)
in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by inserting “ dam or” before “ dike” each place it appears; and
(C)
in paragraph (2), by striking “ December 31, 1945” and inserting “ December 31, 1948”.

SEC. 5945. Transfer of National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Property in Norfolk, Virginia.

Section 1 of Public Law 110–393 is amended to read as follows:

“SEC. 1. TRANSFER OF NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION PROPERTY IN NORFOLK, VIRGINIA.

“(a) In General.—The Secretary shall convey all right, title, and interest of the United States in and to the Norfolk Property to the City, to be used by the City for the purposes of flood management and control, such that—

“(1) the property described in subsection (k)(3)(A) shall be conveyed to the City not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this section; and

“(2) the property described in subsection (k)(3)(B) shall be conveyed to the City not later than the earlier of—

“(A) the date on which the Secretary has transferred all of the employees of the Administration from the facilities at the Norfolk Property; or

“(B) 8 years after the date of the enactment of this section.

“(b) Consideration.—

“(1) In general.—As consideration for the conveyance of the Norfolk Property, the City shall pay to the United States an amount equal to not less than the fair market value of the Norfolk Property, as determined by the Secretary, based on the appraisal described in subsection (g), which may consist of cash payment, in-kind consideration as described in paragraph (3), or a combination thereof.

“(2) Sufficiency of consideration.—

“(A) In general.—Consideration paid to the Secretary under paragraph (1) must be sufficient, as determined by the Secretary, to provide replacement space for and relocation of any personnel, furniture, fixtures, equipment, and personal property of any kind belonging to the Administration and located upon the Norfolk Property.

“(B) Completion prior to conveyance.—Any cash consideration must be paid in full and any in-kind consideration must be complete, useable, and delivered to the satisfaction of the Secretary at or prior to the time of the conveyance of the Norfolk Property.

“(3) In-kind consideration.—In-kind consideration paid by the City under paragraph (1) may include the acquisition, construction, provision, improvement, maintenance, repair, or restoration (including environmental restoration), or combination thereof, of any facilities or infrastructure with proximity to the Norfolk Property that the Secretary considers acceptable.

“(4) Treatment of cash consideration received.—Any cash consideration received by the United States under paragraph (1) shall be deposited in the special account in the Treasury under subparagraph (A) of section 572(b)(5) of title 40, United States Code, and shall be available in accordance with subparagraph (B)(ii) of such section.

“(c) Costs of Conveyance.—All reasonable and necessary costs, including real estate transaction and environmental documentation costs, associated with the conveyance of the Norfolk Property to the City under this section may be shared equitably by the Secretary and the City, as determined by the Secretary, including by the City providing in-kind contributions for any or all of such costs.

“(d) Proceeds.—Any proceeds from a conveyance of the Norfolk Property under this section shall—

“(1) be credited as discretionary offsetting collections to the currently applicable appropriations accounts, or funds of the Administration; or

“(2) cover costs associated with the conveyance of the Norfolk Property and related relocation efforts, and shall be made available for such purposes only to the extent and in the amounts provided in advance in appropriations Acts.

“(e) Survey.—The exact acreage and legal description of the Norfolk Property shall be determined by a survey or surveys satisfactory to the Secretary.

“(f) Condition; Quitclaim Deed.—The Norfolk Property shall be conveyed—

“(1) in an ‘as is, where is’ condition; and

“(2) via a quitclaim deed.

“(g) Fair Market Value.—

“(1) In general.—The fair market value of the Norfolk Property shall be—

“(A) determined by an appraisal that—

“(i) is conducted by an independent appraiser selected by the Secretary; and

“(ii) meets the requirements of paragraph (2); and

“(B) adjusted, at the discretion of the Secretary, based on the factors described in paragraph (3).

“(2) Appraisal requirements.—An appraisal conducted under paragraph (1)(A) shall be conducted in accordance with nationally recognized appraisal standards, including the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice.

“(3) Factors.—The factors described in this paragraph are—

“(A) matters of equity and fairness;

“(B) actions taken by the City regarding the Norfolk Property, including—

“(i) comprehensive waterfront planning, site development, and other redevelopment activities supported by the City in proximity to the Norfolk Property in furtherance of the flood management and control efforts of the City;

“(ii) in-kind contributions made to facilitate and support use of the Norfolk Property by governmental agencies; and

“(iii) maintenance expenses, capital improvements, or emergency expenditures necessary to ensure public safety and access to and from the Norfolk Property; and

“(C) such other factors as the Secretary determines appropriate.

“(h) Compliance With Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980.—In carrying out this section, the Secretary shall comply with section 120(h) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (42 U.S.C. 9620(h)).

“(i) Additional Terms and Conditions.—The Secretary may require such additional terms and conditions in connection with the conveyance of the Norfolk Property as the Secretary determines appropriate to protect the interests of the United States.

“(j) Termination.—Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Secretary, acting through the Under Secretary and Administrator of the Administration, is authorized to enter into a land lease with Mobile County, Alabama for a period of not less than 40 years, on such terms and conditions as the Administration deems appropriate, for purposes of construction of a Gulf of Mexico Disaster Response Center facility, provided that the lease is at no cost to the government. The Administration may enter into agreements with State, local, or county governments for purposes of joint use, operations, and occupancy of such facility.

“(k) Definitions.—In this section:

“(1) Administration.—The term ‘Administration’ means the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

“(2) City.—The term ‘City’ means the City of Norfolk, Virginia.

“(3) Norfolk property.—The term ‘Norfolk Property’ means—

“(A) the real property under the administrative jurisdiction of the Administration, including land and improvements thereon, located at 538 Front Street, Norfolk, Virginia, consisting of approximately 3.78 acres; and

“(B) the real property under the administrative jurisdiction of the Administration, including land and improvements thereon, located at 439 W. York Street, Norfolk, Virginia, consisting of approximately 2.5231 acres.

“(4) Secretary.—The term ‘Secretary’ means the Secretary of Commerce.”

SEC. 5946. Other Matters.

(a)
Brennan Reef.—
(1)
Designation.— The reef described in paragraph (2) shall be known and designated as “Brennan Reef” in honor of the late Rear Admiral Richard T. Brennan of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
(2)
Reef described.— The reef referred to in paragraph (1) is—
(A)
between the San Miguel and Santa Rosa Islands on the north side of the San Miguel Passage in the Channel Island National Marine Sanctuary; and
(B)
centered at 34 degrees, 03.12 minutes North and 120 degrees, 15.95 minutes West.
(3)
References.— Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other record of the United States to the reef described in paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be a reference to Brennan Reef.
(b)
Prohibition on Sale of Shark Fins.—
(1)
Prohibition.— Except as provided in paragraph (3), no person shall possess, acquire, receive, transport, offer for sale, sell, or purchase a shark fin or a product containing a shark fin.
(2)
Penalty.— A violation of paragraph (1) shall be treated as an act prohibited by section 307 of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (16 U.S.C. 1857) and shall be penalized pursuant to section 308 of that Act (16 U.S.C. 1858).
(3)
Exceptions.— A person may possess a shark fin that was taken lawfully pursuant to a Federal, State, or territorial license or permit to take or land sharks if the shark fin was separated after the first point of landing in a manner consistent with the license or permit and is—
(A)
destroyed or disposed of immediately upon separation from the carcass;
(B)
used for noncommercial subsistence purposes in accordance with Federal, State, or territorial law; or
(C)
used solely for display or research purposes by a museum, college, or university pursuant to a Federal, State, or territorial permit to conduct noncommercial scientific research.
(4)
Dogfish exemption.—
(A)
In general.— It shall not be a violation of paragraph (1) for a person to possess, acquire, receive, transport, offer for sale, sell, or purchase a shark fin of a smooth dogfish (Mustelus canis) or a spiny dogfish (Squalus acanthias).
(B)
Report.—
(i)
In general.— Not later than January 1, 2027, the Secretary of Commerce shall review the exemption provided by subparagraph (A) and submit to Congress a report regarding such exemption that includes a recommendation to continue or terminate the exemption.
(ii)
Factors.— In carrying out clause (i), the Secretary of Commerce shall analyze factors including—
(I)
the impact of continuation and termination of the exemption on the economic viability of dogfish fisheries;
(II)
the impact of continuation and termination of the exemption on ocean ecosystems;
(III)
the impact of the exemption on the enforcement of the prohibition described in paragraph (1); and
(IV)
the impact of the exemption on shark conservation.
(5)
Enforcement.— This subsection, and any regulations issued pursuant thereto, shall be enforced by the Secretary of Commerce, who may use by agreement, with or without reimbursement, the personnel, services, equipment, and facilities of another Federal agency or of a State agency or Indian Tribe for the purpose of enforcing this subsection.
(6)
Rule of construction.— Nothing in this subsection may be construed to preclude, deny, or limit any right of a State or territory to adopt or enforce any regulation or standard that is more stringent than a regulation or standard in effect under this subsection.
(7)
Severability.— If any provision of this subsection, or the application thereof to any person or circumstance, is held invalid, the validity of the remainder of the subsection and of the application of any such provision to other persons and circumstances shall not be affected thereby.
(8)
Shark fin defined.— In this subsection, the term “shark fin” means the unprocessed, dried, or otherwise processed detached fin or tail of a shark.

SEC. 5947. Enhancing Transparency on International Agreements and Non-Binding Instruments.

(a)
Section 112b of Title 1, United States Code.—
(1)
In general.— Section 112b of title 1, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:

“§ 112b. United States international agreements and non-binding instruments; transparency provisions

“(a)

(1) Not less frequently than once each month, the Secretary shall provide in writing to the Majority Leader of the Senate, the Minority Leader of the Senate, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, the Minority Leader of the House of Representatives, and the appropriate congressional committees the following:

“(A)

(i) A list of all international agreements and qualifying non-binding instruments signed, concluded, or otherwise finalized during the prior month.

“(ii) The text of all international agreements and qualifying non-binding instruments described in clause (i).

“(iii) A detailed description of the legal authority that, in the view of the Secretary, provides authorization for each international agreement and that, in the view of the appropriate department or agency, provides authorization for each qualifying non-binding instrument provided under clause (ii) to become operative. If multiple authorities are relied upon in relation to an international agreement, the Secretary shall cite all such authorities, and if multiple authorities are relied upon in relation to a qualifying non-binding instrument, the appropriate department or agency shall cite all such authorities. All citations to the Constitution of the United States, a treaty, or a statute shall include the specific article or section and subsection reference whenever available and, if not available, shall be as specific as possible. If the authority relied upon is or includes article II of the Constitution of the United States, the Secretary or appropriate department or agency shall explain the basis for that reliance.

“(B)

(i) A list of all international agreements that entered into force and qualifying non-binding instruments that became operative for the United States or an agency of the United States during the prior month.

“(ii) The text of all international agreements and qualifying non-binding instruments described in clause (i) if such text differs from the text of the agreement or instrument previously provided pursuant to subparagraph (A)(ii).

“(iii) A statement describing any new or amended statutory or regulatory authority anticipated to be required to fully implement each proposed international agreement and qualifying non-binding instrument included in the list described in clause (i).

“(2) The information and text required by paragraph (1) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.

“(b)

(1) Not later than 120 days after the date on which an international agreement enters into force, the Secretary shall make the text of the agreement, and the information described in subparagraphs (A)(iii) and (B)(iii) of subsection (a)(1) relating to the agreement, available to the public on the website of the Department of State.

“(2) Not less frequently than once every 120 days, the Secretary shall make the text of each qualifying non-binding instrument that became operative during the preceding 120 days, and the information described in subparagraphs (A)(iii) and (B)(iii) of subsection (a)(1) relating to each such instrument, available to the public on the website of the Department of State.

“(3) The requirements under paragraphs (1) and (2) shall not apply to the following categories of international agreements or qualifying non-binding instruments, or to information described in subparagraphs (A)(iii) and (B)(iii) of subsection (a)(1) relating to such agreements or qualifying non-binding instruments:

“(A) International agreements and qualifying non-binding instruments that contain information that has been given a national security classification pursuant to Executive Order 13526 (50 U.S.C. 3161 note; relating to classified national security information) or any predecessor or successor order, or that contain any information that is otherwise exempt from public disclosure pursuant to United States law.

“(B) International agreements and qualifying non-binding instruments that address military operations, military exercises, acquisition and cross servicing, logistics support, military personnel exchange or education programs, or the provision of health care to military personnel on a reciprocal basis.

“(C) International agreements and qualifying non-binding instruments that establish the terms of grant or other similar assistance, including in-kind assistance, financed with foreign assistance funds pursuant to the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2151 et seq.) or the Food for Peace Act (7 U.S.C. 1691 et seq.).

“(D) International agreements and qualifying non-binding instruments, such as project annexes and other similar instruments, for which the principal function is to establish technical details for the implementation of a specific project undertaken pursuant to another agreement or qualifying non-binding instrument that has been published in accordance with paragraph (1) or (2).

“(E) International agreements and qualifying non-binding instruments that have been separately published by a depositary or other similar administrative body, except that the Secretary shall make the information described in subparagraphs (A)(iii) and (B)(iii) of subsection (a)(1), relating to such agreements or qualifying non-binding instruments, available to the public on the website of the Department of State within the timeframes required by paragraph (1) or (2).

“(c) For any international agreement or qualifying non-binding instrument for which an implementing agreement or arrangement, or any document of similar purpose or function to the aforementioned regardless of the title of the document, is not otherwise required to be submitted to the Majority Leader of the Senate, the Minority Leader of the Senate, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, the Minority Leader of the House of Representatives, and the appropriate congressional committees under subparagraphs (A)(ii) or (B)(ii) of subsection (a)(1), not later than 30 days after the date on which the Secretary receives a written communication from the Chair or Ranking Member of either of the appropriate congressional committees requesting the text of any such implementing agreements or arrangements, whether binding or non-binding, the Secretary shall submit such implementing agreements or arrangements to the Majority Leader of the Senate, the Minority Leader of the Senate, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, the Minority Leader of the House of Representatives, and the appropriate congressional committees.

“(d) Any department or agency of the United States Government that enters into any international agreement or qualifying non-binding instrument on behalf of itself or the United States shall—

“(1) provide to the Secretary the text of each international agreement not later than 15 days after the date on which such agreement is signed or otherwise concluded;

“(2) provide to the Secretary the text of each qualifying non-binding instrument not later than 15 days after the date on which such instrument is concluded or otherwise becomes finalized;

“(3) provide to the Secretary a detailed description of the legal authority that provides authorization for each qualifying non-binding instrument to become operative not later than 15 days after such instrument is signed or otherwise becomes finalized; and

“(4) on an ongoing basis, provide any implementing material to the Secretary for transmittal to the Majority Leader of the Senate, the Minority Leader of the Senate, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, the Minority Leader of the House of Representatives, and the appropriate congressional committees as needed to satisfy the requirements described in subsection (c).

“(e)

(1) Each department or agency of the United States Government that enters into any international agreement or qualifying non-binding instrument on behalf of itself or the United States shall designate a Chief International Agreements Officer, who shall—

“(A) be selected from among employees of such department or agency;

“(B) serve concurrently as the Chief International Agreements Officer; and

“(C) subject to the authority of the head of such department or agency, have department- or agency-wide responsibility for efficient and appropriate compliance with this section.

“(2) There shall be a Chief International Agreements Officer who serves at the Department of State with the title of International Agreements Compliance Officer.

“(f) The substance of oral international agreements shall be reduced to writing for the purpose of meeting the requirements of subsections (a) and (b).

“(g) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, an international agreement may not be signed or otherwise concluded on behalf of the United States without prior consultation with the Secretary. Such consultation may encompass a class of agreements rather than a particular agreement.

“(h)

(1) Not later than 3 years after the date of the enactment of this section, and not less frequently than once every 3 years thereafter during the 9-year period beginning on the date of the enactment of this section, the Comptroller General of the United States shall conduct an audit of the compliance of the Secretary with the requirements of this section.

“(2) In any instance in which a failure by the Secretary to comply with such requirements is determined by the Comptroller General to have been due to the failure or refusal of another agency to provide information or material to the Department of State, or the failure to do so in a timely manner, the Comptroller General shall engage such other agency to determine—

“(A) the cause and scope of such failure or refusal;

“(B) the specific office or offices responsible for such failure or refusal; and

“(C) recommendations for measures to ensure compliance with statutory requirements.

“(3) The Comptroller General shall submit to the Majority Leader of the Senate, the Minority Leader of the Senate, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, the Minority Leader of the House of Representatives, and the appropriate congressional committees in writing the results of each audit required by paragraph (1).

“(4) The Comptroller General and the Secretary shall make the results of each audit required by paragraph (1) publicly available on the websites of the Government Accountability Office and the Department of State, respectively.

“(i) The President shall, through the Secretary, promulgate such rules and regulations as may be necessary to carry out this section.

“(j) It is the sense of Congress that the executive branch should not prescribe or otherwise commit to or include specific legislative text in a treaty, executive agreement, or non-binding instrument unless Congress has authorized such action.

“(k) In this section:

“(1) The term ‘appropriate congressional committees’ means—

“(A) the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate; and

“(B) the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives.

“(2) The term ‘appropriate department or agency’ means the department or agency of the United States Government that negotiates and enters into a qualifying non-binding instrument on behalf of itself or the United States.

“(3) The term ‘intelligence community’ has the meaning given that term in section 3(4) of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3003(4)).

“(4) The term ‘international agreement’ includes—

“(A) any treaty that requires the advice and consent of the Senate, pursuant to article II of the Constitution of the United States; and

“(B) any other international agreement to which the United States is a party and that is not subject to the advice and consent of the Senate.

“(5) The term ‘qualifying non-binding instrument’—

“(A) except as provided in subparagraph (B), means a non-binding instrument that—

“(i) is or will be under negotiation, is signed or otherwise becomes operative, or is implemented with one or more foreign governments, international organizations, or foreign entities, including non-state actors; and

“(ii)

(I) could reasonably be expected to have a significant impact on the foreign policy of the United States; or

“(II) is the subject of a written communication from the Chair or Ranking Member of either of the appropriate congressional committees to the Secretary; and

“(B) does not include any non-binding instrument that is signed or otherwise becomes operative or is implemented pursuant to the authorities relied upon by the Department of Defense, the Armed Forces of the United States, or any element of the intelligence community.

“(6) The term ‘Secretary’ means the Secretary of State.

“(7)

(A) The term ‘text’ with respect to an international agreement or qualifying non-binding instrument includes—

“(i) any annex, appendix, codicil, side agreement, side letter, or any document of similar purpose or function to the aforementioned, regardless of the title of the document, that is entered into contemporaneously and in conjunction with the international agreement or qualifying non-binding instrument; and

“(ii) any implementing agreement or arrangement, or any document of similar purpose or function to the aforementioned regardless of the title of the document, that is entered into contemporaneously and in conjunction with the international agreement or qualifying non-binding instrument.

“(B) As used in subparagraph (A), the term ‘contemporaneously and in conjunction with’—

“(i) shall be construed liberally; and

“(ii) may not be interpreted to require any action to have occurred simultaneously or on the same day.

“(l) Nothing in this section may be construed—

“(1) to authorize the withholding from disclosure to the public of any record if such disclosure is required by law; or

“(2) to require the provision of any implementing agreement or arrangement, or any document of similar purpose or function regardless of its title, which was entered into by the Department of Defense, the Armed Forces of the United States, or any element of the intelligence community or any implementing material originating with the aforementioned agencies, if such implementing agreement, arrangement, document, or material was not required to be provided to the Majority Leader of the Senate, the Minority Leader of the Senate, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, the Minority Leader of the House of Representatives, or the appropriate congressional committees prior to the date of the enactment of the James M. Inhofe National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2023.”

(2)
Clerical amendment.— The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 2 of title 1, United States Code, is amended by striking the item relating to section 112b and inserting the following:

“112b. United States international agreements and non-binding instruments; transparency provisions.”.

(3)
Technical and conforming amendment relating to authorities of the secretary of state.— Section 317(h)(2) of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 195c(h)(2)) is amended by striking “ Section 112b(c)” and inserting “ Section 112b(g)”.
(4)
Mechanism for reporting.— Not later than 270 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of State shall establish a mechanism for personnel of the Department of State who become aware or who have reason to believe that the requirements under section 112b of title 1, United States Code, as amended by paragraph (1), have not been fulfilled with respect to an international agreement or qualifying non-binding instrument (as such terms are defined in such section) to report such instances to the Secretary.
(5)
Rules and regulations.— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the President, through the Secretary of State, shall promulgate such rules and regulations as may be necessary to carry out section 112b of title 1, United States Code, as amended by paragraph (1).
(6)
Consultation and briefing requirement.—
(A)
Consultation.— The Secretary of State shall consult with the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives on matters related to the implementation of this section and the amendments made by this section before and after the effective date described in subsection (c).
(B)
Briefing.— Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and once every 90 days thereafter for 1 year, the Secretary shall brief the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate, the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate, the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives, and the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives regarding the status of efforts to implement this section and the amendments made by this section.
(7)
Authorization of appropriations.— There is authorized to be appropriated to the Department of State $1,000,000 for each of the fiscal years 2023 through 2027 for purposes of implementing the requirements of section 112b of title 1, United States Code, as amended by paragraph (1).
(b)
Section 112a of Title 1, United States Code.— Section 112a of title 1, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
by striking subsections (b), (c), and (d); and
(2)
by inserting after subsection (a) the following:

“(b) Copies of international agreements and qualifying non-binding instruments in the possession of the Department of State, but not published, other than the agreements described in section 112b(b)(3)(A), shall be made available by the Department of State upon request.”

(c)
Effective Date of Amendments.— The amendments made by this section shall take effect on the date that is 270 days after the date of the enactment of this Act.

SEC. 5948. Ukraine Invasion War Crimes Deterrence and Accountability Act.

(a)
Short Title.— This section may be cited as the “Ukraine Invasion War Crimes Deterrence and Accountability Act”.
(b)
Sense of Congress.— It is the sense of Congress that—
(1)
in its premeditated, unprovoked, unjustified, and unlawful full-scale invasion of Ukraine that commenced on February 24, 2022, the military of the Government of the Russian Federation under the direction of President Vladimir Putin has committed war crimes that include but are not limited to—
(A)
the deliberate targeting of civilians and injuring or killing of noncombatants;
(B)
the deliberate targeting and attacking of hospitals, schools, and other non-military buildings dedicated to religion, art, science, or charitable purposes, such as the bombing of a theater in Mariupol that served as a shelter for noncombatants and had the word “children” written clearly in the Russian language outside;
(C)
the indiscriminate bombardment of undefended dwellings and buildings;
(D)
the wanton destruction of property not justified by military necessity;
(E)
unlawful civilian deportations;
(F)
the taking of hostages; and
(G)
rape, or sexual assault or abuse;
(2)
the use of chemical weapons by the Government of the Russian Federation in Ukraine would constitute a war crime, and engaging in any military preparations to use chemical weapons or to develop, produce, stockpile, or retain chemical weapons is prohibited by the Chemical Weapons Convention, to which the Russian Federation is a signatory;
(3)
Vladimir Putin has a long record of committing acts of aggression, systematic abuses of human rights, and acts that constitute war crimes or other atrocities both at home and abroad, and the brutality and scale of these actions, including in the Russian Federation republic of Chechnya, Georgia, Syria, and Ukraine, demonstrate the extent to which his regime is willing to flout international norms and values in the pursuit of its objectives;
(4)
Vladimir Putin has previously sanctioned the use of chemical weapons at home and abroad, including in the poisonings of Russian spy turned double agent Sergei Skripal and his daughter Yulia and leading Russian opposition figure Aleksey Navalny, and aided and abetted the use of chemical weapons by President Bashar al-Assad in Syria; and
(5)
in 2014, the Government of the Russian Federation initiated its unprovoked war of aggression against Ukraine which resulted in its illegal occupation of Crimea, the unrecognized declaration of independence by the so-called “Donetsk People’s Republic” and “Luhansk People’s Republic” by Russia-backed proxies, and numerous human rights violations and deaths of civilians in Ukraine.
(c)
Statement of Policy.— It is the policy of the United States—
(1)
to collect, analyze, and preserve evidence and information related to war crimes and other atrocities committed during the full-scale Russian invasion of Ukraine that began on February 24, 2022, for use in appropriate domestic, foreign, and international courts and tribunals prosecuting those responsible for such crimes consistent with applicable law, including with the American Service Members’ Protection Act of 2002 (22 U.S.C. 7421 et seq.);
(2)
to help deter the commission of war crimes and other atrocities in Ukraine by publicizing to the maximum possible extent, including among Russian and other foreign military commanders and troops in Ukraine, efforts to identify and prosecute those responsible for the commission of war crimes during the full-scale Russian invasion of Ukraine that began on February 24, 2022; and
(3)
to continue efforts to identify, deter, and pursue accountability for war crimes and other atrocities committed around the world and by other perpetrators, and to leverage international cooperation and best practices in this regard with respect to the current situation in Ukraine.
(d)
Report on United States Efforts.— Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and consistent with the protection of intelligence sources and methods, the President shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report, which may include a classified annex, describing in detail the following:
(1)
United States Government efforts to collect, analyze, and preserve evidence and information related to war crimes and other atrocities committed during the full-scale Russian invasion of Ukraine since February 24, 2022, including a description of—
(A)
the respective roles of various agencies, departments, and offices, and the interagency mechanism established for the coordination of such efforts;
(B)
the types of information and evidence that are being collected, analyzed, and preserved to help identify those responsible for the commission of war crimes or other atrocities during the full-scale Russian invasion of Ukraine in 2022; and
(C)
steps taken to coordinate with, and support the work of, allies, partners, international institutions and organizations, and nongovernmental organizations in such efforts.
(2)
Media, public diplomacy, and information operations to make Russian military commanders, troops, political leaders and the Russian people aware of efforts to identify and prosecute those responsible for the commission of war crimes or other atrocities during the full-scale Russian invasion of Ukraine in 2022, and of the types of acts that may be prosecutable.
(3)
The process for a domestic, foreign, or international court or tribunal to request and obtain from the United States Government information related to war crimes or other atrocities committed during the full-scale Russian invasion of Ukraine in 2022.
(e)
Definitions.— In this section:
(1)
Appropriate congressional committees.— The term “appropriate congressional committees” means—
(A)
the Committee on Foreign Affairs, the Committee on the Judiciary, the Committee on Armed Services, and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives; and
(B)
the Committee on Foreign Relations, the Committee on the Judiciary, the Committee on Armed Services, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate.
(2)
Atrocities.— The term “atrocities” has the meaning given that term in section 6(2) of the Elie Wiesel Genocide and Atrocities Prevention Act of 2018 (Public Law 115–441; 22 U.S.C. 2656 note).
(3)
War crime.— The term “war crime” has the meaning given that term in section 2441(c) of title 18, United States Code.

SEC. 5949. Prohibition on Certain Semiconductor Products and Services.

(a)
Prohibition on Use or Procurement.—
(1)
In general.— The head of an executive agency may not—
(A)
procure or obtain, or extend or renew a contract to procure or obtain, any electronic parts, products, or services that include covered semiconductor products or services; or
(B)
enter into a contract (or extend or renew a contract) with an entity to procure or obtain electronic parts or products that use any electronic parts or products that include covered semiconductor products or services.
(2)
Rule of construction.—
(A)
In general.— Nothing in paragraph (1) shall be construed—
(i)
to require any covered semiconductor products or services resident in equipment, systems, or services as of the day before the applicable effective date specified in subsection (c) to be removed or replaced;
(ii)
to prohibit or limit the utilization of such covered semiconductor products or services throughout the lifecycle of such existing equipment;
(iii)
to require the recipient of a Federal contract, grant, loan, or loan guarantee to replace covered semiconductor products or services resident in equipment, systems, or services before the effective date specified in subsection (c); or
(iv)
to require the Federal Communications Commission to designate covered semiconductor products or services to its Covered Communications Equipment or Services List maintained under section 2 of the Secured and Trusted Communications Networks Act of 2019 (47 U.S.C. 1603).
(B)
Contracting prohibition.— Nothing in paragraph (1)(B) shall be construed to cover products or services that include covered semiconductor products or services in a system that is not a critical system.
(b)
Waiver Authority.—
(1)
Secretary of defense.— The Secretary of Defense may provide a waiver on a date later than the effective date described in subsection (c) if the Secretary determines the waiver is in the critical national security interests of the United States.
(2)
Director of national intelligence.— The Director of National Intelligence may provide a waiver on a date later than the effective date described in subsection (c) if the Director determines the waiver is in the critical national security interests of the United States.
(3)
Secretary of commerce.— The Secretary of Commerce, in consultation with the Director of National Intelligence or the Secretary of Defense, may provide a waiver on a date later than the effective date described in subsection (c) if the Secretary determines the waiver is in the critical national security interests of the United States.
(4)
Secretary of homeland security.— The Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Director of National Intelligence or the Secretary of Defense, may provide a waiver on a date later than the effective date described in subsection (c) if the Secretary determines the waiver is in the critical national security interests of the United States.
(5)
Secretary of energy.— The Secretary of Energy, in consultation with the Director of National Intelligence or the Secretary of Defense, may provide a waiver on a date later than the effective date described in subsection (c) if the Secretary determines the waiver is in the critical national security interests of the United States.
(6)
Executive agencies.— The head of an executive agency may waive, for a renewable period of not more than two years per waiver, the prohibitions under subsection (a) if—
(A)
the head of the agency, in consultation with the Secretary of Commerce, determines that no compliant product or service is available to be procured as, and when, needed at United States market prices or a price that is not considered prohibitively expensive; and
(B)
the head of the agency, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense or the Director of National Intelligence, determines that such waiver could not reasonably be expected to compromise the critical national security interests of the United States.
(7)
Report to congress.— Not later than 30 days after granting a waiver under this subsection, the head of the executive agency granting such waiver shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress and leadership a report with a notification of such waiver, including a justification for the waiver.
(c)
Effective Dates and Regulations.—
(1)
Effective date.— The prohibitions under subsection (a) shall take effect five years after the date of the enactment of this Act.
(2)
Regulations.— Not later than three years after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Federal Acquisition Regulatory Council shall prescribe regulations implementing the prohibitions under subsection (a), including a requirement for prime contractors to incorporate the substance of such prohibitions and applicable implementing contract clauses into contracts for the supply of electronic parts or products.
(d)
Office of Management and Budget Report and Briefing.— Not later than 270 days after the effective date described in subsection (c)(1), the Director of the Office of Management and Budget, in coordination with the Director of National Intelligence and the National Cyber Director, shall provide to the appropriate committees of Congress and leadership a report and briefing on—
(1)
the implementation of the prohibitions under subsection (a), including any challenges in the implementation; and
(2)
the effectiveness and utility of the waiver authority under subsection (b).
(e)
Analysis, Assessment, and Strategy.— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Commerce, in coordination with the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of Homeland Security, the Director of National Intelligence, and the Secretary of Energy and, to the greatest extent practicable, leveraging relevant previous analyses and assessments, shall—
(1)
conduct an analysis of semiconductor design and production capacity domestically and by allied or partner countries required to meet the needs of the Federal Government, including analyses regarding—
(A)
semiconductors critical to national security, as determined by the Secretary of Commerce, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense and the Director of National Intelligence, in accordance with section 9902(a)(6)(A)(i) of the William M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021 (Public Law 116–283); and
(B)
semiconductors classified as legacy semiconductors pursuant to section 9902(a)(6)(A)(i) of William M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021 (Public Law 116–283);
(2)
assess the risk posed by the presence of covered semiconductor products or services in Federal systems;
(3)
assess the risk posed by the presence of covered semiconductor products or services in the supply chains of Federal contractors and subcontractors, including for non-Federal systems;
(4)
develop a strategy to—
(A)
improve the availability of domestic semiconductor design and production capacity required to meet the requirements of the Federal Government;
(B)
support semiconductor product and service suppliers seeking to contract with domestic, allied, or partner semiconductor producers and to improve supply chain traceability, including to meet the prohibitions under subsection (a); and
(C)
either certify the feasibility of implementing such prohibitions or exercising waiver authorities under subsection (b), to ensure uninterrupted Federal Government access to required semiconductor products and services; and
(5)
provide the results of the analysis, assessment, and strategy developed under paragraphs (1) through (4) to the Federal Acquisition Security Council.
(f)
Governmentwide Traceability and Diversification Initiative.—
(1)
In general.— Not later than two years after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Commerce, in coordination with the Secretary of Homeland Security, the Secretary of Defense, the Director of National Intelligence, the Director of the Office of Management and Budget, and the Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy, and in consultation with industry, shall establish a microelectronics traceability and diversification initiative to coordinate analysis of and response to the Federal Government microelectronics supply chain vulnerabilities.
(2)
Elements.— The initiative established under paragraph (1) shall include the following elements:
(A)
Sharing best practices, refining microelectronics standards, such as those established pursuant to section 224 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (Public Law 116–92), and developing recommendations to identify and mitigate, through diversification efforts, microelectronics supply chain concerns.
(B)
Developing an assessment framework to inform Federal decisions on sourcing microelectronics, considering—
(i)
chain of custody and traceability, including origin and location of design, manufacturing, distribution, shipping, and quantities;
(ii)
confidentiality, including protection, verification, and validation of intellectual property included in microelectronics;
(iii)
integrity, including—
(I)
security weaknesses and vulnerabilities that include potential supply chain attacks;
(II)
risk analysis and consequence to system;
(III)
risk of intentional or unintentional modification or tampering; and
(IV)
risk of insider threats, including integrity of people and processes involved in the design and manufacturing of microelectronics; and
(iv)
availability, including—
(I)
potential supply chain disruptions, including due to natural disasters or geopolitical events;
(II)
prioritization of parts designed and manufactured in the United States and in allied or partner countries to support and sustain the defense and technology industrial base;
(III)
risk associated with sourcing parts from suppliers outside of the United States and allied and partner countries, including long-term impacts on availability of microelectronics produced domestically or in allied or partner countries; and
(IV)
obsolescence management and counterfeit avoidance and detection.
(C)
Developing a process for provenance and traceability from design to disposal of microelectronics components and intellectual property contained therein implementable across the Federal acquisition system to improve reporting, data analysis, and tracking.
(D)
Developing and implementing policies and plans to support the following:
(i)
Development of domestic design and manufacturing capabilities to replace covered semiconductor products or services.
(ii)
Utilization of the assessment framework developed under subparagraph (B).
(iii)
Implementation of the strategy required under subsection (e)(4) as applicable.
(iv)
Identification of and integration with existing information reporting and data visualization systems in the Federal Government, including modification to such systems to track the information.
(v)
A requirement to document microelectronics used in systems and subsystems, including origin and location of design and manufacturing, technologies used, and quantities procured.
(vi)
Elimination from Federal Government supply chains of microelectronics from entities included on the Consolidated Screening List maintained by the International Trade Administration of the Department of Commerce.
(3)
Coordination required.— In carrying out this subsection, the Secretary of Commerce shall coordinate, as necessary, with the following entities:
(A)
The National Science and Technology Council Subcommittee on Microelectronics Leadership.
(B)
The Department of Commerce semiconductor industrial advisory committee established under subsection 9906(b) of the William M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021 (Public Law 116–283).
(C)
The White House Coordinator for CHIPS Implementation.
(D)
The Federal Acquisition Security Council (FASC).
(E)
The Government-Industry Working Group on Microelectronics.
(F)
The Joint Defense Manufacturing Technology Panel (JDMTP).
(G)
Standards development organizations.
(g)
Federal Acquisition Security Council.— Not later than two years after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Federal Acquisition Security Council, in consultation with the Secretary of Commerce, the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of Homeland Security, the Director of National Intelligence, and the Secretary of Energy, and after engagement with the private sector and other nongovernmental stakeholders in accordance with section 1323 of title 41, United States Code, shall—
(1)
issue recommendations to mitigate supply chain risks relevant to Federal Government acquisition of semiconductor products and services, considering—
(A)
the analysis, assessment, and strategy developed under subsection (e) and any related updates;
(B)
the standards provided under section 224 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (Public Law 116–92), including any tiers of trust, levels of security, or risk-based approaches established under such section;
(C)
the extent to which such recommendations would enhance the security of critical systems;
(D)
the extent to which such recommendations would impact Federal access to commercial technologies; and
(E)
any risks to the Federal Government from contracting with microelectronics suppliers that include covered semiconductor products or services in non-Federal supply chains; and
(2)
make recommendations to the Federal Acquisition Regulatory Council and the heads of executive agencies for any needed regulations to mitigate supply chain risks.
(h)
Applicability and Responsibilities of Covered Entities and Contractors.— The regulations prescribed pursuant to subsection (c)(2) shall—
(1)
provide that contractors who supply a Federal agency with electronic parts or products are responsible for—
(A)
certifying to the non-use of covered semiconductor products or services in such parts or products;
(B)
detecting and avoiding the use or inclusion of such covered semiconductor products or services in such parts or products; and
(C)
any rework or corrective action that may be required to remedy the use or inclusion of such covered semiconductor products or services in such parts or products;
(2)
require covered entities to disclose to direct customers the inclusion of a covered semiconductor product or service in electronic parts, products, or services included in electronic parts, products, or services subject to the contracting prohibition under subsection (a) as to whether such supplied parts, products, or services include covered semiconductors products or services;
(3)
provide that a covered entity that fails to disclose the inclusion to direct customers of a covered semiconductor product or service in electronic parts, products, or services procured or obtained by an executive agency in contravention of subsection (a) shall be responsible for any rework or corrective action that may be required to remedy the use or inclusion of such covered semiconductor product or service;
(4)
provide that the costs of covered semiconductor products or services, suspect semiconductor products, and any rework or corrective action that may be required to remedy the use or inclusion of such products are not allowable costs for Federal contracts;
(5)
provide that—
(A)
any covered entity or Federal contractor or subcontractor who becomes aware, or has reason to suspect, that any end item, component, or part of a critical system purchased by the Federal Government, or purchased by a Federal contractor or subcontractor for delivery to the Federal Government for any critical system, that contains covered semiconductor products or services shall notify appropriate Federal authorities in writing within 60 days; and
(B)
the Federal authorities shall report such information to the appropriate committees of Congress and leadership within 120 days;
(6)
provide that Federal bidders and contractors—
(A)
may reasonably rely on the certifications of compliance from covered entities and subcontractors who supply electronic parts, products, or services when providing proposals to the Federal Government; and
(B)
are not required to conduct independent third party audits or other formal reviews related to such certifications;
(7)
provide that a Federal contractor or subcontractor that provides a notification under paragraph (5) that does not regard electronic parts or products manufactured or assembled by such Federal contractor or subcontractor shall not be subject to civil liability nor determined to not be a presently responsible contractor on the basis of such notification; and
(8)
provide that a Federal contractor or subcontractor that provides a notification under paragraph (5) that regards electronic parts or products manufactured or assembled by such Federal contractor or subcontractor shall not be subject to civil liability nor determined to not be a presently responsible contractor on the basis of such notification if the Federal contractor or subcontractor makes a comprehensive and documentable effort to identify and remove covered semiconductor products or services from the Federal supply.
(i)
Reports.—
(1)
Secretary of commerce.— Not later than 60 days after completing the assessment required under subsection (e), the Secretary of Commerce shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress and leadership—
(A)
a report of the findings and recommendations of the analyses, assessment, and strategy developed under such subsection; and
(B)
a report on development of the microelectronics traceability and diversification initiative under subsection (f)(1).
(2)
Federal acquisition security council.— Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter for ten years, the Federal Acquisition Security Council shall include in the annual report submitted under section 1325 of title 41, United States Code, a description of—
(A)
the development of recommendations under subsection (g), including the considerations described in paragraph (1) of such subsection; and
(B)
as applicable, the impact of any recommendations or regulations implemented.
(j)
Definitions.— In this section:
(1)
Appropriate committees of congress and leadership.— The term “appropriate committees of Congress and leadership” means—
(A)
the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, the Committee on Foreign Relations, the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, the Select Committee on Intelligence, and the majority and minority leaders of the Senate; and
(B)
the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Energy and Commerce, the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, the Committee on Oversight and Reform, the Committee on Foreign Affairs, the Committee on Homeland Security, the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, and the Speaker, the majority leader, and the minority leader of the of the House of Representatives.
(2)
Covered entity.— The term “covered entity” means an entity that—
(A)
develops, domestically or abroad, a design of a semiconductor that is the direct product of United States origin technology or software; and
(B)
purchases covered semiconductor products or services from an entity described in subparagraph (A) or (C) of paragraph (3).
(3)
Covered semiconductor product or services.— The term “covered semiconductor product or services” means any of the following:
(A)
A semiconductor, a semiconductor product, a product that incorporates a semiconductor product, or a service that utilizes such a product, that is designed, produced or provided by, Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corporation (SMIC) (or any subsidiary, affiliate, or successor of such entity).
(B)
A semiconductor, a semiconductor product, a product that incorporates a semiconductor product, or a service that utilizes such a product, that is designed, produced, or provided by ChangXin Memory Technologies (CXMT) or Yangtze Memory Technologies Corp (YMTC) (or any subsidiary, affiliate, or successor of such entities).
(C)
A semiconductor, semiconductor product, or semiconductor service produced or provided by an entity that the Secretary of Defense or the Secretary of Commerce, in consultation with the Director of the National Intelligence or the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, determines to be an entity owned or controlled by, or otherwise connected to, the government of a foreign country of concern, provided that the determination with respect to such entity is published in the Federal Register.
(4)
Critical system.— The term “critical system”—
(A)
has the meaning given the term “national security system” in section 11103(a)(1) of title 40, United States Code;
(B)
shall include additional systems identified by the Federal Acquisition Security Council;
(C)
shall include additional systems identified by the Department of Defense, consistent with guidance provided under section 224 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (Public Law 116–92); and
(D)
shall not include a system to be used for routine administrative and business applications (including payroll, finance, logistics, and personnel management applications).
(5)
Foreign country of concern.— The term “foreign country of concern” has the meaning given the term in paragraph (7) of section 9901 of the William M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021 (15 U.S.C. 4651), as added by section 103(a)(4) of the CHIPS Act of 2022 (division A of Public Law 117–167).
(k)
Extension of Federal Acquisition Security Supply Chain Act of 2018.—
(1)
Subchapter iii of chapter 13 of title 41, united states code.— Section 1328 of title 41, United States Code, is amended by striking “ the date that is 5 years after the date of the enactment of the Federal Acquisition Supply Chain Security Act of 2018” and inserting “ December 31, 2033”.
(2)
Section 4713 of title 41, united states code.— Section 4713(j) of title 41, United States Code, is amended by striking “ the date that is 5 years after the date of the enactment of the Federal Acquisition Supply Chain Security Act of 2018” and inserting “ December 31, 2033”.
(l)
Authorization of Appropriations for Federal Acquisition Security Council.—
(1)
In general.— There is authorized to be appropriated $3,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2023 through 2033 for the Office of Management and Budget to support the activities of the Federal Acquisition Security Council.
(2)
Transfer authority.— The Director of the Office of Management and Budget may transfer funds authorized to be appropriated under paragraph (1) to other Federal agencies for the performance of work for which the funds were authorized.