Values in Arms Export Act of 2026
A BILL
To amend the Arms Export Control Act to provide for better monitoring and verification of the use of defense articles and defense services by countries of concern, and for other purposes.
Sec. 2 Monitoring and verification of use of defense articles and defense services
“(b) United States policy—It is the policy of the United States that a foreign government’s respect for and compliance with internationally recognized human rights and international humanitarian law are central and deciding factors in determining the eligibility of the foreign government to purchase defense articles or defense services under this Act.”
“40C. Monitoring and verification of use of defense articles and defense services
“(a) Statement of policy
“(1) In general—It is the policy of the United States that a foreign government’s respect for and compliance with internationally recognized human rights and international humanitarian law are central and deciding factors in determining the eligibility of the foreign government to purchase defense articles or defense services under this Act.
“(2) Examples of inconsistent actions and behaviors—Actions or behaviors by a foreign government or its officers or agents inconsistent with the policy described in paragraph (1) include the following:
“(A) Gross violations of internationally recognized human rights (as defined in section 502B(d) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2304(d))).
“(B) Failure to adhere to standards of proportionality, distinction, and discrimination.
“(C) Patterns or egregious incidents of destruction or damage of medical facilities or other civilian objects.
“(D) Patterns or egregious incidents of harm or disregard for the safety of medical personnel, aid workers, peacekeepers, or journalists.
“(E) Patterns or egregious incidents of harm or disregard for the safety of civilians.
“(F) Prohibition or restriction, directly or indirectly, of the transport or delivery of humanitarian assistance.
“(G) Gross or systemic corruption, lack of transparency, or lack of accountability in the government, including among security forces.
“(3) Reporting of inconsistent actions and behaviors
“(A) Reports by officers or employees of united states—Any officer or employee of the United States Government with knowledge of action or behavior by a foreign government or its officers or agents that is inconsistent with the policy described in paragraph (1) shall report the action or behavior to the chief of mission (as defined in section 102 of the Foreign Service Act of 1980 (22 U.S.C. 3902)) for that country.
“(B) Reports from external sources—The Secretary of State shall establish and periodically update written procedures to facilitate receipt by the Department of State and United States foreign missions of credible information about information inconsistent with the policy described in paragraph (1) from individuals outside the United States Government.
“(C) Recordkeeping—The Secretary of State shall ensure information received under subparagraphs (A) and (B) is stored with appropriate confidentiality and protection measures in a centrally managed, searchable database to be utilized for purposes of compliance with section 620M of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2378d) and similar provisions of law and policy restricting assistance for foreign security forces.
“(4) Inclusion in intelligence priorities—The Director of National Intelligence shall ensure that collection and analysis of information related to the policy described in this subsection is included in each National Intelligence Priorities Framework, or any successor directive.
“(b) Monitoring and verification program
“(1) In general—The President shall carry out a program of monitoring and verification of the use of defense articles and defense services acquired under this Act by countries of concern.
“(2) Elements—The program established under this subsection shall include the following elements:
“(A) The observation and evaluation by United States Government personnel, including contractors and members of the United States Armed Forces, as appropriate, of the targeting process used by the country of concern, the employment of the acquired defense articles by the country of concern, the return of any unused defense articles, and the post-use assessment of damage and casualties.
“(B) Employment by the President of direct observation, real-time video feeds, other real-time sensory data and collection methods, and other relevant and reliable sources of information from media, nongovernmental organizations, and other entities.
“(3) Availability and use of information
“(A) In general—All information collected or evaluated as part of the program established under this subsection shall be made available to the Secretary of State, the appropriate congressional committees, and the Human Rights and Law of War Oversight Board established under section 4 of the Values in Arms Export Act of 2026.
“(B) Appropriate congressional committees defined—In this paragraph, the term appropriate congressional committees means—
“(i) the Committee on Foreign Relations, the Committee on Armed Services, and the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate; and
“(ii) the Committee on Foreign Affairs, the Committee on Armed Services, and the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives.
“(4) Separate budgetary line item—The Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of State shall include in the budget justification materials submitted to Congress in support of the Department of Defense and the Department of State budget for each fiscal year (as submitted with the budget of the President under section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code) specific identification, as a budgetary line item, of the amounts required for the program established under this subsection.
“(5) Funding—Funding to carry out the requirements of this section shall be derived from amounts collected under section 21. The President shall ensure such charges pursuant to such section are sufficient to fully meet all requirements of this section without cost to the United States Government.
“(c) Evaluation by the Secretary of State
“(1) Consideration of information—The Secretary of State—
“(A) shall consistently review all relevant information related to a country of concern to determine whether its government or its officers or agents have engaged in any action or behavior inconsistent with the policy described in subsection (a)(1), including—
“(i) information gathered through the program established under subsection (b);
“(ii) information from any agency of the United States Government;
“(iii) information referred by Members of Congress; and
“(iv) credible reports or information gathered by members of the media, nongovernmental organizations, foreign governments, international organizations, or academic experts; and
“(B) may consider exculpatory information proffered by the foreign government if—
“(i) the information can be independently authenticated by the United States;
“(ii) the foreign government provides access to all information in its possession about alleged incidents of the use of security forces of the foreign government in a manner that is inconsistent with the policy described in subsection (a)(1);
“(iii) the foreign government is assessed to be forthcoming in providing access to all information; and
“(iv) there is no evidence that the foreign government has attempted to obstruct investigations by independent parties.
“(2) Determinations required—In each case in which a country of concern may have engaged in an action or behavior inconsistent with the policy described in subsection (a)(1), the Secretary of State, based on United States standards and policy for the conduct of the United States Armed Forces or international law, as applicable, shall make a determination as to the legality and appropriateness of—
“(A) the action or behavior; and
“(B) the employment of defense articles or defense services acquired under this Act in the action or behavior.
“(d) Designation of countries of concern
“(1) Country of concern defined—In this section, the term country of concern means—
“(A) a foreign government designated as a country of concern by the President, the Secretary of State, the Secretary of Defense, or the Human Rights and Law of War Oversight Board established under section 4 of the Values in Arms Export Act of 2026;
“(B) a foreign government designated as a country of concern by law or by Congress through the adoption of a concurrent resolution; or
“(C) any foreign government with respect to which the United States has determined that one or more units of the security forces of the foreign government is ineligible for assistance pursuant to section 620M of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2378d) or section 362 of title 10, United States Code, notwithstanding any waiver exercised under such sections.
“(2) Duration of designation—The designation of a foreign government as a country of concern under paragraph (1)—
“(A) shall remain in effect for a period of three years; and
“(B) may be renewed, before the previous designation expires, in any manner in which a designation may be made under paragraph (1).
“(3) Expedited procedures
“(A) Consideration in Senate—Any bill, joint resolution, or concurrent resolution designating a foreign government as a country of concern under paragraph (1)(B) or terminating a country of concern’s ineligibility period shall be considered in the Senate in accordance with the provisions of section 601(b) of the International Security Assistance and Arms Export Control Act of 1976 (Public Law 94–329; 90 Stat. 765).
“(B) Consideration in House of Representatives—For the purpose of expediting the consideration of bills, joint resolutions, or concurrent resolutions designating a foreign government as a country of concern under paragraph (1)(B) or terminating a country of concern’s ineligibility period, a motion to proceed to the consideration of any such bill, joint resolution, or concurrent resolution after it has been reported by the appropriate committee shall be treated as highly privileged in the House of Representatives.
“(e) Ineligibility for sales and transfers
“(1) Immediate limited ineligibility upon initial designation—A foreign government shall be ineligible for sale or transfer of a covered defense article under this Act for a three-year period beginning on the date the foreign government is designated a country of concern.
“(2) In general—A foreign government shall be ineligible for sale or transfer of defense articles (including spare parts for such articles) or defense services, or the extension of credit (including participation in the extension of credit) or loan guarantees under this Act, for a 10-year period beginning on, and shall immediately discontinue the use of, or return to the United States, any covered defense articles in its possession effective as of, the date—
“(A) the foreign government is designated a country of concern under subsection (d) for the second time in a 10-year period;
“(B) the Secretary of State, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense, determines that the foreign government, at the end of the three-year designation period under subsection (d)(2), has failed to demonstrate sufficient improvement in adherence to the policy described in subsection (a)(1); or
“(C) during the three-year designation period under subsection (d)(2), the foreign government engages in an action or behavior inconsistent with the policy described in subsection (a)(1).
“(3) Restoration of eligibility—A foreign government may qualify for early termination of the ineligibility period under paragraphs (1) or (2)—
“(A) if the Secretary of State determines and reports to Congress that the foreign government has taken meaningful steps to correct the deficiencies upon which such ineligibility is based, which shall include—
“(i) enacting and enforcing new laws or policy;
“(ii) substantial remedial training for government officials and members of the military or security forces;
“(iii) in the case of organized armed groups that are not part of the formal chain of command for regular and irregular forces of the foreign government, but that are controlled or supported by the foreign government to any degree, taking actions to cease any support for or affiliation with those organizations or to cause them to cease participation in hostilities; and
“(iv) fully investigating and holding accountable individuals at any level who were responsible for a violation of internationally recognized human rights or international humanitarian law; and
“(B) upon the enactment of a joint resolution approving such early termination of ineligibility.
“(4) Waiver for valid training
“(A) In general—The President may waive the application of this subsection to International Military Education and Training (IMET) assistance or training provided by any United States Government agency, and carried out by United States Government personnel, focused on internationally recognized human rights, international humanitarian law, anticorruption, or similar issues.
“(B) Limitation on scope of waiver—In no case may a waiver under subparagraph (A) extend to cover operations that are part of any armed conflict or any activity that would be subject to the War Powers Resolution (50 U.S.C. 1541 et seq.).
“(5) Covered defense article defined—In this subsection, the term covered defense article means—
“(A) any defense article in the same category of the United States Munitions List as a defense article determined to have been involved in the foreign government’s designation as a country of concern; and
“(B) any spare parts or services related to the defense article determined to have been involved in the foreign government’s designation as a country of concern.
“(f) Required agreement terms—Any agreement for the transfer of defense articles or defense services under this Act entered into after the date of the enactment of this section shall include terms requiring the foreign government receiving such articles or services to agree to the requirements of this section and to permit and fully cooperate with any investigation by United States Government personnel into an action or behavior by the foreign government that may be inconsistent with the policy described in subsection (a)(1). No such sale or transfer shall be permitted without inclusion of such requirements.
“(g) Reports required
“(1) In general—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this section, and every 180 days thereafter, the Secretary of State shall submit to Congress a report that includes—
“(A) an assessment of whether each country of concern has engaged in actions or behaviors inconsistent with the policy described in subsection (a)(1) during the 180-day period preceding submission of the report, including any progress in improving, or worsening of, such actions or behaviors of that foreign government;
“(B) an identification of each country of concern for which, during the 180-day period following submission of the report—
“(i) the designation of the foreign government as a country of concern will expire;
“(ii) more than 10 years will have elapsed following the designation of the foreign government as a country of concern; or
“(iii) a 10-year ineligibility period under subsection (e) will expire;
“(C) an assessment of any progress made during the 180-day period preceding submission of the report by a foreign government subject to a 10-year ineligibility period under subsection (e) toward eligibility for early termination of that period under paragraph (3) of that subsection;
“(D) all reports submitted pursuant to subsection (a)(3) during the 180-day period preceding submission of the report;
“(E) the findings of the program established under subsection (b), including any instances in which a foreign government failed to fully comply with the program; and
“(F) an identification of any foreign government that has failed to fully comply with investigations described in subsection (f).
“(2) Form of report—Each report required by paragraph (1) shall be submitted in unclassified form to the maximum extent possible, but may include a classified annex.
“(h) Rule of construction—Nothing in this section shall be construed as authorizing the use of military force or otherwise authorizing the President to introduce United States forces into hostilities that have not been specifically authorized by Congress pursuant to the War Powers Resolution (50 U.S.C. 1541 et seq.).”
Sec. 3 Required assessment of risk of exported weapons being used to violate internationally recognized human rights or international humanitarian law
“(Q) an assessment of whether the defense articles, defense services, or design and construction services to be offered are more likely than not to be used to violate internationally recognized human rights or international humanitarian law, prepared by the Secretary of State through the Assistant Secretary for the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense and the Director of Central Intelligence.”
“(4) The issuance of a license does not exempt the licensee from their own due diligence to ensure any defense article or defense service covered by the license is used with respect for and compliance with internationally recognized human rights and international humanitarian law.”