Merit Systems Protection Board Reauthorization Act of 2019
A BILL
To reauthorize and modify the authority of the Merit Systems Protection Board, and for other purposes.
2. Reauthorize appropriations for Merit Systems Protection Board
“(1) for each of fiscal years 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, and 2024—
“(A) $44,490,000 to carry out subchapter I of chapter 12 of title 5, United States Code (as amended by this Act); and
“(B) not to exceed $2,345,000, to be transferred from the Civil Service Retirement and Disability Fund in amounts determined by the Merit Systems Protection Board, for administrative expenses to adjudicate retirement appeals; and”
3. Filing fee for Merit Systems Protection Board claims and appeals
“(o)
“(1) The Board shall establish and collect a filing fee to be paid by any individual filing a claim or appeal with the Board under this title, or under any other law, rule, or regulation, consistent with the requirements of this subsection.
“(2) The filing fee established under paragraph (1) may—
“(A) not exceed the amount that is 50 percent of the fee required for filing a civil action in a United States district court;
“(B) be adjusted from time to time as the Board considers appropriate; and
“(C) upon request of the individual filing the claim or appeal, be waived by the Board if the Board determines the fee would create undue hardship.
“(3) A filing fee shall not be required with respect to any action—
“(A) brought by the Special Counsel under section 1214, 1215, or 1216; or
“(B) taken against an administrative law judge under section 7521.
“(4) A filing fee paid by an individual for an appeal or claim before the Board shall cover any subsequent filing by the individual with the Board during the litigation of that appeal or claim. Such fee shall be returned to the individual if the individual is the prevailing party.”
4. Modification to procedures and authority of the Merit Systems Protection Board
“(B) The Board, an administrative law judge appointed by the Board under section 3105, and any officer or employee of the Board designated by the Board (as the case may be) shall make a decision after receipt of the written representations of the parties to the appeal and after opportunity for a hearing under subsection (a)(1) of this section, except as provided under subparagraph (C).
“(C) The Board, an administrative law judge appointed by the Board under section 3105, and any officer or employee of the Board designated by the Board (as the case may be) may, with respect to any party, grant a motion for summary judgment. Any hearing under subsection (a)(1) of this section shall be limited to the issues remaining in the case, or, if applicable, a decision may be issued without holding a hearing.
“(D) A copy of the decision under subparagraph (B) or (C) shall be furnished to each party to the appeal and to the Office of Personnel Management.”
“(3) With respect to an appeal from a performance or conduct-based adverse action under subchapter II or V of chapter 75, the Board may not mitigate the personnel action involved unless the action is so disproportionate as to be wholly without justification.”
“(1) Subject to paragraph (2), the decision of the agency shall be sustained under subsection (b) only if the agency’s decision is supported by substantial evidence.”
5. Limitation on furlough appeals to the Merit Systems Protection Board
“(a) For the purposes of this section—
“(1) the term “furlough” means the placement of a senior executive in a temporary status in which the senior executive has no duties and is not paid when the placement in such status is by reason of insufficient work or funds or for other nondisciplinary reasons; and
“(2) the term “emergency furlough” has the meaning given that term in section 7501(3).”
“(c) A career appointee who is furloughed in excess of 14 days is entitled to appeal to the Merit Systems Protection Board under section 7701. The previous sentence shall not apply to any emergency furlough.”