Military Special Victims Protection Act of 2019
A BILL
To amend title 10, United States Code, to improve and enhance protections for members of the Armed Forces who are victims of a sex-related or domestic violence offense, and for other purposes.
Sec. 2 Enactment and expansion of policy on withholding of initial disposition authority for certain offenses under the Uniform Code of Military Justice
Sec. 3 Special Victims' Counsel matters
“(g) Definitions—In this section:
“(1) The term alleged covered offense means any of the following:
“(A) An alleged sex-related offense.
“(B) An alleged domestic violence offense.
“(2) The term alleged sex-related offense means any allegation of—
“(A) a violation of section 920, 920b, 920c, or 930 of this title (article 120, 120b, 120c, or 130 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice); or
“(B) an attempt to commit an offense specified in a subparagraph (A) as punishable under section 880 of this title (article 80 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice).
“(3) The term alleged domestic violence offense means any allegation of—
“(A) a violation of section 928(b), 928b(1), 928b(5), or 930 of this title (article 128(b), 128b(1), 128b(5), or 130 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), when committed against a spouse, intimate partner, or immediate family member;
“(B) a violation of any other provision of subchapter X of chapter 47 of this title (the Uniform Code of Military Justice), when committed against a spouse, intimate partner, or immediate family member, as specified by the Secretary concerned for purposes of eligibility for legal consultation and assistance by Special Victims' Counsel under the jurisdiction of such Secretary under this section; or
“(C) an attempt to commit an offense specified in a subparagraph (A) or (B) as punishable under section 880 of this title (article 80 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice).”
“1044e. Special Victims' Counsel: victims of sex-related offenses; victims of domestic violence offenses”
“(C) Any civilian individual not covered by subparagraph (A) or (B) who is the victim of an alleged covered offense if the Secretary of Defense or the Secretary of the military department concerned waives any condition in such section for the purposes of offering Special Victims' Counsel services to such individual.”
“(10) Legal consultation and assistance in connection with an incident of retaliation, whether such incident occurs before, during, or after the conclusion of any criminal proceedings, including—
“(A) in understanding the rights and protections afforded to victims of retaliation;
“(B) in the filing of complaints; and
“(C) in any resulting military justice proceedings.”
“(d) Duty To determine victim's preference for prosecution of an alleged covered offense by court-Martial or civilian court
“(1) In providing legal consultation and representation to a victim under this section in connection with an alleged covered offense that occurs in the United States, a Special Victims' Counsel shall have the duty—
“(A) to solicit the victim's preference regarding whether the offense should be prosecuted by court-martial or in a civilian court with jurisdiction over the offense; and
“(B) to make the victim's preference, if offered, known to appropriate military prosecutors.
“(2) Any consultation by a Special Victims' Counsel pursuant to paragraph (1) shall occur in accordance with the process for such consultation established pursuant to section 534(b) of the Carl Levin and Howard P. “Buck” McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (10 U.S.C. 1044e note) or such other process as the Secretary of Defense shall establish for that purpose.”
Sec. 4 Correction of military records and discharge review for certain former members whose narrative reason for discharge was wrongfully described as personality disorder
“(i)
“(1) This subsection applies to a former member of the Armed Forces who is a military sexual trauma survivor and suffers from post-traumatic stress disorder or traumatic brain injury and whose claim under this section is for review of the narrative reason for discharge of the former member as personality disorder, borderline personal disorder, or a related non-disability mental condition (NDMC).
“(2) A claimant under this subsection shall support the claim with documentation or other evidence from a psychiatrist, psychologist, or other competent health care professional that the claimant does not have the disorder providing the narrative reason for the claimant's discharge.
“(3) In the case of a claimant described in paragraph (1), a board established under subsection (a) shall—
“(A) review and give liberal consideration to the documentation or evidence of the claimant under paragraph (2); and
“(B) if the board determines that the claimant does not have the disorder, correct the military records of the claimant to provide a narrative reason for the claimant's discharge as Secretarial Authority (or similar authority available at the time of the claimant's discharge if before the recognition of Secretarial Authority) or such other narrative reason (other than the disorder) as the board considers appropriate.”
“(f) In the case of a former member of the Armed Forces who is a military sexual trauma survivor and suffers from post-traumatic stress disorder or traumatic brain injury and whose narrative reason for discharge or dismissal was personality disorder, borderline personality disorder, or a related non-disability mental condition (NDMC) and who submits to a board established under this section documentation or other evidence from a psychiatrist, psychologist, or other competent health care professional that the former member does not have the disorder providing the narrative reason for the former member's discharge or dismissal, the board shall—
“(1) review and give liberal consideration to the documentation or evidence submitted by the former member; and
“(2) if the board determines that the former member does not have the disorder, change the narrative reason for the former member's discharge or dismissal to Secretarial Authority or such other narrative reason (other than the disorder) as the board considers appropriate.”