S. 1694 — what changed
One Small Step to Protect Human Heritage in Space Act
From Reported in Senate to Engrossed in Senate. 2 sections amended between Reported in Senate and Engrossed in Senate.
Sec. 2 Findings; sense of Congress
Findings— Congress makes the following findings:
On July 16, 1969, the Apollo 11 spacecraft launched from the John F. Kennedy Space Center carrying Neil A. Armstrong, Edwin E. “Buzz” Aldrin, Jr., and Michael Collins.
July 20, 2019, will mark the 50th anniversary of the date on which the Apollo 11 spacecraft landed on the Moon and Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin became the first humans to set foot on a celestial body off the Earth.
The landing of the Apollo 11 spacecraft and humanity’s first off-world footprints are achievements unparalleled in history, a direct product of the work and perseverance of the more than 400,000 individuals who contributed to the development of the Apollo missions on the shoulders of centuries of science and engineering pioneers from all corners of the world.
Among the thousands of individuals who have contributed to the achievements of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (in this section referred to as “NASA”) are African-American women such as Katherine Johnson, Dorothy Vaughn, Mary Jackson, and Dr. Christine Darden, who made critical contributions to NASA space programs. Katherine Johnson worked at NASA for 35 years and calculated the trajectory of the Apollo 11 landing and the trajectories for the spaceflights of astronauts Alan Shepard and John Glenn. Katherine Johnson, together with many other individuals the work of whom often went unacknowledged, helped broaden the scope of space travel and charted new frontiers for humanity’s exploration of space.
The landing of the Apollo 11 spacecraft was made on behalf of all humankind, and Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin were accompanied by messages of peace from the leaders of more than 70 countries.
The lunar landing sites of the Apollo 11 spacecraft, the robotic spacecraft that preceded the Apollo 11 mission, and the crewed and robotic spacecraft that followed, are of outstanding universal value to humanity.
Such landing sites—
are the first archaeological sites with human activity that are not on Earth;
provide evidence of the first achievements of humankind in the realm of space travel and exploration; and
contain artifacts and other evidence of human exploration activities that remain a potential source of cultural, historical, archaeological, anthropological, scientific, and engineering knowledge.
removed
As commercial enterprises and more countries acquire the ability to land on the Moon, it is necessary to ensure the recognition and protection of the Apollo 11 landing site and other historic landing sites together with all the human effort and innovation the sites represent.
renumbered
was (2)(11)
On July 20, 2011, NASA published the voluntary guidance entitled “NASA’s Recommendations to Space-Faring Entities: How to Protect and Preserve the Historic and Scientific Value of U.S. Government Lunar Artifacts”.
renumbered
was (2)(12)
In March 2018, the Office of Science and Technology Policy published a report entitled “Protecting & Preserving Apollo Program Lunar Landing Sites & Artifacts”.
removed
The Apollo 11 landing site and other similar historic landing sites in outer space merit legal protection from inadvertent or intentional interference with such sites or the environment surrounding such sites in order to prevent irremediable loss of archaeological, anthropological, historical, scientific, and engineering significance and value.
renumbered
was (2)(14)
Space-faring entities based outside the United States have the capacity to land on the Moon.
added
The licensing requirements under this Act are applicable only to United States-based lunar activities and therefore have limited efficacy for protecting the Apollo 11 landing site, other similar historic sites, and lunar artifacts from disturbances caused by space-faring entities based outside the United States.
removed
The licensing requirements under this Act are applicable only to United States-based activities in outer space and therefore have limited efficacy for protecting against intentional or inadvertent disturbances of the Apollo 11 landing site and other similar historic sites from space-faring entities based outside the United States.
removed
A binding international agreement to protect the Apollo 11 landing site and other similar historic sites by requiring adherence to the recommendations described in section 3(b) would be sufficient to protect against intentional or inadvertent disturbances of the Apollo 11 landing site and other similar historic sites.
changed
Sense of Congress— It is the sense of Congress that the President should initiate a diplomatic initiative to negotiate an international agreement described in subsection (a)(14).that—
added
as commercial enterprises and more countries acquire the ability to land on the Moon, it is necessary to ensure the recognition and protection of the Apollo 11 landing site and other historic landing sites in acknowledgment of the human effort and innovation the sites represent;
added
the Apollo 11 landing site, other similar historic landing sites, lunar artifacts, and the environment surrounding such sites and artifacts merit legal protection from disturbance to prevent irremediable loss of sites and artifacts that are of archeological, anthropological, historical, scientific, and engineering significance and value; and
added
the President should work with other countries to develop best practices to ensure the protection of historic lunar landing sites and artifacts.
Sec. 3 Licensing requirements concerning preservation of historic lunar landing sites
changed
In general— Beginning not Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, any Federal agency that issues a license to conduct an a lunar activity in outer space shall require each applicant for such a license—
to agree to abide by the recommendations described in subsection (b); or
changed
in the case of an a lunar activity that requires a license from more than one Federal agency, to certify (as described under penalty of perjury as provided in paragraph (1) or (2), as applicable, of section 1746 of title 28, United States Code) Code, that the applicant has submitted an application for a license for such activity to another Federal agency that satisfies paragraph (1).
Recommendations described— The recommendations described in this subsection are—
changed
“NASA’s Recommendations to Space-Faring Entities: How to Protect and Preserve the Historic and Scientific Value of U.S. Government Lunar Artifacts” issued by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration on July 20, 2011;2011, and updated on October 28, 2011; and
removed
the updates to “NASA’s Recommendations to Space-Faring Entities: How to Protect and Preserve the Historic and Scientific Value of U.S. Government Lunar Artifacts” issued by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration on October 28, 2011; and
renumbered
was (3)(5)
any successor heritage preservation recommendations, guidelines, or principles relating to the protection and preservation of Government lunar artifacts issued by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
changed
Exemptions— A Federal agency issuing a license described in subsection (a) may, in consultation with the Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, exempt specific lunar activities of an applicant from the historic preservation agreement or certification under subsection (a) if such bona fide activities are determined to have legitimate and significant historical, archeological, anthropological, scientific, or engineering value.
changed
Authority To to assess penalty fees—
changed
In general— A Federal agency issuing a license described in subsection (a) may assess a penalty fee on the holder of such license for conduct that violates one or more of terms of the license relating to the agreement under subsection (a)(1).
Amount— The penalty fee amount assessed under paragraph (1) shall be—
commensurate with the nature and extent of the violation; and
sufficient to deter future violations.
changed
Activity Lunar activity defined— In this section, the term lunar activity means an action or endeavor in outer space that—
is intended to be lunar in nature, including lunar orbit, landing, and impact; or
has a greater likelihood than not of becoming lunar in nature, including unintentional orbit and impact.