Congress finds the following:
(1)
In Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump, the Supreme Court of the United States clarified that although the International Emergency Economic Powers Act authorizes the President to exercise certain economic authorities during a bona fide national emergency, that statute does not confer authority to impose tariffs absent clear and express congressional authorization; in so holding, the Court reaffirmed that article I, section 8 of the Constitution vests exclusively in Congress the power to lay and collect duties and tariffs, and that such legislative authority may not be exercised by the executive branch solely by virtue of an emergency declaration.
(2)
The Constitution establishes a deliberate separation of powers, vesting in Congress alone the authority to lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts, and excises under article I, section 8; allowing the executive branch to unilaterally impose tariffs absent explicit congressional authorization would improperly transfer core legislative power to the Presidency, erode democratic accountability, and undermine the foundational principle that laws affecting the economic lives of Americans must originate with the people’s elected representatives.
(3)
These unlawful tariffs resulted in billions of dollars in collections by the Federal Government and materially increased the prices of goods for American consumers, functioning as a regressive tax that disproportionately burdened working families, seniors, and small businesses.
(4)
American consumers bore the direct financial consequences of these actions through higher costs on everyday necessities, without meaningful notice, representation, or recourse, and shall be made whole through a transparent and congressionally directed refund process administered by the Federal Government.