Equal Opportunity for all Investors Act
A BILL
To amend the Securities Act of 1933 to expand the definition of a qualifying accredited investor, and for other purposes.
Sec. 2 Certification examinations for accredited investors
“(C) any individual who is certified as an accredited investor through an examination established or approved by the Commission, the securities commission (or any agency or office performing like functions) of any State, or any self-regulatory organization as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(26)) that—
“(i) measures whether an individual certified as an accredited investor pursuant to such examination understands and appreciates the risks and opportunities of investing in securities;
“(ii) is designed to ensure that an individual with financial sophistication or training would be unlikely to fail; and
“(iii) may be designed and/or administered by any other person approved by the Commission, such securities commission, or such self-regulatory organization.”
Sec. 3 Accredited investor self-certification
Sec. 4 Modification of rules
Sec. 5 Adjusting the accredited investor standard
“(b) Review and adjustment
“(1) In general—The Commission may undertake a review of the definition of the term accredited investor, as such term applies to natural persons, to determine whether the requirements of the definition, excluding the requirement relating to the net worth standard described in subsection (a), should be adjusted or modified for the protection of investors, in the public interest, and in light of the economy.
“(2) Adjustment or modification—Upon completion of a review under paragraph (1), the Commission may, by notice and comment rulemaking, make such adjustments to the definition of the term accredited investor, excluding adjusting or modifying the requirement relating to the net worth standard described in subsection (a), as such term applies to natural persons, as the Commission may deem appropriate for the protection of investors, in the public interest, and in light of the economy.”