§535.7. Averaging, banking, and trading (ABT) credit program.
49 C.F.R. § 535.7
Calculate the total credits generated in a model year for each averaging set using the following equation:
(1) Measure the effectiveness of the advanced system by conducting A to B testing a vehicle equipped with the advanced system and an equivalent conventional system in accordance with 40 CFR 1037.615.
(2) For purposes of this paragraph (f), a conventional vehicle is considered to be equivalent if it has the same footprint, intended vehicle service class, aerodynamic drag, and other relevant factors not directly related to the advanced system powertrain. If there is no equivalent vehicle, the manufacturer may create and test a prototype equivalent vehicle. The conventional vehicle is considered Vehicle A, and the advanced technology vehicle is considered Vehicle B.
(3) The benefit associated with the advanced system for fuel consumption is determined from the weighted fuel consumption results from the chassis tests of each vehicle using the following equation:
(4) Calculate the benefit in credits using the equation in paragraph (c) of this section and replacing the term (Std-FEL) with the benefit.
(5) For electric vehicles calculate the fuel consumption credits using an FEL of 0 g/1000 ton-mile.
(1) Pre-transmission hybrid powertrains are those engine systems that include features that recover and store energy during engine motoring operation but not from the vehicle wheels. These powertrains are tested using the hybrid engine test procedures of 40 CFR part 1065 or using the post-transmission test procedures.
(2) Post-transmission hybrid powertrains are those powertrains that include features that recover and store energy from braking at the vehicle wheels. These powertrains are tested by simulating the chassis test procedure applicable for hybrid vehicles under 40 CFR 1037.550.
(3) Test engines that include Rankine-cycle exhaust energy recovery systems according to the test procedures specified in 40 CFR part 1036, subpart F, unless EPA approves the manufacturer's alternate procedures.
(1) That each vehicle equipped with the technology for which they are seeking credits will comply with all applicable FMVSS(s); and
(2) Whether or not the technology has a fail-safe provision. If no fail-safe provision exists, the manufacturer must explain why not and whether a failure of the innovative technology would affect the safety of the vehicle.
(1) The FEL is generated by GEM or 5-cycle testing;
(2) The technology is not changed or paired with any other off-cycle technology;
(3) The improvement factor only applies to approved vehicle or engine families;
(4) The agencies do not expect the technology to be incorporated into GEM at any point during the Phase 2 program; and
Notes, amendments, and revision history
Amendments
[81 FR 74238, Oct. 25, 2016, as amended at 85 FR 25274, Apr. 30, 2020; 89 FR 18829, Mar. 15, 2024; 89 FR 52952, June 24, 2024]
Authority
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 32902 ; delegation of authority at 49 CFR 1.95.
Source
Source: 81 FR 74238, Oct. 25, 2016, unless otherwise noted.
Amendments
[81 FR 74238, Oct. 25, 2016, as amended at 85 FR 25274, Apr. 30, 2020; 89 FR 18829, Mar. 15, 2024; 89 FR 52952, June 24, 2024]