Section 1 Short title
This Act may be cited as the “Nuclear Licensing Efficiency Act”.
Nuclear Licensing Efficiency Act
A BILL
To streamline nuclear technology regulatory permitting and licensing, and for other purposes.
Sec. 2 Streamlining application and site permit reviews
Section 185 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2235) is amended by adding at the end the following:
“c. Application reviews for nuclear energy projects
“(1) Streamlining license application review—With respect to an application that is docketed seeking issuance of a construction permit, operating license, or combined construction permit and operating license for a production or utilization facility, the Commission shall include the following procedures:
“(A) Undertake an environmental review process and issue any draft environmental impact statement to the maximum extent practicable within 24 months after the application is accepted for docketing.
“(B) Complete the technical review process and issue any safety evaluation report and any final environmental impact statement to the maximum extent practicable within 42 months after the application is accepted for docketing.
“(2) Early site permit
“(A) Supplemental environmental impact statement—In a proceeding for a combined construction permit and operating license for a site for which an early site permit has been issued, any environmental impact statement prepared by the Commission and cooperating agencies shall be prepared as a supplement to the environmental impact statement prepared for the early site permit.
“(B) Incorporation by reference—The supplemental environmental impact statement shall—
“(i) incorporate by reference the analysis, findings, and conclusions from the environmental impact statement prepared for the early site permit; and
“(ii) include additional discussion, analyses, findings, and conclusions on matters resolved in the early site permit proceeding only to the extent necessary to address information that is new and significant in that the information would materially change the prior findings or conclusions.
“(3) Production or utilization facility located at an existing site—In reviewing an application for an early site permit, construction permit, operating license, or combined construction permit and operating license for a production or utilization facility located at the site of a licensed production or utilization facility, the Commission shall, to the extent practicable, use information that was part of the licensing basis of the licensed production or utilization facility.
“(4) Regulations—The Commission shall initiate a rulemaking, not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this subsection, to amend the regulations of the Commission to implement this subsection.
“(5) Environmental impact statement defined—In this subsection, the term environmental impact statement means a detailed statement required under section 102(2)(C) of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(C)).
“(6) Relationship to other law—Nothing in this subsection exempts the Commission from any requirement for full compliance with section 102(2)(C) of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(C)).”
Sec. 3 Updating hearing procedures
Informal hearing procedures— Section 189 a. of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2239(a)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
“(3) The Commission may use informal adjudicatory procedures for any hearing required under this section for which the Commission determines that adjudicatory procedures under section 554 of title 5, United States Code, are unnecessary.”
Study on the impact of the elimination of mandatory hearing for uncontested licensing applications— Not later than 18 months after the date of enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General shall transmit to Congress a report containing the results of a study on the effects of eliminating the hearings required under section 189 a. of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2239(a)) for an application under section 103 or section 104 b. of such Act for a construction permit for a facility in the absence of a request of any person whose interest may be affected by the proceeding.
Sec. 4 Efficiency of Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards
Committee composition— Section 29 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2039) is amended by inserting “The Commission shall seek to include a diversity of disciplines and operational experiences when appointing members of the Committee.” after “four years each.”.
License applications— Section 182 b. of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2232(b)) is amended by adding at the end the following: “If the Commission determines referral of an application to the Committee is necessary, the Committee shall initiate a review of the application not later than 30 days after receiving such referral, and shall submit a report thereon under this subsection not later than 180 days after initiating such review.”.
Sec. 5 Updating Nuclear Regulatory Commission user fees and charges
Section 102(b)(3)(B) of the Nuclear Energy Innovation and Modernization Act (Public Law 115–439) is amended—
by redesignating clause (ii) as clause (iii);
by inserting after clause (i) the following:
“(ii) Fuel facilities
“(I) In general—The total annual charges under subparagraph (A) charged to fuel facility licensees, to the maximum extent practicable, shall not exceed an amount that is equal to the total annual fees collected from the fuel facilities class under the final rule of the Commission entitled “Revision of Fee Schedules; Fee Recovery for Fiscal Year 2016” (81 Fed Reg. 41171 (June 24, 2016)), which amount may be adjusted annually by the Commission to reflect changes in the Consumer Price Index published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the Department of Labor.
“(II) Exception—Subclause (I) shall not apply if the number of licensed facilities classified by the Commission as fuel facilities exceeds seven.
“(III) Changes to annual charges—Any change in an annual charge under subparagraph (A) charged to a fuel facility licensee shall be based on—
“(aa) a change in the regulatory services provided with respect to the fuel facility; or
“(bb) an adjustment described in subclause (I).”
in clause (iii), as redesignated by paragraph (1) of this section, by striking “clause (i)” and inserting “clause (i) or (ii)”.