Victims of Child Abuse Act Reauthorization Act of 2018
An Act
To reauthorize subtitle A of the Victims of Child Abuse Act of 1990.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SEC. 2. Reauthorization.
“(8) State chapters of children’s advocacy center networks are needed to—
“(A) assist local communities in coordinating their multidisciplinary child abuse investigation, prosecution, and intervention services; and
“(B) provide oversight of, and training and technical assistance in, the effective delivery of evidence-informed programming.”
“(8) the term ‘State chapter’ means a membership organization that provides technical assistance, training, coordination, grant administration, oversight, and support to local children’s advocacy centers, multidisciplinary teams, and communities working to implement a multidisciplinary response to child abuse in the provision of evidence-informed initiatives, including mental health counseling, forensic interviewing, multidisciplinary team coordination, and victim advocacy.”
“(4) collaborate with State chapters to provide training, technical assistance, coordination, and oversight to—
“(A) local children’s advocacy centers; and
“(B) communities that want to develop local children’s advocacy centers.”
“(ii) in promoting the effective delivery of the evidence-informed Children’s Advocacy Model and the multidisciplinary response to child abuse, including best practices in—
“(I) organizational support and development;
“(II) programmatic evaluation; and
“(III) financial oversight of Federal funding;”
“(a) In General.—The Administrator, in coordination with the Director of the Office of Victims of Crime, shall make grants to—
“(1) develop and enhance multidisciplinary child abuse investigations, intervention, and prosecution; and
“(2) promote the effective delivery of the evidence-informed Children’s Advocacy Model and the multidisciplinary response to child abuse, including best practices in programmatic evaluation and financial oversight of Federal funding.”
“(f) Grants to State Chapters for Assistance to Local Children’s Advocacy Centers.—In awarding grants under this section, the Administrator shall ensure that a portion of the grants is distributed to State chapters to enable State chapters to provide technical assistance, training, coordination, and oversight to other recipients of grants under this section in providing evidence-informed initiatives, including mental health counseling, forensic interviewing, multidisciplinary team coordination, and victim advocacy.”
“(1) attorneys and other allied professionals instrumental to the criminal prosecution of child abuse cases in State or Federal courts, for the purpose of improving the quality of criminal prosecution of such cases; and
“(2) child abuse professionals instrumental to the protection of children, intervention in child abuse cases, and treatment of victims of child abuse, for the purpose of—
“(A) improving the quality of such protection, intervention, and treatment; and
“(B) promoting the effective delivery of the evidence-informed Children’s Advocacy Model and the multidisciplinary response to child abuse, including best practices in programmatic evaluation and financial oversight of Federal funding.”
“(b) Grantee Organizations.—
“(1) Prosecutors.—An organization to which a grant is made for specific training and technical assistance for prosecutors under subsection (a)(1) shall be one that has—
“(A) a broad representation of attorneys who prosecute criminal cases in State courts; and
“(B) demonstrated experience in providing training and technical assistance for prosecutors.
“(2) Child abuse professionals.—An organization to which a grant is made for specific training and technical assistance for child abuse professionals under subsection (a)(2) shall be one that has—
“(A) a diverse portfolio of training and technical resources for the diverse professionals responding to child abuse, including a digital library to promote evidence-informed practice; and
“(B) demonstrated experience in providing training and technical assistance for child abuse professionals, especially law enforcement officers, child protective service workers, prosecutors, forensic interviewers, medical professionals, victim advocates, and mental health professionals.”
; and
“(a) In General.—All grants awarded”
; and
“(b) Reporting.—Not later than March 1 of each year, the Attorney General shall submit to the Committee on the Judiciary of the Senate and the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives a report that—
“(1) summarizes the efforts of the Administrator to monitor and evaluate the regional children’s advocacy program activities under section 213(d);
“(2) describes—
“(A) the method by which amounts are allocated to grantees and subgrantees under this subtitle, including to local children’s advocacy centers, State chapters, and regional children’s advocacy program centers; and
“(B) steps the Attorney General has taken to minimize duplication and overlap in the awarding of amounts under this subtitle; and
“(3) analyzes the extent to which both rural and urban populations are served under the regional children’s advocacy program.”
SEC. 3. Immunity Protections for Reporters of Child Abuse.
“(vii) provisions for immunity from civil or criminal liability under State and local laws and regulations for individuals making good faith reports of suspected or known instances of child abuse or neglect, or who otherwise provide information or assistance, including medical evaluations or consultations, in connection with a report, investigation, or legal intervention pursuant to a good faith report of child abuse or neglect;”