§137.336. What is the difference between fixed-price and cost-reimbursement agreements?
42 C.F.R. § 137.336
Cost-reimbursement agreements generally have one or more of the following characteristics—
Risk is shared between IHS and the Self-Governance Tribe;
Self-Governance Tribes are not required to perform beyond the amount of funds provided under the agreement;
Self-Governance Tribes establish budgets based upon the actual costs of the project and are not allowed to include profit;
Budgets are stated using broad categories, such as planning, design, construction project administration, and contingency;
The agreement funding amount is stated as a “not to exceed” amount;
Self-Governance Tribes provide notice to the IHS if they expect to exceed the amount of the agreement and require more funds;
Excess funds remaining at the end of the project are considered savings; and
Actual costs are subject to applicable OMB circulars and cost principles.
Fixed Price agreements generally have one or more of the following characteristics—
Self-Governance Tribes assume the risk for performance;
Self-Governance Tribes are entitled to make a reasonable profit;
Budgets may be stated as lump sums, unit cost pricing, or a combination thereof;
For unit cost pricing, savings may occur if actual quantity is less than estimated; and,
Excess funds remaining at the end of a lump sum fixed price project are considered profit, unless, at the option of the Self-Governance Tribe, such amounts are reclassified in whole or in part as savings.
Notes, amendments, and revision history
Authority
Authority: 25 U.S.C. 458 et seq.
Source
Source: 67 FR 35342, May 17, 2002, unless otherwise noted.