Safely Ensuring Lives Future Deployment and Research In Vehicle Evolution Act
A BILL
To amend title 49, United States Code, regarding the authority of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration over highly automated vehicles, to provide safety measures for such vehicles, and for other purposes.
2. Purpose
3. NHTSA authority and State preemption for autonomous motor vehicles
“(b) Preemption
“(1) Highly automated vehicles—No State or political subdivision of a State may maintain, enforce, prescribe, or continue in effect any law or regulation regarding the design, construction, or performance of highly automated vehicles, automated driving systems, or components of automated driving systems unless such law or regulation is identical to a standard prescribed under this chapter.
“(2) Motor vehicle standard—When a motor vehicle safety standard is in effect under this chapter, a State or political subdivision of a State may prescribe or continue in effect a standard applicable to the same aspect of performance of a motor vehicle or motor vehicle equipment only if the standard is identical to the standard prescribed under this chapter.
“(3) Rules of construction
“(A) In general—Nothing in this subsection may be construed to prohibit a State or a political subdivision of a State from maintaining, enforcing, prescribing, or continuing in effect any law or regulation regarding registration, licensing, driving education and training, insurance, law enforcement, crash investigations, safety and emissions inspections, congestion management of vehicles on the street within a State or political subdivision of a State, or traffic unless the law or regulation is an unreasonable restriction on the design, construction, or performance of highly automated vehicles, automated driving systems, or components of automated driving systems.
“(B) Motor vehicle dealers—Nothing in this subsection may be construed to prohibit a State or political subdivision of a State from maintaining, enforcing, prescribing, or continuing in effect any law or regulation regarding the sale, distribution, repair, or service of highly automated vehicles, automated driving systems, or components of automated driving systems by a dealer, manufacturer, or distributor.
“(C) Conformity with Federal law—Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to preempt, restrict, or limit a State or political subdivision of a State from acting in accordance with any other Federal law.
“(4) Higher performance requirement—However, the United States Government, a State, or a political subdivision of a State may prescribe a standard for a motor vehicle, motor vehicle equipment, highly automated vehicle, or automated driving system obtained for its own use that imposes a higher performance requirement than that required by the otherwise applicable standard under this chapter.
“(5) State enforcement—A State may enforce a standard that is identical to a standard prescribed under this chapter.”
“(e) Common law liability
“(1) In general—Compliance with a motor vehicle safety standard prescribed under this chapter does not exempt a person from liability at common law.
“(2) Rule of construction—Nothing in this section shall be construed to preempt common law claims.”
“(f) Licensing—A State may not issue a motor vehicle operator’s license for the operation or use of a dedicated highly automated vehicle in a manner that discriminates on the basis of disability (as defined in section 3 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 12102)).”
4. Updated or new motor vehicle safety standards for highly automated vehicles
“30129. Updated or new motor vehicle safety standards for highly automated vehicles
“(a) Safety assessment certification
“(1) Final Rule—Not later than 24 months after the date of the enactment of this section, the Secretary of Transportation shall issue a final rule requiring the submission of safety assessment certifications regarding how safety is being addressed by each entity developing a highly automated vehicle or an automated driving system. Such rule shall include—
“(A) a specification of which entities are required to submit such certifications;
“(B) a clear description of the relevant test results, data, and other contents required to be submitted by such entity, in order to demonstrate that such entity’s vehicles are likely to maintain safety, and function as intended and contain fail safe features, to be included in such certifications; and
“(C) a specification of the circumstances under which such certifications are required to be updated or resubmitted.
“(2) Interim requirement—Until the final rule issued under paragraph (1) takes effect, safety assessment letters shall be submitted to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration as contemplated by the Federal Automated Vehicles Policy issued in September 2016, or any successor guidance issued on highly automated vehicles requiring a safety assessment letter.
“(3) Periodic review and updating—Not later than 5 years after the date on which the final rule is issued under paragraph (1), and not less frequently than every 5 years thereafter, the Secretary shall—
“(A) review such rule; and
“(B) update such rule if the Secretary considers it necessary.
“(4) Rules of construction
“(A) No conditions on deployment—Nothing in this subsection may be construed to limit or affect the Secretary’s authority under any other provision of law. The Secretary may not condition deployment or testing of highly automated vehicles on review of safety assessment certifications.
“(B) No new authorities—No new authorities are granted to the Secretary under this section other than the promulgation of the rule pursuant to paragraph (1).
“(5) Review and research—To accommodate the development and deployment of highly automated vehicles and to ensure the safety and security of highly automated vehicles and motor vehicles and others that will share the roads with highly automated vehicles, not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this section, the Secretary shall—
“(A) initiate or continue a review of the Federal motor vehicle safety standards in effect on such date of enactment; and
“(B) initiate or continue research regarding new Federal motor vehicle safety standards.
“(b) Rulemaking and safety priority plan
“(1) In general—Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this section, the Secretary shall make available to the public and submit to the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate a rulemaking and safety priority plan, as necessary to accommodate the development and deployment of highly automated vehicles and to ensure the safety and security of highly automated vehicles and motor vehicles and others that will share the roads with highly automated vehicles, to—
“(A) update the motor vehicle safety standards in effect on such date of enactment;
“(B) issue new motor vehicle safety standards; and
“(C) consider how objective ranges in performance standards could be used to test motor vehicle safety standards, which safety standards would be appropriate for such testing, and whether additional authority would facilitate such testing.
“(2) Inclusion of priorities
“(A) Priorities—The plan required by paragraph (1) shall detail the overall priorities of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration for the 5 years following the issuance of the plan, including both priorities with respect to highly automated vehicles and priorities with respect to other safety initiatives of the Administration, in order to meet the Nation’s motor vehicle safety challenges.
“(B) Identification of elements that may require standards—For highly automated vehicles, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration should identify elements that may require performance standards including human machine interface, sensors, and actuators, and consider process and procedure standards for software and cybersecurity as necessary.
“(3) Periodic updating—The plan required by paragraph (1) shall be updated every 2 years, or more frequently if the Secretary considers it necessary.
“(4) Rulemaking proceedings on updated or new motor vehicle safety standards
“(A) In general—Not later than 18 months after the date of enactment of this section, the Secretary shall initiate the first rulemaking proceeding in accordance with the rulemaking and safety priority plan required by paragraph (1).
“(B) Prioritization of subsequent proceedings—The Secretary shall continue initiating rulemaking proceedings in accordance with such plan. The Secretary may change at any time those priorities to address matters the Secretary considers of greater priority. If the Secretary makes such a change, the Secretary shall complete an interim update of the priority plan, make such update available to the public, and submit such update to the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate.”
5. Cybersecurity of automated driving systems
“30130. Cybersecurity of automated driving systems
“(a) Cybersecurity plan—A manufacturer may not sell, offer for sale, introduce or deliver for introduction into commerce, or import into the United States, any highly automated vehicle, vehicle that performs partial driving automation, or automated driving system unless such manufacturer has developed a cybersecurity plan that includes the following:
“(1) A written cybersecurity policy with respect to the practices of the manufacturer for detecting and responding to cyber attacks, unauthorized intrusions, and false and spurious messages or vehicle control commands. This policy shall include—
“(A) a process for identifying, assessing, and mitigating reasonably foreseeable vulnerabilities from cyber attacks or unauthorized intrusions, including false and spurious messages and malicious vehicle control commands; and
“(B) a process for taking preventive and corrective action to mitigate against vulnerabilities in a highly automated vehicle or a vehicle that performs partial driving automation, including incident response plans, intrusion detection and prevention systems that safeguard key controls, systems, and procedures through testing or monitoring, and updates to such process based on changed circumstances.
“(2) The identification of an officer or other individual of the manufacturer as the point of contact with responsibility for the management of cybersecurity.
“(3) A process for limiting access to automated driving systems.
“(4) A process for employee training and supervision for implementation and maintenance of the policies and procedures required by this section, including controls on employee access to automated driving systems.
“(b) Effective date—This section shall take effect 180 days after the date of enactment of this section.”
6. General exemptions
“(v) the exemption would make easier the development or field evaluation of—
“(I) a feature of a highly automated vehicle providing a safety level at least equal to the safety level of the standard for which exemption is sought; or
“(II) a highly automated vehicle providing an overall safety level at least equal to the overall safety level of nonexempt vehicles;
“(vi) the exemption would promote transportation access for individuals with disabilities (as defined in section 3 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 12102)) and would provide—
“(I) a safety level at least equal to the safety level of the standard for which the exemption is sought; or
“(II) an overall safety level at least equal to the overall safety level of nonexempt vehicles.”
“(5) if the application is made under subsection (b)(3)(B)(v) or (vi)—
“(A) such development, testing, and other data necessary to demonstrate that the motor vehicle is a highly automated vehicle; and
“(B) a detailed analysis that includes supporting test data, including both on-road and validation and testing data showing (as applicable) that—
“(i) the safety level of the feature at least equals the safety level of the standard for which exemption is sought; or
“(ii) the vehicle provides an overall safety level at least equal to the overall safety level of nonexempt vehicles.”
“(1) Eligibility under subsection (b)(3)(B)(i)—A manufacturer is eligible for an exemption under subsection (b)(3)(B)(i) of this section (including an exemption under subsection (b)(3)(B)(i) relating to a bumper standard referred to in subsection (b)(1)) only if the Secretary determines that the manufacturer’s total motor vehicle production in the most recent year of production is not more than 10,000.
“(2) Eligibility under subsection (b)(3)(B)(iii)—A manufacturer is eligible for an exemption under subsection (b)(3)(B)(iii) of this section only if the Secretary determines the exemption is for not more than 2,500 vehicles to be sold in the United States in any 12-month period.
“(3) Eligibility under subsection (b)(3)(B)(ii), (iv), or (v)—A manufacturer is eligible for an exemption under subsection (b)(3)(B)(ii), (iv), or (v) of this section only if the Secretary determines the exemption is for not more than 100,000 vehicles per manufacturer to be sold, leased, or otherwise introduced into commerce in the United States in any 12-month period.
“(4) Limitation on Number of Vehicles Exempted—All exemptions granted to a manufacturer under subsections (b)(3)(B)(i) through (v) shall not exceed a total of (i) 25,000 vehicles manufactured within the first 12-month period, (ii) 50,000 vehicles manufactured within the second 12-month period, (iii) 100,000 vehicles manufactured within the third 12-month period, and, (iv) 100,000 vehicles manufactured within the fourth 12-month period. Any renewals under subsections (b)(3)(B)(i) through (v) shall not exceed a total of 100,000 vehicles manufactured within a 12-month period.”
“(1) Exemption under subsection (b)(3)(B)(i)—An exemption or renewal under subsection (b)(3)(B)(i) of this section may be granted for not more than 3 years.
“(2) Exemption under subsection (b)(3)(B)(iii)—An exemption or renewal under subsection (b)(3)(B)(iii) of this section may be granted for not more than 2 years.
“(3) Exemption Under Subsection (b)(3)(B)(ii), (iv), or (v)—An exemption or renewal under subsection (b)(3)(B)(ii), (iv), or (v) of this section may be granted for not more than 4 years.”
“(i) Limitation on Certain Exemptions—No exemption from crashworthiness standards of motor vehicle safety standards shall be granted under subsection (b)(3)(B)(v) until the Secretary issues the safety assessment certification rule pursuant to section 30129(a) and the rulemaking and safety priority plan pursuant to section 30129(b) and one year has passed from the date by which the Secretary has issued both such rule and such plan. This subsection shall not apply to exemptions from occupant protection standards if the exemption is for a vehicle that will not carry its operator or passengers. This subsection shall not apply to exemptions from crashworthiness standards if the exemption sought is for a standard addressing the steering control system and it is for a vehicle that—
“(1) will not have a steering control system;
“(2) provides impact protection to an occupant in the front left seat at a level at least equal to the level provided in nonexempt vehicles; and
“(3) provides a safety level at least equal to the safety level of the standard for which the exemption is sought.
“(j) Reporting Requirement—A manufacturer granted an exemption under subsection (b)(3)(B)(ii), (iv), or (v), shall provide information about all crashes of which it has actual knowledge involving such exempted vehicles, regardless of whether a claim is submitted to the manufacturer, in accordance with part 579 of title 49, Code of Federal Regulations.
“(k) Process and Analysis
“(1) In general—Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this subsection, the Secretary of Transportation shall publish in the Federal Register a notice that details the process and analysis used for the consideration of exemption or renewal applications under subsection (b)(3)(B)(v).
“(2) Periodic Review and Updating—The notice required by paragraph (1) shall be reviewed every 5 years and updated if the Secretary considers it necessary.
“(l) Exemption Database
“(1) In general—The Secretary shall establish a publicly available and searchable electronic database of each motor vehicle for which an exemption from motor vehicle safety standards prescribed under this chapter or a bumper standard prescribed under chapter 325 has been granted.
“(2) Vehicle Identification Number—The database established under paragraph (1) shall be searchable by Vehicle Identification Number and shall include no information identifying the vehicle owner.”
7. Motor vehicle testing or evaluation
“(A) a manufacturer that agrees not to sell or lease or offer for sale or lease”
“(B) a manufacturer of highly automated vehicles, automated driving systems, or components of automated driving systems that agrees not to sell or lease or offer for sale or lease the highly automated vehicles, automated driving systems, or components of automated driving systems at the conclusion of the testing or evaluation and—
“(i) has submitted to the Secretary—
“(I) the name of the individual, partnership, corporation, or institution of higher education and a point of contact;
“(II) the residence address of the individual, partnership, corporation, or institution of higher education and State of incorporation if applicable;
“(III) a description of each type of motor vehicle used during development of highly automated vehicles, automated driving systems, or components of automated driving systems manufactured by the individual, partnership, corporation, or institution of higher education; and
“(IV) proof of insurance for any State in which the individual, partnership, corporation, or institution of higher education intends to test or evaluate highly automated vehicles; and
“(ii) if applicable, has identified an agent for service of process in accordance with part 551 of title 49, Code of Federal Regulations.”
8. Information on highly automated driving systems made available to prospective buyers
9. Highly Automated Vehicle Advisory Council
10. Rear seat occupant alert system
“30131. Rear seat occupant alert system
“(a) Rulemaking required—Not later than 2 years after the date of enactment of this section, the Secretary shall issue a final rule requiring all new passenger motor vehicles weighing less than 10,000 pounds gross vehicle weight to be equipped with an alarm system to alert the operator to check rear designated seating positions after the vehicle motor or engine is deactivated by the operator.
“(b) Phase-In—The rule issued pursuant to subsection (a) shall require full compliance with the rule beginning on September 1st of the calendar year that begins 2 years after the date on which the final rule is issued.
“(c) Definitions—For purposes of this section—
“(1) the term “passenger motor vehicle” has the meaning given that term in section 32101; and
“(2) the term “rear designated seating position” means any designated seating position that is rearward of the front seat.”
11. Headlamps
12. Privacy plan required for highly automated vehicles
13. Definitions
“(1) “automated driving system” means the hardware and software that are collectively capable of performing the entire dynamic driving task on a sustained basis, regardless of whether such system is limited to a specific operational design domain.”
“(3) “dedicated highly automated vehicle” means a highly automated vehicle designed to be operated exclusively by a Level 4 or 5 automated driving system (as defined by the SAE International standard J3016, published on September 30, 2016, or subsequently adopted by the Secretary) for all trips.”
“(7) “dynamic driving task” means all of the real time operational and tactical functions required to operate a vehicle in on-road traffic, excluding the strategic functions such as trip scheduling and selection of destinations and waypoints, and including—
“(A) lateral vehicle motion control via steering;
“(B) longitudinal vehicle motion control via acceleration and deceleration;
“(C) monitoring the driving environment via object and event detection, recognition, classification, and response preparation;
“(D) object and event response execution;
“(E) maneuver planning; and
“(F) enhancing conspicuity via lighting, signaling, and gesturing; and
“(8) “highly automated vehicle”—
“(A) means a motor vehicle equipped with an automated driving system; and
“(B) does not include a commercial motor vehicle (as defined in section 31101).”
“(15) “operational design domain” means the specific conditions under which a given driving automation system or feature thereof is designed to function.”
“(19) “vehicle that performs partial driving automation” does not include a commercial motor vehicle (as defined in section 31101).”
“(c) Revisions to certain definitions
“(1) If SAE International (or its successor organization) revises the definition of any of the terms defined in paragraph (1), (6), or (14) of subsection (a) in Recommended Practice Report J3016, it shall notify the Secretary of the revision. The Secretary shall publish a notice in the Federal Register to inform the public of the new definition unless, within 90 days after receiving notice of the new definition and after opening a period for public comment on the new definition, the Secretary notifies SAE International (or its successor organization) that the Secretary has determined that the new definition does not meet the need for motor vehicle safety, or is otherwise inconsistent with the purposes of this chapter. If the Secretary so notifies SAE International (or its successor organization), the existing definition in subsection (a) shall remain in effect.
“(2) If the Secretary does not reject a definition revised by SAE International (or its successor organization) as described in paragraph (1), the Secretary shall promptly make any conforming amendments to the regulations and standards of the Secretary that are necessary. The revised definition shall apply for purposes of this chapter. The requirements of section 553 of title 5 shall not apply to the making of any such conforming amendments.
“(3) Pursuant to section 553 of title 5, the Secretary may update any of the definitions in paragraph (1), (6), or (14) of subsection (a) if the Secretary determines that materially changed circumstances regarding highly automated vehicles have impacted motor vehicle safety such that the definitions need to be updated to reflect such circumstances.”