Zeroing Out Monetary Benefits Improperly Expended Act
AN ACT
To reform the Payment Integrity Information Act of 2019 to ensure executive agencies focus on fraud prevention, and for other purposes.
Sec. 2 Reforms to Payment Integrity Information Act of 2019
“(iii) published information on improper payments resulting in financial loss to the Government with the annual budget justification of the executive agency for the most recent fiscal year;”
“(9) Financial loss to the Government—The term “financial loss to the Government”—
“(A) means any payment or part of a payment made in excess of the correct amount authorized by law that results in a financial loss to the Federal Government; and
“(B) does not include any payment or part of a payment made to the correct person or entity for the correct amount authorized by law but not made in accordance with certain administrative procedures applicable to the executive agency (excluding any such procedure necessary to establish eligibility or to verify that any payment or part of a payment was made in such correct amount).”
“(B) Development of risk assessment guidance—Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Treasury shall develop risk assessment guidance to assess the risk of improper payments resulting in financial loss to the Government that addresses the following:
“(i) The likelihood of payment errors and the magnitude of such errors that do not result in financial loss to the Government.
“(ii) The likelihood of payment errors and the magnitude of such errors that do result in financial loss to the Government.
“(iii) A formula for estimating financial loss to the Government.
“(iv) Relevant governmentwide documents and best practices for managing improper payments and mitigating fraud risks in Federal programs, such as the document of the Government Accountability Office entitled “A Framework for Managing Fraud Risks in Federal Programs” (or any successor document), as applicable and appropriate.
“(C) Scope—In preparing a list under paragraph (1)(A), the head of each executive agency shall require, within 6 months after issuing the risk assessment guidance, a risk assessment using the guidance developed under subparagraph (B) for each program or activity listed under paragraph (1)(A) for each—
“(i) existing programs or activities prior to the next disbursement of Federal funds with respect to the program or activity; and
“(ii) newly authorized programs and activities prior to any disbursement of Federal funds with respect to the program or activity.”
“(iii) a prioritized listing of risks identified in subparagraph (D) associated with each program and activity listed under paragraph (1)(A) and any corresponding financial and administrative control to mitigate any such risk, including the use of the Do Not Pay Initiative (or any successor system) and any other system or data asset maintained by the Secretary of the Treasury or the Inspector General of the executive agency to prevent fraud or improper payments resulting in financial loss to the Government prior to making an eligibility determination to receive Federal funds with respect to any such program or activity listed under paragraph (1)(A), issuing an award, or requesting a payment.”
“(III) has taken or plans to take to reduce the percentage of improper payments that result in financial loss to the Government;”
“(ii) shall include—
“(I) an estimate of the total amount of the payments that result in financial loss to the Government;
“(II) an estimate of the total amount of the payments that do not result in financial loss to the Government;
“(III) the percentage of payments that result in financial loss to the Government;
“(IV) an assessment of the portion of the total amount of payments that result in financial loss to the Government that are due to fraudulent actions by the recipient of such payments;
“(V) the total amount of disbursed payments; and
“(VI) a description of resources or legislative changes proposed to improve or maintain the integrity of the relevant program or activity; and”
“(III) each statistically valid estimate developed under subsection (c)(1)(A) and make a recommendation to the head of the executive agency on whether the agency estimate should be reassessed and reestablished; and”
“(F) Agency liaison designation and mandatory coordination meetings—Not less frequently than once every fiscal year, the head of each executive agency with a high-priority Federal program or activity identified under paragraph (1)(B) shall designate a senior official of the executive agency to serve as the liaison of the executive agency for work under this subchapter who shall meet for a non-audit or investigative purpose with the Director of the Office of Management and Budget (or a designee of the Director), the Commissioner of the Bureau of the Fiscal Service of the Department of the Treasury (or a designee of the Commissioner), the Inspector General of the executive agency (or a designee of the Inspector General), and the Pandemic Response Accountability Committee established under section 15010 of the CARES Act (Public Law 116–136; 134 Stat. 533) (or any successor organization) to report on any action taken during the preceding fiscal year and any planned action, including any reform to any financial or administrative control, to prevent improper payments (with a focus on improper payments that lead to financial loss to the Government) and mitigate fraud in such program or activity.”
“(G) Federal-State coordination meetings—Not less frequently than once every fiscal year, the Director of the Office of Management and Budget and the Secretary of the Treasury shall convene a meeting of State officials responsible for program and payment integrity in programs administered on behalf of the Federal Government by a State or local government to review fraud prevention performance, share best practices, and identify ongoing coordination challenges.”
“(A) develop a statistically valid estimate of improper payments that result in financial loss to the Government;”
“(B) include such estimate in the annual budget justification of the executive agency; and
“(C) revise such estimate if the head of the executive agency determines, which may be based on a recommendation from the Director in consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury and the Inspector General of the executive agency, that there is a need to reestablish the estimate of improper payments that result in financial loss to the Government due to—
“(i) a significant change, as determined by the agency head, to the program or activity’s appropriation or authorization;
“(ii) newly establishing the program or activity; or
“(iii) a recommendation from the agency Inspector General in the annual compliance report issued under section 3353(a).”
“(D) access to appropriate records and data assets, whether maintained by an executive agency, a State or local government, or a private sector organization;”
“(6) a description of how the level of planned or completed actions by the executive agency to address the causes of the improper payments that result in financial loss to the Government matched the level of improper payments that resulted in financial loss to the Government, including a breakdown by category of such improper payments and specific timelines for completion of those actions; and”
“(7) information on the progress of the executive agency with respect to—
“(A) implementing the financial and administrative controls required to be established under subsection (a)(2)(E)(iii);
“(B) implementing relevant governmentwide documents and best practices for managing improper payments and mitigating fraud risks in Federal programs, such as the document of the Government Accountability Office entitled “A Framework for Managing Fraud Risks in Federal Programs” (or any successor document), as applicable and appropriate, including with respect to the identification of—
“(i) any dedicated entity that leads the fraud risk management activity of the executive agency;
“(ii) responsibilities of such entity, including any program or operation for which the entity is responsible;
“(iii) capacity, including any limitations, to strategically manage fraud risks;
“(iv) any program or operation within the executive agency for which there is not a dedicated entity that leads fraud risk management, along with a detailed justification for not having such a dedicated entity; and
“(v) the status of implementing the overarching concepts with associated leading practices identified in such document entitled “A Framework for Managing Fraud Risks in Federal Programs” (or any such successor document), as applicable and appropriate;
“(C) implementing the Office of Management and Budget Circular A–123, or any successor policy, with respect to leading practices for managing fraud and improper payments risk;
“(D) identifying fraud risks and vulnerabilities, including but not limited to payroll, beneficiary payments, grants, large contracts, and purchase and travel cards; and
“(E) establishing strategies, procedures, and other steps to prevent, detect, and respond to fraud.”
“(C) the Committee on the Budget of the Senate;
“(D) the Committee on the Budget of the House of Representatives;
“(E) the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate;
“(F) the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives; and”