Congress finds as follows:
(1)
The Indian Boarding School Policy was adopted by the United States Government to strip American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) children of their indigenous identities, beliefs, and traditional languages to assimilate them into White American culture through federally funded Christian-run schools, which had the effect of cultural genocide.
(2)
For nearly a century, between 1869 and the 1960s, the Federal Government implemented the Indian Boarding School Policy. This policy authorized the forced removal of hundreds of thousands of AI/AN children, as young as 5 years old, relocating them from their homes in Tribal communities to one of the 367 Indian Boarding Schools across 30 States.
(3)
By 1926, nearly 83 percent of AI/AN school-age children were enrolled in Indian boarding schools in the United States. However, because nearly 62 percent of the school records have been lost or destroyed, the full extent of the Federal Indian boarding school policy has not been identified.
(4)
Gen. Richard Henry Pratt, the founder and superintendent of the Carlisle Indian Industrial School in Carlisle, Pennsylvania, stated the ethos of this policy to “kill the Indian in him, and save the man”. Founded in 1879, the Carlisle Indian School set the precedent as the first Government-funded off-reservation Indian boarding school in the United States where over 10,000 AI/AN children were enrolled from over 140 Tribes.
(5)
The Indian Boarding School policy was designed to assimilate AI/AN children into White American culture by stripping them of their cultural identities, often through physical, sexual, psychological, and spiritual abuse and neglect. Many of the children who were taken to boarding schools never returned to their communities. At the Carlisle Indian School alone, approximately 180 AI/AN children were buried.
(6)
While attending Indian boarding schools, AI/AN children suffered additional psychological abuses as they were sent to White-owned homes and businesses for involuntary and unpaid manual labor work during the summers. Many children ran away and remained missing, or died of illnesses due to harsh living conditions, abuse, and/or substandard health care provided by the schools.
(7)
Many of the children were buried in unmarked graves or off-campus cemeteries. Inaccurate, scattered, and missing school records make it nearly impossible for families to locate the final resting place of their loved ones, especially since only 38 percent of the school’s records have been located from 142 of the known 367 boarding schools.
(8)
Parents of the children who were forcibly removed to the boarding schools were prohibited from visiting or engaging in correspondence with their children. Parental resistance to compliance with this harsh no-contact policy resulted in their incarceration or loss of access to basic provisions including food rations, clothing, or both.
(9)
The 2018 Broken Promises Report published by the United States Commission on Civil Rights reported that AI/AN communities continue to experience intergenerational trauma resulting from experiences in Indian Boarding Schools that divided cultural family structures, damaged indigenous identities, and inflicted chronic psychological ramifications on AI/AN children and families.
(10)
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Kaiser Permanente Adverse Childhood Experiences Study shows that adverse or traumatic childhood experiences disrupts brain development leading to a higher likelihood of negative health outcomes as adults including, but not limited to, heart disease, obesity, diabetes, and autoimmune diseases. AI/ANs suffer from disproportional rates of each of these diseases compared to the national average today.
(11)
The longstanding ramifications of the inhumane treatment of AI/AN children and families at these boarding schools continues to impact Tribal communities through intergenerational trauma, cycles of violence and abuse, disappearance, health disparities, substance abuse, premature deaths, and additional undocumented psychological trauma.
(12)
The continuing lasting implications of the Federal Indian Boarding School Policy and inhumane treatment of AI/AN children and families influenced modern U.S. Department of the Interior’s Bureau of Indian Education (BIE)-operated schools. These schools have often failed to meet the many needs of nearly 50,000 AI/AN students across 23 States.
(13)
The replication of assimilation policies of the boarding school era also presented itself through other Federal programs like the Indian Adoption Project (1958 to 1967) that placed AI/AN children in non-Indian households and institutions for foster care or adoption across 25 States.
(14)
The Association on American Indian Affairs reported that the continuation of cultural genocide and assimilation policies through Federal AI/AN adoption and foster care programs between 1941 to 1967 separated as many as one-third of Native American children from their families in Tribal communities, subsequently prompting the creation of the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) to stop the removal of children.
(15)
In some States, over 50 percent of foster care children in State adoption systems are Native American. The general lack of public awareness, information, and acknowledgment of the residual impacts of the Indian Boarding School Policy and intergenerational trauma remain, signaling the overdue need for an investigative Federal committee to further document and expose the assimilation and cultural genocide implemented under this policy.