Congress makes the following findings:
(1)
Despite a significant decrease in border apprehensions, the Federal immigrant detention system expanded dramatically between 1994 and 2019, with the average daily population of detained noncitizens increasing from fewer than 7,000 during fiscal year 1994 to approximately 48,000 during fiscal year 2019. This population consists of increasing numbers of children and women, including pregnant women and asylum seekers.
(2)
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (referred to in this section as “ICE”) inspections of detention facilities are performed by field offices, facility staff, or divisions within ICE headquarters and are not conducted by qualified independent third parties. Since the inspectors are not independent, they often misrepresent conditions inside the facilities and rarely impose consequences for violations. For example, an outside review of 8 facilities concluded that although ICE identified violations of medical standards as contributing factors to deaths in detention, routine ICE detention facility inspections before and even after the deaths failed to acknowledge (and even dismissed) those violations.
(3)
Multiple Federal oversight bodies, including the Department of Homeland Security’s Office of Inspector General, ICE’s Advisory Committee on Family Residential Centers, and the Government Accountability Office, have documented poor conditions and inhumane detainee treatment, including medical negligence, in immigration detention facilities. State oversight bodies, including the Office of the Attorney General of California, have also noted abuses at detention centers within their borders.
(4)
Since 2003, more than 170 deaths have been reported in immigration detention facilities, a significant number of which resulted from egregious violations of ICE medical care standards, which were often overlooked during ICE inspections of facilities. Since the inauguration of President Trump, more than 24 people have died in ICE custody.
(5)
The Department of Homeland Security Office for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties and the Office of Inspector General have received formal complaints and numerous allegations of inadequate medical care for pregnant women who are in custody in such facilities.
(6)
Responses by the Department of Homeland Security to Freedom of Information Act requests suggest that fewer than 3 percent of the claims of sexual and physical abuse of detainees in such facilities have been investigated by the Office of Inspector General.
(7)
Multiple Federal oversight bodies, including the Homeland Security Advisory Council, have documented limited oversight and management accountability of immigration detention facilities, including a lack of reasonable inspections and deficient contracting practices.
(8)
Some immigration detention facilities have unreasonably restricted visitation and access by attorneys and community groups in violation of applicable requirements, raising serious due process concerns.
(9)
The Department of Homeland Security seeks to vastly expand the immigration detention system despite the availability of a wide array of community-based alternatives to detention that provide cheaper, more compassionate, rights-respecting responses to migration.
(10)
Although the Family Case Management Program operated at a fraction of the cost of detention and resulted in nearly a 100 percent compliance rate among participants, the Department of Homeland Security terminated the program without providing any justification.