Section 1 Short title
This Act may be cited as the “Experts Protect Effective Rules, Transparency, and Stability Act of 2025” or the “EXPERTS Act of 2025”.
Experts Protect Effective Rules, Transparency, and Stability Act of 2025
A BILL
To amend title 5, United States Code, to require disclosure of conflicts of interest with respect to rulemaking, and for other purposes.
Sec. 2 Findings
Congress finds the following:
Congress is dependent on providing discretion to executive officials and agencies (including independent agencies) to implement its statutes. Congress provides appropriate oversight of the use of this discretion.
Regulatory legislation is often phrased in broad terms, with an intelligible principle, to empower agencies to address issues, such as those presented by technological, scientific, or social developments that were not precisely foreseen when the legislation was enacted, and to draw upon the agency's specialized knowledge, experience, and responsibility for implementing the statute.
Such broad authorizing language is often necessary to empower the administering agency to take effective action when new or unforeseen issues arise, provided that the rule does not exceed clear limits in statute nor implement it in an impermissible manner.
A rule that an agency has adopted to implement a broadly worded regulatory statute should generally not be held to be invalid on the basis that Congress has not addressed the agency’s proposed course of action in specific terms.
A rule that an agency has adopted to implement a regulatory statute should generally not be held to be invalid on the basis that the agency has not previously adopted a similar rule or scheme of regulation.
The expectation that a rule will have broad economic, political, or social significance, should not, standing alone, negate application of the principle stated in paragraph (1), (2), or (3).
Sec. 3 Sense of Congress
It is the sense of Congress that—
agency economic analyses of regulatory actions commonly underestimate the benefits of regulatory actions that protect public health and safety and overestimate the costs of regulatory action to industry;
agency regulatory actions often fail to adequately consider the distributional effects and social equity impact of regulatory action; and
an agency shall prioritize the statutory direction of Congress when taking regulatory action.
Sec. 4 Disclosure of conflicts of interest
Section 553 of title 5, United States Code, is amended—
in subsection (c)—
by striking “After notice required” and inserting “(1) After notice required”;
in the first sentence of paragraph (1), as so designated, by inserting “, subject to subsections (f) and (h),” after “the agency shall”; and
by adding at the end the following:
“(2) In the case of any submission under paragraph (1) by an interested person that includes a scientific, economic, or technical study or research (or a citation thereto) that the interested person funded directly or indirectly, or the nonpublic results of any scientific, economic, or technical study or research that the interested person funded directly or indirectly, the interested person shall disclose to the agency the following:
“(A) The amount of any funds that were received by the person who conducted the study or research.
“(B) The entity that provided the funds referred to in subparagraph (A).
“(C) Any entity that was allowed to review or revise the study or research, and the extent of that review or revision.
“(D) Any financial relationship between the person who conducted the study or research, and any person that would be affected by the proposed rule.”
by adding at the end the following:
“(f) With respect to any submission by an interested person under subsection (c) or any other submission by an interested person relating to a proposed rule or final rule that includes a scientific, economic, or technical study or research by the interested person not published in a publicly available peer-reviewed publication, or any result of a scientific, economic, or technical study or research by the interested person not published in a publicly available peer-reviewed publication, the interested person, in making that submission, shall disclose to the agency—
“(1) the source of any funding for the study or research, as applicable;
“(2) any entity that sponsored the study or research;
“(3) the extent to which the findings of the study or research were reviewed by a person that may be affected by the rule making to which the submission relates;
“(4) the identity of any person identified under paragraph (3); and
“(5) the nature of any financial relationship, including a consulting agreement, the support of any expert witness, and the funding of research, between any person that conducted the study or research and any interested person with respect to the rule making to which the submission relates.”
Sec. 5 Increasing disclosures relating to studies and research
Section 553 of title 5, United States Code, as amended by section 4 of this Act, is amended by adding at the end the following:
“(g) With respect to a study or research that is submitted by an interested person to an agency under subsection (c), the agency shall ensure that the study or research is available to the public (including on the internet website of the agency and on the public docket of the agency for the rule making) unless disclosure is exempted or excluded under section 552.
“(h)
“(1) If a study or research submitted by an interested person to an agency under subsection (c) presents a conflict described in paragraph (2), the agency shall disclose the conflict to the public on the internet website of the agency and on the public docket of the agency, and by publication in the Federal Register, unless disclosure is exempted or excluded under section 552.
“(2) A conflict described in this subsection means a study or research for which—
“(A) not less than 10 percent of the funding for the study or research is from an entity subject to the jurisdiction of the agency with respect to that rule making; or
“(B) an entity subject to the jurisdiction of the agency with respect to that rule making that is regulated by the agency conducts, reviews, or revises the study or research.
“(i) In the case of a violation of the requirement to make a disclosure under subsection (c)(2) or subsection (f) with respect to a submission or under subsection (h) with respect to a conflict related to a submission referred to under subsection (g), the agency may exclude from consideration or otherwise disregard the submission, and the agency has no obligation to respond to the submission, except that the submission may be remade with required disclosures during the opportunity for participation referred to in subsection (c)(1). Nothing in this subsection may be construed to affect the level of deference (in accordance with applicable law) accorded to agency action by a court reviewing such action.”
Sec. 6 Disclosure of inter-governmental rule change
With respect to any material provided to the Office with regard to a regulatory action for purposes of centralized review of regulatory actions, the agency shall—
not later than the date on which the agency publishes a general notice of proposed rule making required under section 553(b) of title 5, United States Code, with respect to the action, place in the rule making docket—
the substance of any change between the text of any draft regulatory action that the agency provided to the Office and the text published in the general notice with respect to the action; and
a statement regarding whether any change described in subparagraph (A) was made as a result of communication with—
the Office;
another agency; or
any other Federal official; and
not later than the date on which the agency publishes the regulatory action in the Federal Register, place in the rule making docket—
the substance of any changes between the text of the regulatory action that the agency provided to the Office and the text of the regulatory action that the agency published in the Federal Register; and
a statement regarding whether any change described in subparagraph (A) was made as a result of communication with—
the Office;
another agency; or
any other Federal official.
Sec. 7 Justification of withdrawn rules
In general— If an agency withdraws a regulatory action after providing the action to the Office under section 6(a)(3) of the Executive Order 12866 (5 U.S.C. 601 note; relating to regulatory planning and review) (or, if the agency does not provide the regulatory action to the Office under that section, after publishing the general notice of proposed rulemaking with respect to the action under section 553(b) of title 5, United States Code), the agency shall publish in the Federal Register, on the public docket of the agency, and on the internet website of the agency a statement regarding the decision by the agency to withdraw the action.
Contents— A statement required under subsection (a) with respect to a decision by an agency to withdraw a regulatory action shall include, at a minimum—
a detailed explanation of the reasons that the agency withdrew the action; and
an explanation regarding whether the decision by the agency to withdraw the action was based, in whole or in part, on a request by, or input from—
the Office;
another agency; or
any Federal official.
Sec. 8 Negotiated rulemaking
In general— Subchapter III of chapter 5 of title 5, United States Code, is amended—
in section 561, in the first sentence, by inserting “between agencies and Federal, State, local, or Tribal governments. This subchapter shall apply only to informal negotiations between Federal, State, local, or Tribal governments” after “informal rulemaking process”;
in section 563—
in subsection (a)—
in paragraph (2), by inserting “Federal, State, local, or Tribal government” after “identifiable”; and
in paragraph (3), by striking “persons who” and inserting “representatives of Federal, State, local, and Tribal governments that”; and
in subsection (b)—
in paragraph (1)—
in subparagraph (A)—
by striking “persons who” and inserting “Federal, State, local, or Tribal governments that”; and
by striking “, including residents of rural areas”; and
in subparagraph (B)—
by striking “with such persons” and inserting “with representatives of those governments”; and
by striking “to such persons” and inserting “to those governments”; and
in paragraph (2), in the second sentence—
by striking “persons who” and inserting “representatives of Federal, State, local, or Tribal governments that”; and
by striking “, including residents of rural areas”;
in section 564—
in the section heading, by striking “; applications for membership on committees”;
in subsection (a)—
in paragraph (4), by striking “the persons” and inserting “the representatives of Federal, State, local, and Tribal governments”;
in paragraph (6), by adding “and” at the end;
in paragraph (7), by striking “; and” and inserting a period; and
by striking paragraph (8);
by striking subsection (b);
by redesignating subsection (c) as subsection (b); and
in subsection (b), as so redesignated—
in the subsection heading, by striking “and applications”; and
by striking “and applications”;
in section 565(a)—
in paragraph (1), in the first sentence, by striking “and applications”; and
in paragraph (2)—
by striking “and applications”; and
by striking “publications,” and all that follows through the period at the end and inserting “publications.”; and
in section 569(a), in the first sentence—
by striking “and encourage agency use of”; and
by inserting “between Federal, State, local, and Tribal governments” after “negotiated rulemaking”.
Technical and conforming amendments—
Balanced Budget Act of 1997— Section 4554(b)(1) of the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 (42 U.S.C. 1395u note) is amended by striking “, using a negotiated rulemaking process under subchapter III of chapter 5 of title 5, United States Code”.
Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965— The Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 6301 et seq.) is amended—
in section 1601 (20 U.S.C. 6571)—
in subsection (a), by striking “subsections (b) through (d)” and inserting “subsection (b)”;
by striking subsections (b) and (c); and
by redesignating subsections (d) and (e) as subsections (b) and (c), respectively;
by repealing section 1602 (20 U.S.C. 6572); and
in section 8204(c)(1) (20 U.S.C. 7824(c)(1)), by striking “using a negotiated rulemaking process to develop regulations for implementation no later than the 2017–2018 academic year, shall define” and inserting “shall, for implementation no later than the 2017–2018 academic year, define”.
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996— Section 216(b) of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (42 U.S.C. 1320a–7b note) is amended to read as follows:
“(b) Rulemaking for risk-Sharing exception
“(1) Establishment—The Secretary of Health and Human Services (in this subsection referred to as the “Secretary”) shall establish standards relating to the exception for risk-sharing arrangements to the anti-kickback penalties described in section 1128B(b)(3)(F) of the Social Security Act, as added by subsection (a).
“(2) Factors to consider—In establishing standards relating to the exception for risk-sharing arrangements to the anti-kickback penalties under paragraph (1), the Secretary—
“(A) shall consult with the Attorney General and representatives of the hospital, physician, other health practitioner, and health plan communities, and other interested parties; and
“(B) shall take into account—
“(i) the level of risk appropriate to the size and type of arrangement;
“(ii) the frequency of assessment and distribution of incentives;
“(iii) the level of capital contribution; and
“(iv) the extent to which the risk-sharing arrangement provides incentives to control the cost and quality of health care services.”
in section 207 (20 U.S.C. 1022f)—
by striking subsection (c); and
by redesignating subsection (d) as subsection (c);
in section 422(g)(1) (20 U.S.C. 1072(g)(1))—
in subparagraph (B), by adding “and” at the end;
in subparagraph (C), by striking “; and” and inserting a period; and
by striking subparagraph (D);
in section 487A(b)(3)(B) (20 U.S.C. 1094a(b)(3)(B)), by striking “as determined in the negotiated rulemaking process under section 492”;
in section 491(l)(4)(A) (20 U.S.C. 1098(l)(4)(A)), by striking “, not later than two years after the completion of the negotiated rulemaking process required under section 492 resulting from the amendments to this Act made by the Higher Education Opportunity Act,”; and
in section 492 (20 U.S.C. 1098a)—
in the section heading, by striking “Negotiated”; and
by amending subsection (b) to read as follows:
“(b) Issuance of regulations—After obtaining the advice and recommendations described in subsection (a)(1), the Secretary shall issue final regulations within the 360-day period described in section 437(e) of the General Education Provisions Act (20 U.S.C. 1232(e)).”
Housing Act of 1949— Section 515(r)(3) of the Housing Act of 1949 (42 U.S.C. 1485(r)(3)) is amended by striking “in accordance with” and all that follows through the period at the end and inserting “under the rulemaking authority contained in section 553 of title 5, United States Code.”.
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act— Section 305(g) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (16 U.S.C. 1855(g)) is amended—
by striking paragraphs (2) and (3);
in paragraph (1)—
by striking “(A)”; and
by redesignating subparagraph (B) as paragraph (2) and adjusting the margins accordingly; and
in paragraph (2), as so redesignated, by striking the second sentence.
Mandatory Price Reporting Act of 2010— Section 2(b) of the Mandatory Price Reporting Act of 2010 (Public Law 111–239; 124 Stat. 2501) is amended—
by striking “Wholesale pork cuts” and all that follows through “Chapter 3” and inserting “Wholesale pork cuts.—Chapter 3”; and
by striking paragraphs (2), (3), and (4).
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act— Section 5602 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (42 U.S.C. 254b note) is amended—
in the section heading, by striking “Negotiated”;
by striking subsections (b) through (h);
in subsection (a)—
by redesignating paragraph (2) as subsection (b) and adjusting the margins accordingly;
by striking “Establishment.—” and all that follows through “The Secretary of Health and Human Services” and inserting “Establishment.—The Secretary of Health and Human Services”;
by striking “, through a negotiated rulemaking process under subchapter 3 of chapter 5 of title 5, United States Code,”; and
by redesignating subparagraphs (A) and (B) as paragraphs (1) and (2), respectively, and adjusting the margins accordingly; and
in subsection (b), as so redesignated, by striking “paragraph (1)” and inserting “subsection (a)”.
Price-Anderson Amendments Act of 1988— Section 19 of the Price-Anderson Amendments Act of 1988 (42 U.S.C. 2210 note) is amended—
by striking subsection (b); and
in subsection (a)—
by striking “Rulemaking.—” and all that follows through “The Nuclear” and inserting “Rulemaking Proceeding.—The Nuclear”; and
by redesignating paragraph (2) as subsection (b) and adjusting the margins accordingly.
in section 1834(l)(1) (42 U.S.C. 1395m(l)(1)), by striking “through a negotiated rulemaking process described in title 5, United States Code,”; and
in section 1856(a) (42 U.S.C. 1395w–26(a));
by striking paragraphs (2) through (9);
in paragraph (1)—
by striking “Establishment.—” and all that follows through “The Secretary shall establish” and inserting “Establishment.—The Secretary shall establish”;
by striking “and using a negotiated rulemaking process under subchapter III of chapter 5 of title 5, United States Code”; and
by redesignating subparagraphs (B) and (C) as paragraphs (2) and (3), respectively, and adjusting the margins accordingly; and
in paragraph (2), as so redesignated—
by striking “subparagraph (A)” and inserting “paragraph (1)”; and
by redesignating clauses (i), (ii), and (iii) as subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C), respectively, and adjusting the margins accordingly.
Title 5— The table of sections for subchapter III of chapter 5 of title 5, United States Code, is amended by striking the item relating to section 564 and inserting the following:
Title 49— Section 31136(g)(1) of title 49, United States Code, is amended—
by striking “shall—” and all that follows through “issue” and inserting “shall issue”;
by striking “; or” and inserting a period; and
by striking subparagraph (B).
Toxic Substances Control Act— Section 8(a) of the Toxic Substances Control Act (15 U.S.C. 2607(a)) is amended—
by striking paragraph (6); and
by redesignating paragraph (7) as paragraph (6).
United States Housing Act of 1937— Section 9 of the United States Housing Act of 1937 (42 U.S.C. 1437g) is amended by repealing subsection (f).
Sec. 9 Streamlining OIRA review
In general— Except as provided in subsection (b), if the Office commences a review of a significant regulatory action, the Office shall complete such review not more than 60 days after the date on which the Office receives the significant regulatory action.
Extension— The Office may extend the 60-day period described in subsection (a) by a single 30-day period if the Office provides the agency with, and makes publicly available, a written justification for the extension.
Publication of regulatory action— If the Office waives review of a significant regulatory action of an agency without a request for further consideration or does not notify the agency in writing of the results of the review within the time frame described in subsection (a) or (b), the agency may publish the significant regulatory action in the Federal Register.
Sec. 10 Penalizing public companies that submit false information to agencies
Section 553 of title 5, United States Code, as amended by sections 4 and 5 of this Act, is amended by adding at the end the following:
“(j)
“(1) Any entity required to file an annual report under section 13 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m) that makes a submission under subsection (c) knowing the same—
“(A) to include any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation; or
“(B) to omit any material fact resulting in any statement or representation being false or misleading,
“(2) Any entity that has a subsequent violation of paragraph (1) shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $1,000,000 for each subsequent violation.
“(3) Any submission in violation of this subsection may be excluded from the record and from consideration by the agency or otherwise disregarded, and such submission (or any amendment to such submission) may not be resubmitted thereafter. An exclusion or other disregard of a submission pursuant to this subsection shall not affect the level of deference (in accordance with applicable law) accorded to agency action by a court reviewing such action.
“(k) Any entity required to file an annual report pursuant to section 13 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m), shall include in a submission under subsection (c)(2) of this section the annual report filed in the year previous to such submission and the quarterly report filed most recently prior to such submission.”
Sec. 11 Establishment of the Office of the Public Advocate
Subchapter I of chapter 5 of title 5, United States Code, is amended—
by adding at the end the following:
“505. Office of the Public Advocate
“(a) Establishment—There is established in the Office of Management and Budget an office to be known as the “Office of the Public Advocate”.
“(b) National Public Advocate—The Office of the Public Advocate shall be under the supervision of an official to be known as the “National Public Advocate”, who shall—
“(1) be appointed by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate;
“(2) report to the President;
“(3) be entitled to compensation at the same rate as the highest rate of basic pay established for the Senior Executive Service under section 5382;
“(4) have a background in customer service, consumer protection, or administrative law; and
“(5) have experience working with the public in cases involving rules (as defined in section 551).
“(c) Duties—The duties of the Office of the Public Advocate shall include—
“(1) assisting agencies in soliciting public participation in the rulemaking process under subchapter II;
“(2) assisting individuals in participating in the rulemaking process;
“(3) working with agencies, Congress, and the public to identify problems and improve public participation in the rulemaking process;
“(4) conducting and publishing research on social equity impacts of the rulemaking process;
“(5) developing and coordinating social equity definitions across the executive branch;
“(6) when requested by the agency or by the public through comments submitted through the process described in section 553 of title 5, United States Code, performing, not later than 30 days after the receipt of such a request, a social equity assessment (as such term is defined in the Experts Protect Effective Rules, Transparency, and Stability Act of 2025) for a proposed rule; and
“(7) facilitating means by which individuals and populations that have not historically participated in the rulemaking process may be better included in the rulemaking process, including by—
“(A) recommending and implementing new outreach plans;
“(B) partnering with State, local, and Tribal governments, and with community-based organizations to propagate information about rules changes; and
“(C) ensuring information about agency rulemaking and changes to rules are written in clear, accessible language that is accessible in multiple languages.
“(d) Rulemaking—Not later than 180 days after the date on which the National Public Advocate is appointed under this subsection or 180 days after the date of enactment of this subsection, whichever is later, the National Public Advocate shall make rules to carry out this section.”
in the table of sections for such chapter, by inserting after the item relating to section 504 the following:
Sec. 12 Scope of review
Section 706 of title 5, United States Code, is amended—
in the first sentence of the matter preceding paragraph (1)—
by striking “agency action.” and inserting “agency action. If a statute that an agency administers is silent or ambiguous as to the proper construction of a particular term or provision or set of terms or provisions, and an agency has followed the applicable procedures in subchapter II of chapter 5, has otherwise lawfully adjudicated a matter, or has followed the corresponding procedural provisions of the relevant statute, as applicable, a reviewing court shall defer to the agency’s reasonable or permissible interpretation of that statute, regardless of the significance of the related agency action or a possible future agency action.”; and
by striking “To the extent necessary” and inserting:
“(a) In general—To the extent necessary”
by adding at the end the following:
“(b) Unreasonable delay—For purposes of subsection (a)(1), unreasonable delay shall include—
“(1) when an agency has not issued a notice of proposed rulemaking before the date that is 1 year after the date of enactment of the legislation mandating the rulemaking, where no deadline for the rulemaking was specified in the enacted law;
“(2) when an agency has not issued a final version of a proposed rule before the date that is 1 year after the date on which the proposed rule was published in the Federal Register;
“(3) when an agency has not implemented a final rule before the date that is 1 year after the implementation date published in the Federal Register or, if no implementation date was provided, before the date that is 1 year after the date on which the final rule was published in the Federal Register; and
“(4) when an agency has not issued or implemented a final rule, upon a showing of good cause therefor.”
Sec. 13 Right of review
In general— Chapter 7 of title 5, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:
“707. Statute of limitation
“Except as otherwise expressly provided by law, an action seeking review of an agency action under this chapter shall be commenced not later than 6 years after the date of the final agency action.”
Conforming amendment— Section 2401(a) of title 28, United States Code, is amended by inserting “or section 707 of title 5” after “title 41”.
Clerical amendment— The table of contents for chapter 7 of title 5, United States Code, is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 706 the following:
Sec. 14 Expanding public awareness of rulemakings
In general— Section 553 of title 5, United States Code, as amended by sections 4, 5, and 10 of this Act, is amended by adding at the end the following:
“(l)
“(1) The head of each agency shall take such actions as may be necessary to—
“(A) expand public awareness of the initiation of each rule making proceeding;
“(B) expand public awareness of the publication of each proposed rule;
“(C) expand public awareness when a rule is published; and
“(D) establish a participation log, including all rule making participants, with respect to each rule making.
“(2) Not later than 2 business days after the date on which an agency publishes a notice of proposed rule making or a final rule under this section, the agency shall notify interested persons of the publication, including by using contact information that interested persons have provided to the agency and by publishing such notice on the agency's website and any social media accounts.”
Effective date— The amendment made by this section shall take effect beginning on the date that is 30 days after the date of enactment of this Act.
Sec. 15 Public petitions
Section 553(e) of title 5, United States Code, is amended—
by inserting “(1)” before “Each agency”; and
by adding at the end the following:
“(2) Not later than 60 days after the date on which an agency receives more than 100,000 signatures on a single petition under paragraph (1), the agency shall provide a written response that includes—
“(A) an explanation of whether the agency has engaged or is engaging in the requested issuance, amendment, or repeal of a rule; and
“(B) if the agency has not engaged in the requested issuance, amendment, or repeal of a rule, a written explanation for not engaging in the requested issuance, amendment, or repeal.
“(3) Not later than 30 days after the date of enactment of the Experts Protect Effective Rules, Transparency, and Stability Act of 2025, the head of each agency shall establish and publish procedures for the processing of a petition under paragraph (1), including—
“(A) using the agency website, the Federal Register, and other Federal websites to educate the public about how to file a petition under paragraph (1); and
“(B) creating an accessible docket on the internet website of the agency, or on any existing Government-wide internet website, of any petition filed under paragraph (1).
“(4) No agency action under this subsection shall be subject to review under chapter 7.”
Sec. 16 Amendment to Congressional Review Act
Sec. 17 Reinstatement of disapproved rules
Definitions— In this section—
the term covered rule means a rule for which a joint resolution of disapproval was enacted under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, before the date of enactment of this Act; and
the term Federal agency has the meaning given the term agency in section 551(1) of title 5, United States Code.
Fast-Track reinstatement— A Federal agency may reinstate a covered rule by publishing the covered rule in the Federal Register during the 1-year period beginning on the date of enactment of this Act.
Reinstatement after 1-Year period— After the end of the 1-year period beginning on the date of enactment of this Act, a Federal agency may reinstate a covered rule using the rulemaking procedures described in section 553 of title 5, United States Code.
Sec. 18 Cost-benefit analysis
Requirement of regulatory impact— If an agency is performing a cost-benefit or regulatory impact analysis in the course of issuing a rule, the agency shall—
take into account the benefits of the rule to the public, including the nonquantifiable benefits of the rule; and
except for good cause shown, prioritize adoption of a rule that provides benefits to the public, including nonquantifiable benefits.
Requirement of distributional effects— An agency shall take into account distributional effects and the social equity impact of a rule when issuing such rule.
Scope of review— Section 706 of title 5, United States Code, as amended by section 12, is amended in subsection (a), as so designated, by inserting after “prejudicial error.” the following: “When acting under paragraph (2)(A), the court shall not require an agency to demonstrate that the challenged action meets a cost-benefit analysis standard except where explicitly required by law.”.
Sec. 19 Definitions
In this Act:
Agency; rule— The terms agency and rule have the meanings given such terms in section 551 of title 5, United States Code.
Interested person— The term interested person includes individuals, partnerships, corporations, associations, or public or private organizations of any character other than an agency.
Office— The term Office means the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs of the Office of Management and Budget.
Regulatory action— The term regulatory action means any substantive action by an agency that promulgates or is expected to lead to the promulgation of a final rule or regulation, including notices of inquiry, advance notices of proposed rulemaking, and notices of proposed rulemaking.
Significant regulatory action— The term significant regulatory action means any regulatory action that is likely to result in a rule that may—
have an annual effect on the economy of $100,000,000 or more or adversely affect in a material way the economy, a sector of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public health or safety, or State, local, or Tribal governments or communities;
create a serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an action taken or planned by another agency;
materially alter the budgetary impact of entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan programs or the rights and obligations of recipients thereof; or
raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal mandates, the President’s priorities, or the general principles of regulation customarily practiced by the executive branch.
Social equity impact— The term social equity impact means any impact of a proposed rule, whether intended or unintended, that might reasonably be expected to disproportionately affect a population of interested persons that is part of a protected class or set of protected classes, based on the rule’s plain language, stated intention, and based on credible statistical projections and data on the impacts of similar rules, laws, and policies.
Social equity assessment— The term social equity assessment means a written and publicly available report that shall specifically consider any social equity impact, positive or negative, that the proposed policy might have on a population of interested persons who share a common characteristic that renders them part of a protected class, where that population was previously subjected to discriminatory or exclusionary practices by the agency promulgating the rule or where credible demographic evidence demonstrates significant disparities experienced by different populations within a protected class.