H.R. 6967 — what changed
Chance to Compete Act of 2022
From Introduced in House to Engrossed in House. 4 sections amended and 1 added between Introduced in House and Engrossed in House.
Sec. 3 Defining the term examination for purposes of hiring in the competitive service
“(c) Examinations
“(1) Definitions
changed
“(A) Examination defined for purposes of this chapter—For purposes of this chapter, the term examination—Examination
changed
“(i) means an opportunity to directly demonstrate knowledge, skills, abilities, and competencies, through a passing score assessment;In this chapter, the term examination—
changed
“(ii) includes a résumé review that is—“(I) means an opportunity to directly demonstrate knowledge, skills, abilities, and competencies, through an assessment;
changed
“(I) conducted by “(II) includes a subject matter expert; andrésumé review that is—
changed
“(II) based upon indicators that—“(aa) conducted by a subject matter expert; and
changed
“(aa) are derived from a job analysis; and“(bb) based upon indicators that—
changed
“(bb) bear “(AA) are derived from a rational relationship to performance in the position for which the examining agency is hiring; job analysis; and
changed
“(iii) on and after the date that is 2 years after the date of enactment of the Chance to Compete Act of 2022, does not include a self-assessment from an automated examination, “(BB) bear a résumé review (except as provided rational relationship to performance in clause (ii)), or any other method of determining the experience or level of educational attainment of an individual, alone.position for which the examining agency is hiring; and
changed
“(B) Other terms—In this subsection—“(III) on and after the date that is 2 years after the date of enactment of the Chance to Compete Act of 2022, does not include a self-assessment from an automated examination, a résumé review (except as provided in subclause (II)), or any other method of determining the experience or level of educational attainment of an individual, alone.
added “(ii)
added “(I) An agency’s Chief Human Capital Officer may waive clause (i)(III) if the Officer provides a written report to the Director of the Office of Personnel Management within 30 days of authorizing the waiver that justifies the need for such waiver and articulates the data, evidence, and circumstances for such need.
added “(II) The Director is authorized to provide agencies guidance and instruction on the data, evidence, and circumstances that should be included in the waiver described in subclause (I) and shall post any waiver on a public website within 30 days of receipt of the waiver.
added “(III) A waiver shall not be considered in effect until it is posted on the public website pursuant to subclause (II).
added “(B) Other definitions—In this subsection—
“(i) the term agency means an agency described in section 901(b) of title 31;
“(ii) the term Director means the Director of the Office;
“(iii) the term examining agency means—
“(I) the Office; or
“(II) an agency to which the Director has delegated examining authority under section 1104(a)(2) of this title;
added “(iv) the term subject matter expert means an employee or selecting official—
removed
“(iv) the term Office means the Office of Personnel Management;
removed
“(v) the term passing score assessment means an assessment that an individual can pass or fail;
removed
“(vi) the term subject matter expert means an employee or selecting official—
“(I) who possesses understanding of the duties of, and knowledge, skills, and abilities required for, the position for which the employee or selecting official is developing or administering an assessment; and
added “(II) whom the agency that employs the employee or selecting official designates to assist in the development and administration of technical assessments under paragraph (2); and
added “(v) the term technical assessment means an assessment developed under paragraph (2)(A)(i) that—
removed
“(II) whom the delegated examining unit of the agency that employs the employee or selecting official designates to assist in the development and administration of technical assessments under paragraph (2); and
removed
“(vii) the term technical assessment means an assessment developed under paragraph (2)(A)(i) that—
“(I) allows for the demonstration of job-related technical skills, abilities, and knowledge;
“(II)
“(aa) is based upon a job analysis; and
“(bb) is relevant to the position for which the assessment is developed; and
“(III) may include—
“(aa) a structured interview;
“(bb) a work-related exercise;
“(cc) a custom or generic procedure used to measure an individual’s employment or career-related qualifications and interests; or
“(dd) another assessment that meets the criteria under subclauses (I) and (II).
“(2) Technical assessments
added “(A) In general—For the purpose of conducting an examination for a position in the competitive service, an individual or individuals whom an agency determines to have an expertise in the subject and job field of the position, as affirmed and audited by the Chief Human Capital Officer or Human Resources Director (as applicable) of that agency, may—
removed
“(A) In general—For the purpose of conducting an examination for a position in the competitive service, a subject matter expert who is determined by the subject matter expert's agency to be an expert in the subject and job field of the position, as affirmed and audited by the Chief Human Capital Officer or Human Resources Director (as applicable) of that agency, may—
“(i) develop, in partnership with human resources employees of the examining agency, a position-specific assessment that is relevant to the position; and
“(ii) administer the assessment developed under clause (i) to—
added “(I) determine whether an applicant for the position has demonstrated qualification for the position; or
removed
“(I) determine whether an applicant for the position has a passing score to be qualified for the position; or
“(II) rank applicants for the position for category rating purposes under section 3319.
“(B) Sharing and customization of assessments
“(i) Sharing—An examining agency may share a technical assessment with another examining agency if each agency maintains appropriate control over examination material.
“(ii) Customization—An examining agency with which a technical assessment is shared under clause (i) may customize the assessment as appropriate, provided that the resulting assessment satisfies the requirements under part 300 of title 5, Code of Federal Regulations (or any successor regulation).
“(iii) Platform for sharing and customization
added “(I) In general—The Director shall establish and operate an online platform on which examining agencies can share and customize technical assessments under this subparagraph.
added “(II) Online platform—The Director shall—
added “(aa) not be responsible for independently validating the utility of the content and technical assessments shared in the online platform described in subclause (I); and
added “(bb) ensure that such online platform includes the ability of its users to rate the utility of the content and technical assessments shared in the online platform to allow for a ranking of such contents.
added “(3) Regulations—Not later than one year after the date of enactment of the Chance to Compete Act of 2022, the Office of Personnel Management shall prescribe regulations necessary for the administration of this subsection with respect to employees in each agency.”
removed
“(I) In general—The Director shall establish and operate a platform on which examining agencies can share and customize technical assessments under this subparagraph.
removed
“(II) Guidance—Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of the Chance to Compete Act of 2022, the Director shall issue guidance to examining agencies on how to efficiently and effectively share assessments using the platform established under subclause (I).
removed
“(C) Adoption of determinations by other agencies—For purposes of sections 3318(b) and 3319(c), an appointing authority, other than the appointing authority requesting a certificate of eligibles, that selects an individual from that certificate in accordance with such section 3318(b) or 3319(c) may adopt the determination described in subparagraph (A) of this paragraph of a subject matter expert employed by the requesting appointing authority instead of administering an additional technical assessment of the individual.”
Sec. 4 Amendments to Competitive Service Act of 2015
added “(5) Online tool for sharing résumés of individuals on certificates of eligibles—Not later than one year after the date of enactment of the Chance to Compete Act of 2022, the Director of the Office of Personnel Management shall establish and operate an online tool on which an appointing authority can share, with other appointing authorities and the Chief Human Capital Officers Council established under section 1303 of the Chief Human Capital Officers Act of 2002 (5 U.S.C. 1401 note; Public Law 107–296), the resumes of individuals who are on a certificate of eligibles requested by the appointing authority. In carrying out this paragraph, the Director shall consult with the Chief Human Capital Officers Counsel and its membership to develop a plan to establish such online tool.”
removed
“(5) Platform for sharing résumés of individuals on certificates of eligibles—The Director of the Office shall establish and operate a platform on which an appointing authority can share, with other appointing authorities and the Chief Human Capital Officers Council established under section 1303 of the Chief Human Capital Officers Act of 2002 (5 U.S.C. 1401 note; Public Law 107–296), the résumés of individuals who are on a certificate of eligibles requested by the appointing authority.”
changed
“(c) Maximizing Exploring the benefits of maximizing sharing of applicant information
“(1) Definitions—In this subsection—
“(A) the terms agency, Director, and Office have the meanings given those terms in section 3304(c)(1) of title 5, United States Code; and
“(B) the term competitive service has the meaning given the term in section 2102 of title 5, United States Code.
changed
“(2) Maximizing sharing—The Director shall maximize research the benefits of maximizing the sharing of information among agencies regarding qualified applicants for positions in the competitive service, including by—
“(A) providing for the delegation to other agencies of the authority of the Office to host multi-agency hiring actions to increase the return on investment on high-quality pooled announcements; and
“(B) sharing certificates of eligibles and accompanying résumés for appointment.”
Sec. 5 Modernizing and reforming the assessment and hiring of Federal job candidates
Sec. 6 Talent teams
Sec. 7 Determination of budgetary effects
addedadded The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purpose of complying with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, shall be determined by reference to the latest statement titled “Budgetary Effects of PAYGO Legislation” for this Act, submitted for printing in the Congressional Record by the Chairman of the House Budget Committee, provided that such statement has been submitted prior to the vote on passage.