Title III — Natural Resources
TITLE III Natural Resources
Subtitle A Indian Dam Safety
Subtitle B Irrigation Rehabilitation and Renovation for Indian Tribal Governments and Their Economies
SEC. 3201. Definitions.
PART I Indian Irrigation Fund
SEC. 3211. Establishment.
SEC. 3212. Deposits to Fund.
SEC. 3213. Expenditures from Fund.
SEC. 3214. Investments of Amounts.
SEC. 3215. Transfers of Amounts.
SEC. 3216. Termination.
PART II Repair, Replacement, and Maintenance of Certain Indian Irrigation Projects
SEC. 3221. Repair, Replacement, and Maintenance of Certain Indian Irrigation Projects.
SEC. 3222. Eligible Projects.
SEC. 3223. Requirements and Conditions.
SEC. 3224. Study of Indian Irrigation Program and Project Management.
SEC. 3225. Tribal Consultation and User Input.
SEC. 3226. Allocation Among Projects.
Subtitle C Weber Basin Prepayments
SEC. 3301. Prepayment of Certain Repayment Obligations under Contracts Between the United States and the Weber Basin Water Conservancy District.
Subtitle D Pechanga Water Rights Settlement
SEC. 3401. Short Title.
SEC. 3402. Purposes.
SEC. 3403. Definitions.
SEC. 3404. Approval of the Pechanga Settlement Agreement.
SEC. 3405. Tribal Water Right.
SEC. 3406. Satisfaction of Claims.
SEC. 3407. Waiver of Claims.
SEC. 3408. Water Facilities.
SEC. 3409. Pechanga Settlement Fund.
SEC. 3410. Miscellaneous Provisions.
SEC. 3411. Authorization of Appropriations.
SEC. 3412. Expiration on Failure of Enforceability Date.
SEC. 3413. Antideficiency.
Subtitle E Delaware River Basin Conservation
SEC. 3501. Findings.
SEC. 3502. Definitions.
SEC. 3503. Program Establishment.
SEC. 3504. Grants and Assistance.
SEC. 3505. Annual Letter.
SEC. 3506. Prohibition on Use of Funds for Federal Acquisition of Interests in Land.
SEC. 3507. Sunset.
Subtitle F Miscellaneous Provisions
SEC. 3601. Bureau of Reclamation Dakotas Area Office Permit Fees for Cabins and Trailers.
SEC. 3602. Use of Trailer Homes at Heart Butte Dam and Reservoir (lake Tschida).
SEC. 3603. Lake Tahoe Restoration.
SEC. 3604. Tuolumne Band of Me-Wuk Indians.
SEC. 3605. San Luis Rey Settlement Agreement Implementation.
“SEC. 112. IMPLEMENTATION OF SETTLEMENT.
“(a) Findings.—Congress finds and recognizes as follows:
“(1) The City of Escondido, California, the Vista Irrigation District, the San Luis Rey River Indian Water Authority, and the Bands have approved an agreement, dated December 5, 2014, resolving their disputes over the use of certain land and water rights in or near the San Luis Rey River watershed, the terms of which are consistent with this Act.
“(2) The Bands, the San Luis Rey River Indian Water Authority, the City of Escondido, California, the Vista Irrigation District, and the United States have approved a Settlement Agreement dated January 30, 2015 (hereafter in this section referred to as the ‘Settlement Agreement’) that conforms to the requirements of this Act.
“(b) Approval and Ratification.—All provisions of the Settlement Agreement, including the waivers and releases of the liability of the United States, the provisions regarding allottees, and the provision entitled ‘Effect of Settlement Agreement and Act,’ are hereby approved and ratified.
“(c) Authorizations.—The Secretary and the Attorney General are authorized to execute, on behalf of the United States, the Settlement Agreement and any amendments approved by the parties as necessary to make the Settlement Agreement consistent with this Act. Such execution shall not constitute a major Federal action under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.). The Secretary is further authorized and directed to take all steps that the Secretary may deem necessary or appropriate to implement the Settlement Agreement and this Act.
“(d) Continued Federally Reserved And Other Water Rights.—
“(1) In general.—Notwithstanding any other provision of law, including any provisions in this Act, the Bands had, have, and continue to possess federally reserved rights and other water rights held in trust by the United States.
“(2) Future proceedings.—In any proceeding involving the assertion, enforcement, or defense of the rights described in this subsection, the United States, in its capacity as trustee for any Band, shall not be a required party and any decision by the United States regarding participation in any such proceeding shall not be subject to judicial review or give rise to any claim for relief against the United States.
“(e) Allottees.—Congress finds and confirms that the benefits to allottees in the Settlement Agreement, including the remedies and provisions requiring that any rights of allottees shall be satisfied from supplemental water and other water available to the Bands or the Indian Water Authority, are equitable and fully satisfy the water rights of the allottees.
“(f) No Precedent.—Nothing in this Act shall be construed or interpreted as a precedent for the litigation or settlement of Indian reserved water rights.”
“(i) no more than $3,700,000 per year (in principal, interest or both) may be so allocated; and
“(ii) none of the funds made available by this section shall be available unless the Director of the Office of Management and Budget first certifies in writing to the Committee on Natural Resources of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Indian Affairs of the Senate that the federal budget will record budgetary outlays from the San Luis Rey Tribal Development Fund of only the monies, not to exceed $3,700,000 annually, that the Secretary of the Treasury, pursuant to this section, allocates and makes available to the Indian Water Authority from the trust fund.”
SEC. 3606. Tule River Indian Tribe.
SEC. 3607. Morongo Band of Mission Indians.
SEC. 3608. Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma and the Chickasaw Nation Water Settlement.
Subtitle G Blackfeet Water Rights Settlement
SEC. 3701. Short Title.
SEC. 3702. Purposes.
SEC. 3703. Definitions.
SEC. 3704. Ratification of Compact.
SEC. 3705. Milk River Water Right.
SEC. 3706. Water Delivery Through Milk River Project.
SEC. 3707. Bureau of Reclamation Activities to Improve Water Management.
SEC. 3708. St. Mary Canal Hydroelectric Power Generation.
SEC. 3709. Storage Allocation from Lake Elwell.
SEC. 3710. Irrigation Activities.
SEC. 3711. Design and Construction of Mr&i System.
SEC. 3712. Design and Construction of Water Storage and Irrigation Facilities.
SEC. 3713. Blackfeet Water, Storage, and Development Projects.
SEC. 3714. Easements and Rights-Of-Way.
SEC. 3715. Tribal Water Rights.
SEC. 3716. Blackfeet Settlement Trust Fund.
SEC. 3717. Blackfeet Water Settlement Implementation Fund.
SEC. 3718. Authorization of Appropriations.
SEC. 3719. Water Rights in Lewis and Clark National Forest and Glacier National Park.
SEC. 3720. Waivers and Releases of Claims.
SEC. 3721. Satisfaction of Claims.
SEC. 3722. Miscellaneous Provisions.
SEC. 3723. Expiration on Failure to Meet Enforceability Date.
SEC. 3724. Antideficiency.
Subtitle H Water Desalination
SEC. 3801. Reauthorization of Water Desalination Act of 1996.
“(8) development of metrics to analyze the costs and benefits of desalination relative to other sources of water (including costs and benefits related to associated infrastructure, energy use, environmental impacts, and diversification of water supplies); and
“(9) development of design and siting specifications that avoid or minimize, adverse economic and environmental impacts.”
; and
“(e) Prioritization.—In carrying out this section, the Secretary shall prioritize funding for research—
“(1) to reduce energy consumption and lower the cost of desalination, including chloride control;
“(2) to reduce the environmental impacts of seawater desalination and develop technology and strategies to minimize those impacts;
“(3) to improve existing reverse osmosis and membrane technology;
“(4) to carry out basic and applied research on next generation desalination technologies, including improved energy recovery systems and renewable energy-powered desalination systems that could significantly reduce desalination costs;
“(5) to develop portable or modular desalination units capable of providing temporary emergency water supplies for domestic or military deployment purposes; and
“(6) to develop and promote innovative desalination technologies, including chloride control, identified by the Secretary.”
“(c) Prioritization.—In carrying out demonstration and development activities under this section, the Secretary shall prioritize projects—
“(1) for the benefit of drought-stricken States and communities;
“(2) for the benefit of States that have authorized funding for research and development of desalination technologies and projects;
“(3) that can reduce reliance on imported water supplies that have an impact on species listed under the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.); and
“(4) that demonstrably leverage the experience of international partners with considerable expertise in desalination, such as the State of Israel.
“(d) Water Production.—The Secretary shall provide, as part of the annual budget submission to Congress, an estimate of how much water has been produced and delivered in the past fiscal year using processes and facilities developed or demonstrated using assistance provided under sections 3 and 4. This submission shall include, to the extent practicable, available information on a detailed water accounting by process and facility and the cost per acre foot of water produced and delivered.”
“SEC. 9. CONSULTATION AND COORDINATION.
“(a) Consultation.—In carrying out”
“(c) Other Desalination Programs.—The authorization”
; and
“(b) Coordination of Federal Desalination Research and Development.—The White House Office of Science and Technology Policy shall develop a coordinated strategic plan that—
“(1) establishes priorities for future Federal investments in desalination;
“(2) coordinates the activities of Federal agencies involved in desalination, including the Bureau of Reclamation, the Corps of Engineers, the United States Army Tank Automotive Research, Development and Engineering Center, the National Science Foundation, the Office of Naval Research of the Department of Defense, the National Laboratories of the Department of Energy, the United States Geological Survey, the Environmental Protection Agency, and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration;
“(3) strengthens research and development cooperation with international partners, such as the State of Israel, in the area of desalination technology; and
“(4) promotes public-private partnerships to develop a framework for assessing needs for, and to optimize siting and design of, future ocean desalination projects.”
Subtitle I Amendments to the Great Lakes Fish and Wildlife Restoration Act of 1990
SEC. 3901. Amendments to the Great Lakes Fish and Wildlife Restoration Act of 1990.
“SEC. 1002. FINDINGS.
“Congress finds that—
“(1) the Great Lakes have fish and wildlife communities that are structurally and functionally changing;
“(2) successful fish and wildlife management focuses on the lakes as ecosystems, and effective management requires the coordination and integration of efforts of many partners;
“(3) additional actions and better coordination are needed to protect and effectively manage the fish and wildlife resources, and the habitats on which the resources depend, in the Great Lakes Basin; and
“(4) this Act allows Federal agencies, States, and Indian tribes to work in an effective partnership by providing the funding for restoration work.”
“(vii) the strategic action plan of the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative; and
“(viii) each applicable State wildlife action plan.”
“(A) Non-federal share.—Except as provided in paragraphs (3) and (5) and subject to paragraph (2), not less than 25 percent of the cost of implementing a proposal or regional project”
; and
“(B) Time period for providing match.—The non-Federal share of the cost of implementing a proposal or regional project required under subparagraph (A) may be provided at any time during the 2-year period preceding January 1 of the year in which the Director receives the application for the proposal or regional project.”
“(2) Authorized sources of non-federal share.—
“(A) In general.—The Director may determine the non-Federal share under paragraph (1) by taking into account—
“(i) the appraised value of land or a conservation easement as described in subparagraph (B); or
“(ii) as described in subparagraph (C), the costs associated with—
“(I) securing a conservation easement; and
“(II) restoration or enhancement of the conservation easement.
“(B) Appraisal of conservation easement.—
“(i) In general.—The value of a conservation easement may be used to satisfy the non-Federal share of the cost of implementing a proposal or regional project required under paragraph (1)(A) if the Director determines that the conservation easement—
“(I) meets the requirements of subsection (b)(2);
“(II) is acquired before the end of the grant period of the proposal or regional project;
“(III) is held in perpetuity for the conservation purposes of the programs of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service related to the Great Lakes Basin, as described in section 1006, by an accredited land trust or conservancy or a Federal, State, or tribal agency;
“(IV) is connected either physically or through a conservation planning process to the proposal or regional project; and
“(V) is appraised in accordance with clause (ii).
“(ii) Appraisal.—With respect to the appraisal of a conservation easement described in clause (i)—
“(I) the appraisal valuation date shall be not later than 1 year after the price of the conservation easement was set under a contract; and
“(II) the appraisal shall—
“(aa) conform to the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP); and
“(bb) be completed by a Federal- or State-certified appraiser.
“(C) Costs of securing conservation easements.—
“(i) In general.—All costs associated with securing a conservation easement and restoration or enhancement of that conservation easement may be used to satisfy the non-Federal share of the cost of implementing a proposal or regional project required under paragraph (1)(A) if the activities and expenses associated with securing the conservation easement and restoration or enhancement of that conservation easement meet the requirements of subparagraph (B)(i).
“(ii) Inclusion.—The costs referred to in clause (i) may include cash, in-kind contributions, and indirect costs.
“(iii) Exclusion.—The costs referred to in clause (i) may not be costs associated with mitigation or litigation (other than costs associated with the Natural Resource Damage Assessment program).”
“(c) Continued Monitoring and Assessment of Study Findings and Recommendations.—The Director—
“(1) shall continue to monitor the status, and the assessment, management, and restoration needs, of the fish and wildlife resources of the Great Lakes Basin; and
“(2) may reassess and update, as necessary, the findings and recommendations of the Report.”
“(a) Authorization.—”
; and
“(b) Prohibition on Use of Funds for Federal Acquisition of Interests in Land.—No funds appropriated or used to carry out this Act may be used for acquisition by the Federal Government of any interest in land.”
Subtitle J California Water
SEC. 4001. Operations and Reviews.
SEC. 4002. Scientifically Supported Implementation of Omr Flow Requirements.
SEC. 4003. Temporary Operational Flexibility for Storm Events.
SEC. 4004. Consultation on Coordinated Operations.
SEC. 4005. Protections.
in a manner that directly or indirectly results in reduced water supply to the State Water Project as compared with the water supply available under the smelt biological opinion and the salmonid biological opinion; and as a result, Central Valley Project yield is greater than it otherwise would have been, then that additional yield shall be made available to the State Water Project for delivery to State Water Project contractors to offset that reduced water supply, provided that if it is necessary to reduce water supplies for any Central Valley Project authorized uses or contractors to make available to the State Water Project that additional yield, such reductions shall be applied proportionately to those uses or contractors that benefit from that increased yield.
SEC. 4006. New Melones Reservoir.
SEC. 4007. Storage.
SEC. 4008. Losses Caused by the Construction and Operation of Storage Projects.
SEC. 4009. Other Water Supply Projects.
“(1) Projects.—
“(A) In general.—Subject to the requirements of this subsection, the Secretary of the Interior may participate in an eligible desalination project in an amount equal to not more than 25 percent of the total cost of the eligible desalination project.
“(B) Eligible desalination project.—The term ‘eligible desalination project’ means any project in a Reclamation State, that—
“(i) involves an ocean or brackish water desalination facility either constructed, operated and maintained; or sponsored by any State, department of a State, subdivision of a State or public agency organized pursuant to a State law; and
“(ii) provides a Federal benefit in accordance with the reclamation laws (including regulations).
“(C) State role.—Participation by the Secretary of the Interior in an eligible desalination project under this subsection shall not occur unless—
“(i) the project is included in a state-approved plan or federal participation has been requested by the Governor of the State in which the eligible desalination project is located; and
“(ii) the State or local sponsor determines, and the Secretary of the Interior concurs, that—
“(I) the eligible desalination project is technically and financially feasible and provides a Federal benefit in accordance with the reclamation laws;
“(II) sufficient non-Federal funding is available to complete the eligible desalination project; and
“(III) the eligible desalination project sponsors are financially solvent; and
“(iii) the Secretary of the Interior submits to Congress a written notification of these determinations within 30 days of making such determinations.
“(D) Environmental laws.—When participating in an eligible desalination project under this subsection, the Secretary shall comply with all applicable environmental laws, including the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.).
“(E) Information.—When participating in an eligible desalination project under this subsection, the Secretary of the Interior—
“(i) may rely on reports prepared by the sponsor of the eligible desalination project, including feasibility (or equivalent) studies, environmental analyses, and other pertinent reports and analyses; but
“(ii) shall retain responsibility for making the independent determinations described in subparagraph (C).
“(F) Authorization of appropriations.—
“(i) $30,000,000 of funding is authorized to remain available until expended; and
“(ii) Projects can only receive funding if enacted appropriations legislation designates funding to them by name, after the Secretary recommends specific projects for funding pursuant to this subsection and transmits such recommendations to the appropriate committees of Congress.”
“(e) Authorization of New Water Recycling and Reuse Projects.—
“(1) Submission to the secretary.—
“(A) In general.—Non-Federal interests may submit proposals for projects eligible to be authorized pursuant to this section in the form of completed feasibility studies to the Secretary.
“(B) Eligible projects.—A project shall be considered eligible for consideration under this section if the project reclaims and reuses—
“(i) municipal, industrial, domestic, or agricultural wastewater; or
“(ii) impaired ground or surface waters.
“(C) Guidelines.—Within 60 days of the enactment of this Act the Secretary shall issue guidelines for feasibility studies for water recycling and reuse projects to provide sufficient information for the formulation of the studies.
“(2) Review by the secretary.—The Secretary shall review each feasibility study received under paragraph (1)(A) for the purpose of—
“(A) determining whether the study, and the process under which the study was developed, each comply with Federal laws and regulations applicable to feasibility studies of water recycling and reuse projects; and
“(B) the project is technically and financially feasible and provides a Federal benefit in accordance with the reclamation laws.
“(3) Submission to congress.—Not later than 180 days after the date of receipt of a feasibility study received under paragraph (1)(A), the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate and the Committee on Natural Resources of the House of Representatives a report that describes—
“(A) the results of the Secretary’s review of the study under paragraph (2), including a determination of whether the project is feasible;
“(B) any recommendations the Secretary may have concerning the plan or design of the project; and
“(C) any conditions the Secretary may require for construction of the project.
“(4) Eligibility for funding.—The non-Federal project sponsor of any project determined by the Secretary to be feasible under paragraph (3)(A) shall be eligible to apply to the Secretary for funding for the Federal share of the costs of planning, designing and constructing the project pursuant to subsection (f).
“(f) Competitive Grant Program for the Funding of Water Recycling and Reuse Projects.—
“(1) Establishment.—The Secretary shall establish a competitive grant program under which the non-Federal project sponsor of any project determined by the Secretary to be feasible under subsection (e)(3)(A) shall be eligible to apply for funding for the planning, design, and construction of the project, subject to subsection (g)(2).
“(2) Priority.—When funding projects under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall give funding priority to projects that meet one or more of the criteria listed in paragraph (3) and are located in an area that—
“(A) has been identified by the United States Drought Monitor as experiencing severe, extreme, or exceptional drought at any time in the 4-year period before such funds are made available; or
“(B) was designated as a disaster area by a State during the 4-year period before such funds are made available.
“(3) Criteria.—The project criteria referred to in paragraph (2) are the following:
“(A) Projects that are likely to provide a more reliable water supply for States and local governments.
“(B) Projects that are likely to increase the water management flexibility and reduce impacts on environmental resources from projects operated by Federal and State agencies.
“(C) Projects that are regional in nature.
“(D) Projects with multiple stakeholders.
“(E) Projects that provide multiple benefits, including water supply reliability, eco-system benefits, groundwater management and enhancements, and water quality improvements.
“(g) Authorization of Appropriations.—
“(1) There is authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary of the Interior an additional $50,000,000 to remain available until expended.
“(2) Projects can only receive funding if enacted appropriations legislation designates funding to them by name, after the Secretary recommends specific projects for funding pursuant to subsection (f) and transmits such recommendations to the appropriate committees of Congress.”