Hatch-Waxman Integrity Act of 2019
A BILL
To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to prevent the inter partes review process for challenging patents from diminishing competition in the pharmaceutical industry and with respect to drug innovation, and for other purposes.
Sec. 2 Preventing the inter partes review process for challenging patents from diminishing competition in the pharmaceutical industry and with respect to drug innovation
“(C) in each certification required under subparagraph (A) with respect to a patent, a certification that—
“(i) neither the applicant nor any party in privity with, related to, or cooperating with the applicant has filed, or will file, a petition to institute an inter partes review or a post-grant review of that patent under chapter 31 or 32, respectively, of title 35, United States Code; and
“(ii) in making the certification required under subparagraph (A), the applicant is not relying in whole or in part on any decision issued by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board in an inter partes review or a post-grant review instituted under chapter 31 or 32, respectively, of title 35, United States Code.”
“(ix) in each certification required under clause (vii) with respect to a patent, a certification that—
“(I) neither the applicant nor any party in privity with, related to, or cooperating with the applicant has filed, or will file, a petition to institute an inter partes review or a post-grant review of that patent under chapter 31 or 32, respectively, of title 35, United States Code; and
“(II) in making the certification required under clause (vii), the applicant is not relying in whole or in part on any decision issued by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board in an inter partes review or a post-grant review instituted under chapter 31 or 32, respectively, of title 35, United States Code.”
“(I) In general—An application”
“(cc) shall, with respect to a patent described in subclause (II), include a certification that neither the applicant nor any party in privity with, related to, or cooperating with the applicant has filed, or will file, a petition to institute an inter partes review or a post-grant review of the patent under chapter 31 or 32, respectively, of title 35, United States Code.”
“(II) Patent described—A patent is described in this subclause if—
“(aa) the patent covers the reference product or a method for using the reference product; and
“(bb)
“(AA) the reference product described in item (aa) is marked under section 287(a) of title 35, United States Code; or
“(BB) there is otherwise public notice regarding the applicability of the reference product described in item (aa).”
“(C) the Secretary determines that the application fully complies with the requirements under paragraph (2)(A)(iii).”
Sec. 3 Preventing the manipulative and deceptive use of inter partes review
“(2) For purposes of paragraph (1), a person shall be considered to be using a manipulative or deceptive device if—
“(A) the person, or an affiliate of the person, files a petition to institute an inter partes review under chapter 31 of title 35, United States Code, with respect to a patent; and
“(B) the person, or an affiliate of the person, during the 180-day period beginning on the date that is 90 days before the date on which the person files the petition described in subparagraph (A), engages in a short sale of any publicly traded security of the owner of the patent that is the subject of the petition.”