(a)
Findings— Congress finds the following:
(1)
After generations of unfair policies, failing academics, poor health outcomes, and struggling economies, many residents of rural communities across the United States feel trapped in a system that puts additional burdens on its citizens.
(2)
Children entering kindergarten who live in rural communities often face barriers due to lower incomes and lack of access to quality early childhood education providers. These barriers increase the chance that rural children may be categorized as academically under prepared.
(3)
According to the Bipartisan Policy Center, the economic impact of the childcare gap in rural areas falls between $32,790,000,000 and $49,930,000,000. This lack of childcare options makes it more difficult for rural parents to return to work.
(4)
Schools attended by rural students offer limited access to advanced coursework, offering less science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (referred to in this Act as “STEM”) teaching capacity and fewer STEM extracurricular activities. In turn, rural students are significantly less likely to enroll in STEM degree programs at the college level.
(5)
According to the National Student Clearinghouse, only 55 percent of rural students enrolled in college directly out of high school in 2022, compared with 64 percent of suburban students and 59 percent of urban students. Also, only 80 percent of college students from rural communities continue their higher education into the second year, compared with 85 percent of suburban students and 81 percent of urban students.
(6)
Longitudinal studies of academic growth indicate the increased importance of summer academic opportunities for rural children, who suffer larger academic “summer loss” than non-rural students. As a result, while rural students start kindergarten slightly ahead of non-rural students, they fall behind by middle school, according to the American Educational Research Association.
(7)
Due to the lack of high-quality educational supports in rural schools, rural students who struggle to read are less likely to catch up than non-rural students. According to the University of New Hampshire, the average reading achievement of a rural third grader who scores in the tenth percentile of reading achievement in kindergarten is approximately 6 to 7 points lower than the reading achievement of the average suburban and urban third grader with comparable kindergarten achievement and socioeconomic background.
(8)
Between the 2017–2018 and 2021–2022 school years, chronic absenteeism increased 47 percent among rural students, compared to 44 percent for students in urban districts.
(9)
According to the Health Resources & Services Administration, rural children are less likely to have one or more preventive medical and dental visits in the past 12 months (59.6 percent) than urban children (66.7 percent). This disparity holds at all levels of household income. Rural children are also more likely to be overweight or obese (36 percent) relative to urban children (31.6 percent).
(10)
According to the American College of Education, job training program completion rates vary significantly between urban and rural areas. Rural populations face additional barriers due to geographic isolation, limited broadband access, fewer job training options and smaller training cohorts that restrict program availability. Rural community colleges often struggle to maintain enough enrollment to offer identical certifications.
(11)
Roughly 1 in 7 public high school students fails to earn their high school diploma in 4 years. A 16- to 24-year-old coming from a high-income family is about 7 times as likely to have completed high school as a 16- to 24-year-old coming from a low-income family.
(12)
The average national cost to confine a youth in a juvenile justice facility is $214,620 per year. Comparatively, per pupil annual spending for a student in kindergarten through grade 12 is only $17,620, however spending in States with largely rural populations tends to be in the $13,000–$11,000 range per student.
(b)
Purpose— The purpose of this Act is to establish a 10-year, place-based Federal program designed to strengthen families in rural and tribal communities by providing resources to enhance educational and employment choices that strengthen communities, including by—
(1)
promoting evidence-based literacy and academic success, including through—
(A)
kindergarten readiness;
(B)
reading and mathematics proficiency;
(C)
improving school attendance and reducing chronic absenteeism;
(D)
on-time high school graduation; and
(E)
alignment of career and technical education pathways with local work opportunities;
(2)
empowering family choice, including through—
(A)
supporting household income, employment, and financial stability through meaningful workforce development;
(B)
childcare and after-school programs to support working parents;
(C)
broadband-enabled access to telehealth and mobile health services;
(D)
distance learning opportunities for workforce development;
(E)
transportation support for childcare and career stability; and
(F)
emphasis on the role of the mother and father in the family; and
(3)
returning control of services to the States, including through—
(A)
durable rural service networks across education, health, workforce, and early childhood sectors;
(B)
mental and behavioral health services;
(C)
substance use recovery supports;
(D)
child abuse prevention and services;
(E)
support for rural businesses and economic growth;
(F)
data systems and shared dashboards; and
(G)
healthcare and child care workforces.