Improving Diagnosis in Medicine Act of 2022
A BILL
To improve the quality, appropriateness, and effectiveness of diagnosis in health care, and for other purposes.
Sec. 2 Research program to improve diagnostic safety and quality
“918. Research program to improve diagnostic safety and quality
“(a) In general—The Director shall establish a comprehensive program of research and quality improvement to—
“(1) assess and understand diagnostic errors, including diagnostic delays, and how to eliminate common failures in the diagnostic process that lead to significant patient harm; and
“(2) identify, develop, implement, and disseminate evidence-based strategies and best practices for improving diagnostic quality, safety, and health care value.
“(b) Activities—The program established under subsection (a) shall include the following:
“(1) Continuum of research—A portfolio of conducted and supported activities that is consistent with the general, research, implementation, and dissemination activities of the Center for Quality Improvement and Patient Safety, as described in section 933, including—
“(A) investigator-initiated research to assess diagnostic errors and identify improved methods to prevent errors and the harm they cause;
“(B) translation and synthesis of research findings and development of tools for implementing prevention strategies into practice;
“(C) implementation research to refine evidence-based tools for improving diagnostic processes and effectively integrate these solutions into practice; and
“(D) dissemination to promote implementation of effective methods, strategies and tools for wide-scale improvement.
“(2) Research centers of diagnostic excellence—Consistent with section 911(b), such Centers shall link research directly with clinical practice in geographically diverse locations throughout the United States, and may include—
“(A) academic medical and institutional research centers that combine demonstrated multidisciplinary expertise in diagnostic outcomes or quality improvement research with linkages directly or through national, state or local stakeholder partner organizations to relevant sites of care;
“(B) provider-based research networks, including plan, facility, or delivery system sites of care (especially primary care), that can evaluate outcomes and evaluate and promote quality improvement approaches.
“(3) Financial assistance—The Director may provide financial assistance to assist in meeting the costs of planning and establishing new centers, as well as operating existing and new centers, pursuant to section 902(c).
“(4) Stakeholder engagement—The Director shall identify and enter into a supporting agreement (grant or contract) with a nonprofit entity that convenes a coalition of diverse health care stakeholders for the purpose of—
“(A) raising attention to diagnostic safety and quality concerns;
“(B) facilitating learning, adoption and spread of effective quality improvement interventions; and
“(C) catalyzing novel actions by individual member organizations to reduce harms from diagnostic error and improve patient outcomes.
“(c) Authorization of appropriations
“(1) In general—To carry out this section, there is authorized to be appropriated $20,000,000 for fiscal year 2023, $25,000,000 for fiscal year 2024, $30,000,000 for fiscal year 2025, and $35,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2026 and 2027.
“(2) Reservation—Of the amount appropriated under paragraph (1) for a fiscal year, $700,000 shall be allocated to carrying out the purpose described in subsection (b)(4).
“(3) Availability—Amounts appropriated under this section shall remain available until expended.”
Sec. 3 Fellowships and training grants
“(5) For purposes of the program under this subsection, biomedical and behavioral research includes diagnostic safety and quality research.”
Sec. 4 Quality measure development
“(B) diagnostic safety and quality;”
Sec. 5 Data for research and improvement
“(1) In general—The Secretary”
“(2) Consultation with expert panel—In carrying out paragraph (1), the Secretary, in coordination with the Director, the Director of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology, and the National Library of Medicine, shall convene an expert panel to consider and make recommendations regarding the types, sources, and availability of data needed to accelerate diagnostic safety and quality research, training, and measure development as specified in section 918, including data related to racial, ethnic, and language attributes; gender, age, geography, and socioeconomic conditions; the specificity, interoperability, and socio-technical aspects of electronic vocabularies and ontologies related to presenting symptoms and diagnostic certainty; and the development and use of symptom-based clinical registries. Such panel shall consider enhanced data capabilities that are necessary to support both research and improvement of diagnostic safety and quality.”