Workforce Investments Accountability Act
A BILL
To amend the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act to enhance the performance accountability system and dedicate funding to skills development.
Sec. 2 Performance accountability system
“(VI) of the program participants who received training services during a program year, the percentage of such program participants who participated in on-the-job training, employer-directed skills development, incumbent worker training, or an apprenticeship.”
“(IV) of the program participants who exited the program during a program year, the percentage of such program participants who completed, prior to such exit, a work experience as described in section 129(c)(2)(C).”
“(iii) Identification in State plan
“(I) Secretaries—For each State submitting a State plan, the Secretary of Labor and the Secretary of Education shall, not later than January 15 of the year in which such State plan is submitted, for the first 2 program years covered by the State plan, and not later than January 15 of the second program year covered by the State plan, for the third and fourth program years covered by the State plan—
“(aa) propose to the State expected levels of performance, for each of the corresponding primary indicators of performance for each of the programs described in clause (ii) for such State, which shall—
“(AA) be consistent with the factors listed in clause (v); and
“(BB) be proposed in a manner that ensures sufficient time is provided for the State to evaluate and respond to such proposals; and
“(bb) publish, on a public website of the Department of Labor, the statistical model developed under clause (viii) and the methodology used to develop each such expected level of performance.
“(II) States—Each State shall—
“(aa) evaluate each of the expected levels of performance proposed under subclause (I) with respect to such State;
“(bb) based on such evaluation of each such expected level of performance—
“(AA) accept the expected level of performance as so proposed; or
“(BB) provide a counterproposal for such expected level of performance, including an analysis of how the counterproposal addresses factors or circumstances unique to the State that may not have been accounted for in the expected level of performance; and
“(cc) include in the State plan, with respect to each of the corresponding primary indicators of performance for each of the programs described in clause (ii) for such State—
“(AA) the expected level of performance proposed under subclause (I);
“(BB) the counterproposal for such proposed level, if any; and
“(CC) the level of performance that is agreed to under clause (iv).”
“(1) In general
“(A) Templates for performance reports—Not later than 12 months after the date of enactment of the Workforce Investments Accountability Act, the Secretary of Labor, in conjunction with the Secretary of Education, shall develop, or review and modify, as appropriate, to comply with the requirements of this subsection, the templates for performance reports that shall be used by States (including by States on behalf of eligible providers of training services under section 122) and local areas to produce a report on outcomes achieved by the core programs. In developing, or reviewing and modifying, such templates, the Secretary of Labor, in conjunction with the Secretary of Education, shall take into account the need to maximize the value of the templates for workers, jobseekers, employers, local elected officials, State officials, Federal policymakers, and other key stakeholders.
“(B) Standardized reporting—In developing, or reviewing and modifying, the templates under subparagraph (A), the Secretary of Labor, in conjunction with the Secretary of Education, shall ensure that States and local areas, in producing performance reports for core programs and eligible providers of training services, collect and report information on common data elements—
“(i) in a comparable and uniform format; and
“(ii) using terms that are assigned identical meanings across all such reports.
“(C) Additional reporting—The Secretary of Labor, in conjunction with the Secretary of Education—
“(i) in addition to the information on the common data elements, may require additional information with respect to any core program as necessary for effective reporting; and
“(ii) shall periodically review any such requirement for additional information to ensure the requirement is necessary and does not impose an undue reporting burden.
“(D) Privacy—The Secretary of Labor, in conjunction with the Secretary of Education, shall ensure subparagraph (B) is carried out in a manner that protects and promotes individual privacy and data security, in accordance with applicable Federal privacy laws.
“(E) Access to wage records
“(i) Access—A State may facilitate for a local area that meets the requirements of clause (ii), for the sole purpose of fulfilling the reporting requirements under this subsection, access to the quarterly wage records (excluding such records made available by any other State) of program participants in the local area.
“(ii) Privacy protections—To receive access to such quarterly wage records, the local area shall have demonstrated to the State the ability to comply, and agree to comply, with all applicable Federal and State requirements relating to the access and use of such quarterly wage records, including requirements relating to data privacy and cybersecurity.”
“(J) the median earnings gain of participants who received training services, calculated as the median value of the difference between—
“(i) participant earnings in unsubsidized employment during the 4 quarters after program exit; and
“(ii) participant earnings in the 4 quarters prior to entering the program;”
“(C) the percentage of the local area’s allocation under section 133(b) that the local area spent on services paid for through an individual training account described in section 134(c)(3)(F)(iii) or a training contract described in section 134(c)(3)(G)(ii);
“(D) the percentage of the local area’s allocation under section 133(b) that the local area spent on supportive services;
“(E) the percentage of the local area’s allocation under section 133(b), if any, that is spent on incumbent worker training; and”
“(4) Contents of eligible training providers performance report
“(A) In general—The State shall use the information submitted by the eligible providers of training services under section 122 and administrative records, including quarterly wage records, of the participants of the programs offered by the providers to produce a performance report on the eligible providers of training services in the State, which shall include, subject to paragraph (6)(C)—
“(i) with respect to each program of study (or the equivalent) of a provider on the list described in section 122(d)—
“(I) information specifying the levels of performance achieved with respect to the primary indicators of performance described in subclauses (I) through (IV) of subsection (b)(2)(A)(i) with respect to all individuals engaging in the program of study (or the equivalent); and
“(II) the total number of individuals exiting from the program of study (or the equivalent), disaggregated by whether such individuals completed the program of study (or equivalent); and
“(ii) with respect to all eligible providers of training services under section 122—
“(I) the total number of participants who received training services through each adult and dislocated worker program authorized under chapter 3 of subtitle B, disaggregated by the type of entity that provided the training services, during the most recent program year and the 3 preceding program years;
“(II) the total number of participants who exited from training services, disaggregated by the type of entity that provided the training services, and by whether such participants completed the training services, during the most recent program year and the 3 preceding program years;
“(III) the average cost per participant for the participants who received training services, disaggregated by the type of entity that provided the training, during the most recent program year and the 3 preceding program years;
“(IV) the average of the per-program ratios of median earnings increase for a participant to the total cost of the provider’s program; and
“(V) the number of individuals with barriers to employment served by each adult and dislocated worker program authorized under chapter 3 of subtitle B, disaggregated by each subpopulation of such individuals, and by race, ethnicity, sex, and age; and
“(iii) to the extent practicable, with respect to each recognized postsecondary credential awarded by eligible providers in the State described in section 122(d)—
“(I) information specifying the levels of performance achieved with respect to the primary indicators of performance described in subclauses (I) through (IV) of subsection (b)(2)(A)(i) for all participants in the State receiving such credential; and
“(II) information specifying the levels of performance achieved with respect to the primary indicators of performance described in subclauses (I) through (IV) of subsection (b)(2)(A)(i) for participants in the State receiving such credential who are individuals with barriers to employment, disaggregated by each subpopulation of such individuals, and by race, ethnicity, sex, and age.”
“(A) State performance reports—The Secretary of Labor and the Secretary of Education shall annually make available the performance reports for States containing the information described in paragraph (2), which shall include making such reports available—
“(i) digitally using transparent, linked, open, and interoperable data formats that are human readable and machine actionable such that the data from these reports—
“(I) are easily understandable; and
“(II) can be easily included in web-based tools and services supporting search, discovery, comparison, analysis, navigation, and guidance;
“(ii) in a printable format; and
“(iii) in multiple languages, to the extent practicable.”
“(E) Rule of construction—Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to require the retroactive collection of information, from program years beginning prior to the date of the enactment of the Workforce Investments Accountability Act, that was not required under this subsection prior to such enactment.”
“(f) Sanctions for state failure To meet state performance accountability measures
“(1) Targeted support and assistance
“(A) In general—If a State fails to meet 80 percent of the State adjusted level of performance for an indicator described in subsection (b)(2)(A) (referred to in the regulations carrying out this section as an “individual indicator score”) for a core program for any program year, the Secretary of Labor and the Secretary of Education shall provide technical assistance.
“(B) Sanctions
“(i) In general—If the State fails in the manner described in subclause (I) or (II) of clause (ii) with respect to the program year specified in that subclause, the percentage of each amount that could (in the absence of this subsection) be reserved by the Governor under section 128(a)(1) for the immediately succeeding program year shall be reduced by 5 percent and an amount equivalent to the amount reduced shall be returned to the Secretary of Labor until such date as the Secretary of Labor or the Secretary of Education, as appropriate, determines that the State meets the State adjusted level of performance, in the case of a failure described in clause (ii)(II), or has submitted the reports for the appropriate program years, in the case of a failure described in clause (ii)(I).
“(ii) Failures—A State shall be subject to clause (i)—
“(I) if (except in the case of exceptional circumstances as determined by the Secretary of Labor or the Secretary of Education, as appropriate), such State fails to submit a report under subsection (d) for any program year; or
“(II) for a failure under subparagraph (A) that has continued for a second consecutive program year.
“(2) Comprehensive support and assistance
“(A) In general—If a State fails to meet an average of 90 percent of the State adjusted levels of performance for a single core program across all indicators of performance (referred to in the regulations carrying out this section as an “overall State program score”) for any program year, or if a State fails to meet an average of 90 percent of the State adjusted levels of performance for a single indicator of performance across all core programs (referred to in the regulations carrying out this section as an “overall State indicator score”) for any program year, the Secretary of Labor and the Secretary of Education shall provide technical assistance, as described and authorized under section 168(b), including assistance in the development of a comprehensive performance improvement plan.
“(B) Second consecutive year failure—If such failure under subparagraph (A) continues for a second consecutive program year, the percentage of each amount that could (in the absence of this subsection) be reserved by the Governor under section 128(a)(1) for the immediately succeeding program year shall be reduced by 8 percent and an amount equivalent to the amount reduced shall be returned to the Secretary of Labor until such date as the Secretary of Labor or the Secretary of Education, as appropriate, determines that the State meets such State adjusted levels of performance.
“(3) Limitation—The total reduction under this subsection to the percentage of each amount that could (in the absence of this subsection) be reserved by the Governor under section 128(a)(1) may not exceed 10 percent for a program year.
“(4) Reallotment of reductions
“(A) In general—The amounts available for reallotment for a program year shall be reallotted to a State (in this paragraph referred to as an “eligible State”) that—
“(i) was not subject to a reduction of funds under paragraph (1)(B) or paragraph (2)(B) of this subsection for such program year;
“(ii) in the case of amounts available under section 127(b)(1)(C), was 1 of the 5 States that achieved, in the most recent program year, the greatest increase from the prior year to the average of the State’s adjusted levels of performance across all indicators of performance for the youth program under chapter 2 of subtitle B;
“(iii) in the case of amounts available under section 132(b)(1)(B), was 1 of the 5 States that achieved, in the most recent program year, the greatest increase from the prior year to the average of the State’s adjusted levels of performance across all indicators of performance for the adult program under chapter 3 of subtitle B; and
“(iv) in the case of amounts available under section 132(b)(2)(B), was 1 of the 5 States that achieved, in the most recent program year, the greatest increase from the prior year to the average of the State’s adjusted levels of performance across all indicators of performance for the dislocated worker program under chapter 3 of subtitle B.
“(B) Amounts available for reallotment—In this paragraph, the term “amounts available for reallotment for a program year” means the amounts available under section 127(b)(1)(C) and paragraphs (1)(B) and (2)(B) of section 132(b) for such program year which could (in the absence of the requirements to return funds of paragraph (1)(B) or paragraph (2)(B) of this subsection) have otherwise been reserved under section 128(a)(1) by a Governor of a State for such program year.
“(C) Reallotment amounts—In making reallotments under subparagraph (A) for a program year to eligible States, the Secretary shall allot to each eligible State—
“(i) in the case of amounts available under section 127(b)(1)(C), an amount based on the relative amount of the allotment made (before the reallotments under this paragraph are made) to such eligible State under section 127(b)(1)(C) for such program year, compared to the total allotments made (before the reallotments under this paragraph are made) to all eligible States under section 127(b)(1)(C) for such program year;
“(ii) in the case of amounts available under paragraph (1)(B) of section 132(b), an amount based on the relative amount of the allotment made (before the reallotments under this paragraph are made) to such eligible State under paragraph (1)(B) of section 132(b) for such program year, compared to the total allotments made (before the reallotments under this paragraph are made) to all eligible States under paragraph (1)(B) of section 132(b) for such program year; and
“(iii) in the case of amounts available under paragraph (2)(B) of section 132(b), an amount based on the relative amount of the allotment made (before the reallotments under this paragraph are made) to such eligible State under paragraph (2)(B) of section 132(b) for such program year, compared to the total allotments made (before the reallotments under this paragraph are made) to all eligible States under paragraph (2)(B) of section 132(b) for such program year.”
“(A) In general—If such failure continues, the Governor shall take corrective actions, which shall include—
“(i) in the case of such failure, as described in paragraph (1), for a second consecutive year, on any single indicator, across indicators for a single program, or on a single indicator across programs, a 5-percent reduction in the amount that would (in the absence of this clause) be allocated to the local area for the immediately succeeding program year under chapter 2 or 3 of subtitle B for the program subject to the performance failure;
“(ii) in the case of such failure, as described in paragraph (1), for a third consecutive year, the development of a reorganization plan through which the Governor shall—
“(I) require the appointment and certification of a new local board, consistent with the criteria established under section 107(b);
“(II) prohibit the use of one-stop delivery system contractors or service providers identified as achieving a poor level of performance; and
“(III) redesignate a local area (which may include merging a local area with another local area), if the Governor determines that the likely cause of such continued performance failure of a local area is due to such local area’s designation being granted without the appropriate consideration of parameters described under section 106(b)(1)(B); or
“(iii) taking another significant action determined appropriate by the Governor.”
“(D) Reallocation of reductions—With respect to any amounts available to carry out section 128(b), paragraph (2)(A) or (3) of section 133(b), and section 133(b)(2)(B) to a Governor for a program year which would (in the absence of subparagraph (A)(i)) have otherwise been allocated by such Governor to a local area (referred to individually in this subparagraph as an “unallocated amount”) for such program year—
“(i) 10 percent of those 3 unallocated amounts shall be reserved by the Governor to provide technical assistance to local areas within the State that were subject to a reduction of allocation amounts pursuant to subparagraph (A)(i) for such program year; and
“(ii) the amounts remaining after the reservations under clause (i) shall be reallocated by the Governor, to the local areas within the State that were not subject to a reduction of allocation amounts pursuant to subparagraph (A)(i) for such program year, in a manner determined by the Governor, which may take into consideration the extent to which local areas serve a significant number, as determined by the Governor, of individuals with barriers to employment.”
“(i) Information and technical assistance—Beginning not later than 12 months after the date of enactment of the Workforce Investments Accountability Act, the Secretary of Labor shall hold meetings with each State board and State agency that administers a core program, and that requests such a meeting, to provide information and technical assistance concerning the performance accountability measures established in accordance with subsection (b), and related requirements for States under this section.”
“(3) Designated entity—The Governor shall designate a State agency (or appropriate State entity) to assist in carrying out the performance reporting requirements of this section for core programs and eligible providers of training services. The designated State agency (or appropriate State entity) shall be responsible for—
“(A) facilitating data matches using quarterly wage record information, including wage record information made available by other States, to measure employment and earnings outcomes;
“(B) notifying State agencies that administer core programs and eligible providers of training services of the State’s procedures for data validation and reliability, as described in subsection (d)(5); and
“(C) protection against disaggregation that would violate applicable privacy standards, as described in subsection (d)(6)(C).”
“(k) Implementation of performance accountability measures—Not later than 12 months after the date of enactment of the Workforce Investments Accountability Act, the Secretary of Labor and the Secretary of Education shall fully implement the requirements of this section for programs described in subsection (b)(3)(A)(iv), including—
“(1) developing and disseminating the objective statistical adjustment model described in subsection (b)(3)(A)(viii) and using the model as described in subsection (b)(3)(A)(viii) for each program; and
“(2) notifying the State agencies carrying out such programs of the performance accountability measures established under this section, of the reporting and evaluation requirements for such programs, and of the sanctions requirements for programs that fail to meet State adjusted levels of performance under subsection (b)(3)(A)(iv).”
Sec. 3 Minimum amount for skills development
“(B) Minimum amount for skills development—Not less than 50 percent of the funds described in subparagraph (A) shall be used by the local area for the payment of training services—
“(i) provided to adults and dislocated workers under paragraph (3)(F)(iii); and
“(ii) provided to adults and dislocated workers under paragraph (3)(G)(ii),”