Chance to Compete Act of 2021
A BILL
To implement merit-based reforms to the civil service hiring system that replace degree-based hiring with skills- and competency-based hiring.
Sec. 2 Definitions
Sec. 3 Defining the term “examination” for purposes of hiring in the competitive service
“(a) Definitions
“(1) Examination defined for purposes of chapter—For purposes of this chapter, the term examination, with respect to the competitive service—
“(A) means an opportunity to directly demonstrate knowledge, skills, abilities, and competencies, through a passing score assessment (unless the examining agency determines that another method, not limited to the outcomes of pass or fail, makes meaningful and objective differentiations in rating candidates); and
“(B) does not include a self-assessment from an automated examination, a résumé review (unless conducted by a subject matter expert in a structured manner), or any other method of determining the experience or level of educational attainment of an individual, alone.
“(2) Other terms—In this section—
“(A) the term agency means an agency described in section 901(b) of title 31;
“(B) the term Director means the Director of the Office;
“(C) the term examining agency means—
“(i) the Office; or
“(ii) an agency to which the Director has delegated examining authority under section 1104(a)(2) of this title;
“(D) the term Office means the Office of Personnel Management;
“(E) the term passing score assessment means an assessment that an individual can pass or fail;
“(F) the term subject matter expert means an employee—
“(i) who is determined by the employee's agency to be an expert in the subject and job field of a position in the competitive service; and
“(ii) whom the employee's agency designates to develop and conduct technical assessments; and
“(G) the term technical assessment means a position-specific assessment developed under subsection (b)(1)(A).
“(b) Technical assessments
“(1) In general—For the purpose of conducting an examination for a position in the competitive service, a subject matter expert who is determined by the subject matter expert's agency to be an expert in the subject and job field of the position, as affirmed and audited by the Chief Human Capital Officer or Human Resources Director (as applicable) of that agency, may—
“(A) develop, in partnership with human resources employees of the examining agency, a position-specific assessment that is relevant to the position; and
“(B) conduct the assessment developed under subparagraph (A) to—
“(i) determine whether an applicant for the position has a passing score to be qualified for the position; or
“(ii) rank applicants for the position as “most qualified” or “qualified” for category rating purposes under section 3319.
“(2) Types of assessments—A technical assessment developed under paragraph (1) may include—
“(A) a structured interview;
“(B) a work-related sample;
“(C) a custom or generic behavioral assessment (which, if generic, may be customized as needed); or
“(D) another assessment.
“(3) Sharing and customization of assessments
“(A) Sharing—An examining agency may share a technical assessment developed under paragraph (1) with another examining agency.
“(B) Customization—An examining agency with which a technical assessment is shared under subparagraph (A) may customize the assessment as appropriate.
“(C) Platform for sharing and customization—The Director shall establish and operate a platform on which examining agencies can share and customize technical assessments under this paragraph.
“(4) Adoption of determinations by other agencies—For purposes of sections 3318(b) and 3319(c), an appointing authority, other than the appointing authority requesting a certificate of eligibles, that selects an individual from that certificate in accordance with such section 3318(b) or 3319(c) may adopt the determination described in paragraph (1) of this subsection of a subject matter expert employed by the requesting appointing authority instead of conducting an additional technical assessment of the individual.
“(c) Educational requirements—The Office”
Sec. 4 Amendments to Competitive Service Act of 2015
“(5) Platform for sharing résumés of individuals on certificates of eligibles—The Director of the Office shall establish and operate a platform on which an appointing authority can share, with other appointing authorities and the Chief Human Capital Officers Council established under section 1303 of the Chief Human Capital Officers Act of 2002 (5 U.S.C. 1401 note; Public Law 107–296), the résumés of individuals who are on a certificate of eligibles requested by the appointing authority.”
“(c) Maximizing sharing of applicant information
“(1) Definitions—In this subsection—
“(A) the terms agency, Director, and Office have the meanings given those terms in section 3308(a) of title 5, United States Code; and
“(B) the term competitive service has the meaning given the term in section 2102 of title 5, United States Code.
“(2) Maximizing sharing—The Director shall maximize the sharing of information among agencies regarding qualified applicants for positions in the competitive service, including by—
“(A) providing for the delegation to other agencies of the authority of the Office to host multi-agency hiring actions to increase the return on investment on high-quality pooled announcements; and
“(B) sharing certificates of eligibles for appointment.”