Ensure Accountability in De Minimis Act of 2024
A BILL
To amend the Tariff Act of 1930 to increase accountability relating to articles receiving exemptions from duties for de minimis entries and to require regulations on enhanced data collection with respect to such entries, and for other purposes.
Sec. 2 Limitation on persons authorized to enter articles eligible for de minimis exemption from duties
“(c) Importation under administrative exemption only by certain parties—Notwithstanding any other provision of this Act, an article is eligible for an administrative exemption under section 321(a)(2)(C) only if the article is entered—
“(1) as international mail; or
“(2) by—
“(A) the consignee, the owner, or the purchaser of the article; or
“(B) if designated by a person specified in subparagraph (A), a person holding a valid customs broker’s license issued under section 641(b).”
Sec. 3 Modification to penalties for fraud, gross negligence, and negligence
“(i) aid or abet”
“(ii) direct or facilitate a violation of subparagraph (A).”
“(4) Recurring negligent or grossly negligent violations relating to de minimis entries
“(A) In general—A recurring negligent or grossly negligent violation of subsection (a) that relates to entering articles for which an administrative exemption from duties under section 321(a)(2)(C) is sought is punishable by a civil penalty in—
“(i) except as provided by clause (ii), an amount not to exceed the greater of—
“(I) 10 times the aggregate amount of the lawful duties, taxes, and fees of which the United States is or may be deprived; or
“(II) $2,000; and
“(ii) if the recurring violation did not affect the assessment of duties, an amount not to exceed the greater of—
“(I) 200 percent of the aggregate domestic value of the merchandise; or
“(II) $2,000.
“(B) Recurring defined
“(i) In general—In this paragraph, the term recurring, with respect to a violation of subsection (a) by a person that relates to entering articles described in subparagraph (A), means that—
“(I) the violation—
“(aa) is a second or subsequent such violation by that person; and
“(bb) takes place not later than 3 months after the person received a penalty claim under subsection (b)(2) for a prior such violation and for which the person had the opportunity seek remission or mitigation; and
“(II) the person has been found to have repeatedly, over an aggregate period of 3 months or more, committed violations of subsection (a) that relate to entering articles described in subparagraph (A).
“(ii) Effect of intervening compliant entries—For purposes of clause (i), if, between negligent or grossly negligent violations of subsection (a) by a person that relate to entering articles described in subparagraph (A), that person submits entry documentation with respect to a shipment of articles described in subparagraph (A) accurately and in compliance with the law, the submission of such entry documentation shall not prevent the negligent or grossly negligent violations from being considered recurring.”
“(3) Definitions—In this section:
“(A) Grossly negligent—The term grossly negligent, with respect to a violation of paragraph (1) by a person, means that the person committed the violation with—
“(i) actual knowledge of or wanton disregard for the relevant facts; and
“(ii) indifference or disregard to whether the person was violating paragraph (1).
“(B) Negligent—The term negligent, with respect to a violation of paragraph (1) by a person, means that the person failed to exercise reasonable care and competence—
“(i) to ensure that documents, data, and information provided by the person in connection with the entry of merchandise are complete and accurate; or
“(ii) to perform any material act required by law.”