Congress makes the following findings:
(1)
In
Executive Order 13959 (
50 U.S.C. 1701 note; relating to addressing the threat from securities investments that finance Communist Chinese Military Companies), President Donald J. Trump described the People’s Republic of China’s military-industrial complex by specifically citing the military-civil fusion strategy of the Government of the People's Republic of China, in which that Government “is increasingly exploiting United States capital to resource and to enable the development and modernization of its military, intelligence, and other security apparatuses … [k]ey to the development of the PRC’s military, intelligence, and other security apparatuses is the country’s large, ostensibly private economy”.
(2)
In
Executive Order 14032 (
50 U.S.C. 1701 note; relating to addressing the threat from securities investments that finance certain companies of the People’s Republic of China), President Joseph R. Biden reasserted those concerns and further found that the use of Chinese surveillance technology outside the People's Republic of China and the development or use of Chinese surveillance technology to facilitate repression or serious human rights abuse constitute unusual and extraordinary threats, expanding the scope of the national emergency declared in
Executive Order 13959.
(3)
Section 1260H(g) of the William M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021 (
Public Law 116–283;
10 U.S.C. 113 note) defines a “Chinese military company” as “an entity that
is—
“(i)
“(I) directly or indirectly owned by, controlled by, or beneficially owned by, affiliated with, or in an official or unofficial capacity acting as an agent of or on behalf of, the People’s Liberation Army, Chinese military and paramilitary elements, security forces, police, law enforcement, border control, the People’s Armed Police, the Ministry of State Security (MSS), or any other organization subordinate to the Central Military Commission of the Chinese Communist Party, the Chinese Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (MIIT), the State-Owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission of the State Council (SASAC), or the State Administration of Science, Technology, and Industry for National Defense (SASTIND); or
“(II) identified as a military-civil fusion contributor to the Chinese defense industrial base; and
“(ii) engaged in providing commercial services, manufacturing, producing, or exporting”
(4)
The functions and objectives of Chinese military companies and contributors to the Chinese military-industrial complex are substantially similar and warrant a commensurate level of treatment under United States statutes and regulations.
(5)
Section 805 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2024 (
Public Law 118–31;
10 U.S.C. 4651 note prec.) imposed restrictions on purchases by the Department of Defense of goods and services produced or developed by Chinese military companies identified under section 1260H(g) of the William M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021 and entities subject to the control of such companies. Beginning June 30, 2026, the Department of Defense will be prohibited from executing new contracts with such companies and entities, and starting June 30, 2027, the Department of Defense will be prohibited from purchasing end products or services produced or developed by such companies and entities indirectly through third parties.
(6)
As the Department of Defense prepares to implement the procurement restrictions described in paragraph (5), it is still possible for companies and entities described in that paragraph to raise capital by selling securities to investors that trade on United States exchanges.
(7)
In harmonizing enforcement approaches across sanctions regimes of the United States Government, Congress can assist the President to ensure consistent treatment of entities posing national security risks, thereby enhancing the effectiveness of United States sanctions and investment restrictions.