H.R. 1503 — what changed
Orange Book Transparency Act of 2020
From Introduced in House to Reported in House. 1 section amended and 1 added between Introduced in House and Reported in House.
Sec. 2 Orange Book
changed
“(iii)“(b)
changed
“(I) When patent information submitted under subsection (b) or (c) respecting a drug included on “(1) Any person may file with the list is Secretary an application with respect to be published by any drug subject to the Secretary, provisions of subsection (a). Such persons shall submit to the Secretary shall, in revisions made under clause (ii), include such information for such drug.as part of the application—
changed
“(II) The Secretary—“(A) full reports of investigations which have been made to show whether or not such drug is safe for use and whether such drug is effective in use;
changed
“(aa) shall include on the list, from such patent information respecting “(B) a drug, drug substance (including active ingredient) patents, drug product (including formulation and composition) patents, and method full list of use patents; andthe articles used as components of such drug;
changed
“(bb) may choose to include on the list additional patent information respecting “(C) a full statement of the drug.composition of such drug;
changed
“(III) The Secretary shall not include on the list any patent to the extent such patent claims “(D) a device that is used for the delivery of the drug. Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, the Secretary may require (under other applicable provisions of law) the holder full description of the approved application for a drug to submit, for purposes other than methods used in, and the list under this paragraph, patent information respecting a device that is facilities and controls used for for, the delivery manufacture, processing, and packing of the drug.”such drug;
added “(E) such samples of such drug and of the articles used as components thereof as the Secretary may require;
added “(F) specimens of the labeling proposed to be used for such drug;
added “(G) any assessments required under section 505B; and
added “(H) patent information, with respect to each patent for which a claim of patent infringement could reasonably be asserted if a person not licensed by the owner engaged in the manufacture, use, or sale of the drug, and consistent with the following requirements:
added “(i) The applicant shall file with the application the patent number and the expiration date of—
added “(I) any patent which claims the drug for which the applicant submitted the application and is a drug substance (including active ingredient) patent or a drug product (including formulation and composition) patent; and
added “(II) any patent which claims the method of using such drug.
added “(ii) If an application is filed under this subsection for a drug and a patent of the type described in clause (i) which claims such drug or a method of using such drug is issued after the filing date but before approval of the application, the applicant shall amend the application to include such patent information.”
“(iv) For each drug included on the list, the Secretary shall specify each exclusivity period that is applicable and has not concluded under—
added “(I) clause (ii), (iii), or (iv) of subsection (c)(3)(E) of this section;
removed
“(I) clause (iii) or (iv) of subsection (c)(3)(E) of this section;
“(II) clause (iv) or (v) of paragraph (5)(B) of this subsection;
added “(III) clause (ii), (iii), or (iv) of paragraph (5)(F) of this subsection;
removed
“(III) clause (iii) or (iv) of paragraph (5)(F) of this subsection;
“(IV) section 505A;
“(V) section 505E; or
“(VI) section 527(a).”
“(D)
added “(i) The holder of an application approved under subsection (c) for a drug on the list shall notify within 14 days the Secretary in writing if either of the following occurs:
added “(I) The Patent Trial and Appeals Board issues a decision from which no appeal has been or can be taken that a patent for such drug is invalid.
added “(II) A court issues a decision from which no appeal has been or can be taken that a patent for such drug is invalid.
removed
“(i) The holder of an application approved under subsection (c) for a drug on the list shall promptly notify the Secretary in writing if either of the following occurs:
removed
“(I) The Patent Trial and Appeals Board issues a decision that a patent for such drug is invalid.
removed
“(II) A court issues a decision from which no appeal may be taken that a patent for such drug is invalid.
“(ii) The holder of an approved application shall include in any notification under clause (i) a copy of the decision described in subclause (I) or (II) of clause (i).
“(iii) The Secretary shall remove from the list any patent that is determined to be invalid in a decision described in subclause (I) or (II) of clause (i)—
“(I) promptly; but
added “(II) not before the expiration of any 180-day exclusivity period under paragraph (5)(B)(iv) that relies on a certification described in paragraph (2)(A)(vii)(IV) that such patent was invalid.”
removed
“(II) not before the expiration of any 180-day exclusivity period under clause (iv) or (v) of paragraph (5)(B) that relies on a certification described in paragraph (2)(A)(vii)(IV) that such patent was invalid.”