Habitat Connectivity on Working Lands Act of 2025
A BILL
To amend the Food Security Act of 1985 to improve wildlife habitat connectivity and wildlife migration corridors, and for other purposes.
Sec. 2 Conservation programs
“(11) Habitat connectivity—The term habitat connectivity means the degree to which landscape or habitat elements facilitate native species movement among seasonal habitats.
“(12) Big game species—The term big game species means native species of large mammals including, wild deer, elk, pronghorn, wild sheep, and moose.”
“(8) Cost-share payments for grassland enrolled in the conservation reserve program
“(A) In general—The Secretary may provide payments under the program for costs associated with planning, design, materials, equipment, installation, labor, management, maintenance, or training with respect to eligible land that is—
“(i) enrolled in the conservation reserve program under section 1231(d)(2)(A); and
“(ii) of ecological significance, as described in section 1231(d)(2)(B)(iii).
“(B) Limitation—A producer shall not be eligible for payments under subparagraph (A) for practices if the producer receives payments or other benefits for the same practice on the same land under another Federal program (other than the conservation reserve program under subchapter B of chapter 1).”
“(3) Cost-share payments for grassland enrolled in the conservation reserve program
“(A) In general—The Secretary may provide payments under the program for costs associated with planning, design, materials, equipment, installation, labor, management, maintenance, or training with respect to eligible land that is—
“(i) enrolled in the conservation reserve program under section 1231(d)(2)(A); and
“(ii) of ecological significance, as described in section 1231(d)(2)(B)(iii).
“(B) Limitation—A producer shall not be eligible for payments under subparagraph (A) for conservation activities if the producer receives payments or other benefits for the same conservation activities on the same land under another Federal program (other than the conservation reserve program under subchapter B of chapter 1).
“(C) Emergency grazing and haying access preserved—No priority resource concern, practice, or incentive pertaining to restoration and enhancement of wildlife habitat connectivity and wildlife migration corridors on the acres described above will prevent or alter emergency grazing and haying access for grassland acres enrolled in the conservation reserve program.”
“(v) addresses the conservation and restoration of wildlife habitat, including wildlife habitat connectivity and wildlife migration corridors.”
“(j) Addressing barriers to habitat connectivity
“(1) In general—The Secretary shall—
“(A) to the maximum extent practicable, fully incorporate nonstructural methods to control livestock distribution, such as virtual fencing, into the conservation practice standards; and
“(B) provide for the appropriate range of conservation practices and resource mitigation measures available to landowners using nonstructural methods described in subparagraph (A).
“(2) Availability of adequate technical assistance—The Secretary shall ensure that adequate technical assistance is available for the implementation of—
“(A) nonstructural methods described in paragraph (1)(A); and
“(B) other practices that support habitat connectivity (as that term is defined in section 1240A) through Federal conservation programs.”
“(q) Encouragement of habitat connectivity and big game corridors—In carrying out any conservation program administered by the Secretary, the Secretary may, as appropriate, encourage—
“(1) the conservation of landscape corridors and hydrologic connectivity, where native big game species (as that term is defined in section 1240A) and ecological processes can transition from one habitat to another, in order to conserve native biodiversity and ensure resiliency against impacts from a range of stressors; and
“(2) the use of conservation practices that support the development, restoration, and maintenance of landscape corridors and hydrologic connectivity.”
Sec. 3 High-priority research and extension areas
“(21) Virtual fencing—Research and extension grants may be made under this section for the purposes of—
“(A) understanding and addressing the barriers to the adoption of virtual fencing technology; and
“(B) studying the effects of virtual fencing technology on natural and cultural resources, such as—
“(i) sensitive riparian areas; and
“(ii) crucial winter range and stopover habitats for native big game species (as that term is defined in section 1240A of the Food Security Act of 1985 (16 U.S.C. 3839aa–1)).”