(1)
Evaluation of existing diesel deployment efforts— An assessment of the effectiveness of utilizing diesel generators to assist with natural disaster response efforts, which such assessment shall include—
(A)
information on the current use of diesel generators to assist with natural disaster response efforts, including—
(i)
the prevalence of deploying diesel generators around the United States as the sole power source to assist with natural disaster response efforts;
(ii)
the average number of diesel generators deployed in natural disaster response efforts based on the type of natural disaster, the severity of the natural disaster, and the location of the natural disaster;
(iii)
where Federal, State, and local governments store diesel generators;
(iv)
how diesel generators are transported to areas affected by a natural disaster;
(v)
any logistical concerns with refueling diesel generators over an extended period of time;
(vi)
the potential to utilize accessory equipment that is traditionally connected to diesel generators to help provide electricity to the area in need; and
(vii)
any other information that is necessary to understand the role of diesel generators used to assist with natural disaster response efforts;
(B)
how the effect on the environment of utilizing diesel generators to assist with natural disaster response efforts compares to the estimated effect on the environment of utilizing microreactors to assist with the same natural disaster response efforts; and
(C)
the concerns to public safety when deploying diesel generators in natural disaster response efforts.
(2)
Goals, objectives, and priorities— A comprehensive, research-based, and long-term discussion of goals, objectives, and priorities for utilizing microreactors instead of diesel generators to assist with natural disaster response efforts.
(3)
Department of Defense Analysis— An analysis of—
(A)
how the efforts of the Department of Defense to develop microreactor technology for operational uses could be used to inform the development of microreactors to assist with natural disaster response efforts, including any recommendations and additional direction that may be necessary for such expedited deployment;
(B)
how the Department of Defense can most effectively translate and implement the lessons learned from its operations in the field to assist with natural disaster response efforts, including how operations in the field related to microreactors can be used to answer broad questions for the nuclear industry and for future issues relating to fuel reliability, energy supply chain issues, reducing diesel convoy causalities, and supporting other global humanitarian needs; and
(C)
whether a demonstration program for microreactors is needed prior to deploying microreactors for natural disaster response efforts, based on the analysis provided by subparagraphs (A) and (B).
(6)
Strategic considerations when deploying microreactors— An assessment of various strategic considerations to improve the efficiency, timeliness, and cost-effectiveness of deploying microreactors to assist with natural disaster response efforts, including—
(A)
whether the Department of Defense, the Federal Emergency Management Agency, or any other government entity should build, own, or operate microreactors that are used to assist with natural disaster response efforts, including whether it would be viable to lease microreactors from private industry and whether it would be viable to facilitate public-private partnerships to find cost effective options to utilize microreactors for natural disaster response efforts;
(B)
the recommended number of individuals charged with the usage, maintenance, and upkeep of the microreactors, including the recommended qualifications, training requirements, availability requirements, and oversight responsibility of such individuals;
(C)
the number of microreactors needed, initially and in the long-term, to effectively respond to a natural disaster based on past natural disaster trends and the specific geographic location of the area;
(D)
where microreactors used to assist with natural disaster response efforts would be stored, including information on—
(i)
how different microreactor storage locations may affect swift and economically feasible natural disaster response efforts;
(ii)
the feasibility of utilizing already-built facilities instead of constructing new microreactor storage facilities;
(iii)
the cost of constructing new microreactor storage facilities;
(iv)
how to properly store the microreactor when not being utilized for natural disaster response efforts; and
(v)
potential storage locations, such as—
(I)
the Strategic Alliance for FLEX Emergency Response locations in Memphis, Tennessee and Phoenix, Arizona; and
(II)
Department of Defense bases;
(E)
how to maintain a microreactor and replace, store, and dispose of fuel used by a microreactor, including whether public-private partnerships may be used to assist with such maintenance, replacement, storage, and disposal;
(F)
when a diesel generator will suffice in the event of a natural disaster of limited proportions, in comparison to utilizing microreactors to assist with natural disaster response efforts;
(G)
which States and territories and possessions of the United States that are prone to natural disasters, such as hurricanes, should be prioritized when initially selecting locations to deploy microreactors to assist with natural disaster response efforts;
(H)
the methods, capabilities, and costs associated with transporting microreactors to areas that were or may be impacted by natural disasters;
(I)
any other strategic considerations that should be taken into account before deploying microreactors to assist with natural disaster response efforts;
(J)
how to integrate microreactors into existing electrical grids in emergency situations, including how grid connection points, microgrid limits, site load limits, existing infrastructure, and the standard process for grid interconnections may impact the integration of microreactors into existing electrical grid;
(K)
whether microreactors will be susceptible to cyberattacks, including whether autonomous control will impact the microreactor’s cyberattack susceptibility and what systems or microreactor designs would be ideal for combating such cyberattacks during a natural disaster response effort; and
(L)
how other uses of microreactors, such as utilizing microreactors for various mining efforts, could impact the other considerations in this subsection.
(9)
Partnerships to enhance natural disaster response efforts— An assessment about—
(A)
the current status of any collaboration between the National Guard, Federal Emergency Management Agency, and the Army Corps of Engineers during natural disaster response efforts;
(B)
the specific roles of each entity specified in subparagraph (A) (disaggregated, in the case of the National Guard, by State and by military department) during a natural disaster response effort, and their respective roles when participating in natural disaster response efforts;
(C)
the current emergency responsibilities of the Department of Energy and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission that relate to deploying microreactors during natural disaster response efforts;
(D)
the potential opportunity to set up an annual listening group session or consortium to provide all the necessary information needed to deploy microreactors to assist with natural disaster response efforts and to ensure a smooth transition from the use of diesel generators to the use of microreactors to assist with natural disaster response efforts;
(E)
how the Emergency Management Assistance Compact, consented to by Congress in the joint resolution entitled “Joint resolution granting the consent of Congress to the Emergency Management Assistance Compact” (
Public Law 104–321), can be utilized to allow States to allocate their unused microreactors to other States that are in need of microreactors to assist with natural disaster response efforts; and
(F)
how to improve the collaboration between Federal, State, and local government entities and private entities when deploying microreactors to assist with natural disaster response efforts.
(10)
Utilizing microreactors to charge electric vehicles— Recommendations on how to utilize microreactors as charging stations for electric vehicles in the event of a mass evacuation resulting from a natural disaster, including recommendations on—
(A)
how to deploy microreactors to charge electric vehicles before an evacuation;
(B)
the primary transportation corridors that would be used for such a mass evacuation;
(C)
how many microreactors would be needed to charge electric vehicles during such a mass evacuation, based on the size and population of the State in which the mass evacuation occurs;
(D)
the best placement of microreactors throughout the primary transportation corridors to ensure a smooth electric vehicle charging process and subsequent evacuation;
(E)
any potential public-private partnerships that would be useful in utilizing microreactors to charge electric vehicles during a mass evacuation, including an estimate of the costs that would be associated with establishing these partnerships;
(F)
how to—
(i)
transport microreactors to mass evacuation locations along primary transportation corridors for purposes of charging electric vehicles; and
(ii)
pay for such transportation; and
(G)
any other topic related to subparagraphs (A) through (F).