(1)
as a tool to justify Federal actions by the Secretary of Energy, the Administrator, the Secretary of the Interior, the Secretary of Transportation, the Chair of the Council on Environmental Quality, and the Chair of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to address greenhouse gas emissions, including the regulation or prohibition of the exploration, mining, production, and use of coal and other fossil fuels as energy sources, the social cost of greenhouse gases, specifically the social cost of carbon, the social cost of methane, and the social cost of nitrous oxide, represents the hypothetical cost of 1 incremental ton of carbon dioxide, methane, or nitrous oxide emissions in a given year;
(2)
the document of the Office of Management and Budget entitled “Circular A–4” and dated September 17, 2003—
(A)
guides Federal agencies on the development of regulatory impact analysis required under Executive Order 12866 (
5 U.S.C. 601 note; relating to regulatory planning and review) and other authorities; and
(B)
instructs Federal agencies to include discount rates of 3 and 7 percent and evaluate the costs and benefits of the regulatory action that accrue to citizens and residents of the United States;
(3)
first developed in 2009 by an interagency working group that included the Department of Energy, the Environmental Protection Agency, the Department of Transportation, and the Council on Environmental Quality, the estimates for the social cost of carbon and the subsequently developed social cost of methane and social cost of nitrous oxide fail to comply with the 3- and 7-percent discount rates prescribed by the document of the Office of Management and Budget entitled “Circular A–4” and dated September 17, 2003;
(4)
while the document of the Office of Management and Budget entitled “Circular A–4” and dated September 17, 2003, specifies that, in carrying out an evaluation of the global effects of a rule, regulation, or action, the evaluation shall be reported separately from domestic costs and benefits of that rule, regulation, or action, the social cost of carbon, the social cost of methane, and the social cost of nitrous oxide instead calculates the global benefits in lieu of, not in addition to, the domestic costs of a rule, regulation, or action;
(5)
the use of the estimates of the social cost of greenhouse gases, including the estimates for the social cost of carbon, the social cost of methane, and the social cost of nitrous oxide, in the rulemakings and other actions of the Department of Energy, the Environmental Protection Agency, the Department of the Interior, the Department of Transportation, and the Council on Environmental Quality was without—
(A)
an adequate opportunity for public notice and comment; and
(B)
rigorous scientific peer review;
(6)
by Executive order, the interagency working group described in paragraph (3) was disbanded in March 2017, and the related estimates were withdrawn;
(7)
the Environmental Protection Agency developed new estimates in line with the document described in paragraph (4) in EPA–452/R–18–006, dated August 2018, and entitled “Regulatory Impact Analysis for the Proposed Emissions Guidelines for Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Existing Electric Utility Generating Units; Revisions to Emission Guideline Implementing Regulations; Revisions to New Source Review Program”;
(8)
Executive Order 13990 (86 Fed. Reg. 7037; relating to protecting public health and the environment and restoring science to tackle the climate crisis), issued on January 20, 2021—
(A)
reconvened the interagency working group described in paragraph (3);
(B)
directed the head of each Federal agency to include an interim figure for the social cost of carbon, the social cost of methane, and the social cost of nitrous oxide in any consideration of the effect of greenhouse gas emissions in any regulations and other relevant agency actions; and
(C)
directed the reconvened interagency working group to review and update the methodology and estimates for the social cost of carbon, the social cost of methane, and the social cost of nitrous oxide;
(9)
despite nearly a decade of investigation, the interagency working group described in paragraph (3) has lacked transparency and failed to sufficiently provide Congress and the public with information regarding how often the interagency working group met, the discussions of the interagency working group, and how the interagency working group arrived at its estimates;
(10)
(A)
the use of the interim social cost of greenhouse gas figures was challenged in court and a preliminary injunction was granted by the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana on February 11, 2022; and
(B)
the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals stayed the preliminary injunction on March 16, 2022;
(11)
the Environmental Protection Agency relied on the interagency working group interim estimate of the social cost of methane, without appropriate peer review or opportunity for public notice and comment, in attempting to justify the costs and benefits of the proposed rule entitled “Standards of Performance for New, Reconstructed, and Modified Sources and Emissions Guidelines for Existing Sources: Oil and Natural Gas Sector Climate Review” (86 Fed. Reg. 63110 (November 15, 2021));
(12)
prior to the 2017 disbandment of the interagency working group described in paragraph (3), the Department of the Interior used the social cost of methane estimate to justify the costs and benefits of the final rule entitled “Waste Prevention, Production Subject to Royalties, and Resource Conservation” (81 Fed. Reg. 83008 (November 18, 2016));
(13)
court filings note that various agencies have 38 pending regulatory actions that rely on the interim social cost of greenhouse gases figures; and
(14)
continued use of the social cost of greenhouse gases, including the social cost of carbon, the social cost of methane, and the social cost of nitrous oxide by the Department of Energy, the Environmental Protection Agency, the Department of the Interior, the Department of Transportation, the Council on Environmental Quality, and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ignores sound science.