Congress finds the following:
(1)
According to the Integrated Country Strategy for the United States Mission to China, released on August 29, 2018—
(A)
“Chinese law enforcement and security services employ extra-judicial means against U.S. citizens without regard to international norms”; and
(B)
exit bans “are sometimes used to prevent U.S. citizens who are not themselves suspected of a crime from leaving China as a means to pressure their relatives or associates who are wanted by Chinese law enforcement in the United States”.
(2)
The Government of China has imposed exit bans on United States citizens in the context of criminal charges and private commercial disputes.
(3)
Imposing exit bans on foreign nationals is authorized by Article 28 of the Exit and Entry Administration Law of the People’s Republic of China, which—
(A)
lists the circumstances under which “foreigners shall not be allowed to exit China”, including “other circumstances in which exit shall not be allowed in accordance with laws or administrative regulations”; and
(B)
assigns responsibility for administering exit/entry matters to the Ministry of Public Security and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, with public security organs responsible for administering “the stay and residence of foreigners.”.
(4)
Such exit bans against United States citizens may violate Article 35 of the Consular Convention Between the United States of America and the People’s Republic of China, done at Washington September 17, 1980, which states that—
(A)
if a United States national is “placed under any form of detention”, the Government of China shall notify the United States consulate within 4 days; and
(B)
a United States consular officer is entitled to “be informed of the reasons for which said national has been arrested or detained in any manner.”.
(5)
Such exit bans may also violate Article 36 of the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations, done at Vienna April 24, 1963, and in effect in China as of August 1, 1979, which requires the Government of China to “without delay, inform the consular post of the sending State if, within its consular district, a national of that State … is detained in any other manner.”.
(6)
Many United States citizens are not aware of a ban on their exit until they attempt to leave China and once they are made aware of the ban, Chinese authorities provide very little information to the United States citizen, or to United States consular officials regarding—
(A)
the nature of the ban;
(B)
which Chinese government entity is responsible for the ban; and
(C)
what procedures must be followed to resolve the dispute related to the ban.
(7)
The apparent extra-judicial application of exit bans to United States citizens presents a serious human rights concern that violates due process rights to which United States citizens are entitled under international law.