The following is the sense of Congress:
(1)
Foreign adversaries are increasingly using economic coercion to pressure, punish, and influence foreign trading partners.
(2)
Economic coercion causes economic harm to foreign trading partners and creates malign influence on the sovereign political actions of foreign trading partners.
(3)
Economic coercion of foreign trading partners has negative effects on the national security of the United States.
(4)
Economic coercion is often characterized by—
(A)
arbitrary and discriminatory actions that run counter to the rules-based international order;
(B)
capricious and non-transparent actions taken without due process afforded;
(C)
intimidation or threats of punitive actions; and
(D)
informal actions that take place without explicit government action.
(5)
Recent acts of economic coercion have included instances in which foreign adversaries have—
(A)
arbitrarily restricted transportation of exports from a foreign trading partner to the foreign adversary;
(B)
acted in a capricious and non-transparent manner to prevent or dissuade consumers from purchasing imports from a foreign trading partner;
(C)
enacted arbitrary technical barriers to trade in goods and services in response to political actions taken by a foreign trading partner;
(D)
arbitrarily restricted market access or otherwise limited the import of goods or services from a foreign trading partner;
(E)
arbitrarily restricted investment in or export of goods or services to a foreign trading partner; and
(F)
acted in a non-transparent manner to manipulate a private entity with the intent of causing economic harm to or influencing sovereign political actions of a foreign trading partner.
(6)
Existing mechanisms for trade dispute resolution and international arbitration are inadequate for responding to economic coercion in a timely and effective manner as foreign adversaries exploit plausible deniability and lengthy processes.
(7)
The United States should provide material support to foreign trading partners affected by economic coercion.
(8)
Responding to economic coercion will be most effective when the United States provides relief to affected foreign trading partners in coordination with allies and like-minded countries.
(9)
Such coordination will further demonstrate broad resolve against economic coercion.