Bill Williams River Water Rights Settlement Act of 2014
An Act
To direct the Secretary of the Interior to enter into the Big Sandy River-Planet Ranch Water Rights Settlement Agreement and the Hualapai Tribe Bill Williams River Water Rights Settlement Agreement, to provide for the lease of certain land located within Planet Ranch on the Bill Williams River in the State of Arizona to benefit the Lower Colorado River Multi-Species Conservation Program, and to provide for the settlement of specific water rights claims in the Bill Williams River watershed in the State of Arizona.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SEC. 2. Purposes.
SEC. 3. Definitions.
SEC. 4. Big Sandy River-Planet Ranch Agreement.
SEC. 5. Hualapai Tribe Agreement.
SEC. 6. Waivers, Releases, and Retention of Claims.
SEC. 7. Administration.
“(1) Big sandy river-planet ranch agreement.—The term ‘Big Sandy River-Planet Ranch Agreement’ has the meaning given the term in section 3 of the Bill Williams River Water Rights Settlement Act of 2014.”
“SEC. 9403. ENFORCEABILITY.
“(a) Civil Actions.—
“(1) Colorado river civil actions.—
“(A) Description of civil action.—Due to”
; and
“(B) Venue.—Any civil action under this paragraph may be brought in any United States district court in the State in which any non-Federal party to the civil action is situated.”
; and
“(2) Bill williams civil actions.—
“(A) Description of civil action.—Due to the unique role of the Lower Colorado River Multi-Species Conservation Program in resolving competing water rights claims in the Bill Williams River watershed (as defined in section 3 of the Bill Williams River Water Rights Settlement Act of 2014) and other claims among the parties to the Big Sandy-River Planet Ranch Agreement, any party to the Big Sandy River-Planet Ranch Agreement may commence a civil action in a court described in subparagraph (B) relating only and directly to the interpretation or enforcement of—
“(i) the Bill Williams River Water Rights Settlement Act of 2014; or
“(ii) the Big Sandy River-Planet Ranch Agreement.
“(B) Venue.—A civil action under this paragraph may be brought in—
“(i) the United States District Court for the District of Arizona; or
“(ii) a State court of competent jurisdiction where a pending action has been brought to adjudicate the water rights associated with the Bill Williams River system and source, in accordance with the authority provided by section 208 of the Act of July 10, 1952 (commonly known as the ‘McCarran Amendment’) (43 U.S.C. 666).”
“(1) In general.—The district”
“(2) State courts and district courts.—A State court or United States district court—
“(A) shall have jurisdiction over civil actions described in subsection (a)(2); and
“(B) may issue such orders, judgments, and decrees as are consistent with the exercise of jurisdiction by the court pursuant to—
“(i) this section; or
“(ii) section 7 of the Bill Williams River Water Rights Settlement Act of 2014.
“(3) Effect of subsection.—Nothing in this subsection affects the jurisdiction that would otherwise be available in accordance with the authority provided by section 208 of the Act of July 10, 1952 (commonly known as the ‘McCarran Amendment’) (43 U.S.C. 666).”
“(2) Applicability.—This section—
“(A) applies only to—
“(i) the Lower Colorado River Multi-Species Conservation Program;
“(ii) the Bill Williams River Water Rights Settlement Act of 2014; and
“(iii) the Big Sandy River-Planet Ranch Agreement; and”
; and