US Codex
Bill
Notes

H.R. 4330 — what changed

Protect Reporters from Exploitative State Spying Act

From Introduced in House to Reported in House. 3 sections amended between Introduced in House and Reported in House.

Sec. 2 Definitions

In this Act:

(1)
changed Covered journalist— The term “covered journalist” covered journalist means a person who regularly gathers, prepares, collects, photographs, records, writes, edits, reports, investigates, or publishes news or information that concerns local, national, or international events or other matters of public interest for dissemination to the public.
(2)
Covered service provider—
(A)
changed In general— The term “covered covered service provider” provider means any person that, by an electronic means, stores, processes, or transmits information in order to provide a service to customers of the person.
(B)
changed Inclusions— The term “covered covered service provider” provider includes—
(i)
a telecommunications carrier and a provider of an information service (as such terms are defined in section 3 of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 153));
(ii)
a provider of an interactive computer service and an information content provider (as such terms are defined in section 230 of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 230));
(iii)
a provider of remote computing service (as defined in section 2711 of title 18, United States Code); and
(iv)
a provider of electronic communication service (as defined in section 2510 of title 18, United States Code) to the public.
(3)
changed Document— The term “document” document means writings, recordings, and photographs, as those terms are defined by Federal Rule of Evidence 1001 (28 U.S.C. App.).
(4)
changed Federal entity— The term “Federal entity” Federal entity means an entity or employee of the judicial or executive branch or an administrative agency of the Federal Government with the power to issue a subpoena or issue other compulsory process.
(5)
changed Journalism— The term “journalism” journalism means gathering, preparing, collecting, photographing, recording, writing, editing, reporting, investigating, or publishing news or information that concerns local, national, or international events or other matters of public interest for dissemination to the public.
(6)
changed Personal account of a covered journalist— The term “personal personal account of a covered journalist” journalist means an account with a covered service provider used by a covered journalist that is not provided, administered, or operated by the employer of the covered journalist.
(7)
changed Personal technology device of a covered journalist— The term “personal personal technology device of a covered journalist” journalist means a handheld communications device, laptop computer, desktop computer, or other internet-connected device used by a covered journalist that is not provided or administered by the employer of the covered journalist.
(8)
changed Protected information— The term “protected information” protected information means any information identifying a source who provided information as part of engaging in journalism, and any records, contents of a communication, documents, or information that a covered journalist obtained or created as part of engaging in journalism.

Sec. 3 Limits on compelled disclosure from covered journalists

In any matter arising under Federal law, a Federal entity may not compel a covered journalist to disclose protected information, unless a court in the judicial district in which the subpoena or other compulsory process is, or will be, issued determines by a preponderance of the evidence, after providing notice and an opportunity to be heard to the covered journalist that—

(1)
disclosure of the protected information is necessary to prevent, or to identify any perpetrator of, an act of terrorism against the United States; or
(2)
changed disclosure of the protected information is necessary to prevent a threat of imminent violence, significant bodily harm, or death.death, including specified offenses against a minor (as defined by section 111(7) of the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006 (34 U.S.C. 20911(7))).

Sec. 4 Limits on compelled disclosure from covered service providers

(a)
changed Conditions for compelled disclosure— In any matter arising under Federal law, a Federal entity may not compel a covered service provider to provide testimony or any document consisting of any record, information, or other communication that relates to communications stored by a business transaction between the covered service provider and on behalf of a covered journalist, including testimony or any document relating to a personal account of a covered journalist or a personal technology device of a covered journalist, unless a court in the judicial district in which the subpoena or other compulsory process is, or will be, issued determines by a preponderance of the evidence that there is a reasonable threat of imminent violence unless the testimony or document is provided, and issues an order authorizing the Federal entity to compel the disclosure of the testimony or document.
(b)
Notice to court— A Federal entity seeking to compel the provision of testimony or any document described in subsection (a) shall inform the court that the testimony or document relates to a covered journalist.
(c)
changed Notice to covered journalist and opportunity To to be heard—
(1)
changed In general— A court may authorize a Federal entity to compel the provision of testimony or a document under this section only after the Federal entity seeking the testimony or document provides the covered journalist who on behalf of whom the testimony or document is a party stored pursuant to the business transaction described in subsection (a)—
(A)
notice of the subpoena or other compulsory request for such testimony or document from the covered service provider not later than the time at which such subpoena or request is issued to the covered service provider; and
(B)
an opportunity to be heard before the court before the time at which the provision of the testimony or document is compelled.
(2)
Exception to notice requirement—
(A)
changed In general— Notice and an opportunity to be heard under paragraph (1) may be delayed for not more than 45 days if the court involved determines there is clear and convincing evidence that such notice would pose a clear and substantial threat to the integrity of a criminal investigation, or would present an imminent risk of death or serious bodily harm.harm, including specified offenses against a minor (as defined by section 111(7) of the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006 (34 U.S.C. 20911(7))).
(B)
Extensions— The 45-day period described in subparagraph (A) may be extended by the court for additional periods of not more than 45 days if the court involved makes a new and independent determination that there is clear and convincing evidence that providing notice to the covered journalist would pose a clear and substantial threat to the integrity of a criminal investigation, or would present an imminent risk of death or serious bodily harm under current circumstances.