§33.32. Certified programs.
28 C.F.R. § 33.32
(2) Targeting of activities and services to meet local situation.
(3) Maximum use of volunteers.
(4) Cooperation of community organizations and law enforcement.
(1) Neighborhood Watch
(2) Operation ID
(3) Security Surveys
(4) Citizen Patrols
(5) Escort or Special Services for the Elderly
(6) Block Homes or Safe-Houses
(7) Neighborhood Clean-Ups in High Crime Areas
(8) Public Education
(9) Training
(10) Technical Assistance
(2) Types of services provided.
(3) Units of service delivered (e.g., number of block watches organized).
(4) Number of volunteers participating.
(i) Analysis of the stolen property redistribution system in the jurisdiction.
(ii) Selection of the target criminal population and/or property at which the program will be directed.
(iii) Establishment of policies and procedures governing roles of participants, and program implementation.
(2) Establishment of records maintenance and management system; security management procedures; and stolen property/contraband/evidence management.
(3) Implementation of operations, including undercover activities and ongoing intelligence gathering and analysis.
(4) Coordination with prosecutorial personnel in case development and proper use of undercover techniques; and cooperation with victims to assure return of property.
(2) Number of convictions.
(3) Dollar value of property received.
(4) Dollar value of property returned to victims.
(5) Number of fencing operations disrupted.
(i) An understanding to the area's specific arson problems.
(ii) A selection of program priorities, strategies, and the targeting of the criminal population.
(iii) An outline of policies and procedures for program participants and program implementation.
(iv) Written agreements indicating participation in the program, acceptance of established criteria and procedures, and commitment of resources.
(2) Establishment of a system for collecting and analyzing data to target and identify arson patterns, methods and areas of vulnerability.
(3) Establishment of investigative and prosecutorial elements directed at the crime of arson.
(4) Involvement of community groups and private industry in support of the program.
(2) Number of confirmed arson incidents reported during reporting period.
(3) Number of confirmed arson incidents reported during equivalent pre-reporting period.
(4) Number of incidents resulting in a prosecution during program period.
(5) Number of incidents resulting in a prosecution during equivalent pre-reporting period.
(6) Number of prosecutions resulting in conviction.
(7) Amount of property damage/loss caused by incendiary/suspicious fires during program period.
(8) Amount of property damage/loss by incendiary/suspicious fires during equivalent pre-reporting period.
(2) A separate, full-time prosecutorial unit for violent and repeat offenders to enable vertical prosecution of assigned cases.
(3) Reduction of caseload to enable thorough case preparation/presentation.
(4) A policy requiring limited or no plea negotiations.
(5) A policy of opposing pre-trial motions for continuances.
(6) A policy to maintain effective communications with victims and witnesses.
(2) Number of cases meeting established criteria.
(3) Number of cases prosecuted.
(4) Number of and percentage of cases resulting in conviction.
(5) Number and percentage of individuals incarcerated.
(1) Planning (Phase I):
(i) Formation of delay reduction advisory committee.
(ii) Data collection, analysis, and problem identification.
(iii) Adoption of case processing goals for criminal cases.
(iv) Development of action plan(s).
(2) Implementation (Phase II):
(i) Education of trial judges and others on objectives, standards and procedures.
(ii) Systematic monitoring of all criminal cases filed in participating courts.
(iii) System for regular acquisition and assessment of data from each trial court (state level only).
(iv) Modification of rules and procedures at all levels of program participation when program results indicate need for changes.
(2) Percentage of criminal cases prior to project that met standard.
(3) Percentage of criminal cases disposed of during the project reporting period that met time disposition standard.
(4) Reduction in the average number of continuances from the equivalent pre-project period.
(2) Targeting of existing and planned activities and services to respond to this community situation.
(3) Formulation of agreements for cooperation between criminal justice system agencies and public and private victim/witness service providers.
(1) 24 hour crisis intervention and support or emergency services.
(2) Counseling.
(3) Assistance with compensation claims, creditors, community referrals, and restitution.
(4) Police, prosecutor or court-related services.
(5) Safety (including shelter), supportive counseling, social services support and criminal justice advocacy.
(6) Training and education for individuals having direct contact with the victims, i.e., police, medical personnel, prosecutors, judges, etc.
(2) Types of services provided.
(3) Number of victims/witnesses served (by type of service).
(4) Number of criminal justice personnel and others trained.
(2) Formation of broad-based jail policy committee.
(3) Program planning that includes data collection, analysis, problem identification, and development of jail population management plan, including the removal of juveniles from adult jails and lockups.
(4) Implementation of plan.
(1) Central intake and classification.
(2) Comprehensive pre-trial services.
(3) Diversion of public inebriates to detoxification centers.
(4) Diversion of juveniles to secure and non-secure alternatives.
(5) Citation release.
(6) Community correction centers.
(7) Sentencing alternatives (including restitution and work release).
(8) Jail management information system.
(2) Pretrial jail population.
(3) Types of services and alternatives implemented.
(4) Numbers of arrestees served/diverted by type of alternative.
(5) Convicted clients completing alternative punishment successfully.
(6) Re-arrest rate of released defendants.
(7) Estimated jail days saved.
(2) Establishment of TASC advisory board.
(3) Establishment of administrative management unit with full-time director.
(4) Development of specific program eligibility criteria.
(5) Establishment of a process for screening potential clients and court liaison.
(6) Development of methods for assessing most appropriate treatment approaches.
(7) Documentation of the availability of community treatment programs and their willingness to accept TASC clients.
(8) Establishment of monitoring/tracking system.
(2) Number of persons screened.
(3) Number of clients accepted.
(4) Number of clients completing program.
(5) Number of client re-arrests while in the program.
(2) Implementation plan for fulfilling information needs and improving management and research capabilities.
(3) Process for monitoring management decisions and prosecutor actions.
(2) Case processing time.
(3) Conviction rates.
(2) Commitment of the court and juvenile justice personnel.
(3) Pre-program planning to establish written policies and procedures, including:
(i) The stage of the system at which restitution will be initiated;
(ii) Specification of the target population; and
(iii) Establishment of procedures for determining the appropriate restitution to be rendered by the juvenile offender, enforcing restitution orders.
(4) Program management and administration should describe:
(i) Agency roles and responsibilities; and
(ii) Case management and tracking system for performance indicators.
(5) Community involvement in the program.
(i) Number employed full and part-time in restitution; and
(ii) Average restitution caseload per restitution/probation officer.
(2) Program participation:
(i) Number of juveniles by offense type;
(ii) Type and amount of restitution ordered; and
(iii) Number of victims (by type and amount of loss/injury) receiving restitution.
(3) Number/percent juveniles successfully completing their restitution orders.
(4) Total amount of restitution collected/completed.
(5) Number obtaining restitution-related employment/job services.
(6) Operational costs per case.
(7) Number of participants rearrested during the program.
(8) Number of participants incarcerated as a result of a rearrest or program failure.
(9) Number retaining restitution-related employment following completion.
(10) Victim satisfaction with the program.
(2) Modification of agency data gathering methods to enhance planning and crime analysis.
(3) Establishment of crime analysis and planning function.
(4) Implementation of strategies, tactics and processes based on analysis that contribute to better management of criminal investigation and patrol.
(2) Types of strategies implementations e.g., directed patrol, crime analysis.
(3) Types of crimes targeted.
(4) Clearance rates (by arrest) for targeted crimes.
(5) Conviction rates for targeted crimes.
Notes, amendments, and revision history
Authority
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 3701 through 3797y-4; 5 U.S.C. 301.
Source
Source: 50 FR 22990, May 30, 1985, unless otherwise noted.