Certainty and Uniform Reviews for Reliable Energy and Transmission Act
A BILL
To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to make certain reforms with respect to permits and licenses under such Act, and for other purposes.
Sec. 2 Amendments to section 401 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act
“(d) Conditions
“(1) In general—Any certification provided under this section shall set forth any effluent limitations and other limitations, and monitoring requirements necessary to assure that any discharge subject to this section will comply with the applicable provisions of sections 301, 302, 303, 306, and 307, and any such limitations or requirements shall be imposed by the licensing or permitting agency as a condition on any Federal license or permit subject to the provisions of this section.
“(2) Requirements for denials and conditioned certifications—The State, interstate agency, or the Administrator, as the case may be, may not deny a request for certification with respect to an application for a Federal license or permit under subsection (a), or impose a condition on such license or permit, unless the State, interstate agency, or the Administrator, as applicable, demonstrates, by clear and convincing evidence, that—
“(A) there is no reasonable condition upon the activity proposed to be carried out under such license or permit that meets the requirements of this paragraph that could make it possible for the discharge subject to this section to comply with the applicable provisions of section 301, 302, 303, 306, or 307 of this Act; or
“(B) such a condition—
“(i) is the least burdensome of possible conditions, taking into account—
“(I) technical feasibility;
“(II) cost;
“(III) the purposes of the proposed activity;
“(IV) impacts of the condition on the schedule for such proposed activity; and
“(V) the commercial viability of such proposed activity; and
“(ii) is consistent with the requirements of the Federal license or permit that is the subject of the certification.
“(3) Enforcement—Notwithstanding section 505, any condition imposed on a Federal license or permit by a licensing or permitting agency under this section may be enforced only by such licensing or permitting agency.
“(4) Exception for hydroelectric projects—Notwithstanding paragraph (1), a certification provided under this section may not include conditions relating to the quantity, timing, or rate of water flow over, through, or around a hydroelectric project.”
“(e) Applicable provisions—For purposes of this section, the applicable provisions of sections 301, 302, 303, 306, and 307 are any applicable effluent limitations and other limitations under section 301 or 302, any water quality standard in effect for a State under section 303, any standard of performance under section 306, and any prohibition, effluent standard, or pretreatment standard under section 307.
“(f) Requirements for requests for certification—A request for certification under this section shall be made in writing to the State, interstate agency, or Administrator, as the case may be. A complete request for certification shall consist of the following:
“(1) Identification of each applicant for the Federal license or permit with respect to which the certification is requested.
“(2) A statement that information included in the request for certification is truthful, accurate, and complete, to the best knowledge of each such applicant.
“(3) In the case of a request for certification with respect to an individual permit or license—
“(A) identification of the Federal license or permit that is the subject of the application with respect to which the certification is requested;
“(B) identification of any activity the conduct of which is subject to such Federal license or permit;
“(C) identification of the location and nature of any discharge that may directly result from such activity, and the location of the receiving waters;
“(D) a description of means that may be used to monitor, control, or manage any such discharge; and
“(E) a list of all other Federal, interstate, Tribal, State, or local agency authorizations required for the conduct of such activity, and any approval or denial of such an authorization already received.
“(4) In the case of a request for certification with respect to the issuance of a general license or general permit—
“(A) identification of the proposed categories of activities to be covered by the general license or general permit for which certification is requested;
“(B) a description of the proposed general license or general permit, which may include a draft of the proposed general license or permit; and
“(C) an estimate of the number of discharges expected to result from the proposed general license or general permit annually.
“(g) Judicial review
“(1) Affected certification actions—This subsection shall apply to any civil action for the review of a certification action with respect to an applicant for a license or permit—
“(A) for the construction or operation of facilities for the transmission of electric energy or energy fuels or the transportation of carbon dioxide (including pipelines or associated infrastructure) in interstate or foreign commerce; or
“(B) from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.
“(2) Jurisdiction
“(A) In general—Notwithstanding section 19(d)(1) of the Natural Gas Act (15 U.S.C. 717r(d)(1)), a civil action subject to this subsection shall be filed in a court of appeals of the United States—
“(i) for the circuit in which the applicant is located or has its place of business;
“(ii) for the circuit for the State for which the certification action applies; or
“(iii) for the District of Columbia Circuit.
“(B) Original and exclusive jurisdiction—A court of appeals described in subparagraph (A) shall have original and exclusive jurisdiction over the civil action.
“(3) Expedited consideration—A court described in paragraph (2) shall—
“(A) set any civil action subject to this subsection for expedited consideration; and
“(B) issue a final decision not later than 120 days after the filing of the civil action, unless the court finds extraordinary circumstances, in which case the court may take up to 60 additional days to issue a final decision.
“(4) Standard of review—A court shall hold unlawful a denial of certification under this section if the State, interstate agency, or Administrator, as the case may be, fails to demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that no reasonable condition upon the applicant’s activity that meets the requirements of subsection (d)(2) exists that could make it possible for the activity to avoid violating the applicable provisions of section 301, 302, 303, 306, or 307 of this Act.”