American Manufacturing Leadership Act
AN ACT
To amend the National Institute of Standards and Technology Act to make changes to the implementation of the Manufacturing USA Network, and for other purposes.
2. Changes in implementation of manufacturing USA
“(I) to contribute to the development of regional manufacturing innovation clusters across the Nation.”
“(A) Required activities—Activities of a Manufacturing USA institute shall include”
“(v) Development of roadmaps or leveraging of existing roadmaps with respect to technology areas being pursued by that Manufacturing USA institute that take into account the research and development undertaken at other Manufacturing USA institutes and Federal agencies with respect to such areas.”
“(B) Permissible activities—Activities of a Manufacturing USA institute may include such other activities as the agency head, in consultation with Federal departments and agencies whose missions contribute to, or are affected by, advanced manufacturing, considers consistent with the purposes described in subsection (a)(2).”
“(C) Application—Effective beginning on the date of the enactment of the American Manufacturing Leadership Act, an institute shall be subject to subsections (a)(2), (c), and (d) in the same manner and to the same extent as such provisions apply to a Manufacturing USA institute established pursuant to this section if such institute—
“(i)
“(I) is, as of such date of enactment, considered a Manufacturing USA institute under subparagraph (A) or recognized as a Manufacturing USA institute under subparagraph (B); and
“(II) as of such date of enactment, receives Federal financial assistance under subsection (d) or otherwise consistent with the purposes of this section; or
“(ii) is under pending agency review for such recognition as of such date of enactment.”
“(A) Competitive, merit review—In awarding financial assistance under paragraph (1), the agency head shall—
“(i) use a competitive, merit review process that includes peer review by a diverse group of individuals with relevant expertise from both the private and public sectors; and
“(ii) ensure that the technology focus of a Manufacturing USA institute does not substantially duplicate the technology focus of any other Manufacturing USA institute.”
“(C) Performance measurement, transparency, and accountability—For each award of financial assistance under paragraph (1), the agency head shall develop and implement metrics-based performance standards to assess the effectiveness of activities funded in making progress toward the purposes of the Program, including the effectiveness of Manufacturing USA institutes in advancing technology readiness levels or manufacturing readiness levels.”
“(A) Term of award
“(i) In general—Subject to clause (ii), an award made to a Manufacturing USA institute may be renewed for an additional period not to exceed the duration of the original funding award, subject to a rigorous merit review. In awarding additional funds, the agency head shall consider the extent to which the institute has made progress in achieving the purposes described in subsection (a) and carrying out the activities specified in subsection (c)(2).
“(ii) Existing institutes—Notwithstanding clause (i), an institute already in existence or undergoing a renewal process on the date of enactment of the American Manufacturing Leadership Act—
“(I) may continue to receive support for the duration of the original funding award beginning on the date of establishment of that institute; and
“(II) shall be eligible for renewal of that funding pursuant to clause (i).”
“(e) Grant program for public service activities for manufacturing USA institutes without federal funding—The Secretary may award grants on a competitive basis to Manufacturing USA institutes that are no longer recognized as such under subsection (c)(3)(C) to carry out workforce development, outreach to small- and medium-sized manufacturers, and other activities that—
“(1) are determined by the Secretary to be in the national interest; and
“(2) are unlikely to receive private sector financial support.”
“(G) to work with non-sponsoring Federal agencies to explore and develop options for sponsoring Manufacturing USA institutes at such agencies;
“(H) to work with sponsoring Federal agencies to develop and implement network-wide performance goals with measurable targets and timelines;
“(I) to help develop pilot programs that may be implemented by the Manufacturing USA institutes to address specific purposes of the Program, including to accelerate technology transfer to the private sector; and
“(J) to identify and disseminate best practices for workforce education and training across Manufacturing USA institutes and further enhance collaboration among Manufacturing USA institutes in developing and implementing such practices.”
“(5) Hollings manufacturing extension partnership—The Secretary shall ensure that the National Program Office incorporates the Hollings Manufacturing Extension Partnership into Program planning to ensure—
“(A) significant outreach to, participation of, and engagement of small- and medium-sized manufacturers in Manufacturing USA institutes across the entirety of the manufacturing supply chain; and
“(B) that the results of the Program, including technologies developed by the Program, reach small- and medium-sized manufacturers and that such entities have access to technical assistance, as appropriate, in deploying those technologies.”
“(3) Assessments by gao
“(A) Assessments—Not less frequently than once every 3 years, the Comptroller General shall submit to Congress an assessment of the operation of the Program during the most recent 3-year period, including an assessment of the progress made towards achieving the goals specified in the national strategic plan for advanced manufacturing required under section 102(b)(7) of the America COMPETES Reauthorization Act of 2010 (42 U.S.C. 6622(b)(7)).
“(B) Elements—Each assessment submitted under subparagraph (A) shall include, for the period covered by the report—
“(i) a review of the management, coordination, and industry utility of the Program;
“(ii) an assessment of the extent to which the Program has furthered the purposes described in subsection (a)(2);
“(iii) such recommendations for legislative and administrative action as the Comptroller General considers appropriate to improve the Program; and
“(iv) an assessment as to whether any prior recommendations for improvement made by the Comptroller General have been implemented or adopted.”
“(7) Collaborations with other federal agencies—The Secretary shall collaborate with Federal agencies whose missions contribute to, or are affected by, advanced manufacturing to identify and leverage existing resources at such Federal agencies to assist Manufacturing USA institutes in carrying out the purposes of the program specified in subsection (a)(2). Such existing resources may include programs—
“(A) at the Department of Labor relating to labor and apprenticeships;
“(B) at the Economic Development Administration relating to regional innovation, such as the Regional Innovation Strategies program;
“(C) at the Department of Education relating to workforce development, education, training, and retraining;
“(D) at the Department of Defense relating to procurement and other authorities of the Department of Defense;
“(E) at the Food and Drug Administration relating to biopharmaceutical manufacturing;
“(F) at the National Science Foundation, including the Advanced Technological Education program;
“(G) at the National Aeronautics and Space Administration relating to procurement, workforce development, education, training, and retraining; and
“(H) additional programs that the Secretary determines are appropriate to support the activities of existing Manufacturing USA institutes.”
“(j) Definitions—In this section:
“(1) Agency head—The term “agency head” means the head of any Executive agency (as defined in section 105 of title 5, United States Code), excluding the Department of Defense, that is providing financial assistance for a Manufacturing USA institute, including the Secretary of Commerce and the Secretary of Energy.
“(2) Regional innovation cluster—The term “regional innovation cluster” has the meaning given such term in section 27(f)(1) of the Stevenson-Wydler Technology Innovation Act of 1980 (15 U.S.C. 3722(f)(1)).
“(k) Authorization of appropriations
“(1) NIST—There are authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary to carry out this section $25,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2020 through 2024.
“(2) Reservation—Of the amount made available under paragraph (1) the Secretary shall reserve not less than $5,000,000 for the National Office of the Manufacturing USA Program established under subsection (f).
“(3) Department of energy—For Manufacturing USA institutes operated by the Department of Energy, there are authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary of Energy—
“(A) $70,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2020, 2021, and 2022; and
“(B) $84,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2023 and 2024.”
3. Increased emphasis on regional innovation within and extension of regional innovation program
“(I) Developing relationships at the local level to build supply chains and use existing capabilities of entities operating on that level to bring economic growth to suburban and rural areas.”