US Codex
Pub. L.
Notes

Division A — Department of Defense Authorizations

113th Congress · Approved Dec 19, 2014 · 128 Stat. 3292 · Lineage

DIVISION A Department of Defense Authorizations

TITLE I Procurement

Subtitle A Authorization of Appropriations

SEC. 101. Authorization of Appropriations.

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2015 for procurement for the Army, the Navy and the Marine Corps, the Air Force, and Defense-wide activities, as specified in the funding table in section 4101.

Subtitle B Army Programs

SEC. 111. Plan on Modernization of Uh–60a Aircraft of Army National Guard.

(a)
Plan.— Not later than March 15, 2015, the Secretary of the Army shall submit to the congressional defense committees a prioritized plan for modernizing the entire fleet of UH–60A aircraft of the Army National Guard.
(b)
Additional Elements.— The plan under subsection (a) shall set forth the following:
(1)
A detailed timeline for the modernization of the entire fleet of UH–60A aircraft of the Army National Guard.
(2)
The number of UH–60L, UH–60L Digital, and UH–60M aircraft that the Army National Guard will possess upon completion of such modernization plan.
(3)
The cost, by year, associated with such modernization plan.

Subtitle C Navy Programs

SEC. 121. Construction of San Antonio Class Amphibious Ship.

(a)
In General.— The Secretary of the Navy may enter into a contract beginning with the fiscal year 2015 program year for the procurement of one San Antonio class amphibious ship. The Secretary may employ incremental funding for such procurement.
(b)
Condition on Out-year Contract Payments.— A contract entered into under subsection (a) shall provide that any obligation of the United States to make a payment under such contract for any fiscal year after fiscal year 2015 is subject to the availability of appropriations for that purpose for such fiscal year.

SEC. 122. Limitation on Availability of Funds for Mission Modules for Littoral Combat Ship.

None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for the procurement of additional mission modules for the Littoral Combat Ship program may be obligated or expended until the Secretary of the Navy submits to the congressional defense committees each of the following:
(1)
The Milestone B program goals for cost, schedule, and performance for each module.
(2)
Certification by the Director of Operational Test and Evaluation with respect to the total number for each module type that is required to perform all necessary operational testing.

SEC. 123. Extension of Limitation on Availability of Funds for Littoral Combat Ship.

Section 124(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 693) is amended by striking “ this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014” and inserting “ this Act, the Carl Levin and Howard P. ‘Buck’ McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015, or otherwise made available for fiscal years 2014 or 2015”.

SEC. 124. Report on Test Evaluation Master Plan for Littoral Combat Ship Seaframes and Mission Modules.

(a)
In General.— Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director of Operational Test and Evaluation shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the test evaluation master plan for the seaframes and mission modules for the Littoral Combat Ship program.
(b)
Elements.— The report required under subsection (a) shall include the following elements:
(1)
A description of the progress of the Navy with respect to the test evaluation master plan.
(2)
An assessment of whether or not completion of the test evaluation master plan will demonstrate operational effectiveness and operational suitability for both seaframes and each mission module.

SEC. 125. Airborne Electronic Attack Capabilities.

(a)
In General.— The Secretary of the Navy shall ensure that the Navy retains the option of procuring more EA–18G aircraft in the event that the Secretary determines that further analysis of airborne electronic attack force structure indicates that the Navy should make such a procurement.
(b)
Briefing.— Not later than March 2, 2015, the Secretary shall provide to the congressional defense committees a briefing on—
(1)
the options available to the Navy for ensuring that the Navy will not be precluded from procuring more EA–18G aircraft based on a determination made under subsection (a); and
(2)
an update on the progress of the Navy in conducting an analysis of emerging requirements for airborne electronic attack.

Subtitle D Air Force Programs

SEC. 131. Prohibition on Availability of Funds for Retirement of Mq–1 Predator Aircraft.

(a)
Prohibition.— Except as provided by subsection (b), none of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for the Air Force may be used during fiscal year 2015 to retire any MQ–1 Predator aircraft.
(b)
Exception.— The prohibition in subsection (a) shall not apply to a damaged MQ–1 Predator aircraft if the Secretary determines that repairing such aircraft is not economically viable.

SEC. 132. Prohibition on Availability of Funds for Retirement of U–2 Aircraft.

None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for the Department of Defense may be obligated or expended to make significant changes to retire, prepare to retire, or place in storage U–2 aircraft.

SEC. 133. Prohibition on Availability of Funds for Retirement of A–10 Aircraft.

(a)
Prohibition on Retirement.— None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for the Air Force may be obligated or expended to retire, prepare to retire, or place in storage any A–10 aircraft, except for such aircraft the Secretary of the Air Force, as of April 9, 2013, planned to retire.
(b)
Limitation on Manning Levels.—
(1)
In general.— Except as provided under paragraph (2), none of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for the Air Force may be obligated or expended to make significant changes to manning levels with respect to any A–10 aircraft squadrons.
(2)
Exception.—
(A)
Back up flying status.— The Secretary of Defense may authorize the Secretary of the Air Force to move up to 36 A–10 aircraft in the active component to backup flying status, and make conforming personnel adjustments, for the duration of fiscal year 2015 if—
(i)
on or before the date that is 45 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense submits to the congressional defense committees the certification described in subparagraph (B); and
(ii)
a period of 30 days has elapsed following the date of such submittal.
(B)
Certification.— A certification described in this subparagraph is a certification that the Secretary of Defense has—
(i)
received the results of the independent assessment under subsection (c) by the Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation regarding alternative ways to provide manpower during fiscal year 2015 to maintain the fighter fleet of the Air Force and to field F–35 aircraft; and
(ii)
determined, after giving consideration to such assessment, that an action to move A–10 aircraft under subparagraph (A) is required to avoid—
(I)
significantly degrading the readiness of the fighter fleet of the Air Force; or
(II)
significantly delaying the planned fielding of F–35 aircraft.
(c)
Independent Assessment.— Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation shall conduct an independent assessment of alternative ways to provide manpower during fiscal year 2015 to maintain the fighter fleet of the Air Force and to field F–35 aircraft. In conducting such assessment, the Director shall give consideration to the implementation approaches proposed by the Air Force and to other alternatives, including the retirement of other aircraft and the use of civilian or contractor maintainers on an interim basis for A–10 aircraft, F–35 aircraft, or other aircraft.
(d)
Comptroller General Study.—
(1)
Study.— The Comptroller General of the United States shall conduct an independent study of the platforms used to conduct the close air support mission in light of the recommendation of the Air Force to retire the A–10 fleet.
(2)
Report.— Not later than March 30, 2015, the Comptroller General shall brief the congressional defense committees on the preliminary findings of the study under paragraph (1), with a report to follow as soon as practicable, that includes an assessment of—
(A)
the alternatives considered by the Air Force that led to the recommendation to retire the A–10 fleet, including the relative costs, benefits, and assumptions associated with the alternatives to such retirement;
(B)
any capability gaps in close air support that would be created by such retirement and to what extent the Department of Defense has plans to address such capability gaps; and
(C)
any capability gaps in air superiority or global strike that could be created by the added cost to the Air Force of retaining the A–10 fleet.

SEC. 134. Prohibition on Cancellation or Modification of Avionics Modernization Program for C–130 Aircraft.

(a)
Prohibition.—
(1)
In general.— None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for the Air Force may be used to—
(A)
take any action to cancel or modify the avionics modernization program of record for C–130 aircraft; or
(B)
except as provided by paragraph (2), initiate an alternative communication, navigation, surveillance, and air traffic management program for C–130 aircraft that is designed or intended to replace the avionics modernization program described in subparagraph (A).
(2)
Exception.— The Secretary of Defense may waive the prohibition in paragraph (1)(B) if the Secretary certifies to the congressional defense committees that the program described in such subparagraph is required to operate C–130 aircraft in airspace controlled by the Federal Aviation Administration or airspace controlled by the government of a foreign country.
(b)
Limitation.— Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for operation and maintenance for the Office of the Secretary of the Air Force, not more than 85 percent may be obligated or expended until a period of 15 days has elapsed following the date on which the Secretary of the Air Force certifies to the congressional defense committees that the Secretary has obligated the funds authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available for fiscal years prior to fiscal year 2015 for the avionics modernization program of record for C–130 aircraft.

SEC. 135. Limitation on Availability of Funds for Retirement of Air Force Aircraft.

(a)
Limitation.— None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for the Air Force may be obligated or expended to retire, prepare to retire, or place in storage any aircraft of the Air Force, except for such aircraft the Secretary of the Air Force planned to retire as of April 9, 2013, until a period of 60 days has elapsed following the date on which the Secretary submits the report under subsection (b)(1).
(b)
Report.—
(1)
In general.— The Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the appropriate contributions of the regular Air Force, the Air National Guard, and the Air Force Reserve to the total force structure of the Air Force.
(2)
Elements.— The report under paragraph (1) shall include the following:
(A)
A separate presentation of mix of forces for each mission and aircraft platform of the Air Force.
(B)
An analysis and recommendations for not less than 80 percent of the missions and aircraft platforms described in subparagraph (A).

SEC. 136. Limitation on Availability of Funds for Retirement of E–3 Airborne Warning and Control System Aircraft.

(a)
Limitation.— None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for the Department of Defense may be obligated or expended to make significant changes to manning levels with respect to any E–3 airborne warning and control systems aircraft, or to retire, prepare to retire, or place in storage any such aircraft.
(b)
Rule of Construction.— Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit or otherwise affect the requirement to maintain the operational capability of the E–3 airborne warning and control system aircraft.

SEC. 137. Limitation on Availability of Funds for Divestment or Transfer of Kc–10 Aircraft.

(a)
Limitation.— None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for the Air Force may be obligated or expended to transfer, divest, or prepare to divest any KC–10 aircraft until a period of 60 days has elapsed following the date on which the Secretary of Defense submits to the congressional defense committees an assessment of the costs and benefits of the proposed divestment or transfer.
(b)
Elements.— The assessment referred to in subsection (a) shall include, at a minimum, the following elements:
(1)
A five-year plan for the force structure laydown of all tanker aircraft.
(2)
Current and future air refueling and cargo transportation requirements, broken down by aircraft, needed to meet the global reach and global power objectives of the Department of Defense, including how such objectives relate to supporting the 2012 Defense Strategic Guidance.
(3)
An operational risk assessment and mitigation strategy that evaluates the ability of the military to meet the requirements and objectives stipulated in the Guidance for Employment of the Force of the Department of Defense, the Joint Strategic Capabilities Plan, and all steady-state rotational and warfighting surge contingency operational planning documents of the commanders of the geographical combatant commands.

SEC. 138. Limitation on Availability of Funds for Transfer of Air Force C–130h and C–130j Aircraft.

(a)
Limitation.— None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for the Air Force may be obligated or expended to transfer from one facility of the Department of Defense to another any C–130H or C–130J aircraft until a period of 60 days has elapsed following the date on which the Secretary of the Air Force submits to the congressional defense committees an assessment of the costs and benefits of the proposed transfer.
(b)
Elements.— The assessment referred to in subsection (a) shall include, at a minimum, the following elements:
(1)
A five-year plan for the force structure laydown of C–130H2, C–130H3, and C–130J aircraft.
(2)
An identification of how such plan deviates from the total force structure proposal of the Secretary described in section 1059(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1939).
(3)
An explanation of why such plan deviates, if in any detail, from such proposal.
(4)
An assessment of the national security benefits and any other expected benefits of the proposed transfers under subsection (a), including benefits for the facilities expected to receive the transferred aircraft.
(5)
An assessment of the costs of the proposed transfers, including the impact of the proposed transfers on the facilities from which the aircraft will be transferred.
(6)
An analysis of the recommended basing alignment that demonstrates that the recommendation is the most effective and efficient alternative for such basing alignment.
(7)
For units equipped with special capabilities, including the modular airborne firefighting system capability, a certification that missions using such capabilities will not be negatively affected by the proposed transfers.
(c)
Comptroller General Report.— Not later than 60 days after the date on which the Secretary submits the report required under subsection (a), the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the congressional defense committees a sufficiency review of such report, including any findings and recommendations relating to such review.

SEC. 139. Limitation on Availability of Funds for Transfer of Air Force Kc–135 Tankers.

(a)
Limitation.— None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for the Air Force may be obligated or expended to transfer from Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam to another facility of the Department of Defense any KC–135 aircraft until a period of 60 days has elapsed following the date on which the Secretary of the Air Force submits to the congressional defense committees an assessment of the costs and benefits of the proposed transfer.
(b)
Elements.— The assessment referred to in subsection (a) shall include, at a minimum, the following elements:
(1)
A recommended basing alignment of Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam KC–135 aircraft.
(2)
An identification of how, and an explanation of why, such recommended basing alignment deviates, if in any detail, from the current basing plan.
(3)
An assessment of the national security benefits and any other expected benefits of the proposed transfer under subsection (a), including benefits for the facilities expected to receive the transferred aircraft.
(4)
An assessment of the costs of the proposed transfer, including the impact of the proposed transfer on the facilities from which the aircraft will be transferred.
(5)
An analysis of the recommended basing alignment that demonstrates that the recommendation is the most effective and efficient alternative for such basing alignment.

SEC. 140. Report on C–130 Aircraft.

(a)
Report.— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Air Force shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report including a complete analysis and fielding plan for C–130 aircraft.
(b)
Content.— The fielding plan submitted under subsection (a) shall include specific details of the plan of the Secretary to maintain intra-theater airlift capacity and capability within both the active and reserve components, including the modernization and recapitalization plan for C–130H and C–130J aircraft.

SEC. 141. Report on Status of F–16 Aircraft.

Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Air Force shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the status and location, and any plans to change during the period of the future-years defense program the status or locations, of all F–16 aircraft in the inventory of the Air Force.

SEC. 142. Report on Options to Modernize or Replace T–1a Aircraft.

(a)
Report.— Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Air Force shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on options for the modernization or replacement of the T–1A aircraft capability.
(b)
Elements.— The report under subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1)
A description of options for—
(A)
new procurement;
(B)
conducting a service life extension program on existing aircraft;
(C)
replacing organic aircraft with leased aircraft or services for the longer term; and
(D)
replacing organic aircraft with leased aircraft or services while the Secretary executes a new procurement or service life extension program.
(2)
An evaluation of the ability of each alternative to meet future training requirements.
(3)
Estimates of life cycle costs.
(4)
A description of potential cost savings from merging a T–1A capability replacement program with other programs of the Air Force, such as the Companion Trainer Program.

SEC. 143. Report on Status of Air-Launched Cruise Missile Capabilities.

(a)
Findings.— Congress finds the following:
(1)
The capability provided by the nuclear-capable, air-launched cruise missile is critical to maintaining a credible and effective air-delivery leg of the nuclear triad, preserving the ability to respond to geopolitical and technical surprise, and reassuring allies of the United States through credible extended deterrence.
(2)
In the fiscal year 2015 budget request of the Air Force, the Secretary of the Air Force delayed development of the long-range standoff weapon, the follow-on for the air-launched cruise missile, by three years.
(3)
The Secretary plans to sustain the current air-launched cruise missile, known as the AGM–86, until approximately 2030, with multiple service life-extension programs required to preserve but not enhance the existing capabilities of the air-launched cruise missile.
(4)
The AGM–86 was initially developed in the 1970s and deployed in the 1980s.
(5)
The average age of the inventory of air-launched cruise missiles is more than 30 years old.
(6)
The operating environment, particularly the sophistication of integrated air defenses, has evolved substantially since the inception of the air-launched cruise missile.
(7)
The AGM–86 is no longer in production and the inventory of spare bodies for required annual testing continues to diminish, posing serious challenges for long-term sustainment.
(b)
Report.—
(1)
In general.— Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Air Force, in coordination with the Commander of the United States Strategic Command, shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the status of the current air-launched cruise missile and the development of the follow-on system, the long-range standoff weapon, in accordance with section 217 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 706).
(2)
Elements.— The report under paragraph (1) shall include the following:
(A)
An assessment of the effectiveness and survivability of the air-launched cruise missile through 2030, including the impact of any degradation on the ability of the United States Strategic Command to meet deterrence requirements, including the number of targets held at risk by the air-launched cruise missile or the burdens placed on other legs of the nuclear triad.
(B)
A description of age-related failure trends, an assessment of potential age-related fleet-wide reliability and supportability problems, and the estimated costs for sustaining the air-launched cruise missile.
(C)
A detailed plan, including initial cost estimates, for the development and deployment of the follow-on system that will achieve initial operational capability before 2030.
(D)
An assessment of the feasibility and advisability of alternative development strategies, including initial cost estimates, that would achieve full operational capability before 2030.
(E)
An assessment of current testing requirements and the availability of test bodies to sustain the air-launched cruise missile over the long term.
(F)
A description of the extent to which the airframe and other related components can be completed independent of the payload, as determined by the Nuclear Weapons Council established by section 179 of title 10, United States Code.
(G)
A statement of the risks assumed by not fielding an operational replacement for the existing air-launched cruise missile by 2030.
(3)
Form.— The report required under paragraph (1) shall be submitted in classified form, but may include an unclassified summary.

Subtitle E Defense-Wide, Joint, and Multiservice Matters

SEC. 151. Additional Oversight Requirements for the Undersea Mobility Acquisition Program of the United States Special Operations Command.

Section 144 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1325) is amended—
(1)
in subsection (b)—
(A)
in paragraph (1), by inserting “ or the Joint Capabilities Integration and Development system” before the semicolon; and
(B)
in paragraph (2), by inserting “ , or other comparable and qualified entity selected by the Director” before the semicolon;
(2)
by redesignating subsection (c) as subsection (d); and
(3)
by inserting after subsection (b) the following new subsection (c):

“(c) Technology Roadmap.—

“(1) In general.—The Commander shall develop a plan consisting of a technology roadmap for undersea mobility capabilities that includes the following:

“(A) A description of the current capabilities provided by covered elements as of the date of the plan.

“(B) An identification and description of the requirements of the Commander for future undersea mobility platforms.

“(C) An identification of resources necessary to fulfill the requirements identified in subparagraph (B).

“(D) A description of the technology readiness levels of any covered element currently under development as of the date of the plan.

“(E) An identification of any potential gaps or projected shortfall in capability, along with steps to mitigate any such gap or shortfall.

“(F) Any other matters the Commander determines appropriate.

“(2) Submission.—The Commander shall submit to the congressional defense committees the plan under paragraph (1) at the same time as the Under Secretary submits the first report under subsection (a)(2) following the date of the enactment of the Carl Levin and Howard P. ‘Buck’ McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015.”

SEC. 152. Plan for Modernization or Replacement of Digital Avionic Equipment.

(a)
Plan Required.— Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a plan for the potential modernization or replacement of digital avionics equipment, including use of commercial-off-the-shelf digital avionics equipment, to meet the equipment requirements under the Next Generation Air Transportation System of the Federal Aviation Administration.
(b)
Elements.— The plan required under subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1)
A description of the requirements imposed on aircraft of the Department of Defense by the Federal Aviation Administration transition to the equipment requirements described in subsection (a), including—
(A)
an identification of the type and number of aircraft that the Secretary will need to upgrade;
(B)
a definition of the upgrades needed for such aircraft; and
(C)
the schedule required for the Secretary to make such upgrades in time to meet such requirements.
(2)
A description of options for—
(A)
acquiring new equipment, including—
(i)
new procurement; and
(ii)
leasing equipment and installation and other services, including the use of public-private partnerships; and
(B)
modernizing existing equipment.
(3)
An evaluation of the ability of each option to meet future operational requirements and to meet the equipment requirements described in subsection (a).
(4)
An estimated timeline to modernize or replace the digital avionics equipment in each military department or other element of the Department.
(5)
The estimated costs of options to modernize or replace the avionics equipment in each military department or other element of the Department in order to meet such requirements.

SEC. 153. Comptroller General Report on F–35 Aircraft Acquisition Program.

(a)
Annual Report.— Not later than April 15, 2015, and each year thereafter until the F–35 aircraft acquisition program enters into full-rate production, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report reviewing such program.
(b)
Matters Included.— Each report under subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1)
The extent to which the F–35 aircraft acquisition program is meeting cost, schedule, and performance goals.
(2)
The progress and results of developmental and operational testing.
(3)
The progress of the procurement and manufacturing of F–35 aircraft.
(4)
An assessment of any plans or efforts of the Secretary of Defense to improve the efficiency of the procurement and manufacturing of F–35 aircraft.

TITLE II Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation

Subtitle A Authorization of Appropriations

SEC. 201. Authorization of Appropriations.

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2015 for the use of the Department of Defense for research, development, test, and evaluation as specified in the funding table in section 4201.

Subtitle B Program Requirements, Restrictions, and Limitations

SEC. 211. Modification of Authority for Prizes for Advanced Technology Achievements.

(a)
Modification of Limit on Amount of Awards.— Subsection (c)(1) of section 2374a of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “ The total amount” and all that follows through the period at the end and inserting the following: “ No prize competition may result in the award of a cash prize of more than $10,000,000.”.
(b)
Acceptance of Funds.— Such section is further amended—
(1)
by redesignating subsections (e) and (f) as subsections (f) and (g), respectively; and
(2)
by inserting after subsection (d) the following new subsection (e):

“(e) Acceptance of Funds.—In addition to such sums as may be appropriated or otherwise made available to the Secretary to award prizes under this section, the Secretary may accept funds from other departments and agencies of the Federal Government, and from State and local governments, to award prizes under this section.”

(c)
Frequency of Reporting.— Subsection (f) of such section, as redesignated by subsection (b)(1) of this section, is amended—
(1)
in paragraph (1)—
(A)
by striking “ each year” and inserting “ every other year”; and
(B)
by striking “ fiscal year” and inserting “ two fiscal years”;
(2)
in paragraph (2), in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking “ a fiscal year” and inserting “ a period of two fiscal years”; and
(3)
in the subsection heading, by striking “ Annual” and inserting “ Biennial”.

SEC. 212. Modification of Manufacturing Technology Program.

(a)
Modification of Joint Defense Manufacturing Technology Panel Reporting Requirement.— Subsection (e)(5) of section 2521 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “ the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering” and inserting “ one or more individuals designated by the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics for purposes of this paragraph”.
(b)
Decreased Frequency of Update of Five-Year Strategic Plan.— Subsection (f)(3) of such section is amended by striking “ on a biennial basis” and inserting “ not less frequently than once every four years”.

SEC. 213. Revision of Requirement for Acquisition Programs to Maintain Defense Research Facility Records.

(1)
in subsection (b)—
(A)
in paragraph (4)—
(i)
by inserting “ and issue” after “ technology position”; and
(ii)
by striking “ combatant commands” and inserting “ components of the Department of Defense”; and
(B)
in paragraph (5), by striking “ any position paper” and all that follows through the period and inserting the following: “ any technological assessment made by a Defense research facility shall be provided to the Defense Technical Information Center repository to support acquisition decisions.”; and
(2)
in subsection (c)—
(A)
by striking “ this section:” and all that follows through “ (1) The term” and inserting “ this section, the term”;
(B)
by striking paragraph (2); and
(C)
by redesignating subparagraphs (A) and (B) as paragraphs (1) and (2), respectively, and moving such paragraphs, as so redesignated, 2 ems to the left.

SEC. 214. Treatment by Department of Defense Test Resource Management Center of Significant Modifications to Test and Evaluation Facilities and Resources.

(a)
Review of Proposed Changes.— Subsection (c)(1)(B) of section 196 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after “ Base” the following: “ , including with respect to the expansion, divestment, consolidation, or curtailment of activities,”.
(b)
Elements of Strategic Plans.— Subsection (d)(2) of such section is amended—
(1)
by redesignating subparagraph (E) and (F) as subparagraph (F) and (G), respectively; and
(2)
by inserting after subparagraph (D) the following new subparagraph:

“(E) An assessment of plans and business case analyses supporting any significant modification of the test and evaluation facilities and resources of the Department projected, proposed, or recommended by the Secretary of a military department or the head of a Defense Agency for such period, including with respect to the expansion, divestment, consolidation, or curtailment of activities.”

(c)
Certification of Budgets.— Subsection (e)(1) of such section is amended by inserting “ and for the period covered by the future-years defense program submitted to Congress under section 221 of this title for that fiscal year” after “ activities for a fiscal year”.
(d)
Assessment of Plans for Facilities.— Such section is further amended—
(1)
by redesignating subsections (f), (g), and (h) as subsections (g), (h), and (i), respectively; and
(2)
by inserting after subsection (e) the following new subsection (f):

“(f) Approval of Certain Modifications.—

(1) The Secretary of a military department or the head of a Defense Agency with test and evaluation responsibilities may not implement a projected, proposed, or recommended significant modification of the test and evaluation facilities and resources of the Department, including with respect to the expansion, divestment, consolidation, or curtailment of activities, until—

“(A) the Secretary or the head, as the case may be, submits to the Director a business case analysis for such modification; and

“(B) the Director reviews such analysis and approves such modification.

“(2) The Director shall submit to the Secretary of Defense an annual report containing the comments of the Director with respect to each business case analysis reviewed under paragraph (1)(B) during the year covered by the report.”

SEC. 215. Revision to the Service Requirement under the Science, Mathematics, and Research for Transformation Defense Education Program.

Subparagraph (B) of section 2192a(c)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:

“(B) in the case of a person not an employee of the Department of Defense, the person shall enter into a written agreement to accept and continue employment for the period of obligated service determined under paragraph (2)—

“(i) with the Department; or

“(ii) with a public or private entity or organization outside of the Department if the Secretary—

“(I) is unable to find an appropriate position for the person within the Department; and

“(II) determines that employment of the person with such entity or organization for the purpose of such obligated service would provide a benefit to the Department.”

SEC. 216. Limitation on Availability of Funds for Armored Multi-Purpose Vehicle Program.

(a)
Limitation.— Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for research, development, test, and evaluation, Army, for the armored multi-purpose vehicle program, not more than 80 percent may be obligated or expended until the date on which the Secretary of the Army submits to the congressional defense committees the report under subsection (b)(1).
(b)
Report.—
(1)
In general.— Not later than March 1, 2015, the Secretary of the Army shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the armored multi-purpose vehicle program.
(2)
Matters included.— The report under paragraph (1) shall include the following:
(A)
An identification of the existing capability gaps of the M–113 family of vehicles assigned, as of the date of the report, to units outside of combat brigades.
(B)
An identification of the mission roles that are in common between—
(i)
such vehicles assigned to units outside of combat brigades; and
(ii)
the vehicles examined in the armor brigade combat team during the armored multi-purpose vehicle analysis of alternatives.
(C)
The estimated timeline and the rough order of magnitude of funding requirements associated with complete M–113 family of vehicles divestiture within the units outside of combat brigades and the risk associated with delaying the replacement of such vehicles.
(D)
A description of the requirements for force protection, mobility, and size, weight, power, and cooling capacity for the mission roles of M–113 family of vehicles assigned to units outside of combat brigades.
(E)
A discussion of the mission roles of the M–113 family of vehicles assigned to units outside of combat brigades that are comparable to the mission roles of the M–113 family of vehicles assigned to armor brigade combat teams.
(F)
A discussion of whether a one-for-one replacement of the M–113 family of vehicles assigned to units outside of combat brigades is likely.
(G)
With respect to mission roles, a discussion of any substantive distinctions that exist in the capabilities of the M–113 family of vehicles that are needed based on the level of the unit to which the vehicle is assigned (not including combat brigades).
(H)
A discussion of the relative priority of fielding among the mission roles.
(I)
An assessment for the feasibility of incorporating medical wheeled variants within the armor brigade combat teams.

SEC. 217. Limitation on Availability of Funds for Unmanned Carrier-Launched Airborne Surveillance and Strike System.

(a)
Limitation.— None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for research, development, test, and evaluation, Navy, for the unmanned carrier-launched airborne surveillance and strike system may be obligated or expended to award a contract for air vehicle segment development until a period of 15 days has elapsed following the date on which the Secretary of Defense submits to the congressional defense committees a report that—
(1)
certifies that a review of the requirements for air vehicle segments of the unmanned carrier-launched surveillance and strike system is complete; and
(2)
includes the results of such review.
(b)
Additional Report.— At the same time that the President submits to Congress the budget for fiscal year 2017 under section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, the Secretary of the Navy shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that—
(1)
identifies the cost and performance trade-offs that the Navy made in arriving at the set of requirements for the air vehicle segments of the unmanned carrier-launched surveillance and strike system, including with respect to strike capability in an anti-access or area denial environment;
(2)
addresses the derivation of requirements for the overall composition of the future carrier air wing, including any contribution made to the intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance capabilities of carrier strike groups from non-carrier air wing forces, such as the MQ–4C Triton;
(3)
specifies how the Navy derived the plan for achieving the best mix of capabilities for the carrier strike group air wing to conduct representative joint intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance strike campaigns in the 2030 timeframe, including how the unmanned carrier-launched surveillance and strike system, F–35C aircraft, EA–18G aircraft, and the aircraft that is proposed to replace the F/A–18E/F (FA–XX) would contribute to the overall capability, including in an anti-access or area denial threat environment;
(4)
defines the acquisition strategy for the unmanned carrier-launched surveillance and strike system program and justifies any changes in such strategy from an acquisition strategy for a traditional program that is consistent with Department of Defense Instruction 5000.02; and
(5)
establishes a formal acquisition program cost and schedule baseline to allow the Navy to track unit costs and provide regular reports to Congress on cost, schedule, and performance progress.

SEC. 218. Limitation on Availability of Funds for Airborne Reconnaissance Systems.

(a)
Limitation.— Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for research, development, test, and evaluation, Air Force, for imaging and targeting support of airborne reconnaissance systems, not more than 25 percent may be obligated or expended until the date on which the Secretary of the Air Force submits to the appropriate congressional committees—
(1)
a plan regarding using such funds for such purpose during fiscal year 2015; and
(2)
a strategic plan for the funding of advanced airborne reconnaissance technologies supporting manned and unmanned systems.
(b)
Appropriate Congressional Committees Defined.— In this section, the term “appropriate congressional committees” means—
(1)
the congressional defense committees; and
(2)
the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate.

SEC. 219. Limitation on Availability of Funds for Retirement of Joint Surveillance and Target Attack Radar Systems Aircraft.

(a)
Limitation.— None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for the Air Force may be used to make any significant changes to manning levels with respect to any operational Joint Surveillance and Target Attack Radar Systems aircraft or take any action to retire or to prepare to retire such aircraft until the date that is 30 days after the date on which the Secretary of the Air Force submits to the congressional defense committees the report required by subsection (b).
(b)
Report.— The Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that includes the following:
(1)
An update of the results of the analysis of alternatives for recapitalizing the current Joint Surveillance and Target Attack Radar Systems capability.
(2)
An assessment of the cost and schedule of developing and fielding a new aircraft and radar system to replace the current Joint Surveillance and Target Attack Radar Systems aircraft that would deliver two replacement aircraft to the Joint Surveillance and Target Attack Radar Systems aircraft operating base by fiscal year 2019.

Subtitle C Reports

SEC. 221. Reduction in Frequency of Reporting by Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Systems Engineering.

(a)
In General.— Section 139b(d) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
by redesignating paragraphs (1) and (2) as paragraphs (3) and (4), respectively;
(2)
in paragraph (3), as so redesignated, by striking “ In General.—” and all that follows through “ Each report” and inserting “ Contents.— Each report submitted under paragraph (1) or (2)”;
(3)
by inserting before paragraph (3), as so redesignated, the following new paragraphs (1) and (2):

“(1) Annual report by deputy assistant secretary of defense for developmental test and evaluation.—Not later than March 31 of each year, the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Developmental Test and Evaluation shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the activities undertaken pursuant to subsection (a) during the preceding year.

“(2) Biennial report by deputy assistant secretary of defense for systems engineering.—Not later than March 31 of every other year, the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Systems Engineering shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the activities undertaken pursuant to subsection (b) during the preceding two-year period.”

; and

(4)
in the subsection heading, by striking “ Annual Report” and inserting “ Annual and Biennial Reports”.
(b)
Effective Date.— The amendments made by this section shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act and the first report submitted under paragraph (2) of section 139b(d) of such title, as added by subsection (a)(3), shall be submitted not later than March 31, 2015.

SEC. 222. Independent Assessment of Interagency Biodefense Research and Development.

(a)
Independent Assessment Required.— The Secretary of Defense shall enter into a contract with an entity that is not part of the Department of Defense to conduct an assessment of biodefense research and development activities at the National Interagency Biodefense Campus.
(b)
Elements.— The assessment conducted under subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1)
Identification and assessment of such legal, regulatory, management, and practice barriers as may reduce the effectiveness and efficiency of organizations on the Campus to perform designated missions, including such barriers as may exist with respect to the following:
(A)
Sharing of funds for intramural and extramural research and other activities—
(i)
within and between the Defense Agencies and the military departments;
(ii)
between the Department of Defense and other Federal agencies; and
(iii)
between the Department of Defense and the private sector.
(B)
Sharing in efforts related to the construction, modernization, and maintenance of research facilities—
(i)
within and between the Defense Agencies and the military departments;
(ii)
between the Department of Defense and other Federal agencies; and
(iii)
between the Department of Defense and the private sector.
(C)
Exchange and mobility of personnel—
(i)
within and between the Defense Agencies and the military departments;
(ii)
between the Department of Defense and other Federal agencies; and
(iii)
between the Department of Defense and the private sector.
(D)
Technology transfer and transition—
(i)
within and between the Defense Agencies and the military departments;
(ii)
between the Department of Defense and other Federal agencies; and
(iii)
between the Department of Defense and the private sector.
(2)
Formulation of recommendations for such legal, regulatory, management, and practices as may support attempts to overcome the barriers identified under paragraph (1).
(c)
Coordination.— The assessment conducted under subsection (a) shall be conducted in coordination with the following:
(1)
The Secretary of Homeland Security.
(2)
The Secretary of Health and Human Services.
(3)
Such other private and public sector organizations as the Secretary considers appropriate.
(d)
Report.— Not later than 540 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees the findings of the entity that conducted the assessment under subsection (a) with respect to such assessment.
(e)
Defense Agency Defined.— In this section, the term “Defense Agency” has the meaning given such term in section 101 of title 10, United States Code.

SEC. 223. Briefing on Modeling and Simulation Technological and Industrial Base in Support of Requirements of Department of Defense.

Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics shall provide to the Committees on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the Senate a briefing that provides—
(1)
an update to the assessment, findings, and recommendations in the report submitted under section 1059 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2465); and
(2)
the status of implementing any such recommendations.

Subtitle D Other Matters

SEC. 231. Modification to Requirement for Contractor Cost Sharing in Pilot Program to Include Technology Protection Features During Research and Development of Certain Defense Systems.

Section 243(b) of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 10 U.S.C. 2358 note) is amended in the matter following paragraph (2)—
(1)
by striking “ at least one-half” and inserting “ half”; and
(2)
by inserting “ , or such other portion of such cost as the Secretary considers appropriate upon showing of good cause” after “ such activities”.

SEC. 232. Pilot Program on Assignment to Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency of Private Sector Personnel with Critical Research and Development Expertise.

(a)
Pilot Program Authorized.— In accordance with the provisions of this section, the Director of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency may carry out a pilot program to assess the feasibility and advisability of temporarily assigning covered individuals with significant technical expertise in research and development areas of critical importance to defense missions to the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency to lead research or development projects of the Agency.
(b)
Assignment of Covered Individuals.—
(1)
Number of individuals assigned.— Under the pilot program, the Director may assign covered individuals to the Agency as described in subsection (a), but may not have more than five covered individuals so assigned at any given time.
(2)
Period of assignment.—
(A)
Except as provided in subparagraph (B), the Director may, under the pilot program, assign a covered individual described in subsection (a) to lead research and development projects of the Agency for a period of not more than two years.
(B)
The Director may extend the assignment of a covered individual for one additional period of not more than two years as the Director considers appropriate.
(3)
Application of certain provisions of law.—
(A)
Except as otherwise provided in this section, the Director shall carry out the pilot program in accordance with the provisions of subchapter VI of chapter 33 of title 5, United States Code, except that, for purposes of the pilot program, the term “other organization”, as used in such subchapter, shall be deemed to include a covered entity.
(B)
A covered individual employed by a covered entity who is assigned to the Agency under the pilot program is deemed to be an employee of the Department of Defense for purposes of the following provisions of law:
(i)
Chapter 73 of title 5, United States Code.
(ii)
Sections 201, 203, 205, 207, 208, 209, 603, 606, 607, 643, 654, 1905, and 1913 of title 18, United States Code.
(iii)
Sections 1343, 1344, and 1349(b) of title 31, United States Code.
(iv)
Chapter 171 of title 28, United States Code (commonly known as the “Federal Tort Claims Act”), and any other Federal tort liability statute.
(v)
The Ethics in Government Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.).
(vi)
Section 1043 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
(vii)
Chapter 21 of title 41, United States Code.
(4)
Pay and supervision.— A covered individual employed by a covered entity who is assigned to the Agency under the pilot program—
(A)
may continue to receive pay and benefits from such covered entity with or without reimbursement by the Agency;
(B)
is not entitled to pay from the Agency; and
(C)
shall be subject to supervision by the Director in all duties performed for the Agency under the pilot program.
(c)
Conflicts of Interest.—
(1)
Practices and procedures required.— The Director shall develop practices and procedures to manage conflicts of interest and the appearance of conflicts of interest that could arise through assignments under the pilot program.
(2)
Elements.— The practices and procedures required by paragraph (1) shall include, at a minimum, the requirement that each covered individual assigned to the Agency under the pilot program shall sign an agreement that provides for the following:
(A)
The nondisclosure of any trade secrets or other nonpublic or proprietary information which is of commercial value to the covered entity from which such covered individual is assigned.
(B)
The assignment of rights to intellectual property developed in the course of any research or development project under the pilot program—
(i)
to the Agency and its contracting partners in accordance with applicable provisions of law regarding intellectual property rights; and
(ii)
not to the covered individual or the covered entity from which such covered individual is assigned.
(C)
Such additional measures as the Director considers necessary to carry out the program in accordance with Federal law.
(d)
Prohibition on Charges by Covered Entities.— A covered entity may not charge the Federal Government, as direct or indirect costs under a Federal contract, the costs of pay or benefits paid by the covered entity to a covered individual assigned to the Agency under the pilot program.
(e)
Annual Report.— Not later than the first October 31 after the first fiscal year in which the Director carries out the pilot program and each October 31 thereafter that immediately follows a fiscal year in which the Director carries out the pilot program, the Director shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the activities carried out under the pilot program during the most recently completed fiscal year.
(f)
Termination of Authority.— The authority provided in this section shall expire on September 30, 2025, except that any covered individual assigned to the Agency under the pilot program shall continue in such assignment until the terms of such assignment have been satisfied.
(g)
Definitions.— In this section:
(1)
The term “covered individual” means any individual who is employed by a covered entity.
(2)
The term “covered entity” means any non-Federal, nongovernmental entity that, as of the date on which a covered individual employed by the entity is assigned to the Agency under the pilot program, is a nontraditional defense contractor (as defined in section 2302 of title 10, United States Code).

SEC. 233. Pilot Program on Enhancement of Preparation of Dependents of Members of Armed Forces for Careers in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics.

(a)
Pilot Program.— The Secretary of Defense shall carry out a pilot program to assess the feasibility and advisability of—
(1)
enhancing the preparation of covered students for careers in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics; and
(2)
providing assistance to teachers at covered schools to enhance preparation described in paragraph (1).
(b)
Coordination.— In carrying out the pilot program, the Secretary shall coordinate with the following:
(1)
The Secretaries of the military departments.
(2)
The Secretary of Education.
(3)
The National Science Foundation.
(4)
The heads of such other Federal, State, and local government and private sector organizations as the Secretary of Defense considers appropriate.
(c)
Activities.— Activities under the pilot program may include the following:
(1)
Establishment of targeted internships and cooperative research opportunities at defense laboratories and other technical centers for covered students and teachers at covered schools.
(2)
Establishment of scholarships and fellowships for covered students.
(3)
Efforts and activities that improve the quality of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics educational and training opportunities for covered students and teachers at covered schools, including with respect to improving the development of curricula at covered schools.
(4)
Development of travel opportunities, demonstrations, mentoring programs, and informal science education for covered students and teachers at covered schools.
(d)
Metrics.— The Secretary shall establish outcome-based metrics and internal and external assessments to evaluate the merits and benefits of activities conducted under the pilot program with respect to the needs of the Department of Defense.
(e)
Authorities.— In carrying out the pilot program, the Secretary shall, to the maximum extent practicable, make use of the authorities under chapter 111 and sections 2601, 2605, and 2374a of title 10, United States Code, section 219 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (10 U.S.C. 2358 note), and such other authorities as the Secretary considers appropriate.
(f)
Report.— Not later than two years after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report on activities carried out under the pilot program.
(g)
Termination.— The pilot program shall terminate on September 30, 2020.
(h)
Definitions.— In this section:
(1)
The term “covered schools” means elementary or secondary schools at which the Secretary determines a significant number of dependents of members of the Armed Forces are enrolled.
(2)
The term “covered students” means dependents of members of the Armed Forces who are enrolled at a covered school.

SEC. 234. Sense of Congress on Helicopter Health and Usage Monitoring System of the Army.

It is the sense of Congress that—
(1)
a health and usage monitoring system for current and future helicopter platforms of the Army that provides early warning for failing systems may reduce costly emergency maintenance, improve maintenance schedules, and increase fleet readiness; and
(2)
the Secretary of the Army should—
(A)
consider establishing health and usage monitoring requirements; and
(B)
after any decision to proceed with a program of record for such system, use full and open competition in accordance with the Federal Acquisition Regulation.

TITLE III Operation and Maintenance

Subtitle A Authorization of Appropriations

SEC. 301. Authorization of Appropriations.

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2015 for the use of the Armed Forces and other activities and agencies of the Department of Defense for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for operation and maintenance, as specified in the funding table in section 4301.

Subtitle B Energy and Environment

SEC. 311. Elimination of Fiscal Year Limitation on Prohibition of Payment of Fines and Penalties from the Environmental Restoration Account, Defense.

(1)
by striking “ for fiscal years 1995 through 2010,”; and
(2)
by striking “ for fiscal years 1997 through 2010”.

SEC. 312. Method of Funding for Cooperative Agreements under the Sikes Act.

(a)
Method of Payments Under Cooperative Agreements.— Subsection (b) of section 103A of the Sikes Act (16 U.S.C. 670c–1) is amended—
(1)
by inserting “ (1)” before “ Funds”; and
(2)
by adding at the end the following new paragraphs:

“(2) In the case of a cooperative agreement under subsection (a)(2), such funds—

“(A) may be paid in a lump sum and include an amount intended to cover the future costs of the natural resource maintenance and improvement activities provided for under the agreement; and

“(B) may be placed by the recipient in an interest-bearing or other investment account, and any interest or income shall be applied for the same purposes as the principal.

“(3) If any funds are placed by a recipient in an interest-bearing or other investment account under paragraph (2)(B), the Secretary of Defense shall report biennially to the congressional defense committees on the disposition of such funds.”

(b)
Availability of Funds; Agreement Under Other Laws.— Subsection (c) of such section is amended to read as follows:

“(c) Availability of Funds; Agreement Under Other Laws.—

(1) Cooperative agreements and interagency agreements entered into under this section shall be subject to the availability of funds.

“(2) Notwithstanding chapter 63 of title 31, United States Code, a cooperative agreement under this section may be used to acquire property or services for the direct benefit or use of the United States Government.”

SEC. 313. Report on Prohibition of Disposal of Waste in Open-Air Burn Pits.

(a)
Review and Report Required.— The Secretary of Defense shall conduct a review of the compliance of the military departments and combatant commands with Department of Defense Instruction 4715.19 and with section 317 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2249; 10 U.S.C. 2701 note) regarding the disposal of covered waste in burn pits. Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report containing the results of such review. Such report shall address each of the following:
(1)
The reporting of covered waste through environmental surveys and assessments, including environmental condition reports, of base camps supporting a contingency operation.
(2)
How covered waste and non-covered waste is defined and identified in environmental surveys and assessments covered by paragraph (1), in policies, instructions, and guidance issued by the Department of Defense, the military departments, and the combatant commands, and in the oversight of contracts for, and the operation of, waste disposal facilities at base camps supporting contingency operations.
(3)
Whether the two categories of waste are appropriately and clearly distinguished in such surveys and assessments.
(4)
The current decision authority responsible for determinations regarding whether a base camp supporting a contingency operation is in compliance with the Department of Defense Instruction and section 317 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2249; 10 U.S.C. 2701 note) and the chain of command by which such determinations are made and reported.
(5)
The process through which a waiver of the prohibition on disposal of covered waste in a burn pit is requested and approved, and the process by which Congress is notified of such waiver, pursuant to the applicable provision of law, and how such processes could be improved.
(6)
Updates to policies, guidelines, and instructions that have been undertaken pursuant to the review to address gaps and deficiencies regarding covered waste disposal to ensure compliance.
(7)
Other matters or recommendations the Secretary of Defense determines are appropriate.
(b)
Comptroller General Review.— Not later than 120 days after the date on which the Secretary of Defense submits the report required under subsection (a), the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report containing the assessment of the Comptroller General of the methodology used by the Secretary of Defense in conducting the review under subsection (a), the adequacy of the report, compliance with Department of Defense Instruction and applicable law regarding the disposal of covered waste in burn pits by the military departments and combatant commands, and any additional findings or recommendations the Comptroller General determines are appropriate.
(c)
Definitions.— In this section:
(1)
The term “covered waste” has the meaning given that term in section 317(d)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2249; 10 U.S.C. 2701 note).
(2)
The term “base camp supporting a contingency operation” means any base, location, site, cooperative security location, forward operating base, forward operating site, main operating base, patrol base, or other location as determined by the Secretary from which support is provided to a contingency operation that—
(A)
has at least 100 attached or assigned United States personnel; and
(B)
is in place for a period of time of 90 days or longer.
(3)
The term “burn pit” means an area that—
(A)
does not contain a commercially manufactured incinerator or other equipment specifically designed and manufactured for burning of solid waste; and
(B)
is designated for the purpose of disposing of solid waste by burning in the outdoor air;
(C)
is in a location where at least 100 United States personnel are attached or assigned; and
(D)
is in place longer than 90 days.
(4)
The term “contingency operation” has the meaning given such term in section 101(a)(13) of title 10, United States Code.

SEC. 314. Business Case Analysis of Any Plan to Design, Refurbish, or Construct a Biofuel Refinery.

Not later than 30 days before entering into a contract for the planning, design, refurbishing, or construction of a biofuel refinery, or of any other facility or infrastructure used to refine biofuels, the Secretary of Defense or the Secretary of the military department concerned shall submit to the congressional defense committees a business case analysis for such planning, design, refurbishing, or construction.

SEC. 315. Environmental Restoration at Former Naval Air Station Chincoteague, Virginia.

(a)
Environmental Restoration Project.— Notwithstanding the administrative jurisdiction of the Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration over the Wallops Flight Facility, Virginia, the Secretary of Defense may undertake an environmental restoration project in a manner consistent with chapter 160 of title 10, United States Code, at the property constituting that facility in order to provide necessary response actions for contamination from a release of a hazardous substance or a pollutant or contaminant that is attributable to the activities of the Department of Defense at the time the property was under the administrative jurisdiction of the Secretary of the Navy or used by the Navy pursuant to a permit or license issued by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration in the area formerly known as the Naval Air Station, Chincoteague, Virginia. Any such project may be undertaken jointly or in conjunction with an environmental restoration project of the Administrator.
(b)
Interagency Agreement.— The Secretary and the Administrator may enter into an agreement or agreements to provide for the effective and efficient performance of environmental restoration projects for purposes of subsection (a). Notwithstanding section 2215 of title 10, United States Code, any such agreement may provide for environmental restoration projects conducted jointly or by one agency on behalf of the other or both agencies and for reimbursement of the agency conducting the project by the other agency for that portion of the project for which the reimbursing agency has authority to respond.
(c)
Source of Department of Defense Funds.— Pursuant to section 2703(c) of title 10, United States Code, the Secretary may use funds available in the Environmental Restoration, Formerly Used Defense Sites, account of the Department of Defense for environmental restoration projects conducted for or by the Secretary under subsection (a) and for reimbursable agreements entered into under subsection (b).
(d)
No Effect on Compliance With Environmental Laws.— Nothing in this section affects or limits the application of or obligation to comply with any environmental law, including the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (42 U.S.C. 9601 et seq.) and the Solid Waste Disposal Act (42 U.S.C. 6901 et seq.).

SEC. 316. Limitation on Availability of Funds for Procurement of Drop-In Fuels.

(a)
Limitation.— None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for the Department of Defense may be obligated or expended to make a bulk purchase of a drop-in fuel for operational purposes unless the fully burdened cost of that drop-in fuel is cost-competitive with the fully burdened cost of a traditional fuel available for the same purpose.
(b)
Waiver.—
(1)
In general.— Subject to the requirements of paragraph (2), the Secretary of Defense may waive the limitation under subsection (a) with respect to a purchase.
(2)
Notice required.— Not later than 30 days after issuing a waiver under this subsection, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees notice of the waiver. Any such notice shall include each of the following:
(A)
The rationale of the Secretary for issuing the waiver.
(B)
A certification that the waiver is in the national security interest of the United States.
(C)
The expected fully burdened cost of the purchase for which the waiver is issued.
(c)
Notice of Purchase Required.— If the Secretary of Defense intends to purchase a drop-in fuel intended for operational use with a fully burdened cost in excess of 10 percent more than the fully burdened cost of a traditional fuel available for the same purpose, the Secretary shall provide notice of such intended purchase to the congressional defense committees by not later than 30 days before the date on which such purchase is intended to be made.
(d)
Definitions.— In this section:
(1)
The term “drop-in fuel” means a neat or blended liquid hydrocarbon fuel designed as a direct replacement for a traditional fuel with comparable performance characteristics and compatible with existing infrastructure and equipment.
(2)
The term “traditional fuel” means a liquid hydrocarbon fuel derived or refined from petroleum.
(3)
The term “operational purposes” means for the purposes of conducting military operations, including training, exercises, large scale demonstrations, and moving and sustaining military forces and military platforms. The term does not include research, development, testing, evaluation, fuel certification, or other demonstrations.
(4)
The term “fully burdened cost” means the commodity price of the fuel plus the total cost of all personnel and assets required to move and, when necessary, protect the fuel from the point at which the fuel is received from the commercial supplier to the point of use.

SEC. 317. Decontamination of a Portion of Former Bombardment Area on Island of Culebra, Puerto Rico.

(a)
Sense of Congress.— It is the sense of Congress that certain limited portions of the former bombardment area on the Island of Culebra should be available for safe public recreational use while the remainder of the area is most advantageously reserved as habitat for endangered and threatened species.
(b)
Modification of Restriction on Decontamination Limitation.— The first sentence of section 204(c) of the Military Construction Authorization Act, 1974 (Public Law 93–166; 87 Stat. 668) shall not apply to the beaches, the campgrounds, and the Carlos Rosario Trail.
(c)
Modification of Deed Restrictions.— Notwithstanding paragraph 9 of the quitclaim deed, the Secretary of the Army may expend funds available in the Environmental Restoration Account, Formerly Used Defense Sites, established pursuant to section 2703(a)(5) of title 10, United States Code, to decontaminate the beaches, the campgrounds, and the Carlos Rosario Trail of unexploded ordnance.
(d)
Precise Boundaries.— The Secretary of the Army shall determine the exact boundaries of the beaches, the campgrounds, and the Carlos Rosario Trail for purposes of this section.
(e)
Definitions.— In this section:
(1)
The term “beaches” means the portions of Carlos Rosario Beach, Flamenco Beach, and Tamarindo Beach identified in green in Figure 4 as Beach and located inside of the former bombardment area.
(2)
The term “campgrounds” means the areas identified in blue in Figure 4 as Campgrounds in the former bombardment area.
(3)
The term “Carlos Rosario Trail” means the trail identified in yellow in Figure 4 as the Carlos Rosario Trail and traversing the southern portion of the former bombardment area from the campground to the Carlos Rosario Beach.
(4)
The term “Figure 4” means Figure 4, located on page 8 of the study.
(5)
The term “former bombardment area” means that area on the Island of Culebra, Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, consisting of approximately 408 acres, conveyed to the Commonwealth by the quitclaim deed, and subject to the first sentence of section 204(c) of the Military Construction Authorization Act, 1974 (Public Law 93–166; 87 Stat. 668).
(6)
The term “quitclaim deed” means the quitclaim deed from the United States of America to the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico conveying the former bombardment area, signed by the Governor of Puerto Rico on December 20, 1982.
(7)
The term “study” means the “Study Relating to the Presence of Unexploded Ordnance in a Portion of the Former Naval Bombardment Area of Culebra Island, Commonwealth of Puerto Rico”, dated April 20, 2012, prepared by the United States Army for the Department of Defense pursuant to section 2815 of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4464).
(8)
The term “unexploded ordnance” has the meaning given the term in section 101(e)(5) of title 10, United States Code.

SEC. 318. Alternative Fuel Automobiles.

(a)
Maximum Fuel Economy Increase for Alternative Fuel Automobiles.— Section 32906(a) of title 49, United States Code, is amended by striking “ (except an electric automobile)” and inserting “ (except an electric automobile or, beginning with model year 2016, an alternative fueled automobile that uses a fuel described in subparagraph (E) of section 32901(a)(1))”.
(b)
Minimum Driving Ranges for Dual Fueled Passenger Automobiles.— Section 32901(c)(2) of title 49, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
in subparagraph (B), by inserting “ , except that beginning with model year 2016, alternative fueled automobiles that use a fuel described in subparagraph (E) of subsection (a)(1) shall have a minimum driving range of 150 miles” after “ at least 200 miles”; and
(2)
in subparagraph (C), by adding at the end the following: “ Beginning with model year 2016, if the Secretary prescribes a minimum driving range of 150 miles for alternative fueled automobiles that use a fuel described in subparagraph (E) of subsection (a)(1), subparagraph (A) shall not apply to dual fueled automobiles (except electric automobiles).”.
(c)
Electric Dual Fueled Automobiles.— Section 32905 of title 49, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
by redesignating subsections (e) and (f) as subsections (f) and (g), respectively; and
(2)
by inserting after subsection (d) the following:

“(e) Electric Dual Fueled Automobiles.—

“(1) In general.—At the request of the manufacturer, the Administrator may measure the fuel economy for any model of dual fueled automobile manufactured after model year 2015 that is capable of operating on electricity in addition to gasoline or diesel fuel, obtains its electricity from a source external to the vehicle, and meets the minimum driving range requirements established by the Secretary for dual fueled electric automobiles, by dividing 1.0 by the sum of—

“(A) the percentage utilization of the model on gasoline or diesel fuel, as determined by a formula based on the model’s alternative fuel range, divided by the fuel economy measured under section 32904(c); and

“(B) the percentage utilization of the model on electricity, as determined by a formula based on the model’s alternative fuel range, divided by the fuel economy measured under section 32904(a)(2).

“(2) Alternative calculation.—If the manufacturer does not request that the Administrator calculate the manufacturing incentive for its electric dual fueled automobiles in accordance with paragraph (1), the Administrator shall calculate such incentive for such automobiles manufactured by such manufacturer after model year 2015 in accordance with subsection (b).”

(d)
Conforming Amendment.— Section 32906(b) of title 49, United States Code, is amended by striking “ section 32905(e)” and inserting “ section 32905(f)”.

Subtitle C Logistics and Sustainment

SEC. 321. Modification of Quarterly Readiness Reporting Requirement.

(1)
in subsection (a)—
(A)
by inserting “ the” before “ military readiness”;
(B)
by inserting “ of the active and reserve components” after “ military readiness”; and
(C)
by striking “ subsections (b), (d), (f), (g), (h), (i), (j), and (k)” and all that follows through the period at the end and inserting “ subsections (b), (d), (e), (f), (g), (h), and (i).”;
(2)
by striking subsections (d), (e), (f), and (k);
(3)
by inserting after subsection (c) the following new subsection (d):

“(d) Prepositioned Stocks.—Each report shall also include a military department-level or agency-level assessment of the readiness of prepositioned stocks, including—

“(1) an assessment of the fill and materiel readiness of stocks by geographic location;

“(2) an overall assessment by military department or Defense Agency of the ability of the respective stocks to meet operation and contingency plans; and

“(3) a mitigation plan for any shortfalls or gaps identified under paragraph (1) or (2) and a timeline associated with corrective action.”

(4)
by redesignating subsections (g), (h), (i), (j), and (l) as subsections (e), (f), (g), (h), and (j) respectively;
(5)
in subsection (e)(1), as redesignated by paragraph (4), by striking “ National Response Plan” and inserting “ National Response Framework”;
(6)
in subsection (f), as so redesignated, by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

“(3) The assessment included in the report under paragraph (1) by the Commander of the United States Strategic Command shall include a separate assessment prepared by the Commander of United States Cyber Command relating to the readiness of United States Cyber Command and the readiness of the cyber force of each of the military departments.”

(7)
in subsection (h), as so redesignated—
(A)
in the subsection heading, by inserting “ and Related” after “ Support”;
(B)
in paragraph (1), by striking “ combat support agencies” and inserting “ combat support and related agencies”; and
(C)
in paragraph (2), in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking “ combat support agency” and inserting “ combat support and related agencies”; and
(8)
by inserting after subsection (h) the following new subsection (i):

“(i) Major Exercise Assessments.—

(1) Each report under this section shall also include information on each major exercise conducted by a geographic or functional combatant command or military department, including—

“(A) a list of exercises by name for the period covered by the report;

“(B) the cost and location of each such exercise; and

“(C) a list of participants by country or military department.

“(2) In this subsection, the term ‘major exercise’ means a named major training event, an integrated or joint exercise, or a unilateral major exercise.”

SEC. 322. Additional Requirement for Strategic Policy on Prepositioning of Materiel and Equipment.

Section 2229(a)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting “ support for crisis response elements,” after “ service requirements,”.

SEC. 323. Elimination of Authority of Secretary of the Army to Abolish Arsenals.

(a)
In General.— Section 4532 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
in subsection (a), by striking “ (a) The Secretary” and inserting “ The Secretary”;
(2)
by striking subsection (b); and
(3)
in the section heading, by striking “ ; abolition of”.
(b)
Clerical Amendment.— The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 433 of such title is amended by striking the item relating to section 4532 and inserting the following new item:

“4532. Factories and arsenals: manufacture at.”.

SEC. 324. Modification of Annual Reporting Requirement Related to Prepositioning of Materiel and Equipment.

Section 321(c) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 732; 10 U.S.C. 2229 note) is amended—
(1)
by striking “ Not later than” and inserting the following:

“(1) Initial report.—Not later than”

(2)
by striking “ , and annually thereafter”; and
(3)
by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

“(2) Progress reports.—Not later than one year after submitting the report required under paragraph (1), and annually thereafter for two years, the Comptroller General shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report assessing the progress of the Department of Defense in implementing its strategic policy and plan for its prepositioned stocks and including any additional information related to the Department’s management of its prepositioned stocks that the Comptroller General determines appropriate.”

Subtitle D Reports

SEC. 331. Repeal of Annual Report on Department of Defense Operation and Financial Support for Military Museums.

(a)
In General.— Section 489 of title 10, United States Code, is repealed.
(b)
Clerical Amendment.— The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 23 of such title is amended by striking the item relating to section 489.

SEC. 332. Army Assessment of Regionally Aligned Forces.

At the same time as the President transmits to Congress the budget for fiscal year 2016 under section 1105 of title 31, United States Code, the Secretary of the Army shall submit to the congressional defense committees an assessment of how the Army has—
(1)
captured and incorporated lessons learned through the initial employment of the regionally aligned forces;
(2)
identified, where appropriate, institutionalized and improved region-specific initial, sustaining, and predeployment training;
(3)
improved the coordination of activities among special operations forces, Army regionally aligned forces, Department of State country teams, contractors of the Department of State and the Department of Defense, the geographic combatant commands, the Joint Staff, and international partners;
(4)
identified and evaluated the various Department of Defense appropriations accounts at the subactivity group, project, program, and activity level and other sources of Federal resources used to fund activities of regionally aligned forces, including the amount of funds obligated or expended from each such account;
(5)
identified and assessed the effects associated with activities of regionally aligned forces conducted to meet Department of Defense and geographic combatant command security cooperation requirements;
(6)
identified and assessed the effect on the core mission readiness of regionally aligned forces while supporting geographic combatant commander requirements through regionally aligned force activities, and, in the case of any such effect that is assessed as degrading the core mission readiness of such forces, identified plans to mitigate such degradation;
(7)
identified and assessed opportunities, costs, benefits, and risks associated with the potential expansion of the regionally aligned forces model; and
(8)
identified and assessed opportunities, costs, benefits, and risks associated with retaining or ensuring the availability of regional expertise within forces as aligned to a specific region.

Subtitle E Limitations and Extensions of Authority

SEC. 341. Limitation on Authority to Enter into a Contract for the Sustainment, Maintenance, Repair, or Overhaul of the F117 Engine.

The Secretary of the Air Force may not enter into a contract for the sustainment, maintenance, repair, or overhaul of the F117 engine until the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics certifies to the congressional defense committees that the Secretary of the Air Force has obtained sufficient data to determine that the Secretary of the Air Force is paying a fair and reasonable price for F117 sustainment, maintenance, repair, or overhaul as compared to the PW2000 commercial-derivative engine sustainment price for sustainment, maintenance, repair, or overhaul in the private sector. The Secretary may waive the limitation in the preceding sentence to enter into a contract if the Secretary determines that such a waiver is in the interest of national security.

SEC. 342. Limitation on Establishment of Regional Special Operations Forces Coordination Centers.

None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for the Department of Defense may be obligated or expended to establish Regional Special Operations Forces Coordination Centers.

SEC. 343. Limitation on Transfer of Mc–12 Aircraft to United States Special Operations Command.

(a)
Limitation.— Except as provided under subsection (c), none of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for the Department of Defense for operation and maintenance, Defense-wide, may be obligated or expended for the transfer of MC–12 aircraft from the Air Force to the United States Special Operations Command before the date that is 60 days after the date of the delivery of the report required under subsection (b).
(b)
Report Required.—
(1)
In general.— Not later than March 1, 2015, the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Special Operations and Low-Intensity Conflict, in coordination with the Commander of the United States Special Operations Command, shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report containing an analysis and justification for the transfer of MC–12 aircraft from the Air Force to the United States Special Operations Command.
(2)
Elements.— The report required under paragraph (1) shall include—
(A)
a description of the current platform requirements for manned intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance aircraft to support United States Special Operations Forces;
(B)
an analysis of alternatives comparing various manned intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance aircraft, including U–28 aircraft, in meeting the platform requirements for manned intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance aircraft to support United States Special Operations Forces;
(C)
an analysis of the remaining service life of the U–28 aircraft to be divested by the United States Special Operations Command and the MC–12 aircraft to be transferred from the Air Force;
(D)
a description of the future manned intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance platform requirements of the United States Special Operations Command for areas outside of Afghanistan, including range, payload, endurance, and other requirements, as defined by the Command’s “Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance Road Map”;
(E)
an analysis of the cost to convert MC–12 aircraft to provide intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance capabilities equal to or better than those provided by the U–28 aircraft;
(F)
a description of the engineering and integration needed to convert MC–12 aircraft to provide intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance capabilities equal to or better than those provided by the U–28 aircraft; and
(G)
the expected annual cost to operate 16 U–28 aircraft as a Government-owned, contractor operated program.
(c)
Exception.— Subsection (a) does not apply to up to 13 aircraft designated by the Secretary of the Air Force to be transferred from the Air Force to the United States Special Operations Command and flown by the Air National Guard in support of special operations aviation foreign internal defense and intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance requirements.

Subtitle F Other Matters

SEC. 351. Clarification of Authority Relating to Provision of Installation-Support Services Through Intergovernmental Support Agreements.

(a)
Transfer of Section 2336 to Chapter 159.—
(1)
Transfer and redesignation.— Section 2336 of title 10, United States Code, is transferred to chapter 159 of such title, inserted after section 2678, and redesignated as section 2679.
(2)
Revised section heading.— The heading of such section, as so transferred and redesignated, is amended to read as follows:

“§ 2679. Installation-support services: intergovernmental support agreements”

(b)
Clarifying Amendments.— Such section, as so transferred and redesignated, is further amended—
(1)
in subsection (a)—
(A)
in paragraph (1)—
(i)
by striking “ The Secretary concerned” and inserting “ Notwithstanding any other provision of law governing the award of Federal government contracts for goods and services, the Secretary concerned”; and
(ii)
by striking “ a State or local” and inserting “ , on a sole source basis, with a State or local”;
(B)
in paragraph (2)—
(i)
by striking “ Notwithstanding any other provision of law, an” and inserting “ An”;
(ii)
by striking subparagraph (A); and
(iii)
by redesignating subparagraphs (B) and (C) as subparagraphs (A) and (B) respectively; and
(C)
by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

“(4) Any contract for the provision of installation-support services awarded by the Federal Government or a State or local government pursuant to an intergovernmental support agreement provided in subsection (a) shall be awarded on a competitive basis.”

(2)
by adding at the end of subsection (e) the following new paragraph:

“(4) The term ‘intergovernmental support agreement’ means a legal instrument reflecting a relationship between the Secretary concerned and a State or local government that contains such terms and conditions as the Secretary concerned considers appropriate for the purposes of this section and necessary to protect the interests of the United States.”

(c)
Clerical Amendments.—
(1)
The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 137 of such title is amended by striking the item relating to section 2336.
(2)
The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 159 of such title is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 2678 the following new item:

“2679. Installation-support services: intergovernmental support agreements.”.

SEC. 352. Management of Conventional Ammunition Inventory.

(a)
Consolidation of Data.— Not later than 240 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics shall issue Department-wide guidance designating an authoritative source of data for conventional ammunition. Not later than 10 days after issuing the guidance required by this subsection, the Under Secretary shall notify the congressional defense committees on what source of data has been designated under this subsection.
(b)
Annual Report.— The Secretary of the Army shall include in the appropriate annual ammunition inventory reports, as determined by the Secretary, information on all available ammunition for use during the redistribution process, including any ammunition that was unclaimed and categorized for disposal by another military service during a year before the year during which the report is submitted.
(c)
Briefing and Report.—
(1)
In general.— The Comptroller General of the United States shall provide to the congressional defense committees a briefing and a report on the management of the conventional ammunition demilitarization stockpile of the Department of Defense.
(2)
Elements.— The briefing and report required by paragraph (1) shall include each of the following:
(A)
An assessment of the adequacy of Department of Defense policies and procedures governing the demilitarization of excess, obsolete, and unserviceable conventional ammunition.
(B)
An assessment of the adequacy of the maintenance by the Department of information on the quantity, value, condition, and location of excess, obsolete, and unserviceable conventional ammunition for each of the Armed Forces.
(C)
An assessment of whether the Department has conducted an analysis comparing the costs of storing and maintaining items in the conventional ammunition demilitarization stockpile with the costs of the disposal of items in the stockpile.
(D)
An assessment of whether the Department has—
(i)
identified challenges in managing the current and anticipated conventional ammunition demilitarization stockpile; and
(ii)
if so, developed mitigation plans to address such challenges.
(E)
Such other matters relating to the management of the conventional ammunition demilitarization stockpile as the Comptroller General considers appropriate.
(3)
Deadlines.— The briefing required by paragraph (1) shall be provided by not later than April 30, 2015. The report required by that paragraph shall be submitted not later than June 1, 2015.

TITLE IV Military Personnel Authorizations

Subtitle A Active Forces

SEC. 401. End Strengths for Active Forces.

The Armed Forces are authorized strengths for active duty personnel as of September 30, 2015, as follows:
(1)
The Army, 490,000.
(2)
The Navy, 323,600.
(3)
The Marine Corps, 184,100.
(4)
The Air Force, 312,980.

SEC. 402. Revisions in Permanent Active Duty End Strength Minimum Levels.

Section 691(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking paragraphs (1) through (4) and inserting the following new paragraphs:

“(1) For the Army, 490,000.

“(2) For the Navy, 323,600.

“(3) For the Marine Corps, 184,100.

“(4) For the Air Force, 310,900.”

Subtitle B Reserve Forces

SEC. 411. End Strengths for Selected Reserve.

(a)
In General.— The Armed Forces are authorized strengths for Selected Reserve personnel of the reserve components as of September 30, 2015, as follows:
(1)
The Army National Guard of the United States, 350,200.
(2)
The Army Reserve, 202,000.
(3)
The Navy Reserve, 57,300.
(4)
The Marine Corps Reserve, 39,200.
(5)
The Air National Guard of the United States, 105,000.
(6)
The Air Force Reserve, 67,100.
(7)
The Coast Guard Reserve, 7,000.
(b)
End Strength Reductions.— The end strengths prescribed by subsection (a) for the Selected Reserve of any reserve component shall be proportionately reduced by—
(1)
the total authorized strength of units organized to serve as units of the Selected Reserve of such component which are on active duty (other than for training) at the end of the fiscal year; and
(2)
the total number of individual members not in units organized to serve as units of the Selected Reserve of such component who are on active duty (other than for training or for unsatisfactory participation in training) without their consent at the end of the fiscal year.
(c)
End Strength Increases.— Whenever units or individual members of the Selected Reserve of any reserve component are released from active duty during any fiscal year, the end strength prescribed for such fiscal year for the Selected Reserve of such reserve component shall be increased proportionately by the total authorized strengths of such units and by the total number of such individual members.

SEC. 412. End Strengths for Reserves on Active Duty in Support of the Reserves.

Within the end strengths prescribed in section 411(a), the reserve components of the Armed Forces are authorized, as of September 30, 2015, the following number of Reserves to be serving on full-time active duty or full-time duty, in the case of members of the National Guard, for the purpose of organizing, administering, recruiting, instructing, or training the reserve components:
(1)
The Army National Guard of the United States, 31,385.
(2)
The Army Reserve, 16,261.
(3)
The Navy Reserve, 9,973.
(4)
The Marine Corps Reserve, 2,261.
(5)
The Air National Guard of the United States, 14,704.
(6)
The Air Force Reserve, 2,830.

SEC. 413. End Strengths for Military Technicians (dual Status).

The minimum number of military technicians (dual status) as of the last day of fiscal year 2015 for the reserve components of the Army and the Air Force (notwithstanding section 129 of title 10, United States Code) shall be the following:
(1)
For the Army National Guard of the United States, 27,210.
(2)
For the Army Reserve, 7,895.
(3)
For the Air National Guard of the United States, 21,792.
(4)
For the Air Force Reserve, 9,789.

SEC. 414. Fiscal Year 2015 Limitation on Number of Non-Dual Status Technicians.

(a)
Limitations.—
(1)
National guard.— Within the limitation provided in section 10217(c)(2) of title 10, United States Code, the number of non-dual status technicians employed by the National Guard as of September 30, 2015, may not exceed the following:
(A)
For the Army National Guard of the United States, 1,600.
(B)
For the Air National Guard of the United States, 350.
(2)
Army reserve.— The number of non-dual status technicians employed by the Army Reserve as of September 30, 2015, may not exceed 595.
(3)
Air force reserve.— The number of non-dual status technicians employed by the Air Force Reserve as of September 30, 2015, may not exceed 90.
(b)
Non-Dual Status Technicians Defined.— In this section, the term “non-dual status technician” has the meaning given that term in section 10217(a) of title 10, United States Code.

SEC. 415. Maximum Number of Reserve Personnel Authorized to Be on Active Duty for Operational Support.

During fiscal year 2015, the maximum number of members of the reserve components of the Armed Forces who may be serving at any time on full-time operational support duty under section 115(b) of title 10, United States Code, is the following:
(1)
The Army National Guard of the United States, 17,000.
(2)
The Army Reserve, 13,000.
(3)
The Navy Reserve, 6,200.
(4)
The Marine Corps Reserve, 3,000.
(5)
The Air National Guard of the United States, 16,000.
(6)
The Air Force Reserve, 14,000.

Subtitle C Authorization of Appropriations

SEC. 421. Military Personnel.

(a)
Authorization of Appropriations.— Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2015 for the use of the Armed Forces and other activities and agencies of the Department of Defense for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for military personnel, as specified in the funding table in section 4401.
(b)
Construction of Authorization.— The authorization of appropriations in subsection (a) supersedes any other authorization of appropriations (definite or indefinite) for such purpose for fiscal year 2015.

TITLE V Military Personnel Policy

Subtitle A Officer Personnel Policy

SEC. 501. Authority to Limit Consideration for Early Retirement by Selective Retirement Boards to Particular Warrant Officer Year Groups and Specialties.

(1)
by redesignating paragraph (2) as paragraph (3);
(2)
by designating the second sentence of paragraph (1) as paragraph (2); and
(3)
in paragraph (2), as so designated—
(A)
by striking “ the list shall include each” and inserting

“(A) the name of each”

(B)
by striking the period at the end and inserting “ ; or”; and
(C)
by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:

“(B) with respect to a group of warrant officers designated under subparagraph (A) who are in a particular grade and competitive category, only those warrant officers in that grade and competitive category who are also in a particular year group or specialty, or any combination thereof determined by the Secretary concerned.”

SEC. 502. Authority for Three-Month Deferral of Retirement for Officers Selected for Selective Early Retirement.

(a)
Warrant Officers.— Section 581(e) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
by inserting “ (1)” before “ The Secretary concerned”;
(2)
by striking “ 90 days” and inserting “ three months”; and
(3)
by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

“(2) An officer recommended for early retirement under this section, if approved for deferral under paragraph (1), shall be retired on the date requested by the officer, and approved by the Secretary concerned, which date shall be not later than the first day of the tenth calendar month beginning after the month in which the Secretary concerned approves the report of the board which recommended the officer for early retirement.”

(b)
Officers on the Active-duty List.— Section 638(b) of such title is amended—
(1)
by striking paragraph (1) and inserting the following new paragraph:

“(1)

(A) An officer in a grade below brigadier general or rear admiral (lower half) who is recommended for early retirement under this section or section 638a of this title and whose early retirement is approved by the Secretary concerned shall be retired, under any provision of law under which he is eligible to retire, on the date requested by him and approved by the Secretary concerned, which date shall be not later than the first day of the seventh calendar month beginning after the month in which the Secretary concerned approves the report of the board which recommended the officer for early retirement.

“(B) If an officer described in subparagraph (A) is not eligible for retirement under any provision of law, the officer shall be retained on active duty until the officer is qualified for retirement under section 3911, 6323, or 8911 of this title, and then be retired under that section, unless the officer is sooner retired or discharged under some other provision of law, with such retirement under that section occurring not later than the later of the following:

“(i) The first day of the month beginning after the month in which the officer becomes qualified for retirement under that section.

“(ii) The first day of the seventh calendar month beginning after the month in which the Secretary concerned approves the report of the board which recommended the officer for early retirement.”

; and

(2)
in paragraph (3)—
(A)
by inserting “ (A)” before “ The Secretary concerned”;
(B)
by striking “ 90 days” and inserting “ three months”; and
(C)
by adding at the end the following new subparagraphs:

“(B) An officer recommended for early retirement under paragraph (1)(A) or section 638a of this title, if approved for deferral under subparagraph (A), shall be retired on the date requested by the officer, and approved by the Secretary concerned, which date shall be not later than the first day of the tenth calendar month beginning after the month in which the Secretary concerned approves the report of the board which recommended the officer for early retirement.

“(C) The Secretary concerned may defer the retirement of an officer otherwise approved for early retirement under paragraph (1)(B), but in no case later than the first day of the tenth calendar month beginning after the month in which the Secretary concerned approves the report of the board which recommended the officer for early retirement.

“(D) An officer recommended for early retirement under paragraph (2), if approved for deferral under subparagraph (A), shall be retired on the date requested by the officer, and approved by the Secretary concerned, which date shall be not later than the first day of the thirteenth calendar month beginning after the month in which the Secretary concerned approves the report of the board which recommended the officer for early retirement.”

SEC. 503. Repeal of Limits on Percentage of Officers Who May Be Recommended for Discharge During a Fiscal Year under Enhanced Selective Discharge Authority.

(1)
by striking paragraph (3); and
(2)
by redesignating paragraphs (4) and (5) as paragraphs (3) and (4), respectively.

SEC. 504. Reports on Number and Assignment of Enlisted Aides for Officers of the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marine Corps.

(a)
Annual Report on Number of Enlisted Aides.— Section 981 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

“(c) Not later than March 1 of each year, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report—

“(1) specifying the number of enlisted aides authorized and allocated for general officers and flag officers of the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, and joint pool as of September 30 of the previous year; and

“(2) justifying, on a billet-by-billet basis, the authorization and assignment of each enlisted aide to each general officer and flag officer position.”

(b)
Report on Reduction in Number of Enlisted Aides and Authorization and Assignment Procedures and Duties.— Not later than June 30, 2015, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report containing the following:
(1)
A list of the official military and official representational duties that each Secretary of a military department—
(A)
authorizes enlisted aides to perform on the personal staffs of officers of an Armed Force under the jurisdiction of the Secretary concerned; and
(B)
considers necessary to be performed by enlisted aides to relieve the officers from minor duties, which, if performed by the officers, would be done at the expense of the officers’ primary military or official duties.
(2)
Subject to the limitations in section 981 of title 10, United States Code, the procedures used for allocating authorized enlisted aides—
(A)
between the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marine Corps and the joint pool;
(B)
within each Armed Force, including the regulations prescribed by the Secretaries of the military departments regarding the allocation of enlisted aides; and
(C)
within the joint pool.
(3)
The justification, on a billet-by-billet basis, for the authorization and assignment of each enlisted aide to each general officer and flag officer position as of September 30, 2014.
(4)
Such recommendations as the Secretary of Defense considers appropriate for changes to the statutory method of calculating the authorized number of enlisted aides.
(c)
Report Objective.— In developing the report required by subsection (b), the Secretary of Defense shall have the objective of reducing the maximum number of enlisted aides authorized and allocated for general officers and flag offers by 40, subject to the validation of duties under subsection (b)(1) and the billet-by-billet justification of positions under subsection (b)(3).
(d)
Comptroller General Review.—
(1)
Review required.— The Comptroller General of the United States shall review the report submitted by the Secretary of Defense under subsection (b).
(2)
Elements of review.— The review under paragraph (1) shall include the following:
(A)
An assessment of the methodology used by the Secretary of Defense in satisfying the requirements imposed by paragraphs (1), (2), and (3) of subsection (b).
(B)
An assessment of the adequacy of the data used by the Secretary to support the conclusions contained in the report.
(3)
Report on results of review.— Not later than 180 days after the date on which the Secretary of Defense submits the report under subsection (b), the Comptroller General shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report on the review conducted under paragraph (1).

SEC. 505. Repeal of Requirement for Submission to Congress of Annual Reports on Joint Officer Management and Promotion Policy Objectives for Joint Officers.

(a)
Repeal of Annual Reports.—
(1)
Joint officer management.— Section 667 of title 10, United States Code, is repealed.
(2)
Promotion policy objectives for joint officers.— Section 662 of such title is amended—
(A)
by striking “ (a) Qualifications.—”; and
(B)
by striking subsection (b).
(b)
Clerical Amendment.— The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 38 of such title is amended by striking the item relating to section 667.

SEC. 506. Options for Phase Ii of Joint Professional Military Education.

Section 2154(a)(2) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “ consisting of a joint professional military education curriculum” and all that follows through the period at the end and inserting the following:

“(A) a joint professional military education curriculum taught in residence at the Joint Forces Staff College or a senior level service school that has been designated and certified by the Secretary of Defense as a joint professional military education institution; or

“(B) a senior level service course of at least ten months that has been designated and certified by the Secretary of Defense as a joint professional military education course.”

SEC. 507. Elimination of Requirement That a Qualified Aviator or Naval Flight Officer Be in Command of an Inactivated Nuclear-Powered Aircraft Carrier Before Decommissioning.

(1)
by inserting “ (1)” after “ (a)”; and
(2)
by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

“(2) Paragraph (1) does not apply to command of a nuclear-powered aircraft carrier that has been inactivated for the purpose of permanent decommissioning and disposal.”

SEC. 508. Required Consideration of Certain Elements of Command Climate in Performance Appraisals of Commanding Officers.

The Secretary of a military department shall ensure that the performance appraisal of a commanding officer in an Armed Force under the jurisdiction of that Secretary indicates the extent to which the commanding officer has or has not established a command climate in which—
(1)
allegations of sexual assault are properly managed and fairly evaluated; and
(2)
a victim of criminal activity, including sexual assault, can report the criminal activity without fear of retaliation, including ostracism and group pressure from other members of the command.

Subtitle B Reserve Component Management

SEC. 511. Retention on the Reserve Active-Status List Following Nonselection for Promotion of Certain Health Professions Officers and First Lieutenants and Lieutenants (junior Grade) Pursuing Baccalaureate Degrees.

(a)
Retention of Certain First Lieutenants and Lieutenants (Junior Grade) Following Nonselection for Promotion.— Subsection (a)(1) of section 14701 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
by striking “ A reserve officer of” and inserting “ (A) A reserve officer of the Army, Navy, Air Force, or Marine Corps described in subparagraph (B) who is required to be removed from the reserve active-status list under section 14504 of this title, or a reserve officer of”;
(2)
by striking “ of this title may, subject to the needs of the service and to section 14509 of this title,” and inserting “ of this title, may”; and
(3)
by adding at the end the following new subparagraphs:

“(B) A reserve officer covered by this subparagraph is a reserve officer of the Army, Air Force, or Marine Corps who holds the grade of first lieutenant, or a reserve officer of the Navy who holds the grade of lieutenant (junior grade), and who—

“(i) is a health professions officer; or

“(ii) is actively pursuing an undergraduate program of education leading to a baccalaureate degree.

“(C) The consideration of a reserve officer for continuation on the reserve active-status list pursuant to this paragraph is subject to the needs of the service and to section 14509 of this title.”

(b)
Retention of Health Professions Officers.— Such section is further amended—
(1)
by redesignating subsection (b) as subsection (c); and
(2)
by inserting after subsection (a) the following new subsection (b):

“(b) Continuation of Health Professions Officers.—

(1) Notwithstanding subsection (a)(6), a health professions officer obligated to a period of service incurred under section 16201 of this title who is required to be removed from the reserve active-status list under section 14504, 14505, 14506, or 14507 of this title and who has not completed a service obligation incurred under section 16201 of this title shall be retained on the reserve active-status list until the completion of such service obligation and then discharged, unless sooner retired or discharged under another provision of law.

“(2) The Secretary concerned may waive the applicability of paragraph (1) to any officer if the Secretary determines that completion of the service obligation of that officer is not in the best interest of the service.

“(3) A health professions officer who is continued on the reserve active-status list under this subsection who is subsequently promoted or whose name is on a list of officers recommended for promotion to the next higher grade is not required to be discharged or retired upon completion of the officer’s service obligation. Such officer may continue on the reserve active-status list as other officers of the same grade unless separated under another provision of law.”

SEC. 512. Consultation with Chief of the National Guard Bureau in Selection of Directors and Deputy Directors, Army National Guard and Air National Guard.

(a)
Role of Chief of the National Guard Bureau.— Paragraph (1) of section 10506(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
in subparagraph (A), by inserting “ (after consultation with the Chief of the National Guard Bureau)” after “ selected by the Secretary of the Army”; and
(2)
in subparagraph (B), by inserting “ (after consultation with the Chief of the National Guard Bureau)” after “ selected by the Secretary of the Air Force”.
(b)
Clarifying Amendment.— Paragraph (2) of such section is amended by striking “ The officers so selected” and inserting “ The Director and Deputy Director, Army National Guard, and the Director and Deputy Director, Air National Guard,”.
(c)
Repeal of Obsolete Provision.— Paragraph (3) of such section is amended—
(1)
by striking subparagraph (D); and
(2)
by redesignating subparagraph (E) as subparagraph (D).
(d)
Application of Amendments.— The amendments made by subsection (a) shall apply with respect to assignments to the National Guard Bureau under section 10506 of title 10, United States Code, that occur after the date of the enactment of this Act.

SEC. 513. Centralized Database of Information on Military Technician Positions.

(a)
Centralized Database Required.— The Secretary of Defense shall establish and maintain a centralized database of information on military technician positions that will contain and set forth current information on all military technician positions of the Armed Forces.
(b)
Elements.—
(1)
Identification of positions.— The database required by subsection (a) shall identify each military technician position, whether dual-status or non-dual status.
(2)
Additional details.— For each military technician position identified pursuant to paragraph (1), the database required by subsection (a) shall include the following:
(A)
A description of the functions of the position.
(B)
A statement of the military necessity for the position.
(C)
A statement of whether the position is—
(i)
a general administration, clerical, or office service occupation; or
(ii)
directly related to the maintenance of military readiness.
(c)
Consultation.— The Secretary of Defense shall establish the database required by subsection (a) in consultation with the Secretaries of the military departments.
(d)
Implementation Report.— Not later than September 1, 2015, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report describing the progress made in establishing the database required by subsection (a).

SEC. 514. Report on Management of Personnel Records of Members of the National Guard.

(a)
Report Required.— Not later than December 1, 2015, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report regarding the management of personnel records of members of the Army National Guard of the United States and the Air Guard of the United States.
(b)
Elements of Report.— In preparing the report under subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall assess the following:
(1)
The roles and responsibilities of States and Federal agencies in the management of the records of members of the Army National Guard of the United States and the Air Guard of the United States.
(2)
The extent to which States have digitized the records of National Guard members.
(3)
The extent to which States and Federal agencies have the capability to share digitized records of National Guard members.
(4)
The measures required to correct deficiencies, if any, noted by the Secretary of Defense in the capability of Federal agencies to effectively manage the records of National Guard members.
(5)
The authorities, responsibilities, processes, and procedures for the maintenance and disposition of the records of National Guard members who—
(A)
are discharged or separated from the National Guard;
(B)
are transferred to the Retired Reserve; or
(C)
but for age, would be eligible for retired or retainer pay.

Subtitle C General Service Authorities

SEC. 521. Enhancement of Participation of Mental Health Professionals in Boards for Correction of Military Records and Boards for Review of Discharge or Dismissal of Members of the Armed Forces.

(a)
Boards for Correction of Military Records.— Section 1552 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
by redesignating subsection (g) as subsection (h); and
(2)
by inserting after subsection (f) the following new subsection (g):

“(g) Any medical advisory opinion issued to a board established under subsection (a)(1) with respect to a member or former member of the armed forces who was diagnosed while serving in the armed forces as experiencing a mental health disorder shall include the opinion of a clinical psychologist or psychiatrist if the request for correction of records concerned relates to a mental health disorder.”

(b)
Boards for Review of Discharge or Dismissal.—
(1)
Review for certain former members with ptsd or tbi.— Subsection (d)(1) of section 1553 of such title is amended by striking “ physician, clinical psychologist, or psychiatrist” the second place it appears and inserting “ clinical psychologist or psychiatrist, or a physician with training on mental health issues connected with post traumatic stress disorder or traumatic brain injury (as applicable)”.
(2)
Review for certain former members with mental health diagnoses.— Such section is further amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

“(e) In the case of a former member of the armed forces (other than a former member covered by subsection (d)) who was diagnosed while serving in the armed forces as experiencing a mental health disorder, a board established under this section to review the former member’s discharge or dismissal shall include a member who is a clinical psychologist or psychiatrist, or a physician with special training on mental health disorders.”

SEC. 522. Extension of Authority to Conduct Programs on Career Flexibility to Enhance Retention of Members of the Armed Forces.

(a)
Extension of Program Authority.— Subsection (m) of section 533 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 10 U.S.C. prec. 701 note) is amended—
(1)
by inserting “ (1)” before “ No member”;
(2)
by striking “ December 31, 2015” and inserting “ December 31, 2019”; and
(3)
by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

“(2) A member may not be reactivated to active duty in the Armed Forces under a pilot program conducted under this section after December 31, 2022.”

(b)
Reporting Requirements.— Subsection (k) of such section is amended—
(1)
in paragraph (1), by striking “ and 2017” and inserting “ 2017, and 2019”;
(2)
in paragraph (2), by striking “ March 1, 2019” and inserting “ March 1, 2023”; and
(3)
by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

“(4) Additional elements for final report.—In addition to the elements required by paragraph (3), the final report under this subsection shall include the following:

“(A) A description of the costs to each military department of each pilot program conducted under this section.

“(B) A description of the reasons why members choose to participate in the pilot programs.

“(C) A description of the members who did not return to active duty at the conclusion of their inactivation from active duty under the pilot programs, and a statement of the reasons why the members did not return to active duty.

“(D) A statement whether members were required to perform inactive duty training as part of their participation in the pilot programs, and if so, a description of the members who were required to perform such inactive duty training, a statement of the reasons why the members were required to perform such inactive duty training, and a description of how often the members were required to perform such inactive duty training.”

SEC. 523. Provision of Information to Members of the Armed Forces on Privacy Rights Relating to Receipt of Mental Health Services.

(a)
Provision of Information Required.— The Secretaries of the military departments shall ensure that the information described in subsection (b) is provided—
(1)
to each officer candidate during initial training;
(2)
to each recruit during basic training; and
(3)
to other members of the Armed Forces at such times as the Secretary of Defense considers appropriate.
(b)
Required Information.— The information required to be provided under subsection (a) shall include information on the applicability of the Department of Defense Instruction on Privacy of Individually Identifiable Health Information in DoD Health Care Programs and other regulations regarding privacy prescribed pursuant to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (Public Law 104–191) to records regarding a member of the Armed Forces seeking and receiving mental health services.

SEC. 524. Removal of Artificial Barriers to the Service of Women in the Armed Forces.

(a)
Role of Secretary of Defense in Development of Gender-neutral Occupational Standards.— The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that the gender-neutral occupational standards being developed by the Secretaries of the military departments pursuant to section 543 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1994 (Public Law 103–160; 10 U.S.C. 113 note), as amended by section 523 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 756)—
(1)
accurately predict performance of actual, regular, and recurring duties of a military occupation; and
(2)
are applied equitably to measure individual capabilities.
(b)
Female Personal Protection Gear.— The Secretary of Defense shall direct each Secretary of a military department to take immediate steps to ensure that combat equipment distributed to female members of the Armed Forces—
(1)
is properly designed and fitted; and
(2)
meets required standards for wear and survivability.
(c)
Review of Outreach and Recruitment Efforts Focused on Officers.—
(1)
Review required.— The Comptroller General of the United States shall conduct a review of Services’ Outreach and Recruitment Efforts gauged toward women representation in the officer corps.
(2)
Elements of review.— In conducting the review under this subsection, the Comptroller General shall—
(A)
identify and evaluate current initiatives the Armed Forces are using to increase accession of women into the officer corps;
(B)
identify new recruiting efforts to increase accessions of women into the officer corps specifically at the military service academies, Officer Candidate Schools, Officer Training Schools, the Academy of Military Science, and Reserve Officer Training Corps; and
(C)
identify efforts, resources, and funding required to increase military service academy accessions by women.
(3)
Submission of results.— Not later than October 1, 2015, the Comptroller General shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report containing the results of the review under this subsection.

Subtitle D Military Justice, Including Sexual Assault and Domestic Violence Prevention and Response

SEC. 531. Technical Revisions and Clarifications of Certain Provisions in the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 Relating to the Military Justice System.

(a)
Revisions of Article 32 and Article 60, Uniform Code of Military Justice.—
(1)
Explicit authority for convening authority to take action on findings of a court-martial with respect to a qualifying offense.— Paragraph (3) of subsection (c) of section 860 of title 10, United States Code (article 60 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), as amended by section 1702(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act of 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 955), is amended—
(A)
in subparagraph (A), by inserting “ and may be taken only with respect to a qualifying offense” after “ is not required”;
(B)
in subparagraph (B)(i)—
(i)
by striking “ , other than a charge or specification for a qualifying offense,”; and
(ii)
by inserting “ , but may take such action with respect to a qualifying offense” after “ thereto”; and
(C)
in subparagraph (B)(ii)—
(i)
by striking “ , other than a charge or specification for a qualifying offense,”; and
(ii)
by inserting “ , but may take such action with respect to a qualifying offense” before the period.
(2)
Clarification of applicability of requirement for explanation in writing for modification to findings of a court-martial.— Paragraph (3)(C) of subsection (c) of section 860 of title 10, United States Code (article 60 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), as amended by section 1702(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act of 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 955), is amended by striking “ (other than a qualifying offense)”.
(3)
Victim submission of matters for consideration by convening authority during clemency phase of courts-martial process.— Subsection (d) of section 860 of title 10, United States Code (article 60 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), as added by section 1706(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act of Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 960), is amended—
(A)
in paragraph (2)(A)—
(i)
in clause (i), by inserting “ , if applicable” after “ (article 54(e))”; and
(ii)
in clause (ii), by striking “ if applicable,”; and
(B)
in paragraph (5), by striking “ loss” and inserting “ harm”.
(4)
Restoration of waiver of article 32 hearings by the accused.—
(A)
In general.— Section 832(a)(1) of title 10, United States Code (article 32(a)(1) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), as amended by section 1702(a)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 954), is amended by inserting “ , unless such hearing is waived by the accused” after “ preliminary hearing”.
(B)
Conforming amendment.— Section 834(a)(2) of such title (article 34(a)(2) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), as amended by section 1702(c)(3)(B) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 957), is amended by inserting “ (if there is such a report)” after “ a preliminary hearing under section 832 of this title (article 32)”.
(5)
Non-applicability of prohibition on pre-trial agreements for certain offenses with mandatory minimum sentences.— Section 860(c)(4)(C)(ii) of title 10, United States Code (article 60(c)(4)(C)(ii) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), as amended by section 1702(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 955), is amended by inserting “ pursuant to section 856(b) of this title (article 56(b))” after “ applies”.
(b)
Defense Counsel Interview of Victim of an Alleged Sex-Related Offense.—
(1)
Requests to interview victim through counsel.— Subsection (b)(1) of section 846 of title 10, United States Code (article 46(b) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), as amended by section 1704 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 958), is amended by striking “ through trial counsel” and inserting “ through the Special Victims’ Counsel or other counsel for the victim, if applicable”.
(2)
Correction of references to trial counsel.— Such section is further amended by striking “ trial counsel” each place it appears and inserting “ counsel for the Government”.
(3)
Correction of references to defense counsel.— Such section is further amended—
(A)
in the heading, by striking “ Defense Counsel” and inserting “ Counsel for Accused”; and
(B)
by striking “ defense counsel” each place it appears and inserting “ counsel for the accused”.
(c)
Special Victims’ Counsel for Victims of Sex-Related Offenses.— Section 1044e of title 10, United States Code, as added by section 1716(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 966), is amended—
(1)
in subsection (b)(4), by striking “ the Department of Defense” and inserting “ the United States”;
(2)
in subsection (d)(2), by inserting “ , and within the Marine Corps, by the Staff Judge Advocate to the Commandant of the Marine Corps” after “ employed”; and
(3)
in subsection (e)(1), by inserting “ concerned” after “ jurisdiction of the Secretary”.
(d)
Repeal of Offense of Consensual Sodomy Under the Uniform Code of Military Justice.—
(1)
Clarification of definition of forcible sodomy.— Section 925(a) of title 10, United States Code (article 125(a) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), as amended by section 1707 of the National Defense Authorization Act of Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 961), is amended by striking “ force” and inserting “ unlawful force”.
(2)
Conforming amendments.—
(A)
Article 43.— Section 843(b)(2)(B) of such title (article 43(b)(2)(B) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice) is amended—
(i)
in clause (iii), by striking “ Sodomy” and inserting “ Forcible sodomy”; and
(ii)
in clause (v), by striking “ sodomy” and inserting “ forcible sodomy”.
(B)
Article 118.— Section 918(4) of such title (article 118(4) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice) is amended by striking “ sodomy” and inserting “ forcible sodomy”.
(e)
Clarification of Scope of Prospective Members of the Armed Forces for Purposes of Inappropriate and Prohibited Relationships.— Section 1741(e)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 977; 10 U.S.C. prec. 501 note) is amended by inserting “ who is pursuing or has recently pursued becoming a member of the Armed Forces and” after “ a person”.
(f)
Extension of Crime Victims’ Rights to Victims of Offenses Under the Uniform Code of Military Justice.—
(1)
Clarification of limitation on definition of victim to natural persons.— Subsection (b) of section 806b of title 10, United States Code (article 6b of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), as added by section 1701 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 952), is amended by striking “ a person” and inserting “ an individual”.
(2)
Clarification of authority to appoint individuals to assume rights of certain victims.— Subsection (c) of such section is amended—
(A)
in the heading, by striking “ Legal Guardian” and inserting “ Appointment of Individuals to Assume Rights”;
(B)
by inserting “ (but who is not a member of the armed forces)” after “ under 18 years of age”;
(C)
by striking “ designate a legal guardian from among the representatives” and inserting “ designate a representative”;
(D)
by striking “ other suitable person” and inserting “ another suitable individual”; and
(E)
by striking “ the person” and inserting “ the individual”.
(g)
Revision to Effective Dates to Facilitate Transition to Revised Rules for Preliminary Hearing Requirements and Convening Authority Action Post-Conviction.—
(1)
Effective date for amendments related to article 32.— Effective as of December 26, 2013, and as if included therein as enacted, section 1702(d)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 958; 10 U.S.C. 802 note, 832 note) is amended by striking “ one year after” and all that follows through the end of the sentence and inserting “ on the later of December 26, 2014, or the date of the enactment of the Carl Levin and Howard P. ‘Buck’ McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 and shall apply with respect to preliminary hearings conducted on or after that effective date.”.
(2)
Transition rule for amendments related to article 60.—
(A)
Transition rule.— Section 1702(d)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 958; 10 U.S.C. 860 note) is amended—
(i)
by striking “ The amendments” and inserting “ (A) Except as provided in subparagraph (B), the amendments”; and
(ii)
by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:

“(B) With respect to the findings and sentence of a court-martial that includes both a conviction for an offense committed before the effective date specified in subparagraph (A) and a conviction for an offense committed on or after that effective date, the convening authority shall have the same authority to take action on such findings and sentence as was in effect on the day before such effective date, except with respect to a mandatory minimum sentence under section 856(b) of title 10, United States Code (article 56(b) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice).”

(B)
Application of amendments.— The amendments made by subparagraph (A) shall not apply to the findings and sentence of a court-martial with respect to which the convening authority has taken action before the date that is 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act.

SEC. 532. Ordering of Depositions under the Uniform Code of Military Justice.

Subsection (a) of section 849 of title 10, United States Code (article 49 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended to read as follows:

“(a)

(1) At any time after charges have been signed as provided in section 830 of this title (article 30), oral or written depositions may be ordered as follows:

“(A) Before referral of such charges for trial, by the convening authority who has such charges for disposition.

“(B) After referral of such charges for trial, by the convening authority or the military judge hearing the case.

“(2) An authority authorized to order a deposition under paragraph (1) may order the deposition at the request of any party, but only if the party demonstrates that, due to exceptional circumstances, it is in the interest of justice that the testimony of the prospective witness be taken and preserved for use at a preliminary hearing under section 832 of this title (article 32) or a court-martial.

“(3) If a deposition is to be taken before charges are referred for trial, the authority under paragraph (1)(A) may designate commissioned officers as counsel for the Government and counsel for the accused, and may authorize those officers to take the deposition of any witness.”

SEC. 533. Access to Special Victims’ Counsel.

(a)
In General.— Subsection (a) of section 1044e of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:

“(a) Designation; Purposes.—

(1) The Secretary concerned shall designate legal counsel (to be known as ‘Special Victims’ Counsel’) for the purpose of providing legal assistance to an individual described in paragraph (2) who is the victim of an alleged sex-related offense, regardless of whether the report of that offense is restricted or unrestricted.

“(2) An individual described in this paragraph is any of the following:

“(A) An individual eligible for military legal assistance under section 1044 of this title.

“(B) An individual who is—

“(i) not covered under subparagraph (A);

“(ii) a member of a reserve component of the armed forces; and

“(iii) a victim of an alleged sex-related offense as described in paragraph (1)—

“(I) during a period in which the individual served on active duty, full-time National Guard duty, or inactive-duty training; or

“(II) during any period, regardless of the duty status of the individual, if the circumstances of the alleged sex-related offense have a nexus to the military service of the victim, as determined under regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Defense.”

(b)
Conforming Amendments.— Subsection (f) of such section is amended by striking “ eligible for military legal assistance under section 1044 of this title” each place it appears and inserting “ described in subsection (a)(2)”.

SEC. 534. Enhancement of Victims’ Rights in Connection with Prosecution of Certain Sex-Related Offenses.

(a)
Representation by Special Victims’ Counsel.— Section 1044e(b)(6) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “ Accompanying the victim” and inserting “ Representing the victim”.
(b)
Consultation Regarding Victim’s Preference in Prosecution Venue.—
(1)
Consultation process required.— The Secretary of Defense shall establish a process to ensure consultation with the victim of an alleged sex-related offense that occurs in the United States to solicit the victim’s preference regarding whether the offense should be prosecuted by court-martial or in a civilian court with jurisdiction over the offense.
(2)
Convening authority consideration of preference.— The preference expressed by the victim of an alleged sex-related offense under paragraph (1) regarding the prosecution of the offense, while not binding, should be considered by the convening authority in making the determination regarding whether to refer the charge or specification for the offense to a court-martial for trial.
(3)
Notice to appropriate jurisdiction of victim’s preference for civilian prosecution.— If the victim of an alleged sex-related offense expresses a preference under paragraph (1) for prosecution of the offense in a civilian court, the convening authority described in paragraph (2) shall ensure that the civilian authority with jurisdiction over the offense is notified of the victim’s preference for civilian prosecution.
(4)
Notice to victim of status of civilian prosecution when victim expresses preference for civilian prosecution.— Following notification of the civilian authority with jurisdiction over an alleged sex-related offense of the preference of the victim of the offense for prosecution of the offense in a civilian court, the convening authority shall be responsible for notifying the victim if the convening authority learns of any decision by the civilian authority to prosecute or not prosecute the offence in a civilian court.
(c)
Modification of Manual for Courts-Martial.— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, Part III of the Manual for Courts-Martial shall be modified to provide that when a victim of an alleged sex-related offense has a right to be heard in connection with the prosecution of the alleged sex-related such offense, the victim may exercise that right through counsel, including through a Special Victims’ Counsel under section 1044e of title 10, United States Code (as amended by subsection (a)).
(d)
Notice to Counsel on Scheduling of Proceedings.— The Secretary concerned shall establish policies and procedures designed to ensure that any counsel of the victim of an alleged sex-related offense, including a Special Victims’ Counsel under section 1044e of title 10, United States Code (as amended by subsection (a)), is provided prompt and adequate notice of the scheduling of any hearing, trial, or other proceeding in connection with the prosecution of such offense in order to permit such counsel the opportunity to prepare for such proceeding.
(e)
Definitions.— In this section:
(1)
The term “alleged sex-related offense” has the meaning given that term in section 1044e(g) of title 10, United States Code.
(2)
The term “Secretary concerned” has the meaning given that term in section 101(a)(9) of such title.

SEC. 535. Enforcement of Crime Victims’ Rights Related to Protections Afforded by Certain Military Rules of Evidence.

Section 806b of title 10, United States Code (article 6b of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

“(e) Enforcement by Court of Criminal Appeals.—

(1) If the victim of an offense under this chapter believes that a court-martial ruling violates the victim’s rights afforded by a Military Rule of Evidence specified in paragraph (2), the victim may petition the Court of Criminal Appeals for a writ of mandamus to require the court-martial to comply with the Military Rule of Evidence.

“(2) Paragraph (1) applies with respect to the protections afforded by the following:

“(A) Military Rule of Evidence 513, relating to the psychotherapist-patient privilege.

“(B) Military Rule of Evidence 412, relating to the admission of evidence regarding a victim’s sexual background.”

SEC. 536. Modification of Military Rules of Evidence Relating to Admissibility of General Military Character Toward Probability of Innocence.

(a)
Modification Required.— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, Rule 404(a) of the Military Rules of Evidence shall be amended to provide that the general military character of an accused is not admissible for the purpose of showing the probability of innocence of the accused for an offense specified in subsection (b).
(b)
Covered Offenses.— Subsection (a) applies to the following offenses under chapter 47 of title 10, United States Code (the Uniform Code of Military Justice):
(1)
An offense under sections 920 through 923a of such title (articles 120 through 123a).
(2)
An offense under sections 925 through 927 of such title (articles 125 through 127).
(3)
An offense under sections 929 through 932 of such title (articles 129 through 132).
(4)
Any other offense under such chapter (the Uniform Code of Military Justice) in which evidence of the general military character of the accused is not relevant to an element of an offense for which the accused has been charged.
(5)
An attempt to commit an offense or a conspiracy to commit an offense specified in a preceding paragraph as punishable under section 880 or 881 of such title (article 80 or 81).

SEC. 537. Modification of Rule 513 of the Military Rules of Evidence, Relating to the Privilege Against Disclosure of Communications Between Psychotherapists and Patients.

Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, Rule 513 of the Military Rules of Evidence shall be modified as follows:
(1)
To include communications with other licensed mental health professionals within the communications covered by the privilege.
(2)
To strike the current exception to the privilege contained in subparagraph (d)(8) of Rule 513.
(3)
To require a party seeking production or admission of records or communications protected by the privilege—
(A)
to show a specific factual basis demonstrating a reasonable likelihood that the records or communications would yield evidence admissible under an exception to the privilege;
(B)
to demonstrate by a preponderance of the evidence that the requested information meets one of the enumerated exceptions to the privilege;
(C)
to show that the information sought is not merely cumulative of other information available; and
(D)
to show that the party made reasonable efforts to obtain the same or substantially similar information through non-privileged sources.
(4)
To authorize the military judge to conduct a review in camera of records or communications only when—
(A)
the moving party has met its burden as established pursuant to paragraph (3); and
(B)
an examination of the information is necessary to rule on the production or admissibility of protected records or communications.
(5)
To require that any production or disclosure permitted by the military judge be narrowly tailored to only the specific records or communications, or portions of such records or communications, that meet the requirements for one of the enumerated exceptions to the privilege and are included in the stated purpose for which the such records or communications are sought.

SEC. 538. Modification of Department of Defense Policy on Retention of Evidence in a Sexual Assault Case to Permit Return of Personal Property Upon Completion of Related Proceedings.

Section 586 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1434; 10 U.S.C. 1561 note) is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

“(f) Return of Personal Property Upon Completion of Related Proceedings.—Notwithstanding subsection (c)(4)(A), personal property retained as evidence in connection with an incident of sexual assault involving a member of the Armed Forces may be returned to the rightful owner of such property after the conclusion of all legal, adverse action, and administrative proceedings related to such incident.”

SEC. 539. Requirements Relating to Sexual Assault Forensic Examiners for the Armed Forces.

(a)
Personnel Eligible for Assignment.—
(1)
Specified personnel.— Except as provided in paragraph (2), an individual who may be assigned to duty as a Sexual Assault Forensic Examiner (SAFE) for the Armed Forces is limited to members of the Armed Forces and civilian employees of the Department of Defense who are also one of the following:
(A)
A physician.
(B)
A nurse practitioner.
(C)
A nurse midwife.
(D)
A physician assistant.
(E)
A registered nurse.
(2)
Independent duty corpsmen.— An independent duty corpsman or equivalent may be assigned to duty as a Sexual Assault Forensic Examiner for the Armed Forces if the assignment of an individual specified in paragraph (1) is impracticable.
(b)
Training and Certification.—
(1)
In general.— The Secretary of Defense shall establish and maintain, and update when appropriate, a training and certification program for Sexual Assault Forensic Examiners. The training and certification programs shall apply uniformly to all Sexual Assault Forensic Examiners under the jurisdiction of the Secretaries of the military departments.
(2)
Elements.— Each training and certification program under this subsection shall include training in sexual assault forensic examinations by qualified personnel who possess—
(A)
a Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner—Adult/Adolescent (SANE–A) certification or equivalent certification; or
(B)
training and clinical or forensic experience in sexual assault forensic examinations similar to that required for a certification described in subparagraph (A).
(3)
Nature of training.— The training provided under each training and certification program under this subsection shall incorporate and reflect current best practices and standards on sexual assault forensic examinations.
(4)
Applicability of training requirements.— Effective beginning one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, an individual may not be assigned to duty as a Sexual Assault Forensic Examiner for the Armed Forces unless the individual has completed, by the date of such assignment, all training required under the training and certification program under this subsection.
(c)
Report on Training and Qualifications of Sexual Assault Forensic Examiners.—
(1)
Report required.— The Secretary of Defense shall prepare a report on the adequacy of the training and qualifications of each member of the Armed Forces and civilian employee of the Department of Defense who is assigned responsibilities of a Sexual Assault Forensic Examiner.
(2)
Report elements.— The report shall include the following:
(A)
An assessment of the adequacy of the training and certifications required for the members and employees described in paragraph (1).
(B)
Such improvements as the Secretary of Defense considers appropriate in the process used to select and assign members and employees to positions that include responsibility for sexual assault forensic examinations.
(C)
Such improvements as the Secretary considers appropriate for training and certifying member and employees that perform sexual assault forensic examinations.
(3)
Submission.— Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit the report to the Committees on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the Senate.
(d)
Conforming and Clerical Amendments.—
(1)
Conforming amendments.— Subsection (b) of section 1725 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 971) is amended—
(A)
in the subsection heading, by striking “ Nurse Examiners” and inserting “ Forensic Examiners”;
(B)
in paragraphs (1) and (2), by striking “ sexual assault nurse examiner” each place it appears and inserting “ Sexual Assault Forensic Examiner”;
(C)
in paragraph (1), by striking “ sexual assault nurse examiners” and inserting “ Sexual Assault Forensic Examiners”; and
(D)
by striking paragraph (3).
(2)
Clerical amendment.— The heading of such section is amended by striking “ nurse examiners” and inserting “ forensic examiners”.

SEC. 540. Modification of Term of Judges of the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces.

(a)
Modification of Terms.— Section 942(b)(2) of title 10, United States Code (article 142(b)(2) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended—
(1)
in subparagraph (A)—
(A)
by striking “ March 31” and inserting “ January 31”;
(B)
by striking “ October 1” and inserting “ July 31”; and
(C)
by striking “ September 30” and inserting “ July 31”; and
(2)
in subparagraph (B)—
(A)
by striking “ September 30” each place it appears and inserting “ July 31”; and
(B)
by striking “ April 1” and inserting “ February 1”.
(b)
Saving Provision.— No person who is serving as a judge of the court on the date of the enactment of this Act, and no survivor of any such person, shall be deprived of any annuity provided by section 945 of title 10, United States Code, by the operation of the amendments made by subsection (a).

SEC. 541. Review of Decisions Not to Refer Charges of Certain Sex-Related Offenses for Trial by Court-Martial If Requested by Chief Prosecutor.

Section 1744(c) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 981; 10 U.S.C. 834 note) is amended—
(1)
by striking “ (c)” and all that follows through “ In any case where” and inserting the following:

“(c) Review of Certain Cases Not Referred to Court-martial.—

“(1) Cases not referred following staff judge advocate recommendation for referral for trial.—In any case where”

; and

(2)
by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

“(2) Cases not referred by convening authority upon request for review by chief prosecutor.—

“(A) In general.—In any case where a convening authority decides not to refer a charge of a sex-related offense to trial by court-martial, the Secretary of the military department concerned shall review the decision as a superior authority authorized to exercise general court-martial convening authority if the chief prosecutor of the Armed Force concerned, in response to a request by the detailed counsel for the Government, requests review of the decision by the Secretary.

“(B) Chief prosecutor defined.—In this paragraph, the term ‘chief prosecutor’ means the chief prosecutor or equivalent position of an Armed Force, or, if an Armed Force does not have a chief prosecutor or equivalent position, such other trial counsel as shall be designated by the Judge Advocate General of that Armed Force, or in the case of the Marine Corps, the Staff Judge Advocate to the Commandant of the Marine Corps.”

SEC. 542. Analysis and Assessment of Disposition of Most Serious Offenses Identified in Unrestricted Reports on Sexual Assaults in Annual Reports on Sexual Assaults in the Armed Forces.

(a)
Submittal to Secretary of Defense of Information on Each Armed Force.— Subsection (b) of section 1631 of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (10 U.S.C. 1561 note) is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

“(11) An analysis of the disposition of the most serious offenses occurring during sexual assaults committed by members of the Armed Force during the year covered by the report, as identified in unrestricted reports of sexual assault by any members of the Armed Forces, including the numbers of reports identifying offenses that were disposed of by each of the following:

“(A) Conviction by court-martial, including a separate statement of the most serious charge preferred and the most serious charge for which convicted.

“(B) Acquittal of all charges at court-martial.

“(C) Non-judicial punishment under section 815 of title 10, United States Code (article 15 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice).

“(D) Administrative action, including by each type of administrative action imposed.

“(E) Dismissal of all charges, including by reason for dismissal and by stage of proceedings in which dismissal occurred.”

(b)
Secretary of Defense Assessment of Information in Reports to Congress.— Subsection (d) of such section is amended—
(1)
in paragraph (1), by striking “ and” at the end;
(2)
by redesignating paragraph (2) as paragraph (3);
(3)
by inserting after paragraph (1) the following new paragraph (2):

“(2) an assessment of the information submitted to the Secretary pursuant to subsection (b)(11); and”

; and

(4)
in paragraph (3), as redesignated by paragraph (2) of this subsection, by inserting “ other” before “ assessments”.
(c)
Application of Amendments.— The amendments made by this section shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act and apply beginning with the report regarding sexual assaults involving members of the Armed Forces required to be submitted by March 1, 2015, under section 1631 of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011.

SEC. 543. Plan for Limited Use of Certain Information on Sexual Assaults in Restricted Reports by Military Criminal Investigative Organizations.

(a)
Plan Required.— Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a plan that will allow an individual who files a restricted report on an incident of sexual assault to elect to permit a military criminal investigative organization, on a confidential basis and without affecting the restricted nature of the report, to access certain information in the report, including identifying information of the alleged perpetrator if available, for the purpose of identifying individuals who are suspected of perpetrating multiple sexual assaults.
(b)
Plan Elements.— The plan required by subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1)
An explanation of how the military criminal investigative organization would use, maintain, and protect information in the restricted report.
(2)
An explanation of how the identity of an individual who elects to provide access to such information will be protected.
(3)
A timeline for implementation of the plan during the one-year period beginning on the date of the submission of the plan to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives.

SEC. 544. Improved Department of Defense Information Reporting and Collection of Domestic Violence Incidents Involving Members of the Armed Forces.

(a)
Data Reporting and Collection Improvements.— Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall develop a comprehensive management plan to address deficiencies in the reporting of information on incidents of domestic violence involving members of the Armed Forces for inclusion in the Department of Defense database on domestic violence incidents required by section 1562 of title 10, United States Code, to ensure that the database provides an accurate count of domestic violence incidents and any consequent disciplinary action.
(b)
Conforming Amendment.— Section 543(a) of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 10 U.S.C. 1562 note) is amended—
(1)
by striking paragraph (1); and
(2)
by redesignating paragraphs (2) through (4) as paragraphs (1) through (3), respectively.

SEC. 545. Additional Duties for Judicial Proceedings Panel.

(a)
Additional Duties Imposed.— The independent panel established by the Secretary of Defense under section 576(a)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1758), known as the “judicial proceedings panel”, shall perform the following additional duties:
(1)
Conduct a review and assessment regarding the impact of the use of any mental health records of the victim of an offense under chapter 47 of title 10, United States Code (the Uniform Code of Military Justice), by the accused during the preliminary hearing conducted under section 832 of such title (article 32 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), and during court-martial proceedings, as compared to the use of similar records in civilian criminal legal proceedings.
(2)
Conduct a review and assessment regarding the establishment of a privilege under the Military Rules of Evidence against the disclosure of communications between—
(A)
users of and personnel staffing the Department of Defense Safe Helpline; and
(B)
users of and personnel staffing of the Department of Defense Safe HelpRoom.
(b)
Submission of Results.— The judicial proceedings panel shall include the results of the reviews and assessments conducted under subsection (a) in one of the reports required by section 576(c)(2)(B) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1760).

SEC. 546. Defense Advisory Committee on Investigation, Prosecution, and Defense of Sexual Assault in the Armed Forces.

(a)
Establishment Required.—
(1)
In general.— The Secretary of Defense shall establish and maintain within the Department of Defense an advisory committee to be known as the “Defense Advisory Committee on Investigation, Prosecution, and Defense of Sexual Assault in the Armed Forces” (in this section referred to as the “Advisory Committee”).
(2)
Deadline for establishment.— The Secretary shall establish the Advisory Committee not later than 30 days before the termination date of the independent panel established by the Secretary under section 576(a)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1758), known as the “judicial proceedings panel”.
(b)
Membership.— The Advisory Committee shall consist of not more than 20 members, to be appointed by the Secretary of Defense, who have experience with the investigation, prosecution, and defense of allegations of sexual assault offenses. Members of the Advisory Committee may include Federal and State prosecutors, judges, law professors, and private attorneys. Members of the Armed Forces serving on active duty may not serve as a member of the Advisory Committee.
(c)
Duties.—
(1)
In general.— The Advisory Committee shall advise the Secretary of Defense on the investigation, prosecution, and defense of allegations of rape, forcible sodomy, sexual assault, and other sexual misconduct involving members of the Armed Forces.
(2)
Basis for provision of advice.— For purposes of providing advice to the Secretary pursuant to this subsection, the Advisory Committee shall review, on an ongoing basis, cases involving allegations of sexual misconduct described in paragraph (1).
(d)
Annual Reports.— Not later than March 30 each year, the Advisory Committee shall submit to the Secretary of Defense and the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report describing the results of the activities of the Advisory Committee pursuant to this section during the preceding year.
(e)
Termination.—
(1)
In general.— Except as provided in paragraph (2), the Advisory Committee shall terminate on the date that is five years after the date of the establishment of the Advisory Committee pursuant to subsection (a).
(2)
Continuation.— The Secretary of Defense may continue the Advisory Committee after the termination date applicable under paragraph (1) if the Secretary determines that continuation of the Advisory Committee after that date is advisable and appropriate. If the Secretary determines to continue the Advisory Committee after that date, the Secretary shall submit to the President and the congressional committees specified in subsection (d) a report describing the reasons for that determination and specifying the new termination date for the Advisory Committee.
(f)
Due Date for Annual Report of Judicial Proceedings Panel.— Section 576(c)(2)(B) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1760) is amended by inserting “ annually thereafter” after “ reports”.

SEC. 547. Confidential Review of Characterization of Terms of Discharge of Members of the Armed Forces Who Are Victims of Sexual Offenses.

(a)
Confidential Review Process Through Boards for Correction of Military Records.— The Secretaries of the military departments shall each establish a confidential process, utilizing boards for the correction of military records of the military department concerned, by which an individual who was the victim of a sex-related offense during service in the Armed Forces may challenge the terms or characterization of the discharge or separation of the individual from the Armed Forces on the grounds that the terms or characterization were adversely affected by the individual being the victim of such an offense.
(b)
Consideration of Individual Experiences in Connection With Offenses.— In deciding whether to modify the terms or characterization of the discharge or separation from the Armed Forces of an individual described in subsection (a), the Secretary of the military department concerned shall instruct boards for the correction of military records—
(1)
to give due consideration to the psychological and physical aspects of the individual’s experience in connection with the sex-related offense; and
(2)
to determine what bearing such experience may have had on the circumstances surrounding the individual’s discharge or separation from the Armed Forces.
(c)
Preservation of Confidentiality.— Documents considered and decisions rendered pursuant to the process required by subsection (a) shall not be made available to the public, except with the consent of the individual concerned.
(d)
Sex-related Offense Defined.— In this section, the term “sex-related offense” means any of the following:
(1)
Rape or sexual assault under subsection (a) or (b) of section 920 of title 10, United States Code (article 120 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice).
(2)
Forcible sodomy under section 925 of such title (article 125 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice).
(3)
An attempt to commit an offense specified in paragraph (1) or (2) as punishable under section 880 of such title (article 80 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice).

Subtitle E Member Education, Training, and Transition

SEC. 551. Enhancement of Authority to Assist Members of the Armed Forces to Obtain Professional Credentials.

(a)
In General.— Section 2015 of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:

“§ 2015. Program to assist members in obtaining professional credentials

“(a) Program Required.—The Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Homeland Security, with respect to the Coast Guard when it is not operating as a service in the Navy, shall carry out a program to enable members of the armed forces to obtain, while serving in the armed forces, professional credentials related to military training and skills that—

“(1) are acquired during service in the armed forces incident to the performance of their military duties; and

“(2) translate into civilian occupations.

“(b) Payment of Expenses.—

(1) Under the program required by this section, the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Homeland Security, with respect to the Coast Guard when it is not operating as a service in the Navy, shall provide for the payment of expenses of members for professional accreditation, Federal occupational licenses, State-imposed and professional licenses, professional certification, and related expenses.

“(2) The authority under paragraph (1) may not be used to pay the expenses of a member to obtain professional credentials that are a prerequisite for appointment in the armed forces.

“(c) Regulations.—

(1) The Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Homeland Security shall prescribe regulations to carry out this section.

“(2) The regulations shall apply uniformly to the armed forces to the extent practicable.

“(3) The regulations shall include the following:

“(A) Requirements for eligibility for participation in the program under this section.

“(B) A description of the professional credentials and occupations covered by the program.

“(C) Mechanisms for oversight of the payment of expenses and the provision of other benefits under the program.

“(D) Such other matters in connection with the payment of expenses and the provision of other benefits under the program as the Secretaries consider appropriate.

“(d) Expenses Defined.—In this section, the term ‘expenses’ means expenses for class room instruction, hands-on training (and associated materials), manuals, study guides and materials, text books, processing fees, and test fees and related fees.”

(b)
Clerical Amendment.— The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 101 of such title is amended by striking the item relating to section 2015 and inserting the following new item:

“2015. Program to assist members in obtaining professional credentials.”.

SEC. 552. Applicability of Sexual Assault Prevention and Response and Related Military Justice Enhancements to Military Service Academies.

(a)
Military Service Academies.— The Secretary of the military department concerned shall ensure that the provisions of title XVII of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 950), including amendments made by that title, and the provisions of subtitle D, including amendments made by such subtitle, apply to the United States Military Academy, the Naval Academy, and the Air Force Academy, as applicable.
(b)
Coast Guard Academy.— The Secretary of the Department in which the Coast Guard is operating shall ensure that the provisions of title XVII of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 950), including amendments made by that title, and the provisions of subtitle D, including amendments made by such subtitle, apply to the Coast Guard Academy.

SEC. 553. Authorized Duration of Foreign and Cultural Exchange Activities at Military Service Academies.

(a)
United States Military Academy.— Section 4345a(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “ two weeks” and inserting “ four weeks”.
(b)
Naval Academy.— Section 6957b(a) of such title is amended by striking “ two weeks” and inserting “ four weeks”.
(c)
Air Force Academy.— Section 9345a(a) of such title is amended by striking “ two weeks” and inserting “ four weeks”.

SEC. 554. Enhancement of Authority to Accept Support for Air Force Academy Athletic Programs.

Section 9362 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking subsections (e), (f), and (g) and inserting the following new subsections:

“(e) Acceptance of Support.—

“(1) Support received from the corporation.—Notwithstanding section 1342 of title 31, the Secretary of the Air Force may accept from the corporation funds, supplies, equipment, and services for the support of the athletic programs of the Academy.

“(2) Funds received from other sources.—The Secretary may charge fees for the support of the athletic programs of the Academy. The Secretary may accept and retain fees for services and other benefits provided incident to the operation of its athletic programs, including fees from the National Collegiate Athletic Association, fees from athletic conferences, game guarantees from other educational institutions, fees for ticketing or licensing, and other consideration provided incidental to the execution of the athletic programs of the Academy.

“(3) Limitations.—The Secretary shall ensure that contributions accepted under this subsection do not—

“(A) reflect unfavorably on the ability of the Department of the Air Force, any of its employees, or any member of the armed forces to carry out any responsibility or duty in a fair and objective manner; or

“(B) compromise the integrity or appearance of integrity of any program of the Department of the Air Force, or any individual involved in such a program.

“(f) Leases and Licenses.—

“(1) In general.—The Secretary of the Air Force may, in accordance with section 2667 of this title, enter into leases or licenses with the corporation for the purpose of supporting the athletic programs of the Academy. Consideration provided under such a lease or license may be provided in the form of funds, supplies, equipment, and services for the support of the athletic programs of the Academy.

“(2) Support services.—The Secretary may provide support services to the corporation without charge while the corporation conducts its support activities at the Academy. In this paragraph, the term ‘support services’ includes utilities, office furnishings and equipment, communications services, records staging and archiving, audio and video support, and security systems in conjunction with the leasing or licensing of property. Any such support services may only be provided without any liability of the United States to the corporation.

“(g) Contracts and Cooperative Agreements.—The Secretary of the Air Force may enter into contracts and cooperative agreements with the corporation for the purpose of supporting the athletic programs of the Academy. Notwithstanding section 2304(k) of this title, the Secretary may enter such contracts or cooperative agreements on a sole source basis pursuant to section 2304(c)(5) of this title. Notwithstanding chapter 63 of title 31, a cooperative agreement under this section may be used to acquire property, services, or travel for the direct benefit or use of the athletic programs of the Academy.

“(h) Trademarks and Service Marks.—

“(1) Licensing, marketing, and sponsorship agreements.—An agreement under subsection (g) may, consistent with section 2260 of this title (other than subsection (d) of such section), authorize the corporation to enter into licensing, marketing, and sponsorship agreements relating to trademarks and service marks identifying the Academy, subject to the approval of the Secretary of the Air Force.

“(2) Limitations.—No licensing, marketing, or sponsorship agreement may be entered into under paragraph (1) if—

“(A) such agreement would reflect unfavorably on the ability of the Department of the Air Force, any of its employees, or any member of the armed forces to carry out any responsibility or duty in a fair and objective manner; or

“(B) the Secretary determines that the use of the trademark or service mark would compromise the integrity or appearance of integrity of any program of the Department of the Air Force, or any individual involved in such a program.

“(i) Retention and Use of Funds.—Any funds received under this section may be retained for use in support of the athletic programs of the Academy and shall remain available until expended.”

SEC. 555. Pilot Program to Assist Members of the Armed Forces in Obtaining Post-Service Employment.

(a)
Program Authorized.— The Secretary of Defense may conduct the program described in subsection (c) to enhance the efforts of the Department of Defense to provide job placement assistance and related employment services to eligible members of the Armed Forces described in subsection (b) for the purposes of—
(1)
assisting such members in obtaining post-service employment; and
(2)
reducing the amount of “Unemployment Compensation for Ex-Servicemembers” that the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of the Department in which the Coast Guard is operating pays into the Unemployment Trust Fund.
(b)
Eligible Members.— Employment services provided under the program are limited to members of the Armed Forces, including members of the reserve components, who are being separated from the Armed Forces or released from active duty.
(c)
Evaluation of Use of Civilian Employment Staffing Agencies.—
(1)
Program described.— The Secretary of Defense may execute a program to evaluate the feasibility and cost-effectiveness of utilizing the services of civilian employment staffing agencies to assist eligible members of the Armed Forces in obtaining post-service employment.
(2)
Program management.— To manage the program authorized by this subsection, the Secretary of Defense may select a civilian organization (in this section referred to as the “program manager”) whose principal members have experience—
(A)
administering pay-for-performance programs; and
(B)
within the employment staffing industry.
(3)
Exclusion.— The program manager may not be a staffing agency.
(d)
Eligible Civilian Employment Staffing Agencies.— In consultation with the program manager if utilized under subsection (c)(2), the Secretary of Defense shall establish the eligibility requirements to be used for the selection of civilian employment staffing agencies to participate in the program. In establishing the eligibility requirements for the selection of the civilian employment staffing agencies, the Secretary of Defense shall also take into account civilian employment staffing agencies that are willing to work and consult with State and county Veterans Affairs offices and State National Guard offices, when appropriate.
(e)
Payment of Staffing Agency Fees.— To encourage employers to employ an eligible member of the Armed Forces under the program if executed under this section, the Secretary of Defense shall pay a participating civilian employment staffing agency a portion of its agency fee (not to exceed 50 percent above the member’s hourly wage). Payment of the agency fee will only be made after the member has been employed and paid by the private sector and the hours worked have been verified by the Secretary. The staffing agency shall be paid on a weekly basis only for hours the member worked, but not to exceed a total of 800 hours.
(f)
Oversight Requirements.— In conducting the program, the Secretary of Defense shall establish—
(1)
program monitoring standards; and
(2)
reporting requirements, including the hourly wage for each eligible member of the Armed Forces obtaining employment under the program, the numbers of hours worked during the month, and the number of members who remained employed with the same employer after completing the first 800 hours of employment.
(g)
Source and Limitation on Program Obligations.— Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary of Defense for operation and maintenance for each fiscal year during which the program under this section is authorized, not more than $35,000,000 may be used to carry out the program.
(h)
Reporting Requirements.—
(1)
Report required.— If the Secretary of Defense executes the program under this section, the Secretary shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report describing the results of the program, particularly whether the program achieved the purposes specified in subsection (a). The report shall be submitted not later than January 15, 2019.
(2)
Comparison with other programs.— The report shall include a comparison of the results of the program conducted under this section and the results of other employment assistant programs utilized by the Department of Defense. The comparison shall include the number of members of the Armed Forces obtaining employment through each program and the cost to the Department per member.
(3)
Appropriate congressional committees defined.— In this section, the term “appropriate congressional committees” means the congressional defense committees, the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives, and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate.
(i)
Duration of Authority.— The authority of the Secretary of Defense to carry out programs under this section expires on September 30, 2018.

SEC. 556. Plan for Education of Members of Armed Forces on Cyber Matters.

(a)
Plan Required.— Not later than 360 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in cooperation with the Secretaries of the military departments, shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a plan for the education of officers and enlisted members of the Armed Forces relating to cyber security and cyber activities of the Department of Defense.
(b)
Elements.— The plan submitted under subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1)
A framework for provision of basic cyber education for all members of the Armed Forces.
(2)
A framework for undergraduate and postgraduate education, joint professional military education, and strategic war gaming for cyber strategic and operational leadership.
(3)
Definitions of required positions, including military occupational specialties and rating specialties for each military department, along with the corresponding level of cyber training, education, qualifications, or certifications required for each specialty.

SEC. 557. Enhancement of Information Provided to Members of the Armed Forces and Veterans Regarding Use of Post-9/11 Educational Assistance and Federal Financial Aid Through Transition Assistance Program.

(a)
Additional Information Required.—
(1)
In general.— Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall enhance the higher education component of the Transition Assistance Program (TAP) of the Department of Defense by providing additional information that is more complete and accurate than the information provided as of the day before the date of the enactment of this Act to individuals who apply for educational assistance under chapter 30 or 33 of title 38, United States Code, to pursue a program of education at an institution of higher learning.
(2)
Elements.— The additional information required by paragraph (1) shall include the following:
(A)
Information provided by the Secretary of Education that is publically available and addresses—
(i)
to the extent practicable, differences between types of institutions of higher learning in such matters as tuition and fees, admission requirements, accreditation, transferability of credits, credit for qualifying military training, time required to complete a degree, and retention and job placement rates; and
(ii)
how Federal educational assistance provided under title IV of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1070 et seq.) may be used in conjunction with educational assistance provided under chapters 30 and 33 of title 38, United States Code.
(B)
Information about the Postsecondary Education Complaint System of the Department of Defense, the Department of Veterans Affairs, the Department of Education, and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
(C)
Information about the GI Bill Comparison Tool of the Department of Veterans Affairs.
(D)
Information about each of the Principles of Excellence established by the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, and the Secretary of Education pursuant to Executive Order 13607 of April 27, 2012 (77 Fed. Reg. 25861), including how to recognize whether an institution of higher learning may be violating any of such principles.
(E)
Information to enable individuals described in paragraph (1) to develop a post-secondary education plan appropriate and compatible with their educational goals.
(F)
Such other information as the Secretary of Education considers appropriate.
(3)
Consultation.— In carrying out this subsection, the Secretary of Defense shall consult with the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, the Secretary of Education, and the Director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
(b)
Availability of Higher Education Component Online.— Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall ensure that the higher education component of the Transition Assistance Program is available to members of the Armed Forces on an Internet website of the Department of Defense so that members have an option to complete such component electronically and remotely.
(c)
Definitions.— In this section:
(1)
The term “institution of higher learning” has the meaning given such term in section 3452 of title 38, United States Code.
(2)
The term “types of institutions of higher learning” means the following:
(A)
An educational institution described in section 101(a) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1001(a)).
(B)
An educational institution described in subsection (b) or (c) of section 102 of such Act (20 U.S.C. 1002).

SEC. 558. Procedures for Provision of Certain Information to State Veterans Agencies to Facilitate the Transition of Members of the Armed Forces from Military Service to Civilian Life.

(a)
Procedures Required.— The Secretary of Defense shall develop procedures to share the information described in subsection (b) regarding members of the Armed Forces who are being separated from the Armed Forces with State veterans agencies in electronic data format as a means of facilitating the transition of such members from military service to civilian life.
(b)
Covered Information.— The information to be shared with State veterans agencies regarding a member shall include the following:
(1)
Military service and separation data.
(2)
A personal email address.
(3)
A personal telephone number.
(4)
A mailing address.
(c)
Consent.— The procedures developed pursuant to subsection (a) shall require the consent of a member of the Armed Forces before any information described in subsection (b) regarding the member is shared with a State veterans agency.
(d)
Use of Information.— The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that the information shared with State veterans agencies in accordance with the procedures developed pursuant to subsection (a) is only shared by such agencies with county government veterans service offices for such purposes as the Secretary shall specify for the administration and delivery of benefits.
(e)
Report.—
(1)
In general.— Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services and Veterans’ Affairs of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report on the progress made by the Secretary—
(A)
in developing the procedures required by subsection (a); and
(B)
in sharing information with State veterans agencies as described in such subsection.
(2)
Contents.— The report required by paragraph (1) shall include the following:
(A)
A description of the procedures developed to share information with State veterans agencies.
(B)
A description of the sharing activities carried out by the Secretary in accordance with such procedures.
(C)
The number of members of the Armed Force who gave their consent for the sharing of information with State veterans agencies.
(D)
Such recommendations as the Secretary may have for legislative or administrative action to improve the sharing of information as described in subsection (a).

Subtitle F Defense Dependents’ Education and Military Family Readiness Matters

SEC. 561. Continuation of Authority to Assist Local Educational Agencies That Benefit Dependents of Members of the Armed Forces and Department of Defense Civilian Employees.

(a)
Assistance to Schools With Significant Numbers of Military Dependent Students.— Of the amount authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2015 by section 301 and available for operation and maintenance for Defense-wide activities as specified in the funding table in section 4301, $25,000,000 shall be available only for the purpose of providing assistance to local educational agencies under subsection (a) of section 572 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 (Public Law 109–163; 20 U.S.C. 7703b).
(b)
Local Educational Agency Defined.— In this section, the term “local educational agency” has the meaning given that term in section 8013(9) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7713(9)).

SEC. 562. Impact Aid for Children with Severe Disabilities.

Of the amount authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2015 pursuant to section 301 and available for operation and maintenance for Defense-wide activities as specified in the funding table in section 4301, $5,000,000 shall be available for payments under section 363 of the Floyd D. Spence National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2001 (as enacted into law by Public Law 106–398; 114 Stat. 1654A–77; 20 U.S.C. 7703a).

SEC. 563. Amendments to the Impact Aid Improvement Act of 2012.

Section 563(c) of National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1748; 20 U.S.C. 6301 note) is amended—
(1)
in paragraph (1)—
(A)
by inserting “ (other than the amendment made by paragraph (3)(A) of such subsection)” after “ subsection (b)”; and
(B)
by striking “ 2-year” and inserting “ 5-year”; and
(2)
in paragraph (4)—
(A)
by inserting “ (other than the amendment made by paragraph (3)(A) of such subsection)” after “ subsection (b)”;
(B)
by striking “ 2-year” and inserting “ 5-year”; and
(C)
by inserting “ (other than the amendment made by paragraph (3)(A) of such subsection)” after “ made by such subsection”.

SEC. 564. Authority to Employ Non-United States Citizens as Teachers in Department of Defense Overseas Dependents’ School System.

Section 2(2)(A) of the Defense Department Overseas Teachers Pay and Personnel Practices Act (20 U.S.C. 901(2)(A)) is amended by inserting before the comma at the end the following: “ or, in the case of a teaching position that involves instruction in the host-nation language, a local national when a citizen of the United States is not reasonably available to provide such instruction”.

SEC. 565. Inclusion of Domestic Dependent Elementary and Secondary Schools Among Functions of Advisory Council on Dependents’ Education.

(a)
Expansion of Functions.— Subsection (c) of section 1411 of the Defense Dependents’ Education Act of 1978 (20 U.S.C. 929) is amended—
(1)
in paragraph (1), by inserting “ , and of the domestic dependent elementary and secondary school system established under section 2164 of title 10, United States Code,” after “ of the defense dependents’ education system”; and
(2)
in paragraph (2), by inserting “ and in the domestic dependent elementary and secondary school system” before the comma at the end.
(b)
Membership of Council.— Subsection (a)(1)(B) of such section is amended—
(1)
by inserting “ and the domestic dependent elementary and secondary schools established under section 2164 of title 10, United States Code” after “ the defense dependents’ education system”; and
(2)
by inserting “ either” before “ such system”.

SEC. 566. Protection of Child Custody Arrangements for Parents Who Are Members of the Armed Forces.

(a)
Child Custody Protection.— Title II of the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (50 U.S.C. App. 521 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

“SEC. 208. CHILD CUSTODY PROTECTION.

“(a) Duration of Temporary Custody Order Based on Certain Deployments.—If a court renders a temporary order for custodial responsibility for a child based solely on a deployment or anticipated deployment of a parent who is a servicemember, the court shall require that the temporary order shall expire not later than the period justified by the deployment of the servicemember.

“(b) Limitation on Consideration of Member’s Deployment in Determination of Child’s Best Interest.—If a motion or a petition is filed seeking a permanent order to modify the custody of the child of a servicemember, no court may consider the absence of the servicemember by reason of deployment, or the possibility of deployment, as the sole factor in determining the best interest of the child.

“(c) No Federal Jurisdiction or Right of Action or Removal.—Nothing in this section shall create a Federal right of action or otherwise give rise to Federal jurisdiction or create a right of removal.

“(d) Preemption.—In any case where State law applicable to a child custody proceeding involving a temporary order as contemplated in this section provides a higher standard of protection to the rights of the parent who is a deploying servicemember than the rights provided under this section with respect to such temporary order, the appropriate court shall apply the higher State standard.

“(e) Deployment Defined.—In this section, the term ‘deployment’ means the movement or mobilization of a servicemember to a location for a period of longer than 60 days and not longer than 540 days pursuant to temporary or permanent official orders—

“(1) that are designated as unaccompanied;

“(2) for which dependent travel is not authorized; or

“(3) that otherwise do not permit the movement of family members to that location.”

(b)
Clerical Amendment.— The table of contents in section 1(b) of such Act is amended by adding at the end of the items relating to title II the following new item:

“Sec. 208. Child custody protection.”.

SEC. 567. Improved Consistency in Data Collection and Reporting in Armed Forces Suicide Prevention Efforts.

(a)
Policy for Standard Suicide Data Collection, Reporting, and Assessment.—
(1)
Policy required.— The Secretary of Defense shall prescribe a policy for the development of a standard method for collecting, reporting, and assessing information regarding—
(A)
any suicide or attempted suicide involving a member of the Armed Forces, including reserve components thereof; and
(B)
any death that is reported as a suicide involving a dependent of a member of the Armed Forces.
(2)
Purpose of policy.— The purpose of the policy required by this subsection is to improve the consistency and comprehensiveness of—
(A)
the suicide prevention policy developed pursuant to section 582 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 10 U.S.C. 1071 note); and
(B)
the suicide prevention and resilience program for the National Guard and Reserves established pursuant to section 10219 of title 10, United States Code.
(3)
Consultation.— The Secretary of Defense shall develop the policy required by this subsection in consultation with the Secretaries of the military departments and the Chief of the National Guard Bureau.
(b)
Submission and Implementation of Policy.—
(1)
Submission.— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit the policy developed under subsection (a) to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives.
(2)
Implementation.— The Secretaries of the military departments shall implement the policy developed under subsection (a) not later than 180 days after the date of the submittal of the policy under paragraph (1).
(c)
Dependent Defined.— In this section, the term “dependent”, with respect to a member of the Armed Forces, means a person described in section 1072(2) of title 10, United States Code, except that, in the case of a parent or parent-in-law of the member, the income requirements of subparagraph (E) of such section do not apply.

SEC. 568. Improved Data Collection Related to Efforts to Reduce Underemployment of Spouses of Members of the Armed Forces and Close the Wage Gap Between Military Spouses and Their Civilian Counterparts.

(a)
Data Collection Efforts.— In addition to monitoring the number of spouses of members of the Armed Forces who obtain employment through military spouse employment programs, the Secretary of Defense shall collect data to evaluate the effectiveness of military spouse employment programs—
(1)
in addressing the underemployment of military spouses;
(2)
in matching military spouses’ education and experience to available employment positions; and
(3)
in closing the wage gap between military spouses and their civilian counterparts.
(b)
Report Required.— Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report evaluating the progress of military spouse employment programs—
(1)
in reducing military spouse unemployment and underemployment; and
(2)
in reducing the wage gap between military spouses and their civilian counterparts.
(c)
Military Spouse Employment Programs Defined.— In this section, the term “military spouse employment programs” means the Military Spouse Employment Partnership (MSEP).

Subtitle G Decorations and Awards

SEC. 571. Medals for Members of the Armed Forces and Civilian Employees of the Department of Defense Who Were Killed or Wounded in an Attack by a Foreign Terrorist Organization.

(a)
Purple Heart.—
(1)
Award.—
(A)
In general.— Chapter 57 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 1129 the following new section:

“§ 1129a. Purple Heart: members killed or wounded in attacks by foreign terrorist organizations

“(a) In General.—For purposes of the award of the Purple Heart, the Secretary concerned shall treat a member of the armed forces described in subsection (b) in the same manner as a member who is killed or wounded as a result of an international terrorist attack against the United States.

“(b) Covered Members.—

(1) A member described in this subsection is a member on active duty who was killed or wounded in an attack by a foreign terrorist organization in circumstances where the death or wound is the result of an attack targeted on the member due to such member’s status as a member of the armed forces, unless the death or wound is the result of willful misconduct of the member.

“(2) For purposes of this section, an attack by an individual or entity shall be considered to be an attack by a foreign terrorist organization if—

“(A) the individual or entity was in communication with the foreign terrorist organization before the attack; and

“(B) the attack was inspired or motivated by the foreign terrorist organization.

“(c) Foreign Terrorist Organization Defined.—In this section, the term ‘foreign terrorist organization’ means an entity designated as a foreign terrorist organization by the Secretary of State pursuant to section 219 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1189).”

(B)
Clerical amendment.— The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 57 of such title is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 1129 the following new item:

“1129a. Purple Heart: members killed or wounded in attacks by foreign terrorist organizations.”.

(2)
Retroactive effective date and application.—
(A)
Effective date.— The amendments made by paragraph (1) shall take effect as of September 11, 2001.
(B)
Review of certain previous incidents.— The Secretary concerned shall undertake a review of each death or wounding of a member of the Armed Forces that occurred between September 11, 2001, and the date of the enactment of this Act under circumstances that could qualify as being the result of an attack described in section 1129a of title 10, United States Code (as added by paragraph (1)), to determine whether the death or wounding qualifies as a death or wounding resulting from an attack by a foreign terrorist organization for purposes of the award of the Purple Heart pursuant to such section (as so added).
(C)
Actions following review.— If the death or wounding of a member of the Armed Forces reviewed under subparagraph (B) is determined to qualify as a death or wounding resulting from an attack by a foreign terrorist organization as described in section 1129a of title 10, United States Code (as so added), the Secretary concerned shall take appropriate action under such section to award the Purple Heart to the member.
(D)
Secretary concerned defined.— In this paragraph, the term “Secretary concerned” has the meaning given that term in section 101(a)(9) of title 10, United States Code.
(b)
Secretary of Defense Medal for the Defense of Freedom.—
(1)
Review of the november 5, 2009, attack at fort hood, texas.— If the Secretary concerned determines, after a review under subsection (a)(2)(B) regarding the attack that occurred at Fort Hood, Texas, on November 5, 2009, that the death or wounding of any member of the Armed Forces in that attack qualified as a death or wounding resulting from an attack by a foreign terrorist organization as described in section 1129a of title 10, United States Code (as added by subsection (a)), the Secretary of Defense shall make a determination as to whether the death or wounding of any civilian employee of the Department of Defense or civilian contractor in the same attack meets the eligibility criteria for the award of the Secretary of Defense Medal for the Defense of Freedom.
(2)
Award.— If the Secretary of Defense determines under paragraph (1) that the death or wounding of any civilian employee of the Department of Defense or civilian contractor in the attack that occurred at Fort Hood, Texas, on November 5, 2009, meets the eligibility criteria for the award of the Secretary of Defense Medal for the Defense of Freedom, the Secretary shall take appropriate action to award the Secretary of Defense Medal for the Defense of Freedom to the employee or contractor.

SEC. 572. Authorization for Award of the Medal of Honor to Members of the Armed Forces for Acts of Valor During World War I.

(a)
William Shemin.—
(1)
Waiver of time limitations.— Notwithstanding the time limitations specified in section 3744 of title 10, United States Code, or any other time limitation with respect to the awarding of certain medals to persons who served in the Armed Forces, the President may award the Medal of Honor under section 3741 of such title to William Shemin for the acts of valor during World War I described in paragraph (1).
(2)
Acts of valor described.— The acts of valor referred to in paragraph (1) are the actions of William Shemin while serving as a Rifleman with G Company, 2d Battalion, 47th Infantry Regiment, 4th Division, American Expeditionary Forces, in connection with combat operations against an armed enemy on the Vesle River, near Bazoches, France, from August 7 to August 9, 1918, during World War I for which he was originally awarded the Distinguished Service Cross.
(b)
Henry Johnson.—
(1)
Waiver of time limitations.— Notwithstanding the time limitations specified in section 3744 of title 10, United States Code, or any other time limitation with respect to the awarding of certain medals to persons who served in the Armed Forces, the President may award the Medal of Honor under section 3741 of such title to Henry Johnson for the acts of valor during World War I described in paragraph (2).
(2)
Acts of valor described.— The acts of valor referred to in paragraph (2) are the actions of Henry Johnson while serving as a member of Company C, 369th Infantry Regiment, 93rd Division, American Expeditionary Forces, during combat operations against the enemy on the front lines of the Western Front in France on May 15, 1918, during World War I for which he was previously awarded the Distinguished Service Cross.

Subtitle H Miscellaneous Reporting Requirements

SEC. 581. Review and Report on Military Programs and Controls Regarding Professionalism.

(a)
Review Required.— The Secretary of Defense shall conduct a preliminary review of the effectiveness of current programs and controls of the Department of Defense and the military departments regarding the professionalism of members of the Armed Forces.
(b)
Submission of Report.— Not later than September 1, 2015, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report containing recommendations to strengthen professionalism programs in the Department of Defense.

SEC. 582. Review and Report on Prevention of Suicide Among Members of United States Special Operations Forces.

(a)
Review Required.— The Secretary of Defense, acting through the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness and the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Special Operations and Low Intensity Conflict, shall conduct a review of Department of Defense efforts regarding the prevention of suicide among members of United States Special Operations Forces and their dependents.
(b)
Consultation.— In conducting the review under subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall consult with, and consider the recommendations of, the Office of Suicide Prevention, the Secretaries of the military departments, the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Special Operations and Low Intensity Conflict, and the United States Special Operations Command regarding the feasibility of implementing, for members of United States Special Operations Forces and their dependents, particular elements of the Department of Defense suicide prevention policy developed pursuant to section 533 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 10 U.S.C. 1071 note) and section 582 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239. 10 U.S.C. 1071 note).
(c)
Elements of Review.— The review conducted under subsection (a) shall specifically include an assessment of each of the following:
(1)
Current Armed Forces and United States Special Operations Command policy guidelines on the prevention of suicide among members of United States Special Operations Forces and their dependents.
(2)
Current and directed Armed Forces and United States Special Operations Command suicide prevention programs and activities for members of United States Special Operations Forces and their dependents, including programs provided by the Defense Health Program and the Office of Suicide Prevention and programs supporting family members.
(3)
Current Armed Forces and United States Special Operations Command strategies to reduce suicides among members of United States Special Operations Forces and their dependents, including the cost of such strategies across the future-years defense program.
(4)
Current Armed Forces and United States Special Operations Command standards of care for suicide prevention among members of United States Special Operations Forces and their dependents, including training standards for behavioral health care providers to ensure that such providers receive training on clinical best practices and evidence-based treatments as information on such practices and treatments becomes available.
(5)
The integration of mental health screenings and suicide risk and prevention efforts for members of United States Special Operations Forces and their dependents into the delivery of primary care for such members and dependents.
(6)
The standards for responding to attempted or completed suicides among members of United States Special Operations Forces and their dependents, including guidance and training to assist commanders in addressing incidents of attempted or completed suicide within their units.
(7)
The standards regarding data collection for individual members of United States Special Operations Forces and their dependents, including related factors such as domestic violence and child abuse.
(8)
The means to ensure the protection of privacy of members of United States Special Operations Forces and their dependents who seek or receive treatment related to suicide prevention.
(9)
The potential need to differentiate members of United States Special Operations Forces and their dependents from members of conventional forces and their dependents in the development and delivery of the Department of Defense suicide prevention program.
(10)
Such other matters as the Secretary of Defense considers appropriate in connection with the prevention of suicide among members of United States Special Operations Forces and their dependents.
(d)
Submission of Report.— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report containing the results of the review conducted under subsection (a).

SEC. 583. Review and Report on Provision of Job Placement Assistance and Related Employment Services Directly to Members of the Reserve Components.

(a)
Review Required.— The Secretary of Defense shall conduct a review of the feasibility of improving the efforts of the Department of Defense to provide job placement assistance and related employment services directly to members in the National Guard and Reserves. In evaluating potential job placement programs, the Secretary shall consider—
(1)
the likely cost of the program;
(2)
the impact of the program on increasing employment opportunities and results for members of the reserve components; and
(3)
how a Department program would compare to other unemployment or underemployment programs of the Federal Government already available to members of the reserve components.
(b)
Submission of Report.— Not later than April 1, 2015, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report containing the results of the review.

SEC. 584. Report on Foreign Language, Regional Expertise, and Culture Considerations in Overseas Military Operations.

(a)
Report Required.— Not later than 270 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report concerning—
(1)
foreign language, regional expertise, and culture considerations, including gender-based considerations in the context of foreign cultural norms; and
(2)
how such considerations factor into the planning and execution of overseas operations and missions of the Armed Forces.
(b)
Consultation.— In preparing the report under subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall consult with, and consider the recommendations of, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
(c)
Elements of Report.— The report required by subsection (a) shall include the following elements:
(1)
An assessment of how foreign language, regional expertise, and culture considerations, including gender-based considerations in the context of foreign cultural norms, affect overseas operations and missions of the Armed Forces, including lessons learned as a result of members of the Armed Forces engaging with female civilian populations in Iraq and Afghanistan and during other overseas operations and missions.
(2)
An identification of how the Department of Defense addresses such considerations in its planning and execution of overseas operations and missions, including how it educates military commanders on foreign language, regional expertise, and culture considerations, including gender-based considerations in the context of foreign cultural norms.
(3)
An evaluation of the adequacy of current programs and the need for additional or modified programs to train members of the Armed Forces regarding such considerations, including proposed changes in the length of training and curriculum.
(4)
An evaluation of the need for advisors within the military commands and Armed Forces, including billet descriptions for such advisors, where to assign them within the military command and Armed Forces, and the desirability and feasibility of assigning such advisors in combatant command and joint task force staffs.
(5)
Any other matters the Secretary of Defense may determine to be appropriate.
(d)
Form of Report.— The report prepared under subsection (a) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.

SEC. 585. Deadline for Submission of Report Containing Results of Review of Office of Diversity Management and Equal Opportunity Role in Sexual Harassment Cases.

Not later than April 1, 2015, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report containing the results of the review conducted pursuant to section 1735 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 976).

SEC. 586. Independent Assessment of Risk and Resiliency of United States Special Operations Forces and Effectiveness of the Preservation of the Force and Families and Human Performance Programs.

(a)
Assessment Required.— The Secretary of Defense shall provide for an independent assessment of—
(1)
the mental, behavioral, and psychological health challenges facing members of the Armed Forces assigned to special operations forces; and
(2)
the effectiveness of the Preservation of the Force and Families Program and the Human Performance Program of the United States Special Operations Command in addressing such challenges.
(b)
Entity Conducting Assessment.— To conduct the assessment required by subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall select a federally funded research and development center or another appropriate independent entity.
(c)
Assessment Elements.— The assessment required by subsection (a) shall specifically include the following:
(1)
The factors contributing to the mental, behavioral, and psychological health challenges facing members of the Armed Forces assigned to special operations forces.
(2)
The effectiveness of the Preservation of the Force and Families Program in addressing the mental, behavioral, and psychological health of members of the special operations forces, including the extent to which measurements of effectiveness are being utilized to assess progress—
(A)
in reducing suicide and other mental, behavioral, and psychological risks; and
(B)
in increasing the resiliency of such members.
(3)
The effectiveness of the Human Performance Program in improving the mental, behavioral, and psychological health of members of the special operations forces, including the extent to which measurements of effectiveness are being utilized to assess progress—
(A)
in reducing suicide and other mental, behavioral and psychological risks; and
(B)
in increasing the resiliency of such members.
(4)
Such other matters as the Secretary of Defense considers appropriate.
(d)
Submission of Report.— Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report containing the results of the assessment conducted under subsection (a).

SEC. 587. Comptroller General Report on Hazing in the Armed Forces.

(a)
Report Required.— Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the designated congressional committees a report on the policies to prevent hazing, and systems initiated to track incidents of hazing, in each of the Armed Forces.
(b)
Elements of Report.— The report required by subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1)
An evaluation of the definition of hazing by the Armed Forces.
(2)
A description of the criteria used, and the methods implemented, in the systems to track incidents of hazing in the Armed Forces.
(3)
The number of alleged and substantiated incidents of hazing, as reflected in the tracking systems, over the last two years for each Armed Force, the nature of these incidents, and actions taken to address such incidents through non-judicial and judicial action.
(4)
An assessment of the following:
(A)
The prevalence of hazing in each Armed Force.
(B)
The policies in place and the training on hazing provided to members throughout the course of their careers for each Armed Force.
(C)
The available outlets through which victims or witnesses of hazing can report hazing both within and outside their chain of command, and whether or not anonymous reporting is permitted.
(D)
The actions taken to mitigate hazing incidents in each Armed Force.
(E)
The effectiveness of the training and policies in place regarding hazing.
(5)
An evaluation of the additional actions, if any, the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Homeland Security propose to take to further address hazing in the Armed Forces.
(6)
Such recommendations as the Comptroller General considers appropriate for improving hazing prevention programs, policies, and other actions taken to address hazing within the Armed Forces.
(c)
Designated Congressional Committees Defined.— In this section, the term “designated congressional committees” means—
(1)
the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation of the Senate; and
(2)
the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives.

SEC. 588. Comptroller General Report on Impact of Certain Mental and Physical Trauma on Discharges from Military Service for Misconduct.

(a)
Report Required.— The Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report on the impact of mental and physical trauma relating to Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI), behavioral health matters not related to Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, and other neurological combat traumas (in this section referred to as “covered traumas”) on the discharge of members of the Armed Forces from the Armed Forces for misconduct.
(b)
Elements.— The report required by subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1)
An assessment of the extent to which the Armed Forces have in place processes for the consideration of the impact of mental and physical trauma relating to covered traumas on members of the Armed Forces who are being considered for discharge from the Armed Forces for misconduct, including the compliance of the Armed Forces with such processes and mechanisms in the Department of Defense for ensuring the compliance of the Armed Forces with such processes.
(2)
An assessment of the extent to which the Armed Forces provide members of the Armed Forces, including commanding officers, junior officers, and noncommissioned officers, training on the symptoms of covered traumas and the identification of the presence of such conditions in members of the Armed Forces.
(3)
An assessment of the extent to which members of the Armed Forces who receive treatment for a covered trauma before discharge from the Armed Forces are later discharged from the Armed Forces for misconduct.
(4)
An identification of the number of members of the Armed Forces discharged as described in paragraph (3) who are ineligible for benefits from the Department of Veterans Affairs based on characterization of discharge.
(5)
An assessment of the extent to which members of the Armed Forces who accept a discharge from the Armed Forces for misconduct in lieu of trial by court-martial are counseled on the potential for ineligibility for benefits from the Department of Veterans Affairs as a result of such discharge before acceptance of such discharge.

Subtitle I Other Matters

SEC. 591. Inspection of Outpatient Residential Facilities Occupied by Recovering Service Members.

Section 1662(a) of the Wounded Warrior Act (title XVI of Public Law 110–181; 10 U.S.C. 1071 note) is amended by striking “ inspected on a semiannual basis for the first two years after the enactment of this Act and annually thereafter” and inserting “ inspected at least once every two years”.

SEC. 592. Designation of Voter Assistance Offices.

(a)
Designation Authority.— Subsection (a) of section 1566a of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
by striking “ Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 and under” and inserting “ Under”; and
(2)
by inserting after “ their jurisdiction” the following: “ , or at such installations as the Secretary of the military department concerned shall determine are best located to provide access to voter assistance services for all covered individuals in a particular location,”.
(b)
Report on Closure of Voter Assistance Office.— Subsection (f) of such section is amended—
(1)
by inserting “ (1)” before “ The Secretary of Defense”; and
(2)
by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

“(2) The Secretary of a military department shall provide the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives with notice of any decision by the Secretary to close a voter assistance office that was designated on an installation before the date of the enactment of this paragraph. The notice shall include the rational for the closure, the timing of the closure, the number of covered individuals supported by the office, and the plan for providing the assistance available under subsection (a) to covered individuals after the closure of the office.”

SEC. 593. Repeal of Electronic Voting Demonstration Project.

Section 1604 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2002 (Public Law 107–107; 52 U.S.C. 20301 note) is repealed.

SEC. 594. Authority for Removal from National Cemeteries of Remains of Certain Deceased Members of the Armed Forces Who Have No Known Next of Kin.

(a)
Removal Authority.— Section 1488 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

“(c) Removal of Remains of Certain Members With No Known Next of Kin.—

(1) The Secretary of the Army may authorize the removal of the remains of a covered member of the armed forces who is buried in an Army National Military Cemetery from the Army National Military Cemetery for transfer to any other cemetery.

“(2) The Secretary of the Army, with the concurrence of the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, may authorize the removal of the remains of a covered member of the armed forces who is buried in a cemetery of the National Cemetery System from that cemetery for transfer to any Army National Military Cemetery.

“(3) A removal of remains may not be authorized under this subsection unless the individual seeking the removal of the remains—

“(A) demonstrates to the satisfaction of the Secretary of the Army that the member of the armed forces concerned has no known next of kin or other person who is interested in maintaining the place of burial; and

“(B) undertakes full responsibility for all expenses of the removal of the remains and the reburial of the remains at another cemetery as authorized by this subsection.

“(4) In this subsection:

“(A) The term ‘Army National Military Cemetery’ means a cemetery specified in section 4721(b) of this title.

“(B) The term ‘covered member of the armed forces’ means a member of the armed forces who—

“(i) has been awarded the Medal of Honor; and

“(ii) has no known next of kin.”

(b)
Conforming Amendments.— Such section is further amended—
(1)
by inserting before “ If a cemetery” the following:

“(a) Removal Upon Discontinuance of Installation Cemetery.—

(2)
by striking “ his jurisdiction” and inserting “ the jurisdiction of the Secretary concerned”; and
(3)
by inserting before “ With respect to” the following:

“(b) Removal From Temporary Interment or Abandoned Grave or Cemetery.—

SEC. 595. Sense of Congress Regarding Leaving No Member of the Armed Forces Unaccounted for During the Drawdown of United States Forces in Afghanistan.

It is the sense of Congress that the United States—
(1)
should undertake every reasonable effort—
(A)
to search for and repatriate members of the Armed Forces who are missing; and
(B)
to repatriate members of the Armed Forces who are captured;
(2)
has a responsibility to keep the promises made to members of the Armed Forces who risk their lives on a daily basis on behalf of the people of the United States; and
(3)
while continuing to transition leadership roles in combat operations in Afghanistan to the people of Afghanistan, must continue to fulfill the promise of the United States Soldier’s Creed and the Warrior Ethos, which states that “I will never leave a fallen comrade”, with respect to any member of the Armed Forces who is in a missing status or captured as a result of service in Afghanistan now or in the future.

TITLE VI Compensation and Other Personnel Benefits

Subtitle A Pay and Allowances

SEC. 601. No Fiscal Year 2015 Increase in Basic Pay for General and Flag Officers.

In the case of commissioned officers in the uniformed services in pay grades O–7 through O–10—
(1)
section 203(a)(2) of title 37, United States Code, shall be applied for rates of basic pay payable for such officers during calendar year 2015 by using the rate of pay for level II of the Executive Schedule in effect during 2014; and
(2)
the rates of monthly basic pay payable for such officers shall not increase during calendar year 2015.

SEC. 602. Extension of Authority to Provide Temporary Increase in Rates of Basic Allowance for Housing under Certain Circumstances.

Section 403(b)(7)(E) of title 37, United States Code, is amended by striking “ December 31, 2014” and inserting “ December 31, 2015”.

SEC. 603. Inclusion of Chief of the National Guard Bureau and Senior Enlisted Advisor to the Chief of the National Guard Bureau Among Senior Members of the Armed Forces for Purposes of Pay and Allowances.

(a)
Basic Pay Rate Equal Treatment of Chief of the National Guard Bureau and Senior Enlisted Advisor to the Chief of the National Guard Bureau.—
(1)
Chief of the national guard bureau.— The rate of basic pay for an officer while serving as the Chief of the National Guard Bureau shall be the same as the rate of basic pay for the officers specified in Footnote 2 of the table entitled “commissioned officers” in section 601(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2004 (Public Law 108–136; 37 U.S.C. 1009 note), regardless of cumulative years of service computed under section 205 of title 37, United States Code.
(2)
Senior enlisted advisor to the chief of the national guard bureau.—
(A)
In general.— Subsection (a)(1) of section 685 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 (Public Law 109–163; 37 U.S.C. 205 note) is amended by inserting “ or as Senior Enlisted Advisor to the Chief of the National Guard Bureau” after “ Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff”.
(B)
Clerical amendment.— The heading of such section is amended by inserting “ and for the chief of the national guard bureau” after “ chairman of the joint chiefs of staff”.
(b)
Pay During Terminal Leave and While Hospitalized.— Section 210 of title 37, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
in subsection (a), by inserting “ or the senior enlisted advisor to the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff or the Chief of the National Guard Bureau” after “ that armed force” the first place it appears; and
(2)
in subsection (c), by striking paragraph (6).
(c)
Personal Money Allowance.— Section 414 of title 37, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
in subsection (a)(5), by striking “ or Commandant of the Coast Guard” and inserting “ Commandant of the Coast Guard, or Chief of the National Guard Bureau”; and
(2)
in subsection (c), by striking “ or the Senior Enlisted Advisor to the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff” and inserting “ the Senior Enlisted Advisor to the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, or the Senior Enlisted Advisor to the Chief of the National Guard Bureau”.
(d)
Retired Base Pay.— Section 1406(i) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
in the subsection heading, by inserting “ Chief of the National Guard Bureau,” after “ Chiefs of Service,”;
(2)
in paragraph (1)—
(A)
by inserting “ as Chief of the National Guard Bureau,” after “ Chief of Service,”; and
(B)
by inserting “ or the senior enlisted advisor to the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff or the Chief of the National Guard Bureau” after “ of an armed force”; and
(3)
in paragraph (3)(B), by striking clause (vi).
(e)
Effective Date.— This section and the amendments made by this section shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act, and shall apply with respect to months of service that begin on or after that date.

SEC. 604. Modification of Computation of Basic Allowance for Housing Inside the United States.

(a)
In General.— Paragraph (3) of section 403(b) of title 37, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:

“(3)

(A) The monthly amount of the basic allowance for housing for an area of the United States for a member of a uniformed service shall be the amount equal to the difference between—

“(i) the amount of the monthly cost of adequate housing in that area, as determined by the Secretary of Defense, for members of the uniformed services serving in the same pay grade and with the same dependency status as the member; and

“(ii) the amount equal to a specified percentage (determined under subparagraph (B)) of the national average monthly cost of adequate housing in the United States, as determined by the Secretary, for members of the uniformed services serving in the same pay grade and with the same dependency status as the member.

“(B) The percentage to be used for purposes of subparagraph (A)(ii) shall be determined by the Secretary of Defense and may not exceed one percent.”

(b)
Special Rule.— Any reduction authorized by paragraph (3) of subsection (b) of section 403 of title 37, United States Code, as amended by subsection (a), shall not apply with respect to benefits paid by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs under the laws administered by the Secretary, including pursuant to sections 3108 and 3313 of title 38, United States Code. Such benefits that are determined in accordance with such section 403 shall be subject to paragraph (3) of such section as such paragraph was in effect on the day before the date of the enactment of this Act.

Subtitle B Bonuses and Special and Incentive Pays

SEC. 611. One-Year Extension of Certain Bonus and Special Pay Authorities for Reserve Forces.

The following sections of title 37, United States Code, are amended by striking “ December 31, 2014” and inserting “ December 31, 2015”:
(1)
Section 308b(g), relating to Selected Reserve reenlistment bonus.
(2)
Section 308c(i), relating to Selected Reserve affiliation or enlistment bonus.
(3)
Section 308d(c), relating to special pay for enlisted members assigned to certain high-priority units.
(4)
Section 308g(f)(2), relating to Ready Reserve enlistment bonus for persons without prior service.
(5)
Section 308h(e), relating to Ready Reserve enlistment and reenlistment bonus for persons with prior service.
(6)
Section 308i(f), relating to Selected Reserve enlistment and reenlistment bonus for persons with prior service.
(7)
Section 478a(e), relating to reimbursement of travel expenses for inactive-duty training outside of normal commuting distance.
(8)
Section 910(g), relating to income replacement payments for reserve component members experiencing extended and frequent mobilization for active duty service.

SEC. 612. One-Year Extension of Certain Bonus and Special Pay Authorities for Health Care Professionals.

(a)
Title 10 Authorities.— The following sections of title 10, United States Code, are amended by striking “ December 31, 2014” and inserting “ December 31, 2015”:
(1)
Section 2130a(a)(1), relating to nurse officer candidate accession program.
(2)
Section 16302(d), relating to repayment of education loans for certain health professionals who serve in the Selected Reserve.
(b)
Title 37 Authorities.— The following sections of title 37, United States Code, are amended by striking “ December 31, 2014” and inserting “ December 31, 2015”:
(1)
Section 302c–1(f), relating to accession and retention bonuses for psychologists.
(2)
Section 302d(a)(1), relating to accession bonus for registered nurses.
(3)
Section 302e(a)(1), relating to incentive special pay for nurse anesthetists.
(4)
Section 302g(e), relating to special pay for Selected Reserve health professionals in critically short wartime specialties.
(5)
Section 302h(a)(1), relating to accession bonus for dental officers.
(6)
Section 302j(a), relating to accession bonus for pharmacy officers.
(7)
Section 302k(f), relating to accession bonus for medical officers in critically short wartime specialties.
(8)
Section 302l(g), relating to accession bonus for dental specialist officers in critically short wartime specialties.

SEC. 613. One-Year Extension of Special Pay and Bonus Authorities for Nuclear Officers.

The following sections of title 37, United States Code, are amended by striking “ December 31, 2014” and inserting “ December 31, 2015”:
(1)
Section 312(f), relating to special pay for nuclear-qualified officers extending period of active service.
(2)
Section 312b(c), relating to nuclear career accession bonus.
(3)
Section 312c(d), relating to nuclear career annual incentive bonus.

SEC. 614. One-Year Extension of Authorities Relating to Title 37 Consolidated Special Pay, Incentive Pay, and Bonus Authorities.

The following sections of title 37, United States Code, are amended by striking “ December 31, 2014” and inserting “ December 31, 2015”:
(1)
Section 331(h), relating to general bonus authority for enlisted members.
(2)
Section 332(g), relating to general bonus authority for officers.
(3)
Section 333(i), relating to special bonus and incentive pay authorities for nuclear officers.
(4)
Section 334(i), relating to special aviation incentive pay and bonus authorities for officers.
(5)
Section 335(k), relating to special bonus and incentive pay authorities for officers in health professions.
(6)
Section 336(g), relating to contracting bonus for cadets and midshipmen enrolled in the Senior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps.
(7)
Section 351(h), relating to hazardous duty pay.
(8)
Section 352(g), relating to assignment pay or special duty pay.
(9)
Section 353(i), relating to skill incentive pay or proficiency bonus.
(10)
Section 355(h), relating to retention incentives for members qualified in critical military skills or assigned to high priority units.

SEC. 615. One-Year Extension of Authorities Relating to Payment of Other Title 37 Bonuses and Special Pays.

The following sections of title 37, United States Code, are amended by striking “ December 31, 2014” and inserting “ December 31, 2015”:
(1)
Section 301b(a), relating to aviation officer retention bonus.
(2)
Section 307a(g), relating to assignment incentive pay.
(3)
Section 308(g), relating to reenlistment bonus for active members.
(4)
Section 309(e), relating to enlistment bonus.
(5)
Section 316a(g), relating to incentive pay for members of precommissioning programs pursuing foreign language proficiency.
(6)
Section 324(g), relating to accession bonus for new officers in critical skills.
(7)
Section 326(g), relating to incentive bonus for conversion to military occupational specialty to ease personnel shortage.
(8)
Section 327(h), relating to incentive bonus for transfer between branches of the Armed Forces.
(9)
Section 330(f), relating to accession bonus for officer candidates.

Subtitle C Disability Pay, Retired Pay, and Survivor Benefits

SEC. 621. Earlier Determination of Dependent Status with Respect to Transitional Compensation for Dependents of Certain Members Separated for Dependent Abuse.

Section 1059(d)(4) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “ as of the date on which the individual described in subsection (b) is separated from active duty” and inserting “ as of the date on which the separation action is initiated by a commander of the individual described in subsection (b)”.

SEC. 622. Modification of Determination of Retired Pay Base for Officers Retired in General and Flag Officer Grades.

(a)
Reinstatement of Earlier Method of Determination.— Section 1407a of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:

“§ 1407a. Retired pay base: officers retired in general or flag officer grades

“(a) Rates of Basic Pay to Be Used in Determination.—Except as otherwise provided in this section, in a case in which the determination under section 1406 or 1407 of this title of the retired pay base applicable to the computation of the retired pay of a covered general or flag officer involves a rate of basic pay payable to that officer for any period between October 1, 2006, and December 31, 2014, that was subject to a reduction under section 203(a)(2) of title 37 for such period, such retired-pay-base determination shall be made using the rate of basic pay for such period provided by law, without regard to the reduction under section 203(a)(2) of title 37.

“(b) Partial Preservation of Computation of Retired Pay Base Using Uncapped Rates of Basic Pay for Covered Officers Who First Became Members Before September 8, 1980, and Whose Retired Pay Commences After December 31, 2014.—

“(1) Officers retiring after december 31, 2014.—In the case of a covered general or flag officer who first became a member of a uniformed service before September 8, 1980, and who is retired after December 31, 2014, under any provision of law other than chapter 1223 of this title or is transferred to the Retired Reserve after December 31, 2014, the retired pay base applicable to the computation of the retired pay of that officer shall be determined as provided in paragraph (2) if determination of such retired pay base as provided in that paragraph results in a higher retired pay base than determination of such retired pay base as otherwise provided by law (including the application of section 203(a)(2) of title 37).

“(2) Alternative determination of retired pay base using uncapped rates of basic pay as of december 31, 2014.—For a determination in accordance with this paragraph, the amount of an officer’s retired pay base shall be determined by using the rate of basic pay provided as of December 31, 2014, for that officer’s grade as of that date for purposes of basic pay, with that officer’s years of service creditable as of that date for purposes of basic pay, and without regard to any reduction under section 203(a)(2) of title 37.

“(3) Exception for officer retired in a lower grade.—In a case in which the retired grade of the officer is lower than the grade in which the officer was serving on December 31, 2014, paragraph (2) shall be applied as if the officer was serving on that date in the officer’s retired grade.

“(c) Preservation of Computation of Retired Pay Base Using Uncapped Rates of Basic Pay for Officers Transferring to Retired Reserve During Specified Period.—In the case of a covered general or flag officer who is transferred to the Retired Reserve between October 1, 2006, and December 31, 2014, and who becomes entitled to receive retired pay under section 12731 of this title after December 31, 2014, the retired pay base applicable to the computation of the retired pay of that officer shall be determined using the rates of basic pay provided by law without regard to any reduction in rates of basic pay under section 203(a)(2) of title 37.

“(d) Covered General or Flag Officer Defined.—In this section, the term ‘covered general or flag officer’ means a member or former member of a uniformed service who after September 30, 2006—

“(1) is retired in a general officer grade or flag officer grade (or an equivalent grade, in the case of an officer of the commissioned corps of the Public Health Service or the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration); or

“(2) is transferred to the Retired Reserve in a general officer grade or flag officer grade.”

(b)
Applicability.— Section 1407a of title 10, United States Code, as amended by subsection (a), shall be effective for retired pay that commences after December 31, 2014.

SEC. 623. Inapplicability of Reduced Annual Adjustment of Retired Pay for Members of the Armed Forces under the Age of 62 under the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2013 Who First Become Members Prior to January 1, 2016.

Subparagraph (G) of section 1401a(b)(4) of title 10, United States Code, which shall take effect December 1, 2015, pursuant to section 403(a) of the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2013 (Public Law 113–67; 127 Stat. 1186)), as amended by section 10001 of the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2014 (division C of Public Law 113–76; 128 Stat. 151) and section 2 of Public Law 113–82 (128 Stat. 1009), is amended by striking “ January 1, 2014” and inserting “ January 1, 2016”.

SEC. 624. Survivor Benefit Plan Annuities for Special Needs Trusts Established for the Benefit of Dependent Children Incapable of Self-Support.

(a)
Special Needs Trust as Eligible Beneficiary.—
(1)
In general.— Subsection (a) of section 1450 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(A)
by redesignating paragraph (4) as paragraph (5); and
(B)
by inserting after paragraph (3) the following new paragraph (4):

“(4) Special needs trusts for sole benefit of certain dependent children.—Notwithstanding subsection (i), a supplemental or special needs trust established under subparagraph (A) or (C) of section 1917(d)(4) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396p(d)(4)) for the sole benefit of a dependent child considered disabled under section 1614(a)(3) of that Act (42 U.S.C. 1382c(a)(3)) who is incapable of self-support because of mental or physical incapacity.”

(2)
Conforming amendments.—
(A)
Annuities exemption.— Subsection (i) of such section is amended by inserting “ (a)(4) or” after “ subsection”.
(B)
Plan requirements.— Section 1448 of such title is amended—
(i)
in subsection (b), by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

“(6) Special needs trusts for sole benefit of certain dependent children.—A person who has established a supplemental or special needs trust under subparagraph (A) or (C) of section 1917(d)(4) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396p(d)(4)) for the sole benefit of a dependent child considered disabled under section 1614(a)(3) of that Act (42 U.S.C. 1382c(a)(3)) who is incapable of self-support because of mental or physical incapacity may elect to provide an annuity to that supplemental or special needs trust.”

(ii)
in subsection (d)(2)—
(I)
in subparagraph (A), by striking “ section 1450(a)(2)” and inserting “ subsection (a)(2) or (a)(4) of section 1450”; and
(II)
in subparagraph (B), by striking “ section 1450(a)(3)” and inserting “ subsection (a)(3) or (a)(4) of section 1450”; and
(iii)
in subsection (f)(2), by inserting “ , or to a special needs trust pursuant to section 1450(a)(4) of this title,” after “ dependent child”.
(b)
Regulations.— Section 1455(d) of such title is amended—
(1)
in the subsection heading, by striking “ and Fiduciaries” and inserting “ , Fiduciaries, and Special Needs Trusts”;
(2)
in paragraph (1)—
(A)
in subparagraph (A), by striking “ and” at the end;
(B)
in subparagraph (B), by striking the period at the end and inserting “ ; and”; and
(C)
by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:

“(C) a dependent child incapable of self-support because of mental or physical incapacity for whom a supplemental or special needs trust has been established under subparagraph (A) or (C) of section 1917(d)(4) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396p(d)(4)).”

(3)
in paragraph (2)—
(A)
by redesignating subparagraphs (C) through (H) as subparagraphs (D) through (I), respectively;
(B)
by inserting after subparagraph (B) the following new subparagraph (C):

“(C) In the case of an annuitant referred to in paragraph (1)(C), payment of the annuity to the supplemental or special needs trust established for the annuitant.”

(C)
in subparagraph (D), as redesignated by subparagraph (A) of this paragraph, by striking “ subparagraphs (D) and (E)” and inserting “ subparagraphs (E) and (F)”; and
(D)
in subparagraph (H), as so redesignated—
(i)
by inserting “ or (1)(C)” after “ paragraph (1)(B)” in the matter preceding clause (i);
(ii)
in clause (i), by striking “ and” at the end;
(iii)
in clause (ii), by striking the period at the end and inserting “ ; and”; and
(iv)
by adding at the end the following new clause:

“(iii) procedures for determining when annuity payments to a supplemental or special needs trust shall end based on the death or marriage of the dependent child for which the trust was established.”

; and

(4)
in paragraph (3), by striking “ or fiduciary” in the paragraph heading and inserting “ , fiduciary, or trust”.

SEC. 625. Modification of Per-Fiscal Year Calculation of Days of Certain Active Duty or Active Service to Reduce Eligibility Age for Retirement for Non-Regular Service.

(1)
by inserting “ , subject to subparagraph (C),” after “ shall be reduced”; and
(2)
by striking “ so performs in any fiscal year after such date, subject to subparagraph (C)” and inserting “ serves on such active duty or performs such active service in any fiscal year after January 28, 2008, or in any two consecutive fiscal years after September 30, 2014”.

Subtitle D Commissary and Nonappropriated Fund Instrumentality Benefits and Operations

SEC. 631. Procurement of Brand-Name and Other Commercial Items for Resale by Commissary Stores.

Subsection (f) of section 2484 of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:

“(f) Procurement of Commercial Items Using Procedures Other Than Competitive Procedures.—The Secretary of Defense may use the exception provided in section 2304(c)(5) of this title for the procurement of any commercial item (including brand-name and generic items) for resale in, at, or by commissary stores.”

SEC. 632. Authority of Nonappropriated Fund Instrumentalities to Enter into Contracts with Other Federal Agencies and Instrumentalities to Provide and Obtain Certain Goods and Services.

Section 2492 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “ Federal department, agency, or instrumentality” and all that follows through the period at the end of the section and inserting the following:

“(1) to provide or obtain goods and services beneficial to the efficient management and operation of the exchange system or that morale, welfare, and recreation system; or

“(2) to provide or obtain food services beneficial to the efficient management and operation of the dining facilities on military installations offering food services to members of the armed forces.”

SEC. 633. Competitive Pricing of Legal Consumer Tobacco Products Sold in Department of Defense Retail Stores.

(a)
Prohibition on Banning Sale of Legal Consumer Tobacco Products.— The Secretary of Defense and the Secretaries of the military departments may not take any action to implement any new policy that would ban the sale of any legal consumer tobacco product category sold as of January 1, 2014, within the defense retail systems or on any Department of Defense vessel at sea.
(b)
Use of Prices Comparable to Local Prices.— The Secretary of Defense shall issue regulations regarding the pricing of tobacco and tobacco-related products sold in an outlet of the defense retail systems inside the United States, including territories and possessions of the United States, to prohibit the sale of a product at a price below the most competitive price for that product in the local community.
(c)
Application to Overseas Defense Retail Systems.— The regulations required by subsection (b) shall direct that the price of a tobacco or tobacco-related product sold in an outlet of the defense retail systems outside of the United States shall be within the range of prices established for that product in outlets of the defense retail systems inside the United States.
(d)
Defense Retail Systems Defined.— In this section, the term “defense retail systems” has the meaning given that term in section 2487(b)(2) of title 10, United States Code.

SEC. 634. Review of Management, Food, and Pricing Options for Defense Commissary System.

(a)
Review Required.— The Secretary of Defense shall conduct a review, utilizing the services of an independent organization experienced in grocery retail analysis, of the defense commissary system to determine the qualitative and quantitative effects of—
(1)
using variable pricing in commissary stores to reduce the expenditure of appropriated funds to operate the defense commissary system;
(2)
implementing a program to make available more private label products in commissary stores;
(3)
converting the defense commissary system to a nonappropriated fund instrumentality; and
(4)
eliminating or at least reducing second-destination funding.
(b)
Additional Elements of Review.— The review required by this section also shall consider the following:
(1)
The impact of changes to the operation of the defense commissary system on commissary patrons, in particular junior enlisted members and junior officers and their dependents, that would result from—
(A)
displacing current value and name-brand products with private-label products; and
(B)
reducing or eliminating financial subsidies to the commissary system.
(2)
The sensitivity of commissary patrons, in particular junior enlisted members and junior officers and their dependents, to pricing changes that may result in reduced overall cost savings for patrons.
(3)
The feasibility of generating net revenue from pricing and stock assortment changes.
(4)
The relationship of higher prices and reduced patron savings to patron usage and accompanying sales, both on a national and regional basis.
(5)
The impact of changes to the operation of the defense commissary system on industry support; such as vendor stocking, promotions, discounts, and merchandising activities and programs.
(6)
The ability of the current commissary management and information technology systems to accommodate changes to the existing pricing and management structure.
(7)
The product category management systems and expertise of the Defense Commissary Agency.
(8)
The impact of changes to the operation of the defense commissary system on military exchanges and other morale, welfare, and recreation programs for members of the Armed Forces.
(9)
The identification of management and legislative changes that would be required in connection with changes to the defense commissary system.
(10)
An estimate of the time required to implement recommended changes to the current pricing and management model of the defense commissary system.
(c)
Submission.— Not later than September 1, 2015, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report containing the results of the review required by this section.

TITLE VII Health Care Provisions

Subtitle A TRICARE and Other Health Care Benefits

SEC. 701. Mental Health Assessments for Members of the Armed Forces.

(a)
Annual Mental Health Assessments.—
(1)
In general.— Chapter 55 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 1074m the following new section:

“§ 1074n. Annual mental health assessments for members of the armed forces

“(a) Mental Health Assessments.—Subject to subsection (c), not less frequently than once each calendar year, the Secretary of Defense shall provide a person-to-person mental health assessment for—

“(1) each member of a regular component of the armed forces; and

“(2) each member of the Selected Reserve of an armed force.

“(b) Elements.—The mental health assessments provided pursuant to this section shall—

“(1) be conducted in accordance with the requirements of subsection (c)(1) of section 1074m of this title with respect to a mental health assessment provided pursuant to such section; and

“(2) include a review of the health records of the member that are related to each previous health assessment or other relevant activities of the member while serving in the armed forces, as determined by the Secretary.

“(c) Sufficiency of Other Mental Health Assessments.—

(1) The Secretary is not required to provide a mental health assessment pursuant to this section to an individual in a calendar year in which the individual has received a mental health assessment pursuant to section 1074m of this title.

“(2) The Secretary may treat periodic health assessments and other person-to-person assessments that are provided to members of the armed forces, including examinations under section 1074f of this title, as meeting the requirements for mental health assessments required under this section if the Secretary determines that such assessments and person-to-person assessments meet the requirements for mental health assessments established by this section.

“(d) Privacy Matters.—Any medical or other personal information obtained under this section shall be protected from disclosure or misuse in accordance with the laws on privacy applicable to such information.

“(e) Regulations.—The Secretary of Defense shall, in consultation with the other administering Secretaries, prescribe regulations for the administration of this section.”

(2)
Clerical amendment.— The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 55 of such title is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 1074m the following new item:

“1074n. Annual mental health assessments for members of the armed forces.”.

(3)
Implementation.— Not later than 180 days after the date of the issuance of the regulations prescribed under section 1074n(e) of title 10, United States Code, as added by paragraph (1), the Secretary of Defense shall implement such regulations.
(4)
Report.—
(A)
In general.— Not later than one year after the date on which the Secretary of Defense implements the regulations described in paragraph (3), the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives a report on the annual mental health assessments of members of the Armed Forces conducted pursuant to section 1074n of title 10, United States Code, as added by paragraph (1).
(B)
Matters included.— The report under subparagraph (A) shall include the following:
(i)
A description of the tools and processes used to provide the annual mental health assessments of members of the Armed Forces conducted pursuant to such section 1074n, including—
(I)
whether such tools and processes are evidenced-based; and
(II)
the process by which such tools and processes have been approved for use in providing mental health assessments.
(ii)
Such recommendations for improving the tools and processes used to conduct such assessments, including tools that may address the underreporting of mental health conditions, as the Secretary considers appropriate.
(iii)
Such recommendations as the Secretary considers appropriate for improving the monitoring and reporting of the number of members of the Armed Forces—
(I)
who receive such assessments;
(II)
who are referred for care based on such assessments; and
(III)
who receive care based on such referrals.
(C)
Treatment of certain information.— No personally identifiable information of a member of the Armed Forces may be included in any report under subparagraph (A).
(5)
Conforming amendment.— Section 1074m(e)(1) of such title is amended by inserting “ and section 1074n of this title” after “ pursuant to this section”.
(b)
Frequency of Mental Health Assessments for Deployed Members.—
(1)
In general.— Section 1074m of such title is further amended—
(A)
in subsection (a)(1)—
(i)
by redesignating subparagraphs (B) and (C) as subparagraphs (C) and (D), respectively; and
(ii)
by inserting after subparagraph (A) the following new subparagraph:

“(B) Until January 1, 2019, once during each 180-day period during which a member is deployed.”

; and

(B)
in subsection (c)(1)(A)—
(i)
in clause (i), by striking “ ; and” and inserting a semicolon;
(ii)
by redesignating clause (ii) as clause (iii); and
(iii)
by inserting after clause (i) the following new clause:

“(ii) by personnel in deployed units whose responsibilities include providing unit health care services if such personnel are available and the use of such personnel for the assessments would not impair the capacity of such personnel to perform higher priority tasks; and”

(2)
Conforming amendment.— Subsection (a)(2) of such section 1074m is amended by striking “ subparagraph (B) and (C)” and inserting “ subparagraphs (C) and (D)”.

SEC. 702. Modifications of Cost-Sharing and Other Requirements for the Tricare Pharmacy Benefits Program.

(a)
Availability of Pharmaceutical Agents Through National Mail-Order Pharmacy Program.— Paragraph (5) of section 1074g(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
by striking “ at least one of the means described in paragraph (2)(E)” and inserting “ the national mail-order pharmacy program”; and
(2)
by striking “ may include” and all that follows through the period at the end and inserting “ shall include cost-sharing by the eligible covered beneficiary as specified in paragraph (6).”.
(b)
Modification of Cost-Sharing Amounts.— Paragraph (6)(A) of such section 1074g(a) is amended—
(1)
in clause (i)—
(A)
in subclause (I), by striking “ $5” and inserting “ $8”;
(B)
in subclause (II), by striking “ $17; and” and inserting “ $20.”; and
(C)
by striking subclause (III); and
(2)
in clause (ii)—
(A)
in subclause (II), by striking “ $13” and inserting “ $16”; and
(B)
in subclause (III), by striking “ $43” and inserting “ $46”.
(c)
Refills of Prescription Maintenance Medications Through Military Treatment Facility Pharmacies or National Mail Order Pharmacy Program.—
(1)
In general.— Such section is further amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

“(9)

(A) Beginning on October 1, 2015, the pharmacy benefits program shall require eligible covered beneficiaries generally to refill non-generic prescription maintenance medications through military treatment facility pharmacies or the national mail-order pharmacy program.

“(B) The Secretary shall determine the maintenance medications subject to the requirement under subparagraph (A). The Secretary shall ensure that—

“(i) such medications are generally available to eligible covered beneficiaries through retail pharmacies only for an initial filling of a 30-day or less supply; and

“(ii) any refills of such medications are obtained through a military treatment facility pharmacy or the national mail-order pharmacy program.

“(C) The Secretary may exempt the following prescription maintenance medications from the requirement of subparagraph (A):

“(i) Medications that are for acute care needs.

“(ii) Such other medications as the Secretary determines appropriate.”

(2)
Termination of pilot program.— Section 716(f) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 10 U.S.C. 1074g note) is amended by striking “ December 31, 2017” and inserting “ September 30, 2015”.
(d)
GAO Report on Pilot Program.— Not later than July 1, 2015, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the satisfaction of beneficiaries participating in the pilot program under section 716 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 10 U.S.C. 1074g note). Such report shall address the following:
(1)
The satisfaction of beneficiaries participating in the pilot program.
(2)
The timeliness of refilling prescriptions under the pilot program.
(3)
The accuracy of prescription refills under the pilot program.
(4)
The availability of medications refilled under the pilot program.
(5)
The cost savings to the Department of Defense realized by the pilot program.
(6)
The number of beneficiaries who did not participate in the pilot program by reason of subsection (c) of such section 716.
(7)
Any other matters the Comptroller General considers appropriate.

SEC. 703. Elimination of Inpatient Day Limits and Other Limits in Provision of Mental Health Services.

(a)
Inpatient Day Limits.— Section 1079 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
in subsection (a)—
(A)
by striking paragraph (6); and
(B)
by redesignating paragraphs (7) through (17) as paragraphs (6) through (16), respectively;
(2)
by striking subsection (i); and
(3)
by redesignating subsections (j) through (q) as subsections (i) through (p), respectively.
(b)
Waiver of Nonavailability Statement or Preauthorization.— Section 721(a) of the Floyd D. Spence National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2001 (10 U.S.C. 1073 note) is amended by striking “ (other than mental health services)”.
(c)
Conforming Amendments.— Chapter 55 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
in section 1079(e)(7), by striking “ subsection (a)(13)” and inserting “ subsection (a)(12)”;
(2)
in section 1086—
(A)
in subsection (d)(4)(A)(ii), by striking “ section 1079(j)(1)” and inserting “ section 1079(i)(1)”; and
(B)
in subsection (g), by striking “ Section 1079(j)” and inserting “ Section 1079(i)”; and
(3)
in section 1105(c), by striking “ section 1079(a)(7)” and inserting “ section 1079(a)(6)”.

SEC. 704. Authority for Provisional Tricare Coverage for Emerging Health Care Services and Supplies.

(a)
In General.— Chapter 55 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 1079b the following new section:

“§ 1079c. Provisional coverage for emerging services and supplies

“(a) Provisional Coverage.—In carrying out the TRICARE program, including pursuant to section 1079(a)(12) of this title, the Secretary of Defense, acting through the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs, may provide provisional coverage for the provision of a service or supply if the Secretary determines that such service or supply is widely recognized in the United States as being safe and effective.

“(b) Consideration of Evidence.—In making a determination under subsection (a), the Secretary may consider—

“(1) clinical trials published in refereed medical literature;

“(2) formal technology assessments;

“(3) the positions of national medical policy organizations;

“(4) national professional associations;

“(5) national expert opinion organizations; and

“(6) such other validated evidence as the Secretary considers appropriate.

“(c) Independent Evaluation.—In making a determination under subsection (a), the Secretary may arrange for an evaluation from the Institute of Medicine of the National Academies or such other independent entity as the Secretary selects.

“(d) Duration and Terms of Coverage.—

(1) Provisional coverage under subsection (a) for a service or supply may be in effect for not longer than a total of five years.

“(2) Prior to the expiration of provisional coverage of a service or supply, the Secretary shall determine the coverage, if any, that will follow such provisional coverage and take appropriate action to implement such determination. If the Secretary determines that the implementation of such determination regarding coverage requires legislative action, the Secretary shall make a timely recommendation to Congress regarding such legislative action.

“(3) The Secretary, at any time, may—

“(A) terminate the provisional coverage under subsection (a) of a service or supply, regardless of whether such termination is before the end of the period described in paragraph (1);

“(B) establish or disestablish terms and conditions for such coverage; or

“(C) take any other action with respect to such coverage.

“(e) Public Notice.—The Secretary shall promptly publish on a publicly accessible Internet website of the TRICARE program a notice for each service or supply that receives provisional coverage under subsection (a), including any terms and conditions for such coverage.

“(f) Finality of Determinations.—Any determination to approve or disapprove a service or supply under subsection (a) and any action made under subsection (d)(3) shall be final.”

(b)
Clerical Amendment.— The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 1079b the following new item:

“1079c. Provisional coverage for emerging services and supplies.”.

SEC. 705. Clarification of Provision of Food to Former Members and Dependents Not Receiving Inpatient Care in Military Medical Treatment Facilities.

(1)
by striking “ A member” each place it appears and inserting “ A member or former member”; and
(2)
in subsection (a)(2)(C), by striking “ member or dependent” and inserting “ member, former member, or dependent”.

SEC. 706. Availability of Breastfeeding Support, Supplies, and Counseling under the Tricare Program.

Section 1079(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

“(17) Breastfeeding support, supplies (including breast pumps and associated equipment), and counseling shall be provided as appropriate during pregnancy and the postpartum period.”

Subtitle B Health Care Administration

SEC. 711. Provision of Notice of Change to Tricare Benefits.

(a)
In General.— Chapter 55 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 1097c the following new section:

“§ 1097d. TRICARE program: notice of change to benefits

“(a) Provision of Notice.—

(1) If the Secretary makes a significant change to any benefits provided by the TRICARE program to covered beneficiaries, the Secretary shall provide individuals described in paragraph (2) with notice explaining such changes.

“(2) The individuals described by this paragraph are covered beneficiaries participating in the TRICARE program who may be affected by a significant change covered by a notification under paragraph (1).

“(3) The Secretary shall provide notice under paragraph (1) through electronic means.

“(b) Timing of Notice.—The Secretary shall provide notice under paragraph (1) of subsection (a) by the earlier of the following dates:

“(1) The date that the Secretary determines would afford individuals described in paragraph (2) of such subsection adequate time to understand the change covered by the notification.

“(2) The date that is 90 days before the date on which the change covered by the notification becomes effective.

“(3) The effective date of a significant change that is required by law.

“(c) Significant Change Defined.—In this section, the term ‘significant change’ means a systemwide change—

“(1) in the structure of the TRICARE program or the benefits provided under the TRICARE program (not including the addition of new services or benefits); or

“(2) in beneficiary cost-share rates of more than 20 percent.”

(b)
Clerical Amendment.— The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 1097c the following new item:

“1097d. TRICARE program: notice of change to benefits.”.

SEC. 712. Surveys on Continued Viability of Tricare Standard and Tricare Extra.

Section 711(b)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (10 U.S.C. 1073 note) is amended in the matter preceding subparagraph (A)—
(1)
by striking “ on a biennial basis”; and
(2)
by striking “ paragraph (1)” and inserting the following: “ paragraph (1) during 2017 and 2020”.

SEC. 713. Review of Military Health System Modernization Study.

(a)
Limitation.—
(1)
In general.— The Secretary of Defense may not restructure or realign a military medical treatment facility based on the modernization study until a 90-day period has elapsed following the date on which the Comptroller General of the United States is required to submit to the congressional defense committees the report under subsection (b)(3).
(2)
Report.— The Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that includes the following:
(A)
During the period from 2006 to 2012, for each military medical treatment facility considered under the modernization study—
(i)
the average daily inpatient census;
(ii)
the average inpatient capacity;
(iii)
the top five inpatient admission diagnoses;
(iv)
each medical specialty available;
(v)
the average daily percent of staffing available for each medical specialty;
(vi)
the beneficiary population within the catchment area;
(vii)
the budgeted funding level;
(viii)
whether the facility has a helipad capable of receiving medical evacuation airlift patients arriving on the primary evacuation aircraft platform for the military installation served;
(ix)
a determination of whether the civilian hospital system in which the facility resides is a Federally- designated underserved medical community and the effect on such community from any reduction in staff or functions or downgrade of the facility;
(x)
if the facility serves a training center—
(I)
a determination of the risk with respect to high-tempo, live-fire military operations, treating battlefield-like injuries, and the potential for a mass casualty event if the facility is downgraded to a clinic or reduced in personnel or capabilities; and
(II)
a description of the extent to which the Secretary, in making such determination, consulted with the appropriate training directorate, training and doctrine command, and forces command of each military department;
(xi)
a site assessment by TRICARE to assess the network capabilities of TRICARE providers in the local area;
(xii)
the inpatient mental health availability; and
(xiii)
the average annual inpatient care directed to civilian medical facilities.
(B)
For each military medical treatment facility considered under the modernization study—
(i)
the civilian capacity by medical specialty in each catchment area;
(ii)
the distance in miles to the nearest civilian emergency care department;
(iii)
the distance in miles to the closest civilian inpatient hospital, listed by level of care and whether the facility is designated a sole community hospital;
(iv)
the availability of ambulance service on the military installation and the distance in miles to the nearest civilian ambulance service, including the average response time to the military installation;
(v)
an estimate of the cost to restructure or realign the military medical treatment facility, including with respect to bed closures and civilian personnel reductions; and
(vi)
if the military medical treatment facility is restructured or realigned, an estimate of—
(I)
the number of civilian personnel reductions, listed by series;
(II)
the number of local support contracts terminated; and
(III)
the increased cost of purchased care.
(C)
The results of the modernization study with respect to the recommendations of the Secretary to restructure or realign military medical treatment facilities.
(D)
An assessment of the analysis made by the Secretary to inform decisions regarding the modernization of the military health care system in the modernization study.
(E)
An assessment of the extent to which the Secretary evaluated in the modernization study the impact on the access of eligible beneficiaries to quality health care, and satisfaction with such care, caused by the following changes proposed in the study:
(i)
Changes in military medical treatment facility infrastructure.
(ii)
Changes in staffing levels of professionals.
(iii)
Changes in inpatient, ambulatory surgery, and specialty care capacity and capabilities.
(F)
An assessment of the extent to which the Secretary evaluated in the modernization study how any reduced inpatient, ambulatory surgery, or specialty care capacity and capabilities at military medical treatment facilities covered by the study would impact timely access to care for eligible beneficiaries at local civilian community hospitals within reasonable driving distances of the catchment areas of such facilities.
(G)
An assessment of the extent to which the Secretary consulted in conducting the modernization study with community hospitals in locations covered by the study to determine their capacities for additional inpatient and ambulatory surgery patients and their capabilities to meet additional demands for specialty care services.
(H)
An assessment of the extent to which the Secretary considered in the modernization study the impact that the change in the structure or alignment of military medical treatment facilities covered by the study would have on timely access by local civilian populations to inpatient, ambulatory surgery, or specialty care services if additional eligible beneficiaries also sought access to such services from the same providers.
(I)
An assessment of the impact of the elimination of health care services at military medical treatment facilities covered by the modernization study on civilians employed at such facilities.
(b)
Comptroller General Review.—
(1)
Review.— The Comptroller General of the United States shall review the report under subsection (a)(2).
(2)
Elements.— The review under paragraph (1) shall include the following:
(A)
An assessment of the methodology used by the Secretary of Defense in conducting the study.
(B)
An assessment of the adequacy of the data used by the Secretary with respect to such study.
(3)
Report.— Not later than 180 days after the date on which the Secretary submits the report under subsection (a)(2), the Comptroller General shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the review under paragraph (1).
(c)
Modernization Study Defined.— In this section, the term “modernization study” means the Military Health System Modernization Study of the Department of Defense directed by the Resource Management Decision of the Department of Defense numbered MP–D–01.

Subtitle C Reports and Other Matters

SEC. 721. Designation and Responsibilities of Senior Medical Advisor for Armed Forces Retirement Home.

(a)
Designation of Senior Medical Advisor.— Subsection (a) of section 1513A of the Armed Forces Retirement Home Act of 1991 (24 U.S.C. 413a) is amended—
(1)
in paragraph (1), by striking “ Deputy Director of the TRICARE Management Activity” and inserting “ Deputy Director of the Defense Health Agency”; and
(2)
in paragraph (2), by striking “ Deputy Director of the TRICARE Management Activity” both places it appears and inserting “ Deputy Director of the Defense Health Agency”.
(b)
Clarification of Responsibilities and Duties of Senior Medical Advisor.— Subsection (c)(2) of such section is amended by striking “ health care standards of the Department of Veterans Affairs” and inserting “ nationally recognized health care standards and requirements”.

SEC. 722. Extension of Authority for Joint Department of Defense-Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Facility Demonstration Fund.

Section 1704(e) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2573) is amended by striking “ September 30, 2015” and inserting “ September 30, 2016”.

SEC. 723. Report on Status of Reductions in Tricare Prime Service Areas.

(a)
Report Required.— Section 732 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (10 U.S.C. 1097a note) is amended—
(1)
by redesignating subsections (b) and (c) as subsections (c) and (d), respectively; and
(2)
by inserting after subsection (a) the following new subsection (b):

“(b) Additional Report.—

“(1) Report required.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of the Carl Levin and Howard P. ‘Buck’ McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015, the Secretary shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report on the status of reducing the availability of TRICARE Prime in regions described in subsection (d)(1)(B).

“(2) Matters included.—The report under paragraph (1) shall include the following:

“(A) A description of the implementation of the transition for affected eligible beneficiaries under the TRICARE program who no longer have access to TRICARE Prime under TRICARE managed care contracts as of the date of the report, including—

“(i) the number of eligible beneficiaries who have transitioned from TRICARE Prime to the TRICARE Standard option of the TRICARE program since October 1, 2013;

“(ii) the number of eligible beneficiaries who transferred their TRICARE Prime enrollment to a more distant available Prime service area to remain in TRICARE Prime, by State;

“(iii) the number of eligible beneficiaries who were eligible to transfer to a more distant available Prime service area, but chose to use TRICARE Standard;

“(iv) the number of eligible beneficiaries who elected to return to TRICARE Prime pursuant to subsection (c)(1); and

“(v) the number of affected eligible beneficiaries who, as of the date of the report, changed residences to remain eligible for TRICARE Prime in a new region.

“(B) An estimate of the increased annual costs per affected eligible beneficiary incurred by such beneficiary for health care under the TRICARE program.

“(C) A description of the efforts of the Department to assess the impact on access to health care and beneficiary satisfaction for affected eligible beneficiaries.

“(D) A description of the estimated cost savings realized by reducing the availability of TRICARE Prime in regions described in subsection (d)(1)(B).”

(b)
Conforming Amendment.— Subsection (b)(3)(A) of such section is amended by striking “ subsection (c)(1)(B)” and inserting “ subsection (d)(1)(B)”.

SEC. 724. Extension of Authority to Provide Rehabilitation and Vocational Benefits to Members of the Armed Forces with Severe Injuries or Illnesses.

Section 1631(b)(2) of the Wounded Warrior Act (title XVI of Public Law 110–181; 10 U.S.C. 1071 note) is amended by striking “ December 31, 2014” and inserting “ December 31, 2015”.

SEC. 725. Acquisition Strategy for Health Care Professional Staffing Services.

(a)
Acquisition Strategy.—
(1)
In general.— The Secretary of Defense shall develop and carry out an acquisition strategy with respect to entering into contracts for the services of health care professional staff at military medical treatment facilities.
(2)
Elements.— The acquisition strategy under paragraph (1) shall include the following:
(A)
Identification of the responsibilities of the military departments and elements of the Department of Defense in carrying out such strategy.
(B)
Methods to analyze, using reliable and detailed data covering the entire Department, the amount of funds expended on contracts for the services of health care professional staff.
(C)
Methods to identify opportunities to consolidate requirements for such services and reduce cost.
(D)
Methods to measure cost savings that are realized by using such contracts instead of purchased care.
(E)
Metrics to determine the effectiveness of such strategy.
(F)
Metrics to evaluate the success of the strategy in achieving its objectives, including metrics to assess the effects of the strategy on the timeliness of beneficiary access to professional health care services in military medical treatment facilities.
(G)
Such other matters as the Secretary considers appropriate.
(b)
Report.— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the status of implementing the acquisition strategy under paragraph (1) of subsection (a), including how each element under subparagraphs (A) through (G) of paragraph (2) of such subsection is being carried out.

SEC. 726. Pilot Program on Medication Therapy Management under Tricare Program.

(a)
Establishment.— In accordance with section 1092 of title 10, United States Code, the Secretary of Defense shall carry out a pilot program to evaluate the feasibility and desirability of including medication therapy management as part of the TRICARE program.
(b)
Elements of Pilot Program.— In carrying out the pilot program under subsection (a), the Secretary shall ensure the following:
(1)
Patients who participate in the pilot program are patients who—
(A)
have more than one chronic condition; and
(B)
are prescribed more than one medication.
(2)
Medication therapy management services provided under the pilot program are focused on improving patient use and outcomes of prescription medications.
(3)
The design of the pilot program considers best commercial practices in providing medication therapy management services, including practices under the prescription drug program under part D of title XVIII of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w–101 et seq.).
(4)
The pilot program includes methods to measure the effect of medication therapy management services on—
(A)
patient use and outcomes of prescription medications; and
(B)
the costs of health care.
(c)
Locations.—
(1)
Selection.— The Secretary shall carry out the pilot program under subsection (a) in not less than three locations.
(2)
First location criteria.— Not less than one location selected under paragraph (1) shall meet the following criteria:
(A)
The location is a pharmacy at a military medical treatment facility.
(B)
The patients participating in the pilot program at such location generally receive primary care services from health care providers at such facility.
(3)
Second location criteria.— Not less than one location selected under paragraph (1) shall meet the following criteria:
(A)
The location is a pharmacy at a military medical treatment facility.
(B)
The patients participating in the pilot program at such location generally do not receive primary care services from health care providers at such facility.
(4)
Third location criterion.— Not less than one location selected under paragraph (1) shall be a pharmacy located at a location other than a military medical treatment facility.
(d)
Duration.— The Secretary shall carry out the pilot program under subsection (a) for a period determined appropriate by the Secretary that is not less than two years.
(e)
Report.— Not later than 30 months after the date on which the Secretary commences the pilot program under subsection (a), the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the pilot program that includes—
(1)
information on the effect of medication therapy management services on—
(A)
patient use and outcomes of prescription medications; and
(B)
the costs of health care;
(2)
the recommendations of the Secretary with respect to incorporating medication therapy management into the TRICARE program; and
(3)
such other information as the Secretary determines appropriate.
(f)
Definitions.— In this section:
(1)
The term “medication therapy management” means professional services provided by qualified pharmacists to patients to improve the effective use and outcomes of prescription medications provided to the patients.
(2)
The term “TRICARE program” has the meaning given that term in section 1072 of title 10, United States Code.

SEC. 727. Antimicrobial Stewardship Program at Medical Facilities of the Department of Defense.

(a)
In General.— Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall carry out an antimicrobial stewardship program at medical facilities of the Department of Defense.
(b)
Collection and Analysis of Data.— In carrying out the antimicrobial stewardship program required by subsection (a), the Secretary shall develop a consistent manner in which to collect and analyze data on antibiotic usage, health issues related to antibiotic usage, and antimicrobial resistance trends at medical facilities of the Department.
(c)
Plan.— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the Senate a plan for carrying out the antimicrobial stewardship program required by subsection (a).

SEC. 728. Report on Improvements in the Identification and Treatment of Mental Health Conditions and Traumatic Brain Injury Among Members of the Armed Forces.

(a)
In General.— Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report setting forth an evaluation of specific tools, processes, and best practices to improve the identification of and treatment by the Armed Forces of mental health conditions and traumatic brain injury among members of the Armed Forces.
(b)
Elements.— The report under subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1)
An evaluation of existing peer-to-peer identification and intervention programs in each of the Armed Forces.
(2)
An evaluation of programs that provide training and certification to health care providers that treat mental health conditions and traumatic brain injury in members of the Armed Forces.
(3)
An evaluation of programs and services provided by the Armed Forces that provide training and certification to providers of cognitive rehabilitation and other rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury to members of the Armed Forces.
(4)
An evaluation of programs and services provided by the Armed Forces that assist members of the Armed Forces and family members affected by suicides among members of the Armed Forces.
(5)
An evaluation of tools and processes used by the Armed Forces to identify traumatic brain injury in members of the Armed Forces and to distinguish mental health conditions likely caused by traumatic brain injury from mental health conditions caused by other factors.
(6)
An evaluation of the unified effort of the Armed Forces to promote mental health and prevent suicide through the integration of clinical and nonclinical programs of the Armed Forces.
(7)
Recommendations with respect to improving, consolidating, expanding, and standardizing the programs, services, tools, processes, and efforts described in paragraphs (1) through (6).
(8)
A description of existing efforts to reduce the time from development and testing of new mental health and traumatic brain injury tools and treatments for members of the Armed Forces to widespread dissemination of such tools and treatments among the Armed Forces.
(9)
Recommendations as to the feasibility and advisability of conducting mental health assessments before the enlistment or commissioning of a member of the Armed Forces and again during the 90-day period preceding the date of discharge or release of the member from the Armed Forces, including the utility of using tools and processes in such mental health assessments that conform to those used in other mental health assessments provided to members of the Armed Forces.
(10)
Recommendations on how to track changes in the mental health assessment of a member of the Armed Forces relating to traumatic brain injury, post-traumatic stress disorder, depression, anxiety, and other conditions.
(c)
Privacy Matters.—
(1)
In general.— Any medical or other personal information obtained pursuant to any provision of this section shall be protected from disclosure or misuse in accordance with the laws on privacy applicable to such information.
(2)
Exclusion of personally identifiable information from reports.— No personally identifiable information may be included in the report required by subsection (a).

SEC. 729. Report on Efforts to Treat Infertility of Military Families.

(a)
Report.— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report assessing the access of members of the Armed Forces and the dependents of such members to reproductive counseling and treatments for infertility.
(b)
Matters Included.— The report under subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1)
A description, by location, of the infertility treatment services available at military medical treatment facilities throughout the military health care system.
(2)
An identification of factors that might disrupt treatment, including lack of timely access to treatment, change in duty station, or overseas deployments.
(3)
The number of members of the Armed Forces who have received specific infertility treatment services during the five-year period preceding the date of the report.
(4)
The number of dependents of members who have received specific infertility treatment services during the five-year period preceding the date of the report.
(5)
The number of births resulting from infertility treatment services described in paragraphs (3) and (4).
(6)
A comparison of infertility treatment services covered by health plans sponsored by the Federal Government and infertility treatment services provided by the military health care system.
(7)
The current cost to the Department of Defense for providing infertility treatment services to members and dependents.
(8)
The current cost to members and dependents for infertility treatment services provided by the military health care system.
(9)
Any other matters the Secretary determines appropriate.

SEC. 730. Report on Implementation of Recommendations of Institute of Medicine on Improvements to Certain Resilience and Prevention Programs of the Department of Defense.

Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report setting forth an assessment of the feasibility and advisability of implementing the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine regarding improvements to programs of the Department of Defense intended to strengthen mental, emotional, and behavioral abilities associated with managing adversity, adapting to change, recovering, and learning in connection with service in the Armed Forces.

SEC. 731. Comptroller General Report on Transition of Care for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder or Traumatic Brain Injury.

(a)
Report.— Not later than September 1, 2015, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the congressional defense committees and the Committees on Veterans’ Affairs of the House of Representatives and the Senate a report that assesses the transition of care for post-traumatic stress disorder and traumatic brain injury.
(b)
Matters Included.— The report under subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1)
The programs, policies, and regulations that affect the transition of care, particularly with respect to individuals who are taking or have been prescribed antidepressants, stimulants, antipsychotics, mood stabilizers, anxiolytics, depressants, or hallucinogens.
(2)
Upon transitioning to care furnished by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, the extent to which the pharmaceutical treatment plan of an individual changes, and the factors determining such changes.
(3)
The extent to which the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Veterans Affairs have worked together to identify and apply best pharmaceutical treatment practices.
(4)
A description of the off-formulary waiver process of the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, and the extent to which the process is applied efficiently at the treatment level.
(5)
The benefits and challenges of harmonizing the formularies across the Department of Defense and the Department of Veterans Affairs.
(6)
Any other issues that the Comptroller General determines appropriate.
(c)
Transition of Care Defined.— In this section, the term “transition of care” means the transition of an individual from receiving treatment furnished by the Secretary of Defense to treatment furnished by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs.

SEC. 732. Comptroller General Report on Mental Health Stigma Reduction Efforts in the Department of Defense.

(a)
In General.— The Comptroller General of the United States shall carry out a review of the policies, procedures, and programs of the Department of Defense to reduce the stigma associated with mental health treatment for members of the Armed Forces and deployed civilian employees of the Department of Defense.
(b)
Elements.— The review under subsection (a) shall address, at a minimum, the following:
(1)
An assessment of the availability and access to mental health treatment services for members of the Armed Forces and deployed civilian employees of the Department of Defense.
(2)
An assessment of the perception of the impact of the stigma of mental health treatment on the career advancement and retention of members of the Armed Forces and such employees.
(3)
An assessment of the policies, procedures, and programs, including training and education, of each of the Armed Forces to reduce the stigma of mental health treatment for members of the Armed Forces and such employees at each unit level of the organized forces.
(c)
Report.— Not later than March 1, 2016, the Comptroller General shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the Senate a report on the review under subsection (a).

SEC. 733. Comptroller General Report on Women’s Health Care Services for Members of the Armed Forces and Other Covered Beneficiaries.

(a)
Report.— Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the Senate a report on women’s health care services for members of the Armed Forces serving on active duty and other covered beneficiaries under chapter 55 of title 10, United States Code.
(b)
Elements.— The report under subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1)
A description and assessment of women’s health care services for members of the Armed Forces and other covered beneficiaries, including with respect to access to care, scope of available care, and availability of speciality care, and with a particular emphasis on maternity care.
(2)
An assessment of whether the quality measures used by the military health care system with respect to women’s health care services for members of the Armed Forces and other covered beneficiaries facilitate expected outcomes, and an assessment of whether another, or additional, evidence-based quality measures would improve outcomes in the military health care system.
(3)
A description and assessment of nationally recognized recommendations to improve access to health services and better health outcomes for women members of the Armed Forces and other covered beneficiaries.
(4)
Such recommendations for legislative or administrative action as the Comptroller General considers appropriate to improve women’s health care services for members of the Armed Forces and other covered beneficiaries.

TITLE VIII Acquisition Policy, Acquisition Management, and Related Matters

Subtitle A Acquisition Policy and Management

SEC. 801. Modular Open Systems Approaches in Acquisition Programs.

(a)
Plan for Modular Open Systems Approach Through Development and Adoption of Standards and Architectures.— Not later than January 1, 2016, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics shall submit a report to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives detailing a plan to develop standards and define architectures necessary to enable open systems approaches in the key mission areas of the Department of Defense with respect to which the Under Secretary determines that such standards and architectures would be feasible and cost effective.
(b)
Consideration of Modular Open Systems Approaches.—
(1)
Review of acquisition guidance.— The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics shall review current acquisition guidance, and modify such guidance as necessary, to—
(A)
ensure that acquisition programs include open systems approaches in the product design and acquisition of information technology systems to the maximum extent practicable; and
(B)
for any information technology system not using an open systems approach, ensure that written justification is provided in the contract file for the system detailing why an open systems approach was not used.
(2)
Elements.— The review required in paragraph (1) shall—
(A)
consider whether the guidance includes appropriate exceptions for the acquisition of—
(i)
commercial items; and
(ii)
solutions addressing urgent operational needs;
(B)
determine the extent to which open systems approaches should be addressed in analysis of alternatives, acquisition strategies, system engineering plans, and life cycle sustainment plans; and
(C)
ensure that increments of acquisition programs consider the extent to which the increment will implement open systems approaches as a whole.
(3)
Deadline for review.— The review required in this subsection shall be completed no later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act.
(c)
Treatment of Ongoing and Legacy Programs.—
(1)
Report requirement.— Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report covering the matters specified in paragraph (2).
(2)
Matters covered.— Subject to paragraph (3), the report required in this subsection shall—
(A)
identify all information technology systems that are in development, production, or deployed status as of the date of the enactment of this Act, that are or were major defense acquisition programs or major automated information systems, and that are not using an open systems approach;
(B)
identify gaps in standards and architectures necessary to enable open systems approaches in the key mission areas of the Department of Defense, as determined pursuant to the plan submitted under subsection (a); and
(C)
outline a process for potential conversion to an open systems approach for each information technology system identified under subparagraph (A).
(3)
Limitations.— The report required in this subsection shall not include information technology systems—
(A)
having a planned increment before fiscal year 2021 that will result in conversion to an open systems approach; and
(B)
that will be in operation for fewer than 15 years after the date of the enactment of this Act.
(d)
Definitions.— In this section:
(1)
Information technology.— The term “information technology” has the meaning given the term in section 11101(6) of title 40, United States Code.
(2)
Open systems approach.— The term “open systems approach” means, with respect to an information technology system, an integrated business and technical strategy that—
(A)
employs a modular design and uses widely supported and consensus-based standards for key interfaces;
(B)
is subjected to successful validation and verification tests to ensure key interfaces comply with widely supported and consensus-based standards; and
(C)
uses a system architecture that allows components to be added, modified, replaced, removed, or supported by different vendors throughout the lifecycle of the system to afford opportunities for enhanced competition and innovation while yielding—
(i)
significant cost and schedule savings; and
(ii)
increased interoperability.

SEC. 802. Recharacterization of Changes to Major Automated Information System Programs.

(a)
Addition to Covered Determination of a Significant Change.— Subsection (c)(2) of section 2445c of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
in subparagraph (B), by striking “ ; or” and inserting a semicolon;
(2)
in subparagraph (C), by striking the period at the end and inserting “ ; or”; and
(3)
by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:

“(D) the automated information system or information technology investment failed to achieve a full deployment decision within five years after the Milestone A decision for the program or, if there was no Milestone A decision, the date when the preferred alternative is selected for the program (excluding any time during which program activity is delayed as a result of a bid protest).”

(b)
Removal of Covered Determination of a Critical Change.— Subsection (d)(3) of such section is amended—
(1)
by striking subparagraph (A); and
(2)
by redesignating subparagraphs (B), (C), and (D) as subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C), respectively.
(c)
Technical Amendment for Clarity.— Subsection (d)(2) of such section is amended by striking “ (A) is primarily due to an extension of a program, and (B) involves” and inserting “ are primarily due to an extension of a program and involve”.

SEC. 803. Amendments Relating to Defense Business Systems.

(a)
Exclusion of Certain Information Systems From Definition of Defense Business System.— Subsection (j)(1) of section 2222 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
by inserting “ (A)” after “ (1)”;
(2)
by striking “ , other than a national security system,”; and
(3)
by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:

“(B) The term does not include—

“(i) a national security system; or

“(ii) an information system used exclusively by and within the defense commissary system or the exchange system or other instrumentality of the Department of Defense conducted for the morale, welfare, and recreation of members of the armed forces using nonappropriated funds.”

(b)
Business Process Mapping Requirement.— Section 2222 of such title is further amended—
(1)
in subsection (a)(1)(A), by inserting “ , including business process mapping,” after “ re-engineering efforts”; and
(2)
in subsection (j), by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

“(6) The term ‘business process mapping’ means a procedure in which the steps in a business process are clarified and documented in both written form and in a flow chart.”

SEC. 804. Report on Implementation of Acquisition Process for Information Technology Systems.

(a)
In General.— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology and Logistics shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the implementation of the acquisition process for information technology systems required by section 804 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2402; 10 U.S.C. 2225 note).
(b)
Elements.— The report required under subsection (a) shall, at a minimum, include the following elements:
(1)
The applicable regulations, instructions, or policies implementing the acquisition process.
(2)
With respect to the criteria established for such process in section 804(a) of such Act—
(A)
an explanation for any criteria not yet implemented;
(B)
a schedule for the implementation of any criteria not yet implemented; and
(C)
an explanation for any proposed deviation from the criteria.
(3)
Identification of any categories of information technology acquisitions to which the acquisition process will not apply.
(4)
Recommendations for any legislation that may be required to implement the remaining criteria of the acquisition process.

Subtitle B Amendments to General Contracting Authorities, Procedures, and Limitations

SEC. 811. Extension and Modification of Contract Authority for Advanced Component Development and Prototype Units.

Section 819 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2409; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended—
(1)
in subsection (a)—
(A)
in paragraph (1), by striking “ advanced component development or prototype of technology” and inserting “ advanced component development, prototype, or initial production of technology”; and
(B)
in paragraph (2), by striking “ prototype items” and inserting “ items”; and
(2)
in subsection (b)—
(A)
by redesignating paragraph (4) as paragraph (5);
(B)
by inserting after paragraph (3) the following new paragraph (4):

“(4) Applicability.—The authority provided in subsection (a) applies only to the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of the Army, the Secretary of the Navy, and the Secretary of the Air Force.”

; and

(C)
in paragraph (5), as so redesignated, by striking “ September 30, 2014” and inserting “ September 30, 2019”.

SEC. 812. Amendments Relating to Authority of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency to Carry Out Certain Prototype Projects.

(a)
Amendment Relating to Authority.— Section 845(a)(1) of Public Law 103–160 (10 U.S.C. 2371 note) is amended by striking “ weapons or weapon systems proposed to be acquired or developed by the Department of Defense, or to improvement of weapons or weapon systems in use by the Armed Forces” and inserting the following: “ enhancing the mission effectiveness of military personnel and the supporting platforms, systems, components, or materials proposed to be acquired or developed by the Department of Defense, or to improvement of platforms, systems, components, or materials in use by the Armed Forces”.
(b)
Amendments Relating to Small Business.— Section 845 of Public Law 103–160 (10 U.S.C. 2371 note) is amended—
(1)
in subsection (d)(1)(B), by inserting “ or small business” after “ defense contractor”; and
(2)
in subsection (f)—
(A)
by striking “ Nontraditional Defense Contractor Defined.—In this section, the” and inserting the following:

“(1) The”

; and

(B)
by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

“(2) The term ‘small business’ means a small business concern as defined under section 3 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632).”

SEC. 813. Extension of Limitation on Aggregate Annual Amount Available for Contract Services.

Section 808 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1489), as amended by section 802 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 804) is further amended—
(1)
in subsections (a) and (b), by striking “ or 2014” and inserting “ 2014, or 2015”;
(2)
in subsection (c)(3), by striking “ and 2014” and inserting “ 2014, and 2015”;
(3)
in subsection (d)(4), by striking “ or 2014” and inserting “ 2014, or 2015”;
(4)
in subsection (e), by striking “ 2014” and inserting “ 2015”; and
(5)
by adding at the end the following new subsection:

“(f) Use of Other Data.—For purposes of compliance with subparagraphs (A) and (B) of subsection (c)(2), the Secretaries of the military departments and the heads of the Defense Agencies may use other available sources of data, such as advisory and assistance services information collected for purposes of the annual budget submission of the Department of Defense, to corroborate data from the annual inventory of contractor services required in section 2330a of title 10, United States Code. Any discrepancy identified between the inventory data and the data from other available sources shall be resolved and reported to the congressional defense committees.”

SEC. 814. Improvement in Defense Design-Build Construction Process.

Section 2305a of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking the second sentence of subsection (d) and inserting the following: “ If the contract value exceeds $4,000,000, the maximum number specified in the solicitation shall not exceed 5 unless the head of the contracting activity, delegable to a level no lower than the senior contracting official within the contracting activity, approves the contracting officer’s justification with respect to an individual solicitation that a number greater than 5 is in the Federal Government’s interest. The contracting officer shall provide written documentation of how a maximum number exceeding 5 is consistent with the purposes and objectives of the two-phase selection procedures.”.

SEC. 815. Permanent Authority for Use of Simplified Acquisition Procedures for Certain Commercial Items.

Section 4202 of the Clinger-Cohen Act of 1996 (division D of Public Law 104–106; 10 U.S.C. 2304 note) is amended by striking subsection (e).

SEC. 816. Restatement and Revision of Requirements Applicable to Multiyear Defense Acquisitions to Be Specifically Authorized by Law.

(a)
In General.— Subsection (i) of section 2306b of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:

“(i) Defense Acquisitions Specifically Authorized by Law.—

(1) In the case of the Department of Defense, a multiyear contract in an amount equal to or greater than $500,000,000 may not be entered into under this section unless the contract is specifically authorized by law in an Act other than an appropriations Act.

“(2) In submitting a request for a specific authorization by law to carry out a defense acquisition program using multiyear contract authority under this section, the Secretary of Defense shall include in the request the following:

“(A) A report containing preliminary findings of the agency head required in paragraphs (1) through (6) of subsection (a), together with the basis for such findings.

“(B) Confirmation that the preliminary findings of the agency head under subparagraph (A) were made after the completion of a cost analysis performed by the Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation for the purpose of section 2334(e)(1) of this title, and that the analysis supports those preliminary findings.

“(3) A multiyear contract may not be entered into under this section for a defense acquisition program that has been specifically authorized by law to be carried out using multiyear contract authority unless the Secretary of Defense certifies in writing, not later than 30 days before entry into the contract, that each of the following conditions is satisfied:

“(A) The Secretary has determined that each of the requirements in paragraphs (1) through (6) of subsection (a) will be met by such contract and has provided the basis for such determination to the congressional defense committees.

“(B) The Secretary’s determination under subparagraph (A) was made after completion of a cost analysis conducted on the basis of section 2334(e)(2) of this title, and the analysis supports the determination.

“(C) The system being acquired pursuant to such contract has not been determined to have experienced cost growth in excess of the critical cost growth threshold pursuant to section 2433(d) of this title within 5 years prior to the date the Secretary anticipates such contract (or a contract for advance procurement entered into consistent with the authorization for such contract) will be awarded.

“(D) A sufficient number of end items of the system being acquired under such contract have been delivered at or within the most current estimates of the program acquisition unit cost or procurement unit cost for such system to determine that current estimates of such unit costs are realistic.

“(E) During the fiscal year in which such contract is to be awarded, sufficient funds will be available to perform the contract in such fiscal year, and the future-years defense program for such fiscal year will include the funding required to execute the program without cancellation.

“(F) The contract is a fixed price type contract.

“(G) The proposed multiyear contract provides for production at not less than minimum economic rates given the existing tooling and facilities.

“(4) If for any fiscal year a multiyear contract to be entered into under this section is authorized by law for a particular procurement program and that authorization is subject to certain conditions established by law (including a condition as to cost savings to be achieved under the multiyear contract in comparison to specified other contracts) and if it appears (after negotiations with contractors) that such savings cannot be achieved, but that substantial savings could nevertheless be achieved through the use of a multiyear contract rather than specified other contracts, the President may submit to Congress a request for relief from the specified cost savings that must be achieved through multiyear contracting for that program. Any such request by the President shall include details about the request for a multiyear contract, including details about the negotiated contract terms and conditions.

“(5)

(A) The Secretary may obligate funds for procurement of an end item under a multiyear contract for the purchase of property only for procurement of a complete and usable end item.

“(B) The Secretary may obligate funds appropriated for any fiscal year for advance procurement under a contract for the purchase of property only for the procurement of those long-lead items necessary in order to meet a planned delivery schedule for complete major end items that are programmed under the contract to be acquired with funds appropriated for a subsequent fiscal year (including an economic order quantity of such long-lead items when authorized by law).

“(6) The Secretary may make the certification under paragraph (3) notwithstanding the fact that one or more of the conditions of such certification are not met, if the Secretary determines that, due to exceptional circumstances, proceeding with a multiyear contract under this section is in the best interest of the Department of Defense and the Secretary provides the basis for such determination with the certification.

“(7) The Secretary may not delegate the authority to make the certification under paragraph (3) or the determination under paragraph (6) to an official below the level of Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics.”

(b)
Conforming Amendment.— Subsection (a)(7) of such section is amended by striking “ subparagraphs (C) through (F) of paragraph (1) of subsection (i)” and inserting “ subparagraphs (C) through (F) of subsection (i)(3)”.
(c)
Effective Date.— The amendments made by this section shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act, and shall apply with respect to requests for specific authorization by law to carry out defense acquisition programs using multiyear contract authority that are made on or after that date.

SEC. 817. Sourcing Requirements Related to Avoiding Counterfeit Electronic Parts.

Section 818(c)(3) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1495; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended—
(1)
in subparagraph (A)—
(A)
by striking “ , whenever possible,”;
(B)
in clause (i)—
(i)
by striking “ trusted suppliers” and inserting “ suppliers identified as trusted suppliers in accordance with regulations issued pursuant to subparagraph (C) or (D)”; and
(ii)
by striking “ ; and” and inserting a semicolon;
(C)
in clause (ii), by striking “ trusted suppliers;” and inserting “ suppliers identified as trusted suppliers in accordance with regulations issued pursuant to subparagraph (C) or (D); and”; and
(D)
by adding at the end the following new clause:

“(iii) obtain electronic parts from alternate suppliers if such parts are not available from original manufacturers, their authorized dealers, or suppliers identified as trusted suppliers in accordance with regulations prescribed pursuant to subparagraph (C) or (D);”

(2)
in subparagraph (B)—
(A)
by inserting “ for” before “ inspection”; and
(B)
by striking “ subparagraph (A)” and inserting “ clause (i) or (ii) of subparagraph (A), if obtaining the electronic parts in accordance with such clauses is not possible”; and
(3)
in subparagraph (C), by striking “ identify trusted suppliers that have appropriate policies” and inserting “ identify as trusted suppliers those that have appropriate policies”.

SEC. 818. Amendments to Proof of Concept Commercialization Pilot Program.

(a)
Authority for Secretaries of Military Departments to Carry Out Pilot.— Section 1603(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 944; 10 U.S.C. 2359 note) is amended by inserting after “ Engineering” the following: “ and the Secretary of each military department”.
(b)
Review Board Revisions.—
(1)
Section 1603(c)(3)(B)(i) of such Act is amended to read as follows:

“(i) rigorous review of commercialization potential or military utility of technologies, including through use of outside expertise;”

(2)
Section 1603(d)(1) of such Act is amended by striking “ , including incentives and activities undertaken by review board experts”.
(c)
Increase in Amount of Awards.— Section 1603(c)(5)(B)(i) of such Act is amended by striking “ $500,000” and inserting “ $1,000,000”.
(d)
Authority for Use of Basic Research Funds.— Section 1603(f) of such Act is amended—
(1)
by inserting “ and Use of Funds” after “ Limitation”; and
(2)
by adding at the end the following: “ The Secretary of a military department may use basic research funds, or other funds considered appropriate by the Secretary, to conduct the pilot program within the military department concerned.”
(e)
One-Year Extension.— Section 1603(g) of such Act is amended by striking “ 2018” and inserting “ 2019”.

Subtitle C Industrial Base Matters

SEC. 821. Temporary Extension of and Amendments to Test Program for Negotiation of Comprehensive Small Business Subcontracting Plans.

(a)
Extension.— Subsection (e) of section 834 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Years 1990 and 1991 (15 U.S.C. 637 note) is amended by striking “ December 31, 2014” and inserting “ December 31, 2017”.
(b)
Additional Requirements for Comprehensive Subcontracting Plans.— Subsection (b) of section 834 of such Act is amended—
(1)
in paragraph (1), by striking “ paragraph (3)” and inserting “ paragraph (4)”;
(2)
by redesignating paragraph (3) as paragraph (4), and in that paragraph by striking “ $5,000,000” and inserting “ $100,000,000”; and
(3)
by inserting after paragraph (2) the following new paragraph (3):

“(3) Each comprehensive subcontracting plan of a contractor shall require that the contractor report to the Secretary of Defense on a semi-annual basis the following information:

“(A) The amount of first-tier subcontract dollars awarded during the six-month period covered by the report to covered small business concerns, with the information set forth separately—

“(i) by North American Industrial Classification System code;

“(ii) by major defense acquisition program, as defined in section 2430(a) of title 10, United States Code;

“(iii) by contract, if the contract is for the maintenance, overhaul, repair, servicing, rehabilitation, salvage, modernization, or modification of supplies, systems, or equipment and the total value of the contract, including options, exceeds $100,000,000; and

“(iv) by military department.

“(B) The total number of subcontracts active under the test program during the six-month period covered by the report that would have otherwise required a subcontracting plan under paragraph (4) or (5) of section 8(d) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 637(d)).

“(C) Costs incurred in negotiating, complying with, and reporting on comprehensive subcontracting plans.

“(D) Costs avoided by adoption of a comprehensive subcontracting plan.”

(c)
Additional Consequence for Failure to Make Good Faith Effort to Comply.—
(1)
Amendments.— Subsection (d) of section 834 of such Act is amended—
(A)
by striking “ Company-wide” and inserting “ Comprehensive” in the heading;
(B)
by striking “ company-wide” and inserting “ comprehensive subcontracting”; and
(C)
by adding at the end the following: “ In addition, any such failure shall be a factor considered as part of the evaluation of past performance of an offeror.”.
(2)
Repeal of suspension of subsection (d).— Section 402 of Public Law 101–574 (104 Stat. 2832; 15 U.S.C. 637 note) is repealed.
(d)
Eligibility Requirement.— Subsection (d) of section 834 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Years 1990 and 1991 (15 U.S.C. 637 note) is further amended—
(1)
by inserting “ (1)” before “ A contractor that”; and
(2)
by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

“(2) Effective in fiscal year 2016 and each fiscal year thereafter in which the test program is in effect, the Secretary of Defense may not negotiate a comprehensive subcontracting plan for a fiscal year with any contractor with which such a plan was negotiated in the prior fiscal year if the Secretary determines that the contractor did not meet the subcontracting goals negotiated in the plan for the prior fiscal year.”

(e)
Report by Comptroller General.— Subsection (f) of section 834 of such Act is amended to read as follows:

“(f) Report.—Not later than September 30, 2015, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit a report on the results of the test program to the Committees on Armed Services and on Small Business of the House of Representatives and the Committees on Armed Services and on Small Business and Entrepreneurship of the Senate.”

(f)
Additional Definitions.—
(1)
Covered small business concern.— Subsection (g) of section 834 of such Act is amended to read as follows:

“(g) Definitions.—In this section, the term ‘covered small business concern’ includes each of the following:

“(1) A small business concern, as that term is defined under section 3(a) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632(a)).

“(2) A small business concern owned and controlled by veterans, as that term is defined in section 3(q)(3) of such Act (15 U.S.C. 632(q)(3)).

“(3) A small business concern owned and controlled by service-disabled veterans, as that term is defined in section 3(q)(2) of such Act (15 U.S.C. 632(q)(2)).

“(4) A qualified HUBZone small business concern, as that term is defined under section 3(p)(5) of such Act (15 U.S.C. 632(p)(5)).

“(5) A small business concern owned and controlled by socially and economically disadvantaged individuals, as that term is defined in section 8(d)(3)(C) of such Act (15 U.S.C. 637(d)(3)(C)).

“(6) A small business concern owned and controlled by women, as that term is defined under section 3(n) of such Act (15 U.S.C. 632(n)).”

(2)
Conforming amendment.— Subsection (a)(1) of section 834 of such Act is amended by striking “ small business concerns and small business concerns owned and controlled by socially and economically disadvantaged individuals” and inserting “ covered small business concerns”.

SEC. 822. Plan for Improving Data on Bundled or Consolidated Contracts.

(a)
Plan Required.— Section 15 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 644) is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

“(s) Data Quality Improvement Plan.—

“(1) In general.—Not later than October 1, 2015, the Administrator of the Small Business Administration, in consultation with the Small Business Procurement Advisory Council, the Administrator for Federal Procurement Policy, and the Administrator of General Services, shall develop a plan to improve the quality of data reported on bundled or consolidated contracts in the Federal procurement data system (described in section 1122(a)(4)(A) of title 41, United States Code).

“(2) Plan requirements.—The plan shall—

“(A) describe the roles and responsibilities of the Administrator of the Small Business Administration, each Director of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization, the Administrator for Federal Procurement Policy, the Administrator of General Services, senior procurement executives, and Chief Acquisition Officers in—

“(i) improving the quality of data reported on bundled or consolidated contracts in the Federal procurement data system; and

“(ii) contributing to the annual report required by subsection (p)(4);

“(B) recommend changes to policies and procedures, including training procedures of relevant personnel, to properly identify and mitigate the effects of bundled or consolidated contracts;

“(C) recommend requirements for periodic and statistically valid data verification and validation; and

“(D) recommend clear data verification responsibilities.

“(3) Plan submission.—The Administrator of the Small Business Administration shall submit the plan to the Committee on Small Business of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship of the Senate not later than December 1, 2016.

“(4) Definitions.—In this subsection, the following definitions apply:

“(A) Chief acquisition officer; senior procurement executive.—The terms ‘Chief Acquisition Officer’ and ‘senior procurement executive’ have the meanings given such terms in section 44(a) of this Act.

“(B) Bundled or consolidated contract.—The term ‘bundled or consolidated contract’ means a bundled contract (as defined in section 3(o)) or a contract resulting from the consolidation of contracting requirements (as defined in section 44(a)(2)).”

(b)
Technical Amendment.— Section 44(a) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 657q(a)) is amended—
(1)
in paragraph (1)—
(A)
by inserting “ appointed or” before “ designated”; and
(B)
by striking “ section 16(a) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 414(a))” and inserting “ section 1702(a) of title 41, United States Code”; and
(2)
in paragraph (3), by striking “ section 16(c) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 414(c))” and inserting “ section 1702(c) of title 41, United States Code”.

SEC. 823. Authority to Provide Education to Small Businesses on Certain Requirements of Arms Export Control Act.

(a)
Assistance at Small Business Development Centers.— Section 21(c)(1) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 648(c)(1)) is amended by inserting at the end the following: “ Applicants receiving grants under this section may also assist small businesses by providing, where appropriate, education on the requirements applicable to small businesses under the regulations issued under section 38 of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2778) and on compliance with those requirements.”.
(b)
Procurement Technical Assistance.— Section 2418 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

“(c) An eligible entity assisted by the Department of Defense under this chapter also may furnish education on the requirements applicable to small businesses under the regulations issued under section 38 of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2778) and on compliance with those requirements.”

SEC. 824. Matters Relating to Reverse Auctions.

(a)
In General.— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall clarify regulations on reverse auctions, as necessary, to ensure that—
(1)
single bid contracts may not be entered into resulting from reverse auctions unless compliant with existing Federal regulations and Department of Defense memoranda providing guidance on single bid offers;
(2)
all reverse auctions provide offerors with the ability to submit revised bids throughout the course of the auction;
(3)
if a reverse auction is conducted by a third party—
(A)
inherently governmental functions are not performed by private contractors, including by the third party; and
(B)
past performance or financial responsibility information created by the third party is made available to offerors; and
(4)
reverse auctions resulting in design-build military construction contracts specifically authorized in law are prohibited.
(b)
Training.— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the President of the Defense Acquisition University shall establish comprehensive training available for contract specialists in the Department of Defense on the use of reverse auctions.
(c)
Design-Build Defined.— In this section, the term “design-build” means procedures used for the selection of a contractor on the basis of price and other evaluation criteria to perform, in accordance with the provisions of a firm fixed-price contract, both the design and construction of a facility using performance specifications supplied by the Secretary of Defense.

SEC. 825. Sole Source Contracts for Small Business Concerns Owned and Controlled by Women.

(a)
Authority for Sole Source Contracts for Certain Small Business Concerns Owned and Controlled by Women.— Subsection (m) of section 8 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 637(m)) is amended—
(1)
by amending paragraph (2)(E) to read as follows:

“(E) each of the concerns is certified by a Federal agency, a State government, the Administrator, or a national certifying entity approved by the Administrator as a small business concern owned and controlled by women.”

(2)
in paragraph (5), by striking “ paragraph (2)(F)” each place such term appears and inserting “ paragraph (2)(E)”; and
(3)
by adding at the end the following new paragraphs:

“(7) Authority for sole source contracts for economically disadvantaged small business concerns owned and controlled by women.—A contracting officer may award a sole source contract under this subsection to any small business concern owned and controlled by women described in paragraph (2)(A) and certified under paragraph (2)(E) if—

“(A) such concern is determined to be a responsible contractor with respect to performance of the contract opportunity and the contracting officer does not have a reasonable expectation that 2 or more businesses described in paragraph (2)(A) will submit offers;

“(B) the anticipated award price of the contract (including options) will not exceed—

“(i) $6,500,000, in the case of a contract opportunity assigned a standard industrial classification code for manufacturing; or

“(ii) $4,000,000, in the case of any other contract opportunity; and

“(C) in the estimation of the contracting officer, the contract award can be made at a fair and reasonable price.

“(8) Authority for sole source contracts for small business concerns owned and controlled by women in substantially underrepresented industries.—A contracting officer may award a sole source contract under this subsection to any small business concern owned and controlled by women certified under paragraph (2)(E) that is in an industry in which small business concerns owned and controlled by women are substantially underrepresented (as determined by the Administrator under paragraph (3)) if—

“(A) such concern is determined to be a responsible contractor with respect to performance of the contract opportunity and the contracting officer does not have a reasonable expectation that 2 or more businesses in an industry that has received a waiver under paragraph (3) will submit offers;

“(B) the anticipated award price of the contract (including options) will not exceed—

“(i) $6,500,000, in the case of a contract opportunity assigned a standard industrial classification code for manufacturing; or

“(ii) $4,000,000, in the case of any other contract opportunity; and

“(C) in the estimation of the contracting officer, the contract award can be made at a fair and reasonable price.”

(b)
Reporting on Goals for Sole Source Contracts for Small Business Concerns Owned and Controlled by Women.— Clause (viii) of subsection 15(h)(2)(E) of such Act is amended—
(1)
in subclause (IV), by striking “ and” after the semicolon;
(2)
by redesignating subclause (V) as subclause (VIII); and
(3)
by inserting after subclause (IV) the following new subclauses:

“(V) through sole source contracts awarded using the authority under subsection 8(m)(7);

“(VI) through sole source contracts awarded using the authority under section 8(m)(8);

“(VII) by industry for contracts described in subclause (III), (IV), (V), or (VI); and”

(c)
Accelerated Deadline for Report on Industries Underrepresented by Small Business Concerns Owned and Controlled by Women.— Paragraph (2) of section 29(o) of such Act is amended by striking “ 5 years after the date of enactment” and inserting “ 3 years after the date of enactment”.

Subtitle D Federal Information Technology Acquisition Reform

SEC. 831. Chief Information Officer Authority Enhancements.

(a)
In General.— Subchapter II of chapter 113 of title 40, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

“§ 11319. Resources, planning, and portfolio management

“(a) Definitions.—In this section:

“(1) The term ‘covered agency’ means each agency listed in section 901(b)(1) or 901(b)(2) of title 31.

“(2) The term ‘information technology’ has the meaning given that term under capital planning guidance issued by the Office of Management and Budget.

“(b) Additional Authorities for Chief Information Officers.—

“(1) Planning, programming, budgeting, and execution authorities for cios.—

“(A) In general.—The head of each covered agency other than the Department of Defense shall ensure that the Chief Information Officer of the agency has a significant role in—

“(i) the decision processes for all annual and multi-year planning, programming, budgeting, and execution decisions, related reporting requirements, and reports related to information technology; and

“(ii) the management, governance, and oversight processes related to information technology.

“(B) Budget formulation.—The Director of the Office of Management and Budget shall require in the annual information technology capital planning guidance of the Office of Management and Budget the following:

“(i) That the Chief Information Officer of each covered agency other than the Department of Defense approve the information technology budget request of the covered agency, and that the Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense review and provide recommendations to the Secretary of Defense on the information technology budget request of the Department.

“(ii) That the Chief Information Officer of each covered agency certify that information technology investments are adequately implementing incremental development, as defined in capital planning guidance issued by the Office of Management and Budget.

“(C) Review.—

“(i) In general.—A covered agency other than the Department of Defense—

“(I) may not enter into a contract or other agreement for information technology or information technology services, unless the contract or other agreement has been reviewed and approved by the Chief Information Officer of the agency;

“(II) may not request the reprogramming of any funds made available for information technology programs, unless the request has been reviewed and approved by the Chief Information Officer of the agency; and

“(III) may use the governance processes of the agency to approve such a contract or other agreement if the Chief Information Officer of the agency is included as a full participant in the governance processes.

“(ii) Delegation.—

“(I) In general.—Except as provided in subclause (II), the duties of a Chief Information Officer under clause (i) are not delegable.

“(II) Non-major information technology investments.—For a contract or agreement for a non-major information technology investment, as defined in the annual information technology capital planning guidance of the Office of Management and Budget, the Chief Information Officer of a covered agency other than the Department of Defense may delegate the approval of the contract or agreement under clause (i) to an individual who reports directly to the Chief Information Officer.

“(2) Personnel-related authority.—Notwithstanding any other provision of law, for each covered agency other than the Department of Defense, the Chief Information Officer of the covered agency shall approve the appointment of any other employee with the title of Chief Information Officer, or who functions in the capacity of a Chief Information Officer, for any component organization within the covered agency.

“(c) Limitation.—None of the authorities provided in this section shall apply to telecommunications or information technology that is fully funded by amounts made available—

“(1) under the National Intelligence Program, defined by section 3(6) of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3003(6));

“(2) under the Military Intelligence Program or any successor program or programs; or

“(3) jointly under the National Intelligence Program and the Military Intelligence Program (or any successor program or programs).”

(b)
Clerical Amendment.— The table of sections for chapter 113 of title 40, United States Code, is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 11318 the following new item:

“11319. Resources, planning, and portfolio management.”.

SEC. 832. Enhanced Transparency and Improved Risk Management in Information Technology Investments.

(1)
by redesignating paragraphs (1) and (2) as paragraphs (2) and (5), respectively;
(2)
by inserting before paragraph (2), as so redesignated, the following new paragraph (1):

“(1) Definitions.—In this subsection:

“(A) The term ‘covered agency’ means an agency listed in section 901(b)(1) or 901(b)(2) of title 31.

“(B) The term ‘major information technology investment’ means an investment within a covered agency information technology investment portfolio that is designated by the covered agency as major, in accordance with capital planning guidance issued by the Director.

“(C) The term ‘national security system’ has the meaning provided in section 3542 of title 44.”

; and

(3)
by inserting after paragraph (2), as so redesignated, the following new paragraphs:

“(3) Public availability.—

“(A) In general.—The Director shall make available to the public a list of each major information technology investment, without regard to whether the investments are for new information technology acquisitions or for operations and maintenance of existing information technology, including data on cost, schedule, and performance.

“(B) Agency information.—

“(i) The Director shall issue guidance to each covered agency for reporting of data required by subparagraph (A) that provides a standardized data template that can be incorporated into existing, required data reporting formats and processes. Such guidance shall integrate the reporting process into current budget reporting that each covered agency provides to the Office of Management and Budget, to minimize additional workload. Such guidance shall also clearly specify that the investment evaluation required under subparagraph (C) adequately reflect the investment’s cost and schedule performance and employ incremental development approaches in appropriate cases.

“(ii) The Chief Information Officer of each covered agency shall provide the Director with the information described in subparagraph (A) on at least a semi-annual basis for each major information technology investment, using existing data systems and processes.

“(C) Investment evaluation.—For each major information technology investment listed under subparagraph (A), the Chief Information Officer of the covered agency, in consultation with other appropriate agency officials, shall categorize the investment according to risk, in accordance with guidance issued by the Director.

“(D) Continuous improvement.—If either the Director or the Chief Information Officer of a covered agency determines that the information made available from the agency’s existing data systems and processes as required by subparagraph (B) is not timely and reliable, the Chief Information Officer, in consultation with the Director and the head of the agency, shall establish a program for the improvement of such data systems and processes.

“(E) Waiver or limitation authority.—The applicability of subparagraph (A) may be waived or the extent of the information may be limited by the Director, if the Director determines that such a waiver or limitation is in the national security interests of the United States.

“(F) Additional limitation.—The requirements of subparagraph (A) shall not apply to national security systems or to telecommunications or information technology that is fully funded by amounts made available—

“(i) under the National Intelligence Program, defined by section 3(6) of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3003(6));

“(ii) under the Military Intelligence Program or any successor program or programs; or

“(iii) jointly under the National Intelligence Program and the Military Intelligence Program (or any successor program or programs).

“(4) Risk management.—For each major information technology investment listed under paragraph (3)(A) that receives a high risk rating, as described in paragraph (3)(C), for 4 consecutive quarters—

“(A) the Chief Information Officer of the covered agency and the program manager of the investment within the covered agency, in consultation with the Administrator of the Office of Electronic Government, shall conduct a review of the investment that shall identify—

“(i) the root causes of the high level of risk of the investment;

“(ii) the extent to which these causes can be addressed; and

“(iii) the probability of future success;

“(B) the Administrator of the Office of Electronic Government shall communicate the results of the review under subparagraph (A) to—

“(i) the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs and the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate;

“(ii) the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform and the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives; and

“(iii) the committees of the Senate and the House of Representatives with primary jurisdiction over the agency;

“(C) in the case of a major information technology investment of the Department of Defense, the assessment required by subparagraph (A) may be accomplished in accordance with section 2445c of title 10, provided that the results of the review are provided to the Administrator of the Office of Electronic Government upon request and to the committees identified in subsection (B); and

“(D) for a covered agency other than the Department of Defense, if on the date that is one year after the date of completion of the review required under subsection (A), the investment is rated as high risk under paragraph (3)(C), the Director shall deny any request for additional development, modernization, or enhancement funding for the investment until the date on which the Chief Information Officer of the covered agency determines that the root causes of the high level of risk of the investment have been addressed, and there is sufficient capability to deliver the remaining planned increments within the planned cost and schedule.

“(5) Sunset of certain provisions.—Paragraphs (1), (3), and (4) shall not be in effect on and after the date that is 5 years after the date of the enactment of the Carl Levin and Howard P. ‘Buck’ McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015.”

SEC. 833. Portfolio Review.

Section 11319 of title 40, United States Code, as added by section 831, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

“(c) Information Technology Portfolio, Program, and Resource Reviews.—

“(1) Process.—The Director of the Office of Management and Budget, in consultation with the Chief Information Officers of appropriate agencies, shall implement a process to assist covered agencies in reviewing their portfolio of information technology investments—

“(A) to identify or develop ways to increase the efficiency and effectiveness of the information technology investments of the covered agency;

“(B) to identify or develop opportunities to consolidate the acquisition and management of information technology services, and increase the use of shared-service delivery models;

“(C) to identify potential duplication and waste;

“(D) to identify potential cost savings;

“(E) to develop plans for actions to optimize the information technology portfolio, programs, and resources of the covered agency;

“(F) to develop ways to better align the information technology portfolio, programs, and financial resources of the covered agency to any multi-year funding requirements or strategic plans required by law;

“(G) to develop a multi-year strategy to identify and reduce duplication and waste within the information technology portfolio of the covered agency, including component-level investments and to identify projected cost savings resulting from such strategy; and

“(H) to carry out any other goals that the Director may establish.

“(2) Metrics and performance indicators.—The Director of the Office of Management and Budget, in consultation with the Chief Information Officers of appropriate agencies, shall develop standardized cost savings and cost avoidance metrics and performance indicators for use by agencies for the process implemented under paragraph (1).

“(3) Annual review.—The Chief Information Officer of each covered agency, in conjunction with the Chief Operating Officer or Deputy Secretary (or equivalent) of the covered agency and the Administrator of the Office of Electronic Government, shall conduct an annual review of the information technology portfolio of the covered agency.

“(4) Applicability to the department of defense.—In the case of the Department of Defense, processes established pursuant to this subsection shall apply only to the business systems information technology portfolio of the Department of Defense and not to national security systems as defined by section 11103(a) of this title. The annual review required by paragraph (3) shall be carried out by the Deputy Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense (or any successor to such Officer), in consultation with the Chief Information Officer, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, and other appropriate Department of Defense officials. The Secretary of Defense may designate an existing investment or management review process to fulfill the requirement for the annual review required by paragraph (3), in consultation with the Administrator of the Office of Electronic Government.

“(5) Quarterly reports.—

“(A) In general.—The Administrator of the Office of Electronic Government shall submit a quarterly report on the cost savings and reductions in duplicative information technology investments identified through the review required by paragraph (3) to—

“(i) the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs and the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate;

“(ii) the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform and the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives; and

“(iii) upon a request by any committee of Congress, to that committee.

“(B) Inclusion in other reports.—The reports required under subparagraph (A) may be included as part of another report submitted to the committees of Congress described in clauses (i), (ii), and (iii) of subparagraph (A).

“(6) Sunset.—This subsection shall not be in effect on and after the date that is 5 years after the date of the enactment of the Carl Levin and Howard P. ‘Buck’ McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015.”

SEC. 834. Federal Data Center Consolidation Initiative.

(a)
Definitions.— In this section:
(1)
Administrator.— The term “Administrator” means the Administrator of the Office of Electronic Government established under section 3602 of title 44, United States Code (and also known as the Office of E-Government and Information Technology), within the Office of Management and Budget.
(2)
Covered agency.— The term “covered agency” means the following (including all associated components of the agency):
(A)
Department of Agriculture.
(B)
Department of Commerce.
(C)
Department of Defense.
(D)
Department of Education.
(E)
Department of Energy.
(F)
Department of Health and Human Services.
(G)
Department of Homeland Security.
(H)
Department of Housing and Urban Development.
(I)
Department of the Interior.
(J)
Department of Justice.
(K)
Department of Labor.
(L)
Department of State.
(M)
Department of Transportation.
(N)
Department of Treasury.
(O)
Department of Veterans Affairs.
(P)
Environmental Protection Agency.
(Q)
General Services Administration.
(R)
National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
(S)
National Science Foundation.
(T)
Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
(U)
Office of Personnel Management.
(V)
Small Business Administration.
(W)
Social Security Administration.
(X)
United States Agency for International Development.
(3)
FDCCI.— The term “FDCCI” means the Federal Data Center Consolidation Initiative described in the Office of Management and Budget Memorandum on the Federal Data Center Consolidation Initiative, dated February 26, 2010, or any successor thereto.
(4)
Government-wide data center consolidation and optimization metrics.— The term “Government-wide data center consolidation and optimization metrics” means the metrics established by the Administrator under subsection (b)(2)(G).
(b)
Federal Data Center Consolidation Inventories and Strategies.—
(1)
In general.—
(A)
Annual reporting.— Except as provided in subparagraph (C), each year, beginning in the first fiscal year after the date of the enactment of this Act and each fiscal year thereafter, the head of each covered agency, assisted by the Chief Information Officer of the agency, shall submit to the Administrator—
(i)
a comprehensive inventory of the data centers owned, operated, or maintained by or on behalf of the agency; and
(ii)
a multi-year strategy to achieve the consolidation and optimization of the data centers inventoried under clause (i), that includes—
(I)
performance metrics—
(aa)
that are consistent with the Government-wide data center consolidation and optimization metrics; and
(bb)
by which the quantitative and qualitative progress of the agency toward the goals of the FDCCI can be measured;
(II)
a timeline for agency activities to be completed under the FDCCI, with an emphasis on benchmarks the agency can achieve by specific dates;
(III)
year-by-year calculations of investment and cost savings for the period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act and ending on the date set forth in subsection (e), broken down by each year, including a description of any initial costs for data center consolidation and optimization and life cycle cost savings and other improvements, with an emphasis on—
(aa)
meeting the Government-wide data center consolidation and optimization metrics; and
(bb)
demonstrating the amount of agency-specific cost savings each fiscal year achieved through the FDCCI; and
(IV)
any additional information required by the Administrator.
(B)
Use of other reporting structures.— The Administrator may require a covered agency to include the information required to be submitted under this subsection through reporting structures determined by the Administrator to be appropriate.
(C)
Department of defense reporting.— For any year that the Department of Defense is required to submit a performance plan for reduction of resources required for data servers and centers, as required under section 2867(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (10 U.S.C. 2223a note), the Department of Defense—
(i)
may submit to the Administrator, in lieu of the multi-year strategy required under subparagraph (A)(ii)—
(I)
the defense-wide plan required under section 2867(b)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (10 U.S.C. 2223a note); and
(II)
the report on cost savings required under section 2867(d) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (10 U.S.C. 2223a note); and
(ii)
shall submit the comprehensive inventory required under subparagraph (A)(i), unless the defense-wide plan required under section 2867(b)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (10 U.S.C. 2223a note)—
(I)
contains a comparable comprehensive inventory; and
(II)
is submitted under clause (i).
(D)
Statement.— Each year, beginning in the first fiscal year after the date of the enactment of this Act and each fiscal year thereafter, the head of each covered agency, acting through the Chief Information Officer of the agency, shall—
(i)
(I)
submit a statement to the Administrator stating whether the agency has complied with the requirements of this section; and
(II)
make the statement submitted under subclause (I) publicly available; and
(ii)
if the agency has not complied with the requirements of this section, submit a statement to the Administrator explaining the reasons for not complying with such requirements.
(E)
Agency implementation of strategies.—
(i)
In general.— Each covered agency, under the direction of the Chief Information Officer of the agency, shall—
(I)
implement the strategy required under subparagraph (A)(ii); and
(II)
provide updates to the Administrator, on a quarterly basis, of—
(aa)
the completion of activities by the agency under the FDCCI;
(bb)
any progress of the agency towards meeting the Government-wide data center consolidation and optimization metrics; and
(cc)
the actual cost savings and other improvements realized through the implementation of the strategy of the agency.
(ii)
Department of defense.— For purposes of clause (i)(I), implementation of the defense-wide plan required under section 2867(b)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (10 U.S.C. 2223a note) by the Department of Defense shall be considered implementation of the strategy required under subparagraph (A)(ii).
(F)
Rule of construction.— Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit the reporting of information by a covered agency to the Administrator, the Director of the Office of Management and Budget, or Congress.
(2)
Administrator responsibilities.— The Administrator shall—
(A)
establish the deadline, on an annual basis, for covered agencies to submit information under this section;
(B)
establish a list of requirements that the covered agencies must meet to be considered in compliance with paragraph (1);
(C)
ensure that information relating to agency progress towards meeting the Government-wide data center consolidation and optimization metrics is made available in a timely manner to the general public;
(D)
review the inventories and strategies submitted under paragraph (1) to determine whether they are comprehensive and complete;
(E)
monitor the implementation of the data center strategy of each covered agency that is required under paragraph (1)(A)(ii);
(F)
update, on an annual basis, the cumulative cost savings realized through the implementation of the FDCCI; and
(G)
establish metrics applicable to the consolidation and optimization of data centers Government-wide, including metrics with respect to—
(i)
costs;
(ii)
efficiencies, including, at a minimum, server efficiency; and
(iii)
any other factors the Administrator considers appropriate.
(3)
Cost saving goal and updates for congress.—
(A)
In general.— Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall develop, and make publicly available, a goal, broken down by year, for the amount of planned cost savings and optimization improvements achieved through the FDCCI during the period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act and ending on the date set forth in subsection (e).
(B)
Annual update.—
(i)
In general.— Not later than one year after the date on which the goal described in subparagraph (A) is made publicly available, and each year thereafter, the Administrator shall aggregate the reported cost savings of each covered agency and optimization improvements achieved to date through the FDCCI and compare the savings to the projected cost savings and optimization improvements developed under subparagraph (A).
(ii)
Update for congress.— The goal required to be developed under subparagraph (A) shall be submitted to Congress and shall be accompanied by a statement describing—
(I)
the extent to which each covered agency has developed and submitted a comprehensive inventory under paragraph (1)(A)(i), including an analysis of the inventory that details specific numbers, use, and efficiency level of data centers in each inventory; and
(II)
the extent to which each covered agency has submitted a comprehensive strategy that addresses the items listed in paragraph (1)(A)(ii).
(4)
GAO review.—
(A)
In general.— Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, and each year thereafter, the Comptroller General of the United States shall review and verify the quality and completeness of the inventory and strategy of each covered agency required under paragraph (1)(A).
(B)
Report.— The Comptroller General of the United States shall, on an annual basis, publish a report on each review conducted under subparagraph (A).
(c)
Ensuring Cybersecurity Standards for Data Center Consolidation and Cloud Computing.—
(1)
In general.— In implementing a data center consolidation and optimization strategy under this section, a covered agency shall do so in a manner that is consistent with Federal guidelines on cloud computing security, including—
(A)
applicable provisions found within the Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program (FedRAMP); and
(B)
guidance published by the National Institute of Standards and Technology.
(2)
Rule of construction.— Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit the ability of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget to update or modify the Federal guidelines on cloud computing security.
(d)
Waiver of Requirements.— The Director of National Intelligence and the Secretary of Defense, or their respective designee, may waive the applicability to any national security system, as defined in section 3542 of title 44, United States Code, of any provision of this section if the Director of National Intelligence or the Secretary of Defense, or their respective designee, determines that such waiver is in the interest of national security. Not later than 30 days after making a waiver under this subsection, the Director of National Intelligence or the Secretary of Defense, or their respective designee, shall submit to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate and the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives a statement describing the waiver and the reasons for the waiver.
(e)
Sunset.— This section is repealed effective on October 1, 2018.

SEC. 835. Expansion of Training and Use of Information Technology Cadres.

(a)
Purpose.— The purpose of this section is to ensure timely progress by Federal agencies toward developing, strengthening, and deploying information technology acquisition cadres consisting of personnel with highly specialized skills in information technology acquisition, including program and project managers.
(b)
Strategic Planning.—
(1)
In general.— The Administrator for Federal Procurement Policy, in consultation with the Administrator for E-Government and Information Technology, shall work with Federal agencies, other than the Department of Defense, to update their acquisition human capital plans that were developed pursuant to the October 27, 2009, guidance issued by the Administrator for Federal Procurement Policy in furtherance of section 1704(g) of title 41, United States Code (originally enacted as section 869 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4553)), to address how the agencies are meeting their human capital requirements to support the timely and effective acquisition of information technology.
(2)
Elements.— The updates required by paragraph (1) shall be submitted to the Administrator for Federal Procurement Policy and shall address, at a minimum, each Federal agency’s consideration or use of the following procedures:
(A)
Development of an information technology acquisition cadre within the agency or use of memoranda of understanding with other agencies that have such cadres or personnel with experience relevant to the agency’s information technology acquisition needs.
(B)
Development of personnel assigned to information technology acquisitions, including cross-functional training of acquisition information technology and program personnel.
(C)
Use of the specialized career path for information technology program managers as designated by the Office of Personnel Management and plans for strengthening information technology program management.
(D)
Use of direct hire authority.
(E)
Conduct of peer reviews.
(F)
Piloting of innovative approaches to information technology acquisition workforce development, such as industry-government rotations.
(c)
Federal Agency Defined.— In this section, the term “Federal agency” means each agency listed in section 901(b) of title 31, United States Code.

SEC. 836. Maximizing the Benefit of the Federal Strategic Sourcing Initiative.

Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Administrator for Federal Procurement Policy shall prescribe regulations providing that when the Federal Government makes a purchase of services and supplies offered under the Federal Strategic Sourcing Initiative (managed by the Office of Federal Procurement Policy) but such Initiative is not used, the contract file for the purchase shall include a brief analysis of the comparative value, including price and nonprice factors, between the services and supplies offered under such Initiative and services and supplies offered under the source or sources used for the purchase.

SEC. 837. Governmentwide Software Purchasing Program.

(a)
In General.— The Administrator of General Services shall identify and develop a strategic sourcing initiative to enhance Governmentwide acquisition, shared use, and dissemination of software, as well as compliance with end user license agreements.
(b)
Governmentwide User License Agreement.— The Administrator, in developing the initiative under subsection (a), shall allow for the purchase of a license agreement that is available for use by all Executive agencies (as defined in section 105 of title 5, United States Code) as one user to the maximum extent practicable and as appropriate.

Subtitle E Never Contract With the Enemy

SEC. 841. Prohibition on Providing Funds to the Enemy.

(a)
Identification of Persons and Entities.— The Secretary of Defense shall, in conjunction with the Director of National Intelligence and in consultation with the Secretary of State, establish in each covered combatant command a program to identify persons and entities within the area of responsibility of such command that—
(1)
provide funds, including goods and services, received under a covered contract, grant, or cooperative agreement of an executive agency directly or indirectly to a covered person or entity; or
(2)
fail to exercise due diligence to ensure that none of the funds, including goods and services, received under a covered contract, grant, or cooperative agreement of an executive agency are provided directly or indirectly to a covered person or entity.
(b)
Notice of Identified Persons and Entities.—
(1)
Notice.— Upon the identification of a person or entity as being described by subsection (a), the head of the executive agency concerned (or the designee of such head) and the commander of the covered combatant command concerned (or the specified deputies of the commander) shall be notified, in writing, of such identification of the person or entity.
(2)
Responsive actions.— Upon receipt of a notice under paragraph (1), the head of the executive agency concerned (or the designee of such head) and the commander of the covered combatant command concerned (or the specified deputies of the commander) may notify the heads of contracting activities, or other appropriate officials of the agency or command, in writing of such identification.
(3)
Making of notifications.— Any written notification pursuant to this subsection shall be made in accordance with procedures established to implement the revisions of regulations required by this section.
(c)
Authority to Terminate or Void Contracts, Grants, and Cooperative Agreements and to Restrict Future Award.— Not later than 270 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Federal Acquisition Regulation, the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement, and the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards shall be revised to provide that, upon notice from the head of an executive agency (or the designee of such head) or the commander of a covered combatant command (or the specified deputies of the commander) pursuant to subsection (b), the head of contracting activity of an executive agency, or other appropriate official, may do the following:
(1)
Restrict the award of contracts, grants, or cooperative agreements of the executive agency concerned upon a written determination by the head of contracting activity or other appropriate official that the contract, grant, or cooperative agreement would provide funds received under such contract, grant, or cooperative agreement directly or indirectly to a covered person or entity.
(2)
Terminate for default any contract, grant, or cooperative agreement of the executive agency concerned upon a written determination by the head of contracting activity or other appropriate official that the contractor, or the recipient of the grant or cooperative agreement, has failed to exercise due diligence to ensure that none of the funds received under the contract, grant, or cooperative agreement are provided directly or indirectly to a covered person or entity.
(3)
Void in whole or in part any contract, grant, or cooperative agreement of the executive agency concerned upon a written determination by the head of contracting activity or other appropriate official that the contract, grant, or cooperative agreement provides funds directly or indirectly to a covered person or entity.
(d)
Clause.—
(1)
In general.— Not later than 270 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Federal Acquisition Regulation, the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement, and the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards shall be revised to require that—
(A)
the clause described in paragraph (2) shall be included in each covered contract, grant, and cooperative agreement of an executive agency that is awarded on or after the date that is 270 days after the date of the enactment of this Act; and
(B)
to the maximum extent practicable, each covered contract, grant, and cooperative agreement of an executive agency that is awarded before the date of the enactment of this Act shall be modified to include the clause described in paragraph (2).
(2)
Clause described.— The clause described in this paragraph is a clause that—
(A)
requires the contractor, or the recipient of the grant or cooperative agreement, to exercise due diligence to ensure that none of the funds, including goods and services, received under the contract, grant, or cooperative agreement are provided directly or indirectly to a covered person or entity; and
(B)
notifies the contractor, or the recipient of the grant or cooperative agreement, of the authority of the head of contracting activity, or other appropriate official, to terminate or void the contract, grant, or cooperative agreement, in whole or in part, as provided in subsection (c).
(3)
Treatment as void.— For purposes of this section:
(A)
A contract, grant, or cooperative agreement that is void is unenforceable as contrary to public policy.
(B)
A contract, grant, or cooperative agreement that is void in part is unenforceable as contrary to public policy with regard to a segregable task or effort under the contract, grant, or cooperative agreement.
(4)
Public comment.— The President shall ensure that the process for revising regulations required by paragraph (1) shall include an opportunity for public comment, including an opportunity for comment on standards of due diligence required by this section.
(e)
Requirements Following Contract Actions.— Not later than 270 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Federal Acquisition Regulation, the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement, and the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards shall be revised as follows:
(1)
To require that any head of contracting activity, or other appropriate official, taking an action under subsection (c) to terminate, void, or restrict a contract, grant, or cooperative agreement notify in writing the contractor or recipient of the grant or cooperative agreement, as applicable, of the action.
(2)
To permit the contractor or recipient of a grant or cooperative agreement subject to an action taken under subsection (c) to terminate or void the contract, grant, or cooperative agreement, as the case may be, an opportunity to challenge the action by requesting an administrative review of the action under the procedures of the executive agency concerned not later than 30 days after receipt of notice of the action.
(f)
Annual Review; Protection of Classified Information.—
(1)
Annual review.— The Secretary of Defense, in conjunction with the Director of National Intelligence and in consultation with the Secretary of State shall, on an annual basis, review the lists of persons and entities previously covered by a notice under subsection (b) as having been identified as described by subsection (a) in order to determine whether or not such persons and entities continue to warrant identification as described by subsection (a). If a determination is made pursuant to such a review that a person or entity no longer warrants identification as described by subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall notify the head of the executive agency concerned (or the designee of such head) and the commander of the covered combatant command concerned (or the specified deputies of the commander) in writing of such determination.
(2)
Protection of classified information.— Classified information relied upon to make an identification in accordance with subsection (a) may not be disclosed to a contractor or a recipient of a grant or cooperative agreement with respect to which an action is taken pursuant to the authority provided in subsection (c), or to their representatives, in the absence of a protective order issued by a court of competent jurisdiction established under Article I or Article III of the Constitution of the United States that specifically addresses the conditions upon which such classified information may be so disclosed.
(g)
Delegation of Certain Responsibilities.—
(1)
Combatant command responsibilities.— The commander of a covered combatant command may delegate the responsibilities in this section to any deputies of the commander specified by the commander for purposes of this section. Any delegation of responsibilities under this paragraph shall be made in writing.
(2)
Nondelegation of responsibility for certain actions.— The authority provided by subsection (c) to terminate, void, or restrict contracts, grants, and cooperative agreements, in whole or in part, may not be delegated below the level of head of contracting activity, or equivalent official for purposes of grants or cooperative agreements.
(h)
Additional Responsibilities of Executive Agencies.—
(1)
Sharing of information on supporters of the enemy.— The Secretary of Defense shall, in consultation with the Director of the Office of Management and Budget, carry out a program through which agency components may provide information to heads of executive agencies (or the designees of such heads) and the commanders of the covered combatant commands (or the specified deputies of the commanders) relating to persons or entities who may be providing funds, including goods and services, received under contracts, grants, or cooperative agreements of the executive agencies directly or indirectly to a covered person or entity. The program shall be designed to facilitate and encourage the sharing of risk and threat information between executive agencies and the covered combatant commands.
(2)
Inclusion of information on contract actions in fapiis and other systems.— Upon the termination, voiding, or restriction of a contract, grant, or cooperative agreement of an executive agency under subsection (c), the head of contracting activity of the executive agency shall provide for the inclusion in the Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), or other formal system of records on contractors or entities, of appropriate information on the termination, voiding, or restriction, as the case may be, of the contract, grant, or cooperative agreement.
(3)
Reports.— The head of contracting activity that receives a notice pursuant to subsection (b) shall submit to the head of the executive agency concerned (or the designee of such head) and the commander of the covered combatant command concerned (or specified deputies) a report on the action, if any, taken by the head of contracting activity pursuant to subsection (c), including a determination not to terminate, void, or restrict the contract, grant, or cooperative agreement as otherwise authorized by subsection (c).
(i)
Reports.—
(1)
In general.— Not later than March 1 of 2016, 2017, and 2018, the Director of the Office of Management and Budget shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on the use of the authorities in this section in the preceding calendar year, including the following:
(A)
For each instance in which an executive agency exercised the authority to terminate, void, or restrict a contract, grant, and cooperative agreement pursuant to subsection (c), based on a notification under subsection (b), the following:
(i)
The executive agency taking such action.
(ii)
An explanation of the basis for the action taken.
(iii)
The value of the contract, grant, or cooperative agreement voided or terminated.
(iv)
The value of all contracts, grants, or cooperative agreements of the executive agency in force with the person or entity concerned at the time the contract, grant, or cooperative agreement was terminated or voided.
(B)
For each instance in which an executive agency did not exercise the authority to terminate, void, or restrict a contract, grant, and cooperative agreement pursuant to subsection (c), based on a notification under subsection (b), the following:
(i)
The executive agency concerned.
(ii)
An explanation of the basis for not taking the action.
(2)
Form.— Any report under this subsection may, at the election of the Director—
(A)
be submitted in unclassified form, but with a classified annex; or
(B)
be submitted in classified form.
(j)
Inapplicability to Certain Contracts, Grants, and Cooperative Agreements.— The provisions of this section do not apply to contracts, grants, and cooperative agreements that are performed entirely inside the United States.
(k)
National Security Exception.— Nothing in this section shall apply to the authorized intelligence or law enforcement activities of the United States Government.
(l)
Construction With Other Authorities.— Except as provided in subsection (m), the authorities in this section shall be in addition to, and not to the exclusion of, any other authorities available to executive agencies to implement policies and purposes similar to those set forth in this section.
(m)
Coordination With Current Authorities.—
(1)
Repeal of superseded authority related to centcom.— Effective 270 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, section 841 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1510; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is repealed.
(2)
Repeal of superseded authority related to department of defense.— Effective 270 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, section 831 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 810; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is repealed.
(3)
Use of superseded authorities in implementation of requirements.— In providing for the implementation of the requirements of this section by the Department of Defense, the Secretary of Defense may use and modify for that purpose the regulations and procedures established for purposes of the implementation of the requirements of section 841 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 and section 831 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014.
(n)
Sunset.— The provisions of this section shall cease to be effective on December 31, 2019.

SEC. 842. Additional Access to Records.

(a)
Contracts, Grants, and Cooperative Agreements.—
(1)
In general.— Not later than 270 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, applicable regulations shall be revised to provide that, except as provided under subsection (c)(1), the clause described in paragraph (2) may, as appropriate, be included in each covered contract, grant, and cooperative agreement of an executive agency that is awarded on or after the date of the enactment of this Act.
(2)
Clause.— The clause described in this paragraph is a clause authorizing the head of the executive agency concerned, upon a written determination pursuant to paragraph (3), to examine any records of the contractor, the recipient of a grant or cooperative agreement, or any subcontractor or subgrantee under such contract, grant, or cooperative agreement to the extent necessary to ensure that funds, including goods and services, available under the contract, grant, or cooperative agreement are not provided directly or indirectly to a covered person or entity.
(3)
Written determination.— The authority to examine records pursuant to the contract clause described in paragraph (2) may be exercised only upon a written determination by the contracting officer, or comparable official responsible for a grant or cooperative agreement, upon a finding by the commander of a covered combatant command (or the specified deputies of the commander) or the head of an executive agency (or the designee of such head) that there is reason to believe that funds, including goods and services, available under the contract, grant, or cooperative agreement concerned may have been provided directly or indirectly to a covered person or entity.
(4)
Flowdown.— A clause described in paragraph (2) may also be included in any subcontract or subgrant under a covered contract, grant, or cooperative agreement if the subcontract or subgrant has an estimated value in excess of $50,000.
(b)
Reports.—
(1)
In general.— Not later than March 1 of 2016, 2017, and 2018, the Director of the Office of Management and Budget shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on the use of the authority provided by this section in the preceding calendar year.
(2)
Elements.— Each report under this subsection shall identify, for the calendar year covered by such report, each instance in which an executive agency exercised the authority provided under this section to examine records, explain the basis for the action taken, and summarize the results of any examination of records so undertaken.
(3)
Form.— Any report under this subsection may be submitted in classified form.
(c)
Relationship to Existing Authorities Applicable to CENTCOM.—
(1)
Applicability.— This section shall not apply to contracts, grants, or cooperative agreements covered under section 842 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1513; 10 U.S.C. 2313 note).
(2)
Extension of current authorities applicable to centcom.— Section 842(d)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1514; 10 U.S.C. 2313 note) is amended by striking “ date of the enactment of this Act” and inserting “ date of the enactment of the Carl Levin and Howard P. ‘Buck’ McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015”.

SEC. 843. Definitions.

In this subtitle:
(1)
Appropriate committees of congress.— The term “appropriate committees of Congress” means—
(A)
the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, the Committee on Foreign Relations, and the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate; and
(B)
the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives.
(2)
Contingency operation.— The term “contingency operation” has the meaning given that term in section 101(a)(13) of title 10, United States Code.
(3)
Contract.— The term “contract” includes a contract for commercial items but is not limited to a contract for commercial items.
(4)
Covered combatant command.— The term “covered combatant command” means the following:
(A)
The United States Africa Command.
(B)
The United States Central Command.
(C)
The United States European Command.
(D)
The United States Pacific Command.
(E)
The United States Southern Command.
(F)
The United States Transportation Command.
(5)
Covered contract, grant, or cooperative agreement defined.— The term “covered contract, grant, or cooperative agreement” means a contract, grant, or cooperative agreement with an estimated value in excess of $50,000 that is performed outside the United States, including its possessions and territories, in support of a contingency operation in which members of the Armed Forces are actively engaged in hostilities.
(6)
Covered person or entity.— The term “covered person or entity” means a person or entity that is actively opposing United States or coalition forces involved in a contingency operation in which members of the Armed Forces are actively engaged in hostilities.
(7)
Executive agency.— The term “executive agency” has the meaning given that term in section 133 of title 41, United States Code.
(8)
Head of contracting activity.— The term “head of contracting activity” has the meaning described in section 1.601 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation.
(9)
Uniform administrative requirements, cost principles, and audit requirements for federal awards.— The term “Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards” means the guidance issued by the Office of Management and Budget in part 200 of chapter II of title 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations.

Subtitle F Other Matters

SEC. 851. Rapid Acquisition and Deployment Procedures for United States Special Operations Command.

(a)
Authority to Establish Procedures.— The Secretary may prescribe procedures for the rapid acquisition and deployment of items for the United States Special Operations Command that are currently under development by the Department of Defense or available from the commercial sector and are—
(1)
urgently needed to react to an enemy threat or to respond to significant and urgent safety situations;
(2)
needed to avoid significant risk of loss of life or mission failure; or
(3)
needed to avoid collateral damage risk where the absence of collateral damage is a requirement for mission success.
(b)
Issues to Be Addressed.— The procedures prescribed under subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1)
A process for streamlined communication between the Commander of the United States Special Operations Command and the acquisition and research and development communities, including—
(A)
a process for the Commander to communicate needs to the acquisition community and the research and development community; and
(B)
a process for the acquisition community and the research and development community to propose items that meet the needs communicated by the Commander.
(2)
Procedures for demonstrating, rapidly acquiring, and deploying items proposed pursuant to paragraph (1)(B), including—
(A)
a process for demonstrating performance and evaluating for current operational purposes the existing capability of an item;
(B)
a process for developing an acquisition and funding strategy for the deployment of an item; and
(C)
a process for making deployment determinations based on information obtained pursuant to subparagraphs (A) and (B).
(c)
Testing Requirement.—
(1)
In general.— The process for demonstrating performance and evaluating for current operational purposes the existing capability of an item prescribed under subsection (b)(2)(A) shall include—
(A)
an operational assessment in accordance with expedited procedures prescribed by the Director of Operational Testing and Evaluation; and
(B)
a requirement to provide information to the deployment decision-making authority about any deficiency of the item in meeting the original requirements for the item (as stated in an operational requirements document or similar document).
(2)
Deficiency not a determining factor.— The process may not include a requirement for any deficiency of an item to be the determining factor in deciding whether to deploy the item.
(3)
Additional requirement in case of deficiency.— In the case of any deficiency of an item, a decision to deploy the item may be made only if the Commander of the United States Special Operations Command determines that, for reasons of national security, the deficiency of the item is acceptable.
(d)
Limitation.— The quantity of items of a system procured using the procedures prescribed pursuant to this section may not exceed the number established for low-rate initial production for the system. Any such items shall be counted for purposes of the number of items of the system that may be procured through low-rate initial production.
(e)
Annual Funding Limitation.— Of the funds available to the Commander of the United States Special Operations Command in any given fiscal year, not more than $50,000,000 may be used to procure items under this section.
(f)
Relationship to Other Rapid Acquisition Authority.— The Commander of the United States Special Operations Command may not use the authority under this section at the same time the Commander uses the authority under section 806 of the Bob Stump National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2003 (Public Law 107–314; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note).
(g)
Congressional Notifications.—
(1)
Notification before procedures go into effect.— The Secretary of Defense shall notify the congressional defense committees at least 30 days before the procedures prescribed pursuant to this section are made effective.
(2)
Notification after use of procedures.— The Secretary of Defense shall notify the congressional defense committees not later than 48 hours after each use of the procedures prescribed pursuant to this section.

SEC. 852. Consideration of Corrosion Control in Preliminary Design Review.

The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics shall ensure that Department of Defense Instruction 5000.02 and other applicable guidance require full consideration, during preliminary design review for a product, of metals, materials, and technologies that effectively prevent or control corrosion over the life cycle of the product.

SEC. 853. Program Manager Development Report.

(a)
Report.— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on enhancing the role of Department of Defense civilian and military program managers in developing and carrying out defense acquisition programs.
(b)
Matters to Be Addressed.— The report required by this section shall address, at a minimum, recommendations for—
(1)
enhancing training and educational opportunities for program managers;
(2)
increasing emphasis on the mentoring of current and future program managers by experienced senior executives and program managers within the Department;
(3)
improving career paths and career opportunities for program managers;
(4)
creating additional incentives for the recruitment and retention of highly qualified individuals to serve as program managers;
(5)
improving required resource levels and support (including systems engineering expertise, cost estimating expertise, and software development expertise) for program managers;
(6)
improving means of collecting and disseminating best practices and lessons learned to enhance program management across the Department;
(7)
creating common templates and tools to support improved data gathering and analysis for program management and oversight purposes;
(8)
increasing accountability of program managers for the results of defense acquisition programs;
(9)
enhancing monetary and nonmonetary awards for successful accomplishment of program objectives by program managers; and
(10)
improving program manager tenure with the goal of maintaining both civilian and military program managers in their positions for a sufficient period of time to ensure program stability and consistency of leadership, including consideration of tying program manager tenure to milestone decision points for major defense acquisition programs and major automated information system programs.

SEC. 854. Operational Metrics for Joint Information Environment and Supporting Activities.

(a)
Guidance.— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, acting through the Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense, shall issue guidance for measuring the operational effectiveness and efficiency of the Joint Information Environment within the military departments, Defense Agencies, and combatant commands. The guidance shall include a definition of specific metrics for data collection, and a requirement for each military department, Defense Agency, and combatant command to regularly collect and assess data on such operational effectiveness and efficiency and report the results to such Chief Information Officer on a regular basis.
(b)
Baseline Architecture.— The Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense shall identify a baseline architecture for the Joint Information Environment by identifying and reporting to the Secretary of Defense any information technology programs or other investments that support that architecture.
(c)
Joint Information Environment Defined.— In this section, the term “Joint Information Environment” means the initiative of the Department of Defense to modernize the information technology networks and systems within the Department.

SEC. 855. Compliance with Requirements for Senior Department of Defense Officials Seeking Employment with Defense Contractors.

Section 847(b)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 243; 10 U.S.C. 1701 note) is amended by inserting after “ repository” the following: “ maintained by the General Counsel of the Department”.

SEC. 856. Enhancement of Whistleblower Protection for Employees of Grantees.

(a)
Addition of Reference to Grantee.— Section 2409(a)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “ or subcontractor” and inserting “ , subcontractor, grantee, or subgrantee”.
(b)
Conforming Amendments.— Section 2409(g) of such title is amended—
(1)
in paragraph (4), by striking “ or a grant”; and
(2)
by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

“(7) The term ‘grantee’ means a person awarded a grant with an agency.”

SEC. 857. Prohibition on Reimbursement of Contractors for Congressional Investigations and Inquiries.

Section 2324(e)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:

“(Q) Costs incurred by a contractor in connection with a congressional investigation or inquiry into an issue that is the subject matter of a proceeding resulting in a disposition as described in subsection (k)(2).”

SEC. 858. Requirement to Provide Photovoltaic Devices from United States Sources.

(a)
Contract Requirement.— The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that each covered contract includes a provision requiring that any photovoltaic device installed under the contract be manufactured in the United States substantially all from articles, materials, or supplies mined, produced, or manufactured in the United States, unless the head of the department or independent establishment concerned determines, on a case-by-case basis, that the inclusion of such requirement is inconsistent with the public interest or involves unreasonable costs, subject to exceptions provided in the Trade Agreements Act of 1979 (19 U.S.C. 2501 et seq.) or otherwise provided by law.
(b)
Definitions.— In this section:
(1)
Covered contract.— The term “covered contract” means a contract awarded by the Department of Defense that provides for a photovoltaic device to be—
(A)
installed inside the United States on Department of Defense property or in a facility owned by the Department of Defense; or
(B)
reserved for the exclusive use of the Department of Defense in the United States for the full economic life of the device.
(2)
Photovoltaic device.— The term “photovoltaic device” means a device that converts light directly into electricity through a solid-state, semiconductor process.

SEC. 859. Reimbursement of Department of Defense for Assistance Provided to Nongovernmental Entertainment-Oriented Media Producers.

(a)
In General.— Subchapter II of chapter 134 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

“§ 2264. Reimbursement for assistance provided to nongovernmental entertainment-oriented media producers

“(a) In General.—There shall be credited to the applicable appropriations account or fund from which the expenses described in subsection (b) were charged any amounts received by the Department of Defense as reimbursement for such expenses.

“(b) Description of Expenses.—The expenses referred to in subsection (a) are any expenses—

“(1) incurred by the Department of Defense as a result of providing assistance to a nongovernmental entertainment-oriented media producer;

“(2) for which the Department of Defense requires reimbursement under section 9701 of title 31 or any other provision of law; and

“(3) for which the Department of Defense received reimbursement after the date of the enactment of the Carl Levin and Howard P. ‘Buck’ McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015.”

(b)
Clerical Amendment.— The table of sections at the beginning of such subchapter is amended by adding at the end the following new item:

“2264. Reimbursement for assistance provided to nongovernmental entertainment-oriented media producers.”.

TITLE IX Department of Defense Organization and Management

Subtitle A Department of Defense Management

SEC. 901. Reorganization of the Office of the Secretary of Defense and Related Matters.

(a)
Conversion of Position of Deputy Chief Management Officer to Position of Under Secretary of Defense for Business Management and Information.—
(1)
In general.— Effective on February 1, 2017, section 132a of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:

“§ 132a. Under Secretary of Defense for Business Management and Information

“(a) There is an Under Secretary of Defense for Business Management and Information, appointed from civilian life by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate.

“(b) The Under Secretary also serves as—

“(1) the Performance Improvement Officer of the Department of Defense; and

“(2) the Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense.

“(c) Subject to the authority, direction, and control of the Secretary of Defense and the Deputy Secretary of Defense in the role of the Deputy Secretary as the Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense, the Under Secretary of Defense for Business Management and Information shall perform such duties and exercise such powers as the Secretary of Defense may prescribe, including the following:

“(1) Assisting the Deputy Secretary of Defense in the Deputy Secretary’s role as the Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense under section 132(c) of this title.

“(2) Supervising the management of the business operations of the Department of Defense and adjudicating issues and conflicts in functional domain business policies.

“(3) Establishing business strategic planning and performance management policies and measures and developing the Department of Defense Strategic Management Plan.

“(4) Establishing business information technology portfolio policies and overseeing investment management of that portfolio for the Department of Defense.

“(5) Establishing end-to-end business process and policies for establishing, eliminating, and implementing business standards, and managing the Business Enterprise Architecture.

“(6) Supervising the business process reengineering of the functional domains of the Department in order to support investment planning and technology development decision making for information technology systems.

“(d) The Under Secretary of Defense for Business Management and Information takes precedence in the Department of Defense after the Secretary of Defense and the Deputy Secretary of Defense.”

(2)
Placement in the office of the secretary of defense.— Effective on the effective date specified in paragraph (1), section 131(b)(2) of such title is amended—
(A)
by redesignating subparagraphs (A) through (E) as subparagraphs (B) through (F), respectively; and
(B)
by inserting before subparagraph (B) (as so redesignated) the following new subparagraph (A):

“(A) The Under Secretary of Defense for Business Management and Information.”

(b)
Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense.—
(1)
Statutory establishment of position.— Chapter 4 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 141 the following new section:

“§ 142. Chief Information Officer

“(a) There is a Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense.

“(b)

(1) The Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense—

“(A) is the Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense for the purposes of sections 3506(a)(2) and 3544(a)(3) of title 44;

“(B) has the responsibilities and duties specified in section 11315 of title 40;

“(C) has the responsibilities specified for the Chief Information Officer in sections 2222, 2223(a), and 2224 of this title; and

“(D) exercises authority, direction, and control over the Information Assurance Directorate of the National Security Agency.

“(2) The Chief Information Officer shall perform such additional duties and exercise such powers as the Secretary of Defense may prescribe.

“(c) The Chief Information Officer takes precedence in the Department of Defense with the officials serving in positions specified in section 131(b)(4) of this title. The officials serving in positions specified in section 131(b)(4) and the Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense take precedence among themselves in the order prescribed by the Secretary of Defense.”

(2)
Placement in the office of the secretary of defense.— Section 131(b) of such title, as amended by subsection (a)(2), is further amended—
(A)
by redesignating paragraphs (5, (6), (7), and (8) as paragraphs (6), (7), (8), and (9), respectively; and
(B)
by inserting after paragraph (4) the following new paragraph (5):

“(5) The Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense.”

(c)
Repeal of Requirement for Defense Business System Management Committee.— Section 186 of title 10, United States Code, is repealed.
(d)
Assignment of Responsibility for Defense Business Systems.— Section 2222 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
in subsection (a)—
(A)
by inserting “ and” at the end of paragraph (1);
(B)
by striking “ ; and” at the end of paragraph (2) and inserting a period; and
(C)
by striking paragraph (3);
(2)
in subsection (c)(1), by striking “ Defense Business Systems Management Committee” and inserting “ investment review board established under subsection (g)”; and
(3)
in subsection (g)—
(A)
in paragraph (1), by striking “ , not later than March 15, 2012,”;
(B)
in paragraph (2)(C), by striking “ each” the first place it appears and inserting “ the”; and
(C)
in paragraph (2)(F), by striking “ and the Defense Business Systems Management Committee, as required by section 186(c) of this title,”.
(e)
Deadline for Establishment of Investment Review Board and Investment Management Process.— The investment review board and investment management process required by section 2222(g) of title 10, United States Code, as amended by subsection (d)(3), shall be established not later than March 15, 2015.
(f)
Redesignation of Assistant Secretary of Defense for Operational Energy Plans and Programs To Reflect Merger With Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Installations and Environment.— Paragraph (9) of section 138(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:

“(9) One of the Assistant Secretaries is the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Energy, Installations, and Environment. The Assistant Secretary—

“(A) is the principal advisor to the Secretary of Defense and the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics on matters relating to energy, installations, and environment; and

“(B) is the principal advisor to the Secretary of Defense and the Deputy Secretary of Defense regarding operational energy plans and programs.”

(g)
Clarification of Policy and Responsibilities of Assistant Secretary of Defense for Energy, Installations, and Environment.—
(1)
Transfer of policy provisions from section 138c.— Chapter 173 of such title is amended—
(A)
by adding at the end the following new section:

“§ 2926. Operational energy activities”

(B)
by transferring paragraph (3) of section 138c(c) of such title to section 2926, as added by subparagraph (A), inserting such paragraph after the section heading, and redesignating such paragraph as subsection (a);
(C)
in subsection (a) (as so inserted and redesignated)—
(i)
by inserting “ Alternative Fuel Activities.—” before “ The Assistant Secretary”;
(ii)
by redesignating subparagraphs (A) through (E) as paragraphs (1) through (5), respectively; and
(iii)
in paragraph (5) (as so redesignated), by striking “ subsection (e)(4)” and inserting “ subsection (c)(4)”;
(D)
by transferring subsections (d), (e), and (f) of section 138c of such title to section 2926, as added by subparagraph (A), inserting those subsections after subsection (a) (as transferred and redesignated by subparagraph (B)), and redesignating those subsections as subsections (b), (c), and (d), respectively;
(E)
in subsections (a), (b), (c), and (d) of section 2926 (as transferred and redesignated by subparagraphs (B) and (D)), by inserting “ of Defense for Installations, Energy, and Environment” after “ Assistant Secretary” the first place it appears in each such subsection;
(F)
in subsection (b) of section 2926 (as transferred and redesignated by subparagraph (D)), by striking “ provide guidance to, and consult with, the Secretary of Defense, the Deputy Secretary of Defense, the Secretaries of the military departments,” and inserting “ make recommendations to the Secretary of Defense and Deputy Secretary of Defense and provide guidance to the Secretaries of the military departments”; and
(G)
in subsection (c) of section 2926 (as transferred and redesignated by subparagraph (D)), by amending paragraphs (4), (5), and (6) to read as follows:

“(4) Not later than 30 days after the date on which the budget for a fiscal year is submitted to Congress pursuant to section 1105 of title 31, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress a report on the proposed budgets for that fiscal year that were reviewed by the Assistant Secretary under paragraph (3).

“(5) For each proposed budget covered by a report under paragraph (4) for which the certification of the Assistant Secretary under paragraph (3) is that the budget is not adequate for implementation of the strategy, the report shall include the following:

“(A) A copy of the report set forth in paragraph (3).

“(B) A discussion of the actions that the Secretary proposes to take, together with any recommended legislation that the Secretary considers appropriate, to address the inadequacy of the proposed budget.

“(C) An appendix prepared by the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff describing—

“(i) the progress made by the Joint Requirements Oversight Council in implementing the energy Key Performance Parameter; and

“(ii) details regarding how operational energy is being addressed in defense planning, scenarios, support to strategic analysis, and resulting policy to improve combat capability.

“(D) An appendix prepared by the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics certifying that and describing how the acquisition system is addressing operational energy in the procurement process, including long-term sustainment considerations, and how programs are extending combat capability as a result of these considerations.

“(E) A separate statement of estimated expenditures and requested appropriations for that fiscal year for the activities of the Assistant Secretary in carrying out the duties of the Assistant Secretary.

“(F) Any additional comments that the Secretary considers appropriate regarding the inadequacy of the proposed budgets.

“(6) For each proposed budget covered by a report under paragraph (4) for which the certification of the Assistant Secretary under paragraph (3) is that the budget is adequate for implementation of the strategy, the report shall include the items set forth in subparagraphs (C), (D), and (E) of paragraph (5).”

(2)
Repeal of superseded provision.— Sections 138c of such title is repealed.
(h)
Amendments Relating to Certain Prescribed Assistant Secretary of Defense Positions.— Chapter 4 of title 10, United States Code, is further amended as follows:
(1)
Assistant secretary of defense for logistics and materiel readiness.— Paragraph (7) of section 138(b) is amended—
(A)
in the first sentence, by inserting after “ Readiness” the following: “ , who shall be appointed from among persons with an extensive background in the sustainment of major weapons systems and combat support equipment”;
(B)
by striking the second sentence;
(C)
by transferring to the end of that paragraph (as amended by subparagraph (B)) the text of subsection (b) of section 138a;
(D)
by transferring to the end of that paragraph (as amended by subparagraph (C)) the text of subsection (c) of section 138a; and
(E)
by redesignating paragraphs (1) through (3) in the text transferred by subparagraph (C) of this paragraph as subparagraphs (A) through (C), respectively.
(2)
Assistant secretary of defense for research and engineering.— Paragraph (8) of such section is amended—
(A)
by striking the second sentence and inserting the text of subsection (a) of section 138b;
(B)
by inserting after the text added by subparagraph (A) of this paragraph the following: “ The Assistant Secretary, in consultation with the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Developmental Test and Evaluation, shall—”;
(C)
by transferring paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection (b) of section 138b to the end of that paragraph (as amended by subparagraphs (A) and (B)), indenting those paragraphs 2 ems from the left margin, and redesignating those paragraphs as subparagraphs (A) and (B), respectively;
(D)
in subparagraph (A) (as so transferred and redesignated)—
(i)
by striking “ The Assistant Secretary” and all that follows through “ Test and Evaluation, shall”; and
(ii)
by striking the period at the end and inserting “ ; and”; and
(E)
in subparagraph (B) (as so transferred and redesignated), by striking “ The Assistant Secretary” and all that follows through “ Test and Evaluation, shall”.
(3)
Assistant secretary of defense for nuclear, chemical, and biological defense programs.— Paragraph (10) of such section is amended—
(A)
by striking the second sentence and inserting the text of subsection (b) of section 138d; and
(B)
by inserting after the text added by subparagraph (A) of this paragraph the text of subsection (a) of such section and in that text as so inserted—
(i)
by striking “ of Defense for Nuclear, Chemical, and Biological Defense Programs”; and
(ii)
by redesignating paragraphs (1) through (3) as subparagraphs (A) through (C), respectively.
(4)
Repeal of separate sections.— Sections 138a, 138b, and 138d are repealed.
(i)
Codification of Restrictions on Use of the Deputy Under Secretary of Defense Title.—
(1)
Codification.— Effective on January 1, 2015, section 137a(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

“(3) The officials authorized under this section shall be the only Deputy Under Secretaries of Defense.”

(2)
Conforming repeal.— Effective on the effective date specified in paragraph (1), section 906(a)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2426; 10 U.S.C. 137a note) is repealed.
(j)
Clarification of Orders of Precedence.—
(1)
Clarification relating to chief information officer.— Effective on the effective date specified in subsection (a)(1)—
(A)
(i)
by striking paragraph (5); and
(ii)
by redesignating paragraphs (6), (7), (8), and (9) as paragraphs (5), (6), (7), and (8), respectively; and
(B)
section 142 of such title is amended by striking subsection (c).
(2)
Clarification relating to other positions.— Effective on the effective date specified in subsection (a)(1)—
(A)
section 133(e)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “ and the Deputy Secretary of Defense” and inserting “ , the Deputy Secretary of Defense, and the Under Secretary of Defense for Business Management and Information”;
(B)
section 134(c) of such title is amended by inserting “ the Under Secretary of Defense for Business Management and Information,” after “ the Deputy Secretary of Defense,”;
(C)
section 137a(d) of such title is amended in the first sentence by striking all that follows after “ the military departments,” and inserting “ and the Under Secretaries of Defense.”; and
(D)
section 138(d) of such title is amended by striking “ the Deputy Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense,”.
(k)
Technical and Conforming Amendments.— Title 10, United States Code, is further amended as follows:
(1)
In paragraph (8) of section 131(b) (as redesignated by subsection (b)(2))—
(A)
by redesignating subparagraphs (A) through (H) as subparagraphs (B) through (I), respectively; and
(B)
by inserting before subparagraph (B), as redesignated by subparagraph (A) of this paragraph, the following new subparagraph (A):

“(A) The two Deputy Directors within the Office of the Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation under section 139a(c) of this title.”

(2)
In section 132(b), by striking “ is disabled or there is no Secretary of Defense” and inserting “ dies, resigns, or is otherwise unable to perform the functions and duties of the office”.
(3)
In section 137a(b), by striking “ is absent or disabled” and inserting “ dies, resigns, or is otherwise unable to perform the functions and duties of the office”.
(3)
Effective on the effective date specified in subsection (a)(1), in section 2222—
(A)
by striking “ the Deputy Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense” each place it appears in subsections (c)(2)(E), (f)(1)(D), (f)(1)(E), (f)(2)(E), and (g)(1) and inserting “ the Under Secretary of Defense for Business Management and Information”; and
(B)
in subsection (g)(3)(A)—
(i)
by striking “ Deputy Chief Management Officer” the first place it appears and inserting “ Under Secretary of Defense for Business Management and Information”; and
(ii)
by striking “ Deputy Chief Management Officer” the second, third, and forth places it appears and inserting “ Under Secretary”.
(4)
In section 2925(b), by striking “ Operational Energy Plans and Programs” and inserting “ Energy, Installations, and Environment”.
(l)
Clerical Amendments.—
(1)
The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 4 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(A)
effective on the effective date specified in subsection (a)(1), by amending the item relating to section 132a to read as follows:

“132a. Under Secretary of Defense for Business Management and Information.”;

(B)
by striking the items relating to sections 138a, 138b, 138c, and 138d; and
(C)
by inserting after the item relating to section 141 the following new item:

“142. Chief Information Officer.”.

(2)
The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 7 of such title is amended by striking the item relating to section 186.
(3)
The table of sections at the beginning of subchapter III of chapter 173 of such title is amended by adding at the end the following new item:

“2926. Operational energy activities.”.

(m)
Executive Schedule Matters.—
(1)
Executive schedule level ii.— Effective on the effective date specified in subsection (a)(1), section 5313 of title 5, United States Code, is amended by inserting above the item relating to the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics the following: “Under Secretary of Defense for Business Management and Information.”.
(2)
Executive schedule level iii.— Effective on the effective date specified in subsection (a)(1), section 5314 of title 5, United States Code, is amended by striking “ Deputy Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense.”.
(3)
Conforming amendment to prior reduction in number of assistant secretaries of defense.— Section 5315 of such title is amended by striking “ Assistant Secretaries of Defense (16)” and inserting “ Assistant Secretaries of Defense (14)”.
(n)
References.—
(1)
DCMO.— After February 1, 2017, any reference to the Deputy Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense in any provision of law or in any rule, regulation, or other record, document, or paper of the United States shall be deemed to refer to the Under Secretary of Defense for Business Management and Information.
(2)
ASDEIE.— Any reference to the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Operational Energy Plans and Programs or to the Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Installations and Environment in any provision of law or in any rule, regulation, or other paper of the United States shall be deemed to refer to the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Energy, Installations, and Environment.

SEC. 902. Assistant Secretary of Defense for Manpower and Reserve Affairs.

(a)
Single Assistant Secretary of Defense for Manpower and Reserve Affairs.—
(1)
Redesignation of position.— The position of Assistant Secretary of Defense for Reserve Affairs is hereby redesignated as the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Manpower and Reserve Affairs. The individual serving in that position on the day before the date of the enactment of this Act may continue in office after that date without further appointment.
(2)
Statutory duties.— Paragraph (2) of section 138(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:

“(2) One of the Assistant Secretaries is the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Manpower and Reserve Affairs. In addition to any duties and powers prescribed under paragraph (1), the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Manpower and Reserve Affairs shall have as the principal duty of such Assistant Secretary the overall supervision of manpower and reserve affairs of the Department of Defense.”

(b)
Conforming Amendments.—
(1)
Cross reference in subtitle e.— Section 10201 of such title is amended to read as follows:

“§ 10201. Assistant Secretary of Defense for Manpower and Reserve Affairs

“As provided in section 138(b)(2) of this title, the official in the Department of Defense with responsibility for overall supervision of reserve affairs of the Department of Defense is the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Manpower and Reserve Affairs.”

(2)
Clerical amendment.— The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 1007 of such title is amended by striking the item relating to section 10201 and inserting the following new item:

“10201. Assistant Secretary of Defense for Manpower and Reserve Affairs.”.

SEC. 903. Requirement for Assessment of Options to Modify the Number of Combatant Commands.

(a)
Assessment Required.— The Secretary of Defense shall conduct an assessment of the feasibility, advisability, and recommendations, if any, for reducing or increasing the number or consolidating the common staff functions and infrastructure of the combatant commands by the end of fiscal year 2020.
(b)
Matters Covered.— The assessment required by subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1)
An analysis of alternative versions of the Unified Command Plan for distribution and assignment of the following:
(A)
Command responsibility and authority.
(B)
Span of control.
(C)
Headquarters structure and organization.
(D)
Staff functions, capabilities, and capacities.
(2)
A detailed analysis of each alternative that reduces or increases the number or consolidates the common staff functions of the combatant commands in terms of assigned personnel, resources, and infrastructure, set forth separately by fiscal year, by the end of fiscal year 2020.
(3)
A description of the changes to the Unified Command Plan necessary to implement such reductions, increases, or consolidations.
(4)
An assessment of the feasibility, advisability, risks, and estimated costs associated with such reductions, increases, or consolidations.
(5)
An assessment of efficiencies, potential savings from such efficiencies, and operational risk, if any, that could be realized by—
(A)
combining or otherwise sharing common staff or support functions between two or more combatant command headquarters;
(B)
establishing a new organization to manage the combined staff or support functions of two or more combatant command headquarters; or
(C)
any other efficiency initiatives or arrangements that the Secretary considers appropriate.
(c)
Use of Previous Studies and Outside Experts.— In conducting the assessment required by subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff may—
(1)
use and incorporate previous plans or studies of the Department of Defense; and
(2)
consult with and incorporate views of defense experts from outside the Department.
(d)
Report.—
(1)
Requirement.— Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report containing the findings and recommendations of the assessment required by subsection (a). The report shall include the views of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
(2)
Form.— The report shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.

SEC. 904. Office of Net Assessment.

(a)
Independent Office Required.— The Secretary of Defense shall establish and maintain an independent organization within the Department of Defense to develop and coordinate net assessments of the standing, trends, and future prospects of the military capabilities and potential of the United States in comparison with the military capabilities and potential of other countries or groups of countries, so as to identify emerging or future threats or opportunities for the United States.
(b)
Direct Report to the Secretary of Defense.— The head of the office established and maintained pursuant to subsection (a) shall report directly to the Secretary of Defense without intervening authority and may communicate views on matters within the responsibility of the office directly to the Secretary without obtaining the approval or concurrence of any other official within the Department of Defense.

SEC. 905. Periodic Review of Department of Defense Management Headquarters.

(a)
Plan Required.— Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall develop a plan for implementing a periodic review and analysis of the Department of Defense personnel requirements for management headquarters.
(b)
Elements of Plan.— The plan required by subsection (a) shall include the following for each covered organization:
(1)
A description of how current management headquarters are sized and structured to execute Department of Defense assigned mission requirements, including a list of the reference documents and instructions that explain the mission requirements of the management headquarters and how the management headquarters are sized and structured.
(2)
A description of the critical capabilities and skillsets required by management headquarters to execute Department of Defense strategic guidance in order to fulfill mission objectives.
(3)
An identification and analysis of the factors that directly or indirectly influence or contribute to the expense of Department of Defense management headquarters.
(4)
An assessment of the effectiveness of current systems in use to track how military, civilian, and contract personnel are identified, managed, and tracked at the management headquarters.
(5)
A description of the proposed timeline, required resources necessary, and Department of Defense documents, instructions, and regulations that need to be updated in order to implement a permanent periodic review and analysis of Department of Defense personnel requirements for management headquarters.
(c)
Covered Organization Defined.— In this section, the term “covered organization” includes each of the following:
(1)
The Office of the Secretary of Defense.
(2)
The Joint Staff.
(3)
The Defense Agencies.
(4)
The Department of Defense field activities.
(5)
The headquarters of the combatant commands.
(6)
Headquarters, Department of the Army, including the Secretary of the Army, the Office of the Chief of Staff of the Army, and the Army Staff.
(7)
The major command headquarters of the Army.
(8)
The Office of the Secretary of the Navy, the Office of the Chief of Naval Operations, and the Headquarters, United States Marine Corps.
(9)
The major command headquarters of the Navy and the Marine Corps.
(10)
Headquarters, Department of the Air Force, including the Office of the Secretary of the Air Force, the Office of the Air Force Chief of Staff, and the Air Staff.
(11)
The major command headquarters of the Air Force.
(12)
The National Guard Bureau.
(d)
Report.— Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees the plan required by subsection (a).
(e)
Amendments.— Section 904(d)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 816; 10 U.S.C. 111 note) is amended—
(1)
by striking “ 2016” and inserting “ 2017”;
(2)
in subparagraph (B), by inserting “ , consolidations,” after “ through changes”;
(3)
in subparagraph (C)—
(A)
by inserting “ , consolidations,” after “ through changes”; and
(B)
by inserting “ , or other associated cost drivers, including a discussion of how the changes, consolidations, or reductions were prioritized,” after “ programs and offices”;
(4)
in subparagraph (E), by inserting “ , including the risks of, and capabilities gained or lost by implementing, such modifications” before the period; and
(5)
by adding at the end the following new subparagraphs:

“(F) A description of how the plan supports or affects current Department of Defense strategic guidance, policy, and mission requirements, including the quadrennial defense review, the Unified Command Plan, and the strategic choices and management review.

“(G) A description of the associated costs specifically addressed by the savings.”

Subtitle B Other Matters

SEC. 911. Modifications of Biennial Strategic Workforce Plan Relating to Senior Management, Functional, and Technical Workforces of the Department of Defense.

(a)
Senior Management Workforce.— Subsection (c) of section 115b of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
by striking paragraph (1) and inserting the following new paragraph (1):

“(1) Each strategic workforce plan under subsection (a) shall—

“(A) specifically address the shaping and improvement of the senior management workforce of the Department of Defense; and

“(B) include an assessment of the senior functional and technical workforce of the Department of Defense within the appropriate functional community.”

; and

(2)
in paragraph (2), by striking “ such senior management, functional, and technical workforce” and inserting “ such senior management workforce and such senior functional and technical workforce”.
(b)
Highly Qualified Experts.— Such section is further amended—
(1)
in subsection (b)(2), by striking “ subsection (f)(1)” in subparagraphs (D) and (E) and inserting “ subsection (h)(1) or (h)(2)”;
(2)
by redesignating subsections (f) and (g) as subsections (g) and (h), respectively; and
(3)
by inserting after subsection (e) the following new subsection (f):

“(f) Highly Qualified Experts.—

(1) Each strategic workforce plan under subsection (a) shall include an assessment of the workforce of the Department of Defense comprising highly qualified experts appointed pursuant to section 9903 of title 5 (in this subsection referred to as the ‘HQE workforce’).

“(2) For purposes of paragraph (1), each plan shall include, with respect to the HQE workforce—

“(A) an assessment of the critical skills and competencies of the existing HQE workforce and projected trends in that workforce based on expected losses due to retirement and other attrition;

“(B) specific strategies for attracting, compensating, and motivating the HQE workforce of the Department, including the program objectives of the Department to be achieved through such strategies and the funding needed to implement such strategies;

“(C) any incentives necessary to attract or retain HQE personnel;

“(D) any changes that may be necessary in resources or in the rates or methods of pay needed to ensure the Department has full access to appropriately qualified personnel; and

“(E) any legislative actions that may be necessary to achieve HQE workforce goals.”

(c)
Definitions.— Subsection (h) of such section (as redesignated by subsection (b)(2)) is amended to read as follows:

“(h) Definitions.—In this section:

“(1) The term ‘senior management workforce of the Department of Defense’ includes the following categories of Department of Defense civilian personnel:

“(A) Appointees in the Senior Executive Service under section 3131 of title 5.

“(B) Persons serving in the Defense Intelligence Senior Executive Service under section 1606 of this title.

“(2) The term ‘senior functional and technical workforce of the Department of Defense’ includes the following categories of Department of Defense civilian personnel:

“(A) Persons serving in positions described in section 5376(a) of title 5.

“(B) Scientists and engineers appointed pursuant to section 342(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1995 (Public Law 103–337; 108 Stat. 2721), as amended by section 1114 of the Floyd D. Spence National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2001 (as enacted into law by Public Law 106–398 (114 Stat. 1654A–315)).

“(C) Scientists and engineers appointed pursuant to section 1101 of the Strom Thurmond National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1999 (5 U.S.C. 3104 note).

“(D) Persons serving in Intelligence Senior Level positions under section 1607 of this title.

“(3) The term ‘acquisition workforce’ includes individuals designated under section 1721 of this title as filling acquisition positions.”

(d)
Conforming Amendment.— The heading of subsection (c) of such section is amended to read as follows: “ Senior Management Workforce; Senior Functional and Technical Workforce.—”.
(e)
Formatting of Annual Report.— Subsections (d)(1) and (e)(1) of such section are each amended by striking “ include a separate chapter to”.

SEC. 912. Repeal of Extension of Comptroller General Report on Inventory.

Section 803(c) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2402), as amended by section 951(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 839), is amended by striking “ 2013, 2014, and 2015” and inserting “ and 2013”.

SEC. 913. Extension of Authority to Waive Reimbursement of Costs of Activities for Nongovernmental Personnel at Department of Defense Regional Centers for Security Studies.

Section 941(b)(1) of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (10 U.S.C. 184 note) is amended by striking “ through 2014” and inserting “ through 2019”.

SEC. 914. Pilot Program to Establish Government Lodging Program.

(a)
Authority.— Notwithstanding the provisions of section 5911 of title 5, United States Code, the Secretary of Defense may, for the period of time described in subsection (b), establish and carry out a Government lodging program to provide Government or commercial lodging for employees of the Department of Defense or members of the uniformed services under the Secretary’s jurisdiction performing duty on official travel, and may require such travelers to occupy adequate quarters on a rental basis when available.
(b)
Program Duration.— The authority to establish and execute a Government lodging program under this section expires on December 31, 2019.
(c)
Limitation.— A Government lodging program developed under the authority in subsection (a), and a requirement under subsection (a) with respect to an employee of the Department of Defense, may not be construed to be subject to a duty to negotiate under chapter 71 of title 5, United States Code.
(d)
Reports.—
(1)
Initial report.— Not later than six months after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on the exercise of authority provided by subsection (a). The report shall include a detailed description of the facets of the Government lodging program, a description of how the program will increase travel efficiencies within the Department, a description of how the program will increase the safety of authorized travelers of the Department of Defense, and an estimate of the savings expected to be achieved by the program.
(2)
Annual reports.— Each year, the Secretary shall include with the materials submitted to Congress by the Secretary in support of the budget submitted by the President under section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, a report that provides actual savings achieved (or costs incurred) under the Government lodging program to date and a description of estimated savings for the fiscal year budget being submitted, any changes to program rules made since the prior report, and an overall assessment to date of the program’s effectiveness in increasing efficiency of travel and safety of Department employees.
(3)
Final report.— With the budget materials submitted to Congress by the Secretary in support of the budget submitted by the President for fiscal year 2019, the Secretary shall include a final report providing the Secretary’s overall assessment of the effectiveness of the Government lodging program established under subsection (a), including a statement of savings achieved (or costs incurred) as of that date, and a recommendation for whether the program shall be made permanent. The Secretary may, in consultation with the heads of other Federal agencies, make a recommendation on whether the program should be expanded and made permanent with respect to those other Federal agencies.
(4)
Appropriate committees of congress defined.— In this subsection, the term “appropriate committees of Congress” means—
(A)
the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, and the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate; and
(B)
the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives.

SEC. 915. Single Standard Mileage Reimbursement Rate for Privately Owned Automobiles of Government Employees and Members of the Uniformed Services.

(a)
In General.— Section 5704(a)(1) of title 5, United States Code, is amended in the last sentence by striking all that follows “ the rate per mile” and inserting “ shall be the single standard mileage rate established by the Internal Revenue Service.”.
(b)
Regulations and Reports.—
(1)
Provisions relating to privately owned airplanes and motorcycles.— Paragraph (1)(A) of section 5707(b) of title 5, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:

“(1)

(A) The Administrator of General Services shall conduct periodic investigations of the cost of travel and the operation of privately owned airplanes and privately owned motorcycles by employees while engaged on official business, and shall report the results of such investigations to Congress at least once a year.”

(2)
Provisions relating to privately owned automobiles.— Clause (i) of section 5707(b)(2)(A) of title 5, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:

“(i) shall provide that the mileage reimbursement rate for privately owned automobiles, as provided in section 5704(a)(1), is the single standard mileage rate established by the Internal Revenue Service referred to in that section, and”

SEC. 916. Modifications to Requirements for Accounting for Members of the Armed Forces and Department of Defense Civilian Employees Listed as Missing.

(a)
Designation of Agency and Director.— Subsection (a) of section 1501 of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:

“(a) Responsibility for Missing Persons.—

(1)

(A) The Secretary of Defense shall designate a single organization within the Department of Defense to have responsibility for Department matters relating to missing persons, including accounting for missing persons and persons whose remains have not been recovered from the conflict in which they were lost.

“(B) The organization designated under this paragraph shall be a Defense Agency or other entity of the Department of Defense outside the military departments and is referred to in this chapter as the ‘designated Defense Agency’.

“(C) The head of the organization designated under this paragraph is referred to in this chapter as the ‘designated Agency Director’.

“(2) Subject to the authority, direction, and control of the Secretary of Defense, the responsibilities of the designated Agency Director shall include the following:

“(A) Policy, control, and oversight within the Department of Defense of the entire process for investigation and recovery related to missing persons, including matters related to search, rescue, escape, and evasion.

“(B) Policy, control, and oversight of the program established under section 1509 of this title.

“(C) Responsibility for accounting for missing persons, including locating, recovering, and identifying missing persons or their remains after hostilities have ceased.

“(D) Coordination for the Department of Defense with other departments and agencies of the United States on all matters concerning missing persons.

“(E) Dissemination of appropriate information on the status of missing persons to authorized family members.

“(F) Establishment of a means for communication between officials of the designated Defense Agency and family members of missing persons, veterans service organizations, concerned citizens, and the public on the Department’s efforts to account for missing persons, including a readily available means for communication of their views and recommendations to the designated Agency Director.

“(3) In carrying out the responsibilities established under this subsection, the designated Agency Director shall be responsible for the coordination for such purposes within the Department of Defense among the military departments, the Joint Staff, and the commanders of the combatant commands.

“(4) The designated Agency Director shall establish policies, which shall apply uniformly throughout the Department of Defense, for personnel recovery (including search, rescue, escape, and evasion) and for personnel accounting (including locating, recovering, and identifying missing persons or their remains after hostilities have ceased).

“(5) The designated Agency Director shall establish procedures to be followed by Department of Defense boards of inquiry, and by officials reviewing the reports of such boards, under this chapter.”

(b)
Public-private Partnerships and Other Forms of Support.— Chapter 76 of such title is amended by inserting after section 1501 the following new section:

“§ 1501a. Public-private partnerships; other forms of support

“(a) Public-private Partnerships.—The Secretary of Defense may enter into arrangements known as public-private partnerships with appropriate entities outside the Government for the purposes of facilitating the activities of the designated Defense Agency. The Secretary may only partner with foreign governments or foreign entities with the concurrence of the Secretary of State. Any such arrangement shall be entered into in accordance with authorities provided under this section or any other authority otherwise available to the Secretary. Regulations prescribed under subsection (e)(1) shall include provisions for the establishment and implementation of such partnerships.

“(b) Acceptance of Voluntary Personal Services.—The Secretary of Defense may accept voluntary services to facilitate accounting for missing persons in the same manner as the Secretary of a military department may accept such services under section 1588(a)(9) of this title.

“(c) Cooperative Agreements and Grants.—

“(1) In general.—The Secretary of Defense may enter into a cooperative agreement with, or make a grant to, a private entity for purposes related to support of the activities of the designated Defense Agency.

“(2) Inapplicability of certain contract requirements.—Notwithstanding section 2304(k) of this title, the Secretary may enter such cooperative agreements or grants on a sole-source basis pursuant to section 2304(c)(5) of this title.

“(d) Use of Department of Defense Personal Property.—The Secretary may allow a private entity to use, at no cost, personal property of the Department of Defense to assist the entity in supporting the activities of the designated Defense Agency.

“(e) Regulations.—

“(1) In general.—The Secretary of Defense shall prescribe regulations to implement this section.

“(2) Limitation.—Such regulations shall provide that acceptance of a gift (including a gift of services) or use of a gift under this section may not occur if the nature or circumstances of the acceptance or use would compromise the integrity, or the appearance of integrity, of any program of the Department of Defense or any individual involved in such program.

“(f) Definitions.—In this section:

“(1) Cooperative agreement.—The term ‘cooperative agreement’ means an authorized cooperative agreement as described in section 6305 of title 31.

“(2) Grant.—The term ‘grant’ means an authorized grant as described in section 6304 of title 31.”

(c)
Section 1505 Conforming Amendments.— Section 1505(c) of such title is amended—
(1)
in paragraph (1), by striking “ the office established under section 1501 of this title” and inserting “ the designated Agency Director”; and
(2)
in paragraphs (2) and (3), by striking “ head of the office established under section 1501 of this title” and inserting “ designated Agency Director”.
(d)
Section 1509 Amendments.— Section 1509 of such title is amended—
(1)
in subsection (b)—
(A)
in the subsection heading, by striking “ Process”;
(B)
in paragraph (1), by striking “ POW/MIA accounting community” and inserting “ through the designated Agency Director”;
(C)
by striking paragraph (2) and inserting the following new paragraph (2):

“(2)

(A) The Secretary shall assign or detail to the designated Defense Agency on a full-time basis a senior medical examiner from the personnel of the Armed Forces Medical Examiner System. The primary duties of the medical examiner so assigned or detailed shall include the identification of remains in support of the function of the designated Agency Director to account for unaccounted for persons covered by subsection (a).

“(B) In carrying out functions under this chapter, the medical examiner so assigned or detailed shall report to the designated Agency Director.

“(C) The medical examiner so assigned or detailed shall—

“(i) exercise scientific identification authority;

“(ii) establish identification and laboratory policy consistent with the Armed Forces Medical Examiner System; and

“(iii) advise the designated Agency Director on forensic science disciplines.

“(D) Nothing in this chapter shall be interpreted as affecting the authority of the Armed Forces Medical Examiner under section 1471 of this title.”

(2)
in subsection (d)—
(A)
in the subsection heading, by inserting “ ; Centralized Database” after “ Files”; and
(B)
by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

“(4) The Secretary of Defense shall establish and maintain a single centralized database and case management system containing information on all missing persons for whom a file has been established under this subsection. The database and case management system shall be accessible to all elements of the Department of Defense involved in the search, recovery, identification, and communications phases of the program established by this section.”

; and

(3)
in subsection (f)—
(A)
in paragraph (1)—
(i)
by striking “ establishing and”; and
(ii)
by striking “ Secretary of Defense shall coordinate” and inserting “ designated Agency Director shall ensure coordination”;
(B)
in paragraph (2)—
(i)
by inserting “ staff” after “ National Security Council”; and
(ii)
by striking “ POW/MIA accounting community”; and
(C)
by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

“(3) In carrying out the program, the designated Agency Director shall coordinate all external communications and events associated with the program.”

(e)
Report on POW/MIA Policies.—
(1)
Report required.— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives a report on policies and proposals for providing access to information and documents to the next of kin of missing service personnel, including under chapter 76 of title 10, United States Code, as amended by this section.
(2)
Elements of report.— The report required by paragraph (1) shall include the following elements:
(A)
A description of information and documents to be provided to the next of kin, including the status of recovery efforts and service records.
(B)
A description of the Department’s plans, if any, to review the classification status of records related to past covered conflicts and missing service personnel.
(C)
An assessment of whether it is feasible and advisable to develop a public interface for any database of missing personnel being developed.
(f)
Clerical Amendments.—
(1)
Section heading.— The heading of section 1509 of such title is amended to read as follows:

“§ 1509. Program to resolve missing person cases”

(2)
Table of sections.— The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 76 of such title is amended—
(A)
by inserting after the item relating to section 1501 the following new item:

“1501a. Public-private partnerships; other forms of support.”; and

(B)
by striking the item relating to section 1509 and inserting the following new item:

“1509. Program to resolve missing person cases.”.

TITLE X General Provisions

Subtitle A Financial Matters

SEC. 1001. General Transfer Authority.

(a)
Authority to Transfer Authorizations.—
(1)
Authority.— Upon determination by the Secretary of Defense that such action is necessary in the national interest, the Secretary may transfer amounts of authorizations made available to the Department of Defense in this division for fiscal year 2015 between any such authorizations for that fiscal year (or any subdivisions thereof). Amounts of authorizations so transferred shall be merged with and be available for the same purposes as the authorization to which transferred.
(2)
Limitation.— Except as provided in paragraph (3), the total amount of authorizations that the Secretary may transfer under the authority of this section may not exceed $4,500,000,000.
(3)
Exception for transfers between military personnel authorizations.— A transfer of funds between military personnel authorizations under title IV shall not be counted toward the dollar limitation in paragraph (2).
(b)
Limitations.— The authority provided by subsection (a) to transfer authorizations—
(1)
may only be used to provide authority for items that have a higher priority than the items from which authority is transferred; and
(2)
may not be used to provide authority for an item that has been denied authorization by Congress.
(c)
Effect on Authorization Amounts.— A transfer made from one account to another under the authority of this section shall be deemed to increase the amount authorized for the account to which the amount is transferred by an amount equal to the amount transferred.
(d)
Notice to Congress.— The Secretary shall promptly notify Congress of each transfer made under subsection (a).

SEC. 1002. Authority to Transfer Funds to the National Nuclear Security Administration to Sustain Nuclear Weapons Modernization and Naval Reactors.

(a)
Transfer Authorized.— If the amount authorized to be appropriated for the weapons activities of the National Nuclear Security Administration under section 3101 or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 is less than $8,700,000,000 (the amount projected to be required for such activities in fiscal year 2015 as specified in the report under section 1251 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2549)), the Secretary of Defense may transfer, from amounts authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2015 pursuant to this Act, to the Secretary of Energy an amount, not to exceed $150,000,000, to be available only for naval reactors or weapons activities of the National Nuclear Security Administration.
(b)
Notice to Congress.— In the event of a transfer under subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall promptly notify Congress of the transfer, and shall include in such notice the Department of Defense account or accounts from which funds are transferred.
(c)
Transfer Mechanism.— Any funds transferred under this section shall be transferred in accordance with established procedures for reprogramming under section 1001 or successor provisions of law.
(d)
Construction of Authority.— The transfer authority provided under subsection (a) is in addition to any other transfer authority provided under this Act.

SEC. 1003. Reporting of Balances Carried Forward by the Department of Defense at the End of Each Fiscal Year.

Not later March 1 of each year, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees, and make publicly available on the Internet website of the Department of Defense, the following information:
(1)
The total dollar amount, by account, of all balances carried forward by the Department of Defense at the end of the fiscal year preceding the fiscal year during which such information is submitted.
(2)
The total dollar amount, by account, of all unobligated balances carried forward by the Department of Defense at the end of the fiscal year preceding the fiscal year during which such information is submitted.
(3)
The total dollar amount, by account, of any balances (both obligated and unobligated) that have been carried forward by the Department of Defense for five years or more as of the end of the fiscal year preceding the fiscal year during which such information is submitted.

Subtitle B Counter-Drug Activities

SEC. 1011. Extension of Authority to Support Unified Counterdrug and Counterterrorism Campaign in Colombia.

(a)
Extension.— Section 1021 of the Ronald W. Reagan National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005 (Public Law 108–375; 118 Stat. 2042), as most recently amended by section 1011 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 126 Stat. 843), is amended—
(1)
in subsection (a), by striking “ 2014” and inserting “ 2016”; and
(2)
in subsection (c), by striking “ 2014” and inserting “ 2016”.
(b)
Notice to Congress on Assistance.— Not later than 15 days before providing assistance under section 1021 of the Ronald W. Reagan National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005 (as amended by subsection (a)) using funds available for fiscal year 2015, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a notice setting forth the assistance to be provided, including the types of such assistance, the budget for such assistance, and the anticipated completion date and duration of the provision of such assistance.

SEC. 1012. Extension and Modification of Authority of Department of Defense to Provide Support for Counterdrug Activities of Other Governmental Agencies.

(a)
Extension.— Subsection (a) of section 1004 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1991 (Public Law 101–510; 10 U.S.C. 374 note) is amended by striking “ 2014” and inserting “ 2017”.
(b)
Expansion of Authority To Include Activities To Counter Transnational Organized Crime.— Such section is further amended—
(1)
by inserting “ or activities to counter transnational organized crime” after “ counter-drug activities” each place it appears;
(2)
in subsection (a)(3), by inserting “ or responsibilities for countering transnational organized crime” after “ counter-drug responsibilities”; and
(3)
in subsection (b)(5), by inserting “ or counter-transnational organized crime” after “ Counter-drug”.
(c)
Notice to Congress on Facilities Projects.— Subsection (h)(2) of such section is amended by striking “ $500,000” and inserting “ $250,000”.
(d)
Definition of Transnational Organized Crime.— Such section is further amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

“(j) Definition of Transnational Organized Crime.—In this section, the term ‘transnational organized crime’ means self-perpetuating associations of individuals who operate transnationally for the purpose of obtaining power, influence, monetary, or commercial gains, wholly or in part by illegal means, while protecting their activities through a pattern of corruption or violence or through a transnational organization structure and the exploitation of transnational commerce or communication mechanisms.”

(e)
Clerical Amendment.— The heading of such section is amended to read as follows:

“SEC. 1004. ADDITIONAL SUPPORT FOR COUNTER-DRUG ACTIVITIES AND ACTIVITIES TO COUNTER TRANSNATIONAL ORGANIZED CRIME.”

.

SEC. 1013. Availability of Funds for Additional Support for Counterdrug Activities of Certain Foreign Governments.

Subsection (e) of section 1033 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1998 (Public Law 105–85; 111 Stat. 1881), as most recently amended by section 1013(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 844), is amended to read as follows:

“(e) Availability of Funds.—Of the amount authorized to be appropriated for any fiscal year after fiscal year 2014 in which the authority under this section is in effect for drug interdiction and counter-drug activities, an amount not to exceed $125,000,000 shall be available in such fiscal year for the provision of support under this section.”

SEC. 1014. Extension and Modification of Authority for Joint Task Forces Supporting Law Enforcement Agencies Conducting Activities to Counter Transnational Organized Crime to Support Law Enforcement Agencies Conducting Counter-Terrorism Activities.

(a)
In General.— Subsection (a) of section 1022 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2004 (10 U.S.C. 371 note) is amended by inserting “ or counter-transnational organized crime activities” after “ counter-terrorism activities”.
(b)
Availability of Funds.— Subsection (b) of such section is amended—
(1)
by striking “ 2015” and inserting “ 2020”;
(2)
by inserting “ for drug interdiction and counter-drug activities that are” after “ funds”; and
(3)
by inserting “ or counter-transnational organized crime” after “ counter-terrorism”.
(c)
Reports.— Subsection (c) of such section is amended—
(1)
in the matter preceding paragraph (1)—
(A)
by striking “ after 2008”; and
(B)
by striking “ Congress” and inserting “ the congressional defense committees”;
(2)
in paragraph (1)—
(A)
by inserting “ , counter-transnational organized crime,” after “ counter-drug” the first place it appears; and
(B)
by striking “ counterterrorism support” and inserting “ counter-terrorism or counter-transnational organized crime support”;
(3)
in paragraph (2), by inserting before the period the following: “ , and a description of the objectives of such support”; and
(4)
in paragraph (3), by striking “ conducting counter-drug operations” and inserting “ exercising the authority under subsection (a)”.
(d)
Conditions.— Subsection (d)(2) of such section is amended—
(1)
in subparagraph (A) by inserting “ or counter-transnational organized crime” after “ counter-terrorism”;
(2)
in subparagraph (B)—
(A)
by striking “ Congress” and inserting “ the congressional defense committees”; and
(B)
by inserting before the period at the end of the second sentence the following: “ , together with a description of the vital national security interests associated with the support covered by such waiver”; and
(3)
by striking subparagraph (C).
(e)
Support for Counter-Transnational Organized Crime.— Such section is further amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

“(e) Definitions.—

(1) In this section, the term ‘transnational organized crime’ has the meaning given such term in section 1004(j) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1991 (Public Law 101–510; 10 U.S.C. 374 note).

“(2) For purposes of applying the definition of transnational organized crime under paragraph (1) to this section, the term ‘illegal means’, as it appears in such definition, includes the trafficking of money, human trafficking, illicit financial flows, illegal trade in natural resources and wildlife, trade in illegal drugs and weapons, and other forms of illegal means determined by the Secretary of Defense.”

SEC. 1015. Sense of Congress Regarding Security in the Western Hemisphere.

(a)
Findings.— Congress makes the following findings:
(1)
The stability and security of the Western Hemisphere has a direct impact on the security interests of the United States.
(2)
Over the past decade, there has been a marked increase in violence and instability in the region as a result of weak governance and increasingly capable transnational criminal organizations. These criminal organizations operate global, multi-billion dollar networks that traffic narcotics, humans, weapons, and bulk cash.
(3)
Conflict between the various transnational criminal organizations for smuggling routes and territory has resulted in skyrocketing violence. According to the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, Honduras has the highest murder rate in the world with 90 murders per 100,000 people.
(4)
United States Northern Command and United States Southern Command are the lead combatant commands for Department of Defense efforts to combat illicit trafficking in the Western Hemisphere.
(5)
To combat these destabilizing threats, through a variety of authorities, the Department of Defense advises, trains, educates, and equips vetted troops in the region to enhance their military and police forces, with an emphasis on human rights and the rule of law.
(6)
As a result of decades of instability and violence, tens of thousands of unaccompanied alien children and their families have fled to the border between the United States and Mexico. In fiscal year 2014, approximately 66,000 such children were apprehended crossing into the United States from Mexico.
(b)
Sense of Congress.— It is the sense of Congress that—
(1)
the Department of Defense should continue its efforts to combat transnational criminal organizations in the Western Hemisphere;
(2)
the Department of Defense should increase its maritime, aerial and intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance capabilities in the region to more effectively support efforts to reduce illicit trafficking into the United States; and
(3)
enhancing the capacity of partner nations in the region to combat the threat posed by transnational criminal organizations should be a cornerstone of the Department of Defense’s strategy in the region.

Subtitle C Naval Vessels and Shipyards

SEC. 1021. Definition of Combatant and Support Vessel for Purposes of the Annual Plan and Certification Relating to Budgeting for Construction of Naval Vessels.

Section 231(f) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

“(4) The term ‘combatant and support vessel’ means any commissioned ship built or armed for naval combat or any naval ship designed to provide support to combatant ships and other naval operations. Such term does not include patrol coastal ships, non-commissioned combatant craft specifically designed for combat roles, or ships that are designated for potential mobilization.”

SEC. 1022. National Sea-Based Deterrence Fund.

(a)
Establishment of Fund.—
(1)
In general.— Chapter 131 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 2218 the following new section:

“§ 2218a. National Sea-Based Deterrence Fund

“(a) Establishment.—There is established in the Treasury of the United States a fund to be known as the ‘National Sea-Based Deterrence Fund’.

“(b) Administration of Fund.—The Secretary of Defense shall administer the Fund consistent with the provisions of this section.

“(c) Fund Purposes.—

(1) Funds in the Fund shall be available for obligation and expenditure only for construction (including design of vessels), purchase, alteration, and conversion of national sea-based deterrence vessels.

“(2) Funds in the Fund may not be used for a purpose or program unless the purpose or program is authorized by law.

“(d) Deposits.—There shall be deposited in the Fund all funds appropriated to the Department of Defense for construction (including design of vessels), purchase, alteration, and conversion of national sea-based deterrence vessels.

“(e) Expiration of Funds After 5 Years.—No part of an appropriation that is deposited in the Fund pursuant to subsection (d) shall remain available for obligation more than five years after the end of fiscal year for which appropriated except to the extent specifically provided by law.

“(f) Budget Requests.—Budget requests submitted to Congress for the Fund shall separately identify the amount requested for programs, projects, and activities for construction (including design of vessels), purchase, alteration, and conversion of national sea-based deterrence vessels.

“(g) Definitions.—In this section:

“(1) The term ‘Fund’ means the National Sea-Based Deterrence Fund established by subsection (a).

“(2) The term ‘national sea-based deterrence vessel’ means any vessel owned, operated, or controlled by the Department of Defense that carries operational intercontinental ballistic missiles.”

(2)
Clerical amendment.— The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 131 of such title is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 2218 the following new item:

“2218a. National Sea-Based Deterrence Fund.”.

(b)
Transfer Authority.—
(1)
In general.— Subject to paragraph (2), and to the extent provided in appropriations Acts, the Secretary of Defense may transfer to the National Sea-Based Deterrence Fund established by section 2218a of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a)(1), amounts not to exceed $3,500,000,000 from unobligated funds authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years 2014, 2015, or 2016 for the Navy for the Ohio Replacement Program. The transfer authority provided under this paragraph is in addition to any other transfer authority provided to the Secretary of Defense by law.
(2)
Availability.— Funds transferred to the National Sea-Based Deterrence Fund pursuant to paragraph (1) shall remain available for the same period for which the transferred funds were originally appropriated.

SEC. 1023. Limitation on Use of Funds for Inactivation of U.s.s. George Washington.

No funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for the Navy may be obligated or expended to conduct tasks connected to the inactivation of the U.S.S. George Washington (CVN–73) unless such tasks are identical to tasks that would be necessary to conduct a refueling and complex overhaul of the vessel.

SEC. 1024. Sense of Congress Recognizing the Anniversary of the Sinking of U.s.s. Thresher.

(a)
Findings.— Congress makes the following findings:
(1)
U.S.S. Thresher was first launched at Portsmouth Naval Shipyard on July 9, 1960.
(2)
U.S.S. Thresher departed Portsmouth Naval Shipyard for her final voyage on April 9, 1963, with a crew of 16 officers, 96 sailors, and 17 civilians.
(3)
The mix of that crew reflects the unity of the naval submarine service, military and civilian, in the protection of the United States.
(4)
At approximately 7:47 a.m. on April 10, 1963, while in communication with the surface ship U.S.S. Skylark, and approximately 220 miles off the coast of New England, U.S.S. Thresher began her final descent.
(5)
U.S.S. Thresher was declared lost with all hands on April 10, 1963.
(6)
In response to the loss of U.S.S. Thresher, the United States Navy instituted new regulations to ensure the health of the submariners and the safety of the submarines of the United States.
(7)
Those regulations led to the establishment of the Submarine Safety and Quality Assurance program (SUBSAFE), now one of the most comprehensive military safety programs in the world.
(8)
SUBSAFE has kept the submariners of the United States safe at sea ever since as the strongest, safest submarine force in history.
(9)
Since the establishment of SUBSAFE, no SUBSAFE-certified submarine has been lost at sea, which is a legacy owed to the brave individuals who perished aboard U.S.S. Thresher.
(10)
From the loss of U.S.S. Thresher, there arose in the institutions of higher education in the United States the ocean engineering curricula that enables the preeminence of the United States in submarine warfare.
(11)
The crew of U.S.S. Thresher demonstrated the “last full measure of devotion” in service to the United States, and this devotion characterizes the sacrifices of all submariners, past and present.
(b)
Sense of Congress.— Congress—
(1)
recognizes the 51st anniversary of the sinking of U.S.S. Thresher;
(2)
remembers with profound sorrow the loss of U.S.S. Thresher and her gallant crew of sailors and civilians on April 10, 1963; and
(3)
expresses its deepest gratitude to all submariners on “eternal patrol”, who are forever bound together by dedicated and honorable service to the United States of America.

SEC. 1025. Pilot Program for Sustainment of Littoral Combat Ships on Extended Deployments.

(a)
Authority.— Notwithstanding subsection (a) of section 7310 of title 10, United States Code, the Secretary of the Navy may establish a pilot program for the sustainment of Littoral Combat Ships when operating on extended deployment as follows:
(1)
The pilot program shall be limited to no more than three Littoral Combat Ships at any one time operating in extended deployment status.
(2)
Sustainment authorized under the pilot program is limited to corrective and preventive maintenance or repair (whether intermediate- or depot-level) and facilities maintenance. Such maintenance or repair may be performed—
(A)
in a foreign shipyard;
(B)
at a facility outside of a foreign shipyard; or
(C)
at any other facility convenient to the vessel.
(3)
Such maintenance or repair may be performed on a vessel as described in paragraph (2) only if the work is performed by United States Government personnel or United States contractor personnel.
(4)
Facilities maintenance may be performed by a foreign contractor on a vessel as described in paragraph (2).
(b)
Report Required.— Not later than 120 days after the conclusion of the pilot program authorized under subsection (a), the Secretary of the Navy shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the pilot program. Such report shall include each of the following:
(1)
Lessons learned from the pilot program regarding sustainment of Littoral Combat Ships while operating on extended deployments, including the extent to which shipboard personnel were involved in performing maintenance.
(2)
A comprehensive sustainment strategy, including maintenance requirements, concepts, and costs, intended to support Littoral Combat Ships operating on extended deployments.
(3)
Observations and recommendations regarding limited exceptions to existing authorities required to support Littoral Combat Ships operating on extended deployments.
(4)
The effect of the pilot program on material readiness and operational availability.
(5)
Whether overseas maintenance periodicities undertaken during the pilot program were accomplished in the scheduled or allotted timeframes throughout the pilot program.
(6)
The total cost to sustain the three Littoral Combat Ships selected for the pilot program during the program, including all costs for Federal and contractor employees performing corrective and preventive maintenance, and all facilitization costs, both ashore and shipboard.
(7)
A detailed comparison of costs, including the cost of labor, between maintenance support provided in the United States and any savings achieved by performing facilities maintenance in foreign shipyards.
(8)
A description of the permanent facilities required to support Littoral Combat Ships operating on extended deployment at overseas locations.
(c)
Definitions.— In this section:
(1)
The term “corrective and preventive maintenance or repair” means—
(A)
maintenance or repair actions performed as a result of a failure in order to return or restore equipment to acceptable performance levels; or
(B)
scheduled maintenance or repair actions intended to prevent or discover functional failures, including scheduled periodic maintenance requirements and integrated class maintenance plan tasks that are time-directed maintenance actions.
(2)
The term “facilities maintenance” means—
(A)
preservation or corrosion control efforts, including surface preparation and preservation of the structural facility to minimize effects of corrosion; or
(B)
cleaning services, including—
(i)
light surface cleaning of ship structures and compartments; and
(ii)
deep cleaning of bilges to remove dirt, oily waste, and other foreign matter.
(d)
Termination.— The authority to carry out a pilot program under subsection (a) shall terminate on September 30, 2016.

SEC. 1026. Availability of Funds for Retirement or Inactivation of Ticonderoga Class Cruisers or Dock Landing Ships.

(a)
Limitation on Availability of Funds.—
(1)
In general.— Except as otherwise provided in this section, none of the funds authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available for the Department of Defense by this Act or the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66) may be obligated or expended to retire, prepare to retire, inactivate, or place in storage a cruiser or dock landing ship.
(2)
Use of smosf funds.— As provided by section 8107 of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2014 (Public Law 113–76), funds in the Ship, Modernization, Operations, and Sustainment Fund may be used only for 11 Ticonderoga-class cruisers (CG 63 through CG 73) and 3 dock landing ships (LSD 41, LSD 42, and LSD 46).
(b)
Modernization of Ticonderoga Class Cruisers and Dock Landing Ships.— The Secretary of the Navy shall begin the upgrade of two cruisers specified in (a)(2) during fiscal year 2015, including—
(1)
hull, mechanical, and electrical upgrades; and
(2)
combat systems modernizations.
(c)
Requirements and Limitations on Modernization.—
(1)
Requirements.— During the period of modernization under subsection (b) of the vessels specified in subsection (a)(2), the Secretary of the Navy shall—
(A)
continue to maintain the vessels in a manner that will ensure the ability of the vessels to reenter the operational fleet;
(B)
conduct planning activities to ensure scheduled and deferred maintenance and modernization work items are identified and included in maintenance availability work packages; and
(C)
conduct hull, mechanical, and electrical and combat system modernization necessary to achieve a service life of 40 years.
(2)
Limitations.— During the period of modernization under subsection (b) of the vessels specified in subsection (a)(2), the Secretary may not—
(A)
permit removal or cannibalization of equipment or systems to support operational vessels, other than—
(i)
rotatable pool equipment; and
(ii)
equipment or systems necessary to support urgent operational requirements (but only with the approval of the Secretary of Defense); or
(B)
make any irreversible modifications that will prohibit the vessel from reentering the operational fleet.
(d)
Reports.—
(1)
In general.— At the same time as the submittal to Congress of the budget of the President under section 1105 of title 31, United States, for each fiscal year during which activities under the modernization of vessels will be carried out under this section, the Secretary of the Navy shall submit to the congressional defense committees a written report on the status of the modernization of vessels under this section.
(2)
Elements.— Each report under this subsection shall include the following:
(A)
The status of modernization efforts, including availability schedules, equipment procurement schedules, and by-fiscal year funding requirements.
(B)
The readiness and operational and manning status of each vessel to be undergoing modernization under this section during the fiscal year covered by such report.
(C)
The current material condition assessment for each such vessel.
(D)
A list of rotatable pool equipment that is identified across the whole class of cruisers to support operations on a continuing basis.
(E)
A list of equipment, other than rotatable pool equipment and components incidental to performing maintenance, removed from each such vessel, including a justification for the removal, the disposition of the equipment, and plan for restoration of the equipment.
(F)
A detailed plan for obligations and expenditures by vessel for the fiscal year beginning during the calendar year during which the report is submitted, and projections of obligations by vessel by fiscal year for the remaining time a vessel is projected to be in the modernization program.
(G)
A statement of the funding required for that fiscal year to ensure the Ship, Modernization, Operations, and Sustainment Fund account has adequate resources to execute the plan under subparagraph (F) for that fiscal year and the following fiscal year.
(3)
Notice on variance from plan.— Not later than 30 days before executing any material deviation from a plan described in paragraph (2)(F) for a fiscal year, the Secretary shall notify the congressional defense committees in writing of such deviation from the plan.
(e)
Repeal of Superseded Limitation.— Section 1023 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 846) is repealed.

Subtitle D Counterterrorism

SEC. 1032. Prohibition on Use of Funds to Construct or Modify Facilities in the United States to House Detainees Transferred from United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

Section 1033 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 850) is amended by striking “ December 31, 2014” and inserting “ December 31, 2015”.

SEC. 1033. Prohibition on the Use of Funds for the Transfer or Release of Individuals Detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

Section 1034 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 851) is amended by striking “ December 31, 2014” and inserting “ December 31, 2015”.

Subtitle E Miscellaneous Authorities and Limitations

SEC. 1041. Modification of Department of Defense Authority for Humanitarian Demining Assistance and Stockpiled Conventional Munitions Assistance Programs.

(a)
Inclusion of Information About Insufficient Funding in Annual Report.— Subsection (d)(3) of section 407 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting “ or insufficient funding” after “ such activities”.
(b)
Definition of Stockpiled Conventional Munitions Assistance.— Subsection (e)(2) of such section is amended—
(1)
by striking “ and includes” and inserting the following: “ small arms, and light weapons, including man-portable air-defense systems. Such term includes”; and
(2)
by inserting before the period at the end the following: “ , small arms, and light weapons, including man-portable air-defense systems”.

SEC. 1042. Airlift Service.

(a)
In General.— Chapter 931 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

“§ 9516. Airlift service

“(a) Interstate Transportation.—

(1) Except as provided in subsection (d) of this section, the transportation of passengers or property by CRAF-eligible aircraft in interstate air transportation obtained by the Secretary of Defense or the Secretary of a military department through a contract for airlift service in the United States may be provided only by an air carrier that—

“(A) has aircraft in the civil reserve air fleet or offers to place the aircraft in that fleet; and

“(B) holds a certificate issued under section 41102 of title 49.

“(2) The Secretary of Transportation shall act as expeditiously as possible on an application for a certificate under section 41102 of title 49 to provide airlift service.

“(b) Transportation Between the United States and Foreign Locations.—Except as provided in subsection (d), the transportation of passengers or property by CRAF-eligible aircraft between a place in the United States and a place outside the United States obtained by the Secretary of Defense or the Secretary of a military department through a contract for airlift service shall be provided by an air carrier referred to in subsection (a).

“(c) Transportation Between Foreign Locations.—The transportation of passengers or property by CRAF-eligible aircraft between two places outside the United States obtained by the Secretary of Defense or the Secretary of a military department through a contract for airlift service shall be provided by an air carrier referred to in subsection (a) whenever transportation by such an air carrier is reasonably available.

“(d) Exception.—When the Secretary of Defense decides that no air carrier holding a certificate under section 41102 of title 49 is capable of providing, and willing to provide, the airlift service, the Secretary of Defense may make a contract to provide the service with an air carrier not having a certificate.

“(e) CRAF-eligible Aircraft Defined.—In this section, ‘CRAF-eligible aircraft’ means aircraft of a type the Secretary of Defense has determined to be eligible to participate in the civil reserve air fleet.”

(b)
Clerical Amendment.— The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by adding at the end the following new item:

“9516. Airlift service.”.

SEC. 1043. Authority to Accept Certain Voluntary Legal Support Services.

Section 1588(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

“(10) Voluntary legal support services provided by law students through internship and externship programs approved by the Secretary concerned.”

SEC. 1044. Expansion of Authority for Secretary of Defense to Use the Department of Defense Reimbursement Rate for Transportation Services Provided to Certain Non-Department of Defense Entities.

(a)
Eligible Categories of Transportation.— Subsection (a) of section 2642 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking “ The Secretary” and inserting “ Subject to subsection (b), the Secretary”;
(2)
in paragraph (3)—
(A)
by striking “ During the period beginning on October 28, 2009, and ending on October 28, 2019, for” and inserting “ For”; and
(B)
by striking “ of Defense” the first place it appears and all that follows through “ military sales” and inserting “ of Defense”; and
(3)
by adding at the end the following new paragraphs:

“(4) For military transportation services provided in support of foreign military sales.

“(5) For military transportation services provided to a State, local, or tribal agency (including any organization composed of State, local, or tribal agencies).

“(6) For military transportation services provided to a Department of Defense contractor when transporting supplies that are for, or destined for, a Department of Defense entity.”

(b)
Termination of Authority for Certain Categories of Transportation.— Such section is further amended—
(1)
by redesignating subsection (b) as subsection (c); and
(2)
by inserting after subsection (a) the following new subsection (b):

“(b) Termination of Authority for Certain Categories of Transportation.—The provisions of paragraphs (3), (4), (5), and (6) of subsection (a) shall apply only to military transportation services provided before October 1, 2019.”

(c)
Clerical Amendments.—
(1)
Section heading.— The heading of such section is amended to read as follows:

“§ 2642. Transportation services provided to certain non-Department of Defense agencies and entities: use of Department of Defense reimbursement rate”

(2)
Table of sections.— The item relating to such section in the table of sections at the beginning of chapter 157 of such title is amended to read as follows:

“2642. Transportation services provided to certain non-Department of Defense agencies and entities: use of Department of Defense reimbursement rate.”.

SEC. 1045. Repeal of Authority Relating to Use of Military Installations by Civil Reserve Air Fleet Contractors.

(a)
(b)
Clerical Amendment.— The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 931 of such title is amended by striking the item relating to section 9513.

SEC. 1046. Inclusion of Chief of the National Guard Bureau Among Leadership of the Department of Defense Provided Physical Protection and Personal Security.

(a)
Inclusion.— Subsection (a) of section 1074 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 330) is amended—
(1)
by redesignating paragraph (7) as paragraph (8); and
(2)
by inserting after paragraph (6) the following new paragraph (7):

“(7) Chief of the National Guard Bureau.”

(b)
Conforming Amendment.— Subsection (b)(1) of such section is amended by striking “ paragraphs (1) through (7)” and inserting “ paragraphs (1) through (8)”.

SEC. 1047. Inclusion of Regional Organizations in Authority for Assignment of Civilian Employees of the Department of Defense as Advisors to Foreign Ministries of Defense.

(a)
Inclusion of Regional Organizations in Authority.— Section 1081 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1599; 10 U.S.C. 168 note) is amended—
(1)
in subsection (a)—
(A)
in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by inserting “ or regional organizations with security missions” after “ foreign countries”; and
(B)
by inserting “ or regional organization” after “ ministry” each place it appears in paragraphs (1) and (2);
(2)
by redesignating subsections (c) and (d) as subsections (d) and (e), respectively, and inserting after subsection (b) the following new subsection (c):

“(c) Congressional Notice.—Not later than 15 days before assigning a civilian employee of the Department of Defense as an advisor to a regional organization with a security mission under subsection (a), the Secretary shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services and Foreign Relations of the Senate and the Committees on Armed Services and Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives a notification of such assignment. Such a notification shall include each of the following:

“(1) A statement of the intent of the Secretary to assign the employee as an advisor to the regional organization.

“(2) The name of the regional organization and the location and duration of the assignment.

“(3) A description of the assignment, including a description of the training or assistance proposed to be provided to the regional organization, the justification for the assignment, a description of the unique capabilities the employee can provide to the regional organization, and a description of how the assignment serves the national security interests of the United States.

“(4) Any other information relating to the assignment that the Secretary of Defense considers appropriate.”

(3)
in subsection (d), as so redesignated, by inserting “ and regional organizations with security missions” after “ defense ministries” each place it appears in paragraphs (1) and (5); and
(4)
in subsection (e), as so redesignated, by striking “ subsection (c)” and inserting “ subsection (d)”.
(b)
Update of Policy Guidance on Authority.— The Under Secretary of Defense for Policy shall issue an update of the policy of the Department of Defense for assignment of civilian employees of the Department as advisors to foreign ministries of defense and regional organizations under the authority in section 1081 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1599; 10 U.S.C. 168 note), as amended by this section.
(c)
Conforming Amendment.— The section heading of such section is amended to read as follows:

“SEC. 1081. AUTHORITY FOR ASSIGNMENT OF CIVILIAN EMPLOYEES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AS ADVISORS TO FOREIGN MINISTRIES OF DEFENSE AND REGIONAL ORGANIZATIONS.”

.

SEC. 1048. Report and Limitation on Availability of Funds for Aviation Foreign Internal Defense Program.

(a)
Report.—
(1)
In general.— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the aviation foreign internal defense program. Such report shall include each of the following:
(A)
An overall description of the program, including validated requirements from each of the geographic combatant commands and the Joint Staff, and of the statutory authorities used to support fixed and rotary wing aviation foreign internal defense programs within the Department of Defense.
(B)
Program goals, proposed metrics of performance success, and anticipated procurement and operation and maintenance costs across the Future Years Defense Program.
(C)
A comprehensive strategy outlining and justifying contributing commands and units for program execution, including the use of the Air Force, the Special Operations Command, the reserve components of the Armed Forces, and the National Guard.
(D)
The results of any analysis of alternatives and efficiencies reviews for any contracts awarded to support the aviation foreign internal defense program.
(E)
A certification that the program is cost effective and meets the requirements of the geographic combatant commands.
(F)
Any other items the Secretary of Defense determines appropriate.
(2)
Form.— The report required under paragraph (1) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.
(b)
Limitation.— Not more than 50 percent of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for Procurement, Defense-wide, for the fixed-wing aviation foreign internal defense program, may be obligated or expended until the date that is 45 days after the date on which the Secretary of Defense provides to the congressional defense committees the certification required under subsection (a).

SEC. 1049. Modifications to Oh–58d Kiowa Warrior Aircraft.

(a)
In General.— Notwithstanding section 2244a of title 10, United States Code, the Secretary of the Army may modify OH–58D Kiowa Warrior aircraft of the Army that the Secretary determines will not be retired and will remain in the aircraft fleet of the Army.
(b)
Manner of Modifications.— The Secretary shall carry out the modifications under subsection (a) in a manner that ensures—
(1)
the safety and survivability of the crews of the OH–58D Kiowa Warrior aircraft;
(2)
the safety of flight for such aircraft; and
(3)
that the minimum capability requirements of the commanders of the combatant commands are met.

Subtitle F Studies and Reports

SEC. 1051. Protection of Top-Tier Defense-Critical Infrastructure from Electromagnetic Pulse.

(a)
Report Required.— Not later than June 1, 2015, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on whether top-tier defense-critical infrastructure requiring electromagnetic pulse protection that receives its power supply from commercial or other non-military sources is protected from the adverse effects of man-made or naturally occurring electromagnetic pulse. In the case of any of such infrastructure that the Secretary determines is not protected from such adverse effects, the Secretary shall include in the report a description of the actions that would be required to provide for the protection of such infrastructure from such adverse effects.
(b)
Form of Submission.— The report required by subsection (a) shall be submitted in classified form.
(c)
Definition.— In this section, the term “top-tier defense-critical infrastructure” means Department of Defense infrastructure essential to project, support, and sustain the Armed Forces and military operations worldwide.

SEC. 1052. Response of the Department of Defense to Compromises of Classified Information.

(a)
Findings.— Congress makes the following findings:
(1)
Compromises of classified information cause indiscriminate and long-lasting damage to United States national security and often have a direct impact on the safety of warfighters.
(2)
In 2010, hundreds of thousands of classified documents were illegally copied and disclosed across the Internet.
(3)
Classified information has been disclosed in numerous public writings and manuscripts endangering current operations.
(4)
In 2013, nearly 1,700,000 files were downloaded from United States Government information systems, threatening the national security of the United States and placing the lives of United States personnel at extreme risk. The majority of the information compromised relates to the capabilities, operations, tactics, techniques, and procedures of the Armed Forces of the United States, and is the single greatest quantitative compromise in the history of the United States.
(5)
The Department of Defense is taking steps to mitigate the harm caused by these leaks.
(6)
Congress must be kept apprised of the progress of the mitigation efforts to ensure the protection of the national security of the United States.
(b)
Reports Required.—
(1)
Initial report.— Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on actions taken by the Secretary in response to significant compromises of classified information. Such report shall include each of the following:
(A)
A description of any changes made to Department of Defense policies or guidance relating to significant compromises of classified information, including regarding security clearances for employees of the Department, information technology, and personnel actions.
(B)
An overview of the efforts made by any task force responsible for the mitigation of such compromises of classified information.
(C)
A description of the resources of the Department that have been dedicated to efforts relating to such compromises.
(D)
A description of the plan of the Secretary to continue evaluating the damage caused by, and to mitigate the damage from, such compromises.
(E)
A general description and estimate of the anticipated costs associated with mitigating such compromises.
(2)
Updates to report.— During calendar years 2015 and 2016, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees quarterly updates to the report required by paragraph (1). Each such update shall include information regarding any changes or progress with respect to the matters covered by such report.

SEC. 1053. Study on Joint Analytic Capability of the Department of Defense.

(a)
Independent Assessment.— The Secretary of Defense shall commission an appropriate entity outside the Department of Defense to conduct an independent assessment of the joint analytic capabilities of the Department of Defense to support strategy, plans, and force development and their link to resource decisions.
(b)
Elements.— The assessment required by subsection (a) shall include each of the following:
(1)
An assessment of the analytical capability of the Office of the Secretary of Defense and the Joint Staff to support force planning, defense strategy development, program and budget decisions, and the review of war plans.
(2)
Recommendations on improvements to such capability as required, including changes to processes or organizations that may be necessary.
(c)
Report.— Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the entity that conducts the assessment required by subsection (a) shall provide to the Secretary an unclassified report, with a classified annex (if appropriate), containing its findings as a result of the assessment. Not later than 90 days after the date of the receipt of the report, the Secretary shall transmit the report to the congressional defense committees, together with such comments on the report as the Secretary considers appropriate.

SEC. 1054. Business Case Analysis of the Creation of an Active Duty Association for the 168th Air Refueling Wing.

(a)
Business Case Analysis.— The Secretary of the Air Force shall conduct a business case analysis of the creation of a 4–PAA (Personnel-Only) KC–135R active association with the 168th Air Refueling Wing. Such analysis shall include consideration of—
(1)
any efficiencies or cost savings achieved assuming the 168th Air Refueling Wing meets 100 percent of current air refueling requirements after the active association is in place;
(2)
improvements to the mission requirements of the 168th Air Refueling Wing and Air Mobility Command; and
(3)
effects on the operations of Air Mobility Command.
(b)
Report.— Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a report on the business case analysis conducted under subsection (a).

SEC. 1055. Reports on Recommendations of the National Commission on the Structure of the Air Force.

(a)
Reports.— Not later than 30 days after the date of the submittal to Congress pursuant to section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, of the budget of the President for each of fiscal years 2016 through 2019, the Secretary of the Air Force shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the response of the Air Force to the 42 specific recommendations of the National Commission on the Structure of the Air Force in the report of the Commission pursuant to section 363(b) of the National Commission on the Structure of the Air Force Act of 2012 (subtitle G of title III of Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1704).
(b)
Elements of Initial Report.— The initial report of the Secretary under subsection (a) shall set forth the following:
(1)
Specific milestones for review by the Air Force of the recommendations of the Commission described in subsection (a).
(2)
A preliminary implementation plan for each of such recommendations that do not require further review by the Air Force as of the date of such report for implementation.
(c)
Elements of Subsequent Reports.— Each report of the Secretary under subsection (a) after the initial report shall set forth the following:
(1)
An implementation plan for each of the recommendations of the Commission described in subsection (a), and not previously covered by a report under this section, that do not require further review by the Air Force as of the date of such report for implementation.
(2)
A description of the accomplishments of the Air Force in implementing the recommendations of the Commission previously identified as not requiring further review by the Air Force for implementation in an earlier report under this section, including a description of any such recommendation that is fully implemented as of the date of such report.
(d)
Deviation From Commission Recommendations.— If any implementation plan under this section includes a proposal to deviate in a material manner from a recommendation of the Commission described in subsection (a), the report setting forth such implementation plan shall—
(1)
describe the deviation; and
(2)
include a justification of the Air Force for the deviation.
(e)
Allocation of Savings.— Each report of the Secretary under subsection (a) shall—
(1)
identify any savings achieved by the Air Force as of the date of such report in implementing the recommendations of the Commission described in subsection (a) when compared with spending anticipated by the budget of the President for fiscal year 2015; and
(2)
indicate the manner in which such savings affected the budget request of the President for the fiscal year beginning in the year in which such report is submitted.

SEC. 1056. Report on Protection of Military Installations.

Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Attorney General and the Secretary of Homeland Security, shall submit to Congress a report on the protection of military installations. Such report shall include each of the following:
(1)
An identification of specific issues, shortfalls, and gaps related to the authorities providing for the protection of military installations by the agencies concerned and risks associated with such gaps.
(2)
A description of specific and detailed examples of incidents that have actually occurred that illustrate the concerns referred to in paragraph (1).
(3)
Any recommendations for proposed legislation that would—
(A)
improve the ability of the Department of Defense to fulfill its requirement to provide for the protection of military installations; and
(B)
address the concerns referred to in paragraph (1).

SEC. 1057. Comptroller General Briefing and Report on Army and Army National Guard Force Structure Changes.

(a)
Briefing and Report.—
(1)
Briefing.— Not later than March 1, 2015, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the congressional defense committees a written briefing on the assessment of the Comptroller General of the Aviation Restructuring Initiative of the Army and of any proposals submitted by the Chief of the National Guard Bureau or the Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation Office of the Department of Defense that could serve as alternatives to the Army’s proposal for adjusting the structure and mix of its combat aviation forces among regular Army, Army Reserve, and Army National Guard units.
(2)
Report.— Not later than 60 days after the submittal of the briefing under paragraph (1), the Comptroller General shall submit to the congressional defense committees a final report on the assessment referred to in that paragraph.
(b)
Elements.— The briefing and report of the Comptroller General required by subsection (a) shall include, at a minimum, each of the following:
(1)
A comparison of the assumptions on strategy, current demands, historical readiness rates, anticipated combat requirements, and the constraints and limitations associated with mobilization, utilization, and rotation policies underlying the Aviation Restructuring Initiative and any alternatives proposed by the Chief of the National Guard Bureau and the Department of Defense Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation Office.
(2)
An assessment of the models used to estimate future costs and cost savings associated with each proposal for allocating Army aviation platforms among the regular Army, Army Reserve, and Army National Guard units.
(3)
A comparison of the military and civilian personnel requirements for supporting combat aviation brigades under each proposal, including a description of the anticipated requirements and funding allocated for active Guard Reserve and full-time military technicians supporting the Army National Guard AH–64 “Apache” units.
(c)
Sense of Congress Regarding Additional Funding for the Army.— Congress is concerned with the planned reductions and realignments the Army has proposed for the regular Army, the Army National Guard, and the Army Reserves in order to comply with the funding constraints under the Budget Control Act of 2011 (Public Law 112–25). Concerns are particularly associated with proposed reductions in end strength for all components that will result in additional reductions in the number of regular Army and National Guard brigade combat teams as well as reductions and realignments of combat aircraft within and between the regular Army and the Army National Guard. Sufficient funding should be provided to retain the force structure and sustain the readiness of as much Total Army combat capability as possible.

SEC. 1058. Improving Analytic Support to Systems Acquisition and Allocation of Acquisition, Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance Assets.

(a)
Guidance.— Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall review and issue or revise guidance to components of the Department of Defense to improve the application of operations research and systems analysis to—
(1)
the requirements process for acquisition of major defense acquisition programs and major automated information systems; and
(2)
the allocation of intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance systems to the combatant commands.
(b)
Briefing of Congress.— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall brief—
(1)
the congressional defense committees on any guidance issued or revised under subsection (a); and
(2)
the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives on any guidance issued or revised under subsection (a)(2) relevant to intelligence.

SEC. 1059. Review of United States Military Strategy and the Force Posture of Allies and Partners in the United States Pacific Command Area of Responsibility.

(a)
Independent Review.—
(1)
In general.— The Secretary of Defense shall commission an independent review of the United States Asia-Pacific rebalance, with a focus on issues expected to be critical during the ten-year period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act, including the national security interests and military strategy of the United States in the Asia-Pacific region.
(2)
Conduct of review.— The review conducted pursuant to paragraph (1) shall be conducted by an independent organization that has—
(A)
recognized credentials and expertise in national security and military affairs; and
(B)
access to policy experts throughout the United States and from the Asia-Pacific region.
(3)
Elements.— The review conducted pursuant to paragraph (1) shall include the following elements:
(A)
An assessment of the risks to United States national security interests in the United States Pacific Command area of responsibility during the ten-year period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act as a result of changes in the security environment.
(B)
An assessment of the current and planned United States force posture adjustments and the impact of such adjustments on the strategy to rebalance to the Asia-Pacific region.
(C)
An assessment of the current and planned force posture and adjustments of United States allies and partners in the region and the impact of such adjustments on the strategy to rebalance to the Asia-Pacific region.
(D)
An evaluation of the key capability gaps and shortfalls of the United States and its allies and partners in the Asia-Pacific region, including undersea warfare (including submarines), naval and maritime, ballistic missile defense, cyber, munitions, and intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance capabilities.
(E)
An analysis of the willingness and capacity of allies, partners, and regional organizations to contribute to the security and stability of the Asia-Pacific region, including potential required adjustments to United States military strategy based on that analysis.
(F)
An appraisal of the Arctic ambitions of actors in the Asia-Pacific region in the context of current and projected capabilities, including an analysis of the adequacy and relevance of the Arctic Roadmap prepared by the Navy.
(G)
An evaluation of theater security cooperation efforts of the United States Pacific Command in the context of current and projected threats, and desired capabilities and priorities of the United States and its allies and partners.
(H)
The views of noted policy leaders and regional experts, including military commanders, in the Asia-Pacific region.
(b)
Report.—
(1)
Submission to the secretary of defense.— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the independent organization that conducted the review pursuant to subsection (a)(1) shall submit to the Secretary of Defense a report containing the findings of the review. The report shall be submitted in classified form, but may contain an unclassified annex.
(2)
Submission to congress.— Not later than 90 days after the date of receipt of the report required by paragraph (1), the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees the report, together with any comments on the report that the Secretary considers appropriate.

SEC. 1060. Repeal of Certain Reporting Requirements Relating to the Department of Defense.

(a)
Title 10, United States Code.— Title 10, United States Code, is amended as follows:
(1)
Oversight of procurement, test, and operational plans for ballistic missile defense programs.— Section 223a is amended by striking subsection (d).
(2)
Annual report on public-private competition.—
(A)
Repeal.— Chapter 146 is amended by striking section 2462.
(B)
Clerical amendment.— The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 146 is amended by striking the item relating to section 2462.
(b)
Display of Annual Budget Requirements for Air Sovereignty Alert Mission Under Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009.— Section 354 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4426; 10 U.S.C. 221 note) is hereby repealed.

SEC. 1061. Repeal of Requirement for Comptroller General of the United States Annual Reviews and Report on Pilot Program on Commercial Fee-For-Service Air Refueling Support for the Air Force.

Section 1081 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–81; 122 Stat. 335) is amended by striking subsection (d).

SEC. 1062. Report on Additional Matters in Connection with Report on the Force Structure of the United States Army.

(a)
Report Required.— Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Army shall submit to Congress a report on the matters specified in subsection (b) with respect to the report of the Secretary on the force structure of the United States Army submitted under section 1066 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1943).
(b)
Matters.— The matters specified in this subsection with respect to the report referred to in subsection (a) are the following:
(1)
An update of the planning assumptions and scenarios used to determine the size and force structure of the Army, including the reserve components, for the future-years defense program for fiscal years 2016 through 2020.
(2)
An updated evaluation of the adequacy of the proposed force structure for meeting the goals of the national military strategy of the United States.
(3)
A description of any new alternative force structures considered, if any, including the assessed advantages and disadvantages of each and a brief explanation of why those not selected were rejected.
(4)
The estimated resource requirements of each of the new alternative force structures referred to in paragraph (3).
(5)
An updated independent risk assessment of the proposed Army force structure, to be conducted by the Chief of Staff of the Army.
(6)
A description of plans and actions taken to implement and apply the recommendations of the Comptroller General of the United States regarding force reduction analysis and decision process improvements in the report entitled “Defense Infrastructure: Army Brigade Combat Team Inactivations Informed by Analysis but Actions Needed to Improve Stationing Process” (GAO–14–76, December 2013) used in the Supplemental Programmatic Environmental Assessment of the Army.
(7)
Such other information or updates as the Secretary considers appropriate.
(c)
Form.— The report required by subsection (a) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.

SEC. 1063. Certification for Realignment of Forces at Lajes Air Force Base, Azores.

Prior to taking any action to realign forces at Lajes Air Force Base, Azores, the Secretary of Defense shall certify to the congressional defense committees that—
(1)
the action is supported by a European Infrastructure Consolidation Assessment initiated by the Secretary of Defense on January 25, 2013, including a specific assessment of the efficacy of Lajes Air Force Base, Azores, in support of the United States overseas force posture; and
(2)
the Secretary of Defense has determined, based on an analysis of operational requirements, that Lajes Air Force Base is not an optimal location for United States Special Operations Command or for United States Africa Command. The certification shall include a discussion of the basis for such determination.

Subtitle G Other Matters

SEC. 1071. Technical and Clerical Amendments.

(a)
Amendments To Title 10, United States Code, to Reflect Enactment of Title 41, United States Code.— Title 10, United States Code, is amended as follows:
(1)
Section 2013(a)(1) is amended by striking “ section 6101(b)–(d) of title 41” and inserting “ section 6101 of title 41”.
(2)
Section 2302 is amended—
(A)
in paragraph (7), by striking “ section 4 of such Act” and inserting “ such section”; and
(B)
in paragraph (9)(A)—
(i)
by striking “ section 26 of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 422)” and inserting “ chapter 15 of title 41”; and
(ii)
by striking “ such section” and inserting “ such chapter”.
(3)
Section 2306a(b)(3)(B) is amended by striking “ section 4(12)(C)(i) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 403(12)(C)(i))” and inserting “ section 103(3)(A) of title 41”.
(4)
Section 2314 is amended by striking “ Sections 6101(b)–(d)” and inserting “ Sections 6101”.
(5)
Section 2321(f)(2) is amended by striking “ section 35(c) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 431(c))” and inserting “ section 104 of title 41”.
(6)
Section 2359b(k)(4)(A) is amended by striking “ section 4 of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 403)” and inserting “ section 110 of title 41”.
(7)
Section 2379 is amended—
(A)
in subsections (a)(1)(A), (b)(2)(A), and (c)(1)(B)(i), by striking “ section 4(12) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 403(12))” and inserting “ section 103 of title 41”; and
(B)
in subsections (b) and (c)(1), by striking “ section 35(c) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 431(c))” and inserting “ section 104 of title 41”.
(8)
Section 2410m(b)(1) is amended—
(A)
in subparagraph (A)(i), by striking “ section 7 of such Act” and inserting “ section 7104(a) of such title”; and
(B)
in subparagraph (B)(ii), by striking “ section 7 of the Contract Disputes Act of 1978” and inserting “ section 7104(a) of title 41”.
(9)
Section 2533(a) is amended by striking “ such Act” in the matter preceding paragraph (1) and inserting “ chapter 83 of such title”.
(10)
Section 2533b is amended—
(A)
in subsection (h)—
(i)
in paragraph (1), by striking “ sections 34 and 35 of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 430 and 431)” and inserting “ sections 1906 and 1907 of title 41”; and
(ii)
in paragraph (2), by striking “ section 35(c) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 431(c))” and inserting “ section 104 of title 41”; and
(B)
in subsection (m)—
(i)
in paragraph (2), by striking “ section 4 of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 403)” and inserting “ section 105 of title 41”;
(ii)
in paragraph (3), by striking “ section 4 of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 403)” and inserting “ section 131 of title 41”; and
(iii)
in paragraph (5), by striking “ section 35(c) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 431(c))” and inserting “ section 104 of title 41”.
(11)
Section 2545(1) is amended by striking “ section 4(16) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 403(16))” and inserting “ section 131 of title 41”.
(12)
Section 7312(f) is amended by striking “ Section 3709 of the Revised Statutes (41 U.S.C. 5)” and inserting “ Section 6101 of title 41”.
(b)
Amendments to Other Defense-related Statutes to Reflect Enactment of Title 41, United States Code.—
(1)
The Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383) is amended as follows:
(A)
Section 846(a) (10 U.S.C. 2534 note) is amended—
(i)
by striking “ the Buy American Act (41 U.S.C. 10a et seq.)” and inserting “ chapter 83 of title 41, United States Code”; and
(ii)
by striking “ that Act” and inserting “ that chapter”.
(B)
Section 866 (10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended—
(i)
in subsection (b)(4)(A), by striking “ section 26 of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 422)” and inserting “ chapter 15 of title 41, United States Code”; and
(ii)
in subsection (e)(2)(A), by striking “ section 4(13) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 403(13))” and inserting “ section 110 of title 41, United States Code”.
(C)
Section 893(f)(2) (10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended by striking “ section 26 of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 422)” and inserting “ chapter 15 of title 41, United States Code”.
(2)
The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181) is amended as follows:
(A)
Section 805(c)(1) (10 U.S.C. 2330 note) is amended—
(i)
in subparagraph (A), by striking “ section 4(12)(E) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 403(12)(E))” and inserting “ section 103(5) of title 41, United States Code”; and
(ii)
in subparagraph (C)(i), by striking “ section 4(12)(F) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 403(12)(F))” and inserting “ section 103(6) of title 41, United States Code”.
(B)
Section 821(b)(2) (10 U.S.C. 2304 note) is amended by striking “ section 4(12) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 403(12))” and inserting “ section 103 of title 41, United States Code”.
(C)
Section 847 (10 U.S.C. 1701 note) is amended—
(i)
in subsection (a)(5), by striking “ section 27(e) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 423(e))” and inserting “ section 2105 of title 41, United States Code”;
(ii)
in subsection (c)(1), by striking “ section 4(16) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act” and inserting “ section 131 of title 41, United States Code”; and
(iii)
in subsection (d)(1), by striking “ section 27 of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 423)” and inserting “ chapter 21 of title 41, United States Code”.
(D)
Section 862 (10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended—
(i)
in subsection (b)(1), by striking “ section 25 of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 421)” and inserting “ section 1303 of title 41, United States Code”; and
(ii)
in subsection (d)(1), by striking “ section 6(j) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 405(j))” and inserting “ section 1126 of title 41, United States Code”.
(3)
The John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109–364) is amended as follows:
(A)
Section 832(d)(3) (10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended by striking “ section 8(b) of the Service Contract Act of 1965 (41 U.S.C. 357(b))” and inserting “ section 6701(3) of title 41, United States Code”.
(B)
Section 852(b)(2)(A)(ii) (10 U.S.C. 2324 note) is amended by striking “ section 4(12) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 403(12))” and inserting “ section 103 of title 41, United States Code”.
(4)
Section 8118 of the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2005 (Public Law 108–287; 10 U.S.C. 2533a note) is amended by striking “ section 34 of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 430)” and inserting “ section 1906 of title 41, United States Code”.
(5)
The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2004 (Public Law 108–136) is amended as follows:
(A)
Section 812(b)(2) (10 U.S.C. 2501 note) is amended by striking “ section 6(d)(4)(A) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 405(d)(4)(A))” and inserting “ section 1122(a)(4)(A) of title 41, United States Code”.
(B)
Section 1601(c) (10 U.S.C. 2358 note) is amended—
(i)
in paragraph (1)(A), by striking “ section 32A of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act, as added by section 1443 of this Act” and inserting “ section 1903 of title 41, United States Code”; and
(ii)
in paragraph (2)(B), by striking “ Subsections (a) and (b) of section 7 of the Anti-Kickback Act of 1986 (41 U.S.C. 57(a) and (b))” and inserting “ Section 8703(a) of title 41, United States Code”.
(6)
Section 8025(c) of the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2004 (Public Law 108–87; 10 U.S.C. 2410d note), is amended by striking “ the Javits-Wagner-O’Day Act (41 U.S.C. 46–48)” and inserting “ chapter 85 of title 41, United States Code”.
(7)
Section 817(e)(1)(B) of the Bob Stump National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2003 (Public Law 107–314; 10 U.S.C. 2306a note) is amended by striking “ section 26(f)(5)(B) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 422(f)(5)(B))” and inserting “ section 1502(b)(3)(B) of title 41, United States Code”.
(8)
Section 801(f)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2002 (Public Law 107–107; 10 U.S.C. 2330 note) is amended by striking “ section 16(3) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 414(3))” and inserting “ section 1702(c) of title 41, United States Code”.
(9)
Section 803(d) of the Strom Thurmond National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1999 (Public Law 105–261; 10 U.S.C. 2306a note) is amended by striking “ subsection (b)(1)(B) of section 304A of the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949 (41 U.S.C. 254b)” and inserting “ section 3503(a)(2) of title 41, United States Code”.
(10)
Section 848(e)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1998 (Public Law 105–85; 10 U.S.C. 2304 note) is amended by striking “ section 32 of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 428)” and inserting “ section 1902 of title 41, United States Code”.
(11)
Section 722(b)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1997 (Public Law 104–201; 10 U.S.C. 1073 note) is amended by striking “ section 25(c) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 421(c))” and inserting “ section 1303(a) of title 41, United States Code”.
(12)
Section 3412(k) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1996 (Public Law 104–106, 10 U.S.C. 7420 note) is amended by striking “ section 303(c) of the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949 (41 U.S.C. 253(c))” and inserting “ section 3304(a) of title 41, United States Code”.
(13)
Section 845 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1994 (Public Law 103–160; 10 U.S.C. 2371 note) is amended—
(A)
in subsection (a)(2)(A), by striking “ section 16(c) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 414(c))” and inserting “ section 1702(c) of title 41, United States Code,”;
(B)
in subsection (d)(1)(B)(ii), by striking “ section 16(3) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 414(3))” and inserting “ section 1702(c) of title 41, United States Code”;
(C)
in subsection (e)(2)(A), by striking “ section 4(12) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 403(12))” and inserting “ section 103 of title 41, United States Code”; and
(D)
in subsection (h), by striking “ section 27 of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 423)” and inserting “ chapter 21 of title 41, United States Code”.
(14)
Section 326(c)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1993 (Public Law 102–484; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended by striking “ section 25(c) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 421(c))” and inserting “ section 1303(a) of title 41, United States Code”.
(15)
Section 806 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Years 1992 and 1993 (Public Law 102–190; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended—
(A)
in subsection (b), by striking “ section 4(12) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act” and inserting “ section 103 of title 41, United States Code”; and
(B)
in subsection (c)—
(i)
by striking “ section 25(a) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act” and inserting “ section 1302(a) of title 41, United States Code”; and
(ii)
by striking “ section 25(c)(1) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 421(c)(1))” and inserting “ section 1303(a)(1) of such title 41”.
(16)
Section 831 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1991 (Public Law 101–510; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended—
(A)
by designating the subsection after subsection (k), relating to definitions, as subsection (l); and
(B)
in paragraph (8) of that subsection, by striking “ the first section of the Act of June 25, 1938 (41 U.S.C. 46; popularly known as the ‘Wagner-O’Day Act’)” and inserting “ section 8502 of title 41, United States Code”.
(c)
Amendments to Title 10, United States Code, To Reflect Reclassification of Provisions of Law Codified in Title 50, United States Code.— Title 10, United States Code, is amended as follows:
(1)
Sections 113(b), 125(a), and 155(d) are amended by striking “ (50 U.S.C. 401)” and inserting “ (50 U.S.C. 3002)”.
(2)
Sections 113(e)(2), 117(a)(1), 118(b)(1), 118a(b)(1), 153(b)(1)(C)(i), 231(b)(1), 231a(c)(1), and 2501(a)(1)(A) are amended by striking “ (50 U.S.C. 404a)” and inserting “ (50 U.S.C. 3043)”.
(3)
Sections 167(g), 421(c), and 2557(c) are amended by striking “ (50 U.S.C. 413 et seq.)” and inserting “ (50 U.S.C. 3091 et seq.)”.
(4)
Section 201(b)(1) is amended by striking “ (50 U.S.C. 403–6(b))” and inserting “ (50 U.S.C. 3041(b))”.
(5)
Section 429 is amended—
(A)
in subsection (a), by striking “ Section 102A of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 403–1)” and inserting “ section 102A of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3024)”; and
(B)
in subsection (e), by striking “ (50 U.S.C. 401a(4))” and inserting “ (50 U.S.C. 3003(4))”.
(6)
Section 442(d) is amended by striking “ (50 U.S.C. 404e(a))” and inserting “ (50 U.S.C. 3045(a))”.
(7)
Section 444 is amended—
(A)
in subsection (b)(2), by striking “ (50 U.S.C. 403o)” and inserting “ (50 U.S.C. 3515)”; and
(B)
in subsection (e)(2)(B), by striking “ (50 U.S.C. 403a et seq.)” and inserting “ (50 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.)”.
(8)
Section 457 is amended—
(A)
in subsection (a), by striking “ (50 U.S.C. 431)” and inserting “ (50 U.S.C. 3141)”; and
(B)
in subsection (c), by striking “ (50 U.S.C. 431(b))” and inserting “ (50 U.S.C. 3141(b))”.
(9)
Sections 462, 1599a(a), and 1623(a) are amended by striking “ (50 U.S.C. 402 note)” and inserting “ (50 U.S.C. 3614)”.
(10)
Sections 491(c)(3), 494(d)(1), 496(a)(1), 2409(e)(1) are amended by striking “ (50 U.S.C. 401a(4))” and inserting “ (50 U.S.C. 3003(4))”.
(11)
Section 1605(a)(2) is amended by striking “ (50 U.S.C. 403r)” and inserting “ (50 U.S.C. 3518)”.
(12)
Section 2723(d)(2) is amended by striking “ (50 U.S.C. 413)” and inserting “ (50 U.S.C. 3091)”.
(d)
Amendments to Other Defense-Related Statutes To Reflect Reclassification of Provisions of Law Codified in Title 50, United States Code.—
(1)
The following provisions of law are amended by striking “(50 U.S.C. 401a(4))” and inserting “(50 U.S.C. 3003(4))”:
(A)
Section 911(3) of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 10 U.S.C. 2271 note).
(B)
Sections 801(b)(3) and 911(e)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 10 U.S.C. 2304 note; 2271 note).
(C)
Section 812(e) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2004 (Public Law 108–136; 10 U.S.C. 2501 note).
(2)
Section 901(d) of the Bob Stump National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2003 (Public Law 107–314; 10 U.S.C. 137 note) is amended by striking “ (50 U.S.C. 401 et seq.)” and inserting “ (50 U.S.C. 3001 et seq.)”.
(e)
Date of Enactment References.— Title 10, United States Code, is amended as follows:
(1)
Section 1218(d)(3) is amended by striking “ on the date that is five years after the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010” and inserting “ on October 28, 2014”.
(2)
Section 1566a(a) is amended by striking “ Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 and under” and inserting “ Under”.
(3)
Section 2275(d) is amended—
(A)
in paragraph (1), by striking “ before the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013” and inserting “ before January 2, 2013”; and
(B)
in paragraph (2), by striking “ on or after the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013” and inserting “ on or after January 2, 2013”.
(4)
Section 2601a(e) is amended by striking “ after the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012” and inserting “ after December 31, 2011,”.
(5)
Section 6328(c) is amended by striking “ on or after the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010” and inserting “ on or after October 28, 2009,”.
(f)
Other Technical Corrections to Title 10, United States Code.— Title 10, United States Code, is amended as follows:
(1)
Section 118 is amended by striking subsection (g).
(2)
The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 3 is amended—
(A)
by striking the item relating to section 130e and inserting the following new item:

“130e. Treatment under Freedom of Information Act of certain critical infrastructure security information.”; and

(B)
by striking the item relating to section 130f and inserting the following new item:

“130f. Congressional notification of sensitive military operations.”.

(3)
The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 7 is amended by inserting a period at the end of the item relating to section 189.
(4)
Section 189(c)(1) is amended by striking “ 139c” and inserting “ 2430(a)”.
(5)
Section 407(a)(3)(A) is amended by striking the comma after “ as applicable”.
(6)
Section 429(c) is amended by striking “ act” and inserting “ law”.
(7)
Section 488(a) is amended by inserting a comma after “ Every three years”.
(8)
Section 674(b) is amended by striking “ afer” and inserting “ after”.
(9)
Section 949i(b) is amended by striking “ ,,” and inserting a comma.
(10)
Section 950b(b)(2)(A) is amended by striking “ give” and inserting “ given”.
(11)
Section 1040(a)(1) is amended by striking “ ..” and inserting a period.
(12)
Section 1044(d)(2) is amended by striking “ ..” and inserting a period.
(13)
Section 1074m(a)(2) is amended by striking “ subparagraph” in the matter preceding subparagraph (A) and inserting “ subparagraphs”.
(14)
Section 1154(a)(2)(A)(ii) is amended by striking “ U.S.C.1411” and inserting “ U.S.C. 1411”.
(15)
Section 1513(1) is amended in the last sentence by striking “ subsection (b)” and inserting “ subsection (c)”.
(16)
Section 2222(g)(3) is amended by striking “ (A)” after “ (3)”.
(17)
Section 2335(d) is amended—
(A)
by designating the last sentence of paragraph (2) as paragraph (3); and
(B)
in paragraph (3), as so designated—
(i)
by inserting before “ each of” the following paragraph heading: “ Other terms.—”.
(ii)
by striking “ the term” and inserting “ that term”; and
(iii)
by striking “ Federal Campaign” and inserting “ Federal Election Campaign”.
(18)
Section 2430(c)(2) is amended by striking “ section 2366a(a)(4)” and inserting “ section 2366a(a)(6)”.
(19)
Section 2601a is amended—
(A)
in subsection (a)(1), by striking “ issue” and inserting “ prescribe”; and
(B)
in subsection (d), by striking “ issued” and inserting “ prescribed”.
(20)
Section 2371 is amended by striking subsection (h).
(21)
The item relating to section 2642 in the table of sections at the beginning of chapter 157 is amended by striking “ rates” and inserting “ rate”.
(22)
Section 2642(a)(3) is amended by inserting “ and” after “ Department of Defense”.
(23)
Section 2684a(h) is amended by inserting “ 670” after “ U.S.C.”.
(24)
Section 2853(c)(1)(A) is amended by striking “ can be still be” and inserting “ can still be”.
(25)
Section 2866(a)(4)(A) is amended by striking “ repayed” and inserting “ repaid”.
(26)
Section 2884(c) is amended by striking “ on evaluation” in the matter preceding paragraph (1) and inserting “ an evaluation”.
(27)
Section 7292(d)(2) is amended by striking “ section 1024(a)” and inserting “ section 1018(a)”.
(g)
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014.— Effective as of December 26, 2013, and as if included therein as enacted, the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66) is amended as follows:
(1)
Section 314 (127 Stat. 729) is amended by striking “ Section 317(c)(2)” and inserting “ Section 317(d)(2)”.
(2)
Section 812(a)(3)(B) (127 Stat. 807) is amended by inserting “ the first place it appears” before the semicolon.
(3)
Section 905(b) (127 Stat. 818) is amended by striking “ training, and education” and inserting “ Training, and education”.
(4)
Section 1073(a)(2)(B) (127 Stat. 869) is amended by striking “ and” after “ inserting”.
(5)
Section 1709(b)(1)(B) (127 Stat. 962; 10 U.S.C. 113 note) is amended by striking “ of” after “ such”.
(6)
Section 2712 (127 Stat. 1004) is repealed.
(7)
Section 2809(a) (127 Stat. 1013) is amended by striking “ subjection” and inserting “ subsection”.
(8)
Section 2966 (127 Stat. 1042) is amended in the section heading by striking “ title” and inserting “ administrative jurisdiction”.
(9)
Section 2971(a) (127 Stat. 1044) is amended—
(A)
by striking “ the map” and inserting “ the maps”; and
(B)
by striking “ the mineral leasing laws, and the geothermal leasing laws” and inserting “ and the mineral leasing laws”.
(10)
Section 2972(d)(1) (127 Stat. 1045) is amended—
(A)
in subparagraph (A), by inserting “ public” before “ land”; and
(B)
in subparagraph (B), by striking “ public”.
(11)
Section 2977(c)(3) (127 Stat. 1047) is amended by striking “ ; and” and inserting a period.
(h)
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013.— Effective as of January 2, 2013, and as if included therein as enacted, section 604(b)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1774) is amended by striking “ on the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013” and inserting “ on January 2, 2013,”.
(i)
Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011.— Section 1631(b)(6) of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 10 U.S.C. 1561 note) is amended by striking “ section 596(b) of such Act” and inserting “ section 596(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 (Public Law 109–163; 10 U.S.C. 1561 note)”.
(j)
Strategic and Critical Materials Stock Piling Act.— Section 11(b)(2) of the Strategic and Critical Materials Stock Piling Act (50 U.S.C. 98h–2(b)(2)) is amended by striking “ under section 9(b)(2)(G)” and inserting “ under section 9(b)(2)(H)”.
(k)
Coordination With Other Amendments Made by This Act.— For purposes of applying amendments made by provisions of this Act other than this section, the amendments made by this section shall be treated as having been enacted immediately before any such amendments by other provisions of this Act.

SEC. 1072. Reform of Quadrennial Defense Review.

(a)
In General.—
(1)
Reform.— Section 118 of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:

“§ 118. Defense Strategy Review

“(a) Defense Strategy Review.—

“(1) Review required.—Every four years, during a year following a year evenly divisible by four, the Secretary of Defense shall conduct a comprehensive examination (to be known as a ‘Defense Strategy Review’) of the national defense strategy, force structure, modernization plans, posture, infrastructure, budget plan, and other elements of the defense program and policies of the United States with a view toward determining and expressing the defense strategy of the United States and establishing a defense program. Each such Defense Strategy Review shall be conducted in consultation with the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

“(2) Conduct of review.—Each Defense Strategy Review shall be conducted so as to—

“(A) delineate a national defense strategy in support of the most recent National Security Strategy prescribed by the President pursuant to section 108 of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3043);

“(B) provide a mechanism for—

“(i) setting priorities for sizing and shaping the force, guiding the development and sustainment of capabilities, allocating resources, and adjusting the organization of the Department of Defense to respond to changes in the strategic environment;

“(ii) monitoring, assessing, and holding accountable agencies within the Department of Defense for the development of policies and programs that support the national defense strategy;

“(iii) integrating and supporting other national and related interagency security policies and strategies with other Department of Defense guidance, plans, and activities; and

“(iv) communicating such national defense strategy to Congress, relevant United States Government agencies, allies and international partners, and the private sector;

“(C) consider three general timeframes of the near-term (associated with the future-years defense program), mid-term (10 to 15 years), and far-term (20 years);

“(D) address the security environment, threats, trends, opportunities, and challenges, and define the nature and magnitude of the strategic and military risks associated with executing the national defense strategy by using the most recent net assessment submitted by the Secretary of Defense under section 113 of this title, the risk assessment submitted by Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff under section 153 of this title, and, as determined necessary or useful by the Secretary, any other Department of Defense, Government, or non-government strategic or intelligence estimate, assessment, study, or review;

“(E) define the force size and structure, capabilities, modernization plans, posture, infrastructure, readiness, organization, and other elements of the defense program of the Department of Defense that would be required to execute missions called for in such national defense strategy;

“(F) to the extent practical, estimate the budget plan sufficient to execute the missions called for in such national defense strategy;

“(G) define the nature and magnitude of the strategic and military risks associated with executing such national defense strategy; and

“(H) understand the relationships and tradeoffs between missions, risks, and resources.

“(3) Submission of report on defense strategy review to congressional committees.—The Secretary shall submit a report on each Defense Strategy Review to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives. Each such report shall be submitted by not later than March 1 of the year following the year in which the review is conducted. If the year in which the review is conducted is in the second term of a President, the Secretary may submit an update to the Defense Strategy Review report submitted during the first term of that President.

“(4) Elements.—The report required by paragraph (3) shall provide a comprehensive discussion of the Review, including each of the following:

“(A) The national defense strategy of the United States.

“(B) The assumed or defined prioritized national security interests of the United States that inform the national defense strategy defined in the Review.

“(C) The assumed strategic environment, including the threats, developments, trends, opportunities, and challenges that affect the assumed or defined national security interests of the United States.

“(D) The assumed steady state activities, crisis and conflict scenarios, military end states, and force planning construct examined in the review.

“(E) The prioritized missions of the armed forces under the strategy and a discussion of the roles and missions of the components of the armed forces to carry out those missions.

“(F) The assumed roles and capabilities provided by other United States Government agencies and by allies and international partners.

“(G) The force size and structure, capabilities, posture, infrastructure, readiness, organization, and other elements of the defense program that would be required to execute the missions called for in the strategy.

“(H) An assessment of the significant gaps and shortfalls between the force size and structure, capabilities, and additional elements as required by subparagraph (G) and the current elements in the Department’s existing program of record, a prioritization of those gaps and shortfalls, and an understanding of the relationships and tradeoffs between missions, risks, and resources.

“(I) An assessment of the risks assumed by the strategy, including—

“(i) how the Department defines, categorizes, and measures risk, including strategic and military risk; and

“(ii) the plan for mitigating major identified risks, including the expected timelines for, and extent of, any such mitigation, and the rationale for where greater risk is accepted.

“(J) Any other key assumptions and elements addressed in the review or that the Secretary considers necessary to include.

“(5) CJCS review.—

(A) Upon the completion of each Review under this subsection, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff shall prepare and submit to the Secretary of Defense the Chairman’s assessment of risks under the defense strategy developed by the Review and a description of the capabilities needed to address such risks.

“(B) The Chairman’s assessment shall be submitted to the Secretary in time for the inclusion of the assessment in the report on the Review required by paragraph (3). The Secretary shall include the Chairman’s assessment, together with the Secretary’s comments, in the report in its entirety.

“(6) Form.—The report required under paragraph (3) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex if the Secretary determines it is necessary to protect national security.

“(b) National Defense Panel.—

“(1) Establishment.—Not later than February 1 of a year following a year evenly divisible by four, there shall be established an independent panel to be known as the National Defense Panel (in this subsection referred to as the ‘Panel’). The Panel shall have the duties set forth in this subsection.

“(2) Membership.—The Panel shall be composed of ten members from private civilian life who are recognized experts in matters relating to the national security of the United States. Eight of the members shall be appointed as follows:

“(A) Two by the chairman of the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives.

“(B) Two by the chairman of the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate.

“(C) Two by the ranking member of the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives.

“(D) Two by the ranking member of the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate.

“(3) Co-chairs of the panel.—In addition to the members appointed under paragraph (2), the Secretary of Defense shall appoint two members from private civilian life to serve as co-chairs of the panel.

“(4) Period of appointment; vacancies.—Members shall be appointed for the life of the Panel. Any vacancy in the Panel shall be filled in the same manner as the original appointment.

“(5) Duties.—The Panel shall have the following duties with respect to a Defense Strategy Review conducted under subsection (a):

“(A) Assessing the current and future security environment, including threats, trends, developments, opportunities, challenges, and risks, by using the most recent net assessment submitted by the Secretary of Defense under section 113 of this title, the risk assessment submitted by Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staffs under section 153 of this title, and, as determined necessary or useful by the Panel, any other Department of Defense, Government, or non-government strategic or intelligence estimate, assessment, study, review, or expert.

“(B) Suggesting key issues that should be addressed in the Defense Strategy Review.

“(C) Based upon the assessment under subparagraph (A), identifying and discussing the national security interests of the United States and the role of the armed forces and the Department of Defense related to the protection or promotion of those interests.

“(D) Assessing the report on the Defense Strategy Review submitted by the Secretary of Defense under subsection (a)(3).

“(E) Assessing the assumptions, strategy, findings, and risks of the report on the Defense Strategy Review submitted under subsection (a)(3).

“(F) Considering alternative defense strategies.

“(G) Assessing the force structure and capabilities, posture, infrastructure, readiness, organization, budget plans, and other elements of the defense program of the United States to execute the missions called for in the Defense Strategy Review and in the alternative strategies considered under subparagraph (F).

“(H) Providing to Congress and the Secretary of Defense, in the report required by paragraph (7), any recommendations it considers appropriate for their consideration.

“(6) First meeting.—If the Secretary of Defense has not made the Secretary’s appointments to the Panel under paragraph (3) by March 1 of a year in which the Panel is established, the Panel shall convene for its first meeting with the remaining members.

“(7) Reports.—Not later than three months after the date on which the report on a Defense Strategy Review is submitted under paragraph (3) of subsection (a) to the committees of Congress referred to in such paragraph, the Panel shall submit to such committees a report on the Panel’s assessment of such Defense Strategy Review, as required by paragraph (5).

“(8) Administrative provisions.—The following administrative provisions apply to a Panel established under paragraph (1):

“(A) The Panel may request directly from the Department of Defense and any of its components such information as the Panel considers necessary to carry out its duties under this subsection. The head of the department or agency concerned shall cooperate with the Panel to ensure that information requested by the Panel under this paragraph is promptly provided to the maximum extent practical.

“(B) Upon the request of the co-chairs, the Secretary of Defense shall make available to the Panel the services of any federally funded research and development center that is covered by a sponsoring agreement of the Department of Defense.

“(C) The Panel shall have the authorities provided in section 3161 of title 5 and shall be subject to the conditions set forth in such section.

“(D) Funds for activities of the Panel shall be provided from amounts available to the Department of Defense.

“(9) Termination.—A Panel established under paragraph (1) shall terminate 45 days after the date on which the Panel submits its report on a Defense Strategy Review under paragraph (7).”

(2)
Clerical amendment.— The item relating to section 118 at the beginning of chapter 2 of such title is amended to read as follows:

“118. Defense Strategy Review.”.

(b)
Repeal of Quadrennial Roles and Missions Review.—
(1)
Repeal.— Chapter 2 of such title is amended by striking section 118b.
(2)
Conforming amendment.— The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by striking the item relating to section 118b.
(c)
Effective Date.— Section 118 of such title, as amended by subsection (a), and the amendments made by this section, shall take effect on October 1, 2015.
(d)
Additional Requirement for Next Defense Strategy Review.— The first Defense Strategy Review required by subsection (a)(1) of section 118 of title 10, United States Code, as amended by subsection (a) of this section, shall include an analysis of enduring mission requirements for equipping, training, sustainment, and other operation and maintenance activities of the Department of Defense, including the Defense Agencies and military departments, that are financed by amounts authorized to be appropriated for overseas contingency operations.

SEC. 1073. Biennial Surveys of Department of Defense Civilian Employees on Workplace and Gender Relations Matters.

(a)
Surveys Required.—
(1)
In general.— Chapter 23 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 481 the following new section:

“§ 481a. Workplace and gender relations issues: surveys of Department of Defense civilian employees

“(a) In General.—

(1) The Secretary of Defense shall carry out every other fiscal year a survey of civilian employees of the Department of Defense to solicit information on gender issues, including issues relating to gender-based assault, harassment, and discrimination, and the climate in the Department for forming professional relationships between male and female civilian employees of the Department.

“(2) Each survey under this section shall be known as a ‘Department of Defense Civilian Employee Workplace and Gender Relations Survey’.

“(b) Elements.—Each survey conducted under this section shall be conducted so as to solicit information on the following:

“(1) Indicators of positive and negative trends for professional and personal relationships between male and female civilian employees of the Department of Defense.

“(2) The specific types of assault on civilian employees of the Department by other personnel of the Department (including contractor personnel) that have occurred, and the number of times each respondent has been so assaulted during the preceding fiscal year.

“(3) The effectiveness of Department policies designed to improve professional relationships between male and female civilian employees of the Department.

“(4) The effectiveness of current processes for complaints on and investigations into gender-based assault, harassment, and discrimination involving civilian employees of the Department.

“(5) Any other issues relating to assault, harassment, or discrimination involving civilian employees of the Department that the Secretary considers appropriate.

“(c) Report to Congress.—Upon the completion of a survey under this section, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a report containing the results of the survey.”

(2)
Clerical amendment.— The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 23 of such title is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 481 the following new item:

“481a. Workplace and gender relations issues: surveys of Department of Defense civilian employees.”.

(3)
Initial survey.— The Secretary of Defense shall carry out the first survey required by section 481a of title 10, United States Code (as added by this subsection), during fiscal year 2016.
(b)
Report on Feasibility of Similar Surveys of Military Dependents and Department of Defense Contractors.—
(1)
In general.— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report setting forth an assessment by the Secretary of the feasibility of conducting recurring surveys of each population specified in paragraph (2) on issues relating to gender-based assault, harassment, and discrimination.
(2)
Covered populations.— The populations specified in this paragraph are the following:
(A)
Military dependents.
(B)
Contractors of the Department of Defense.

SEC. 1074. Revision to Statute of Limitations for Aviation Insurance Claims.

(a)
In General.— Section 44309 of title 49, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
in subsection (a)(2), by adding at the end the following new sentence: “ A civil action shall not be instituted against the United States under this chapter unless the claimant first presents the claim to the Secretary of Transportation and such claim is finally denied by the Secretary in writing and notice of the denial of such claim is sent by certified or registered mail.”; and
(2)
by striking subsection (c) and inserting the following new subsection (c):

“(c) Time Requirements.—

(1) Except as provided under paragraph (2), an insurance claim made under this chapter against the United States shall be forever barred unless it is presented in writing to the Secretary of Transportation within two years after the date on which the loss event occurred. Any civil action arising out of the denial of such a claim shall be filed by not later than six months after the date of the mailing, by certified or registered mail, of notice of final denial of the claim by the Secretary.

“(2)

(A) For claims based on liability to persons with whom the insured has no privity of contract, an insurance claim made under the authority of this chapter against the United States shall be forever barred unless it is presented in writing to the Secretary of Transportation by not later than the earlier of—

“(i) the date that is 60 days after the date on which final judgment is entered by a tribunal of competent jurisdiction; or

“(ii) the date that is six years after the date on which the loss event occurred.

“(B) Any civil action arising out of the denial of such claim shall be filed by not later than six months after the date of mailing, by certified or registered mail, of notice of final denial of the claim by the Secretary.

“(3) A claim made under this chapter shall be deemed to be administratively denied if the Secretary fails to make a final disposition of the claim before the date that is 6 months after the date on which the claim is presented to the Secretary, unless the Secretary makes a different agreement with the claimant when there is good cause for an agreement.”

(b)
Applicability.— The amendments made by subsection (a) shall apply with respect to a claim arising after the date of the enactment of this Act.

SEC. 1075. Pilot Program for the Human Terrain System.

(a)
Pilot Program Required.— The Secretary of the Army may carry out a pilot program under which the Secretary utilizes Human Terrain System assets in the United States Pacific Command area of responsibility to support phase 0 shaping operations and the theater security cooperation plans of the Commander of the United States Pacific Command.
(b)
Reports.—
(1)
Initial report.— Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Army shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the status of the pilot program under this section. Such report shall include the independent analysis and recommendations of the Commander of the United States Pacific Command regarding the effectiveness of the program and how it could be improved.
(2)
Final report.— Not later than December 1, 2016, the Secretary of the Army shall submit to the congressional defense committees a final report on the pilot program. Such report shall include an analysis of the comparative value of human terrain information relative to other analytic tools and techniques, recommendations regarding expanding the program to include other combatant commands, and any improvements to the program and necessary resources that would enable expanding the program.
(c)
Termination.— The authority to carry out a pilot program under this section shall terminate on September 30, 2016.

SEC. 1076. Clarification of Policies on Management of Special Use Airspace of Department of Defense.

(a)
Issuance of Guidance.— Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall issue guidance to clarify the policies of the Department of Defense with respect to—
(1)
the appropriate management of special use airspace managed by the Department; and
(2)
governing access by non-Department users to such special use airspace.
(b)
Briefing.— Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall provide to the congressional defense committees a briefing on the status of implementing the guidance issued under subsection (a).

SEC. 1077. Department of Defense Policies on Community Involvement in Department Community Outreach Events.

(a)
In General.— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives a report setting forth such recommendations as the Secretary considers appropriate for modifications of the policies of the Department of Defense on the involvement of non-Federal entities in Department community outreach events (including air shows, parades, open houses, and performances by military musical units) that feature any unit, aircraft, vessel, equipment, or members of the Armed Forces in order to increase the involvement of non-Federal entities in such events.
(b)
Consultation.— The Secretary shall prepare the report required by subsection (a) in consultation with the Director of the Office of Government Ethics.
(c)
Elements.— The report required by subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1)
A description of current Department of Defense policies and regulations on the acceptance and use of voluntary gifts, donations, sponsorships, and other forms of support from non-Federal entities and persons for Department community outreach events described in subsection (a), including the authorities or requirements of the Department to accept fees for such air shows, parades, open houses, and performances by military musical units.
(2)
Recommendations for modifications of such policies and regulations in order to permit additional voluntary support and funding from non-Federal entities for such events, including recommendations on matters such as increased recognition of donors, authority for military units to endorse the fundraising efforts of certain donors, and authority for the Armed Forces to charge fees or solicit and accept donations for parking and admission to such events.

SEC. 1078. Notification of Foreign Threats to Information Technology Systems Impacting National Security.

(a)
Notification Required.—
(1)
In general.— Not later than 30 days after the Secretary of Defense determines, through the use of open source information or the use of existing authorities (including section 806 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4260; 10 U.S.C. 2304 note)), that there is evidence of a national security threat described in paragraph (2), the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a notification of such threat.
(2)
National security threat.— A national security threat described in this paragraph is a threat to an information technology or telecommunications component or network by an agent of a foreign power in which the compromise of such technology, component, or network poses a significant risk to the programs and operations of the Department of Defense, as determined by the Secretary of Defense.
(3)
Form.— A notification under this subsection shall be submitted in classified form.
(b)
Action Plan Required.— In the event that a notification is submitted pursuant to subsection (a), the Secretary shall work with the head of any department or agency affected by the national security threat to develop a plan of action for responding to the concerns leading to the notification.
(c)
Agent of a Foreign Power.— In this section, the term “agent of a foreign power” has the meaning given such term in section 101(b) of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (50 U.S.C. 1801(b)).

SEC. 1079. Pilot Program to Rehabilitate and Modify Homes of Disabled and Low-Income Veterans.

(a)
Definitions.— In this section:
(1)
Disabled.— The term “disabled” means an individual with a disability, as defined by section 12102 of title 42, United States Code.
(2)
Eligible veteran.— The term “eligible veteran” means a disabled or low-income veteran.
(3)
Energy efficient features or equipment.— The term “energy efficient features or equipment” means features of, or equipment in, a primary residence that help reduce the amount of electricity used to heat, cool, or ventilate such residence, including insulation, weatherstripping, air sealing, heating system repairs, duct sealing, or other measures.
(4)
Low-income veteran.— The term “low-income veteran” means a veteran whose income does not exceed 80 percent of the median income for an area, as determined by the Secretary.
(5)
Nonprofit organization.— The term “nonprofit organization” means an organization that is—
(A)
described in section 501(c)(3) or 501(c)(19) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986; and
(B)
exempt from tax under section 501(a) of such Code.
(6)
Primary residence.—
(A)
In general.— The term “primary residence” means a single family house, a duplex, or a unit within a multiple-dwelling structure that is the principal dwelling of an eligible veteran and is owned by such veteran or a family member of such veteran.
(B)
Family member defined.— For purposes of this paragraph, the term “family member” includes—
(i)
a spouse, child, grandchild, parent, or sibling;
(ii)
a spouse of such a child, grandchild, parent, or sibling; or
(iii)
any individual related by blood or affinity whose close association with a veteran is the equivalent of a family relationship.
(7)
Qualified organization.— The term “qualified organization” means a nonprofit organization that provides nationwide or statewide programs that primarily serve veterans or low-income individuals.
(8)
Secretary.— The term “Secretary” means the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development.
(9)
Veteran.— The term “veteran” has the meaning given the term in section 101 of title 38, United States Code.
(10)
Veterans service organization.— The term “veterans service organization” means any organization recognized by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs for the representation of veterans under section 5902 of title 38, United States Code.
(b)
Establishment of a Pilot Program.—
(1)
Grant.—
(A)
In general.— The Secretary shall establish a pilot program to award grants to qualified organizations to rehabilitate and modify the primary residence of eligible veterans.
(B)
Coordination.— The Secretary shall work in conjunction with the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to establish and oversee the pilot program and to ensure that such program meets the needs of eligible veterans.
(C)
Maximum grant.— A grant award under the pilot program to any one qualified organization shall not exceed $1,000,000 in any one fiscal year, and such an award shall remain available until expended by such organization.
(2)
Application.—
(A)
In general.— Each qualified organization that desires a grant under the pilot program shall submit an application to the Secretary at such time, in such manner, and, in addition to the information required under subparagraph (B), accompanied by such information as the Secretary may reasonably require.
(B)
Contents.— Each application submitted under subparagraph (A) shall include—
(i)
a plan of action detailing outreach initiatives;
(ii)
the approximate number of veterans the qualified organization intends to serve using grant funds;
(iii)
a description of the type of work that will be conducted, such as interior home modifications, energy efficiency improvements, and other similar categories of work; and
(iv)
a plan for working with the Department of Veterans Affairs and veterans service organizations to identify veterans who are not eligible for programs under chapter 21 of title 38, United States Code, and meet their needs.
(3)
Use of funds.— A grant award under the pilot program shall be used—
(A)
to modify and rehabilitate the primary residence of an eligible veteran, and may include—
(i)
installing wheelchair ramps, widening exterior and interior doors, reconfigurating and re-equipping bathrooms (which includes installing new fixtures and grab bars), removing doorway thresholds, installing special lighting, adding additional electrical outlets and electrical service, and installing appropriate floor coverings to—
(I)
accommodate the functional limitations that result from having a disability; or
(II)
if such residence does not have modifications necessary to reduce the chances that an elderly, but not disabled person, will fall in their home, reduce the risks of such an elderly person from falling;
(ii)
rehabilitating such residence that is in a state of interior or exterior disrepair; and
(iii)
installing energy efficient features or equipment if—
(I)
an eligible veteran’s monthly utility costs for such residence is more than 5 percent of such veteran’s monthly income; and
(II)
an energy audit of such residence indicates that the installation of energy efficient features or equipment will reduce such costs by 10 percent or more; and
(B)
in connection with modification and rehabilitation services provided under the pilot program, to provide technical, administrative, and training support to an affiliate of a qualified organization receiving a grant under such pilot program.
(4)
Limitation on use of funds.— Funds may be expended under the pilot program only for the benefit of an eligible veteran who the Secretary determines is residing in and reasonably intends to continue residing in a primary residence owned by such veteran or by a member of such veteran’s family. The Secretary shall make this determination on the basis of a certification by the veteran or a member of the veteran’s family that the veteran intends to continue residing in the primary residence for a sufficient period of time to be determined by the Secretary.
(5)
Oversight.— The Secretary shall direct the oversight of the grant funds for the pilot program so that such funds are used efficiently until expended to fulfill the purpose of addressing the adaptive housing needs of eligible veterans.
(6)
Matching funds.—
(A)
In general.— A qualified organization receiving a grant under the pilot program shall contribute towards the housing modification and rehabilitation services provided to eligible veterans an amount equal to not less than 50 percent of the grant award received by such organization.
(B)
In-kind contributions.— In order to meet the requirement under subparagraph (A), such organization may arrange for in-kind contributions.
(7)
Limitation cost to the veterans.— A qualified organization receiving a grant under the pilot program shall modify or rehabilitate the primary residence of an eligible veteran at no cost to such veteran (including application fees) or at a cost such that such veteran pays no more than 30 percent of his or her income in housing costs during any month.
(8)
Reports.—
(A)
Annual report.— The Secretary shall submit to Congress, on an annual basis, a report that provides, with respect to the year for which such report is written—
(i)
the number of eligible veterans provided assistance under the pilot program;
(ii)
the socioeconomic characteristics of such veterans, including their gender, age, race, and ethnicity;
(iii)
the total number, types, and locations of entities contracted under such program to administer the grant funding;
(iv)
the amount of matching funds and in-kind contributions raised with each grant;
(v)
a description of the housing rehabilitation and modification services provided, costs saved, and actions taken under such program;
(vi)
a description of the outreach initiatives implemented by the Secretary to educate the general public and eligible entities about such program;
(vii)
a description of the outreach initiatives instituted by grant recipients to engage eligible veterans and veteran service organizations in projects utilizing grant funds under such program;
(viii)
a description of the outreach initiatives instituted by grant recipients to identify eligible veterans and their families; and
(ix)
any other information that the Secretary considers relevant in assessing such program.
(B)
Final report.— Not later than 6 months after the completion of the pilot program, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a report that provides such information that the Secretary considers relevant in assessing the pilot program.
(C)
Inspector general report.— Not later than March 31, 2019, the Inspector General of the Department of Housing and Urban Development shall submit to the Chairmen and Ranking Members of the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate and the Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives a report containing a review of—
(i)
the use of appropriated funds by the Secretary and by grantees under the pilot program; and
(ii)
oversight and accountability of grantees under the pilot program.
(9)
Authorization of appropriations.— There are authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Housing and Urban Development for carrying out this section $4,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2015 through 2019.

TITLE XI Civilian Personnel Matters

SEC. 1101. One-Year Extension of Authority to Waive Annual Limitation on Premium Pay and Aggregate Limitation on Pay for Federal Civilian Employees Working Overseas.

Effective January 1, 2015, section 1101(a) of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4615), as most recently amended by section 1101 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66), is further amended by striking “ through 2014” and inserting “ through 2015”.

SEC. 1102. One-Year Extension of Discretionary Authority to Grant Allowances, Benefits, and Gratuities to Personnel on Official Duty in a Combat Zone.

Paragraph (2) of section 1603(a) of the Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act for Defense, the Global War on Terror, and Hurricane Recovery, 2006 (Public Law 109–234; 120 Stat. 443), as added by section 1102 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4616) and most recently amended by section 1102 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66), is further amended by striking “ 2015” and inserting “ 2016”.

SEC. 1103. Revision to List of Science and Technology Reinvention Laboratories.

Section 1105(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2487; 10 U.S.C. 2358 note) is amended by adding at the end the following:

“(18) The Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences.

“(19) The Space and Missile Defense Command Technical Center.”

SEC. 1104. Extension and Modification of Experimental Program for Scientific and Technical Personnel.

(a)
Positions Covered by Authority.—
(1)
In general.— Subsection (b)(1) of section 1101 of the Strom Thurmond National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1999 (5 U.S.C. 3104 note) is amended—
(A)
in subparagraph (A), by striking “ 60 scientific and engineering positions” and inserting “ 100 scientific and engineering positions”;
(B)
in subparagraph (B), by adding “ and” at the end;
(C)
by striking subparagraphs (C) and (D); and
(D)
by redesignating subparagraph (E) as subparagraph (C).
(2)
Conforming amendment.— Subsection (c)(2) of such section is amended by striking “ the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency” and inserting “ the Department of Defense”.
(b)
Additional Payments.— Subsection (d) of such section is amended—
(1)
in paragraph (1), by striking “ 12-month period” and inserting “ calendar year”; and
(2)
in paragraph (2), by striking “ fiscal year” and inserting “ calendar year”.
(c)
Extension.— Subsection (e)(1) of such section is amended by striking “ September 30, 2016” and inserting “ September 30, 2019”.

SEC. 1105. Temporary Authorities for Certain Positions at Department of Defense Research and Engineering Facilities.

Section 1107 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66) is amended—
(1)
in subsection (a), by adding at the end the following:

“(3) Students enrolled in scientific and engineering programs.—The director of any STRL may appoint qualified candidates enrolled in a program of undergraduate or graduate instruction leading to a bachelor’s or an advanced degree in a scientific, technical, engineering or mathematical course of study at an institution of higher education (as that term is defined in section 101 and 102 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1001)) to positions described in paragraph (3) of subsection (b) as an employee in a laboratory described in that paragraph without regard to the provisions of subchapter I of chapter 33 of title 5, United States Code (other than sections 3303 and 3328 of such title).”

(2)
in subsection (b), by adding at the end the following:

“(3) Candidates enrolled in scientific and engineering programs.—The positions described in this paragraph are scientific and engineering positions that may be temporary or term in any laboratory designated by section 1105(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2486; 10 U.S.C. 2358 note) as a Department of Defense science and technology reinvention laboratory.”

; and

(3)
in subsection (c), by adding at the end the following:

“(3) In the case of a laboratory described in subsection (b)(3), with respect to appointment authority under subsection (a)(3), the number equal to 3 percent of the total number of scientific and engineering positions in such laboratory that are filled as of the close of the fiscal year last ending before the start of such calendar year.”

SEC. 1106. Rate of Overtime Pay for Department of the Navy Employees Performing Work Aboard or Dockside in Support of the Nuclear Aircraft Carrier Forward Deployed in Japan.

(a)
In General.— Subparagraph (B) of section 5542(a)(6) of title 5, United States Code, is amended by striking “ 2014” and inserting “ 2015”.
(b)
Limitation on Overtime Pay.— Notwithstanding the authority provided by such section (as amended by subsection (a)), during fiscal year 2015 the Secretary of the Navy may not pay more than $250,000 in overtime pay under such section until the Director of the Office of Personnel Management submits a report containing the information described in section 1105(b)(2) of Public Law 111–383, the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011.

SEC. 1107. Extension of Part-Time Reemployment Authority.

(a)
CSRS.— Section 8344(l)(7) of title 5, United States Code, is amended by striking “ 5 years after the date of enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010” and inserting “ on December 31, 2019”.
(b)
FERS.— Section 8468(i)(7) of such title is amended by striking “ 5 years after the date of enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010” and inserting “ on December 31, 2019”.
(c)
Applicability.— The amendments made by subsections (a) and (b) shall be effective as of October 28, 2014.

SEC. 1108. Personnel Authorities for Civilian Personnel for the United States Cyber Command and the Cyber Component Headquarters of the Military Departments.

Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Principal Cyber Advisor to the Secretary of Defense shall—
(1)
identify improvements to be made to the employment, compensation, and promotion authorities of the Department of Defense to meet the needs of the United States Cyber Command and the cyber component headquarters of the military departments for obtaining and retaining civilian personnel with the skills and experience required to support the missions and responsibilities of those organizations;
(2)
identify the additional employment, compensation, and promotion authorities necessary to ensure that the United States Cyber Command and the cyber component headquarters of the military departments have a civilian workforce able to support the missions and responsibilities of those organizations; and
(3)
submit to the Secretary recommendations for administrative and legislative actions, including actions in connection with authorities identified pursuant to paragraph (2), to ensure that the United States Cyber Command and the cyber component headquarters of the military departments have a civilian workforce able to support the missions and responsibilities of those organizations.

TITLE XII Matters Relating to Foreign Nations

Subtitle A Assistance and Training

SEC. 1201. Modification and Extension of Global Security Contingency Fund.

(a)
Revisions to Global Security Contingency Fund.— Subsection (c)(1) of section 1207 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1625; 22 U.S.C. 2151 note) is amended by striking “ the provision of equipment, supplies, and training.” and inserting the following:

“(A) Equipment, including routine maintenance and repair of such equipment.

“(B) Supplies.

“(C) With respect to amounts in the Fund appropriated or transferred into the Fund after the date of the enactment of the Carl Levin and Howard P. ‘Buck’ McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015, small-scale construction not exceeding $750,000 on a per-project basis.

“(D) Training.”

(b)
Availability of Funds.— Subsection (i) of such section is amended—
(1)
by striking “ Amounts” and inserting the following:

“(1) In general.—Except as provided in paragraph (2), amounts”

(2)
by striking “ September 30, 2015” and inserting “ September 30, 2017”; and
(3)
by adding at the end the following:

“(2) Exception.—Amounts appropriated and transferred to the Fund before the date of the enactment of the Carl Levin and Howard P. ‘Buck’ McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 shall remain available for obligation and expenditure after September 30, 2015, only for activities under programs commenced under subsection (b) before September 30, 2015.”

(c)
Expiration.— Subsection (p) of such section, as amended by section 1202(e) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 894), is further amended—
(1)
by striking “ September 30, 2015” and inserting “ September 30, 2017”;
(2)
by striking “ fiscal years 2012 through 2015” and inserting “ fiscal years 2012 through 2017”; and
(3)
by adding at the end before the period the following: “ and subject to the requirements contained in paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection (i)”.

SEC. 1202. Notice to Congress on Certain Assistance under Authority to Conduct Activities to Enhance the Capability of Foreign Countries to Respond to Incidents Involving Weapons of Mass Destruction.

Section 1204(e) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 896; 10 U.S.C. 401 note) is amended by inserting after “ congressional defense committees” the following: “ and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives”.

SEC. 1203. Enhanced Authority for Provision of Support to Foreign Military Liaison Officers of Foreign Countries While Assigned to the Department of Defense.

(a)
Eligibility.— Subsection (a) of section 1051a of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
in the matter preceding paragraph (1)—
(A)
by striking “ The Secretary of Defense” and inserting “ Subject to subsection (d), the Secretary of Defense”; and
(B)
by striking “ involved in a military operation with the United States”;
(2)
in paragraph (1), by striking “ in connection with the planning for, or conduct of, a military operation”; and
(3)
in paragraph (2), by striking “ To the headquarters of” and all that follows and inserting “ To the Joint Staff.”.
(b)
Travel, Subsistence, and Medical Care Expenses.— Subsection (b) of such section is amended—
(1)
in paragraph (1)—
(A)
by striking “ to the headquarters of a combatant command”; and
(B)
by inserting “ or by the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, as appropriate” before the period at the end; and
(2)
in paragraph (3), by striking “ if such travel” and all that follows and inserting

“(A) The travel is in support of the national interests of the United States.

“(B) The commander of the relevant combatant command or the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, as applicable, directs round-trip travel from the assigned location to one or more travel locations.”

(c)
Terms of Reimbursement.— Subsection (c) of such section is amended—
(1)
by striking “ To the extent that the Secretary determines appropriate, the” and inserting “ The”; and
(2)
by adding at the end the following new sentence: “ The terms of reimbursement shall be specified in the appropriate agreement used to assign the liaison officer to a combatant command or to the Joint Staff.”.
(d)
Limitation and Oversight.— Such section, as so amended, is further amended—
(1)
by redesignating subsection (d) as subsection (f); and
(2)
by inserting after subsection (c) the following new subsection:

“(d) Limitation and Oversight.—

(1) The amount of unreimbursed support for any liaison officer supported under subsection (b)(1) in any fiscal year may not exceed $200,000 (in fiscal year 2014 constant dollars).

“(2) The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff shall be responsible for implementing the authority under this section.”

(e)
Secretary of State Coordination.— Such section, as so amended, is further amended by inserting after subsection (d), as added by subsection (d)(2) of this section, the following new subsection (e):

“(e) Secretary of State Coordination.—The authority of the Secretary of Defense to provide administrative services and support under subsection (a) for the performance of duties by a liaison officer of another nation may be exercised only with respect to a liaison officer of another nation whose assignment as described in that subsection is accepted by the Secretary of Defense with the coordination of the Secretary of State.”

(f)
Definition.— Subsection (f) of such section (as so redesignated) is amended by inserting “ training programs conducted to familiarize, orient, or certify liaison personnel regarding unique aspects of the assignments of the liaison personnel,” after “ police protection,”.

SEC. 1204. Prohibition on Use of Funds for Assistance to Units of Foreign Security Forces That Have Committed a Gross Violation of Human Rights.

(a)
Prohibition.—
(1)
In general.— Subchapter I of chapter 134 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

“§ 2249e. Prohibition on use of funds for assistance to units of foreign security forces that have committed a gross violation of human rights

“(a) In General.—

(1) Of the amounts made available to the Department of Defense, none may be used for any training, equipment, or other assistance for a unit of a foreign security force if the Secretary of Defense has credible information that the unit has committed a gross violation of human rights.

“(2) The Secretary of Defense shall, in consultation with the Secretary of State, ensure that prior to a decision to provide any training, equipment, or other assistance to a unit of a foreign security force full consideration is given to any credible information available to the Department of State relating to human rights violations by such unit.

“(b) Exception.—The prohibition in subsection (a)(1) shall not apply if the Secretary of Defense, after consultation with the Secretary of State, determines that the government of such country has taken all necessary corrective steps, or if the equipment or other assistance is necessary to assist in disaster relief operations or other humanitarian or national security emergencies.

“(c) Waiver.—The Secretary of Defense, after consultation with the Secretary of State, may waive the prohibition in subsection (a)(1) if the Secretary determines that the waiver is required by extraordinary circumstances.

“(d) Procedures.—The Secretary of Defense shall establish, and periodically update, procedures to ensure that any information in the possession of the Department of Defense about gross violations of human rights by units of foreign security forces is shared on a timely basis with the Department of State.

“(e) Report.—Not later than 15 days after the application of any exception under subsection (b) or the exercise of any waiver under subsection (c), the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report—

“(1) in the case of an exception under subsection (b), providing notice of the use of the exception and stating the grounds for the exception; and

“(2) in the case of a waiver under subsection (c), describing—

“(A) the information relating to the gross violation of human rights;

“(B) the extraordinary circumstances that necessitate the waiver;

“(C) the purpose and duration of the training, equipment, or other assistance; and

“(D) the United States forces and the foreign security force unit involved.

“(f) Appropriate Committees of Congress Defined.—In this section, the term ‘appropriate committees of Congress’ means—

“(1) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Foreign Relations, and the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate; and

“(2) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives.”

(2)
Clerical amendment.— The table of sections at the beginning of subchapter I of chapter 134 of such title is amended by adding at the end the following new item:

“2249e. Prohibition on use of funds for assistance to units of foreign security forces that have committed a gross violation of human rights.”.

(b)
Annual Reports.—
(1)
In general.— Not later than March 31, 2015, and every March 31 thereafter through 2024, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report setting forth for the preceding fiscal year the following:
(A)
The total number of cases submitted for vetting for purposes of section 2249e of title 10, United States Code (as added by subsection (a)), and the total number of such cases approved, or suspended or rejected for human rights reasons, non-human rights reasons, or administrative reasons.
(B)
In the case of units rejected for non-human rights reasons, a detailed description of the reasons relating to the rejection.
(C)
A description of the interagency processes that were used to evaluate compliance with requirements to conduct vetting.
(D)
An addendum that includes any comments by the commanders of the combatant commands about the impact of section 2249e of title 10, United States Code (as so added), on their theater security cooperation plan.
(E)
Such other matters with respect to the administration of section 2249e of title 10, United States Code (as so added), as the Secretary considers appropriate.
(2)
Form.— Each report under this subsection shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.
(3)
Appropriate committees of congress defined.— In this subsection, the term “appropriate committees of Congress” has the meaning given that term in subsection (f) of section 2249e of title 10, United States Code (as so added).

SEC. 1205. Codification and Enhancement of Authority to Build the Capacity of Foreign Security Forces.

(a)
Codification, Extension, and Enhancement of Authority.—
(1)
In general.— Chapter 136 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

“§ 2282. Authority to build the capacity of foreign security forces

“(a) Authority.—The Secretary of Defense, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State, is authorized to conduct or support a program or programs as follows:

“(1) To build the capacity of a foreign country’s national military forces in order for that country to—

“(A) conduct counterterrorism operations; or

“(B) participate in or support on-going allied or coalition military or stability operations that benefit the national security interests of the United States.

“(2) To build the capacity of a foreign country’s national maritime or border security forces to conduct counterterrorism operations.

“(3) To build the capacity of a foreign country’s national-level security forces that have among their functional responsibilities a counterterrorism mission in order for such forces to conduct counterterrorism operations.

“(b) Types of Capacity Building.—

“(1) Authorized elements.—A program under subsection (a) may include the provision of equipment, supplies, training, defense services, and small-scale military construction.

“(2) Required elements.—A program under subsection (a) shall include elements that promote the following:

“(A) Observance of and respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms.

“(B) Respect for civilian control of the military.

“(c) Limitations.—

“(1) Annual funding limitation.—The Secretary of Defense may use amounts specifically authorized and appropriated or otherwise made available to carry out programs under this section on an annual basis to carry out programs authorized by subsection (a).

“(2) Assistance otherwise prohibited by law.—The Secretary of Defense may not use the authority in subsection (a) to provide any type of assistance described in subsection (b) that is otherwise prohibited by any provision of law.

“(3) Limitation on eligible countries.—The Secretary of Defense may not use the authority in subsection (a) to provide assistance described in subsection (b) to any foreign country that is otherwise prohibited from receiving such type of assistance under any other provision of law.

“(4) Availability of funds for activities across fiscal years.—

“(A) In general.—Amounts made available in a fiscal year to carry out the authority in subsection (a) may be used for programs under that authority that begin in the fiscal year such amounts are made available but end in the next fiscal year.

“(B) Achievement of full operational capability.—If, in accordance with subparagraph (A), equipment is delivered under a program under the authority in subsection (a) in the fiscal year after the fiscal year in which the program begins, amounts for supplies, training, defense services, and small-scale military construction associated with such equipment and necessary to ensure that the recipient unit achieves full operational capability for such equipment may be used in the fiscal year in which the foreign country takes receipt of such equipment and in the next fiscal year.

“(5) Limitations on availability of funds for small-scale military construction.—

“(A) Activities under particular programs.—The amount that may be obligated or expended for small-scale military construction activities under any particular program authorized under subsection (a) may not exceed $750,000.

“(B) Activities under all programs.—The amount that may be obligated or expended for small-scale military construction activities during a fiscal year for all programs authorized under subsection (a) during that fiscal year may not exceed up to five percent of the amount made available in such fiscal year to carry out the authority in subsection (a).

“(d) Formulation and Execution of Program.—The Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of State shall jointly formulate any program under subsection (a). The Secretary of Defense shall coordinate with the Secretary of State in the implementation of any program under subsection (a).

“(e) Congressional Notification.—

“(1) In general.—Not less than 15 days before initiating activities under a program under subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a notice of the following:

“(A) The country whose capacity to engage in activities in subsection (a) will be built under the program.

“(B) The budget, implementation timeline with milestones, anticipated delivery schedule for assistance, military department responsible for management and associated program executive office, and completion date for the program.

“(C) The source and planned expenditure of funds to complete the program.

“(D) A description of the arrangements, if any, for the sustainment of the program and the source of funds to support sustainment of the capabilities and performance outcomes achieved under the program beyond its completion date, if applicable.

“(E) A description of the program objectives and assessment framework to be used to develop capability and performance metrics associated with operational outcomes for the recipient unit.

“(F) Information, including the amount, type, and purpose, on the assistance provided the country during the three preceding fiscal years under each of the following programs, accounts, or activities:

“(i) A program under this section.

“(ii) The Foreign Military Financing program under the Arms Export Control Act.

“(iii) Peacekeeping Operations.

“(iv) The International Narcotics Control and Law Enforcement (INCLE) program under section 481 of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2291).

“(v) Nonproliferation, Anti-Terrorism, Demining, and Related Programs (NADR).

“(vi) Counterdrug activities authorized by section 1004 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1991 (10 U.S.C. 374 note) and section 1033 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1998.

“(vii) Any other significant program, account, or activity for the provision of security assistance that the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of State consider appropriate.

“(G) An assessment of the capacity of the recipient country to absorb assistance under the program.

“(H) An assessment of the manner in which the program fits into the theater security cooperation strategy of the applicable geographic combatant command.

“(2) Coordination with secretary of state.—Any notice under paragraph (1) shall be prepared in coordination with the Secretary of State.

“(f) Assessments of Programs.—Amounts available to conduct or support programs under subsection (a) shall be available to the Secretary of Defense to conduct assessments and determine the effectiveness of such programs in building the operational capacity and performance of the recipient units concerned.

“(g) Appropriate Committees of Congress Defined.—In this section, the term ‘appropriate committees of Congress’ means—

“(1) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Foreign Relations, and the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate; and

“(2) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives.”

(2)
Clerical amendment.— The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 136 of such title is amended by adding at the end the following new item:

“2282. Authority to build the capacity of foreign security forces.”.

(b)
Conforming Amendments.—
(1)
Section 943(g)(1) of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4578), as most recently amended by section 1205(f) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1624), is further amended by striking “ sections 1206 and 1207 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 (Public Law 109–163; 119 Stat. 3456 and 3458)” and inserting “ section 2282 of title 10, United States Code, and section 1207 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 (Public Law 109–163; 119 Stat. 3458)”.
(2)
Section 1209(b)(1)(A) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 368), as most recently amended by section 1203(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2512), is further amended by striking “ section 1206 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 (Public Law 109–163; 119 Stat. 3456)” and inserting “ section 2282 of title 10, United States Code”.
(c)
Repeal of Superseded Authority.— Section 1206 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 (Public Law 109–163) is repealed.
(d)
Funding.—
(1)
In general.— Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2015 by section 301 and available for operation and maintenance as specified in the funding table in section 4301, up to $350,000,000 may be used for programs under subsection (a) of section 2282 of title 10, United States Code (as added by subsection (a) of this section).
(2)
Limitation on amount for building capacity to participate in allied or coalition military or stability operations.— Of the amount available under paragraph (1) for fiscal year 2015, not more than $150,000,000 may be used in such fiscal year for purposes described in subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 2282 of title 10, United States Code (as so added).
(e)
Annual Secretary of Defense Reports.—
(1)
In general.— Not later than 90 days after the end of each of fiscal years 2015 through 2020, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report summarizing the findings of the assessments of programs carried out under subsection (f) of section 2282 of title 10, United States Code (as so added), during such fiscal year.
(2)
Elements.— Each report under paragraph (1) shall include, for each program assessed under such subsection (f) during the fiscal year covered by such report, the following:
(A)
A description of the nature and the extent of the potential or actual terrorist threat, if any, that the program is intended to address.
(B)
A description of the program, including the objectives of the program, the types of recipient country units receiving assistance under the program, and the baseline operational capability and performance of the units receiving assistance under the program before the commencement of receipt of assistance under the program.
(C)
A description of the extent to which the program is implemented by United States Government personnel or contractors.
(D)
A description of the assessment framework to be used to develop capability and performance metrics associated with operational outcomes for units receiving assistance under the program.
(E)
An assessment of the program using the assessment framework described in subparagraph (D).
(F)
An assessment of the effectiveness of the program in achieving its intended purpose.
(f)
Biennial Comptroller General of the United States Audits.—
(1)
In general.— Not later than March 31 of each of 2016, 2018 and 2020, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress an audit of such program or programs conducted or supported pursuant to section 2282 of title 10, United States Code (as so added), during the preceding two fiscal years as the Comptroller General shall select for purposes of such report.
(2)
Elements.— Each report should, to the extent information is available, include, for the program or programs covered by such report, the following:
(A)
A description of the program or programs, including—
(i)
the objectives of the program or programs;
(ii)
the types of units receiving assistance under the program or programs;
(iii)
the delivery and completion schedules for assistance under the program or programs; and
(iv)
the baseline operational capability and performance of the units receiving assistance under the program or programs before the commencement of receipt of assistance under the program or programs.
(B)
An assessment of the capacity of each recipient country to absorb assistance under the program or programs.
(C)
An assessment of the arrangements, if any, for the sustainment of the program or programs, including any source of funds to support sustainment of the capabilities and performance outcomes achieved under the program or program beyond completion date, if applicable.
(D)
An assessment of the effectiveness of the program or programs in achieving their intended purpose.
(E)
Such other matters as the Comptroller considers appropriate.
(g)
Appropriate Committees of Congress Defined.— In subsections (e) and (f), the term “appropriate committees of Congress” has the meaning given that term in subsection (g) of section 2282 of title 10, United States Code (as so added).

SEC. 1206. Training of Security Forces and Associated Security Ministries of Foreign Countries to Promote Respect for the Rule of Law and Human Rights.

(a)
In General.— The Secretary of Defense is authorized to conduct human rights training of security forces and associated security ministries of foreign countries.
(b)
Construction With Limitation on Use of Funds.— Human rights training authorized by this section may be conducted for security forces otherwise prohibited from receiving such training under any provision of law only if—
(1)
such training is conducted in the country of origin of the security forces;
(2)
such training is withheld from any individual of a unit when there is credible information that such individual has committed a gross violation of human rights or has commanded a unit that has committed a gross violation of human rights;
(3)
such training may be considered a corrective step, but is not sufficient for meeting the accountability requirement under the exception established in subsection (b) of section 2249e of title 10, United States Code (as added by section 1204(a) of this Act); and
(4)
reasonable efforts have been made to assist the foreign country to take all necessary corrective steps regarding a gross violation of human rights with respect to the unit, including using funds authorized by this Act to provide technical assistance or other types of support for accountability.
(c)
Role of the Secretary of State.—
(1)
Concurrence.— Training activities may be conducted under this section only with the concurrence of the Secretary of State.
(2)
Consultation.— The Secretary of Defense shall consult with the Secretary of State on the content of the training, the methods of instruction to be provided, and the intended beneficiaries of training conducted under this section.
(d)
Authorized Activities.— Human rights training authorized by this section may include associated activities and expenses necessary for the conduct of training and assessments designed to further the purposes of this section, including technical assistance or other types of support for accountability.
(e)
Annual Reports.— Not later than March 31 each year through 2020, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on the use of the authority in this section during the preceding fiscal year. Each report shall include information on any human rights training (as defined in subsection (f)) or other assistance that was provided during the fiscal year to foreign security forces.
(f)
Definitions.— In this section
(1)
The term “appropriate committees of Congress” means—
(A)
the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Foreign Relations, and the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate; and
(B)
the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives.
(2)
The term “human rights training” means training for the purpose of directly improving the conduct of foreign security forces to—
(A)
prevent gross violations of human rights and support accountability for such violations;
(B)
strengthen compliance with the laws of armed conflict and respect for civilian control over the military;
(C)
promote and assist in the establishment of a military justice system and other mechanisms for accountability; and
(D)
prevent the use of child soldiers.
(g)
Sunset.— The authority in subsection (a) shall expire on September 30, 2020.

SEC. 1207. Cross Servicing Agreements for Loan of Personnel Protection and Personnel Survivability Equipment in Coalition Operations.

(a)
In General.— The Secretary of Defense may, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State, enter into an arrangement, under an agreement concluded pursuant to section 2342 of title 10, United States Code, under which the United States agrees to loan personnel protection and personnel survivability equipment for the use of such equipment by military forces of a nation participating in the following:
(1)
A coalition operation with the United States as part of a contingency operation.
(2)
A coalition operation with the United States as part of a peacekeeping operation under the Charter of the United Nations or another international agreement.
(3)
Training of such forces in connection with the deployment of such forces to be deployed to an operation described in paragraph (1) or (2).
(b)
Limitations.—
(1)
Loan only of equipment for which u.s. forces have no unfulfilled requirements.— Equipment may be loaned to the military forces of a nation under the authority of this section only upon a determination by the Secretary of Defense that the United States forces in the coalition operation concerned have no unfulfilled requirements for such equipment.
(2)
Scope of use of loaned equipment.— Equipment loaned to the military forces of a nation under the authority of this section may be used by those forces only for personnel protection or to aid in the personnel survivability of those forces and only in—
(A)
a coalition operation with the United States described in paragraph (1) or (2) of subsection (a); or
(B)
training described in paragraph (3) of subsection (a).
(3)
Duration of use of loaned equipment.— Equipment loaned to the military forces of a nation under the authority of this section may be used by the military forces of that nation not longer than the duration of that country’s participation in the coalition operation concerned.
(4)
Notice and wait on loan of equipment for training.— Equipment may not be loaned under subsection (a) in connection with training described in paragraph (3) of that subsection until 15 days after the date on which the Secretary of Defense submits to the appropriate committees of Congress written notice on the loan of such equipment for such purpose.
(c)
Waiver of Reimbursement in Case of Loss of Equipment in Combat.—
(1)
In general.— In the case of equipment loaned under the authority of this section that is damaged or destroyed as a result of combat operations during coalition operations while held by forces to which loaned under this section, the Secretary of Defense may, with respect to such equipment, waive any other requirement under applicable law for—
(A)
reimbursement;
(B)
replacement-in-kind; or
(C)
exchange of supplies or services of an equal value.
(2)
Basis for waiver.— Any waiver under this subsection may be made only if the Secretary determines that the waiver is in the national security interest of the United States.
(3)
Waiver on a case-by-case basis.— Any waiver under this subsection may be made only on a case-by-case basis.
(d)
Reports to Congress.— If the authority provided under this section is exercised during a fiscal year, the Secretary of Defense shall, in coordination with the Secretary of State, submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on the exercise of such authority by not later than October 30 of the year in which such fiscal year ends. Each report on the exercise of such authority shall specify the recipient country of the equipment loaned, the type of equipment loaned, and the duration of the loan of such equipment.
(e)
Definitions.— In this section:
(1)
The term “appropriate committees of Congress” means—
(A)
the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate; and
(B)
the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives.
(2)
The term “personnel protection and personnel survivability equipment” means items enumerated in categories I, II, III, VII, X, XI, and XIII of the United States Munitions List under section 38(a)(1) of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2778(a)(1) that the Secretary of Defense designates as available for loan under this section.
(f)
Expiration of Authority.— The authority in subsection (a) shall expire on September 30, 2019.

SEC. 1208. Extension and Modification of Authority for Support of Special Operations to Combat Terrorism.

(a)
Amount Available for Support.— Subsection (a) of section 1208 of the Ronald W. Reagan National Defense Authorization Act of Fiscal Year 2005 (Public Law 108–375; 118 Stat. 2086), as most recently amended by section 1203(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act of Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1621), is further amended by striking “ $50,000,000” and inserting “ $75,000,000”.
(b)
Extension.— Subsection (h) of such section 1208, as most recently amended by section 1203(c) of the National Defense Authorization Act of Fiscal Year 2012, is further amended by striking “ 2015” and inserting “ 2017”.

SEC. 1209. Authority to Provide Assistance to the Vetted Syrian Opposition.

(a)
In General.— The Secretary of Defense is authorized, in coordination with the Secretary of State, to provide assistance, including training, equipment, supplies, stipends, construction of training and associated facilities, and sustainment, to appropriately vetted elements of the Syrian opposition and other appropriately vetted Syrian groups and individuals, through December 31, 2016, for the following purposes:
(1)
Defending the Syrian people from attacks by the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL), and securing territory controlled by the Syrian opposition.
(2)
Protecting the United States, its friends and allies, and the Syrian people from the threats posed by terrorists in Syria.
(3)
Promoting the conditions for a negotiated settlement to end the conflict in Syria.
(b)
Notice Before Provision of Assistance.— Not later than 15 days prior to the provision of assistance authorized under subsection (a) to appropriately vetted recipients for the first time—
(1)
the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of State, shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees and leadership of the House of Representatives and Senate a report, in unclassified form with a classified annex as appropriate, that contains a description of—
(A)
the plan for providing such assistance;
(B)
the requirements and process used to determine appropriately vetted recipients; and
(C)
the mechanisms and procedures that will be used to monitor and report to the appropriate congressional committees and leadership of the House of Representatives and Senate on unauthorized end-use of provided training and equipment and other violations of relevant law by appropriately vetted recipients; and
(2)
the President shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees and leadership of the House of Representatives and Senate a report, in unclassified form with a classified annex as appropriate, that contains a description of how such assistance fits within a larger regional strategy.
(c)
Plan Elements.— The plan required in subsection (b)(1) shall include, at a minimum, a description of—
(1)
the goals and objectives of assistance authorized under subsection (a);
(2)
the concept of operations, timelines, and types of training, equipment, stipends, sustainment, construction, and supplies to be provided;
(3)
the roles and contributions of partner nations;
(4)
the number and role of United States Armed Forces personnel involved;
(5)
any additional military support and sustainment activities; and
(6)
any other relevant details.
(d)
Quarterly Progress Report.— Not later than 90 days after the Secretary of Defense submits the report required in subsection (b)(1), and every 90 days thereafter, the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of State, shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees and leadership of the House of Representatives and the Senate a progress report. Such progress report shall, based on the most recent quarterly information, include—
(1)
any updates to or changes in the plan, strategy, vetting requirements and process, and end-use monitoring mechanisms and procedures, as required in subsection (b)(1);
(2)
a description of how the threat of attacks against United States or coalition personnel is being mitigated, statistics on any such attacks, including green-on-blue attacks, and how such attacks are being mitigated;
(3)
a description of the appropriately vetted recipients receiving assistance authorized under subsection (a);
(4)
the recruitment, throughput, and retention rates of appropriately vetted recipients and equipment;
(5)
any misuse or loss of provided training and equipment and how such misuse or loss is being mitigated;
(6)
a description of the command and control of appropriately vetted recipients;
(7)
an assessment of the operational effectiveness of the appropriately vetted recipients in meeting the purposes specified in subsection (a);
(8)
a description of sustainment support provided to appropriately vetted recipients pursuant to subsection (a);
(9)
a list of construction projects carried out under authority in subsection (a);
(10)
a statement of the amount of funds expended during the period for which the report is submitted, and in aggregate since September 19, 2014, to provide assistance by authorized category pursuant to subsection (a) and section 149 of the Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2015 (Public Law 113–164); and
(11)
an assessment of the effectiveness of the assistance authorized under subsection (a) as measured against subsections (b) and (c).
(e)
Definitions.— For purposes of this section, the following definitions shall apply:
(1)
The term “appropriately vetted” means, with respect to elements of the Syrian opposition and other Syrian groups and individuals, at a minimum—
(A)
assessments of such elements, groups, and individuals for associations with terrorist groups, Shia militias aligned with or supporting the Government of Syria, and groups associated with the Government of Iran. Such groups include, but are not limited to, the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL), Jabhat al Nusrah, Ahrar al Sham, other al-Qaeda related groups, and Hezbollah; and
(B)
a commitment from such elements, groups, and individuals to promoting the respect for human rights and the rule of law.
(2)
The term “appropriate congressional committees” means—
(A)
the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Foreign Affairs, the Committee on Appropriations, and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives; and
(B)
the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Foreign Relations, the Committee on Appropriations, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate.
(f)
Reprogramming Requirement.— The Secretary of Defense may submit a reprogramming or transfer request of funds made available for Overseas Contingency Operations beginning on October 1, 2014, and ending on December 31, 2016, to the congressional defense committees to carry out activities authorized under this section.
(g)
Authority to Accept Contributions.— The Secretary of Defense may accept and retain contributions, including assistance in-kind, from foreign governments to provide assistance as authorized by this section. Any funds so accepted by the Secretary shall be credited to appropriations for the appropriate operation and maintenance accounts, except that any funds so accepted by the Secretary shall not be available for obligation until a reprogramming request is submitted to the congressional defense committees.
(h)
Construction of Authorization.— Nothing in this section shall be construed to constitute a specific statutory authorization for the introduction of United States Armed Forces into hostilities or into situations wherein hostilities are clearly indicated by the circumstances.
(i)
War Powers Resolution Matters.— Nothing in this section supersedes or alters the continuing obligations of the President to report to Congress pursuant to section 4 of the War Powers Resolution (50 U.S.C. 1543) regarding the use of United States Armed Forces abroad.
(j)
Waiver Authority.— For purposes of the provision of assistance pursuant to subsection (a), the President may waive any provision of law if the President determines that such provision of law would (but for the waiver) impede national security objectives of the United States by prohibiting, restricting, delaying, or otherwise limiting the provision of such assistance. Such waiver shall not take effect until 30 days after the date on which the President notifies the appropriate congressional committees of such determination and the provision of law to be waived.
(k)
Assistance to Third Countries in Provision of Assistance.— The Secretary may provide assistance to third countries for purposes of the provision of assistance authorized under this section.

SEC. 1210. Provision of Logistic Support for the Conveyance of Certain Defense Articles to Foreign Forces Training with the United States Armed Forces.

(a)
In General.— During fiscal years 2015 and 2016, the Secretary of Defense is authorized to provide logistic support for the conveyance of certain defense articles in Afghanistan to the armed forces of a country with which the Armed Forces of the United States plan to conduct bilateral or multilateral training overseas during fiscal years 2015 and 2016.
(b)
Limitations.— The Secretary may provide logistic support under subsection (a) only—
(1)
in accordance with the Arms Export Control Act and other relevant export control laws of the United States;
(2)
in accordance with section 516(c)(2) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2321j); and
(3)
with the concurrence of the Secretary of State.
(c)
Limitation.— The total value of logistic support provided under subsection (a) for a fiscal year may not exceed $10,000,000.
(d)
Source of Funds.— To provide logistic support under subsection (a), the Secretary may use funds available for Operation and Maintenance, Defense-wide, for fiscal years 2015 and 2016.
(e)
Report.— Not later than 30 days after the last day of a fiscal year during which the Secretary of Defense exercises the authority under subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of State, shall submit to the congressional defense committees, the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate, and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives a report on the exercise of authority under this section during that fiscal year. Such report shall include a description of the types of defense articles provided, the amount of funds expended, and the countries that received defense articles.
(f)
Definitions.— In this section:
(1)
The term “logistic support” means—
(A)
the use of military transportation and cargo-handling assets, including aircraft;
(B)
materiel support in the form of fuel, petroleum, oil, or lubricants; and
(C)
commercially contracted transportation.
(2)
The term “certain defense article” means an item that has been declared an excess defense article and has been transferred from the stocks of the Department of Defense in Afghanistan but has not yet been made available for disposal through the Defense Logistics Agency process.

SEC. 1211. Biennial Report on Programs Carried Out by the Department of Defense to Provide Training, Equipment, or Other Assistance or Reimbursement to Foreign Security Forces.

(a)
Biennial Report Required.— Not later than February 1 of each of 2016, 2018, and 2020, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that sets forth, on a country-by-country basis, a description of each program carried out by the Department of Defense to provide training, equipment, or other security assistance or reimbursement during the two fiscal years ending in the year before the year in which such report is submitted under the authorities specified in subsection (c).
(b)
Elements of Report.— Each report required under subsection (a) shall provide for each program covered by such report, and for the reporting period covered by such report, the following:
(1)
A description of the purpose and type of the training, equipment, or assistance or reimbursement provided, including how the training, equipment, or assistance or reimbursement provided advances the theater security cooperation strategy of the combatant command, as appropriate.
(2)
The cost of such training, equipment, or assistance or reimbursement, including by type of support provided.
(3)
A description of the metrics, if any, used for assessing the effectiveness of such training, equipment, or assistance or reimbursement provided.
(c)
Specified Authorities.— The authorities specified in this subsection are the following authorities (or any successor authorities):
(1)
Section 127d of title 10, United States Code, relating to authority to provide logistic support, supplies, and services to allied forces participating in a combined operation with the Armed Forces.
(2)
Section 166a(b)(6) of title 10, United States Code, relating to humanitarian and civic assistance by the commanders of the combatant commands.
(3)
(A)
to provide assistance to nations of the former Soviet Union as part of the Warsaw Initiative Fund;
(B)
to conduct the Defense Institution Reform Initiative; and
(C)
to conduct a program to increase defense institutional legal capacity through the Defense Institute of International Legal Studies.
(4)
Section 2010 of title 10, United States Code, relating to authority to reimburse foreign troops for participation in combined exercises.
(5)
Section 2011 of title 10, United States Code, relating to authority to reimburse foreign troops for participation in Joint Combined Exercise Training.
(6)
Section 2249c of title 10, United States Code, relating to authority to use appropriated funds for costs associated with education and training of foreign officials under the Regional Defense Combating Terrorism Fellowship Program.
(7)
Section 2282 of title 10, United States Code (as added by section 1205 of this Act), relating to authority to build the capacity of foreign military forces, or the predecessor authority to such section in section 1206 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 (Public Law 109–163; 119 Stat. 3456).
(8)
Section 2561 of title 10, United States Code, relating to authority to provide humanitarian assistance.
(9)
Section 1532, relating to the Afghanistan Security Forces Fund.
(10)
Section 1205 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (32 U.S.C. 107 note), relating to authority for National Guard State Partnership program.
(11)
Section 1081 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (10 U.S.C. 168 note), relating to the Ministry of Defense Advisors program.
(12)
Section 1207 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (22 U.S.C. 2151 note), relating to the Global Security Contingency Fund.
(13)
Section 1233 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 393), relating to authority to reimburse certain coalition nations for support provided to United States military operations.
(14)
Section 1234 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (122 Stat. 394), relating to authorization for logistical support for coalition forces supporting certain United States military operations.
(15)
Section 1033 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1998 (Public Law 105–85; 111 Stat. 1881), relating to authority to provide additional support for counter-drug activities of Peru and Colombia.
(16)
Section 1004 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1991 (10 U.S.C. 374 note), relating to additional support for counter-drug activities.
(17)
Any other authority on assistance or reimbursement that the Secretary of Defense considers appropriate and consistent with subsection (a).
(d)
Nonduplication of Effort.— If any information required under subsection (a) has been included in another report or notification previously submitted to Congress by law, the Secretary of Defense may provide a list of such reports and notifications at the time of submitting the report required by subsection (a) in lieu of including such information in the report required by subsection (a).
(e)
Form.— Each report required under subsection (a) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may contain a classified annex.
(f)
Repeal of Superseded Requirement.— Section 1209 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (122 Stat. 368) is repealed.

Subtitle B Matters Relating to Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Iraq

SEC. 1221. Commanders’ Emergency Response Program in Afghanistan.

(a)
One-Year Extension.— Section 1201 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1619), as most recently amended by section 1211 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 904), is further amended by striking “ fiscal year 2014” each place it appears and inserting “ fiscal year 2015”.
(b)
Semi-Annual Reports.— Subsection (b) of such section, as so amended, is further amended—
(1)
in the subsection heading, by striking “ Quarterly” and inserting “ Semi-annual”; and
(2)
in paragraph (1)—
(A)
in the paragraph heading, by striking “ Quarterly” and inserting “ Semi-annual”;
(B)
by striking “ fiscal year quarter” and inserting “ half fiscal year”; and
(C)
by striking “ that quarter” and inserting “ that half fiscal year”.
(c)
Funds Available During Fiscal Year 2015.— Subsection (a) of such section, as so amended, is further amended by striking “ $60,000,000” and inserting “ $10,000,000”.
(d)
Restriction on Amount of Payments.— Subsection (e) of such section is amended by striking “ $20,000,000” and inserting “ $2,000,000”.
(e)
Notification on Certain Projects.— Subsection (g) of such section is amended—
(1)
in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking “ $5,000,000” and inserting “ $500,000”;
(2)
in paragraph (1), by striking “ to advance the military campaign plan for Afghanistan” and inserting “ to directly benefit the security or stability of the people of Afghanistan”; and
(3)
in paragraph (3), by striking “ any agreement with either the Government of Afghanistan,” and inserting “ any written agreement with either the Government of Afghanistan, an entity owned or controlled by the Government of Afghanistan,”.
(f)
Submittal of Revised Guidance.— Not later than 15 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a copy of the guidance issued by the Secretary to the Armed Forces concerning the Commanders’ Emergency Response Program in Afghanistan as revised to take into account the amendments made by this section.

SEC. 1222. Extension and Modification of Authority for Reimbursement of Certain Coalition Nations for Support Provided to United States Military Operations.

(a)
Extension.— Subsection (a) of section 1233 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 393), as most recently amended by section 1213 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 905), is further amended—
(1)
by striking “ fiscal year 2014” and inserting “ fiscal year 2015”; and
(2)
in paragraph (1), by striking “ Operation Enduring Freedom” and inserting “ Iraq or in Operation Enduring Freedom in Afghanistan”.
(b)
Other Support.— Subsection (b) of such section, as so amended, is further amended by inserting “ Iraq or in” before “ Operation Enduring Freedom in Afghanistan”.
(c)
Limitation on Amounts Available.— Subsection (d)(1) of such section, as so amended, is further amended—
(1)
in the second sentence, by striking “ during fiscal year 2014 may not exceed $1,500,000,000” and inserting “ during fiscal year 2015 may not exceed $1,200,000,000”; and
(2)
in the third sentence, by striking “ during fiscal year 2013 may not exceed $1,200,000,000” and inserting “ during fiscal year 2015 may not exceed $1,000,000,000”.
(d)
Extension of Notice Requirement Relating to Reimbursement of Pakistan for Support Provided by Pakistan.— Section 1232(b)(6) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (122 Stat. 393), as most recently amended by section 1213(c) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (127 Stat. 906), is further amended by striking “ September 30, 2014” and inserting “ September 30, 2015”.
(e)
Extension of Limitation on Reimbursement of Pakistan Pending Certification on Pakistan.— Section 1227(d)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2001), as amended by section 1213(d) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (127 Stat. 906), is further amended by striking “ fiscal year 2014” and inserting “ fiscal year 2015”.
(f)
Additional Limitation on Reimbursement of Pakistan Pending Certification on Pakistan.— Of the total amount of reimbursements and support authorized for Pakistan during fiscal year 2015 pursuant to the third sentence of section 1233(d)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (as amended by subsection (b)(2)), $300,000,000 shall not be eligible for the waiver under section 1227(d)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (126 Stat. 2001) unless the Secretary of Defense certifies to the congressional defense committees that—
(1)
Pakistan has undertaken military operations in North Waziristan that have contributed to significantly disrupting the safe haven and freedom of movement of the Haqqani network in Pakistan; and
(2)
Pakistan has taken steps that have demonstrated a commitment to ensuring that North Waziristan does not return to being a safe haven for the Haqqani network.

SEC. 1223. One-Year Extension of Logistical Support for Coalition Forces Supporting Certain United States Military Operations.

(a)
Extension.— Section 1234 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 394), as most recently amended by section 1217(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 909), is further amended—
(1)
in subsection (a), by striking “ fiscal year 2014” and inserting “ fiscal year 2015”;
(2)
in subsection (d), by striking “ during the period beginning on October 1, 2013, and ending on December 31, 2014” and inserting “ during the period beginning on October 1, 2014, and ending on December 31, 2015”; and
(3)
in subsection (e)(1), by striking “ December 31, 2014” and inserting “ December 31, 2015”.
(b)
Authority for Use of Funds in Connection With Iraq.—
(1)
In general.— Subsection (a) of such section 1234, as so amended, is further amended by inserting “ and Iraq” after “ in Afghanistan”.
(2)
Conforming amendment.— The heading of such section 1234 is amended by inserting “ and iraq” after “ afghanistan”.

SEC. 1224. United States Plan for Sustaining the Afghanistan National Security Forces Through the End of Fiscal Year 2017.

(a)
Plan Required.— Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of State, shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report that contains a detailed plan for sustaining the Afghanistan National Army (ANA) and the Afghanistan National Police (ANP) of the Afghanistan National Security Forces (ANSF) through the end of fiscal year 2017, with the objective of ensuring that the ANSF will be able to independently and effectively conduct operations and maintain security and stability in Afghanistan.
(b)
Matters To Be Included.— The plan contained in the report required under subsection (a) shall include a description of the following matters:
(1)
A comprehensive sustainment strategy, including target end-strengths, budget, and defined objectives.
(2)
The commitments for funding contributions from the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) and non-NATO nations for sustaining the ANSF through the end of fiscal year 2017, any shortfalls in funding for such purposes, and the plan for achieving such commitments as necessary to sustain the ANSF.
(3)
A mechanism for tracking funding, equipment, training, and services provided to the ANSF by the United States, countries participating in NATO’s Operation Resolute Support, and other members of the international community contributing to the sustainment of the ANSF.
(4)
Plans for assisting the Government of Afghanistan to achieve the following goals:
(A)
Improve and sustain effective Afghan security institutions with fully capable senior leadership and staff, including logistics, intelligence, medical, and recruiting units.
(B)
Train and equip key enabling capabilities, including for the Afghan Special Operations Forces, the Afghan Air Force, and Afghan Special Mission Wing, such that these entities are fully-capable of conducting operations independently and in sufficient numbers.
(C)
Establish effective and sustainable ANSF-readiness assessment tools and metrics.
(D)
Improve and sustain strong, professional ANSF officers at the junior-, mid-, and senior-levels.
(E)
Enhance strong ANSF communication and control between central command and regions, provinces, and districts.
(F)
Develop and improve institutional mechanisms for incorporating lessons learned and best practices into ANSF operations.
(G)
Improve ANSF oversight mechanisms, including an effective record-keeping system to track ANSF equipment and personnel and a sustainable process to identify, investigate, and eliminate corruption.
(c)
Appropriate Congressional Committees Defined.— In this section, the term “appropriate congressional committees” means—
(1)
the congressional defense committees; and
(2)
the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives.

SEC. 1225. Semiannual Report on Enhancing Security and Stability in Afghanistan.

(a)
Reports Required.—
(1)
In general.— The Secretary of Defense shall, in coordination with the Secretary of State, submit to the appropriate committees of Congress on a semiannual basis a report on building and sustaining the Afghan National Security Forces (ANSF) and enhancing security and stability in Afghanistan.
(2)
Submittal.— A report under paragraph (1) shall be submitted not later than June 15 each year, for the 6-month period ending on May 31 of such year, and not later than December 15 each year, for the 6-month period ending on November 30 of such year. No report is required to be submitted under paragraph (1) after the report required to be submitted on December 15, 2017.
(3)
Form.— Each report required under paragraph (1) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.
(b)
Matters To Be Included.— Each report required under subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1)
Strategy and objectives of united states and nato missions in afghanistan after 2014.— A detailed description of—
(A)
the strategy and objectives of any post-2014 United States mission and any mission agreed by the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), to train, advise, and assist the ANSF or to conduct counterterrorism operations; and
(B)
indicators of effectiveness as developed by the Secretary or NATO, as appropriate, in the assessment of any such United States train, advise, and assist mission and of any such train, advise, and assist mission agreed by NATO, including efforts to build the counterterrorism capabilities of the ANSF.
(2)
Threat assessment.— An assessment of the current security conditions in Afghanistan and the security conditions anticipated in Afghanistan during the 24-month period beginning on the date of the submittal of such report, including with respect to threats from terrorist groups such as al-Qaeda, the Taliban, and the Haqqani Network.
(3)
Description of size and structure and strategy and budget of ansf.— A description of—
(A)
the size and force structure of the ANSF, including the Afghanistan National Army (ANA), the Afghanistan National Police (ANP), the Afghan Border Police, the Afghan Local Police, and such other major force components of the ANSF as the Secretary considers appropriate;
(B)
the rationale for any changes in the overall end strength or the mix of force structure for the ANSF during the period covered by such report;
(C)
levels of recruitment, retention, and attrition within the ANSF, in the aggregate and by force component;
(D)
personnel end strength within the Afghanistan Ministry of Defense and the Afghanistan Ministry of Security;
(E)
the strategy and budget of the ANSF; and
(F)
a description of the activities of the ANSF during the period covered by the report.
(4)
Assessment of size, structure, capabilities, and strategy of ansf.— An assessment whether the size, structure, capabilities, and strategy of the ANSF are sufficient to provide security in light of the current security conditions in Afghanistan and the security conditions anticipated in Afghanistan during the 24-month period beginning on the date of the submittal of such report. Such assessment should describe the risks and trade-offs the ANSF are making and any gaps in the capacity and capabilities of the ANSF.
(5)
Building key capabilities and enabling forces within ansf.—
(A)
A description of programs to achieve key mission enabling capabilities within the ANSF, including any major milestones and timelines, and the end states intended to be achieved by such programs, including for the following:
(i)
Security institution capacity building.
(ii)
Special operations forces and their key enablers.
(iii)
Intelligence.
(iv)
Logistics.
(v)
Maintenance.
(vi)
Air forces.
(B)
Metrics, as developed by the Commander of United States forces in Afghanistan, for monitoring and evaluating the performance of such programs in achieving the intended outcomes of such programs.
(6)
Financing the ansf.— A description of—
(A)
any plan agreed by the United States, the international community, and the Government of Afghanistan to fund and sustain the ANSF that serves as current guidance on such matters during the period covered by such report, including a description of whether such plan differs from—
(i)
in the case of the first report submitted under subsection (a), commitments undertaken at the 2012 NATO Summit in Chicago and the Tokyo Mutual Accountability Framework; or
(ii)
in the case of any other report submitted under subsection (a), such plan as set forth in the previous report submitted under subsection (a);
(B)
the Afghan Security Forces Fund financing plan through 2017;
(C)
contributions by the international community to sustaining the ANSF during the period covered by such report;
(D)
contributions by the Government of Afghanistan to sustaining the ANSF during the period covered by such report; and
(E)
efforts to ensure that the Government of Afghanistan can assume an increasing financial responsibility for sustaining the ANSF consistent with its commitments at the Chicago Summit and the Tokyo Mutual Accountability Framework.
(c)
Appropriate Committees of Congress Defined.— In this section, the term “appropriate committees of Congress” means—
(1)
the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Appropriations, and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate; and
(2)
the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Appropriations, and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives.
(d)
Repeal of Superseded Authority.— Section 1230 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181) is repealed.

SEC. 1226. Sense of Congress on Stability and Sovereignty of Afghanistan.

It is the sense of Congress that—
(1)
a top national security priority for the United States continues to be to support the stability and sovereignty of Afghanistan and to help Afghanistan ensure that its territory is not used by al Qaeda, the Haqqani Network, or other violent extremist groups to launch attacks against the United States or its interests;
(2)
the presence of United States military forces in Afghanistan after 2014 to train, advise, and assist the Afghanistan National Security Forces (ANSF) and conduct counterterrorism operations is a key step to maintaining the significant gains achieved in Afghanistan and should be executed consistent with the security conditions on the ground;
(3)
any drawdown of such United States military forces and operations should be considered in relation to security conditions on the ground in Afghanistan at the time of the drawdown and the recommendations of senior United States military commanders; and
(4)
NATO member countries and other members of the international community should honor their commitments to support Afghanistan at the Lisbon, Chicago, and Tokyo conferences taking into account the mutual accountability framework agreed by the Government of Afghanistan.

SEC. 1227. Extension of Afghan Special Immigrant Program.

Section 602(b) of the Afghan Allies Protection Act of 2009 (8 U.S.C. 1101 note) is amended—
(1)
in paragraph (2)(A)—
(A)
by amending clause (ii) to read as follows:

“(ii) was or is employed in Afghanistan on or after October 7, 2001, for not less than 1 year—

“(I) by, or on behalf of, the United States Government; or

“(II) by the International Security Assistance Force in a capacity that required the alien—

“(aa) while traveling off-base with United States military personnel stationed at International Security Assistance Force, to serve as an interpreter or translator for such United States military personnel; or

“(bb) to perform sensitive and trusted activities for United States military personnel stationed at International Security Assistance Force;”

(B)
in clause (iii), by striking “ the United States Government,” and inserting “ an entity or organization described in clause (ii),”; and
(C)
in clause (iv), by striking “ by the United States Government.” and inserting “ described in clause (ii).”;
(2)
by adding at the end of paragraph (3) the following:

“(F) Fiscal years 2015 and 2016.—In addition to any unused balance under subparagraph (D), for the period beginning on the date of the enactment of this subparagraph and ending on September 30, 2016, the total number of principal aliens who may be provided special immigrant status under this section shall not exceed 4,000. For purposes of status provided under this subparagraph—

“(i) the period during which an alien must have been employed in accordance with paragraph (2)(A)(ii) must terminate on or before September 30, 2015;

“(ii) the principal alien seeking special immigrant status under this subparagraph shall apply to the Chief of Mission in accordance with paragraph (2)(D) not later than December 31, 2015; and

“(iii) the authority to issue visas shall commence on the date of the enactment of this subparagraph and shall terminate on March 31, 2017.”

; and

(3)
by adding at the end the following:

“(14) Report.—Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this paragraph, the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense, shall submit a report to the Committee on the Judiciary of the Senate and the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives containing the following information:

“(A) The occupations of aliens who—

“(i) were provided special immigrant status under this section; and

“(ii) were considered principal aliens for such purpose.

“(B) The number of appeals submitted under paragraph (2)(D)(ii)(I)(bb) from application denials by the Chief of Mission and the number of those applications that were approved pursuant to the appeal.

“(C) The number of applications denied by the Chief of Mission on the basis of derogatory information that were appealed and the number of those applications that were approved pursuant to the appeal.

“(D) The number of applications denied by the Chief of Mission on the basis that the applicant did not establish faithful and valuable service to the United States Government that were appealed and the number of those applications that were approved pursuant to the appeal.

“(E) The number of applications denied by the Chief of Mission for failure to establish the one-year period of employment required that were appealed and the number of those applications that were approved pursuant to the appeal.

“(F) The number of applications denied by the Chief of Mission for failure to establish employment by or on behalf of the United States Government that were appealed and the number of those applications that were approved pursuant to the appeal.

“(G) The number of special immigrant status approvals revoked by the Chief of Mission and the reason for each revocation.

“(H) The number of special immigrant status approvals revoked by the Chief of Mission that were appealed and the number of those revocations that were overturned pursuant to the appeal.”

SEC. 1228. Independent Assessment of United States Efforts Against Al-Qaeda.

(a)
Independent Assessment.— The Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of State and the Director of National Intelligence, shall provide for the conduct of an independent assessment of the effectiveness of the United States efforts to disrupt, dismantle, and defeat al-Qaeda, including its affiliated groups, associated groups, and adherents since September 11, 2001.
(b)
Elements.— The assessment required by subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1)
An assessment of al-Qaeda core’s current relationship with affiliated groups, associated groups, and adherents, and how it has changed over time.
(2)
An assessment of the current objectives, capabilities, and overall strategy of al-Qaeda core, its affiliated groups, associated groups, and adherents, and how they have changed over time.
(3)
An assessment of the operational and organizational structure of al-Qaeda core, its affiliated groups, associated groups, and adherents, and how it has changed over time.
(4)
An analysis of the activities that have proven to be most effective and least effective at disrupting and dismantling al Qaeda, its affiliated groups, associated groups, and adherents.
(5)
Recommendations for United States policy to disrupt, dismantle, and defeat al-Qaeda, its affiliated groups, associated groups, and adherents.
(6)
Other matters that the Secretary determines to be appropriate.
(c)
Report.—
(1)
In general.— Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the entity selected for the conduct of the assessment required by subsection (a) shall provide to the Secretary of Defense and the appropriate committees of Congress a report containing its findings as a result of the assessment.
(2)
Form.— The report shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.
(d)
Appropriate Committees of Congress Defined.— In this section, the term “appropriate committees of Congress” means—
(1)
the congressional defense committees;
(2)
the Committee on Foreign Relations and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate; and
(3)
the Committee on Foreign Affairs and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives.

SEC. 1229. Sense of Congress on Security of Afghan Women.

It is the sense of Congress that—
(1)
the United States Government should continue to work with the Government of Afghanistan and Afghan civil society to promote the rights of women in Afghanistan and their inclusion in the political, economic, and security transition process; and
(2)
the United States Government should continue to support and encourage efforts by the Government of Afghanistan to recruit, integrate, train, and retain women in the Afghanistan National Security Forces (ANSF), including through the use of not less than $25,000,000 as specified in section 1531(c) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 938) for programs and activities for such purposes, which may include—
(A)
assistance in prioritizing efforts to increase the number of women serving in the ANSF, taking into account the Master Ministerial Development Plan for Afghanistan National Army (ANA) Gender Integration;
(B)
further development of training for the ANA and the Afghanistan National Police (ANP) to increase awareness and responsiveness among ANA and ANP personnel regarding the unique security challenges women confront when serving in those forces;
(C)
assistance in the development of a plan to increase the number of female security officers specifically trained to address gender-based violence, such as the Family Response Units of the ANP, and to ensure that such units are appropriately resourced;
(D)
assistance in the development of accountability mechanisms for ANA and ANP personnel relating to the treatment of women and girls, including female members of the ANSF;
(E)
assistance in the implementation of a plan, developed in coordination with the Government of Afghanistan, to promote the equal treatment of female members of the ANA and ANP through such steps as providing appropriate equipment, modifying facilities, and ensuring literacy and gender awareness training for female recruits and male counterparts; and
(F)
assistance to the Afghan Ministry of Defense and the Afghan Ministry of Interior in recruiting, training, and funding sufficient female searchers and security officers to staff voting stations during the 2015 parliamentary elections.

SEC. 1230. Review Process for Use of United States Funds for Construction Projects in Afghanistan That Cannot Be Physically Accessed by United States Government Personnel.

(a)
Prohibition.—
(1)
In general.— None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act may be obligated or expended for a construction project in Afghanistan in excess of $1,000,000 that cannot be audited and physically inspected by authorized United States Government personnel or their designated representatives, in accordance with generally-accepted auditing guidelines.
(2)
Applicability.— Paragraph (1) shall apply only with respect to a project that is initiated on or after the date of the enactment of this Act.
(b)
Waiver.— The prohibition in subsection (a) may be waived with respect to a project otherwise covered by that subsection if not later than 15 days prior to the initial obligation of funds for the project the Secretary of Defense submits to the congressional defense committees a report that contains the following:
(1)
A determination of the Secretary of Defense that—
(A)
the project clearly contributes to United States national interests or strategic objectives;
(B)
the project has been coordinated with the Government of Afghanistan and any other implementing agencies or international donors; and
(C)
adequate arrangements have been made for sustainment of the project following its completion, including arrangements with respect to funding and technical capacity for sustainment.
(2)
A plan that contains—
(A)
a description of how the Secretary of Defense will monitor the use of the funds for the project—
(i)
to ensure the funds are used for the specific purposes for which the funds are intended; and
(ii)
to mitigate waste, fraud, and abuse; and
(B)
metrics to measure the progress and effectiveness of the project in meeting its objectives.

SEC. 1231. Extension of Authority to Transfer Defense Articles and Provide Defense Services to the Military and Security Forces of Afghanistan.

(a)
Extension.— Subsection (h) of section 1222 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1992) is amended by striking “ December 31, 2014” and inserting “ December 31, 2015”.
(b)
Quarterly Reports.— Subsection (f)(1) of such section is amended by striking “ March 31, 2015” and inserting “ March 31, 2016”.
(c)
Excess Defense Articles.— Subsection (i)(2) of such section is amended by striking “ and 2014” each place it appears and inserting “ , 2014, and 2015”.

SEC. 1232. One-Year Extension of Authority to Use Funds for Reintegration Activities in Afghanistan.

Section 1216 of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4392), as most recently amended by section 1212 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 905), is further amended—
(1)
in subsection (a)—
(A)
by striking “ $25,000,000” and inserting “ $5,000,000”; and
(B)
by striking “ for fiscal year 2014” and inserting “ for fiscal year 2015”; and
(2)
in subsection (e), by striking “ December 31, 2014” and inserting “ December 31, 2015”.

SEC. 1233. Clearance of Unexploded Ordnance on Former United States Training Ranges in Afghanistan.

(a)
Authority to Conduct Clearance.— Subject to subsection (b), the Secretary of Defense may, using funds specified in subsection (c), conduct surface and sub-surface clearance of unexploded ordnance at closed training ranges used by the Armed Forces of the United States in Afghanistan.
(b)
Conditions on Authority.—
(1)
Limitation to ranges not transferred to afghanistan.— The surface and sub-surface clearance of unexploded ordnance authorized under subsection (a) may only take place on training ranges managed and operated by the Armed Forces of the United States that have not been transferred to the Government of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan for use by its armed forces.
(2)
Limitation on amounts available.— Funds expended for clearance pursuant to the authority in subsection (a) through September 30, 2016, may not exceed $250,000,000.
(c)
Funds.— The surface and sub-surface clearance of unexploded ordnance authorized by subsection (a) shall be paid for using amounts as follows:
(1)
For fiscal year 2015, amounts authorized to be appropriated by section 1502 and available for operation and maintenance for overseas contingency operations.
(2)
For fiscal year 2016, amounts authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2016 for the Department of Defense as additional authorizations of appropriations for overseas contingency operations and available for operation and maintenance for overseas contingency operations.
(d)
Unexploded Ordnance Defined.— In this section, the term “unexploded ordnance” has the meaning given that term in section 101(e)(5) of title 10, United States Code.

SEC. 1234. Report on Impact of End of Major Combat Operations in Afghanistan on Authority to Use Military Force.

(a)
Report Required.— Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Attorney General, submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report setting forth an assessment of the impact, if any, of the end of major combat operations in Afghanistan on the authority of the Armed Forces of the United States to use military force, including the authority to detain, with regard to al Qaeda, the Taliban, and associated forces, pursuant to—
(1)
the Authorization for Use of Military Force (Public Law 107–40); and
(2)
any other available legal authority.
(b)
Form.— The report under subsection (a) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.
(c)
Appropriate Committees of Congress Defined.— In this section, the term “appropriate committees of Congress” means—
(1)
the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Foreign Relations, and the Committee on the Judiciary of the Senate; and
(2)
the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives.

SEC. 1235. Report on Bilateral Security Cooperation with Pakistan.

(a)
Report Required.— Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act and every six months thereafter, the Secretary of Defense shall, in consultation with the Secretary of State, submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on the nature and extent of bilateral security cooperation between the United States and Pakistan.
(b)
Elements.— The report required under subsection (a) shall include, at a minimum, the following:
(1)
A description of any strategic security objectives that the United States and Pakistan have agreed to pursue in cooperation.
(2)
A description of programs or activities that the United States and Pakistan have jointly undertaken to pursue mutually agreed security cooperation objectives.
(3)
A description and assessment of the effectiveness of efforts by Pakistan, unilaterally or jointly with the United States, to disrupt operations and eliminate safe havens of al Qaeda, Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan, and other militant extremist groups such as the Haqqani Network and the Quetta Shura Taliban located in Pakistan.
(4)
A description and assessment of efforts by Pakistan, unilaterally or jointly with the United States, to counter the threat of improvised explosive devices and the networks involved in the acquisition, production, and delivery of such devices and their precursors and components.
(5)
An assessment of the effectiveness of any United States security assistance to Pakistan to achieve the strategic security objectives described in paragraph (1).
(6)
A description of any metrics used to assess the effectiveness of programs and activities described in paragraph (2).
(c)
Form.— The report required under subsection (a) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.
(d)
Sunset.— The requirements in this section shall terminate on December 31, 2017.
(e)
Appropriate Committees of Congress Defined.— In this section, the term “appropriate committees of Congress” means—
(1)
the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Appropriations, and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate; and
(2)
the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Appropriations, and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives.
(f)
Repeal of Obsolete and Superseded Requirements.— Section 1232 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181) is amended by striking subsections (a) and (c).

SEC. 1236. Authority to Provide Assistance to Counter the Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant.

(a)
In General.— The Secretary of Defense is authorized, in coordination with the Secretary of State, to provide assistance, including training, equipment, logistics support, supplies, and services, stipends, facility and infrastructure repair and renovation, and sustainment, to military and other security forces of or associated with the Government of Iraq, including Kurdish and tribal security forces or other local security forces, with a national security mission, through December 31, 2016, for the following purposes:
(1)
Defending Iraq, its people, allies, and partner nations from the threat posed by the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) and groups supporting ISIL.
(2)
Securing the territory of Iraq.
(b)
Notice Before Provision of Assistance.— Of the funds authorized to be appropriated under this section, not more than 25 percent of such funds may be obligated or expended until not later than 15 days after—
(1)
the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of State, submits to the appropriate congressional committees and leadership of the House of Representatives and Senate a report, in unclassified form with a classified annex as appropriate, that contains a description of—
(A)
the plan for providing such assistance;
(B)
an identification of such forces designated to receive such assistance; and
(C)
the plan for re-training and re-building such forces; and
(2)
the President submits to the appropriate congressional committees and leadership of the House of Representatives and Senate a report, in unclassified form with a classified annex as appropriate, that contains a description of how such assistance supports a larger regional strategy.
(c)
Plan Elements.— The plan required in subsection (a)(1) shall include, at a minimum, a description of—
(1)
the goals and objectives of assistance authorized under subsection (a);
(2)
the concept of operations, timelines, and types of training, equipment, stipends, sustainment, and supplies to be provided;
(3)
the roles and contributions of partner nations;
(4)
the number and role of United States Armed Forces personnel involved;
(5)
any additional military support and sustainment activities; and
(6)
any other relevant details.
(d)
Quarterly Progress Report.— Not later than 90 days after the date on which the Secretary of Defense submits the report required in subsection (b)(1), and every 30 days thereafter, the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of State, shall provide the appropriate congressional committees and leadership of the House of Representatives and the Senate with a progress report. Such progress report shall, based on the most recent quarterly information, include a description of the following:
(1)
Any updates to or changes in the plan, strategy, process, vetting requirements and process as described in subsection (e), and end-use monitoring mechanisms and procedures.
(2)
A description of how attacks against United States or coalition personnel are being mitigated, statistics on any such attacks, including “green-on-blue” attacks.
(3)
A description of the forces receiving assistance authorized under subsection (a).
(4)
A description of the recruitment, throughput, and retention rates of recipients and equipment.
(5)
A description of any misuse or loss of provided equipment and how such misuse or loss is being mitigated.
(6)
An assessment of the operational effectiveness of the forces receiving assistance authorized under subsection (a).
(7)
A description of sustainment support provided to the forces authorized under subsection (a).
(8)
A list of projects to repair or renovate facilities authorized under subsection (a).
(9)
A statement of the amount of funds expended during the period for which the report is submitted.
(10)
An assessment of the effectiveness of the assistance authorized under subsection (a).
(e)
Vetting.— The Secretary of Defense should ensure that prior to providing assistance to elements of any forces described in subsection (a) such elements are appropriately vetted, including at a minimum, by—
(1)
conducting assessments of such elements for associations with terrorist groups or groups associated with the Government of Iran; and
(2)
receiving commitments from such elements to promote respect for human rights and the rule of law.
(f)
Definition.— In this section, the term “appropriate congressional committees” means—
(1)
the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Foreign Relations, and the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate; and
(2)
the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives.
(g)
Funding.— Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated in this Act for Overseas Contingency Operations in title XV for fiscal year 2015, there are authorized to be appropriated $1,618,000,000 to carry out this section. Amounts authorized to be appropriated under this subsection are authorized to remain available until September 30, 2016.
(h)
Authority to Accept Contributions.— The Secretary of Defense may accept and retain contributions, including assistance in-kind, from foreign governments, including the Government of Iraq, to provide assistance authorized under subsection (a). Any funds accepted by the Secretary may be credited to the account from which funds are made available for the provision of assistance authorized under subsection (a) and may be used for such purpose until expended.
(i)
Construction of Authorization.— Nothing in this section shall be construed to constitute a specific statutory authorization for the introduction of United States Armed Forces into hostilities or into situations wherein hostilities are clearly indicated by the circumstances.
(j)
Waiver Authority.—
(1)
By secretary of defense.—
(A)
In general.— For purposes of the provision of assistance pursuant to subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense may waive any provision of law described in subparagraph (B) if the Secretary—
(i)
determines that such provision of law would (but for the waiver) prohibit, restrict, delay, or otherwise limit the provision of such assistance; and
(ii)
submits to the appropriate congressional committees a notice of and justification for the waiver and the provision of law to be waived.
(B)
Provisions of law.— The provisions of law described in this subparagraph are the following:
(i)
Any provision of law relating to the acquisition of items and support services.
(ii)
Sections 40 and 40A of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2780 and 2785).
(2)
By president.— For purposes of the provision of assistance pursuant to subsection (a), the President may waive any provision of law other than a provision of law described in paragraph (1)(B) if the President determines that it is vital to the national security interests of the United States to waive such provision of law. Such waiver shall not take effect until 15 days after the date on which the President notifies the appropriate congressional committees of such determination and the provision of law to be waived.
(3)
Report.—
(A)
In general.— Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act the President shall transmit to the congressional defense committees a report that provides a specific list of provisions of law that need to be waived under this subsection for purposes of the provision of assistance pursuant to subsection (a) and a justification for each such waiver.
(B)
Update.— The President shall submit to the congressional defense committees an update of the report required by subparagraph (A) not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act.
(k)
Cost-Sharing Requirement.—
(1)
In general.— Of the funds authorized to be appropriated under this subsection, not more than 60 percent of such funds may be obligated or expended until not later than 15 days after the date on which the Secretary of Defense certifies to the appropriate congressional committees and leadership of the House of Representatives and the Senate that an amount equal to not less than 40 percent of the amount authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section has been contributed by other countries and entities for the purposes described in subsection (a), which may include contributions of in-kind support for forces described in subsection (a), as determined from October 1, 2014, of which not less than 50 percent of such amount contributed by other countries and entities has been contributed by the Government of Iraq.
(2)
Exception.— The limitation in paragraph (1) shall not apply if the Secretary of Defense determines, in writing, that the national security objectives of the United States will be compromised by the application of the limitation to any such assistance, and notifies the appropriate congressional committees not less than 15 days in advance of the exemption taking effect, including a justification for the Secretary’s determination and a description of the assistance to be exempted from the application of such limitation.

SEC. 1237. Extension and Modification of Authority to Support Operations and Activities of the Office of Security Cooperation in Iraq.

(a)
Extension.— Subsection (f)(1) of section 1215 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1631; 10 U.S.C. 113 note), as most recently amended by section 1214 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 906; 10 U.S.C. 113 note), is further amended—
(1)
by striking “ fiscal year 2014” and inserting “ fiscal year 2015”;
(2)
by striking “ non-operational”; and
(3)
by striking “ in an institutional environment” and inserting “ at a base or facility of the Government of Iraq”.
(b)
Amount Available.— Such section is further amended—
(1)
in subsection (c), by striking “ fiscal year 2014 may not exceed $209,000,000” and inserting “ fiscal year 2015 may not exceed $140,000,000”; and
(2)
in subsection (d), by striking “ fiscal year 2014” and inserting “ fiscal year 2015”.

Subtitle C Matters Relating to the Russian Federation

SEC. 1241. Limitation on Military Cooperation Between the United States and the Russian Federation.

(a)
Limitation.— None of the funds authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2015 for the Department of Defense may be used for any bilateral military-to-military cooperation between the Governments of the United States and the Russian Federation until the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of State, certifies to the appropriate congressional committees that—
(1)
the Russian Federation has ceased its occupation of Ukrainian territory and its aggressive activities that threaten the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Ukraine and members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization; and
(2)
the Russian Federation is abiding by the terms of and taking steps in support of the Minsk Protocol, signed on September 5, 2014, regarding a ceasefire in eastern Ukraine.
(b)
Nonapplicability.— The limitation in subsection (a) shall not apply to—
(1)
any activities necessary to ensure the compliance of the United States with its obligations or the exercise of rights of the United States under any bilateral or multilateral arms control or nonproliferation agreement or any other treaty obligation of the United States; and
(2)
any activities required to provide logistical or other support to the conduct of United States or North Atlantic Treaty Organization military operations in Afghanistan or the withdrawal from Afghanistan.
(c)
Waiver.— The Secretary of Defense may waive the limitation in subsection (a) if—
(1)
the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of State—
(A)
determines that the waiver is in the national security interest of the United States; and
(B)
submits to the appropriate congressional committees—
(i)
a notification that the waiver is in the national security interest of the United States and a description of the national security interest covered by the waiver; and
(ii)
a report explaining why the Secretary of Defense cannot make the certification under subsection (a); and
(2)
a period of 15 days has elapsed following the date on which the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of State, submits the information in the report under subparagraph (B)(ii).
(d)
Exception for Certain Military Bases.— The certification requirement specified in paragraph (1) of subsection (a) shall not apply to military bases of the Russian Federation in Ukraine’s Crimean peninsula operating in accordance with its 1997 agreement on the Status and Conditions of the Black Sea Fleet Stationing on the Territory of Ukraine.
(e)
Appropriate Congressional Committees Defined.— In this section, the term “appropriate congressional committees” means—
(1)
the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate; and
(2)
the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives.
(f)
Effective Date.— This section takes effect on the date of the enactment of this Act and applies with respect to funds described in subsection (a) that are unobligated on or after such date of enactment.

SEC. 1242. Notification and Assessment of Proposal to Modify or Introduce New Aircraft or Sensors for Flight by the Russian Federation under Open Skies Treaty.

(a)
Notification.— Not later than 30 days after the date on which the Russian Federation submits to the States Parties to the Open Skies Treaty a proposal to modify or introduce a new aircraft or sensor for flight by the Russian Federation under the Open Skies Treaty, the President shall notify the appropriate committees of Congress of such proposal and the relevant details thereof.
(b)
Assessment.—
(1)
In general.— Not later than 30 days prior to the date on which the United States intends to agree to a proposal described in subsection (a), the Director of National Intelligence, jointly with the Secretary of Defense and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and in consultation with the Secretary of State, shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress an assessment of such proposal on the national security of the United States.
(2)
Additional element.— The assessment required by paragraph (1) shall include a description of any plans of the United States to mitigate the effect of the proposal on the national security of the United States, including an analysis of the cost and effectiveness of any such plans.
(3)
Form.— The assessment required by paragraph (1) may be submitted in classified or unclassified form as appropriate.
(c)
Definitions.— In this section:
(1)
Appropriate committees of congress.— The term “appropriate committees of Congress” means—
(A)
the congressional defense committees;
(B)
the Select Committee on Intelligence and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate; and
(C)
the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives.
(2)
Open skies treaty.— The term “Open Skies Treaty” means the Treaty on Open Skies, done at Helsinki March 24, 1992, and entered into force January 1, 2002.

SEC. 1243. Limitations on Providing Certain Missile Defense Information to the Russian Federation.

Section 1246(c) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 923) is amended—
(1)
in paragraph (1), by striking “ 2016” and inserting “ 2017”;
(2)
in paragraph (2)—
(A)
by inserting after “ 2014” the following: “ or 2015”; and
(B)
by adding at the end before the period the following: “ or information relating to velocity at burnout of United States missile defense interceptors or targets”; and
(3)
in paragraph (3), by inserting “ and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives” after “ congressional defense committees”.

SEC. 1244. Report on Non-Compliance by the Russian Federation with Its Obligations under the Inf Treaty.

(a)
Findings.— Congress makes the following findings:
(1)
It was the object and purpose of the INF Treaty to eliminate the production or deployment of ground launched ballistic and cruise missiles with a range of between 500 and 5,500 kilometers, which was accomplished in 1992.
(2)
The July 2014 Department of State annual report on “Adherence to and Compliance with Arms Control, Nonproliferation, and Disarmament Agreements and Commitments” stated that “The United States has determined that the Russian Federation is in violation of its obligations under the INF Treaty not to possess, produce, or flight-test a ground-launched cruise missile (GLCM) with a range capability of 500km to 5,500km, or to possess or produce launchers of such missiles.”.
(3)
In a letter to the Senate Armed Services Committee dated October 23, 2014, General Martin Dempsey, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, wrote “these violations are a serious challenge to the security of the United States and our allies. These actions, particularly when placed in the broader context of Russian regional aggression, must be met with a strategic response.”.
(b)
Sense of Congress.— It is the sense of Congress that—
(1)
the Russian Federation’s actions in violation of its obligations under the INF Treaty adversely affect the national security of the United States and its allies, including the members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) and those in East Asia;
(2)
the Government of the Russian Federation is responsible for this violation and also for returning to compliance with the INF Treaty;
(3)
it is in the national security interests of the United States and its allies for the INF Treaty to remain in effect and for the Russian Federation to return to full and verifiable compliance with all its obligations under the INF Treaty; and
(4)
as identified in section 1061 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 865), the President should take appropriate actions to resolve the issues relating to noncompliance by the Russian Federation with its obligations under the INF Treaty.
(c)
Report Required.—
(1)
In general.— Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the President shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on noncompliance by the Russian Federation with its obligations under the INF Treaty.
(2)
Elements.— The report required under paragraph (1) shall include the following:
(A)
An assessment of the effect of Russian noncompliance on the national security interests of the United States and its allies, including the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, and those in East Asia.
(B)
A description of the President’s plan to resolve issues related to Russian noncompliance, including—
(i)
actions that have been taken, and what further actions are planned or warranted by the United States;
(ii)
plans to address Russian noncompliance diplomatically with the Russian Federation to resolve concerns about such noncompliance and bring Russia back into full compliance with the INF Treaty;
(iii)
an assessment of possible steps (including verification measures) that would permit confidence that the Russian Federation has returned to full compliance; and
(iv)
the status of any United States efforts to develop coordinated or cooperative responses with allies.
(C)
An assessment of whether Russian noncompliance threatens the viability of the INF Treaty, whether such noncompliance constitutes a material breach of the INF Treaty, and whether it is in the interests of the United States to remain a party to the INF Treaty if such noncompliance continues.
(3)
Form.— The report required under paragraph (1) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.
(d)
Briefings Required.— At the time of the submission of the report required under subsection (c), and every six months thereafter until the date on which the Russian Federation is in compliance with its obligations under the INF Treaty, the Secretary of State, jointly with the Secretary of Defense and the heads of such other departments or agencies as appropriate, shall provide to the appropriate congressional committees a briefing on the status of United States efforts to resolve its concerns relating to noncompliance by the Russian Federation with its obligations under the INF Treaty.
(e)
Notification.— In the event the President determines that the Russian Federation has deployed, or intends to deploy, systems that violate the INF Treaty, the President shall promptly notify the appropriate congressional committees of such determination and any plans to respond to such deployments.
(f)
Definitions.— In this section:
(1)
Appropriate congressional committees.— The term “appropriate congressional committees” means—
(A)
the congressional defense committees;
(B)
the Committee on Foreign Relations and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate; and
(C)
the Committee on Foreign Affairs and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives.
(2)
INF treaty.— The term “INF Treaty” means the Treaty Between the United States of America and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics on the Elimination of Their Intermediate-Range and Shorter-Range Missiles, commonly referred to as the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty, signed at Washington December 8, 1987, and entered into force June 1, 1988.

SEC. 1245. Annual Report on Military and Security Developments Involving the Russian Federation.

(a)
Report Required.— Not later than June 1 of each year, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report, in both classified and unclassified form, on the security and military strategies and capabilities of the Russian Federation (in this section referred to as “Russia”).
(b)
Matters To Be Included.— The report required under subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1)
An assessment of the security priorities and objectives of Russia, including those priorities and objectives that would affect the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), the Middle East, and the People’s Republic of China.
(2)
A description of the goals and factors shaping Russian security strategy and military strategy, including military spending and investment priorities and their alignment with the security priorities and objectives described in paragraph (1).
(3)
An assessment of the force structure of the Russian military.
(4)
A description of Russia’s current missile defense strategy and capabilities, including efforts to develop missile defense capabilities.
(5)
A description of developments in Russian military doctrine and training.
(6)
An assessment of the tactics, techniques, and procedures used by Russia in operations in Ukraine.
(7)
An assessment of the proliferation activities of Russia and Russian entities, as a supplier of materials, technologies, or expertise relating to nuclear weapons or other weapons of mass destruction or missile systems.
(8)
A description of Russia’s asymmetric capabilities, including its strategy and efforts to develop and deploy electronic warfare, space and counterspace, and cyber warfare capabilities, including details on the number of malicious cyber incidents and associated activities against Department of Defense networks that are known or suspected to have been conducted or directed by the Government of the Russian Federation.
(9)
A description of Russia’s nuclear strategy and associated doctrines and nuclear capabilities, including the size and state of Russia’s nuclear weapons stockpile, its nuclear weapons production capacities, and plans for developing its nuclear capabilities.
(10)
A description of Russia’s anti-access and area denial capabilities.
(11)
A description of Russia’s modernization program for its command, control, communications, computers, intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance program and its applications for Russia’s precision guided weapons.
(12)
In consultation with the Secretary of Energy and the Secretary of State, developments regarding United States-Russian engagement and cooperation on security matters.
(13)
The current state of United States military-to-military cooperation with Russia’s armed forces, which shall include the following:
(A)
A comprehensive and coordinated strategy for such military-to-military cooperation.
(B)
A summary of all such military-to-military cooperation during the one-year period ending on the day before the date of submission of the report, including a summary of topics discussed.
(C)
A description of such military-to-military cooperation planned for the 12-month period beginning on the date of submission of the report.
(D)
An assessment by the Secretary of Defense of the benefits that Russia expects to gain from such military-to-military cooperation.
(E)
An assessment by the Secretary of Defense of the benefits the Department of Defense expects to gain from such military-to-military cooperation, and any concerns regarding such cooperation.
(F)
An assessment by the Secretary of Defense of how such military-to-military cooperation fits into the larger security relationship between the United States and Russia.
(14)
A description of changes to United States policy on military-to-military contacts with Russia resulting from Russia’s annexation of Crimea.
(15)
Other military and security developments involving Russia that the Secretary of Defense considers relevant to United States national security.
(c)
Nonduplication.— If any information required under subsection (b) has been included in another report or notification previously submitted to Congress as required by law, the Secretary of Defense may provide a list of such reports and notifications at the time of submitting the report required by subsection (a) in lieu of including such information in the report required by subsection (a).
(d)
Appropriate Congressional Committees Defined.— In this section, the term “appropriate congressional committees” means—
(1)
the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate; and
(2)
the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives.
(e)
Repeal of Superseded Authority.— Section 10 of the Support for the Sovereignty, Integrity, Democracy, and Economic Stability of Ukraine Act of 2014 (Public Law 113–95) is repealed.
(f)
Sunset.— This section shall terminate on June 1, 2018.

SEC. 1246. Prohibition on Use of Funds to Enter into Contracts or Other Agreements with Rosoboronexport.

(a)
Prohibition.— None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act for fiscal year 2015 may be used to enter into a contract, memorandum of understanding, or cooperative agreement with, to make a grant to, or to provide a loan or loan guarantee to Rosoboronexport or a subsidiary that is publicly known to be controlled by Rosoboronexport.
(b)
Waiver.—
(1)
In general.— Subject to paragraph (3), the Secretary of Defense may waive the application of subsection (a) with respect to a contract or other agreement for the supply of spare parts for, or conduct of any other activity related to, the maintenance of helicopters operated by the Afghan National Security Forces or otherwise purchased by the Department of Defense only if, prior to issuing the waiver, the Secretary submits to the congressional defense committees a certification described in paragraph (2).
(2)
Certification.— A certification referred to in paragraph (1) is a certification that contains the following:
(A)
A determination of the Commander of United States forces in Afghanistan that—
(i)
the supply of spare parts or conduct of the related activity is critical to the success of the mission of the Afghan National Security Forces in Afghanistan; and
(ii)
the failure to supply spare parts or conduct the related activity would have a negative impact on the mission of United States forces in Afghanistan.
(B)
A determination of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics that no practicable alternative exists to entering into such contract or other agreement for supply of spare parts or conduct of the related activity.
(C)
A determination of the Secretary of Defense, after consideration of the determinations described in subparagraphs (A) and (B), that the waiver is in the national security interests of the United States.
(3)
Initial limitation.— The Secretary of Defense may exercise the authority of paragraph (1) beginning on or after the date on which the Secretary submits the report required by the matter relating to section 1531 in the Joint Explanatory Statement to accompany the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (H.R. 3304, One Hundred Thirteenth Congress) regarding the potential to incorporate United States-manufactured rotary wing aircraft into the Afghan National Security Forces after the current program of record is completed.
(c)
Report.— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the following:
(1)
A list of known transfers of lethal military equipment by Rosoboronexport to the Government of the Syria since March 15, 2011.
(2)
A list of known contracts, if any, that Rosoboronexport has signed with the Government of the Syria since March 15, 2011.
(3)
A list of existing contracts, subcontracts, memoranda of understanding, cooperative agreements, grants, loans, and loan guarantees between the Department of Defense and Rosoboronexport, including a description of the transactions, signing dates, values, and quantities.
(4)
A discussion of what role, if any, Rosoboronexport has had in providing military weapons, including heavy weapons, to the rebel forces in eastern Ukraine.

SEC. 1247. Report on the New Start Treaty.

(a)
Findings.— Congress makes the following findings:
(1)
There have been significant changes in the geopolitical environment during 2014, including developments that pose a challenge to the national security interests of the United States.
(2)
The July 2014 Department of State annual report on “Adherence to and Compliance with Arms Control, Nonproliferation, and Disarmament Agreements and Commitments” stated that “The United States has determined that the Russian Federation is in violation of its obligations under the INF Treaty not to possess, produce, or flight-test a ground-launched cruise missile (GLCM) with a range capability of 500km to 5,500km, or to possess or produce launchers of such missiles.”.
(3)
The July 2014 Department of State “Annual Report on Implementation of the New START Treaty” stated that “Based on the information available as of December 31, 2013, the United States certifies the Russian Federation to be in compliance with the terms of the New START Treaty.”.
(b)
Report Required.— Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff shall jointly submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report stating the reasons continued implementation of the New START Treaty is in the national security interests of the United States.
(c)
Definitions.— In this section:
(1)
Appropriate congressional committees.— The term “appropriate congressional committees” means—
(A)
the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate; and
(B)
the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives.
(2)
INF treaty.— The term “INF Treaty” means the Treaty Between the United States of America and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics on the Elimination of Their Intermediate-Range and Shorter-Range Missiles, commonly referred to as the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty, signed at Washington December 8, 1987, and entered into force June 1, 1988.
(3)
New start treaty.— The term “New START Treaty” means the Treaty between the United States of America and the Russian Federation on Measures for the Further Reduction and Limitation of Strategic Offensive Arms, signed on April 8, 2010, and entered into force on February 5, 2011.

Subtitle D Matters Relating to the Asia-Pacific Region

SEC. 1251. Strategy to Prioritize United States Defense Interests in the Asia-Pacific Region.

(a)
Required Report.—
(1)
In general.— Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that contains the strategy of the Department of Defense to prioritize United States defense interests in the Asia-Pacific region.
(2)
Matters to be included.— The report required by paragraph (1) shall address the following:
(A)
United States national security interests in the Asia-Pacific region.
(B)
The security environment, including threats to global and regional United States national security interests emanating from the Asia-Pacific region, including efforts by the People’s Republic of China to advance their national interests in the Asia-Pacific region.
(C)
Regional multilateral institutions, such as the Association of Southeast Asia Nations (ASEAN).
(D)
Bilateral security cooperation relationships, including military-to-military engagements and security assistance.
(E)
United States military presence, posture, and capabilities supporting the rebalance to the Asia-Pacific region.
(F)
Humanitarian and disaster relief response capabilities.
(G)
International rules-based structures.
(H)
Actions the Department of Defense could take, in cooperation with other Federal agencies, to advance United States national security interests in the Asia-Pacific region.
(I)
Any other matters the Secretary of Defense determines to be appropriate.
(3)
Form.— The report required by paragraph (1) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may contain a classified annex if necessary.
(b)
Resources.— The report required by subsection (a)(1) shall be informed by the results of the integrated, multi-year planning and budget strategy for a rebalancing of United States policy in Asia submitted to Congress pursuant to section 7043(a) of the Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2014 (division K of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2014 (Public Law 113–76; 128 Stat. 533)).
(c)
Annual Budget.— The President, acting through the Director of the Office of Management and Budget, shall ensure that the annual budget submitted to Congress under section 1105 of title 31, United States Code, clearly highlights programs and projects that are being funded in the annual budget of the United States Government that relate to the strategy required by subsection (a)(1) and the integrated strategy referred to in subsection (b).

SEC. 1252. Modifications to Annual Report on Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China.

(a)
Matters To Be Included.— Subsection (b)(14) of section 1202 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2000 (Public Law 106–65; 113 Stat. 781; 10 U.S.C. 113 note) is amended by striking “ their response” and inserting “ their capabilities, organizational affiliations, roles within China’s overall maritime strategy, activities affecting United States allies and partners, and responses”.
(b)
Effective Date.— The amendment made by this section takes effect on the date of the enactment of this Act and applies with respect to reports required to be submitted under subsection (a) of section 1202 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2000 on or after that date.

SEC. 1253. Military-To-Military Engagement with the Government of Burma.

(a)
Authorization.— The Department of Defense is authorized to provide the Government of Burma the following:
(1)
Consultation, education, and training on human rights, the laws of armed conflict, civilian control of the military, rule of law, and other legal matters.
(2)
Consultation, education, and training on English-language, humanitarian and disaster relief, and improvements to medical and health standards.
(3)
Courses or workshops on defense institution reform.
(4)
Observer status to bilateral or multilateral humanitarian assistance and disaster relief exercises.
(5)
Aid or support in the event of a humanitarian crisis or natural disaster.
(b)
Annual Reports.—
(1)
In general.— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and each March 1 thereafter, the Secretary of Defense shall, in consultation with the Secretary of State, submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on military-to-military engagement between the United States Armed Forces and the Burmese military.
(2)
Elements.— Each report under paragraph (1) shall include the following:
(A)
A description of the military-to-military activities between the United States and Burma, and how engagement with the Burmese military supports the United States national security strategy and promotes reform in Burma.
(B)
A description of the objectives of the United States for developing the military-to-military relationship with the Burmese military, how the United States measures progress toward such objectives, and the implications of failing to achieve such objectives.
(C)
A description and assessment of the political, military, economic, and civil society reforms being undertaken by the Government of Burma, including those affecting—
(i)
individual freedoms and human rights of the Burmese people, including those of ethnic and religious minorities and internally displaced populations;
(ii)
the peaceful settlement of armed conflicts between the Government of Burma and ethnic minority groups in Burma;
(iii)
civilian control of the armed forces;
(iv)
constitutional and electoral reforms;
(v)
access for the purposes of human rights monitoring and humanitarian assistance to all areas in Burma, and cooperation with civilian authorities to investigate and resolve cases of human rights violations;
(vi)
governmental transparency and accountability; and
(vii)
respect for the laws of armed conflict and human rights, including with respect to child soldiers.
(D)
A description and assessment of relationships of the Government of Burma with unlawful or sanctioned entities.
(3)
Form.— Each report under this subsection shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.
(4)
Sunset.— The requirement to submit additional reports under this subsection shall terminate at the end of the 5-year period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act.
(c)
Rule of Construction.— No Department of Defense assistance to the Government of Burma is authorized by this Act except as provided in this section.
(d)
Appropriate Committees of Congress Defined.— In this section, the term “appropriate committees of Congress” means—
(1)
the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Foreign Relations, and the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate; and
(2)
the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives.

SEC. 1254. Report on Department of Defense Munitions Strategy of the United States Pacific Command.

(a)
Report Required.— Not later than April 1, 2015, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the munitions strategy of the United States Pacific Command to address deficiencies in the ability of the United States Pacific Command to execute major operational plans.
(b)
Elements.— The report required by subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1)
An identification of current and projected critical munitions requirements, including as identified in the most-recent future-years defense program submitted to Congress by the Secretary of Defense pursuant to section 221 of title 10, United States Code.
(2)
An assessment of—
(A)
significant munitions gaps and deficiencies; and
(B)
munitions capabilities and necessary munitions investments to address identified gaps and deficiencies.
(3)
A description of current and planned munitions programs to address munitions gaps and deficiencies identified in paragraph (2), including with respect to—
(A)
research, development, test, and evaluation efforts;
(B)
cost, schedule, performance, and budget, to the extent such information is available; and
(C)
known industrial base issues.
(4)
An assessment of infrastructure deficiencies or needed enhancements to ensure adequate munitions storage and munitions deployment capability.
(5)
Any other matters concerning the munitions strategy of the United States Pacific Command the Secretary of Defense determines to be appropriate.
(c)
Form.— The report required by subsection (a) may be submitted in classified or unclassified form.

SEC. 1255. Missile Defense Cooperation in Northeast Asia.

(a)
Sense of Congress.— It is the sense of Congress that increased cooperation on missile defense among the United States, Japan, and the Republic of Korea would enhance the security of allies of the United States in Northeast Asia, increase the defense of forward-based forces of the United States, and enhance the protection of the United States with regard to threats from the Korean Peninsula.
(b)
Assessment Required.— The Secretary of Defense shall conduct an assessment to identify opportunities for increasing missile defense cooperation among the United States, Japan, and the Republic of Korea, and to evaluate options for enhanced short-range missile, rocket, and artillery defense capabilities to address threats from the Korean Peninsula.
(c)
Elements.— The assessment under subsection (b) shall include the following:
(1)
Candidate areas for increasing missile defense cooperation, including greater information sharing, systems integration, and joint operations.
(2)
Potential challenges and limitations to enabling such cooperation and options for mitigating such challenges and limitations.
(3)
An assessment of the utility of short-range missile defense and counter-rocket, artillery, and mortar system capabilities on the Korean Peninsula, including with respect to—
(A)
meeting the military needs for defense of the Korean Peninsula;
(B)
cost, schedule, and availability;
(C)
technology maturity and risk; and
(D)
consideration of alternatives.
(4)
Such other matters as the Secretary of Defense determines to be appropriate.
(d)
Briefing Required.— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall provide to the congressional defense committees a briefing on the assessment under subsection (b).

SEC. 1256. Sense of Congress and Report on Taiwan and Its Contribution to Regional Peace and Stability.

(a)
Sense of Congress.— It is the sense of Congress that the United States reaffirms its security commitments under the Taiwan Relations Act (Public Law 96–8) as the cornerstone of United States relations with Taiwan and as a key instrument of peace, security, and stability in the Taiwan Strait since the enactment of such Act in 1979.
(b)
Report Required.— Not later than December 1, 2015, the Secretary of Defense shall, in consultation with the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, submit to the congressional defense committees, the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate, and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives a report on the self-defense capabilities of Taiwan.
(c)
Elements.— The report required by subsection (b) shall contain the following:
(1)
A description of the key assumptions made regarding the impact of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army on the maritime or territorial security of Taiwan, including the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s—
(A)
undersea and surface warfare capabilities in the littoral areas in and around the Taiwan Strait;
(B)
amphibious and heavy sealift capabilities;
(C)
capabilities to establish air dominance over Taiwan; and
(D)
capabilities of the Second Artillery Corps.
(2)
An assessment of the force posture, capabilities, and readiness of the armed forces of Taiwan for maintaining the maritime or territorial security of Taiwan, including an assessment of Taiwan’s—
(A)
undersea and surface warfare capabilities;
(B)
air and land-based capabilities;
(C)
early warning and command and control capabilities; and
(D)
other deterrent, anti-access and area-denial capabilities, or asymmetric capabilities that could contribute to Taiwan’s self-defense.
(3)
Recommendations for further security cooperation and assistance efforts between Taiwan and the United States.
(4)
Any other matters the Secretary determines to be appropriate.
(d)
Form.— The report required by subsection (b) may be submitted in classified or unclassified form.
(e)
Nonduplication of Efforts.— If any information required under subsection (c) has been included in another report or notification previously submitted to Congress as required by law, the Secretary of Defense may provide a list of such reports and notifications at the time of submitting the report required by subsection (b) in lieu of including such information.

SEC. 1257. Independent Assessment of the Ability of the Department of Defense to Counter Anti-Access and Area-Denial Strategies, Capabilities, and Other Key Technologies of Potential Adversaries.

(a)
Assessment Required.—
(1)
In general.— The Secretary of Defense shall enter into an agreement with an independent entity to conduct an assessment of the ability of the Department of Defense to counter anti-access and area-denial strategies, capabilities, and other key technologies of potential adversaries.
(2)
Matters to be included.— The assessment required under paragraph (1) shall include the following:
(A)
An assessment of anti-access and area-denial strategies, capabilities, and other key technologies of potential adversaries during each of the fiscal year periods described in paragraph (3) that would represent a significant challenge to deployed forces and systems of the United States military, including an assessment of the extent to which such strategies, capabilities, and other key technologies could affect United States military operations.
(B)
An assessment of gaps and deficiencies in the ability of the Department of Defense to address anti-access and area-denial strategies, capabilities, and other key technologies described in subparagraph (A), including an assessment of the adequacy of current strategies, programs, and investments of the Department of Defense.
(C)
Recommendations for adjustments in United States policy and strategy, force posture, investments in capabilities, systems and technologies, and changes in business and management processes, or other novel approaches to address gaps and deficiencies described in subparagraph (B), or to restore, maintain, or expand United States military technological advantages, particularly in those areas in which potential adversaries are closing gaps or have achieved technological superiority with respect to the United States.
(D)
Any other matters the independent entity determines to be appropriate.
(3)
Fiscal year periods described.— The fiscal year periods described in this paragraph are the following:
(A)
Fiscal years 2015 through 2019.
(B)
Fiscal years 2020 through 2030.
(C)
Fiscal years 2031 and thereafter.
(b)
Report Required.—
(1)
In general.— Not later than March 1, 2016, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that includes the assessment required under subsection (a) and any other matters the Secretary determines to be appropriate.
(2)
Form.— The report required under paragraph (1) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may contain a classified annex if necessary.
(c)
Department of Defense Support.— The Secretary of Defense shall provide the independent entity described in subsection (a) with timely access to appropriate information, data, resources, and analysis so that the entity may conduct a thorough and independent assessment as required under subsection (a).

SEC. 1258. Sense of Congress Reaffirming Security Cooperation with Japan and the Republic of Korea.

It is the sense of Congress that—
(1)
the United States values its alliances with the Governments of Japan and the Republic of Korea as cornerstones of peace and security in the region, based on shared values of democracy, the rule of law, free and open markets, and respect for human rights;
(2)
the United States welcomes Japan’s new policy of collective self-defense, which will enable Japan to contribute more proactively to regional and global peace and security, as well as Japan’s recent increases in defense funding, adoption of a National Security Strategy, and formation of security institutions such as the Japanese National Security Council;
(3)
the United States reaffirms its commitment to the Government of Japan under Article V of the Treaty of Mutual Cooperation and Security between the United States of America and Japan that “[e]ach Party recognizes that an armed attack against either Party in the territories under the administration of Japan would be dangerous to its own peace and safety and declares that it would act to meet the common danger in accordance with its constitutional provisions and processes”;
(4)
the United States welcomes the Republic of Korea’s ratification of a new five-year Special Measures Agreement, which establishes the framework for Republic of Korea contributions to offset costs associated with the stationing of United States forces in the Republic of Korea, as well as efforts by the Republic of Korea to enhance its defense capabilities, including its recent decision to acquire surveillance and strike capabilities;
(5)
the United States and the Republic of Korea share deep concerns that the nuclear and ballistic missiles programs of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea and its repeated provocations pose grave threats to peace and stability on the Korean Peninsula and to Northeast Asia, that the United States and the Republic of Korea and will work together to achieve the peaceful denuclearization of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, and that the United States and the Republic of Korea remain fully committed to continuing close cooperation on the full range of issues related to the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea; and
(6)
the United States welcomes greater security cooperation with, and among, Japan and the Republic of Korea to promote mutual interests and to address shared concerns.

SEC. 1259. Report on Maritime Security Strategy in the Asia-Pacific Region.

(a)
Report Required.— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees, the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate, and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives a report that outlines the strategy of the Department of Defense with regard to maritime security in the Asia-Pacific region, with particular emphasis on the South China Sea and the East China Sea.
(b)
Elements.— The report required by subsection (a) shall outline the strategy described in that subsection and include the following:
(1)
An assessment of how the actions of the People’s Republic of China in the South China Sea and the East China Sea have affected the status quo with regard to competing territorial and maritime claims and United States security interests in those seas.
(2)
An assessment of how the naval and other maritime strategies and capabilities of the People’s Republic of China, including military and law enforcement capabilities, affect the strategy in the Asia-Pacific region.
(3)
An assessment of how anti-access and area denial strategies and capabilities of the People’s Republic of China in the Asia-Pacific region, including weapons and technologies, affect the strategy.
(4)
A description of any ongoing or planned changes in United States military capabilities, operations, and posture in the Asia-Pacific region to support the strategy.
(5)
A description of any current or planned bilateral or regional naval or maritime capacity-building initiatives in the Asia-Pacific region.
(6)
An assessment of how the strategy leverages military-to-military engagements between the United States and the People’s Republic of China to reduce the potential for miscalculation and tensions in the South China Sea and the East China Sea, including a specific description of the effects of such engagements on particular incidents or interactions involving the People’s Republic of China in those seas.
(7)
Any other matters the Secretary may determine to be appropriate.
(c)
Form.— The report required by subsection (a) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.

SEC. 1259A. Sense of Congress on Taiwan Maritime Capabilities and Exercise Participation.

It is the sense of Congress that—
(1)
the United States should consider opportunities to help enhance the maritime capabilities and nautical skills of the Taiwanese navy that may contribute to Taiwan’s self-defense and to regional peace and stability; and
(2)
the People’s Republic of China and Taiwan should be afforded opportunities to participate in the humanitarian assistance and disaster relief portions of future multilateral exercises, such as the Pacific Partnership, Pacific Angel, and Rim of the Pacific (RIMPAC) exercises, to increase their respective capacities to conduct these types of operations.

SEC. 1259B. Modification of Matters for Discussion in Annual Reports of United States-China Economic and Security Review Commission.

(a)
Matters for Discussion.— Section 1238(c)(2) of the Floyd D. Spence National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2001 (as enacted into law by Public Law 106–398; 22 U.S.C. 7002(c)(2)) is amended by striking subparagraphs (A) through (J) and inserting the following new subparagraphs:

“(A) The role of the People’s Republic of China in the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and other weapon systems (including systems and technologies of a dual use nature), including actions the United States might take to encourage the People’s Republic of China to cease such practices.

“(B) The qualitative and quantitative nature of the transfer of United States production activities to the People’s Republic of China, including the relocation of manufacturing, advanced technology and intellectual property, and research and development facilities, the impact of such transfers on the national security of the United States (including the dependence of the national security industrial base of the United States on imports from China), the economic security of the United States, and employment in the United States, and the adequacy of United States export control laws in relation to the People’s Republic of China.

“(C) The effects of the need for energy and natural resources in the People’s Republic of China on the foreign and military policies of the People’s Republic of China, the impact of the large and growing economy of the People’s Republic of China on world energy and natural resource supplies, prices, and the environment, and the role the United States can play (including through joint research and development efforts and technological assistance) in influencing the energy and natural resource policies of the People’s Republic of China.

“(D) Foreign investment by the United States in the People’s Republic of China and by the People’s Republic of China in the United States, including an assessment of its economic and security implications, the challenges to market access confronting potential United States investment in the People’s Republic of China, and foreign activities by financial institutions in the People’s Republic of China.

“(E) The military plans, strategy and doctrine of the People’s Republic of China, the structure and organization of the People’s Republic of China military, the decision-making process of the People’s Republic of China military, the interaction between the civilian and military leadership in the People’s Republic of China, the development and promotion process for leaders in the People’s Republic of China military, deployments of the People’s Republic of China military, resources available to the People’s Republic of China military (including the development and execution of budgets and the allocation of funds), force modernization objectives and trends for the People’s Republic of China military, and the implications of such objectives and trends for the national security of the United States.

“(F) The strategic economic and security implications of the cyber capabilities and operations of the People’s Republic of China.

“(G) The national budget, fiscal policy, monetary policy, capital controls, and currency management practices of the People’s Republic of China, their impact on internal stability in the People’s Republic of China, and their implications for the United States.

“(H) The drivers, nature, and implications of the growing economic, technological, political, cultural, people-to-people, and security relations of the People’s Republic of China’s with other countries, regions, and international and regional entities (including multilateral organizations), including the relationship among the United States, Taiwan, and the People’s Republic of China.

“(I) The compliance of the People’s Republic of China with its commitments to the World Trade Organization, other multilateral commitments, bilateral agreements signed with the United States, commitments made to bilateral science and technology programs, and any other commitments and agreements strategic to the United States (including agreements on intellectual property rights and prison labor imports), and United States enforcement policies with respect to such agreements.

“(J) The implications of restrictions on speech and access to information in the People’s Republic of China for its relations with the United States in economic and security policy, as well as any potential impact of media control by the People’s Republic of China on United States economic interests.

“(K) The safety of food, drug, and other products imported from China, the measures used by the People’s Republic of China Government and the United States Government to monitor and enforce product safety, and the role the United States can play (including through technical assistance) to improve product safety in the People’s Republic of China.”

(b)
Effective Date.— The amendments made by subsection (a) shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act, and shall apply with respect to annual reports submitted under section 1238(c) of the Floyd D. Spence National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2001 after such date of enactment.

Subtitle E Other Matters

SEC. 1261. One-Year Extension of Authorization for Non-Conventional Assisted Recovery Capabilities.

(a)
Extension.— Subsection (h) of section 943 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4579), as most recently amended by section 1241 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 920), is further amended by striking “ 2015” and inserting “ 2016”.
(b)
Cross-Reference Amendment.— Subsection (f) of such section is amended by striking “ 413b(e)” and inserting “ 3093(e)”.

SEC. 1262. Modification of National Security Planning Guidance to Deny Safe Havens to Al-Qaeda and Its Violent Extremist Affiliates.

(a)
Modification.— Section 1032(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1571; 50 U.S.C. 3043 note) is amended—
(1)
in paragraph (2)—
(A)
by redesignating subparagraph (C), (D), and (E) as subparagraph (D), (E), and (F), respectively;
(B)
by inserting after subparagraph (B) the following:

“(C) For each specified geographic area, a description of the following:

“(i) The feasibility of conducting multilateral programs to train and equip the military forces of relevant countries in the area.

“(ii) The authority and funding that would be required to support such programs.

“(iii) How such programs would be implemented.

“(iv) How such programs would support the national security priorities and interests of the United States and complement other efforts of the United States Government in the area and in other specified geographic areas.”

; and

(C)
in subparagraph (F) (as redesignated), by striking “ subparagraph (C)” and inserting “ subparagraph (D)”; and
(2)
in paragraph (3)(A), by striking “ paragraph (2)(C)” and inserting “ paragraph (2)(D)”.
(b)
Report.— Section 1032(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1571; 50 U.S.C. 3043 note), as amended by subsection (a), is further amended—
(1)
by redesignating paragraph (4) as paragraph (5); and
(2)
by inserting after paragraph (3) the following:

“(4) Report.—

“(A) In general.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of the Carl Levin and Howard P. ‘Buck’ McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015, the President shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report that contains a detailed summary of the national security planning guidance required under paragraph (1), including any updates thereto.

“(B) Form.—The report may include a classified annex as determined to be necessary by the President.

“(C) Definition.—In this paragraph, the term ‘appropriate congressional committees’ means—

“(i) the congressional defense committees; and

“(ii) the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives.”

SEC. 1263. Enhanced Authority to Acquire Goods and Services of Djibouti in Support of Department of Defense Activities in United States Africa Command Area of Responsibility.

(a)
Sense of Congress.— It is the sense of Congress that—
(1)
the United States forces should continue to be forward postured in Africa and in the Middle East;
(2)
Djibouti is in a strategic location to support United States vital national security interests in the region;
(3)
the United States should take definitive steps to maintain its basing access and agreements with the Government of Djibouti to support United States vital national security interests in the region;
(4)
the United States should devise and implement a comprehensive governmental approach to engaging with the Government of Djibouti to reinforce the strategic partnership between the United States and Djibouti; and
(5)
the Secretary of State and the Administrator of the United States Agency for International Development, in conjunction with the Secretary of Defense, should take concrete steps to advance and strengthen the relationship between United States and the Government of Djibouti.
(b)
Authority.— In the case of a good or service to be acquired in direct support of covered activities for which the Secretary of Defense makes a determination described in subsection (c), the Secretary may conduct a procurement in which—
(1)
competition is limited to goods of Djibouti or services of Djibouti; or
(2)
a preference is provided for goods of Djibouti or services of Djibouti.
(c)
Determination.—
(1)
In general.— A determination described in this subsection is a determination by the Secretary of either of the following:
(A)
That the good or service concerned is to be used only in support of covered activities.
(B)
That it is vital to the national security interests of the United States to limit competition or provide a preference as described in subsection (b) because such limitation or preference is necessary—
(i)
to reduce—
(I)
United States transportation costs; or
(II)
delivery times in support of covered activities; or
(ii)
to promote regional security, stability, and economic prosperity in Africa.
(C)
That the good or service is of equivalent quality of a good or service that would have otherwise been acquired.
(2)
Additional requirement.— A determination under paragraph (1)(B) shall not be effective for purposes of a limitation or preference under subsection (b) unless the Secretary also determines that the limitation or preference will not adversely affect—
(A)
United States military operations or stability operations in the United States Africa Command area of responsibility; or
(B)
the United States industrial base.
(d)
Reporting and Oversight.— In exercising the authority under subsection (b) to procure goods or services in support of covered activities, the Secretary of Defense—
(1)
in the case of the procurement of services, shall ensure that the procurement is conducted in accordance with the management structure implemented pursuant to section 2330(a) of title 10, United States Code;
(2)
shall ensure that such goods or services are identified and reported under a single, joint Department of Defense-wide system for the management and accountability of contractors accompanying United States forces operating overseas or in contingency operations (such as the synchronized predeployment and operational tracker (SPOT) system); and
(3)
shall ensure that the United States Africa Command has sufficiently trained staff and adequate resources to conduct oversight of procurements carried out pursuant to subsection (b), including oversight to detect and deter fraud, waste, and abuse.
(e)
Definitions.— In this section:
(1)
Covered activities.— The term “covered activities” means Department of Defense activities in the United States Africa Command area of responsibility.
(2)
Good of djibouti.— The term “good of Djibouti” means a good wholly the growth, product, or manufacture of Djibouti.
(3)
Service of djibouti.— The term “service of Djibouti” means a service performed by a person that—
(A)
(i)
is operating primarily in Djibouti; or
(ii)
is making a significant contribution to the economy of Djibouti through payment of taxes or use of products, materials, or labor of Djibouti, as determined by the Secretary of State; and
(B)
is properly licensed or registered by authorities of the Government of Djibouti, as determined by the Secretary of State.
(f)
Termination.— The authority and requirements of this section expire at the close of September 30, 2018.

SEC. 1264. Treatment of the Kurdistan Democratic Party and the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan under the Immigration and Nationality Act.

(a)
Removal of the Kurdistan Democratic Party and the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan From Treatment as Terrorist Organizations.—
(1)
In general.— Except as provided in paragraph (2), the Kurdistan Democratic Party and the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan shall be excluded from the definition of terrorist organization (as defined in section 212(a)(3)(B)(vi)(III) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1182(a)(3)(B)(vi)(III))) for purposes of such section 212(a)(3)(B).
(2)
Exception.— The Secretary of State, after consultation with the Secretary of Homeland Security and the Attorney General, or the Secretary of Homeland Security, after consultation with the Secretary of State and the Attorney General, may suspend the application of paragraph (1) for either or both of the groups referred to in paragraph (1) in such Secretary’s sole and unreviewable discretion. Prior to or contemporaneous with such suspension, the Secretary of State or the Secretary of Homeland Security shall report their reasons for suspension to the Committees on Judiciary of the House of Representatives and of the Senate, the Committees on Appropriations in the House of Representatives and of the Senate, the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives, the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate, the Committee on Homeland Security of the House of Representatives, and the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate.
(b)
Relief Regarding Admissibility of Nonimmigrant Aliens Associated With the Kurdistan Democratic Party and the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan.—
(1)
For activities opposing the ba’ath regime.— Paragraph (3)(B) of section 212(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1182(a)(3)(B)) shall not apply to an alien with respect to activities undertaken in association with the Kurdistan Democratic Party or the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan in opposition to the regime of the Arab Socialist Ba’ath Party and the autocratic dictatorship of Saddam Hussein in Iraq.
(2)
For membership in the kurdistan democratic party and patriotic union of kurdistan.— Paragraph (3)(B) of section 212(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1182(a)(3)(B)) shall not apply to an alien applying for a nonimmigrant visa, who presents themselves for inspection to an immigration officer at a port of entry as a nonimmigrant, or who is applying in the United States for nonimmigrant status, and who is a member of the Kurdistan Democratic Party or the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan and currently serves or has previously served as a senior official (such as Prime Minister, Deputy Prime Minister, Minister, Deputy Minister, President, Vice-President, Member of Parliament, provincial Governor or member of the National Security Council) of the Kurdistan Regional Government or the federal government of the Republic of Iraq.
(3)
Exception.— Neither paragraph (1) nor paragraph (2) shall apply if the Secretary of State or the Secretary of Homeland Security (or a designee of one of such Secretaries) determine in their sole unreviewable discretion that such alien poses a threat to the safety and security of the United States, or does not warrant a visa, admission to the United States, or a grant of an immigration benefit or protection, in the totality of the circumstances. This provision shall be implemented by the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Homeland Security in consultation with the Attorney General.
(c)
Prohibition on Judicial Review.— Notwithstanding any other provision of law (whether statutory or nonstatutory), section 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1252), sections 1361 and 1651 of title 28, United States Code, section 2241 of such title, and any other habeas corpus provision of law, no court shall have jurisdiction to review any determination made pursuant to this section.

SEC. 1265. Prohibition on Integration of Missile Defense Systems of China into Missile Defense Systems of United States and Sense of Congress Concerning Integration of Missile Defense Systems of Russia into Missile Defense Systems of Nato.

(a)
Prohibition.— None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for the Department of Defense may be obligated or expended to integrate a missile defense system of the People’s Republic of China into any missile defense system of the United States.
(b)
Sense of Congress.— It is the sense of Congress that missile defense systems of the Russian Federation should not be integrated into the missile defense systems of the United States or the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) if such integration undermines the security of the United States or NATO, respectively.

SEC. 1266. Limitation on Availability of Funds to Implement the Arms Trade Treaty.

(a)
In General.— None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for the Department of Defense may be obligated or expended to implement the Arms Trade Treaty, or to make any change to existing programs, projects, or activities as approved by Congress in furtherance of, pursuant to, or otherwise to implement the Arms Trade Treaty, unless the Arms Trade Treaty has received the advice and consent of the Senate and has been the subject of implementing legislation, as required, by Congress.
(b)
Rule of Construction.— Nothing in this section shall be construed to preclude the Department of Defense from assisting foreign countries in bringing their laws and regulations up to United States standards.

SEC. 1267. Notification and Review of Potentially Significant Arms Control Noncompliance.

(a)
Notice to President.— If the Secretary of Defense, after consultation with the Secretary of State and the Director of National Intelligence, has substantial reason to believe that there is a case of foreign activity that would pose a significant threat to United States national security interests and that may be inconsistent with an arms control treaty to which the United States is a party, and such case is not included in, or is significantly different from a case included in, the most-recent annual report submitted to Congress pursuant to section 403 of the Arms Control and Disarmament Act (22 U.S.C. 2593a), the Secretary of Defense shall notify the President of such belief of the Secretary.
(b)
Referral to Secretary of State.— If the President receives a notification from the Secretary of Defense under subsection (a), the President shall promptly refer the matter to the Secretary of State to arrange for an inter-agency review of the case in order to provide for an assessment of whether the case constitutes a significant case of non-compliance with an arms control treaty to which the United States is a party.
(c)
Notice to Congress.— Not later than 60 days after the date on which the President makes a referral under subsection (b), the Secretary of State shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress the results of the assessment of the case with respect to which the referral was made under subsection (b).
(d)
Definition.— In this section, the term “appropriate congressional committees” means—
(1)
the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Foreign Relations, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate; and
(2)
the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives.

SEC. 1268. Inter-European Air Forces Academy.

(a)
Operation.— The Secretary of the Air Force may operate the Air Force education and training facility known as the Inter-European Air Forces Academy (in this section referred to as the “Academy”).
(b)
Purpose.— The purpose of the Academy shall be to provide military education and training to military personnel of countries that are members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization or signatories to the Partnership for Peace Framework Documents.
(c)
Limitations.—
(1)
Concurrence of secretary of state.— Military personnel of a country may be provided education and training under this section only with the concurrence of the Secretary of State.
(2)
Assistance otherwise prohibited by law.— Education and training may not be provided under this section to the military personnel of any country that is otherwise prohibited from receiving such type of assistance under any other provision of law.
(d)
Supplies and Clothing.— The Secretary of the Air Force may, under such conditions as the Secretary may prescribe, provide to a person receiving education and training under this section the following:
(1)
Transportation incident to such education and training.
(2)
Supplies and equipment to be used during such education and training.
(3)
Billeting, food, and health services in connection with the receipt of such education and training.
(e)
Living Allowance.— The Secretary of the Air Force may pay to a person receiving education and training under this section a living allowance at a rate to be prescribed by the Secretary, taking into account the rates of living allowances authorized for a member of the Armed Forces under similar circumstances.
(f)
Funding.— Amounts for the operations and maintenance of the Academy, and for the provision of education and training through the Academy, may be paid from funds available for the Air Force for operation and maintenance.
(g)
Annual Reports.—
(1)
In general.— Not later than 60 days after the end of each fiscal year in which the Secretary of the Air Force operates the Academy pursuant to this section, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees, the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate, and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives a report on the operations of the Academy during such fiscal year.
(2)
Elements.— Each report under this subsection shall set forth, for the fiscal year covered by such report, the following:
(A)
A description of the operations of the Academy, including a description of the education and training courses provided under this section.
(B)
A summary of the number of individuals receiving education and training through the Academy, set forth by country of origin and education or training provided.
(C)
The amount paid by the Secretary for the operations and maintenance of the Academy.
(D)
The amounts paid by the Secretary under subsections (d) and (e) in connection with the provision of education and training through the Academy.
(E)
Any other matters the Secretary determines to be appropriate.
(h)
Expiration.— The authority in subsection (a) shall expire on September 30, 2019.

SEC. 1269. Department of Defense Support to Security of United States Diplomatic Facilities.

(a)
Marine Corps Security Guard Program.—
(1)
In general.— The Secretary of Defense, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State, shall—
(A)
develop and implement a plan to incorporate the additional Marine Corps Security Guard personnel authorized under section 404 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 10 U.S.C. 5983 note) at United States embassies, consulates, and other facilities;
(B)
conduct an annual review of the Marine Corps Security Guard Program, including—
(i)
an evaluation of whether the size and composition of the Marine Corps Security Guard Program is adequate to meet global diplomatic security requirements;
(ii)
an assessment of whether Marine Corps security guards are appropriately deployed among facilities to respond to evolving security developments and potential threats to United States diplomatic facilities abroad; and
(iii)
an assessment of the mission objectives of the Marine Corps Security Guard Program and the procedural rules of engagement to protect diplomatic personnel under the Program; and
(C)
provide an assessment of the effectiveness of Department of Defense-provided Security Augmentation Units utilized during the previous year to improve security at high threat, high risk facilities, including an evaluation of any impediments to the effectiveness of such units.
(2)
Reporting requirement.— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of State, shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees an unclassified report, with a classified annex as necessary, that addresses the requirements set forth in paragraph (1).
(b)
Report on “New Normal” and General Mission Requirements of United States Africa Command.—
(1)
In general.— Not later than March 1, 2015, the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of State, shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on what changes, if any, have been made to the force posture and structure of the United States Africa Command or adjacent combatant commands to respond, if requested, to a diplomatic facility’s security requirements (so-called “new normal” requirements) and general mission of United States Africa Command.
(2)
Elements.— The report required by paragraph (1) shall include the following elements:
(A)
A detailed description of the “new normal” requirements in the area of responsibility of the United States Africa Command.
(B)
A description of any changes required for the United States Africa Command or adjacent combatant commands to meet the “new normal” and general mission requirements in the United States Africa Command area of responsibility, including the gaps in capability, size, posture, agreements, basing, and enabler support of crisis response forces and associated assets to respond to requests for support from the Secretary of State.
(C)
A discussion and estimate of the military forces required to support mission requirements of the United States Africa Command and the shortfall, if any, in meeting such requirements.
(D)
A discussion and estimate of the annual intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance requirements of the United States Africa Command and the shortfall, if any, in meeting such requirements.
(3)
Form.— The report required by paragraph (1) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.
(c)
Appropriate Congressional Committees Defined.— In this section, the term “appropriate congressional committees” means—
(1)
the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate; and
(2)
the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives.

SEC. 1270. Information on Sanctioned Persons and Businesses Through the Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System.

Section 2313(c) of title 41, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

“(8) Whether the person is included on any of the following lists maintained by the Office of Foreign Assets Control of the Department of the Treasury:

“(A) The specially designated nationals and blocked persons list (commonly known as the ‘SDN list’).

“(B) The sectoral sanctions identification list.

“(C) The foreign sanctions evaders list.

“(D) The list of persons sanctioned under the Iran Sanctions Act of 1996 (Public Law 104–172; 50 U.S.C. 1701 note) that do not appear on the SDN list (commonly known as the ‘Non-SDN Iranian Sanctions Act list’).

“(E) The list of foreign financial institutions subject to part 561 of title 31, Code of Federal Regulations.”

SEC. 1271. Reports on Nuclear Program of Iran.

(a)
In General.— Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the President shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on the interim agreement relating to the nuclear program of Iran. Such report shall include—
(1)
verification of whether Iran is complying with such agreement; and
(2)
an assessment of the overall state of the nuclear program of Iran.
(b)
Additional Reports.— If the interim agreement described in subsection (a) is renewed or if a comprehensive and final agreement is entered into regarding the nuclear program of Iran, by not later than 90 days after such renewal or final agreement being entered into, and every 180 days thereafter, the President shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on such renewed or final agreement. Such report shall include the matters described in paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection (a).
(c)
Appropriate Congressional Committees Defined.— In this section, the term “appropriate congressional committees” means—
(1)
the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate; and
(2)
the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives.
(d)
Sunset.— This section shall terminate on the date that is 10 years after the date of the enactment of this Act.

SEC. 1272. Sense of Congress on Defense Modernization by Nato Countries.

(a)
Findings.— Congress findings the following:
(1)
At the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) summit in Wales in September 2014, NATO members made important commitments to reverse the decline in their defense budgets and to aim to move toward the NATO guideline to spend a minimum of two percent of each member’s Gross Domestic Product on defense within a decade.
(2)
At the Wales summit, NATO members declared that increased investments in defense should be directed towards meeting the capability priorities of the Alliance.
(b)
Sense of Congress.— It is the sense of Congress that—
(1)
the United States should work with other NATO members as they seek to modernize their defense capabilities to encourage such members to procure defense systems, including air and missile defense systems, that are interoperable with NATO defense systems and help fill critical NATO shortfalls;
(2)
such United States efforts to facilitate the modernization of defense capabilities are particularly important to help address the security requirements of the newer members of NATO in Eastern Europe; and
(3)
the United States stands ready to assist other NATO members to modernize their defense capabilities and restructure their armed forces consistent with the objectives set out at the NATO summit in Wales in September 2014.

SEC. 1273. Report on Protection of Cultural Property in Event of Armed Conflict.

(a)
Report.— Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of State, shall submit to the congressional defense committees and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives a report on efforts of the Department of Defense to protect cultural property abroad, including activities undertaken pursuant to the 1954 Hague Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict.
(b)
Elements of Report.— The report required under subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1)
A description of Department of Defense policies, directives, and regulations for the protection of cultural property abroad at risk of destruction due to armed conflict.
(2)
A description of actions the Armed Forces have taken to protect cultural property abroad, including efforts to avoid damage to cultural property during military construction activities and efforts made to inform military personnel about the identification and protection of cultural property as part of the law of war.
(3)
The status and number of specialist personnel in the Armed Forces assigned to secure respect for cultural property abroad and to cooperate with civilian authorities responsible for safeguarding cultural property abroad, consistent with the requirements of the 1954 Hague Convention.

SEC. 1274. United States Strategy and Plans for Enhancing Security and Stability in Europe.

(a)
Review.— The Secretary of Defense shall conduct a review of the force posture, readiness, and responsiveness of United States forces and the forces of other members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) in the area of responsibility of the United States European Command, and of contingency plans for such United States forces, with the objective of ensuring that the posture, readiness, and responsiveness of such forces are appropriate to meet the obligations of collective self-defense under Article V of the North Atlantic Treaty. The review shall include an assessment of the capabilities and capacities needed by the Armed Forces of the United States to respond to unconventional or hybrid warfare tactics like those used by the Russian Federation in Crimea and Eastern Ukraine.
(b)
United States Strategy and Plans.—
(1)
Report on strategy and plans required.— Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall, in coordination with the Secretary of State, submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on a strategy and plans for enhancing security and stability in Europe.
(2)
Elements.— The report required by this subsection shall include the following:
(A)
A summary of the relevant findings of the review conducted under subsection (a).
(B)
A description of any initiatives or recommendations of the Secretary of Defense for enhancing the force posture, readiness, and responsiveness of United States forces in the area of responsibility of the United States European Command as a result of the review.
(C)
A description of any initiatives of other members of NATO for enhancing the force posture, readiness, and responsiveness of their forces within the area of responsibility of NATO.
(D)
A plan for reassuring Central European and Eastern European members of NATO regarding the commitment of the United States and other members of NATO to their obligations under the North Atlantic Treaty, including collective defense under Article V, including the following:
(i)
A description of measures to be undertaken by the United States to reassure members of NATO regarding the commitment of the United States to its obligations under the North Atlantic Treaty.
(ii)
A description of measures undertaken or to be undertaken by other members of NATO to provide assurances of their commitment to meet their obligations under the North Atlantic Treaty.
(iii)
A description of any planned measures to increase the presence of the Armed Forces of the United States and the forces of other members of NATO, including on a rotational basis, on the territories of the Central European and Eastern European members of NATO.
(iv)
A description of the measures undertaken by the United States and other members of NATO to enhance the capability of members of NATO to respond to tactics like those used by the Russian Federation in Crimea and Eastern Ukraine or to assist members of NATO in responding to such tactics.
(E)
A plan for enhancing bilateral and multilateral security cooperation with appropriate countries participating in the NATO Partnership for Peace program using the authorities for enhancing security cooperation specified in subsection (c), which plan shall include the following:
(i)
An identification of the objectives and priorities of such United States security assistance and cooperation programs, on a bilateral and regional basis, and the resources required to achieve such objectives and priorities.
(ii)
A methodology for evaluating the effectiveness of such United States security assistance and cooperation programs, bilaterally and regionally, in making progress toward identified objectives and priorities.
(3)
Form.— The report required by this subsection shall be submitted in an unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.
(c)
Authorities for Enhancing Security Cooperation.— The authorities for enhancing security cooperation specified in this subsection include the following:
(1)
Section 168 of title 10, United States Code, relating to the Warsaw Initiative Fund.
(2)
Section 2282 of title 10, United States Code (as added by section 1205 of this Act), relating to authority to build the capacity of foreign military forces.
(3)
Section 1206 of this Act, relating to training of security forces and associated ministries of foreign countries to promote respect for the rule of law and human rights.
(4)
Section 1081 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (10 U.S.C. 168 note), relating to the Ministry of Defense Advisors program.
(5)
Section 1207 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (22 U.S.C. 2151 note), relating to the Global Security Contingency Fund.
(6)
Any other authority available to the Secretary of Defense or Secretary of State appropriate for the purpose of this section.
(d)
Appropriate Committees of Congress Defined.— In this section, the term “appropriate committees of Congress” means—
(1)
the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Foreign Relations, and the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate; and
(2)
the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives.

SEC. 1275. Report on Military Assistance to Ukraine.

(a)
Sense of Congress.— It is the sense of Congress that the United States should provide lethal and nonlethal military assistance to the Government of Ukraine to defend its territory and sovereignty from further aggressive actions designed to undermine regional peace and stability to the extent such assistance is defensive and non-provocative in nature.
(b)
Report Required.— Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and every 180 days thereafter, the Secretary of Defense shall conduct an assessment and submit to the congressional defense committees a report related to military assistance to Ukraine.
(c)
Elements.— At a minimum, the report required under subsection (b) should provide a detailed explanation of the following matters:
(1)
Military equipment, supplies, and defense services, including type, quantity, and prioritization of such items, requested by the Government of Ukraine.
(2)
Military equipment, supplies, and defense services, including type, quantity, and actual or estimated delivery date, that the United States Government has provided, is providing, and plans to provide to the Government of Ukraine.
(3)
An assessment of what United States military assistance to the Government of Ukraine, including type and quantity, would most effectively improve the military readiness and capabilities of the Ukrainian military, including a discussion of those defensive, lethal capabilities that could be provided by the United States that would enable the Government of Ukraine to better ensure the territorial integrity of Ukraine.
(4)
An assessment of the need for, appropriateness of, and force protection concerns of any United States military advisors that may be made available to the armed forces of Ukraine.
(5)
Military training requested by the Government of Ukraine.
(6)
Military training the United States Government has conducted with Ukraine in the previous six months.
(7)
Military training the United States Government plans to conduct with the Government of Ukraine in the next year.
(d)
Form.— The report required under subsection (b) shall be unclassified in form, but may contain a classified annex.
(e)
Sunset.— The requirements in this section shall terminate on January 31, 2017.

SEC. 1276. Sense of Congress on Efforts to Remove Joseph Kony from the Battlefield and End the Atrocities of the Lord’s Resistance Army.

Consistent with the provisions of the Lord’s Resistance Army Disarmament and Northern Uganda Recovery Act of 2009 (Public Law 111–172), it is the sense of Congress that—
(1)
the ongoing United States advise and assist operation in support of regional governments in Central Africa and the African Union to remove Joseph Kony and his top commanders from the battlefield and end atrocities perpetuated by the Lord’s Resistance Army, also known as Operation Observant Compass, has made significant progress in achieving its objectives;
(2)
the Department of Defense should continue its support of Operation Observant Compass, particularly through the provision of key enablers, such as mobility assets and targeted intelligence collection and analytical support, to enable regional partners to effectively conduct operations against Joseph Kony and the Lord’s Resistance Army;
(3)
Operation Observant Compass must be integrated into a comprehensive strategy to support security and stability in the region; and
(4)
the regional governments should recommit themselves to the Regional Cooperation Initiative for the Elimination of the Lord’s Resistance Army authorized by the African Union.

SEC. 1277. Extension of Annual Reports on the Military Power of Iran.

Section 1245(d) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2544) is amended by striking “ December 31 2014” and inserting “ December 31, 2016”.

SEC. 1278. Report and Strategy Regarding North Africa, West Africa, and the Sahel.

(a)
Report.— Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with other appropriate Federal officials, shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that contains an assessment of the actions taken by the Department of Defense and other Federal agencies to identify, locate, and bring to justice those persons and organizations that planned, authorized, or committed the attacks against the United States facilities in Benghazi, Libya that occurred on September 11 and 12, 2012, and the legal authorities available for such purposes.
(b)
Strategy.—
(1)
Timing and content.— Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the President shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a comprehensive strategy to counter the growing threat posed by radical Islamist terrorist groups in North Africa, West Africa, and the Sahel, which shall include, among other things—
(A)
a description of the radical Islamist terrorist groups active in the region, including an assessment of their origins, strategic aims, tactical methods, funding sources, leadership, and relationships with other terrorist groups or state actors;
(B)
a strategy to stem the movement of foreign fighters from North Africa, West Africa, and the Sahel to other areas, including Syria and Iraq;
(C)
a description of steps the United States is taking to stabilize the political and security situation in North Africa, West Africa, and the Sahel and support counterterrorism and stability efforts in the region;
(D)
a description of the key military, diplomatic, intelligence, and public diplomacy resources available to address these growing regional terrorist threats; and
(E)
a strategy to maximize the coordination between, and the effectiveness of, United States military, diplomatic, intelligence, and public diplomacy resources to counter these growing regional terrorist threats.
(2)
Definition of appropriate congressional committees.— In this subsection, the term “appropriate congressional committees” means—
(A)
the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Foreign Relations, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate; and
(B)
the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives.

SEC. 1279. Rule of Construction.

Nothing in this Act shall be construed as authorizing the use of force against Iran.

SEC. 1280. Approval of the Amendment to the Agreement Between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland for Cooperation on the Uses of Atomic Energy for Mutual Defense Purposes.

(a)
In General.— Notwithstanding the provisions for congressional consideration of a proposed agreement for cooperation in subsection d. of section 123 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2153), the amendments to the Agreement Between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland for Cooperation on the Uses of Atomic Energy for Mutual Defense Purposes, done at Washington, July 22, 2014, and transmitted to Congress on July 24, 2014, including all portions thereof (hereinafter in this section referred to as the “Amendment”), may be brought into effect on or after the date of the enactment of this Act as if all the requirements in such section 123 for consideration of the Amendment had been satisfied, subject to subsection (b) of this section.
(b)
Applicability of Atomic Energy Act of 1954 and Other Provisions of Law.— Upon coming into effect, the Amendment shall be subject to the provisions of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2011 et seq.) and any other applicable United States law as if the Amendment had come into effect in accordance with the requirements of section 123 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954.

TITLE XIII Cooperative Threat Reduction

Subtitle A Funds

SEC. 1301. Specification of Cooperative Threat Reduction Funds.

(a)
Fiscal Year 2015 Cooperative Threat Reduction Funds Defined.— As used in this subtitle, the term “fiscal year 2015 Cooperative Threat Reduction funds” means the funds appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 301 and made available by the funding table in section 4301 for the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program established under section 1321.
(b)
Availability of Funds.— Funds appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 301 and made available by the funding table in section 4301 for the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program shall be available for obligation for fiscal years 2015, 2016, and 2017.

SEC. 1302. Funding Allocations.

Of the $365,108,000 authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2015 in section 301 and made available by the funding table in section 4301 for the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program established under section 1321, the following amounts may be obligated for the purposes specified:
(1)
For strategic offensive arms elimination, $1,000,000.
(2)
For chemical weapons destruction, $15,720,000.
(3)
For global nuclear security, $20,703,000.
(4)
For cooperative biological engagement, $256,762,000.
(5)
For proliferation prevention, $40,704,000.
(6)
For threat reduction engagement, $2,375,000.
(7)
For activities designated as Other Assessments/Administrative Costs, $27,844,000.

Subtitle B Consolidation and Modernization of Statutes Relating to the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program

SEC. 1311. Short Title.

This subtitle may be cited as the “Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Act”.

SEC. 1312. Definitions.

In this subtitle:
(1)
The term “congressional defense committees” has the meaning given that term in section 101(a)(16) of title 10, United States Code.
(2)
The term “Cooperative Threat Reduction funds” means funds appropriated pursuant to an authorization of appropriations for the Program, or otherwise made available to the Program.
(3)
The term “Program” means the Cooperative Threat Reduction Program of the Department of Defense established under section 1321.

PART I Program Authorities

SEC. 1321. Authority to Carry Out Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program.

(a)
Authority.— The Secretary of Defense may carry out a program, referred to as the “Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program”, with respect to foreign countries to do the following:
(1)
Facilitate the elimination and the safe and secure transportation and storage of chemical, biological, or other weapons, weapons components, weapons-related materials, and associated delivery vehicles.
(2)
Facilitate—
(A)
the safe and secure transportation and storage of nuclear weapons, nuclear weapons-usable or high-threat radiological materials, nuclear weapons components, and associated delivery vehicles; and
(B)
the elimination of nuclear weapons, nuclear weapons components, and nuclear weapons delivery vehicles.
(3)
Prevent the proliferation of nuclear and chemical weapons, weapons components, and weapons-related materials, technology, and expertise.
(4)
Prevent the proliferation of biological weapons, weapons components, and weapons-related materials, technology, and expertise, which may include activities that facilitate detection and reporting of highly pathogenic diseases or other diseases that are associated with or that could be used as an early warning mechanism for disease outbreaks that could affect the Armed Forces of the United States or allies of the United States, regardless of whether such diseases are caused by biological weapons.
(5)
Prevent the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction-related materials, including materials, equipment, and technology that could be used for the design, development, production, or use of nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons and the means of delivery of such weapons.
(6)
Carry out military-to-military and defense contacts for advancing the mission of the Program, subject to subsection (f).
(b)
Concurrence of Secretary of State.— The authority under subsection (a) to carry out the Program is subject to any concurrence of the Secretary of State or other appropriate agency head required under section 1322 or 1323 (unless such concurrence is otherwise exempted pursuant to section 1352 with respect to activities or determinations carried out or made before the date of the enactment of this Act).
(c)
Scope of Authority.— The authority to carry out the Program in subsection (a) includes authority to provide equipment, goods, and services, but does not include authority to provide funds directly for a project or activity carried out under the Program.
(d)
Type of Program.— The Program carried out under subsection (a) may involve assistance in planning and in resolving technical problems associated with weapons destruction and proliferation. The Program may also involve the funding of critical short-term requirements relating to weapons destruction.
(e)
Reimbursement of Other Agencies.— The Secretary of Defense may reimburse heads of other departments and agencies of the Federal Government under this section for costs of the participation of the respective departments and agencies in the Program.
(f)
Military-to-Military and Defense Contacts.— The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that the military-to-military and defense contacts carried out under subsection (a)(6)—
(1)
are focused and expanded to support specific relationship-building opportunities, which could lead to the development of the Program in new geographic areas and achieve other benefits of the Program;
(2)
are directly administered as part of the Program; and
(3)
include cooperation and coordination with—
(A)
the unified combatant commands; and
(B)
the Department of State.
(g)
Prior Notice to Congress of Obligation of Funds.—
(1)
Annual requirement.— Not less than 15 days before any obligation of any Cooperative Threat Reduction funds, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on that proposed obligation of such funds for that fiscal year.
(2)
Matters included.— Each report under paragraph (1) shall specify—
(A)
the activities and forms of assistance for which the Secretary plans to obligate funds;
(B)
the amount of the proposed obligation; and
(C)
the projected involvement (if any) of any other department or agency of the United States and of the private sector of the United States in the activities and forms of assistance for which the Secretary plans to obligate such funds.
(3)
Exception for notifications previously provided.— Paragraph (1) shall not apply with respect to a proposed obligation of Cooperative Threat Reduction funds that is covered by a notification previously submitted by the Secretary to the congressional defense committees that includes the matters described in subparagraphs (A) through (C) of paragraph (2).

SEC. 1322. Use of Funds for Certain Emergent Threats or Opportunities.

(a)
Authority.— For purposes of the Program, the Secretary of Defense may obligate and expend Cooperative Threat Reduction funds for a fiscal year, and any Cooperative Threat Reduction funds for a prior fiscal year that remain available for obligation, for a proliferation threat reduction project or activity if the Secretary, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State, determines each of the following:
(1)
That such project or activity will—
(A)
assist the United States in the resolution of a critical emerging proliferation threat; or
(B)
permit the United States to take advantage of opportunities to achieve long-standing nonproliferation goals.
(2)
That such project or activity will be completed in a period not exceeding five years.
(3)
That the Department of Defense is the entity of the Federal Government that is most capable of carrying out such project or activity.
(b)
Congressional Notification.— At the time at which the Secretary obligates funds under subsection (a) for a project or activity, the Secretary of Defense shall notify, in writing, the congressional defense committees and the Secretary of State shall notify, in writing, the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate of the determinations made under such subsection with respect to such project or activity, together with—
(1)
a justification for such determinations; and
(2)
a description of the scope and duration of such project or activity.
(c)
Non-Defense Agency Partner-Nation Contacts.— With respect to military-to-military and defense contacts carried out under subsection (a)(6) of section 1321, as further described in subsection (f) of such section, concurrence of the Secretary of State under subsection (a) is required only for participation in such contacts by personnel from non-defense agencies of foreign countries.
(d)
Exception to Requirement for Certain Determinations.— The requirement for a determination under subsection (a) shall not apply to a state of the former Soviet Union.

SEC. 1323. Authority for Urgent Threat Reduction Activities under Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program.

(a)
Limitation on Use of Funds for Urgent Threat Reduction Activities.— Subject to subsections (b) and (c), not more than 15 percent of the total amount of Cooperative Threat Reduction funds for any fiscal year may be obligated or expended, notwithstanding any other provision of law, for covered activities.
(b)
Secretary of Defense Determination and Notice for Urgent Threat Reduction Activities in Governed Areas.— With respect to an area not covered by subsection (c), the Secretary of Defense may obligate or expend funds pursuant to subsection (a) for covered activities if—
(1)
the Secretary determines, in writing, that—
(A)
a threat arising in such area from the proliferation of chemical, nuclear, or biological weapons or weapons-related materials, technologies, or expertise must be addressed urgently;
(B)
certain provisions of law would unnecessarily impede the ability of the Secretary to carry out such covered activities to address such threat; and
(C)
it is necessary to obligate or expend such funds to carry out such covered activities;
(2)
the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Energy concur with such determination; and
(3)
at the time at which the Secretary of Defense first obligates such funds, the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of State, submits to the congressional defense committees, the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives, and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate—
(A)
the determination under paragraph (1);
(B)
a description of the covered activities to be carried out using such funds;
(C)
the expected time frame for such activities; and
(D)
the expected cost of such activities.
(c)
Presidential Determination and Notice for Urgent Threat Reduction Activities in Ungoverned Areas.— With respect to an ungoverned area or an area that is not controlled by an effective governmental authority, as determined by the Secretary of State, the President may obligate or expend funds pursuant to subsection (a) for covered activities if—
(1)
the President determines, in writing, that—
(A)
a threat arising in such an area from the proliferation of chemical, nuclear, or biological weapons or weapons-related materials, technologies, or expertise must be addressed urgently; and
(B)
it is necessary to obligate or expend such funds to carry out such covered activities to address such threat; and
(2)
at the time at which the President first obligates such funds, the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of State, submits to the congressional defense committees, the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives, and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate—
(A)
the determination under paragraph (1);
(B)
a description of the covered activities to be carried out using such funds;
(C)
the expected time frame for such activities; and
(D)
the expected cost of such activities.
(d)
Covered Activity Defined.— In this section, the term “covered activity” means an activity under the Program to address a threat arising from the proliferation of chemical, nuclear, or biological weapons or weapons-related materials, technologies, or expertise.

SEC. 1324. Use of Funds for Unspecified Purposes or for Increased Amounts.

(a)
Notice to Congress of Intent to Use Funds for Unspecified Purposes.—
(1)
Report.— For any fiscal year for which Cooperative Threat Reduction funds are specifically authorized in an Act other than an appropriations Act for specific purposes within the Program, the Secretary of Defense may obligate or expend such funds, or other funds otherwise made available for the Program for that fiscal year, for purposes other than such specified purposes if—
(A)
the Secretary determines that such obligation or expenditure is necessary in the national interests of the United States;
(B)
the Secretary submits to the congressional defense committees—
(i)
notification of the intent of the Secretary to make such an obligation or expenditure of funds; and
(ii)
a complete discussion of the purpose and justification for such obligation or expenditure, including the amount of funds to be obligated or expended; and
(C)
a period of 15 days has elapsed following the date on which the Secretary submits the notification and discussion under subparagraph (B).
(2)
Construction with other laws.— Paragraph (1) may not be construed to authorize the obligation or expenditure of Cooperative Threat Reduction Program funds for a purpose for which the obligation or expenditure of such funds is specifically prohibited under section 1331 or any other provision of law.
(b)
Limited Authority to Vary Individual Amounts Provided for Any Fiscal Year for Specified Purposes.— For any fiscal year for which Cooperative Threat Reduction funds are specifically authorized in an Act other than an appropriations Act for specific purposes within the Program, the Secretary may obligate or expend such funds, or other funds otherwise made available for the Program for that fiscal year, in excess of the specific amount so authorized for that purpose if—
(1)
the Secretary determines that such obligation or expenditure is necessary in the national interests of the United States;
(2)
the Secretary submits to the congressional defense committees—
(A)
notification of the intent of the Secretary to make such an obligation or expenditure of funds in excess of such authorized amount; and
(B)
a complete discussion of the justification for exceeding such specified amounts, including the amount by which the Secretary will exceed such specified amounts; and
(3)
a period of 15 days has elapsed following the date on which the Secretary submits the notification and discussion under paragraph (2).

SEC. 1325. Use of Contributions to Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program.

(a)
Authority to Enter Into Agreements.—
(1)
Authority.— Subject to paragraph (2), the Secretary of Defense may enter into one or more agreements with any person (including a foreign government, international organization, multinational entity, or any other entity) that the Secretary considers appropriate under which the person contributes funds for activities conducted under the Program.
(2)
Concurrence by secretary of state.— The Secretary may enter into an agreement under paragraph (1) only with the concurrence of the Secretary of State.
(b)
Retention and Use of Funds.— Notwithstanding section 3302 of title 31, United States Code, and subject to subsections (c) and (d), the Secretary of Defense may retain and obligate or expend funds contributed pursuant to subsection (a) for purposes of the Program. Funds so contributed shall be retained in a separate fund established in the Treasury for such purposes and shall be available to be obligated or expended without further appropriation.
(c)
Return of Funds Not Obligated or Expended Within Three Years.— If the Secretary does not obligate or expend funds contributed pursuant to subsection (a) by the date that is three years after the date on which the contribution was made, the Secretary shall return the amount to the person who made the contribution.
(d)
Notice.—
(1)
In general.— Not later than 30 days after receiving funds contributed pursuant to subsection (a), the Secretary shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a notice—
(A)
specifying the value of the contribution and the purpose for which the contribution was made; and
(B)
identifying the person who made the contribution.
(2)
Limitation on use of amounts.— The Secretary may not obligate funds contributed pursuant to subsection (a) until a period of 15 days elapses following the date on which the Secretary submits the notice under paragraph (1).
(e)
Annual Report.— Not later than the first Monday in February of each year, the Secretary shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on amounts contributed pursuant to subsection (a) during the preceding fiscal year. Each such report shall include, for the fiscal year covered by the report, the following:
(1)
A statement of any funds contributed pursuant to subsection (a), including, for each such contribution, the value of the contribution and the identity of the person who made the contribution.
(2)
A statement of any funds so contributed that were obligated or expended by the Secretary, including, for each such contribution, the purposes for which the funds were obligated or expended.
(3)
A statement of any funds so contributed that were retained but not obligated or expended, including, for each such contribution, the purposes (if known) for which the Secretary intends to obligate or expend the amount.
(f)
Implementation Plan.— The Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees—
(1)
an implementation plan for the authority provided under this section prior to obligating or expending any funds contributed pursuant to subsection (a); and
(2)
any updates to such plan that the Secretary considers appropriate.
(g)
Appropriate Congressional Committees Defined.— In this section, the term “appropriate congressional committees” means the following:
(1)
The congressional defense committees.
(2)
The Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate.

PART II Restrictions and Limitations

SEC. 1331. Prohibition on Use of Funds for Specified Purposes.

(a)
In General.— Cooperative Threat Reduction funds may not be obligated or expended for any of the following purposes:
(1)
Conducting any peacekeeping exercise or other peacekeeping-related activity.
(2)
Provision of housing.
(3)
Provision of assistance to promote environmental restoration.
(4)
Provision of assistance to promote job retraining.
(5)
Provision of assistance to promote defense conversion.
(b)
Limitation With Respect to Conventional Weapons.— Cooperative Threat Reduction funds may not be obligated or expended for the elimination of—
(1)
conventional weapons; or
(2)
delivery vehicles of conventional weapons, unless such delivery vehicles could reasonably be used or adapted to be used for the delivery of chemical, nuclear, or biological weapons.

SEC. 1332. Requirement for On-Site Managers.

(a)
On-site Manager Requirement.— Before obligating any Cooperative Threat Reduction funds for a project described in subsection (b), the Secretary of Defense shall appoint one on-site manager for that project. The manager shall be appointed from among employees of the Federal Government.
(b)
Projects Covered.— Subsection (a) applies to a project—
(1)
to be located in a state of the former Soviet Union;
(2)
which involves dismantlement, destruction, or storage facilities, or construction of a facility; and
(3)
with respect to which the total contribution by the Department of Defense is expected to exceed $50,000,000.
(c)
Duties of On-site Manager.— The on-site manager appointed under subsection (a) shall—
(1)
develop, in cooperation with representatives from governments of states participating in the project, a list of those steps or activities critical to achieving the disarmament or nonproliferation goals of the project;
(2)
establish a schedule for completing those steps or activities;
(3)
meet with all participants to seek assurances that those steps or activities are being completed on schedule; and
(4)
suspend the participation of the United States in a project when a participant other than the United States fails to complete a scheduled step or activity on time, unless the Secretary of Defense directs the on-site manager to resume the participation of the United States.
(d)
Authority to Manage More Than One Project.—
(1)
In general.— Subject to paragraph (2), an employee of the Federal Government may serve as on-site manager for more than one project, including projects at different locations.
(2)
Limitation.— If such an employee serves as on-site manager for more than one project in a fiscal year, the total cost of the projects for that fiscal year may not exceed $150,000,000.
(e)
Steps or Activities.— Steps or activities referred to in subsection (c)(1) are those steps or activities that, if not completed, will prevent a project from achieving its disarmament or nonproliferation goals, including, at a minimum, the following:
(1)
Identification and acquisition of permits (as defined in section 1333).
(2)
Verification that the items, substances, or capabilities to be dismantled, secured, or otherwise modified are available for dismantlement, securing, or modification.
(3)
Timely provision of financial, personnel, management, transportation, and other resources.
(f)
Notification to Congress.— In any case in which the Secretary directs an on-site manager to resume the participation of the United States in a project under subsection (c)(4), the Secretary shall notify the congressional defense committees of such direction by not later than 30 days after the date of such direction.

SEC. 1333. Limitation on Use of Funds Until Certain Permits Obtained.

(a)
In General.— The Secretary of Defense shall seek to obtain all the permits required to complete each phase of construction of a project under the Program in a state of the former Soviet Union before obligating more than 40 percent of the total costs of that phase of the project.
(b)
Use of Funds for New Construction Projects.— Except as provided in subsection (c), with respect to a new construction project to be carried out by the Program, not more than 40 percent of the total costs of the project may be obligated from Cooperative Threat Reduction funds for any fiscal year until the Secretary—
(1)
determines the number and type of permits that may be required for the lifetime of the project in the proposed location or locations of the project; and
(2)
obtains from the state in which the project is to be located any permits that may be required to begin construction.
(c)
Exception to Limitations on Use of Funds.— The limitation in subsection (b) on the obligation of funds for a construction project otherwise covered by such subsection shall not apply with respect to the obligation of funds for a particular project if the Secretary—
(1)
determines that it is necessary in the national interest to obligate funds for such project; and
(2)
submits to the congressional defense committees a notification of the intent to obligate funds for such project, together with a complete discussion of the justification for doing so.
(d)
Definitions.— In this section, with respect to a project under the Program:
(1)
The term “new construction project” means a construction project for which no funds have been obligated or expended as of November 24, 2003.
(2)
The term “permit” means any local or national permit for development, general construction, environmental, land use, or other purposes that is required for purposes of major construction.

SEC. 1334. Limitation on Availability of Funds for Cooperative Threat Reduction Activities with Russian Federation.

(a)
Sense of Congress.— It is the sense of Congress that—
(1)
the United States should carry out activities under the Program in the Russian Federation only if those activities are consistent with and in support of the security interests of the United States; and
(2)
in carrying out any such activities after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense should focus on only those activities that—
(A)
are in support of the arms control obligations of the United States and the Russian Federation; or
(B)
will reduce the threats posed by weapons of mass destruction and related materials and technology to the United States and countries in the Euro-Atlantic and Eurasian regions.
(b)
Completion of Cooperation Threat Reduction Activities in Russian Federation.— Cooperative Threat Reduction funds made available for a fiscal year after fiscal year 2015 may not be obligated or expended for activities in the Russian Federation unless such activities in Russia are specifically authorized by law.

PART III Recurring Certifications and Reports

SEC. 1341. Annual Certifications on Use of Facilities Being Constructed for Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Projects or Activities.

Not later than the first Monday in February each year, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a certification for each facility of a project or activity of the Program for which construction occurred during the preceding fiscal year on matters as follows:
(1)
Whether or not such facility will be used for its intended purpose by the government of the foreign country in which the facility is constructed.
(2)
Whether or not the government of such country remains committed to the use of such facility for such purpose.
(3)
Whether the actions needed to ensure security at the facility, including the secure transportation of any materials, substances, or weapons to, from, or within the facility, have been taken.

SEC. 1342. Requirement to Submit Summary of Amounts Requested by Project Category.

(a)
Summary Required.— The Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees in the materials and manner specified in subsection (c)—
(1)
a descriptive summary, with respect to the appropriations requested for the Program for the fiscal year after the fiscal year in which the summary is submitted, of the amounts requested for each project category under each program element; and
(2)
a descriptive summary, with respect to appropriations for the Program for the fiscal year in which the list is submitted and the previous fiscal year, of the amounts obligated or expended, or planned to be obligated or expended, for each project category under each program element.
(b)
Description of Purpose and Intent.— The descriptive summary required under subsection (a) shall include a narrative description of each program and project category under each program element that explains the purpose and intent of the funds requested.
(c)
Inclusion in Certain Materials Submitted to Congress.— The summary required to be submitted in a fiscal year under subsection (a) shall be set forth by project category, and by amounts specified in paragraphs (1) and (2) of such subsection in connection with such project category, in each of the following:
(1)
The annual report on activities and assistance under the Program required in such fiscal year under section 1343.
(2)
The budget justification materials submitted to Congress in support of the Department of Defense budget for the fiscal year succeeding such fiscal year (as submitted with the budget of the President under section 1105 of title 31, United States Code).

SEC. 1343. Reports on Activities and Assistance under Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program.

(a)
Annual Report.— In any year in which the President submits to Congress, under section 1105 of title 31, United States Code, the budget for a fiscal year that requests funds for the Department of Defense for activities or assistance under the Program, the Secretary of Defense, after consultation with the Secretary of State, shall submit to the congressional defense committees, the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives, and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate a report on the activities and assistance carried out under the Program.
(b)
Deadline.— Each report under subsection (a) shall be submitted not later than the first Monday in February of a year.
(c)
Matters Included.— Each report under subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1)
An estimate of the total amount that will be required to be expended by the United States during the fiscal year covered by the budget described in subsection (a) in order to achieve the objectives of the Program.
(2)
A five-year plan setting forth the amount of funds and other resources proposed to be provided by the United States for the Program during the period covered by the plan, including the purpose for which such funds and resources will be used.
(3)
A description of the activities and assistance carried out under the Program during the fiscal year preceding the submission of the report, including—
(A)
the funds notified, obligated, and expended for such activities and assistance and the purposes for which such funds were notified, obligated, and expended for such fiscal year and cumulatively for the Program;
(B)
a description of the participation, if any, of each department and agency of the Federal Government in such activities and assistance;
(C)
a description of such activities and assistance, including the forms of assistance provided;
(D)
a description of the United States private sector participation in the portion of such activities and assistance that were supported by the obligation and expenditure of funds for the Program; and
(E)
such other information as the Secretary considers appropriate to fully inform Congress of the operation of activities and assistance carried out under the Program, including, with respect to proposed demilitarization or conversion projects, information on the progress toward demilitarization of facilities and the conversion of the demilitarized facilities to civilian activities.
(4)
A description of the means (including program management, audits, examinations, and other means) used by the United States during the fiscal year preceding the submission of the report to ensure that assistance provided under the Program is fully accounted for, that such assistance is being used for its intended purpose, and that such assistance is being used efficiently and effectively, including—
(A)
if such assistance consisted of equipment, a description of the current location of such equipment and the current condition of such equipment;
(B)
if such assistance consisted of contracts or other services, a description of the status of such contracts or services and the methods used to ensure that such contracts and services are being used for their intended purpose;
(C)
a determination whether the assistance described in subparagraphs (A) and (B) has been used for its intended purpose and an assessment of whether the assistance being provided is being used effectively and efficiently; and
(D)
a description of the efforts planned to be carried out during the fiscal year beginning in the year of the report to ensure that Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction assistance provided during such fiscal year is fully accounted for and is used for its intended purpose.
(5)
A description of the defense and military activities carried out under section 1321(a)(6) during the fiscal year preceding the submission of the report, including—
(A)
the amount of funds obligated or expended for such activities;
(B)
the strategy, goals, and objectives for which such funds were obligated and expended;
(C)
a description of the activities carried out, including the forms of assistance provided, and the justification for each form of assistance provided;
(D)
the success of each activity, including the goals and objectives achieved for each activity;
(E)
a description of participation by private sector entities in the United States in carrying out such activities, and the participation of any other department or agency of the Federal Government in such activities; and
(F)
any other information that the Secretary considers relevant to provide a complete description of the operation and success of activities carried out under the Program.

SEC. 1344. Metrics for Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program.

The Secretary of Defense shall implement metrics to measure the impact and effectiveness of activities of the Program to address threats arising from the proliferation of chemical, nuclear, and biological weapons and weapons-related materials, technologies, and expertise.

PART IV Repeals and Transition Provisions

SEC. 1351. Repeals.

The following provisions of law are repealed:
(1)
Sections 212, 221, 222, and 231 of the Soviet Nuclear Threat Reduction Act of 1991 (title II of Public Law 102–228; 22 U.S.C. 2551 note).
(2)
Sections 1412 and 1431 of the Former Soviet Union Demilitarization Act of 1992 (22 U.S.C. 5902 and 5921).
(3)
Sections 1203, 1204, 1206, and 1208 of the Cooperative Threat Reduction Act of 1993 (22 U.S.C. 5952, 5953, 5955, and 5957).
(4)
Section 1205 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1996 (Public Law 104–106; 22 U.S.C. 5955 note).
(5)
Section 1501 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1997 (Public Law 104–201; 50 U.S.C. 2362 note).
(6)
Section 1307 of the Strom Thurmond National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1999 (Public Law 105–261; 22 U.S.C. 5952 note).
(7)
Section 1303 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2000 (Public Law 106–65; 22 U.S.C. 5952 note).
(8)
(A)
Sections 1303 and 1304 of the Floyd D. Spence National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2001 (as enacted into law by Public Law 106–398; 22 U.S.C. 5952 note).
(B)
Section 1306 of such Act (as enacted into law by Public Law 106–398; 114 Stat. 1654A–340).
(C)
Section 1308 of such Act (as enacted into law by Public Law 106–398; 22 U.S.C. 5959).
(9)
Section 1304 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2002 (Public Law 107–107; 22 U.S.C. 5952 note).
(10)
Sections 1305 and 1306 of the Bob Stump National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2003 (Public Law 107–314; 116 Stat. 2673; 22 U.S.C. 5952 note).
(11)
Sections 1303, 1305, 1307, and 1308 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2004 (22 U.S.C. 5960, 5961, 5962, and 5963).
(12)
(A)
Section 1303 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 22 U.S.C. 5952 note).
(B)
Sections 1304 and 1305 of such Act (22 U.S.C. 5964 and 5965).
(C)
Section 1306 of such Act (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2560; 22 U.S.C. 5952 note).

SEC. 1352. Transition Provisions.

(a)
Determinations Relating to Certain Proliferation Threat Reduction Projects and Activities.— Any determination made before the date of the enactment of this Act under section 1308(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2004 (22 U.S.C. 5963(a)) shall be treated as a determination under section 1322(a).
(b)
Determinations Relating to Urgent Threat Reduction Activities.— Any determination made before the date of the enactment of this Act under section 1305(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (22 U.S.C. 5965(b)) shall be treated as a determination under section 1323(b).
(c)
Funds Available for Cooperative Threat Reduction Program.— Funds made available for Cooperative Threat Reduction programs pursuant to the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1632) or the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 672) that remain available for obligation as of the date of the enactment of this Act shall be available for the Program.

TITLE XIV Other Authorizations

Subtitle A Military Programs

SEC. 1401. Working Capital Funds.

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2015 for the use of the Armed Forces and other activities and agencies of the Department of Defense for providing capital for working capital and revolving funds, as specified in the funding table in section 4501.

SEC. 1402. Chemical Agents and Munitions Destruction, Defense.

(a)
Authorization of Appropriations.— Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2015 for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for Chemical Agents and Munitions Destruction, Defense, as specified in the funding table in section 4501.
(b)
Use.— Amounts authorized to be appropriated under subsection (a) are authorized for—
(1)
the destruction of lethal chemical agents and munitions in accordance with section 1412 of the Department of Defense Authorization Act, 1986 (50 U.S.C. 1521); and
(2)
the destruction of chemical warfare materiel of the United States that is not covered by section 1412 of such Act.

SEC. 1403. Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense-Wide.

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2015 for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense-wide, as specified in the funding table in section 4501.

SEC. 1404. Defense Inspector General.

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2015 for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for the Office of the Inspector General of the Department of Defense, as specified in the funding table in section 4501.

SEC. 1405. Defense Health Program.

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2015 for the Defense Health Program, as specified in the funding table in section 4501, for use of the Armed Forces and other activities and agencies of the Department of Defense in providing for the health of eligible beneficiaries.

Subtitle B Other Matters

SEC. 1411. Authority for Transfer of Funds to Joint Department of Defense–department of Veterans Affairs Medical Facility Demonstration Fund for Captain James a. Lovell Federal Health Care Center, Illinois.

(a)
Authority for Transfer of Funds.— Of the funds authorized to be appropriated for section 1405 and available for the Defense Health Program for operation and maintenance, $146,857,000 may be transferred by the Secretary of Defense to the Joint Department of Defense–Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Facility Demonstration Fund established by subsection (a)(1) of section 1704 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2571). For purposes of subsection (a)(2) of such section 1704, any funds so transferred shall be treated as amounts authorized and appropriated specifically for the purpose of such a transfer.
(b)
Use of Transferred Funds.— For the purposes of subsection (b) of such section 1704, facility operations for which funds transferred under subsection (a) may be used are operations of the Captain James A. Lovell Federal Health Care Center, consisting of the North Chicago Veterans Affairs Medical Center, the Navy Ambulatory Care Center, and supporting facilities designated as a combined Federal medical facility under an operational agreement covered by section 706 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4500).

SEC. 1412. Authorization of Appropriations for Armed Forces Retirement Home.

There is hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2015 from the Armed Forces Retirement Home Trust Fund the sum of $63,400,000 for the operation of the Armed Forces Retirement Home.

SEC. 1413. Comptroller General of the United States Report on Captain James a. Lovell Federal Health Care Center, North Chicago, Illinois.

(a)
Report Required.— Not later than 120 days after the date of the submittal to Congress by the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Veterans Affairs of the evaluation report on the joint Department of Defense-Department of Veterans Affairs medical facility demonstration project known as the Captain James A. Lovell Federal Health Care Center, North Chicago, Illinois, that is required to be submitted in March 2016, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on that demonstration project.
(b)
Elements.— The report required by subsection (a) shall include an assessment by the Comptroller General of the following:
(1)
The evaluation measures, standards, and criteria used by the Department of Defense and the Department of Veterans Affairs to measure the overall effectiveness and success of the medical facility referred to in subsection (a).
(2)
The measurable effect, if any, on the missions of the Department of the Navy and the Department of Veterans Affairs of the provision of care in a joint facility such as the medical facility.
(3)
Such other matters with respect to the medical facility demonstration project described in subsection (a) as the Comptroller General considers appropriate.
(c)
Availability of Certain Documents.— For purposes of the report required by subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall make available to the Comptroller General any documents related to the medical facility demonstration project referred to in such subsection, including any evaluation plans, task summaries, in-process reviews, interim reports, and draft final report.
(d)
Appropriate Committees of Congress Defined.— In this section, the term “appropriate committees of Congress” means—
(1)
the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs of the Senate; and
(2)
the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs of the House of Representatives.

TITLE XV Authorization of Additional Appropriations for Overseas Contingency Operations

Subtitle A Authorization of Appropriations

SEC. 1501. Purpose.

The purpose of this subtitle is to authorize appropriations for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2015 to provide additional funds for overseas contingency operations being carried out by the Armed Forces.

SEC. 1502. Procurement.

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2015 for procurement accounts for the Army, the Navy and the Marine Corps, the Air Force, and Defense-wide activities, as specified in the funding table in section 4102.

SEC. 1503. Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation.

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2015 for the use of the Department of Defense for research, development, test, and evaluation, as specified in the funding table in section 4202.

SEC. 1504. Operation and Maintenance.

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2015 for the use of the Armed Forces and other activities and agencies of the Department of Defense for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for operation and maintenance, as specified in the funding table in section 4302.

SEC. 1505. Military Personnel.

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2015 for the use of the Armed Forces and other activities and agencies of the Department of Defense for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for military personnel, as specified in the funding table in section 4402.

SEC. 1506. Working Capital Funds.

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2015 for the use of the Armed Forces and other activities and agencies of the Department of Defense for providing capital for working capital and revolving funds, as specified in the funding table in section 4502.

SEC. 1507. Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense-Wide.

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2015 for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense-wide, as specified in the funding table in section 4502.

SEC. 1508. Defense Inspector General.

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2015 for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for the Office of the Inspector General of the Department of Defense, as specified in the funding table in section 4502.

SEC. 1509. Defense Health Program.

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2015 for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for the Defense Health Program, as specified in the funding table in section 4502.

SEC. 1510. Counterterrorism Partnerships Fund.

(a)
Authorization of Appropriations.— Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2015 for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for the Counterterrorism Partnerships Fund, as specified in the funding table in section 4502.
(b)
Duration of Availability.— Amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in subsection (a) shall remain available for obligation through September 30, 2016.

SEC. 1511. European Reassurance Initiative.

(a)
Authorization of Appropriations.— Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2015 for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for the European Reassurance Initiative, as specified in the funding table in section 4502.
(b)
Duration of Availability.— Amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in subsection (a) shall remain available for obligation through September 30, 2016.

Subtitle B Financial Matters

SEC. 1521. Treatment as Additional Authorizations.

The amounts authorized to be appropriated by this title are in addition to amounts otherwise authorized to be appropriated by this Act.

SEC. 1522. Special Transfer Authority.

(a)
Authority to Transfer Authorizations.—
(1)
Authority.— Upon determination by the Secretary of Defense that such action is necessary in the national interest, the Secretary may transfer amounts of authorizations made available to the Department of Defense in this title for fiscal year 2015 between any such authorizations for that fiscal year (or any subdivisions thereof). Amounts of authorizations so transferred shall be merged with and be available for the same purposes as the authorization to which transferred.
(2)
Limitations.— The total amount of authorizations that the Secretary may transfer under the authority of this subsection may not exceed $3,500,000,000.
(b)
Terms and Conditions.— Transfers under this section shall be subject to the same terms and conditions as transfers under section 1001.
(c)
Additional Authority.— The transfer authority provided by this section is in addition to the transfer authority provided under section 1001.

Subtitle C Limitations, Reports, and Other Matters

SEC. 1531. Afghanistan Infrastructure Fund.

No amounts authorized to be appropriated by this Act may be available for, or used for purposes of, the Afghanistan Infrastructure Fund.

SEC. 1532. Afghanistan Security Forces Fund.

(a)
Continuation of Existing Limitation on the Use of Amounts in Fund.— Funds available to the Department of Defense for the Afghanistan Security Forces Fund for fiscal year 2015 shall be subject to the conditions contained in subsections (b) through (g) of section 1513 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 428), as amended by section 1531(b) of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4424).
(b)
Equipment Disposition.—
(1)
Acceptance of certain equipment.— Subject to paragraph (2), the Secretary of Defense may accept equipment that is procured using amounts in the Afghanistan Security Forces Fund authorized under this Act and is intended for transfer to the security forces of Afghanistan, but is not accepted by such security forces.
(2)
Conditions on acceptance of equipment.— Before accepting any equipment under the authority provided by paragraph (1)—
(A)
the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees the report required by subsection (c); and
(B)
the Commander of United States forces in Afghanistan shall make a determination that the equipment was procured for the purpose of meeting requirements of the security forces of Afghanistan, as agreed to by both the Government of Afghanistan and the United States, but is no longer required by such security forces or was damaged before transfer to such security forces.
(3)
Elements of determination.— In making a determination under paragraph (2)(B) regarding equipment, the Commander of United States forces in Afghanistan shall consider alternatives to Secretary of Defense acceptance of the equipment. An explanation of each determination, including the basis for the determination and the alternatives considered, shall be included in the relevant quarterly report required under paragraph (5).
(4)
Treatment as department of defense stocks.— Equipment accepted under the authority provided by paragraph (1) may be treated as stocks of the Department of Defense upon notification to the congressional defense committees of such treatment.
(5)
Quarterly reports on equipment disposition.— Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act and every 90-day period thereafter during which the authority provided by paragraph (1) is exercised, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report describing the equipment accepted under this subsection or section 1531(d) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 938; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note) during the period covered by the report. Each report shall include a list of all equipment that was accepted during the period covered by the report and treated as stocks of the Department and copies of the determinations made under paragraph (2)(B), as required by paragraph (3).
(c)
Report on Afghanistan Equipment Procurement Process.— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Commander of United States forces in Afghanistan, shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report describing in detail—
(1)
the methods used to identify equipment requirements for the security forces of Afghanistan and to incorporate such requirements into the procurement process for such security forces; and
(2)
the steps being taken to improve coordination between United States forces in Afghanistan and the security forces of Afghanistan within such procurement process.
(d)
Conforming Amendments.— Section 1531(d) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 938; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note)—
(1)
in paragraph (1), by striking “ prior Acts” and inserting “ this Act or prior Acts”; and
(2)
by striking paragraph (3).

SEC. 1533. Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Fund.

(a)
Use and Transfer of Funds.— Subsections (b) and (c) of section 1514 of the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109–364; 120 Stat. 2439), as in effect before the amendments made by section 1503 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4649), but as amended by subsection (b) of this section, shall apply to the funds made available to the Department of Defense for the Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Fund for fiscal year 2015.
(b)
Plan for Consolidation and Alignment of Rapid Acquisition Organizations.—
(1)
Plan required.— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a plan to consolidate and align all of the rapid acquisition or quick reaction capability organizations, including, at a minimum, the following—
(A)
The Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Organization (JIEDDO).
(B)
The Joint Rapid Acquisition Cell (JRAC).
(C)
The Warfighter Senior Integration Group (SIG).
(D)
The Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (ISR) Task Force.
(E)
The Afghanistan Resources Oversight Council (AROC).
(F)
Any other Department of Defense-wide or military department specific organizations, and associated capabilities and funding, carrying out comparable joint urgent operational needs (JUONs) or joint emergent operational needs (JEONs) efforts.
(2)
Plan elements.— The plan required by this subsection shall include the following elements:
(A)
A review, and if necessary, recommended modifications to the current arrangements for oversight of the Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Organization within the Office of the Secretary of Defense.
(B)
A review and, if necessary, recommended modifications to the current policies and regulations governing the satisfaction of joint urgent operational needs (JUONs) and joint emergent operational needs (JEONs).
(C)
A review, and if necessary, recommended modifications to authorities provided to enduring or successor rapid acquisition or quick reaction capability organizations.
(3)
Plan implementation.— The plan required by this subsection shall include a timeline for—
(A)
implementation of the consolidation and alignment decisions contained in the plan; and
(B)
consolidation of funding sources, including the consolidation of the Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Fund with the Joint Urgent Operational Needs Fund.
(c)
Extension of Interdiction of Improvised Explosive Device Precursor Chemicals Authority.— Section 1532(c)(4) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2057), as amended by section 1532(c) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 939), is amended by striking “ December 31, 2014” and inserting “ December 31, 2015”.
(d)
Prohibition on Use of Funds.—
(1)
Prohibition; exceptions.— None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for the Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Organization may be used for the purposes of the Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Organization assigning personnel or contractors on a permanent or temporary basis, or as a detail, to the combatant commands or associated military components unless such personnel or contractors are supporting—
(A)
Operation Enduring Freedom and any successor operation to that operation,
(B)
Operation Inherent Resolve and any successor operation to that operation, or
(C)
another operation that, as determined by the Secretary of Defense, requires the direct support of the Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Organization.
(2)
Congressional notification.— If the Secretary of Defense makes a determination pursuant to paragraph (1)(C) that an operation requires the direct support of the Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Organization, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a notice of the determination and the reasons for the determination.

SEC. 1534. Counterterrorism Partnerships Fund.

(a)
Availability of Funds.— Amounts authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2015 by this title for the Counterterrorism Partnerships Fund shall be available for the following purposes:
(1)
To provide support and assistance to foreign security forces or other groups or individuals to conduct, support, or facilitate counterterrorism and crisis response activities under authority provided the Department of Defense by any other provision of law (in this section referred to as an “underlying Department of Defense authority”).
(2)
To improve the capacity of the United States Armed Forces to provide enabling support to counterterrorism and crisis response activities undertaken by foreign security forces or other groups or individuals under any underlying Department of Defense authority.
(b)
Geographic Limitation.—
(1)
In general.— Activities using amounts available pursuant to subsection (a) may be conducted only in the area of responsibility of the United States Central Command or the United States Africa Command, but may not include activities for the provision of assistance or other support for the Government of Iraq.
(2)
Additional areas of responsibility.— Activities using amounts available pursuant to subsection (a) may be conducted in an area of responsibility of a geographic combatant command not specified in paragraph (1) if the Secretary of Defense determines that—
(A)
such activities are consistent with the purposes specified in subsection (a);
(B)
the absence of such activities would result in an increased risk to the national security of the United States; and
(C)
such activities could not be conducted using funds already available to the Department of Defense (other than funds transferred from the Counterterrorism Partnerships Fund).
(3)
Notice of determination of additional areas.— The Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a notification of any determination made pursuant to paragraph (2) not later than 15 days before transferring amounts from the Counterterrorism Partnerships Fund for activities in the area of responsibility covered by such determination.
(c)
Contract Authority.— Activities using amounts available pursuant to subsection (a) may be conducted by contract, including contractor-operated capabilities, if the Secretary of Defense typically acquires services or equipment by contract in conducting a similar activity for the Department of Defense.
(d)
Transfer Requirement and Authorities.—
(1)
Use of funds only pursuant to transfer.— Amounts in the Counterterrorism Partnerships Fund may be used for the purposes specified in subsection (a) only pursuant to transfers authorized by this subsection.
(2)
Transfers authorized.— Amounts in the Counterterrorism Partnerships Fund may be transferred from the Fund to any accounts of the Department of Defense for operation and maintenance for the purposes specified in subsection (a).
(3)
Reprogramming requirement.— The Secretary of Defense shall submit a reprogramming or transfer request from amounts authorized to be appropriated by section 1510 to the congressional defense committees to carry out activities supported under this section. Each such request shall set forth the following:
(A)
A detailed description of the activities to be supported by the reprogramming or transfer, including the request of the commander of the combatant command concerned for support, urgent operational need, or emergent operational need.
(B)
The amount planned to be obligated or expended on such activities, the recipient of such amount, and the timeline for such obligation or expenditure.
(C)
The underlying Department of Defense authorities that authorize such activities.
(4)
Effect on authorization amounts.— The transfer of an amount to an account under the authority in paragraph (2) shall be deemed to increase the amount authorized for such account by an amount equal to the amount transferred.
(5)
Transfers back to the fund.— Upon a determination that all or part of the funds transferred from the Counterterrorism Partnerships Fund under paragraph (2) are not necessary for the purpose provided, such funds may be transferred back to the Fund.
(6)
Construction with other transfer authority.— The transfer authority provided by paragraph (2) is in addition to any other transfer authority available to the Department of Defense.
(e)
Construction With Other Limitations.—
(1)
In general.— Except as provided in paragraph (2), nothing in this section may be construed to terminate, alter, or override any requirement or limitation applicable to activities funded with amounts in the Counterterrorism Partnerships Fund under the underlying Department of Defense authority that authorizes such activities.
(2)
Inapplicability of limitations on availability of funds.— A limitation on the amount that may be used for activities in a fiscal year under the underlying Department of Defense authority that authorizes such activities shall not apply to amounts made available for such activities in such fiscal year pursuant to this section.
(f)
Plan.— Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a plan for the intended management and use of the Counterterrorism Partnerships Fund. The plan shall include the following:
(1)
An identification of the underlying Department of Defense authorities that the Secretary has identified as available for use pursuant to subsection (a).
(2)
A detailed description, to the maximum extent practicable, of the requirements, activities, and planned allocation of amounts available for use pursuant to subsection (a).
(3)
An identification of the senior civilian employee of the Department of Defense designated by the Secretary to serve as manager of the Fund.
(g)
Semi-Annual Reports.— Not later than 60 days after the end of the first half of fiscal years 2015, 2016, and 2017, and the second half of fiscal years 2015 and 2016, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report setting forth, for the preceding fiscal half-year, the following:
(1)
A description of the underlying Department of Defense authorities that authorized activities supported by the Counterterrorism Partnerships Fund.
(2)
A description of the activities supported by the Fund.
(3)
A description of any obligations and expenditures of amounts transferred from the Fund, including recipients of amounts, set forth by country (where applicable).
(4)
A description of any determinations made as described in subsection (d)(5), and a description of any transfers back to the Fund pursuant to that subsection.
(5)
A description of any revisions to the plan submitted pursuant to subsection (f).
(h)
Duration of Authority.— No amounts may be transferred from the Counterterrorism Partnerships Fund after December 31, 2016.

SEC. 1535. European Reassurance Initiative.

(a)
Total Amount and Authorized Purposes of ERI.— The $1,000,000,000 authorized to be appropriated in sections 1502, 1504, 1505, 1511, and 2904 for fiscal year 2015 for the European Reassurance Initiative, as specified in the funding tables in sections 4102, 4302, 4402, 4502, and 4602, may be used by the Secretary of Defense solely for the following purposes:
(1)
Activities to increase the presence of the United States Armed Forces in Europe.
(2)
Bilateral and multilateral military exercises and training with allies and partner nations in Europe.
(3)
Activities to improve infrastructure in Europe to enhance the responsiveness of the United States Armed Forces.
(4)
Activities to enhance the prepositioning in Europe of equipment of the United States Armed Forces.
(5)
Activities to build the defense and security capacity of allies and partner nations in Europe.
(b)
Activities to Build Defense and Security Capacity of Allies and Partner Nations.— Of the funds made available for the European Reassurance Initiative that will be used for the purpose specified in subsection (a)(5)—
(1)
not less than $75,000,000 shall be available to be used for programs, activities, and assistance to support the Government of Ukraine;
(2)
not less than $30,000,000 shall be available to be used for programs and activities to build the capacity of European allies and partner nations; and
(3)
the Secretary of Defense may transfer the funds to support activities conducted under the authorities of the Department of Defense specified in section 1274(c) of this Act.
(c)
Transfer Requirements Related to Certain Funds.—
(1)
Use of funds only pursuant to transfer.— In the case of the funds authorized to be appropriated in section 1511 for the European Reassurance Initiative Fund, as specified in the funding tables in section 4502, the funds may be used for the purposes specified in subsection (a) only pursuant to a transfer of the funds to either or both of the following accounts of the Department of Defense:
(A)
Military personnel accounts.
(B)
Operation and maintenance accounts.
(2)
Effect on authorization amounts.— During fiscal years 2015 and 2016, the transfer of an amount made available for the European Reassurance Initiative to an account under the authority provided by paragraph (1) or subsection (b)(3) shall be deemed to increase the amount authorized for such account by an amount equal to the amount transferred.
(3)
Construction with other transfer authority.— The transfer authority provided by paragraph (1) and subsection (b)(3) is in addition to any other transfer authority available to the Department of Defense.
(d)
Notification Requirements.— Not later than 15 days before that date on which a transfer of funds under subsection (b)(3) or (c)(1) takes effect, the Secretary of Defense shall notify the congressional defense committees in writing of the planned transfer. Each notice of a transfer of funds shall include the following:
(1)
A detailed description of the project or activity to be supported by the transfer of funds, including any request of the Commander of the United States European Command for support, urgent operational need, or emergent operational need.
(2)
The amount planned to be transferred and expended on such project or activity.
(3)
A timeline for expenditure of the transferred funds.
(e)
Duration of Transfer Authority.— The transfer authority provided by subsections (b)(3) and (c)(1) expires September 30, 2016.

SEC. 1536. Plan for Transition of Funding of United States Special Operations Command from Supplemental Funding for Overseas Contingency Operations to Recurring Funding for Future-Years Defense Programs.

At the same time the budget of the President for fiscal year 2016 is submitted to Congress pursuant to section 1105 of title 31, United States Code, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a plan to maintain critical and enduring special operations capabilities for the United States Special Operations Command by fully transitioning funding for the United States Special Operations Command from funds available for overseas contingency operations to funds available for the Department of Defense on a recurring basis for purposes of future-years defense programs.

TITLE XVI Strategic Programs, Cyber, and Intelligence Matters

Subtitle A Space Activities

SEC. 1601. Department of Defense Space Security and Defense Program.

(a)
Sense of Congress.— It is the sense of Congress that—
(1)
critical United States national security space systems are facing a serious growing foreign threat;
(2)
the People’s Republic of China and the Russian Federation are both developing capabilities to disrupt the use of space by the United States in a conflict, as recently outlined by the Director of National Intelligence in testimony before Congress; and
(3)
a fully-developed multi-faceted space security and defense program is needed to deter and defeat any adversaries’ acts of space aggression.
(b)
Report on Ability of the United States to Deter and Defeat Adversary Space Aggression.— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report containing an assessment of the ability of the Department of Defense to deter and defeat any act of space aggression by an adversary.
(c)
Study on Alternative Defense and Deterrence Strategies in Response to Foreign Counterspace Capabilities.—
(1)
Study required.— The Secretary of Defense, acting through the Office of Net Assessment, shall conduct a study of potential alternative defense and deterrent strategies in response to the existing and projected counterspace capabilities of China and Russia. Such study shall include an assessment of the congruence of such strategies with the current United States defense strategy and defense programs of record, and the associated implications of pursuing such strategies.
(2)
Report.— Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees the results of the study required under paragraph (1).

SEC. 1602. Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle Notification.

(a)
Notification.— At the same time as the President submits the budget required under section 1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal years 2016 and 2017, the Secretary of the Air Force shall provide to the appropriate congressional committees notice of each change to the evolved expendable launch vehicle acquisition plan and schedule from the plan and schedule included in the budget submitted by the President under such section 1105 for fiscal year 2015. Such notification shall include—
(1)
an identification of the change;
(2)
a national security rationale for the change;
(3)
the impact of the change on the evolved expendable launch vehicle block buy contract;
(4)
the impact of the change on the opportunities for competition for certified evolved expendable launch vehicle launch providers; and
(5)
the costs or savings of the change.
(b)
Inapplicability of Notification Requirement if No Changes.— No notification under subsection (a) is required if at the time such notification would be required no change described in subsection (a) has occurred.
(c)
Appropriate Congressional Committees.— In this section, the term “appropriate congressional committees” means—
(1)
the congressional defense committees; and
(2)
with respect to a change to the evolved expendable launch vehicle acquisition schedule for an intelligence-related launch, the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate.

SEC. 1603. Satellite Communications Responsibilities of Executive Agent for Space.

The Secretary of Defense shall, not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, revise Department of Defense directives and guidance to require the Department of Defense Executive Agent for Space to ensure that in developing space strategies, architectures, and programs for satellite communications, the Executive Agent shall—
(1)
conduct strategic planning to ensure the Department of Defense is effectively and efficiently meeting the satellite communications requirements of the military departments and commanders of the combatant commands;
(2)
coordinate with the secretaries of the military departments, the commanders of the combatant commands, and the heads of Defense Agencies to eliminate duplication of effort and to ensure that resources are used to achieve the maximum effort in related satellite communication science and technology; research, development, test and evaluation; production; and operations and sustainment;
(3)
coordinate with the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics and the Chief Information Officer of the Department to ensure that effective and efficient acquisition approaches are being used to acquire military and commercial satellite communications for the Department, including space, ground, and user terminal integration; and
(4)
coordinate with the chairman of the Joint Requirements Oversight Council to develop a process to identify the current and projected satellite communications requirements of the Department.

SEC. 1604. Rocket Propulsion System Development Program.

(a)
Development.—
(1)
In general.— The Secretary of Defense shall develop a next-generation rocket propulsion system that enables the effective, efficient, and expedient transition from the use of non-allied space launch engines to a domestic alternative for national security space launches.
(2)
Requirements.— The system developed under paragraph (1) shall—
(A)
be made in the United States;
(B)
meet the requirements of the national security space community;
(C)
be developed by not later than 2019;
(D)
be developed using full and open competition; and
(E)
be available for purchase by all space launch providers of the United States.
(b)
Report.— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report that includes—
(1)
a plan to carry out the development of the rocket propulsion system under subsection (a), including an analysis of the benefits of using public-private partnerships;
(2)
the requirements of the program to develop such system; and
(3)
the estimated cost of such system.
(c)
Appropriate Congressional Committees Defined.— In this section, the term “appropriate congressional committees” means the following:
(1)
The congressional defense committees.
(2)
The Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate.

SEC. 1605. Pilot Program for Acquisition of Commercial Satellite Communication Services.

(a)
Pilot Program.—
(1)
In general.— The Secretary of Defense may develop and carry out a pilot program to determine the feasibility and advisability of expanding the use of working capital funds by the Secretary to effectively and efficiently acquire commercial satellite communications services to meet the requirements of the military departments, Defense Agencies, and combatant commanders.
(2)
Funding.— Of the funds authorized to be appropriated for any of fiscal years 2015 through 2020 for the Department of Defense for the acquisition of satellite communications, not more than $50,000,000 may be obligated or expended for such pilot program during such a fiscal year.
(3)
Certain authorities.— In carrying out the pilot program under paragraph (1), the Secretary may not use the authorities provided in sections 2208(k) and 2210(b) of title 10, United States Code.
(b)
Goals.— In developing and carrying out the pilot program under subsection (a)(1), the Secretary shall ensure that the pilot program—
(1)
provides a cost-effective and strategic method to acquire commercial satellite communications services;
(2)
incentivizes private-sector participation and investment in technologies to meet future requirements of the Department of Defense with respect to commercial satellite communications services;
(3)
takes into account the potential for a surge or other change in the demand of the Department for commercial satellite communications services in response to global or regional events; and
(4)
ensures the ability of the Secretary to control and account for the cost of programs and work performed under the pilot program.
(c)
Duration.— The pilot program under subsection (a)(1) shall terminate on October 1, 2020.
(d)
Reports.—
(1)
Initial report.— Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that includes—
(A)
a plan and schedule to carry out the pilot program under subsection (a)(1); or
(B)
if the Secretary finds that carrying out the pilot program authorized under subsection (a)(1) is not an appropriate method to effectively and efficiently acquire commercial satellite communications services, a description of how the Secretary will achieve the goals described in subsection (b) without carrying out such pilot program.
(2)
Final report.— Not later than December 1, 2020, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the pilot program under subsection (a)(1). The report shall include—
(A)
an assessment of expanding the use of working capital funds to effectively and efficiently acquire commercial satellite communications services to meet the requirements of the military departments, Defense Agencies, and combatant commanders; and
(B)
a description of—
(i)
any contract entered into under the pilot program, the funding used under such contract, and the efficiencies realized under such contract;
(ii)
the advantages and challenges of using working capital funds as described in subparagraph (A);
(iii)
any additional authorities the Secretary determines necessary to acquire commercial satellite communications services as described in subsection (a)(1); and
(iv)
any recommendations of the Secretary with respect to improving or extending the pilot program.

SEC. 1606. Update of National Security Space Strategy to Include Space Control and Space Superiority Strategy.

(a)
In General.— The Secretary of Defense shall, in consultation with the Director of National Intelligence, update the National Security Space Strategy to include a strategy relating to space control and space superiority for the protection of national security space assets.
(b)
Elements.— The strategy relating to space control and space superiority required by subsection (a) shall address the following:
(1)
Threats to national security space assets.
(2)
Protection of national security space assets.
(3)
The role of offensive space operations.
(4)
Countering offensive space operations.
(5)
Operations to implement the strategy.
(6)
Projected resources required over the period covered by the current future-years defense program under section 221 of title 10, United States Code.
(7)
The development of an effective deterrence posture.
(c)
Consistency With Space Protection Strategy.— The Secretary shall, in consultation with the Director, ensure that the strategy relating to space control and space superiority required by subsection (a) is consistent with the Space Protection Strategy developed under section 911 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (10 U.S.C. 2271 note).
(d)
Report.—
(1)
In general.— Not later than March 31, 2015, the Secretary shall, in consultation with the Director, submit a report on the strategy relating to space control and space superiority required by subsection (a) to—
(A)
the Committee on Armed Services and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate; and
(B)
the Committee on Armed Services and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives.
(2)
Form of report.— If the report required by paragraph (1) is submitted in classified form, such report shall also include an unclassified summary.
(e)
Space Protection Strategy.— Section 911(d) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (10 U.S.C. 2271 note) is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

“(4) Fiscal years 2026 through 2030.”

SEC. 1607. Allocation of Funds for the Space Security and Defense Program; Report on Space Control.

(a)
Allocation of Funds.— Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or any other Act and made available for the Space Security and Defense Program, a majority of such funds shall be allocated to the development of offensive space control and active defensive strategies and capabilities.
(b)
Statement With Respect to Allocation.— The Secretary of Defense shall include, in the budget justification materials submitted to Congress in support of the budget of the Department of Defense for a fiscal year (as submitted with the budget of the President under section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code), a statement with respect to whether the budget of the Department allocates funds for the Space Security and Defense Program as required by subsection (a).
(c)
Report.— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a report that contains the following:
(1)
An updated integrated capabilities document for offensive space control.
(2)
A concept of operations for the defense of critical national security space assets in all orbital regimes.
(3)
An assessment of the effectiveness of existing deterrence strategies.
(4)
A review of the appropriate types of accounts that should be used to fund space control programs in accordance with the direction required by subsection (a).
(d)
Termination of Requirement.— The requirements under subsections (a) and (b) shall terminate on the date that is five years after the date of the enactment of this Act.

SEC. 1608. Prohibition on Contracting with Russian Suppliers of Rocket Engines for the Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle Program.

(a)
In General.— Except as provided by subsections (b) and (c), beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense may not award or renew a contract for the procurement of property or services for space launch activities under the evolved expendable launch vehicle program if such contract carries out such space launch activities using rocket engines designed or manufactured in the Russian Federation.
(b)
Waiver.— The Secretary may waive the prohibition under subsection (a) with respect to a contract for the procurement of property or services for space launch activities if the Secretary determines, and certifies to the congressional defense committees not later than 30 days before the waiver takes effect, that—
(1)
the waiver is necessary for the national security interests of the United States; and
(2)
the space launch services and capabilities covered by the contract could not be obtained at a fair and reasonable price without the use of rocket engines designed or manufactured in the Russian Federation.
(c)
Exception.—
(1)
In general.— The prohibition in subsection (a) shall not apply to either—
(A)
the placement of orders or the exercise of options under the contract numbered FA8811–13–C–0003 and awarded on December 18, 2013; or
(B)
subject to paragraph (2), a contract awarded for the procurement of property or services for space launch activities that includes the use of rocket engines designed or manufactured in the Russian Federation that prior to February 1, 2014, were either fully paid for by the contractor or covered by a legally binding commitment of the contractor to fully pay for such rocket engines.
(2)
Certification.— The Secretary may not award or renew a contract for the procurement of property or services for space launch activities described in paragraph (1)(B) unless the Secretary, upon the advice of the General Counsel of the Department of Defense, certifies to the congressional defense committees that the offeror has provided to the Secretary sufficient documentation to conclusively demonstrate that prior to February 1, 2014, the offeror had either fully paid for the rocket engines described in such paragraph or made a legally binding commitment to fully pay for such rocket engines.

SEC. 1609. Assessment of Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle Program.

Not later than June 1, 2015, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the evolved expendable launch vehicle program that includes an assessment of the advisability of the Secretary of Defense requiring, when selecting launch providers for the program using competitive procedures as described in section 2304 of title 10, United States Code, that new entrant launch providers or incumbent launch providers establish or maintain business systems that comply with the data requirements and cost accounting standards of the Department of Defense, including certified cost or price data.

SEC. 1610. Competitive Procedures Required to Launch Payload for Mission Number Five of the Operationally Responsive Space Program.

(a)
In General.— In awarding a contract for the launch of the payload for mission number five of the Operationally Responsive Space Program, the Secretary of the Air Force shall use competitive procedures described in section 2304 of title 10, United States Code, and ensure that the policies of the Department of Defense concerning competitive space launch opportunities are followed.
(b)
Waiver.— The Secretary may waive the requirement under subsection (a) if—
(1)
the Secretary—
(A)
determines that the waiver is necessary in the national security interests of the United States; and
(B)
submits to the congressional defense committees a report on such determination and use of the waiver; and
(2)
a period of 15 days elapses following the date on which the Secretary submits such report.

SEC. 1611. Availability of Additional Rocket Cores Pursuant to Competitive Procedures.

(a)
In General.— Relative to the number of rocket cores for which space launch providers certified under the evolved expendable launch vehicle program may submit bids or competitive proposals under competitive procedures pursuant to the National Security Space Launch Procurement Forecast, as of the date on which the President submitted the budget for fiscal year 2015 to Congress pursuant to section 1105 of title 31, United States Code, the Secretary of Defense shall—
(1)
during fiscal year 2015, increase by one the number of such cores for which such providers may submit bids or competitive proposals; and
(2)
for fiscal years 2015 through 2017, increase by one (in addition to the core referred to in paragraph (1)) the number of such cores for which such providers may submit bids or competitive proposals, unless the Secretary—
(A)
determines that there is no practicable way to increase the number of such cores for which such providers may submit bids or competitive proposals and remain in compliance with the requirements of the firm fixed price contract for 36 rocket engine cores during the five fiscal years beginning with fiscal year 2013; and
(B)
not later than 45 days after making such determination, submits to the congressional defense committees—
(i)
a certification that there is no practicable way to make the increase described in subparagraph (A); and
(ii)
a description of the basis for the determination.
(b)
Competitive Procedures Defined.— In this section, the term “competitive procedures” means procedures as described in section 2304 of title 10, United States Code.

SEC. 1612. Limitations on Availability of Funds for Weather Satellite Follow-On System and Defense Meteorological Satellite Program.

(a)
Weather Satellite Follow-on System.—
(1)
Limitation.— Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for research, development, test, and evaluation, Air Force, for the weather satellite follow-on system, not more than 50 percent may be obligated or expended until the date on which the Secretary of Defense submits to the congressional defense committees the plan under paragraph (2).
(2)
Plan required.— The Secretary of Defense shall develop a plan to meet the meteorological and oceanographic collection requirements of the Joint Requirements Oversight Council, including the requirements of the combatant commands, the military departments, and the Defense Agencies (as defined in section 101(a)(11) of title 10, United States Code). The plan shall include the following:
(A)
How the Secretary will use existing assets of the defense meteorological satellite program, including an identification of the extent to which requirements can be addressed by the Defense Meteorological Satellite program.
(B)
How the Secretary will use other sources of data, such as civil, commercial satellite weather data, and international partnerships, to meet such requirements, and the extent to which requirements can be addressed by such sources of data.
(C)
An explanation of the relevant risks, costs, and schedule.
(D)
The requirements of the weather satellite follow-on system.
(3)
GAO review.—
(A)
The Comptroller General of the United States shall review the analysis of alternatives for the weather satellite follow-on system, or space based environmental monitoring, to determine—
(i)
the extent that such analysis of alternatives met best practices and fully addressed the concerns of the acquisition, operation, and user communities; and
(ii)
how the Department of Defense assessed and addressed the cost, schedule, and risks posed for each alternative evaluated under such analysis of alternatives.
(B)
The Comptroller General shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report containing the review under subparagraph (A).
(b)
Defense Meteorological Satellite Program.—
(1)
Limitation.— None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for the Defense Meteorological Satellite Program may be obligated or expended for the storage of a satellite of such program until the Secretary of Defense certifies to the congressional defense committees that—
(A)
the Department of Defense intends to launch the satellite; and
(B)
storing the satellite until the anticipated launch of the satellite is the most cost-effective approach to meeting the requirements of the Department.
(2)
Requirements in the event of no launch.—
(A)
If the Secretary determines not to launch the next satellite of the Defense Meteorological Satellite Program, the Secretary shall—
(i)
certify to the congressional defense committees that the Secretary will be able to meet the related requirements of the Department; and
(ii)
not later than 60 days after making such certification, submit to such committees a report on how the Secretary will meet such related requirements.
(B)
The Comptroller General shall—
(i)
review the report submitted under subparagraph (A)(ii) to ensure that such report fully addresses the concerns of the user communities; and
(ii)
submit to the congressional defense committees a report containing such review.

SEC. 1613. Limitation on Availability of Funds for Space-Based Infrared Systems Space Data Exploitation.

Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for research, development, test, and evaluation, Air Force, for data exploitation under the space-based infrared systems, not more than 50 percent may be obligated or expended until the date on which the Secretary of the Air Force, acting as the Department of Defense Executive Agent for Space, submits to the congressional defense committees certification that—
(1)
such funds will be used in support of data exploitation of the current space-based infrared systems program of record, including the scanning and staring sensor; or
(2)
the data from such program of record, including such scanning and starring sensor, is being fully exploited and no further efforts are warranted.

SEC. 1614. Limitations on Availability of Funds for Hosted Payload and Wide Field of View Testbed of the Space-Based Infrared Systems.

(a)
Phased Limitations.— Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for research, development, test, and evaluation, Air Force, for the hosted payload and wide field of view testbed of the space-based infrared systems program—
(1)
not more than 50 percent may be obligated or expended on alternative approaches to the program of record of such program until the Secretary of the Air Force submits to the appropriate congressional committees a copy of the analysis of alternatives for such program of record; and
(2)
following the date on which the Secretary submits such analysis of alternatives, not more than 75 percent may be obligated or expended on alternative approaches to the program of record of such program until a period of 30 days has elapsed following the date on which the Secretary and the Commander of the United States Strategic Command jointly provide to the appropriate congressional committees a briefing on the findings and recommendations of the Secretary and Commander under such analysis of alternatives, including the cost evaluation of the Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation.
(b)
Exception.— The limitations in subsection (a) shall not apply to efforts to examine and develop technology insertion opportunities for the program of record specified in subsection (a).
(c)
Appropriate Congressional Committees Defined.— In this section, the term “appropriate congressional committees” means the following:
(1)
The congressional defense committees.
(2)
The Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives.
(3)
The Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate.

SEC. 1615. Limitations on Availability of Funds for Protected Tactical Demonstration and Protected Military Satellite Communications Testbed of the Advanced Extremely High Frequency Program.

(a)
Phased Limitations.— Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for research, development, test, and evaluation, Air Force, for the protected tactical demonstration and protected military satellite communications testbed of the advanced extremely high frequency program—
(1)
not more than 50 percent may be obligated or expended on alternative approaches to the program of record for such program until the Secretary of the Air Force submits to the congressional defense committees a copy of the analysis of alternatives for such program of record; and
(2)
following the date on which the Secretary submits such analysis of alternatives, not more than 75 percent may be obligated or expended on alternative approaches to the program of record for such program until a period of 30 days has elapsed following the date on which the Secretary and the Commander of the United States Strategic Command jointly provide to the congressional defense committees a briefing on the findings and recommendations of the Secretary and Commander under such analysis of alternatives, including the cost evaluation of the Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation.
(b)
Exception.— The limitations in subsection (a) shall not apply to efforts to examine and develop technology insertion opportunities for the current, as of the date of the enactment of this Act, programs of record.

SEC. 1616. Study of Space Situational Awareness Architecture.

(a)
In General.— The Secretary of Defense shall direct the Defense Science Board to conduct a study of the effectiveness of the ground and space sensor system architecture for space situational awareness.
(b)
Elements.— The study required by subsection (a) shall include an assessment of the following:
(1)
Projected needs, based on current and future threats, for the ground and space sensor system during the five-, 10-, and 20-year periods beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act.
(2)
Capabilities of the ground and space sensor system to conduct defensive and offensive operations.
(3)
Integration of ground and space sensors with ground processing, control, and battle management systems.
(4)
Any other matters relating to space situational awareness the Secretary considers appropriate.
(c)
Report.—
(1)
In general.— Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the study conducted under subsection (a).
(2)
Form of report.— If the report required by paragraph (1) is submitted in classified form, such report shall also include an unclassified summary.

SEC. 1617. Briefing on Range Support for Launches in Support of National Security.

(a)
In General.— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Air Force shall provide to the congressional defense committees a briefing on the requirements and investments needed to modernize Department of Defense space launch facilities and supporting infrastructure.
(b)
Elements.— The briefing required under subsection (a) shall include the following elements:
(1)
The results of the investigation into the failure of the radar system supporting the Eastern range in March 2014, including the causes for the failure.
(2)
An assessment of each current radar and other system as well as supporting infrastructure required to support the mission requirement of the range, including back-up systems.
(3)
An estimate of the annual level of dedicated funding required to maintain and modernize the range infrastructure in adequate condition to meet national security requirements.
(4)
A review of requirements to repair, upgrade, and modernize the radars and other mission support systems to current technologies.
(5)
A prioritized list of projects, costs, and projected funding schedules needed to carry out the maintenance, repair, and modernization requirements.

Subtitle B Defense Intelligence and Intelligence-Related Activities

SEC. 1621. Tactical Exploitation of National Capabilities Executive Agent.

(a)
Establishment.— Subchapter I of chapter 21 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

“§ 430. Tactical Exploitation of National Capabilities Executive Agent

“(a) Designation.—The Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence shall designate a civilian employee of the Department or a member of the armed forces to serve as the Tactical Exploitation of National Capabilities Executive Agent.

“(b) Duties.—The Executive Agent designated under subsection (a) shall—

“(1) report directly to the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence;

“(2) work with the combatant commands, military departments, and the intelligence community (as defined in section 3(4) of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3003(4)) to—

“(A) develop methods to increase warfighter effectiveness through the exploitation of national capabilities; and

“(B) promote cross-domain integration of such capabilities into military operations, training, intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance activities.”

(b)
Briefings.— At the same time as the President submits to Congress the budget pursuant to section 1105 of title 31, for each of fiscal years 2016 through 2020, the Executive Agent designated under subsection (a) of section 430 of title 10, United States Code (as added by subsection (a) of this section), in consultation with the commanders of the combatant commands, the Secretaries of the military departments, and the heads of the Department of Defense intelligence agencies and offices (including the Directors of the Defense Intelligence Agency, the National Security Agency, the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, and the National Reconnaissance Office), shall provide to the congressional defense committees, the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate, and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives a briefing on the investments, activities, challenges, and opportunities of the Executive Agent in carrying out the responsibilities under subsection (b) of such section 430.

SEC. 1622. One-Year Extension of Report on Imagery Intelligence and Geospatial Information Support Provided to Regional Organizations and Security Alliances.

Section 921(c)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1878) is amended by striking “ 2014 and 2015” and inserting “ 2014 through 2016”.

SEC. 1623. Extension of Secretary of Defense Authority to Engage in Commercial Activities as Security for Intelligence Collection Activities.

Section 431(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended, in the second sentence, by striking “ December 31, 2015” and inserting “ December 31, 2017”.

SEC. 1624. Extension of Authority Relating to Jurisdiction Over Department of Defense Facilities for Intelligence Collection or Special Operations Activities Abroad.

Section 926(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1541) is amended, in the matter before paragraph (1)—
(1)
by striking “ September 30, 2015” and inserting “ September 30, 2017”; and
(2)
by striking “ fiscal year 2016” and inserting “ fiscal year 2018”.

SEC. 1625. Assessment and Limitation on Availability of Funds for Intelligence Activities and Programs of United States Special Operations Command and Special Operations Forces.

(a)
Assessment.—
(1)
Requirement.— The Secretary of Defense, acting through the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence, the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Special Operations and Low Intensity Conflict, and the Director of the Defense Intelligence Agency, shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress and the Comptroller General of the United States an assessment of the intelligence activities and programs of United States Special Operations Command and special operations forces.
(2)
Inclusions.— The assessment under paragraph (1) shall include each of the following elements:
(A)
An overall strategy defining such intelligence activities and programs, including definitions of intelligence activities and programs carried out by special operations forces and how such activities and programs relate to conventional military intelligence and the capabilities of the Armed Forces.
(B)
The oversight roles and responsibilities of the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence, the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Special Operations and Low Intensity Conflict, and the Assistant to the Secretary of Defense for Intelligence Oversight with respect to the employment of special operations forces for intelligence activities and programs, including an analysis of any oversight limitations or gaps.
(C)
A strategy and roadmap of United States Special Operations Command intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance programs and requirements, including enabling capabilities provided by the Armed Forces, for special operations across the future years defense program.
(D)
A comprehensive description of Joint Staff-validated current and anticipated future requirements for the intelligence activities and programs of each geographic combatant commander that are likely to be fulfilled by special operations forces, including those that can only be addressed by special operations forces, programs, or capabilities.
(E)
Validated current and expected future United States Special Operations Command force structure requirements necessary to meet near-, mid-, and long-term special operations intelligence activities and programs of the geographic combatant commanders.
(F)
A comprehensive review and assessment of statutory authorities, and Department and interagency policies, including limitations, for special operations forces intelligence activities and programs.
(G)
A cost estimate of special operations intelligence activities and programs, including an estimate of the costs of the period of the current future years defense program, including a description of all rules and assumptions used to develop the cost estimates.
(H)
A copy of any memoranda of understanding or memoranda of agreement between the Department of Defense and other departments or agencies of the United States Government, or between components of the Department of Defense that are required to implement objectives of special operations intelligence activities and programs.
(I)
Any other matters the Secretary considers appropriate.
(3)
Form.— The assessment required under paragraph (1) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.
(4)
Comptroller general review.— Not later than 60 days after the date on which the assessment required under paragraph (1) is submitted, the Comptroller General shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a review of such assessment. Such review shall include an assessment of—
(A)
the extent to which the assessment required under paragraph (1) addressed the elements required under paragraph (2);
(B)
the sufficiency of oversight of the intelligence activities and programs of special operations forces by the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence, the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Special Operations and Low Intensity Conflict, and the Assistant to the Secretary of Defense for Intelligence Oversight;
(C)
the validity of the cost estimate of special operations intelligence activities and programs required by paragraph (2)(G); and
(D)
any other matters the Comptroller General determines are relevant.
(b)
Limitations.—
(1)
In general.— Subject to paragraph (2), not more than 50 percent of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for procurement, Defense-wide, for intelligence systems, and for research, development, test, and evaluation, Defense-wide, for intelligence systems development may be obligated until the assessment required under subsection (a) is submitted.
(2)
Exception.— Paragraph (1) shall not apply—
(A)
with respect to funds authorized to be appropriated for Overseas Contingency Operations under title XV; or
(B)
in any case where the Secretary of Defense determines the limitation in paragraph (1) may impede a current operation.
(c)
Definitions.— In this section:
(1)
Appropriate committees of congress.— The term “appropriate committees of Congress” means the congressional defense committees, the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate.
(2)
Future years defense program.— The term “future years defense program” means the future years defense program under section 221 of title 10, United States Code.
(3)
Geographic combatant commander.— The term “geographic combatant commander” means a commander of a combatant command (as defined in section 161(c) of title 10, United States Code) with a geographic area of responsibility.

SEC. 1626. Annual Briefing on the Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance Requirements of the Combatant Commands.

At the same time that the President’s budget is submitted pursuant to section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, for each of fiscal years 2016 through 2020—
(1)
the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff shall provide to the congressional defense committees, the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate a briefing on—
(A)
the intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance requirements, by specific intelligence capability type, of each of the combatant commands;
(B)
for the year preceding the year in which the briefing is provided, the satisfaction rate of each of the combatant commands with the intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance requirements, by specific intelligence capability type, of such combatant command; and
(C)
a risk analysis identifying the critical gaps and shortfalls in such requirements in relation to such satisfaction rate; and
(2)
the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence shall provide to the congressional defense committees, the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate a briefing on short-term, mid-term, and long-term strategies to address the critical intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance requirements of the combatant commands.

SEC. 1627. Prohibition on National Intelligence Program Consolidation.

(a)
Prohibition.— No amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available to the Department of Defense may be used during the period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act and ending on December 31, 2015, to execute—
(1)
the separation of the National Intelligence Program budget from the Department of Defense budget;
(2)
the consolidation of the National Intelligence Program budget within the Department of Defense budget; or
(3)
the establishment of a new appropriations account or appropriations account structure for the National Intelligence Program budget.
(b)
Definitions.— In this section:
(1)
National intelligence program.— The term “National Intelligence Program” has the meaning given the term in section 3 of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3003).
(2)
National intelligence program budget.— The term “National Intelligence Program budget” means the portions of the Department of Defense budget designated as part of the National Intelligence Program.

SEC. 1628. Personnel Security and Insider Threat.

(a)
Report Required.— Not later than March 30, 2015, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress a report on the plans of the Department to address—
(1)
the adoption of an interim capability to continuously evaluate the security status of the employees and contractors of the Department who have been determined eligible for and granted access to classified information by the Department of Defense Central Adjudication Facilities;
(2)
the use of an interim system to assist in developing requirements, lessons learned, business rules, privacy standards, and operational concepts applicable to the objective automated records checks and continuous evaluation capability required by the strategy for modernizing personnel security;
(3)
the engineering for an interim system and the objective automated records checks and continuous evaluation capability for initial investigations and reinvestigations required by the strategy for modernizing personnel security to support automation-assisted insider threat analyses conducted across the law enforcement, personnel security, human resources, counterintelligence, physical security, network behavior monitoring, and cybersecurity activities of all the components of the Department of Defense, pursuant to Executive Order 13587;
(4)
how competitive processes and open systems designs will be used to acquire advanced commercial technologies throughout the life cycle of the objective continuous evaluation capability required by the strategy for modernizing personnel security;
(5)
how the senior agency official in the Department of Defense for insider threat detection and prevention will be supported by experts in counterintelligence, personnel security, law enforcement, human resources, physical security, network monitoring, cybersecurity, and privacy and civil liberties from relevant components of the Department and experts in information technology, large-scale data analysis, systems engineering, and program acquisition;
(6)
how the senior agency official, in developing the integrated, automation-assisted insider threat capability, will be supported by—
(A)
the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics;
(B)
the Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense; and
(C)
the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness; and
(7)
who will be responsible and accountable for managing the development and fielding of the automation-assisted insider threat capability.
(b)
Inclusion of Gaps.— The report required under subsection (a) shall include specific gaps in policy and statute to address the requirements placed on the Department by section 907(c) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66) and Executive Order 13587.
(c)
Strategy for Modernizing Personnel Security Defined.— In this section, the term “strategy for modernizing personnel security” means the strategy developed under section 907(c) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66).

SEC. 1629. Migration of Distributed Common Ground System of Department of the Army to an Open System Architecture.

(a)
Migration Required.— Not later than three years after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Army shall migrate the Distributed Common Ground System of the Department of the Army, including the Red Disk initiative under development at the Intelligence and Security Command, to an open system architecture to enable—
(1)
competitive acquisition of components, services, and applications for the Distributed Common Ground System; and
(2)
rapid competitive development and integration of new capabilities for the Distributed Common Ground System.
(b)
Compliance With Open System Architecture Standards.— In carrying out the migration required by subsection (a), the Secretary shall ensure that the Distributed Common Ground System—
(1)
is in compliance with the open system architecture standards developed under the Defense Intelligence Information Enterprise by the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence; and
(2)
reuses services and components of the Defense Intelligence Information Enterprise.
(c)
Open System Architecture Defined.— In this section, the term “open system architecture” means, with respect to an information technology system, an integrated business and technical strategy that—
(1)
employs a modular design and uses widely supported and consensus-based standards for key interfaces;
(2)
is subjected to successful validation and verification tests to ensure key interfaces comply with widely supported and consensus-based standards; and
(3)
uses a system architecture that allows components to be added, modified, replaced, removed, or supported by different vendors throughout the life-cycle of the system to afford opportunities for enhanced competition and innovation while yielding—
(A)
significant cost and schedule savings; and
(B)
increased interoperability.

Subtitle C Cyberspace-Related Matters

SEC. 1631. Budgeting and Accounting for Cyber Mission Forces.

(a)
Budgeting.—
(1)
In general.— Chapter 9 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

“§ 238. Cyber mission forces: program elements

“(a) Budget Justification Display.—The Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress, as a part of the defense budget materials for fiscal year 2017 and each fiscal year thereafter, a budget justification display that includes—

“(1) a major force program category for the five-year defense plan of the Department of Defense for the training, manning, and equipping of the cyber mission forces; and

“(2) program elements for the cyber mission forces.

“(b) Waiver.—The Secretary may waive the requirement under subsection (a) for fiscal year 2017 if the Secretary—

“(1) determines the Secretary is unable to comply with such requirement for fiscal year 2017; and

“(2) establishes a plan to implement the requirement for fiscal year 2018.”

(2)
Table of sections.— The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 9 of such title is amended by adding at the end the following new item:

“238. Cyber mission forces: program elements.”.

(b)
Assessment of Transfer Account for Cyber Activities.—
(1)
In general.— The Secretary shall assess the feasibility and advisability of establishing a transfer account to execute the funds contained in the major force program category required by subsection (a).
(2)
Report.—
(A)
In general.— Not later than April 1, 2015, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the assessment carried out under paragraph (1).
(B)
Contents.— The report required by subparagraph (A) shall include the following:
(i)
The findings of the Secretary with respect to the assessment carried out under paragraph (1).
(ii)
A recommendation as to whether a transfer account should be established as described in such paragraph.

SEC. 1632. Reporting on Cyber Incidents with Respect to Networks and Information Systems of Operationally Critical Contractors.

(a)
Reporting.— Part I of subtitle A of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after chapter 18 the following new chapter:

“CHAPTER 19— CYBER MATTERS

“391. Reporting on cyber incidents with respect to networks and information systems of operationally critical contractors.

“§ 391. Reporting on cyber incidents with respect to networks and information systems of operationally critical contractors and certain other contractors

“(a) Designation of Department Component to Receive Reports.—The Secretary of Defense shall designate a component of the Department of Defense to receive reports of cyber incidents from contractors in accordance with this section and with section 941 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (10 U.S.C. 2224 note) or from other governmental entities.

“(b) Procedures for Reporting Cyber Incidents.—The Secretary of Defense shall establish procedures that require an operationally critical contractor to report in a timely manner to component designated under subsection (a) each time a cyber incident occurs with respect to a network or information system of such operationally critical contractor.

“(c) Procedure Requirements.—

“(1) Designation and notification.—The procedures established pursuant to subsection (a) shall include a process for—

“(A) designating operationally critical contractors; and

“(B) notifying a contractor that it has been designated as an operationally critical contractor.

“(2) Rapid reporting.—The procedures established pursuant to subsection (a) shall require each operationally critical contractor to rapidly report to the component of the Department designated pursuant to subsection (d)(2)(A) on each cyber incident with respect to any network or information systems of such contractor. Each such report shall include the following:

“(A) An assessment by the contractor of the effect of the cyber incident on the ability of the contractor to meet the contractual requirements of the Department.

“(B) The technique or method used in such cyber incident.

“(C) A sample of any malicious software, if discovered and isolated by the contractor, involved in such cyber incident.

“(D) A summary of information compromised by such cyber incident.

“(3) Department assistance and access to equipment and information by department personnel.—The procedures established pursuant to subsection (a) shall—

“(A) include mechanisms for Department personnel to, if requested, assist operationally critical contractors in detecting and mitigating penetrations; and

“(B) provide that an operationally critical contractor is only required to provide access to equipment or information as described in subparagraph (A) to determine whether information created by or for the Department in connection with any Department program was successfully exfiltrated from a network or information system of such contractor and, if so, what information was exfiltrated.

“(4) Protection of trade secrets and other information.—The procedures established pursuant to subsection (a) shall provide for the reasonable protection of trade secrets, commercial or financial information, and information that can be used to identify a specific person.

“(5) Dissemination of information.—The procedures established pursuant to subsection (a) shall limit the dissemination of information obtained or derived through the procedures to entities—

“(A) with missions that may be affected by such information;

“(B) that may be called upon to assist in the diagnosis, detection, or mitigation of cyber incidents;

“(C) that conduct counterintelligence or law enforcement investigations; or

“(D) for national security purposes, including cyber situational awareness and defense purposes.

“(d) Definitions.—In this section:

“(1) Cyber incident.—The term ‘cyber incident’ means actions taken through the use of computer networks that result in an actual or potentially adverse effect on an information system or the information residing therein.

“(2) Operationally critical contractor.—The term ‘operationally critical contractor’ means a contractor designated by the Secretary for purposes of this section as a critical source of supply for airlift, sealift, intermodal transportation services, or logistical support that is essential to the mobilization, deployment, or sustainment of the Armed Forces in a contingency operation.”

(b)
Issuance of Procedures.— The Secretary shall establish the procedures required by subsection (b) of section 391 of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a) of this section, not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act.
(c)
Assessment of Department Policies.—
(1)
In general.— Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of the Act, the Secretary of Defense shall complete an assessment of—
(A)
requirements that were in effect on the day before the date of the enactment of this Act for contractors to share information with Department components regarding cyber incidents (as defined in subsection (d) of such section 391) with respect to networks or information systems of contractors; and
(B)
Department policies and systems for sharing information on cyber incidents with respect to networks or information systems of Department contractors.
(2)
Actions following assessment.— Upon completion of the assessment required by paragraph (1), the Secretary shall—
(A)
designate a Department component under subsection (a) of such section 391; and
(B)
issue or revise guidance applicable to Department components that ensures the rapid sharing by the component designated pursuant to such section 391 or section 941 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (10 U.S.C. 2224 note) of information relating to cyber incidents with respect to networks or information systems of contractors with other appropriate Department components.
(d)
Table of Chapters Amendment.— The table of chapters at the beginning of subtitle A of title 10, United States Code, and at the beginning of part I of such subtitle, are each amended by inserting after the item relating to chapter 18 the following new item:

“19. Cyber matters 391”.

SEC. 1633. Executive Agents for Cyber Test and Training Ranges.

(a)
Executive Agent.— Chapter 19 of title 10, United States Code, as added by section 1632 of this Act, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

“§ 392. Executive agents for cyber test and training ranges

“(a) Executive Agent.—The Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Principal Cyber Advisor, shall—

“(1) designate a senior official from among the personnel of the Department of Defense to act as the executive agent for cyber and information technology test ranges; and

“(2) designate a senior official from among the personnel of the Department of Defense to act as the executive agent for cyber and information technology training ranges.

“(b) Roles, Responsibilities, and Authorities.—

“(1) Establishment.—The Secretary of Defense shall prescribe the roles, responsibilities, and authorities of the executive agents designated under subsection (a). Such roles, responsibilities, and authorities shall include the development of a biennial integrated plan for cyber and information technology test and training resources.

“(2) Biennial integrated plan.—The biennial integrated plan required under paragraph (1) shall include plans for the following:

“(A) Developing and maintaining a comprehensive list of cyber and information technology ranges, test facilities, test beds, and other means of testing, training, and developing software, personnel, and tools for accommodating the mission of the Department. Such list shall include resources from both governmental and nongovernmental entities.

“(B) Organizing and managing designated cyber and information technology test ranges, including—

“(i) establishing the priorities for cyber and information technology ranges to meet Department objectives;

“(ii) enforcing standards to meet requirements specified by the United States Cyber Command, the training community, and the research, development, testing, and evaluation community;

“(iii) identifying and offering guidance on the opportunities for integration amongst the designated cyber and information technology ranges regarding test, training, and development functions;

“(iv) finding opportunities for cost reduction, integration, and coordination improvements for the appropriate cyber and information technology ranges;

“(v) adding or consolidating cyber and information technology ranges in the future to better meet the evolving needs of the cyber strategy and resource requirements of the Department;

“(vi) finding opportunities to continuously enhance the quality and technical expertise of the cyber and information technology test workforce through training and personnel policies; and

“(vii) coordinating with interagency and industry partners on cyber and information technology range issues.

“(C) Defining a cyber range architecture that—

“(i) may add or consolidate cyber and information technology ranges in the future to better meet the evolving needs of the cyber strategy and resource requirements of the Department;

“(ii) coordinates with interagency and industry partners on cyber and information technology range issues;

“(iii) allows for integrated closed loop testing in a secure environment of cyber and electronic warfare capabilities;

“(iv) supports science and technology development, experimentation, testing and training; and

“(v) provides for interconnection with other existing cyber ranges and other kinetic range facilities in a distributed manner.

“(D) Certifying all cyber range investments of the Department of Defense.

“(E) Performing such other assessments or analyses as the Secretary considers appropriate.

“(3) Standard for cyber event data.—The executive agents designated under subsection (a), in consultation with the Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense, shall jointly select a standard language from open-source candidates for representing and communicating cyber event and threat data. Such language shall be machine-readable for the Joint Information Environment and associated test and training ranges.

“(c) Support Within Department of Defense.—The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that the military departments, Defense Agencies, and other components of the Department of Defense provide the executive agents designated under subsection (a) with the appropriate support and resources needed to perform the roles, responsibilities, and authorities of the executive agents.

“(d) Compliance With Existing Directive.—The Secretary shall carry out this section in compliance with Directive 5101.1.

“(e) Definitions.—In this section:

“(1) The term ‘designated cyber and information technology range’ includes the National Cyber Range, the Joint Information Operations Range, the Defense Information Assurance Range, and the C4 Assessments Division of J6 of the Joint Staff.

“(2) The term ‘Directive 5101.1’ means Department of Defense Directive 5101.1, or any successor directive relating to the responsibilities of an executive agent of the Department of Defense.

“(3) The term ‘executive agent’ has the meaning given the term ‘DoD Executive Agent’ in Directive 5101.1.”

(b)
Designation and Roles and Responsibilities.— The Secretary of Defense shall—
(1)
not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, designate the executive agents required under subsection (a) of section 392 of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a) of this section; and
(2)
not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, prescribe the roles, responsibilities, and authorities required under subsection (b) of such section 392.
(c)
Selection of Standard Language.— Not later than June 1, 2015, the executive agents designated under subsection (a) of section 392 of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a) of this section, shall select the standard language under subsection (b)(3) of such section 392.
(d)
Table of Sections Amendment.— The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 19 of title 10, United States Code, as added by section 1632 of this Act, is amended by adding at the end the following new item:

“392. Executive agents for cyber test and training ranges.”.

SEC. 1634. Cyberspace Mapping.

(a)
Designation of Network.— Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall develop a plan to use a controlled laboratory environment or an existing network or network segment within the Department of Defense to identify network mapping capabilities to meet requirements of the United States Cyber Command.
(b)
Recommendations.— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Principal Cyber Advisor shall submit to the Secretary policy recommendations regarding the mapping of cyberspace to support the operational requirements of the United States Cyber Command.

SEC. 1635. Review of Cross Domain Solution Policy and Requirement for Cross Domain Solution Strategy.

(a)
Review of Policy.— The Secretary of Defense shall review the policies and guidance of the Department of Defense concerning the procurement, approval, and use of cross domain solutions by the Department of Defense.
(b)
Strategy for Cross Domain Solutions.—
(1)
In general.— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall develop a strategy for procurement, approval, and use of cross domain solutions by the Department.
(2)
Elements.— The strategy required by paragraph (1) shall include the following:
(A)
Identification and assessment of the current cross domain solutions in use throughout the Department of Defense, including the relative capabilities of such solutions and any gaps in current capabilities.
(B)
A determination of the requirements for cross domain solutions for enterprise applications as well as deployed warfighting operations, including operations with coalition partners.
(C)
A plan to enable verification of compliance with Department of Defense policies regarding the use of cross domain solutions.
(D)
A review of the current Department of Defense Information Assurance Certification and Accreditation Process for the applicability of such process to future virtualized cross domain technology.
(E)
A plan to meet the cross domain solution requirements for the Defense Intelligence Information Enterprise that must operate within the Joint Information Environment and the Intelligence Community Information Technology Environment.

SEC. 1636. Requirement for Strategy to Develop and Deploy Decryption Service for the Joint Information Environment.

(a)
Strategy Required.— The Secretary of Defense shall develop a strategy to develop and deploy a decryption service that enables the efficient decryption and re-encryption of encrypted communications within the Joint Information Environment and through the Internet access points of the Joint Information Environment in a manner that allows the Secretary to inspect the content of such communications to detect cyber threats and insider threat activity.
(b)
Elements.— The strategy required developed pursuant to subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1)
Requirements.
(2)
An estimate of the cost.
(3)
An assessment of the added security benefit.
(4)
An architecture.
(5)
A concept of operations.
(c)
Congressional Briefing.— Not later than October 1, 2015, the Secretary shall brief the congressional defense committees and the congressional intelligence committees (as defined in section 3 of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3003)) on the strategy developed under subsection (a).

SEC. 1637. Actions to Address Economic or Industrial Espionage in Cyberspace.

(a)
Report Required.—
(1)
In general.— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter through 2020, the President shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on foreign economic and industrial espionage in cyberspace during the 12-month period preceding the submission of the report that—
(A)
identifies—
(i)
foreign countries that engage in economic or industrial espionage in cyberspace with respect to trade secrets or proprietary information owned by United States persons;
(ii)
foreign countries identified under clause (i) that the President determines engage in the most egregious economic or industrial espionage in cyberspace with respect to such trade secrets or proprietary information (to be known as “priority foreign countries”);
(iii)
categories of technologies or proprietary information developed by United States persons that—
(I)
are targeted for economic or industrial espionage in cyberspace; and
(II)
to the extent practicable, have been appropriated through such espionage;
(iv)
articles manufactured or otherwise produced using technologies or proprietary information described in clause (iii)(II); and
(v)
to the extent practicable, services provided using such technologies or proprietary information;
(B)
describes the economic or industrial espionage engaged in by the foreign countries identified under clauses (i) and (ii) of subparagraph (A); and
(C)
describes—
(i)
actions taken by the President to decrease the prevalence of economic or industrial espionage in cyberspace; and
(ii)
the progress made in decreasing the prevalence of such espionage.
(2)
Determination of foreign countries engaging in economic or industrial espionage in cyberspace.— For purposes of clauses (i) and (ii) of paragraph (1)(A), the President shall identify a foreign country as a foreign country that engages in economic or industrial espionage in cyberspace with respect to trade secrets or proprietary information owned by United States persons if the government of the foreign country—
(A)
engages in economic or industrial espionage in cyberspace with respect to trade secrets or proprietary information owned by United States persons; or
(B)
facilitates, supports, fails to prosecute, or otherwise permits such espionage by—
(i)
individuals who are citizens or residents of the foreign country; or
(ii)
entities that are organized under the laws of the foreign country or are otherwise subject to the jurisdiction of the government of the foreign country.
(3)
Form of report.— Each report required by paragraph (1) shall be submitted in unclassified form but may contain a classified annex.
(b)
Imposition of Sanctions.—
(1)
In general.— The President may, pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.), block and prohibit all transactions in all property and interests in property of each person described in paragraph (2), if such property and interests in property are in the United States, come within the United States, or are or come within the possession or control of a United States person.
(2)
Persons described.— A person described in this paragraph is a foreign person the President determines knowingly requests, engages in, supports, facilitates, or benefits from the significant appropriation, through economic or industrial espionage in cyberspace, of technologies or proprietary information developed by United States persons.
(3)
Exception.— The authority to impose sanctions under paragraph (1) shall not include the authority to impose sanctions on the importation of goods.
(4)
Implementation; penalties.—
(A)
Implementation.— The President may exercise all authorities provided under sections 203 and 205 of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1702 and 1704) to carry out this subsection.
(B)
Penalties.— The penalties provided for in subsections (b) and (c) of section 206 of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1705) shall apply to a person that violates, attempts to violate, or conspires to violate, or causes a violation of, this subsection or a regulation prescribed under this subsection to the same extent that such penalties apply to a person that commits an unlawful act described in section 206(a) of that Act.
(c)
Rule of Construction.— Nothing in this section shall be construed to affect the application of any penalty or the exercise of any authority provided for under any other provision of law.
(d)
Definitions.— In this section:
(1)
Appropriate congressional committees.— The term “appropriate congressional committees” means—
(A)
the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, the Committee on Finance, the Committee on Foreign Relations, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate; and
(B)
the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Energy and Commerce, the Committee on Homeland Security, the Committee on Financial Services, the Committee on Foreign Affairs, the Committee on Ways and Means, and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives.
(2)
Cyberspace.— The term “cyberspace”—
(A)
means the interdependent network of information technology infrastructures; and
(B)
includes the Internet, telecommunications networks, computer systems, and embedded processors and controllers.
(3)
Economic or industrial espionage.— The term “economic or industrial espionage” means—
(A)
stealing a trade secret or proprietary information or appropriating, taking, carrying away, or concealing, or by fraud, artifice, or deception obtaining, a trade secret or proprietary information without the authorization of the owner of the trade secret or proprietary information;
(B)
copying, duplicating, downloading, uploading, destroying, transmitting, delivering, sending, communicating, or conveying a trade secret or proprietary information without the authorization of the owner of the trade secret or proprietary information; or
(C)
knowingly receiving, buying, or possessing a trade secret or proprietary information that has been stolen or appropriated, obtained, or converted without the authorization of the owner of the trade secret or proprietary information.
(4)
Knowingly.— The term “knowingly”, with respect to conduct, a circumstance, or a result, means that a person has actual knowledge, or should have known, of the conduct, the circumstance, or the result.
(5)
Own.— The term “own”, with respect to a trade secret or proprietary information, means to hold rightful legal or equitable title to, or license in, the trade secret or proprietary information.
(6)
Person.— The term “person” means an individual or entity.
(7)
Proprietary information.— The term “proprietary information” means competitive bid preparations, negotiating strategies, executive emails, internal financial data, strategic business plans, technical designs, manufacturing processes, source code, data derived from research and development investments, and other commercially valuable information that a person has developed or obtained if—
(A)
the person has taken reasonable measures to keep the information confidential; and
(B)
the information is not generally known or readily ascertainable through proper means by the public.
(8)
Technology.— The term “technology” has the meaning given that term in section 16 of the Export Administration Act of 1979 (50 U.S.C. App. 2415) (as in effect pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.)).
(9)
Trade secret.— The term “trade secret” has the meaning given that term in section 1839 of title 18, United States Code.
(10)
United states person.— The term “United States person” means—
(A)
an individual who is a citizen or resident of the United States;
(B)
an entity organized under the laws of the United States or any jurisdiction within the United States; or
(C)
a person located in the United States.

SEC. 1638. Sense of Congress Regarding Role of Reserve Components in Defense of United States Against Cyber Attacks.

It is the sense of Congress that—
(1)
members of the reserve components may possess knowledge of critical infrastructure in the States in which the members serve that may be of value for purposes of defending such infrastructure against cyber threats;
(2)
traditional members of the reserve components and reserve component technicians may have experience in both the private and public sector that could benefit the readiness of the Department of Defense’s cyber force and the development of cyber capabilities;
(3)
the long-standing relationship the reserve components has with local and civil authorities may be beneficial for purposes of providing for a coordinated response to a cyber attack and defending against cyber threats;
(4)
the States are already working to establish cyber partnerships with the reserve components; and
(5)
the reserve components have a role in the defense of the United States against cyber threats and consideration should be given to how the reserve components might be integrated into a comprehensive national approach for cyber defense.

SEC. 1639. Sense of Congress on the Future of the Internet and the .mil Top-Level Domain.

It is the sense of Congress that the Secretary of Defense should—
(1)
work within the existing interagency process underway as of the date of the enactment of this Act regarding the transfer of the remaining role of the United States Government in the functions of the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority to a global multi-stakeholder community and support transferring this role only if—
(A)
assurances are provided for the protection of the current status of legacy top-level domain names and Internet Protocol address numbers, particularly those used by the Department of Defense and the components of the United States Government for national security purposes;
(B)
mechanisms are institutionalized to uphold and protect consensus-based decision making in the multi-stakeholder approach; and
(C)
existing stress-testing scenarios of the accountability process of the multi-stakeholder model can be confidently shown to work transparently, securely, and efficiently to maintain a free, open, and resilient Internet; and
(2)
take all necessary steps to sustain the successful stewardship and good standing of the Internet root zone servers managed by components of the Department of Defense, including active participation, review, and analysis for transition planning documents and accountability stress testing.

Subtitle D Nuclear Forces

SEC. 1641. Preparation of Annual Budget Request Regarding Nuclear Weapons.

Section 179(f) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraphs:

“(3)

(A) With respect to the preparation of a budget for a fiscal year to be submitted by the President to Congress under section 1105(a) of title 31, the Secretary of Defense may not agree to a proposed transfer of estimated nuclear budget request authority unless the Secretary of Defense submits to the congressional defense committees a report described in subparagraph (B).

“(B) A report described in this subparagraph is a report that includes the following:

“(i) Except as provided by subparagraph (C), certification that, during the fiscal year prior to the fiscal year covered by the budget for which the report is submitted, the Secretary of Energy obligated or expended any amounts covered by a proposed transfer of estimated nuclear budget request authority made for such prior fiscal year in a manner consistent with a memorandum of agreement that was developed by the Nuclear Weapons Council and entered into by the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Energy.

“(ii) A detailed assessment by the Nuclear Weapons Council regarding how the Administrator for Nuclear Security implemented any agreements and decisions of the Council made during such prior fiscal year.

“(iii) An assessment from each of the Chairman of the Joints Chiefs of Staff and the Commander of the United States Strategic Command regarding any effects to the military during such prior fiscal year that were caused by the delay or failure of the Administrator to implement any agreements or decisions described in clause (ii).

“(C) With respect to a report described in subparagraph (B), the Secretary may waive the requirement to include the certification described in clause (i) of such subparagraph if the Secretary—

“(i) determines that such waiver is in the national security interests of the United States; and

“(ii) instead of the certification described in such clause (i), includes as part of such report—

“(I) a copy of the agreement that the Secretary has entered into with the Secretary of Energy regarding the manner and the purpose for which the Secretary of Energy will obligate or expend any amounts covered by a proposed transfer of estimated nuclear budget request authority for the fiscal year covered by the budget for which such report is submitted; and

“(II) an explanation for why the Secretary did not include such certification in such report.

“(4) The Secretary of Defense shall include with the defense budget materials for a fiscal year the memorandum of agreement described in subparagraph (B)(i) of paragraph (3), or the agreement described in subparagraph (C) of such paragraph, as the case may be, that covers such fiscal year.

“(5)

(A) Not later than 30 days after the President submits to Congress the budget for a fiscal year under section 1105(a) of title 31, the Commander of the United States Strategic Command shall submit to the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff an assessment of—

“(i) whether such budget allows the Federal Government to meet the nuclear stockpile and stockpile stewardship program requirements during the fiscal year covered by the budget and the four subsequent fiscal years; and

“(ii) if the Commander determines that such budget does not allow the Federal Government to meet such requirements, a description of the steps being taken to meet such requirements.

“(B) Not later than 30 days after the date on which the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff receives the assessment of the Commander of the United States Strategic Command under subparagraph (A), the Chairman shall submit to the congressional defense committees—

“(i) such assessment as it was submitted to the Chairman; and

“(ii) any comments of the Chairman.

“(6) In this subsection:

“(A) The term ‘budget’ has the meaning given that term in section 231(f) of this title.

“(B) The term ‘defense budget materials’ has the meaning given that term in section 231(f) of this title.

“(C) The term ‘proposed transfer of estimated nuclear budget request authority’ means, in preparing a budget, a request for the Secretary of Defense to transfer an estimated amount of the proposed budget authority of the Secretary to the Secretary of Energy for purposes relating to nuclear weapons.”

SEC. 1642. Improvement to Biennial Assessment on Delivery Platforms for Nuclear Weapons and the Nuclear Command and Control System.

Section 492(a)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting “ , and the ability to meet operational availability requirements for,” after “ military effectiveness of”.

SEC. 1643. Congressional Budget Office Review of Cost Estimates for Nuclear Weapons.

Section 1043 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1576), as most recently amended by section 1054 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 861), is further amended by striking subsection (b) and inserting the following new subsection (b):

“(b) Estimate of Costs by Congressional Budget Office.—

“(1) Budgets for odd-numbered fiscal years.—Not later than July 1 of each year in which the President transmits a covered odd-numbered fiscal year report, the Director of the Congressional Budget Office shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that includes—

“(A) an estimate of the costs during the 10-year period beginning on the date of such covered odd-numbered fiscal year report associated with fielding and maintaining the current nuclear weapons and nuclear weapon delivery systems of the United States;

“(B) an estimate of the costs during such period of any life extension, modernization, or replacement of any current nuclear weapons or nuclear weapon delivery systems of the United States that is anticipated as of the date of such covered odd-numbered fiscal year report; and

“(C) an estimate of the relative percentage of total defense spending during such period represented by the costs estimated under subparagraphs (A) and (B).

“(2) Budgets for even-numbered fiscal years.—If the Director determines that a covered even-numbered fiscal year report contains a significant change that affects the estimates of the Director included in the report submitted under paragraph (1) in the year prior to the year in which such covered even-numbered fiscal year report is submitted, the Director shall submit to the congressional defense committees a letter describing such significant changes.

“(3) Definitions.—In this subsection:

“(A) The term ‘covered even-numbered fiscal year report’ means a report required to be transmitted under subsection (a)(1) not later than 30 days after the submission to Congress of the budget of the President for an even-numbered fiscal year.

“(B) The term ‘covered odd-numbered fiscal year report’ means a report required to be transmitted under subsection (a)(1) not later than 30 days after the submission to Congress of the budget of the President for an odd-numbered fiscal year.”

SEC. 1644. Retention of Missile Silos.

(a)
Requirement.— During the period in which the New START Treaty (as defined in section 494(a)(2)(D) of title 10, United States Code) is in effect, the Secretary of Defense shall preserve each intercontinental ballistic missile silo that contains a deployed missile as of the date of the enactment of this Act in, at minimum, a warm status that enables such silo to—
(1)
remain a fully functioning element of the interconnected and redundant command and control system of the missile field; and
(2)
be made fully operational with a deployed missile.
(b)
Rule of Construction.— Nothing in subsection (b) shall be construed to prohibit the Secretary of Defense from temporarily placing an intercontinental ballistic missile silo offline to perform maintenance activities.

SEC. 1645. Procurement Authority for Certain Parts of Intercontinental Ballistic Missile Fuzes.

(a)
In General.— The Secretary of the Air Force may enter into contracts for the life-of-type procurement of covered parts of the intercontinental ballistic missile fuze.
(b)
Availability of Funds.— Notwithstanding section 1502(a) of title 31, United States Code, of the amount authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2015 by section 101 and available for Missile Procurement, Air Force as specified in the funding table in section 4101, $4,700,000 shall be available for the procurement of covered parts pursuant to contracts entered into under subsection (a).
(c)
Covered Parts Defined.— In this section, the term “covered parts” means commercially available off-the-shelf items as defined in section 104 of title 41, United States Code.

SEC. 1646. Assessment of Nuclear Weapon Secondary Requirement.

(a)
Assessment.— The Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of Energy and the Commander of the United States Strategic Command, shall assess the annual secondary production requirement needed to sustain a safe, secure, reliable, and effective nuclear deterrent.
(b)
Report.—
(1)
In general.— Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of Energy and the Commander of the United States Strategic Command, shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report regarding the assessment conducted under subsection (a).
(2)
Matters included.— The report under paragraph (1) shall include the following:
(A)
An explanation of the rationale and assumptions that led to the current 50 to 80 secondaries per year production requirement, including the factors considered in determining such requirement.
(B)
An analysis of whether there are any changes to such 50 to 80 secondaries per year production requirement, including the reasons for any such changes.
(C)
A description of how the secondary production requirement is affected by or related to—
(i)
the demands of stockpile modernization, including the schedule for life extension programs;
(ii)
the requirement for a responsive infrastructure, including the ability to hedge against technical failure and geopolitical risk; and
(iii)
the number of secondaries held in reserve or the inactive stockpile, and the likelihood such secondaries may be reused.
(E)
The proposed timeframe for achieving such 50 to 80 secondaries per year production requirement.
(3)
Form.— The report under paragraph (1) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.

SEC. 1647. Certification on Nuclear Force Structure.

Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, in coordination with the Commander of the United States Strategic Command, shall certify to the congressional defense committees that the plan for implementation of the New START Treaty (as defined in section 494(a)(2)(D) of title 10, United States Code) announced on April 8, 2014, will enable the United States to meet its obligations under such treaty in a manner that ensures the nuclear forces of the United States—
(1)
are capable, survivable, and balanced; and
(2)
maintain strategic stability, deterrence and extended deterrence, and allied assurance.

SEC. 1648. Advance Notice and Reports on B61 Life Extension Program.

(a)
Notification and Reports.— Not later than 30 days before any decision is made to reduce the number of final production units for the B61 life extension program below the total number of such units planned in the stockpile stewardship and management plan required by section 4203 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2523) for fiscal year 2015—
(1)
the Chairman of the Nuclear Weapons Council established under section 179 of title 10, United States Code, shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that includes—
(A)
a notification of such decision;
(B)
an explanation of the proposed changes to the life extension program; and
(C)
a comprehensive discussion of the justification for such changes; and
(2)
the Commander of the United States Strategic Command shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that includes—
(A)
an assessment of such changes to the life extension program;
(B)
a description of the risks associated with such decision;
(C)
an assessment of the impact of such decision on the ability of the United States Strategic Command to meet deterrence, extended deterrence, and assurance requirements during the expected lifetime of the B61–12 bomb; and
(D)
such other matters as the Commander considers appropriate.
(b)
Form of Reports.— Each report required by subsection (a) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.

SEC. 1649. Notification and Report Concerning Removal or Consolidation of Dual-Capable Aircraft from Europe.

(a)
Notification and Report.— Not later than 90 days before the date on which the Secretary of Defense removes or consolidates dual-capable aircraft of the United States from the area of responsibility of the United States European Command, the Secretary shall notify the congressional defense committees of such proposed removal or consolidation. Such notification shall include a report explaining—
(1)
how such removal or consolidation is in the national security interests of the United States and the allies of the United States, including the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Alliance; and
(2)
whether, and in what respects, such proposed removal or consolidation is affected by—
(A)
the armed forces of the Russian Federation continuing to illegally occupy Ukrainian territory;
(B)
the Russian Federation deploying or preparing to deploy its nuclear weapons to Ukrainian territory;
(C)
the Russian Federation not complying with the INF Treaty and other treaties and agreements to which it is a party; and
(D)
the Russian Federation not complying with the CFE Treaty and not lifting its suspension of Russian observance of its treaty obligations.
(b)
Definitions.— In this section:
(1)
The term “CFE Treaty” means the Treaty on Conventional Armed Forces in Europe, signed at Paris, November 19, 1990, and entered into force July 17, 1992.
(2)
The “dual-capable aircraft” means tactical fighter aircraft that can perform both conventional and nuclear missions.
(3)
The term “INF Treaty” means the Treaty Between the United States of America and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics on the Elimination of Their Intermediate-Range and Shorter-Range Missiles, commonly referred to as the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty, signed at Washington, December 8, 1987, and entered into force June 1, 1988.

SEC. 1650. Reports on Installation of Nuclear Command, Control, and Communications Systems at Headquarters of United States Strategic Command.

(a)
In General.— Not later than 30 days after the date on which the budget of the President for a fiscal year is submitted to Congress pursuant to section 1105 of title 31, United States Code, the Commander of the United States Strategic Command shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the installation and operation of nuclear command, control, and communications systems associated with the construction of the headquarters of the United States Strategic Command.
(b)
Elements.— The report required by subsection (a) shall address, with respect to the installation and operation of nuclear command, control, and communications systems associated with the construction of the headquarters of the United States Strategic Command, the following:
(1)
Milestones and costs associated with installation of communications systems.
(2)
Milestones and costs associated with integrating targeting and analysis planning tools.
(3)
An assessment of progress on the upgrade of systems that existed before the date of the enactment of this Act, such as the Strategic Automated Command and Control System and the MILSTAR satellite communications system, for compatibility with such nuclear command, control, and communications systems.
(4)
Such other information as the Commander of the United States Strategic Command considers necessary to assess adherence to overall cost, scope, and schedule milestones.
(c)
Termination.— The Commander of the United States Strategic Command shall not be required to submit a report under subsection (a) with the budget of the President for any fiscal year after the date on which the Commander certifies to the congressional defense committees that all milestones relating to the installation of nuclear command, control, and communications systems associated with the construction of the headquarters of the United States Strategic Command have been completed and such systems are fully operational.

SEC. 1651. Report on Plans for Response of Department of Defense to Inf Treaty Violation.

(a)
Report.— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report containing a detailed description of any steps being taken or planned to be taken by the Secretary in response to actions of the Government of the Russian Federation in violation of its obligations under the INF Treaty in order to reduce the negative impact of such actions on the national security of the United States.
(b)
Elements.— The report under subsection (a) shall include a description of any plans to conduct activities relating to the research, development, testing, or deployment of potential future military capabilities of the United States, including with respect to activities to modify, test, or deploy existing military systems, to deter or defend against the threat of intermediate-range nuclear force systems of Russia if Russia deploys such systems.
(c)
Form.— The report required by subsection (a) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.
(d)
INF Treaty Defined.— In this section, the term “INF Treaty” means the Treaty Between the United States of America and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics on the Elimination of Their Intermediate-Range and Shorter-Range Missiles, commonly referred to as the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty, signed at Washington December 8, 1987, and entered into force June 1, 1988.

SEC. 1652. Statement of Policy on the Nuclear Triad.

It is the policy of the United States—
(1)
to operate, sustain, and modernize or replace the triad of strategic nuclear delivery systems consisting of—
(A)
heavy bombers equipped with nuclear gravity bombs and air-launched nuclear cruise missiles;
(B)
land-based intercontinental ballistic missiles equipped with nuclear warheads that are capable of carrying multiple independently targetable reentry vehicles; and
(C)
ballistic missile submarines equipped with submarine launched ballistic missiles and multiple nuclear warheads;
(2)
to operate, sustain, and modernize or replace a capability to forward-deploy nuclear weapons and dual-capable fighter-bomber aircraft;
(3)
to deter potential adversaries and assure allies and partners of the United States through strong and long-term commitment to the nuclear deterrent of the United States and the personnel, systems, and infrastructure that comprise such deterrent; and
(4)
to ensure that the members of the Armed Forces who operate the nuclear deterrent of the United States have the training, resources, and national support required to execute the critical national security mission of the members.

SEC. 1653. Sense of Congress on Deterrence and Defense Posture of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization.

It is the sense of Congress that the United States reaffirms and remains committed to the policies enumerated by the North Atlantic Treaty Organization in the Deterrence and Defense Posture Review, dated May 20, 2012, and the Wales Summit Declaration of September 2014, including the following statements:
(1)
As stated in the Deterrence and Defense Posture Review:
(A)
“The greatest responsibility of the Alliance is to protect and defend our territory and our populations against attack, as set out in Article 5 of the Washington Treaty. The Alliance does not consider any country to be its adversary. However, no one should doubt NATO’s resolve if the security of any of its members were to be threatened. NATO will ensure that it maintains the full range of capabilities necessary to deter and defend against any threat to the safety and security of our populations, wherever it should arise. Allies’ goal is to bolster deterrence as a core element of our collective defense and contribute to the indivisible security of the Alliance.”.
(B)
“Nuclear weapons are a core component of NATO’s overall capabilities for deterrence and defense alongside conventional and missile defense forces. The review has shown that the Alliance’s nuclear force posture currently meets the criteria for an effective deterrence and defense posture.”.
(C)
“The circumstances in which any use of nuclear weapons might have to be contemplated are extremely remote. As long as nuclear weapons exist, NATO will remain a nuclear alliance. The supreme guarantee of the security of the Allies is provided by the strategic nuclear forces of the Alliance, particularly those of the United States; the independent strategic forces of the United Kingdom and France, which have a deterrent role of their own, contribute to the overall deterrence and security of the Allies.”.
(D)
“NATO must have the full range of capabilities necessary to deter and defend against threats to the safety of its populations and the security of its territory, which is the Alliance’s greatest responsibility.”.
(E)
“NATO is committed to maintaining an appropriate mix of nuclear, conventional, and missile defense capabilities for deterrence and defense to fulfill its commitments as set out in the Strategic Concept. These capabilities, underpinned by NATO’s Integrated Command Structure, offer the strongest guarantee of the Alliance’s security and will ensure that it is able to respond to a variety of challenges and unpredictable contingencies in a highly complex and evolving international security environment.”.
(2)
As stated in the Wales Summit Declaration:
(A)
“Deterrence, based on an appropriate mix of nuclear, conventional, and missile defence capabilities, remains a core element of our overall strategy.”.
(B)
“Arms control, disarmament, and non-proliferation continue to play an important role in the achievement of the Alliance’s security objectives. Both the success and failure of these efforts can have a direct impact on the threat environment of NATO. In this context, it is of paramount importance that disarmament and non-proliferation commitments under existing treaties are honoured, including the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty, which is a crucial element of Euro-Atlantic security. In that regard, Allies call on Russia to preserve the viability of the INF Treaty through ensuring full and verifiable compliance.”.

Subtitle E Missile Defense Programs

SEC. 1661. Availability of Funds for Iron Dome Short-Range Rocket Defense System.

(a)
Availability of Funds.— Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by section 1502 for procurement, Defense-wide, and available for the Missile Defense Agency, not more than $350,972,000 may be provided to the Government of Israel to procure the Iron Dome short-range rocket defense system as specified in the funding table in section 4102, including for co-production of Iron Dome parts and components in the United States by industry of the United States.
(b)
Conditions.—
(1)
Agreement.— Funds described in subsection (a) to produce the Iron Dome short-range rocket defense program shall be available subject to the terms, conditions, and co-production targets specified for fiscal year 2015 in the “Agreement Between the Department of Defense of the United States of America and the Ministry of Defense of the State of Israel Concerning Iron Dome Defense System Procurement,” signed on March 5, 2014.
(2)
Certification.— Not later than 30 days prior to the initial obligation of funds described in subsection (a), the Director of the Missile Defense Agency and the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics shall jointly submit to the congressional defense committees—
(A)
a certification that the agreement specified in paragraph (1) is being implemented as provided in such agreement; and
(B)
an assessment detailing any risks relating to the implementation of such agreement.

SEC. 1662. Testing and Assessment of Missile Defense Systems Prior to Production and Deployment.

(a)
Sense of Congress.— It is the sense of Congress that—
(1)
it is a high priority of the United States that the ballistic missile defense system should work in an operationally effective and cost-effective manner;
(2)
prior to making final production decisions for such systems, and prior to the operational deployment of such systems, the United States should conduct operationally realistic intercept flight testing that should create sufficiently challenging operational conditions to establish confidence that such systems will work in an operationally effective and cost-effective manner when needed; and
(3)
in order to achieve these objectives, and to avoid post-production and post-deployment problems, it is essential for the Department of Defense to follow a “fly before you buy” approach to adequately test and assess the elements of the ballistic missile defense system before final production decisions or operational deployment.
(b)
Successful Testing Required Prior to Final Production or Operational Deployment.— The Secretary of Defense may not make a final production decision for, or operationally deploy, a covered system unless—
(1)
the Secretary ensures that—
(A)
sufficient and operationally realistic testing of the covered system is conducted to assess the performance of the covered system in order to inform a final production decision or an operational deployment decision; and
(B)
the results of such testing have demonstrated a high probability that the covered system—
(i)
will work in an operationally effective manner; and
(ii)
has the ability to accomplish the intended mission of the covered system;
(2)
the Director of Operational Test and Evaluation has carried out subsection (c) with respect to such covered system; and
(3)
the Commander of the United States Strategic Command has carried out subsection (d) with respect to such covered system.
(c)
Assessment by Director of Operational Test and Evaluation.— The Director of Operational Test and Evaluation shall—
(1)
provide to the Secretary the assessment of the Director, based on the available test data, of the sufficiency, adequacy, and results of the testing of each covered system, including an assessment of whether the covered system will be sufficiently effective, suitable, and survivable when needed; and
(2)
submit to the congressional defense committees a written summary of such assessment.
(d)
Assessment by Commander of United States Strategic Command.— The Commander of the United States Strategic Command shall—
(1)
provide to the Secretary a military utility assessment of the operational utility of each covered system; and
(2)
not later than 30 days after providing such assessment to the Secretary, submit to the congressional defense committees a written summary of such assessment.
(e)
Rule of Construction.— Nothing in this section shall be construed to alter, modify, or otherwise affect a determination of the Secretary with respect to the participation of the Missile Defense Agency in the Joint Capabilities Integration Development System or the acquisition reporting process under the Department of Defense Directive 5000 series.
(f)
Covered System.— In this section, the term “covered system” means a new or substantially upgraded interceptor or weapon system of the ballistic missile defense system, other than the re-designed exo-atmospheric kill vehicle covered by the acquisition plan developed under section 1663.

SEC. 1663. Acquisition Plan for Re-Designed Exo-Atmospheric Kill Vehicle.

(a)
Sense of Congress.— It is the sense of Congress that—
(1)
the existing models of the exo-atmospheric kill vehicle of the ground-based midcourse defense system are prototype designs that were developed and deployed without using traditional acquisition practices in order to provide an initial defensive capability for an emerging ballistic missile threat;
(2)
consequently, while the deployed models of the exo-atmospheric kill vehicle have demonstrated an initial level of capability against a limited threat, such models do not have the degree of reliability, robustness, cost effectiveness, and performance that are desirable;
(3)
the exo-atmospheric kill vehicle for the ground-based midcourse defense system needs to be re-designed to substantially improve the performance and reliability of such kill vehicles; and
(4)
the Secretary of Defense should follow a robust and rigorous acquisition plan for the design, development, and testing of the re-designed exo-atmospheric kill vehicle.
(b)
Acquisition Plan Required.— The Secretary of Defense shall develop an acquisition plan for the re-design of the exo-atmospheric kill vehicle of the ground-based midcourse defense system that includes rigorous elements for system engineering, design, integration, development, testing, and evaluation.
(c)
Objectives.— The objectives of the acquisition plan under subsection (b) shall be to ensure that the re-designed exo-atmospheric kill vehicle is operationally effective, reliable, producible, cost effective, maintainable, and testable.
(d)
Approval of Acquisition Plan Required.— The acquisition plan under subsection (b) shall be subject to approval by the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics.
(e)
Testing Required.— Prior to operational deployment of the re-designed exo-atmospheric kill vehicle, the Secretary shall ensure that the re-designed kill vehicle has demonstrated, through successful, operationally realistic flight testing—
(1)
a high probability of working in an operationally effective manner; and
(2)
the ability to accomplish the intended mission of the re-designed kill vehicle, including against more complex emerging ballistic missile threats.
(f)
Report Required.— Not later than 60 days after the date on which the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics approves the acquisition plan under subsection (d), the Director of the Missile Defense Agency shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report describing the acquisition plan and the manner in which the plan will meet the objectives described in subsection (c).

SEC. 1664. Study on Testing Program of Ground-Based Midcourse Missile Defense System.

(a)
Study.— Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall enter into a contract with a federally funded research and development center to conduct a study on the testing program of the ground-based midcourse missile defense system.
(b)
Elements.— The study under subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1)
An assessment of whether the testing program described in subsection (a) has established, as of the date of the study, that the ground-based midcourse missile defense system has a high probability of performing reliably and effectively against limited missile threats from North Korea and Iran under realistic operational conditions, including an explanation of the degree of confidence supporting such assessment.
(2)
An assessment of whether the currently planned testing program, if implemented, is sufficient to establish reasonable confidence that the ground-based midcourse missile defense system has a high probability of performing reliably and effectively under realistic operational conditions against current and plausible near- and medium-term limited ballistic missile threats from North Korea and Iran.
(3)
Any recommendations for improvements that could be made to the testing program to—
(A)
achieve reasonable confidence that the system would be reliable and effective under realistic operational conditions; or
(B)
improve test and cost efficiencies.
(c)
Report.— Not later than one year after entering into the contract under subsection (a), the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report containing the study. The report shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.

SEC. 1665. Sense of Congress and Report on Homeland Ballistic Missile Defense.

(a)
Sense of Congress.— It is the sense of Congress that—
(1)
it is a national priority to defend the United States homeland against the threat of limited ballistic missile attack (whether accidental, unauthorized, or deliberate);
(2)
although the currently deployed ground-based midcourse defense system provides a level of protection of the entire United States homeland, including the East Coast, against the threat of limited ballistic missile attack from North Korea and Iran, this capability needs to be improved to meet evolving ballistic missile threats;
(3)
the initial step in this process of improvement is to correct the problems that caused the flight test failures with the current kill vehicles, and to improve the reliability of the deployed ground-based interceptor fleet;
(4)
as indicated by senior officials of the Department of Defense, continued investments to enhance homeland defense sensor and discrimination capabilities are essential to improve the operational effectiveness and shot doctrine of the ground-based midcourse defense system;
(5)
given limitations with the currently deployed exo-atmospheric kill vehicles, it is important to re-design the exo-atmospheric kill vehicle using a rigorous acquisition approach, including realistic testing, that can achieve a demonstrated capability as soon as practicable using sound acquisition principles and practices; and
(6)
in order to stay ahead of evolving ballistic missile threats, the Department should design the next generation exo-atmospheric kill vehicle to take full advantage of improvements in sensors, discrimination, kill assessment, battle management, and command and control, including the potential to engage multiple objects.
(b)
Report Required.—
(1)
In general.— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director of the Missile Defense Agency, in coordination with the Commander of the United States Northern Command, shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report setting forth the status of current and planned efforts to improve the homeland ballistic missile defense capability of the United States.
(2)
Elements.— The report under paragraph (1) shall include the following:
(A)
A detailed description of the current assessment of the threat to the United Sates from limited ballistic missile attack (whether accidental, unauthorized, or deliberate), particularly from countries such as North Korea and Iran, and an assessment of the projected future threat through 2023, including a discussion of confidence levels and uncertainties in such threat assessment.
(B)
A detailed description of the status of efforts to correct the problems that caused the flight test failures of the capability enhancement-I and capability enhancement-II exo-atmospheric kill vehicles.
(C)
A detailed description of the status of efforts to field the additional 14 ground-based interceptors planned for deployment at Fort Greely, Alaska, including the status of the refurbishment of Missile Field 1 at Fort Greely, and the operational impact of the additional interceptors.
(D)
A detailed description of the plans and progress toward improving the capability, reliability, and availability of fielded ground-based interceptors, including progress toward improving the capabilities of ground-based interceptors deployed with upgraded capability enhancement-I and capability enhancement-II exo-atmospheric kill vehicles.
(E)
A detailed description of the planned improvements to homeland ballistic missile defense sensor and discrimination capabilities, including through the use of additional sensor systems of the United States, and an assessment of the expected operational benefits of such improvements to homeland ballistic missile defense.
(F)
A detailed description of the plans and efforts to redesign, develop, test, and field the exo-atmospheric kill vehicle for the ground-based midcourse defense system, and an explanation of the expected improvements of such kill vehicle with respect to capability, cost effectiveness, reliability, maintainability, and producibility.
(G)
A detailed description of the plans for developing, testing, and fielding the next generation exo-atmospheric kill vehicle, and an explanation of how the anticipated capabilities are intended to remain ahead of evolving ballistic missile threats.
(H)
A status of efforts on, and goals for, a common kill vehicle with multiple object kill capability, and an explanation of how such capability could keep the missile defense capability of the United States paced ahead of evolving ballistic missile threats.
(I)
A detailed description of the options to improve the homeland ballistic missile defense capability that would respond to the emergence of a long-range ballistic missile threat from Iran, including an evaluation of the potential benefits and drawbacks of—
(i)
the deployment of a missile defense interceptor site on the East Coast;
(ii)
the deployment of a missile defense interceptor site in another location in the United States other than on the East Coast;
(iii)
the deployment of a missile defense interceptor site in a location other than in the United States; and
(iv)
the deployment of additional ground-based interceptors for the ground-based midcourse defense system at Fort Greely, Alaska, or Vandenberg Air Force Base, California, or both.
(J)
Any other matters the Director considers appropriate.
(3)
Form.— The report under paragraph (1) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.

SEC. 1666. Sense of Congress and Report on Regional Ballistic Missile Defense.

(a)
Sense of Congress.— It is the sense of Congress that—
(1)
the regional ballistic missile capabilities of countries such as Iran and North Korea pose a serious and growing threat to forward deployed forces of the United States, allies, and partner countries;
(2)
given this growing threat, it is a high priority for the United States to develop, test, and deploy effective regional missile defense capabilities to provide the commanders of the geographic combatant commands with capabilities to meet the operational requirements of the commanders, and for allies and partners of the United States to improve their regional missile defense capabilities;
(3)
the United States and its North Atlantic Treaty Organization partners should continue the development, testing, and implementation of phases 2 and 3 of the European Phased Adaptive Approach to defend forward deployed forces of the United States, allies, and partners in the North Atlantic Treaty Organization in Europe against the growing regional missile capability of Iran;
(4)
the United States should continue efforts to improve regional missile defense capabilities in the Middle East, including its close cooperation with Israel and its efforts with countries of the Gulf Cooperation Council, in order to improve regional security against the growing regional missile capabilities of Iran; and
(5)
the United States should continue to work closely with its allies in Asia, particularly Japan, South Korea, and Australia, to improve regional missile defense capabilities, particularly against the growing threat from North Korean ballistic missiles.
(b)
Report Required.— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director of the Missile Defense Agency, in coordination with the Commander of the United States Strategic Command, shall submit to the congressional defense committees, the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives, and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate a report setting forth the status and progress of efforts to improve the regional missile defense capabilities of the United States in Europe, the Middle East, and the Asia-Pacific region, including efforts and cooperation by allies and partner countries.
(c)
Elements.— The report under subsection (b) shall include the following:
(1)
A detailed description of the status of implementation (including on the basis of technical development and acquisition of systems and capabilities) of the European Phased Adaptive Approach, including—
(A)
the status of efforts to develop, test, and deploy the capabilities planned for phases 2 and 3 of the European Phased Adaptive Approach;
(B)
a detailed description of the current and projected defended area of each phase of the European Phased Adaptive Approach and the missile defense requirement for the capability provided under each such phase;
(C)
a detailed description of current force structure plans of the United States and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization associated with the different phases of the European Phased Adaptive Approach at various alert conditions and readiness levels;
(D)
a detailed explanation of the current concept of operations for phase 1 of the European Phased Adaptive Approach and information on phase 2, including—
(i)
the arrangements for allocating the command of assets assigned to the missile defense of Europe between the Commander of the United States European Command and the Supreme Allied Commander, Europe;
(ii)
an explanation of the circumstances under which such command would be allocated to each such commander; and
(iii)
a description of the prioritization of defense of both the deployed forces of the United States and the territory of the member states of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization using available missile defense interceptor inventory;
(E)
an explanation of the concept for the defense of assets of the European Phased Adaptive Approach in the event such assets are targeted by adversaries; and
(F)
an explanation of the development and acquisition of the active layered theater ballistic missile defense system of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, including the interoperability of such system with the ballistic missile defense system and other command and control systems of the United States.
(2)
A detailed description of the status of efforts to improve the regional missile defense capabilities of the United States and the countries of the Gulf Cooperation Council in the Middle East against regional missile threats from Iran, including the progress made toward, and benefits of, multilateral cooperation and data sharing among the countries of the Gulf Cooperation Council with respect to multilateral integrated air and missile defense against threats from Iran.
(3)
A detailed description of the progress of the United States and the allies of the United States in the Asia-Pacific region, particularly Japan, South Korea, and Australia, to improve regional ballistic missile defense capabilities and an assessment of the value of increasing cooperation, information sharing, and opportunities for additional interoperability on a bilateral and multilateral basis.
(4)
A description of how the missile defense acquisitions of allies and partners of the United States, including the acquisition of missile defense technology of the United States, could be optimized to contribute to integrated and networked regional missile defense, including a description of any steps being taken to carry out such optimization.
(5)
A detailed description of—
(A)
the degree of coordination among the commanders of the geographic combatant commands with respect to integrated missile defense planning and operations, including obstacles and opportunities to improving such coordination and integrated capabilities; and
(B)
efforts to integrate offensive and defensive forces, as specified in the “Joint Integrated Air and Missile Defense Strategy: Vision 2020” signed by the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff in December 2013.
(6)
A detailed description of the phased and adaptive elements of the regional missile defense approaches of the United States tailored to the specific regional requirements in the areas of responsibility of the United States Central Command and the United States Pacific Command, including the role of missile defense capabilities of allies and partners of the United States in each region.
(7)
A detailed description of the regional missile defense risk assessment and priorities of the commanders of the geographic combatant commands and a detailed description of the assessed ballistic missile threat facing each geographic combatant command through 2024.
(8)
A detailed explanation of the contributions made by the regional missile defense capabilities of the United States to the defense of the United States.
(9)
Such other matters as the Director considers appropriate.
(d)
Form.— The report required by subsection (b) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.

TITLE XVII National Commission on the Future of the Army

Subtitle A Establishment and Duties of Commission

SEC. 1701. Short Title.

This subtitle may be cited as the “National Commission on the Future of the Army Act of 2014”.

SEC. 1702. National Commission on the Future of the Army.

(a)
Establishment.— There is established the National Commission on the Future of the Army (in this subtitle referred to as the “Commission”).
(b)
Membership.—
(1)
Composition.— The Commission shall be composed of eight members, of whom—
(A)
four shall be appointed by the President;
(B)
one shall be appointed by the Chairman of the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate;
(C)
one shall be appointed by the Ranking Member of the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate;
(D)
one shall be appointed by the Chairman of the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives; and
(E)
one shall be appointed by the Ranking Member of the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives.
(2)
Appointment date.— The appointments of the members of the Commission shall be made not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act.
(3)
Effect of lack of appointment by appointment date.— If one or more appointments under subparagraph (A) of paragraph (1) is not made by the appointment date specified in paragraph (2), the authority to make such appointment or appointments shall expire, and the number of members of the Commission shall be reduced by the number equal to the number of appointments so not made. If an appointment under subparagraph (B), (C), (D), or (E) of paragraph (1) is not made by the appointment date specified in paragraph (2), the authority to make an appointment under such subparagraph shall expire, and the number of members of the Commission shall be reduced by the number equal to the number otherwise appointable under such subparagraph.
(4)
Expertise.— In making appointments under this subsection, consideration should be given to individuals with expertise in national and international security policy and strategy, military forces capability, force structure design, organization, and employment, and reserve forces policy.
(c)
Period of Appointment; Vacancies.— Members shall be appointed for the life of the Commission. Any vacancy in the Commission shall not affect its powers, but shall be filled in the same manner as the original appointment.
(d)
Chair and Vice Chair.— The Commission shall select a Chair and Vice Chair from among its members.
(e)
Initial Meeting.— Not later than 30 days after the date on which all members of the Commission have been appointed, the Commission shall hold its initial meeting.
(f)
Meetings.— The Commission shall meet at the call of the Chair.
(g)
Quorum.— A majority of the members of the Commission shall constitute a quorum, but a lesser number of members may hold hearings.

SEC. 1703. Duties of the Commission.

(a)
Study on Structure of the Army.—
(1)
In general.— The Commission shall undertake a comprehensive study of the structure of the Army, and policy assumptions related to the size and force mixture of the Army, in order—
(A)
to make an assessment of the size and force mixture of the active component of the Army and the reserve components of the Army; and
(B)
to make recommendations on the modifications, if any, of the structure of the Army related to current and anticipated mission requirements for the Army at acceptable levels of national risk and in a manner consistent with available resources and anticipated future resources.
(2)
Considerations.— In undertaking the study required by subsection (a), the Commission shall give particular consideration to the following:
(A)
An evaluation and identification of a structure for the Army that—
(i)
has the depth and scalability to meet current and anticipated requirements of the combatant commands;
(ii)
achieves cost-efficiency between the regular and reserve components of the Army, manages military risk, takes advantage of the strengths and capabilities of each, and considers fully burdened lifecycle costs;
(iii)
ensures that the regular and reserve components of the Army have the capacity needed to support current and anticipated homeland defense and disaster assistance missions in the United States;
(iv)
provides for sufficient numbers of regular members of the Army to provide a base of trained personnel from which the personnel of the reserve components of the Army could be recruited;
(v)
maintains a peacetime rotation force to avoid exceeding operational tempo goals of 1:2 for active members of the Army and 1:5 for members of the reserve components of the Army; and
(vi)
manages strategic and operational risk by making tradeoffs among readiness, efficiency, effectiveness, capability, and affordability.
(B)
An evaluation and identification of force generation policies for the Army with respect to size and force mixture in order to fulfill current and anticipated mission requirements for the Army in a manner consistent with available resources and anticipated future resources, including policies in connection with—
(i)
readiness;
(ii)
training;
(iii)
equipment;
(iv)
personnel; and
(v)
maintenance of the reserve components as an operational reserve in order to maintain as much as possible the level of expertise and experience developed since September 11, 2001.
(C)
An identification and evaluation of the distribution of responsibility and authority for the allocation of Army National Guard personnel and force structure to the States and territories.
(D)
An identification and evaluation of the strategic basis or rationale, analytical methods, and decision-making processes for the allocation of Army National Guard personnel and force structure to the States and territories.
(b)
Study on Transfer of Certain Aircraft.—
(1)
In general.— The Commission shall also conduct a study of a transfer of Army National Guard AH–64 Apache aircraft from the Army National Guard to the regular Army.
(2)
Considerations.— In conducting the study required by paragraph (1), the Commission shall consider the factors specified in subsection (a)(2).
(c)
Report.— Not later than February 1, 2016, the Commission shall submit to the President and the congressional defense committees a report setting forth a detailed statement of the findings and conclusions of the Commission as a result of the studies required by subsections (a) and (b), together with its recommendations for such legislative and administrative actions as the Commission considers appropriate in light of the results of the studies.

SEC. 1704. Powers of the Commission.

(a)
Hearings.— The Commission may hold such hearings, sit and act at such times and places, take such testimony, and receive such evidence as the Commission considers advisable to carry out its duties under this subtitle.
(b)
Information From Federal Agencies.— The Commission may secure directly from any Federal department or agency such information as the Commission considers necessary to carry out its duties under this subtitle. Upon request of the Chair of the Commission, the head of such department or agency shall furnish such information to the Commission.
(c)
Postal Services.— The Commission may use the United States mails in the same manner and under the same conditions as other departments and agencies of the Federal Government.

SEC. 1705. Commission Personnel Matters.

(a)
Compensation of Members.— Each member of the Commission who is not an officer or employee of the Federal Government may be compensated at a rate not to exceed the daily equivalent of the annual rate of $155,400 for each day (including travel time) during which such member is engaged in the performance of the duties of the Commission. All members of the Commission who are officers or employees of the United States shall serve without compensation in addition to that received for their services as officers or employees of the United States.
(b)
Travel Expenses.— The members of the Commission shall be allowed travel expenses, including per diem in lieu of subsistence, at rates authorized for employees of agencies under subchapter I of chapter 57 of title 5, United States Code, while away from their homes or regular places of business in the performance of services for the Commission.
(c)
Staff.—
(1)
In general.— The Chair of the Commission may, without regard to the civil service laws and regulations, appoint and terminate an executive director and such other additional personnel as may be necessary to enable the Commission to perform its duties. The employment of an executive director shall be subject to confirmation by the Commission.
(2)
Compensation.— The Chair of the Commission may fix the compensation of the executive director and other personnel without regard to chapter 51 and subchapter III of chapter 53 of title 5, United States Code, relating to classification of positions and General Schedule pay rates, except that the rate of pay for the executive director and other personnel may not exceed the rate payable for level V of the Executive Schedule under section 5316 of such title.
(d)
Detail of Government Employees.— Any Federal Government employee may be detailed to the Commission without reimbursement, and such detail shall be without interruption or loss of civil service status or privilege.
(e)
Procurement of Temporary and Intermittent Services.— The Chair of the Commission may procure temporary and intermittent services under section 3109(b) of title 5, United States Code, at rates for individuals which do not exceed the daily equivalent of the annual rate of basic pay prescribed for level V of the Executive Schedule under section 5316 of such title.

SEC. 1706. Termination of the Commission.

The Commission shall terminate 90 days after the date on which the Commission submits its report under this subtitle.

SEC. 1707. Funding.

Amounts authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2015 by section 301 and available for operation and maintenance for the Army as specified in the funding table in section 4301 may be available for the activities of the Commission under this subtitle.

Subtitle B Related Limitations

SEC. 1711. Prohibition on Use of Fiscal Year 2015 Funds to Reduce Strengths of Army Personnel.

None of the funds authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for the Army may be used to reduce Army personnel below the end strength authorizations for personnel of the Army specified in section 401(1) for active duty personnel and section 411 for Selected Reserve personnel of the reserve components of the Army.

SEC. 1712. Limitations on the Transfer, Including Preparations for the Transfer, of Ah–64 Apache Helicopters Assigned to the Army National Guard.

(a)
Prohibition on Transfers During Fiscal Year 2015.— During fiscal year 2015, the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of the Army may not transfer any AH–64 Apache helicopters from the Army National Guard to the regular Army.
(b)
Additional Limitation on Aircraft or Personnel Transfers and Related Activities.— In addition to the prohibition on transfers imposed by subsection (a), but subject to the exceptions provided in subsection (e), the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of the Army may not, before March 31, 2016—
(1)
divest, retire, or transfer, or prepare to divest, retire, or transfer, any AH–64 Apache helicopters from the Army National Guard to the regular Army; or
(2)
reduce personnel related to any AH–64 Apache helicopters of the Army National Guard below the levels of such personnel as of September 30, 2014.
(c)
Continued Readiness of Aircraft and Personnel.— The Secretary of the Army shall ensure the continuing readiness of AH–64 Apache helicopters during fiscal year 2015 as necessary to meet the requirements of combatant commanders.
(d)
Effect on Personnel Actions and Training.— Notwithstanding the prohibition imposed by subsection (a), the limitation imposed by subsection (b), and the duty imposed by subsection (c), the Secretary of the Army may—
(1)
carry out any personnel action, as determined to be appropriate by the Secretary, necessary to support Army aviation readiness and operations;
(2)
conduct qualification and reclassification training for pilots, crew, and military occupational specialties related to Army Aviation; and
(3)
continue flight training and advanced qualification courses for selected National Guard personnel related to AH–64 Apache helicopters in accordance with Army readiness requirements.
(e)
Exceptions.— Subject to the Secretary of Defense certification required by subsection (f), the Secretary of the Army may—
(1)
during the period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act and ending on March 31, 2016, make preparations for the transfer of not more than 48 AH–64 Apache helicopters from the Army National Guard to the regular Army; and
(2)
during the period beginning on October 1, 2015, and ending on March 31, 2016, transfer not more than 48 AH–64 Apache helicopters from the Army National Guard to the regular Army.
(f)
Certification Required.— The certification referred to in subsection (e) is a certification by the Secretary of Defense in writing to the congressional defense committees that the commencement of preparations to transfer AH–64 Apache helicopters pursuant to the exception provided by subsection (e)(1) or a transfer of AH–64 Apache helicopters pursuant to the exception provided by subsection (e)(2) would not create unacceptable risk—
(1)
to the strategic depth or regeneration capacities of the Army; and
(2)
to the Army National Guard in its role as the combat reserve of the Army.