Securing Our Schools Act of 2022
A BILL
To provide for safe schools and safe communities.
Sec. 2 Nonprofit security grant program
“(f) Feedback
“(1) In general—If the Administrator denies an application for a grant under this section, not later than 120 days after the date of the denial, the Administrator shall—
“(A) notify the applicant; and
“(B) provide an explanation for the denial.
“(2) Explanation—An explanation described in paragraph (1)(B) shall include information identifying the reason for the denial of the application, including—
“(A) any factors that led to a lower score or rank compared to other applicants; and
“(B) an identification of any deficiencies in the application.
“(g) Administrative costs and technical assistance—A State through which the Administrator makes a grant to an eligible nonprofit organization under this section shall receive a 5-percent increase in the amount of the grant—
“(1) for administrative costs; and
“(2) to provide technical assistance to the eligible nonprofit organization.
“(h) Application update and improvements
“(1) Public meeting—Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of the Securing Our Schools Act of 2022, the Administrator shall hold a public meeting to solicit recommendations on updating the application process for a grant under this section.
“(2) Report—Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of the Securing Our Schools Act of 2022, the Administrator shall—
“(A) develop recommendations to modernize and update the application process for a grant under this section, which shall include considerations for—
“(i) establishing a more streamlined application process;
“(ii) establishing greater uniformity in the application process among all applicants and the guidance provided to States through which the Administrator makes grants to eligible nonprofit organizations under this section;
“(iii) ensuring that the application template is compatible with the latest or most widely used version of software programs; and
“(iv) coordinating with the Administrator of General Services to ensure that applications submitted under this section are compatible across online platforms of the Federal Government; and
“(B) submit to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate and the Committee on Homeland Security of the House of Representatives a report that includes—
“(i) the recommendations developed under subparagraph (A); and
“(ii) a description of whether the recommendations developed under subparagraph (A) are consistent with feedback received at the public meeting required under paragraph (1).
“(3) Implementation of recommendations—Not later than 270 days after the date of enactment of the Securing Our Schools Act of 2022, the Administrator shall implement the recommendations developed under paragraph (2)(A).
“(4) Paperwork reduction act waiver—For the purpose of meeting the deadlines established under this subsection, the Secretary may waive the application of subchapter I of chapter 35 of title 44, United States Code, to the requirements of this subsection.”
“(2) High-risk urban areas—Of the amounts made available to carry out this section for each of fiscal years 2023 through 2030, not less than 0.35 percent shall be for grants to eligible recipients located in each high-risk urban area receiving grants under section 2003.
“(3) Salaries and expenses—Of the amounts made available to carry out this section in any fiscal year, the Administrator may transfer to another account of the Federal Emergency Management Agency not more than 3 percent for salaries and administrative expenses, including any necessary expenses to provide feedback or technical assistance to applicants for a grant under this section in accordance with subsection (g).”
Sec. 3 Securing schools
“(v) improving school conditions for student learning, by enabling local educational agencies to use funds available under subsection (a)(3) for the purpose of planning and designing school buildings and facilities, installing infrastructure, and implementing technology or other measures, that strengthen security on school premises, which may include—
“(I) controlling access to school premises or facilities, through the use of metal detectors, or other measures, or technology, with evidence-based effectiveness (to the extent the State involved determines that such evidence is reasonably available), which may include—
“(aa) secured campus external gate or locked doors or check-in points;
“(bb) active shooter alert systems;
“(cc) access control;
“(dd) internal door locks;
“(ee) peepholes for classroom doors;
“(ff) school site alarm and protection systems;
“(gg) metal detectors or x-ray machines (including portable);
“(hh) door locking mechanisms and access control doors;
“(ii) increased lighting on school grounds;
“(jj) emergency call boxes;
“(kk) two-way radios;
“(ll) emergency alerts;
“(mm) surveillance cameras or systems and infrastructure (such as poles and wiring);
“(nn) software costs and warranties;
“(oo) fencing and gating; and
“(pp) emergency generators to provide back-up power for phone systems, critical lighting, and essential outlets;
“(II) implementing any technology or measure, or installing any infrastructure, to cover and conceal students within the school during crisis situations;
“(III) implementing technology to provide coordination with law enforcement and notification to relevant law enforcement and first responders during such a situation, which shall include—
“(aa) emergency planning and preparation;
“(bb) emphasis on a school safety plan with buy in from all elements of the school community, including board members, employees, students, parents, law enforcers, government and business leaders, the media, and local residents;
“(cc) school implementation of threat assessment programs;
“(dd) development of district-based mandatory incident reporting systems;
“(ee) establishment of local school safety advisory groups (including parents, families, judges, first responders, health and human service professionals, and mental health professionals);
“(ff) evidence-based training for school resource officers, school personnel, and students to prevent student violence to enable them to recognize and quickly respond to warning signs;
“(gg) development and operations of anonymous reporting systems;
“(hh) evidence-based school threat assessment and crisis intervention teams;
“(ii) programs to facilitate coordination with local law enforcement;
“(jj) liability and insurance for school districts;
“(kk) trauma-informed training for school staff on responses to active shooter situations; and
“(ll) community engagement for planning and implementing safety policies and procedures;
“(IV) implementing any technology or measure, including hiring school security officers, or installing any infrastructure, with evidence-based effectiveness (to the extent the State involved determines that such evidence is reasonably available) to increase the safety of school students and staff;
“(V) implementing any technology or measure, or installing any infrastructure, for school safety reinforcement, including bullet-resistant doors and windows; and
“(VI) implementing any technology or system that would reduce the time needed to disseminate official information to parents regarding the safety of their children during and immediately following a crisis;”
Sec. 4 Improving school security through the COPS ON THE BEAT program
“(24) to pay salaries and expenses of school resource officers at public, charter, and private elementary schools and secondary schools (as such terms are defined under section 8101 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7801)); and
“(25) to improve physical school security at public, charter, and private elementary schools and secondary schools (as such terms are defined under section 8101 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7801)) by obtaining security equipment to protect students in schools and equip law enforcement officers responding to school security issues and installing physical structure improvements, including—
“(A) fencing, external gates, door locks, and check-in points, to establish a secured campus;
“(B) active shooter alert systems;
“(C) access controls;
“(D) internal door locks;
“(E) school site alarm and protection systems;
“(F) metal detector or x-ray machines (including portable machines);
“(G) ballistic safety equipment for schools and responding law enforcement officers;
“(H) increased lighting on school grounds;
“(I) emergency call boxes;
“(J) two-way radios;
“(K) emergency alert systems;
“(L) surveillance cameras or systems, including infrastructure for such systems such as poles and wiring;
“(M) software costs and warranties; and
“(N) emergency generators to provide back-up power for phone systems, critical lighting, and essential outlets.”