Eliminating Abusive and Rampant Neglect of Interactive Technologies Act of 2020
A BILL
To establish a National Commission on Online Child Sexual Exploitation Prevention, and for other purposes.
Sec. 2 Definitions
Sec. 3 National commission on online child sexual exploitation prevention
Sec. 4 Duties of the commission
Sec. 5 Protecting victims of online child sexual abuse
“(6) No effect on child sexual exploitation law—Nothing in this section (other than subsection (c)(2)(A)) shall be construed to impair or limit—
“(A) any claim in a civil action brought against a provider of an interactive computer service under section 2255 of title 18, United States Code, if the conduct underlying the claim constitutes a violation of section 2252 or section 2252A of that title;
“(B) any charge in a criminal prosecution brought against a provider of an interactive computer service under State law regarding the advertisement, promotion, presentation, distribution, or solicitation of child sexual abuse material, as defined in section 2256(8) of title 18, United States Code; or
“(C) any claim in a civil action brought against a provider of an interactive computer service under State law regarding the advertisement, promotion, presentation, distribution, or solicitation of child sexual abuse material, as defined in section 2256(8) of title 18, United States Code.
“(7) Encryption technologies
“(A) In general—Notwithstanding paragraph (6), none of the following actions or circumstances shall serve as an independent basis for liability of a provider of an interactive computer service for a claim or charge described in that paragraph:
“(i) The provider utilizes full end-to-end encrypted messaging services, device encryption, or other encryption services.
“(ii) The provider does not possess the information necessary to decrypt a communication.
“(iii) The provider fails to take an action that would otherwise undermine the ability of the provider to offer full end-to-end encrypted messaging services, device encryption, or other encryption services.
“(B) Consideration of evidence—Nothing in subparagraph (A) shall be construed to prohibit a court from considering evidence of actions or circumstances described in that subparagraph if the evidence is otherwise admissible.”
Sec. 6 Use of term “child sexual abuse material”
Sec. 7 Modernizing the cybertipline
“(2) Information about the involved minor—Information relating to the identity or location of any involved minor, which may, to the extent reasonably practicable, include the electronic mail address, Internet Protocol address, uniform resource locator, or any other information which may identify or locate any involved minor, including self-reported identifying information.”
“(7) Formatting of reports—When in its discretion a provider voluntarily includes any content described in this subsection in a report to the CyberTipline, the provider shall use best efforts to ensure that the report conforms with the structure of the CyberTipline.”
“(1) the performance”
“(2) transmitting, distributing, or mailing child sexual abuse material to any Federal, State, or local law enforcement agency, or giving such agency access to child sexual abuse material, in response to a search warrant, court order, or other legal process issued by such agency; or
“(3) research voluntarily undertaken by the provider or domain name registrar using any material being preserved under section 2258A(h), if the research is only for the purpose of—
“(A) improving or facilitating reporting under this section, section 2258A, or section 2258C; or
“(B) stopping the online sexual exploitation of children.”
“(A) Provision to providers—NCMEC”
“(B) Provision to non-profit entities—NCMEC may provide hash values or similar technical identifiers associated with visual depictions provided in a CyberTipline report or submission to the child victim identification program described in section 404(b)(1)(K)(ii) of the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act of 1974 (34 U.S.C. 11293(b)(1)(K)(ii)) to a non-profit entity for the sole and exclusive purpose of preventing and curtailing the online sexual exploitation of children.”
Sec. 8 Eliminating network distribution of child exploitation
“(5) Extension of preservation—A provider of a report to the CyberTipline may voluntarily preserve the contents provided in the report (including any comingled content described in paragraph (2)) for longer than 180 days after the submission to the CyberTipline for the purpose of reducing the proliferation of online child sexual exploitation or preventing the online sexual exploitation of children.”
Sec. 9 It solutions relating to combating online child exploitation
“409. It solutions relating to combating online child exploitation
“(a) Development of IT solutions—The Administrator shall enable the development of information technology solutions and the creation and acquisition of innovative tools to implement updates, improvements, and modernization needed to enhance efforts to combat online child exploitation in order to ensure that consistent, actionable information is provided to law enforcement agencies, including Internet Crimes Against Children (commonly known as “ICAC”) task forces.
“(b) Consultation with partners—In developing the information technology solutions under subsection (a), the Administrator shall solicit input from all partners in the effort to combat online child exploitation, including the Center, ICAC task forces, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Homeland Security Investigations, and the United States Marshals Service.
“(c) Funding—Each fiscal year, the Administrator shall carry out this section using not less than $1,000,000 of the amounts made available to carry out this title for that fiscal year.”