Student, Teachers, and Officers Preventing School Violence Act of 2018
A BILL
To reauthorize the grant program for school security in the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968.
Sec. 2 Grant program for school security
“(1) Evidence-based training to prevent student violence against others and self, including training for local law enforcement officers, school personnel, and students.”
“(i) the development and operation of anonymous reporting systems for threats of school violence, including mobile telephone applications, hotlines, and Internet websites; and
“(ii) placement”
“(c) Contracts and subawards—A State, unit of local government, or Indian tribe may, in using a grant under this part for purposes authorized under subsection (b), use the grant to contract with or make one or more subawards to one or more—
“(1) schools or local education agencies;
“(2) nonprofit organizations; or
“(3) units of local government or tribal organizations.”
“(3) include an assurance that the applicant shall maintain and report such data, records, and information (programmatic and financial) as the Director may reasonably require; and
“(4) include a certification, made in a form acceptable to the Director, that—
“(A) the programs to be funded by the grant meet all the requirements of this part;
“(B) all the information contained in the application is correct; and
“(C) the applicant will comply with all provisions of this part and all other applicable Federal laws.”
“(a) Annual report—Not later”
“(b) Grant accountability—Section 3026 (relating to grant accountability) shall apply to grants awarded by the Director under this part. For purposes of the preceding sentence, any references in section 3026 to the Attorney General shall be considered references to the Director and any references in that section to part LL shall be considered references to part AA.”
“(4) the term evidence-based means a program, practice, technology, or equipment that—
“(A) demonstrates a statistically significant effect on relevant outcomes based on—
“(i) strong evidence from not less than 1 well-designed and well-implemented experimental study;
“(ii) moderate evidence from not less than 1 well-designed and well-implemented quasi-experimental study; or
“(iii) promising evidence from not less than 1 well-designed and well-implemented correlational study with statistical controls for selection bias;
“(B) demonstrates a rationale based on high-quality research findings or positive evaluation that such program, practice, technology, or equipment is likely to improve relevant outcomes, and includes ongoing efforts to examine the effects of the program, practice, technology, or equipment; or
“(C) in the case of technology or equipment, demonstrates that use of the technology or equipment is—
“(i) consistent with best practices for school security, including—
“(I) applicable standards for school security established by a Federal or State government agency; and
“(II) findings and recommendations of public commissions and task forces established to make recommendations or set standards for school security; and
“(ii) compliant with all applicable codes, including building and life safety codes; and
“(5) the term tribal organization has the same meaning given the term in section 4(l) of the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act (25 U.S.C. 5304(l)).”
“(a) In general—There are”
“(1) $75,000,000 for fiscal year 2018; and
“(2) $100,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2019 through 2028.”
“(b) Offset—Any funds appropriated under this section may be offset by an equal reduction in the funds appropriated, if any, for the Comprehensive School Safety Initiative of the National Institute of Justice.
“(c) Rules of construction
“(1) None of the funds appropriated to carry out this part may be used to provide firearms or training in the use of firearms.
“(2) Nothing in this part shall be construed to prohibit any other existing or future law from permitting or funding the provision of firearms or training in the use of firearms.”