Uniting and Strengthening America by Reforming and Improving the Government’s High-Tech Surveillance Act of 2017
A BILL
To amend the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 to protect privacy rights, and for other purposes.
Sec. 2 Clarification on prohibition on querying of collections of communications to conduct warrantless queries for the communications of United States persons and persons inside the United States
“(1) In general—An acquisition”
“(2) Clarification on prohibition on querying of collections of communications of United States persons and persons inside the United States
“(A) In general—Except as provided in subparagraphs (B) and (C), no officer or employee of the United States may conduct a query of information acquired under this section in an effort to find communications of or about a particular United States person or a person inside the United States.
“(B) Concurrent authorization and exception for emergency situations—Subparagraph (A) shall not apply to a query for communications related to a particular United States person or person inside the United States if—
“(i) such United States person or person inside the United States is the subject of an order or emergency authorization authorizing electronic surveillance or physical search under section 105, 304, 703, 704, or 705 of this Act, or under title 18, United States Code, for the effective period of that order;
“(ii) the entity carrying out the query has a reasonable belief that the life or safety of such United States person or person inside the United States is threatened and the information is sought for the purpose of assisting that person;
“(iii) such United States person or person in the United States is a corporation; or
“(iv) such United States person or person inside the United States has consented to the query.
“(C) Queries of federated data sets and mixed data—If an officer or employee of the United States conducts a query of a data set, or of federated data sets, that includes any information acquired under this section, the system shall be configured not to return such information unless the officer or employee enters a code or other information indicating that—
“(i) the person associated with the search term is not a United States person or person inside the United States; or
“(ii) if the person associated with the search term is a United States person or person inside the United States, one or more of the conditions of subparagraph (B) are satisfied.
“(D) Matters relating to emergency queries
“(i) Treatment of denials—In the event that a query for communications related to a particular United States person or a person inside the United States is conducted pursuant to an emergency authorization authorizing electronic surveillance or a physical search described in subsection (B)(i) and the application for such emergency authorization is denied, or in any other case in which the query has been conducted and no order is issued approving the query—
“(I) no information obtained or evidence derived from such query may be received in evidence or otherwise disclosed in any trial, hearing, or other proceeding in or before any court, grand jury, department, office, agency, regulatory body, legislative committee, or other authority of the United States, a State, or political subdivision thereof; and
“(II) no information concerning any United States person acquired from such query may subsequently be used or disclosed in any other manner by Federal officers or employees without the consent of such person, except with the approval of the Attorney General if the information indicates a threat of death or serious bodily harm to any person.
“(ii) Assessment of compliance—The Attorney General shall assess compliance with the requirements under clause (i).”
Sec. 3 Prohibition on reverse targeting under certain authorities of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978
“(i) that”
“(ii) that an application is filed under title I, if otherwise required, when a significant purpose of an acquisition authorized under subsection (a) is to acquire the communications of a particular, known person reasonably believed to be located in the United States; and”
“(aa) that”
“(bb) that an application is filed under title I, if otherwise required, when a significant purpose of an acquisition authorized under subsection (a) is to acquire the communications of a particular, known person reasonably believed to be located in the United States; and”
“(I) that”
“(II) that an application is filed under title I, if otherwise required, when a significant purpose of an acquisition authorized under subsection (a) is to acquire the communications of a particular, known person reasonably believed to be located in the United States; and”
Sec. 4 Prohibition on acquisition, pursuant to certain FISA authorities to target certain persons outside the United States, of communications that do not include persons targeted under such authorities
“(E) may not acquire a communication as to which no participant is a person who is targeted pursuant to the authorized acquisition;”
Sec. 5 Prohibition on acquisition of entirely domestic communications under authorities to target certain persons outside the United States
“(F) may not acquire communications known to be entirely domestic; and”
Sec. 6 Limitation on use of information obtained under certain authority of Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 relating to United States persons
“(1) In general—Information acquired”
“(2) Limitation on use in criminal, civil, and administrative proceedings and investigations—No communication to or from, or information about, a person acquired under section 702 who is either a United States person or is located in the United States may be introduced as evidence against the person in any criminal, civil, or administrative proceeding or used as part of any criminal, civil, or administrative investigation, except—
“(A) with the prior approval of the Attorney General; and
“(B) in a proceeding or investigation in which the information is directly related to and necessary to address a specific threat of—
“(i) terrorism (as defined in clauses (i) through (iii) of section 2332(g)(5)(B) of title 18, United States Code);
“(ii) espionage (as used in chapter 37 of title 18, United States Code);
“(iii) proliferation or use of a weapon of mass destruction (as defined in section 2332a(c) of title 18, United States Code);
“(iv) a cybersecurity threat from a foreign country;
“(v) incapacitation or destruction of critical infrastructure (as defined in section 1016(e) of the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism (USA PATRIOT ACT) Act of 2001 (42 U.S.C. 5195c(e))); or
“(vi) a threat to the armed forces of the United States or an ally of the United States or to other personnel of the United States Government or a government of an ally of the United States.”
Sec. 7 Reforms of the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board
“(5) Whistleblower complaints
“(A) Submission to Board—An employee of, or contractor or detailee to, an element of the intelligence community may submit to the Board a complaint or information that such employee, contractor, or detailee believes relates to a privacy or civil liberties concern. The confidentiality provisions under section 2409(b)(3) of title 10, United States Code, shall apply to a submission under this subparagraph. Any disclosure under this subparagraph shall be protected against discrimination under the procedures, burdens of proof, and remedies set forth in section 2409 of such title.
“(B) Authority of Board—The Board may take such action as the Board considers appropriate with respect to investigating a complaint or information submitted under subparagraph (A) or transmitting such complaint or information to any other Executive agency or the congressional intelligence committees.
“(C) Relationship to existing laws—The authority under subparagraph (A) of an employee, contractor, or detailee to submit to the Board a complaint or information shall be in addition to any other authority under another provision of law to submit a complaint or information. Any action taken under any other provision of law by the recipient of a complaint or information shall not preclude the Board from taking action relating to the same complaint or information.
“(D) Relationship to actions taken under other laws—Nothing in this paragraph shall prevent—
“(i) any individual from submitting a complaint or information to any authorized recipient of the complaint or information; or
“(ii) the recipient of a complaint or information from taking independent action on the complaint or information.”
“(n) Definitions—In this section, the terms congressional intelligence committees and intelligence community have the meanings given such terms in section 3 of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3003).”
“(2) Appointment in absence of chairman—If the position of chairman of the Board is vacant, during the period of the vacancy the Board, at the direction of the majority of the members of the Board, may exercise the authority of the chairman under paragraph (1).”
Sec. 8 Improved role in oversight of electronic surveillance by amici curiae appointed by courts under Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978
“(5) Referral for review
“(A) Referral to Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court en banc—If the court established under subsection (a) appoints an amicus curiae under paragraph (2)(A) to assist the Court in the consideration of any matter presented to the Court under this Act and the Court makes a decision with respect to such matter, the Court, in response to an application by the amicus curiae or any other individual designated under paragraph (1), may refer the decision to the Court en banc for review as the Court considers appropriate.
“(B) Referral to Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review—If the court established under subsection (a) appoints an amicus curiae under paragraph (2)(A) to assist the Court in the consideration of any matter presented to the Court under this Act and the Court makes a decision with respect to such matter, the Court, in response to an application by the amicus curiae or any other individual designated under paragraph (1) may refer the decision to the court established under subsection (b) for review as the Court considers appropriate.
“(C) Referral to Supreme Court—If the Court of Review appoints an amicus curiae under paragraph (2) to assist the Court of Review in the review of any matter presented to the Court of Review under this Act or a question of law that may affect resolution of a matter in controversy and the Court of Review makes a decision with respect to such matter or question of law, the Court of Review, in response to an application by the amicus curiae or any other individual designated under paragraph (1) may refer the decision to the Supreme Court for review as the Court of Review considers appropriate.
“(D) Annual report—Not later than 60 days after the end of each calendar year, the Court and the Court of Review shall each publish, on their respective Internet websites, a report listing—
“(i) the number of applications for referral received by the Court or the Court of Review, as applicable, during the most recently concluded calendar year; and
“(ii) the number of such applications for referral that were granted by the Court or the Court of Review, as applicable, during such calendar year.”
“(6) Assistance—Any individual designated pursuant to paragraph (1) may raise a legal or technical issue or any other issue with the Court or the Court of Review at any time. If an amicus curiae is appointed under paragraph (2)(A)—
“(A) the court shall notify all other amicus curiae designated under paragraph (1) of such appointment;
“(B) the appointed amicus curiae may request, either directly or through the court, the assistance of the other amici curiae designated under paragraph (1); and
“(C) all amici curiae designated under paragraph (1) may provide input to the court whether or not such input was formally requested by the court or the appointed amicus curiae.”
“(I) the court”
“(II) are cited by the Government in an application or case with respect to which an amicus curiae is assisting a court under this subsection;”
“(ii) shall have access to an unredacted copy of each decision made by a court established under subsection (a) or (b) in which the court decides a question of law, notwithstanding whether the decision is classified; and”
“(i) shall have access to unredacted copies of each opinion, order, transcript, pleading, or other document of the Court and the Court of Review; and
“(ii) may have access”
“(12) Public notice and receipt of briefs from third parties—Whenever a court established under subsection (a) or (b) considers a novel a question of law that can be considered without disclosing classified information, sources, or methods, the court shall, to the greatest extent practicable, consider such question in an open manner—
“(A) by publishing on its Internet website each question of law that the court is considering; and
“(B) by accepting briefs from third parties relating to the question under consideration by the court.”
“(A) In general”
“(B) Participation by amici curiae—In reviewing a certification under subparagraph (A)(i), the Court shall randomly select an amicus curiae designated under section 103(i) to assist with such review.”
“(1) In general—Following”
“(2) Public Notice
“(A) In general—Except as provided in subparagraph (B), whenever a court established under subsection (a) certifies a question of law for review under paragraph (1) of this subsection, the court shall publish on its Internet website—
“(i) a notice of the question of law to be reviewed; and
“(ii) briefs submitted by the parties, which may be redacted at the discretion of the court to protect sources, methods, and other classified information.
“(B) Protection of classified information, sources, and methods—Subparagraph (A) shall apply to the greatest extent practicable, consistent with otherwise applicable law on the protection of classified information, sources, and methods.”
Sec. 9 Reforms to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court
“(1)
“(A) There is a court which shall have jurisdiction to hear applications for and to grant orders approving electronic surveillance anywhere within the United States under the procedures set forth in this Act.
“(B)
“(i) The court established under subparagraph (A) shall consist of 13 judges, one of whom shall be designated from each judicial circuit (including the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia and the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit).
“(ii) The Chief Justice of the United States shall—
“(I) designate each judge of the court established under subparagraph (A) from the nominations made under subparagraph (C); and
“(II) make the name of each judge of such court available to the public.
“(C)
“(i) When a vacancy occurs in the position of a judge of the court established under subparagraph (A) from a judicial circuit, the chief judge of the circuit shall propose a district judge for a judicial district within the judicial circuit to be designated for that position.
“(ii) If the Chief Justice does not designate a district judge proposed under clause (i), the chief judge shall propose 2 other district judges for a judicial district within the judicial circuit to be designated for that position and the Chief Justice shall designate 1 such district judge to that position.
“(D) No judge of the court established under subparagraph (A) (except when sitting en banc under paragraph (2)) shall hear the same application for electronic surveillance under this Act which has been denied previously by another judge of such court.
“(E) If any judge of the court established under subparagraph (A) denies an application for an order authorizing electronic surveillance under this Act, such judge shall provide immediately for the record a written statement of each reason for the judge's decision and, on motion of the United States, the record shall be transmitted, under seal, to the court of review established in subsection (b).”
“(2) The Chief Justice may designate a district court judge or circuit court judge to a position on the court established under paragraph (1) only if at least 5 associate justices approve the designation of such individual.”
Sec. 10 Study and report on diversity and representation on the FISA Court and the FISA Court of Review
Sec. 11 Grounds for determining injury in fact in civil action relating to surveillance under certain provisions of Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978
“(m) Challenges to Government surveillance
“(1) Injury in fact—In any claim in a civil action brought in a court of the United States relating to surveillance conducted under this section, the person asserting the claim has suffered an injury in fact if the person—
“(A) has a reasonable basis to believe that the person’s communications will be acquired under this section; and
“(B) has taken objectively reasonable steps to avoid surveillance under this section.
“(2) Reasonable basis—A person shall be presumed to have demonstrated a reasonable basis to believe that the communications of the person will be acquired under this section if the profession of the person requires the person regularly to communicate foreign intelligence information with persons who—
“(A) are not United States persons; and
“(B) are located outside the United States.
“(3) Objective steps—A person shall be presumed to have taken objectively reasonable steps to avoid surveillance under this section if the person demonstrates that the steps were taken in reasonable response to rules of professional conduct or analogous professional rules.”
Sec. 12 Clarification of applicability of requirement to declassify significant decisions of Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court and Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review
Sec. 13 Clarification regarding treatment of information acquired under Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978
“(q) For the purposes of notification provisions of this Act, information or evidence is derived from an electronic surveillance, physical search, use of a pen register or trap and trace device, production of tangible things, or acquisition under this Act when the Government would not have originally possessed the information or evidence but for that electronic surveillance, physical search, use of a pen register or trap and trace device, production of tangible things, or acquisition, and regardless of any claim that the information or evidence is attenuated from the surveillance or search, would inevitably have been discovered, or was subsequently reobtained through other means.”
“(b) Information acquired under sections 703–705—Information acquired from an acquisition conducted under section 703, 704, or 705 shall be deemed to be information acquired from an electronic surveillance pursuant to title I for the purposes of section 106.”
Sec. 14 Limitation on technical assistance from electronic communication service providers under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978
“(A) In general—Subject to subparagraph (B), in carrying out”
“(B) Limitations—The Attorney General or the Director of National Intelligence may not request assistance from an electronic communication service provider under subparagraph (A) without demonstrating, to the satisfaction of the Court, that the assistance sought—
“(i) is necessary;
“(ii) is narrowly tailored to the surveillance at issue; and
“(iii) would not pose an undue burden on the electronic communication service provider or its customers who are not an intended target of the surveillance.
“(C) Compliance—An electronic communication service provider is not obligated to comply with a directive to provide assistance under this paragraph unless—
“(i) such assistance is a manner or method that has been explicitly approved by the Court; and
“(ii) the Court issues an order, which has been delivered to the provider, explicitly describing the assistance to be furnished by the provider that has been approved by the Court.”
Sec. 15 Modification of authorities for public reporting by persons subject to nondisclosure requirement accompanying order under Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978
“(1) A semiannual report that aggregates the number of orders, directives, or national security letters with which the person was required to comply into separate categories of—
“(A) the number of national security letters received, reported—
“(i) for the first 1000 national security letters received, in bands of 200 starting with 1–200; and
“(ii) for more than 1000 national security letters received, the precise number of national security letters received;
“(B) the number of customer selectors targeted by national security letters, reported—
“(i) for the first 1000 customer selectors targeted, in bands of 200 starting with 1–200; and
“(ii) for more than 1000 customer selectors targeted, the precise number of customer selectors targeted;
“(C) the number of orders or directives received, combined, under this Act for contents—
“(i) reported—
“(I) for the first 1000 orders and directives received, in bands of 200 starting with 1–200; and
“(II) for more than 1000 orders and directives received, the precise number of orders received; and
“(ii) disaggregated by whether the order or directive was issued under section 105, 402, 501, 702, 703, or 704;
“(D) the number of customer selectors targeted under orders or directives received, combined, under this Act for contents—
“(i) reported—
“(I) for the first 1000 customer selectors targeted, in bands of 200 starting with 1–200; and
“(II) for more than 1000 customer selectors targeted, the precise number of customer selectors targeted; and
“(ii) disaggregated by whether the order or directive was issued under section 105, 402, 501, 702, 703, or 704;
“(E) the number of orders or directives received under this Act for noncontents—
“(i) reported—
“(I) for the first 1000 orders or directives received, in bands of 200 starting with 1–200; and
“(II) for more than 1000 orders or directives received, the precise number of orders received; and
“(ii) disaggregated by whether the order or directive was issued under section 105, 402, 501, 702, 703, or 704; and
“(F) the number of customer selectors targeted under orders or directives under this Act for noncontents—
“(i) reported—
“(I) for the first 1000 customer selectors targeted, in bands of 200 starting with 1–200; and
“(II) for more than 1000 customer selectors targeted, the precise number of customer selectors targeted; and
“(ii) disaggregated by whether the order or directive was issued under section 105, 402, 501, 702, 703, or 704.”
“(b) Additional disclosures—A person who publicly reports information under subsection (a) may also publicly report the following information, relating to the previous 180 days, using a semiannual report that indicates whether the person was or was not required to comply with an order, directive, or national security letter issued under each of sections 105, 402, 501, 702, 703, and 704 and the provisions listed in section 603(e)(3).”