Preventing Foreign Interference in American Elections Act
A BILL
To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to further restrict contributions of foreign nationals, and for other purposes.
Sec. 2 Modifications to foreign money ban
“(D) a donation for the purpose of—
“(i) voter registration activity;
“(ii) ballot collection;
“(iii) voter identification;
“(iv) get-out-the-vote activity;
“(v) any public communication that refers to a clearly identified Federal, State, or local political party; or
“(vi) the administration of a Federal, State, or local election; or”
“(b) Definitions—For purposes of this section—
“(1) Foreign national—The term”
“(2) Federal, state, or local election
“(A) In general—The term Federal, State, or local election includes a State or local ballot initiative, referendum, or recall election.
“(B) Rule of construction regarding state or local elections and ballot initiatives and referenda—Nothing in this section may be construed to treat a State or local election or a State or local ballot initiative or referendum as an election for any other purpose under this Act.”
“(3) a person to knowingly aid or facilitate a violation of paragraph (1) or (2).”
“(c) Indirect contributions—For purposes of this section, a person shall be treated as having indirectly made a contribution, donation, expenditure, or disbursement described in subparagraph (A), (B), (C), or (D) of subsection (a)(1) if such person has made a contribution or donation to a person with a designation, instruction, or encumbrance (whether direct or indirect, express or implied, oral or written, or involving intermediaries or conduits) which results in any part of such contribution, donation, expenditure, or disbursement being used for an activity described in subparagraph (A), (B), (C), or (D) of subsection (a)(1).”
“(d) Enforcement
“(1) Use of certification as a defense
“(A) In general—In the case of any allegation that a person has violated subsection (a), any person alleged in the complaint may, in connection with a response to such allegation under section 309(a)(1), submit, under penalty of perjury, a certification that no such violation has occurred.
“(B) Effect of submission—The Commission shall take into consideration any certification submitted under subparagraph (A) in making a determination under section 309(a)(2) whether there is reason to believe such violation has occurred.
“(2) Limitation on investigations
“(A) In general—If the Commission makes a determination under section 309(a)(2) that there is reason to believe a violation of subsection (a) has occurred or is about to occur, any investigation of such alleged violation shall be limited in scope to the factual matter necessary to determine whether such alleged violation occurred.
“(B) Petition to quash subpoena or order on basis not limited in scope to necessary factual matter
“(i) In general—A person subject to an investigation by the Commission following a determination of the Commission that there is reason to believe a violation of subsection (a) has occurred or is about to occur may file a petition in any United States district court with jurisdiction to quash any subpoena or order of the Commission issued under paragraph (3) or (4), respectively, of section 307(a) on the basis that the subpoena or order is not limited in scope to the factual matter necessary to determine whether such alleged violation occurred as required under subparagraph (A).
“(ii) Clarification—Nothing in clause (i) shall be construed to alter the right of any person to otherwise challenge the power of the Commission to issue a subpoena under section 307(a)(3) or an order under section 307(a)(4).”
“(9) under penalty of perjury, a certification that the committee has complied with the requirements of section 319(a).”
“(C) under penalty of perjury, a certification that the independent expenditure does not violate section 319(a); and”
“(G) A certification, under penalty of perjury, that the disbursement does not violate section 319(a).”